signes or vvonders wee say that those which were done by Christ and his Apostles and in those ancient and primitive Churches be sufficient for the confirmation of that most ancient primitive Christian and Apostolicke faith and religion conteined in the booke of God which wee professe Yea now in these daies saith S. Chrysostome the vvorking of miracles is ceased and they be rather counterfeit miracles saith he vvhich be found amongst them that be false Christians Againe he saith There be some that aske vvhy men vvorke not miracles novv in these dayes If thou bee beleeving saith he as thou oughtest to be and if thou lovest Christ as he should be loved thou needest no miracles for signes be given to unbeleevers and not to beleevers Againe S. Cyrill saith that to vvorke miracles maketh not a man one iot the more holy seing it is common to evill men and to such as he obiects or reprobates For so the Lord himselfe witnesseth saying Manie shall say unto mee in that day Lord Lord have not vvee prophesied in thy name and in thy name cast out divels in thy name done manie great vvorks And yet will he neverthelesse professe unto them I never knevv you depart from me ye vvorkers of iniquitie And on the other side working of no miracles hindereth not a mans holinesse for Iohn wrought neither signe nor miracle and yet was this no derogation to his holinesse for amongst them that are borne of vvomen arose there not a greater then hee as Christ himselfe testifieth Yea that miracles signes or wonders may be done by false Prophets and false teachers is further manifest for even Christ himselfe saith that There shall arise false Christs and false Prophets and they shall shevv great signes and vvonders so that if is vvere possible they should deceive the very Elect. S. Paul also directlie testifieth that in the Antichristian Church there shall be the vvorking of Sathan vvith all power and signes and lying VVonders Which saith S. Augustine be called lying signes and VVonders for this cause that either mens senses be deceived thinking that to be done which revera is not done or else because if they be done in deed they draw men to beleeve that they could not be done but by the power of God whereas they know not the power of the Divell For S. Iohn in the Revelation mentioneth spirits of Divels vvorking Miracles to deceive those that be of the Antichristian Church By all this then you see that the Miracles wrought in Poperie be no argument or proofe that therfore it is the right or true Church or that the Teachers therein be the right and true Teachers for they may be false Prophets and false Teachers and the Popish Church may be as indeed it is the false and Antichristian Church all these their Miracles notwithstanding But hereof I shall have occasion to speake more fullie afterward when I come to speake of Antichrist and his Miracles In the meane time concerning this point thus much may suffice CAP. III. Of Iustification by Faith onely The right sense and meaning of that position and of the truth of it And that being rightly understood it excludeth not good workes nor importeth anie licentiousnesse at all in it but the cleane contrarie IT is a thing well knowne how busie and earnest Popish Teachers be not only by word of mouth but by their books writings also to perswade you all that ever they can against ours the most ancient most pure and only right Religion and amongst other their bad devises which they plot contrive for their owne advantage and behoofe this is not the least that they accuse our Religion to be a doctrine and religion of much licentiousnesse and that in sundrie points which therefore must be answered And manie there be also that be too hastie and over credulous to beleeve them as if all that they speake and write were to be held for undoubted truth and oracles without further enquirie or examination But howsoever they thus boldly presume they for all that be not able to take anie iust exception against our Religion or to shew or prove it in anie point whatsoever to be an allower of anie the least impietie or licentiousnesse if it be rightly understood It is true that sundrie that professe Protestancie live licentiously and wickedly and so doe manie also that professe Poperie likewise live wickedly licentiously If therefore they allow not this for an argument sufficient to convince their religion of wickednesse licentiousnesse which is taken from the wicked lives manners and conversations of men Why will they be so unequall as to make it of anie force against our religion Wise men can easily distinguish inter vitium rei personae betweene that which is the fault of the thing and the fault of mens persons For the religion may be good though some persons that professe it live not answerably thereunto yea the Protestant that is the Christian Religion which we professe is so good godly divine holy and pure as that it neither alloweth nor tolerateth the filthie Stewes nor anie other impuritie nor anie treasons or rebellions nor perjuries nor lying or deceitfull equivocations nor anie other wickednesse or impietie whatsoever but utterly condemneth them all So that for true pietie puritie integritie and all manner of good life and godly conversation the religion of Poperie commeth farre short of it and is in no sort to be compared with it If then anie professing our religion live wickedly or licentiously as too manie do it is the fault of the men that live so dissolutely and not of the religion which requireth and commandeth the cleane contrarie at their hands But for all that they persist and say that even the Protestants religion it selfe is licentious because it teacheth and holdeth that men are justified in Gods sight and before his Tribunall onely by faith in Iesus Christ which doctrine say they maketh men licentious and carelesse of doing good workes Howbeit both they and you must understand that when the Protestants doe say or have said at anie time that Faith onely iustifieth in Gods sight it is and ever was meant and intended howsoever some seeme purposely to mistake it not of anie dead faith which hath no life in it to bring forth anie good workes but of a true and lively faith which is accompanied with good works and is fruitfull and working by love as S. Paul and S. Iames and S. Peter and the rest of the holy Scriptures cleerly declare Whilst therefore they teach both in their Sermons writings with S. Iames and the rest of the Scriptures That the faith that is vvithout vvorks is dead and that such a faith cannot save or iustifie a man but that it must be a true and lively faith that is such a faith as produceth bringeth forth good workes I hope you sufficiently perceive that the doctrine of
the Protestants concerning iustification by this lively faith and not by anie dead faith is such as you can no way dislike that it is so far from making anie carelesse of doing good works that contrariwise it urgeth abetteth perswadeth and provoketh men unto them if they meane or desire to have such a faith as whereby they may be saved But now although the Protestants doe thus rightly teach that this faith and good workes goe together and be inseparable in respect of the person so that he that hath this faith hath also good workes yet in the point of our Iustification in Gods sight and before his Tribunall they are to be distinguished and to be considered apart and not confusedlie because it is Faith onlie and not Workes whereby we apprehend and applie Christ Iesus unto us as our Righteousnesse To understand this the better you must ever remember that Christ Iesus is in verie deed our Righteousnes for so the scriptures doe plentifullie teach and proclaime Our faith is but the hand or instrument whereby we apprehend and applie that righteousnesse unto us and our good workes be the fruits testimonies and declarations both to our selves and other men of that faith in Christ which iustifieth us before God And therefore it is not enough for a man to say hee hath faith but if hee have that true livelie and iustifying faith which he pretendeth he must declare shew it by his workes for so S. Iames saith Ostende mihi fidem tuam ex operibus tuis shew me thy faith by thy vvorkes And agreeablie hereunto S Paul calleth good workes and a sanctified course of life fructus Iustitiae the fruits of righteousnesse So that wee are first righteous by faith in Christ before wee doe or can bring forth these fruits of righteousnes And so S. August likewise teacheth affirming directly that Opera sequuntur Iustificatum non praecedunt Iustificandum Good vvorkes doe follow him that is formerly iustified and doe not goe before him that is afterward to be iustified And this even Christ Iesus also himselfe declareth namelie that the tree must first be good before it can bring forth good fruit By all which it is verie manifest that good works be not causes but fruits effects and consequents of that faith which iustifieth us before God But this is yet further evident because S. Paul saith expresselie that wee are Iustified by faith and so have peace vvith God Hee further excludeth Workes verie directlie and by name from having anie thing to doe in that act of our Iustification Therefore vve conclude saith he that a man is Iustified by faith vvithout the vvorkes of the Law And againe he saith that God imputeth righteousnes vvithout vvorks Againe he saith It is by grace and not of works Rom. 11.6 And againe he saith It is not of vvorkes Rom. 9.11 And againe hee saith By grace are yee saved through faith and that not of your selves for it is the gift of God and not of vvorkes lest any man should boast himselfe In all which places yee may perceive that how requisite or commendable soever good workes be and what good use soever they have yet they bee directlie excluded from being anie cause of our Iustification and salvation in Gods sight and censure And with this also agreeth that saying of S. Paul in his Epistle to the Galathians where he giveth this conclusion saying Yee are all the sonnes of God by faith in Christ Iesus And so also testifieth S. Iohn saying That as many as received Christ to them he gave this prerogative to be the sonnes of God even to them that beleeve in his name Where you may observe that beleefe or faith is reckoned as the hand or instrument whereby Christ is apprehended or received Againe he saith That God so loved the vvorld that he gave his onely begotten Sonne that vvhosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life In which words you may observe againe the first and originall cause of our salvation to be the meere grace and love of God Secondly the materiall cause to be Christ the Sonne of God with his obedience and righteousnesse And thirdlie the instrumentall cause to be faith or beleefe in that his Sonne and our Saviour Iesus For he saith the text was sent into the world to this end that vvhosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life But consider that he saith yet further That as Moses lift vp the Serpent in the vvildernesse so must the sonne of man be lift vp that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have eternall life Some of you no doubt remember the storie of the Serpent there mentioned which is in the booke of Numbers for after that the people of Israel had wickedly spoken and murmured against God and against Moses The Lord sent fierie Serpents among the people which stung the people so that manie of the people of Israel died Therefore the people came to Moses and said VVe have sinned for we have spoken against the Lord and against thee pray to the Lord that he take away the Serpents from us And Moses prayed for the people And the Lord said unto Moses make thee a fierie Serpent and set it up for a signe that as many as are bitten may looke upon it and live So Moses made a Serpent of brasse and set it up for a signe and when a Serpent had bitten a man then he looked to the Serpent of brasse and lived As therefore Moses lift up this brazen Serpent in the wildernes to the end that whosoever was stung by those fierie Serpents and did looke upon that brazen Serpent might be cured live and was cured and did live accordingly So was also the Sonne of man Christ Iesus lift up upon the Crosse where he was crucified to the end that whosoever is stung with the deadly stings of sinne or of that old Serpent the Divell and doth with the eies of his faith applying him looke upon Christ Iesus so lifted vp and crucified for him should bee healed and have eternall life Where you may againe perceive that as Christ is compared to that brazen Serpent so is our beliefe or faith in him compared to their looking upon the brazen Serpent so that still it appeareth that faith is as the eie or instrument whereby wee behold apprehend and apply Christ crucified as a salve unto us for all our sores For in him is comprehended whatsoever is necessarie or fit to cure us When therefore wee say and speake in this sort that Sola fides iustificat Faith onely iustifieth wee meane not that this faith is so sole or alone as that it is without good works but that in the act of our iustification before God and in his sight and as it respecteth and apprehendeth Christ the obiect of it it is sole and alone workes having no
part with it in that apprehensive facultie Where also you may understand how S. Iames S. Paul be cleerly reconciled between whom neverthelesse there neither is nor ever was anie variance being rightly understood namely even by that evident common and knowne distinction that CHRISTVS iustificat effectivè Fides instrumentaliter sivè apprehensivè Opera declarativè CHRIST is he that iustifieth in verie deede effectually Faith iustifieth instrumentally or apprehensively and workes iustifie declaratively that is they doe declare or shew forth unto men the goodnesse and livelinesse of that faith whereby as by an instrument apprehending Christ our righteousnesse wee are iustified in the sight of God And this is the reason that S. Iames spake in that sort before mentioned viz Declare or Shew me thy faith by thy vvorkes and I will shew thee my faith by my workes In which sense also he further saith that Abraham was iustified that is was shewed or declared to be iust by his workes when he offered Isaac his sonne upon the Altar Likewise hee saith that Rahab the harlot vvas iustified that is was shewed or declared to be iust through workes when she received the messengers and sent them out another vvay So that to bee iustified by workes in S. Iames is nothing else but thereby to be shewed or declared to be iust For all S. Iames his dispute in that place if you well observe it is directly and expresly against a Dead faith which hath no good workes with it and against that vaine man that shall say or thinke that he hath a faith good enough to save him when as being without workes it was indeede but an idle brag and conceite and not a lively or saving faith but like a bodie without a soule as he there resembleth it for that it hath not the action of a living thing appearing in it The iustification therefore by faith without workes whereof S. Paul speaketh and the iustification by workes and not by faith onely that is when faith onelie is pretended or alledged which is destitute of good workes whereof S. Iames speaketh appeare to have no contradiction or contrarietie at all but a verie plaine evident and cleare consent and agreement For both those Apostles doe teach alike and concurre in this that the iustifying and saving faith is not an idle or dead faith but such a one as is livelie and operative working by love and bringing forth the fruites of good workes And therefore doth also S. Paul aswell as S. Iames require of all beleevers in Christ that they be carefull to shew forth good vvorkes and of as manie as be redeemed by him and iustified by faith in him that They should bee zealous of good vvorkes Yea although hee teacheth that wee are iustified in Gods sight and saved by grace through faith and not by workes yet he further addeth and saith neverthelesse that VVee are his vvorkemanship created in Christ Iesus unto good vvorkes and that God hath before ordained those good vvorkes that vvee should vvalke in them So that good workes be as S. Bernard also witnesseth of them Via regni non causa regnandi The way vvherin men must vvalke tovvards Gods kingdome but they be not the cause of their raigneing or of their comming thither As for that they obiect touching the Heresie of faith only iustifying or saving which S. Augustine saith was held by some in the Apostles time the same S. Augustine himselfe there plainely declareth that the heresie was of them that thoght they might be iustified or saved by such a faith as was void of good works which is indeed an heretical or erroneous opinioÌ„ which nothing toucheth us yea which we likewise condemne detest as much as anie ever holding with the same S· August with S. Paul S. Iames and the rest of the Scriptures that a iustifying or saving faith will produce good workes and a care to live well and in obedience to all Gods commandements Here then you may see the unsoundness of that distinction which the Rhemists and other Papists use viz. that workes done before Faith received that is whilst men be Infidels and unbeleevers do not indeed Iustifie but works done after faith received that is after that men be beleevers do say they iustifie in Gods sight For doth not S. Paul in that his dispute concerning Iustification expressely mention the example of Abraham as being the father of the faithfull in that case And doth he not say of that beleeving and godlie man Abraham that his Faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse before God and not his Works And doth he not further say that David likewise describeth the blessednesse of a man to consist not in anie workes or inherent righteousnesse of his owne but in remission of his sinnes and in Gods not imputing sinne unto him yea unto whom God imputeth righteousnesse without workes as he there directlie speaketh Was not S. Paul also a godlie and faithful man and one that had received grace from God and done manie good workes after that faith and grace received and yet he saith thus of himselfe Doubtlesse I thinke all things but losse for the excellent knowledg sake of Christ Iesus my Lord for whom I have counted all thiâ—gs lâ—sse do iudge them to be dung that I might win Christ might be found in him that is not having mine owne righteoâ—snes vvhâ—ch is of the Law but that righteousnes which is through the faith of Christ even the righteousnes which is of God through faith In which words ye see that S. Paul thogh a godly man yet disclaimeth all his own works and inherent righteousnesse whatsoever accounting it as Dung and altogether unmeet to stand in Gods presence and before his Iudgement seate to claime Iustification by that all his ioy delight and desiâ—e was to goe out of himselfe and to be found In hâ—m that is in Christ and so to have his righteousnesse and not his owne imputed to him For in Christ it is that the Father is vvell pleased and in Christ it is and for his sake and not for our owne that vvee are accepted As hee likewise saith againe There is no condemnation to them that be in Christ Iesus And againe he saith God hath made him to bee sinne for us vvhich knew no sinne that we should be made the righteousnesse of God in him Where you also see that Christ Iesus our most kinde Suertie and most loving Saviour though hee had not anie the least speck or spot of sinne but was most holie most pure and in all compleate fulnesse and perfection righteous in himselfe had neverthelesse our sinnes imputed to him that wee might be made the righteousnesse of God In him as this Text speaketh and not in our selves As Christ then became sinne in respect of the imputation of our sinnes unto him so are we iudged righteous in Gods sight not by
anie righteousnesse of our owne or inherent in our owne persons but by that immaculate and spotlesse righteousnesse of his imputed unto us So that In him it is as this Text most plainlie sheweth and not in our selves that wee are deemed righteous in Gods sight Yea here consider further what righteousnesse also it is that God approveth and will have to stand for the Iustification of sinfull men in his sight for it must be a righteousnesse transcendent and going farre beyond the righteousnesse of anie sinfull creatures namelie it must be that which S. Paul here calleth the righteousnesse of God that is a most pure perfect and complete righteousness wherein must not be anie the least spot speck or staine to be found as S. Chrysostome also declareth Which kind of most pure and spotlesse righteousnesse because no other man hath but Iesus Christ only the second Adam who is both God and Man therefore in his person only and not in ours it is to be both sought and found For which cause also it is that the Church and people of God considered not in themselves but in Christ are by the Apostle S. Paul said to have not so much as a spot or vvrinckle or any such thing in them Well therefore doth S. Augustine make this double observation upon this Text of 2. Cor. 5.21 saying Videâ—e duo Iustitiam Dei non nostram In ipso non in nobis Behold and consider two things saith he first That vvee are made the righteousnesse of God and not our owne righteousnes and secondly In him and not in our selves The same observation likewise giveth S. Hierome upon the same Text saying Christus pro peccatis nostris oblatus peccati nomen accepit ut nos efficeremuâ— Iustitia Dei in ipso non nostra nec in nobis Christ being offered for our sinnes tooke the name of sinne that vve might be made the righteousnesse of God in him not our owne righteousnesse nor in us And therefore doth S. Paul againe not onlie for himselfe but in the behalfe of other Christians also speake in this sort even after faith and grace received VVe vvhich are Iewes by nature and not sinners of the Gentiles doe know that a man is not Iustified by the vvorkes of the Law but by the faith of Iesus Christ even vve I say have beleeved in Iesus Christ that vvee might be Iustified by the faith of Christ and not by the vvorkes of the Law because that by the works of the Law no flesh shall be iustified Be not these wordes verie direct for this purpose shewing that even those that be Christians and beleevers in Christ doe neverthelesse expect Iustification by Faith in Christ and not by the Workes of the Law Yea what man ever yet Christ Iesus onely excepted did fully and perfectlie keepe the whole Law and commandements of God in his owne person For which cause it is that none can be Iustified in Gods sight by anie works or observance of the Law which he by and in his owne person can doe or performe If theâ—e had beene a Law given vvhich could have given life then indeed righteousnes should have beene by the Law as S. Paul affirmeth But the Scripture saith he hath concluded all under sinne that the promâ—se by the faith of Iâ—sus Christ should be given to them that beleeve In which words you see he sheweth it verie significantlie to be a thing Impossible for anie that be but meere men to keep the Law of God in that full measure and perfection which the Law reâ—uireth and therefore that they must seeke to be Iustified in Gods sight and to have eternall life another way namelie by Faith in Iesus Christ. Againe he saith thus Be it knowne unto you men and Brethren thâ—t through this man Iesus is preached unto you the forgivenes of sinnes and by him every one that beleeveth is Iustified from all those things from vvhich yee could not be Iustified bâ— the Law of Moses Here also observe that hee saith they could not be Iustified by the Law as noting it likewise to bee a thing Impossible But hee speaketh yet further saying That vvhich vvas Impossible to the Law inasmuch as it vvas vveake because of the flesh God sent his owne Sonne in â—he similitude of sinfull flesh for sinne condemned sinne in the flesh thâ—t the righteousaesse of the Law might be fulfilled in us vvhich vvalke not after the flesh but after the spirit Where you may againe perceive that he teacheth it constantly expresly to be a thing impossible by reason of the vveakenesse that is in all flesh for the most godly person upon earth being but a meere man fullie exactly to keepe and performe the law and that therefore the Son of God Christ Iesus himselfe was sent into the world and became Man for our sakes that so the righteousnesse of the Law which hee in his humane nature in all points and perfection fully performed might by our faith apprehending and applying it bee made ours and so be fulfilled in us namelie by imputation and application and not by anie inherent and actual performance of it by in our owne persons for this he before affirmed to be impossible And this also do the ancient Fathers themselves affirme and teach S. Ambrose saith That the commandements of God bee so great vt impossibile sit servare ea as that it is impossible to keep them S. Chrysostome speaking of the Law and performance of it saith Id vero nemini possibile est That it is possâ—ble to no man S. Hierome saith That no man can performe the Lavv S. Bernard saith that God commanding things impossible made not men transgressors but made them thereby humble Yea it was the heresie of the Pelagians as S. Hierome sheweth ad Clesiphontem to hold as the Papists also hold that Mandata dei sunt possibilia The Commaundements of God are possible And they went about to prove it as the Papists likewise doe by these Texts viz. My yoake is easie and my burthen light in Mat. 11.30 And his commandements be not burdenous in 1. Ioh. 5.3 wheras they did not rightly understand those speeches no more then the Papists their followers doe For it is true that none of the commandements of God be grievous heavie or burthensome to a regenerate godly and sanctified minde which is ever desirous endeavoring and delighting to keepe them and to walke in the obedience of them though hee shall never be able during this mortall life fully and perfectly to keepe and performe them And therefore thus saith S. Hierome to the Pelagian and we also say the same to the Papists â—acilia dicis dei mandata tamen nullum proferre potes qui universa compleverit Thou saist the commandements of God be easie and yet thou canst bring forth none that hath kept them all Againe he saith Tunc ergo iusti sumus quando
likewise doth the Church and people of God in Daniels time disclaime all merite and conceite of inherent righteousnes in themselves as appeareth by their praier which they make unto God saying VVee do not present our supplications before thee for our ovvne righteousnesse but for thy great tender mercies O Lord heare O Lord forgive O Lord consider and doe it That holy man Iob likewise speaketh to the same effect If man saith hee dispute vvith God hee cannot answer him one thing of a Thousand And againe he saith If I vvould Iustifie my selfe mine owne mouth shall condemne mee and If I vvould be perfect hee shall Iudge mee vvicked But now although the Protestants doe thus rightly teach Iustification by Faith onely and not by Workes or by anie Inherent righteousnesse in men therewithall condemne the doctrine of mens merits most justly yet doe they confesse that there is a reward in Scripture promised to them that doe good workes But Reward and Merit doe differ and be not all one For it is a Reward not of merit or desert of mens behalfe but of meere grace favour and bountie in God farre above the merits and deserts of anie men and performed given and bestowed for Gods promise sake and for the merits onely and mediation of Iesus Christ. There is Merces ex gratia a Reward counted by favour aswell as ex debito of Debt or Due desert as S. Paul himselfe distinguisheth even in this verie case Yea Saint Paul saith againe that though Christ paid a price and ransome for us yet in respect of our selves vve are Iustificati gratis Iustified frankely and freely without our paying or performing anie thing toward it or in that behalfe What could be spoken more plainely or more forcibly to quell the swelling pride of men and to dash all conceit of their merit at GODS hand It is true which is written in the Epistle to the Hebrewes where it is said thus To doe good and to to Distribute forgett not for vvith such sacrifices God is vvell pleased The Papists translate it for maintenance of their meritts that with such Hosts or Sacrifices God is promerited for so is their Latin Translation Promeretur Deus Which word in Latin as it is not used passively as the Rhemists in their English have translated it so neither is that Latin translation which they follow right in that point being not answerable to the originall in Greeke according whereunto the ancient Fathers would have all translations to be reformed and framed as before is declared for the Greek word in that Text is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth as our Translation hath it is wel pleased or is delighted but it importeth no such thing as matter of merit in it And therefore you must hereby learne to take heed of your false translations Yea the Parable in the Gospel of the Servant that did the commandement of his Maister plainlie and purposelie sheweth that we deserue no thankes or recompence at Gods hand for anie duetie or obedience we performe to him For saith Christ doth the Maister thanke that servant because hee did that vvhich vvas commanded him I trow not So likewise yee vvhen yee have done all those things that are commanded you yet say VVe are unprofitable servants vvee have done no more but that vvhich was our duety to doe It is here then verie manifest that no men by anie duetie or obedience they performe to God can possiblie merit or deserve anie benefite at Gods hand much lesse Eternall Heavenlie happinesse And yet you have a conceit that so long as yee acknowledge those vertues and good workes to come not from your selves but from God from his gift ye may repose confidence in them matter of merit but what is this if yee well consider it but plaine Pharisaisme for all that For did not the Pharisee in the Gospel say O God I thanke thee c. acknowledging therein the vertues and workes which he had to come from God and to be of his gift and therefore gave him thankes and yet for reposing confidence therein for being proud of Gods gifts he is disliked and reproved Bernard saith Meritum meum miseratio Domini The merit I relye upon is the Lords mercy Againe he saith Non est quo gratia intret ubi meritum occupavit There is no place for grace to enter vvhere merit hath taken possession Againe he sheweth That men can by no manner of meanes possiblie deserve or merit eternall life and salvation And so teacheth Anselmus likewise and Cusanus Yea both wee and yee be so farre from meriting and deserving salvaon that contrariwise wee all in respect of our owne merits must confesse that we deserve damnation For yee for your parts aswell as wee cannot denie but yee sometimes sinne and goe astray and if you did sinne but once in all your life time yet were that sufficient in the sentence of Gods Law and the severitie of his Iustice to make you subiect to his curse and to throw you down to hell and eternall torments Never therefore sooth nor flatter your selves with that your distinction of some Veniall and some deadlie sinnes For although it be true that some sinnes be greater then other some are and that all sinnes be in respect of Gods mercie veniall that is remissible and may be forgiven except the sinne against the Holie Ghost of which it is directlie said that it shall never be forgiven yet is it also as true that everie sinne even the least that can be named is in his owne nature deadlie and maketh a breach and transgression of Gods Law and consequently deserveth his curse and condemnation for so have S. Paul and S. Iames before instructed us whereunto the rest of the Scriptures doe accord So that even those which you call small and veniall sinnes if they should be laid to your charge and should not be forgiven you through Christ the Saviour and Redeemer they be of weight sufficient to presse you downe to hell there to be everlastinglie tormented And yet it is true that in respect of the quantitie and qualitie of sinnes committed by reprobates and according to the difference of them shall be the diversitie of their punishments in hell some being there to be tormented more and some lesse Doe ye not then all this while perceive in what a wofull and damnable estate they all be that stand upon their owne deservings merits and workes and looke to bee Iustified before Gods tribunall by a righteousnesse inherent in their owne persons and not by the righteousnesse onlie of Iesus Christ apprehended and applied by faith Well therefore did S. Bernard say that Assignata est homini aliena Iustitia quia caruit sua There is assigned to a man another mans righteousnesse because he vvanted his owne Pigghius likewise speaketh teaching that we are Iustified by the righteousnesse of
Christ imputed to us by faith And so also doe the Divines of Coleyn teach that we are Iustified by the righteousnesse of Christ not as it is without us abiding in him but as the same being apprehended by faith is imputed to us CHAP. IV. Certaine objections of the Adversaries answered concerning this matter of Iustification FIrst the ambiguitie of this word Iustificare seemeth much to misleade you in this point for you will have it to signifie and import to make a man iust who before was uniust by a quality of Iustice inherent in his owne person And true it is That whosoever is Iustified is also sanctified so that hee hath in some sort a Sanctitie or Iustice inherent in his owne person by the operation of Gods spirit within him This then which you call Inherent Iustice in a man is the same that wee call Sanctification and is not all one with Iustification but is a fruit effect and consequent of it Neither doth the word Iustificare to Iustifie evermore so signifie but sometimes it signifieth to declare or approve one to be Iust as in Psal. 51.4 and Rom. 3.4 where it is thus said to God himselfe That thou mayest be iustified in thy sayings meaning that thou maist bee declared or approved to be Iust. And so in the first of Tim. 3.16 Christ is said to be Iustified that is declared or approved to be iust And this sense also doth S. Iames in his second Chapter of his Epistle say That a man is Iustified by vvorkes that is declared or approved to be Iust by them as being the fruits and declarations of his faith And sometimes againe it signifieth by a Iudgement or sentence to absolve and acquit a man of faults and crimes laid to his charge of all punishments to the same belonging as in Pro. 17.15 it is said Hee that Iustifieth the vvicked and hee that condemneth the Iust even they both are an abhomination unto the Lord that is hee that absolveth or acquiteth a wicked man in Iudgement when contrariwise he should be condemned and he that condemneth a Iust and innocent person who should of right be acquited both these are abhominable in Gods sight Where you see that to Iustifie the wicked is not by alteration of qualities actuallie to make a man Iust who before was unjust but it signifieth by sentence and Iudgement to acquit and free him that is accused And thus is the word Iustifie taken in S. Pauls discourse touching this matter as to omit all other places is manifest by that one place of Rom. 8.33 34 where it is said thus VVho shall lay anything to the charge of Gods elect It is God that Iustifieth who is he that condemneth Where you see that the word Iustifie is set as opposite to the word Condemne and consequently signifieth an acquiting cleering freeing or discharging of whatsoever may bee laid to the charge of anie of Gods elect and chosen children 2 Neither can anie rightly conclude because this righteousnesse of Christ is thus said to be imputed by faith that therefore it is onely an imaginarie and phantasticall Iustice and no Iustice or righteousnesse indeed yea such blasphemies must be detested For the word Imputed doth not diminish or detract from the truth of the Iustice as though it were imputed or reputed for Iustice which were none revera but it signifieth that as it is in it selfe a most pure full perfect and complete righteousnesse being farre above the best righteousnesse that is to be found in anie earthly Saints or such as be meere men so doth God accordingly reckon and esteeme of it So that although we be most uniust in respect of our selves yet by having Christs righteousnesse imputed to us we are in him really and truely Iust righteous and without all spot staine or imperfection For Christ with all his merits righteousnesse satisfaction and obedience is not by way of fancie opinion conceit or imagination but revera actuallie and verilie bestowed and given of God to all his faithfull and beloved children Vnto us a childe is borne unto us a sonne is given saith Esay the Prophet And againe it is said That God so loved the vvorld that he gave his onely begotten Sonne c. And it is said againe that He vvas given of God his Father to the Elect and that those Elect were likewise given of God to him Agreeably whereunto speaketh also S. Paul saying that Christ is made unto us of God vvisedome and righteousnesse and sanctification and redemption that as it is vvritten vvhosoever glorieth should glory in the Lord. Seeing therefore Christ with all his obedience and righteousnesse is given unto us of God and that wee take and receive him by faith there can be no doubt but that he is as verilie and reallie become ours as anie mans lands possessions or goods become his which he hath by lawfull conveyance or gift from another man 3 But when we say that Faith only Iustifieth in Gods sight you further obiect that this word Onely is more then is in the Scripture to be found Howbeit you may observe that in the Gospel of S. Marke Christ said thus to one Be not afraid onely beleeve But neither are these words Trinity Consubstaâ—tiall c. expressely found in the Scripture but so long as the effect and equivalencie of them is there found it sufficeth In like sort if words equipollent or equivalent to this word Onely be found in the Scripture it sufficeth What is then the sense of this word onely in this position Faith onely iustifieth it is added to exclude vvorkes and their merit from being anie cause of that our Iustification in the sight of God Now then when the Scriptures expresly and plentifully affirme that vvee are Iustified by faith vvithout vvorkes and by faith and not by vvorkes is it not as much as if they had said in plaine termes that wee are Iustified by faith onely Againe when the Scriptures say and teach that vve are Iustificati gratis and ex gratia and per gratiam Iustified franckely and freely that is for nothing paid or performed on our parts and of grace and by grace Doe not these words fully import and cleerly shew that we are Iustified without anie merits or workes of our owne deserving it Can anie thing be more plainely declared 4 Neverthelesse they still seeke refuges and therefore sometimes say that When S. Paul speaketh of the Workes of the Law excluding them from Iustifying in Gods sight he meaneth only the vvorkes of the Ceremonial Law and not the vvorkes of the Morall Law But indeed S. Paul speaking of the Workes of the Law verie apparantly meaneth as well the Workes of the Morall law as of the Ceremoniall for when he saith that Not the hearers of the Law but the doers of the Law shall be Iustified can this be intended onely of the Ceremoniall law without anie regard at all had to the Morall Or when
onely nor see at all so these two sayings likewise may stand well enough together that among all the vertues in the soule faith is the onely instrument whereby we lay hold upon Christ for our iustification and yet that faith being alone and disioyned from the societie of other graces is dead in it selfe as S. Iames speaketh and in that respect can neyther only iustifie nor iustifie at all So though Claudius doe teach as we doe that faith alone saveth us because by the workes of the law no man shall be justified yet hee addeth withall this caution Not as if the workes of the law should be contemned and without them a simple faith so hee calleth that solitarie faith whereof we spake which is a simple faith indeed should be desired but that the workes themselves should be adorned with the faith of Christ. For that sentence of the wise man is excellent that the faithfull man doth not live by righteousnesse but the righteous man by faith In like maner Sedulius acknowledgeth with us that God hath purposed by faith onely to forgive our sinnes freely and by faith onely to save the beleevers and that when men have fallen they are to be renewed onely by the faith of Christ which worketh by love intimating by this last clause that howsoever faith only be it which iustifieth the man yet the worke of love is necessarily required for all that to iustifie the faith And this faith saith he when it hath beene justified sticketh in the soyle of the soule like a root which hath received a showre that when it hath begun to be manured by the law of God it may rise up againe into bowes which may beare the fruit of workes Therefore the root of righteousnesse doth not grow out of workes but the fruit of workes out of the root of righteousnesse namely out of that roote of righteousnesse which God doth accept for righteousnesse without workes The conclusion is that saving faith is alwaies a fruitfull faith and though it never goe alone yet may there be some gift of God which it alone is able to reach unto as Columbanus also implieth in that verse Sola fides fidei dono ditabitur almo The greatest depressers of Gods grace and the advancers of mans abilities were Pelagius and Celestius the one borne in Brittaine as appeareth by Prosper Aquitanus the other in Scotland or Ireland as Mr. Persons doth gather out of those words of S. Hierome in one of the Prefaces of his commentaries not upon Ezechiel as he quoteth it but upon Ieremy Hee hath his off-spring from the Scottish nation neere to the Britans Against these Palladius and Patricius sent into these parts by Celestinus Bishop of Rome bent their forces by whose meanes the grounds of sound doctrine in these great points were well setled among the Scottish and Irish. And when the poyson of the contrarie heresie about two hundred yeares after that beganne to breake out among them againe the Clergie of Rome in the yeare of our Lord DCXXXIX during the vacancie of the See upon the death of Severinus directed their letters unto them for the preventing of this growing mischiefe Wherein among other things they put them in minde that it is both blasphemy and folly to say that a man is without sinne which none at all can say but that one mediator betwixt God and man the man Christ Iesus vvho was conceived and borne without sinne Which is agreeable partly to that of Claudius that it is manifest unto all wise men although it be contradicted by heretickes that there is none who can live upon earth without the touch of some sinne partly to that of Sedulius that there is none of the elect so great whom the Divell doth not dare to accuse but him alone who did no sinne and who said The Prince of this world commeth now and in me he findeth nothing For touching the imperfection of our sanctification in this life these men held the same that wee doe to wit that the Law cannot be fulfilled that there is none that doth good that is to say perfect and intire good that Gods elect shall be perfectly holy and immaculate in the life to come where the Church of Christ shall have no spot nor wrinkle whereas in this present life they are righteous holy and immaculate not wholy but in part only that the righteous shall then be without all kinde of sinne vvhen there shall bee no law in their members that shall resist the law of their mind that although sinne do not now raigne in their mortall body to obey the desires thereof yet sinne dwelleth in that mortall body the force of that natural custome being not yet extinguished which we have gotten by our originall and increased by our actuall transgressions And as for the matter of merit Sedulius doth resolve us out of S. Paul that wee are Saints by the calling of God not by the merit of our deed that God is able to doe exceeding aboundantly above all that we aske or thinke according to the power that worketh in us not according to our merits that whatsoever men have from God is grace because they have nothing of due and that nothing can be found worthy or to be compared with the glory to come The next point that offereth it selfe unto our consideration is that of Purgatory Whereof if anie man doe doubt Caesarius a Germane Monke of the Cistercian order adviseth him for his resolution to make a iourney into Scotland the greater Scotland he meaneth and there to enter into S. Patricks Purgatory and then he giveth him his word that he shall no more doubt of the paines of Purgatory If Doctor Terry who commendeth this unto us as the testimonie of a most famous author should chance to have a doubtfull thought hereafter of the paines of Purgatory I would wish his ghostly Father to injoine him no other penance but the undertaking of a pilgrimage unto S. Patricks purgatorie to see whether he would prove any wiser when he came from thence than when hee went thither In the meane time untill he hath made some further experiment of the matter he shall give me leave to beleeve him that hath beene there and hath cause to know the place as well as anie the Iland wherein it is seated being held by him as a part of the inheritance descended unto him from his ancestors and yet professeth that he found nothing therein which might afford him anie argument to thinke there was a Purgatorie I passe by that Nennius and Probus and all the elder writers of the life of S. Patrick that I have met withall speake not one word of anie such place and that Henry the monke of Saltrey in the dayes of king Stephen is the first in whom I could ever finde anie mention thereof this onely would I know
good ends and purposes and not to satisfie the severity of his Iustice by that meanes for their sinnes and the punishment thereto belonging p. 125. c There is no iust cause to be shewed vvhy the pretended Catholicks should refuse to take the oath of Supremacy or refuse to come to our Churches Their obiections and reasons answered p. 1 2 c p. 407 c. See also throughout the vvhole booke for this purpose Concerning auricular Confession and to vvhom confession of sinnes is to be made and that it ought to be free and voluntarie and not forced or compelled pag. 302 303 c. pag. 253 254 D FOr vvhom Christ Dyed and to vvhom hee is a Redeemer pag. 187 188 189 c Every sinne Deadly in his owne nature although all sinnes be also veniall and remissible in respect of Gods mercie grace and bounty except the sinne against the holy Ghost pag. 114 115 E THe Emperor in ancient time had the Supremacy and not the Pope pag. 30 The Emperor in times past had power to place and displace Popes pag. 27 The Emperor in ancient time banished imprisoned and otherwise punished aswell Bishops of Rome as other Bishops pag. 22 Hee did make Lawes concerning Ecclesiasticall causes and religion pag. 24 As also Commissioners in an Ecclesiasticall cause and the B. of Rome himselfe vvas one of those Commissioners pag. ibid. An appeale to the Emperor in an Ecclesiasticall cause pag 24 Generall Councils in ancient times called by the Emperor and his Authoritie pag. 24 The Christian Emperor did and vvas to meddle in matters of the Church and concerning Religion pag. 25 The Christian Emperor in ancient time did nominate and appoint Bishops of Diocesses and Provinces and even the Bishop of Rome himselfe pag. 25 Emperors in ancient time did ratifie the decrees of Councils before they vvere put in execution pag 28 Miltiades Leo and Gregory all Bishops of Rome in their severall times subiect to the Emperor and at his command pag 24.26 Ancient Fathers Popes of Rome and Councils aswell generall as provinciall may erre even in matter of faith aswell as in matter of fact pag. 49 50 51 52. c See also the Preface for this point The Romane Empire dissolved ever since the Emperors have ceased to have the soveraigne command and rule of Rome and that the Popes have gotten to be the heads and supreme Rulers of that City and to be above the Emperors pa. 331.332 and pag. 391.392.393 The Pope of Rome hath no power or authoritie from Christ to Excommunicate any pag. 299 c Excommunications be they never so iust and lawfull be by Gods law and appointment of no force to depose from Earthly kingdomes or to dissolve the dutie and allegeance of subiects pag. 299 300 301 c F OVr Forefathers and ancestors not to be followed in any vices or errors they held pag 34 35 Foretold in the Booke of God that an apostacie from the right faith and a mysterie of iniquitie otherwise called an Antichristianisme should come upon the Church and that so the Church by degrees should grow corrupted and deformed pag. 35 36 280 Foretold also how long the Church should lye in those her corruptions and errors and vvhen she should begin to be clensed and reformed pag. 35 36 VVhat is to be thought of our Forefathers that lived and dyed in the time of Popery pag 39.40 41 42 Foretold that a strong delusion to beleeve lyes shouâ—d possesse them of the Antichristian Church because they received not the love of the truth extant in the divine Scriptures pag. 307 308 Men are iustified in Gods sight and before his tribunall by Faith only and good vvorkes be the fruits and declarations of that faith pag. 99 100 101 c. to the end of that chapter and pag. 116 117 118 c. to the end also of that chapter G God is not the author of sinne pag. 168 169 c. H NOt Protestants but Papists be the Heretickes pag. 72. and Schismaticks pag. 37 38. pag. 413.414 c Not the Pope but Christ onely is the Head of the universall militant Church as well as of the triumphant pag 94 95 96 97 98 I VVHo is to be the infallible Iudge of controversies in religion or vvhich commeth all to one effect in the conclusion vvhat is the infallible Rule vvhereby men must iudge and be directed for the finding out of truth in those controversies pag. 49 50 51 c. See also the Preface for this matter The Implicita fides of Papists reproved pag 78 79 80 K KIngs have the Supremacie over all maner of persons aswell Ecclesiasticall as Civill vvithin their own Dominions pa. 1. to p. 5 Their Supremacie in all kinde of causes aswell Ecclesiasticall as Civill pag. 5 c Kings and Princes although they have the Supremacie yet thereby claime not nor can claime to preach to minister the Sacraments to excommunicate absolve or to consecrate Bishops or to doe any other act proper to the function of the Ecclesiasticall ministers pag. 32 c Kings and Princes be notwithstanding their Supremacies under God and subiect to him and his vvord pag. 33 Even heathen Kings may command and make Edicts and Proclamations for God and his service pag. 7. c Christian Kings and Queenes are by Gods appointment to be nursing fathers and nursing mothers to his Church and Religion p. 7. The authoritie of a Christian King in respect of contemptuous disorderly and unruly persons requisite and necessary in the Church as vvell as in the Common-weale pag. 6 c Kings and Princes may command and compell their subiects to externall obedience for God pag. 6 7 8 9 10 Christian Kings may make lawes about matters Ecclesiast p. 7 8.24 Hee may make Commissioners in Ecclesiasticall causes pag. 24 He may have Appeales made unto him in a cause Ecclesiastical ib. He may nominate and appoint Bishops of Diocesses and Provinces pag. 27. Councels and Convocations to be assembled by his authoritie and the decrees thereof by him to be ratified and confirmed before they be put in execution pag. 26 27 28 Christian Kings doe punish offendors in Ecclesiasticall causes not Ecclesiastically but Civilly pag. 6 7.32 Subiects ought not to rebell against their Kings and Princes though they be adversaries to the Christian Religion and though subiects have power force enough to do it pa. 20 21 22.299 300 Kings of Rome did sometimes send the Bishops of Rome as their Ambassadors pag. 22 How thankefull subiects ought to be unto God for Christian Kings and Princes pag. 33 The power of the Keyes most grossely abused by the B of Rome to vvorke his owne exaltation above Kings and Princes pag 299 300 301 c The Keyes of the kingdome of heaven no more given to S. Peter then to the rest of the Apostles pag. 292 293 294 295 L NO Licentiousnesse or impiety in the doctrine of Iustification by faith or in the doctrine of predestination or
assurance of salvation or in the doctrine of redemption or in any point of the religion of the Protestants but the cleane contrary pag. 99 100 c pag. 153 154. c. pag. 125 c pag. 404 c Lay persons may and ought to reade the Scriptures and thereby to examine and try the doctrines of men vvhether they be right or no pag. 73 74 75 76. c. See also the Preface It is impossible for meere men by and in their owne persons perfectly to fulfill the Law of the ten Commandements and so to be iustified yea the Law vvas given to other uses and ends pag. 108 c No such place as Limbus Patrum pag. 130 131 132 M MIracles signes or vvonders done in the antichristian Church pag. 98 99 pag 306 307 pag 280 281 Mens Merits deserve not salvation but damnation p. 110 111 112 113 c. pag 366 367 N THe Name of Christians the most ancient and the most honourable See the Preface toward the end The Name of Catholicks to vvhom it rightly and properly belongeth pag. 63 64 O THe Oath of Supremacie to the King explaned and declared to be iust and lawfull pag 1 2 3 4 c. to the end of that chapter P THe Pope got his supremacie over Emperors and Kings partly by fraude and partly by force pag. 27 28 The Ecclesiasticall supremacie vvhen it vvas first affected by a Bishop vvas oppugned even by some of the B. of Rome themselves p. 13 14 15. Divers generall Councils also against it p 16 17 The Popes Supremacie vvhat a vvicked founder it had and how vvickedly it is still maintayned and upheld pag. 12 Three Texts of Scripture usually alledged for maintenance of the Popes supremacie abused answered p. 11 12 p. 291 292 c Excommunication and the power of the Kâ—yes abused by the Pope for establishing maintenance of his supremacie p. 299 300 301 Divers vvritings forged under the names of Clemens Anacletus Evaristus and other ancients for the upholding of the Popes new Supremacie pag. 12 The Donation of Constantine also forged for that purpose ibid. Miracles signes or wonders also done for that end p. 341 342 c Poperie is a corruption of the most ancient and Christian Religion and is to the Church as an infection or disease is to the body of a man or as a plague or pestilence is to a Citie pag. 38 Pope and Poperie exclaymed against long before Luther or Calvin vvere borne pag. 42 43 44 45 46 c The Popes excommunications and curses to be contemned pag. 44 45 299 Popes of Rome have erred and may erre even in matter of faith and iudicially pag 51 52 53 54. See the Preface also No such place as Popish Purgatorie pag. 125 126 c. to the end of that chapter That there is a Predestination is confessed both by Protestants and Papists the doctrine vvhereof being rightly understood is verie sweet and comfortable and is so farre from introducing any inconvenience licentiousnesse or impiety as that it inferreth the cleane contrary pag. 153 154 155 156 157 158 Predestination dependeth not upon the vvill of men but upon the vvill of God pag. 178.179 180 c Vocation iustification sanctification and all saving graces be consequents and effects of Election or Predestination to life everlasting pag. 154 c pag. 198 c Predestination dependeth upon Gods foreknowledge and vvhat that foreknowledge is pag. 194 195 196 c Faith foreseene and good vvorkes foreseene be not the cause of Predestination but the effect and a consequent thereunto ibid. The doctrine of Predestination teacheth no dissolutenâ—sse or carelesnesse but the cleane contrary pag 154 155 c. p. 199 200 c Predestination teacheth no man utterly to despaire though he be exceedingly vvicked and impious for the present inasmuch as there is a possibilitie to be converted so long as life lasteth as likewise it teacheth no man rashly or unadvisedly to presume p. 157 158 198 200 c The Popish Masse and Popish Priesthood thereto belonging both abominable pag. 217 218 219 c VVhat maner of Primacie it vvas that Peter had amongst the Apostles pag. 295 296 c Popish Priests be not the Ministers of Christ but of Antichrist and therefore to resort to them as if they had commission or authoritie from Christ to give absolution or forgivenesse of sins is vvicked and in vaine pag. 302. c. Q ALl Questions and controversies concerning faith and religion to be decided and determined by the sacred and canonicall Scriptures pag. 49 50 c. See also the Preface throughout R THat there is a Reprobation aswell as an Election and vvhat it is pag. 165 c Reprobation and Election both at one time and the cause vvhy this man in particular vvus chosen and that man refused is Gods own meere will and pleasure pag. 196 197 198 None can certainly determine of himselfe before-hand that hee is a reprobate though he be for the present exceedingly vvicked and ungodly because God may possibly call and convert him before hee dye p. 157.158 p 199 200 Rome apparantly proved to be the vvhore of Babylon p. 246 o. Bellarmine himselfe other Papists confesse Rome to be the whore of Babylon pag. 247 The evasion they make that onely heathen Rome is there intended is shewed to be very vaine and false pag. 247 248 249 c Some special spiritual whoredomes that is Idolatries of the Romish Church pâ—g 258 259 260 c VVho is the Rock and foundation vvhereupon the Church is builded pag. 292 293. c. S THe Spirit that speaketh in the sacred Scriptures is not a private or humane spirit but a divine spirit even the Spirit of God And by this Spirit speaking in those Scriptures is every spiriâ— speaking in men to be tryed pag. 53 54 Exposition of one place of Scripture must be such as agreeth vvith the rest of the Scriptures pag. 58 59 A rule to kâ—ow vvhen a man speaketh by a private Spirit of his owne and vvhen not pag. 53.54 The true Church to be tried and knowne by the sacred and canonical Scriptures pag. 59 60 61 62 Some bookes held by the Papists to be canonicall Scriptures which the ancient Church held not to be so pag. 65 66 The publicke prayers and Service in the Church should be in such a tongue as the people might understand pag 67 The originals of the Scripture incorrupt and to be preferred before that vvhich is called S Hieromes Translation and all other Translations vvhatsoever pag. 67 68 69.70 The English Translation of the Scripture is rightly iustified against the uniust exceptions of Papists pag. 71 Not any humane learning or private spirit of any man but God only and his Spirit is the opener and unfolder of the true sense of the divine Scriptures pag. 73 74 Lay people may and ought to reade the Scriptures pag. 73 74 75 76 77. See also the Preface That there be
in Christ and not of their owne inherent righteousnesse or through their owne merits or workes in anie sort An example whereof we have in S. Bernard himselfe who though hee lived in the times of Poperie and was himselfe an Abbot yet in the extremitie of his sickenesse and the end of his dayes this was his refuge I confesse saith hee I am not vvorthy neyther can I obteyne the kingdome of heaven by mine owne merits But my Lord obtayning it by a double right by inheritance from the father and by the merit of his Passion he being content vvith the one giveth me the other and clayming it by the gift vvhich he hath made me thereof I shall not be confounded Againe he saith My merit is the Lords mercie I am not poore in merits because he is rich in mercies I have greatly sinned but I vvill remember the vvounds of my Lord c. Contarenus a Cardinal did also in that time hold justification by faith in Christ and so did sundry others in those dayes Now so long as a man holdeth the foundation though he erre in other points that be not fundamentall he may be saved as S. Paul sheweth and S. Augustine Gregory Nyssen doe also declare But thirdly if it were so that some of our forefathers and ancestors were in their life time as likely enough it is that too manie of them were horribly polluted defiled with the corruptions of those times yet who can tell how they dyed For sundrie live wickedly who neverthelesse may dye verie godly and penitently as did that good Theefe at Christ his Crucifixion It is therefore no good argument to say They lived in the profession of Poperie Ergo they died so for diverse we see die otherwise then they lived and God was as well able to give them a right faith and repentance and to convert them unto himselfe before their death or at the instant of their death as anie others Yea I thinke that few or none that be well advised or considerate persons whatsoever they professe at other times will dare to dye Papists that is in a beleefe and confidence to be saved by their owne workes and merits or by a righteousnesse inherent in their owne persons but that they will then at that time of their death relye wholly and altogether upon Gods mercie and Christ his merits renouncing utterly their owne as S. Bernard did For even Bellarmine himselfe also writing in these late times notwithstanding whatsoever he had said before in defence of merits yet concludeth against them and teacheth that Tutissimum est fiduciam totam in sola Dei misericordia benignitate reponere It is the safest vvay to put our vvhole confidence onely in the mercy of God and his bounty But fourthly manie and sundrie living in those times and being much grieved and groning under the Popes tyrannie made hold to utter their complaints and to cry out as loud as they could or at least as they durst against both Pope Poperie Amongst whom was the forenamed S. Bernard who calleth the Popes doctrines or pastures Daemonum potius quam ovium pascua Pastures rather for Divels then for sheepe where hee further inveigheth against the Pope and his Clergie saying Omiserandam sponsam talibus creditam paranymphis O miserable spouse vvhich art committed to such Leaders or such Overseers And againe he saith O good Iesus all Christendome seemeth to have conspired against thee they are chiefe in persecuting of thee vvhich seeme to hold the Primacy and to beare principality in the Church Iniquitie is come from thy Vicars even from those that seeme to governe thy people They have possessed the Fort of Sion seised upon the munitions and they burne vvith all their power the vvhole City Miserable is their conversation and miserable is the subversion of thy people c. They doe wickedly against Christ and there be many Antichrists in our times A stinking infection this day creepeth over all the body of the Church and the Deeper it is so much the more desperate and the more Inward that it is so much the more perillous for if it vvere an open Enemy he might be cast out and he vvould wither or if it were a violent Enemy a man might hide himselfe from him But vvhat is now to be done vvhither shall the Church drive him or vvhere shall she hide her selfe from him All friends and yet all enemies all kinsfolkes and yet all adversaries They are in pretence the Ministers of Christ and yet they serve Antichrist VVoe saith he to this generation because of the leaven of the Pharisees vvhich is Hypocrisie If yet it be to be Termed Hypocrisie vvhich is not able to hide is selfe it is so abundant nor yet seeketh to conceale it selfe it is so impudent And in another place he saith further That the Beast spoken of in the Revelation cap. 13. to vvhich a mouth is given to speake blasphemies and to make vvarre with the Saints of God is now gotten into Saint Peters chayre as a Lyon prepared to his prey 4 You see then that manie hundreth yeares before the daies of King Henry the eight and before Luther or Calvin were borne the Pope of Rome and his Clergie were complained of and exclaimed against But this shall yet further appeare for your better satisfaction For under the raigne of Hugh Capet in France about the yeare of our Lord 1000 there was held a Nationall Councell at Rhemes wherein was President Arnold that famous Bishop of Orleance It was there handled and proved by the Canons of former Councels That the Bishop of Rome had nothing to doe in France That a Councel vvas more to be respected then his Sea That the time was vvhen Rome brought forth good or tolerable Bishops but now alas saith this Arnold in place of these shee bringeth forth nought else but Monsters And there reckoning up diverse wicked Bishops of Rome and among the rest one Boniface a Monster exceeding in wickednesse and having his hands imbrued in his predecessors bloud he addeth And must so many the good servants of God over all the world needs be subiect to such Monsters and then concludeth Reverend Fathers vvhom doe you thinke this man to be which sitteth upon the high Throne glittering in gold and scarlet For vvhom doe you take him Verily if he be vvithout the love of God and be puffed up and extolled for his knowledge onely he is Antichrist sitting in the Temple of God shewing himselfe as if he vvere God But if he be neyther founded in love nor set up for knowledge he is an Image and as an Idoll in Gods Temple and to goe to him to aske counsell or for answers is to aske counsell of a stone And therefore he cryeth out O Lugenda Roma O Rome to be lamented Againe about the yeare of our Lord 1100 the whole Church of Liege uttered the like voice For where Pope
without further search and examination For all their Councells bee they never so generall consist of men and of such men as may possibly fall into error and be themselves deceived either through ignorance and want of sufficient knowledge or through corruption partialitie or through some one meanes or other Their Councels I am sure are not better then those that were in Gregory Nazianzens time nor altogether so good and yet he saith out of his owne observation of the Councels of his time that The lust of strife and desire to beare rule did raigne there many times And Eusebius saith likewise of those times that The chiefe Rulers of the Church forgetting Gods commandements vvere enflamed one against another vvith contention emulation pride malice and hatred And therefore it appeareth to be a thing possible enough even for general Councels aswell as for Provincial sometime to erre and goe astray For example They remember the general Councels wherein the Arrian heresie was established whereof that of Arimine was one as also the second Ephesine Councell which decreed for the Nestorians Did not these generall Councels erre that even in matters of Faith I am sure they will grant that they did for so the Rhemists and other Papists themselves confesse Why then may not their generall Councels likewise erre which make decrees in maintenance of their Poperie as those other did which decreed in maintenance of their Arrianisme and Nestorianisme The Rhemists answer That those Councels wanted the Popes assent assistance or confirmation and therefore they erred howbeit that is not the reason why they erred but the true reason and cause of their error was because they decreed not according to the holy and Canonical Scriptures but contrarie thereunto For even Councels also which had the Bishop of Romes assent were not therefore priviledged from error as appeareth by the second Councell of Nice which decreed that Angels and mens soules also be corporeall for this the Papists themselves cannot denie to be an error Yea how is it possible that by the Popes assent or confirmation anie Councell should or can be ever the more priviledged from error when even the Popes themselves have no such priviledge in that behalfe For it is well knowne that Pope Liberius erred and that not onely personally but iudicially also and definâ—tively and in a matter of Faith when hee subscribed to the Arrian heresie as testifieth Athanasius Apolog. 2. ad solitariè vitam agentes S. Hierome in Catalogo Damasus in Pontificali Marianus Scotus Petrus Damianus epist. 5. cap. 16. c. Honorius also Pope of Rome was a Monotbelite and did not onely fall into that heresie but in a Decretal Epistle did also publish and confirme the same as is proved by the Councel of Constantinople the sixt where he was condemned Constant. 6. act 13. Pope Innocentius likewise erred in a matter of Faith when he held that Infants could not bee saved unlesse they received the Communion for this the Papists themselves confesse to be an error and yet Pope Innocentius held it as S. Augustine witnesseth cyting the Decretal Epistle of the same Pope to the Bishops of Numidia for proofe thereof cont duas epistol Pel. ad Bonifac. lib. 2. cap. 4 cont Iul. lib. 1. cap. 2. If Popes then may erre and become Heretickes as both here and before and afterwards also is verie evident it is thereby manifest that their assenting subscribing or confirming of Councels can give the same Councels no more priviledge from error then formerly they had But they then alledge that the Holy Ghost is promised to Councels and therefore they cannot erre I demand of them whether the Holy Ghost is not promised to Provincial Councels as well as to General They cannot denie but he is And yet the Rhemists and other Popish Teachers grant that a Provincial Councel may erre in matter of Faith notwithstanding this promise of the Holy Ghost whence is rightly inferred that a General Councell may by the same reason likewise erre in matter of Faith as well as a Provincial notwithstanding that promise For you must ever remember that it is not in respect of a greater Number or Multitude but in respect of the promise of the Holy Ghost that this priviledge from Error is pretended and supposed But yet further observe that the holy Ghost the spirit of truth is promised and given to everie particular godly Pastor Doctor and Minister of Christ as well as to Councels yea everie true Christian and faithfull member of Christ hath also the holy Ghost to guide and direct him as the Scriptures doe plainly testifie By vertue then of this reason drawn from the promise or giving of the holy Ghost I may as well conclude that no godly particular Pastor or Doctor or other Minister of Christ can possibly erre in a matter of Faith yea inasmuch as the holy Ghost the spirit of sanctification is also promised and given to everie godly man I may aswell conclude that no godly man therefore can possibly erre at any time as touching life conversation for the holy Ghost is as well able to guide a man continually in a good and not erring life as in a right not erring faith But touching this matter S. August saith That eveÌ„ general Councels which are gathered out of all the Christian world be oftentimes corrected the former by the latter when by any triall of things that is opened which before was shut that is known which before lay hidden And therefore also was it appointed that even in a general Councel it selfe they should pray unto God that hee would Ignorantiae ipsorum parcere errori indulgere spare their ignorance and pardon their error Doth not this cleerly declare that even a General Councell may also possibly erre as well as a Provinciall Yea your selves doe grant that a Generall Councell may erre in matters of fact notwithstanding this promise why then wil you not grant that it may by the same reason possibly erre also in a matter of faith For is not the holy Ghost promised to a General Councel as powerfull to preserve and keepe from error in the one case as in the other No question but hee is Concerning this point therefore ye must not forget that which I said before namely that although most true it is that the Holy Ghost cannot possibly erre nor anie men or Councels so long as he guideth them that they follow his directions yet because Men and Councels be not alwaies guided and directed by him but be suffered sometime to follow their owne conceiâ—s fancies and affections for the Holy Ghost may at his owne good pleasure and doth sometimes leave men to themselves not extending nor shewing forth his strength vertue force and efficacie at all times In such cases and at such times it is a most easie matter for men and Councels to erre sinne and goe astray Wherefor S. Chrysostome
he speaketh of the whole Booke of the Law saying that It is written Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things that be vvritten in the booke of the Law to doe them doth not this extend to the Morall Law or can these words be restrained only to the Ceremoniall Yea when he further saith thus I had not knowne sinne but by the Law for I had not known lust or concupiscence to be sinne except the Law had said Non concupisces Thou shalt not covet or Thou shalt no lust doth not everie one hereby most plainly perceive of what Law it is that he chiefly speaketh meaneth namely that it is principally of the Morall Law that is of the Decalogue or Law of the Ten Commandements For to what other end else is it that he there expresly and by name rehearseth and bringeth in one of those ten Commandements But yet further he sheweth that there be but two waies of righteousnesse namely the righteousnes that is of the Law and the righteousnes which is of faith and saith that Moses describeth the righteousnesse which is of the Law in this sort viz. That the man vvhich doth those things shall live by them But the righteousnesse vvhich is of faith speaketh after another manner and he sheweth it to consist not in anie doubtfull questioning but in a firme beleeving in Christ vvho is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to every one that beleeveth When therefore he here againe saith touching the vvorkes of the Law and the righteousnesse compassable that way That the man that doth those things shall live by them is it his meaning thinke you that hee that observeth the workes of the Ceremonial Law only without observing or doing anie of the workes of the Moral Law shall live thereby and enioy everlasting happinesse I presume none can be so absurd or unwise as to thinke it It is then a thing verie manifest that hee speaketh not onely of the workes of the Ceremonial Law but of the workes also of the Morall Law and of these chiefly excluding aswell the works of the one as of the other from being anie cause of our Iustification in Gods sight And this is so much the more evident because S. Paul yet further in that his dispute of Iustification excludeth not only the Iewes but the Gentiles also from all hope of Iustification by the Law teaching that they both are to expect iustification in Gods sight Not by the vvorkes of the law but by faith in Iesus Christ. Now yee know that the Gentiles be not bound to the observation of the ceremonial law as the Iewes were but the Gentiles aswell as the Iewes bee bound to the observation of the moral law of the ten Commandements When therefore S. Paul teacheth that aswell the Gentiles as the Iewes are to expect Iustification not by the workes of the law but by faith in Christ it is apparant that he must needes meane to exclude herein aswell the workes of the Moral law whereto the Gentiles are bound as the workes of the Ceremoniall law whereto the Iewes onelie were bound and not the Gentiles for otherwise you will make him a verie vaine and idle disputer in this point as in respect of the Gentiles 5 Howbeit being thus repulsed from this hold they then retire and returne to their old wonted and ordinarie nold wherein they seeme to repose their greatest strength and that is the same which is before mentioned namely that S. Paul when he excludeth workes from being anie cause of Iustification in Gods sight meaneth it of vvorkes done before faith received and whilst a man is an unbeleever and not of workes done after faith received Which works done by a beleeving person doe as they suppose Iustifie before God and in his sight This hath beene before sufficiently answered yet because they so often and usuallie urge it I hope it will not be offensive that I also here once againe make answer unto it First therefore it might suffice to call to your remembrance that which hath been spoken concerning those two faithfull godlie men Abraham and David who albeit they had after faith grace received from God lived well and done sundrie good workes for which they might deserve praise and glorie amongst men yet for al that they deserved no praise nor glorie with God as S. Paul witnesseth nor were thereby iustified in his sight Yea as touching Abraham he saith that notwithstanding all that he did not his vvorkes but his Faith vvas imputed to him for righteousnesse before God And as touching David though he were a man likewise verie faithfull and godly and did manie good workes yet by his godlie life and good workes he never thought to be iustified before Gods tribunall but found all the godlines and goodnes that was in him to bee too defective and to come too short for that purpose and therefore also he crieth out thus unto God saying Enter not into iudgement vvith thy servant for in thy sight shall no man living be iustified Yea hee discribeth the blessednesse of everie man even of the holiest man that liveth to consist not in his owne sanctitie or righteousnesse but in this that His sinnes be forgiven or not imputed to him And so doth S. Paul inferre and teach out of this example of David That God imputeth righteousnesse vvithout vvorkes So that neither the workes which David did nor the workes which Abraham did nor consequently the workes that anie other godly or holie man doth after grace and faith received be sufficient to Iustifie in Gods presence For I knovv nothing by my selfe saith S. Paul yet am I not thereby iustified I might here further desire you to call to your remembrance that holie man Iob and that holy Prophet of God Daniel yea all that godlie companie and Church of God in Daniels time and Esaies time who all did as themselves testifie renounce all their owne inherent righteousnes as too insufficient and unmeet to stand before Gods most pure eies to claime Iustification thereby in his sight Yea if God should looke narrowlie to see what is said done amisse and to recompence it in the rigor and severitie of his Iustice according to mens merits and deserts VVho as the Psalmist speaketh should bee able to stand or to abide it Yea I might here moreover desire you to remember whatsoever is conteined in the former Chapter touching this matter For not the workes even of a iust man doe iustifie in Gods sight as S. Paul prooveth by an expresse testimonie out of the Prophet Abacuk where he saith even of the iust man that He liveth by his faith and not by his Workes And this he urgeth and enforceth againe in his Epistle to the Galathians saying thus But that no man is iustified by the lavv in the sight of God it is evident for saith he The iust shall live by
faith And thus himselfe being otherwise dead did live or had life in him namely by faith in the Sonne of God and not by the workes of the law Yea he further excludeth even the workes of righteousnes in expresse termes saying thus Not by the vvorkes of righteousnesse vvhich vve have done but according to his mercie he hath saved us Observe that he here directlie affirmeth of himselfe of all the rest that shall be saved that they are saved not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by vvorkes done by them in righteousnes but of Gods meere mercie and grace through Christ Iesus And againe observe that speaking not to unbeleevers but to beleevers Saints and sanctified people living in Ephesus he saith thus By grace are ye saved through faith and that not of your selves it is the gift of God not of vvorkes lest anie man should glorie for vvee are his vvorkemanship created in Christ Iesus unto good vvorkes vvhich God hath before ordained that vvee should vvalke in them Heere also you see infalliblie that workes though done by such as be sanctified and regenerate persons be neverthelesse excluded from being anie cause of their salvation yea by the verie words themselves of the text you perceive that he speaketh expresly and by name of good vvorkes vvhich God hath before ordained that vvee should vvalke in them denying them neverthelesse to be anie cause of salvation But here why doe they speake of anie good workes done by Infidels or before faith received For to speake properlie and truely none doe or can doe good workes so allowed to be in Gods censure but beleeving persons onely inasmuch as the best workes of Infidels and before a man hath received faith be not allowed for good in Gods sight but bee as S. Augustine affirmeth of them Splendida peccata Glittering sinnes Howbeit here remember that although those which be Saints upon earth that is which bee regenerate and sanctified people be thus expresly affirmed to be saved by their faith and not by their good workes yet have they neverthelesse these good workes appointed for them to walke in so long as they live in this world for so this text to the Ephesians directlie sheweth to the end their faith should not be idle but working through love as S. Paul speaketh in another place and that so it might appeare to bee not a vaine and a dead faith but a sound and a lively faith and such as will save a man as S. Iames and the rest of the Scriptures have also before declared Yea this point even Christ Iesus also himselfe by his last Iudgement in the end of the world doth declare namely that the iustifying and saving faith is not voide of good workes but furnished with them and yet that Gods people doe not relye upon them For thus will hee say to his faithfull and elect ones Come ye blessed of my father inherite yee the kingdome prepared for you from the foundation of the vvorld for I vvas hungrie and yee gave me meate I was thirstie and yee gave me drinke I was a stranger and yee tooke mee in naked and ye clothed mee I vvas sicke and yee visited mee I vvas in prison and yee came unto me But now observe that although these elect and righteous persons had these good workes yet doe not they so much as take notice of them much lesse stand upon the merite of them and therefore doe they answer and say Lord when savv vvee thee hungrie and fed thee or thirstie and gave thee drinke vvhen saw vvee thee a stranger and tooke thee in or naked and clothed thee sicke or in prison and came unto thee Reade further the rest of the Chapter to the end of it And by all of it considered together ye may verie easilie perceive first that they bee not the elect and righteous people but the reprobates that stand upon their workes obiect their workes to plead for them And secondlie that Christ their Lord taketh notice of the good works of the elect although themselves take no notice of them nor doe so much as once mention or alledge them Where Christ by alledging their good works would have the world also to take notice and to be advertised that it was not a vaine idle or dead faith but a iustifying and saving faith which these men had For their good workes be there mentioned as testimonies fruites and declarations of their faith and as being Via regni non causa regnandi The vvay vvherein they walked toward this kingdome but not as being the cause of their enioying of that kingdome as S. Bernard also himselfe hath before taught affirmed Yea in verie deede the primarie and original cause of their enioying of that most happie kingdome is there delivered in the former words where Christ calleth them the Blessed of his father and telleth them moreover directlie that they are to possesse this kingdom not by anie purchase or desert of their owne but by way of Inheritance for the word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Inherite yee or possesse yee it by waie of Inheritance And further he there telleth them that this kingdom was prepared for them long before they were borne or had done anie good workes at all namelie even from the foundation of the world So that this glorious and heavenlie kingdome is given them of Gods meere bountie and grace and is unto them a Revvard according to their vvorkes as the Scripture speaketh but not for their workes as though their workes deserved it or were the meritorious cause of their salvation Yea it is a reward of grace and favour and not of debt or due desert as S. Paul hath also before testified and a revvard of Inheritance as the same S. Paul againe expresly affirmeth it In vaine therefore also is that your distinction of the first Iustification which you make to be by faith without vvorkes and of the second Iustification which you say is by workes and by living an holie and godlie life for the Scriptures speake but of one Iustification in Gods sight availeable to salvation As for that which you call the second Iustification consisting in doing good workes and in holinesse of life and conversation it is as I said before more properlie and rightly to be tearmed as the Scripture calleth it Sanctification it being an effect declaration fruite and consequent of that Iustification we have before by faith as S. Iames and S. Paul and the rest of the Scriptures doe manifestly teach CHAP. V. That Christ is our onely and all-sufficient Redeemer and hath fully satisfied Gods Iustice for our sinnes and the punishment thereto belonging against mens merits and satisfactions in that behalfe and against Popish Purgatorie And that there is no licentiousnesse in this doctrine but the cleane contrary BVt they further accuse our Religion to be licentious because relying wholly upon Christ our
love Non quia futuros tales nos esse prâ—scivit sed ut essemus tales per ipsam Electionem gratiae Not because he foreknevv that vve should be such but that vvee might be such by the verie election of grace saith S. Augustine By all which you cleerely may perceive that not foreseene or foreknowne faith in Christ not anie foreseene good vvorkes the fruites of the same faith nor anie sanctitie or obedience that men have or performe unto God bee the cause of their predestination to eternall life but a consequent and an effect of it And this S. Paul also yet further and fully sheweth where he maketh mens effectual Calling and Iustification and consequently Sanctification and Glorification also it selfe to depend all upon this that God hath predestinated them And even this predestination likewise he maketh to depend upon his fore-knovvledge that is upon his fore-purposing of them to this eternal glory in his owne secret approbation of them and Counsell had with himselfe before the world was made And againe S. Paul yet further declareth it saying that God hath saved us and called us vvith an holy calling not according to our vvorkes but according to hâ—s ovvne purpose and grace vvhich vvas given to us through Christ Iesus before the vvorld vvas Be not these words most plaine direct and expresse for this purpose But yet againe he saith There is a remnant through the election of grace and if it be of grace it it is no more of vvorkes oâ—hervvise grace vvere no more grace But if it be of vvorkes then is it no more grace othervvise vvorke vvere no more vvorke Yea againe speaking of the two Children of Rebecca Iacob and Esau he saith that the one was loved and the other hated and that before they vvere borne and vvhen they had done neither good nor evill That the purpose of God according to election might stand and not of workes c. What would you have more For by all these Texts and sundrie other which might bee cited if neede were it is abundantly manifest that not future faith or future good workes but the meere good pleasure and will of GOD and his owne most free purpose and Counsaile had with himselfe otherwise termed his fore-knovvledge was and is the first primarie and original cause of mens predestination to eternal life And consequently you may withall perceive that not future unbeleefe or future bad works but Gods owne meere pleasure vvill and purpose was and is likewise the original cause of the Reprobation or refusal of them that were refused or not elected For the Election of the one sort from the rest and the reprobation that is the preterition or refusall of the rest that were not elected being done both at one time must needs both have one and the selfe same primarie and originall cause namely the free and uncontrollable vvill purpose and pleasure of the Almightie 9 For indeed beside the will of God which is ever Iust and the highest and supreame cause of all things what cause or reason can be shewed on mens behalfe why God should Elect and choose that particular man to salvation and refuse this why he should choose Iacob and refuse Esau or why hee should choose Paul and refuse Iudas Iscariot If you answer and say that originall sinne was and is the cause of that difference Doe you not consider that Iacob had original sinne aswell as Esau and that Paul had it aswell as Iudas and that all the Elect have it aswell as the Reprobate So that if Original sinne wherewith all are infected alike had beene the cause of Reprobation then should all have beene reprobated one aswell as another And this even Bellarmme himselfe saw affirming that the cause why God hated Esau before he was borne was not original sinne for if that had beene the cause he should for that cause saith he aswell have hated Iacob as Esau. Yea Gods electing of some and consequently his reprobating or refusing of the rest whom he did not elect was in respect of the purpose and decree of it before the foundations of the world were laid howsoever in respect of the manifestation of it it was not til after the Creation and fall of Adam How then could anie sinne either Orâ—gâ—nal or Actual be the cause when at the time of the purposing of this reprobation as also of Election neither men nor Angels nor world was made nor anie sinne committed If you answer that although sinne were not then committed yet God foresaw it should afterward bee committed and that sinne thus foreseene was the cause of the decree or purpose of reprobation you know that God did foresee sinne aswell in the Elect as in the Reprobate and therefore if sinne foreseene should be che cause of the purpose or decree of reprobation then again should all have beene purposed or decreed to bee reprobated in as much as sinne was foreseene to be in all the people of the world If you reply and say that although sinne was foreseene in all yet it was with a difference because some namely the Elect were foreseene to bee beleeving and repentant sinners new Creatures mortified regenerated iustified and sanctified persons and so were not reprobates I answer that this faith repentance effectuall calling mortification regeneration iustification sanctification and all saving graces whatsoever were so foreseene in the Elect not as antecedent causes but as consequents and effects of that their predestination and election and as dependants thereupon for so is it before proved and apparant and therefore the Reprobats on the otherside must be deemed to have their occecation and obduration in their sinnes and their vnregeneration unmortification unsanctification uneffectual calling and the absence defect or want of saving graces not as Antecedents but as Consequents likewise and Events following that Decree of their not Election otherwise called their Reprobation And this will be yet the more evident if we enquire search whence this difference of sinners ariseth namely that some bee mollified repentant regenerate iustified and sanctified persons and that some others be not so Is it not because God doth bestowe those his saving graces upon the one sort and not upon the other And why doth hee bestow them upon the one sort and not upon the other Is it not because the one sort be Elect and the other Reprobate And why be the one sort Elect and the other Reprobate can anie other reason be yeelded for it but Gods owne meere will and pleasure You see then that in the conclusion you must bee forced in this case to have recourse to the meere pleasure and will of God and to make that as indeed it is the true highest and supreame cause why God chooseth this man and refuseth that man and accordingly giveth his sanctifying and saving graces to the one and not to the other It is true neverthelesse that Reprobation hath an eye
relation or respect unto sinne for no man is damned or decreed or intended to bee damned but in respect of sinne but thereupon it no more followeth that sinne was the cause of the reprobation of the one then of the election of the other For Election aswell as Reprobation was made with an eye relation or respect unto sinne it being made in mercie and mercie evermore presupposeth miserie and misery evermore presupposeth sinne and transgression beginning and arising by and in the fall of Adam whose fall God then beheld when he made this his decree Sinne then gave the occasion but was not the cause of the decree either of election or reprobation Wherefore mankinde considered as he was fallen was indeede Subiectum circa quod the subiect matter about which Gods predestination or preordination of men either to salvation or damnation wrought and was imployed but it neither was nor could be Causa propter quam the cause why amongst men so fallen this particular man was chosen and that particular man was refused but it was Gods meere will and pleasure onely that made that difference For which therefore the Elect are everlastingly to praise magnifie and thanke God and the Reprobate who through their owne default have procured their owne deserved perdition and damnation have no cause to complaine of anie but of themselves in respect of that their fall in Adam and other their transgressions since that time added thereunto 10 But there yet remaine some to be answered who upon this doctrine of Predestination reason thus That if they be ordained to salvation they shall be saved whatsoever they doe and if they bee ordained to damnation they shall bee damned whatsoever they doe and therefore they will bee carelesse of all Relâ—gion and without regard of anie thing that is good or godly But whilst these men talke thus licentiously and dissolutely and seeme by such speeches to have as yet little or no feare of God or care of his religion yet doe they not know for all that whether they belong to the number of Gods elect or to the number of the reprobate and so long it will bee good for them in the meane time to use the meanes which God hath in that case provided to bring men unto salvation and to eschewe those waies that lead to damnation For howsoever as yet anie have not the markes and tokens of Gods children appearing in them that is faith in Iesus Christ repentance godlinesse regeneration and sanctification yet for all that possibly they may have them hereafter before they die if they neglect not the meanes which God hath appointed in that behalfe If a man lye sicke and good wholsome physick and meates and drinkes should be proffered unto him for preserving of his life and he should refuse all and answer thus if God have ordeyned mee to live I shal live though I take neither physick nor meate nor drinke and if hee hath ordeyned me to die I shall die what physicke meate or drinke soever I take and therefore I will be carelesse of all and take nothing Would not everie man that hath his right wits hold this for a verie foolish speech and an absurd maner of inference And is not then the other of speech and inference touching Predestination as ridiculous foolish and absurd Questionlesse it is as everie man of understanding easily perceiveth These kinde of senselesse wicked and licentious inferences therefore the Protestants in their doctrine of Predestination abhorre and detest as they are indeede iustly worthie For as God hath ordeined men to salvation so hee hath ordeined waies and meanes that bring thereunto which must not be neglected Some man againe is so blasphemous and bold as that he dare barke and raile against God and his doings in this matter as though he were uniust or partiall for that he is reprobated and not ordained to salvation aswell as another sith at the time of that his reprobation or refusall he no more deserved to be refused then others whom neverthelesse it pleased him to elect and ordeine to salvation To whom I answer first that he which thus speaketh knoweth not as I said bsfore nor can tell for certaine as yet whether he be of the reprobate number yea or no for he may be for all that of the number of Gods elect for ought that as yet he knoweth to the contrarie for so long as a man liveth in this world God hath his times to call men unto himselfe and to repentance and to a true lively faith in Iesus Christ the Saviour So that none during this life ought to preiudice himselfe with despairefull conceipts or to give a finall sentence of condemnation before hand against himselfe for it is a thing which lieth not in his power so to doe nor in his knowledge so to determine of himselfe before the time But secondly I answer that there is no partialitie or iniustice in this case Indeed there might be partialitie and iniustice if both beleeving well and rightly and living good and godly lives alike the one should neverthelesse be saved and the other damned but in this case where both after the fall of Adam be sinners alike and no more merit in the one then in the other there it was a most free thing in God to give mercie and pardon to the one and not to the other And herein is no more partialitie or iniustice then when two have committed felonie or treason alike the King pardoneth the one rnd not the other or when a man hath two debtors that be alike bound unto him in severall bonds he forgiveth his debt to the one and challengeth it of the other Is there anie iniustice in this If you goe higher and say that God decreed to permit the fall of Adam you have beene before answered that his decree or purpose to permit him to fall did not compell or enforce him to fall but left him still to his owne free will he received in the creation whereby he was enabled to stand if he had would It therefore still appeareth that the fault is to be ascribed and to rest wholly and altogether upon themselves in respect of their fall in Adam and other their sinnes since that time added thereunto Can anie then accuse God of anie iniustice For shall not the Iudge of all the vvorld doe right Or can hee doe wrong or iniustice to anie man or in anie thing he doth Or do not they iustly deserve their damnation which are damned for their sinnes due deserts Or was it not a most free thing in God to doe and determine of all his creatures which way soever it pleased him especially of men after their fall For all being fallen in the transgression of Adam all might iustly have beene condemned and it was of his meere mercie that hee was pleased to save anie But againe shall men challenge this authoritie over all the things themselves doe make whatsoever is the
therefore can be no Sacrament For who is hee at this day that hath this miraculous gift of healing the sicke by annointing them with oyle I Popish Priests had it it would appeare in their extreame unctions and annointings but no such thing appeareth For what sicke man doe they recover or restore to health by that meanes Yea they use not this their unction and annoyling but when the sicke partie lyeth in extreamitie of sicknesse and is no way likely to recover and indeed most usually dieth notwithstanding these their annointings and whatsoever else they doe Thirdly the Sacraments whereof wee speake be such as bee common and appliable to all the members of Christ aswell when they bee well and in health as at other times But this their extreame Vnction belongeth and is applied onely to those that bee sicke and at such times as they be in their extreamest sicknesse and therefore it can bee no Sacrament Fourthly they use this forme of words in it By this annointing and his most holy mercie God doth forgive thee whatsoeuer thou hast offended by seeing hearing smelling tasting and touching Whereby appeareth that they make this their extreame Vnction to extend but onely to such sinnes as the man hath committed by seeing hearing smelling tasting touching that is to say by those his exterior five senses But those that bee true Sacraments indeed as is evident by Baptisme and the Lords Supper bee not so particularly limited or restrained but be Sacraments to a faithfull and godly man of the full remission and forgivenesse of all sinnes committed not onely by those his five outward senses but anie other waie else whatsoever either by thought word or deede And therefore this their extreame Vnction can bee no Sacrament rightly and properly so called 7 Now remaineth to be shewed that even those that be the verie true Sacraments indeede doe not give grace ex opere operato For they verie erroneously attribute remission of sinnes to the Sacraments administred as namely to Baptisme and the Lords Supper ex opere operato even by the verie worke done and performed whereas it is not in verie deede the external water in Baptisme administred that hath this power and vertue in it to take awaie sinnes or to cleanse and purge them neither is it the consecrated bread and wine in the Lords Supper that hath this power and vertue in it For so to suppose and imagine were to â—ttribute that to the outward signes or Sacraments which rightly and properlie belongeth to Christ Iesus inasmuch as hee onelie is the Lambe of God that taketh away the sinnes of the world and it is his blood onely that cleanseth us from all sinne as S. Iohn expresly witnesseth and all the rest of the Scripturs accord For which cause it is againe said in the Revel of S. Iohn that it is Christ that hath washed us from our sinnes in his blood Seeing then it is Christ and his blood onely that washeth purgeth and cleanseth in verie deede and materially from all sinnes the water in Baptisme administred must not have this power and vertue attributed unto it nor also the consecrated bread and wine in the Lords Supper received You will then demand why or in what sense it is that in the scripture the water in Baptisme is said to cleanse to sanctifie to regenerate I answere that it is said so to doe not that it hath these vertues inclosed in it or did these things efficiently or materially but for that it doth them sacramentally and significatively that is to say in plainer termes because the water in Baptisme is a Sacrament signe and seale unto us of that regeneration sanctification and cleansing which wee have through Christ For it is Gods spirit that efficiently worketh faith repentance regeneration sanctification or whatsoever other supernatural grace in a man and not the element of water And therefore also did S. Iohn Baptist say to those whom he baptized thus I Baptise you with vvater unto repentance but hee that commeth after mee is mightier then I whose shooes I am not worthie to beare he shall baptise you with the holy Ghost Where you plainely see that S. Iohn Baptist acknowledgeth that he in his Baptisme administred by him gave but water and that it was Christ that gave the holy Ghost and consequently that in the elemental water the holy Ghost was not conteined nor included but was to come another way Saint Peter hath a like speech saying That Baptisme doth save us not that it is the material cause of our salvation for Christ Iesus only is our Saviour in that sort but for that it is a sacrament signe and seale of that salvation which we have by Iesus Christ. And thus you see how all the scriptures stand well together and be rightly reconciled whereas otherwise according to their sense there would be a confusion and repugnancie Yea if it were true that the verie external act of Baptisme performed did ipso facto regenerate clense sanctifie and save then should all without exception that be baptised be also regenerated clensed sanctified and saved soules But this you neither do nor will affirme and therefore no reason have you to affirme the other whereupon this must necessarily follow In like sort if consecrated bread and wine externally distributed and received in the Lords Supper did ipso facto give grace and remission of sinnes then might Iudas that Traytor or anie other the most wicked and ungodly reprobate that externally receiveth that bread and wine receive also grace and remission of sinnes thereby which it were verie grosse and absurd for anie to affirme Yea S. Paul himselfe sheweth that there be some unworthy receivers that be so farre from receiving grace and remission of sinnes by it that contrariwise They eate and drinke Iudgement or condemnation to themselves as hee speaketh and directly witnesseth CHAP. X. Concerning the Popish Masse and the Popish Priesthood thereto belonging NOw give mee leave to tell you how detestable a thing your Popish Masse is which ye neverthelesse so much and so highly reverence being misled by the doctrine of your Teachers For yee say that your Priests doe therein offer up Christ Iesus everie day or often to his Father and that in a bodily manner and affirme it moreover to be a sacrifice propitiatorie for the sins of men What can anie that professe Christ or Christianitie be so absurd as to beleeve that Christ is often or daily offered up in a bodily manner to his Father for the sinnes of men Doe not the Scriptures themselves proclaime that Christ Iesus was in that his bodily sacrifice to be offered but Once and not often and doe they not withall expressely testifie that with that one Oblation or offering He hath consecrated for ever them that are sanctified What needeth then or how can there be anie more bodily offerings of him then that one whereby hee offered himselfe once upon the
Sacrament in remembrance of that his death and passion For whereas in Matth. 26.26 it is said that when Christ had taken bread hee blessed S. Marke S. Luke and S. Paul all three of them as it were expounding what that meaneth in steede of those words hee blessed doe say that Hee gave thankes Mar. 14 22. Luk. 22.19 1. Cor. 11.24 By the word blessing then mentioned in S. Mâ—thew is meant Thankesgiving as by conferring him with the other three doth plainely appeare Yea this doth also appeare even by S. Mathew himselfe For whereas S. Mathew saith That Iesus tooke the Bread and when hee had blessed hee brake it and gave it c. hee saith likewise that hee tooke the Cup and when hee had given thankes hee gave it c. Mat. 26.26.27 thereby shewing that to blesse in S. Mathew and to give thankes is all one And this also serveth well to declare and expound those other words of S. Paul concerning the Cup in 1. Cor 10.16 where he saith thus The Cup of blessing which wee blesse is it not the Communion of the blood of Christ He calleth it the Cup of blessing which we blesse saith Chrysostome because when wee have it in our hands with admiration and a certaine horrour of that unspeakeable gift wee praise and blesse Him for that hee hath shed his blood that wee should not remaine in errour and hath not onely shed it but made us all partakers of it And so doth also Photius and OEcumenius expound those words The Cup of blessing which vvee blesse that is say they vvhich having in our hands vvee blesse Him vvho hath gratiously given us his blood that is vvee give him thankes Iustin Martyr toward the end of his 2. Apologie saith thus VVee receive vvith the action of thankesgiving the consecrated meaâ—e blessed by prayer S. Augustine in his third Booke of the Trinitie Cap. 4. saith VVee call that the bodie and blood of Christ Iesus vvhâ—ch vvee receive for the health of our soules it being taken from the fruits of the earth and consecrated by mystical prayer And Gregorie the first Bishop of Rome in his 7. Booke of Epistles Epist. 63. saith that The Apostles did consecrate by prayer Yea Pope Innocentius the third also in his third Booke of the Mysteries of the Masse doth himselfe hold that Christ did not consecrate by these words Hoc est corpus meum This is my bodie but that hee had consecrated before those words were uttered Consecration then in a Sacrament is of no such nature operation or force as to make anie change or alteration in the substance of a thing but onely in the qualitie use or end And this you may verie clearely and demonstrativelie perceive by the vvater consecrated and applied in Baptisme for before it be consecrate to that use it is but common and ordinarie water But after it is consecrate it is then become another thing namely a sacred signe of the washing and cleansing wee have by Christ and yet neverthelesse it is still water as touching the substance of it as it was before although in the qualitie and use it bee altered So likewise is it of bread and wine in the other Sacrament of the Lords Supper before Consecration it is but ordinarie and common bread and wine but after Consecration they are become holie signes of the bodie and blood of Christ and yet are they still bread and wine as touching the substance of them as before though they bee thus altered in the use and qualitie And so saith Ambrose Sunt quae erant in aliud commutantur They are the same things still for matter and substance vvhich they vvere before and yet be changed into another thing in respect of the use and qualitie An example for better explications sake and to take away all doubt in this matter he giveth in a man before he be consecrate and sanctified and after he is sanctified Tu ipse eras c. Thou thy selfe vvast faith he before thou vvast sanctified but thou vvast an old Creature But after thou vvast sanctified or consecrated thou begannest to be a nevv Creature So that he is the same man still as touching matter and substance after his consecration or sanctification that hee was before albeit in qualitie hee bee thus altered and changed And this also witnesseth S. Chrysostome Panis sanctificatus dignus est dominici corporis appellatione etsi natura panis in illo remanserit The bread after it is sanctified or consecrated hath this dignity to bee called the Lords Bodie although saith he the nature of bread still remaine in it Theodoret likewise most plainelie telleth us that Signa mystica post sanctificationem non recedunt a natura sua manet enim in priori substantia figura forma The mystical signâ—s after sanctification or consecration doe not depart from their ovvne nature for they still remaine in their former substance figure and forme Yea even Gelatius himselfe a Bishop of Rome saith also that after consecration Non desinit esse substantia panis natura vini There ceaseth not to bee the substance of bread and the nature of vvine These so direct and expresse speeches and most evident testimonies of the ancient times concurring with the Scriptures bee they not sufficient to satisfie all that bee reasonable and equal christians that there is no transubstantiation in this Sacrament or real bodily presence of Christ to the bodily Mouth of the Receiver For that there is a real bodilie presence of Christ to bee apprehended by the mouth of the Soule that is by the faith of the Receiver is a thing granted and so affirmed by S. Augustine who expreslie saith that Faith is the mouth vvherby vvee eat and drinke Christ and the hand vvhich vve stretch to heaven to lay hold upon him sitting there And so saith S Ambrose also Fidei tactus est quâ— tangitur Christus It is by faith that vvee touch Christ. Yea this is so cleare as that the verie Church of Rome it selfe in ancient and former times beleeved heerein as wee doe as is manifest at large in the second distinction of Consecration and in the glosse likewise upon the Canon hoc est where it is said that the consecrated bread is called the Bodie of Christ Non propriè sed impropriè nec rei veritate sect significante mysterio Not properly but improperly and not in the truth of the thing but in a mysterie signifying it Thus then as touching this point it is more then evident that Rome is departed from that shee was in former times But hence arose moreover their adoration of the bread at their elevation wherein most grosse Idolatrie is committed inasmuch as it still remaineth Bread after consecration as you see And I wonder they tremble not at this their most horrible Idolatrie so often as they thinke upon it or use it For even the rudest and most barbarous Heathens were never
thereunto expressely said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is such as perish and are to goe with him to destruction Can anie thing then be more evident Now that the Pope of Rome is The man of sinne that is according to the Hebrew phrase a verie notorious sinner or a most sinfull man and consequently well deserveth to be called the sonne of perdition who can doubt of it inasmuch as he is in Christendome like Ieroboam in Israel who not onely was a great sinner in his owne person but caused also Israel to sinne or like Ahab with his Iezabel who did exceed Ieroboam in wickednesse or worse then these For must not hee needs be a verie notorious wicked man who being at first a Bishop equal with the rest of his fellow Bishops was not so content but with his wings of pride and ambition would mount above them all Yea who with that his unmeasurable pride hath exalted himselfe not onely above all those his fellowes but even above his superiors also namely above all Kings Princes and Emperors of the world nor yet so content proceeded further claiming authoritie also even over the Angels of heaven for so it appeareth by the Bull of Pope Clement the sixt before mentioned where hee saith Mandamus prorsus Angelis Paradisi c VVee straightly command the Angels of Paradise c. And in another place he forbiddeth Hell also from taking anie hold of those that should crosse themselves for the holy warres But hath hee here ceased No for he hath gone yet further clayming the power and authoritie of God himselfe and even the name of God also to be given him and which is yet a further degree beyond all degrees he hath exalted himselfe even above God himselfe amongst his followers as before appeareth But to shew this matter yet further by some other particulars And to begin with the word of God the sacred and canonical Scriptures doth not Hee and his Clergie extremely dishonour and vilipend them 1. In that they preferre their corrupt Latine translation before the originals of the Greeke and Hebrew 2. In that they make Apocryphal bookes to be of equall authoritie with the Canonicall 3. In that they equall their Traditions with the Canonicall Scriptures 4. In that they number their Decretall Epistles also amongst the canonical Scriptures 5. In that they accuse the holy Scriptures as not conteining sufficient matter of instruction for a mans salvation without their Traditions 6. In that they take upon them to expound those Scriptures according to their owne fancie sense and pleasure and as they list themselves 7. In that they preferre the authority of their Church before the authoritie of the scriptures and the Popes authoritie above both Concerning the Sacraments also how have they perverted those Two which be of Christ his institution and have added to the number of them making seven in all And this is one note of Antichrist as S. Hierome upon 2. Thess. 2. observeth that he should change attempt to increase the Sacraments of the Church The Sacraments they also strangely hold to give grace ex opere operato by vertue of the verie worke done and performed And touching Baptisme have they not horribly polluted and abused it And concerning the other Sacrament of the Lords Supper have they not also taken away the one halfe of it from the people and moreover turned it into such a fearefull and abominable Idolatrie viz. of adoring and worshipping a peece of bread for God as that amongst the verie Pagans and Heathens the like hath not beene seene The vertue also efficacie end fruit and benefit of Christ his comming into the world they have likewise cleane overturned debased or diminished 1. in that themselves take upon them either in the whole or in part to be their owne Saviours and Redeemers by their owne merites and workes of satisfaction as they call them to Gods Iustice as also by suffering satisfactorie punishments in their owne persons for their sinnes after this life ended in their supposed Purgatorie 2. for that in their detestable Masse their Priests take upon them to offer up Christ everie day or often in a bodily maner and that as a sacrifice propitiatory for the taking away of the sinnes of men when in verie deed that Bodily propitiatorie sacrifice was offered but Once and that by Christ himselfe onely and namely upon the Crosse. 3. In that they hold not Iustification in Gods sight to be by faith in Christ but by a righteousnesse inherent in their owne persons nor will allow a man to make a particular application of Christ to himself to be his Saviour Redeemer or anie way to be rest so assured which what is it else but to bereave a man of all sound comfort and benefit by Christ For what profite comfort or benefit is it to anie to know and beleeve that Christ is a Saviour and Redeemer indefinitely or to others if he know not or beleeve not that he is a Saviour and redeemer to himselfe in particular For so farre even the Divels themselves doe goe beleeving all to be true that God speaketh in his word and that Christ is a Saviour and Redeemer to others and hereat they tremble as S. Iames speaketh It is not enough therefore for men that desire to be saved to beleeve historically all the Articles of the Creed to be true or whatsoever God speaketh in his word to be true or that Christ is a Saviour and Redeemer to others for thus farre as is evident even Divels and Reprobates may goe but they must goe further by applying the truth of all the Articles of the Creede and of the promises of salvation made in Gods word and of Christ Iesus to bes a Saviour and Redeemer in particular to themselves by a speciall faith 4. In that they allow not Christ to bee the sole and onely Mediator and Intercessor betweene God and his People but will needs have other Mediators and Intercessors for them besides him namely the blessed Virgin Marie and other Saints and Angels The Ecclesiastical discipline likewise especiallie in the point of Excommunication they have extreamely perverted abusing it most grosly impiously and traiterously to the deposing of Kings and Princes from their Thrones and Kingdomes and to the disanulling of the subjection and loyaltie of Subiects and to the raysing of treasons and rebellions within their Kingdomes And as touching Prayer Almesdeeds Fasting and all the chiefe duties workes of Christianitie they have also utterly marred corrupted them For their usuall fasting is not an abstinence from all kinde of meates and drinkes ioyned with fervent and repentant Prayers unto God and other holy exercises divine meditations during that time or day of the fast as true Christians and rightly religious fasts ought to bee but consisteth in a difference of meates as namely in an abstinence from flesh and eating fish and whit-meates Yea all their Fastings Almes-deeds and
had deserved that the due judgement of God should have condemned even those that are justified unlesse mercie had relieved them from that which was due that so all the mouthes of them which would glory of their merits might be stopped and he that glorieth might glorie in the Lord. They further taught as S. Augustin did that Man using ill his Free will lost both himselfe it that as one by living is able to kill himselfe but by killing himselfe is not able to live nor hath power to rayse up himselfe when he hath killed himselfe so when sinne had beene committed by freewill sinne being the conqueror freewill also was lost forasmuch as of whom a man is overcome of the same is he also brought in bondage 2. Pet. 2.19 that unto a man thus brought in bondage and sold there is no libertie left to do well unlesse he redeeme him whose saying is this If the Sonne make you free yee shall be free indeed Ioh. 8.36 that the minde of men from their very youth is set upon evill there being not a man which sinneth not that a man hath nothing from himselfe but sinne that God is the author of all good things that is to say both of good nature and of goodwill which unlesse God do worke in him man cannot doe because this good will is prepared by the Lord in man that by the gift of God hee may doe that which of himselfe hee could not doe by his owne free-will that the good will of man goeth before many gifts of God but not all of those which it doth not go before it selfe is one For both of these is read in the holy Scriptures His mercie shall goe before me and His mercie shall follow me it preventeth him that is unwilling that hee may will and it followeth him that is willing that hee will not in vaine and that therefore vvee are admonished to aske that we may receive to the end that what we doe will may be effected by him by whom it was effected that vvee did so will They taught also that the Law was not given that it might take away sinne but that it might shut up all under sinne to the end that men being by this meanes humbled might understand that their salvation was not in their owne hand but in the hand of a Mediator that by the Law commeth neyther the remission nor the removeall but the knowledge of sinnes that it taketh not away diseases but discovereth them forgiveth not sins but condemneth them that the Lord God did impose it not upon those that served righteousnesse but sin namely by giving a just law to unjust men to manifest their sinnes and not to take them away forasmuch as nothing taketh away sinnes but the grace of faith which worketh by love That our sinnes are freely forgiven us without the merit of our workes that through grace wee are saved by faith and not by workes and that therefore we are to rejoyce not in our owne righteousnesse or learning but in the faith of the Crosse by which all our sinnes are forgiven us That grace is abject and vaine if it alone doe not suffice us and that wee esteeme basely of Christ when we thinke that hee is not sufficient for us to salvation That God hath so ordered it that he will be gracious to mankinde if they doe beleeve that they shall be freed by the blood of Christ. that as the soule is the life of the bodie so faith is the life of the soule and that wee live by faith only as owing nothing to the Law that he who beleeveth in Christ hath the perfection of the Law For whereas none might be justified by the Law because none did fulfill the Law but only he which did trust in the promise of Christ faith was appointed which should be accepted for the perfection of the Law that in all things which were omitted faith might satisfie for the whole Law That this righteousnesse therefore is not ours nor in us but in Christ in whom wee are considered as members in the head That faith procuring the remission of sinnes by grace maketh all beleevers the children of Abraham and that it was just that as Abraham was justified by faith onely so also the rest that followed his faith should be saved after the same maner That through adoption we are made the sonnes of God by beleeving in the Sonne of God and that this is a testimonie of our adoption that we have the spirit by which we pray and cry Abba Father forasmuch as none can receive so great a pledge as this but such as be sonnes onely That Moses himselfe made a distinction betwixt both the justices to wit of faith and of deedes that the one did by workes justifie him that came the other by beleeving only that the Patriarches and the Prophets were not justified by the workes of the Law but by faith that the custome of sinne hath so prevayled that none now can fulfill the Law as the Apostle Peter saith Act. 15.10 Which neyther our fathers nor wee have beene able to beare But if there were any righteous men which did escape the curse it was not by the workes of the Law but for their faithes sake that they were saved Thus did Sedulius and Claudius two of our most famous Divines deliver the doctrine of free-will and grace faith and workes the Law and the Gospell Iustification and Adoption no lesse agreeably to the faith which is at this day professed in the reformed Churches then to that which they themselves received from the more ancient Doctors whom they did follow therein Neyther doe wee in our judgement one whit differ from them when they teach that faith alone is not sufficient to life For when it is said that Faith alone justifieth this word alone may be conceived to have relation either to the former part of the sentence which in the schooles they terme the Subject or to the latter which they call the Predicat Being referred to the former the meaning will be that such a faith as is alone that is to say not accompanied with other vertues doth justifie and in this sense wee utterly disclaime the assertion But being referred to the latter it maketh this sense that faith is it which alone or only iustifieth and in this meaning onely doe wee defend that proposition understanding still by faith not a dead carkase thereof for how should the iust be able to live by a dead faith but a true and lively faith which worketh by love For as it is a certaine truth that among all the members of the bodie the eye is the only instrument whereby wee see and yet it is as true also that the eye being alone and seperated from the rest of the members is dead and for that cause doth neyther seâ—