to looke to holinesse of life or Testimony of the same Confutation 65. This is contrary to Rom. 1.7 and the inscriptions of divers Epistles being directed to Saints and Saints by calling and 1 Cor. 14 33. Churches of the Saints Acts 2. the members there were said to repent before they were admitted and 1 Cor. 5. the incestuous person should not then have beene cast out for want of holinesse and Paul could not be received into communion without Testimony Acts 9 26. Error 66. To lay the brethren under a Covenant of works hurts not but tends to much good to make men looke the better to their evidences Confutation 66. If that bee done ungroundedly it is contrary to Isa 5.20 where woe is pronounced to such as call good evill c. and Ezek. 13.22 that make such hearts sad as the Lord would not have sadded and it is against the rule of the Covenant 1 Cor. 13. besides it may trench upon the devils office in accusing the Brethren and then it will be good to tell untruth good to breake house and Church Communion then good to break nearest relations then good to bite one another and good to offend the little ones Matth. 18. Errour 67. A man cannot evidence his justification by his sanctification but he must needs build upon his sanctification and trust to it Confutation 67. First this is contrary to 1 John 3.18 19. where the holy Ghost saith that by unfained and hearty love we may have assurance and yet neither there nor any where else would have us trust to our sanctification so vers 7. He that doth righteousnesse is righteous as he is righteous Secondly if poverty of spirit which emptieth us of all confidence in our selves may evidence a mans justification without trusting to it then may sanctification without trusting to it but the former is true therefore also the latter Thirdly if it be an ordinance of God to evidence our justification by our sanctification then we may doe this without trusting to it but that is apparent from 2 Pet. 1.10 Ergo. Errour 68. Faith justifies an unbeleever that is that faith that is in Christ justifieth me that have no faith in my selfe Confutation 68. This is contrary to Hab. 2.4 For if the just shall live by his faith then that faith that justifies is not in Christ So John 3. ult He that beleeveth not the wrath of God abideth on him it is not anothers faith will save me Errour 69. Though a man can prove a gracious worker in himselfe and Christ to be the authour of it if thereby he will prove Christ to be his this is but a sandy foundation Confutation 69. This is contrary to these Scriptures John 14.21 and 28. He that keepeth my commandements is he that loveth me and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father and I will love him and will shew my selfe unto him 1 John 3.14 We know that we have passed from death to life because we love the brethren and 1 John 5.12 He that hath the Sonne hath life therefore he that can prove that he hath spirituall life may assure himselfe that hee hath Christ Errour 70. Frequency or length of holy duties or trouble of conscience for neglect thereof are all signes of one under a Covenant of workes Confutation 70. This is contrary to these Scriptures 1 Cor. 15.58 Be abundant alwayes in the worke of the Lord if the faithfull in Christ Jesus be commanded to abound alwayes in the worke of the Lord that is holy duties then frequency in holy duties is no signe of one under a Covenant of workes but the former is true therefore also the latter as also 1 Thes 4.17.18 Psal 55.17 Evening and morning and noone will I pray and make a noyse and he will heare me and elsewhere Seven times a day doe I praise thee Psal 119.146 Psal 1.2 So also contrary is the third branch to these Scriptures 2 Cor. 7.8.11 the Corinthians were troubled in conscience and sorrowed that they had neglected the holy duties of Church censure towards the incestuous person and Isa 64.7 and 8. Cant. 5.2 Rom. 7.19 I doe not the good I would which he lamenteth and complaineth of Errour 71. The immediate revelation of my good estate without any respect to the Scriptures is as cleare to me as the voyce of God from Heaven to Paul Confutation 71. This is contrary to John 14.26 He shall teach you all things and bring all things to your remembrance c. whence we reason thus If the Spirit reveale nothing without concurrence of the Word then this revelation of the Spirit without respect to the Word is not cleare nor to be trusted but the Spirit doth reveale nothing but with respect to the Word for John 14.26 If the office of the Spirit be to teach and to bring to remembrance the things that Christ hath taught us Esay 8.20 what ever spirit speakes not according to this Word there is no light there Errour 72. It is a fundamentall and soule-damning errour to make sanctification an evidence of justification Confutation 72. This is contrary to these Scriptures Rom. 8.1 They that walke after the Spirit are freed from condemnation and are in Christ and so justified so 1 John 3.10 In this are the children of God knowne c. Errour 73. Christs worke of grace can no more distinguish betweene a Hypocrite and a Saint then the raine that fals from Heaven betweene the just and the unjust Confutation 73. This proposition being generall includes all gracious works and being so taken is contradicted in the parable of the sower Matth. 13.20.21 22. where the good ground is distinguished from the stony by this that it brings forth fruit with patience so Hebr. 6.9 there is something better in the Saints then those common gifts which are found in Hypocrites Errour 74. All verball Covenants or Covenants expressed in words as Church Couenants vowes c. are Covenants of workes and such as strike men off from Christ Confutation 74. First this is contrary to Scripture Esay 44 5. One shall say I am the Lords another shall call himselfe by the name of the God of Jacob Rom. 10.10 With the mouth confession is made to salvation Secondly contrary to reason for then the Covenant of grace is made a Covenant of workes by the writing reading and preaching of the same for they are verball expressions of the Covenant on Gods part as Church Covenants verbally expresse our closing herewith Errour 75. The Spirit giveth such full and cleare evidence of my good estate that I have no need to be tried by the fruits of sanctification this were to light a candle to the Sun Confutation 75. This opinion taken in this sense that after the Spirit hath testified a mans good estate the person need not to be tried by the fruit of sanctification is contrary to the scope of the whole first Epistle of Saint John where variety of arguments are propounded to all
beleevers in common 1 John 5.13 to distinguish the persons of beleevers from unbeleevers the water is annexed to the Spirit and bloud 1 Iohn 5.8 Errour 76. The Devill and nature may be cause of a gracious worke Confutation 76. The words are unsavoury and the position unsound for taking gracious according to the language of the Scripture gracious words Luke 4.22 Let your speech be gracious gracious words are such as issue from the saving grace of Christs Spirit indwelling in the soule which neither the Devill nor nature is able to produce for Christ professeth Iohn 15.3 4. Without me yee can doe nothing nothing truly gracious Iohn 3. What ever is borne of the flesh is flesh and Rom. 7.18 In my flesh dwels no good truly spirituall and gracious Gen. 6.5 Every imagination of the thoughts of a mans heart are evill and that continually Besides the Devill is that evill and wicked one onely wickednesse an adversary to Gods grace and glory that which is contrary to corrupt nature and the hellish nature of Satan and above the power of both they cannot be the causes of gracious works Errour 77. Sanctification is so farre from evidencing a good estate that it darkens it rather and a man may more clearely see Christ when he seeth no sanctification then when he doth the darker my sanctification is the brighter is my justification Confutation 77. This is contrary to the Scripture of truth which rather giveth the name of light to sanctification and holinesse and even for this use to cleare our justification 1 Iohn 1.6 7. For the holy Ghost concludes as from a cleare and infallible promise and proposition that if we walke in the light as he is in the light then doth the bloud of Christ cleanse us from all sinne meaning that then and thereby it appeareth that it is done as by the contrary unholinesse and unholy walking is like darknesse which obscureth all the goodly presumption flourishes and hopes of an unregenerate man vers 6. For this purpose 1 Iohn 5.8 the water of sanctification is made a witnesse now the nature of a witnesse is not to darken and obscure matters in question but to cleare them and Psal 51.10 11 12. when David saw his heart so uncleane and his spirit so altogether out of order his justification was not then brighter for then he should have had the joy of his salvation more full and not so to sinke as that he begs it might be restored to him as implying that his joy for the present was wanting to him Errour 78. God hath given sixe witnesses three in Heaven and three in earth to beget and build justifying faith upon Confutation 78. This expression answers not the patterne of wholesome words for if this position be taken thus God hath given all these sixe witnesses both to beget and also to build justifying faith upon it is contrary to Scripture for God hath not given all these fixe witnesses to beget justifying faith because the water of sanctification which is one of the sixe doth not goe before justifying faith but followeth after it for our hearts are justified by faith Acts 15.9 Errour 79. If a member of a Church be unsatisfied with any thing in the Church if he expresse his offence whether he hath used all meanes to convince the Church or no he may depart Confutation 79. Contrary to the rule of our Saviour Matth. 18. If thy brother offend convictingly admonish whence it is evident that in our carriage towards a private brother we must convince him before admonish him much lesse separate from him Therefore our carriage towards the whole Church must upon greater reason be with like prudence and tendernesse whence the argument followes thus An offence taken before conviction will not beare an admonition much lesse separation from a brother or Church but the offence in the question propounded is such Ergo. Errour 80. If a man thinke he may edifie better in another congregation then in his owne that is ground enough to depart ordinarily from word seales fastings feastings and all administrations in his owne Church notwithstanding the offence of the Church often manifested to him for so doing Confutation 80. It is contrary to the condition and station of a member of the body in which he stands 1 Cor. 12.27 A member must not put it selfe from the body upon its owne thoughts as the admission of a member was by the consent of the whole so likewise must his dismission be It is contrary also to the duty of a member Ephes 4.16 there must be an effectuall working in every part for the edification of the whole which this departure from the administration of all the holy ordinances in the Church will necessarily hinder It is contrary also to the good of the whole Church and the rule which the Lord hath appointed for the preservation thereof 1 Cor. 14 33. God is not the author of confusion and therefore not of this practise which will certainly bring it for if one member upon these his imaginations may depart why may not ten yea twenty yea an hundred Why may not the Pastor upon such grounds leave his people as well as they him considering the tye is equall on both parts Error 81. Where faith is held forth by the Ministery as the condition of the covenant of grace on mans part as also evidencing justification by sanctification and the activity of faith in that Church there is not sufficient bread Confutation 81. This position seemeth to deny faith to be a condition at all or at all active and so if condition in this place signifie a qualification in man wrought by the holy Ghost without which the promises doe not belong to men this is contrary to Scripture for John 6.48 Christ is the bread of life and yet in the same chapter faith is held out as a condition of the covenant by the Ministery of Christ himselfe and the activity of it is held forth in these words Verily I say unto you unlesse yee eate the flesh and drinke the bloud of the Sonne of man you have no life in you and who so eateth c. As for the lawfulnesse of evidencing justification by sanctification if it be understood of that sanctification which is by faith in Christ it is contrary to the intent of the whole Epistle of John besides many other places of Scripture which yet hold forth bread sufficient if by sufficient is meant that doctrine which in its right use is wholsome and good food for it was written that their joy might be full yet the evidencing of justification by sanctification is expressely held forth chap. 1. vers 7. where he saith If we walke in the light as Christ is in the light we have fellowship one with another and the bloud of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sinne by walking in the light in opposition to walking in darknesse spoken of before verse 6. Sanctification is evidently meant and this is
kind of righteousnesse as before is mentioned from which the soule must bee againe converted before it can bee made partaker of Gods Kingdome Confutation 13. This is contrary to Titus 3.4 where the new birth is made a fruit of Gods love to wards man in Christ of any new birth besides this the Scripture speaketh not It is also contrary to 2 Cor. 3. where it is made the worke of the Spirit that is the Gospel opposed to the letter that is the Law to give life the new birth brings forth the new creature and the new creature argueth our being in Christ 2 Cor. 5.17 It is true indeed Gods children that are borne againe must bee converted againe as Mat. 18.3 but that conversion is not from that grace which they have received but from the corruption that still remaines Error 14. That Christ workes in the regenerate as in those that are dead and not as in those that are alive or the regenerate after conversion are altogether dead to spirituall acts Confutation 14. This is contrary to Rom. 6.11 Yee are alive unto God in Jesus Christ Ephes 2.1.5 Hee hath quickned us 1 Pet. 2.5 Living stones Gal. 2.20 The life that I now live Error 15. There is no inherent righteousnesse in the Saints or grace and graces are not in the soules of beleevers but in Christ only Confutation 15. This is contrary to 2 Tim. 1.5 The unfained faith that dwelt in thee and dwelt first in thy Grandmother 2 Pet. 1.4 partakers of the divine nature which cannot bee but by inherent righteousnesse 2 Tim. 1.6 Stirre up the grace of God which is in thee Job 1.16 Of his fulnesse wee all receive grace for grace but if there be no grace in us wee receive nothing from his fulnesse 2 Cor. 4.16 Our inward man is renewed day by day Rom. 12.2 with Ephes 4.23 wee are changed or renewed Error 16. There is no difference betweene the graces of hypocrites and beleevers in the kinds of them Confutation 16. If this be true then hypocrites are wise humble mercifull pure c. and so shall see God Mat. 5.8 but they are called fooles Mat. 7.26 Mat. 25.1 2 3. neither shall they see God Mat. 24.51 Mat. 13.20 21 22 23. Heb. 6.7 8 9. the difference of the grounds argueth the difference in the kinds of graces Error 17. True poverty of spirit doth kill and take away the sight of grace Confutation 17. This is contrary to Mark. 9.24 Lord I beleeve help my unbeleefe if this were so then poverty of spirit should hinder thankfulnesse and so one grace should hinder another and the graces of the Spirit should hinder the worke of the Spirit and crosse the end why hee is given to us 1 Cor. 2.12 Error 18. The Spirit doth worke in Hypocrites by gifts and graces but in Gods children immediately Confutation 18. This is contrary to Nehem. 5.15 So did I because of the feare of the Lord Heb. 11.17 Noah moved with feare prepared an Arke Error 19. That all graces even in the truely regenerate are mortall and fading Confutation 19. This is contrary to John 4.14 they are graces which flow from a fountaine which springeth up to eternall life and therefore not fading Jer. 31.39.40 Error 20. That to call into question whether God be my deare Father after or upon the commission of some hainous sinnes as Murther Incest c. doth prove a man to be in the Covenant of workes Confutation 20. It being supposed that the doubting here spoken of is not that of finall despaire or the like but onely that the position denyeth a possibility of all doubting to a man under a Covenant of grace this is contrary to Scripture which speaketh of Gods people under a Covenant of grace in these or other cases exercised with sweete doubtings and questions David was a justified man for his sinnes were pardoned 2 Sam. 12.12 13. yet his bones waxed old through his roaring all the day long and the heavinesse of Gods hand was upon him night and day and the turning of his moysture into the drought of Summer Psal 32.3 4. And Gods breaking his bones by with-holding from him the joy of his Salvation Psal 51.8 shew that he was exercised with sweete doubts and questions at least as this position speaketh of and the like may be gathered out of Psal 77.3 4. where the holy man Asaph mentioneth himselfe being troubled when he remembred God and that he was so troubled he could not speake nor sleepe and expostulateth with God Will the Lord cast off for ever and will he be favourable no more and vers 6 7 8 9. These shew that he had at least sweete doubts as the position mentioneth and yet he was not thereby proved to be under a Covenant of workes for he doth afterward confesse this to bee his infirmity vers 10. and receiveth the comfort of former experiences in former dayes and his songs in the nights and of Gods former workes vers 5 6.10 11 12. and he resumeth his claime of his right in God by vertue of his Covenant vers 13. Errour 21. To be justified by faith is to be justified by workes Confutation 21. If faith in this position be considered not simply as a worke but in relation to its object this is contrary to the Scripture that so appropriateth Justification to faith as it denieth it to workes setting faith and workes in opposition one against another in the point of Justification as Rom. 3.27 Where is boasting then It is excluded By what Law by the Law of workes no but by the Law of faith and vers 28. We conclude that a man is justified by faith without the workes of the Law and chap. 4. 16. Therefore it is by faith that it may be by grace compared with vers 4. To him that worketh is thereward reckoned not of grace but of debt Errour 22. None are to be exhorted to beleeve but such whom we know to be the elect of God or to have his Spirit in them effectually Confutation 22. This is contrary to the Scriptures which maketh the commission which Christ gave his Disciples in these words Go preach the Gospel to every creature he that beleeveth and is baptized shall be saved Mar. 16.15.16 where the latter words imply an exhortation to beleeve and the former words direct that this should not onely be spoken to men knowne to be elected or onely to men effectually called but to every creature The Scripture also telleth us that the Apostles in all places called upon men to repent and beleeve the Gospel which they might not have done had this position beene true Errour 23. We must not pray for gifts and graces but onely for Christ Confutation 23. This is contrary to Scripture which teacheth us to pray for wisdome Jam. 1.5 and for every grace bestowed by vertue of the new Covenant Ezech. 36.37 as acknowledging every good gift and every perfect giving is from above and commeth downe from the
expressely noted to be an evidence of our good condition when it is said if we so walke the bloud of Christ cleanseth us from all finne Errour 82. A Minister must not pray nor preach against any errour unlesse he declare in the open Congregation upon any members enquiry the names of them that hold them Confutation 82. This is contrary to Scriptures which teach Ministers to pray and preach against all errours by whom soever they be held when it calleth them Watchmen and Stewards in whom faithfulnesse is required in all administrations yet withall it enjoyneth them if a brother sinne not openly to admonish him in secret first betweene them two alone and afterwards in the presence of two or three witnesses and after that and not before to bring the matter to the Church Matth. 18.15 16 17. Vnsavoury speeches confuted These that follow were judged by the Assembly aforesaid as unsafe speeches 1. TO say that we are justified by faith is an unsafe speech we must say we are justified by Christ Answer 1. Faise for the constant language of the Scripture is not unsafe but we are justified by faith is the constant language of the Scripture Rom. 5.1 being justified by faith the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 10.31 32. Righteousnesse by faith Phil. 3 9 10. 2. The distinct phrase of the Scripture used in distinguishing Legall and Evangelicall righteousnesse is no unsafe speech but such is this Rom. 9.31 32. Israel found not righteousnesse because they sought it of the Law and not of or by faith so Rom. 10.5 6. The righteousnesse of faith saith thus c. The Apostle makes these two so directly opposite as membra dividentia or contrary species that there is no danger one should be taken for another but that it 's so safe as that he that affirmes the one denies the other yea in the most exact expression that ever Paul made to exclude whatsoever might be unsafe towards a mans justification you have this phrase yea twice in the same verse Phil. 3.9 not having mine owne righteousnesse which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ And againe The righteousnesse which is of God by faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ergo it is no unsafe speech yea it must be said on the contrary from those grounds that to say a man is justified before faith or without faith is unsafe as contrary to the language of the Scriptures And for the second part that we must say we are justified by Christ it is true so farre as that it cannot be denyed nor is it unsound or unsafe at all so to speake but if it meane a must of necessity alwayes or onely so to speake as it is here set in opposition to the phrase of being justified by faith then it is utterly false for as much as the Scripture leades us along in the way of other expressions ordinarily and the Apostle gives us the truth of doctrine and soundnesse of phrase together Rom. 10.3 Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to every one that beleeveth 2. To evidence justification by sanctification or graces savours of Rome Answer Not so 1. Rome acknowledgeth not justification in our common fense Scil. by righteousnesse imputed 2. Rome demies evidencing of our justification and peace with God and teacheth a doctrine of doubting and professeth that a man cannot know what God will doe with him for life or death unlesse by speciall revelation which is not ordinary But if they meane old Rome or Pauls Rome to which he wrote it 's true that it savours of the doctrine that they received as appeareth Rom. 8.28 All things co-worke for good the evill of every evill being taken away which is a point of justification and this is propounded under the evidence of the love of God to them that love him because Rom. 8.2.9.13.14 the evidencing of our being in Christ freedome from condemnation and adoption is prosecuted by arguments from sanctification as by having the spirit being led by the spirit walking after the spirit mortifying the deeds of the flesh by the spirit and if hereto were added the doctrine of Saint John so abundant this way in his first Epistle whereof I have already made mention I doubt not but it was the faith of the Church of Rome that then was so that the speech is unsavoury and casting a foule aspersion upon a good thing expressed in the Scriptures but as for the point it selfe that is included we referre it to its place to be discussed when it is rightly stated 3. If I be holy I am never the better accepted of God if I be unholy I am never the worse this I am sure of be that hath electodome must save me Answ These words savour very ill and relish of a carelesse and ungraclous spirit for howsoever we grant that our acceptation unto justification is alwayes in and through Christ the same in Gods account yet this expression imports that though a mans conversation be never so holy and gracious yet hee can expect never the more manifestation of Gods kindnesse and love to him contrary to Psal 50. ult To him that orders his conversation aright I will shew the salvation of God and John 14.21 It implies secondly that though a mans conversation be never so vile and sensuall yet he neede not feare nor expect any further expression of Gods displeasure and anger to breake forth against him or withdrawings of his favour from him contrary to Psal 51.8.11 12. where God breakes Davids bones for his sinne and Jonah 2.4 Jonah was as one cast out of Gods presence and 2 Chron. 15.2 If you forsake him hee will forsake you And in a word it imports as if God neither loved righteousnesse nor hated wickednesse contrary to Psal 5.6 7. and did take no delight in the obedience of his people contrary to Psal 147.11 The Lord delighteth in those that feare him c. As concerning the last clause he that hath elected me must save me it is true the foundation of Gods election remaineth sure yet it is as true that whom he chooseth he purposeth to bring to Salvation through Sanctification of the Spirit 2 Thes 2.13 4. If Christ will let me sinne let him looke to it upon his honour be it Answ This retorts the Lords words upon himselfe Prov. 4.23 24 Keepe thine heart c. Ponder thy paths c. and therefore no lesse blasphemous and is contrary to the professed practise of David Psal 18 23. I was upright before him and kept my selfe from mine iniquity The latter clause puts the cause of Gods dishonour upon himselfe no lesse blasphemous then the former and contrary to Rom. 2.23 where the dishonouring of God is laid upon themselves 5. Here is a great stirre about graces and looking to hearts but give me Christ I seeke not for graces but for Christ I seeke not for promises but for Christ I seeke not for sanctification but for Christ
cause why he was sent for viz. To satisfie the Court about some passages in his Sermon which seemed to be offensive and therewith a copy of it was produced and he was demanded whether he would owne it whereupon he drew forth another copy which he delivered into the Court as a true copy for the substance of it so he was dismissed very gently and desired to be ready when he should be called for againe The next day he was againe sent for by the former messenger About this time a Petition was delivered into the Court under the hands of above forty persons being most of the Church of Boston being none of the Petitions before mentioned which were delivered after to this effect that as free-men they might be admitted to be present in the Court in causes of judicature and that the Court would declare whether they might proceed in cases of conscience without referring them first to the Church To this the Court answered on the backside of the Petition that they did conceive the Petition was without just ground for the first part of it the Court had never used privacie in Judiciall proceedings but in preparation thereto by way of examination of the party c. they might and would use their liberty as they should see cause and for the other part of the Petition when any matter of conscience should come before them they would advise what were fit to be done in it When Mr. Wheelwright came in the Court was private and then they told him they had considered of his Sermon and were desirous to aske him some questions which might tend to cleare his meaning about such passages therein as seemed offensive he demanded whether he were sent for as an innocent person or as guilty It was answered neither but as suspected onely Then he demanded who were his accusers It was answered his Sermon which was there in Court being acknowledged by himselfe they might thereupon proceed ex officio at this word great exception was taken as if the Court intended the course of the High Commission c. It was answered that the word ex officio was very safe and proper signifying no more but the authority or duty of the Court and that there was no cause of offence seeing the Court did not examine him by any compulsory meanes as by oath imprisonment or the like but onely desired him for better satisfaction to answer some questions but he still refused yet at last through perswasion of some of his friends he seemed content The question then put to him was whether before his Sermon he did not know that most of the Ministers in this jurisdiction did teach that doctrine which be in his Sermon called a Covenant of works to this he said he did not desire to answer and hereupon some cried out that the Court went about to ensnare him and to make him to accuse himselfe and that this question was not about the matter of his Sermon c. Upon this he refused to answer any further so he was dismissed till the afternoone The reason why the Court demanded that question of him was not to draw matter from himselfe whereupon to proceed against him neither was there any need for upon a conference of the Ministers not long before there had beene large dispute betweene some of them and himselfe about that point of evidencing Justification by Sanctification so as the court might soone have convinced him by witnesses if they had intended to proceed against him upon that ground In the afternoone he was sent for againe in the same manner as before and the Ministers also being in the Towne and come thither to conferre together for further discovery of the ground of the disterences which were in the Countrey about the Covenant of Grace c. they were desired to be present also in the Court to beare witnesse of the proceedings in the case and to give their advice as the Court upon occasion should require so the doores being set open for all that would to come in and there was a great Assembly and Mr. Wheelwright being willed to sit downe by the Ministers his Sermon was produced and many passages thereof was read to him which for the better understanding we have digested into this order following He therein describeth two Covenants the Covenant of Grace and the Covenant of Works the Covenant of Grace he describeth to be when in the point of Justification and the knowledge of this our Justification by Faith there is nothing revealed but Christ Jesus but if men thinke to be saved because they see some worke of Sanctification in themselves as hungring and thirsting c. this is a Covenant of Works if men have revealed to them some work of righteousnesse as love to the brethren c. and hereupon come to be assured that they are in a good estate this is not the assurance of Faith for Faith hath Crist revealed for the object therefore if the assurance of a mans Justification be by Faith as a Work it is not Gospel Having thus described those who goe under a Covenant of Works he pronounceth them to be enemies to Christ to be Antichrists to be flesh opposed to spirit such as will certainly persecute those who hold forth the truth and the wayes of Grace he resembleth them to the Philistims who stop up with the earth of their owne inventions the Wels of true beleevers he resembleth them also to Herod who would have killed Christ so soone as he was borne and to Herod and Pilate who did kill Christ when he came once to shew forth himselfe and would have kept him eternally in the grave he further describeth them out of the second Psalme to be the people of God as the Jewes were and such as would take away the true Christ and put in false Christs to deceive if it were possible the very elect he also describeth them by that in Cant. 10.6 they make the children of Grace keepers of the Vineyard they make them travell under the burden of the Covenant of Works which doth cause Christ many times from them He commeth after to a use of exhortation wherein he stirreth up all those of his side to a spirituall combate to prepare for battel and come out and fight against the enemies of the Lord those under a Covenant of Works he shewes whom he meaneth thus to excite alluding to Davids valiant men to Baruch Deborah Jael and all the men of Jsrael and bind them hereunto under the curse of Meroz He further exhorteth them to stand upon their guard c. by alluding to the 600. valiant men who kept watch about the bed of Solomon a type of Christ then he encourageth those of his side against such difficulties as might be objected as 1. If the enemies shall oppose the way of God they must lay the more load on them and kill them with the Word of the Lord and there he alludeth to those places which
Father of lights The whole 119. Psalme besides innumerable texts of Scripture doth abundantly confute this by shewing that the servants of God have beene taught by the Spirit of God to pray for every gift and grace needfull for them and not onely for Christ Errour 24. He that hath the seale of the Spirit may certainely judge of any person whether he be elected or no. Confutation 24. This is contrary to Deut. 29.29 Secret things belong to God and such is election of men not yet called Errour 25. A man may have all graces and poverty of spirit and yet want Christ Confutation 25. This is contrary to Matth. 5.3 Blessed are the poore in spirit but without Christ none can be blessed Ephes 4.22.24 he that hath righteousnesse and true holinesse hath learned the truth as it is in Jesus and therefore hath Christ Errour 26. The faith that justifieth us is in Christ and never had any actuall being out of Christ Confutation 26. This is contrary to Scripture Luke 17.5 Lord encrease our faith Ergo faith was in them 2 Tim. 1.6 faith is said to dwell in such and such persons therefore faith was in them Esay 64.7 No man stirres up himselfe to lay hold upon thee Errour 27. It is incompatible to the Covenant of grace to joyne faith thereunto Confutation 27. This is contrary to Marke 16.16 Preach the Gospel hee that beleeveth shall be saved Rom. 4.3 Abraham beleeved and it was counted to him for righteousnesse and Abraham is a patterne to all under the Covenant of grace Rom. 4.24 Errour 28. To affirme there must be faith on mans part to receive the Covenant is to undermine Christ Confutation 28. First Faith is required on mans part to receive the Covenant of grace according to these Scriptures John 1.12 To as many as received him even to them that beleeved on his name Marke 16.16 He that beleeveth shall be saved Secondly to affirme there must be faith on mans part to receive Christ is not to undermine Christ but to exalt him according to these Scriptures John 3.33 He that beleeveth hath put to his seale that God is true and so honours Gods truth which cannot undermine Christ Rom. 4.20 but was strong in the faith giving glory to God c. Errour 29. An hypocrite may have these two witnesses 1 John 5.5 that is to say the water and bloud Confutation 29. No hypocrite can have these two witnesses water and bloud that is true justification and sanctification for then he should be saved according to these Scriptures Rom. 8.30 2 Thess 2.13 Acts 26.18 Errour 30. If any thing may be concluded from the water and bloud it is rather damnation then salvation Confutation 30. This is contrary to the Scriptures last mentioned Errour 31. Such as see any grace of God in themselves before they have the assurance of Gods love sealed to them are not to be received members of Churches Confutation 31. This is contrary to Acts 8.37.38 where the Eunuch saw his faith only and yet was presently baptized and therfore by the same ground might be admitted Errour 32. After the revelation of the spirit neither Devill nor sinne can make the soule to doubt Confutation 32. This position savours of orrour else Asaph had not the revelation of the Spirit seeing he doubted Psal 73.13 whether he had not clensed his heart in vaine and that God had forgotten to be gracious then also faith should be perfect which was never found no not in our father Abraham Errour 33. To act by vertue of or in obedience to a command is legall Confutation 33. So is it also Evangelicall the mystery of the Gospel is said to be revealed for the obedience of faith Rom. 16.25 Also the Lord Jesus is said to be the author of salvation to all that obey him Hebr. 5.9 If we love Christ we are to keep his Commandements John 14.29 Errour 34. We are not to pray against all sinne because the old man is in us and must be and why should we pray against that which cannot be avoyded Confutation 34. This is contrary to 1 Thess 5 23. 1 Cor. 13.7 Errour 35. The efficacy of Christs death is to kill all activity of graces in his members that he might act all in all Confutation 35. This is contrary to Rom. 6.4 Our old man is crucified with him that the body of finne might be destroyed that we should not serve sinne contrary also to Hebr. 4.14 that he might through death destroy him c. and 1 John 3.8 whence we infer that if Christ came to destroy the body of sin to destroy the Devill to dissolve the workes of the Devill then not to kill his owne graces which are the workes of his owne Spirit Errour 36. All the activity of a beleever is to act to sinne Confutation 36. Contrary to Rom. 7.15 as also to Gal. 5.17 the spirit lusteth against the flesh Errour 37. We are compleatly united to Christ before or without any faith wrought in us by the Spirit Confutation 37. The terme united being understood of that spirituall relation of men unto Christ whereby they come to have life and right to all other blessings in Christ 1 John 5.12 He that hath the Son hath life And the terme compleatly implying a presence of all those bands and ligaments and meanes as are required in the word or are any wayes necessary to the making up of the union we now conceive this assertion to be erroneous contrary to Scripture that either expressely mentioneth faith when it speaketh of this union Ephes 3.17 that Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith Gal. 2.20 Christ liveth in me by faith or ever implyeth it in those phrases that doe expresse union as comming to Christ John 6.35 and eating and drinking Christ vers 47. compared with vers 54. having the Sonne 1 John 5.12 and receiving Christ John 1.12 and marriage unto Christ Ephes 5.32 if there be no dwelling of Christ in us no comming to him no receiving him no eating nor drinking him no being married to him before and without faith but the former is true therefore also the latter Errour 38. There can be no true closing with Christ in a promise that hath a qualification or condition expressed Confutation 38. This opinion we conceive erroneous contrary to Esay 55.1 2. Ho! every one that thirsteth come yee to the waters Matth. 11.28 Come to me all yee that are weary and heavy laden John 7.37 If any man thirst let him come to me and drinke Revel 22.17 Let him that is athirst come Marke 1.15 Repent and beleeve the Gospel if the word indefinitely be sanctified for the begetting of faith if the Gospel it selfe be laid downe in a conditionall promise if the Apostles and Prophets and Christ himselfe have laid hold upon such promises to help to union and closing with himselfe then there may be a true closing with Christ in a promise that hath a qualification or condition expressed Errour 39.
must keep his wife and children for which hee was presently committed to the Officer The Court reasoned a good while with them both but they were peremptory and would acknowledge no failing and because of their contemptuous speeches and for that they were known to bee very busie persons and such as had offered contempt to the Magistrates for that they were not of their opinion they were dis-franchised and sined William Baulston twenty pounds Ed. Hutchison foety pounds The next morning Ed. Hutchison acknowledged his fault in his mis-behaviour in the face of the Court and so was released of his imprisonment but both were disabled from bearing any publick Office Tho. Marshal Dynely Dier Rich. Gridly ANother day were called foure more of the principall stirring men who had subscribed to the Petition Thomas Marshal the Ferry-man who justifyed the Petition so farre that hee would not acknowledge any fault yet hee answered more modestly then the former therefore hee was not fined but dis-franchised and put out of his place Dynely and Dier had little to say for themselves but perfisting in their justification they were also dis-franchised likewise Rich. Gridly an honest poore man but very apt to meddle in publick affaires beyond his calling or skill which indeed was the fault of them all and of many others in the Country meane condition and weake parts having nothing to say but that he could find no fault c. was dis-franchised Mistris Hutchison ALl these except Mr. Wheelwright were but young branches sprung out of an old root the Court had now to do with the head of all this faction Dux faemina facti a woman had been the breeder and nourisher of all these distempers one Mistris Hutchison the wife of Mr. William Hutchison of Boston a very honest and peaceable man of good estate and the daughter of Mr. Marbury sometimes a Preacher in Lincolnshire after of London a woman of a haughty and fierce carriage of a nimble wit and active spirit and a very voluble tongue more bold then a man though in understanding and judgement inferiour to many women This woman had learned her skil in England and had discovered some of her opinions in the Ship as shee came over which had caused some jealousie of her which gave occasion of some delay of her admission when shee first desired fellowship with the Church of Boston but shee cunningly dissembled and coloured her opinions as shee soon got over that block and was admitted into the Church then shee began to go to work and being a woman very helpfull in the times of child-birth and other occasions of bodily infirmities and well furnished with means for those purposes shee easily insinuated her selfe into the affections of many and the rather because shee was much inquisitive of them about their spiritual estates and in discovering to them the danger they were in by trusting to common gifts and graces without any such witnesse of the Spirit as the Scripture holds out for a full evidence whereby many were convinced that they had gone on in a Covenant of works and were much humbled thereby and brought to inquire more after the Lord Jesus Christ without whom all their gifts and graces all their contributions c. would prove but legall and would vanish all this was well and suited with the publick Ministery which went along in the same way and all the faithful imbraced it and blessed God for the good successe that appeared from this discovery But when shee had thus prepared the way by such wholesome truths then shee begins to set forth her own stuffe and taught that no sanctification was any evidence of a good estate except their justification were first cleared up to them by the immediate witnesse of the Spirit and that to see any work of grace either faith or repentance c. before this immediate witnesse was a Covenant of works whereupon many good soules that had been of long approved godlinesse were brought to renounce all the work of grace in them and to wait for this immediate revelation then sprung up also that opinion of the in-dwelling of the person of the Holy Ghost and of union with Christ and Justification before faith and a denying of any gifts or graces or inherent qualifications and that Christ was all did all and that the soule remained alwayes as a dead Organ and other of those grosse errours which were condemned in the late Assembly and whereof diverse had been quashed by the publick Ministery but the maine and bottom of all which tended to quench all indevour and to bring to a dependance upon an immediate witnesse of the Spirit without sight of any gift or grace this stuck fast and prevailed so as it began to bee opposed and shee being questioned by some who marvelled that such opinions should spread so fast shee made answer that where ever shee came they must and they should spread and indeed it was a wonder upon what a sudden the whole Church of Boston some few excepted were become her new converts and infected with her opinions and many also out of the Church and of other Churches also yea many prophane persons became of her opinion for it was a very easie and acceptable way to heaven to see nothing to have nothing but waite for Christ to do all so that after shee had thus prevailed and had drawn some of eminent place and parts to her party whereof some profited so well as in a few moneths they outwent their teacher then shee kept open house for all commers and set up two Lecture dayes in the week when they usually met at her house threescore or fourescore persons the pretence was to repeate Sermons but when that was done shee would comment upon the Doctrines and interpret all passages at her pleasure and expound dark places of Scripture so as whatsoever the Letter held forth for this was one of her tenents that the whole Scripture in the Letter of it held forth nothing but a Covenant of works shee would bee sure to make it serve her turn for the confirming of her maine principles whereof this was another That the darker our sanctification is the cleerer is our justification And indeed most of her new tenents tended to slothfulnesse and quench all indevour in the creature and now was there no speech so much in use as of vilifying sanctification and all for advancing Christ and free grace and the whole pedegree of the Covenant of works was set forth with all its Complements beginning at Cain If thou dost well shalt thou not bee accepted then it is explained and ratifyed at Mount Sinui and delivered in the two Tables and after sprinkled with the blood of Christ Exod. 24. and so carryed on in the Letter of the Scripture till it bee compleat as the Covenant of Grace by the Spirit seales forgivenesse of sins one of the venters whereon Christ begets children c. and in the end wherefore is all this adoe
in Esay before mentioned hee might have known that the Spirit of God doth teach his servants to discern of seasons as well as of truths for if there be such a point in wisdom as men call discretion sure Religion which maketh truely wise doth not deprive the servants of God of the right use thereof When Paul was to deale with the sorcerer who did oppose his doctrine Act. 13. hee cals him the childe of the devill c. but when hee answered Festus who told him hee was madde and rejected his doctrine also hee useth him gently and with termes of honourable respect Though Steven cals the Jews stiffenecked and of uncircumcised hearts c. as knowing them to bee malitious and obstinate enemies to Christ yet Paul directs Timothy being to deale with such as were not past hope though they did oppose his Doctrine for the present not to strive but to use all gentlenesse instructing them with meeknesse c. 2 Tim. 2. The Prophet Elisha when hee speaks to Jehoram very roughly as one not worthy to bee looked at yet hee shews a different respect of Jehosaphat though hee were then out of his way and under a sin for which hee had been formerly reproved 2 King 3. Christ himselfe though hee sharply reproveth the Pharisees c. yet hee instructeth Nicodemus gently when hee objected against his doctrine and that somewhat rudely Joh. 3. The Apostles would not forbeare to Preach Christ though Rulers forbad them Act. 3. yet another Prophet forbare at another season at the command of King Amasia 2 Chron. 25. so wee see that this plea of Mr. Wheelwright is as weak as the former and will not excuse him from contempt If it bee yet objected that his Sermon was not all for contention seeing hee raised and pressed an use of brotherly love wee grant hee did so but it was ejusdem farinae a loafe of the same leaven with the other for hee applyeth it to those of his own party to perswade them to hold together and help one another against those of the other party whom hee setteth forth as their opposites and encourageth them thereto by the example of Moses who in love to his brother killed the Aegyptian A further objection hath been made against the proceedings of the Court as if Mr. Wheelwright had not a lawfull tryall as not being put upon a Jury of freemen But the answer to this is easie it being wel known to all such as have understanding of matters of this nature that such Courts as have power to make and abrogate Laws are tyed to no other Orders but their own and to no other rule but Truth and Justice and why thrice twelve men sitting as Judges in a Court should bee more subject to partiality then twelve such called as a Jury to the barre let others judge Now if some shall gather from that which is here before mentioned viz. that every truth is not seasonable at all times if wee shall grant that what Master Wheelwright delivered was the truth wee must desire him to take onely so much as wee granted viz. by way of supposition onely for letting passe as wee said such points as were meerly doctrinall and not ripe for the Court depending as yet in examination among the Elders wee may safely deny that those speeches were truths which the Court censured for contempt and sedition for a brother may fall so farre into disobedience to the Gospel as there may bee cause to separate from him and to put him to shame and yet hee is not to bee accounted an enemy 2 Thess 3. Therefore when Mr. Wheelwright pronounced such taking them at the worst hee could make them to bee enemies c. it was not according to the truth of the Gospell Againe to incense and heate mens minds against their Brethren before hee had convinced or admonished them as being in an estate of enmity c. is not to bee termed in any truth of the Gospel so likewise to bring extraordinary examples for ordinary rules as of Joh. 8.44 to incite his party to the like practise against such whose hearts they cannot judge of as Christ could of theirs to whom hee spake is as farre from the rule prescribed to ordinary Ministers 2 Tim. 2.25 and to all Christians Gal. 6.1 and Jam. 3 17. as that example of Elijah by which the Apostles would have called for fire from heaven upon the Samaritans was different from the Spirit whereof they were so to resemble such among us as professe their faith in Christ only c. and are in Church fellowship and walk inoffensively submitting to all the Lords Ordinances in Church and Common wealth to resemble such to branded Reprobates and arch-enemies of Christ such as Herod c. wee suppose hath no warrant of Truth Wee might instance in other like passages as his ordinary inciting to spirituall combates by examples of bodily fight and bloody victories being very unsutable but these may suffice to prove that all hee spake was not true and by this is the offence more aggravated for if it were seditious only in the manner it must needs bee much worse when the matter it selfe also was untrue But if any shall yet pretend want of satisfaction by all that hath been produced for indeed it is beyond reason how farre prejudice hath prevailed to captivate some Judgements otherwise godly and wise and shal object further that his doctrines c. were generall and so could not bee intended of any particular persons wee desire such first to remember what application Mr. Wh. made of the same in the open Court viz. that hee did intend all such as walked in such a way Then again let the case bee put in a reversed frame some other had then taught that all such as deny that sanctification as it is held by the other party is a good evidence of justification and that say or have their assurance by faith as a work of God in them have it in the way of the Gospel that these were enemies to Christ c. Persecutors of the way of grace c. and should have stirred up others against them with like arguments and vehemency as Mr. Wheelwright did there is no doubt but Mr. Wheel and others of his opinion would soone have pointed out those who must necessarily have been intended by it for it is well known that some proper adjunct or some noted circumstance may design a particular person or company as well as names so Christ points out Judas by the sop Paul the Jews by those of the circumcision and the Antichrist by That man of sin c. But wee meet yâ—â— with another objection viz. that disturbance of unity is not sedition except it also lead to the hurt of utility To this wee answer first that if it tend immediately to such hurt wee deny the truth of the proposition for if in the time of famine a man should stir up the people to fetch corn out of
that those which eate his flesh should never dye not taking the speech in the true meaning so did hee said shee who brought that argument for it is said there they should bee like the Angels c. The Elders of Boston finding her thus obstinate propounded to the Church for an admonition to bee given her to which all the Church consented except two of her sons who because they persisted to defend her were under admonition also Mr. Cotton gave the admonition and first to her sons laying it sadly upon them that they would give such way to their naturall affection as for preserving her honour they should make a breach upon the honour of Christ and upon their Covenant with the Church and withall teare the very bowels of their soule by hardning her in her sin In this admonition to her first hee remembred her of the good way shee was in at her first comming in helping to discover to divers the false bottom they stood upon in trusting to legall works without Christ then hee shewed her how by falling into these grosse and fundamentall errors shee had lost the honour of her former service and done more wrong to Christ and his Church then formerly shee had done good and so laid her sin to her conscience with much zeale and solemnity hee admonished her also of the height of spirit then hee spake to the siders of the Church and advised them to take heed of her opinions and to with-hold all countenance and respects from her lest they should harden her in her sin so shee was dismissed and appointed to appeare againe that day sevennight The Count had ordered that shee should return to Roxbury again but upon intimation that her spirit began to fall shee was permitted to remain at Mr. Cottons house where Davenport was also kept who before her next appearing did both take much pains with her and prevailed so far that shee did acknowledge her errour in all the Articles except the last and accordingly shee wrote down her answers to them all when the day came and shee was called forth and the Articles read again to her shee delivered in her answers in writing which were also read and being then willing to speak to the Congregation for their further satisfaction shee did acknowledge that shee had greatly erred and that God had left her to her self herein because shee had so much under-natured his Ordinances both in slighting the Magistrates at the Court and also the Elders of the Church and confessed that when shee was at the Court shee looked only at such failings as shee apprehended in the Magistrates proceedings without having regard to the place they were in and that the speeches shee then used about her revelations were rash and without ground and shee desired the prayers of the Church for her Thus farre shee went on well and the Assembly conceived hope of her repentance but in her answers to the severall articles shee gave no satisfaction because in diverse of them shee answered by circumlocutions and seemed to lay all the faults in her expressions which occasioned some of the Elders to desire shee might expresse her self more cleerly and for that ever shee was demanded about the Article whether shee were not or had not been of that judgement that there is no inherent righteousnesse in the Saints but those gifts and graces which are ascribed to them that are only in Christ as the subject to which shee answered that shee was never of that judgement howsoever by her expressions shee might seem to bee so and this shee affirmed with such confidence as bred great astonishment in many who had known the contrary and diverse alledged her own sayings and reasonings both before her confinement and since which did manifest to all that were present that shee knew that shee spake untruth for it was proved that shee had alledged that in Esay 53. By his knowledge shall my righteous servant justifie many which shee had maintained to bee meant of a knowledge in Christ and not in us so likewise that in Galathians I live by the faith of the Son of God which shee said was the faith of Christ and not any faith inherent in us also that shee had maintained that Christ is our sanctification in the same sort that hee is our justification and that shee had said that shee would not pray for grace but for Christ and that when she had been pressed with diverse Scriptures which spake of washing and creating a new heart and writing the Law in the heart c. shee had denyed that they did mean any sanctification in us There were diverse women also with whom shee had dealt about the same point who if their modesty had not restrained them would have born witnesse against her herein as themselves after confessed wherefore the Elders pressed her very earnestly to remember her self and not to stand so obstinately to maintain so manifest an untruth but shee was deafe of that eare and would not acknowledge that shee had been at any time of that judgement howsoever her expressions were Then Mr. Cotton told the Assembly that whereas shee had been formerly dealt with for matter of doctrine he had according to the duty of his place being the teacher of that Church proceeded against unto admonition but now the case being altered and she being in question for maintaining of untruth which is matter of manners he must leave the businesse to the Pastor Mr. Wilson to goe on with her but withall declared his judgement in the case from that in Revel 22. that such as make and maintaine a lye ought to be cast out of the Church and whereas two or three pleaded that she might first have a second admonition according to that in Titus 3.10 he answered that that was onely for such as erred in point of doctrine but such as shall notoriously offend in matter of conversation ought to be presently cast out as he proved by Ananias and Saphira and the incestuous Corinthian and as appeares by that of Simin Magus and for her owne part though she heard this moved in her behalfe that she might have a further respite yet she her selfe never desired it so the Pastor went on and propounding it to the Church to know whether they were all agreed that she should be cast out and a full consent appearing after the usuall manner by their silence after a convenient pause he proceeded and denounced the sentence of excommunication against her and she was commanded to depart out of the Assembly In her going forth one standing at the dore said The Lord sanctifie this unto you to whom she made answer The Lord judgeth not as man judgeth better to be cast out of the Church then to deny Christ Thus it hath pleased the Lord to have compassion of his poore Churches here and to discover this great imposter an instrument of Satan so fitted and trained to his service for interrupting the passage Kingdome in this