1. Cor. 8. 10. chap. 10. 21. the Idols table Therefore vntill they proue vs Babilonish and besides all that to be incurable their pretended grounds shall end in meeare conceits for Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne The last sort or sect that I purpose to meddle with who would faine seeke a staffe from Scripture to hold themselues by is the Papist One of their mainest grounds is in the Epstile of Iames 2. 24. Ye see then how that of workes a man is iustified Iam. 2. 24. and not of faith onely Here they ground their second iustification for Second iustification a mere inuention they would haue him that is iust to be more iustified although comparisons of greater and lesser do not make a seuerall kind but declare an increase in the same kind of iustification and not a new kind of iustification Now wheras the Apostles Paul and Iames may seeme to contradict and oppose themselues the one prouing so often in his Epistles that we are iustified by faith without the workes Rom. 4. 3. Galat. 3. 6. of the Law alledging the example of Abraham for iustification by faith whom the Apostle Iames here vseth for iustification by works We must therefore examine and scanne sundry necessarie questions for the reconciling of them as also for the remouing the aduersary from off his blind ground in this weighty point The first question to be scanned is what faith the Apostle Iames meaneth or speaketh of in this place the which he maketh so insufficient whether historicall miraculous hypocriticall or liuely and operatiue It is true that the Apostle Paul speaketh of the last as appeareth Gal. 5. 5. 6. Galathians 5. 5. 6. Circumcision auaileth nothing nor vncircumcision but faith which worketh by loue But the Apostle Iames No opposition betweene the Apostles I am 2. 19. Great difference betwixt a liuing faith and a dead faith speaketh of the first namely historicall as appeareth in the 19. verse of this second chapter which he calleth the faith of diuels So then they both speake the truth the one that we are iustified by faith onely without workes speaking of a liuely faith the other that we are not iustified by faith onely speaking of a dead barren and counterfet faith The second question to be scanned is what iustification the Apostle Iames meaneth for there is a twofold iustification as there are sundry sorts of faith First therefore we are iustified before God of which iustification the Prophet Dauid speaketh Psa 32. 1. 2. Blessed is that Rom. 43. Psal 32. 1. 2. man vnto whom the Lord imputeth not his sinne Of which righteousnesse and iustification the Apostle Paul speaketh who saith That Abraham beleeued and it was Gods promise a sufficient ground for iustifying faith counted vnto him for righteousnesse The other iustification is before men which we haue by workes they being as euidences that we are righteous before God Of this iustification doth the Apost Iames speake for Abrahams offering vp of his sonne could not be the cause of his righteousnesse before God for his Rom. 4. 18. faith in the promise was reckoned vnto him for righteousnesse thirty yeares before he offered vp his sonne Therefore before God was his faith not made perfect through workes but before men Besides we reade of but few workes that the theefe on the crosse wrought Yet Luke 23. 42. 43. through faith was he iustified and the heauenly paradise promised vnto him The third question to be scanned is what works the Apostle Iames meaneth whether workes going before or after faith It is certaine that the Apostle Paul speaketh of workes going before faith which he denieth to be able to iustifie vs as appeareth Galath 5. 2. 3. 4. Behold I Paul say vnto you that if ye be circumcised Gal. 5. 23. 4. Christ shall profit you nothing for I testifie againe to euery man which is circumcised that he is bound to keepe the whole Law Ye are abolished from Christ whosoeuer are iustified by the Law ye are fallen from grace But Saint Iames speaketh of workes which follow faith as appeareth in the 18. verse Iames 2. 18. In nature causes of things go before their effects where he saith thus Shew me thy faith out of thy workes and I will shew thee my faith by my workes Besides the author to the Hebrewes declareth that Abrahams obedience and sacrifice was a worke following faith for he saith That by faith Hebr. 11. 17. Abraham offered vp his sonne Isaacke Workes then that follow Iustification cannot be the causes thereof wherefore the Apostle Iames must needs speake of Iustification before men and not before God The fourth question to be scanned is touching the persons with whom they haue to deale a distinction is very apparent Rom. 103. The Apostle Paul was to deale with pharisaicall hypocrites and Iewish teachers who held and taught that vnlesse they obserued the law of Moses they could not be saued But the Apostle Iames was to deale with carnall libertines and Epicure-like professours who boasted of a barren faith and neglected to bring forth the fruits of righteousnesse Many there were that vpon the preaching of faith gaue libertie to the flesh and thereby became the seruants of corruption as the Apostle Peter witnesseth 2. Pet. 2. 18. 19 therefore there must needs be necessitie of their seuerall doctrine and no opposition in it the one being to deale with such as too much preferred workes the other being to deale with such as too much neglected them From whose examples People of different qualities must haue different doctrine preached vnto them the Ministers of the Gospell may learne that one kind of doctrine cannot be necessarie at all times in all places and to all persons therefore must they take heede to their flockes wisely and perfectly to guide by the rule of faith in the life of life for Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Vse 5 The fift vse is an admonition against ignorance Our doctrine will not giue vs libertie nor licence to pleade for simplicity Knowledge very necessarie to the life of faith Christians may make some vse of Satan for he knowes much and laboureth much Pro. 8. 10. 11. for where there is blindnesse in the iudgement there cannot be but sin in the practise Therefore search we for knowledge as for hid treasures let vs make choise of wisedome before gold and preferre it before pearles But for our better proceeding consider we of some motiues and speciall inducements The first is the necessitie of knowledge Our grand enemy the Diuell is subtill and well practised in our manifold corruptions yea he vnderstandeth historically the Scriptures he rageth in these last and worst dayes insomuch that although he cannot hinder many from profession yet he keepeth many from sauing knowledge driuing men into extreames conceits and base absurdities Pray we therefore earnestly for a sanctified vnderstanding Secondly knowledge
more clearely the rotten ground-worke of this Romish building the Rhemists theÌ„selues comment vpon our text and tell vs that the proper sence is That euery thing that a man doth against his knowledge and conscience is a sinne but they shew the ground neither for knowledge nor conscience something must be vnderstood which is not expressed or else the consequent must conclude that a man can neither erre in iudgement nor conscience which well may be gathered from some of their propositions as namely this one Ignorance the mother of deuotion For it is neither against knowledge nor conscience when that faith will serue which is fixed vpon the Church although that Church be grounded vpon the diuell himselfe Againe other stones there are which Iustificatio est actus indiuiduus ac simul totus belong to this brittle foundation as namely that second iustification by workes as if there were a first and a last in the act of iustification whereas it is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a free acceptation of a mans person yea a iustifying of the vngodly as the Apostle witnesseth But to Rom. 4. 5. him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnesse If any regenerate man might haue merited any thing in the matter of iustification it could not haue bene but Dauid and Paul who were so abounding in the worke of the Lord might haue gained something for themselues but it is farre otherwise as appeareth by their owne testimonies in facred Scripture Lord saith Psal 143. 2. 1. Cor. 4. 4. Iustificatio exprimitur in Hebraico Hizdik Pro. 17. 15. in Graeco 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dauid enter not into iudgement with thy seruant for in thy sight shall no flesh liuing be iustified The Apostle likewise saith I haue in all good conscience serued God vnto this day neither know I any thing of my selfe yet am I not thereby iustified Besides the word to iustifie is opposed in the Scriptures to condemning signifying an absoluing or imputatiue iustice It is God that iustifieth who can condemne Yea the blessed Apostle Rom. 8. 33. 34. Isai 50. 8. Act. 13. 39. Paul is noâ— aâ—â—aid to publish in the Synagogue of the Iewes at Antioch that From all things from which they could not be iustified by the Law of Moses by him that is by Christ euery one that beleeueth is iustified Well saith Bernard to this purpose Bern. in fest Omnium Sanct. Serm. 1. Vaehominum iustitiae quantumvis laudabili si remota misericordia Dei iudicetur that is Wo to the righteousnesse of man were it neuer so laudable if God setting aside mercy enter to iudge it For this cause holy Iob is not ashamed to confesse that if he would dispute with God yet Iob. 9. 3. could he not make answer vnto one of a thousand Thus you see with what rubbish the foundation of the Romish Church is laid of which a workman would be ashamed yea neuer aduenture so great a building with so slippery a ground-worker but that the prophecy must be fulfilled in them as well as in other namely Christ to be a stone to stumble at and a rocke of offence euen to them which stumble at Esay 8. 14. 1. Pet. 2. 8. the word being disobedient vnto the which things they were euen ordained Were it not so how could they withstand so plaine euidences of the spirit in sacred Scriptures as namely iustification only by faith without the works of the Law figured recorded by Moses the Prophets Christ and his Apostles Either it must be of grace or of debt but if debt then were Eph. 2. 8. grace no more grace In like manner they stand vpon Peters prerogatiues aboue the other Apostles which were a thing impossible to humaine reason were they not giuen vp to diabolicall delusions for no other Apostle we reade of that fell so often and grieuously as this man did They tel vs that he walked vpon the water so did none of the rest But what supernaturall act was this for herein by the testimony of the Euangelist he bewraied diffidence and much weakenesse and had not Christ caught him by the hand he had suncke What vnity Matth. 14. 30. therefore or vniformity can there be betwixt the Church of Christ and the Church of Antichrist when there is so Rome cannot stand for it wanâ—eth a sound foundation great difference in the principles Furthermore besides all this other stories there are or rather vanishing rubbish which prop and vphold this Romane Hierarchy neither of Christs or any of his Apostles getting or laying as namely that vngrounded doctrine of Transsubstantiation lately hatched and decreed at the Councell of Lateran being 1215 yeares after Christ vnder Pope Innocentius the third neuer taught by those Fathers of great antiquity namely Irenaeus Tertullian Cyprian Augustine Yea the Euangelists themselues Marke and Matthew are sufficient witnesses of Christs owne words who said that he would drinke no more of the fruite of the vine Matth. 26. 29. Marke 14. 25. which was not bloud but wine as Chrysostome and Cyprian both affirme These things being considered who can iustly Cal. lib. Instiâ— cap. 13. blame M. Caluin thogh he say the mother organ of popish traditions was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an erronious zeale and preposterous humour deriued from Satan the father of lies and vngrounded Axiomes And were not poore ignorant and deluded soules bewitched through the deceits of Satan and vanity of their minds drawne aside with those speculatiue shewes of Antichristian piety and withall blinded The doctriâ—â— of the Romish Church cannot be maintained by Scripture with those false perswasions of admired Cardinals how could it be but they should relinquish such impious falsities and counterfet holinesse grounded vppon nothing but mans inuention I could proceed in shewing the insufficiency and weaknesse of this declining Babell the head corner stone which should vphold the building being cast aside but their apparent folly I ceasse to speak of it being sufficiently manifested to the Church of God by the faithfull witnesses of the Almightie Let Iesuits therefore or rather He that preacheth Christ truly cannot but preach good workâ— Iebusites maintaine their faithlesse doctrines as of free will workes of superâ—rogation with such like yet let Sion fly to the Law and the Testimony and if they speake not according to this word it is as the Prophet saith because there is no light in them And although they falsely Esay 8. 20. charge the Embassadors of Christ as enemies vnto good workes let them set them no higher then the Scriptures and they shall set them no higher then we For we are his workemanship created in Ephes 2. 10 Christ Iesus vnto good workes that we should walke in them Besides The weapons of our warfare are notcarnall but spirituall mighty through God to cast downe 2. Cor. 10. 4. 5. holds casting
was there any opposition in the Spirit of Christ which was both in Moses and the Prophets 1. Pet. 1. 10. 11 The doctrine of Moses and the Prophets rightly applied very profitable and Christ Of this saluation saith the Apostle the Prophets haue enquired and searched which prophesied of the grace that should come vnto you Searching when or what time the Spirit which testified before of Christ which was in them should declare the sufferings that should come vnto Christ and the glorie that should follow Yea the same Apostle affirmeth that We haue a 2. Pet. 1. 19. most sure word of the Prophets What letteth then but we may attend vnto the sound doctrine of Moses and the Prophets Furthermore the testimonie of the Apostle Paul is pregnant to this purpose who auoucheth That the whole 2. Tim. 3. 16. Corruption needeth correction as well as instruction Reproofes sometimes very needfull Scripture is giuen by inspiration of God and is profitable to teach improue correct and to instruct in righteousnesse therefore the whole Scripture is necessarie the Christian standing in neede of it either for ground of faith or rule of obedience both in his generall particular calling Like vnto these dreames is the errour of many Libertines who ground vpon that saying in Ieremiah After those dayes Ierem. 31. 33. saith the Lord I will put my Lawes in the◠inward parts and write them in their hearts as also vpon that saying of the Apostle Yee are our Epistle written not with inke 2. Cor. 3. 2. 3. but with the Spirit of the liuing God Although it be true that the knowledge of the Law may be written naturally in mens hearts yet he commanded the same to be writtē in two tables of stone For how doth the Lord write this Law in our hearts How doth he seale vp vnto vs the couenant of our reconciliation and regeneration by the finger of his The preaching of the word the conduit pipe to conuey grace into our harts Spirit but by the doctrine of the Law and Gospell preached heard written read meditated Or how could the Apostles call themselues the Preachers of the New Testament if the Gospel could not be preached And in vaine should Christ bid vs Search the Scriptures Iohn 5. 39. Furthermore the Euangelists and Apostles call their doctrine which was the New Testament a Scripture or Writing as appeareth by that testimony of Luke who thought it meete to write Those Luke 1. 3. things which he had diligently searched out Luke 1. 3. as also Iohn witnesseth who saith That these things are written that ye may beleeue Iohn 20. 31. And the Apostle Paul thought it necessary to write as is plaine in his Epistles Phil. 3. 1. Thus we see that the men of God and The Spirit of God in the hearts of his people and his word agree together Ministers of the Gospell wrote by the Spirit the Gospell with inke the hearts of true beleeuers sanctified by the Spirit through the preaching of the Gospel answering correspondently that word which was both written and preached as was euident among those Conuerts at Corinth in whom was manifest the power of the Gospell the preaching of faith being the power of God to saluation to Rom. 1. 16. euery one that doth beleeue We see then by wofull experience that Satan transforming himselfe into an It is the work of Satan to draw men frō Gods word which is the ground of faith Angell of light seeketh to ground many a poore soule vpon seeming shadowes drawing them from the rocke of refuge and certenty namely Moses and the Prophets Euangelists and Apostles of Iesus Christ who haue written and spoken as the Spirit directed and gaue them vtterance Were not therefore the proud Anabaptist fuller of conceit then iudgement he would neuer paraphrase the sacred Scriptures in that manner as he doth as I haue already shewed and will further shew in one instance Christ saith Mathew 5. 34. Sweare not at all therefore Matth. 5. 34. saith he it is not lawfull in any case to sweare Whereas the Lord vpon necessitie hath commended and commanded a lawfull oath warranting the same both by example and precept as appeareth in Deut. 6. 13. Thou shalt feare the Lord thy Deut. 6. 13. God and serue him and shalt sweare by his Name Yea the Apostle testifieth vppon necessity an oath to be a very good thing An oath saith he for confirmation Hebr. 6. 16. is the end of all strife Thus by conceited exposition would this sect of people bring Christ to abrogate his Fathers law and derogate from his Fathers glorie A proud spirit vnfit to expound the Scripture whereas our Sauiour meaneth nothing lesse for his purpose is nothing else but to expound the Law and deliuer it from the grosse corruptions and deprauations He that willingly wresteth the Scripture neither respecteth God nor Christ of the Scribes and Pharises For they taught that the third commandement was to be vnderstood of periurie onely or false swearing therefore our Sauiour sheweth that in this commandement is forbidden not onely periury and false swearing by the Name of God but also all rash and ordinary swearing in our common talke whether by the Name of God or any of his creatures because swearing amisse by them redoundeth to his dishonour He therefore here forbiddeth all needelesse and superfluous All needlesse swearing is much forbidden in the Scripture oathes in our ordinary communication And as these do erre not knowing nor vnderstanding the Scriptures so do many others as namely the Carnall cauiller that ioyneth himselfe with the publike assemblies partaking of the same word and Sacraments with the Saints of God But this man would haue one line to be sufficient vnto saluation for he findeth it written in the Scriptures That Iohn 3. 36. Naturall men would haue all but they would do nothing he which beleeueth in the Sonne hath euerlasting life But if this man reade forward he shall see and finde That he which obeyeth not the Sonne shall not see life Such will like the doctrine of faith but they cannot well brooke the doctrine of repentance But if they attend or list to heare they shall heare Christ to be as rigorous as his Father both in summoning all men Marke 1. 15. Luke 13. 5. to repent as also in threatning woes against impenitents The Apostles as they preach faith so they preach sanctification Acts 2. 38. and amendment of life for it is the absolute will of God that we should 1. Thessal 43 1. Pet. 1. 15. be holy as the Lord our God is holy The whole word of the Lord therefore must be deliuered by the Ministers of the Gospell that the whole courses of mens liues may be guided by the rule of faith Christ and his Apostles did not alwayes Rom. 9. 10. 11 preach faith but according to the dispositions