insisted so much upon the Conditionality of Works and wherein it 's said they continued not viz. In the Mount Sinai Covenant which God gave them when he brought them out of Egypt Heb. 8.9 4. In regard of that sort of Promises which they stood encouraged by to the performance of this External Obedience they were usually Temporal Blessings only and the Threats and Curses denounced against Disobedience was usually in rsepect of outward things though under all this Cloudiness and Conditionality the Covenant of Promise was applied in its Absolute Nature as at first revealed to Adam and Abraham which was to all the Elect living before Christ the Ministry of the quickning Spirit and a Savour of Life 15. The Original Contract of this Covenant before the World was is by some called the Covenant of Redemption and distinguisht from the Covenant of Grace but such do greatly mistake for both the Original Contract and the Manifestation thereof are one and the same Covenant there 's no Specifick Difference that which is is but secundum adjuncta Ordinis Manifestationis Neonom Next to the Doctrine of Imputation which I think I have sufficiently cleared up according to my Scheme and fully and rightly stated Truths and Errours in those Points Let us now Debate the Conditionality of the Covenant of Grace This being a Point of Great Concern I shall premise an Enquiry nto some particulars for the explaining this Subject Q. 1. What is the Covenant of Grace D. W. C. 8. p. 53. A. 1. It is not the Covenant of Redemption between the Father and Spirit as one Party and the Eternal Word the Lord Jesus as the other Party Antinom Who ever put the Father and Spirit on one Party in the Covenant of Grace it's New Divinity and secondly you are very Magisterial in this Negative Position Quadam confidentia non est Virtus ut audacia Methinks the Judgment of the Reverend Divines should have weighed so much with you as not to have blowed it off at one Puff In the Larger Catechism Q. 30. Doth God leave Mankind to perish in a state of Sin and Misery A. God doth not leave all Mankind to perish in the Estate of Sin and Misery into which they fell by the Breach of the first Covenant commonly called the Covenant of Works but of his meer Love and Mercy delivereth his Elect out of it and bringeth them into a state of Salvation by the second Covenant commonly called a Covenant of Grace Q. 31. VVith whom was the Covenant of Grace made A. The Covenant of Grace was made with Christ as the second Adam and in him with all the Elect as his Seed You say That the Covenant Agreement made with Christ was not the Covenant of Grace You call it a Covenant of Redemption as another thing from the Covenant of Grace I acknowledge the Covenant of Grace is a Covenant of Redemption and the Covenant you call the Covenant of Redemption is the Covenant of Grace and therefore shall not incumber our Discourse with a Debate about Names but shall affirm that there is no such thing as an Essential Difference between the Covenant of Grace and Redemption the distinction made between them is but Novel at least that it was but lately so generally received for it appears by what is here spoken in this Answer of the Assembly so plainly and positively that they owned but two Covenants that of Works and that of Grace They are only distinguished between the making and manifesting this Covenant of Grace A Covenant hidden or secret and manifest is but distributio ex adjunctis therefore after they had told us that this Covenant of Grace was made with Christ the second Adam and with all the Elect as his Seed They enquire next Q. 32. How is the Grace of God manifest in the second Covenant A. The Grace of God is manifested in the second Covenant in that he freely provideth and offereth to Sinners a Mediator and Life and Salvation by him c. So that the Covenant of Grace contains all Grace and Mercy Redemption and the offer and application thereof Neonom Were this Covenant understood I think many well meaning People would be undeceived In that Covenant i. e. of Redemption all the Causes of Man's Salvation are adjusted and secured all Satisfaction and Merit are on Christ as his undertaking c. Antinom It seems then this well-meaning Assembly was deceived and many Able Divines besides who have not admitted of this Novel Distinction between the Covenant of Redemption and that of Grace 2. You talk at least very improperly that the causes of Man's Salvation are adjusted and secured in the Covenant of Redemption which placeth it before Election for I take the Grace of Election to be the first adjusting and securing cause of Mens Salvation and not so only but of the Covenant it self made with Christ I thought all the causes were sufficiently adjusted in the Councel of God's Will and that by the purpose of Grace they were secured to us and Redemption too Christ's Undertaking the charge of Satisfaction and Merit is a cause of our Salvation not adjusting and securing it they were adjusted and secured before Neonom Yea it 's provided there that the Elect shall obey the terms of Life and certainly possess Salvation Antinom 1. It 's manifest that you esteem not Redemption one of the Terms of Life but some other Terms distinct from it I had thought that Christ's Righteousness had been the great condition of our Life and Salvation but it seems it 's but provision for the performing the Terms of Life 2. I thought it had been provided in Election that all the Elect should certainly believe and obey the Gospel but it seems by what you say here they were only conditionally Elected and provision made in the Covenant of Redemption that they should perform the Condition and obey the Term very improper it's to perform the Terms Now what is in such a Covenant of Grace more than Adam's would have had if he had stood for God must have provided that he should obey or perform the Terms of Life which were to him very small and easie no more than giving a Pepper-corn or not so much only to forbear plucking and eating an Apple when he had enough besides There 's no Essential Difference in your Opinion for where-ever the Creature performs a Condition of a Covenant of God's making God must provide for that performance by Grace given and confirmed Neonom Yea as that Covenant was not made with the Elect though for the Elect so they have nothing to do as a Condition of this Covenant Antinom Rare Divinity Mens tua sublimis supra genus eminet ipsum 1. You say that Covenant was not made with the Elect. The Assembly say it was made with the second Adam and his Seed but you I suppose deny Christ to be a second Adam a publick Person and a Spiritual or Mystical Root 2. I would fain
received by us in this Covenant between the Father and Son the Gift of the Spirit the Grace of Faith Justification by his Blood by him came all Grace yea all other supposed Grace that came not from the Father and through Christ is no Grace and will not profit us 7. Where the Covenanters Condition and Promises are all from Grace and Love to us there 's a Covenant of Grace but in that which you call a distinct Covenant of Redemption the Covenanters the Conditions and Promises are of Free Grace and Love to us God the Father from his Free Grace and Love to us called his Son to this Undertaking and Covenanting with him God the Son in our Person from his Love and Free Grace Covenanted with his Father he came and freely offered himself to perform the Covenant condition The condition of this Covenant in all Mediatorial Perfections and Performances is freely promised and bestowed upon us The Promise of Eternal Life all Grace and Glory are promised and given in this Covenant That is a Covenant of Grace wherein God is to us a God of all Grace 8. If the Covenant of Redemption be not the Covenant of Grace then there is more Covenants than the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace for Life and Salvation but there is no more Covenants for our Life and Salvation but that of Works and that of Grace The Minor I think hardly any will deny but if it be said there was Moses Mount Sinai Covenant that was but a darker and faultier Dispensation of the Covenant of Grace in the Moral and Ceremonial Law if Church Covenants be alledged under the Law or Gospel they add nothing to this grand Covenant but are Accomplishments of the Promises thereof to whom it doth belong it being promised that they shall be God's People in this Covenant Christ stipulates and we in him as we did in the first Adam then when we believe we stipulate moved thereto from the Grace of the Promise and enter personally into this Covenant embracing that Covenant which was made for us in Christ it 's called laying hold of it It is solemnly also owned professed and restipulated to when we enter into Church Fellowship repeated Restipulations and Renewings of the same Covenant may be without changing the Covenant for as we find God often repeats this Covenant and renews it with his People in Revelation and Establishment as with Adam Noah Abraham Isaac and Jacob yet it was but the same Covenant so are God's Children excited and encouraged thereto from the Free Grace of the said Covenant I shall not here enlarge any further but refer the Reader to that Excellent Treatise of the Reverend Mr. Petto concerning the Covenants where C. 2. p. 18. he gives us this account of the Covenant of Grace viz. The Covenant of Grace was made and established not only with us but jointly with Jesus Christ and us in him so that both are within one and the same Covenant for the great Transactions with Jesus yea even the giving and sending of him and his accepting the Office of a Redeemer and undertaking for us these are all of Grace as well as what is promised to us through him therefore the Covenant of Grace must take in all that conduceth otherwise than a meer Decree to our Restauration and Eternal Salvation 1. There is no Scripture Evidence for making these two Covenants one of Suretiship or Redemption with Jesus Christ and another of Grace and Reconciliation made with us that distinction which some use is improper for the parts are coincident seeing that which was with Christ was of meer Grace also John 3.16 And it 's promised that he should be given for a Covenant Isa 42.6 therefore it 's of Grace we are Redeemed by him 2 Tim. 1.9 There was Grace before the World was and that must be in the Covenant as with Jesus Christ which was for Reconciling the VVorld to the Father 2 Cor. 5.18 19. Colos 1.20 21. It 's true Christ only is our Redeemer and Surety not we in our own Persons And Christ hath some peculiar Precepts and Promises appropriated to him which are not afforded to us in the same manner and degree yet this hindereth not the Oneness of the Covenant with him and us 2. The Covenant of Grace was made with Jesus Christ as a Publick Person a Second Adam and therefore with all his Seed in him 3. All in the Covenant as with us is undertaken for and promised in the Covenant as between the Father and the Son and so together make but one Covenant 4. All Covenant Blessings are primarily granted to Christ See more p. 23 c. Neonom Q. 2. What is intended by a Condition A. I answer in the Words of the Worthy Mr. Flavel Discourse of Errors p. 248. An antecedent condition signifies no more than an Act of ours which though it be neither perfect in every degree nor in the least meritorious of the Benefit conferr'd nor performed in our natural Strength yet according to the Constitution of the Covenant it is required of us in order to the Blessing consequent thereupon by vertue of the Promise and consequently the Benefits and Mercies granted in this Order are and must be suspended by the Donor or Disposer of them till it be performed such a Condition we affirm Faith to be Antinom Mr. Flavel was a worthy Man but it may be not without some Hay and Stubble I wish it do not prove an attempting at another Foundation besides Christ 1 Cor. 3.10 11 12 13. You tell us what an antecodent condition is that it signifies no more than an Act of ours and such is Faith I suppose you and he mean in distinction from a consequent condition The Antecedent gains the Estate the Lawyers reckon it the Purchase-Mony the consequent condition keeps it and it 's the Quit-rent which if it be not duly paid the Lord can enter and take to the Estate So that Faith you 'll have to be the Antecedent condition money deposited and laid down before you have any thing of your Spiritual Estate And you say it signifies no more than an Act of ours I pray whose should it be but ours if the condition be to be performed by us And why is this put in it signifies no more Unless the meaning be that Christ's Righteousness should be shut out and it should be reckoned under the nature of this condition meerly as an Act of ours without respect to Christ the Author of it and Christ the true Object of it And now you tell us it 's Negative Qualifications 1. It 's not perfect in every degree What 's the meaning of that This insinuates as if it were perfect in some degrees I had thought no Grace were perfect in degrees tho' as to Kind and Truth But you will have it perfect in some degrees and imperfect in other degrees Pray in what degrees is this condition perfect and in what imperfect And whether
World and turn all Benefits into Conditions We are to talk of a Condition upon which as such all others are Benefits and relative Conditions are given forth by Promise And we say Jehovah our Righteousness is that Condition for which we are blessed with all Blessings in and through him in and through him they are bestowed and all ways and means of bestowing them are Blessings provided in him and bestowed by him that there is a Method of Order in bestowing them and a relative Connexion between them there is as also among the Blessings and Benefits and is no hindrance to the Absoluteness of the Promise A Man gives me an Estate to come gradually to me 20 l. per Annum this year and 20 l. next c. is my having 20 l. per Annum this year the reason by way of condition of my having 20 l. per Annam more the next The Condition of all this Estate is resolved into the Free-Will of the Donor and his purchasing of it for me with his Money As to your consequence it follows you say That all to whom the Offer is made have an Interest in them I deny it utterly in such Offers as God makes for though the Tender of Grace be indefinite yet God knows who are his by Election and Redemption and to them he gives his Son and his Spirit and the first Gift of the Promise to perswade and enable them to come unto Christ Or you say It 's not a Serious Offer viz. To offer Grace upon such Terms and Conditions which the Sinner is not able to perform This Inference will rebound back again upon you for saying That these Conditions are freely wrought of God in us Doth God work these Conditions before he offers them the Grace of the Covenant If so you say something and work them in all too to which they are offered if not it 's not serious as you and the Arminians will say Therefore to support your Hypothesis you must grant a Free-will in Man and Power of himself to perform the said Condition Now it is true you say as not containing a real and natural Connexion between the Benefit and Duty Why so Can 't Benefits be relative and truly connected without there be a Foederal Condition Having Food and Raiment let us therewith be content Contentment is the Benefit here and it 's a Duty and the Condition â—â—od and Raiment a manifest Benefit too and can't these be conâ—â—â—ted without one be a Foederal Condition of the other which wanting the Blessing is not look'd for Then you may say Not having Food and Rayment sufficient I need not be content Know this the Spirit of God makes the Promise the Condition of the Duty As to Abraham I am God All-sufficient walk before me and it s always so if we rightly understand the Language for it first bids us live before it bids us do And this is the difference between the Covenant of Works and that of Grace Neonom 2. Faith it self is no more necessary to our first Interest in those Benefits than any other Grace nay than Vnbelief Let no man object It 's a Sign for so is any other Grace so might be the Description of Paul by his Name by his Abode yea Sin a Persecutor c. D. W. p. 63. Antinom There is an Interest antecedaneous to Faith but hidden yet such as our Faith can never come into being without And as to our Interest by Faith you speak of Christ by Revelation of his Grace in the Gospel makes us Partaker thereof It 's an Interest of Possession and yet a Man may be thrown out of Possession unless he have this antecedent Right and Title to it And the Interest by Possession of and Communion with Christ is greater by Faith than any other way because it 's directed to Christ objectively and receives more eminently Christ himself And though it do so yet it can't be the Condition of receiving Christ That is the very receiving of Christ for the receiving cannot be the Condition of receiving then an Act should be the Condition of it self Neonom Let not any one say it 's a Sign for so is any other Grace and Paul may be known by this Name Abode c. Antinom Faith is for those Uses that Christ hath appointed but he never appointed it for a Moral Foederal Condition For if it be a Condition it 's so as an Act and if as an Act a Duty and as a Duty Moral and so makes your Covenant only a Moral Law Believing is more than a Sign but it 's most naturally so in your Sence for in it's Conditionality you make it but the same with other Graces and Duties But we say Believing is feeding on Christ seeing of him receiving of him and it 's not proper for to say Feeding is a Condition of Feeding Seeing a Condition of Seeing yet it carries it's Evidence with it abundantly because there is Perception of all I see and feed upon Neonom Men are said to enter into Covenant with God Deut. 29.12 13. Psal 50.3 To keep Covenant Psal 103.18 To perform the Covenant 2 Chron. 34.31 To take hold of the Covenant Isa 6.6 Antinom In the Covenants mentioned betwixt God and the Church of the Jews we must always consider the Pedagogy that they were under and that they were under the Covenant of Grace vailed and not only with Levitical Types but Legal Dispensations in respect of Duty And the Apostle tells us that this Ministry was faulty and therefore he saith Christ hath obtained a more excellent Ministry far differing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By so much that he was the Mediator of a better Covenvnt which is established on better Promises Heb. 8.6 For if the first Covenant had been Faultless 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there had been no place found for the Second This Second is not to be understood of the Covenant of Works but the Mosaical Ministry of the Covenant of Grace which is fully expressed in the beginning of the Chapter Neither doth the Apostle mean only the meer Ceremonial part of that Ministry but the morally legal and conditional way of Dispensation like the Covenant of Works And therefore he saith The new Covenant that he would make or promulge by the more excellent Ministry of the Mediator it should be published in the true absolute and unconditional Light of it not according to the Mount-Sinai Covenant upon their coming out of Egypt 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They abode not in that Covenant by performing the conditional Duties 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith the Lord ver 9. i. e. He did not give them those Promises of external good things that he made unto them for the Promises were external for the most part as the Conditions of them were morally Legal 2. Besides these explicit Covenants there were Ecclesiastical Covenants as they were a National Congregational Church and in these Covenants they promised Subjection unto God and Observation of all his
Appointments in that Dispensation whereby God would have them to be visibly a peculiar and separate People and what they did in this kind in a right manner was an Effect and not a Cause of their true Interest in the Covenant of Grace but the Covenant it self as externally made was a National Church-Covenant as appears Deut. 29.15 and so when it was renewed in Joshua's time ch 24. And I think any one that readeth that Solemn Covenant Deut. 29. will see that it carried with it all the Thunder and Lightning of Mount Sinai to enforce it and also the Blessings promised were Temporal and the Conditions were the Duties of the Moral Law and Ceremonies ver 26. Now I wonder that any can pretend that this Covenant was the New Covenant for so it was not in the Sence of the Apostle and that it was a Ministry of the Covenant of Grace any more than in a carnal and legal Dispensation after the manner of the Covenant of Works And you shall find among the great things promised for the strengthening and encouraging of the Faithful one thing was the reforming the external Dispensation of Grace in taking off the Vails and therefore always in those places we have it run as a free absolute Promise and God beginning first with them before any Condition is performed on their parts Ezek. 26.25 I will sprinkle clean water upon you and you shall be clean c. So Exek 27.26 I will make a Covenant of Peace with them and it shall be an everlasting Covenant c. Jer. 31.31 33. Zech. 8.8 Hence all external Covenant-Obligations that the Church makes are effects of this new Covenant-Interest Covenants that they are obliged to and Covenants that in the New Covenant are promised absolutely as their Blessings and Priviledges and in that way commended to Gospel-Churches 2 Cor. 6.16 17 18. I will be their God and they shall be my People It 's all Promise and upon this account they are commanded to walk as a becoming People under such an Obligation of Free Grace laid upon them Yea God always in these Old Testament Covenants made his goodness and kindness to them first as a motive and condition unto them to build their Obedience upon whereby he preached Free-Grace to them Exod. 19.4 ch 20.1 and innumerable other places And you mention places your self which shew our Covenant with God is promised by him Jer. 50.4 5. They shall go and seek the Lord their God They shall ask the way to Zion saying Come let us joyn our selves to the Lord in a perpetual Covenant that shall not be forgotten We grant every Believer doth actually and freely enter into Covenant but it 's because God hath covenanted with him first We are not reconciled to God but upon believing God's Reconciliation to us Therefore the Gospel-Ministry is the Declaration of God's Reconciliation and from thence an Argument to perswade us to be reconciled unto God So it is Ezek. 20.37 Neonom All these Expressions are convincing that there is a restipulation on Man's part and that it is a Covenant in respect of that mutual Stipulation between God and us Antinom It 's a strange thing that most of those Men that quote the Church-Covenant of the Old Testament to make good their Notion of the Covenant of Grace that it 's a moral conditional Covenant are against all Explicit Church Covenants whereby Men that profess Godliness should have an external visible Tie to walk in the Faith and Order of the Gospel which was the main Intent and Design that God had upon his People in the days of the Old Covenant and never intended it as a condition of their Personal Covenant with him but a fruit and consequent after they were in Covenant It 's mightily to derogate from the Covenant of Grace to make the Promise thereof to depend on a stipulation on our part For if we stipulate with God we also promise to him as well as he to us before Performance and likewise that we do our part before he doth his for the Stipitulation is covenanting and for any Man to talk of any such thing runs upon multitudes of Rocks Our radical Stipitulation was in Christ all other Stipitulations are effects of it Neonom To sappose the Covenant to be the sole Act of God and an Act that 's meerly absolute renders all these Phrases impertinent and impossible Antinom The Covenant of Grace is the Act of God in the Person of the Father with us in the Person of Christ in him we did restipulate he was the great Covenanter on our part and the Condition of this Covenant and when we by vertue of the Promise take hold of this Covenant we stand upon this Condition with God and God dispenseth all Benefits upon this Condition to us And it 's a free and absolute Covenant to us a Covenant of Promise because not only the Promise is bestowed without Foederal Conditions performed by our selves and the great Foederal Condition the Lord Christ is freely bestowed on us Neonom It was his Act to appoint a Covenant and enable us to keep it and it 's his Act to restipulate on his part c. Antinom This frees it not from being a Covenant of Works for God appointed Adam's Covenant and gave him strength to keep it which strength he had when God gave him the Law but to talk of God's covenanting with fallen Man in that state and say Man hath restipulated while in a state of Enmity is most absurd Or to say he shall restipulate when God gives him Power so to do is as much as to say I have sold to a Man my Horse for 10 l. and when he brings me that 10 l. he shall have it but hath not a Groat to pay Rags to his Back or Bread for his Belly and he refused my Horse too and hates me with a perfect Hatred yet I will make him willing to take the Horse and I will give him the Money to pay for 't there 's no Man can think this Man hath any other Design than to lose the Honour of giving away his Horse that this Man and all the World should look upon the Horse as purchased and so it was and the Law will find it so for all his giving him the Purchase-Money And it 's no less absurd that God restipulates to our covenanting to make us first in covenanting with God which is contrary to all the Account we have of the Covenant of Grace and when any place speaks so it 's ad hominem and in the Language of the Covenant of Works Neonom Consider the Seals of the Covenant Baptism and the Lord's Supper they seal not absolutely but conditionally Antinom Baptism is for Remission of Sins which is an absolute Gift and it supposeth it given where there 's no Qualification for it and this is an Argument to baptize Infants And if you will have it to Seal the Performance of conditional Duties you must never
God unto Salvation but not as the Cause this were to change the Covenant of Grace into a Covenant of Works our good Works are the effects of Grace the Reward of good Works are a Reward of Grace Good Works are necessary to Salvation as the Way not as an Instrument or Cause Faith is necessary to Salvation as an Instrument The Active and Passive Obedience of Christ is necessary as a meritorious Cause Calvin Mr. Antisozzo I pray do you now speak impartially to this Point Antisozzo I think I have met with his Scheme before now and as I take it it runs thus and the Question that lies before us is this What Influence the Sacrifice of Christs Death and the Righteousness of his Life have upon our acceptance with God The Gentleman that I once disputed with stated the Question so and resolved it as follows Antisozzo p. 580. All that I can find in Scripture about this is That to this we owe the Covenant of Grace That God being well-pleased with the Obedience of Christ's Life and the Sacrifice of his Death for his sake entred into a new Covenant with Mankind wherein he promises pardon of Sin and eternal Life to those who believe and obey the Gospel I think this is exactly your Scheme Mr. Neonomian Neonom Yes and something more D. W. p. 8. viz. That the Gospel barrs all Vnbelievers and dead Sinners from Pardon and Adoption and denounceth the continuance of Condemnation against them limiting it's Benefits to such as believe Antisozzo This Scheme contains three things 1. A Description of the Covenant of Grace 2. An Assertion that this Covenant of Grace is owing to the Sacrifice and Righteousness of Christ 3. A Supposition that this Righteousness and Sacrifice of Christ hath no other Influence upon our acceptance with God but that for his sake he enrted into such a Covenant with Mankind 1. His Description is this A Promise of the pardon of Sin and Eternal Life to those who believe and obey the Gospel Neonom You will not I hope deny this to be a true Description of the Covenant of Grace Antisozzo But I will for all your hast It is a Description so liable to Exceptions that it describes neither the whole of the Covenant nor a New Covenant nor upon the matter any Covenant at all Neonom If you prove what you say Eris mihi magnus Apollo I 'll strike out your Name from my Book and if I can be convinced I must subscribe yours Antisozzo You shall see what I can do presently 1. This Description gives us very little of a true Covenant of Grace For 1. Tho you think to put us off with a Promise of Pardon and Life to those that believe and obey the true Covenant of Grace hath given us a Promise of that Faith whereby we may believe and of that New Heart whereby we are enabled to obey the Gospel And First We have the Promise of the right Faith in the true Covenant John 6.37 Eph. 1.8 And least it should be said Faith is a common Gift as other things are the Apostle hath his reply ready Eph. 1.19 Secondly We have a direct and express Promise too of that New Heart from which we give to God new Obedience Ezek. 36. Ver. 26 27. c. 2. This Description gives but very little of the true Covenant of Grace there 's a Promise of Pardon and Life to them who believe and obey but Perseverance in Faith and Obedience is left to the Desultory and Lubricous Power of Free Will whereas in the true Câ—venant of Grace there 's an Undertaking that the Covenant shall be immutable both on God's part Jer. 32.38 4. God hath said He will not turn away from doing them good And 2ly He hath promised That they shall not depart from him c. p. 583. 2. As it describes not the whole of the Covenant so it describes not the Nature of a new Covenant 1. It describes no New Covenant in opposition to the Old Covenant of Works The Covenant with Adam promised Life upon condition of Oâ—edience and those Commands as easie as those now given to Mankind and much easier too if we consider Adam's Natural Strength 2. We are told by you that Christ hath added to the Moral Law i. e. to the Moral Duties required by the New Law Faith and Repentance which is to lay more Load on those that were overcharged before So that as you make Covenants Adam's was much the better Covenant of the two but you have wisely shuffled in a Promise of the Pardon of Sin which may seem to give this Covenant a Preheminence above that of Adam But that will not mend the matter both because it 's better to have no Sin in our Natures than such a Remedy better to have no Wound than such a Plaister and also because the Promise of Pardon as you say is suspended upon the condition of Faith and Obedience which without a Supernatural real Influx of immediate Divine Power reduceth the Promise to an impossibility of Performance 2ly This Covenant described is no new Covenant in opposition to the Old Administration of the Covenant of Grace there were the same Promises then that we have now the same Moral Precepts that we have now Though the Word Gospel come in for a Blind yet the Apostle assures us the Gospel was preached to Abraham 3. Upon the matter it 's no Covenant of Grace at all p. 584. For 1. A Promise of Pardon and Life upon condition of believing and obeying is neither better nor worse than a Threatning of Condemnation and Death to them who believe not and obey not It may with equal right be called a Threatning of Death as a Promise of Life It 's no more of Grace than a Covenant of Wrath And therefore 2ly If it be lawful to consider Man as the Word of God describes him dead in Sins and Trespasses It 's no Covenant at all to him For what is the nice difference betwixt the Promise of Life to him that obeys when it 's certain before-hand he cannot obey and no Promise at all c. Neonom Well Sir pray let us call another Cause Do you argue like a Voucher to my Book Mr. Calvinist he is a sharp Man and he doth this only for Argumentation sake he is of my mind for all this Antisozzo No do not you believe that you wheadled me in to vouch for your Book I know not how but I shall stick the closer upon your Skirts for that I have not done with you yet Calvin I will then propound one Question to Mr. Antisozzo Whether the Covenant of Grace be owing to the Sacrifice of Christs Death and so be distinct from that he calls the Covenant of Redemption Because our time now is up speak only what your Judgment is in this Point Antisozzo Mr. Neonomian I must tell you I have narrowly pryed into this Paradox That the Covenant of Grace is owing to procured by and
likewise and saith God lays the Iniquity of every Elect Person two ways in respect of the Application of this Grace 1. Secretly 2 Manifestly As to secret applying he instances in God's Declaration of his Love to Jacob Rom. 9. and saith We have here p. 362. the Lord's declaring himself personally and judicially unto the one whom he loved Jacob there was a Love to him from Eternity in the Election of Grace but till there was a single Individual Person as Jacob the Lord did not say Jacob have I loved c. Now he concludes That this secret Application of the Grace of laying Sins on Christ is at the very instant of such a Persons having a Being in the World then God doth appropriate this Grace to an Elect Person and therefore in the Unregenerate Estate of such a Person in the Excess of Riot he is secured from the Judicial Charge of Sin from Vindicative Justice There 's great diversity of Judgment about the time of applying this Grace saith he Some say it 's at Baptism some say at first Conversion c. pag. 364. It 's true an Elect person not called is never able to know individually of himself that he is such an one that God hath nothing to charge upon him because till Calling God gives not unto Persons to Believe And it 's only Believing is the Evidence of things not seen and this he calls the Application of pardoning Grace by way of manifestation Thus I have given you the Summ of Dr. Crisp's Opinion in this matter Calvin I perceive then his Opinion is that 1. In General That by Electing and Redeeming Love the Elect are secured from the Stroak of Vindicative Justice and God hath nothing to lay to their Charge having accepted the Satisfaction of Christ on their behalf 2. That the Application of this Love to a particular Person is in time as to God's Sentence concerning him and as to some Fruits of this Love from his first having a Being as suppose distinguishing of him as a chosen Vessel as he did Jacob from Esau As he separated Paul to the Designs of electing Love as to preventing Grace yea and providential Grace to bring such a Person it may be under the Secret Effects of the Promise and the means of Grace 3. He saith The manifest Application is when God gives to Believe So that notwithstanding all the Security he hath by Election Redemption and secret Application he is before Faith but in a state of Death and under the Law-Sentence in Foro Conscientiae and by Nature born a Child of Wrath and so in Foro Mundi Hence that he knows nothing of all this spoken of an Elect Person any more than a Reprobate doth till he doth believe I think this is Dr. Crisp's Full Sence and therefore I think Mr. Neonomian you are too partial in your Representation of the Doctor you take those Expressions only that may render him odious and leave out the Grounds and Reasons thereof As to that Opinion of his concerning God's secret passing over his Love to the Elect Persons so long before they believe What if he be singular therein yet there may be more in it than you or I can tell seeing it is manifest that it hath been so in several that have lived to be Adult and I doubt not but it is so daily as to Elect Infants that die in Infancy And I must tell you if you deny this Covenant of Grace to belong to the Infants of believing Parents as it is claimed by vertue of a Gospel-Promise you can have little Ground to plead for Infant-Baptism which is a Sign and Seal of Forgiveness of Sins in some Gospel-Sence or other But I leave that Point now and I must tell you that there is no doubt but that there is a secret passing over of the Grace of God in Christ to every Elect Person before he can put forth anyone Vital Act. Neonom He saith the Elect of God are Heirs of God so that their first Being puts them into a right of Inheritance c. Antinom He gathers this from Gal. 4.1 2 3. See Page 367. Though God doth secretly give over his Right and Title of his own Grace to a Person in the Womb yet he doth not make it known to him that he hath that Right and Title till such time as he doth call him during which time being under the Law he is under a Schoolmaster Tutors and Governours And here he saith The Heir so long as a Child differs nothing from a Servant though he be Lord of all From which I observe from hence 1. That there is an Heirship during Childhood it self 2. That there is this Heirship when there is no difference between being a Child and a Servant 3. A Child is an Heir as soon as born yea when first conceived If a Man of Estate leaves his Wife but a Month gone with Child he leaves an Heir c. Calvin Mr. Neonomian though you grant not the secret Application of Grace he speaks of at Conception yet you can't deny a secret and sure Relation by Vertue of Election and Redemption Relata affectio in Deo ponit objectum correlatum A Right must be in the Object whenever it hath a Being Jus adrem if not in re All that are redeemed by Christ are called the Sheep of Christ before Calling John 10. Shew me a Person that is an Elect and Redeemed One I can tell you God's Justice is satisfied on his behalf and eternal Life procured for him though he be yet an Unbeliever be not in Possession nor can make any Claim as yet I pray was not Paul in his unregenerate State an Elect Vessel and secured from the Hands of Vindicative Justice by Christ's Satisfaction and Heaven secured by Christ's Impetration Impetratio dat Jus ad Beneficium I pray Mr. Neonomian what would you say of Paul a Persecutor in the Heighth of his Villany had you known then that he was an Elect Vessel Neonom I would say thus That Paul when a wicked persecuting Saul while breathing forth Cruelty against the Churches should not die under the Dominion of Sin and being an Elect Person and Christ having born his Sins on the Cross was the Object of God's Love and good Will even while he was so wicked and vile and that God continues his gracious purpose of doing him good notwithstanding all his Wickedness and Abomination that Christ hath made full Attonement for his Sins and merited Eternal Life for him and that he shall certainly be Justified Adopted and Glorified in God's appointed way and time and that Christ hath left nothing to be done by us in a way of Atonement and Merit yea I affirm that distinguishing Grace doth make a very great difference between an Elect Sinner and others D.W. p. 1. p. 3. Calvin I pray now what is it more that Dr. Crisp hath said Neonom He saith the Elect are at no time of their Lives under the Wrath of God
that I do know still I do count them but as Dung that I may win Christ p. 126. There is nothing can be done in a Man that proveth him to be out of Wrath any farther than it proveth him to be in Christ In this Argument lyes all the strength that Christ is yours and that you are Christs what other Arguments otherwise you have that will not prove this Point are all but Fallacies and your Hopes are but Ropes of Sand. Dress up yourselves in the best Attire you have Vertue Civility Learning Excellent Parts let them paint over the rotten Face of corrupt Nature never so curiously will all this prove that you shall be saved The Apostle counteth all this but Stuff and Lumber Trash Loss and Dung for Christ Can you climb Heaven by any Ladder of Nature's erecting What Ladder reacheth to Heaven but Jacob's Ladder which was a Type of Christ p. 147. Let me come to the Graces of God's Spirit They prove that you are out of the state of Wrath that you shall be saved but how do they prove it Not as the causes thereof doth your Grace that is in you satisfie the Justice of God and redeem you from the Curse and pay the Ransom Is it your Title for Salvation Do you pretend to have him upon the Worth of your Graces Like a Man that 's questioned about his Land goes about to prove the worth of the Land by the wax with which his Deeds are sealed the Seal is more than the Wax therefore the Apostle saith not only we are translated but hereby we know we are translated Now how doth Grace signifie to you that you are out of Wrath As it evidences you to be in Christ and so the Sign bringeth you to the Cause If they prove but unto you the Work of Grace in your Heart and that you are in Christ you need ask them no more they have done enough they have setled you upon a sure ground The least Dram of Grace is worth a 1000 Tun of such kind of stuff of Moral Righteousness which may be in you and not prove you to be in Christ A little Seal is worth a Cart-load of Wax because it sealeth more to me than the Wax is worth so the least Dram of Grace wrought in a Man that is in Jesus Christ is worth a World of Moral Duties because it sealeth Evidences Pardon of Sin Favour with God therefore examine yourselves that you take not a Human-Faith for a Saving-Faith c. p. 148 149 150. V. 8 9. That I may be sâ—und in him that I may know him In these two Expressions is comprized that which he calls the gaining of Christ To be found in Christ that he referreth to Justification or the making a Sinner righteous before God therefore he saith not having mine own Righteousness but the Righteousness of God which is the Faith of Christ. To know Christ referreth to Sanctification as it is expressed in three things The Power of his Resurrection the Fellowship of his Sufferings Conformity to his Death p. 151 152. That I may be found in him c. In this Verse you have two great things expressed Union with Christ that I may be found in him Righteousness with God having the Righteousness of God There is a distribution of Righteousness into two sorts Legal Evangelical These two sorts are first described what they are Legal mine own Righteousness which is of the Law Evangelical the Righteousness of God which is by the Faith of Christ 2. Being described they are opposed the one to the other the one is of the Law the other is by the Faith of Christ they are set contrary because they cannot be had together 3. There is a disclaim of the one not having my own righteousness which is of the Law and an adherence to the other the righteousness of God by Faith in Christ Doct. 1. In the gaining or having of Christ the first thing is Union this word in Christ notes Union as 2 Pet. 3.14 Be diligent that ye may be found in him p. 156 157. Union must be before Communion Christ is a great Mystery Christ and his People are all like one great Tree he is the Stock and Root and they are the Twigs planted in that great Stock and they two live like one great Body as the Head and Members they are alike as Man and Wife are one flesh so Christ and his People are one Spirit as Man and Wife are one Person in Law so are Christ and all that are in him they cannot be cast into Hell because the Sentence must light upon Christ before it falleth upon them Antinom How doth this agree with your Doctrin That the state of Men in this Life is not eternally decided but they are in a State-Tryal as Subjects in Tryal for Eternity p. 55. of your First Book The grossest Divinity that ever Protestant delivered before which both the true Protestant Doctrin of Election and Redemption and Union to Christ must fall to the ground if it be true R. Vines I come to the 2d thing in the words the distribution of Righteousness into Legal and Evangelical Doct. There are two sorts of Righteousness Legal and Evangelical the one of the Law the other of the Gospel for that which we call Righteousness with God is the same which we call Gospel or Evangelical Righteousness which is plain Rom. 1.17 Now do not stumble at this do not think I mean as you do Mr. Neonom that there are two sorts of Righteousnesses which a Sinner may be justified by For by one Righteousness we are justified with God Rom. 5.18 But when I say there are two sorts it is to be understood thus there are but two sorts of Righteousnesses by which Life at any time hath been attained there never was a third Righteousness whereby a Man should be Righteous with God ever propounded to Man standing or falling Where 's your subordinate Righteousness now There are there have been there can be no more the own is his own the other is that which is called the Righteousness of God Now to describe these two sorts of Righteousness see Rom. 1.17 Rom. 10.10 11. These two doing and believing are the Characteristical Words that describe these two sorts of Righteousnesses of the Law and of the Gospel The Righteousness of the Law is only for the perfect Man that never sinned because it must be doing Neonom I could shew there 's no one saving Benefit granted to a Sinner but upon Supposition of his doing D. W. p. 230. Mr. R. Vines But I tell you the Righteousness of the Gospel is for a Sinner a Sinner overwhelmed and overspread with Sins Neonom But I say throughout my Divinity That the Gospel excludes Sinners and that the Righteousness of Christ belongs to none but those that are first meet for it Mr. R. V. The Righteousness of the Law is an exact compliance with the Law of God in every Tittle the Righteousness