Selected quad for the lemma: glory_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
glory_n	ghost_n	holy_a	trinity_n	3,450	5	10.0768	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A07496	The sinne vnto death. Or an ample discouery of that fearefull sinne, the sinne against the holy Ghost together with the signes, degrees and preservatiues thereof. In a sermon preached at Pauls Crosse. August 26. 1621. By Tho: Bedford ...	Bedford, Thomas, d. 1653.	1621 (1621)	STC 1788; ESTC S101417	81,812	112

Sinne grounded vpon malice These are parts of that sinne wee seeke for and Ergo I passe them over Now for the last couple viz. Desperation and Presumption These cannot be that sinne which we seeke for As for Desperation how many poore soules haue there beene heretofore who through the sense of GODS wrath and anger against sinne whereof their guiltie conscience did accuse them haue for a time cast off all hope of pardon fallen into despaire as if God had forgotten to be gracious and had shut vp his louing kindnesse in displeasure concluding plainely with Dauid This is my death and yet afterward remembring the yeeres of the right hand of the most high haue recollected themselues gathered strength and regained comfort But what neede I Scripture or experience or the consent of Orthodoxall Writers to proue this point if our Adversaries will stand to their words Thus then I set mine Argument The sinne against the holy Ghost is a sinne vnto death and irremissible this is in confesso amongst all and shall God willing be further confirmed when I come to the second maine point In the meane space I assume Praesumption is not to death but remissible wherefore I conclude that Presumption is not the sinne against the holy Ghost and consequently neitheir can Desperation bee because contraries are alwayes to be referred to the same head The assumption I prooue out of the words of their owne Authors He that shall vpon hope of a Iubilee to come willingly and purposely fall into a sinne reserued may notwithstanding be absolved Neither will their common Euasion serue the turne to say It is but one Doctors opinion and therefore they are not bound to receiue it For these are chiefe men Pillars of their Church Navarre the great Cas●ist Cord●bensis and Bellarmine If they refuse the judgement of these men who hereafter will step forth to maintaine the Romane Church and Papall dignitie Thus is it plaine I hope and euident that hitherto we haue not found out that sinne which wee seeke for The schoole-men and their followers though learned wise graue judicious yet haue in this point fayled come short and are not to be maintained Marcus Cae●●us hauing a better veine in obiecting then in answering in vrging then in defending is by Cicero said to haue Bonam dextram malam vero sinistram A good right hand but not so good a left one all●ding to this that the right hand holds the sword to strike the lef● the backler to defend The saying of Cicero may perhaps by some and that deseruedly be to mee applyed who hitherto haue spent the time rather in confutation then confirmation which least it be I now come to the vse of my left hand and will tye my selfe close to it in the Explanation and confirmation of that definition which as I take it doth most happily most properly most perfectly set forth what this sinne is which wee seeke for what the sinne against the holy Ghost is the which I describe to be A generall Apostasie and revolt of a man wilfully fallen from the truth knowne even to a malicious persecuting and blaspheming of the same In the which before I come to particulars I note in generall that it is a sinne not so much against the person of the spirit as against the worke of the spirit For which we haue a cloud of witnesses A whole day would not suffice to take their Examination Let Beza speake for the rest It is called the sinne against the holy Ghost not as the spirit is a person in the sacred and euer blessed Trinitie for neither is the dignity of the spirit greater then of the father or the sonne they being in glory coequall in maiestie coeternall which would follow were the sinne against the person Nor is it possible to offend any one person of this Tri-vnitie but the iniurie doth redound to them all but in respect of his proper and peculiar worke in vs. The which here is not so much the act of Faith and Repentance cast off by Obstinacie and Impenitencie nor of Hope and Feare reiected by Desperation Presumption as of the illumination of the minde and vnderstanding and the convincing of the Conscience and affections This is that worke of the spirit which this sinne opposeth and opposing is sealed vp to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the sinne against the holy Ghost a sinne vnto death and irremissible Now for perticulars Where that we may let nothing of any moment passe from vs vn-examined I will ranke the wordes of the former definition vnto three heads This Apostasie is a Motion though a bad one in which as in all other Motions wee may obserue first The Terminus a quo from whence Secondly The Terminus ad quem whethor Thirdly The motion it selfe 1. Terminus a quo from whence id est Truth Knowne 2. Terminus ad quem whether Persecuting Blaspheming Malicious 3. The Motion Apostasie Generall Wilfull THe first word in the Terme from whence they fall is the Truth For this marke Beza speaking of this our subiect sayth that This Sinne doth directly and immediately respect the first Table not the second Bucanus seemeth to contradict this Hinc colligo Hence sayth he I gather that the sinne against the spirit is not any transgression of the morall Law neither vniuersall nor particular whether proceeding from ignorance or infirmitie or malice against the Law of God This difference is not so great but an easie reconciliation will suffice For either Beza meanes no more then this that it is directly and immediately against God as the breaches of the first Table not mediately as the breaches of the second Or else he enlargeth the bounds of the Law including vnder it the knowledge of the Mediatour which Bucan perhaps excludeth And this I am the rather induced to beleeue in that Beza a little afterwards reckoning vp particular lapses and sinnes against the first Table which sayth he cannot be this sinne mentioneth Dubitationam de Christo doubting of Christ. And certainely I fully beleeue that this sinne against the holy Ghost doth necessarily suppose the knowledge of the Mediatour for it seemeth impossible that the creature should vnrecoverably fall from the Creatour vntill he haue reiected also the helpe of the Mediatour offered to him So that by Truth in my definition I vnderstand not with the Novatians any naturall morall or civill truth wherof certain knowledge is obtained no nor any supernatural truth in Scripture reuealed but the supernaturall Truth of the Gospell that euerlasting Word of Truth to witnesse which Christ came into the world In which respect Christ calls himselfe the Truth viz. because he is the matter and argument of the Gospell This point besides that which Aquinas doth helpe vs with who maketh Apostasie to be Species a kind of Infidelitie which is contrary to faith faith I say required