AN EXPOSITION OF THE 28. VERSE OF THE THIRD CHAPTER OF THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS Wherein is manifestly proued the Doctrine of IVSTIFICATION by FAITH and by Faith onely By FRANCIS BVNNY one of the Prebendaries of the Cathedrall Church of DVRHAM Habac. 2.4 The iust shall liue by his Faith LONDON Printed by William Stansby for Henry Fetherstone 1616. TO THE RIGHT REVEREND FATHER IN GOD MY VERY GOOD LORD WILLIAM LORD BISHOP of DVRHAM F. B. wisheth most happy increase of all graces in this life and endlesse happinesse in the life to come HOw bad a guest sinne is and how vnworthy to be intertayned in the house of our hearts there is no man but will readily confesse if he consider first how diligent it is to solicit and allure to euill alwayes prouoking and intising to offend and when it hath preuailed how clamorous it is and ready to accuse vs neuer suffering vs to haue true peace and quietnesse vntill by some meanes or other we finde our selues reconciled to him against whom we haue offended Neither by any other way can this atonement with God be wrought so that our consciences may without feare stand before God Rom. 3.25 but by him only whom God hath set forth to be a reconciliation through faith in his bloud He is called Iesus Matt. 1.21 because he saueth his people from their sins And Rom. 5.1 we haue peace with God through Iesus Christ our Lord. Now this peace with God which Christ by his death hath wrought paying for a ransome thereof his precious bloud is made to dwell in our hearts by an assured faith and stedfast apprehension of the mercies of God in Christ But the light of comfort which this most sweet doctrine should make to shine to such as feeling the burden of their sinne grone to bee eased of the same is so dimmed and darkened by the clouds of Merits and such Satisfactions as men haue deuised to blinde the eyes of the simple withall that hardly they can finde that true consolation I therefore in two Sermons preached at Durham indeuoured according to my small talent to scatter those mists and to make the Sunne of truth to shine to all such as wilfully doe not winke against the same Wherein how little soeuer I haue performed my indeuour was to take away some stumbling blocks whereby the vnlearned haue beene somewhat hindered that the truth might haue free passage This short Treatise hath long lyen hidden in corners almost quite forgotten at the least without any purpose that I had to publish the same vntill a right Worshipfull friend thinking better thereof then it was my part to doe shewed himselfe very forward to furder the publishing of it Seeing therefore it must come to light I humbly intreat your Lordship that it may goe forth vnder the shaddow of your protection who haue most right thereto not only in respect of your Honours diuers fauours shewed to my selfe but because the Sermons were long since preached in your Cathedrall Church perchance also in your owne hearing at the least by one deuoted to your Lordship who will pray the Father of all graces to inrich your Honour with his heauenly blessings to the comfort of Gods Church while here you liue and in the end to your endlesse and vnspeakable ioy in a better life Your Honours in all duety at commandement FRA. BVNNY AN EXPOSITION OF IVSTIFICATION BY FAITH ROM 3.28 We conclude that a man is iustified by Faith without the workes of the Law ALL knowledge of things godly and necessary for this life of ours is good and commendable but none more needful for a Christian either yet so comfortable for a wounded and afflicted conscience The most needfull knowledge as that which teacheth vs how and by what meanes wee may haue peace with God For when without partiality we take a view of our selues and consider duly of our owne waies which thing we must doe before we can haue true quietnesse at home in our own consciences or perfect reconciliation with God we cannot but see in our selues many wants and infirmities often doing the euill we should not omitting also and that not seldom the good duties which we should performe alwaies wanting that cheerefulnesse alacritie and sinceritie in the good things we indeuour or take in hand which must by Christ season our worke and make it acceptable to God In regard of so manifold imperfections how shall we be able with confidence and assurance to stand before that iust Iudge who also seeth the very secret of our harts and searcheth our hidden thoughts and therefore before him euen the least and most vnknowne offence lyeth open vnlesse we know assuredly that our atonement is made The Apostle S. Paul as in many other places so in these wordes also preacheth vnto vs most plainely the meanes of our atonement and how it cōmeth to passe that we are reconciled to God and as I may say friended with him But Satan that ancient enemie to mankind Satans indeuour to darken this doctrine who seeketh and that most greedily the destruction of our body soule by his instruments in the Popish Church indeuoureth to dimme this Sunne-shine that we should not inioy that sweet comfort and to put this candle vnder the bushell of violent and false interpretations lest the light thereof shining in the house of God should discouer the absurditie of their errors I therefore will assay as God shall inable me to put this candle in a candle-sticke Mat. 5.15 that it may giue light to the whole house of God by freeing it from their wrested glosses To come then roundly to the matter the difference between vs and our aduersaries concerning these words standeth especially in two points The one is the interpretation and meaning of the wordes themselues for the other they much mislike the Conclusion of our iustification by Faith only which out of the wordes we gather Therefore will I by Gods assistance first iustifie our exposition then also our conclusion Which that I may more fully performe I purpose in the third place to answere the principall obiections that they haue out of Gods word whereby these seeke to impugne our doctrine Iustifying what it signifieth And first this word of iustifying our aduersaries following that sense which the Latine word may yeeld as if iustificare to iustifie must be to make righteous doe take it for an inherent righteousnesse as if the Apostle had said By faith we are inabled to liue holily and to haue increase in righteousnesse True it is I confesse that our gracious God of his infinite goodnesse and mercy worketh in vs holinesse also Act. 15 9. Hebr. 11.6 and godlinesse Purifying our hearts by Faith without which it is impossible to please God and therefore iustification in that sense we denie not but willingly acknowledge it to be an effect of Faith and that all our goodnesse groweth from it as the fruit from
workes necessarie is the Iustification that is by inherent righteousnesse This I confesse is a goodly ornament vnto a Christian But if wee looke well about vs we shall find it too short to couer our imperfections and therefore must wee seeke otherwise to appeare righteous before God namely in the righteousnesse of Iesus Christ by whom wee haue forgiuenesse of sinnes And whereas the Apostle denyed that wee are iustified by workes would you not thinke hee spoke very absurdly to take this word as the Romish Church vnderstandeth it For to say a man is made godly without good workes and this they must say is as if I should affirme any thing to be burnt in the fire without heate Againe Iustification in our aduersaries sence is alwayes in doing For it is our regeneration or new birth our renouation or sanctification which can neuer bee perfected so long as wee are in this flesh and carry about with vs this bodie subiect to sinne Heere wee are militant and striuing after wee must looke for the crowne Heere we are Pilgrimes after this wee shall be Citizens and rest in ioy For now wee know but in part wee prophecie in part 1. Cor. 13.9 10. But when that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be abolished And as our knowledge is but in part euen so yea much more is our obedience heere very maimed and vnperfect That Paul himselfe confesseth Our inward man is renewed daily sayth he 2. Cor. 4.16 And hee whose prayse is in the Scripture for wisdome doth verie aptly liken the way of the righteous to the morning Pro. 4.18 that shineth as the light that shineth more and more vnto the perfect day By which fit similitude Salomon setteth forth vnto vs the continuall increase in godlinesse that an inherent righteousnesse that I may so terme our maimed and vnperfect obedience can bring forth Saint Bernard pithily and prettily expresseth as much comparing man in respect of his fall vnto one that falleth vpon a heape of stones and in the myre too Bernardus de Coena Domini Cecidimus super aceruum lapidum sayth he in luto vnde non solum inquinati sed etiam vulnerati grauiter quassati sumus lauari quidem cito possuinus ad sanandum vero opus est curatione multa We haue falne vpon a heape of stones and in the mire so as wee are not only defiled but wounded also and sore bruised Wee may quickly be washt but to heale vs there must bee long time By washing away our myre he meaneth our Iustification which he saith may soone be but by healing our wounded and bruised nature he vnderstandeth our sanctification Aug. de Trinit lib. 14. cap. 17. which is long in doing Therefore most truly sayth Saint Augustine Sanè renouatio ista non fit in momento Truly this renewing or new birth is not wrought of a sudden And now to adde an Assumption to that proposition that righteousnesse of which Saint Paul speaketh Iustification already perfited Rom. 5.1 is alreadie in them that are iustified We are iustified sayth hee as speaking of a thing alreadie perfited as also elsewhere being iustified by faith wee haue peace with God The same Apostle telling the Corinthians that Fornicatours Idolaters c. shall not inherit the Kingdom of God applying this vnto them 1. Cor. 6.11 saith Such were some of you but you are iustified These reasons then being wel considered of giue vs to vnderstand that there is so great difference betweene that sence of this word Iustification which our aduersaries would haue and that which is agreeable to the Apostles meaning as that their exposition of this word heere cannot be good and true But as I mislike and that iustly of that they teach so is it needful I should shew what is the true meaning of this word We seeke no strange signification of the word neyther force it to any other then that in the Scriptures most commonly it hath and most properly belongeth vnto it This I might proue by infinite testimonies I will produce but some few Hee that iustifieth the wicked sayth Salomon and hee that condemneth the iust Prou. 17.15 euen they both are abomination vnto the Lord. In like sort in Esay God by that Prophet denounceth Esa 5.23 Woe to them that iustifie the wicked I know our aduersaries will not say that woe shall be to them that shall make a wicked man righteous and reforme his vngodlinesse but to such as call euill good or good euill Esay 5 20. The Prophet Dauid acknowledgeth his sinnes to be verie great that GODS faithfulnesse in shewing mercie to him may bee confessed that thou sayth hee maist be iustified in thy sayings which words the Apostle in this verie Chapter alleadgeth as before is said But that God standeth in need to be iustified in the Popish sence our aduersaries dare not for shame say To be short the Prophet Dauid prayeth thus Enter not into iudgement with thy seruants O Lord for in thy sight shall no man liuing be iustified In all which and infinite moe places that I might produce the word iustifying is so taken as that a man is absolued or acquited that hee is pronounced not guiltie and so must it in these words be vnderstood when the Apostle sayth wee are iustified by faith that is by faith wee stand before GOD and may plead not guiltie For confirmation of that which I haue said I vse this argument Saint Paul speaketh heere of such Iustification Iustification bringeth peace Rom. 5.1 as maketh vs to haue peace with God For so are the words of the Apostle Being iustifi'd by faith wee haue peace with God But Iustification in the Popish sence maketh vs not to haue peace with GOD and in our sence it bringeth peace with God therefore Saint Paul speaketh not of Iustificatiō in the Popish sence but in ours My Minor only is to be proued for I haue alreadie shewed that the Apostle auerreth the Maior and that hath two parts the one negatiue wherein I deny Iustification in their sence to bring peace with God the other affirmatiue that in our sence it doth That Iustification as it is a doing of good workes and a liuing righteously so farre forth as mans frailetie will permit which is the sence that our aduersaries say belongs to this word heere cannot procure our peace with God I proue because the perfection of the Law which wee are commanded to obserue and keepe is such as man can neuer attaine to the fulfilling thereof None can fulfill the Law For who is hee that can so rule his affections by the Spirit that hee can in all sincerity and soundnesse serue the Lord Not any Man but Christ could euer doe it as the godly most plainely confesse The reason is because the Law commandeth perfection and our weakenesse is not able to performe it The Apostle teacheth vs so much saying
It was impossible for the Law in as much as it was weake Rom. 8.2.3 because of the flesh to free vs from the Law of sinne or of death If then our obedience be so vnperfit can wee hope to finde quietnesse in our consciences and peace with GOD when wee shall stand before him who because he is infinite in wisedome seeth all things bee they done neuer so secretly or in the darke yea hee heareth what we whisper in the eare and knoweth the most secret thoughts of the heart and because he is iust will punish transgressors and in that he is Almightie is able to take vengeance No no our best workes can in this case giue vs no securitie Then by inherent righteousnesse we haue not peace with God But that knowing our selues to bee acquited of our sinnes wee haue peace with GOD and in that sence wee take this word of iustifying it is most plaine Sinne hindreth our peace with God For first the thing that hindreth this our peace is sinne sinne I say that naughtie and noysome neighbour euen the worst neighbour that any man can dwell with It neuer resteth but eyther by faire meanes or foule it intiseth to consent to it Rom. 7.23 For what else is that Law that Paul did see in his mēbers rebelling against the Law of his mind and leading him captiue vnto the law of sinne which was in his members And when it hath preuailed Psal 51.3 it is euer before vs as a seruant of God complaineth neither will it let vs take any rest Gen. 4.7 it lyeth at the doore of our conscience alwaies accusing and bawling against vs. And marke I pray you what sowre fruit this bitter roote yeeldeth It maketh a breach betweene God and vs as the Prophet Esay telleth Gods people in his dayes Esa 59.2 Your sinnes haue separated betweene you and your God and your iniquities haue hidden his face from you that hee will not heare And by that meanes wee are depriued of many blessings which GOD vseth to bestow vpon his seruants as another of the Prophets also saith to the Iewes Ier. 5.25 Your iniquities haue turned away these things speaking of raine in due season and the appointed time of haruest and your sinnes haue hindered good things from you Leuit. 26. Deut. 8. And yet by sinne wee haue greater hurt then this For God denounceth many plagues against his people if they transgresse which also that he can powre vpon the inhabitants of the earth when in his iust iudgement hee will execute the same the drowning of the World in that generall deluge and the casting of fire and brimstone from Heauen vpon those wicked Cities of the plaine and the rooting out of that Nation which he did chuse to serue him doth sufficiently teach vs. Vntill then sinne so odious to GOD so grieuous vnto men bee taken away it is impossible there should be any true quietnesse or peace vnto men For GOD often telleth his people howsoeuer they would flatter themselues in their owne strength or in the friendship of their confederates or in their externall ceremonies and seruice of GOD in outward shew That there is no peace to the wicked Esa 48.22 Esa 50.11 Psal 14.5 1. Thess 5. ◠but they shall lye downe in sorrow and feare where no feare is because they haue promised to themselues peace and safetie without this atonement with God Out of all which it doth appeare that if wee will haue peace with God we must first haue sinne this cumbersome neighbour remoued which altogether hindereth this reconciliation whereby we haue quietnesse of consciences Therefore the Apostle telleth vs Rom. 3.24.25 that Wee are iustified freely by Gods grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus whom God hath set forth to bee a reconciliation through faith in his bloud Reconciliation with God by forgiuenesse of sinne Act. 13.38 Ephes 1.7 to declare his righteousnesse by the forgiuenesse of sinnes that are past through the patience of God And the same Apostle preaching at Antioch teacheth this Iustification in these words Men brethren through this man is preached vnto you forgiuenesse of sinnes as also elsewhere By Christ we haue redemption through his bloud the forgiuenesse of sinnes according to his rich grace Which great and inestimable benefit whoso feeleth hath to his vnspeakeable comfort a most sweet tast of that blessednes which the Apostle out of the Prophet Dauid mentioneth Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiuen Ps 32.1 2. Rom. 4.7 S. Aug. de verb. Dom. Serm. 61. Hieron in Rom. 4. or whose sinnes are couered Blessed is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sinne Fide viuenti sayth Saint Augustine soluuntur peccata He who liueth by faith hath his sinnes forgiuen him And Saint Hierome hauing written thus Per solam fidem iustificat Deus God by faith only doth iustifie doth after shew how this iustification is and in what manner Proposuit per solam fidem peccata dimittere He purposed to forgiue sinnes by faith only And thus by forgiuenesse of sinnes the cause of this dangerous iarre betweene GOD and vs being taken away we haue boldnesse to cal him Father and to stand before him pleading not guiltie But God gaue a Law to his people Exo. 23.15 Good workes That none should appeare before the Lord emptie So that being now freed from sinne yet must we be fraught and loden with holinesse and righteousnesse Well therefore doth Saint Peter out of the Psalme conioyne these two precepts Eschew euill doe good Psa 34.14 1. Pet. 3.11 But where shall this goodnesse be had Or how shall wee get any thing that may bee acceptable to God Our light is but darkenesse our righteousnesse but as stained clothes And when we haue indeuoured our selues as much as we are able to serue the Lord yet shall we find many wants much imperfection It is therefore good we doe as did Bernard who of himselfe thus writeth Ber. in Cantic ser 61. Christ alone supplyeth all our wants Ego vero fidenter quod ex me mihi deest vsurpo mihi ex visceribus Domini quia misericordia affluunt nec desunt foramina per quae effluant I sayth Bernard doe boldly take out of the bowels of the Lord that which I want of mine owne because they abound with mercie neyther want they holes by which they may gush out And after he addeth what holes these are Foderunt manus cius pedes eius latusque lancea forauerunt per has rimas licet mihi sugere mel de petra oleumque de saxo durissimo id est gustare videre quà m suauis est Dominus Psal 21.16 They haue pierced mine hands and my feet and haue opened my side with a speare and by these rifts I may sucke hony out of the rocke and oyle out of the hardest stone that is I may taste and see how sweet the Lord
GOD had done no doubt many good Workes and offered many Sacrifices vnto God yet without respect vnto any of his Workes that hee now the childe and seruant of God had done Abraham beleeued God Gen. 15 6. Gal. 4.9.3 Rom. 4.13 and that his beleeuing was imputed to him for righteousnesse And therefore Paul is bolde to vse such exclusiue words The promise was not giuen through the Law but through the righteousnesse of faith And Sicut Abrahae nostra filiorum eius per gratiam sayth Primasius Primas in Epist ad Rom. 4. As was the Iustification of Abrahams so is ours also who are his children by grace But to be short I suppose we may bee bold to gather out of that which is said this reason As Abraham was iustified so shall wee bee but Abraham was iustified by faith without the workes that he did being Gods seruant therefore we also shall so be iustified All this argument may well and strongly be prooued out of this fourth Chapter of the Epistle to the Romanes But what neede many Arguments Confitentem habemus reum Stapleton our Countriman a sure friend to the Romish Church and as loth as any of them to write any thing that might any way impugne their Popish Maximes seeing the deadly wound which these words of the Apostle giue to their Doctrine of Merits is very carefull to salue that sore yet the force of truth driueth him to grant that heere the Apostle Antidot in Rom. 3.28 Our works cannot merit forgiuenesse of sinnes Excludit opera à virtute iustificandi absolutè id est à virtute remittendi peccata Excludeth Workes from hauing power simply or absolutely to iustifie that is to remit sinne or from power to remit sin What can be more plaine Good Workes cannot obtaine remission of sins sayth Stapleton and therefore not iustifie absolutely or perfitly Now an vnperfit Iustification we are not acquainted withal neither hath Christ or any of his Apostles taught vs any such But we know that a perfect cause hath her perfect effect a perfit Sacrifice such an one was that which Christ offered hath obtained perfect Iustification before God for all beleeuers But heere I would faine haue asked a question of Stapleton if he had beene aliue or of some other friend of his seeing hee is gone to giue an account how well he hath vsed his talent whether to gaine soules to Christ or to Antichrists how Parish Priests shall doe hereafter When men and women come to bee shriuen and haue confessed their sinnes shall their Ghostly Father bid them fast so many Frydayes Wednesdayes or Saints Eeues gad on Pilgrimage to Hales or Buxton to Compostel to Rome or to Loretta weare Haire-cloth next their skinne goe bare-foote and bare-legged shall they torment their bodie with Whips or other punishments Popish penances plaine cozenages or begger their Posteritie in building Chaunteries and such like places for satisfaction for sinne All this is to no purpose For Stapleton assureth vs there is in these or any other though better workes by farre such as GOD hath commanded no power to remit sinne so that Iustification must bee sought for some better way And so it seemeth the World hath beene couzened a great while by these cogging Companions which haue made men and women beleeue that by such Workes they may satisfie for their sinnes And thus I trust vpon so good a confession of Stapleton so good warrant of the Word and sure grounds of doctrine wee may conclude that a man is iustified and accounted guiltlesse before God by faith apprehending Christ Iesus in whom we haue redemption by forgiuenesse of our sinnes without any Merit of our Wrokes whether before or after our Iustification Now that which out of these words we conclude doth of necessitie follow but that our Aduersaries fearing lest their Diana of Merits should be nothing esteemed if they cast not a mist before mens eyes to hinder from them seeing the cleere light of truth that shineth in our Doctrine Act. 19.25.28 assemble as did the Siluersmiths at the call of Demetrius who told them by that craft they got their goods and with such other speeches made them full of wrath insomuch as they cried out saying Great is Diana of the Ephesians Euen so is it with vs. The Romish Demetrius that getteth much by selling such as they call good Workes with his followers seeking to defend the Doctrine of Merits cry out of that which teacheth Iustification by faith only whereby they may haue much losse if want of euill gotten goods may bee counted losse I confesse we teach that Faith only doth iustifie that is that a true and liuely faith wrought in our hearts by Gods Spirit working by loue True faith only iustifieth fruitfull in good workes adorned and beautified with holinesse of life for these are badges whereby to know a true faith doth iustifie and acquite vs before God so as wee boldly stand and plead not guiltie Whereby our Aduersaries may see how vniustly they slander vs and our Doctrine as if wee were enemies to all good Workes And yet we only teach that such a true faith as I haue now described without respect of the Workes that alwayes accompanie it doth iustifie not by the Merit of this faith but in that it is our hand whereby we apprehend and hold fast that Iustification which we haue in Christ through the vnspeakeable mercie of God And this our Doctrine is so warranted in Sacred Scripture as nothing more Saint Paul doeth often vse exclusiue words Exclusiue words Negatiue Equiualent as these are without the Law without Workes Sometime plaine negatiue words Not by Workes not by the Law Otherwhile words equiualent or of such like force As by grace Freely These manners of speech when I consider of I cannot but like well of the good and Christian counsell giuen by Primasius an ancient Writer Audi gratis tace de Meritis Heare what the Apostle sayth freely and speake not a word of Merits Thus therefore I reason for our Doctrine of Iustification by faith only If Workes are not to be ioyned with faith in the matter of Iustification then faith only euen by the confession of our Aduersaries doth iustifie For our Romish Catholikes denie not this our Doctrine but in respect of workes neyther doe they in any their Bookes or Writings seeke to match any thing with faith as cause of Iustification but workes only But workes are not to be ioyned with faith in the matter of Iustification as the Apostle most plainly proueth Gal. 2.16 Know ye that a man is not iustified by the Workes of the Law but by the faith of Iesus Christ Againe Ye are saued by grace Eph. 2.8.9 through faith not of your selues it is the gift of God not of Workes lest any man should boast himselfe Lastly these words to the Romanes are very effectuall Rom. 1.28 Therfore wee conclude that a man is iustified
by faith without the workes of the Law As if he would haue said We the Apostles of Iesus Christ appointed to bee the Scholemasters and Teachers of the World vpon good ground teach this as a doctrine not to be denied a principle in Religion not to be doubted of Faith only And howsoeuer our Aduersaries impugne this Doctrine and would perswade the simple that it is strange and hath no warrant yet are we able to produce such as many hundreds of yeeres since haue taught the same and gathered it out of these words of the Apostle Origen who liued about fourteene hundred yeeres since in verie few words Orig. in Ro. lib. 3. cap. 3. doth twice auerre the same Dixit Apostolus sayth he fide solius iustificationem sufficere ita vt credens quis tantummodo iustificetur The Apostle hath said that Iustification of faith only will suffice so that he who beleeueth only is iustified Isichius wrote at the least a thousand yeeres since and he sayth much like as Origen before him Isich in Leuit l. 4. c. 18 Gratia misericordia fide comprehenditur sola non ex operibus vt dicit Apostolus Grace and mercy is obtained by faith only not by Workes as Paul saith We cannot then be iustly charged as Teachers of new Doctrine heerein seeing wee affirme nothing but that others long before vs haue taught But because this is so much misliked as it is and so scornefully reiected of our aduersaries although all truth must bee grounded vpon the word of truth Iam. 1.18 as S. Iames calleth the Word of God neither needeth it the testimonie of any man which God in the Sacred Scriptures so plainly hath deliuered yet for the satisfying of the simple and the stopping of the slanderous mouthes of our obstinate enemies I purpose to let you see such a consent with vs in Doctrine for this point of Ancient Fathers and Learned Writers long before our time as in no one article or piece of doctrine wherein our aduersaries dissent from vs I suppose a greater can be shewed neither mo seuerall Authors alleaged So that I may well impanell for tryall of this controuersie two Grand-Iuries of famous men well reported of for godlinesse and learning among all men many of them and the meanest of them of such reputation in the Church of Rome as they are thought sufficient to goe vpon tryall of as great a matter as this is although it be of great importance And S. Paul himselfe shall speake for all as you heare hee hath done and bee Fore-man of this Iurie for they all haue learned of him that they say euen in these wordes which now I intreat vpon And first I will second him with some of them Commentaries vpon these wordes that wrote their Commentaries vpon this Epistle of S. Paul to the Romanes All I haue not out of such as I haue I will alleage but out of euery one one place although out of diuers of them I might produce very many Of Origen I haue spoken before and therefore I now omit him S. Ambrose is next who affordeth very good choice of testimonies he hath such plenty Amb. in Rom. 3. Iustificati sunt gratis saith hee quia nihil operantes neque vicem reddentes Sola fide iustificati sunt dono Dei They are iustified freely because working nothing neither recompensing they are iustified by faith only by Gods gift S. IEROME very briefly but as plainely writeth Hieron in Rom. 4. Per solam fidem iustificat Deus God iustifieth by faith only Then haue we Sedulius writing thus Ad Christum veniens sola quum credit fide saluatur Sedul in Rom. 3. He that commeth vnto Christ is saued by faith only when he beleeueth And the last of this ranke shall Primasius be who writeth thus Primas in Rom. 4. Impium per solam fidem iustificat God iustifieth the vngodly by faith only Another sort of them whom I meane to produce in this matter Other expounding other Scriptures are such as expounding other places of Scripture haue in such their Commentaries taught the same doctrine Among whom the first is Hilarie as most ancient in yeeres so most worthy to haue the first roome because he setteth downe the very wordes in question betweene vs now Hil. in Mat. Con. 8. Sola fides iustificat saith he Only faith iustifieth The next shall be Chrysostome who as he was next him in yeeres of all this company so hee differeth very little in wordes Ex sola quippe fide nos saluauit For by faith only he hath saued vs. Chrysost in Eph. hom 5. Augustine a man most famous in Gods Church for learning and his great labours against Heretikes well agreeth with the rest saying Aug. in Ps 88 Conc. 2. Sola fides Christi mundat The faith only of Christ cleanseth To whom may Cyril also be added who though he haue not the same wordes yet teacheth he that substance of doctrine in these wordes Cyril Alex. in Iob. lib. 9. cap. 30. Per fidem namque non aliter saluamur By faith for no other way we are saued ISYCHIVS I haue before produced I will not therefore mention him againe in this place But venerable Bede the glory of our North Country speaketh more plainely Per iustitiam factorum nullus saluabitur Beda in Ps 77. sed per solam iustitiam fidei By righteousnesse of workes shall no man be saued but by the righteousnesse of faith only Theophil in Gal. 3. After him Theophilact writeth thus Demonstrat Apostolus fidem vel solam habere iustificandi virtutem The Apostle sheweth that euen only faith hath power to iustifie Very well also and agreeably to the rest writeth Haimo who liued about some 800. yeeres since Haimo in Gal. 3. Bernard in Cantic ser 22. Fides sola saluat Faith only saueth And most comfortably as in many things writeth good BERNARD Quisquis pro peccatis compunctus esurit sitit iustitiam credat in te qui iustificat impium solam iustificatus per fidem pacem habebit apud Deum Whoso feeleth remorce for sinne and so doth hunger and thirst after righteousnesse let him beleeue in thee who dost iustifie the vngodly and being iustified by faith only he shall haue peace with God And Oecumenius telleth vs Oecumen in Iam 2. That ABRAHAM was an image of iustification by faith only when it was imputed to him for righteousnes that he beleeued Then haue we Rupert Rupert in Reg. cap. 39. lib. 2. who writeth that sola iustificare potest fides Iesu Christi The only faith of Iesus Christ can iustifie Sundry other Fathers also and learned Writers we haue who in their seuerall Treatises affirme that also Fathers in their seuerall Treatises which we out of the Apostle doe gather To begin with Cyprian as most ancient Fides tantùm prodest saith he Faith only profiteth Next vnto
himselfe sometime with that the Church Romish hath formerly taught Lambertus Danaeus in the place before alleaged reckoneth at the least 37. or 38. who haue taken such paines and yet as not hauing reckoned all referreth them who are desirous to know of mo vnto Trithemius This great Doctor of the chaire for Schoole-diuinitie in a Preface he writeth before his Commentaries vpon Pauls Epistles in the very latter end thereof gathering a briefe and summe of the former part of Pauls Epistle to the Romanes hath these wordes Pluribus modis ostendit iustitiam salutem Lombard Praefat in Comment in Epi. Paul aequè Iudaeis Gentibus esse non per legem sed per fidem Iesu Christi vt à lege eos tollat in sola fide Christi eos constituat The Apostle many wayes proueth that righteousnesse and saluation is both to Iewes and Gentiles alike not by the Law but by faith of Iesus Christ that he may with-draw them from the Law and settle them in the only faith of Christ. And after in the very beginning of his exposition vpon the third Chapter of the Epistle vnto the Philippians Lombard in Epist ad Philip. c. 3. Contra Pseudo-apostolos eos monuit ne legalia ab eis recipiant sed fidem Christi solam sufficere credant Against false Apostles he hath admonished them that they receiue not of them precepts of the Law but beleeue that the only faith of Christ sufficeth Yet haue we the Doctor of Doctors behinde that Angellical Doctor for so they call him whose wordes at Rome are Oracles and his writings with too many haue more credit then the sacred Scriptures Yet in this I beleeue he will proue a Lutheran or Caluinist I know not whether but sure I am a Paulinist Yee shall heare his owne words that you may know I wrong him not Moralium legitimus vsus est saith he vt homo non attribuat eis Tho. Aquin. 1. Tim. 1. Ier. 3. quam quod in eis continetur Data est lex vt cognoscatur peccatum Rom. 7. Concupiscentiam nesciebam nisi lex diceret Non concupisces quod dicitur in decalogo Notable good counsell it is which in these wordes hee giueth and sound and Christian instruction which I would it were well marked The lawfull vse saith he of the morall precepts is when a man ascribeth not any thing to them but what in them is contayned The Law is giuen that sinne might bee knowne Rom. 7. I knew not lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not lust as is said in the Decalog Now marke the conclusion which he hereupon inferreth Non est ergo in eis spes iustificationis sed in sola fide Rom. 3. Arbitramur hominem iustificari per fidem absque operibus legis Therefore there is not in them the precepts of the Law any hope of iustification but in faith only Rom. 3. We conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Law I haue the more carefully set downe his words because they are so plaine and pregnant for vs. For first he teacheth that the lawfull vse of the morall Law is to let vs see our sinne not to seeke for iustification by it as after he sheweth And why should wee bee taught this if not to driue vs vnto Christ Then also he affirmeth that there is no hope of saluation therein but in faith only And that which doth much contradict our now Romish Catholikes he gathereth this doctrine of Iustification by faith only euen out of these wordes of Paul as we doe How now can we be Heretikes and your Angellical Doctor a Catholike No no hee writeth as plainely for Iustification by faith only as any of vs. It is high time the purgers of mens writings should be set on work to mend their Index Expurgatorius that Thomas may bee taught to speake otherwise then thus or else he will marre all for he speaketh here not Romish For to make it more plaine what hee thinketh elsewhere too concerning iustification by workes when duly and indifferently he considereth of the word it selfe and examineth that he writeth by the true touch-stone one place more out of the said Thomas I trust shall not be thought tedious Expounding the wordes of S. Paul to the Galathians Gal. 3.10 As many as are of the workes of the Law are vnder the curse He sheweth the Apostle speaketh here of all workes Aquin. in Gal. 3. Lect. 4. Ceremoniall or Morall Opera enim non sunt causa quòd aliquis sit iustus apud Deum sed potiùs executiones manifestationes iustitiae Nam nullus per opera iustificatur apud Deum sed per habitum fidei non quidem acquisitum sed infusum Et ideo quicunque ex operibus legis iustificari quaerunt sub maledicto sunt quia per ea peccata non remouentur nec aliquis quo ad Deum iustificatur sed per habitum fidei charitate informatum For saith he workes are not the cause why a man is iust before God but the executions rather or manifestations of iustice For by workes is no man iustified before God but by the habit of faith and that not gotten but giuen Whosoeuer then by the workes of the Law seeke to be iustified are vnder the curse because by works our sinnes are not put away neyther is any iustified before God but by faith beautified with loue These two sentences of Thomas of Aquine being duly weighed doe as plainely auow Iustification by faith only and disproue Iustification by Workes and our owne Merits as any thing we doe say or write insomuch as if he were aliue I make no doubt but he should be forced eyther to recant or would be accounted a Caluinist hee followeth so truly the trace of Saint Pauls Doctrine herein But what if our Countriman Stapleton bee of this minde too I know that if hee were aliue he would not say so for any thing he hath alwayes beene so pestilent and peruerse an enemie to the same calling the Doctrine of Iustification by faith only Stap. Antid in Act. 15.10 Antid in Ro. 3. v. 21. A most wicked and most pestilent Doctrine Yea elsewhere too he is nothing better perswaded thereof but sayth It is impious and full of shame so shamefully doth this impious wretch write of this most comfortable Doctrine But we will not moue him to say it plainly wee will not stand vpon termes so hee teach the substance of the Doctrine we will beare with him And with a little helpe hee will be brought to that We will but lend him a Maior proposition much like that which I vsed in the beginning of this discourse of Iustification by faith only and he will fit himselfe of a Minor and so iumpe with vs in Doctrine If the Apostle exclude from Iustification all workes so as they haue no power to iustifie then faith only doth iustifie but he excludeth all workes from
deuices No no vnlesse this our garment be dipt in the bloud of Christ and so made white it will euer appeare defiled A fift obiection They tell vs that eternall life is called a reward great is your reward in Heauen Mat. 5.12 As before in answering their third obiection I sayd that not euery promise proueth that which is giuen to be merited by the worke so heere I doe auerre How life eternall is called a reward that the calling of eternall life a reward doth not euict that it is giuen in regard of the worthinesse of the worke If you demand why it is then called a reward I answere It pleaseth God not only to acquaint vs with his will that we may know what is good and what is euil but also by many arguments sometime of his power sometime of his Iustice sometime of his goodnesse to moue his people to obedience To them therefore that with more alacritie Gal. 6.10 While we haue time to do good vnto all men as the Apostle exhorteth he telleth vs that our labour shall not be without reward The like argument doth the Apostle vse to the Corinthians 1. Co. 15.58 Therefore my beloued brethren be yee stedfast vnmoueable abundant alwayes in the worke of the Lord knowing that your labour is not in vaine in the Lord. But eternall life is called a reward Be it so It is also called a Kingdome Mat. 25.34 and that prepared for Gods seruants from the beginning of the world If prepared so long since for them then not bestowed for the worthinesse of their worke If a Kingdome it is an inheritance that is giuen by grace for we are sonnes by adoption heires of God and heires annexed with Christ. Or else by election we haue this inheritance Rom. 8.17 For no man is elected to a Kengdome in regard of his merits especially so long before hee can doe any thing for it Coloss 3.24 The Apostle calleth it a reward of inheritance Ye shall receiue a reward of inheritance sayth he Howsoeuer therefore it is called sometime a reward yet is it a reward that is promised Gal. 3.29 Bel. de Iustific l. 5. c. 18. and therefore Saint Paul sayth Wee are heires by promise And therefore Bellarmine himselfe confesseth that remota promissione non tenetur Deus acceptare opus nostrum ad mercedem taking away the promise God is not bound to accept our worke to reward it Now if a father promise his sonne being yet but a childe both in strength and discretion and such children are we in heauenly matters a great reward if hee doe some small matter at his appointment yet such as hee knoweth passeth eyther his abilitie or skill whether shall we say when this recompence is giuen that it is of promise or of dutie The sonne indeuoureth as well as he can to doe it and with much adoe with continuall helpe of his father he doth it at length in some sort I hope no man will say his worke deserued it For the Father promised much for a small matter hee helpeth his sonne to doe it and beareth in the end with many wants euen so God for the little that wee can doe promiseth much and that wee doe hath many imperfections too Can wee then thinke of merit Ber in Cant. Serm. â—7 No no the Spouse of Christ doth then shew her selfe to be more full of grace when she ascribeth all to grace knowing her part is first and last Luk. 17.7 But against the meriting of the reward that parable in S. Luke is most plaine A seruant ploweth or doth any other worke in the field when hee commeth home his Master biddeth him not sit downe but willeth him to dresse meat and giue himselfe and wait and serue him teaching vs that we haue no time to bestow otherwise then vpon our Masters worke Ambros in Luke 17. Theopilact in Luk. 17. We must alwayes while wee liue be doing saith Ambrose This Parable sheweth saith Theophilact that a man must not be proud of any good worke no neyther yet in the fulfilling of all the Commandements For the seruant must doe what his Master commandeth neither must hee ascribe it to himselfe as a good worke Ambros in Luk. 7. Dionis Carthus in Luk. 17. And Ambrose gathereth the same lesson too Let no man glory of workes for we owe our seruice to the Lord. So doth the Carthusian also The seruant is tyed to this and after his worke in the field he must labour in the house that he may daily be labouring It being thus let vs consider of the conclusion of the Parable So likewise ye Luk. 17.10 when you haue done all things which were commanded you say We are vnprofitable seruants we haue done that was our dutie to doe Hieron ad Ctesiphontem Theophil in Luk. 17. No merit in this worke If that seruant were vnprofitable that did all sayth Hierom What shall we say of him that could not doe it Theophilact also in like manner If when we haue done all the Commandements yet wee haue no cause to thinke well of our doing how greatly doe we sinne when not doing the greatest part of Gods Commandements yet we are proud of our doing The Carthusian likewise If they must account themselues vnprofitable seruants who haue fulfilled all the Commandements what shall we doe who in so many things transgresse and so vnperfectly perchance keepe that we keepe that as the Prophet Esai sayth all our righteousnesse is like a filthy clout But Bellarmine telleth vs De Iustific lib. 5. cap. 5. Bernard de tripl custodia Bernard de precepto dispensatione that Christ so concludeth to teach humilitie I answere with Bernard Sanè propter humilitatem sed numquid contra veritatem True indeed for humility but is it against verity He also elsewhere thus speaketh to that seruant You are free from duty but not glorious by merit You haue escaped punishment but haue not gotten the crowne The Parable teacheth vs that all wee can doe is dutie therefore wee may not thinke of merit because whatsoeuer wee are able to performe at any time in any place by any meanes we owe all that seruice to God Lastly I come to those words of Iames in shew as contrarie to Saint Paul as can be yet because they both had one teacher both were guided in writing by one Spirit and were both of one faith and Religion we are sure both teach one Doctrine Rom. 3.28 Iam. 2.24 What Iustification is by workes Iude 4. Aug lib. 83. quaest 76. de fide operibus cap. 14. And yet Paul sayth We are iustified by faith without workes Iames sayth Wee are iustified by workes and not by faith only and both these are most true For if we speake of the cause of Iustification then must wee hearken to Saint Paul who teacheth that is by faith without workes But because many turning the grace of God
into wantonnesse gathered out of the Apostles words that so they beleeued they needed no regard or care how they liued as Augustine saith in moe places then one Therefore Saint Iames teacheth how men shall know that wee are iustified and what manner of faith this true faith is For faith without workes as it is not a true or liuing but a counterfeit and dead faith so it auaileth nothing to Iustification So that the word of Iustification hath not the like signification in S. Iames that it had in S. Paul For in S. Paul it is taken for our iustification before God as in the beginning I haue declared plentifully And in S. Iames it signifieth that Iustification before men whereby we are knowne to be righteous S. Iames his words tend to that end Iam. 2.18 Shew me thy faith by thy workes and I will shew thee my faith by my workes He would haue a faith shewed to men which cannot be but by workes for works are the touchstone whereby a true and liuely faith is discerned from a false and dead faith when oportuniry is offered to vs to bring forth that fruit Otherwise the faith that many speake of will proue no better scarse so good Vers 19. as that the Deuils haue who beleeue and tremble Therefore as S. Peter exhorteth vs to beautifie our selues with that better then any golden chaine of Christian vertues which will make vs neither idle nor vnfruitfull 2 Pet. 1.8 in the knowledge of our Lord Iesus Christ so doth S. Iames giue them of his time to vnderstand how they haue mistaken a bare name of faith and knowledge of Christ for an effectuall and a iustifying faith He therefore speaketh in this sort Thou saist thou hast faith I see it not for thy workes shew no such matter Proue then before men that thou hast this confidence in God that thou hast this assurance within thee of thy atonement with him Primasius who wrote about 1100. yeeres since so expoundeth these wordes reconciling that which seemed to bee contradiction in the Apostles S. Iames saith he speaketh of the workes that shew a man to be faithfull Primas in Rom. cap. 3. as himselfe in that which followeth expoundeth it Shew me by workes thy faith It is workes whereby faith is knowne Venerable Bede also is of that minde Bede vpon Iam. 2. that Iames would vt fidem suam per opera probarent That they should proue their faith by their workes But Thomas of Aquine the Angellicall Doctor whose authority in the Romish Church will beare the sway will loose this knot For reconciling those wordes of PAVL Gal. 3.11 No man is iustified by the Law with these wordes of Iames Iam. 2.21 ABRAHAM was iustified by workes He telleth that the iustification that is of workes is an execution or manifestation of righteousnesse whereby he is shewed to be iust And by and by after The righteousnesse before God is in the inner heart Tho. Aquin. in Gal. 3. Lect. 4. but the righteousnes that is of workes that is that maketh knowne or manifest him that is iust is before men What can be spoken more plaine S. Paul teacheth how with boldnes we may stand before God pleading not guilty now this confidence is alwayes within vs S. Iames would haue this by their fruit to appeare vnto others Lest men deceiue their owne hearts Iam. 1.26 and the Religion of such men proue vaine as himselfe saith elsewhere Thus then truly considering in what sense the one and the other Apostle doe take the word Iustification the difference appeareth to be none at all and so the matter is easily compounded And thus I trust it will appeare the premises truly considered that our interpretation of the Apostles wordes A man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Law is both true and Catholike Rom. 3.28 our conclusion that out of them we gather is sound and agreeable to the Apostles doctrine hauing a very great consent of most approued antiquitie yea and of Popish writers too And our workes how good soeuer haue not in them any worthinesse or merit but are in mercy rewarded according to promise So that the seruant of God must learne with good Bernard to say Bern. super Cantic ser 67. Gratia reddit me mihi iustificatum gratis sic liberatum a seruitute peccati Grace restoreth me to my selfe iustified freely and so deliuered from the thraldome of sinne Luk. 2.23.24 Then shall we sing with that multitude of heauenly Souldiers praysing God and saying Glory be to God on high Yea with those many Angels round about the Throne Reuel 5.11 and about the Beasts and the Elders and those thousand thousands Saying with a lowd voice Worthy is the Lambe that was killed to receiue power and riches 12. and wisedome and strength and honor and glory and prayse because O Lord Thou hast redeemed vs to God by thy bloud 9. Reuel 1.5 yea thou hast loued vs and in it hast washed vs from our sinnes Which Meditations will teach vs casting off all confidence in our selues or our owne righteousnesse 1. Iob. 3.8 Mat. 1.21 to rest only vpon him that came to destroy the workes of the Deuill and to saue his people from their sinnes who his owne selfe bare our sinnes in his body vpon the tree that we being deliuered from sinne should liue in righteousnesse by whose stripes we are healed To him therefore with the Father and the holy Ghost bee all honor and praise now and euer AMEN FINIS
Howsoeuer that gracelesse wretch Boniface the eighth who instituted the first Romish Iubile giuing therein immunitie both from sinne and the punishment thereof would make the world beleeue that hee hath power to forgiue sinnes too Anton. part 3. cap. 8 tit 20. §. 2. The fruit of application Praefat. exhort ad Martyr ad Fortunatuâ— Job 19.25.26 Micah 7.7 â— Tim. 1.15 But as Antoninus Bishop of Florence writing that Historie sayth God only forgiueth sinne But to returne from whence for a few lines I haue digressed When we can in this sort apply vnto our selues the mercy of God and thus make a garment fitting our selues to couer therewith our shame of the wooll of the Lambe as Cyprian in one place prettily speaketh for so he calleth the Scripture Oh with what assurance will wee bee able with Iob to say I am sure my Redeemer liueth I shall see God in my flesh And with Micah I will waite for God my Sauiour my God will heare me And with the Apostle Christ Iesus came into the World to saue sinners whereof I am chiefe Notwithstanding for this cause was I receiued to mercie that Iesus Christ should first shew on me all long suffering vnto the example of them who shall in time to come beleeue in hir 〈◊〉 eternall life But the Apostle sheweth in many places vnspeakeable comfort by applying to himselfe in particular the mercies of God in so much as hee assureth himselfe that none could charge Gods seruants to indanger them none could condemne them Rom. 8.33.35.38.39 Yea who shall separate vs sayth hee from the loue of Christ I am perswaded that neither death nor life nor the Angels nor principalities nor powers nor things present nor things to come nor height nor depth nor any other creature is able to separate vs from the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus our Lord. Thus wee see what wonderfull assurance and confidence they haue whom Gods Spirit guideth to apply vnto their wounded consciences the most Soueraigne salue of the promises and examples of Gods mercie Whereas others in the time of feare and danger languish in perplexitie Luk. 23 30. Bernard de Annunt serm 3. and could wish the mountaines would fall vpon them and the hills would couer them For truly sayth Bernard as it were speaking vnto God Non reponis â—leum misericordiae nisi in vase fiduciae Thou Lord puttest not the oyle of mercie but into the vessell of confidence This this I say is the faith commended by the Apostle this is the faith that iustifieth before God which beginning with knowledge of Gods mercy in Christ Iesus out of it gathereth confidence and boldnes And thus with good warrant out of the Word I trust wee may affirme that this faith which doth assuredly know and comfortably apply vnto vs the promised mercies of God causeth vs with boldnesse to stand before God without feare of condemnation yet not for the merit or worthinesse of the act of beleeuing but because the office yea the very nature of faith is to apprehend and take hold of Christ through whom wee are found righteous before God in that he is made vnto vs of God wisedome 1. Cor. 1.30 and righteousnesse and sanctification and redemption as before I haue said The last wordes in this sentence What workes of the Law are meant whereof there is any question betweene our aduersaries and vs are these The workes of the Law Out of these arise two doubts The first is what Law the Apostle speaketh of in these wordes For some euen very ancient haue beene in that error that he speaketh of the Law ceremoniall as Origen and others Now the Romish Church not seeing how they might maintayne their doctrine of Merits and Iustification by workes vnlesse they were of that minde also were in former times of that mind too being glad that they might shrowd themselues vnder the name of ancient â—â—â—rs I need not speake in particular of these Popish Writers seeing Bellarmine confesseth as much as I say Nonnulli saith he è Catholicis Bellar. de Iustific l 1. cap. 19. docent per opera quae Apostolus à iustificatione excludit intelligi obseruationem legalium ceremoniarum Many of the Catholikes teach that by the workes which the Apostle excludeth from iustification the obseruation of the ceremoniall Law is meant But how many or how great in learning Not works ceremoniall Rom. 2.13 or accompt soeuer they be S. Paul affordeth vs proofe enough to conuince them of error When he saith The doers of the Law shall be iustified is there any colour of reason to imagine that they who obserue the ceremonies of the Law shall bee iustified Wee see in the first and last Chapters of the Prophet Esay Micah the 6. the 50. Psalme and in other places of Scripture that many who were most diligent performers of the ceremonies were notwithstanding misliked of God yea reproued for satisfying themselues with that externall seruice What haue I to doe with the multitude of your sacrifices Esa 1.11 saith the Lord I am full of the burnt offrings of Rams and of the fat of fed beasts and I desire not the bloud of Bullocks nor of Lambs nor of Goates That also which the Apostle writeth of the effect of the Law written in mens hearts by reason whereof we haue thoughts accusing excusing cannot be vnderstood of the Law ceremonial But to come yet neerer to the purpose S. Paul euen in that place where hee handleth this question concluding the former part of this discourse and hauing proued Iewes and Gentiles to be transgressors of the Law either written or of nature thus saith Therefore by the workes of the Law Rom. 3.20 shall no flesh be iustified in Gods sight And lest we might make any doubt what Law hee meaneth of he yeeldeth a reason of his former assertion which maketh the matter plaine For by the Law is knowledge of sinne And yet that it may be more manifest what Law is here meant elswhere in plaine wordes he expoundeth himselfe Rom 7.7 I knew not sinne but by the Law For I had not known lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not lust Out of which wordes I reason thus The Apostle speaketh of that Law that maketh vs to know sinne but that is not the Law ceremoniall therefore the Apostle speaketh not of the Law ceremoniall Yea this place seemed to S. Augustine to haue such force as that thereupon he groundeth that which we teach August de Spir. lit cap. 8. Ac ne quisquam putaret hic Apostolum ea lege dixisse hominem iustificari quae in Sacramentis veteribus multa continet figurata praecepta c. And lest any man should thinke the Apostle to haue said that a man is iustified by that which in the old Sacraments haue many figuratiue precepts from whence commeth circumcision which children were commended to receiue he by and by sheweth what Law
he meant and saith For by the Law is knowledge of sinne But the Apostle himselfe is best Interpreter of his owne meaning Out of that he had said some perchance would gather that he had little regard to the Law whereby the Iewes would be offended for they knew the Law was giuen of God Others would take occasion thereupon more boldly to transgresse to meet therefore with these inconueniences hee maketh vnto himselfe this obiection Rom. 3.31 Doe wee then make the Law of no effect through faith Yea we establish the Law But the Law ceremoniall is not by the Gospell established Hebr. 10.1 Rom. 10.4 but abolished For that Law had but the shaddow of good things to come But the end of the Law is Christ So that he offering himselfe vpon the Altar of the Crosse to God the Father Iob. 19.30 a sacrifice for sin did vpon good ground say It is finished So as Christ being come if wee will still tye our selues to the obseruation of that Law Gal. 5.2 Paul telleth vs that Christ shall profit vs nothing 4. Yee are saith he abolished from Christ whosoeuer are iustified by the Law yee are fallen from grace Therefore were the Apostles in their dayes very carefull to teach men to rest vpon Christ and not to imagine that now in the time of the Gospell they are tyed to those impotent and beggerly rudiments Gal. 4.9 as the Apostle calleth them This may appeare by that notable Councell Act. 15. and in diuers places Much more might bee alleaged to proue that the Law ceremoniall cannot in this place be vnderstood But this I trust is sufficient and had indeed beene more then enough but that our Aduersaries of later time Bellar. de Iustif l. 1. c. 19. Andrad Orthodox Explic. l 6. although they dare not defend that opinion yet would they make it seeme lesse absurd as doth Bellarmine in pointing to some places that their errour is grounded vpon as if they had reason so to teach and Andradius nameth some Fathers of that minde Well then by the Law without all question wee must vnderstand the Law morall But here ariseth another doubt what works are here excluded in these wordes What workes are excluded Without the workes of the Law And here our aduersaries doe earnestly contend not to haue all workes excluded from Iustification but such only as are done before they beleeued For if they should confesse that no works can iustifie then falleth downe that doctrine of Merits to the ground a most gainefull doctrine to Pope and Popish Priests who must supply with their store that which other want of their owne merits But we teach that all workes All works before after excluded from Iustification aswell such as follow our iustification this our aduersaries denie as the workes that wee doe afore our iustification which themselues confesse are in these wordes excluded from being any causes of our iustification before God And to auerre this which we say we haue many strong reasons The first is taken from the wordes themselues being mightily strengthned with the faithfulnesse of him who teacheth this doctrine and with his sincerity in teaching For as hee requireth in other disposers of the secrets of God that euery man be found faithfull 1. Cor. 4.2 so he testifieth of his owne faithfulnesse in his ministery speaking vnto the Elders of the Church of Ephesus Act. 20.20 I kept backe nothing saith he that was profitable but haue shewed you and taught you openly and throughout euery house And againe 27. I haue kept nothing backe but haue shewed you all the counsell of God Neither can wee in reason suppose he would deale more sincerely with them of Ephesus then with the Romanes of whose instruction in the faith how carefull hee was may well bee seene in his first and fifteenth Chapters of that Epistle The Apostle therefore All without exception speaking of workes without any exception as hee doth without the workes of the Law if any workes should not haue beene excluded from iustification he might haue beene charged by the Romanes that he kept backe somwhat from them namely what workes were to be admitted as causes of iustification and what not and so did not shew them all the counsell of God For if he had beene of our aduersaries opinion sincerity would haue forced him to haue said When I say we are iustified without workes I speake only of workes done afore we are iustified not of all workes For when we are once iustified by God then by our workes wee must iustifie our selues So that if any workes may be accounted as causes of our iustification the Apostles manner of speaking would rather haue beseemed some acquiuocating Priest or Iesuite who haue taught their hearts to dissemble and their tongues to lye yea who professe to teach the arte of dissimulation and cogging and glory in their falshood whereby they deceiue the world then this faithfull Apostle It is most certayne therefore that the Apostle being as he was a most faithfull disposer of the mysteries of God one that detested all such doubtfull or double dealing in Gods matters especially 1. Cor. 2.4 Whose preaching standeth not in the iniycing speech of mans wisedome but in the plaine euidence of Spirit and power excepting no workes excludeth all And many such like speeches we haue in Scriptures in which such indefinite propositions as Logicians call them are vniuersally to bee vnderstood Hebr. 4.15 Christ is said to bee without sinne Now seeing there is sinne Originall and Actuall of commission and of omission shall we imagine that because the Apostle saith not without all sinne therefore Christ is subiect to some sinne Zach. 2.4 God maketh promise to his people that Ierusalem shall be inhabited without wall Now because there are sundry sorts of walls some of stone some of earth or of other matter as men fancy shall some cauilling companion say Though they had no stone walls yet had they some other walls for their strength But infinite such places might bee brought wherein it may easily appeare that though this vniuersall signe all be not added yet it must be vnderstood as also it must be in these wordes of S. Paul as well all workes going before or following iustification as all Lawes either Naturall or Morall or Ceremoniall Againe if the Apostle had meant only to exclude the workes done in our infidelity he needed not so carefully to haue set down the manner of our Iustification as he doth immediatly before these words That it is by the righteousnesse of God Rom. 3.22.24 by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon all that beleeue And that Wee are iustified freely by his grace through the Redemption that is in Christ Iesus whom God hath set forth to bee a reconciliation 25. through faith in his bloud to declare his righteousnesse by the forgiuenesse of sinnes In all which there
is not one word of Workes but all is ascribed to Christ Wherein the Apostle also writeth so carefully and so warily as if he feared nothing more then that man should rest any thing vpon his Merits To conclude therefore this my first argument I say with the Apostle If it be of grace it is no more of Workes Rom. 11.6 or else were grace no more grace but if it bee of Workes it is no more grace for then were Workes no more Workes So that because the Apostle sayth it is of grace and by faith without Workes therefore Workes are wholly excluded as Andradius himselfe will warrant me to say For Mercedis ratio Andrad Orthodox Explicat lib. 6. cum gratiae nomine ex aduerso pugnat For the consideration of reward or Merit is cleane contrarie to grace A second argument I take from the finall causes of this doctrine of Iustification by faith only which are two set downe by the Apostle The one in this Chapter immediately before the words of my Text namely to exclude our reioycing or boasting But if all workes bee not disabled as insufficient causes of our Iustification some workes should be left wherein we might reioyce To exclude reioycing in our selues For by reioycing the Apostle meaneth nothing else but that confidence that men haue whereby they content themselues as if they were out of danger of Gods wrath Saint Paul then concluding out of that he hath taught of Iustification by faith that our reioycing is thereby taken away teacheth vs thus much that whoso apprehendeth with an assured faith this Iustification that we haue by Christ resteth nothing vpon his owne workes or contenteth not himselfe with the righteousnesse that is by the Law But on the contrarie our Aduersaries suppose their reioycing is not taken away In so much as a great man among them dareth affirme Andrad Orthodox Explicat lib. 6. That heauenly blisse is not so freely giuen of God and liberally as in respect of their workes it is due And by and by after We gather that eternall felicitie ought not to bee imputed according to grace but according to debt And therefore within a few words after he also defineth Merit Merit A free action whereunto a reward is due Which Doctrine of Andradius because it is also the Doctrine of the Romish Church wee may truly affirme of them that they doe what in them lyeth to make the Apostle a Lyer when hee affirmeth that reioycing is taken away by the Law of faith seeing they still reioyce and content themselues in their workes But I will end this with one short argument If Iustification may bee by workes then is not our reioycing in the Law taken away by faith but it is by faith taken away therefore Iustification is not by workes The Minor proposition is the wordes of the Apostle Rom. 11.6 The Maior is proued by that which a little before out of the Apostle I alleadged that workes and grace cannot both stand as causes of our Iustification But notably for this purpose doth Chrysostome gather out of these words Chrys in Epist ad Rom. hom 7 If the faithfull man and he who is saued would thinke well of himselfe in this respect that he regardeth the Law doe heare in these words how by the Law it selfe his mouth is stopped how by the Law hee is accused how the Law it selfe denieth as it were saluation to sinners and excludeth all boasting and he who as yet beleeueth not being hereby deiected and humbled may take occasion to draw neere vnto faith thou seest how great force faith hath how it driueth vs from whatsoeuer we had before not suffering vs to reioyce though neuer so little in them And a little before he hath sayd that God saueth Nullis ad hoc vsus operibus sed fidem tantum exigens Not vsing for our Iustification any workes but requiring faith only Sedul in Epist ad Rom. cap. 3. Sedulius also verie well noteth thus Talis gloriatio quae veniebat ex operibus legis excluditur Such reioycing is excluded as commeth of the workes of the Law Our comfort Another end why our Iustification is by faith is for our vnspeakeable comfort That it might come by grace and the promise might bee sure to all the seed Rom. 4.16 Whereas if wee should seeke to get the inheritance by the Law Gal. â— 18 we could not thinke to haue it by promise and so in respect of our owne manifold imperfections wee might alwayes bee doubtfull and wauering and farre from that comfort that Gods children finde in themselues In this respect then it is good that we perswade our selues that we are saued by grace Bell. de Iustific l. 5. c. 7 that we may looke vnto Christ only Yea Bellarmine himselfe giueth this aduice Propter incertitudinem propriae iustitiae periculum inanis gloriae tutissimum est fiduciam totam in sola Dei misericordia ponere In respect of the vncertaintie of our owne righteousnesse and the danger of vaine glorie the safest way is to put all our confidence only in Gods mercy and goodnesse Very well writeth vpon these words of the Apostle Theophilact Theophil in Epist ad Rom. 4. Quum vniuersa sint in Dei tum gratia tum misericordia fita profecto quae ab eoconferuntur stabilia fore certa omni semini id est credentibus cunctis existimanda sunt Seeing all things are of Gods grace and mercie sure the things that are giuen from him as it may be thought are stable and sure to all the seed that is to all beleeuers Ambros in Epist ad Rom. 4. Saint Ambrose also sayth Firma esse non potest promissio omni semini hoc est omni homini ex omni gente nisi fuerit ex fide The promise cannot bee firme vnto all the seed that is to all men of euery Nation vnlesse it bee of faith And he after yeeldeth a reason of that he hath said because by the Law we are found guiltie and the promise cannot be giuen to them that are guiltie vnlesse they bee purified which must bee done by faith Thus then I reason The promise of Iustification must be sure but vnlesse it be of faith it cannot be sure therefore the promise of Iustification must bee of faith The Maior is Saint Pauls Rom. 4.16 The Minor is the former wordes of Saint Ambrose A third argument to proue that euen the workes of them that are regenerate cannot iustifie and are excluded by Saint Paul from hauing that force is taken from the example of Abraham who is set forth as a patterne in whom wee may learne how wee all can attaine to Iustification as it is plaine to see in the fourth Chapter of this Epistle to the Romanes Abraham Abraham not iustified by workes a good while after he was called out of Vr of the Chaldees had liued a good time in obedience vnto
perfection of righteousnesse Another obiection they haue out of such testimonies as teach that God shall reward euery man according to his worke Psal 62.12 Mat. 16.27 Rom. 2.6 Reue. 22.12 Bell. de Iustific l. 5. c. 2 Aug. Confess l. 9. c. 13 How the godly are rewarded according to workes Of which sort the Scripture affordeth vs diuers And out of those wordes Bellarmine draweth this Doctrine Secundum opera sua id est vt opera merentur According to his workes that is as his workes deserue I might answer him with that golden saying of Saint Augustine Vae hominum vitae etiam ladabili si remota misericordia discutias eam Woe to the life of man that is commendable if thou Lord setting mercie aside doe sift the same But that the absurditie of his assertion may the rather appeare it is needfull that if the reward be giuen according to the merit of the worke there should bee some equalitie of proportion betweene the worke and the reward it meriteth But what proportion can there be betweene workes so vnperfect as before I haue shewed ours to bee and that eternall glorie which is so great and excellent a reward that the Apostle describeth it in these wordes The things which eye hath not seene 1. Cor. 2.9 eare hath not heard neyther can enter into the heart of man God hath prepared for them that loue him Howsoeuer therefore Bellarmine dareth affirme Bell. de Justific lib. 5. cap. 18. That non requiritur absoluta aequaelitas inter meritum praemium a perfit equalitie is not requisite betweene merit and the reward which thing he indeed barely affirmeth without any one testimonie of Scripture or sentence of Fathers yet dare I boldly pronounce that if any man saith that eternall life is giuen as workes deserue and yet that there is no proportion betweene eternall life and the worke hee speaketh most absurdly making merit no merit and deseruing no deseruing whereas in all reason and learning how much a worke wanteth of the equalitie with the reward which is to be giuen for doing it so much it lacketh of meriting that reward Very well therefore S. Bernard after he hath shewed That mens merits are not such Bern. Serm. 1. de Annunt that eternall life is of right due to them or that God should doe wrong if he so giue it not because euen our merits are Gods gifts and therefore we are rather bound to God for them then he to vs asketh this question Quid sunt merita omnia ad tantam gloriam What are all merits to so great glory As if he had said There is no proportion no equalitie This then which Bellarmine heerein hath taught is as absurd as if a man should affirme that hee doth not sell twelue penny-worth of ware or doe twelue penny-worth of worke must be deemed to haue truly deserued twelue pence I trow Bellarmine would not well like of such penny-worthes Not as workes merit One other argument I will produce which plainely enough confuteth that which Bellarmine sayth that According to the worke must be expounded as the worke meriteth Consider of the Parable of the Labourers in the Vineyard Mat. 20.1.3.5.6 whereof some went to their labour at the dawning of the day others at the third houre but some were not called to worke before the sixt or ninth houres yea other about Sunne-setting that is at the eleuenth houre The Master of the Vineyard when euen was come sent for the Labourers and as hee promised to the first paid to euerie one a pennie But they who came first 12. pleaded that they had borne the burden and heat of the day and therefore thought as our Papists doe they deserued more then the rest But the master of the Vineyard answered they had their due and what hee promised if hee gaue other more that hindred not them Now I would that our Romish Catholikes would answere truly to this question If paiment should haue beene made according to the merit of the worke who deserued most I suppose they will answere for otherwise they cannot truly answere that they who came first to their labour deserued best payment Yet wee see the last had as much as they Therefore it is plaine payment was not made to them nor shal be to vs as our worke meriteth but according to promise For euerie one had his pennie Hill in Mat. Can. Merces quidem nulla est ex dono quia debetur ex opere sed gratuitam Deus omnibus ex fidei iustificatione donauit 20. There is no wages of gift sayth Hilarie for it is due by the worke but God hath giuen a free reward vnto all by Iustification of faith The penny in the Gospell Prosper de vocat Gent. lib. c. 17. Thereby prouing that this penny was not as wages but a free reward not for the worke but giuen in promise Notably therefore sayth Prosper who wrote about that time Saint Augustine did who gathereth out of this parable Operarios accepisse donum gratiae non mercedem operis that these workemen receiued a gift of grace not a reward or wages for their worke But Bellarmine contending for merits would faine remoue this blocke out of the way Hee feareth lest some of his friends stumbling thereon should reele from the Romish Church He therefore out of Augustine and others telleth vs that denarius diurnus Bell. de Iustific li. 3. c. 16 li. 5. cap. 6. this penny for the day worke is aequalitas aeternitatis non gloriae equaelitie of eternitie not of glorie But our controuersie is not what this penny is but in what respect it is giuen whether for the worthinesse of the worke or not If he say for the merit of the worke the Parable is against his opinion therein If he say it is of promise as elsewhere he seemeth to affirme wee haue that we seeke Bell. de Iufic l. 5. c. 19. Wee see saith he the whole penny giuen to them who had not laboured the whole day and the Lord himselfe sheweth in these words I will giue to him as to thee c. that this was done not of dutie but of liberalitie Heere our aduersary confesseth the reward not to be as the labour merited Therefore to omit that needlesse question what this pennie is let vs heere remember that it is not giuen for the worthines of the worke For Bellarmines answere seemeth to mee much like as if I aske which way I may goe to London and he answere me it is a faire Citie Seeing then the reward is of mercie and not of merit let not vs by ascribing that to our workes which is giuen freely in grace be vnthankefull vnto him who so loued vs that he dyed for vs as Saint Hierom exhorteth vs yeelding this reason Ierom vpon Gal. 2. Abiecta est gratia si mihi sola non sufficit Grace is but cast away if it only suffice me