are in his stead in earth but the Godhead and name of God is simply and properly given unto Christ. 3. Cont. Ecclesiasticall persons subject to the civill magistrat FUrther though Aaron be Moses mouth and speake for him to the people yet Moses is made his superiour so though the Priests and Ministers doe declare unto the people the will of God and the law is to be required at their mouth yet are they subject to the Civill power as here Aaron to Moses Pellican as the Apostle saith Let every soule be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13.1 4. Cont. Against the baptisme of infants by women Vers. 25. ANd Zipporah tooke a sharpe knife This example is alleaged by the Romanists to prove the lawfulnesse of Baptisme by women in the case of necessity Bellar. lib. 1. de Bapt. cap. 7. Contra But this example cannot serve their turne 1. because the Minister of circumcision in the old Testament is not precisely appointed as the Minister of Baptisme is for the Levites and Priests were not specially charged by commandement to bee Ministers of circumcision but that charge did indifferently lie upon the masters of the family Gen. 17.9 But in the Gospell they are bid to baptise that are commanded to teach Mat. 28.20 Piscato◠2. The Romanists lay upon baptisme a necessity of salvation but here the necessity was not in respect of the infant uncircumcised but in regard of Moses and not a necessity of eternall salvation but of preserving the outward life Piscator 3. Zipporah did it in presence of Moses by this example they may allow women also to baptise in the presence of the lawfull Minister Simler 4. And though it pleased God to remit the temporall punishment upon this externall obedience yet this sheweth not that God did approve this act as before instance is given of the Samaritanes who were delivered from the Lions being but halfe worshippers of God 2. King 17. the Lord onely sheweth hereby that it is pleasing unto him that the externall discipline of the Church should be preserved Simler 5. This then being in it selfe an unlawfull act in Zipporah saving that necessity forced it and extraordinary it cannot be drawne to an ordinarie practice specially where there can bee no such necessity Iun. 6. This example rather sheweth that baptisme though by an unlawfull Minister is to be held to bee baptisme as after Zipporah had circumcised her sonne he was not circumcised againe then that such are to be allowed lawfull Ministers Heretikes are not fit Ministers of Baptisme yet if they keepe the true forme of Baptisme the Church useth not to baptise after them for as Augustine well saith That which is given 〈◊〉 be said not to be given although it may be rightly said not to be rightly given 5. Cont. That the punishment for the contempt of circumcision was not only temporall but in Gods justice eternall Vers. 24. THe Lord met him and would have killed him Bellarmine from hence would prove that the penalty of the neglect of circumcision was only temporall and consequently that circumcision had not to it annexed the promise of remission of sinnes and deliverance from eternall death as the Sacraments of the new Testament have lib 2. de effect sacrament cap. 17. Resp. 33. ad argum 1. Cont. 1. The penalty inflicted for the omission of circumcision is laid upon the party himselfe that is not circumcised even that person shall be cut off Gen. 17.4 therefore this example of punishment imposed upon the parent for the neglect of it in his sonne is not fitly urged to that end 2. that law is made against those that willingly neglect circumcision and so wilfully breake the Lords covenant but here is no contempt but only negligence and oversight 3. It followeth not Moses only should have beene temporally chasticed for this negligence therefore the neglect of circumcision was onely punished by temporall death like as God would have killed Aaron with temporall death for consenting to the Idolatry of Israel Deut. 9.20 Doth it therefore follow that the punishment of Idolatrie was only temporall God unto his servants remitted in mercie the eternall debt chastising them onely temporally for their owne amendment and the example of other 4. But that the contempt of circumcision deserved everlasting death in the justice of God appeareth both by the phrase that soule shall be cut off from his people which signifieth a finall perishing from the Church of God both in this world and in the next as it is taken Levit 20.3 that he which giveth his seed to Moloch shall bee cut off as also by the reason there given because hee hath broken the Lords covenant and cursed is every one which transgresseth any part of the law Deut. 27.26 And the curse of God is not only temporall but eternall 5. Further that circumcision had annexed to it a promise of grace and remission of sinnes the Apostle sheweth calling circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.11 and the outward circumcision represented the circumcision of the heart whose praise was not of men but of God Rom. 2.29 6. Cont. Against the necessity of Baptisme NEither can this example of Zipporahs necessary circumcision of her sonne bee fitly alleaged to prove an absolute necessity of baptisme an hypotheticall that is a conditionall necessity depending upon the precept of Christ wee graunt that it is necessary that baptisme both in generall should bee retained in the Church because Christ hath instituted it and in particular that every one should yeeld ready obedience thereunto as unto Christs ordinance when it may bee conveniently had but such a penall necessity as to imagine children dying without baptisme to bee excluded the kingdome of God cannot be admitted 1. This were to tye salvation unto the externall signe and so to limit the worke of the spirit 2. Some of the fathers indeed as Augustine held such a necessity but hee made the same necessity of the other Sacrament upon these words of our Saviour Ioh. 6.53 Except yee eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. ye have no life in you c. Simler 3. There is not the like necessitie of baptisme now and of circumcision then for that was tied to the eight day so is not baptisme and the necessitie was not in respect of the infant but of the parent that neglected it as the child here was not in danger but Moses himselfe 6. Morall observations 1. Observ. That one standeth in need of anothers gifts Vers. 14. DOe not I know Aaron thy brother c. that he shall speake God could if it had pleased him have given unto Moses the gift of eloquence utterance but he rather joyneth Aaron as assistant unto Moses not giving all gifts unto one but so diverslie dispensing and disposing his graces that one may stand in need of another even as the members of the bodie cannot say one to another I have no need of thee 1
and barrennesse to none other cause originally but to the will of God Thus godly men doe both acknowledge God the authour of all good things which they enjoy as also the inflicter of all such punishments which befall them as Iob confesseth The Lord hath given and the Lord hath taken it Iob 1.21 Perer. 2. Observ. Not to yeeld unto tentation Vers. 4. ANd he went in unto Hagar c. Abraham who as a mighty and invincible champion had stood out hitherto against the temptations and baits of Satan is overcome of his wife and yeeldeth to her motion to goe in unto Hagar which proceded from want of due consideration of Gods power who though Saraâ— hitheto had beene barren yet was able and so accordingly did to make heâ— fruitfull Thus David who withstood many tentations yeelded to the pleasure of the flesh therefore as the Apostle saith He that thinketh he standeth let him take heed lest he fall 1 Cor. 10.10 Muscul. 3. Observ. Not to be proud of Gods gifts Vers. 4. HEr dame was despised Hagar waxeth insolent and proud of this blessing bestowed upon her whereby Gregory well noteth such as are puffed up and swell with pride in respect of their gifts as also it is a great example of ingratitude in despising her which was the first occasion of this benefit Calvin 4. Observ. Domesticall contention Vers. 5. THou doest me wrong c. We see that even the houses of the faithfull such as this of Abraham was have sometime their domesticall contentions Calvin But as Abraham by his wisdome and discretion qualifieth the intemperate heat of Sarai so men are taught to beare with the infirmities of their wives and as the Apostle saith To dwell with them as men of knowledge and to give honour to them as to the weaker vessell 1 Pet. 3.7 5. Observ. Affliction maketh admonition to be regarded Vers. 8. SAraies maid whence commest thou c. The Angels speech was so much the more seasonable to Hagar being now in some distresse in the wildernesse and feeling some smart for her folly and disobedience So after men have beene afflicted they will more diligently apply their eare to instruction as the Prophet David saith It is good for me that I have beene afflicted that I may learne thy statutes Psal. 119.71 his afflictions brought him to learne more perfectly the statutes of God Muscul. And in this present example it appeareth how fruitfull affliction was for Hagar that before was so proud and lifted up that she knew not her selfe and despised her mistresse is now humbled and calleth upon the name of the Lord vers 13. 6. Observ. Temporall blessings are signes of election Vers. 10. I Will increase thy seed c. Ismael though he were not the chosen seed yet receiveth a goodly temporall blessing to multiply and increase whereby we see that the outward benefits of this life are no signes of Gods speciall favour and eternall election Muscul. As the Preacher saith No man knoweth either love or hatred of all that is before them Eccles. 9.1 that is whether he be loved of God or otherwise no man knoweth by his outward state in the world 7. Observ. The Law must be preached before the Gospell Vers. 9. IN that Hagar it bid first to humble her selfe before the promise is made unto her wee learne that the order of doctrine is to beginne with repentance and then followeth the promise of grace Mercer which order the Prophet observeth Isa. 1.16 18. CHAP. XVIII The Method IN this Chapter is set forth Gods covenant with Abraham which containeth on Gods behalfe promise of grace and protection on Abrahams obedience The covenant on Gods behalfe is propounded generally containing both the promise of God and the foundation thereof Gods sufficiency and the obedience of Abraham in walking uprightly vers 1 2. Then followeth the particular promises which are either offered of God unasked or craved by Abraham The promises offered are three with their severall signes first hee promiseth he should be a father of many Nations yea of Kings and the signe thereof is the change of Abrahams name vers 4. to 7. The second is the promise of the land of Canaan with perpetuall protection of him and his seed vers 7 8. the signe thereof is circumcision where the law and right of circumcision is expressed where they shall be circumcised vers 11. when vers 12. who all males both home-borne and strangers vers 13. wherefore to be a signe of the covenant vers 11. then the perill in neglecting of this covenant is signified vers 14. The third promise offered as concerning the birth of Isaack and the signe thereof the changing of Sarai her name ver 15. to 19. Then followeth the promise craved of Abraham concerning Ismael Lastly Abrahams obedience is declared in circumcising himselfe and Ismael and all the males of his house vers 23. to the end The divers readings v. 1. be pleasing before me S. serve me Ch. walke before me caet sic hebr v. 4. It is I and I will make my covenant c. H.B. behold I have made Ch. I make my covenant make iâ— supplied G. de me concerning me T. heb I and my covenant with thee that is it is I that made this covenant v. 7. I will stablish my covenant betweene my word and thee G. betweene me and thee caet v. 8. The land of thy habitation C.S. of thy peregrination or where thou art a stranger caet hebr ghur to inhabite to be a peregrine v. 15. Thou shalt not call her Sara but Sara S. not Sarai but Sarah caet v. 18. That Ismael might remaine in thy sight C. live in thy sight caet v. 23. All which he had bought H.S. bought with his silver C. with his money T.B.G. casaph silver In the time of the same day S. in the same day caet in the body of that day guetsem body or substance heb The Explanation of doubts QUEST I. Whether this apparition were visible Vers. 1. THe Lord appeared The Angell of God was sent to Agar but the Lord himselfe appeareth to Abraham Mercer This was not a secret revelation made to Abraham but a manifest vision Calvin which was shewed unto Abraham not being in a trance but in some sensible and visible manner as though an Angell in humane shape talked with him this may be gathered both by Abrahams gesture in falling twice upon his face vers 3.17 as though he had seene some divine presence as in that Abraham laughed he was then waking and in the use of his sense not rapt in a trance and further vers 22. God is said to goe up from Abraham that visible Majesty was taken out of his sight Cajetane QUEST II. Of the meaning of the word Shaddai GOd almighty or all sufficient 1. Some derive the word Shaddai here used for dai that signifieth sufficiencie sic Genevens 2. Some from Shad that signifieth a breast or plenty Oleaster 3. Other from Shaddad
be deferred like as the eating of the Passeover might bee put off to the second moneth upon extraordinary occasion as if a man were uncleane or in his journey Num. 9.10 This also appeareth in that for the space of forty yeares all the while that the Israelites sojourned in the wildernesse their children were not circumcised till Iosua his time Iosua 5.5 and the reason is given vers 7. They did not circumcise them by the way they were continually in their journey to remove from place to place and therefore could not conveniently be circumcised But if Moses example be objected whom God would have killed because his sonne was not circumcised the answer is ready that the case is not alike for Moses might either have circumcised his childe before he came forth or he had not such great haste of his way but might have stayed to performe so necessary a worke 6. But whereas the Lord prescribeth the eighth day both some Hebrewes are deceived that thinke the sonnes of bond-servants might be circumcised before and the Ismaelites that circumcised at the age of thirteene yeares QVEST. IX Circumcision found among those which belonged not to the covenant Vers. 13. HE that is borne in thy house and bought with thy money c. All which belonged to the covenant or would have any part among the people of God were circumcised but on the other part it followeth not that all which were circumcised did belong to the covenant as the Ismaelites Egyptians Ammonites Moabites and other people inhabiting neare to Palestina were circumcised as Hierome sheweth upon the 9. chap. of Ieremie vers 26. These people retained circumcision as a rite and tradition of their fathers but not as a signe of the covenant or profession of their faith and obedience QVEST. X. Circumcision not imposed upon strangers FUrther it is here questioned whether the Hebrewes were to compell their servants that were strangers to take upon them the profession of their faith and to be circumcised 1. Tostatus thinketh that their servants might be compelled but not other strangers that dwelt among them but that it is not like for seeing he that was circumcised was a debter of the whole Law Galat. 5. and circumcision was a badge of their profession it was not fit to force any man to take upon him a profession of religion against his desire 2. Cajetane thinketh that servants might be forced to take the outward marke of circumcision though not the spirituall profession thereunto annexed in 12. chap. Exod. But these two cannot be severed as whosoever is now baptized must needs also enter into the profession of Christianity 3. Pererius thinketh aright that the necessity of circumcision was not imposed upon any beside the posterity of Abraham neither that the Hebrewes might force their servants to take circumcision yet he saith that it was lawfull for them to use the ministery of servants uncircumcised as now Christians have Moores and Turks to serve them Perer. disput 5. But herein Pererius is deceived and I preferre the opinion of Thomas Anglicus which he misliketh that it was dangerous for the Hebrewes to be served with men of a divers religion lest they also by them might have beene corrupted 5. Wherefore the resolution is this that as no stranger servant or other was to be forced to circumcision but it must come from his owne desire as it may be gathered Exod. 12.48 so neither were they to receive any uncircumsed person into their house that would not be circumcised this is evident by Abrahams practice that circumcised all his servants both borne and bought with money who no doubt would not have served him if they had not submitted themselves to Gods ordinance againe seeing every one in the house must eat the Passeover Exod. 12.4.19 neither stranger nor borne in the house must eat any leavened bread for the space of seven dayes and yet none could eat the Passeover that was not circumcised vers 48. it followeth that no uncircumcised persons were to bee entertained unlesse they were contented to be circumcised QVEST. XI The penalty for the neglect of circumcision afflicted onely upon the adulti Vers. 14. THe uncircumcised male shall be cut off c. Saint Augustine following the reading of the Septuagint in this place who adde the man childe which is uncircumcised the eighth day which addition is not in the originall doth understand this place of infants and their cutting off he interpreteth of everlasting death to be cut off from the society of the Saints and by the breaking of the covenant would have signified the transgression of Gods commandement in paradise for the not being circumcised saith he Nulla culpa in parvulis Is no fault in little ones and therefore not worthy of so great a punishment and so he urgeth this place against the Pelagians to prove that infants are guilty of originall sinne and therefore have need of remission Lib. 16. de Civit. Dei cap. 27. 1. In that Augustine expoundeth this cutting off of separation from the society of the Saints he interpreteth right some take it for the corporall death some for the extraordinary shortning of their dayes some for excommunication but it is better taken for the cutting off from the society of Gods people now and the fellowship of the Saints afterward for he that should contemne circumcision being Gods ordinance doth consequently refuse the covenant and grace of God whereof it is a seale and pledge 2. But that exposition of Augustine seemeth to be wrested to referre the breaking of the covenant to Adams transgression 1. The Apostle saith that they sinne not after the like manner of the transgression of Adam Rom. 5.14 2. The Scripture calleth not that prohibition given to Adam a covenant 3. The Lord calleth circumcision his covenant vers 20. what other covenant then is broken but that which the Scripture treateth of here 3. Neither can this place be understood of infants that are uncircumcised 1. That addition the eighth day is used onely by the Septuagint it is not in the Hebrew 2. the words are qui non ciâ—cumciderit hee which shall not circumcise c. so readeth the originall the Chalde paraphrast Iunius c. which sheweth that it must be understood of them that are adulti of yeares of discretion not of infants 3. Abrahams practice sheweth as much who circumcised those that were of yeares 4. Againe to breake the covenant is not incident to children the punishment therefore is not to be inflicted where the offence cannot be committed 5. If Infants be not circumcised it is the parents faults for omitting it not the Infants as may appeare in the example of Moses whom the Lord punished and not the childe for the neglecting of that Sacrament QUEST XII Whether Abraham laughed through incredulitie Vers. 17. ABraham fell upon his face and laughed 1. This was not onely an inward rejoycing of the minde as the Chalde translateth for Abraham indeed
it is most like that Noah was exercised in most excellent workes yet Moses omitteth to speake of them as also of the rest godly succeeding fathers because he hasteth to the story of faithfull Abraham who was diversly honoured of God 1. in being selected to be the father of his people and visible Church 2. hee received the visible signe of the covenant circumcision whereby the people of God should be distinguished from all other 3. to him were given most rich promises both temporall for the possession of the land of Canaan and spirituall concerning the Messiah 5. But whereas it pleased some of the fathers to turne this story of Noahs drunkennesse to an allegory resembling the Jewes to the true vine that Noah planted Christ to Noah that was cast into the sleepe of death by his owne people the Jewes deriding Christ infirmâ—ties and sufferings upon the crosse to C ham scorning his fathers nakednesse I hold it not safe wading without a bottome and therefore I omit these allegoricall applications as mens fancies and so leave them 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Liberty granted to eat flesh Vers. 3. EVery thing that moveth shall bee meat for you Here this liberty to eat flesh is granted to all wherefore for religion sake for we speak not of the prohibition politicall to forbid the eating of some meats infringeth this liberty granted by the Lord. Calvin 2. Doct. The prohibition of not eating of bloud not perpetuall Vers. 4. FLesh with the life thereof Tertullian writeth that in his time it was counted an heinous thing to taste the bloud of beasts but we must know that this prohibition was not perpetuall but for those times the better afore hand to inure them to beare the yoke of Legall ceremonies afterward to be given The Apostles likewise willed for a time the forbearance from strangled and bloud only because of offending the beleeving Jewes but these ceremoniall observations as touch not taste not handle not are now abolished in Christ. Coloss. 2.21 3. Doct. The liberty of marriage generall Vers. 7. BRing forth fruit and multiply Here the liberty of marriage is granted to all this blessing of increasing and multiplying is given to all Noahs posterity of all sorts and degrees wherefore the Papall restraint of marriage in some callings and degrees is contrary to the divine indulgence and permission in this place Oâ—colampad 4. Doct. The word and Sacraments must be joyned together Vers. 12. THis shall bee the signe of my covenant Here wee see the word and the signe or Sacrament goe together first the Lord maketh a covenant and then addeth a signe as a seale thereof for better assurance The Chalde paraphrast interpreteth not amisse this shall bee a signe betweene my word and the earth Wherefore the edifying word must goe before and the Sacraments concurre as seales 5. Doct. In the visible Church hypocrites mingled with the faithfull Vers. 22. WHen C ham the father of Canaan We see that in the visible Church the wicked are mixed together with the faithfuâ—l as in Adams family there was a Caine with an Abel so in Noahs house there is a Cham for a Sem. So the Apostle saith in a great house there are vessels of gold and vessels of silver some of honour some of dishonour The Church of God shall not be purged from all drosse in this life till it be made a glorious spouse without spot and wrinkle in the kingdome of heaven 5. Places of Controversie 1. Confut. No wickednesse to eat flesh Vers. 3. EVery thing that moveth That which God permitteth is lawfull therefore Ovid was deceived that thus writ heu quantum scelus est in viscera condi c. it is a wicked thing in deed with other flesh our bellies to feed How can that be counted a wicked thing which the Lord alloweth 2. Confut. Of negative doctrine 2. WHereas it is a common objection of the Papists that the Protestants doctrine and principles be altogether negative if it were so which to be otherwise is other where shewed at large yet it might be warranted by this place whereas Pererius a man of their owne side though more reasonable than the rest confesseth that there are two precepts given to man and both negative the one morall and perpetuall not to shed mans bloud v. 5. the other ceremoniall and temporary not to eat flesh with the bloud 3. Confut. The covenant belongeth to infants though presently they want Faith Vers. 12. BEtweene me and every living thing to perpetuall generation c. If God make a covenant even with unreasonable creatures that have no understanding it is no sufficient reason to exclude infants from the covenant as the Anabaptists doe because presently they want faith And seeing God made not this covenant only with that present age but with the generations following why should not the covenant of grace be extended also unto infants which are the succeeding generation Calvin 4. Confut. Noahs drunkennesse not without sinne Vers. 21. HE was drunken and uncovered c. Pererius noteth here ebrietatem Noe excusandum est ab omni peccato that Noahs drunkennesse must be excused from all sinne because it was involuntary and proceeded of ignorance for he never is read to have beene drunke againe But this is a very corrupt glosse for admit that Noah was ignorantly overtaken of the force of wine which yet is not sufficiently proved yet ignorance excuseth not aÌ„ toto sed a tanto from all sinne but from a greater sinne the sinne is not adnihilate that is made no sinne by ignorance but onely extenuate made a lesse sin unlesse they will in like manner excuse the incest of Lot from all sin because it was involuntary 2. What though Noah committed not the like afterward no more did Iudas lye any more with his daughter in law Thamar Genes 38.26 yet that did not exempt his unchast action from sinne no more doth this Noahs intemperancy 3. We are not afraid therefore to the glory of God to confesse the infirmities of holy men which the Scripture hath not concealed and wee say with Ambrose Patriarchae nos instruunt non solum docentes sed errantes the Patriarkes instruct us not only teaching but erring 5. Confut. Popish Bishops not the fathers of the Church and therefore may be discovered Vers. 23. BY the example of Sem and Iapheth covering their fathers nakednesse Pererius againe noteth that the like piety should be shewed toward our spirituall fathers the Bishops of the Church as Constantine said that if he should find a Bishop committing adultery hee would rather cover that uncleane act with his cloake than others should be offended c. Ans. 1. True it is that if those popish Bishops which he speaketh of were the fathers indeed and shepherds of the Church such as Constantine meaneth and not rather the Ministers of Antichrist and devourers of the flock their infirmities should be covered Calvin 2. If their
of faith Rom. 4.11 as also analogicall in representing the Sacrament of Baptisme that should come in the place thereof So the Apostle collecteth In whom ye are circumcised with circumcision not made with hands c. in that ye are buried with him through baptisme Coloss. 2.11 12. he maketh circumcision and baptisme one to answer another QVEST. V. How circumcision is said to be eternall Vers. 13. MY covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant c. It is called everlasting not because simply this signe was to endure for ever as some thinke that for this cause circumcision yet remaineth among the Jewes who are now usurpers of this ceremonie which by right is extinguished in Christ. But it is said to be eternall 1. conditionally and according to the nature of the subject that so long as the covenant indured whereof it was a signe so long the signe should remaine but the first covenant or testament being determined in Christ the date also of the signe is expired 2. It is eternall in respect of that which it signified which is indeed eternall the grace of God in Christ Calvin 3. It may be said to be eternall in respect of the perpetuall supply thereof namely baptisme which shall continue while the Church hath a being on earth Mercer QVEST. VI. Why circumcision was to determine in Christ. NOw further whereas the Jewes calumniate the Christians because they have abrogated circumcision it shall appeare by these reasons that at the comming of Christ circumcision in right was to cease 1. Chrysostome yeeldeth this reason that circumcision being given to the Israelites as a marke of separation and distinction from other Nations this marke was no longer to bee in use than while such separation continued But now in Christ as the Apostle saith There is neither Iew nor Grecian Galat. 2.28 the wall of partition is taken away therefore the badge of this separation should likewise be removed 2. The signe was to endure no longer than the covenant whereof it was a signe but the covenant is abrogated as the Apostle alleageth out of the Prophet Behold the dayes will come saith the Lord that I wil make with the house of Israel a new testament c. Heb. 8. vers 8. and so he concludeth vers 13. In that hee saith a new testament he hath abrogated the old 3. The Apostle thus reasoneth if the Priesthood be changed of necessity then must be a change of the Law Heb. 7.12 If all the ceremonies of the Law at the change of the Priesthood must be altered then circumcision also among the rest for if circumcision remained the whole Law should still be in force Galat. 5.3 He that is circumcised is bound to keepe the whole Law 4. The externall circumcision of the flesh was a type of the internall circumcision of the heart wrought in us by Christ the bodie now being come the spirituall circumcision the shadow that is the carnall should cease as Ambrose saith oportuit circumcisione ex parte fieri ante ejus adventum qui totum hominem circumcidere post cessare It was meet that circumcision in part should be kept before he came which should circumcise the whole man and then to cease Epist. 77. 5. Lastly the same Ambrose giveth this reason Donec pratium pro omnib hominib dominici sanguinis effusione solveretur opus fuit singulorum sanguine c. till the price in shedding of Christs bloud was payed for all men it was fit that every mans bloud should be shed to fulfill the rite and custome of the Law but after Christ had suffered there was no more need of circumcision in every mans bloud Cum in Christi sanguine circumcisio universorum celebrata sit When in Christs bloud the circumcision of all men once for all was celebrated QVEST. VII Why the fore-skinne was commanded to be circumcised Vers. 11. YE shall circumcise the fore-skinne of your flesh 1. Two speciall reasons may be alleaged why that part which was the instrument of generation was commanded to be circumcised first because the promise was made to Abraham that in his seed all Nations should be blessed the Messiah was promised to come out of Abrahams loynes Calvin Secondly the signe was there placed to shew the corruption and contagion of mans nature that there the remedy should be ministred where the disease reigned Muscul. Ambrose addeth a third reason Vt iiâ— quâ— ignobiliora membra putarentur majorem honestaâ—em circundarent That upon those parts which seemed more base or vile more comelinesse should be put on 2. Some might be borne circumcised by nature as the Hebrewes doe affirme of Sem that hee was so borne but of this assertion there is no ground the other is naturall yet but rare 3. Likewise when the foreskinne was circumcised once it might by art be drawne over againe as Epiphanius collecteth out of Saint Paul 1 Cor. 7.18 If any man be called being circumcised let him not gather uncircumcision and mention is made of some 1 Maccab. 1.16 that renounced circumcision and made themselves uncircumcised It was also an usuall thing as Epiphanius witnesseth for the Samaritans to circumcise againe those that came from the Jewes and Jewes such as came from the Samaritans this practice of drawing againe the fore-skinne that was circumcised is thought by Epiphanius to have beene invented by Esau to deny his profession and to raze out his circumcision ex Pererie QVEST. VIII Why circumcision was tyed to the eighth day Vers. 12. EVery man childe of eight dayes old c. Why circumcision was tyed to the eighth day these reasons are yeelded 1. Chrysostome alleageth these two because that circumcision in infants their bodies being not yet come to the growth might be better endured and with lesse danger as also to shew that the circumcision of the body did not profit the soule seeing infants had no understanding of that which was done but was a signe onely of grace hom 39. Genes 2. Others doe make a mystery of it referring this eighth day to the resurrection of Christ who rose upon the eighth day by whom we have circumcision sic Augustine lib. 16. de Civit. Dei cap. 26. 3. But the best reason is this because the infant before the eighth day was not of sufficient strength to endure that paine and therefore it was provided that young cattell should be seven dayes with the damme before they were offered Levit. 22.27 because they were yet but tender And againe it was not fit to deferre circumcision longer because the body of the infant waxing stronger should be put to the more paine Perer. Calvin 4. Circumcision was not upon any occasion then to be ministred before the eighth day but infants dying without circumcision might have inwardly supplyed that which was outwardly wanting by the grace of election and force of Gods covenant made to the faithfull and their seed 5. Yet necessity so urging circumcision might
laughed 2. Neither did this laughter of Abraham shew any infidelitie and unbeliefe in him as Chrysostome thinketh and some others who make Abrahams and Sarahs laughter all one infidelitate peccavit sanctus Abraham c. Holy Abraham saith he sinned by infidelity and therefore his seed was punished 400. yeares with servitude 6. homil de poenitent The same also is the opinion of Hierome that Abrahams laughing his speech shall Sarah that is ninetie yeare old beare his wish and prayer for Ismael did declare his incredulity lib. 3. cont Pelag. But the Apostle cleareth Abraham of all such imputation of unbeleefe where he saith Rom. 4.19 alluding to this place He was not weake in faith v. 21. being fully assured that he which had promised was also able to doe it And if Abrahams laughter had proceeded from doubtfulnesse God would not have named Isaack of such laughter in the which name Rasi noteth many mysteries in the letters jod signifieth the ten tentations of Abraham â—sadds the age of Sarah of ninetie yeare cheth the eighth day for circumcision coph an hundred yeares which was Abrahams age 3. Neither did Abraham at the first doubt but afterward was confirmed in the faith which is the opinion of Ioannes Arboreus reported by Pererius for the Apostle doth free Abraham also from all doubting either first or last Rom. 4.20 Neither did hee doubt of the promise of God through unbeleefe 4. Neither is Cajetans conceit to be admitted whereunto Pererius seemeth to subscribe that Abraham doubted not of the truth of Gods promise or of his power but onely he doubted whether the promise were to be taken literally or mystically in chap. 17. Gen. for what reason had Abraham to thinke of any mysticall sense if he beleeved that God would and could literally and properly make good his word And Saint Paul sheweth that Abraham understood the promise properly and literally when he saith that he considered not his owne body which was now dead being almost an hundred yeare old nor the deadnesse of Sarahs wombe Rom. 4.19 5. Neither yet can I fully consent to Ambrose and Rupertus that doe discharge Abraham of all manner of doubtfulnesse as Ambrose saith that whereas Abraham prayeth for Ismael he did not doubt of Gods promise to receive a sonne by Sarah but desireth that Ismael also may live sic superabundet gratia and so Gods grace might abound the more Rupertus saith that whereas Abraham said shall a sonne be borne to him that is an hundred yeare old Non dubitando dixit sed suam faelicitatem admirando He doubted not in so saying but admiring his owne happinesse for there appeareth some difficulty and hesitation in Abrahams speech seeing hee objecteth with himselfe the same thing which Sarah did shall a childe bee borne to him that is an hundred yeare old as Sarah said shall I certainly beare a childe that am old Gen. 19.13 though Abraham yeelded not to this objection as Sarah did neither shewed so great weaknesse in doubting and therefore was not reproved as Sarah was 6. Wherefore the best solution is that these objections and doubts in Abraham proceeded not from want of faith but Abraham feeling in himselfe a sight betweene faith and carnall sense striveth against humane reason and overcommeth these motions at the first and so was strengthened as the Apostle saith in the faith and his faith was thereby made more glorious Calvin There was then in Abraham a strife betweene his naturall reason which wondred that he at an hundred yeare should have a sonne of Sarah and his faith which beleeved that God was able to doe it yet in this cogitation he remained not long his faith prevailed QVEST. XIII Whether Abraham were circumcised first or last Vers. 23. THen Abraham tooke Ismael c. 1. It is questioned whether Abraham were circumcised first to give good example or last which I thinke rather with the Hebrewes because Abraham had beene unfit by reason of his cutting to circumcise others but it is certaine he beganne first with his owne sonne Ismael to make the other more willing 2. Abraham alone could not circumcise all his family therefore it is like that thereto be used the helpe of others as the Jewes to this day use Chirurgians which are skilfull in cutting to circumcise their children 3. Abraham the same day doth circumcise his family to testifie to the world that he was not ashamed of the badge of his profession and to shew his prompt obedience in not deferring the commandement whereupon to this day the Jewes circumcise in the day not in the night Mercer 4. Places of doctrine 1. Doct. Our faith must rest onely upon Gods words Vers. 4. BEhold I make my covenant c. Wee learne that our faith must depend onely upon Gods word as here the Lord would have Abraham to consider who it was that made this covenant with him behold I c. We must not then greatly regard what man saith but the word of God must be our warrant As our Saviour maketh this opposition You have heard that it was said to you of old time c. but I say unto you Mat. 5.27 sic Calvin 2. Doct. the Sacraments called by the name of the things Vers. 10. THis is my covenant That is the signe of my covenant so the Sacraments are called by the name of the things which they represent because they are not naked and bare signes but doe verily seale unto us the promise of God In the same sense and by the like figure called metonymiâ— doth our Saviour call the bread his body saying This is my body whereof it was a figure onely and representation Mercer 3. Doct. Difference betweene externall and internall calling in the Church Vers. 7. I Will establish my covenant betweene me and thee and thy feed after thee in their generations c. All then that were of Abrahams seed by Isaack did belong to the externall covenant and Church of God and therefore are called in generall by our Saviour the children of the Kingdome yet the covenant of grace appertained onely to those that received it by faith and so were the children of faithfull Abraham as Saint Paul saith They which are the children of the flesh are not the children of God but the children of the promise are counted for the seed Rom. 9.8 Calvin 4. Doct. Baptisme the Sacrament of regeneration belongeth to Infants Vers. 12. EVery man-childe of eight dayes old shall be circumcised c. From hence the baptisme of Infants which commeth in the place of circumcision is most pertinently proved against the grosse errour of the Anabaptists for as then Infants were circumcised to shew the contagion of the nature from the which they were cleansed by the circumcision of the spirit so even Infants now being guiltie of originall corruption have need of the Sacraments of regeneration 5. Doct. Gods purpose and promise towards vs should not stay our prayers Vers. 20. COncerning Ismael I
have heard thee c. God had promised before to Hagar that he would greatly increase her seed Gen. 16.10 and yet here it is ascribed to the prayer of Abraham whereby we learne that we are to pray even for those things which we know God purposeth toward us as our Saviour saith Your heavenly father knoweth whereof ye have need before ye aske of him Matth. 6.8 yet in the same place he teacheth his Apostles to pray Mercer 5. Places of Confutation 1. Confut. Against adoration of Angels Vers. 3. ABraham fell on his face and God talked with him If it were an Angell that in the person of God talked with Abraham then was this no gesture of adoration in that Abraham fell upon his face for the Angels will not suffer men to worship them Revel 22.9 But if they will needes have it adoration then it was God that talked with him and not an Angell as the words of the text insinuate Muscul. 2. Conf. The circumcision of the male how it served also for the use of the female Vers. 12. EVery man child of â—ight daies c. Though the males only were circumcised because the beginning of generation and so of originall corruption was from them yet it served also for the signe of the covenant for the female sexe because the woman is of the man as the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 11.8 and so was circumcised in the man But hence it followeth not that sacraments now may be applyed to the use and benefit of such as receive them nor which is an usuall thing in the popish Church because there is now no such reason or meanes of communicating the sacraments to the not receivers as circumcision both by the intention of the Author and order of nature in the male was forcible also in the other sex 3. Confut. Sacraments doe not actually conferre grace HEnce also it is evident that Sacraments doe not actually conferre the grace of Justification or remission of sinnes because Abraham was not justified by his circumcision But he was first justified by faith and afterward received circumcision the seale thereof as S. Paul sheweth Rom. 4.10 11. This Irenaeus concludeth Quod non per circumcisionem justificabatur homo sed in signum data est populo clarum fuit judicium ipse Abraham qui ante circumcisionem justificatur c. That man was not justified by circumcision but it was given as a signe to the people Abraham is a cleare evidence who was justified before circumcision Chrysostome also rendring a reason why Infants were circumcised thus writeth Altera causa fuit ut re ipsa discerâ—mus nihil animae circumcisionem illam profuisse sed eam signum tantum gratia esse factam c. Another cause is that we should learne that the circumcision did not profit the soule but was onely a signe of grace for children when they understand not what is done to them can reape no profit thereby to their soules Hence also is confuted the note of some Hebrewes that Abraham chap. 17. vers 1. is bidden to be perfect because he had not yet received circumcision whereby he was made perfect for circumcision was no cause but a signe of his election in the covenant Mercer 4. Confut. Baptisme wheretâ— it excelleth circumcision WHerefore whereas Pererius sheweth a threefold preeminence of Baptisme beyond circumcision 1. In the facility or easinesse of it because it is not so painfull to the flesh as circumcision was 2. In the universality and liberty for baptisme is free for both sexes for all Nations that professe Christ at all times circumcision belonged onely to the Israelites and to males and was tied to the eighth day 3. In the efficacie because baptisme absolveth a man from all sinne and the punishment thereof c. We willingly acknowledge the two first points of preeminence but such an efficacie actually to give remission of sinnes neither circumcision had then nor baptisme now for it would then follow that every one that is baptised is surely saved his sinnes being remitted or else that his sinnes being remitted may returne againe But God useth not where hee hath once forgiven sinnes to remember them any more Esech 18.22 Baptisme then we confesse significationâ— in signification and representation is more rich than circumcision was for washing is a more lively resemblance of our cleansing in the bloud of Christ and it is a commemoration of a benefit performed whereas circumcision was a type of the same to be exhibited But otherwise for the efficacie there is no difference they both are seales and confirmations of faith for the remission of sinnes nor actuall conferrers and bestowers of grace 5. Confut. Abraham the first that received circumcision FUrther Herodotus is here found to be in an errour that thinketh that the Egyptians were the first that were circumcised and that the Jewes received it from them Whereas it is evident that Abraham was the first that received circumcision by the commandement of God himselfe and that the Egyptians above 200. yeare after learned it of the Hebrewes that sojourned with them above 200. yeares more 6. Confut. Neither Circumcision under the Law nor Baptisme under the Gospell absolutely necessary Vers. 14. THe uncircumcised male c. shall be cut off c. This place I shewed before quest 1. to be understood not of children that were uncircumcised which was their parents fault and not theirs but of such as were adulti of yeares therefore it is no good reading to say the uncircumcised man childe but the male Zachar for the infant of eight dayes old mentioned vers 12. is of purpose omitted here Hence then it is inferred that there was no such absolute necessity of circumcision that children wanting it should be damned 1. For the children of Israel were not circumcised for the space of fortie yeares all the time of their sojourning in the wildernesse Ios. 5.6 Neither is it noted to have beene any fault to neglect it because they were continually in their journey So they were charged to keepe the Passeover by an ordinance for ever and whosoever kept it not as it was prescribed should be cut off Exod. 12.14 15. yet upon extraordinary occasion as of some uncleannesse or by reason of a long journey they might deferre the eating of the Passeover till the foureteenth day of the second moneth Numb 9.10 11. yea it is evident that the Passeover after the first institution was but once kept in the wildernesse for the space of forty yeares namely in the first moneth of the second yeare Num. 9. 1. And it was not celebrated againe till Iosua his time Iosua 5.10 after they were entred into the land of Canaan 2. Cajetane a popish Writer giveth good evidence here Consentaneum est ut non puniatur nisi qui culpam admisit infantes antem nullam possunt admittere culpam proinde poena hic designata adsolos adultos spectat ut ii solum merito
And so Augustine giveth the solution of this place Non itaque quod ajit in servitutem redigent eos c. ad quadringentos annos referendum est c. In that it is said they shall hold them in servitude it must not bee referred to the foure hundred yeeres as though they kept them in servitude so many yeeres but the foure hundred yeeres must bee referred to that which is said thy seede shall be a stranger in a land not theirs August quaest 47. in Exod. QUEST LVI That the Israelites dwelt not 430. yeeres in Egypt only SEcondly it is not to be supposed that the Israelites dwelt in Egypt all this space of 430. yeeres which is the opinion of Genebrard who thinketh that this terme taketh beginning from the comming of Iacob into Egypt and expireth with the time of their deliverance and departure thence his reasons are these 1. Because in this place it is so affirmed that the Israelites dwelt so long in Egypt 2. As also that it is not like that in the space of 215. yeeres which is the time according to the common opinion of their abode in Egypt of seventy persons they could increase into so great a multitude Contra. 1. In this place a figurative speech must needes be admitted for wee must understand not only the time of Israels sojourning in Egypt but of their fathers also in the land of Canaan as Augustine saith these words must be expounded Manifestum est computandum esse tempus Patriarcharum Abrahâ— c. It is manifest that the time of the Patriarks Abraham Izhak Iakob must bee accounted when they began to sojourne in the land of Canaan quaest 47. in Exod. But of this more afterward 2. Neither is it impossible or improbable even without a miracle for so many thousands in the space of 215. yeeres to bee multiplied as is shewed before at large quest 5. in chap. 1. And Augustine giveth two reasons thereof Si fâ—cunditas hominis consideretur adjuvante illo qui illos valde voluit multiplicari reperietur non esse mirum The fecundity of men considered God also helping who would have them exceedingly to increase it will bee found not to be strange Now that the Israelites could not continue 430. yeeres in Egypt these two arguments doe evidently convince 1. Whereas Caath was one of those which came with Iacob into Egypt who lived 133. yeeres and his sonne Amram 137. yeeres and Moses his sonne was 80. yeere old at the departure of Israel out of Egypt all these yeeres put together make but 350. from which summe must bee deducted the yeeres wherein they lived together Genebrard answeres that their yeeres are only reckoned after they begat children and that some may be omitted that came betweene as S. Matthew leaveth out in his genealogy three Kings Ahaziah Ioas and Amasiah This answer of Genebrard may easily be taken away for neither is it the use of Scripture when it setteth downe the yeeres of a mans life to name onely the yeeres when he begate children and seeing in that line from Levi to Moses no other persons are elsewhere named that came betweene beside Caath and Amram it is a conjecture without ground to imagine any other But the omission of these three in S. Matthewes genealogy is evident because wee finde them elsewhere in the stories of the Kings to be set downe Perer. 2. S. Paul beginneth these 430. yeeres from the promise and covenant that was made to Abraham Galath 3.17 Therefore Israel stayed not all those yeeres in Egypt Genebrard here answereth that where the Apostle saith the law which was 430. yeeres after this word after is not referred to the covenant but to the law that came 430. yeeres after that is from the departure of the Israelites Contra. But this is a manifest wresting of the Apostles words who of purpose maketh a comparison betweene the law and the covenant of grace shewing that salvation dependeth not of the law but of the grace and promise of God which came 430. yeeres before And whereas the Apostles words in that order which hee set them downe are these This I say that the covenant 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 confirmed afore of God the Law made after foure hundred and thirty yeeres could not disanull what other sense can be made of these words but that the law was given so many yeeres after the promise for after must of necessity have relation to that which is said to have beene before which was not the departure of the Israelites not here so much as mentioned but the covenant said to be before ratified and confirmed of God Pererius QUEST LVII The Israelites dwelt in Egypt 215. yeeres only FUrther that the Israelites neither stayed in Egypt under 200. yeeres as Chrysostome thinketh nor yet 210. only as the Hebrewes to whom Lyranus and Cajetanus give consent nor yet 230. yeeres as Calvin but 215. yeeres only it may be thus made to appeare First from the first promise made to Abraham unto the going of Israel out of Egypt are 430. yeeres according to the Apostles account of this summe there were 215. yeeres gone before Iacob descended into Egypt Abraham at 75. received the promise 25. yeeres after when Abraham was 100. yeere old was Isaack borne he at 60. begate Iacob Iacob at 130. went downe into Egypt these yeeres put together 25.60.130 make in all 215. yeeres there remaineth then the other halfe of the summe 215. yeeres more for the sojourning of Israel in Egypt Thus Augustine reckoneth approving Eusebius account quaest 47. in Exod. Secondly whereas the yeeres of Coath Amram and Moses when Israel came out of Egypt doe make as is before shewed all together 350. yeeres but from this summe must be subtracted the yeeres wherein they lived together as from Coaths age of 133. yeeres who at 65. yeeres begate Amram as Epiphanius thinketh the residue wherein he lived together with Amram that is 68. yeeres must bee deducted and from Amrams age of 137. who at 70. yeeres begat Moses as Epiphanius the residue must likewise bee defaulked which are 67. yeeres adde unto these yeeres 65. of Coath and 70. yeeres of Amram 80. yeeres of Moses life and wee shall have the said summe of 215. yeeres all the time of the sojourning of Israel in Egypt QUEST LVIII That the Israelites were not in bondage and servitude in Egypt all the foresaid terme of 215. yeeres THis being then made plaine that the Israelites after Iacobs comming downe thither continued in Egypt 215. yeeres yet were they not so long in servitude and bondage 1. Augustine thinketh that they served in Egypt 144. or 145. yeeres for from the whole summe of 215. yeeres hee onely deducteth 71. yeeres of Iosephs life after Israel came into Egypt after whose death hee thinketh their bondage immediately began But that cannot bee for not onely Ioseph but all his brethren also were first dead Exod. 1.6 of the which Levi being about foure yeere elder than