and evill 2. An earnest exhortation to increase both in Knowledge Obedience et us be led forward to perfection which is strengthened with a dreadfull threatning of vengeance against non Proficients and Apostataes betweene whom there is no medium the condition of Grace being unlike to that of Nature admitting no degree of consistancy or stay betweene growing and decaying This exhortation reacheth to the 9. verse of this 6. Chapter 3. A sweete consolation against all discouragements that might hinder their perseverance by proposing unto them 1. the examples of the old Saints in times past who through Faith and Patience now inherit the Promises 2. the stablenesse of Gods counsells and purposes who hath not onely promised but sworne to performe it by which two immutable things Gods Word and Gods Oath we may have strong consolation and firme ground whereupon to cast the anchor of our Hope sure and stedfast to the end of the 6. Chapter You now see by this briefe Analysis wherto these words which I have read doe tend namely to a growth after a plantation a finishing after a foundation laid to perfection after a beginning These Ebrews had gone to schoole long and the principles of Christianity had beene taught them a great while agoe now 't was a shame for them like children to be alwaies in their horne-bookes and never take forth a higher lesson The Apostle will now no longer favour their ignorance 't was not infirmity but negligence in them and therefore he purposes to read them a harder lecture and to sticke no longer on common points of Catechisme which hee onely names and so passes on The words then describe unto us the progresse that Preacher and People are to make in the knowledge and practise of Christianity I joine both together because it is manifest by the threatning consolations following that this exhortation perswades the increase of obedience as well as knowledge though the words seem to speake most for the latter This proceeding in Christian piety is expressed by an opposition of the two Termim or limits thereof 1. Where it begins and that is in the plaine and fundamentall points of Christian religion which must bee knowne and left Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ. 2. Where it ends and that is at perfection so farre as is attainable in this life whereto we must strive Let us boled forward or goe on unto perfection The former part is amplified and expounded more at large in the next words wherein the Apostle declares 1. What he meanes by Leaving the principles and rudiments of religion Wee must not learne and leave them i. e. forget them No. But wee may not sticke fast there and goe no further Hee is an idle and unskilfull Architect that is alwaies busie in laying of a foundation but never reares up a building upon it and no lesse unprofitable is that Hearer or Preacher who still is learning or preaching nought but the first elements of sacred science this is that he signifies by not laying again the foundation which by his and other Apostles preaching had been laid before 2. What hee meanes by the Doctrine of the beginning of Christ for so the words runne Now that he here calls a foundation from the use that Doctrinall principles have in the spirituall building of Christianity like to that of a foundation in materiall edifices Of these fundamentall points sixe are here reckoned up as so many heads and common places of the ancient Catechisme 1. Repentance from dead workes 2. Faith towards God 3. the Doctrine of Baptismes 4. I aying on of hands 5. Resurrection of the dead 6. Lastly Eternall judgement The latter part of attaining to perfection is amplified two waies 1. By the meanes that must bring us to it which is Gods grace not our owne or others abilities And this will we doe if God permit 2. By its contrary and the punishment therof viz. backsliding in the verse following It is not my meaning to goe over every particular as they lye in the words nor to stand now upon the discussing of all the difficulties which trouble the Text but purposing to handle them hereafter as just occasion shall offer them unto us I shall for this present commend to your observation two conclusions which the words naturally afford The first shall be this That it is a necessary and usefull practise in the Church of God to teach the doctrine of Christian religion plainly and summarily to yongue beginners I need not go far to make this good Nature shewes it 'T is in Grace as in Nature we are first babes in Christ then perfect men and the difference of spirituall food fetcht from our naturall sustenance approves it Children must have milke which is of effectuall nourishment but yet easie digestion Men must have strong meat 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 solider or harder meates who have teeth to chew and stomacks to digest them that is larger capacities and riper judgements to pierce into the deeper mysteries of Divinity Reason and Comparison in all other knowledge teach the same wherein infinite conclusions are deducted out of a few Principles which first learned give light of knowledge and strength of proofe to every one of them Your owne experience shall save me the labour of instances If we looke but to the words the excellent definition of Catechisme which the Apostle here gives yeelds us two good proofes of its necessity 1. It s the Doctrine of the beginning of Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by some rendred not unsitly for the sense Sermo qui rudes in Christo inchoat that gives beginning in Christ. This entrance into the knowledge of Christianity being that meanes whereby Christ is first formed within us and the seede out of which that holy conception of his glorious Image is at first shaped in our soules A blessed institution of yonguer yeares when Reason and Religion are together moulded and fashioned in tender mindes so that Religion shall not onely sanctifie but also perfect Natures abilities which euer from their first emploiment are as sinfull as they are weake 2. It s a foundation that beares up all the building and though it make the least shew is yet of greatest use Nor is their heresie more damnable who lay any other foundation besides Iesus Christ than their heresie is justly reproveable who build upon their own or others any speculations without the tryed ground-worke of infallible Principles surely laid and throughly understood If you will bee pleased to take a briefe survey of the practise of this institution you shall easily perceive that it is no new or needlesse invention In the ancient Church before Moses time as the doctrine of Religion was more obscure so the maner of its delivery is somewhat uncertaine yet we may not unfitly say that all teaching then was but Catechisme when the fathers to the children delivered by word of mouth so much of sacred
truth as themselves had either received by tradition from the Ancestors or learned by new revelation from God himselfe When the Church grew out of a family into a Nation and that as men multiplied so ignorance corruption increased God himselfe writes a Catechisme for the Iewes describing a short compendium of Religion in the two Authenticke Tables of the Law containing Ten words so few and so plaine that the shortest memory and shallowest wit might easily comprehend them And withall God now layes an expresse command upon his people both for themselves and for their children Deut. 6. 6 7. And these words which I command thee this day shall be in thine heart And thou shalt rehearse them vnto thy children and shalt talke of them when thou sittest in thine house and when thou walkest by the way and when thou liest downe and when thou risest up The word is emphaticall Thou shalt rehearse them continually 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou shalt sharpen them by often and seasonable instruction giving an edge or point to the precepts of the Law that they may pierce into the mindes of the unlearned How carefully this strict injunction was afterward observed either by the Levites in publick or in private by masters of families wee cannot certainely define where Scripture is silent of both their practises but if wee may judge of the carefulnesse of former times by the carelesnesse of these there is good cause to thinke that both Levites in the Synagogues and Governours in their private houses were negligent enough in discharging this duty Yet we may well presume that there were both of the one and other not a few whose godly industry in this particular may justly shame the impious slothfulnesse of Ministers and People in latter ages Where will a David and Bathsheba be now found personages of highest quality yet counting it no disgrace to reade a Lecture of religion and morality to a yongue Salomon You shall finde their practise 2. Chron. 28. 8. Prov. 31. 1. And Salomon himselfe seemes to give that precept out of the experience of his owne most excellent education Teach a childe the trade of his way and when hee is old he shall not depart from it though himselfe scarce did so Yea albeit infinite corruptions have at this day deformed all religion among the Iewes yet even to these times may be seene some prints of their ancient discipline among them whose children are in their tender yeares first taught the law and bookes of Moses and after that their Talmudicall Traditions with such care and industry as their skill in Iudaisme at 17. exceedes the knowledge of many among us in Christianity at 70. whereof see the learned Buxd. Synag Iudaic. c. 3. But come we unto those times when the Sunne of righteousnesse arose and the knowledge of holy things shone in its full strength by the ministery of Christ and his Apostles and we may trace this practise by its apparant footsteps even from the first age of the Christian Church and downeward The words which I have read are but a copy and briefe description of the Primitive Catechisme the Apostle Paul commends to Timothies custody 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a pattern and delincation of wholesome doctrine which hee had learned from the Apostle 2. Tim. 1. 13. which also Rom. 12. 6. he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Analogy of faith contained in all fundamentall points of sacred doctrine with which all interpretations of Scripture must beare due proportion Now very necessity drave them in those Primitive times to draw religion into compendious heads and short summaries partly in regard of Infidels who being converted to the faith were to be instructed in the maine points of Christian beleefe a thorow knowledge and open confession whereof was required of them at their Baptisme partly in respect of the children of Christian parents who because of the dangerous sollicitations of Idolatrous Gentiles and Hereticall Christians privily creeping in to beguile by craftinesse ignorant and unstable soules were of necessity to have their mindes setled in the chiefe and generall conclusions of Christian doctrine by which they might defend themselves against all sophistical seducements Both these whether new Converts or yongue Christians were anciently called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 till their Baptisme and Confirmation and for such whose narrow wits could not comprehend large discourses it was needfull to make use of Epitomes Touching the word we finde it more ancient than this custome and more generally understood than of it onely In generall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in its Metonymicall signification is to teach others vivâ voâ—â— by speech sounding into their eares in speciall to instruct any in the first rudiments of an art or science because such as are ignorant learne more by others teaching than their owne study In the generall acception besides profane authors wee finde it used in the new Testament five severall times Luke 1. 4. That thou mightest acknowledge the certainty of those things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereof thou hast been instructed saith S. Luke to Theophilus rendring the reason of the dedication of his Gospell unto him Of Apollos an eloquent man mighty in the Scriptures it s said he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 instructed in the way of the Lord Act. 18. 25. Rom. 2. 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 instucted by the Law againe 1. Cor. 14. 19. I had rather in the Church speake fiue words with mine understanding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that I might also teach others than ten thousand words in a strange tongue But most notable is that place Gal. 6. 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let him that is taught in the Word make him that hath taught him partaker in all his goods In all which places 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is no more than 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to bee taught or instructed as the circumstances of the Texts doe evidently demonstrate But in times presently succeeding the Apostles and since the word hath been usually taken by Ecclesiasticall Writers in the strictest sense for the first instruction of yongue beginners in the rudiments of Christianity For now began the Gentiles in great multitudes to joyn themselves unto the Church and the number of those that were to be Catechised daily increasing gave occasion to the Pastors of every Congregation to bee more frequently imployed in this businesse And as the burden grew heavier so new meanes were devised for their better institution Hence besides the Pastors and Bishops of the Churches there were some specially deputed to attend this office who from their imploiment were called Catechistae and not onely in the Temples but also in Schooles opened for that purpose did teach such as were rude and ignorant the elements of Christian religion Famous above others is that Schoole at Alexandria in Egypt wherin so many learned men taught and so many holy Martyrs and Confessors had their first education There it was that Origen
doth not teach that 't is honest to beleeve him Can any thing be more senselesse or will not every man in the world excepting a Iesuite confesse that the very light of nature teacheth him to acknowledge that it is a very good and honest thing to beleeve Gods authority let him reveale his will unto us which way hee please But t is the fashion of these writers to dorre their readers with a distinction and so to leave them with a prius conceditur posterius negatur distracted and confounded rather than any whit satisfied This of the first reason That a man may beleeve without the helpe of Gods grace the second followes which also confirmes the former viz. 2. That is no act of Iustifying Faith which is found in Divells Heretickes Hypocrites and Reprobates But this assent unto divine Revelations because of Gods authority is in those both divells and men Ergo It is no act of Iustifying Faith The major is agreed upon that the acts of Iustifying Faith are found onely in those who are justified which cannot be said those persons mentioned The minor is likewise evident That Divells Hereticks Hypocrites and Reprobates may and doe assent unto such propositions as God reveales and that because of Gods authority who doth reveale them This hath beene formerly shewed unto you in the explication of the nature of a generall Faith and t is so cleere by Scriptures and experience that our adversaries cannot deny it The forenamed Schoole-man grants it manifestly as concerning Hypocrites and wicked livers who yet professe the Catholicke Faith for disputing Cap. 8. de Habit. Fidei touching that vertue which is infused into the Will whereby it may if it list command the Supernaturall assent of the Vnderstanding heetelleth us that this Vertue is a distinct vertue from all others and is neither Charity nor Obedience § 10. in conclus and that it is perfect in it selfe though it be without them according as other morall habites of justice temperance c. are Whence hee tells us § 11. in plaine termes Potest esse sinâ— charitate ut patet in Christiano peccatorâ— qui Fidem habet siue gratia charitate A Christian that is a sinner may have Faith without grace and charity What Iustifying Faith yea according to the Romish Divinity for he may beleeve the truth of the articles of Religion because of Gods authority who hath revealed them and to do this is a Supernaturall assent and the proper act of Iustifying Faith as these men teach Now touching the Divells and Heretickes the man is a little more coy He will not confesse that the Divels yeeld that assent of Faith he speakes of They doe not beleeve the mysteries of Religion Per assensum supernat uralem i. e. because of Gods authority but Per assensum quendam naturalem qui non oritur ex pio affectu sed ex vi pondere argumentorum quibus intellectus illorum convincitur cap. 11. quaest 2. § 4. We grant willingly that they doe not assent out of any good affection nor is that needfull to make their assent supernaturall for in hypocriticall impenitent and reprobate Catholickes there 's no pious affection moving them to beleeve and yet if wee beleeve their Doctors there is in them a supernaturall assent of Faith But for that other thing That the divells beleeve onely ex vi pondere argumentorum t is utterly false seeing it cannot be doubted but that they beleeve the truth of many future contingents wherof they are not convinced by any force of argument from the things themselves but from authority of Gods Revelations in his Word or otherwise Which infallible truth of God in all his revelations is so cleerely apprehended by these damned Spirits that it makes them to acknowledge the truth and goodnesse of that which otherwise they abhorre Wherefore that comparison which hee makes betweene the faith of 〈◊〉 and wicked Christians is most vaine and erroneoâ—… 〈◊〉 â—…ith hee you consider the faith of either of them wâ—…â—egard to the Object there 's par ratio both being â—…d about the same things But if you take it with râ—â—ard 〈◊〉 honesty of the act so the assent of the Divells is farrâ—… 〈◊〉 than that of bad Christians who have faith anâ—â—…rkes But wherein He tells us The Faith of Châ—… Supernaturalis Voluntaria Honesta The Faith of Divells is Naturalis Coacta pravis circumstantijs vitiata All which are false For the Faith of Divells is Supernaturallas much as that of wicked Christians seeing both beleeve propter authoritatem Dei revelantis which is formalis ratio of Supernaturall assent Againe the Faith of divells is as voluntary as that of wicked men for it cannot bee wrought in either by compulsion simply and if the Majesty of Gods infallible truth command the assent of Divells to that which they love not doth not the same cause also prevaile with ungodly men who beare as little true affection to God and Goodnesse as the divells doe Lastly the Faith of Divells is as Honest as that of wicked men For let any man speake Is it not as Honest a thing for wicked angâ—lls to beleeve what God saith as it is for wicked men If not wherein lies the dishonesty of that act in the angells or wherein stands the honesty of that act in men Can there be named any circumstances which make the Divels Faith dishonest but that the same or as bad may bee alledged against the honesty of the Faith of wicked Christians Sure I am what everthese men conceit of the Honesty of Faith without workes in men Saint Iames is plaine in his comparison that t is no whit better than the Faith of Divells Iames 2. 19. Thou beleevest that there is one God thou doest well the Divells also beleeve it and doe not they doe well too Yes haply better than thou for they beleeve and tremble which thou doest not To conclude in the last place we object that Heretickes have such a kinde of Faith as the Romanists call Iustifying For though they erre in some articles of Faith yet others they assent unto because of Gods authority revealing them This Becanus denies telling us that Heretici qui veâ— in uno articulo sunt infideles omnem fidem amiserunt cap. 11. quaest 3. § 4. which answer hee makes upon this ground That the Habite of Faith is lost by any one act of infidelity § 2. and therefore whereas Heretickes beleeve many things t is but upon a kinde of custome and by a humane faith We reply and say that that position One act of infidelity destroyes the habit of Faith is false and contrary to reason and Scriptures as hereafter I shall have occasion to shew speaking of the opposites of Faith For the point we grant that He who is a persevering Heretick though but in one fundamentall article he hath no justifying faith not because he hath lost it but because he never had it But
hee had rather enter upon the Church by undermining the Faith with Heresies than at an open breach upon good manners Ill manners finde more resistance there 's feare of lawes and rod of discipline to curbe them they want their apologies and colourable excuses so lye open to the reproofe and hatred of morall honesty they come accompanied with shame and disgrace following at the heeles which hinders their appearing and entertainment in publike But Heresie easily enters and quickly spreads abroad it findes favourers enough having the advantage of mens common infirmity who are apt to entertaine novelties and take a pride to bee singular it comes armed with reason and such justifications as it thinkes it needs not blush being painted over with the colour of truth lastly it aimes at the fairest the Leaders of the flocke whose authority and example speedily infects the rest With this weapon hath the Dragon made warre with the woman raising up even of her owne children such as have fought against her by damnable Heresies against all the Articles of Faith Of which part have been cut asunder by the sword of the Spirit and yet some againe reviving have been brought into the field under new colours part though convicted condemned yet stand it out under the support of tyrannicall violence remain to this day in that Augean stable that sink or common sewer of the Romish Synagogue whereto all Heresies almost of former latter times have made their confluence Besides a new breed of Hereticall opinions not plainly denying but by consequent overturning sursum vorsum the maine Articles of Christian beleefe and therefore are so much the moâ—e dangerous by how much the lesse easily they are discernable in their damnable issues So as the Doctrine thereof is no lesse perplexed with strange disputes and difficulties than the Grace it selfe is continually assaulted by fearefull doubting and distrust Whether it bee mans infelicity to be ignorant of that which stands him in most stead or the divells malice to lessen our comforts in the vse of Faith by confounding our understanding in the knowledge of the nature thereof that so we might either dangerously erre or discomfortably doubt touching the truth of it in our selves or Writers misexplication of that excellent grace through their own weaknes or want of faith sure I am if any point of Divinity this touching faith is full of much obscurity and contention T is much men should have a grace so divine and powerfull and yet know not what it is but as the Apostle speakes of men Faith is not of all so may wee say of Writers All have not faith that write of it especially Popish Doctors who speaking of faith but by imagination have profanely censured the faith of Gods elect expounded by Protestants according to Scripture to bee but a very fancy Among whose curious and Metaphysicall discourses of this subject he that wants faith shall never finde it and hee that hath faith may chance lose it at least the life and powerfull practice of it whilst his head is intangled in subtile and nice speculations about it For our selves let it be our care so to speake and judge of faith as that most precious grace which is given us to save our soules not exercise our wits the knowledge whereof by contemplation is most empty and vain without the reall inhabitation of it within our soules It shall be my weake and yet best endeavour by the helpe of Gods assistance to give you the knowledge thereof so farre as the word in manifold precepts and examples of the Saints together with the paines of the learned have discovered it to my poore understanding In the unfolding of the nature of it I must spend more time than at first I purposed to doe because in this point some other parts of Divinity are so enterwoven and linked one with another that without the knowledge of all wee shall not cleerly discerne of any alone Such are our Vocation the forerunner and our Iustification the follower of our faith All that I have to say I will reduce to these foure generalls 1. Touching the antecedents of faith namely our Conversion Vocation of which so much as shal serve to discover unto us the generation and birth of faith 2. Touching the nature of faith it selfe wherein the being of that most heavenly vertue consists 3. Concerning the consequents and concomitants of faith both in regard of God as Iustification and our selves as Obedience whereby we may be able to judge as of the benefit so of the truth of our faith 4. Concerning the opposites and enemies of faith the knowledge whereof may arme us against them For the first namely our Conversion the knowledge thereof will give us some light to finde out how faith is wrought in us which by Divines is made the first degree of our Conversion and last Terminus of our effectuall Vocation However a part it is and that a principall one too of our first resurrection from the death of sinne to the supernaturall life of grace Which that it may appeare we must distinctly consider of the threefold difference of such qualities as are in the reasonable soule and doe either help or hinder it in its operations This difference is according to mans triple estate 1. In the state of innocency man was created right or upright Eccl. 7. 29. and very good Gen. 1 ult endowed with such strength and integrity in all parts as did wholly dispose them to all operations conformable to Gods will His understanding so farre as was needefull before his translation had a cleer apprehension of the Deity in his nature attributes and worship as also of the creatures in their essence and qualities His will embraced and clave fast unto God whom Adam knew to be the author of his being and happinesse His affections and all inferiour faculties obeyed without all resistance the rule of reason and motions of the sanctified Will This universall holinesse and perfection in the whole man was that Image of God or originall justice wherein Adam was created but continued not For in the second place 2. After his fall for a punishment of his wilfull transgression God withdrew from Adam this his Image and stript him naked of that habite of grace and perfect holinesse wherewith he was before in all parts qualified leaving onely here and there some few traces or lines of that excellent Character unblotted out And now in place of originall justice succeeds originall corruption being an universall depravation and disability of mans whole nature to work well and conformably to the law of his first creation The understanding is dark erroneous confused in the apprehension of naturall stark blinde in perceiving spirituall things The will froward averse from affecting or choosing its chief good The affections and lower faculties disorderly violent untameable And this universall corruption of mans nature is that which we call the image of Satan to whom Adam
our assent vnto Diuine Truths springs from these three fountaines 1 From the Infallible Authority of the Reuelation 2 From the excellent greatnesse and worth of things Reuealed 3 From the manifest experiment of some part of their Truth knowne vnto vs. Of these in order The first and chiefest ground whereon is built the Certainty of faiths assent is The Infallible truth and Authority of Diuine Reuelations I call this the chiefest ground because it is that whereunto finally all our Beliefe is resolued For aske the question wherefore do you firmely belieue the Articles of the â—reed The answere is Because God hath reuealed them in Scriptures to be belieued The reason of which answere is this because What euer God saith istrue Now this is a principle in Nature aswell knowne to the reasonable creature as that they haue reason it is grauen deepe vpon the conscience of euery one which tels him That God is so infinitely Wise that hee can be ignorant of nothing that none can circumuent and ouer each him And againe that he is so infinitely good holy and Iust that no â—ie can come of this truth as Iohn speaketh Iohn 2. 21. Wisedome it selfe cannot bee deceiued Truth it selfe cannot deceiue and God is both Wherefore none but a Iesuite like Becaâ—… whose wits haue serued an apprentiship in the mystery of lying and aequiuocation vnder the Father of â—ies would haue affirmed that the Prophets and Apostles though they knew it was God that reuealed heauenly mysteries vnto them yet they knew not Euidently whether God was not deceiued himselfe or would not deceiue them Alying surmise much like that of the Serpent when hee tempted the Woman Yea saith he hath God indeed said so Yes the woman answeres God hath said so and we know it But Satan replies Are you sure that God spake true when hee said it The Diuell then denyed it and Becanus staggers at it as a thing very doubtfull telling vs that when God speakes man cannot be euidently certaine whether he speaks true or false But we reiect with abomination such a suggestion to Infidelity that strikes at the roote of all Christian Faith and shakes the lowest foundation-stone in all that building we know and are euidently assured That God is truth and in him or of him there is no Lie From this first ground of faith in Gods Essentiall truth wee draw another that whersoeuer any Reuelation is certainely known or belieued to be of God there the reasonable creature doth fully assent to the truth of things reuealed Whence all the holy Pen-men of Scriptures did for themselues most certainely belieue the truth of all things they deliuered though sometimes they vnderstood but darkely what was the meaning of that which they spake and wrote because they knew that they were taught them immediatly from God Yea the diuels themselues when they know as they doe these reuelations to be from God howeuer they tempt men to distrust and out of malice raises vp lies and slanders vpon Gods truth yet in the meane time are themselues cleerely conuinced of this truth and doe assent vnto it in their consciences The diuell knew well that Gods threatning to Alam was a certaine truth euen whilst he perswaded him it was but a lie And when he inspired the Pharisies to call Christ. Samaritan Belzebub a possessed Daemoniacke a Deceiuer and all to nought euen then himselfe could not but confesse that he was that Christ Iesus the Sonne of the most high God Mar. 5. 7. But this is the malice of Hell to sight against the Light and furiously to oppose what we cannot but acknowledge to be truth Well Thus far then our Faith goes vpon a sure ground That whatsoeuer God saith is true And againe When wee know euidently that God sayes it wee are ready to belieue it without further question But here in the next place is all the doubt How know wee infallibly that God is the Author of the Scriptures and that such things as therein are proposed for vs to belieue are reuealed by God himselfe This is a fundamentall Question wherein it greatly behoues euery Christian to be rightly informed It would require a large discourse to bee prosecuted through euery particular I shall but onely touch vpon the generall and giue occasion to each one carefully to bethinke himselfe that his faith be built on the rocke and not vpon the Sand. The Question is How is it knowne certenly that the Scriptures are the very word of God it hath two braÌ„ches 1 Toaching each seuerall part of Scripture as it was reuealed and giuen to the Church of God How did the People of the Iewes know that what was deliuered by Moses and other Prophets after him from time to time was the word of God To which I answere they knew the writing and Preaching of Moses and the Prophets to be of diuine Inspiration partly by the holinesse of the Doctrine which they taught the liuely power and worke whereof the hearts of the godly then felt partly by the miracles which they wrought for confirmation of their propheticall office partly by the certaine and infallible accomplishment of all their prophecies Of which triall of Prophets and their prophesies wee haue a generall rule set downe Deut. 18. 18. c. I will raise them vp a Prophet from among their brethren like vnto thee and will pur my words in his mouth and hee shall speake vnto them all that I command him 19. And whosoeuer will not hearken vnto my words which hee shall speake in my name I will require it of him 20. But the Prophet that shall presume to speake a word in my name which I haue not commanded him to speake or that speaketh in the name of other gods euen the same Prophet shall die 2â— And if thou thinke in thine heart How shall wee know the word which the Lord hathnot spoken 22. When a Prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord if the thing follow not nor come to passe that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken but the Prophet hath spoken it presumptuously thou shalt not so be afraid of him By the same meanes were the preaching of Christ also the preaching and writing of the Apostles knowne in their times 2 Touching the whole Scripture as it is now compleatly deliuered vnto vs in writing How can it euidently and infallibly appeare vnto vs that what wee finde written in the Bible is of diuine inspiration the very oracles of God not mans Inuentions In the solution of this Question our aduersaries of the Romish and wee of the Reformed Churches differ irreconcileably Wee affirme that the Scriptures are knowne to be of God by themselues they maintaine that we cannot bee certaine of the Scriptures Diuinity by any other argument then the testimony of the Church which say they doth infallibly propose vnto vs what is to be belieued what is not to be belieued So that ask a Roman Catholike Wherfore do you