reuerence him and declare our loue and thankefulnes towardes him by our good workes and obedience Rom. 12.1 J beseech you brethren by the mercies of God that ye giue vp your bodies a liuing sacrifice holy acceptable vnto God which is your reasonable seruing of God 1. Pet. 2.5 Yee are made an holie Priesthoode to offer vp spiritual sacrifices acceptable to god by Jesus Christ We are to doe good workes also in respect of our selues 1. That by our good workes we maie be assured of our faith Mat. 7.17 Euerie good tree bringeth forth good fruite Iames 2.20 That faith which is without workes is dead Phil. 1.11 Filled with the fruites of righteousnesse which are by Iesus Christ vnto the glorie and praise of god Now by our workes we must needes know that wee haue faith because the effect is not without his cause and wee must knowe the cause by his proper effect when as therefore we find not in our selues good works or newe obedience we are hypocrites neither haue we faith but an euil conscieÌ„ce For true faith only which neuer waÌ„teth al her fruites bringeth foorth as a fruitful tree good woorkes obedience amendment of life and these fruites likewise discerne and distinguish true faith from historical and temporary faith and so also from hypocrisie 2. That we maie be assured that we haue obtained remission of sinnes through Christ and are for Christes sake iustified before God for iustification and sanctification are benefites linked together which so cleaue together and that necessarily as they neuer can be seuered or pulled asunder For Christ obtained both for vs at once namely both remission of sinnes and the holy Ghost who stirreth vp in vs by faith the study and desire of good works and new obedience 3. That we maie be assured of our election and saluation 2. Pet. 1.10 Giue diligence to make your calling and election sure These proceede from the cause next going before For god hath chosen from euerlasting of his free mercy those onely which are iustified for the merit of his sonne Roman 8.30 Whom he predestinat them also hee called and them also he iustified Nowe that wee haue receiued from Christ iustification which is neuer giuen vnto the Elect without sanctification we knowe by faith And that we haue faith wee perceiue by the woorkes of faith true obedience and true conuersion 4. That by good woorkes our faith maie bee exercised cherished strengthned and aduaunced For they who giue themselues ouer to corrupt lusts against their conscience in them faith cannot be and therefore neither a good conscience neither a confidence and trust in god as beeing appeased and fauourable vnto them For wee haue through faith onelie a feeling of gods fauor towards vs a good conscience Rom. 8.13 Jf yee liue after the flesh yee shal die 2. Tim. 1.6 J put thee in remembrance that thou stirre vp the gift of god which is in thee by the putting on of my hands 5. That by good works we may shew forth and honest our life and calling Ephes 4.1 I praie you that yee walke worthie of the vocation whereunto yee are called 6. That wee maie escape temporal and eternal punishmentes Matth. 7.19 Euerie tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is cut off and cast into the fire Rom. 8.3 If ye liue according to the flesh ye shal die 7. That we maie obtaine corporall and spirituall rewardes which according vnto the promise accompanie good workes 1. Timot. 4.8 Godlines is profitable vnto al things which hath the promise of the life present and of that that is to come Except God woulde haue the hope of rewards and the feare of punishments to be motiue causes vnto good works he would not vse them in admonitions We must doe good woorkes also in respect of our neighbour 1. That wee maie bee profitable vnto our neighbours by our good example and so edifie them 1. Cor 15. All things are for your sakes that most plenteous grace by the thankes-giuing of manie maie redound to the praise of god Phil. 1.24 That I abide in the flesh is more needefull for you 2. That offences maie bee auoided Matth. 18.7 Woe bee to that man by whome offences come Rom. 2.24 The name of god is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you 3. That wee maie winne vnbeleeuers and by our woordes and deedes and example conuert them vnto Christ Luk. 22.32 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy brethren We see now then what are the causes for which we must necessariely doe good workes as also how or in what sense our workes are said to be necessarie for vs vnto saluation to wit not as a cause of our saluation but as mean or way without which wee come not vnto it And after the same sort also it maie be said That good woorkes are necessarie vnto iustice and righteousnes or vnto iustification or in them that are to be iustified namely as a consequent following iustification wherewith regeneration is vnseparably ioined But yet I would not vse these kindes of speaking 1. Because they are ambiguous doubtful 2. Because they breed contentioÌ„s minister occasioÌ„ of cauilling vnto the aduersaries 3. Because the Scripture doth not vse them which must be followed of vs in speaking 6 Whether good woorkes merit any thing before God THIS sixt question ariseth out of the fift as the fourth did out of the thirde For when men heare that wee receiue rewardes by our woorkes they presently conclude that we merit somewhat by them Wherefore wee are to know that good workes indeede are necessarie and therefore are to bee doone also for the rewardes ensuing them but yet that they merit nothing no not the least of gods giftes either corporall or spirituall The reasons hereof are most true and most euident 1 Our woorkes are vnperfect wherefore we can merit nothing by them Gal. 5.17 The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and these are contrarie one to the other so that yee do not the same thinges that yee would 2 The good workes what euer we are able to doe are all due Luk. 17.10 When ye haue doone all those thinges which are commanded you say we are vnprofitâ—ble seruants 3 Our woorkes are impure and vitious how-euer they seeme most good Isay 64.6 Wee haue all beene as an vncleane thing and all our righteousnesse is as filthy cloutes Phil 3.8 J thinke all things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Jesus my Lord for whome I haue counted all thinges losse and doe iudge them to be dongue that J might winne Christ 4 If we doe any good woorkes they are not ours but are belonging to god onely Phil. 2.13 Jt is god which worketh in you both the will and the deede euen of his good pleasure 1. Corinth 4.7 What hast thou which thou hast not receiued We are euill trees if then we doe any good that must needes come from God onely Mat 20.15 Is it
it is manifest that the decrees of the Church are of no lesse authoritie then the expresse sentence of the Scripture But we as we willingly grant that the controuersies of the Church must bee at length determined Aun Not the Church but the holie ghost is iudge in the word and that according to the Sentence of that iudge of whom wee may bee certainlie assured that we can not be deceaued So wee acknowledge this iudge to be not the Church but the holy Ghost himself speaking vnto vs in the Scripture and declaring his owne woords For he is the supreme iudge whose iudgement the Church onely demandeth declareth and signifieth he can not bee deceaued whereas all men are subiect vnto the daunger of error in a word he being the author of the Scripture is the best and surest interpreter of his owne words And therefore the Scripture it selfe in al doubtes recalleth vs and bindeth vs vnto it selfe as 2. Pet. 1. We haue a most sure word of the Prophets to the which yee doe wel that yee take heede as vnto a light that shineth in a dark place Iohn 5. Search the Scriptures Esay 8 To the Lawe and to the Testimonie if they speake not according to this word The Church doth not alwaies speake the words of the holie Ghost it is because there is no light in them For although the holie Ghost speaketh also by the Church yet because shee doth not alwaies speak the words of the holy Ghost she can not be the supreme chiefe iudge of controuersies in Religion For this iudge must be such a one whose sentence may by no means bee called in question But wee haue none such besides the word of God registred in the Scriptures Deciding of controuersies is not taken away Neither doe we at all take away the deciding of controuersies when wee make Scripture iudge of the meaning of the scripture For although contentious persons alwaies seeke sophismes by which they may delude and shift off the testimonies of Scripture yet doe they this against their conscience and the louers of the truth require no other interpreter of the Scripture but the Scripture and doe acknowledge and confesse themselues to be plentifully satisfied by it For whereas vnto men also it is graunted to bee themselues the best interpreters of their own wordes how much more ought this honor to bee yeelded vnto the holy Scripture The way how to decide doubtful places 1 The Analogy of faith Wherefore if controuersie be mooued concerning the meaning of some place in the Scripture we ought much more to doe that here which we would doe in other writinges First of all to consider and respect the anologie of faith that is to receiue no exposition which is against the ground of doctrine that is against any article of faith or commaundement of the Decalog or against any plaine testimonie of Scripture 1 Cor. 3. 2 Examining of Antecedents Consequents euen as Paul admonisheth forbidding to build wood hey stubble vpon the foundation Secondly to weigh the thinges that goe before and follow after that place which is in question that so not onely nothing contrary to these may be faigned on it but also that that may bee set for the meaning of it which these require For these either not beeing obserued or beeing dissembled the meaning of the Scripture is not seldome depraued Psalm 91. So those words of the Psalme Hee shall giue his Angels charge ouer thee that they shall beare thee in their handes that thou hurte not thy foote against a stone The Diuell tempting Christ interpreteth them as if they serued to maintaine ouer-rash and curious attempts when yet that which is added In all thy waies doth shew that they are to bee vnderstood of men doing those thinges that are proper vnto their calling Thirdly 3 Resorting to places which teach the same more clearly wee ought to search euery where in the Scripture whether there bee extant any place where it stands for confessed or is manifest or may bee shewed that the same doctrine in other woordes is deliuered touching the same matter which is conteined in that place which is in controuersie For if the meaning of the clearer and vndoubted place be manifest vnto vs wee shall also be assured of the place which is doubted of because in both places the same is taught as when Rom. 3. it is said We conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Lawe That in this place to be iustified by faith is not to please God for the worthines of faith but for the merit of Christ apprehended by faith and that the woorkes of the Law signifie not the ceremonies onely but the whole obedience of the Law chiefly the morall other places doe teach vs which in moe and clearer woordes deliuer the same doctrine concerning the iustification of man before God as in the same chapter By the woorkes of the Law shall no flesh bee iustified in his sight for by the Law commeth the knowledge of sinne But now is the righteousnes of God made manifest without the Law hauing witnes of the Law and of the Prophets The righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus Christ vnto all and vpon al that beleeue for there is no difference For all haue sinned and are depriued of the glorie of God and are iustified freelie by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Iesus 4 Conferring like places togither Fourthly wee must conferre places of Scripture where though the same woords bee not spoken of the same thing yet the like woordes and formes of speaking are vsed of the like thinges For if the interpretation of the like place bee certaine and there bee the same causes for the like interpretation to bee giuen in the place that is in controuersie which are in the other then of like places wee must giue one and the same iudgement The Lord willeth Mat. 5. to put out our eie to cut off our hand if it be a cause of offence vnto vs. Now whereas the Law forbiddeth vs to maime our bodie Thou shalt not kill that therefore by this figure of speech the Lord would haue vs that wee should rather forsake thinges most deere vnto vs then that by the lust and motion of thē wee should suffer our selues to be withdrawen from God the like forme of speech otherwhere vsed to signifie things most deer and precious doth shew as Ierem. 22. If Iechoniah were the signet of my right hand yet would I plucke thee thence And Deut. 32. Hee kept him as the apple of his eie 5 The catholike Church When once according to these rules the controuersie concerning the text meaning thereof is iudged we may lawfully also descend to the consent of the Church yet putting great space betwixt not without great aduisement For least by the name of the Church we be beguiled first of all no sentence or
all euill For these are the effectes to come of that present and perpetuall wil of God towards vs which wee apprehend by faith Rom. 8.24 Wee are saued by hope but hope that is seen is not hope But if we hope for that we see not we doo with patience abide for it 1 Obiection Life euerlasting is a thing to come We beleeue life euerlasting Wee beleeue therefore that which is to come that is faith is also of things to come and so faith is hope it selfe Ans The Maior must bee distinguished Life euerlasting is to come tru as concerning the consummation or accomplishment therof But it is present vnto vs as cōcerning the wil and vnchaungeable purpose of God who hath decreed from euerlasting that which he hath begun in vs and will also in due time accomplish it Againe it is present vnto vs as concerning the beginning therof For euerlasting life is begun here in the elect by the holy ghost Wherefore faith apprehendeth it as it is present both in respect of the purpose of God in respect of the beginning thereof in vs. For he that beleeueth feeleth and knoweth that he is quickened and resolueth this to bee the will of God that that quickening and reuiuing which is here begunne shall bee absolued in another life Iohn 5.24 He that beleeueth in the sonne hath passed from death to life Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only verie God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your harts which crieth Abba father Rom. 8.24 We are saued by hope 1. Ioh. 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God but it doth not yet appear what we shal be By faith thē we are certein that those blessings also which as yet we haue not are notwithstanding ours for Gods promise for the vnchangeable will in God to giue them vs but in certain hope wee looke for them as concerning their accomplishment Faith apprehendeth the promises of thinges to come hope relieth on the thinges promised The summe is There is one and the same act and operation of faith and of hope but they differ in consideration It is called faith as it doth apprehend things to come as if they were present in regard of the vnchangeablenes of Gods will It is called hope as it doth certainlie look for the bestowing of those things Therfore Heb. 11 1. it is shewed that faith is the ground substance of things which are hoped for that is it is that which maketh things which are hoped for to be extant and present in that manner as hath bin shewed Shorter thus Faith apprehendeth the promises concerning things to come as they are to come Hope the things themselues which are promised 2 Obiection Faith is the euidence of thinges which are not seene therefore not of thinges present Aunswere It is the euidence of thinges which are not seene to wit by the outward senses but they are seene by the eies of the mind euen as if they did lie open to the eies of the bodie Againe they are not seene in respect of their accomplishment or consummation 5 What are the causes of Faith THE first and principall efficient cause of faith is the holie ghost illightening the minde that it may vnderstand the word and moouing the will that it may assent vnto the woord once vnderstoode Yee are freelie saued by faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Obiection The Diuel hath faith It is wrought therefore in him by the holie ghost Aunswere What faith is in the Diuel is wrought by the spirit of God but that by a generall woorking onely whereby hee worketh in all euen in Diuels and hypocrites what-soeuer knowledge or vnderstanding is in them 1. Cor. 12. c. not by a speciall and proper action or working wherby to regenerat or sanctifie them that they might truely acknowledge him to bee the author of this gift and magnifie him therefore after which maner hee woorketh faith in the elect alone The Diuels therefore and hypocrits haue faith from the spirit of God but the elect from the spirit of God sanctifieng them The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole worde of God the Lawe and the Gospell written spoken readde heard The chiefe instrumental causes of ingendering iustifieng faith are the preaching of the word and the vse of the sacramentes meditated likewise many works miracles of God in the world But the chiefe and proper instrument of iustifieng faith is the preaching of the Gospell the vse of the sacraments For these doth the holy ghost vse as instruments yet not necessarie but arbitrarie at his own good pleasure both to stir vp faith in vs and to nourish strengthen increase the same Rom. 10.17 Faith commeth by hearing Rom. 1.16 The gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 1. Cor. 4.15 I haue begottē you through the gospel Mar. 16.16 He that shall beleeue and be Baptized shall be saued Act. 22.16 Wash away thy sins 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is the communion of the bodie of Christ Wherefore ordinarilie iustifieng faith is neuer engendred in those who are of yeares to receiue it without the preaching of the gospell The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the woorde of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall and immediate reuelation from God The formal causes of faith a sure and ful confidence in Christ The obiect of faith Christ and his benefites promised The final causes of faith Gods glorie our saluation The formall cause of iustifieng faith is a certaine knowledge confidence in Christ The obiect of it is Whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word Likewise God fauorable to vs through Christ The subiect wherein it remaineth is the vnderstanding will of man The end or finall cause 1 The glorie of God to wit the celebration of his trueth iustice bountie mercie which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Sonne and in the giuing of faith in him 2 Our Saluation that we may receiue the blessings which are promised in the worde 6 What are the effects of faith The effectes of faith iustification and regeneration THe effects of iustifieng faith are 1 The iustifieng of vs before God 2 Peace of conscience or ioy resting on God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith we haue peace with god 3 Our whole conuersion which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith are our hats purified 4 The fruits of conuersion repentance euen good woorkes For whatsouer is not of faith is sinne Hither may be referred also the consequences of faith that is encrease of spirituall corporal giftes The first then and immediate effect of iustifieng-faith is Iustification from this afterwardes flow al other benefites
of Christ imputed vnto vs. Christ is in respect of our iustification 1. As the subiect matter wherein our iustice is 2. As the impellent cause because he obtaineth it 3. As the chief efficient because he together with his Father dooth iustifie vs and 4. Because he giueth vs faith whereby we beleeue and apprehend it The mercy of god is as the impellent cause thereof in GOD. Christes satisfaction is the formal cause of our iustification giuing the very life and being vnto it 7 Why Christes satisfaction is made ours by faith onelie Faith the apprehensiue instrument of Christs satisfaction CHRISTES satisfaction is made ours by faith alone 1. Because faith is the onely instrument which apprehendeth Christs satisfaction 2. Because the proper act operation of faith and not any other act of vertue is the application or apprehension of Christes merite yea faith is nothing else than the acceptation it selfe or apprehension of anothers iustice and of the merit of Christ 3. It is done by faith onely because we are iustified by the obiect of faith onely to wit by the merite of Christ alone besides which there is no iustice of ours nor any part thereof For wee are iustified freely for Christes sake without woorkes There is nothing which is our iustice and righteousnes before God neither in whole nor in part besides Christes merite onely by receiuing and beleeuing anothers iustice and not by working wee are iustified Not by working nor by meriting but by apprehension and acceptation only we are iust and righteous Wherefore we are iustified by faith onely by faith as Saint Paul speaketh as by a mean and instrument but not for faith as the Papistes say who wil admit both these maners of speaking as if faith were indeede the application whereby we apply vnto our selues Christes iustice but were also besides a certaine work or merite whereby we merite to bee iust Nowe the exclusiue particle onely is added that whatsoeuer merit of ours may bee excluded and faith vnderstoode with relation and respect to Christes merit which is our iustice That so the sense may be Christes merite iustifieth vs and not faith it selfe that which is apprehended dooth iustifie vs and not the instrument which doth apprehend Neuerthelesse this proposition Wee are iustified by faith may bee vnderstoode also without relation to wit wee are iustified by faith as by a meane But this proposition of the Apostle Faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse and other the like are necessarilie to bee vnderstoode with a relation vnto Christes merite and iustice Faith was imputed vnto him for righteousnes as faith is the apprehending instrument of righteousnes apprehended faith beeing as it were the hande wherewith the Iustice of Christ is receiued and by this means faith is wholy excluded frō that which is receiued by faith vnto which nature notwithstanding of faith it were repugnaunt That For faith we should be iust and righteous For if for faith then faith were nowe no longer an acceptation of anothers righteousnesse but were a merit and cause of our owne iustice neither should receiue anothers satisfaction which now it should haue no neede of Obiections against this Doctrine of Iustification 1 OBiection Wee are iustified by faith Faith is a woorke Therefore we are iustified by the woorkes thereof that is by the merite of faith Aunswere First the consequence of this reason is denied because more is in the conclusion than in the premisses of which premisses this onely followeth That by that worke wee are iustified as by an instrument or meane not as an impellent cause Nowe it is one thing to be iustified by faith that is to be iustified faith only being the meane to receiue it by the bloode of Christ and it is another thing to be iustified for faith that is for the merite of faith 2. The kinde of affirmation is diuerse for in the Maior faith is vnderstoode with relation to Christes merite in the Minor it is taken absolutelie and properlie 2 Obiection Justice is that whereby wee are formallie or essentiallie iust Faith is iustice Therefore we are by faith formallie and essentiallie iust Aunswere The consequence of this reason is to bee denied because the kinde of affirmation is diuers For the Maior is meant properly but the Minor * Per Metalepsin figuratiuely one thing being taken for another faith for the obiect of faith which is Christs merite and iustice 3 Obiection Faith is imputed for righteousnes as Paul saith Therefore for faith we are righteous Aunswere This is also figuratiuely vnderstood because by faith which is imputed for righteousnes is correlatiuely vnderstood the obiect of faith vnto which faith hath relation For Christs merite which is apprehended by faith is properly our iustice and this merite of Christ is the formall cause of our iustice The efficient of our iustice is God applying that merite of Christ vnto vs. The instrumental cause of our iustice is faith And therefore this proposition We are iustified by faith being legallie vnderstoode with the Papists is not true but blasphemous but being taken correlatiuely that is Euangelically with relation to Christs merit it is true For the correlatiue of faith is the merit of Christ which faith also as a ioint-relatiue or correlatiue respecteth and as an instrument apprehendeth 4 Obiection That which is not alone dooth not iustifie alone Faith is not alone Therefore faith dooth not iustifie alone Aunswere Here is a fallacie of composition the reason beeing deceitfully composed For the woorde alone is composed and ioined in the conclusion with the predicate which is the woorde iustifie but in the premisses or antecedent it is ioined with the verbe is The Argument is true if in the conclusion alone bee not sundred from the verbe is or from being which is the participle of is but bee ioined with it on this wise Faith therefore doth not iustifie alone that is being alone For if it be so vnderstood the argument is of force for faith is neuer without workes as her effects Faith iustifieth alone but is not alone when it iustifieth hauing workes accompanying it as effects of it but not as ioint-causes with it of iustification 5 Obiect That which is required in those who are to be iustified without the same faith doth not iustifie Good works are required in those who are to be iustified Therefore without good workes faith doth not iustifie Auns The particle without is ambiguously doubtfully taken for in the Maior it is taken thus Faith without it that is being without it doth not iustifie So that the same fallacie is in this obiection which was in the former The Minor also of this obiection is more at large to be explaned In them who are to be iustified moe things are required but not after the same maner Faith is required in them who are to be iustified as an instrumēt apprehending anothers iustice Good works are required in them not as a cause of
iustification but as effectes of faith and as it were a testimony of their faith and thankefulnes For faith is not without her fruit Now to applie the merit of Christ is the proper act of faith but other good workes are not so though they also proceede from faith Wherefore also the apprehension of Christs merite is after another manner required in them that are to bee iustified than are other good woorkes For faith with this her proper act without which faith cannot bee considered is required as a necessarie instrument whereby we applie Christs merite vnto vs. But good woorkes are not required that by them we may apprehend Christs merite and much lesse that for them wee should be iustified but that by them we may shew our faith which without good woorkes is dead and is not knowen but by them Whatsoeuer is necessarily coherent with the cause that is not therefore necessarily required to the proper effect of that cause but good workes although they are necessarily coherent and ioined with faith yet are they not necessarie for the apprehension of Christs merit that we should ouer and besides faith by them also apply the same vnto vs. 6 Obiection The Messias bringeth euerlasting iustice and righteousnes Jmputed righteousnes is not eternall Therefore wee are not thereby iustified Aunswere It is said that Christes righteousnesse shall bee an euerlasting righteousnesse but after a diuerse manner For in the life to come wee shal bee iust after another manner than in this life For although we shall then be iust by the same righteousnes euen by the righteousnes of Christ imputed vnto vs yet with this shall also the legal iustice and righteousnesse be continued so that then also by the legall righteousnesse we shall be perfectly iust because now onely we are as concerning that but in part and beginning iust Each iustice both the iustice of the Law and the iustice of the Gospel is eternall by continuation And the iustice and righteousnesse of the Gospell that is the iustice of Christ imputed vnto vs is eternal by continuation of the imputation The iustice of the Law is eternal by continuation of good woorkes euen as it is continued by good woorkes first and beginning in this life vntill at length after this life it bee perfected and become perfect and so continue to al eternity 7 Obiection Knowledge dooth not iustifie Faith is a knowledge Therefore faith doth not iustifie Aunswere Knowledge alone dooth not iustifie But iustifieng faith is not a knoweledge onely but also a confidence and sure persuasion whereby as a meane we apply Christes merit vnto vs. And furthermore Knowledge and this sure persuasion are much different Knowledge is in the vnderstanding but this is in the will Therefore a sure persuasion or confidence is not only a knoweledge of a thing but also a will and purpose of doing or applieng that which wee knowe or of resting in it so that wee are thereby secure and take ioie of heart therein 8 Obiection Saint Iames saith cap. 2.24 Yee see then how that of workes a man is iustified and not of faith onelie Answere 1. Hee speaketh of that iustice whereby wee are iustified through our workes before men that is are approued iust or are found to be iustified but he speaketh not of that iustice whereby we are iustified before God that is whereby wee are reputed of God iust for vniust For hee saith in the same chapter Shew me thy faith by thy works and J will shewe thee my faith by my woorkes 2. He speaketh not of a true or liuely faith but of a dead faith which is without works 9 Obiection Euil workes condemne Therefore good workes iustifie Ans 1. These contraries are not matches for our euil works are perfectly euil our good workes are imperfectly good 2. Although our good woorkes were perfectly good yet should they not deserue eternal life because they are debts Vnto euil workes a reward is giuen by order of iustice vnto good works not so because we are obliged and bound to doe them For the creature is obliged vnto his creator neither may he of the contrary bind god vnto him by any works or means to benefit him 10 Obiect Saint Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 3.7 He that doth righteousnes is righteous Therefore not he that beleeueth Ans 1. He is righteous before mē that is by doing righteousnes he declareth himself righteous to others but before god we are righteous not by dooing righteousnes but by beleeuing 2. He sheweth there not how we are righteous but what the righteous are when he saith that hee that is regenerated is also iustified 11 Obiection Christ saith Luk. 7.47 Many sinnes are forgiuen her because she loued much Therfore good works are the cause of iustification Ans 1. Christ here reasoneth from the latter to the former from the effect which commeth after to the cause which goeth before Manie sins are forgiuen her Therefore shee loued much and because there is a great feeling in that woman of the benefite it must needes therefore bee that the benefite is great and many sins are forgiuen her That this is the meaning of Christes woordes appeareth by the parable which hee there vseth 2. Not euerie thing that is the cause of consequence in reason is also the cause of the thing it selfe which followeth in that consequence of reason Wherefore it is a fallacie of the consequent if it bee concluded Therefore for her loue manie sins are forgiuen her For the particle because which Christ vseth doth not alwaies signifie the cause of the thing folowing It foloweth not The Sunne is risen because it is day Therefore the day is cause of the rising of the Sun the contrarie rather is true 12 Obiection That which is not in the Scripture is not to be taught or reteined That wee are iustified by faith onelie is not in the Scripture neither the wordes themselues nor the sense of the woords Therefore it is not to be reteined Aunswere To the Maior we say That which is not in Scripture neither in words nor in sense is not to be reteined But that we are iustified by faith onely is conteined in Scripture as touching the sense thereof For we are said to be iustified freely Rom. 3.27 Gal. 2.16 Eph. 2.8 9. Tit. 3.5 1. Iohn 1.7 without the workes of the Law by faith without merite Not of anie righteousnesse which we haue doone The blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth vs from al sinne Therefore no woork shall be meritorious If no worke Therefore are we iustified by faith onely apprehending Christes merit Wherefore wee are necessarily to retaine the particle onelie 1. That all merite either of faith or our workes maie be remooued from this woork of our iustification 2. That it maie be shewed that faith not the merite of faith is necessarily required to iustice because the iustice or merite of Christ is giuen by faith onely and by this meane alone we receiue that iustice and
righteousnesse 13 Obiection Jf Christ hath satisfied for vs we shall not be iustified freelie but for merite and desert Aunswere Wee are iustified freely in respect of vs not freely in respect of Christ whom the sauing of vs cost full dearely 14 Obiection Reward presupposeth merite So that where reward is there is also merite For reward and merite are correlatiues whereof if one bee put the other is put also But euerlasting life is proposed as a reward for good workes therefore also the merite of good workes is euerlasting life Aunswere The Maior is sometimes true as concerning creatures as when men may merite or deserue of men But neither alwaies among men doth it folowe that there is merite where there is reward For men also oftentimes giue rewards not of merit or desert Now it is vnproperly saide of God that he proposeth eternal life vnto our workes as a reward for we can merite nothing at Gods hands by our workes But for this cause especially doth God say that he wil giue a reward to our workes thereby to shew that good workes are grateful and pleasing vnto him 15 Obiection That which is not required vnto iustification is not necessarie to be done Good woorkes are not required vnto iustification Therefore it is not necessarie to doe them Answere The Maior is false if it bee meant generallie because wee ought to doe good woorkes in token of thankefulnes But if the Maior be meant particularly then nothing can bee concluded the premisses beeing meere particular nowe good woorkes are as an effect without which the cause to wit faith cannot be Therefore good workes verily are necessarie but not as any cause or merite of iustice 16 Obiection He that is iustified by two things is not iustified by one only But we besides that we are iustified by faith are iustified also by the merite and obedience of Christ therefore not by faith onely Answere He that is iustified by two things is not iustified by one onely that is after one and the same manner But we are iustified by two thinges after a diuerse manner For we are iustified by faith as by an instrument apprehending iustice but by the merit of Christ as by the formal cause of our iustice 17 Obiect Doctrine which maketh men profane is not to be deliuered But this doctrine that we are iustified by works maketh men profane Therefore it is not to be deliuered Ans If it should so fal out with any man it were but an accident Reply Euen those thinges which fall out to bee euils by an accident are to be eschued But this doctrine maketh men by an accident euil Therefore it is to be eschued Aunswere Those thinges which fal out to be euils by an accident are to be eschued if ther remain no greater cause for which they are not to bee omitted which by an accident make men euil But we haue greater causes why this doctrine ought to be deliuered 1. The commaundement of God 2. Our owne saluation 18 Obiection Christ hath brought vs eternall iustice This applied iustice is not eternal Therefore this is not our iustice but God himselfe is our iustice Aunswere The Lorde is our iustice that is our iustifier But that our applied iustice is eternal hath been shewed before because the imputation thereof is continued to all eternity That iustice also of the Lawe which is begunne in vs in this life shall bee continued and perfected in the life to come But that iustice which is God himselfe is not in vs because so God should be an accident to his creature and become iustice in man For iustice and vertue are thinges created in vs not the essence of God Moreouer Osiander who obiecteth this doth not discerne the cause from the effect As we liue not or are wise by the essence of God for this is all one as to say that wee are as wise as God so also we are not iust by the essence of God Wherefore nothing is more impious than to say That the essentiall iustice of the creatour is the iustice of the creatures for thereof it would follow that wee haue the iustice of God yea the verie essence of God The cause must be discerned from the effect increate iustice from created iustice 19 Obiection Where sinne is not there is no place for remission or imputation Jn the life to come sinne shall not be Therefore no place there for remission or imputation Aunswere In the life to come shall not bee remission of any sin then present but the remission which was graunted in this life shall continue and endure for euer And that conformity also which we shal haue with God in the life to come shal be an effect of this imputation 20 Obiection Ten Crownes are part of a hundred Crownes in paiment of a debt Therefore good workes also may be some part of our iustice Aunswere There is a dissimilitude because ten Crownes are a whole part of an hundred Crownes But our workes are not a whole and perfect part 21 Obiection It is said that Phinees worke and deede was imputed vnto him for righteousnes Answere The meaning of the place is That God did approue his worke but not that he was iustified by that worke Why we are iustified by christs merit onely We are iustified by the merite of Christ onely 1. For his glorie that his sacrifice might not bee extenuated and made of lesse value 2. For our owne comfort that we may be assured that our iustice doth not depend vpon our owne woorkes but vpon the sacrifice of Christ onely otherwise we should leese it a thousand times Why we are not Iustified partly by faith and partly by works Gal. 3.10 We are iustified not partly by faith partly by works 1. Because works are vnperfect and therefore our iustice also should be then vnperfect Cursed is euerie man that continueth not in all thinges which are written in the booke of the lawe to doe them 2. Although they were perfect yet are they due and debt So that wee cannot satisfie for an offence past by them When ye haue done all that yee are commaunded say wee are vnprofitable seruants 3. They are Gods works who worketh them in vs. 4. They are temporarie neither haue anie proportion with eternall blessinges 5. They are effectes of iustification therefore no cause 6. They are excluded that wee might not haue whereof to glorie 7. If they were part of our iustification our conscience should be destitute of stable and certaine comfort 8. Christ should haue died in vain 9. We should not haue the same way to saluation 10. Christ should not be a perfect Sauiour Why our works are vnperfect therefore cannot merit Now our workes are vnperfect 1. Because we omit manie things which we should doe and doe manie things which we should not doe 2. Because we blend and mingle euil with that good which wee doe that is wee doe good but wee doe it ill The thinges
and true conuersion vnto God By this testimonie of the holie Ghost wee know that wee are Gods after wee are once deliuered from these miseries For the holy ghost which is the surest pledge of this thing doth witnes in our hartes that they trulie belong vnto vs. For hee maketh vs to serue God without feare Luk. 1.74 Gal. 4 6. And this Spirit of Christ which God hath sent foorth into our hartes crieth Abba Father 6. Our certaintie of euerlasting life This part differeth from the fifth because that is the certaintie of the thinges themselues but this is our certaintie by which wee know these thinges to be certaine And this is the beginning of faith Three things to bee obserued for the attaining vnto this comfort 1 The knowledge of our miserie 2 Our deliuerie 3 Our thankfulnes That we may attaine vnto this comfort three thinges are to bee considered of vs. 1. The knowledge of our miserie that we may desire deliuerance and be thankful to God 2. Our deliuerance without which we haue not comfort 3. Our thankfulnes without which wee are not deliuered Herein is conteined the summe and purpose of the whole sacred Scripture And these doe plainly accord with the diuision of the Scripture or Catholicke doctrine into the Law and Gospel and with the differences of these parts For vnto those three members are the Law and the Gospel referred to the first and third apperteineth the Decalog or tenne commandementes because there is a double vse of the Law the knowledge of our sinne and the rule of our life To the second member appertaineth the Creede because this speaketh of our deliuerie and is the sum of the Gospel The Sacramentes likewise are to be referred vnto the second part because they seal that which is taught in the Gospel They are those appurtenances as it were adioyned to the promise of grace and the seals of iustification by faith Praier belongeth vnto the third part that is to thankfulnes because praier is the chiefest part of thankfulnesse Out of these arise foure questions 1. From these arise fower quaestions 1 Quaestion For what cause these three are necessarie for our obtaining of comfort 2. Whence we may knowe these three euen out of the Lawe and the Gospel 3. How 4. Wherefore The knowledge of our miserie is necessarie for our obtaining of comfort 1. Because if we knew not our miserie Why these three are necessarie for the obtaining of our comfort Why the knowledge of our misery is necessarie Mat. 11.28 Isaie 57.15 and euen the greatnes of it we should not know the greatnes of our happines neither should we desire deliuerie out of euils If wee desire not deliuerie out of euils wee doe not seeke it if wee seeke it not we obtaine it not because God giueth deliuerie only to those who seeke it it is opened onlie to him that knocketh and so hath God his ende in them euen his worship Blessed are they who thirst after righteousnes Come vnto me al ye that labor I dwel in a contrite spirit That which wee haue now said is confirmed also by this syllogism or form of argument That which is necessarie for to stir vp in vs a desire of deliuerance that is necessarie for our comfort But the knowledge of our miserie is necessarie for the desire of saluation or deliuerance Therefore the knowledge of our miserie is necessarie for the obtaining of our comfort yet not for the comforting of vs for we are terrified by this knowledge of our miserie But this terror is good for vs because except we know our miserie we desire not deliuerie And they that desire not deliuerie receiue it not 2 The knowledge of our miserie is necessarie for the obtaining of our comfort because wee should be vngratefull if we were ignorant out of how great miseries wee were deliuered and drawen For how much the more wee feele the greatnes of our euil so much the more desire wee and with for a remedie and so much the more thankfull are wee towards God because he gaue vs a remedie against sin 3. Because by the preaching of the Lawe is made a preparation to the preaching of grace otherwise there followeth carnal securitie and our comfort is made vnstable Whereof it appeareth that we drawe the knowledge of our miserie chiefly out of the Law that therfore we must begin frō the preaching of the Law as the Prophets and Apostles haue done and that to the end that mens consciences and hearts may be cast downe before God and prepared to repentance and to the receiuing of the gospel Except this be done men wil become more careles and stubburne and pearles shal be throwen to swine to be trodden vnder feet Why the knowledge of our deliuerie is necessarie Igno◠nulla cupido The knowledge of our deliuerie is necessarie for our comfort 1. Because a good thing not knowen is not desired according to that There is no coueting after an vnknowen thing When wee haue found it also if wee knowe not what it is wee desire it not and therefore doe not obtaine it Yea that verie meanes by which wee attaine vnto our deliuerie requireth the knowledge of our deliuerie For thou shalt er in the desire of thy deliuery except thou know what and of what qualitie it is and after what manner it is receiued Furthermore wee are made by faith partakers of this deliuerie But faith is not without knowledge Wherefore the knowledge of our deliuerie is necessarie both that we may obtaine it also because the mean instrument it selfe by which we do obtaine it cannot bee without the knowledge of our deliuerie 2. A good thing not knowen doth not comfort that therefore it may comfort thee thou must knowe how great and what maner a good thing it is 3. The knowledge of our deliuerie is necessarie that we may be thankeful because for a thing not knowen to be good wee vse not to giue thankes for that we make light account of it and if we wil be indeed grateful al the circumstances of that good thing are knowen and desired of vs. We know our deliuerie out of the gospel 1. By hearing it 2. By learning it 3. By assenting vnto it and that out of the gospel because the Gospel alone doth promise deliuerie vnto those that beleeue in Christ Now wee must diligently also obserue the maner of our deliuerie that wee doe not our selues imagine or receiue imagined by others any maner of deliuerie to the reproch of Gods name and hazard of our owne saluation The knowledge of our thankefulnes is necessarie for our comfort Why the knowledge of our thankfulnes is necessarie 1. Because no man can doe anie thing gratefull vnto God except he first know what is grateful vnto him For he wil be worshipped and haue vs gratefull vnto him not after that maner which wee will but which himselfe hath prescribed Except therefore thou knowe what
of Christ applied vnto vs by faith and yet according to workes as according to the tokens or testimonies of faith from which they proceede and which they as effectes thereof doe shewe to bee in men 4 Obiection The Scripture in manie places ascribeth perfection of good woorkes to Saintes euen in this life and saith that they are perfect and did walke with their whole and perfect heart before God Psalme 119. I haue sought thee with my whole heart and in the same Psalme Blessed are they that keepe his testimonies and seeke him with their whole heart Genes 6. Noah was a iust and vpright man in his time 2. Chron. 15.17 The heart of Asa was perfect in all his daies Matth. 5. In what sense the Scriptures sometimes ascribe perfection of workes to the regenerate in this life Bee yee perfect as your father in heauen is perfect Answere First these and the like speeches speake of that perfection which is not of degrees but of partes or of the integritie and syncerity of the obedience begun in them Perfection of degrees or obedience perfect in degrees is that which hath not onely all the parts of obedience but that degree also which the law requireth in vs. Such a perfection haue not the regenerate in this life They haue indeede all the partes of obedience begun in them but yet weakely so that they are here daily more and more perfected but attaine not to the chiefe and due degree thereof vntill they inioy the life to come The perfection of partes is the integrity of obedience or whole obedience begun according to the whole law or it is a desire and endeuor to obay God and withstand corrupt lustes according not to some only but to al the commandements of his lawe The perfection of securitie is a desire or studie of obedience and godlinesse not fained but true and earnest albeit somewhat bee wanting to the partes as touching the degree This perfection to wit both the integritie and syncerity of obedience is in al the regenerate For vnto them is it proper to submit themselues to the commaundementes of God euen to all without exception and to beginne in this life all the partes of true godlinesse or obedience This is called also the iustice of a good conscience because it is a necessarie effect of faith and pleaseth God through Christ And albeit in all men euen in the most holy much hypocrisie remaineth as it is saide Euerie man is a lyer yet there is a great difference betweene them who are wholy hypocrites and please themselues in their hypocrisie hauing no beginning or feeling of true godlinesse in their hearts and those who acknowledging and bewailing the remnantes of hypocrisie which are in them haue withal the beginnings of true faith and conuersion vnto God Those hypocrites are condemned of GOD these are receiued into fauour not for this beginning of obedience in them but for the perfect obedience of Christ which is imputed vnto them And therefore to this declaration or exposition another is also to be added That they who are conuerted are perfect in the sight of God not onely in respect of the partes of true Godlinesse which all are begunne in them but also in respect of the degrees of the true and perfect righteousnesse of Christ imputed vnto them As it is said Coloss 2.10 Yee are compleate in him Heb. 10.14 With one offering hath he consecrated for euer them that are sanctified But they reply that the perfection also of degrees is attributed vnto the Saintes in the Scripture 1. Corint 2. vers 6. Wee speak wisedome among them that are perfect 1. Cor. 14. Be perfect in vnderstanding Eph. 4. vers 13. Till we all meete together in the vnity of faith and knowledge of the Sonne of God vnto a perfect man and vnto the measure of the age of the fulnesse of Christ. But these places also doe not call them perfect in respect of the Law of God that is in respect of that degree of knowledge and obedience which the Law requireth in vs but in respect of the weaker who haue lesse light and certainty and readines confirmed by vse and exercise to obey God to resist carnall lustes and to bear the crosse For so is this perfection expounded Heb. 5. and Ephes 4.14 That we be no more children wandering and carried about with euerie wind of doctrine Philip. 3.12 Not as though I had alreadie attained to it or were already perfect They oppose against these aunsweres a place out of 1. Iohn 4. vers 17. Herein is the loue perfect in vs that we should haue boldnesse in the daie of iudgement for as he is euen so are we in this woorld There is no feare in Loue but perfect Loue casteth out feare for feare hath painfulnesse and hee that feareth is not perfect in Loue. But Saint Iohn meaneth not that our Loue towardes GOD but Gods Loue towards vs is perfect that is declared and fully knowen vnto vs by the effects or benefites of GOD bestowed vpon vs in Christ Our regeneration newnes of life doth assure vs of our iustification as being an effect thereof or as Saint Paul speaketh Roman 5. Where hee saith that the Loue of GOD shed abroad in our heartes by the holy Ghost is the cause why wee doe without feare and with bouldnesse expect the day of iudgement And of this mercy and free Loue of GOD towards vs hee signifieth that by this token or testimonie wee are assured because in this life wee are refourmed by the holy spirite to his image For by our regeneration wee are assured of our iustification not as by the cause of the effect but as by the effect of the cause Nowe though regeneration be not perfect in this life yet if it bee indeede begun it sufficeth for the confirmation and proouing of the truth of our faith vnto our consciences And these very words which S. Iohn addeth Loue casteth out fear shew that Loue is not yet perfect in vs because wee are not perfectly deliuered in this life from fear of the wrath and iudgement of God and eternal punishment For these two contrary motions are now together in the godly euen the fear and loue of God in remisse and low degrees their feare decreasing and their loue and comfort or ioy in God encreasing vntill ioy get the conquest and perfectly cast out all trembling in the life to come when GOD shall wipe away euery teare Diuers places of Scripture to be vnderstood of the vprightnesse of a good conscience not of anie perfect fulfilling of the Law in the godly Obiection Iohn 3.21 He that doth truth commeth to the light that his deedes might bee made manifest that they are wrought according to God 1. Iohn 3.20 If our heart condemne vs not then haue wee boldenes toward God Psalm 119. I haue not declined from thy Lawe Therefore the good woorckes of the regenerate maie bee alleadged and stand in Gods
our wisedome 2 Hee is called our Righteousnesse that is our Iustifier 2. Righteousnes For in him our righteousnesse is as in the subiect and is made ours by his merite and forcible operation For 1. hee suffered the punishment of our sinnes which is iustice and righteousnesse and the merit for-which we are reputed iust and righteous Furthermore he by his power maketh vs righteous in the sight of god by imputing vnto vs that his righteousnesse and by giuing vs faith whereby our selues also receiuing it may apply it vnto vs. 3 He is called our Sanctification 3 Sanctification 4. Redemption because he doth regenerate vs by his holy spirit 4 Redemption because hee finally deliuereth vs. For the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we interpret Redemption dooth not onely signifie the price but also the effect thereof For abstractes are put for their concretes according to the vsuall maner of the Hebrewes 4 What manner of Mediator ours ought to bee IT is manifest by those thinges which are gone before that there is giuen vs a recouerie out of eternal paines wherunto we were adiudged by reason of our sin by a sufficient satisfaction perfourmed by some Mediator in our behalfe Now therefore it may bee well demaunded what manner of Mediatour is required to performe pay a recompence and ransome equiualent to our sins and of sufficient worthinesse to redeeme vs To this answere is made in the 15. question of the Catechisme That such a one is required who must bee True man that is Our Mediatour must bee true man and true God who must haue mans nature comming of mankind and sprung from Adam and stil retaining it not as that it should be created of nothing or made anie way than of our bloode 2. A man perfectlie iust 3. True God Nowe the Demonstrations and proofes concerning the person of the Mediatour are drawne from his office For because such is his office him-selfe also ought to bee such a one Hee must bee true man subiect vnto all our infirmities except sinne 1 He ought to be true man and that a seruaunt that is subiect to al infirmities Phil. 2.7 Isa 53.3 First because it was man that sinned As by one man sinne entered into the woorlde Secondly That he might suffer death For he ought to make satisfaction for vs by shedding his blood Hee coulde not haue suffered death except he had bin true man Thirdly That he might help and relieue our infirmities Fourthly That hee might bee our brother and our head and wee his members Heb. 2.14 For as much as the children were partakers of the flesh and bloode hee also himselfe likewise tooke part with them It was requisite therefore that our Mediatour shoulde bee true man and that borne of the same mankind which sinned not created of nothing 1. Because of Gods iustice which required that the selfesame nature which hadde sinned should pay for those sinnes because the same was to bee deliuered But our nature which sprang from Adam sinned Wherefore true man of the same nature with vs ought to pay for men that which was required at their handes Gen. 2.17 In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Ezech. 18.20 The same soul that sinneth shall die 1. Cor. 15.21 By man came death by man came also the resurrection of the dead Hereof the Apostle also saith Coloss 2.12 That wee are buried with him thorough Baptisme in whom wee are also raised vp together Augu. Lib. de vera relig And Augustine in his booke Of true Religion saith The same nature was to bee taken which was to bee deliuered 2. For our comfort which consisteth in this that wee may know our Mediatour to bee very man sprung of the same bloode of which our selues were and to be our brother For except hee were such a one wee should neuer bee able to resolue that he is the Messias and promised Sauiour vnto vs and that the benefite of redemption dooth certainely belong to our flesh and to vs men neither shoulde wee freely fly and betake vs vnto him in our temptations For of the seede of the woman it is saide Gen. 3.15 Gen. 12. 22.26 that hee shall break the head of the Serpent the Diuel and In Abrahams seede are all nations to bee blessed It was requisite therefore that our Mediatour shoulde bee borne of mankinde very man And furthermore I adde that it was requisite that he should be subiect to al our infirmities sinne onely excepted And that 1. For the truth of God who often by the Prophetes describeth our Mediatour to bee such a man as is poore weake contemptible And of Esaias especially is hee described to bee such a one 2. Isai 53.3 Heb. 2.11 For our comfort Hee that sanctifieth and they which are sanctified are al of one that is of the same humane nature Wherefore he is not ashamed to cal them brethren 2 It is requisite that hee bee a man perfectly iust Why our mediatour was to bee voide of sinne that hee might worthily bee our Sauiour that is that his passion might bee a ransome for the sinnes of others For had he bin a sinner or vniust he should not haue beene able to haue satisfied so much as for his owne sinnes and to haue auoided the wrath of God much lesse to merit gods fauour for others 2. Corinth 5.21 God hath made him to bee sinne for vs which knewe no sinne that we should be the righteousnesse of God in him Hebru 7.26 Such an High-Priest it became vs to haue which is holy harmelesse vndefiled separate from sinners 1. Pet. 2.22 Who did no sinne neither was there guile found in his mouth 1. Pet. 3.18 Christ hath once suffered for sinnes the iust for the vniust that hee might bring vs to god Nowe foure manner of waies is Christ perfectly iust Christ said to be perfectly iust foure waies or hath perfectly fulfilled the Lawe 1. By his owne righteousnesse For Christ alone perfourmed perfect obedience such as the Lawe required For hee was conceiued by the holie ghost neither was there guile in him 2. By paying sufficient punishment for our sinnes It was necessary that this double fulfilling of the Law should be in Christ For except hee were iust for himselfe that is hadde perfect conformitie with the Lawe he could not haue fulfilled the Lawe for vs by making satisfaction for our sinnes or by suffering the punishment which the Law exacted of vs not of him And except his suffering of punishment had beene sufficient wee shoulde as yet remaine in our sinnes and death Furthermore that righteousnesse of Christ whereby himselfe did perfectlie keepe the Lawe is called the fulfilling of the Lawe by obedience and his suffering of punishment due for our sinnes is termed the fulfilling of the Lawe by punishment likewise obedience perfected and absolued in suffering punishment And the punishment verily vnto which we were bound he of his owne accord
the 18. 19 20. questions of the Catechisme such a definitiō of the Gospel is framed The gospel is the doctrin cōcerning Christ deliuering teaching that he is made of god vnto all those who are ingraffed into him by a true faith and do imbrace his benefites wisedome righteousnes sanctification redemption which doctrine was reuealed of god first in Paradise by his son afterwards propagated by the Prophets shadowed by the sacrifices and ceremonies of the law and lastly fulfilled and accomplished by Christ Both which definitions all the summes which are in scripture deliuered of the Gospel doe confirme as Ioh. 6.40 This is the will of him that sent me that euerie man that seeth the sonne and beleeueth in him should haue euerlasting life And I will raise him vp at the last day Act. 13.38 Through his name was repentaunce and remission of sinnes to be preached to all nations Luc. 24 47. He commandeth his disciples to preach faith repentance Ioh. 1.17 The law was giuen by Moses but grace came by Christ By these and the like testimonies of the scriptures it is manifest that both the law and the gospel preacheth repentance and that the instrument whereby god doth worke in vs repentaunce or true conuersion is properly the gospel But this order in proceeding must bee obserued First the law is to be proposed that thence wee may know our miserie Then What order is to be obserued in teaching the law and the Gospel that wee may not dispaire after our miserie is knowen vnto vs the Gospel is to bee taught which both giueth vs a certaine hope of returning into Gods promised fauour by Christ our Mediatour and sheweth vnto vs the maner how we are to repent Thirdly that after we attaine vnto our deliuerie we bee not careles and wanton Againe the lawe is to bee taught that it may bee the leuil squire and rule of our life and actions 2 Whether the gospel hath beene alwaies knowen THe gospel that is the doctrine concerning the promise of grace through Christ our Mediatour is not newe but hath alwaies beene extant in the Church The Gospel published in Paradise For presently after mans fall it was manifested in Paradise but consummated and absolued by Christ both in the fulfilling or ful performance as also in a more cleare declaration of those things which had before time beene promised in the olde Testament This is confirmed by the records of the Apostles as of Peter Act. 10.43 To him also giue all the Prophets witnes that through his name all that beleeue in him shall receiue remission of sinnes 1. Pet. 1.10 Of the which saluation the Prophets haue inquired and searched Likewise of Paul Rom. 1.2 Which gospel he had promised afore by his Prophets in the holie scriptures Of Christ himselfe also saying Ioh. 5.46 Had yee beleeued Moses ye woulde haue beleeued me for he wrote of me The same is manifest by all the promises and prophecies which speake of the Messias This is therefore diligently to bee marked because God will haue vs know that there was is from the beginning of the world vnto the end one onely way of saluation Ioh. 1. In him was life and the life was the light of men Ioh. 10.28 I giue vnto them eternal life Ioh. 8.56 Abraham saw my day and was glad Gen. 12.3 In thy seede shal all Nations bee blessed Iohn 10.7 I am the doore Iohn 14.6 I am the way the truth and the life No man commeth to the father but by mee Ephes 1.22 God hath appointed him ouer al thinges to bee the head to the Church Hebrewes 13.8 Christ is yesterdaie and to daie Iohn 5.46 Moses writ of me Now Moses writ of Christ Why Moses is saide to write of Christ First Because he recounteth the promises concerning the Messias Gen. 12.3 In thy seede shall al nations be blessed Deutronom 18.11 God shall raise you vp a Prophet Numb 24.17 A starre shall rise out of Iacob Secondly he restraineth the promise concerning the Messias vnto certaine persons of whom hee was to bee borne By which afterwardes the promise of the Messias was more and more renewed and reuealed Thirdly The whole Leuitical Priesthood and ceremoniall worship had a respect and were referred vnto Christ as the Sacrifices the immolations the altars the temple Yea the kingdome also and the kings were a type of the kingdome of Christ Wherefore Moses writ many things of Christ 1 Obiection But Paul saith that the Gospel was promised by the Prophets and Peter saith that the Prophets did foreshew the grace which should come vnto vs wherefore the Gospell hath not beene alwaies Aunswere The Antecedent of this reason is to bee distinguished The Gospel was promised and the grace and fauour to come was foreshewed it is true First as concerning the fulfilling of those thinges which in the olde testament were promised to come Secondly In respect of the more manifest knowledge of the promise of grace Thirdly In respect of a more large pouring out of the giftes of the holie Ghost Wherefore the whole reason wee accept of as true if by the Gospell they vnderstand the doctrine of Christ alreadie exhibited raised from the dead sitting at the right hand of his Father and giuing aboundantly giftes vnto men But wee denie it as the worde Gospell is taken for the very promise it selfe of grace remission of sinnes regeneration glorification freely to be bestowed for the Mediatours desert and merit For this grace was also promised truely proffered in the old testament to all beleeuers for Christs sake but who was hereafter to come to be exhibited as the same grace is yeelded vnto vs for the same Christ but who is alreadie come and exhibited Iohn 8.56 Abraham sawe my day and was glad Act. 10.43 To him giue all the Prophetes witnesse Rom. 10.4 Christ is the end of the Law Obiection 2. Paul Ephes 3.5 saith That in other ages the gospell was not opened vnto the Sonnes of men Aunswere This reason is a fallacy of diuision as the Logicians call it in dismembring or diuiding those thinges which are to bee ioined or otherwise it is a fallacie in affirming that simply to bee saide so which was so said but in some respect For the Apostle in the same place presently addeth as it is nowe For now that is the Messias beeing manifested the gospell is much more clearely discouered and deriued and spread to many more than it was in the old Testament It was therefore knowen vnto them who liued of olde though not in so simple sort as vnto vs. 3 Obiection The Lawe was giuen by Moses grace and truth came by Christ Iohn 1.17 Therefore the gospell was not from the beginning Aunswere Grace and truth did appeare by Christ exhibited and manifested to witte in respect of the fulfilling and full and plentifull perfourmance of those thinges which were promised in the old Testament But hereof it followeth not
generally meant The recalling of sinners vnto God is proper vnto the Gospel For this precept is proper vnto the Gospell That it commandeth vs to beleeue it to embrace the benefit of Christ and now being iustified to begin that righteousnes which the Lawe requireth of vs. Wherefore the Gospell is the preaching of repentaunce because it willeth sinners yeelding them hope to obtaine pardon thorough and for CHRIST to returne vnto GOD. It sheweth them the way howe to exercise true repentaunce and beginneth it in their hearts by the force of the holy Ghost These thinges are not doone by the Lawe but by the Gospell onely They reply Yea but the Lawe also willeth vs to beleeue and commaundeth conuersion Therefore it is not proper to the Gospell or else the Gospell is not diuerse from the Lawe Aunswere Both the Law and the Gospell commaundeth faith and conuersion to God but diuersly The Lawe dooth it onelie in general because it commaundeth vs to beleeue euery woord of God Both the lawe and the Gospel require faith that is all the promises commaundements and threatninges of God deliuered either in the Lawe or in the Gospell and that with a denouncing of punishment except wee doe it The Lawe saith Beleeue euerie woorde of God it willeth therefore that we beleeue and obey this commaundement also by which God in the Gospell commaundeth vs to returne vnto him and to beleeue in Christ But the Gospell in speciall and expresly willeth vs to embrace by faith the grace promised vs in Christ and to returne vnto God that is it saith not in generall Beleeue all the promises and denouncinges of God c. For this it leaueth vnto the Law but it saith plainely and expressely Beleeue this promise to wit that thy sinnes are pardoned thee and that thou art receaued of God into fauour by and for Christ and returne vnto GOD. Further it exhorteth vs both inwardely and outwardely by the woord and Sacramentes that wee walke woorthie of him that is doe such woorkes as are pleasing to GOD but this it dooth onely in generall and therefore sendeth vs backe vnto the Lawe which in particular and distinctly declareth what that righteousnes or obedience or workes are which God requireth of vs. 4 What are the proper effectes of the Gospell THe proper effectes of the gospell are 1. Faith Roman 10.17 Faith commeth by hearing 2. Corint 3.8 The gospell is the ministery of the spirite Rom. 1.16 The gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 2. Our whole conuersion vnto God iustification regeneration and saluation which are the effects of Faith For by Faith as by the instrument whole Christ together with all his benefits is receiued 5 Whence the truth and certainty of the gospel maie appeare THe truth and certainty of the gospell that is of the promise of grace appeareth 1. By the testimony of the holy ghost 2. By the prophecies which haue bin vttered by the Prophets and other holy men 3. By the fulfilling of those Prophecies which was accomplished in the new Testament 4. By the miracles whereby the doctrine of the gospel was confirmed 5. By the end or property of the doctrine of the gospel Because that alone sheweth the way how to escape death and sinne Question 20. 21. of Faith The necessitie of the true doctrine of Faith THese two questions are necessarily annexed to the former concerning the Mediator Christ the gospel For without this Doctrine of faith neither the Mediator neither the preaching of the gospell are profitable to anie but rather encrease and aggrauate their condemnation For albeit the satisfaction of our Mediatour Christ for our sinnes be most perfect and God doth testifie in his gospell that hee will accept it for righteousnesse for it receiue men into fauour yet notwithstanding all are not freed from miserie but they only who beleeue the gospell and also doe apply the merit of Christ vnto themselues by a true faith For of that condition is Christes righteousnesse made ours if wee receiue it now that receiuing is the act and worke of faith alone that is faith only is the mean whereby we are made partakers both of Christ himselfe and of all his benefites Wherefore we are diligently to learne out of Gods word what is the nature and what the propertie of faith Grace is greater than sinne in respect of the sufficiencie of Christes satisfaction not in respect of the application thereof 1 Obiection Grace exceedeth the sinne of Adam If therefore for the sinne of Adam al men are cast away much more by the grace of Christ all and not beleeuers onlie are saued Aunswere to the Antecedent Grace exceedeth and is aboue sinne in respect of the sufficiencie of the satisfaction not in respect of the application thereof Wherefore that al are not saued through the satisfaction or obedience of Christ the fault thereof sticketh in men themselues and is to bee ascribed vnto the vnbeleeuers who embrace not the grace of Christ offered but like vngratefull men reiect it But in the beleeuers onlie doth god obtaine his end and purpose when as they bee thankefull vnto God receiue the benefites of god by a true faith and celebrate and magnifie them in their whole life 2 Obiection Whomsoeuer Christ hath fully satisfied for they are to be receiued of god into fauor For so doth the Iustice of god require But Christ hath fullie satisfied for all the sinnes of all men Therefore al men are to be receiued of god into fauor or if this be not doone god shall be vniust or somwhat is derogated from christs merit Aunswere The Maior proposition beeing vnderstoode simply and without any limitation is false All are receiued into fauor for whom Christ hath satisfied to wit if they apply the satisfaction of Christ vnto themselues by beleeuing and resoluing that they are for that his satisfaction accepted of god Ioh. 3.16 So god loued the world that he gaue his Sonne that whosoeuer beleeueth in him might haue euerlasting life And hereof it appeareth wherefore all are not saued euen because all doe not apply by faith Christes satisfaction vnto them and god will haue examples to remaine not only of his mercy in his chosen but of his Iustice also in the reprobate This would not be if al without making of difference were saued Obiection Adam by one sin made al subiect to condemnation but Christ doth iustifie only some The force of Christes satisfaction is seene not in the multitude of them who are saued but in the greatnes of the benifit The force therefore is greater of sin to condemne than of the satisfaction of Christ to saue Auns We deny the consequence of this argument because the efficacie and excellency of the satisfaction of Christ is not to bee esteemed by the multitude of them who are thereby saued but by the greatnesse of the benefit it selfe For it is a greater work to deliuer and
saue euen one from euerlasting death than to make all men by one sin guiltie of euerlasting death For be it that Christ should saue euen but one man 1. It was necessarie that hee shoulde paie in a finit time a punishment in greatnesse and valewe infinit not only for that one sinne of Adam but for other infinite sinnes which followed it of which euery one also deserue infinit punishment 2. It was required also that he should purge and take away not onlie that originall birth-sinne but also infinite others 3. and should restore in vs a perfect conformitie with god Wherefore the grace of Christ in sauing euen one man doth in infinit manner exceed the sinne of Adam Againe that al are not saued by Christ the cause lieth not in the force and excellency of his satisfaction or in the merit of Christ for this in it selfe is a sufficient and ful worthie ransome for the expiating of al the sinnes of al men but the fault rather is in men who do not as much as applie vnto themselues by a true faith Christs merit as they doe apply vnto themselues the sinne of Adam both by beeing borne in it and consenting vnto it and in fostering it For the grace of God is not narrower or of a straiter compasse than sinne in respect of the sufficiencie of Christes satisfaction but in respect of the sufficiency of the application thereof which is required of men For God will not so shewe his mercie as that he will not also exercise his iustice Now the reason why God doth impute for perfect righteousnesse the merit of Christ to beleeuers onely and restoreth saluation vnto them is for that in them alone he obtaineth the end both of his creation also of his deliuerie iustification euen his praise and glorie For they only agnise this benefit of GOD and yeeld thanks vnto him for it the rest despise it OF FAITH HAVING declared the Doctrine concerning the Mediatour which is the gospell it remaineth that we speake of the meane whereby wee are made partakers of the Mediatour that is of faith without which also the preaching of the Gospell profiteth and auaileth nothing The principal questions concerning Faith are seuen 1 What faith is in generall 2 How many kindes of faith there are 3 How those kindes differ 4 How faith and hope differ and agree 5 What are the causes of faith 6 What the effects 7 To whom it is giuen 1 WHAT FAITH IS FAith in generall is a knowledge of certaine propositions a firme assent caused by the authoritie of a true witnesse who is not thought to deceiue whether it be God or Angell or Man or Experience or it is to assent firmelie to a thing knowen for the asseueration sake word of true witnesses This faith reacheth to thinges both diuine and humane Wherefore wee must giue a more restrained faith which may agree to diuine thinges which notwithstanding must bee also generall Theologicall faith therefore is a certaine knowledge firmely yeelding assent to all thinges The definition of Theological faith in general which are deliuered in the sacred Scriptures of God his will and woorkes and of sinne euen because God himselfe dooth affirme it or it is to yeeld assent to euerie word of God deliuered to the Church either in the Lawe or in the Gospell for that it is the asseueration or auouching of God himself Oftentimes it is taken for the very doctrine of the Church or those thinges whereby wee are out of Gods woorde enfourmed and instructed vnto faith or assent and beleefe Furthermore albeit there be also other certain notices whereunto we firmely giue assent as vnderstanding or apprehension of principles Science Sapience Art How faith differeth from all other kindes of knowledge Prudence for the assent comming vnto the notice doth confirme and perfect it so that what knowledge of a thing is had without assent it is imperfect and vnprofitable yet none of these are that faith especially the Theologicall such as a little before it is described For to those notices or apprehensions we doe assent either because they are naturally engraffed in our mindes or for that they bring demonstrance or some other true and certaine proofes But the Theologicall assent or faith is not neither ariseth it out of the instinct of nature neither out of sense or experience neither out of demonstrations or reasons borrowed from Philosophie but commeth and dependeth of a peculiar and supernaturall reuelation or diuine Testimonie That therefore which is added in the former description for the asseueration of God himselfe distinguisheth Theological faith from al other knowledges euen the most certaine And this generall definition of Theologicall faith is necessarie that wee may not thinke that out of Philosophie or such principles as are naturally knowen to all are to bee drawen reasons or argumentes sound and sufficient to confirme the articles of our faith but may know that the woord of God and those good and necessarie consequences and arguments which are framed out of it are a supernaturall light and more certaine then all though most exact and exquisite demonstrances either natural or Mathematicall of Philosophers 2 What are the kinds of faith 1 Historical 2 Temporary 3 Working miracles 4 Iustifieng What historical faith is THe difference of these kindes one from the other appeareth out of their definitions Historicall faith is to know and think al those thinges to bee true which are manifested from aboue either by voice or by visions or by any other manner of reuelation and are taught in the bookes of the Prophetes and Apostles and thus to be persuaded of them for the asseueration and testimonie of god himselfe It is called historicall because it is a bare knowledge of such thinges as God saith hee dooth or hath done or hereafter wil doe Of this faith these Testimonies of holy Scripture make mention Iames 2.19 The Diuels beleeue and tremble For the Diuel knoweth exactly both what things are written in the woorde and also what are not written Because he is a spirit witty quick and learned hee is present and seeth whatsoeuer things are doone in the church also through long experience hath known doth know the doctrin of the church to be true c. 1. Cor. 13.2 If I haue al faith so that I moue moūtains c. Which saying may be constred of al the sorts of faith Iustifing faith only excepted Act. 13. Simon Magus is said to haue beleeued to wit that the doctrine was true which the Apostles did propound Historical faith good in it selfe but made ill by them who can not applie it vnto themselues Wherefore historicall faith may be without iustifieng faith although iustifieng faith is not without it for the historical is a part of the iustifieng therefore this is good and profitable and necessarie in it selfe but is made in Diuels and men sinne by an accident for that they apply not
purchased by the blood of Christ which all we beleeue to be giuen vs by faith If therefore faith be the next cause of our Iustification in respect of vs it is also the cause of those thinges which necessarily followe Iustification Luk. 8.48 Thy faith hath saued thee In a worde The effects of faith are Iustification and Regeneration which is begunne here and is to bee perfected in the life to come Rom. 3.28 10.10 Acts. 13.39 7 Vnto whom faith is giuen IVstifieng faith is only proper to the elect Iustifieng faith giuen to all the Elect and to them onely and that to all of them For it is giuen to the elect alone and to all the elect euen to infants as concerning some inclnation Ioh. 6.44 No man cā come to me except the father which hath sent me drawe him Ioh. 20.16 Ye beleeue not for yee are not of my sheepe Mat. 13.11 It is giuen to you to knowe the secrets of heauen but vnto them it is not giuen Act. 13.48 And they beleeued as many as were ordained to euerlasting life Rom. 8.30 Whome hee predestinated them also hee called and whome hee called them also hee iustified Ephes 2.8 Faith is the gift of God Rom. 10.16 All haue not harkened to the gospell 2. Thes 3.2 For all men haue not faith Temporarie faith and the faith of miracles is giuen to those who are members of the visible Church only that is hypocrites But now neuerthelesse this faith of miracles ceaseth which florished in the Primatiue Church for that nowe the Doctrine is sufficiently confirmed Historicall faith all they haue who are by profession of the Church whether they be of the godly or reprobates yea and they also who are not members of the Church but enimies as Diuels Tyrants Historicall is a part of Iustifieng faith because there can bee no assent or perswasion of a thing which is not first knowen Obiection Historicall faith is a good worke Historical faith which is good in it selfe made ill The Diuels haue Historicall faith Therefore they haue good woorkes Aunswere Historical faith is a good worke if it be ioyned with an application of those thinges whereto it assenteth that is with confidence Reply Historicall faith is a good woork though it bee not ioined with confidence because it is an effect of the spirite of God Therefore the Diuels haue good woorkes Aunswere Historical faith is a good woorke in it selfe but is made ill by an accident for that the reprobate doe not apply those thinges to themselues which they knowe and beleeue to bee true Wherefore the Diuels are saide to tremble for that they doe not think that God is towardes them also such as is described in his woorde good mercifull c. The summe is As the substaunce it selfe of the Diuels and other things which they retaine still of their first creation so also both the knowlege and faith which they haue concerning diuine matters are in themselues very good because they are the effects and gifts of god but they are made euil by an accident euen by reason of their abusing of them for that they referre them not to this end as to shewe themselues gratefull vnto God the author of these good things and to magnifie him for them A beleeuing inclination in infante though not an actual beleefe Obiection Against this that all the Elect are saide to haue faith some thus reason Many infantes are of the Elect and yet haue not faith Therefore al the Elect haue not faith Answere They haue not indeede actuall faith but they haue a power or inclination to beleeue which the holy Ghost as is fittest for their capacity and condition woorketh in them Wherefore that remaineth stil which before was confirmed That all the Elect haue faith And further this I adde that not only faith but the confession also of faith is necessary for al the Elect which are growen to years and vnderstanding 1. Because of the commandements of God Exod. 20. Thou shalt not take the name of the Lorde thy God in vaine Therfore thou shalt take it aright He that shal confes me c. Mat. 10.32 2. Because of the glory of god Let your light shine before the woorlde Mat. 5.16 3. Bicause faith is not idle for it is as a fruitful tree 4. That we may bring others to Christ And thou beeing conuerted confirme thy brethren Luc. 22.32 How to know that wee haue faith Now we know that we haue faith 1. By the testimony of the holy ghost and by a feeling of true faith in our selues or by the thing it selfe that is by a true and vnfained desire of receiuing the benefits offered by Christ For he that beleeueth knoweth that hee dooth beleeue 2. By the strife and conflict within vs of the faith of doubtfulnes 3. By the effects that is by an earnest purpose of obeying God according to all his commandements Against the certainty of faith The certaintie of faith whereof we spake in the definition of faith some dispute on this wise Obiect 1. They who may fal before the end of their life into sin dānation cannot be certain of their saluation euerlasting life This is proued because to be certaine and to be in possibility to fall are contrary one to the other It is false therefore which is taught in the definitiō of Iustifieng faith to wit that euerlasting life is giuen vs and so our faith to be certaine and assured of it Ans To be in possibility of falling or failing that is finally True faith may faint for a time but cannot fail finallie is contrary to the certainty of our saluatiō But they who are once inriched by god with true faith doe not fail finally Reply 1. All that are weak may faile finally We are al weak Therefore we maie fail finally Auns The Maior is to bee distinguished All that are weak may faile finally true if they stoode by their owne strength But we who are beleeuers stand preserued and vphelde by the grace and power of God Therefore can wee not finally fail For whom God hath once embraced with his fauour them he wil not nor suffereth to fal vtterly from his grace Reply 2. But god hath no where promised that he wil keep and preserue vs in his grace Answere Yes he hath promised and expressed it Ioh. 1.28 I giue vnto them eternal life and they shall neuer perish neither shall any pluck them out of mine hand My father which gaue them me is greater than all and none is able to take them out of my fathers hand I and my father are one Rom. 8.38 I am persuaded that neither death nor life nor Angels nor principalities nor powers nor thinges present nor thinges to come c. shall bee able to separate vs from the loue of God which is in Christ Iesus Reply 3. But it is saide 1. Corint 10.12 Let him that thinketh hee standeth take heede least hee
God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth And this is the ordinarie manner of giuing vs this beginning of euerlasting life namely by the woord mediately But there is another maner of giuing the same vnto infants and by miracles 7 Whether we can be assured in this life of euerlasting life IN this life not onely wee maie Our assurance of euerlasting life is necessary and grounded vpon sure reasons but wee ought also to bee assured and certain of euerlasting life otherwise we shal neuer haue it For it is giuen to al the elect and to them onely And wee maie be certaine of it by faith euen by a full persuasion of the good wil of God towardes vs likewise by the beginning of true repentaunce which is a ful purpose and intent to liue according to gods cōmandements lastly by the peace of consciēce by a desire of God and by a ioie and gladnesse in God This assuraunce and certainty is grounded on sure and strong reasons 1. The autor of euerlasting life is vnchangeable euen GOD himselfe 2. Gods election is vnchaungeable 3. Christ is heard in all thinges which he desireth of his Father But he praied that his father woulde saue all those whom hee had giuen him 4. God will not haue vs to praie for good things necessarie to saluation with a condition but simplie 2. Tim. 2.19 The foundation of God remaineth sure the lord knoweth who ar his Ioh. 10.28 No mā shal pluck my sheepe out of my hand I giue vnto them eternal life but it were not eternal life if it could be interrupted or broken off Of the consummation of euerlasting life we must bee assured by the beginning thereof Rom. 11.29 The giftes and calling of God are without repentaunce God is faithfull therefore as hee hath begunne so also will hee accomplish and end Wherefore to doubt of the continuaunce and consummation of euerlasting life is to ouerthrow the faith and truth of god Now of the beginning of eternal life we are assured chiefly by a true faith which withstandeth doubtes that is which hath a purpose to resist the Diuel and crieth I beleeue Lord help my vnbeliefe But this faith cannot bee without repentaunce and therefore by an assured repentance we are also assured of the beginning of euerlasting life and therfore withal of the consummation thereof That which now hath been spoken of this article doth sufficiently declare what is To beleeue euerlasting life namely assuredly and certainely to bee perswaded 1. That after this life there shall be also a life wherein the Church shall be glorified and God magnified of her euerlastingly 2. That J also am a member of this Church and therefore partaker of euerlasting life 3. That J also in this life haue and enioy the beginning of euerlasting life OF IVSTIFICATION THIS doctrine Of iustification is one of the chiefe points of our faith not onely because it treateth of the chiefe and principall matters but also because this doctrine is most of all others called by heretiques into controuersie For there are two principall controuersies between the Church and Heretiques The first Of the doctrine concerning God the other of this doctrine of Justification and either of these doctrines beeing ouerthrowen the other points of our faith easily goe to wracke Wherefore we ought chiefly to fence and strengthen our selues against heresies in the doctrine concerning God and iustification The special questions 1 What iustice or righteousnes is in generall 2 How manifold it is 3 What iustice differeth from iustification 4 What is our iustice or righteousnes 5 How it is made ours 6 Why it is made ours 7 Why it is made ours by faith onelie 1 WHAT IVSTICE OR RIGHTEOVSNES IN GENERAL IS A Definition so generall of iustice can scarce bee giuen as may agree both to God and creatures euen such as may agree to the furthest and highest kindes of iustice or righteousnes which are Vncreate and created righteousnes except we wil make a definition full of ambiguity For vncreated iustice or righteousnes is God himselfe Vncreate Iustice is God himselfe who is the very squire and rule of all iustice Created iustice is an effect of vncreate or diuine iustice in reasonable creatures This created iustice or righteousnes may be defined generally in such sort as the definition shall bee alike common to all sortes thereof Justice therefore or righteousnes in generall as it agreeth to reasonable creatures is a fulfilling of those lawes which belong vnto reasonable creatures Our created Iustice is our conformitie with Gods lawes appertaining vnto vs. or is the conformitie or correspondence of reasonable creatures with the lawes appertaining and belonging vnto them It may be also defined on this wise Justice is a conformitie with God or with the law of God Or it is a fulfilling of Gods law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 For iustice or righteousnes is the obseruance of the law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as sin is the transgression of the law the name Righteousnes is deriued from Right which is the lawe it self and conformitie with the law is righteousnes it self This we must know because we must be iustified by the fulfilling of the law we must vnderstand that the law is not abolished but established by the gospel For the righteousnes iustice of the Gospel is the fulfilling of the lawe but doth not at all disagree from the lawe Obiect He that is iust and righteous is conformed and agreeable vnto the law To iustifie is to make iust Therefore to iustifie is to make one agreeable vnto the law Answere All this is graunted that is either in himselfe to be so or in another Now these are all one the imputed righteousnes or iustice of an other the righteousnes of the Gospel the righteousnes of faith Wherefore to iustifie is to assoile and absolue one from sin for that iustice or righteousnes which either is in himself or in an other This significatiō meaning of the worde is prooued throughout the whole Epistle to the Romans It was imputed to him for righteousnes 2 How manifold Justice is Legall Iustice IVstice we speak in general of created iustice is legal and Euangelical Legal iustice is the fulfilling of the Law performed by him who is therby said to be iust Or it is such a fulfilling of the Law which one performeth by his own obedience or it is a conformitie in the Law which is in him also who is called iust This legal iustice either is in vs or in Angels or in Christ as he is man as an accident inherent in his subiect Euangelical iustice is also a fulfilling of the Law but is not in him who is called therby iust or righteous but in another and is onelie imputed vnto him who is thereof called iust This is christs iustice or righteousnes performed for vs or that ransome of the Son of God imputed vnto vs by faith Euangelicall Iustice or the Iustice
sinnes for which Christ hath satisfied cannot hurt but christ hath satisfied for sinnes past and to come Therefore sinnes past and to come cannot hurt vs. Aunswere Nowe knitte and force this reason that wee maie see whither it tendeth Reply That which hurteth not we neede not to eschue sinnes to come hurt not therefore wee neede not beware of sinnes to câ—me Auns 1. The Minor is false For god is offended with sinnes which is the greatest hurt and further sinnes bereaue vs of that conformity with God purchase bodily paines vnto the faithful But we are to distinguish between these questions 1. How a reasonable creature may be iust before god 2. Hâ—w maÌ„ being a sinner may be iust before god 3. Whether a reasonable creature may merit or deserue ought at gods hands To the first question we answere That a reasonable creature may be iust before God by the conformitie with the law inherent in him as blessed men and Angels are iust To the second That man being a sinner is iust by the imputation onely of Christs merit and of this question is our speech when we speake of iustification To the third That no reasonable creature can deserue ought at gods hands Luk. 17.10 When yee haue done all say Wee are vnprofitable seruantes For neither is Christes obedience verily any merit in this respect as if any good came to God by it but in respect of the dignitie of the person bicause it was Christ that suffered it is called merite But a man which is a sinner cannot bee iust before God 1. Because before his iustification his woorkes are corrupt 2. Also after his iustification the works of a man which is a sinner are vnperfect 3. And when they are perfect as in the life to come they shal be yet can we not satisfie for the sinnes past for we owe those workes when we doe them 5 How Christes satisfaction is made our iustice and righteousnesse THIS question is adioined because it seemeth absurd that we should bee iustified by that which is another mans Christs satisfaction made ours two waies 1 By God imputing it or applyeng it vnto vs. and not ours The satisfaction or iustice of Christ is made ours or applied vnto vs two waies that is by a double application The former application is Gods who in respect of that fulfilling of the Law perfourmed by christ accepteth vs and applieth the same vnto vs that is he imputeth it no lesse than if wee had neuer sinned or at least had paied and suffered sufficient punishment for our sinnes For albeit to iustifie signifieth to make iust yet in the Church it signifieth another thing and is taken in another sense Or god doth applie it when hee imputeth the fulfilling of the Lawe perfourmed by Christ vnto vs euen as if it were perfourmed by vs neither wil at all punish vs. But to impute is to accept christs satisfaction performed to this end that it might be our iustice righteousnes 2 By our selues applyeng it vnto our selues We then also applie vnto vs the fulfilling of the Law perfourmed by Christ when we are stedfastly persuaded that God doth impute applie giue it vnto vs and for it reputeth vs for iust absoluing vs from al guilt Without this application the former is not at all and this latter is also from God For God first imputeth vnto vs Christes satisfaction then he engendereth faith in vs whereby wee maie applie the same vnto vs. Whence also it appeareth that Gods application doth go before is the cause of our application which is of faith albeit his is not without ours as christ also saith Ioh. 15.16 Ye haue not chosen me but I haue chosen you Moreouer wee may then bee assured and certaine that the righteousnesse or satisfaction of Christ is imputed vnto vs of God When wee may be assured of Christs satisfaction imputed vnto vs. when wee earnestly desire the grace of God and feele the holy ghost to work in vs a true confidence in the Mediatour of the faithful That which we haue nowe spoken of both applications both gods and ours doth manifestly shew what is meant in this place by iustifieng Which is that to iustifie is not to make one iust who is vniust but to repute him for iust and righteous who is vniust and to absolue the vniust and vnrighteous from al guilt and not to punish him and this for anothers iustice and righteousnesse imputed by faith vnto vs. Obiection But to iustifie is to make one iust who is vniust Aunswere This indeede is true in general but in the Church it is taken otherwise For the legall iustification is a woorking of iustice and righteousnesse in vs as in one subiect But the iustification of the gospell whereof wee speake here is a farre diuerse thing For the subiect of that iustice and righteousnesse which is made ours by the Gospels iustification that is whereby being appplied by faith vnto vs wee are reputed iust and righteous is Christ himselfe and wee are onely the obiect of this iustice and the matter about which it is conuersaunt but the matter wherein it is inherent is Christ only 6 Why Christs satisfaction is made ours THE perfect fulfilling of the Law performed by Christ for vs is made ours or applied vnto vs The cause of Christs satâ—sfaction applied imputed is in God onely not in vs. through the alone and free mercie of God as who from euerlasting did predestinate vs and freely chuse vs to whom he might apply of his mere grace by faith that iustice and righteousnesse at his appointed time Wherefore al imagination and affirmation of merit is to bee taken awaie as which fighteth with the grace of God and is a denial of his diuine grace For the grace and mercie of GOD is the onely cause of both applications Hee of his goodnesse infinite and passing measure applieth Christes merit vnto vs and maketh that we also may apply the same vnto vs. The cause therefore why this application is wrought is in God alone but not at al in vs that is it is neither anie thing foreseene in vs neither also our apprehension and receiuing of this iustice For all the giftes and graces which are in vs are effectes of the application of Christes merit and therefore that merit of Christ is no waie applied vnto vs for the workes sake which we doe but this is done as the Apostle teacheth Ephes 1.5 according to the good pleasure of his wil. WhereupoÌ„ also it is said 1. Cor. 4 7. What hast thou that thou hast not receiued And Ephes 2.8 By grace are ye saued through faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God And here it is to be obserued that to bee saued by the grace of God and to be iustified by faith are not all one for that signifieth the impellent or motiue cause in God this the instrumental cause in vs whereby we apprehend the righteousnesse
one sacrifice for sinnes sitteth for euer at the right hand of God Now the Papists contrarie to these manifest places of scripture will haue Christ to be often offered in the Masse 6 The Masse is repugnant to the doctrine of grace and iustification which teacheth that in this life onelie is the time of obteining fauour by faith alone for the onelie merite of christ The papists neglecting faith which they haue no knowledge of reiecting Christs merit substitute in place thereof this idolatrous inuention For through and for this sacrifice of the Masse and so for this worke as they speake wrought they maintaine that the dead also obtaine remission of sinnes 7 The Masse is repugnant vnto the articles of our faith concerning the true humanitie of christ concerning his true ascension into heauen and his returning from thence at the day of iudgement For they make a corporal presence of christ in the Masse saying that christ is inuisible present vnder the forme of breade and wine the substance of the bread and wine beeing abolished as often as the Masse is celebrated and this presence of Christ is corporal when the accidents onely of the signe remaine Jt is contrarie also to the nature of sacraments which permitteth not the substance of the signs to be abolished neither requireth any naturall connexion of the signes and things and therefore neither is it required in the Supper which leadeth vs to christ crucified and raigning in heauen and from thence communicating himselfe vnto vs. 8 The Masse is contrarie to the communion of Saintes with Christ. For it imagineth an execrable inuention which is that Christes bodie doth descend into our bodies and remaineth as long within our bodies as the formes remaine of bread and wine But the supper reacheth that wee are made members of Christ by the holy gh st and ingraffed into him 9 The Masse is repugnaunt to the true worship of God because it maketh Christ to be there corporally present so by consequent there to bee worshipped Euen as of ould before his ascension it was not onely lawful but in duty required that Christ should be worshipped in whatsoeuer place hee was and so also did his Disciples alwaies worship him when he was present as also when he ascended from them but after his ascension they did not from that time adore worship him turning vnto any one particular place more than other Wherfore seing the Papists in their Masse tie the worship and adoration of christ vnto a thing whereunto christ himselfe by expresse word hath not tied it they professe them selues to be idolaters and doe no lesse absurdly and impiously in this than if they should worship Christ at a wal or if they should worship a piller falling downe before it Which we prooue 1. Because no creature hath power to ty the woorshippe of God to anie thing or place wherein God hath not commaunded by expresse word himselfe to be worshipped and wherein God hath not promised to hear vs. And hereby is the cause of that difference plainly scene why the Iewes directing their praier to the propitiatorie or mercy seat did notwithstanding withall in spirite worship the true God and were by promise from him assured to bee head but worshipping in Dan and in Bethel and in the high places and in the temple of Samaria were idolaters not knowing what they worshipped Ioh. 4 22. Yee worship that which yee knowe not we worship that which we know for saluation is of the Iewes and the cause of this thing is more at large declared in the second of Kinges cap. 17. 2. Because in the newe testament all worshippe which is tied to anie certaine place on earth is vtterlie taken awaie and spiritual worship onlie required stirred and kindled by the holy ghost and doone with a true faith and knowledge of God Ioh. 4.21 The houre commeth when ye shal neither in this mountaine nor at Jerusalem worship the Father In these words Christ doth plainely take away worship tied and restrained to any certaine place on earth Wherefore wee must also take away and haue in detestation this impious inuention of christs corporal presence in the Masse or in the breade and wine For this being but that christ is in bodie present in the bread whether it be said to be done by transubstantiation or by consubstantiation the popish adoration standeth fast and of the contrarie side the presence of Christs body in the breade is taken away if wee take away this foule and shamefull Popish adoration of Christs bodie lying couertly by their iudgement vnder the formes of bread and wine Now withall wee are here to obserue What it is to worship christ in the bread namelie to direct our worshippe in soule minde cogitation and as much as may be in the motion of our bodies to the place in which the bread is and turning thereto to yeelde reuerence vnto christ as if hee were present there m re than else-where So of olde they worshipped God at the Arke turning thereto with their mindes and as much as might be with their external grace and inclination of bodie 1 OBiection The Masse is an application of Christes sacrifice Therefore it is not to be taken away Aunsw I denie the Antecedent because wee applie Christs merit by faith onely Obiect 2. There must bee a perpetuall sacrifice in the Church because Jsai foretoldâ— that it should bee from sabbath to sabbath Aunswere There must indeed be a perpetuall sacrifice in the church which is the sacrifice of thankes-giuing 1. Because it is a remembraunce of Christes sacrifice 2. Because almes were giuen in the primitiue church after the supper was ended which were a sacrifice 3. The supper also is an Eucharistical or thankesgiuing sacrifice For a propitiatory sacrifice the Fathers neuer dreamt of 6 What is the right and lawful vse of the supper THE right and lawfull vse of the supper consisteth in three thinges 1. When the rites and ceremonies instituted of CHRIST are reteined and obserued yet so that they bee not obserued of one or two priuatelie but that in a conuenient and lawfull assemblie of the church the breade be broken distributed and receiued and the wine giuen to all that communicate in remembrance of Christes death that is for confirmation of their faith and to shew their thankefulnesse 2. When the rites are obserued of those persons for whome Christ did institute them that is when the bread and wine is distributed and receiued of others of whom the Lorde woulde haue it receiued namely not of his enemies but of his Disciples which are the faithful For the obseruing of the rite without faith and repentance is not the vse but the abuse of it 3. When the supper is receiued for the right end which is in commemoration and remembraunce of the Lordes death 7 What the wicked receiue in the Lords supper THE wicked receiue 1. The bare signes onely namely bread and wine 2. They receiue those signes
concupiscence Therefore it is no sinne Aunswere An Inclination whether it bee according to Gods lawe or inordinate which is mooued towardes such thinges as displease God is sinne To desire the fruit of a tree is naturall but as it was desired of Eue beeing forbidden of God it was sinne But originall sinne and concupiscence differ For concupiscence is a propension to those things which are forbidden by the lawe Originall sinne is the guilt of all mankind the want of the knowledge and will of God 2 Obiection That which is not in our power to cause either to bee in vs or not to be in vs is no sinne Concupiscence is not in our power Therefore it is no sinne Aunswere The Maior is true except wee haue lost that power through our owne fault otherwise it is false For God requiring of vs vnpossible things doth not iniurie vs because hee commaunded them when they were possible Neither hath he nowe lost his right of requiring that of vs which hee left with vs. 3 Obiection In Baptisme sinne is taken away Therefore concupiscence is not sinne in those that are baptized Aunswere The guilt of sinne is taken awaie in baptisme but not the corruption or inclination to sinne 4 Obiection Sinne maketh men obnoxious to the wrath of God Concupiscence doth not make the regenerate obnoxious to Gods wrath Therefore concupiscence is no sinne Aunswere Concupiscence dooth not make the regenerate obnoxious to the wrath of God that is by reason of the grace of God but this commeth not thereof as if concupiscence were no sinne For neither doe other sinnes condemne the regenerate And this is it that the School-men say The Formal of sinne is taken away and the Material remaineth 5 Obiect Where the formall of sinne is taken away there also the thing it selfe is taken awaie that is the material of sinne or sinne it selfe But in baptisme the formal of sinne is taken awaie Therefore sin it selfe is taken away in Baptisme Answere There is a double formal of sinne 1. The guilt that is the appointing of it to punishment which guilt is taken awaie 2. The repugnancie with the Law and an inclination to sin which abideth NOW we haue expounded the Decalogue or Ten cōmaundements there are two Questions as yet remaining concerning the Lawe which haue beene heretofore handled and now are brieflie to be run ouer againe 1. Howe the Law is possible or How men may keepe it 2. What is the vse of the Lawe since in this life we are not able to fulfill it S. Ierome saith Let him be accursed who saith the Lawe is vnpossible to wit with grace in Christ And againe Let him be accursed who saith the Law is possible that is without grace 1 How the Law is possible THAT this Question maie the better be vnderstoode we are to distinguish the nature of mā as it was first entire vncorrupt and afterwardes fallen and againe restored Vnto nature entire and vncorrupt the whole Lawe as touching al parts and degrees thereof is possible as vnto Angels Vnto the regenerate who haue nature restored againe the Lawe is possible 1. As concerning outward order and discipline 2. By the benefite of iustification and regeneration both which benefites wee obtaine by faith 3. As touching the beginning of inwarde and outward obedience in this life 1. Ioh. 5.3 Likewise as concerning the imputation of Christes iustice in whom is our victorie Hee that without the beginning of obedience that is without regeneration glorieth that hee knoweth and worshippeth God is a lier But the Law is vnpossible to the regenerate in respect of God that is as touching the perfect inward and outwarde obedience of the Law For they fulfil not the Lawe perfectly because they doe many things contrary to the Lawe And those things also which they doe according to the Law are vnperfect For in the regenerate are many sinnes yet remaining as original sinne many actual sinnes ignoraunces omissions infirmities which their sins thēselues notwithstāding acknowledge and bewaile Therefore regenerate sinners differ much from vnregenerate sinners And this difference is threefolde 1. The purpose in God himselfe of sauing the regenerat 2. The certaine final repentaunce of the regenerat 3. Euen in the very sinnes of the regenerate there remaineth some beginning of true faith conuersion The wicked and vnregenerate in whom is nature fallen but not restored haue neither whole obedience nor the beginning of obedience 2 What is the vse of the Law SAINT Paul teacheth two vses of the Law in his Epistle to the Galathians 1. The knowledge of sinne 2. That it is a Schoole-Master vnto Christ In nature vncorrupted the vses of the Law were 1. Conformitie with God 2. A good conscience In nature corrupted the vses or endes of the Lawe are 1. Mainteinaunce of order and discipline as wel in the regenerate as vnregenerate 2. That we maie know that God is and what he is 3. The knowledge of sinne 4. A preparing to despaire in the reprobate 5. A meane whereby repentance maie be kindled and encreased in Gods chosen 6. A leuil or rule of liuing vnto the faithful and that whereunto we must tend and shoot as vnto our mark The Law then hath his vse both before and after conuersion It is profitable for the acknowledgement of sinne and repentaunce because it is a rule vnto vs whereunto we are to frame our life and thankefulnes Likewise it is a glasse vnto vs wherein wee maie see our wantes that so our renuing encreasing our praieng also maie encrease whereby we desire more more to be conformed vnto God and his Law The obiections whereby the aduersaries endeuor to prooue that there is no vse of the lawe vnto christians are these 1 That which cannot be kept ought not to bee taught because it profiteth nothing The Law cannot be kept Therefore the Lawe ought not to be taught Aunswere The Maior is false For the Law is to be taught that we maie striue and endeuour to come as neere as we can vnto it Obiection 2. Hee that commaundeth vnpossible things commaundeth vnprofitable thinges God commaundeth the Lawe which is vnpossible Therefore God commaundeth vnprofitable things Aunswere He commaundeth vnprofitable thinges who commandeth vnpossible thinges that is 1. Jf they be simply vnpossible 2. Jf they be alwaies vnpossible 3. If there be no other vses of this commaunding but that those things be done which are commaunded Now we haue heard before which are the endes of the Lawe for which ends of the law before declared God wil haue both the Law to be commanded and vs to be taught the same Obiection 3. What God wil not giue vs and so what wee are not able to attaine vnto that wee maie not desire God wil not giue vs perfect fulfilling of the Law in this life Therefore we ought not to desire perfectly to fulfil the Lawe Aunswere Wee ought not to craue or desire that which God will not giue vs that is except God
From what euils he saueth vs 433 How he saueth 434 VVhom he saueth 437 Of Christ What is signified by the name of christ 437 What Christes vnction or annointing is 438 What his Prophetical function 444 VVhat his Priesthood 448 VVhat his kingdome 451 Of the communion of the faithful with Christ vvhat the Annointing of Christians is 452 In what sense christians are called prophets 456 vvhat is the Priesthoode of christians 456 vvhat is the kingdom of christians 458 Of Christ the Sonne of God How manie waies men are called sons 461 How christ is the son of God 463 vvhy christ is called the only begotten and first begotten sonne of God 464 Of Christs Diuinitie The sonne of God is a subsistent in the flesh borne of the virgin and before the flesh 467 The sonne of God Christ is a person reallie distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost 498 The Worde is equall consubstantial with the Father 500 503 Other rules whereby the obiections of the Arrians are dissolued 507 The principall arguments against the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the Holie Ghost with the answeres vnto them 509 Of Christ our Lord. In what sense christ is called Lord 514 For what causes he is our Lorde 515 Of christs conception by the holy ghost and birth of the Virgin Marie 518 The common place of the two natures in Christ vvhether there be two natures in christ our Mediatour 520 vvhether christ be one person or moe 525 vvhat maner of vnion this is of the two natures in christ and how made 529 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of both natures in christ 536 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of christ the Mediatour 544 vvhy it was necessary that two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God 550 Of Christs humiliation that is of his Passion vvhat Christ suffered 554 According to which nature christ suffered 556 The causes impellent or motiues of christes Passion 55â— The final causes oâ— ends of his Passion 558 Of Christs death How christ is said to haue beene dead 561 vvhether it was requisite and necessary that christ should die 562 The fruit of christs death 564 His burial 566 His descension into hel 567 Of Christs glorification that is of his Resurrection vvhether christ rose againe 571 How christ rose 571 For what cause he rose 572 vvhat are the fruits of christes Resurrection 576 Of Christs Ascension into heauen vvhither christ ascended 580 How wherefore christ ascended into heauen 582 587 vvhat is the difference between christs Ascension and our 588 vvhat are the fruits of christs AscensioÌ„ 589 Of Christs sitting at the right hand of GOD. vvhat the right hand of God signifieth 591 vvhat is to sit at Gods right hand 591 vvhether christ did alwaies fitte at the right hand of God 595 vvhat are the fruites of christes sitting at the right hand of the father 597 Of Christs comming to iudgement vvhether there shal be any iudgement 599 vvhat the last iudgement is 601 vvho shal iudge 603 vvhence and whither christ shal come 604 Howe christ shall come to iudgement 605 vvhom christ shal iudge 605 vvhat shall be the senteÌ„ce executioÌ„ 606 For what cause that iudgemeÌ„t shal be 607 vvhen it shal be 608 vvherefore God woulde haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 608 For what causes God would not haue vs certain of the time of iudgement 609 For what cause GOD differreth that iudgement 609 Whether the last iudgement be to bee wished for 610 The third part of the Creede of the Holie Ghost the sanctifier What the name spirite signifieth 610 Who and what the holie Ghost is 611 What the office of the holy gost is 617 Of whom the holie Ghost is giuen and wherefore 621 To whom the holie Ghost is giuen 622 How he is giuen receiued 624 How the holie Ghost is reteined 625 Whether and how the holie ghost may be lost 625 wherefore the Holie Ghost is necessarie 626 Howe wee may knowe that the holie ghost dwelleth in vs. 627 Of the Church What the Church is 627 How many waies the Church is taken 629 What are the tokens and markes of the church 631 Why the church is called Holy Catholicke 633 In what the church differeth from the common weale 634 Whence ariseth the difference of the church from the rest of mankinde 635 Whether any one may be saued out of the church 636 Of Predestination Whether there be Predestination 636 What Predestinâ—tion is 641 What are the causes of Predestination or Election and of Reprobation 642 What are the effects of Predestination 644 Whether Predestination be vnchangeable 645 How far forth Predestination Election and Reprobation are known vnto vs. 645 Whether the elect be alwaies meÌ„bers of the church the reprobate neuer 646 Whether the elect may fall from the church and the reprobate abide alwaies in the church 648 What is the vse of this doctrine 649 Of the communion of Saints 649 Of the remission of sinnes What remission of sinnes is 651 Who giueth remission of sinnes 652 For what remission of sinnes is graunted 653 Whether remission of sinnes agreeth with Gods iustice 653 Whether remission of sinnes be freely giuen 654 To whom remission of sins is giuen and how 655 Of the Resurrection of the flesh What the Resurrection is 656 The Errours concerning the Resurrection 656 Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainely be 657 For what end the Resurrection shall be 659 By whom the Resurrection shal be 660 How the Resurrection shal be 660 When the Resurrection shal be 661 What bodies shal rise 661 Whether the soule be immortall 662 Of euerlasting life What euerlasting life is 670 VVho giueth euerlasting life 672 To whom euerlasting life is giuen 673 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen 673 VVhen how euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs 674 675 VVhether wee can bee assured in this life of euerlasting life 675 Of Justification VVhat iustice or righteousnes is in generall how manifold it is 677. 678 In what iustice differeth from iustification 679 VVhat is our iustice 680 How Christs satisfactioÌ„ is made our iustice and righteousnes 681 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours 683 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours by faith onely 684 Obiections against this doctrine of iustification aunswered 685 Of Sacraments VVhat sacraments are 694 VVhat are the ends of sacraments 697 In what sacraments differ from sacrifices 699 In what sacramentes agree with the word and in what they differ from it 700 How the sacraments of the old new Testament agree how they differ 702 VVhat the sacramentall vnion is 703 In what the thinges differ from the signes 704 VVhat phrases and formes of speaking of the sacraments are vsuall vnto the church and scripture 705 VVhat is the right and lawful vse of sacraments 705 VVhat the wicked receiue in the vse administration of the sacraments 706 How