Exercitations CONCERNING The Pure and True AND The Impure and False RELIGION By CHARLES de BEAVVAIS Rector of the Parish of Witheham In the County of Sussex LONDON Printed by J. R. for Francis Eglesfield at the Signe of the Marygold in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1665. TO THE ORTHODOX AND TRULY Christian Church The Church of the KINGDOM of ENGLAND For the Advancement of the Glory of Almighty God And for Her Confirmation More and More IN THE Pure and True Doctrine of Faith And of Divine Worship CHARLES de BEAVVAIS One of Her most Faithfull And most Affectionate Ministers Doth in all Humility Offer And Dedicate This Present WORK An Humble Request Of the AUTHOR To the Reader THe Reader is Intreated Humbly to begin the Reading of this Book by the Methodical Representation following Because in It He shall clearly perceive all the Chapters or Heads thereof and all the Exercitations about the said Chapters or Heads Besides in It He shall find an Epitomy of the whole Work A Methodical Representation of all the Chapters or Heads and of all the Exercitations about the said Chapters or Heads that are contained in this Work Which is also an Epitomy of the whole Book SECTION I. Chap. 1. OF Religion in General 1 With this Exercitation 1. There is a Religion And that Necessarily 1 Chap. 2. Of the Distinction of Religion in True in Heretical in Schismatical and in False 2 Chap. 3. Of the True Religion in General 3 With these Exercitations 1. The True Religion can be but one 3 2. Of Antiquity concerning Religion 6 3. Nothing must be ordained concerning the Things belonging to Religion without the Word of God 4. The onely Ground and Rule of Faith and of Divine Worship is the Holy Scripture 12 5. The Holy Scripture ought to be among us the Supream Interpreter of Scriptures and the Judge of Controversies 13 6. Consequently this Power and Authority is not to be Attributed to any Creature 14 7. What force have in Religion Arguments taken from Reason 15 8. The Controversies concerning Religion in all Disputations must be decided onely by Holy Scriptures 16 Chap. 4. Concerning the Power and Authority of the Soveraign Prince in regard of Religion 18 With these Exercitations 1. The Supream Authority of Establishing Conserving and Reforming Religion doth belong to him 18 2. He must Order and Settle nothing concerning Religion without consulting the Book of Scriptures and assembling Learned and Godly Divines whose Charge is to Expound them 21 3. In what regard a Soveraign Prince is said to be the Head of the Church which is within his States and Dominions 23 Chap. 5. Of the Marks of the True Religion 24 Chap. 6. Of the True Religion in Particular 25 As such was the Religion of the Ancient Jews And the first Christian Religion Chap. 7. The Ancient Judaical Religion was a true Religion 25 Chap. 8. The first Christian Religion was Pure and True 26 Chap. 9. Of the Agreements and of the Differences between the Religion of the ancient Jews and the true Christian Religion 27 Chap. 10. So there hath been but one way to attain to the Fruition of Salvation since the first sin of Adam 28 Chap. 11. Of the Mutation which happened to the first Christian Religion in General 30 With these Exercitations 1. Vnder the Empire of Constantine the first Christian Religion suddenly changed 30 2. Of the Terms or Words and of the Ceremonies borrowed from the Jews and from the Pagans in the above said change SECT 2. Chap. 1. OF the Corruption which in Particular is happened to the First Religion of the Church of Rome 33 With these Exercitations 1. The Religion and Church of Rome is not Now what it was in the Beginning In the Beginning it was Pure and Orthodox But now it is Impure and Heretical 35 2. 1. Because the Greater part of Her Belief is contrary to Holy Scriptures 36 Art 5. 3. 2. Because besides a great part of the Ancient Heresies are received in Her and Approved by Her 38. Art 7. 4. Answer to four Objections against the above Assertion Of the First see Pag. 41 Of the Second see Pag. 42 Of the Third see Pag. 45 Of the Fourth see Pag. 48 5. Popery is not of the First and Primary Antiquity 49 Ch. 2. Of the Principles of the Roman Religion 51 With these Exercitations 1. Those Principles are Scriptures Traditions of the Apostles The Catholick Church General Councils The Ancient Fathers The Pope 51 2. These Principles are 1. Fraudulous 2. False 3. The Fraudes about the said Principles are 1. Either in regard of them all and Conjointly 2. Or in respect of each of them and separately Chap. 3. Of the Frauds about all the said Principles and conjointly 52 Which are the three following 1. The Church of Rome careth indeed for none of Her Principles but for the last which is the Determination of the Pope 52 2. Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope and take all Authority quoad nos From the Scripture So that by the Church they understand the Pope 53 3. The Pope also is thought by the Papists to be the True and Lawfull Interpreter of the Scriptures And the supreame Judge of Controversies about Religion 54 55 Chap. 4. Of the Fraudes about the First Principle which is the Scriptures 57 Which are the two following 1. The Papists making shew to receive the Scriptures for Rule of Faith do disgrace them in joyning Traditions with them 57 2. The Church of Rome which Produceth Scriptures for one of Her principles and Rules hath indeed no sufficient Scriptures by reason of the Corruption of the Vulgar Latin Translation which is the Papists Scripture 57 § Of the Corruption of the said Vulgar Latin Translation more fully 58 § Refutation of the Excessive Praises which the Seminary Priests of Rhemes gives to the English Rhemish Translation 59 § Condemnation of the Annotations joyned with the said Rhemish Translation 62 Chap. 5. Of the Fraudes about the Second principle which is the Ancient Fathers 63 Which are these two following 1. That by an Expurgatory Index the Church of Rome causes to be blotted out of the Books of the said Fathers all that is displeasing unto Her Or else doth falsifie them and alter their sense and meaning 63 2. That although the Church of Rome acknowledgeth That there are many Faults and Errors in the Books of the Ancient Fathers which are not to be approved Yet the Roman Religion is as it were a Body consisting for the most part of Rottennesse and Corruption namely the Ancient and new Errors 64 § Again of this matter more briefly 66 § Again Papists suck Errors from the Fathers unsound speeches And of a small Error of the Fathers do occasionally procreate a great one 67 Chap. 6. Of the Frauds about the Third Principle which is concerning Councils 67 These Fraudes are the four following 1. The many Frauds and Slights committed in the last Councils of
the Church of Rome 67. 2. This is a great Slight of the Popes in these last times to oppose themselves to the holding of Councils and for what Causes he doth it 68 3. This was a great Fraude and Slight in the Court of Rome to endeavour as much as could be done to suppress the Relation of what was passed in the Council of Trent 69 § Concerning the History of the Council of Trent 70 4. The Acts of the Councils have been falsyfied for the most part and things have been supposed which never were 71 A Digression of the Council of Trent in particular with the following Exercitations 1. IT is with Just Causes that the Council of Trent is rejected and condemned by the Reformed 72 2. Yet it is by great Rhetorical Ornaments commended by the Jesuites 73 3. But it deserves not such Commendations and why 74 4. Of the Decrees of that Council 75 5. Of the Examen of that Council by Kemnitius 75 6. For what Reasons the Protestants made no great hast to go to that Council 76 § A Resolution of this Question whether the Pope be above the Councils or otherwise 77 Chap. 7. Of the Fraude about the fourth Principle Namely the Church And this Fraude is that because the Scripture maketh honourable mention of the Church therefore the Roman Church is that true Church of Christ 78 79 Chap. 8. Of the Falshood of the above said Principles of the Church of Rome 79 With this Exercitation 1. By Reason of that Falshood such Principles are Excluded by the Reformed from the Rule of Faith 80 Chap. 9. 1. They Exclude justly the Traditions called Apostolical 80 Chap. 10. The Scripture is a perfect Rule of Faith without Tradition 81 Chap. 11. 2. The Catholick Church is justly excluded 83 Chap. 12. 3. General Councils are justly excluded 83 Chap. 13. Refutation of an Objection made against our Rejection of the Church and of General Councils 84 Chap. 14. 4. The Antient Fathers are justly excluded 85 Whereupon the following Exercitations are considerable 1. Answer to a Demand of the Jesuites about our Rejection of the Fathers 86 2. How the Reformed carry themselves in regard of the Scriptures and in regard of the Fathers 87 3. Of Bishop Jewels challenge to the Fathers that flourished 600. years after Christ 88 89 4. The Fathers have Errors 90 5. Notwithstanding some of their Errors we Reformed esteem them as holy Men and holy Fathers 90 6. Answer to an objection against this Declaration 91 7. There is great difference between the Errors of the Fathers and those of the present Church of Rome 92 8. Examination of some words of Luther about the Fathers reproved by the Popish Writers 93 9. Answer to two Objections against that Examination 94 95 Chap. 15. The Determination of the Pope is justly Excluded from the Rule 97 With these Exercitations 1. The Pope may fall into Heresie and have erred in great Articles of Faith 97 2. Answer to an Objection about that Assertion 98 3. Besides we say that the Pope is the great Antichrist foretold in the Scriptures 98 4. Of the divers Ages of Antichrist 100 5. What Horrour is it to submit to him that is the Antichrist 101 § Concerning Cardinals the Popes Counsellours in two Exercitations 101 102 Chap. 16. It is an observation greatly to be considered That the Arguments used in the Church of Rome for defence of their Erroneous Doctrins before the coming in of the Jesuites are declared by the Jesuites themselves to have been but sleight and weak Arguments 106 § The Jesuites then of all the Sophisters of the Church of Rome are the greatest 106 § And I do add that of all the Sophisters Jesuites Bellarmin a Jesuite is the greatest and most universal as appears by the Representation and Observation of his Faults 107 Chap. 17. Again of the Jesuites with divers Exercitations 108 c. Chap. 18. Of the Sects of Thomists Scotists Dominicans Franciscans 112 § By them appears what unity there is in the Church of Rome 113 Chap. 19. Of the Seduction of People by the Popes and the Roman Church by their false Doctrin 114 With these following Exercitations 1. This Seduction is a crying Sin 114 2. It is wrought by four Means 116 Chap. 20. The first Mean of Seduction of People Consisteth in Mysteries and Secrets 116 Chap. 21. The second Mean of Seduction of People consisteth in Impostures and Frauds 118 Chap. 22. The third Mean of the Seduction of People consisteth in Signes and Miracles 118 Chap. 23. The fourth Mean of the Seduction of People consisteth in Persecution and Cruelty 122 With two Exercitations more 122 123 § Of the Popish Inquisition 124 § Of the Cruelty and also Perfidiousnesse exercised by the Council of Constance upon John Huss and Hierome of Prague 125 § The Doctrin of the Church of Rome is False concerning the Faith given to Hereticks 126 Chap. 24. Another Fraud of the Church of Rome Which is concerning the pretended Donation of Constantine 127 And also 129 c. Besides 132 Chap. 25. Another Fraud of the Church of Rome Which is in regard of pretended Revelations both by Dreams and by extraordinary Visions and Apparitions of the Dead 136 Chap. 26. Of another Fraud of the Church of Rome in Disputations to demand onely Formal Places of Scripture contained word by word in it 137 § The necessary Consequences that are drawn from the Scriptures are as valuable in Disputations as the Formal Texts are 138 Chap. 27. This is a Fraud of some Jesuites in Disputations ever to Question and never to Answer 140 Chap. 28. This is another Fraud of the Church of Rome That the 3. following Heads are onely grounded upon worldly Interest 140 Namely 1. The Taking away of the Cup from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper 141 2. Forbidding Marriage to Priests or the Clergy 141 3. And Divine Service being in an unknown Tongue to the People 142 Chap. 29. Of a most considerable contradiction of the Priâ—cipal Doctors of the Church of Rome in regard of their Doctrine That Eternal Life is due as a Debt to our good works 142 Chap. 30. The Burden of Ceremonies which is now laid upon the Members of the Roman Church is an Intolerable Burden 144 Chap. 31. Of the False Worship of the Church of Rome 146 Chap. 32. Of the Idolatry of the Church of Rome 1 Conjointly 2 Separately 147 148 1 In regard of the Saints which are departed 149 152 154 2. Particularly in regard of the Virgin Mary 155 3. In regard of the Adoration of Relicks 157 § Of Miracles wrought by the Dead Bones and Carcasses of Saints 158 Chap. 33. The Reformed must not frequent the exercises of Popish Worship nor Assit to the Mass 159 Chap. 34. Of the Corruption of the Church of Rome in regard of Manners 160 1. In Regard of the Pope her Head 160 2. In Respect of the Popish Clergy and other Members of the said Church
Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope And take all Authority quoad nos from the Scripture So that by the Church they understand the Pope 1. THe Papists 1. take all Authority from the Scripture 2. They give it to the Church And 3. They give the Churches Authority to the Pope 2. I say 1. That the Papists take all Authority quoad nos from the Scripture which appears in that they teach that it is not the ground or pillar of truth Nor properly and of it self any Cause or Means of Belief or of Charity And that God doth not immediately speak by it Neither is the Holy Ghost joined with the writing of the Scripture And that the Church is not subject to the Scripture And that put case any person living out of the Communion of the Roman Church do read or study the Scripture it is not the word of God to them or of greater Authority then Aesops Fables 3. I have said 2. That the Papists give all Authority to the present Roman Church This appears in that they make it the onely External ground and pillar of Truth The sole Judge of Controversies The principle or first ground and foundation from whence the Scripture in regard of men receiveth all Authority 4. I have said 3. That the Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope And no Papist in these daies can or will deny This. For 1. the Positive Speeches of their greatest Doctors thereupon manifestly confirms it Ecclesiae nomine saith Gregorius de Valentia intelligimur ejus Caput Romanum Pontificem Tom. 3. Dist 1. q. 1. part 1. pag 30. And Bannes 2.2 q. 1. Ar. 10. Animadvertendum est cum Cajetano c. quod apud Thomam pro eodem omnino reputatur Authoritas Ecclesiae universalis Authoritas Concilii Et Authoritas Summi Pontificis 2. The same Assertion followeth upon the main principles of their Doctrine which are That the Pope is the prime subject of Ecclesiastical Authority And that the whole Authority of all the Body and of all the Members thereof is derived by and from him And that the promise of the perpetual Assistance of the Holy Ghost And the Infallible Judgement and the Supream Authority And other Priviledges are intailed upon his Tribunal The 2. of those Fraudes is That The Pope also is Taught by the Papists To be the true and Lawful Interpreter of the Sense of the Scriptures And the Supream Judge of Controversies Concerning Faith and Divine Worship 1. IT is most clear that the Jesuites make both the Scripture it self and the Interpretation of it to Depend upon the Authority of the Church 2. And the Church they call not the whole Multitude of Christians and Faithful Men. 3. But they Restrain both the Name and the Nature of the Church 1. unto their Bishops 2. If Thereupon we Reformed object That their Bishops may Differ touching the Sense of the Scriptures so shall we be uncertain and shall not resolve which of them to Believe but they help this and Answer That General Councils must Decide and Determine all Questions and Controversies 3. Shall we then Rest in them No more then in then the other For the Pope must be Judge over the Councils 4. So in the Conclusion The whole Interpretation of Holy Scriptures is transferred to the Pope and must be fetched out of his Breast yea and as a proper Right he so challengeth the Power of Interpreting of the Scripture That whatsoever he thinketh That must be accounted the Sense and Meaning of them Refutation of this Doctrine of the Jesuits by the Reformed Doctors 1. THat which hath been said above is the Jesuites constant and perpetual property and disposition in interpreting the Scriptures 2. Which is full of Dotage Error and Falsehood void of Advise Knowledge and Wisdome 3. For what an Absurd and horrible Thing is it that the Sense and Meaning of the Holy Scripture should depend upon one mans Judgement and Voice 4. Specially being such a one as commonly the Bishops of Rome have been Unlearned Wicked Heretical 5. And hence have proceeded all the following goodly Interpretations 1. Take Eate That is you Priests say Private Masses 2. Drink ye all of This That is onely the Priests must Drink 3. Be ye Holy for I am Holy Therefore it is unlawful for the Ministers of the Word to marry a Wife Exception of the Jesuites Which of the Popes or what Catholick Writer ever concluded this out of that place Answer to this Exception Pope Syricius did first of all so Collect And after him Pope Innocent As it may be read in Gratian Dist. 31. cap. Tenere and Dist 82. cap. Proposuisti cap. Plurimos 4. This is another like Interpretation Give not holy things unto Doggs Therefore the people must be forbidden to read the Scriptures 5. What should we number up Innumerable more of the Popes and Papists Interpretations By which they do nothing but pervert and wrest the Scriptures In Particular These be the Frauds of the Church of Rome Concerning Her first Principle Which is the Scripture 1. Fraud The Papists making Shew to Receive the Scriptures for Ground and Rule of Faith Do Disgrace Them in Joyning Traditions with Them 1. FOr as the Scriptures are Grounds And Rule of true Doctrine So are They onely Grounds And Rule 2. And as in Matters of Faith Arguments ought principally to be drawn from Them so such Arguments onely conclude necessarily As even the Schoolman Thomas Aquinas doth Directly confesse 1. Part. 1. Quaest. Artic. 8. Ad. 2. 2. Fraud The Church of Rome which Produceth Scriptures for one of Her Principles And Rules hath indeed no sufficient Scriptures For in making an old rotten Translation which we may boldly call so being compared with the Original Word of Scripture to be the Authentical Word of God and denying the Original Faithful Texts which Moses the Prophets the Apostles the Evangelists did write to be the Word of God What doth she else but plainly as it were with one dash of a Penne Cancel the whole Scriptures 2. This Homely Latin Translation is the Papists Scripture 3. Coined and Canonized of late in the Councel of Trent And never before 4. And other Scripture have They none §. Of the Corruption of the vulgar Latine Translation more Fully 1. THe Reader of the vulgar Latin Translation may manifestly perceive That in it are manifold and almost infinite Faults of all sorts 1. By Adding 2. By Omitting 3. By Mistaking Of Letters Of Points Of Syllables And of Words 4. By wrong Interpreting the Original Text. 2. Which Faults The Popish Doctors shall never be able to Approve or Justifie Though They weary Themselves never so much with Traveling and Toiling and seeking some Defence 3. When They have said what They can say for Maintenance of These Corruptions it shall for all that Appear By all Learning and Evidence of Reason that They have Neither the Old nor the New Testament in the Entire and Original
of the Councel of Trent Written by Patre Paulo See the Addition Concerning this Question Whether the Pope be above the Councils Or otherwise Jesuites THe Jesuites puts the Pope above the Councils And they alleadge this Reason Because no Council is of any Authoritie which was not Confirmed by the Pope Answer of the Reformed to that Reason That is false 1. For the Sixth African Council and the Chalcedon Council had their Authoritie without the Pope 2. And Emperours Patriarchs and Bishops have Confirmed Councils 3. And the Council of Constantinople by Letters desired the Confirmation of the Decrees from Theodosius the Emperour Fraud This is a Fraud of the Church of Rome in Regard of another of her Principles That is the Catholick Church That because the Scripture maketh Honorable Mention of the Church The Roman Church is that true Church of Christ of which the Scripture speaketh so often 1. VVE Reformed acknowledge That both in the Old and New Testament there is every where honorable mention made of the Church And that it is called A Holy City A Fruitful Vineyard An High Hill A Direct Path The onely Dove The Kingdom of Heaven The Spouse and Bodie of Christ The Pillar of Truth The Multitude unto which the Holy Ghost being promised poureth all things needful to Salvation The Congregation against which the Gates of Hell shall never so prevail That they shall utterly extinguish the same The Congregation which who so Repugneth though he confesse Christ with his mouth yet hath he no more to do with Christ then hath a Publican and a heathen man 2. The above-said Titles do not belong to the now Church of Rome 1. FOr on the contrary It is the Babylonish Whore A Branch cut off from the true Vine A Den of Thieves A broad way leading to Destruction The Kingdom of Hell The body of Antichrist A Sink of Errors A great Mother of Fornication The Church of the wicked out of which every Christian ought to depart which Christ shall one day fearfully destroy and give her the just Recompence of all her sins 2. In vain then do the Popish Writers reckon up the praises of the Church unlesse they can demonstrate that they are proper to the Church of Rome 3. Which they shall never be able to do so long as Rome standeth As the Church of Rome is Fraudulous in regard of the Principles of Faith and Worship that she doth produce So is her Doctrine false concerning these Principles 1. Concerning the Traditions that she calleth Apostolical 2. Concerning the Church 3. Concerning General Councils 4. Concerning the Ancient Fathers 5. Concerning the Pope And therefore such Principles are justly excluded by the Reformed from the Rule of Faith 1. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith the Traditions called Apostolical by the Papists 1. FOr the Popish Apostolical Traditions are but forged and devised Things and therefore no stay for a man to settle his Conscience upon 2. That they are not such as the Papists sayes Let them tell us if they can which be the Apostles Traditions how many and where they may be found If they cannot satisfie this Demand as they cannot indeed How may they then make any Reckoning of that whereof they have no certain knoledge How can They without falling Build their Faith upon Fantasies such as they are 3. The Apostles Doctrine we have in Writing The Apostles Doctrine we have in writing 4. Other Traditions of the Apostles we receive none for our belief The Scripture is the onely Rule of Faith and not Traditions a part of the Rule of Faith that is That Scripture is a perfect Rule 1. THat I prove in this manner 2 Timoth. 3.15 Apoc. 22.18 1 Cor. 4.6 John 20.31 2. That is the onely Rule whereunto the chiefest properties of a rule do solely belong But the properties of a true and certain rule do onely belong to the holy Scriptures in matters of Faith The rule of Catholick Faith saith Bellarmine must be certain and known De verb. Dei libr. 1. cap. 2. Now there is nothing better known or more certain then the Scripture which appears Because Traditions are far more uncertain than the written word and because many of them are false and uncertain 3. The written word is a Rule of Traditions From whence it follows that it is the onely rule That the written word is a rule of Tradition appeareth by the Doctrine of our Adversaries who acknowledge that no Traditions must be admitted but such as agree with the Scripture Bellarm. de verb. Dei libr. 4. cap. 3. And which are derived from the Scripture and the writings of the Primitive Fathers Bellarm. de Script libr. 4. cap. 3. But those Traditions which are derived from the Scriptures have the same to be their rule And there is nothing more common in the Primitive Fathers then to subject all their writings to be Regulate by the holy Scriptures Therefore such Traditions as are found in the works of the holy Fathers have the holy Scripture to be their rule from whence it followeth that the Scripture is the onely primitive rule of Faith 4. It is that which is acknowledged by some of our Adversaries Gabr. Biel Can. Miss Lect. 71. whereof Ferus saith expresly The holy Scripture is the sole rule of veritie and whatsoever differs or contradicteth the same it is error and cokle with whatsoever shew it come forth Ferus in Matth. lib. 2. in cap. 13. pag. 248. col 1. And another saith The Doctrine of the books of the Prophets and Apostles is alone the foundation of truth and the rule c. Villavincen de formand Concion lib. 2. cap. 2. 2. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith the Catholick Church 1. VVE Reformed do Reverence and Love The Catholick Church as the Spouse of Christ 2. But we know that her duty is to hearken only to the voice of Christ her Husband And that she hath no Authority to adde so much as one iota in his Word or any waies to dissent from it 3. And further we know That the Romish Synagogue is not that Catholick Church of Christ whereof we speak 3. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith General Councils 1. VVE Reformed doe esteem and regard General Councils in their place We thank God for them We Read Allow and Commend them so far forth as they agree with Gods Word 2. Let therefore their Decrees be examined by Gods Word 3. And if they agree let them be received for that Agreement 4. If not let them be rejected for the contrary 5. But the Argument holdeth not in this Form such a Council decreed so and therefore so must we believe 6. If this Principle were set down for certain and perpetual in Divinity we should have strange Beliefs enow yea surely scarcely should we retain any one true Belief 7. Two famous General Councils have been held in Nice The First And the Second In the First is
If they Remember how Christ promised his Spouse Perpetual Preservation Hos 2.19 I will even betroth thee unto me for ever Isa 59.21 As for me This is my Covenant with Them saith the Lord My Spirit that is upon thee And my words which I have put in thy Mouth shall not Depart out of thy Mouth Nor out of the Mouth of thy Seed Nor out of the Mouth of thy Seeds Seed saith the Lord from henceforth and for ever And Such Like Answer to this Third Objection 1. TO what Purpose doth this Objection serve the Popish Writers Or what Argument may the Perpetuity Of Christs Universal Church afford Them against our former Assertion 2. We Believe and Confesse to the Comfort of our Souls That Christs Church hath continued And shall never fail so long as the world endureth 3. And we account it a prophane Heresie to teach that Christs Universal Church hath Perished from the Earth at any Time For this Assertion shaketh the Foundation of all Faith and Religion 4. But the Popish Writers who makes this Objection Should prove by invincible evidence of Scripture That the Catholick Universal Church of Christ is nothing Else But the Outward Succession of the Roman See If They can Prove This They should Prove their Objection Soundly And should confute our Opinion Truely 5. But it is a Thing which They cannot Doe They cannot bring us Either Texts of Scriptures or Reasons To shew that Christs Church Either is the Popes Succession Or Else dependeth upon the same See 6. For as Touching External Shew And Succession of Churches The Scriptures have foretold Apoc. 12. and 13.16 That Antichrist shall Seduce Great and Small Rich and Poor Free and Bond And that the Church shall flie into the Wildernesse And there Remain Of all which no word could be true If the Catholick Church were tied To the Popes Chaire And the Popes Chaire were the Rock That cannot be removed 7. And yet notwithstanding this General Dispersion And the Flight of the Church under Antichrist The Catholick Church shall for all That Continue 8. Although not in that outward strength And Glory In which sometimes it hath appeared And Flourished 4. Objection Of the Popish Writers Against the above Exercitations That the Now Church of Rome is Changed And is not Now what it was in the Beginning What Impudence is This say the said Writers There was never Heresie that Assaulted the Church of Rome Of which it carried not the Victory As Over the Donatists Over Jovinian Over Pelagius the Britain And over Others Answer to this Fourth Objection 1. THe Triumphs of which the Popish Writers do boast of Are no more proper to the Now or Latter Church of Rome Then the Triumphs of old Rome Over Pyrrhus Over Annibal Over Perses Over Antiochus are to be esteemed the Triumphs of Rome Now Being 2. And for the pretended Victory over Pelagius the Britain we saw that he Triumphed over the Popish Kingdome For did he not Teach That Grace was imbred in Nature And the Popish Crew of Jesuites Defendeth the same Who seeth not then Pelagius sitting in the Popish Triumphant Chariot Popery is not of the first and Primary Antiquity That is many of the present Doctrines of the Church of Rome And in what Time Errors were received in it 1. PApists are not able to produce any Record Expresse and direct testimony Canon of Council or Ecclesiastical constitution For their burning Lights in the Church at noon day before the Decree of Pope Sabinianus in the year of our Lord 605. 2. Nor for Rome to be the Head of all Churches before Pope Boniface the Third in the year 606. 3. Nor for the Invocation of Saints in their Publick Lithurgy before Boniface the Fifth in the year 618. 4. Nor for their Latine Service thrust upon all Churches before Pope Vitalian in the year 666 which is the very number of the name of the Beast 5. Nor for the Cutting of the Host into three parts and offering one part for the Souls in Purgatory before Pope Seâ—gius in the year 688. 6. Nor for setting up Images in Churches Generally and worshipping them before Pope Adrian the First and the Second Council of Nice in the year 787. 7. Nor for Canonization of Saints departed before Leo the Third about the year 800. 8. Nor for the Orall Manducation of Christs Body in the Sacrament before Pope Nicholas the Second in the year 1053. 9. Nor for the entire number of seven Sacraments before Peter Lombard in the year 1140. 10. Nor for Indulgences before Eugenius the third in the year 1145. 11. Nor for Transubstantiation of the Bread into Christs body before the Fourth Council of Lateran in the year 1215. 12. Nor for the Elevation of the Host that the People might adore it before Honorius the Third in the year 1216. 13. Nor for any Jubilee before Pope Boniface the Eighth in the yeer 1300. 14. Nor for the Carrying the Sacrament in Procession under a Canopy before Pope Vrban the Fifth In the year 1262. 15. Nor for the Day and half Communion before the Council at Constance in the year 1416. 16. Nor for the suspending the Efficacy of Sacramental Consecration upon the Priests Intention before the Council at Florence in the year 1439. 17. Nor for the Popes Superiority to General Councils before the Sixt Council at Lateran under Leo the Tenth in the year 1517. 18. Nor the vulgar Latine Translation to be held for Authentical And upon no pretended Cause whatsoever to be reiected before the fourth Session of the Council of Trent in the year 1546. 19. Nor for the Second book of the Macchabees and the Apocryphal Additions to Hester and Daniel with the History of Bell and the Dragon which S. Jerome termeth a Fable to bereceived for Canonical Scripture before the said Session in the year above named 1. Fraude 1. These be the Principles and Grounds of Faith and Worship that the Church of Rome doth Produce 1. Scriptures 2. Traditions of the Apostles 3. The Catholick Church 4. General Councils 5. The Ancient Fathers 6. The Pope which she calls the Supream Pastour of the Church 2. These be the Fraudes of the Church of Rome Concerning all the Principles and Rules above Produced The 1. of those Fraudes is That the Church of Rome careth indeed for none of Them but for the last which is The Determination of her Pope 1. THe Scripture must not be Scripture in any other Sense then as the Pope will Expound So that the Scripture being the Meaning of the Scripture And the Meaing of the Scripture being the Popes Exposition Hereof it followeth That the Scripture is nothing else but the Popes Interpretation 2. So Likewise In Traditions In Doctors In Councils In Churches If any Thing Dissent from the Popes understanding and Determination It is Rejected Abolished Condemned 3. And Finally all Faith all Religion all Divinity of the Church of Rome is only the Popes Sacred will and pleasure
condemned the Popes Supremacie Can. 6. In the Second is established the Idolatrous Worship of Images The First Belief the Papists will not allow The Second is detested by us Reformed 8. Let Councils therefore be esteemed as they deserve 9. And let them be tried as hath been said §. Objection of the Popish Writers against our Rejection from the rule of Faith the Catholick Church and General Councils IF the Church say they and general Councils be not Grounds and Rules of Faith Why then did the Ancient Fathers draw an Argument from them to Refute the Errors of the Antient Hereticks Answer of the Reformed to that Objection 1. VVE know say the Reformed That the Ancient Godly Fathers in Confuting all Hereticks used onely Arguments drawn out of the Scriptures and plainly taught That by no other Weapons an Heretick can be put to flight 2. The same Reformed do know That the Ancient Fathers did charge the Hereticks sometimes With the Judgment of Churches With Determination of Councils With Succession of Bishops With the Name of Catholicks Not as though this were a necessary Conviction of it self but thereby the rather to induce them to believe the Doctrine to be true which they did see from the first planting thereof in the Church to have remained 3. The case of the Papists drawing Arguments of Conviction from the Doctrine of their Popish Church is nothing like seeing they have onely the bare Title of the Church without the Thing and as it were the empty Casket without the Treasure 4. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith The Ancient Fathers 1. VVE Reformed as hath been said of General Councils do esteem and regard them in their place We thank God God for them We Read Allow and Commend them So far forth as they agree with Gods word 2. For it cannot be truely said that they never disagree from it 3. We grant that they were Learned and Godly Men but yet were they Men having their Infirmities and Imperfections 4. Their Learning Their Zeal Their Ages Were not Priviledge unto them but that notwithstanding they might be deceived in their Writings and in their Expositions of Scripture 5. And let the Popish Doctors take this for a sure Conclusion That in the Sayings of Those who are all of them subject to Error there is no stable and stedy Ground to build our Faith upon least perhaps we build upon Error in stead of Truth 6. So that without Tryal and Examination no Sentence of a Father nor of all Fathers may safely be Received §. Objection of the Popish Writers against our Rejection from the Rule of Faith the Ancient Fathers SInce the Reformed Exclude the Ancient Fathers from the Rule of Faith Why say the Popish Writers do they make use of them and alledge them Answer to this Objection 1. THe Reformed do read the Ancient Fathers And oftentimes they rehearse their Sentences and their Expositions of the Scripture 2. But not as Proofs in Doctrines of themselves For they do not acknowledge them as Rule and Ground of the Faith 3. It is to stop the Papists Mouthes that cry so loud in the ears of the simple that all the Fathers are against them 4. It being most true That they are notably and generally for them § How the Reformed carry themselves in regard of the Scriptures in regard of the Ancient Fathers 1. This is their Carriage in regard of the Scriptures 1. THey receive that which the Scripture delivereth 2. They reject that which the Scripture reproveth 2. This is Their Carriage in regard of the Ancient Fathers 1. THey read the Fathers with Indifferent and Free Judgement 2. Weighing all their Doctrine in the Balance of Gods Word and thereby either allowing or refusing the same 3. This they must do or else of Fathers they make Gods of Mens Writings They make Canonical Scriptures Of Doctors Opinions they make Articles of Faith 4. And herein they do no otherwise then they are taught both by Scriptures and by Fathers to do 5. They declare to the Popish Writers That concerning these two Heads they shall never get at their hands more than this § Of Bishop Jewels Challenge to the Fathers that flourished 600 years after Christ The Popish Writers IOhn Jewel say they challenged the Catholicks calling upon and desiring the help of the Fathers as many as flourished 600 years after Christ Answer of the Reformed to that Relation 1. They Answer this THat Bishop Jewel proved all the Ancient Fathers to be against the Church of Rome in Disputing with Doctor Harding as he had affirmed at Paul's Crosse 2. They Answer this 1. THat the present Popish Writers may be ashamed to make mention of that Challenge which they have so long ago given over as a Desperate Cause 2. Wherein Doctor Harding the chiefest Adversarie could not make shew of Proof without using the Testimonies of forged and Counterfeit Writers As Amphilochius Clemens Abdias Hippolytus And such Others of which no more Account is to be made then of Fables and shamelesse Forgeries Such were the Chiefest Proofs which Dr. Harding was able to bring 2. And whatsoever he brought hath been fully Answered in the Reply by the Bishop himself Which Book as yet though it hath been in some parts nipped at by Divers yet throughly confuted was it never what the present Popish Writers can do in this Case may easily be guessed 3. They Answer This. 1. THat what which Bishop Jewel promised to give over and to subscribe If any of the 27. Articles of Controversies propounded by him could be proved by Scriptures Councils or Doctors within 660. years after Christ was not because he meant ever to subscribe to the Popish Doctrine or was unstayed in his Religion but it was of a most assured knowledge and resolute perswasion That the Popish Doctors were utterly destitute in this behalf of all Truth and Antiquity as indeed they are 2. Otherwise the Popish Doctors may remember That our Religion is grounded onely upon the Holy Scriptures of God 3. And therefore though the said Doctors brought against us Reformed Writers and Fathers never so many for these Matters as they can bring not one of Credit and Age. Yet will we never subscribe unto them having once subscribed to the certain Truth of God revealed unto us in his holy perfect and written word 4. By which all Sentences Opinions and Writings of Men whatsoever must be examined §. Notwithstanding some Errors of the Ancient Fathers we Reformed esteem them as Gods Saints and holy Men and holy Fathers 1. THe Ancient Fathers holding the Ground and Foundation of Doctrine did oftentimes build thereon Stubble and Straw partly by some Superstitious Opinions which themselves conceived of such Inventions and partly by the sway and violence of Custome whereby they were carried to a liking of those Things which they saw commended and practised by others 2. And yet God forbid that because of some Errors which they held we Reformed
only 3. Having begun first at the Diet of Ausbourg we are enforced to use it The Reformed are truely Christians and Catholicks 1. VVE Reformed tell the Papists notwithstanding their Opprobrious Names that if a Christian be he that believeth in Christ according to his word and if Catholicks be they that professe the universal Faith of Christ we are truely Christians and Catholicks believing so and professing so 2. And are content with these Names and desire no other §. Let the Papists be called as they will the Reformed who Reprove and Confute the multitude of their Namss will not be grieved at them 1. LEt the Papists be called Diversly Franciscanes Benedictines Dominicanes And whatsoever other Title they can take up the Reformed are not grieved at the multitude and variety of their Names 2 Who being in Truth almost any thing rather then Christians delight in any Name rather then in the Name of Christians Against the Reconcilement and Reunion of the two Religions the Reformed and the Roman 1. BEing true that the Roman Church is Heretikcal and Impure And on the contrary the Reformed Churches Orthodox and Pure It follows manifestly that there can be none well grounded hope to agree and reunite Popery with the Reformed Churches And therefore that the labour of those who would think upon such a thing were not a seasonable labour 1. Because that in the differences which are amongst us we are so contrary one to the other that the one do clearly maintain the Negative and the others the Affirmative Now it must necessarily be that one of the Propositions be true and the other false Because two contradictories cannot be together true And it is not possible to soulder them by the mastick of some distinctions having no ground in the Word of God 2. The Errors of the Church of Rome have been solemnly ratified and confirmed by the Council of Trent upon pain of Anathema And therefore since that Ratification and confirmation there is no way nor mean left of reconcilement and Agreement For if there were the said Church should be bound to acknowledge her Errors to the end that they may be reformed And to disanul and abrogate concerning them the Canons of the said Council of Trent which is not to be expected from her as long as she shall maintain this poin as she doth vehemently that she cannot Erre And that she layes down and propounds no other Principle of Faith than her belief Against Toleration of false Religions with the pure and Reformed when they differ in Fundamental grounds 1. IT is not onely evil to do but also to suffer evil when it is in our power to hinder it Therefore Religion differing in Fundamental Grounds are not to be Tolerated together 2. This is proved by many Arguments Drawn 1. From the Law forbidding to plow with an Ox and an Asse And punishing Idolaters with Death Deut. 22.10 11. and Deut. 19.6.8 9. 2. From the Gospel denying the service of two Masters Mat. 6.24 And interdicting all fellowship and communion of light with darkness or Christ with Belial 2 Cor. 6.14 15 16. 3. From the Spirits Bill of enditement framed against the Angels of Pergamos and Thyatira for tollerating the Nicolaitans Rev. 2.15 20. 4. From Gods threatning to cut off all such as swear by him and by Malcham Zeph. 1.5 5. From the Imputation which is laid by the Spirit upon many Kings of Israel and Judah for not taking away the High places 1 King 15.14 6. From the Examples of Asa Josiah Ezekiah Constantine Jovian Theodosius and other Religious Princes who by severe Laws restrained Heresie and Idolatry and constrained the true worship of God 7. From the great danger of Heresie which like a Canker soon spreads over the whole body of the Church and if it be not looked into killeth and that eternally thousands of souls breaketh the bands of Nature and cutteth in sunder all sinews of human Society Putteth enmity variance and implacable discords in families Soweth seeds of Sedition in the State and Rebellion against the Prince Refutation of this Slander of the Popish Doctors That the Reformed are Enemies to Scriptures 1. THe Reformed say that this is indeed a very impudent Slander 2. For who ever thought and spoke more Honourablie Reverently and with more due Regard of the Scriptures then they Who have received and imbraced all Scripture given by Inspiration as the very voice of God himself Holding it for the onely Ground and Rule of their Faith and Religion And so resting in it as that they desire no other help as necessary to Salvation Which if they had not with more diligence and devotion defended then the Romanists ever did long ere this the glory of it had perished and it had been counted as a dead Letter 3. For what have the Reformed done for these many years with more endeavour and diligence then to maintain the Majesty and Excellencie of the Scriptures 4. Which the Romanists have so unworthily violated 5. And yet they blush not to match the Reformed with the Manichees and Ebionites who have violently laid villanous hands upon those Sacred Books Of the Apocryphal Books excluded from the Canon by the Reformed Churches Jesuits THe Jesuites and other Papists do demand of the Reformed by what Authority they Maime and Rob the Corps of the Bible Answer of the Reformed to that Demand 1. WE offer no violence to this Body neither do we cut off any which do appertain to the substance and perfection of it we pull away no Member 2. For we do not cut out any true Canonical Scriptures but cull out such as are not Canonical but foisted in and Counterfeit 3. Herein we do the Canonical Scriptures no injury dividing them from such Books as are not of that absolute Authority That they which are in truth Canonical may remain intire and whole together no more then the Shepheard doth injury to the Sheep in sorting the Goats and orher Cattel from them The Doctrine of the Reformed Churches and particularly of the Church of England that the Ministers of God hath power to Forgive Sins if the Sinner repent and believe the Gospel maketh not the English Reformed Ministers to be Priests as they are called in the Church of Rome 1. VVE Reformed say that the Ministers of God hath power to forgive sins not in some Cases only but in all whatsoever if the sinner repent and believe the Gospel 2. This Authority is given unto him by Christ 3. This in the State and Church of England the Parliament and the Communion Book confesse 2. 1. NEvertheless a Popish Writer is far from his purpose to prove thereby the Popish Order of Priesthood 2. For this maketh not the English Reformed Ministers to be Priests as they are called in the Church of Rome but Preachers of Repentance which bring the glad Tidings of the Gospel to all those that be heavie laden and desire to be refreshed 3. 1. NEither have they power
reason is given by Aquinas 2. part q. 97. Art 3. Because the Law of God proceedeth from the will of God and therefore may not be altered by Custome proceeding from the will of Man 7. In that regard very well doth S. Cyprian write lib. 2. Epist 3. ad Caecilium If only Christ is to be heard we ought not to regard what any before us hath thought fit to be done but what Christ who is before all hath first done For we must not follow the Custome of Man but the truth of God And in another place Custome without truth is nothing but Antiquity of Error Idem ad Pomp. cont Epist. Steph. Papae God alone is the Law-giver of his Church Nothing must be ordained concerning the Things which belong to Religion without the Word of God 1. THe Reason of that is because God alone is the Law-giver of his Church And the onely Author of the Doctrine Concerning Faith or Belief And Religious Worship That God is the onely Authour of the Doctrine concerning Faith or Belief we prove it by the following Arguments 1. THe 1. is taken from the Nature of Faith For all the Doctrines of Faith in regard of the matter which is to be believed must have a certain infallible and undoubted Truth Now it is the property of God alone to be infallibly true of his own nature Let God be true but every man a lyar saith S. Paul Rom. 3.4 And therefore God alone is the Author of the Doctrine of Faith 2. The 2. Argument is taken from the Quality of the Articles of Faith For the proper documents and Doctrines of Faith do exceed the capacity and apprehension of the Creature And therefore they could not be revealed but onely by the Creator Such is the Doctrine of the Trinity of the Persons in the unity of an Essence Such is the Doctrine of the Eternal Birth of the Son of God Such that of the Procession of the Holy Ghost And such that of the hypostaticall union of the two Natures of Christ Divine and Humane And such are all other Articles concerning Faith properly and strictly taken which in that they are above the naturall knowledge of the Creature cannot be known by us but by the supernaturall Revelation of the Creator Of all them this of Christ may be said Flesh and Bloud hath not revealed these things unto mankind but God the Father which is in Heaven Matth. 16.17 3. The 3. Argument is taken from the reward of Faith and the punishment propounded to unbelief and infidelity Which doe manifestly argue that it belongeth to God alone to frame and prescribe to Men Articles and dogmes concerning beliefe and Faith For the reward propounded to Faith is Eternall Life Iohn 3.36 And that is the gift of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Rom. 6.23 And the punishment denounced against infidelity is Eternall Death Which punishment God alone is able to inflict Christ teacheth it Matt. 10.28 in these words Fear not them which kill the body but are not able to kill the soul But rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell He teacheth it also John 3.36 when he sayes that he that believeth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him 2. That God is the onely Author of the Doctrine concerning Religious Worship We prove it by the following Arguments 1. THe 1. Argument is taken from the Relation which is between God And the Church God alone in the Spiritual Government of the Soul is Soveraign Monarch Is the Housholder Is the Husband In regard of his Church This Church in regard of her Relation to God Is Called The City of God The House of Cod The Spouse of God Now who should be so Impudent As to prescribe Laws to a Foreign City Concerning her Duties to her King Or to Another Mans Family Or to Another Mans Wife Concerning the Manner Of Obeying And Rendring Service To her Master Or to her Husband 2. The 2. Argument is taken From the Reward And Punishment Annexed to the Works of Divine Worship For the Works of Divine Worship Piously observed have from the Munificence of God a Promise of Eternal Reward But being Neglected or Contemned a Commination of Eternal Death From whence it may be Gathered That God Alone who is the Lord of Life and Death Hath the Power To Ordain such Works And to Injoin Them By the Empire of a Law-giver 3. The 3. Argument is drawn from the Prohibition of God For God himself by an Expresse Law hath attributed to Himself Alone The Authority to Ordain his Service Deut. 12.32 What thing soever I command you observe to do it Thou shalt not adde thereto nor diminish from it From whence also is that of our Saviour Matth. 15.9 But in vain they do worship me Teaching for Doctrines the Commandements of men 4. The 4. Argument is Because the Works of Worship depend from the Will of God who is to be Worshipped Therefore God is not Worshipped at all by those Works By which he did not declare whether he would be Worshipped or Not. But in This None can know the Will of God unlesse he doth reveal it and Injoines it For who hath known the Mind of the Lord Or who hath been his Counsellour That is Confirmed by This That all whosoever did think to Worship God with their own Invented Works Did provoke him to Anger rather than honour him Nay they are found To have worshipped the Devil Or the Idols of their own heart rather than God They went a whoring with their own Inventions Therefore was the wrath of God kindled against his People Psal 106.39 40. §. The onely Ground and Rule of Faith And Divine Worship Is the Holy Scripture 1. NO Mortal Creature can Teach Religion 2. Nor Carnal Man can attain true knowledge unlesse God Instructs Him And his Spirit lead Him to the Truth 3. The Phrophets Agree to the Truth of this Doctrine Esa 8.20 To the Law and to the Testimony 4. So doth Christ Joh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures for in them ye think ye have eternal Life and they are they which testifie of me 5. And so do the Apostles calling the Scriptures a Rule As S. Paul doth Gal. 6.16 And as many as walk according to this Rule And Philip. 3.16 Let us walk by the same Rule 6. And so do the Ancient Fathers and Doctors Sequi Divinas Literas De fide ad Reginas c. To follow this Rule saith Cyrill is the Path unto Heaven And to be led by this Canon is the way to Salvation And S. Irene Non per alios Dispositionene Salutis cognovimus By the Scriptures we Learn to be saved §. Also The Holy Scripture ought to be among us the Supream Interpreter of Scriptures And the Judge of Controversies 1. FOr Confirmation of That this Language of the Reformed is to be noted and observed How better say They would it stand with
should raze their Names out of the Calender of Gods Saints or think otherwise then Reverently of them § Objection of the Popish Writers against this Declaration of the Reformed HOw say they can we esteem them to be Holy teaching that they did Erre Answer to that Objection 1. VVE Reformed do Answer That the Ancient Fathers are not in such Assertions contrary to themselves 2. Were not the Apostles Holy Men when they dreamed of an Earthly Kingdom in this World Yet this Opinion is contrarie to a principal Article of our Faith Were They void of Holiness when they believed that the Gospel was to be preached to the Jews onely Which is greatly Derogatory to the Grace of God and Salvation of his people Then every Error doth not overthrow all holiness in the servants of God 3. In the Primitive Church many Holy Fathers were infected with the Error of Christs Reigning a thousand years on earth who notwithstanding are worthily accounted Saints of God 4. Cyprian and many Godly Bishops with him erred about the Baptism Ministred by Hereticks Yet lost they not for all that the Opinion and Name of Holy Bishops and Fathers 5. All such errors mentioned were such as in the before named Fathers did not raze the Foundation of the Gospel § There is great difference between the Errors of the Antient Fathers And those of the present Church of Rome And Popish Doctors 1. THe Fathers slipt a little The Popish Doctors and Papists are fallen headlong into the pit 2. The Fathers were overseen through infirmide The Popish Doctors and Papists are blind of Malice 5. The Fathers scattered some Darnel in the Lords Field The Popish Doctors and Papists have plucked up by the Roots the good Corn. 4. The Fathers have suffered losse of this building being not agreeable to the foundation yet are saved The Popish Doctors and Papists overthrow indirectly and by good consequence the foundation it self And therefore continuing in these opinions what hope can they have to be saved § Examination of these words of Luther repreved by the Popish Writers That he was not moved though a thousand Austins Cyprians Churches be against him The Popish Writers BY these words say the Popish Writers Luther did shew that he was unmeasurable Arrogant and wilful Answer to that Accusation and Presumption 1. LVther's Spirit was far from this Insolent and Immoderate Presumption as may by his own words appear ‖ Contra Regem Angliae For he saith not that he more setteth by his own private judgment then he doth by all the Fathers and Doctors But he saith That he setteth against the sayings of the Fathers of Men of Angels of Devils the Word of the onely Eternal Majestie the Gospel And again immediately he saith The Word of God is above all The Majestie of God maketh with me That I care not though a thousand Augustines and Cyprians stood against me 2. Is this to set his private judgment against All the Fathers Is this Pride Is this Presumption Must Gods word and Majesty and Gospel yield to the judgment of Fathers be they never so many 3. Luther did not think so but meant this by the words alledged against him If Augustine or Cyprian or any other Father maintain any thing against Gods Word Luther or any other Minister of Christ may in such Case preferre his Judgement warranted by the word of God before theirs 4. If the Popish Doctors deny this they are not worthy to be called Christians 5. And yet closely They doe deny it in that they reprove Luther and condemn him for saying the same §. Objections against this Answer of the Reformed by the Popish Writers 1. Objection YOu Reformed say the said Writers can bring no Instance that ever the Ancient Fathers did so Answer of the Reformed to that Objection 1. HAve the Popish Writers forgotten what fell out in the first Council of Nice when the Fathers agreeing to dissolve the Marriage of Ministers were withstood by Paphnutins and yielded in the end Here one Paphnutius Judgement was preferred before all the other three hundreds of Fathers 2. And so oftentimes the Judgement of many hath been corrected by one S. Augustine saith Whether of Christ Contra Petil. lib. 3. cap. 6. or of his Church or of any other thing that appertaineth to or Faith and Life I will not say We not to be compared to him that said Though we But as he added If an Angel from Heaven shall Preach any thing besides that ye have received in the Legal and Evangelical Scriptures let him be accursed If we may accurse them how many and whosoever they be that Teach contrary to the Prophetical and Apostolical Scriptures then may we prefer our Judgement in such Cases before them 3. In another place S. Augustine saith August Epist 19. For all these namely Fathers yea above all these the Apostle Paul offereth himself I flie to Him I appeal to Him from all Writers that think otherwise Thus was S. Augustine bold to write even to S. Jerome and feared not any suspicion either of Arrogancy or of Heresie for the same 4. Such Account then must we make of the Truth that we must stand with it against all the world and not for the Reverence of mens Persons give it over or betray it or be afraid to defend it 2. Objection THough the Fathers in the Councils of Nice of Ephesus of Chalcedon had alledged no direct and evident Place against Arius and Nestorius and Eutiches yet the Christian People was bound to believe them grounding themselves onely upon the Catholick and Universal Faith of the Churches before them Answer of the Reformed to that Objection 1. THis is boldly and bluntly spoken 2. These Godly and Catholick Fathers Assembled in Council against these Hereticks Confuted them by the Authority of Gods Word and as it were did cut the throat of their Heresies with the Sword of the Spirit This is onely the Weapon then used And with this they prevailed 3. As likewise have all other godly Councils ever done against the Hereticks and enemies of the Church The Fathers have Errors and the Doctors of the Roman Church do acknowledge it 1. IT is confessed by our Adversaries that the Fathers had their Errors 2. And themselves in divers cases challenge and censure them 3. There is none of the Fathers saith Stapleton in which something erroneous may not be observed And Anselm saith in the books of those holy Doctors which the Church readeth as Authentical some things are found wicked and heretical And Mulhusinus the Jesuite We know the Fathers were men and erred sometimes 4. Before the Pelagian Heresie arose Augustine was deceived in the matter of divine grace and freewill And although the same Father is many times Orthodox in the Question of Purgatory yet at other times he varieth at least doubtfully from his own sounder judgment The Reformed justly exclude from the rule of Faith The Determinations of the Pope 1. VVE
have said before That the Determinations of the Pope is the onely Rule of Faith in the Roman Church 2. Now then this being the Papists own certain Rule and Ground and Resolution We Reformed would gladly be Enformed How by the same a man may be assured of any Faith It being further also agreed and confessed among themselves That the Pope may fall into Heresie 3. Then who seeth not That their Ground being shaken and their Staie failing All that is Builded and upohlden thereon is clean overthrown The Popes may fall into Heresie and have erred in great Articles of the Faith 1. MArtinus sacrifice to Idols Liberius subscribe to Arianism John the 24. an hererick oppressor persecutor fornicator Simmonist did deny the immortality of the Soul and the resurrection of the body Leo the seventh was not much behind for the Life to come And Clement the 7th doubted of the immortality Answer to an Objection of the Jesuites 4. IF the Jesuites say That the Pope falling into Heresie forthwith ceaseth to be a Pope We demand who they are that must judge the Popes Cause and give Sentence against Him 4. And if the Pope be obstinate and teaching Heresie and therewith infecting the World will notwithstanding stoutly stand in defence of his Doctrine and will keep his Chaire What shift have the Papists then And what can they do against him seeing he is their Pope their Head their Author and Founder of all their Faith 6. Thus a man going with the Papists along and coming to the end of all findeth no stay but must wander still as in an endless Labyrinth wherein he shall at last languish and perish everlastingly Besides The Reformed say of the Pope That he is not the Rule of Faith and Judge of Controversies because he is the great Antichrist foretold in the Scriptures 1. IN the Bishops of Rome after Boniface the third and Hildebrand we find The Name the Seat the Apparel the Time the Pride the Cruelty the Idolatry the Coveteousnesse the Imposture the Power and the fortune of Antichrist which are the Marks whereby S. Paul and S. John describes that man of sin and son of perdition 2. The Name of Antichrist containeth in it the number 666 which Irenaeus findeth in the word Latinus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. The Seat of Antichrist is a City built upon seven Hills that ruleth over the whole world This City Propertius tells us to be Rome Septem urbs clara jugis toti quae praesidet orbi 4. The Apparel and Ornaments of Antichrist are Scarlet and Purple Gold Jewels and precious stones which the Popes wear especially on high daies 5. The Time of Antichrist his rising is foretold to be after the Division of the Roman Empire after whch it appears by all stories that the Pope grew to his greatnesse 6. The vices of Antichrist are these especially Pride Idolatry or Spiritual Fornication Cruelty Imposture Covetousnesse who are to be found in the Popes as hath been represented above under the Title of the Popes vices 7. The Beast is said to have horns like a Lamb and to speak like a Dragon and to exercise all the power of the first Beast Apoc. 18.11 This agreeth to the Papacy and Pope who resembleth Christ whose Vicar he calleth himself and arrogateth to himself Christs double power both Kingly and Priestly He exerciseth also the power of the first Beast to wit the Roman Empire described by seven Heads and ten Horns because as the first Beast the Roman Empire by power and temporal Authority So the Pope by policy and Spiritual Jurisdiction ruleth over a great part of the world 8. It is written of the Whore of Babylon that the Kings of the earth should give their power to her for a time but that in the end they should hate her and make her desolate Apoc. 17.13.16 which we find daily more and more fulfilled in the Papacy 9. From all which we do justly argue in this manner He in whom all or the principal Marks of Antichrist are found he is the Antichrist But in the Pope all or the principal marks of Antichrist are to be found Ergo the Pope is the Antichrist Of the divers Ages of Antichrist 1. THe First Age of Antichrist was when Bonifacius the third Bishop of Rome was declared Head of the Church and the Bishop of Bishops by Phocas who killed the Emperour Mauritius his Master and did usurp the Empire which Phocas to get the good will of the Romans drew to himself That Bonifacius the third giving him the abovesaid Title 2. The Second Age of Antichrist was when he was put in possession of the City of Rome and of the Exarchat 3 The Third Age of Antichrist was when he raised himself above the Emperours their Soveraigns and Lords The Pope being the foretold Antichrist and demonstrating it What Horrour is it to submit to him 1. ALthough the Pope be the foretold Antichrist yet people do Adore this Monster and Princes do Applaude him and very often ruine their Kingdoms at his desire and appetite and daily yet do offer their poor Subjects in a Sacrifice of good Odour to this Antichrists feet 2. Who would believe it if Gods Spirit had not foretold it 3. And who shall believe it after us when he is consumed by this same Spirit An Appendix concerning Cardinals the Popes Counsellours 1. WHen Cardinals have been raised up this is the Language of the Archbishop of Bragantia among many Prelates of the Council of Trent That in the Church had been established an Order Superiour to the Bishops in times past unknown of the Church namely that of Cardinals 2. Who in the first times were reputed to be of the number of other Priests and Deacons 3. And onely after the tenth Age had raised themselves above their Degree 4. Yet not so much that they durst make themselves equals unto Bishops unto whom they were held to be inferiours until the year of Grace a thousand and two hundred 5. But from that time Not onely have they esteemed themselves to be Equals unto Bishops but moreover have raised themselves above them So that now they hold them for servants in their Houses 6. He concluded That the Church should never be reformed untill Bishops and Cardinals were brought again to the Rank due unto each of them Of Cardinals more particularly 1. NOt one word can be found in the Antient Church concerning Cardinals save in this signification That Cardinal Priest did signifie the Parson or Rector of one of the Parishes of the Bishoprick Then Cardinal Priest was as much as principal Priest even as some virtues are called Cardinal virtues And some winds Cardinal winds that is to say First and Principal 2. And this Title was used not onely in Rome but also in other great Archiepiscopal Cities principally at Milan where Sigonius reporteth that there were 22. Cardinals about the end of the seventh book 3. And there being many Priests in one Parish he that
when he goes on 4. Concerning the particular Faults of the said Cardinal they appear in every point of controversie which he handles against the Reformed Churches Which particular Faults are clearly discovered and solidly refuted by the Doctors of the said Churches who did undertake the Answer to the said Controversie §. An Observation very considerable concerning the Society of Jesus and the Name of Jesuite 1. THe Societie of the Jesuites have separated Christ Else why have they separated Jesus from Christ 2. And leaving the Ancient ordinary Name of Christians which they scorn as too common they desiring rather to be called Jesuites a new Name of their own framing then to be called Christians 3. As though there were some society of Jesus priated to one kind of men separated from other Christians 4. If there be then is Christ divided 5. If not then you Jesuites are too Impudent to devise a new Society §. Exception of the Jesuites YOu Reformed set upon our Society and say we have divided Christ because certain men have chosen unto them this Name above all others to be accounted of the Society of Jesus because they have consecrated themselves wholy to advance this Name Must they therefore of necessity divide Christ Have not the English Christ Colledge in Oxford Answer of the Reformed to this Exception 1. WE will not strive much with you Jesuites about your Society of which we reformed make very small account 2. If you have for some special consideration Dedicated your selves unto Christ What is that consideration Why do not you tell us what Jesus requireth of you which all other Christians are not bound to do 3. If the Order of your profession require that you propagate the honour and magnifie the Name Jesus If for this all Christians ought not to labour at least Bishops and specially the Pope of Rome And if they be Jesuites who do this Why are not your Divines Bishops Cardinals and Popes Jesuites 4. It may be this care is far from them 5. Whereas then Names are for distinguishing of things they be needlesse and vain when there is no difference of the thing 6. Either shew us what is the proper and peculiar duties of Jesuites Or confesse that without any cause you have appropriated such a Name unto them 7. In Cambridge as well as in Oxford there are both Christ and Jesus Colledges but they that live in those Colledges are called onely Christians 8. Think you That because there are many Colledges different in Names there are many different Orders and Professions of men 9. In places distinctions of Names are necessary and without danger unlesse some Schism may happen betwixt the wals 10. Have you Jesuites no other thing to say for your Sect and Society Concerning the Conversion of Countries made by Papists What judgment is to be made of such Conversions 1. IT may happen that a corrupt Church which holdeth not the faith intirely throughout but erreth in some parcels thereof may convert Heathens 2. Such a conversion shall be mixed In some things it shall be to the true Faith In others it shall be to erroneous beleeving 3. Like as diseased Parents when they procreate Children do together with their nature and kind propagate hereditarie sicknesse 4. And that the Ecclesiastical story reporteth That the Arrians converted the Goths to Christianity 5. And such is the conversion of Heathens made by Papists Again Of the Conversion of the Americans by the Jesuites 1. The Jesuites which have assayed to make new kingdoms among the Indians did not serve Christ but the Pope 2. Nor did they enlarge the Kingdome of Christ but they did prepare for the Pope a Kingdom far from the Reformed where he may reign after he shall be banished from these countries 3. Which newly could easily have been effected by Lewis the 14 King of France if he had been willing to chastise or rather so far to punish Alexander now Pope as to take from him the Temporal Dominions of which the Popes are become Princes by the liberalitie of the Kings of France his predecessors Of the different Sects that are in the Church of Rome namely Thomists Scotists Dominicans Franciscans Jesuites COncerning these different Sects the Jesuites for Defense of them produce this Reason That all these did ever consent in Faith and differed onely in such things which might be disputed without any hazard of Faith Answer to that by the Reformed 1. BE it granted they did agree in matters of Faith Why then do they not follow all one Rule 3. For S. Paul reproved the Corinthians agreeing in Faith because they attributed to their Ministers more then was meet whilest one had Devoted himself to S. Paul another to S. Peter and another to Apollo What then shall be done to the Scotists to the Thomists and to others Are the Names of Scotus of Thomas of Francis more holy and lawful Names in their Disciples then the names of S. Peter S. Paul and of Apollo 3. Besides the difference is very great not in the name onely but in things also 4. As thus Let the Question be whether the Crosse of Christ and the Image of Christ be to be worshipped with the same kind of worship that Christ is Adored withal Doth not this appertain to Faith But Error in this will be plain Idolatry And yet the Jesuites know some of the Schoolmen stand for it Some against it 5. What of that Question which hath exercised all Churches and all Schools so long Whether the Virgin Mary had Original sin Or was ever pure and without spot 6. And infinite such Differences the Reformed do omit being matter of Faith § From hence I infer That the Vnitie pretended by the Popish Doctors to be in the Church of Rome is not so Intire and General as they would have it thought 1. BUt although it be not so yet if it proceeded of knowledge of the Truth and of faithful submission with the heartie obedience to the same truth it should deserve great Commendation 2. But springing from this Fountain That all men must obey the Pope whatsoever he teach and command without Examination or Resistance upon pain of Eternal Damnation It is altogether unworthie of commendation and praise because it is an easie matter upon this Foundation to raise up and maintain any unitie whatsoever 3. In that regard such unity is Tyrannical and Devilish 4. And in other Regards it is Carnal For in the chiefest Members of the Church of Rome it doth proceed from vain Ambition from worldly Pleasures and from filthy Covetousnesse 5. In another regard besides It is Brutish and also carnal proceeding in the most Members of Brutish Ignorance and of Fear Of the Seduction of People by the Popes and the Roman Church by their False Doctrine in General 1. IT is one of the Sinnes of the Popes and of the Church of Rome to seduce People by their False and Corrupted Doctrine 2. Which is a crying and an abominable Sin
That they were grounded upon the Word of God because there is no passage which formally saith That the Son is consubstantial to the Father and that it is not a Created God 2. The Nestoreans also could say That they were grounded upon the Word of God because there is no formal place which saies That in Jesus Christ there are not two Persons 3. So much could say the Eutichians For there are no places which formally saies That the two Natures of Christ be not confused and that the Human Nature hath not swallowed up by the Divine Nature 4. Likewise the Jews who reject Jesus Christ with a prodigious obstinacie could say That they were grounded upon the Word of God because that in Moses and in all the Prophets there is not any place which saith formally That Jesus the Son of Mary born in Bethlehem under the Empire of Caesar Augustus is the Messias 5. In a word the Religion of the Mahometans could be said to be grounded upon the Word of God For there is no Text in the Bible which saith that Mahomet is a false Prophet and that his Religion is impious and abominable and that the Paradise which God promiseth to his children is not a carnal Paradise § The necessarie consequences that are drawn out of the Scriptures are as valuable to prove the falshood of a Belief as the formal Texts are as also to prove the Truth of a Belief ANd so whensoever we are to confirm the Truth and to confute Errors and Untruths it is lawful to make use of two kind of Arguments drawn out of the Canonical Books of Scripture Namely 〈◊〉 of those who expressely and as in as many words are drawn out of the Holy Scriptures Secondly of those which are drawn out of them by good and lawfull Consequence 1. Certainly those that would reject Consequences drawn out of the Reason of Holy Scriptures should condemn Jesus Christ who made use of Consequences to prove the Resurrection against the Sadducees For after he had produced the place of Moses Exod. 3.6 where God calleth himself the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. He inferres by a good Consequence for proofe of the Resurrection God is not the God of the Dead but of the Living 2. Truely whosoever is against the drawing out of any Consequence doth abolish all the common sense and all use of Reason which consists onely in that 3. We acknowledge That Faith proceeds another way then Humane Sciences do for Faith drawes all her Proofs from the Divine Authority but as the most famous School-men do observe the Sacred Divinity is Argumentative that is to say That it doth not abolish but on the contrary makes more Noble the use of Argumentation and Discourse We allow besides That the Rules of Logick are not Articles of Faith But notwithstanding we say that they are Tools and Instruments to handle all knowledge with order and certainty And Consequently the Theological Matters Fraud This is a Fraud of some Jesuites that in Disputations concerning Religion they will ever Question and never Answer 1. FOr it belongs to him that Affirmeth a Thing to prove it otherwise one might Affirm all things impudently 2. According to this Rule It belongeth then unto those who maintain That every day Christ is to be offered in a Propitiatory Sacrifice who maintain The Prayers unto the Dead to Justifie their Belief by the Word of God And to make us see That it hath been written and set down in clear and formal words or that it is drawn from it by a Necessary Consequence This is another of the Frauds of the Church of Rome 1. That the taking away of the Cup from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper 2. Forbidding Marriage to Priests 3. And Divine Service being in an unknown Tongue to the People are onely grounded upon worldly Interest 1. This is true in Regard of the taking away the Cup from the Communion COncerning the taking away the Cup from the Sacrament This is the language of the Doctors of the Church of Rome That if it were possible to grant to the people the use of the Cup without doing any wrong to the Faith it should be a thing of small importance but that could not be because by the grant of the said use of the Cup a gate should be opened to require that all the Ordinances which are of positive right should be broken And yet say they They are they by which alone the Prerogative given by Christ to the Curch of Rome is conserved 2. This is true in regard of the Prohibition of Marriage to Clergie Men. FOr say the said Doctors from the Marriage of Clergie men if it were granted it should happen that they having a Family Wives and Children should no more depend from the Pope but from their natural Prince and their affections towards their issue would make them agree to all things wrongful unto the Church that they should indeavour to render Livings Hereditarie And in a short time the Holy Seat should be Restraned in the onely City of Rome That before the Coeliba or Single Life had been decreed The Roman See drew no thing at all from other Towns and Countries but by it was become Master of such a great number of Benefits Of whom by the Marriage of Clergie men it should be deprived in a short time 3. This is true in regard of Divine Service in a Tongue unknown to the people FOr say the said Doctors from the use of the vulgar Tongue in the Celebration of Divine Service it should follow that every one should esteem themselves Divines That the Prelates Authoritie should be vilified and that Heresie should creep in All. Of a most considerable Contradiction of the Principal Doctors of the Church of Rome in regard of their Doctrine That the Kingdom of Heaven And Eternal Life is due as a Debt to our good works 1. VVE Reformed do Teach That he that sinneth hath deserved death worthily in respect of the sin committed which is a Transgression of Gods will and Commandement And for which without Remission there is no hope to Escape eternal Condemnation 2. But can he that worketh well for one or two or for more good Works claim unto himself as a due Debt the Kingdome of Heaven for the same 3. The Reformed Doctors do deny it for many strong Reasons 4. The Popish Doctors in the Schooles and in handling Controversies of Religion that are between the Reformed and the Church of Rome do openly affirm it maintaining that the Kingdome of Heaven and Eternal Life is due as a due Debt to our good works 5. 1. But howsoever it is now for a Fashion with great Countenance and vehement Disputation avouched by some Doctors of the Roman Church that we merit Heaven by our good works 2. Yet we are perswaded that no Adversary of Conscience can otherwise think or dare in peril of Death otherwise say but that he hath deserved for
discoursing of the Waldenses a People for substance of the Protestants Religion saith in these termes They are in all the Cities of Lombardy and of Provence No Sect hath continued so long Some say it hath been since Pope Sylvesters time Some since the Apostles These Waldenses believe all Articles concerning God but they hate the Church of Rome 3. So that the Reformed have had a Church and their Religion before Luther A Refutation of this shift of the Jesuites That because Luther was in Error in Regard of his doctrine of Consubstantiation Therefore his Refutations of their Opinions and Doctrines is not to be considerable 1. THis is a strange shift indeed for is it not a miserable perverseness in the Jesuites and others Popish Doctors and Writers that being not able to maintain their own Heresies against Luther they will think to escape in the Judgement of Men from being condemned because Luther himself in one point of Doctrine erred 2. May no man convince Error but such an one as is free from Error at all Himself 3. The Scriptures are left unto us to be our Rule of Truth by them must all Doctrine be squared and directed they sit in the highest Seat of Judgement to give Sentence in every Cause 4. With Them did Luther cut down the Popish Errors 5. But one Error of Luther cannot serve to excuse infinite Errors in the Popish Church The Reformed of England France Holland c. do not Believe whatsoever the late Writers have said 1. VVE are not so addicted in these Reformed Churches as to Believe whatsoever the late Writers have said 2. We are no more partial unto them in this behalf then we are unto the Ancient Fathers 3. Our Religion and Faith hangeth not upon the sayings of Men be they old or young but onely upon the Canonical Scriptures of God 4. And if they be against us so long as Scripture is for us our Cause is good and we will not be ashamed thereof 5. From hence it followeth That therefore most false is it that the Papists say That our Divity resteth upon these late Writers and young Fathers whom the Jesuites and other Popish Doctors do so scornfully compare with the Old Fathers 6. We use not to alledge for proofs authentical of any Doctrine and as the Rule of our Faith Calvin Bucer or others 7. But our Traditive and Use is this Thus saith the Lord Thus say the Prophets Thus say the Apostles Thus the Evangelists Thus it is written in the Scriptures Thus we read in some Book of the Old or of the New Testament Again If Luther or any other Learned Man among the Protestants or of the Reformed in the Churches above mentioned have either Interpreted the Scripture in somthing amiss or have doubted of some one Book of Scripture whereof doubt also hath been made of old in the Church of Christ we are not to defend their Expositions or to approve their Judgement Again The particular Opinions of Luther and Lutherans are not to be objected by the Papists against the Reformation of England France the United Provinces c. 1. FOr these Reformed Churches are not bound to justifie all Luthers sayings and the Lutherans and their private Opinions no more then the Papists will be content to avouch whatsoever hath been spoken or published by any one or other famous man of their Sect. 2. Which thing if they will take upon them to perform then let them profess it or else they offer us the more injury that object still against us a saying which was never either uttered or allowed by us 3. This might suffice men of indifferent Reason § Of Luthers Error concerning the Bodily Presence in the Sacrament LVther retained this Error of his old leaven wherewith in time of Papistry his Judgement was corrupted § Another Answer of the Reformed to the Objection made by the Jesuites against Luther in regard of his Error of Consubstantiation That therefore his Refutation of their Doctrine is not to be considerable THe Reformed again return this answer to that Objection 1. That although Luther therein somthing swarved from the Truth yet that he might bring in other Causes assured thereof out of the Word of God reject the Opinions of such as dissent from the same word 2. Otherwise no Man in Defence of Gods Truth may challenge or bid Defiance to the Adversaries thereof seeing they have no Priviledge or Charter granted to them but that themselves also may be deceived § Again Concerning Luther 1. LVther say the Reformed was an excellent Man and a worthy servant of Christ 2. Whose Ministery especially it pleased God to use in revealing to these Times the Son of Perdition who fitteth in the Temple of God and advanceth himself above God 3. Yet Luther was a Man 4. And therefore no marvel if he were not exempted altogether as from Ignorance so also from Infirmities § Concerning the Contention between Luther and Zuinglius about the Sacrament of the Lords Supper 1. 1. THis Contention and Dissention was a very hard one hotly debated in many Books 2. And the same hath continued since to the great hinderance of the Gospel and offence of many 3. In which contrary Writings and Discourses are found oftentimes harder speeches of either against other then were to be wished 4. Now do come in the Popish Writers like crafty enemies and gathering a heap of such speeches out of sundry of their Books do insert the same in their Books to make their Readers acquainted therewith that seeing such earnest contention among the chiefest Professors of the Gospel they may be further withdrawn in alienation of mind from the love and liking thereof 2. Examination of that matter 1. THose speeches of either against other which are harder oftentimes then were to be wished are yet such as the godly Servants of the Lord in contention about the Truth somtimes are moved to utter against their Brethren 1. S. Paul openly and sharply reprehended S. Peter to his face whereat wicked Porphyrie catched a like occasion to rail at Christian Religion long since as our Adversaries do at these dayes 2. What a violent and troublesome contention was there between Theophilus of Alexandria and good Chrysostome of Constantinople 3. Who knoweth not how sharply Cyrillus a learned and wise Bishop of Alexandria hath written against Theodoretus a good and Catholick Bishop in a Controversie touching the Catholique Faith both Bishops both Catholiques both Learned both Godly both Excellent Pillars of the Church And yet he that readeth both their Writings would think that both were dangerous Enemies of the Church and of the Faith of Christ and to be avoided of all Christians 2. So in the Books of Luther and of Zuinglius and of those that maintain either part appeareth we grant great sharpness and bitterness of Dissention who all notwithstanding if we set the heat of Dissention aside were as godly as learned as zealous Christians as the World had any The Reformed
themselves to forgive sins but God alone forgiveth sins Mark 1.7 2. But having the word of Reconciliation committed unto them from God they offer pardon and in his Name pronounce pardon to the sinner that believeth and that turneth from his wickednesse and sinnes unto the Lord. Refutation of this Accusation of the Jesuites and other Popish Writers that in the Religion and Doctrine of the Reformed their is no Stay or Certainty 1. VVHat greater stedfastnesse in Religion can be required then to hold Gods Word which we Reformed profess to be the Ground we build our Faith 2. If the Popish Doctors can shew wherein we swarve from it we will not refuse their Instruction 3. But that they cannot do for we plant not our Religion in mans Judgement and in the uncertainty of Traditions in vain Ceremonies and Devices as the Papists do 4. But in matters of Faith and Religion we depend upon God who in the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament hath delivered to his Church one certain Uniform and perfect Doctrine to which we add nothing from which we take nothing away in which we settle and ground our selves §. In matter of Points of Religion the private Judgement of some few is not to be objected by the Popish Doctors against the consent of a whole Reformed Church And therefore conclude that in our Reformed Religion we have no certain staie 1. FOr then may we Reformed in like manner and by as good reason argue against the Papists for a thousand such matters wherein hath been no small dissention among the Popish Divines That the Papists have no certain ground of their Faith 2. That appears by the following Examples 1 A Cardinal of Rome hath openly defended and taught that the Apostle S. Paul permitteth one Wife to Priests and to others more And that plurality of Wives is not forbidden either by the Law of God or by the Law of Nature This Cardinal was Caietan the Popes Legate in Germany and the great Adversary of Luther Katherine hath noted this among his manifold Errors 2. And another Popes Legate writ and published in print a Treatise in commendation of a foul sin for which he was greatly and grievously punished by the Pope being preferred to a great Archbishoprick 3. Pighus saith that Justice in us is a Relation wherein he hath exceedingly offended the other Popish Doctors and Writers 3. May we Reformed Now by the Papists Example hereof conclude that this is the Doctrine of the Roman Church That thus the Papists do believe generally or else that there is no stay in their Religion Refutation of this Accusation of the Jesuites and others Popish Doctors that in the Reformed Churches There is no Vnity but great Differences 1. VVE Reformed say that greater Difference shall not the Popish Doctors find among the true Professors of the Gospel and Reformed Churches then may be amongst the children of God 2. When such bitter Dissention was between the East and the West Churches about the day of Passeover and the same continued so many years with great offence and Alienation among the Faithful yet they ceased not for all that to be the Churches of Christ 3. Neither is it ever to be hoped for that such perfect concord shall be among the Professors of Christs Religion that they shall agree most joynly together in the Truth or in every particular point thereof 4. Yet let us add That although the Tyrannical and the worldly and the carnal provisions for keeping of Unity above Represented be not amongst the Reformed Churches notwithstanding through Gods grace and blessing all Churches Reformed agree soundly in all Articles of Faith that are substantial and necessary to Salvation and shall so do unto the end Refutation of this Accusation of the Jesuites and other Popish Doctors that in the Doctrine and Religion of the Reformed Churches many Paradoxes are to be found and that in General 1. HIerome said that he would not have any man to be patient if he were suspected of Heresie 2. And therefore in so much the worser part do we Reformed take it that so many Paradoxes false and horrible be by the Jesuites and other Popish Doctors objected against us 3. And indeed those Jesuites and others of the Popish Clergy that do object them to us do in this place manifest an horrible Impudence and audaciousnesse for unlesse they had quite and clean put off both all Religion of God and Reverence towards Men they would never have admitted so much Impudencie into themselves as to upbraid us with these monstrous Opinions 4 But we perceive what they intend for they hope that by slandering boldly somewhat would alwaies cleave fast which one of them was wont to say 5. For sith they lack true Imputations whereby they might oppugn our Churches it remained that either they should leave off writing which were their honestest way or at least devise some slanders which they would cast like venomed darts upon us 6. Which thing is both in it self very filthy and also a sure Argument of their desperatenesse 7. When we handle in particular the Controversies that are between us by Gods grace we shall so wipe away these their Paradoxes and Impossibilities that all men shall perceive that they are ascribed to us by them most falsly and most impudently 8. In the mean time we intreat the Reader to observe this That those pretended Paradoxes are either such things as that nothing can be truer then they or else that they are craftily and treacherously wrested by them in a perverse meaning §. It is the Doctrines and Religion of the Church of Rome that many Paradoxes are to be found 1. THe Jesuites publish that there are Paradoxes in great number in the Reformed Religion and Doctrine and do endeavour to manifest it by many Instances which they propose But although they have stirred this Puddle to the bottome with all their diligence yet they have found so much as one Paradox or a piece of a Paradox of the Reformed 2. 1. BUt now if the said Reformed should but a little make search into the most filthy Puddles of the Popish Writers as to reckon up what they have affirmed Of God Of the actual Providence of God Of Predestination Of the Person and of the Offices of Christ Of Original Sin Of the Law Of Righteousnesse and Justification Of Purgatory Of the Pope of Rome Of the Sacraments And of the rest of the greatest Matters in Reliligion how many Carts should they fill with Paradoxes horrible to be spoken or thought 2. We forbear at this present handling but general Observations to stirre this common Sewer but we will do it hereafter by Gods grace when we take in hand the particular Controversies about the said common places that have been mentioned The Renowned Doctors of the Reformed Churches are impudently accused of Ignorance by the Jesuites and others of the Roman Clergie 1. FOr we Reformed do ask of these Jesuites and their fellows and
demand to know of them what Learning is wherein it consisteth and how it may be gotten 2. Unlesse they have some special means and as it were some secret way to attain unto it which others have not The said Reformed see not why the Jesuites and others such like Popish Doctors should think that they have gotten a greater Measure of Learning and Wisdome then others who have used as great indeavour as themselves 3. And therefore the said Reformed Doctors may think that it is some spice of Pride in the Jesuites and their fellows to object Ignorance unto them 4. Who for any thing that appeareth have no cause to bragge of such knowledge or to challenge more to themselves then they may safely grant to another 5. Besides there are none of the Reformed Doctors how unlearned soever the Jesuites and others their fellows think they are but by the grace of God and the Light of his Word can easily discover the Falshood and Corruption of the Religion of the Church of Rome There is an unity in the Protestants Faith and Concord among the Protestants And how Considerable against the Slanders of Papists 1. VVE acknowledge that there be differences and jarres among the Protestants 2. But we deny that there is any such discord or difference among them as dissolveth the unity of Faith Essential to the true Church 3. The difference among the Protestants is no other then such as hath formerly been in the true Church of Christ since the Apostles age which is represented in the end of this Thesis 4. It is not in point of Faith or Primitive Articles of Faith or about things Essential in the object of Faith 1. But the difference is either in accidental probable and secondary points 2. Or touching things difficult in Religion for the searching out of the verity whereof it is profitable that Learned men proceeding modestly do dispute pro and contra 3. Or else the disagreement is personal either among private men or raised by private men Schismatically and Factiously against the Church 5. Now if our Adversaries who object Division unto the Protestant Churches dispute the question of Unity in it self the Scripture and the Fathers and the History of the Church will convince them That Unity in the substance of Faith and of Religion observed by the firmest Members of the Church is simply necessary and an essential property of the Church And other Unity is of the perfection and well being of the Church and yet contingent and variable sometimes greater sometimes less and at no time absolute in all the parts And the same many times is greatly wanting by reason of the Malice of wicked Imps. 6. In the dayes of Constantine wherein it is acknowledged by all men that the visible society of Christians was a true Church There hapned so grievous and unseemly contentions among the Bishops and Pastours that the discord of Christians was brought upon the Stage And Religion was derided and traduced by Infidels 7. Saint Augustine acknowledgeth that the concord of Godly men in this Life wherein they are not perfect but proficient is sometimes interrupted with discord and dissention ariseth even among Brethren and Saints And there be divers things saith he wherein the best learned and most worthy defender of the Catholick rule without prejudice to the Body of Faith do not accord And one of them speaketh more truly then another of the same thing 8. If it be objected that Luther saith that the differences between him and Zuinglius and Calvin are not in small points of Government and Ceremonie c. The Answer to that is that Luthers personal and fretful speech proceeding from passion against such as were contrary minded to him prove that godly men have infirmities and are sometimes over-bitter one against another Like as Cyprian was against Pope Stephen calling him proud ignorant and of a blind and wicked mind and as Epiphanius was against Chrysostome But they are not sufficient to demonstrate that Protestant Churches want the Note of Unity neither doth condemning and Anathematising one another imply dissension in profound points of Religion but may proceed from affection and from want of charity This appeareth by Pope Victor proclaiming Anathema against the East Churches about an Adiaphorous Ceremony It appeareth also by Pope Stephen and by Sergius condemning their predecessor Formosus and raking him being defunct out of his Grave c. 2. 1. IF our Adversaries of the Church of Rome will proceed substantially and prove that there is discord of Faith and of Doctrine among the Protestants they must perform these two things 1. They must produce the principal part of Doctrine belonging to the main object of Faith and demonstate that the Protestant Churches which are reputed Orthodox are divided in these For we have nothing to do with Anabaptists Arians c. 2. They must also give instance in such persons as are reputed sound Members and what parts of the several Churches wherein they live Not of Novellists Incendiaries and Extravagants which are condemned and resisted by the sound and best parts of the Church Rom. 16.17 A Representation of good Magistrates and truly Christians towards the Reformed Religion 1. SUch Magistrates are those who have been alwayes zealous lovers of Christs Gospel and who by their godly Wisdom have done their endeavour to advance greatly the Lords cause from time to time And to hinder the practices of the Adversaries 2. True Religious men ought to beseech the Lord to increase in those Godly Magistrates all those Christian vertues to the benefit of Christs Church and of the Common-wealth of all the Estates where the Reformed Churches are gathered and tollerated Concerning the Church and Religion of England touching the Conversion of England by Augustine the Monk 1. GAlfridus Monumetensis writeth that before Augustine the Monk came in England in the time of Gregory the Great Truth was preached there and sincere Doctrine delivered Vide Godofri Mon. de Orig. gest Britan Libr. 8. cap. 4. 2. Augustines pretended conversion of England was onely the planting of some trifling Ceremonies Of the shaking off of the Ropes yoak by Henry the Eight King of England 1. IT is a thing much to be admired that Henry the Eight King of England having written against Luther in the Popes behalf and for a reward of his affection and pains having received the glorious Title of Defendor of the Faith yet shortly after withdrew himself from the Popes Jurisdiction and became his open and profest Enemy 2. Which Act did seem to many to have proceeded from a cause very little commendable as if it had been onely in revenge that the Pope crossed him in the fruition of his pleasures 3. But it is most certain that the exquisite consideration both of the Kings and of the Popes proceedings thereupon doth cause us to lift up our minds to an higher cause and obliges us to confess that Gods providence hath been manifested therein in a particular