faith in the same as Isaac was And therefore such are said to be as Isaac was children of the free-woman the true seed of Abraham after the Spirit so heires according to promise as Gal. 4.28 29 30 31. Gal. 3.29 Rom 9 8. Now the promise in the letter the land of Canaan an earthly possession answerable to the heire naturall and Circumcision in the flesh as a seale to confirme the same upon condition of the like faith and obedience and so to walke as such circumcised in heart So God would be their God to blesse increase and to bring them into their promised inheritance as Deut. 1. But in the substance the heavenly Canaan a spirituall inheritance answerable to the heire spirituall and Circumcision in the heart as the seale of the Spirit to confirme faith in the free and absolute promise of life and faith required not of man as a condition but in man as the work of the Spirit of grace in the heart by which the same is made capable to joyne in covenant with God by faith And though that Infants were in the first yet not at all in the last as visibly to appeare in the covenant aforesaid untill their faith so declares them And further 〈…〉 consider of it thus first that no beleever now can so stand to his seed as Abraham of old did unto his seed except he assumes the place of Abraham and also his fatherhood over all the faithfull But if any beleever should so farre presume as to assume Abrahams place and fatherhood upon him yet another cannot doe so Except we make may Abrahams and so all fathers and no children And if it be said that every beleever in his owne familie is an Abraham If it be so then he is the same unto his servants as well as to his children for so was Abraham But some will say that a beleever is an Abraham onely to his own personall seed as Abraham was Then a beleever would have a greater priviledge then ever Abraham had for the covenant was not founded upon Abrahams personall seed for had it been so then the priviledges thereof would have reached to all Abrahams personall seed as well as to Isaac But this it did not for Abraham begot many children of his own body besides Isaac who shared not with him neither in the covenant or priviledges thereof as Gen. 25.1 to 6. The like it is with the beleevers seed to which the covenant lyes not in any respect as to a particular seed but joyntly considered together as a body and so the Church of Christ and their off-spring seed or children as aforesaid considered are the generation of the righteous succeeding them in the faith not in the flesh And this is the seed that God so highly exalteth in Scripture and promises so many blessings unto And secondly 〈…〉 it was not Abrahams personall being in the covenaÌ„t nor yet his faith that brought in his seed or admitted the same to the seale thereof but onely Gods speciall commandement for both Abraham and many others were in the covenant of grace long before Circumcision was administred and the reason why such were not sealed with circumcision before that time was be cause that God no where had commanded the same No more can a beleevers being in the covenant now bring in his seed nor admit of the same to Baptisme without Gods speciall command for the same now as Abraham had then otherwise they proudly assume a priviledge above their father Abraham And though that beleevers are in some sense under the same covenant now as then yet in no sense under the same command for then they must circumcise and not baptize and that Males onely and not females also But as there is a new King so there must be a new Law and as a new covenant so a new subject a new Church must have a new state a new ordinance a new commandement so that as all things are become new even so must all be of God whose will is to be obeyed in whatsoever he commands which is the only ground of all mans obedience for no man can be said to obey God in doing that which he hath not commanded therefore seeing there is no command from the Lord for the Baptizing of Infants as was for the circumcising of Infants though by Abraham they were circumcised yet by Christ they shall not be baptized And so I come to the second Argument thus If in the whole body of Israel 〈…〉 as well Infants as mon of yâ—ares were baptized and with the same Baptisme as ours is then Infants are now to be baptized as then thy were But in the whole body of the IsrAelites Infants were baptized and that with the same baptisme spiritually that ours is therefore Infants are now to be baptized as then they were That it was the same baptisme with ours spiritually is evident the other Ordinances there mentioned were the same spiritually with ours for they eate the same spirituall meate and dranke the same spirituall drinke with us 1 Cor. 10.1 2 3 4. Therefore they were baptized with the same spirituall baptisme Otherwise the Apostles argument were not of force against the Corinthians if they were not the same Sacraments with ours nor the conclusion contained that the Corinthians should be pun shed with the like punishment if they committed the like sins therfore the argument is firme In answer to this I shall endeavour to be briefe therefore let the Reader consider well these particulars First here God took unto himselfe the whole body of these people the Jewes who were his own people before by covenant for they were the seed of Abraham and the family of Jacob that came into Aegypt to sojourne there as Gen. 46. Act. 7. Now let the like be made to appeare that God ever took unto himselfe the whole body of the Gentiles as he did the Jewes and then it will be somewhat the same with the Gentils and their seed as it was with the Jews and their seed But if the one cannot be proved then the other will not be granted and so this argument falls already Secondly here was no ordinance of the new Testament much lesse Baptisme administred upon any of the Israelites at their departing out of Aegypt but onely Gods great power goodnesse declared by leading of his people through the maine Sea in and by the which God did preserve them and so delivered them up as it were to Moses and to his Government and direction as a people preserved in death As in and by Baptisme the partie being by the grace and power of God preserved he is delivered up to Christ to his Government and direction as one risen from death with a new life to God as Rom. 6. Col. 2. Gal. 3. The Israelites Baptisme in the Cloud and in the Sea was onely in the type or shadow and so in the Letter of the old Testament opposed to the Ministration of
the same And to affirme this to be Gods way to brings persons to the faith by working so upon them by his Spirit in their infancy argues some ignorance of the true nature and worke of grace as the Gospell holds it forth And to be capable of the grace of the Covenant which must be understood of the promise containing the blessings and priviledges thereof in the holy dispensations of the same We shall finde in the Scriptures of God all the sweet promises of Grace under the New Testament holding forth their blessings and blessed priviledges onely to such as beleeve And that to the Elect themselves as they are considered in Christ and appeare so by some effect of grace declaring their faith and they to be such as God approves of in his Sonne and so to have visible right to those priviledges they are visibly justified by and possessed in as such that have a visible right unto the same Which can come to us Gentiles no other way then by Christ and faith in his Name And if any shall object from the testimony of John the Baptist Obj. that he is said to be filled with the holy Ghost from his Mothers wombe Luk. 1.15 c. and hence conclude that Infants may have faith To this I answer in a word Ans first what Infants may have is one thing and what Infants can from this Scripture be proved to have is another For if any thing from this Text can be proved for Infants it will be that they are filled with the holy Ghost from the Mothers wombe as John is said to be which is another thing then to beleeve as Act. 6 5. 4 31. Secondly All such so testified of by God as he did of John I shall acknowledge as much as is here meant to be in him to be also in them so testified of by the holy Ghost But to affirme because God so testified of John the Baptist in the wombe therefore the same holds true upon all other Infants likewise This is indeed weaker then infancy so to affirme Job 31.18 and grosser then ignorance for any to beleeve Job is said to be a Guide to the distressed from his Mothers wombe Shall it be concluded thence that he was a Guide to such when he was an Infant or if he were so must it needs follow that all Infants are capable Guides because it is said so of him And lastly I am not against any that have faith but absolutely for all that beleeve whether Infants or others so that their faith appeares by such effects as the Word of God approves of Otherwise what have I or any man to doe to meddle with the secret and unrevealed things of God either to justifie or condemne And whereas in the former Proposition there seemes a restraint made of the worke of grace in an Infant over there is in other persons by saying onely so farre as is necessary to union with Christ and justification to life thereby Now for answer to this we shall first consider what in this sense is to be understood by Christ and secondly what by union with Christ so as to be justified thereby By Christ here I understand him so as the Gospel holds him forth in the work of mans Redemption in reference to his death resurrection and the onely righteousnesse that commends such to God as beleeve in the same And so Christ thus considered is the onely subject of life to every soule that shall be united unto him by faith To which union with Christ these three things must be minded as essentiall to the same First Gods revealing tendering of Christ as the alsufficient onely way to life Secondly A heart fitly disposed by faith to apprehend and receive Christ so tendered And lastly The Spirit of grace uniting and knitting of the heart and Christ togegether as aforesaid And this I understand to be that effectuall and substantiall union with Christ to justification of life which the Word of God approves of that most decide all differences in matters of Religion For justification to life ever presupposeth apprehension of Christ as the subject of life and a true application of the same by faith as aforesaid The Gospel holds forth no other justification to salvation but what is or faith and faith ever presupposes the parties knowledge of the thing beleeved Rom. 10.14 Heb. 11.6 Now let this be well examined by the rule of truth then let the Reader judge how capable Infants are of union with Christ and justification to life thereby Now for to darken and obscure this truth there are these evill consequences as absurdities brought in as to follow upon the same First If Infants should not be capable of those graces aforesaid then they were not elected Obj. Secondly Then their bodies should not be raised againe to life And lastly We have not infallible judgement but may be mistaken as in the case of Simon Magus c. To this in a word and first I would know of such Ans whether Infants with referrence to their non-age were the subjects of Gods Election Secondly If Infants so considered are capable subjects of glory And if not as I suppose none will affirme then why any more in Grace then in Glory And for any to appoint God a way how to save Infants or to draw out to themselves a way how the holy Spirit of Grace must sanctifie them to salvation above what is written I thinke it is somewhat too much boldnesse God will have his creature to keepe onely to his Word as the Rule by which man must judge all things and the Word of God shews that he hath elected persons to the meanes as well as to the end being the way unto the same And that was the Adoption of Sonnes and to be called and justified by beleeving in Jesus Christ as Ephes 1.4 5. Rom. 8.29 30. 1 Pet. 1.2 2 Thes 2.13 14. And therefore the ground of Gods calling us and our beleeving is attributed unto out Election Act. 2.47 Act. 13.48 Rom. 8.28 Rom. 11.7 And to the glory of God as the cause of all by the dispensation of his grace upon his chosen in Christ and their free obedience unto him againe as Rom 9.23 24. Ephes 1.6.12 These things God hath revealed in his Word and further I dare not goe but leaving the secret things to God who gives not account of all his wayes And for the raising of Infants bodies doth none rise but such as are in visible union with Christ as for invisible things we meddle not with It is the power of God that raiseth the dead and not union with Christ 1 Thes 4.16 And when any of Gods Elect can by the Scriptures be shewed to die in their infancy then it will be granted that their bodies are raised to life eternall onely as they are Infants Nor that I hold all that dye in their infancy to be damned but being a secret thing I leave the
to enter or admits any into the said Covenant What inrights into the covenant and that is the promise of God in Christ and faith in the same that gives right of entrance and onely admits into Covenant with God as Neh. 9.8 The Covenant aforesaid hath these essentiall parts and visible branches First Grace in the agent God Secondly faith in the Subject Man Thirdly a uniting or closing of these together which is that mutuall consent agreement by faith in the same grace revealed by the Gospel which is the word of Reconciliation So that it is the blessed word of life and faith in the same that gives right and admits into Covenant with God Thirdly Who are the true approved Subjects of this Covenant and they are onely such as beleeve for God approves of none in covenant with him by his Word out of Christ nor of any in Christ without faith Nay God denies his approving of any in fellowship or communion with him that doe not beleeve as John 3.5 6 36. Heb. 11.6 Rom. 8.9 Thus God approves of none as Subjects of his gracious covenant but onely such as he hath elected and chosen in Christ and so appearing by some fruit and effects of the same as these Scriptures with many other witnes Rom. 8.29 30. Rom. 11.7 Ephes 1.4 5 6. 2 Thes 2.13 14. 1 Pet. 1.2 Act. 2.47 Act. 13.48 So that such as are the chosen and called of the Lord are the onely approved Subjects by him in his saving and ever-blessed Covenant of life The fourth and last is this Whether that all persons now under the Gospel have not one and the same way of entrance into the foresaid Covenant For answer to this the holy Word of God must be Judge and I finds the Gospel of Christ to approve of none in the Lords holy Covenant of grace but such as beleeve neither any approved of as to be in the way of life but such as are in Christ by faith and therefore no other way to come into the Covenant of grace and salvation as the Scriptures reveale but only by Jesus Christ For in him are all the promises confirmed made over only unto such as beleeve as 2 Cor. 1.20 Rom. 10 4 1 Joh. 5.11 12. Rom. 8.9 The holy Covenant of life consisteth of these three essentialls for entrance thereinto The essentials of the covenant First the word of God to reveale the same Secondly Christ to open the way and to inright the partie therein And lastly faith without which none can enter thereinto So that as there is but onely one way of entrance into Covenant with God that the Scripture reveals now under the Gospel that is by Jesus Christ and faith in his name Then all must enter this way that can be approved in covenant with God for none can come to the Father but by the Sonne nor any to the Sonne but by faith as John 14.6 with John 6.44.45 Heb. 11.6 Let all this be well considered and then see how Infants are discovered to be in this Covenant what way of entrance hath God by his word appointed for them to come in and denied the same unto others except they be naturally begotten born in the covenant and so were never out of the same which thing indeed the opposite doctrine affirmes for if Infants be in the covenant of grace and that by vertue of their being borne of beleeving parents who are in the same then such Infants are borne in a saving estate of grace and were never out of the same which doctrine makes voyd many heavenly and divine truths that speak to the contrary which lay all under sin and wrath for the same as conceived in sin borne children of wrath and so under the curse untill Christ by his bloud and death redeemes them and by his heavenly voice calls them and by his holy Spirit of grace begets them unto a lively hope working faith in their hearts to lay hold upon Christ Gods arme of salvation that carries them up to glory and therefore all are said to be borne againe from above of water and of the Spirit before they can enter into the Kingdome of God Now for such as are begotten and borne in the covenant being the seed of beleevers as is affirmed then such were never out of the same which doctrine disables them of any of the former priviledges by Christ for none can be under grace wrath the curse at one and the same time in the outward dispensation of the same the which all out discourse intends for invisible things belong to God and so I come to some other grounds tending to prove Infants to be in the covenant now as they were of old and they are these First Obj. If it were not so then this Covenant would not be the same with that And for answer to this Ans I shall referre the Reader to what hath been aforesaid concerning the differencebetween the Covenant then and this now not the same in a typicall way nor the same in a fleshly seed nor the same in the outward priviledges nor the same in the visible profession thereof c. All which I have already spoken to and shall adde more here after Another ground is this Obj. else the state of the grace of God should be straitned and made of lesse extent by Christs coming then it was before whereas it is more inlarged and of greater extent there being nothing more required in the state of the persons to interesse Infants into the covenant then then is now This particular consists of two parts Ans and the first is to this effect if Infants be not in the covenant now as they were at the first then is the covenant of lesse extent since Christs coming then it was before the answer is that indeed it is of lesse extent in respect of the flesh by Christs coming then it was before because that by him is taken away all fleshly respects either in regard of persons or priviledges in matters of grace which is a further inlarging of the covenant in a spirituall sense for the neerer the covenant comes to perfection the larger it is and the perfection of the covenant in one sense is this to have nothing contained in it but what is truely of it and the contrary is a straitning of the same and a bondage unto the true Subjects thereof Againe It can not properly be said that the covenant in the full accomplishment of the same in glory will be more straite of lesse extent then now in grace and yet there shall be none but onely such as truely appeare to be of the same The second part of the Proposition lies to this effect Obj. There was no more required in Infants then to interesse them into the Covenant then there is required of Infants now For answer to this in a word Ans let the Reader consider well what was required to interesse Infants into the covenant
God did sanctifie all the rest of the same lump so beleeving parents sanctifie all their seed that proceeds from their loyns And so as the first fruits and the root being beleeving parents are holy even so the lump and branches being their Infants are holy also and so to be baptised as their parents are which is a meer fallacie and farre from the intent of the Apostle in those words And for our better understanding of the same let us a little examine the Scriptures alledged and first for Rom. 11.16 The generall scope of the Apostles discourse in this Chapter is concerning the Jews breaking off and the occasion of it as also their calling by the Gospel who were the people of God in a two fold consideration First as they were a nationall people according to the flesh with many outward priviledges sutable to the same by which God declared himself to be their God and they his people above all others in the world Secondly some of them God owned in a more speciall manner with reference to his gracious covenant made with Abraham and established with Isaac and his seed after him for an everlasting covenant As Gen. 17. which consideration cannot be of the Jews nationally considered as I have formerly proved For if so then all the whole nation must have been in a true and saving estate of grace and so all of them to have been saved or else to fall from an estate of grace So that as God had then a nationall Church and people even so had he for the same also nationall priviledges both for order ordinances and government Which order cannot now be expected for us Gentiles under the new Testament and though that God admitted them all alike to the outward priviledges in the type yet God had another consideration of them in respect of the substance as not to approve of them all in his holy Covenant of grace Yet of that whole body in generall Abraham according to the flesh was the stock or root from whom they sprong as naturall branches as Joh. 8. Which nationall people must be considered in a two-fold respect First a civill state or common-wealth under a civill government as Kings Judges and other the like Governers of that nature Secondly a Church consisting of an holy Assembly of worship and worshippers and so a spirituall state with the like government and governors as Priests prophets and the like of that nature All which held fellowship and communion together because God took into one body that whole Nation for his own people Or rather one head comprehending them all which was Abraham from whom they descended as children springing from the loyns of a father All which so springing out of his loyns did assume to themselves an equall right and priviledge in Gods gracious covenant made with Abraham and his seed supposing God had bound his covenant generally upon him and his seed in his naturall generation after the flesh But God respecting in the same onely his chosen in Christ with whom he confirmed his Covenant with Isaac in reference to Christ Gen. 17. Gal. 3. Who in Gods own time he cals them to the faith that they might appear to whom they belong Rom. 8 28.29 30. Gal. 4.4 6. These the Apostle ever defends against the generall rejection of that nation For though such were rejected as were not elected this made not the promise of God of none effect to those who stood firm in the covenant by grace in Christ Jesus as branches in their root Which grace the rest opposed and were cast off for their unbeleef and when the fulnesse of Gods time is come to call them to belief they shall be received again into their former estate as alive from the dead as Rom. 11.23 24. Luke 15.24 Therefore the Apostle after he hath proved the rejection of the Jews he labours to make good the faithfulnesse of God in his promise of grace and the effectuall power of the Gospel in the saving effects thereof in such as beleeved through grace though the Jews in their nationall respect were rejected and so few of them gained to the truth as Rom. 3.3 4. Rom. 9.6 Rom. 11. And he gives a reason of it thus though that the Jews were all under an outward form of profession of Gods name and truth and so his people in that respect yet there was but a remnant that he approved of in the Covenant according to his election of grace unto whom the promise of life did belong As Rom. 9.6 7 8. Rom. 11.5.7 Now to these Gods speciall care is to perform his Covenant and all that he promised to them in their father Abraham with reference to Christ in whom as the root God established his holy Covenant for these his holy branches Rom. 9.11.12.23 Rom. 11.1.2 Rom. 8.28 29 30. Rom. 11.26.2 Pet. 3.9 Now the lump generally considered comprehends all both the first fruits and the latter for except the first fruits were part of the lump it could not give testimonie that the lump was holy which lump so considered is Gods elect and chosen in Christ with reference to their beleeving in him and so the approved subjects of Gods gracious Covenant and heirs apparent to the kingdom of Christ In which sence God had one and the same respect unto all and every part of the same lump and that was as he considered the same in a conformitie to his Son as the end of his election Rom. 8.28.29 30. Ephes 1.8.4.5 6.1 Pet. 1.1 2. So that there is in the substance of truth one and the same consideration in the first fruits and the lump according to what is laid down in the proposition the lump being as aforesaid a remnant according to Gods election with reference to faith and so approved subiects in his holy covenant appearing in Abrahams Isaacs and Jacobs beleeving as the first fruits of the same Now as those first fruits of that blessed crop in Gods holy Covenant were holy onely so appearing for we speak of visible things so is the lump out of which these first appeared by faith as a part of the same also holy in the same consideration Again the lump which the Apostle spake of is to be understood of the Jews and not of the Gentiles as he here applies it For though he speaks to the Gentiles yet here he speaks of the Jews For in the Chapter before labours to provoke the Jews to receive the Gospel as vers 14. Therefore he intends the Jews by the first fruits of the lump The first fruits the beleeving fathers as aforesaid that first appeared in the Covenant of grace in such a way by faith and so holy was that remnant which God had still among them with reference to the same state the first fruits were in and so holy the same consideration is to be had of the lump with reference to that state which God in his time shall call them unto by his Gospel and so are
13. and therefore we are said now to know no man after the flesh no nor Christ himself as the Jews did not Christ himself after the flesh 2 Cor. 5.16 and Circumcision was one priviledge of the flesh as Phil. 3.4 5. Therefore though that the Jews infants were admitted to all those outward priviledges being a nationall people and so a nationall bodie with a naturall birth and the like seed in generall yet the Gentiles infants cannot be admitted to their spirituall priviledges they being a personall people called by the Word of grace and so a spirituall body with a spirituall birth and the like seed And so much for the meaning of the Apostle Rom. 11.16 which makes nothing for the baptising of Infants but altogether against the same the words not being well considered and therefore misapplied the first fruits being such as first so appeared of Gods elect by faith in such a way of grace by gods receiving and approving of them in his holy covenant under so many gracious promises The lump such a remnant in the election of grace chiefly of the Jews with reference to the same state of grace and faith in Christ as the first fruits were in when God so approved of them And so a second fruits following the first fruits of the same kind which first fruits did ever presuppose the same And so for the root and branches the root Christ mystically considered as aforesaid as the Scriptures hold him forth The branches such as grow in him by faith and he in them by his Spirit by which they are alive in their vine All which are understood of beleevers and not of Infants and so with respect to their calling and not to their infancy as Act. 2.39 which promise is in no other sence to the children then to the parents and that is either to turn them from their sins by calling them to repentance As Act. 3.19 20.25 26. or to comfort them so turned or repenting by tendring and applying to them the promised Saviour Christ Jesus as Act. 13.23.26 32 33.38 39. And as God hath not grounded his election of grace in the seed of beleevers but in the good pleasure of his will no more hath he the dispensation of the same in his gracious Covenant but in his free and effectuall call to beleeve in his Son in whom they were elected to the same which call to the faith makes the onely difference between them and others and not their being the seed of beleevers by a naturall birth For we are alike by nature children of wrath as well the seed of beleevers as any others considered in any personall respect as Rom. 3.9 Eph. 2 3. Whose happinesse depends upon that blessed change and spirituall birth by which they are born again and called to beleeve in the Lord of life and not their being the seed of a beleeving parent for so one may be and perish as soon as any others And now for the other Scriptures 1 Cor. 7.14 if this be of the same consideration with the former then the same is answered with that and so they are both void in respect of the end for which they are alledged namely to prove the holinesse of infants being in the Covenant of grace and life by vertue of their being the children of beleeving parents and so to have right to Baptisme But I do not understood this Scripture to be of the same consideration with the former and therefore a word or two of this also And for the understanding of the Apostle in the same its good first to consider what that holinesse is which inrights persons to the priviledges of grace and that is one of these two at the least Either the holinesse of Christ in whom God looks upon his children and approves of them holy in him and so to have right through his Son to all things both in grace and glory 〈…〉 generation appearing in the holy fruits and effects thereof by which such persons appear to to have right to the aforesaid priviledges before men who must judge of the tree by the fruit and of both by the Word of God Ephes 4.24 Tit. 3.5 1. Pet. 1.15 16. Hebr. 12.14 There is no other holinesse that proceeds from Gods holy Covenant or that can inright to any priviledge of grace now under the Gospel For whatsoever can truly inright any person to the priviledges of grace the same inrights to glory For no lesse can inright to grace then what inrights to glory So that if this be such a holinesse then look how many it inrights to Baptisme it also inrights to glory and so all that are baptised being children of beleevers and so holy must be saved or else fall from grace But neither of these d◠I beleeve for truth and therefore this holinesse must be some other holinesse then that which tends to life eternall It is said the unbeleeving wife is holy or sanctified which is all one by the husband and the unbeleeving husband by the wife and if it were not so your children would be unclean also but in that the unbeleeving husband and wife is holy by the beleevers so are your children by the same means holy likewise For the same way the children would be unclean by the same rule of contraries they are holy But if unbeleeving husband were not sanctified by the wife and the unbeleeving wife by the beleeving husband now if they were not thus sanctified the one to the other that so they might lawfully continue together as husband and wife their children would be unclean in that they were begotten in an unlawfull way for here the uncleannesse of the unbeleeving and unsanctified parents if in case they were so and the uncleannes of the children is the same even so on the contrary the unbeleeving husband being sanctified by the beleeving wife that so they may lawfully continue together in that honourable way of marriage and the bed undefiled hence your children are holy Which holinesse of the children and the sanctitie of the unbeleeving parents is the same opposed to the uncleannesse in opposition to the same So that as the one is uncleannesse of the flesh so is the other the holinesse of the flesh compared with these together Ezra 10.2.3 1. Sam. 21.4 5. 1 Cor. 6.18 and 7.1 2. 1 Thes 4.3 4. And for the two-fold holinesse that is noted in the Argument to be considered in the Apostles words the one not in the thing it self but to another use and the other of the thing it self and therefore sin to confound them This is in part true for the holinesse of the children is not onely such a relative holinesse as to another use as the unbeleever to the beleevers use and no more but the holinesse of the children rests in themselves as the subjects thereof by nature being begotten and born in that lawfull and honourable way of marriage by Gods appointment and so holy and clean in opposition to such as are
because commonly to one that is borne of the spirit there is twenty borne of the flesh Thirdly It is a practise that overthrows and destroys the body of Christ or holy temple of God for in time it will come to consist of naturall and so a nation and so a nationall Generation carnall members amongst whom if any godly be they will be brought in bondage and become subjects of scorn contempt and the power of government rest in the hands of the wicked Fourthly because it is a ground both of ignorance and errour for it holds people in blindnes that they cannot come to know the nature of that holy ordinance nor what the same requires in the subjects thereof also it causes the simple to conceive that Baptisme is of necessity to salvatiō Fifthly it keeps up the State of Antichrist by granting him this so chiefe a corner-stone of the Lords house to lie in his foundation for that church where Baptisme is the true ordinance of God in the administration thereof is by the Rules of the Gospel a true Church so that if Antichrists Baptisme which he administers be Gods ordinance then that Church wherein he doth so administer the same must be also the Church of God and in sin that refuseth communion with it Sixtly Because it builds faith upon humane testimony in matters fundamentall for such as are baptized in their infancy have no other way to satisfie either themselves or others but the bare word of man that must stand in the place of the word of God for such to beleeve their true receiving of so holy ordinance of God Seventhly To Baptize Infants makes the holy ordinance of God a lying signe because none of those things can be expected in an Infant which the said ordinance holds forth or signifies in the administration thereof which is the parties regeneration and spirituall new birth a dying and burying with Christ in respect of sin and a rising with him in a new life to God and a confirmation of faith in the death and resurrection of Christ and a free remission of sinne by the same as Rom. 6.3 4. Col. 2.12 1 Pet. 3.21 Act. 2.38 〈…〉 None of all which can be expected in an Infant Eightly Because the subject of Baptisme is to be passive but an Infant is no way passive as that ordinance requires 〈…〉 I meane a passive subject threefold 1. a thing uncapable and thus is a stone 2. a thing forced and thus is an Infant who opposeth its Baptisme to the utmost of its abilitie so farre is it from being passive in the same 3. A thing is passive by a subjecting power producing the same in the subject by bringing it to a free and voluntary subjection and thus is the true subject of Baptisme None can be passive to receive grace but by grace because it consists of selfe-deniall And lastly this doctrine of Infants Baptisme opposes directly the expresse word of God by teaching that Infants are in the covenant of grace being borne of beleeving parents and so an holy seed by vertue of which they have right to Baptisme as a priviledge of grace Against which the holy Ghost affirmes that all are conceived in sinne brought forth in iniquitie and so by nature children of wrath and under the curse and except they be borne againe from above they cannot see the Kingdome of God Psal 51.5 Eph. 2.1 2 3. Rom. 3 9. Gal. 3 10.13 14. Job 3.3.5 6. Job 1.12 13. Here man saith that Infants are cleane and holy in and from the wombe and so are subjects of grace and glory but God saith that all Infants as well one as another are first in sinne and unholy and so are subjects of wrath untill the second birth makes the difference as Joh. 3.5.6 And now which to beleeve let the upright heart to God judge But it is said that as the Covenant was made to the Jews and their seed under the old Testament so in the same manner doth the Apostle apply the said Covenant to beleevers and their seed in the new Testament as Act. 2.39 Ans The words are not unto your seed but unto your children wherein there is great difference For by seed in the Scripture is very often put for a naturall generation begotten and born after the flesh And by children a spirituall generation walking in the steps of the faith of such as have gone before them as Act. 3.25 Act. 13.26.33 and so Job 8.37.39 with Rim. 9.7 8. and so the words import as much which is to you and to your children and to all afarre off even as many as the Lord our God shall call So that the promise is onely to such as God shall call and to none else Again it s called the promise and not the Covenant and we know that every promise is not a covenant there being a large difference between a promise and a covenant And now let it be well considered what is here meant by the promise and that is Gods sending of the Messias or the seed in whom the Nations should be blessed and so the sending of a Saviour or Redeemer unto Israel as these Scriptures manifest compared together Isa 11.1 Jer. 23.5 6. with Luke 1.68.74 Act. 13.23 Act. 3.25.26 This was performed by Christs coming first in the flesh in which respect he came both of and to the Jews onely by promise as Joh 4.22 Rom. 9.5 Matth 10.5 6. Matth. 15.24 Joh. 1.11 Secondly in the preaching of the Gospel by which he was held forth as a Saviour to all that by faith laid hold upon him as the arm of Gods grace stretched out unto them And this way also Christ was first tendered to the Jews for a Saviour to save them from their fins Act. 4.12 and for to be their King as to save them so unto whose state and government they were to submit as Luk. 19.14.27 Act. 2.36 In which sense the Apostle speaks when he saith the promise is to you and to your children and to all farre and neer as God shall call that is the promise or promised Saviour is come and is now according to Gods promise tendered to you by the Gospel calling you and your children and all else where the word of grace shall come to beleeve and receive him by saith who is now come to save you and all that beleeve from their sins Act. 3.25 26. And therefore it s said as many as gladly received or beleeved this glad tidings the same was sealed or confirmed unto them by baptisme Act. 2.41 according to Joh. 1.11 12 13. By all which it is manifest that the promise Act. 2.39 is meant the sending of the Messias or a Saviour to the house of Israel to call them to repentance and to save such as beleeve from their sins as is clear also by these Scriptures Isa 59.20 Act. 13.23.26 32.38.39 And thus the promise is unto you and your children that is the promised Saviour is offered and
offers himself freely to save you notwithstanding your crucifying of him yet now repent and beleeve for his promise is upon the same freely to forgive and to save you from all your sins Thus the promise is applied to saith which is the way of preaching the Gospel and not an absolute conclusion of persons to be in the covenant of grace and life whether they have faith or not What is this but to keep the wicked from leaving of his way by promising him life This God did not in making of his Covenant at the first nor the Apostle by his applying of the same at the last Otherwise to bring the personall or naturall seed of Abraham Isaac and Jacob and so of all beleevers into the Covenant of grace and that by Gods appointment whose word i◠like himself both true and stable as a word of faith purely tried as gold seven times in the fire Hence observe the evils that attend this doctrine unavoidably First it makes void the stability of Gods Covenant of grace it self thus If the Covenant of grace be absolute and stable then all within the same must be saved But all within the said Covenant were not saved ergo the Covenant of grace is not absolute and stable The major is confessed that a beleevers seed is in the Covenant of grace without exception The minor is proved from Ishmael Esau and the rejected Jews all which were the seed of beleevers and yet not all saved 2. It s a ground of falling from grace thus All that God took into his Covenant of grace were in an estate of grace But all that God took into his Covenant of grace did not there continue Ergo such fell from an estate of grace I prove this the same way with the former 3. It s a ground of universall redemption for it makes the death of Christ equall as well to such as perish as to such as are saved thus All that are in the Covenant of grace Christ died for But all that were in the Covenant of grace were not saved Ergo Christ died for such as are not saved The proof of this is the same with the former if God took Abraham and his seed into his Covenant of grace without exception 4. It makes God the author of mans beleeving untruth by injoyning him to beleeve the salvation of such as he himself knows and reveals the contrary as Ishmael Esau and but a remnant among the Jews nay none at all but such as beleeve Gen 17. Gen. 25. Gen. 48. Rom. 9.27 Against which opinion and evils aforesaid I argue thus The Covenant of grace is absolute and saving unto all once with in the same But all the personall seed of beleevers are not saved therefore all beleevers seed are not in the Covenant of grace The Proposition is clear from these Scriptures Jer. 32.40 Isa 49.21 Jer. 31.3 Joh. 13.1 Mal. 3.6 Joh. 10.28.29 The Assumption from these Gen. 21.10 with Gal. 4 29.30 Gen. 25.23 with Rom. 9.11 12 13.27 God requires no man to beleeve untruth But for a beleever to beleeve that all his seed is in the Covenant of grace is to beleeve untruth Therefore God requires no such thing This Argument is sully proved in the former And so much for the promise Act. 2.39 which being well understood men would never go about to build the baptising of the Gentiles infants upon that Scripture But it is said that Christ admits of little children to come unto him blessing them and acknowledging their right unto the kingdom of God Mark 10.14 therefore such may be baptised To which I answer briefly thus That the blessing of Christ upon these children was for bodily cures as is manifest by the desires of those that brought them to Christ which was not that he should baptise them but that he would touch them and lay his hands upon them and pray as Mark 5.23 Matth. 19.13.15 This was the ordinary way of healing in the time of the Law by such as were inabled by God thereunto as is clear by these Scriptures compared together 2. King 5.11 with Matth. 19.13 Matth. 8.3 Matth. 9 18. Luk. 4.38.40 Never were any so brought to Christ but for some cure and for his blessing of them that was in respect of that temporall mercie he bestowed upon them according to that they came to him for and to shew his bountie and humilitie that he was no respecter of persons as such might seem to be that suffered others to come and would have kept back children And for such to belong unto the kingdom so those children did and therefore they ought to come as well as any other For they were children of the Jews and at that time members of that Church and so of that kingdome and had as much interest in Christ for outward blessings as any else And further Christ is pleased to make use of childrens humilitie and innocencie to reprove the high mindednesse of his disciples and to draw them forth a pattern from the same As Mat. 18.1 2 3 4. with Mark 10.5 〈…〉 So that all this makes nothing for the baptizing of Infants they being not brought to Christ for baptisme But it s further objected that the Apostles baptized whole housholds as the houshold of Stephanas Lydia and the Jayler 1 Cor. 1.16 Act. 16.15 33. and infants being a part of the houshold therefore infants were baptized Answer Though that Infants are a part of the family when there be infants in the same yet this makes nothing for the baptizing of Infants except it be first proved that infants were there in those housholds And also upon the same ground we may prove that the Jayler had a wife and Lydia an husband because that husbands and wives are commonly in a houshold or family and being there they are a part of the same and that the Jaylers wife and Lydias husband and servants though never so wicked were all baptised But if it be said that faith was to be required of them being of yeers Hence it will follow that no infants were then baptised because that one and the same condition is required of all that are baptised and so it is said of the Jayler that the Word was preached to him and to all that were in his house and that he beleeved and all his house and these are said to be baptised Act. 16.32.34 and thus the Apostle preached and they beleeved and such onely were baptised and none else And what the Apostles order and practise was in this family it was the same in all other housholds and families for they walked alwayes by one rule and therefore their order was not to baptise infants It is said that Christ sent out his Apostles to teach and to baptize all Nations Matth. 28.19 in which Nations there were infants as well as men of yeers and so commanded to be baptized Ans In a word briefly to this for this Scripture being well considered and rightly understood
thereof which cannot be untill a man be borne from above and such as are spirituall alive are the onely subjects of Baptisme This will be further cleared in the constitution of the Church which now follows which constitution is the orderly collection conjoyning of persons into the new covenant or visible union with Christ their head and so consequently into an orderly body among themselves wherein the Saints are the matter and the covenant the forme from which two concurring the Church ariseth and is by them constituted as Ezek. 16.8 Jer. 31.33 Heb. 8.10 Gal. 3.18.29 Heb. 6.17 Zech. 13.9 with Deut. 26.16 to 19 Deut. 29.12 13. Rom. 9.8 with Gal 4.28 By which it appeares that it is the promise or the covenant of grace that produceth a Christian and gives him a beeing in such an estate of grace as in Church-fellowship and so consequently the Church it selfe for that which is true in a part is the same in the whole Now for the constituting causes by which God ordinarily useth to effect this worke are these First the word of God which is to fit and prepare the matter for the forme Secondly the confession of faith which is to declare the fitnesse of the matter for the forme Thirdly the free and mutuall consent and agreement of the particular persons upon the practise of the same truth beleeved and confessed as aforesaid And lastly the Spirit of Christ uniting and knitting up their hearts together in and by the same truth and of each of these a word First of the Word of God sitting and preparing of the matter and this appeares in the ministery of John thâ—â— Baptist who was to goe before Christ in the spirit and power of Elias for to turne the hearts of the fathers to the children and the disobedient unto the wisdome of the just and to make ready a people prepared for the Lord as Luk. 1.17 Compare with this Luk. 3.4 5 6. where he is said to prepare the way of the Lord and to make his paths straight And now the manner how this is to be done is to fill up every valley and to bring down every mountain and hill and to make the crooked straight and the rough wayes smooth And so verse 6. by the valleys is to be understood of such as whose hearts were possessed with fear either of Gods displeasure against them for sin or fear of the dangers straits and difficulties that attends the Gospel of Christ in the true profession of the same From both which the hearts of such are to be freed that are fit to follow Christ and prepared subjects for his Kingdome Luk. 14.26 In which sense the Gospel is a preparative meanes to fill up such valleys by powring in the great abundance of Gods rich grace and free love in Christ towards all such as beleeve and his all-sufficiency to preserve such as suffer for his Names lake And for laying low the mountains and hills that is to humble and to bring downe the proud heart of man that exalts himselfe and cannot submit unto the simplicitie of the Gospel and to that low and meane condition of Christ upon his Crosse as Isa 2 11-22 with 2 Cor. 10.4 5 6. And for the crooked to be made straight that is the crooked and Serpent like nature wayes and evill dispositions of men these shall be changed and made conformable to Christ And so for the making of the tough smooth that is the hard and rough turbulent spirits of men that will admit of no rule order or peaceable societie at all shall by the word of God be made soft smooth and of such a meek temper of spirit as that all such shall live together in love innocent and harmlesse with unitie peace and uniformitie to Christ in all things as Isa 11.6 7 8 9. All which Christ himselfe often affirmed that except a man deny himselfe he cannot be his disciple All which change thus upon the hearts of men is by the power of the Word of God by which they as matter are sitted and prepared for the forme The second constituting cause is the confession of faith which declares the fitnes of the matter for the forme which confession of faith is produced by the power of the Gospel shining into the heart of man and drawes away the same after that which is by the Gospel revealed Which truth is of such a working nature that will not be kept in but like unto leaven which so seasons and sweetens the whole man that as fire at length it breaks forth and discovers it selfe or rather such as have it not onely so but it brings them together by which they come now to conferre about the same so that at length they come to be of one and the same minde and judgement in it and withall convicted of their obedience thereunto And upon this here follows a third constituting cause which is their free mutuall consent and agreement upon the practise of that truth so by God revealed and by faith received as his will in their obedience thereunto which agreement is between God and them in his truth who by his power subjects them to himselfe by the same and where this is in truth Now comes the cause in the last place which 〈…〉 and concludes the whole work and that is the Spirit of grace and power going forth in their hearts by faith uniting knitting them up together in one for the manifestation of their obedience to God in their practie all subjection to Christ in the said truth by them received and agreed upon as aforesaid and this is the Covenant that formes the Church which ever goes in order before the externall administration of any other ordinance then the matters joyning together for orderly practise for persons must be informed of the truth in judgement and bound by the same in conscience and agree upon the practise before the same can orderly be put into execution which foresaid union is the holy Ghosts conjoyning and uniting the said persons together in one and the same truth and so consequently into an orderly body among themselves immediately under Christ their head Which conjunction is called in Scripture the unitie of the Spirit Eph. 4.3 and the gracious covenant by which God becomes their God and they his approved people in such a visible relation Gen. 17. as Deut. 29.12 13. with Deut. 26.17 18. Ezek. 16.8 Ier. 31.3 This is called also joyning to the Lord as Ier. 50.5 They shall aske the way to Sion with their faces thitherward saying Come and let us joyne our selves unto the Lord in a perpetuall covenant that shall not be forgotten And the sonne of the stranger that joyns himselfe to the Lord to serve him and to love his name and to be his servant c. Isa 56.6 And bâ— that is joyned to the Lord is one Spirit 1 Cor. 6.17 And of the rest durst no man joyne himselfe unto them Act. 5.13 And when Paul
and received the seale thereof even so are Infants now in the Covenant and ought to receive the seale thereof Three things are to be cleared in this Argument First That the Covenant made with Abraham and his posteritie in the flesh before Christ and that now under Christ is the same Secondly As Infants were in that Covenant so are Infants now Thirdly as Infants were sealed then so they ought to be now Now for the proving of these aforesaid there are 3. other grounds laid down as follow First That Gospel is the doctrine of the Covenant but this being one was preached to Abraham as Gal. 3.8.17.18 Rom 4.11 and so to the end and to the Jewes in the Wildernesse Heb. 4.1.2 Heb. 3.7 and so in Davids time Heb. 4.7 c. Therefore the Covenant is the same Secondly If Abraham be the Father of the Jewes and Gentiles and equally as he beleeved the righteousnesse of faith and they his children equally as so beleeving and no otherwise then the Covenant is the same But Abraham is the father of the Jewes and Gentiles and equally as he beleeves as aforesaid Rom. 4.11 12.16 17.23 24. Gal. 3.3.9.26.29 Therefore the Covenant is the same Thirdly The standing of the Jewes in the Grace of God was the same with Abraham as is cleare from Gods often expressing of himselfe to be the God of Abraham and his seed and praying to God for to remember the Covenant he made with Abraham Isaac and Jacob and acknowledging the accomplishing of the same to them as Luk. 1.73 74. Luk 1.54 55. and ours in the same with the Jewes as is cleare from Mat. 21.41.43 22.1 Therefore the Covenant is the same Thus lies the Argument Ans and the grounds to back it and all to prove the Covenant God made with Abraham and his seed to be the same now to the beleeving Gentiles and their seed and Infants to be in this now as they were in that then In answer to which I shall onely touch at the three last grounds briefly in a word as I come to the Covenant it selfe The first is because the Gospel is the doctrine of the Covenant and was preached to Abraham and to the Jewes c. therefore the Covenant is the same For the first if the preaching of the Gospel being the doctrine of the Covenant can prove the Covenant to be the same to them as to us then all to whom the Gospel was and is preached are in the same Covenant But I think it is the effectuall beleeving of that which the Gospel holds forth in the doctrine of it that proves persons in the Covenant and not the preaching of it because many may have the Gospel preached among them and yet not be in the Covenant And for the second that Abraham is the equall father both of the Jewes and Gentiles onely as he did beleeve and they his children onely so beleeving as their father Abraham did and not else In respect of which the covenant is the same to the one as it is to the other This in a sense I confesse is a truth that none are accounted children of Abraham but onely as they beleeve as their father Abraham did and iâ— this be true as the ground affirmes it is then let the Reader judge how Infants can be said to be the children of Abraham and in the Covenant and so to have right to Baptisme as the scale to confirme their saith and whether they doe beleeve as Abraham did But that Abraham may be said to be an equall father both of the Jewes and Gentiles I thinke not so in all respects the Jewes were the seed of Abraham as they descended from his loynes as well as from his faith But for the Gentiles they are called the seed or children of Abraham onely as they walke in the steppes of his faith and not else as 1 Pet. 3 6. And lastly Obj. that the standing of the Jewes in the grace of God was the same with Abrahams and ours the same with the Jewes therefore the Covenant is the same This doctrine so generally laid downe without distinction or exception holds forth a mans falling from grace Ans or out of Gods gracious Covenant of life eternall A doctrine to be testified against by all that truely feare the Lord. For Abrahams standing was true and firme in Gods gracious Covenant and if the Jewes was the same without exception then the Jewes that did oppose Christ and were cut off for the same fell out of this Covenant of grace But I shall further cleare this in that which follows and so I come to the Covenant it selfe and to see how that God made with Abraham and this under Christ will agree In the handling of which in the first place this must be well observed A double â—eed in Abraham that there was in Abraham a double secd when God made his covenant with him and his seed and confirmed the same by the seale of Circumcision There was in Abraham at that time a spirituall seed and a fleshly seed Between which seeds God ever distinguished through all their Generations And as there was a distinction thus made by God in Abrahams seed before they were circumcised and yet admitted to the seale of the Covenant by Gods speciall command For Ishmael and Esau were by God commanded to be circumcised as well as any of the rest of Abrahams seed Gen 17.10.13 Even so there must be the same respect observed also in the Covenant and that because the Covenant comprehends divers things and Circumcision was a seale unto them all Some of which were proper unto both the seeds and some not as may be gathered from the severall branches of the Covenant expressed by God Gen 17. As first for the multiplication of Abrahams seed Gen. 17.2 this was proper as well to his fieshly seed as his spirituall as Gen. 21.13 Deut. 10.22 Isa 48.19 Secondly The land of Canaan Gen. 17.8 This was proper also to both the seeds of Abraham And as it was onely a temporall inheritance the same was conditionall as Heb. 3. And so confirmed by circumcision upon both the seeds of Abraham as Gen. 21.9 10. Deut. 30.18 19 20. And as it pointed at a spirituall inheritance shadowed out under it Now thus considered it was absolute and confirmed onely upon the spirituall seed as Gen. 17.19.21 Gen. 21.12 Gal. 3.17 Thirdly That from Abrahams loynes should come a seed in whom all the Nations of the earth should be blessed as Gen. 17.16.19 18.10.18 21.2 This blessed branch of the Covenant was proper onely to the spirituall seed considered either in the cause or in the effect as Act. 3.25 26. Gal. 3.7 8.9 16. Fourthly Abrahams fatherhood of the faithfull as Gen. 17.4 5. This was onely proper to faithfull Abraham and his seed as they are found walking in the steppes of his faith as Rom. 4.11 12 13 16. Rom. 9.7 8. Gal. 3.6 7 9 29. 1 Pet. 3. Lastly To be a
God to Abraham and to his seed after him in their generations as Gen. 17.7 That was faithfully to performe all that he had promised either to Abraham in particular or his seed in generall as Neh. 9.8 Psal 105 9.10 11 12 13 14.42 Luke 1.72 73 74. In token of which God annexed Circumcision as a seale to confirme the same as Gen. 17.11 These are the severall parts and branches of the Covenant that God made with Abraham and his seed and Circumcision in the flesh as a seale to confirme every part to each seed as was proper to the same But if any shall say the Scriptures deny many seeds Obj. and approve onely of one seed in Abraham with whom the promise was made as Gal. 3.16 To this I answer and say that this place well considered will help forward the truth Ans for the Apostle here speaks of the Covenant so as comprehending Christ the substance of the same and the Elect in him for eternall life In which sense the covenant of grace was not made to Abraham and to all his seed without exception for then all his seed must either be saved or else such as are not but perish must fall out of the said covenant of Grace for I suppose no man will say that all the seed of Abraham without exception were saved And if not then there was some of Abrahams seed comprehended in the Covenant in one sense and admitted to the seale thereof whom God excepted against in another some of which was Ishmael and Esau signifying in Abrahams generation a fleshly seed as well as a spirituall between which seeds God ever held forth a distinction through all their generations from Abraham untill Christ who put an end to the type and the flesh and all priviledges of that nature thereunto belonging Col. 2. as 2 Cor. 5.16 Phil. 3.3 4 5. So that now all is laid up in Christ as Gods store-house and treasury and in him only for such as beleeve and therefore now first in Christ by faith and then to the Covenant and the priviledges thereof as Gal. 3.29 And none by the Gospel approved of now to be the children of Abraham but onely such as walke in the steps of his saith For as none invisible before God are by him at all approved to have right to any priviledge of grace but onely as he lookes upon them in his Sonne No more are there any visibly before men to be approved of so as to have right to the same but as they appeare to be in Christ by some effect of faith declaring the same And so much the more in that God excludes all from his holy Covenant is to have right in the outward dispensation thereof but onely such as beleeve Rom. 11.20 Heb. 3.18 19. Heb. 4.1 2 3. Heb. 11.5 6. Rom. 9.7 8. Gal. 3.22.26.29 Let all this be well considered and I doubt not but the difference between the Covenant God made with Abraham before Christ and this under Christ will appeare very great though in some respect for substance the same Yet in the outward profession of them the difference is great both in respect of persons and things Wherein our descent chiefly lyes that covenant admitted of a fleshly seed but this only of a spirituall Gen. 17. with Rom. 9. That in the flesh and this in the heart Gen. 17.13 with Jer. 31.33 Rom. 2.28 29. The seale and ordinances of that Covenant confirmed faith in things to come but the seale and ordinances of this confirme faith in things already done That Covenant was nationall and admitted all of the same to the seales thereof but this personall and admits of none but such as beleeve That Covenant begot children after the flesh as all Abrahams naturall posteritie But this onely begets children after the Spirit and onely approves of such as are begotten and borne from above in whose hearts God writes his Law Jer. 31. Ezek. 36. Heb. 8. Joh. 3.5 6. That covenant with Abraham and his posteritie before Christ comprehended a civill State and a worldly Government with the like carnall Subjects for the service of the same But this covenant now under Christ comprehends onely a spirituall State and a heavenly Government with the like spirituall Subjects for the service of this also That covenant held forth Christ in the flesh to a heart vailed this holds him forth after the Spirit to a face open 2 Cor. 3. In all understand the visible profession of the Covenant in the out ward dispensation of the priviledges thereof And now I come to the consequence gathered from the Covenants Obj. being one and the same as aforesaid That as Infants were in that covenant then and circumcised so are Infants in this now and to be baptized In answer to which Ans I shall commit in the first place to the Readers consideration these particulars for the further clearing of the aforesaid truth First What the Covenant is Secondly What is that which admits into the said Covenant Thirdly Who are the true approved Subjects of this Covenant And lastly Whether all have not one and the same way of entrance into the said Covenant and to each of these a word First the Covenant it selfe is a Covenant of grace and salvation by which God of his grace takes a person or a people to himselfe for his own above all others and to be their God and to manâ—â—est upon them the riches of his grace and glory and the manner of which is in effect but onely thus much Gods calling of a man to an agreement with himselfe in his Sonne wherein he promises to be his God and to give him life and happines and all things in Christ and that he shall beleeve and rest upon his faithfulnes and truth and so take him for his God c. And thus I say God and man come to an agreement in Christ upon something passing between them wherein they both agree and this is called a Coveannt and I call it a covenant of grace when the thing agreed upon is a subject of grace as Gods giving of man life and peace and all things in Jesus Christ and that he will be his God upon whom he shall relie and beleeve the accomplishment of all things in his due time and that he shall heare and know his will by his Sonne and obey him in the same and mans free consent to God againe that he likes of all this well and concludes with God that it shall be so For a Covenant presupposeth two persons at least and also something to agree or covenant upon thus did God with Abraham and so he doth with every beleever and chiefely when God takes any into a Church-fellowship So that the covenant consisteth of these essentials First the persons disposed to agree Secondly something to agree upon And lastly their mutuall consent which is the agreement it selfe And so much for the Covenant and what the same is Secondly What it is that gives right
grafted in againe to their owne roote or Olive tree as at the first which is union and communion with God in his holy way of worship under the Gospel as of old under the Law And so much for the roote or Olive tree which must be understood of Christ mystically considered and not of beleeving parents as aforesaid Now a word of the branches which cannot be meant of Infants but beleevers onely in the Apostles sense being holy First They are branches onely in the same consideration as they subsist and grow in the roote or Vine and so beare the true nature of the same by which they appeare to be holy by the fruits thereof Christ as aforesaid being the roote or vine the branches can no way be said to subsist and to grow in him as their roote but onely by saith and he in them by his spirit without which there is no holines in the Apostles sence who speaks of such as holines as is produced in the branch by the holy roote in which ingrowes and so partakes of the nature of the roote by vertue of the union and communion it hath with the same all which is by saith as the Word reveales Secondly There is no branch that is alive in the Vine but partakes of the life and sap of the same by vertue of which the branch though never so young and small is discovered to be alive and inabled to bring forth in its season such fruit as by which the same may be discerned so it is here by these spirituall branches they cannot properly be called branches in the Apostles sence but as they partake of the life and grace of Christ their true vine and olive tree by which they appeare at the least to be alive in him by faith and inabled by the same to bring forth such fruits as may discover them to be in the Covenant of grace and so to be admitted unto the priviledges thereof as Joh. 15.1.7 Nature it selfe teaches as much for no man will admit of dead plants to be set in his vineyard or grafted into a stock but onely such as are capable to comply with the same in the sap and nourishment thereof to the end it may grow and bring forth fruit and so it is with Christ who comes not short of nature and therefore he admits not of any dead plants to be set in his spirituall vineyard or dead members to be joyned to his mysticall body but onely such as by faith capable to comply with the head Neither took he for himself a compounded body consisting of both living and dead members which all are that have not a living principle of grace faith in him which all beleevers Infants have not nor any at all untill they are borne againe of the Spirit as Job 3.5 6. The Church of God which is the mysticall body of Christ is not a mixt company but onely one substantiall and royall substance sutable to her head matter by which shee was produced being the immortall seed of the Word and therefore one holy spirituall uniforme compacted body both for nature and forme Cant. 6.9 Mal. 2.15 Eph. 2.14 to 22. Joh. 4.23 All which considered proves the body of Christ or Church of God under the new Testament not to consist of Infants neither in whole nor in part and so the branches aforesaid not to be understood of Infants but beleevers And if any object from the words of Christ Mat. 18.6 speaking there of some little ones that beleeved in him and from thence gather that Infants have faith c. The answer in a word is this That I am for all that beleeve and onely for them whether they be Infants or others so that their faith be visible as it may be discerned otherwise it concerns nothing the point in hand for we are upon visible things such as may be judged of by the Word of God Againe little children that beleeve in the Scripture sense are such as be little and weake in the faith and so babes in Christ as 1 Joh. 2.12 1 Cor. 3.1.3 Heb. 5.12 13. But it is said that the Church of the Jewes of old and the Church of the Gentiles now are one in nature as they are both the Church of God and so Infants in the one as they were in the other and the same priviledges to the one as to the other c. I have before shewed the large difference between the Jewes and the Gentiles in respect of their outward priviledges but a word or two more and so end The Church of God under the old Testament and that now under the new for nature are one in reference to the Elect of God called to the faith and by the spirit of grace united to Christ as the branches to their vine and so an holy plant of Gods planting of which indeed the true Church of Christ consists and therefore God did ever put a distinction in Abrahams seed even from Abraham to Christ as in Abraham between Isaac and Ishmael Gen. 17.20 21. Gen. 21.11 12 13. in Isaac between Jacob and Esau Gen. 25.23 Rom. 9.11 12. in Jacob between Ephraim and Manasse Gen. 48.13 14.16 17 18 19. And thus the holy Ghost figuratively pointed at a difference in Abrahams seed between the children of the flesh the children of God Rom. 9.6 7 8. and though God did thus distinguish in Abrahams posteritie yet there could not be the like dividing in the same they being nationall people consisting both of a Church and so spirituall and of a common wealth and so all under a civill worldly government Which nation God crowned with many outward priviledges as he never did any people in the earth they being the first people that God ever tooke into covenant with himselfe in such a way by whom he raised himselfe a name and same in all the world and so his peculiar treasure to whom he committed great matters of trust as Psal 135.4 Rom. 3.1 2. 9.4 Eph. 2.12 Of whom came Christ the Saviour of man and therefore salvation is said to be of the Jewes as Rom. 9.5 Joh. 4.22 In respect of which there was a blessed promise passed upon the Jews for the bringing forth of the Messias and the promised seed in whom all Nations should be blessed And therefore all of that nation were admitted to the outward priviledges as figures of him which that Nation was to bring forth so that a fruitfull wombe was counted a great blessing among the Jews not knowing who might be so honoured as to bring forth that blessed and all blessing seed And therefore God honoured the naturall birth among the Jews with such outward blessings and priviledges that belongs not to the Gentiles at all The Gentiles now are to look for their bringing forth of Christ according to the Spirit as the Jews did then according to the flesh and likewise their birth and their seed in all things sutable to the same As Joh. 3.3.5 6. Joh. 1.12
begotten and brought forth in a way of uncleannesse as adultery fornication and the like And whereas it is said that if this were the meaning of the Apostle then he said nothing for the clearing of the scruple because this holinesse of the children might be questioned as well as their own c. To which I answer and say that to expound the Apostle this way makes onely forth clearing of the scruple which scruple befell the Corinthians by reason of an Epistle which the Apostle writ to them before as 1 Cor. 5 9. wherein he so presses them from having any communion or fellowship with any unclean person in the worship of God which they understood of civill commerce with the world upon which they questioned the lawfull retaining of their unbeleeving husband and wives and to have communion with them in that neer relation of husband and wife in their civill commerce and societie And so much the more having an example of the like nature in the Law Ezra 10.7 about which thing they wrote to the Apostle for information 1 Cor. 7.1 and questioned not their children Whereby it appears they held it lawfull for to retain their children To which the Apostle answers from a double ground thus 1. In that all things are sanctified to such as beleeve as Tit. 1.15 and so is the unbeleeving wife to the beleeving husband So that you may lawfully live together in that comfortable estate and societie of marriage which God hath ordained for man and wife to abide in 2. If you judge your selves to live in such a way of uncleannesse upon which you must now part then your children so begotten are unclean and to be put away also but in that you 〈◊〉 it lawfull to retain your children and not to put them away though you beleeve and they do not Then much more the unbeleeving parents as aforesaid that bear them for if the effect be holy then must the cause be also holy that produceth the same which is Gods holy ordinance of marriage and not his holy covenant of grace Now it had been in vain for the Apostle to have gone about to prove the lawfull restraining of the unbeleeving husband and wife from the holinesse of their children being in the Covenant for nothing was more clear then this that such children as are begotten in uncleannesse were not approved of in Gods holy Covenant of life not any way holy either by Law or Gospel How then could this tend to remove the Corinthians scruple to tell them they might lawfully continue together because their children were in the Covenant of grace and life and so were holy when as their scruple lay in matter of uncleannesse upon which they were to part Now this must first be cleared whether they were so or not in respect of themselves before ever they could beleeve the holinesse of their children or any such to be in Gods gracious Covenant for the children of adultery and fornication are debarred the holy Covenant both in the Law and Gospel But if it be said that the scruple was about the unlawfull commerce of the beleever with the unbeleever and not of their marriage as if they lived in adultery and fornication and so the uncleannesse of the flesh in that respect as if they were not married Now if this be true that they scruple not their marriage then it holds true also that they did not question the lawfull retaining of their children And so the Apostles argument from the same is of force to prove the lawfull continuing of their parents also though the one called to the faith and so a beleever and the other not In which respect they judged their children free from that uncleannesse the unbeleeving parent was or might be guiltie of to which the Apostle answers and affirms that the condition of the parents and the children is one and the same in the aforesaid respects If they put away the one as unclean upon the same ground the other is unclean and to be put away also And as the one is holy and to be retained upon the same ground the other is holy and to be retained likewise And I conclude as I began tht the holinesse here both of the unbeleeving parents and the children is the same for nature being opposed to one and the same uncleannesse which is onely the holinesse of the creature in a naturall respect not the holinesse of the gracious Covenant of life in a spirituall respect as it is affirmed And so this Scripture also hath nothing at all in it for the proving of Infants true subjects of Baptisme One thing more in the Proposition I cannot passe which is this 〈…〉 That by vertue of a beleevers state in grace all his fruit is holy and partakes with the same state of grace with him unlesse they do by some act of theirs deprive themselves of it as Esau and Ishmael A word briefly of this and so I leave it as answered already 〈…〉 1. If this be a truth then one may be saved by another mans faith for here by vertue of a beleevers state in grace all his fruit that is his children pertake of the same with him and so fare as he doth onely by vertue of his grace or state in grace which is the same And so by the fathers saith the children share together with him in that grace which his faith instates him in which is salvation it self 2. This doctrine takes away the being of originall sinne for here they are all holy and partakers of grace untill they commit some actuall sinne Which denies any originall sin for that would make them unholy though they never committed actuall sin in their own persons 3. It layes a ground of falling out of an estate of grace for by this doctrine Esau and Ishmael and all beleevers children are holy and partakers of the same grace with their parents untill they commit sin as Esau and Ishmael did and then to fall from the same as they did And lastly this is false doctrine for both Esau and Ishmael were excluded from being subjects of Gods saving grace before they committed actuall sin As Gen. 25.23 with Rom. 9.11.12 13. and so Gen. 17.20.21 Gen. 21 9.10 12. But as it tends to Poperie and Arminianisme so I shall leave it as an old Creed bare error not worth any further medling with And now to the fourth and last Argument thus If Baptisme succeeds circumcision 〈…〉 4. then as infants were to be circumcised so are infants to be baptized but Baptisme succeeds circumcision as Col. 2.11 12. Therefore as infants were circumcised so are infants to be baptized This Argument is somewhat weak 〈…〉 and therefore a weak answer shall serve What though Baptisme succeeds circumcision must it needs follow that as Infants were circumcised they must of necessitie be baptized The new Testament succeeds the old must it needs follow therefore that the same order be observed now as was then
All the whole houshold of every familie among the Israelites in Aegypt as well children as others were to eate the Passeover Exod. 12.3 4. And the Lords Supper succeeds that 〈…〉 and yet Infants are not approved as fit Communicants in the Lords Supper because they are not capable subjects But it is a double mystery how persons are fit and capable of union in a State that are not fit and capable of communion in the ordinances of the same State And more mysticall how one should be a capable subject of Baptisme and noâ— of the Supper 〈…〉 I can see no Rule for such a practise in all the booke of God and it s against the Rule of nature that when a childe is borne to keep it from food The Church of the new Testament succeeds the old but it will not follow that the like order and subjects succeed each other also for no rejected Ishmaelite or Esau are to be admitted either to union or communion in the Church under the new Testament by Christs appointment therefore though that Baptisme succeed circumcision yet the same subjects doe not so The two Testaments are as Wills containing certaine Legacies given and bequeathed to such onely as whose names are expresly set downe in the same as Rev. 21.27 In the old Testament as the first Will a Male of eight dayes old or a Prosolyte Exod. 12.48.49 Gen. 17 10-44.23.25 Joâ— 8. Phil. 3.4 5. So in the new Testament as the last Will of Christ the Legacies therein contained as the priviledges and blessing of Abraham are given onely to such as beleeve and to none else Gal. 3.14 22 29. Rom. 8 17. 4.11 12. 9.7 8. Gal. 3.6 7. These are such as are begotten againe by the immortall seed of the Word borne of the Spirit and so children of God and the onely true â—eiâ—es of the Kingdome of Christ with the priviledges thereof as Jam. 1.18 1 Pet. 2.23 Joh. 1 12 13. Joh. 3.5 6 1 Joh. 3.9 10. Rom. 8.17 These are the holy seed which God so approves of in the Scriptures as subjects of grace heires of life and being in the covenant they onely have right to the priviledges thereof and their children or of-spring are such as succeed them in the same saith and truth and so are called the Generation of the righteous as succeeding each other in the way of righteousnesse and not their Infants or personall seed proceeding from their loyns by carnall generation as Esa 43.5 44 3. 54.3 59.21 66.22 61.9 65.23 compare Rev 12.17 Gal. 4.26 to 31. These and the like Scriptures shew what is the right and true approved seed unto which the priviledges of grace belong so that although Baptisme succeeds Circumcision yet the difference is great both in matter and manner in persons and things Circumcision sealed to things temporall and carnall as well as spirituall and so were the subjects and things to come as under types and shadows and so in a cloud and darknesse Whereas Baptisme hath for its subjects children of the light in the cleare evidence of the Spirit with the face open and confirmes faith in things come and already done for Baptisme seals onely to faith in Christ and grace in the new birth which cannot be where there is not first a begetting by the immortall seed of the Word of life for which end God hath ordained in the Gospel preaching beleeving to goe before baptizing as Mat. 28.19 with Mark â—6 15 16. And that way or order which hath not God for its Author and found in the Records of Christ with his image and superscription upon it let us say as sometime he did Give to Caesar that which is Caesars and to God that which is Gods so say I Give to Antichrist his baptizing of Infants to Christ his baptizing of beleevers What advantage will it be to Infants to come before they are called to have a name to live and yet dead for ought any one knows and to come to the marriage-Supper without a wedding Garment shall the holy things of God be forced upon such as neither beleeve know or once desires them will men set a seale to a blanke are children capable to receive meate before they be borne except we make Baptisme the wombe of regeneration as many doe who teach that Infants are regenerated borne againe of the Spirit of grace in Baptisme whose doctrine is of the same stampe and authoritie as he that sent them so to preach What can be more naturall then begetting and bringing forth of the Infant before feeding of it at the Mothers breasts Is it not sacriledge to presse such upon the wise of Christ the Church for her Paps with whom she never travelled or beare of her body Christ will deny himselfe to be food and nourishment to any where he hath not beene first seed to beget Let men take heed how they impute such folly to the wisdome of god as to give the milke of his breasts unto any that are still borne or to set dead twigs in his heavenly and divine stocke or naturall branches in his holy and spirituall vine Let such beware how they fight against the God of order least in stead of finding the breast to feed before the wombe to beare they meet with a curse upon the single emptinesse of Christ with a double barrennesse that will admit of no conception or spirituall birth to succeed the naturall Not that I intend the least to deny salvation unto Infants no I am so far from this that I testifie against all such doctrine nor yet affirme all Infants to be saved neither doe I know among Infants which shall be saved and which not therefore I leave it as a secret thing to God untill he makes the same appeare by some visible effect of faith which onely gives a visible right unto any ordinance of the new Testament and therefore I cannot see by the Gospel how Infants voyde of visible faith should have visible right unto the priviledges of grace neither ought they to be admitted thereunto as hath been proved and also for these and the like reasons following First 〈…〉 because there is neither command nor example for the baptizing of Infants in all the new Testament the order and government of which in the administrations thereof is no way inferiour to the old but in the old Testament there was an expresse Rule by command from God what communicants were to be admitted to circumcision and other ordinances of that nature and what not but this order is no where found in the new Testament for the baptizing of Infants and therefore the same is not to be practised Secondly It is a high contempt and injury to Christ as he is the husband of the Church his holy Spouse to force upon him an naturall wife himselfe being spirituall and desires the like associate as such a Church is founded upon the naturall birth namely Infants
received there as a true ordinance of God And for a more orderly proceeding in this discourse I shall first set down my dissent and the causes of it and then examine those grounds that are brought for the proving of the contrary And first for that ordinance of Baptisme which as aforesaid hath been administred and received in a false Antichristian estate and retained the true ordinance of God and such so baptized by the power of the man of sin to be admitted into the Church of Christ with the same baptisme as the Lords ordinance This I cannot assent unto because I see no such thing in all the Word of God by which I must be guided here and judged hereafter So that I dissent from that baptisme administred by the power of Antichrist and cannot own the same for Gods ordinance appointed by him and instituted by Christ in the new Testament and that for these and the like reasons First because in so doing I shall approve of Antichrists matter and form 〈…〉 and so of the state it self As an infant for his matter and the words with water applied his form I have alreadie proved that an infant is not the subject of baptisme appointed by God though it be the child of a beleever but how much lesse such who are the carnall seed of the wicked The covenant of grace and the parents faith is alledged to inright the former unto baptisme but what inrights these unto it and how came they by it Secondly the ordinance of baptisme instituted by Christ is so essentiall to the constitution of the Church under the new Testament that none can be true in her constitution without it Neither can that be a false Church where baptisme is truly the Lords ordinance in the administration thereof as 1 Cor. 12.13 with Gal. 3.27 So that to approve of Antichrists baptisme to be Gods ordinance is to approve of his Church to be also the Church of God For as the eaters of the sacrifice were of old partakers of the Alcar 1 Cor. 10.17 18. and to receive him that is sent is a receiving also of him that sent him Mat. 13.40 so it is with this essentiall ordinance of baptisme in the church of Antichrist that whosoever approves of the one by the same he approves of the other also For the ground and piller that bears up the truth and that truth so born up stands and falls together as 1 Tim. 3.15 So that where there is not a tâ—â—e constituted Church there is no true constituted Church ordinance and where there is a true Church ordinance in its constitution as baptisme is there is at least presupposed a true Church also And therefore to condemne a Church to be false and altogether Antichristian and yet baptisme there and by the same administred to be the ordinance of God this I can see no rule for in Scripture and therefore I dissent Thirdly 〈…〉 6. Christ hath disclaimed and denieth all communion with the man of sin both in respect of himself and his subjects and hath also proclaimed open warre against him in all his dominions and therefore he cals home his subjects as Jer. 51.6.45 Revel 18.4 Christ refuseth to be laid as a chief corner stone under Antichrists building as he must be if he in his holy ordinance of baptisme be granted to lie in his foundation For baptisme is no otherwise Christs ordinance but as it depends upon him the ordainer But Christ denies Antichrist any such priviledge and also forbids his people from taking a stone from Babylon to lay in the foundation of the I ords building as Jer. 51.26 But if Antichrists church be of himself and so false then all the parts thereof must be of his own devising and false also For if in opposition to a true Church of Christ there is a false church of Antichrists which thing cannot be if there be not in opposition to true ordinances of the one false ordinances of the other that are essentiall to the same as the ordinance of baptisme is And so the like ministery proportionable to the same as 1 Cor. 10.21 2 Cor. 11.13 14 15. Revel 2.2 according to Matth. 24.24 with 2 Thes 2.9 10. Fourthly I cannot approve of that baptisme in the church of Antichrist to be Gods ordinance because in so doing I shall advance humane testimony above the Word of God For I have no way to satisfie my conscience whether I have that ordinance or no but onely by Antichrists Church-book or my godfathers godmothers which if the one be dead and the other lost then am I to seek my baptisme But at the best if any should demand of me whether I were baptized or not all that I can say is that men tell me so in all which Christ must have no voice and the Word of God put to silence as knowing no such thing and Antichrists Church-book come in the place as a ground of my faith in a truth so essentiall Which thing I dare not approve of Fifthly to justifie baptisme in the church of Antichrist to be Gods ordinance is to force men to sin against conscience for if any man comes unto such for fellowship in the truth he must either justifie the baptisme he received of the man of sin as Gods ordinance or else continue in that sinfull way in which he is and desires to leave I speak now in their sense whose practise it is which I cannot at all assent unto for a truth Sixtly I cannot justifie Antichrists baptisme for Gods ordinance because it makes against Christs baptisme in these two respects First for the power by which the same was constituted and so authorised in the hand of the Minister being the power of the man of sin rejected of God as an enemic to the crown and dignitie of Christ the King of Saints Secondly in respect of that body into which the partie was baptized and so by the same made a visible member and that was in the body of Antichrist In both which respects the baptisme administered en the false Antichristian state in my judgement cannot be the ordinance of God And lastly I dare not go from that rule and order which Christ left in his last Testament for the constituting of his Church and taking of members into the same which is by faith and baptisme All which grounds being well considered I cannot see by any rule of truth to approve of the baptisme administred in a false Antichristian church to be Gods ordinance instituted by Christ in his new Testament That being there administred under a false power by a â—â—se ministery upon a wrong subject in a false body and yet the same Gods ordinance this is more then I can find by the Word of God from which rule I dare not go Thus having shewed my judgement and some reasons why I so judge of the baptisme administred in a false Antichristian estate cannot be the ordinance of God instituted by Christ in the
the Lords people now Moses and the Prophets Christ and his Apostles in their writings as Luk. 16.29 30 31. Which are to us with the Spirit of life in them as effectuall as their personall presence if not more as Job 6.62 63. 2 Pet. 1.18 19. Rev. 11.3.5.11 And thus all succession from the beginning came to Christ and from Christ to the Apostles and from them to the Scriptures which are the head-spring of all to us so that all succession now is onely spirituall according to faith and follows not the personall succession of any but onely the word that gives being to all order and ordinances that is of God And so I come to such as will have no Church before Baptisme and so make Baptisme the forme of the Church I shall be briefe in this because the truth of this will appear in the causes constituting the Church This I thinke we all agree in that matter and forme constitutes a Church the matter is a company of Saints or persons professing faith in the righteousnesse of Jesus Christ and living accordingly that is in holines of life The forme is that by which these are united and knit up together in one fellowship and orderly body and that is the covenant of grace that lies between God and his people by which God visibly becomes the God of such persons and they his people above all other That this is the forme of a Church and not Baptisme I prove thus that by which God and a people become each others apart from all other people that is the forme of them but the covenant is that by which God owns a people for his and they him for their God therefore the covenant is the forme Jer. 31.33 Heb. 8.10 Act. 2. â—1 Gen. 17.11 Luk. 1.72 Act. 3.25 〈…〉 Secondly That which at the first was the forme of a thing ever remaines the forme of the same thing without alteration but the covenant was the forme of the Church at the first before ever any ordinance was annexed therefore the same still the Church remaining the same without alteration in the nature of it Thirdly That which both gives a beeing to a thing and ever keeps the same that must be the forme of the same thing but the covenant both gave a being to the Church ever keeps the same therefore the covenant is the forme Fourthly That which makes a member to be a member or no member of a Church that makes a Church to be a Church or no church and so that is the forme of it for there is the same reason for the whole that is for every part but the covenant is that which makes a member and so the rest as Esa 56.4.6 therefore the covenant is the forme Fifthly That which persons may have and yet be no church that cannot be the forme of a church but persons may have baptisme yet no church ergo not the forme the church being the greatest ordinance of God and the very center of all ordinances as Psal 87.7 with 1 Tim. 3.15 Cannot be formed by any particular ordinance no nor by any lesse then that which comprehends all the essentiall parts and properties of a church which is Gods gracious covenant that gives being to all true churches both first and last But some will say that the Word speakes of no church before Baptisme For answer to this I must distinguish in Baptisme between the truth in the doctrine of Baptisme and the outward administration of the same In the first sense Baptisme is one branch of the covenant as a truth to be revealed and by faith to be received as an essentiall truth together with other truths for the constituting of the church and no church according to the order of Christs new Testament either without it or before it But for the last namely the outward administration of Baptisme that ever follows the Saints joyning in fellowship by mutuall faith agreement in the doctrine wherein consists the stating of the Church in her conjoyning in covenant which ever goes before the administration of Baptisme and gives power and authoritie for the same So that in the first sense the Church is not before Baptisme but in the last sense the church is before Baptisme This distinction being observed I answer in a word thus we are not to deny a church to be a church untill the Word so calls it for the church in the old testament and most of the churches in the new Testament were churches sometime before they were so called And why may not the same be so here be a church before Baptisme be administred Againe a church is onely so a church before Baptisme as that the end of her union is for communion and so an immediate proceeding to the practise of the same truth shee agreed upon by a free and mutuall consent in her conjunction That which states a person or persons in covenant instates them in church-fellowship but faith and not practise instates a people in covenant for a people must first agree upon truth in judgement before they practise the same therefore faith and not practise instates a people in church-fellowship and so a church in covenant and fellowship before baptisme be administred A people are a church by covenant unto which ordinances are annexed to confirme and establish the same as Gen. 17.11 Ezek 16.8 9. Act. 2.41 as Eph. 4.5 So that here was a church before ordinances or that ever Baptisme was administered either by John the Baptist on the 〈…〉 Some say from Act 2.41 They were added to the Church after they were baptized To which I answer and say If it should bâ— so that they were after Baptisme added to the Church then they should neither put on Christ by Baptisme not yet be baptized into one body not to the true profession of the Father Son and holy Ghost c. directly against these Scriptures Gal. 3.27 1 Cor. 12 13. Mat. 28.19 And for Act. 2.41 the words are these Then they that gladly received his Word were baptized and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand soules which is nothing else but to shew how many they were that received the truth and so by the same were added to them holding Forth the power and goodnes of God in making his word so fruitfull in bringing in so many by one Sermon to the truth as Act. 2.47 which is onely a repeating over the number of Persons God at that time added to the rest Againe it may be said that Baptisme signifies our regeneration and new birth so that a childe must be first borne and brought forth in Baptisme before it can be mad a living Member in Christs body the Church Baptisme indeed is a signe of the new birth and so holds forth the same as a thing done and not as a thing to be done and therefore Baptisme requites the appearance of the same as faith and repentance to goe before the administration
was come to Ierusalem be assayed to joyne himselfe to the disciples Act. 9 26. And the whole body fitly joyned together c. Eph. 4 16. And a fitly framing of matter together for a house or habitation of God as Eph. 2.21 22. All which is the Saints entering covenant with God which covenant is their forme that gives them a being in such a relation or fellowship Isa 43.21 1 Pet. 2.9 And so much in briefe of the constitution of a Church or of the Saints entering into Church-fellowship and the causes producing the same And now being come into her own land as of old was signified Ezek. 36.24 25. which is into a visible covenant with God or union with Christ and so become his own shee is now to be washed with water in Baptisme as Ezek. 16.8 9. Mat. 28.19 Eph. 4 5. And thus being in covenant with God by faith in Jesus Christ in which their state consists and so the agreement made the covenant passed between them now the seale is see to which is the outward ordinance of Baptisme to confirme the same which being done she is then to enter upon her holy communion in all the rest of Gods holy ordinances thereunto belonging for her comfort and well-being And thus I have by Gods gracious assistance done with this subject charged upon me partly by such as feare the Lord in a far Countrey beyond the Seas and partly by my own conscience for the truths sake at home And good Reader confider well before you judge and what I see not teach thou me c. Job 34.31 But let not my unweary Readâ—â— be offended with me though I speake a word or two more It may be some will aske me if I condemne all Churches but onely such as I have here described To which I answer that I condemne no Church which God approves of in his word secondly I condemne no Church at all for I goe not about to shew who are false but what is true and it is enough for me if such a Church as hath been spoken of be granted to be true and let all others alone to stand and fall to their own Master and in regard of those reproachfull clamours cast upon all without exception that seem to be of my judgement about Baptisme I shall yet make bold with my Reader briefly to declare a word of my faith what I beleeve and hold to be truth and desire to practise the same and so leave all to God for the godly Reader to judge what difference there is between him and me in the maine that men should be so incensed against me as to seeke my life as some have done the Lord in mercy forgive them and lay it not to their charge And now for my faith First I doe beleeve that there is onely one God who is distinguished in three persons God the Father God the Sonne and God the holy Ghost yet but one in nature or essence without division and uncommunicable who made the world and all things therein by the word of his power and governes them all by his wise providence Secondly I beleeve that God made man in his own Image an upright and a perfect creature consisting of soule and body which body God framed of the earth and breathed a soul into the same To whom God gave a law upon his keeping of which depended all his happinesse and upon the contrary attended his misery which soon took effect for he breaking that Law he fell under the curse and the wrath of God lay upon him all his posterity By which fall Man lost the knowledge of God utterly disabled himself of all ability ever to recover the same againe Thirdly I beleeve God out of the counsell of his own will did before he made the world elect and choose some certain number of his foreseen fallen creatures and appointed them to eternall life in his Sonne for the glory of his grace which number so elected shall unavoydably be saved and come to glory and the rest left to themselves in their sinne to glorifie his justice Fourthly I beleeve that God in the fulnesse of his owne time did send his Sonne the second person who in the wombe of the Virgin Mary assumed mans nature and in the same he suffered death upon the Crosse onely as he was man to satisfie his Fathers justice for the sinnes of all his elect and them onely and that he lay three dayes three nights in his grave from whence he arose the third day by the power of his Godhead for the justification of all for whose sinnes be dyed and that in the same body Christ dyed be arose from tho dead and afterwards ascended into heaven the place of glory where he was before and there to remaine untill he comes at the last day to judge the world in righteousnesse Fifthly I beleeve that God of his grace in his own time effectually calls such as shall be saved to the knowledge sive as a childe in the parents begetting of it and so God by his Spirit works faith in the hearts of all such to beleeve in Christ and his righteousnes only for justification And thus they are made righteous before God in Christ and so conformable to the will of the Father through the Sonne and also made holy through the worke of regeneration and the holy Spirit of grace dwelling in them yet all such have still as long as they live here in the flesh remaining in them an old man that originall corruption the flesh that warres against the Spirit which hinders them in their obedience both to God and man and many times draws them to that which is evill and contrary to their intentions yet all of them shall through Christ overcome and safely be brought to glory at last Sixthly I beleeve the holy Scriptures to be the word of God and have the onely authoritie to binde the conscience to the obedience of all therein contained and are the allsufficient Rule by the Spirit of God to guide a man in all his obedience both to God and man Seventhly As for the absence of originall sin and power in the will to receive and refuse grace and salvation being generally offered by the Gospel and Christs dying for all persons universally to take away sinne that stood between them and salvation and so laid downe his life a ransome for all without exception and for such as have been once in Gods love so as approved of by him in Christ for salvation and in the covenant of grace and for such to fall so as to be damned eternally and all of the like nature I doe beleeve is a doctrine from beneath and not from above and the teachers of it from Satan and not from God and to be rejected as such that oppose Christ and his Gospel Eightly I doe beleeve the resurrection of the dead that all shall rise and come to judgement and every one give account of himselfe
to God and receive according to the things done in their bodyes whether they be good or bad therefore no conscience ought to be forced in the matters of Religion because no man can beare out another in his account to God if in case he should cause him to sinne Ninthly I do beleeve the King is set upon his throne by God who hath given him power and authority to reigne and rule for God over all his subjects as supreame head over all persons in his Dominions in whom is resident all power to punish any that shall offend either against his royall person crowne or dignity and that all his Subjects are to obey him out of conscience to God and all in lawfull authoritie under him and wherein they rule wâ—â—l I am bound in conscience actually to obey and assist them to the utmost of my abiliaie both in my person and state and wherein they goe amisse that I cannot with a good conscience actually obey them as aforesaid I shall passively submit my body to suffer their pleasure according to the Word of God in what they shall inflict upon me without resistance this is my faith and the faith of all that I desire to have fellowship with And lastly I do beleeve that there is an holy and blessed communion of Saints that God of his grace calls suck as belong to life by election unto the fellowship of his Sonne by the Gospel of which matter God by his Word and Spirit joyns them together in his covenant of grace and so constitutes his Church as I have before shewed And as God hath thus built for himselfe an holy habitation of such pure matter and also after ho holy a manner even so hath he provided a way of preservation and safetie for the same as Isa 26.1 We have a strong Citie salvation will God appoint for walls and bulworks which Citie is said to have a wall both great and high and built upon twelve foundations great that none shall break through high that none shall overtop or get over and strong in the foundation that nothing shall shake it 〈…〉 5. 〈…〉 3. and God hath said that he will be a wall of fire round about and the glory in the midst of it and that he will keepe it and watch over it by night and by day that nothing shall hurt it and as God hath built himselfe a house after his own minde and is a guard to the same even so he also is said to beautifie the same with salvation 〈…〉 3. 〈…〉 and to make the place of his feet glorious and that he will lay all her stones with faire colours and her foundations with Saphires and her windows of Agaâ—s and her gates of Carbuncles and all her borders of pleasant stones and all her children taught of the Lord and great shall be the peace of her children Which Citie and the streets thereof are said to be of pure gold like unto cleare glasse 〈…〉 11 whose light is like to a stone most precious even as a Jasper stone cleare as Crystall Of which Christ saith Thou art all faire my love and there is no spot in thee 〈…〉 and that the Kings daughter is all glorious within and her clothing is of wrought gold And as Christ doth thus signifie unto us the nature of his Church both in respect of her matter her forme her grace and comely order in him her head even so he holds forth his love to her and delight in her by these and the like sweet expressions of comfort and solace 〈…〉 The Lord hath chosen Zion be hath desired it for his habitation saying this is my rest and here will I dwell for ever And so faith the Apostle In Christ all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord 〈…〉 1 〈…〉 in whom you are builded together for a habitation of God through the Spirit and therefore God is said to love the gates of Zion more then all the dwellings of Jacob and glorious things are spoken of thee O thou Citie of God Which Citie is said to be Jerusalem which is above bo is the mother of us all And so the mountain of the Lords house is said to be established in the top of the mountains and to be exalted above the hils 〈…〉 6. For whose sake saith the Lord I will not hold my peace nor rest untill I cause the righteousnesse thereof to break forth as brightnesse and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth And so called by Christ and holy people the redeemed of the Lord a City sought out and not forsaken The name of which Citie from that day shall be 〈…〉 12 〈…〉 8. The Lord is there And further called his vine his plant his temple his flocke his pleasant portion his first borne his bride his Queene his Spouse his wife his body his love his dove his onely joy and place of Rest Consider Some were perswaded with the things that were spoken but some beleeved not Act. 28.24 ERRATA Faults escaped Page 8 line 5. Reade as for is p. 12. l. 4. r. therefore though the first c. p. 19. l. 45. 〈…〉