Mr. VVhelewright upon the Fast-day which they do here present to the Honored Court and the Churches of Christ planted amongst us to be considered of desiring Grace Truth and Peace from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ In this Accusation I am charged to have delivered these Four Points I. That Faith and Repentance are no parts of the Doctrine of the Gospel II. That to evidence Justification by Sanctification is a covenant of Works III. That they who see in themselves any Sanctification and thence conclude a good estate shall never be saved IV. They who hold not according to this Doctrine are Antichrists enemies to Christ and under a covenant of Works VVhether my Brethren the Elders dealt regularly and justly with me either for the Manner or Matter of this Accusation I shal now make it appear As for the Manner I shal not much insist upon it but the truth is They accuse me to the Court secretly In the Preface to their Charge after many bitter invectives ranking me amongst the instruments of Satan acted by him to put down the Kingdom of Christ upon earth because I could not do it in heaven c. It is pretended by them That they do not write so much to aggravate my fault in the eye of Authority as to convince me in my Conscience and to bring me to Repentance yet al this while they conceal it from me neither did I ever come to know of this their writing more or less by their means or by the Court but a Gentleman my Friend one of the Magistrates did procure a copy to be transcribed secretly in al haste and sent it unto me For the Matter of their Accusation I shal examine the grounds of the several branches of their Charge I. They inform the Court That I taught That Faith and Repentance are no parts of the Doctrine of the Gospel The reason which they give is because I said That in the Gospel there is nothing revealed but Christ Surely it could not be imagined that I meant that nothing is revealed in the whole Gospel but this simple term Christ The words immediately precedent which they leave out taking that absolutely which I spoke in some respect declare my sense When the Lord said I draws his Elect to believe in Christ he doth not reveal unto them some work and from that work carrieth them to believe on him there is nothing revealed but Christ I exclude qualifications from that promise wherein Christ is revealed offered given to be believed on and make it absolute How should I deny Faith to be part of the Gospel in that discourse in which my chief scope was to put a difference between a legal and evangelical Faith The two Deputys Testimony concerning some expressions which I used in a Sermon at the Mount did not agree made nothing to the purpose If I had spoken something then from which such a conclusion would follow which I never did can you necessarily conclude from thence That I delivered the same in my Sermon at the Fast as you accuse me As for this Article of your Charge there is not to be found in my whole Sermon a syllable sounding that way ne gry quidem To my best remembrance al that I have spoken taught written at any time concerning Faith and Repentance from which you might take occasion to draw such a groundless inference was this for substance 1. That Faith and Repentance are law i. e. our inherent conformity to the law of the Gospel in opposition to the righteousness of the Promise which is Christs righteousness and that only in point of justification I asserted herein no more but this That Faith and Repentance is not that justice for which we are acquitted before God it is alone the righteousness of God which is by Faith 2. That these conditional Promises believe and be saved repent and be saved are not proper and peculiar to the Gospel as conditional but common to the law with the Gospel though not in respect of their matter yet in regard of their conditional form to difference them from absolut promises peculiar to the Gospel both for matter and form 3. Those conditional Promises being made the whole intire Gospel by an exclusion of al absolute Promises without any relation unto them becomes a covenant of Works for form A meer conditional covenant is a legal covenant This is one essential difference between the covenant of Works and Grace In the covenant of Works al the Promises are meerly conditional in the covenant of Grace with relation to Gods Elect the Promises are either absolute or upon conditions absolutely promised Will it follow from these principles That I deny the doctrine of Faith and Repentance to be part of the doctrine of the Gospel or the gifts of Faith and Repentance to be evangelical Graces God forbid I should This is a fundamental Errour of the Antinomians who confounding justification and sanctification imagine that Christ did as wel perform for us the conditions of the Gospel as the law repenting and believing for us All my constant hearers can bear me witness That I have ever Preached Repentance towards God and Faith in our Lord Jesus Christ I never denyed these conditional Promises to be part of the Gospel but I deny them to be the whole Gospel I do in the name of the Lord as I am called exhort al men not only to believe but repent and you amongst the rest II. The Second Errour of which you accuse me is That to evidence Justification by Sanctification is a Covenant of Works You infer this from these expressions in the broken Notes taken by others which I owned only for substance but not for al expressions that if men think to be saved because they see some work of Sanctification in themselves if they be saved it is without the Gospel this is a covenant of works I spake with relation to that which immediately went before to wit when the Lord is pleased to convert any Soul unto himself he doth not reveal unto him some work and from that work carrieth him to believe on Christ All that I affirmed herein was this To make gracious Qualifications previous to Faith the media to baild that act of Faith upon by which we believe on Christ is not evangelical but legal What though I called them works of Sanctification I did not mean they were such indeed but in the opinion of some III. This is the Third Errour which you fasten upon me That they who see in themselves any Sanctification and thence conclude a good estate shall never be saved This conclusion is inferred by you from the former Passages in none of which I denyed the evidencing of true Sanctification but of supposed Sanctification as gracious Qualifications before Union and Works made first evidences You reason stil from that which is spoken in some respect to that which is spoken absolutely You cut off part of these defective Notes and give such
confuted by Aquinas 22. c. q. 23.2 Far be it from me to deny the work of Regeneration or new qualities This was my meaning in these passages that we cannot act graciously from any inward principle of Grace further than we are acted upon by the Spirit of Christ in Union That the Commandments of the Law are never accompanied by the Spirit enabling us to perform them being severed from Christ and the Covenant of Grace or before faith come Surely I maintained none of these Points in the Synod which you make the Ground-work of Sedltion 3. Thirdly I am much condemned by you for obstinacy after conviction Of what was I convicted Was it of laying the Magistrates Elders and the most part of the Country under a covenant of works absolutely and that to the knowledg of the hearers out of Contempt of Authority to stir up Sedition Contempt of Authority and sedition is then made the circumstances principles of an act to wit the laying them under a covenant of works in that sort If that act be not proved contempt of Authority and Sedition vanish away having no subject to which they do adhere A man cannot be justly condemned for wilful murder unless it appear that he hath committed murder nor can I be justly condemned for laying men under a covenant of works in that manner out of Contempt of Authority to rayse up sedition except it can be made evident that I did lay them under that Covenant That is then to be enquired into proved by the Court that the Magistrates Elders and most of the Country were the men whom I described and affirmed to be under a Covenant of works otherwise contempt of Authority sedition falls to the ground having no foundation The Court proceeded against me as they said Ex officio which in case of publick infamy and manifest evidence of the fact is not only lawful but necessary and when I humbly requested of the Honoured Court that my accusers might come forth it was answered by them that my sermon was my accuser Then must my Sermon accuse me of that fact which they judged contemptuous and Seditious or else I am condemned without any accusation or accusers meerly from their wil and pleasure How wil they make it appeare that my Sermon was my accuser The Elders in their secret Accusation shewed them a way how to do it viz. by forcing my Sermon to speak thus That faith and repentance are no parts of the Gospel That Sanctification is no good evidence of a good estate That they who see in themselves any Sanctification and thence conclude a good estate shal never be saved That they who are not of this judgment are Antichristians enemys to Christ and under a covenant of works This is made the ground by Mr. Weld in the short story but the Court did not declare themselves to sentence me upon this proofe How then wil they make my sermon my accuser I know not how except it was thus To take a proposition out of my sermon And an assumption which the Elders brought in as hath been said and to conclude against me as though I had been author of them both was the false accusation or application c. of my Sermon Do you think in your Conscience that this was conviction and that I persist obstinate after conviction my circumstantial failing I have acknowledged I did not much inquire after an Apology which I heard was written in the Courts defence because I know very wel that the cause was uncapable of any just defence I knew that if al the men in the world should combine together they could not make a bad cause good no not the Lord himself the defect lieth not in God but in the thing Let a man twist ten thousand sins together he cannot cover sin with sin If your cause was so just and convincing why have you deserted the true cause and set up a new title prove the ground of the Courts sentence out of my sermon or else you say nothing 4. Fourthly You tel a story of a man whom as you say I led into these damnable errors and heresies 1. That the free promises are only for them under the Law 2. That al our assurance is by immediate revelation 3. That in the New Testament there are no signes 4. That Baptisme of water is of no use to them who are Baptized by the holy Ghost 5. That a man may be adopted and not justified 6. That every new creature is a dead lumpe and acts not at al. 7. That we have no inherent righteousness 8. That the commandments are a dead letter I do reject and abominate al these corrupt opinions as none of mine against which I do oppose these following positions as mine own judgment 1. That the free promises are no parts of the covenant of works but of Grace 2. That we do not only come to an assurance of a good estate by the immediate Testimony of the Holy-ghost but also by that which is mediate from faith repentance and works of sanctification 3. That in the New Testament the Lord gives to his confederates signes of their being in Covenant with him both inward and outward 4. That Christians who are inwardly and invisibly ingraffed into Christ stand in need of an outward visible baptizing into him and into one body 5. That justification and adoption are inseparable benefits flowing from our union with Christ 6. That every new creature acts from an inward formal principle of Spiritual life 7. That we are not only justified by the imputed righteousness of Christ received by faith but also have an inherent righteousness infused into us by the spirit of regeneration 8. The Commandements are the spirits instrument to quicken Gods elect The authors of the short story do not propound this to be credited barely upon their authority for than they might have deluded the reader who would beleeve it because of their report but this witness which they beare against me in such a matter of weight consists of this hypothetical proposition If M. Wheelwright tenderly contradicted this poor man being newly come to the profession of religion then must he needs learne those points of Mr. Wheelwright or draw them as necessary consequents from some of his Tenents The Consequent part of this proposition doth not follow from the Antecedent here is no good consequence And therefore this their Testimony must needs appeare to be palpably false to al such as have the use of reason How they should conscientiously ground such an accusation upon such an argument I cannot apprehend 5. Fiftly You much glory in my conceived ruine and cal your proceedings against me to banishment the Lords marvellous doings If by ruine you meane the ruine of my doctrine and cause there is no such matter that you have not touched it is a doctrine and cause of your own devising and setting up which you have ruined If by ruine you understand ruine in respect of
a sense as the words seem to carry considered by themselves without any Relation to that which goes before or follows You dis-member wrest torture by putting upon the rack some broken Notes of an extemporary Sermon and make them speak what you think good against the Preacher and where they are altogether silent and speak not one word you put in words of your own which makes for your purpose Let such dealings pass for current what Sermon can be Preached by any Minister of the Gospel which ye may not arraign accuse condemne banish as guilty of Heresie contempt of Authority Sedition and what not No man can say with a good Conscience That I did at any time in publick or private in Old England or in New deny true Sanctification to be a good evidence I look at Works of Sanctification to be no dubious nor litigious evidence but demonstrative and infallible without which the imagined spirits witness is delusory and al supposed Faith is vain The Sanctification which I denyed to be any good evidence are certain effects of the spirit of bondage and works of the law and I taught That an act of Faith founded upon them is not saving and according to the Gospel but legal against them who never knew their inward call or hear and learn of the Father and so by Faith come unto Christ The inward witness of the Spirit in a simple promise of grace is not immediately and in it self discerned by them but by their legal Reformation going under the name of sanctification These are my apprehensions concerning our evidencing a good estate The immediate foundation of that act of Faith by which we are perswaded That Christ and his benefits is ours and by which we do receive him is the free simple absolute promise of grace applied by the spirit in our effectual call which is called throughout the Gospel by way of excellency the promise and therefore al Gods children are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the children of the promise Rom. 9 8. This Promise indeed is indefinite yet is it determined to every Elect person in his efficacious call The indefinite Promise with a commandment to believe and make it particular comes not in word only but also in Power and in the holy Ghost from whence he can thus conclude I am perswaded to believe by Christ not only outwardly in his words but inwardly by his Spirit in my heart that the promise and Christ promised belongs unto me therefore Christ with al his benefits is mine The medium of the particular Application of the general Promise is the inward witness of the spirit of Adoption who as Mr. Perkins saith in his Sermon entituled Christ the true and perfect gain beareth witness to our consciences of such things as God hath given us in particular and are only in general manner propunded in the Promise The Apostle Paul grounded his Faith upon this simple promise The indefinite runs thus Christ loved the world and gave himself for the world Christ came into the world to save sinners Paul applies it and makes it particular according to Christs command for thus he expresseth himself He loved me and gave himself for me Gal. 2.20 Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners of which I am chief 1 Tim. 1.15 How came Paul to make this application Because he was perswaded thereunto not only outwardly in the word but inwardly by the spirit in his heart 1 Cor. 10.12 The Apostle John saith That he that believeth on the Son of God hath the witness in himself 1 Joh. 5.10 Believing on the Son of God is the effect the witness in himself the cause Mr. Calvin thus expounds it Non dicit Deum extra loqui sed unumquemque fidelem intus in seipso sentire fidei suae authorem If it be objected That our first act of Faith cannot be a perswasion that Christ is ours because he is not ours antecedently to our act of believing that seems to me easily to be answered Christ unites himself unto us by his Spirit in our effectual call infusing the seed of Faith and al other saving graces is in us novo modo operandi gives us a new heart and puts his spirit within us Ezek. 36.26 27. Christ is ours by a passive Reception antecedently in order to our act of believing Christ unites himself unto us by his spirit before we joyn our selves to him by an act of believing Phil. 3.12 Faith being thus founded upon the free simple promise of grace applied by the spirit of promise is confirmed divers wayes 1. First by works of Sanctification the immediate proper effects thereof For though the habit of Faith be not the cause of the habits of other Christian vertues yet is the act of faith the spirits instrument to produce al acts of sanctity as being apprehensive of Gods grace mercy love in Christ and other motives and perswasives to induce to good works receiving strength from Christ enabling us to perform them So that true faith works by love which love with other Christian vertues wherein we do resemble Christ to whom we are united are unto us a seal of that fellowship we have with him according to that of the Apostle In whom after ye believed ye were sealed with the holy spirit of Promise Ephes 1.13 The spirit in sealing of us imprints in some measure the very image of Christ upon us consisting in righteousness and true holiness being not only holy in his essence and nature but in regard of his gracious effects in us All these works of Sanctification are so many arguments of the truth of our Faith 1 John 2.3 3.14 They are distinguishing marks and put a manifest difference between the children of God and the children of the Devil 1 John 3.10 They who do not know God to be their God as wel by putting his law in their inward parts and writing it in their hearts as by forgving their iniquities were never truly taught of God Jer. 31.33 34. This is one end of the spirits giving that holy spirit that spirit of sanctification not only to work sanctification but to teach us to know it amongst other things which are freely given us of God 1 Cor. 2.12 This hath been practised by Job David Hezekiah Paul and the whole Church of the Elect believers and saints from time to time in al generations who after that they had built their Faith upon Christ revealed offered given in the free promise did under-prop confirm strengthen the same by works of sanctification 2. Secondly by the immediate testimony of the holy Ghost There is an inward testimony of the spirit common to al true Christians Rom 8.16 which I take to be an act of the spirit applying the Gospel with such power as we perceive it is the spirit who speaks and it be gets in us an affured Faith 1 Thess 1.5 This is immediate in and by the word of grace for of his own wil begat he us
a special Faith or order of evidencing were under a covenant of Works I was not so censorious I doubt not but many of your judgment who are truly gracious having an internal principle of true faith byassing their spirits another way than they discern The persons so judged by me were such as walked and only walked according to that judgement which I condemend not only Theoretically but Practically But seeing by this Doctrine you understand that Heretical Blasphemous Doctrine contained in the three former parts of your Accusation which you have fathered upon me fallaciously without any just cause it is a double injury and this member of your charge must needs vanish away with the rest of your devised calumnies putting a corrupt sense upon certain expressions in the Notes of my Sermon contrary to all rules of interpretation divine and humane This ground-work being thus secretly laid in the conclusion I am censured by the major-part of the Court to banishment as guilty of those two crimes Contempt of Authority and Sedition That I was justly condemned and censured by the court is that which you in your short story endeavour to prove but by what evidence of reason and force of arguments falls now into consideration to be examined and discussed 1. First You go about to prove that I was guilty of Contempt of Authority because say you I did not study Truth and Peace which Authority required Contempt is an act of the mind whereby we little or not at all regard a thing Contempt of Authority is when a man doth willingly refuse to submit to the promulgated just Laws or lawful known commands of Magistrates as such and hereupon proceeds to do something contrary to those laws and commands I know no law or command prohibiting me to Preach what I delivered Neither do I see how any such law could be just and it will be a difficult thing for you to prove That I acted from obstinacy of Will and such a defect of the Mind I have already proved the truth of my Doctrine and that I endeavoured to bring my Heaters to consent to that Doctrine cannot be denied so that herein I studied truth and peace Peradventure some Magistrates and Elders intended that I should not Preach against gracious qualifications before union and the first evidencing of Works but rather to have cryed down the contrary Doctrine as Antinomianisme and Familism and because I did not Preach according to their Minds this is looked at as contempt of Authority If to preach true Doctrine and unite men in the truth contrary to the intent of some Magistrates and Elders be contempt of Authority surely the Prophets Christ and his Apostles were notorious delinquents and guilty of this crime You speak of other contemptuous carriages but instance in no particulars I came one day tardy to the Court of which you tell all the world but that was from mis-information not out of any contempt I used some expressions of an acquitting glorying conscience when I suffered such shame in your Assemblies and did dispise that shame and so did he who was free enough from contempt of Authority endure the Cross despising the shame 2. In the second place you undertake to make it good That I was guilty of Sedition by these Arguments 1. First say you I inflamed the minds of men one against another caused divisions made breaches All this was accidental The word of God is a fire a sword and hammer to inflame divide break in pieces If simply to make divisions were Sedition it would more strongly conclude against Christ than Barrabas Your Arguments taken from Ethnick partial descriptions of Sedition are of no force against Christians Sedition is a dividing civil Societies as they are combin'd together in an unity of justice and common utility My Division was not Civil but Spiritual I did not go about to divide in that which was just and profitable but in that Errour of gracious Qualifications before Union and Works first Evidencing Paul was accused by Tertullus the Orator for a pestilent fellow and a mover of Sedition upon the like ground 2. Secondly You Object That I laid most of the Magistrates and Elders under a Covenant of Works To lay men under a covenant of Works simply in it self is not any transgression Political Moral or Evangelical The Syllogisme which concluded the Elders under that covenant was this They who walk in that way described by me to be a Covenant of Works are under that Covenant But the Elders Walk in that way described by me to be a Covenant of Works Therefore the Elders are under that Covenant Upon much questioning in the Court the major was made by me upon a question put by the Court to the Elders the minor was brought into Court in writing by them The Conclusion was made by the Court My Proposition was conditional or equipollent thereunto and conditionalis prepositio nihil ponit in esse seu nihil certe affirmat The Elders assumption made it absolute The Argument by which I described a man under a covenant of Works were the internal motions of his spirit known only to God and his own conscience and the Argument sub unâ utrâque is not à pari In a word I did not so much as in my thoughts conclude the Magistrates and Elders or any one of them or any other person absolutely to be under that covenant This conclusion The Magistrate and Elders are under a covenant of Works cannot be deduced from any thing delivered by me without the Elders Assumption in which I had no hand This was the Courts frequent and main Objection against me That I laid them and the Elders under a Covenant of Works I desired to know of them in what line or page protesting that I neither expressed nor intended any such thing Far be it from me to take Gods Office out of his hand who is the searcher of the heart and the tryer of the reins of all men If the Elders Assumption and the Courts Conclusion be removed there remains nothing for me to suffer for but only my Proposition which it seems did pungere and cut deep If it cannot be proved out of my Sermon that I said the Magistrates Elders and most of the Country were under a Covenant of Works c. I am innocent 3. Thirdly You Reason from the Seditious Effects of my Sermon I do not know any following Seditious practises But if there were any such they are not to be called Effects but Events That is put for a cause which is no cause I do not see any innate force in my Sermon to produce any Effects but these 1. To draw the Hearers from your Tenants about Faiths grounds both in judgement and practise 2. To Unite them in that judgement and practise which I apprehended to be evangelical 3. To contend by Arguments and sufferings with such as did profess themselves to be legal persecuting them for the Truth herein in case
Assurance of Faith Assurance of Faith may be taken in a Twofold sense 1. Largely for whatsoever assurance we have of Gods special love to us in Christ from Scripture-grounds in which sense a conclusion deduced from true Works of Sanctification is a conclusion of Faith beleeved in its premises or one of them the other being known by spiritual sense The witness which the spirit gives in a conditional promise is as true as that which he bears in an absolute promise No man living saith Vega should ever draw me to doubt of my being in the state of Grace if I might infer it out of two Propositions the one beleeved and the other made some way evident unto me 2ly Assurance of Faith may be taken strictly and properly for our first perswasion we have of Gods mercy towards us in Christ 1 Thess 1.5 This distinction is in use amongst Protestant Writers and the Papists understand them in this sense Certainty saith Mr. Perkins is either of Faith or Experimental which Papists call Moral Certainty by Faith is to apply the promise of salvation to our selves and to beleeve without doubting that remission of sins belongs unto us Moral certainty is that which proceeds from Works of sanctification as signs and tokens of true Faith Treat of Con. cap. 3. Bellarmine doth acknowledge this Moral certainty with this difference from us That it is only conjectural but he will by no means admit of that absolute perswasion precedent to our works calling it the Lutheran presumption They saith he will have their certainty to go before their works and not to follow them Tom. 4. Cap. 9. De Justificatione So that in this Thesis I do not deny simply that we have any assurance of Justification from our works of sancttification far be it from me but that the assurance which we have from our works is our first perswasion of Gods Grace and mercy towards us in Christ which properly in strictness of speech is called an assurance of Faith is denied by me In which respect I said in my Sermon That our first perswasion of Gods love was not by faith it self 1. By faith as an argument though it be by faith as an organ or instrument Consonant to this is that which is affirmed by Zanchy in his dispute with Mazhacchius about the order of evidencing our election page 361. Thus he writes Quis hic non videat apertè qualis fuerit sententia Buceri in hâc materiâ Nimirum ut incipiamus à priori id est contemplatione soluis divinae bonitatis gratiae in Christo oblatae in Evangelio revelatae Et inde certam persuasionem concipiamus nos vere fuisse ad aeternam salutem electos ideoque nunc efficaciter vocari Deinde descendamus ad id quod etiam revera est posterius nimirnm ad certum fidem assensum obsequium vocanti praebendum This is all which I do herein assert That our first perswasion of Gods mercy towards us in Christ is not founded upon any arguments taken from our works of sanctification which I have aboundantly proved in my second Proposition whether I refer the Reader THESIS II. That Justification goes in order before our Beleeving Justification by a passive Faith goes in order of Nature before our act of beleeving which is thus confirmed 1. We have the Spirit of Adoption are made partakers of divine Nature become new creatures before we put forth any act of Faith 1 Joh. 5.1 Joh. 1.12 13. This is Mr. Calvins Note upon this 13. vers Negat Evangelista posse quemquam credere nisi qui ex Deo genitus est Now whereas it seems by the twelfth verse that we are not the sons of God but consequently to our act of beleeving he doth thus answer it In respect of our sense we do not begin to be the sons of God but after faith 2. We are no sooner living in the first Adam but his sin is imputed unto us before we commit any actual sin Rom. 5. and by the like reason as soon as we live in the second Adam his righteousness is imputed unto us before we put forth any act of righteousness As in carnal Generation all men are born sinners even by imputation So in spiritual regeneration all men are born righteous having the righteousness of Christ imputed to them 3. If we be not justified antecedently to our act of beleeving then can a man in the state of condemnation do that eminent work of God to beleeve on Christ whereas except we be in Union with Christ and so by consequence in the state of Grace we can do nothing Joh. 15.5 To Beleeve is the act of a Person either in the state of Grace or in the state of condemnation Not of condemnation therefore of grace and we are justified before our act of Faith 4. Elect Infants dying before they come to years of discretion or sanctified in their Mothers Wombs are justified by the habit of Faith Persons in this state of Grace being adulti cease not to be justified when they fall into sownes or otherwise put forth no act of Faith which I suppose would follow were they not justified by the seed of Faith If the seed failed in such a case so much as the act doth by what band should they be united unto Christ And how could persons out of union with Christ be justified The Belgick Professors in the Synod of Dort give this as a reason Why the Faith by which we are first converted and from which we are called Beleevers is not an act but an habit infused of God because otherwise oft upon one and the same day we should be Beleevers and Unbeleevers the children of God and the children of the Devil It would I conceive upon the same ground follow That were we not justified by rhe habit of Faith but only by the act we should many times be successively justified and unjustified Chamier thus expresseth himself I say it is most true That justifying Faith doth follow if not in time yet in order justification Mr. Cotton saith in his New Covenant page 55. A man is as passive in regeneration as in his first generation only God giveth his spirit that doth unite us unto Christ which is received by Faith together with Adoption and Justification and yet by the act of Beleeving we are justified also Gal. 2.16 that is manifested to be justified in our own consciences Object 1. This is against the judgement of our Orthodox Divines who generally make Faith an instrumental cause of our Justification Answ They who do affirm That in our active conversion we perceive and receive Christ by an act of Faith do not deny a passive reception precedent to that act in our conversion wherein we are altogether passive Object 2. The Scripture never saith That we are justified by the habit of Faith but rather by the act Answ The Scripture doth not say That we are justified by the habit or act of Faith in
terminis but in sense These are frequent Gospel expressions We are justified by Faith Faith is taken as well for the habit as the act When Faith is said not to fail that is to be understood of the habit When we are commanded to Beleeve that is meant of the act Bucer saith Zanchy is not ashamed to say That we beleeve sometimes in act sometimes only in habit There is no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus Let a man be in Christ whether by the act or by the habit of Faith he is justified Which way soever Christ and his righteousness is made ours this righteousness is counted to us for ours by God who counts things as they are Object 3. He that beleeveth not is condemned already Joh. 3.18 We are not then justified but consequently to our act of beleeving Answ The act of Faith doth ever follow the habit and in order of time they can scarce be distinguished the one from the other But in order of causality Gods work goes before ours A Christian is in the order of nature in the state of grace before Faiths act though not in time In a word when it is said He that beleeveth not is condemned already it must be understood thus He that beleeveth not either actu secundo or actu primo else what will become of us when we are asleep and put forth no act of beleeving Object 4. If we be justified antecedently to our act of Faith then justification goes before vocation contrary to that Rom. 8.30 And whom he called them he also justified Answ That doth not follow Vocation is a gracious act of God by which we are brought into fellowship with Christ 1 Cor. 1.9 We are in our effectual call drawn into union with Christ by a Physical act of God in our passive conversion precedently to our act of beleeving Faith goes in order before justification both in our passive and active conversion the habit in the one and both habit and act in the other THESIS III. That the Faith of Gods Elect whereby they do beleeve on Christ is grounded upon a free simple absolute promise of Grace The Question is Whether God in the Gospel do first reveal his special love to his Elect in giving of them Christ and blessing through him in a conditional promise or in an absolute promise I say in an absolute These are my Arguments 1. Almighty God himself the Prophets Angels John Baptist Christ and the Apostles in the publishing of the Gospel have ever propounded Christ to be beleeved on in an absolute promise of Grace Gen. 3.15 15.5 Isa 9.6 Hos 2.19 20. Luk. 2.10 11. Matth. 3.2 4.17 10.7 2. The Elect have alwayes founded that act of Faith by which they did beleeve on Christ upon this principle Abraham beleeved on the Lord and it was counted unto him for righteousness Upon what promise did he ground his Faith Upon this absolute promise Thus shall thy Seed be Gen. 15.5 6. This Faith of Abraham is made a patern for all the spiritual seed of Abraham to follow Rom 4.23 24 25. Paul describeth the Faith by which he spiritually lived Gal. 2.20 In what Promise was Christ revealed Even in this absolute Declaration of Gods good Will towards him who loved me and gave himself for me The Apostle tells us That all the Elect are born as Isaac was Now we Brethren as Isaac was are the children of the Promise Gal. 4.28 In what form runs the Promise This is the word of Promise At this time I will come and Sarah shall have a Son Rom 9.9 The children of this absolute Promise are counted for the seed vers 8. 3. The proper immediate effects of justifying Faith do strongly argue That it is built upon an absolute promise powerfully applyed by the spirit in our effectual call How comes Faith to work by Love It apprehends Gods love to us in Christ How doth it cause Rejoycing It beholds Christ given for us and to us out of Gods eternal love Abraham rejoyced to see Chrtsts day and he saw it and was glad Joh. 8.56 How doth it beget Peace It looks at God as reconciled unto us in Christ How doth it cause Repentance It makes us apprehensive that we have sinned against our Saviour Omnium appetitivorum motuum causa est bonum vel malum apprehensum 4. As in Conjugal Contracts amongst us the Husband doth first make known his Love and express his absolute consent so doth Christ when he doth betroth the Church of his Elect unto himself in their effectual Call I will say unto them that were not my People Thou art my People and they shall say thou art my God Hos 2.23 5. If our Faith be not founded upon an absolute Promise then is not the Covenant of Grace established upon better Promises for form than the Covenant of Works contrary to that which is affirmed by the Apostle Heb. 8.6 7 8 9 10 11 12. The New Covenant Promises are better than the Old in this respect amongst the rest That they are absolute or upon conditions absolutely promised 6. The absolute Promises are either only to be propounded to Beleevers antecedently or else also to Unbeleevers for the begetting of Faith But they are not only to be propounded to Beleevers antecedently They were no Beleevers to whom the Lord by the Prophet Hosea applies the absolute Promises Hos 2.19 20. being such as were unmarried and not betrothed to what end did he propound them if not to build faith upon 7. There is no conditional Promise or Grant in all the Word of God wherein Christ doth convey himself over to us for the beginning of Salvation Christ doth absolutely promise to give us a new heart inhabit in us his Spirit Ezek. 36.26 27. What ever the Remonstrants say to put in any condition is against Scripture and Reason Wherefore we must beleeve on Christ and receive him as given in an absolute Promise of Grace This very Doctrine which teacheth us to ground our faith whereby we are perswaded of Gods Love to us in Christ upon an absolute Promise is maintained by Zanchy in his Miscellanies against Marbuchius who objects against it as one of Zanchy's Errors and new Revelations but he doth earnestly contend for the truth hereof affirming of it to be the Judgment of Bucer and that conformable to the Scriptures Which he could not but imbrace proving it by Four Arguments and Answers three Objections The Definition of Justifying Faith given by Dr. Zanchy and Mr. Calvin declares them to be of this mind Faith say they is a stedfast and assured knowledg of Gods kindness towards us which being grounded upon the truth of the free Promise in Christ is both revealed to our minds and sealed in our hearts by the Holy Ghost They make two Essential parts of Faith 1. An apprehension of Gods Love to us in Christ which is an act of the Intellect 2. A receiving and imbracing of Christ which is
an act of the Will And they ground both these Acts upon a free Promise of Grace efficaciously applied by the Holy Ghost These are the words of Mr. Calvin upon Gal 3.7 Faith is not an imagination of our own forging it is an assuredness which we conceive of Gods Goodness when he cometh unto us and uttereth familiarly his love that he beareth to us This hath been the constant Definition of Justifying Faith given by our Orthodox Divines in Luthers time and of many since Fides est certa persuasio et 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 quâ cum servatorem amplectimur hâc fiduciâ quod crucifixus mortuus sit in propitiationem pro peccatis non aliarum tantum sed et meis Melanchthon Beza with many others describe Faith after that manner and generally this is part of the description of it Faith is a certain perswasion of Gods mercy towards us in Christ which they could not do did they not ground it upon an absolute Promise All our Expositors of the Creed who make this part of the meaning of that Article I beleeve in Jesus Christ to be I beleeve that Christ is mine and place it before that act of the heart by which we rely on Christ do found it upon an absolute Promise Mr. Perkins in his Exposition of the Creed saith That no man can put his confidence in God till he be first perswaded of Gods mercy towards him in Christ This is Mr. Dikes Judgment on Phil. 5. First we must beleeve that Christ is ours before we can be able to commit our selves to him for the will and affections follow the understanding Mr. Cotton in his N. Covenant declares himself fully to be of this Judgment and saith Faith to receive Christ is ever upon an absolute Promise pag. 56. which is as much as I affirm Object 1. The Promise propounded in the Gospel for the begetting of faith is conditional Beleeve and be saved Answ That is not the Gospels first Promise There is an absolute indefinite Promise I take an absolute Promise for that which shall certainly be accomplished in Gods Elect precedent to this viz. The Kingdom of Heaven is at hand to which the command of Beleeving in the conditional Promise hath relation As in the Covenant of Works first there is an absolute Law given and then a conditional Covenant made Do this and live So in the Covenant of Grace first there is made an absolute Promise of Salvation through Christ taking absolute in that sense which I have named and then a conditional Covenant Beleeve and be saved When I am commanded to beleeve the Gospel or beleeve on the Lord Jesus Christ it is intended that I beleeve this absolute Promise not only Historically but Applicatorily and that I receive and relie upon Christ promised and then I shall not perish but have everlasting life The act of faith is not terminated in the Promise but in the simple term Christ Object 2. There is no absolute Promise of Salvation through Christ in all the Gospel Answ That is not so The first Gospel Promise of Grace and Life was absolute The seed of the Woman shall bruise the Serpents head Gen. 3.15 This is renewed to Abraham In thee shall all Families of the Earth be blessed Gen. 12.3 Is not this a simple categorical Proposition and Declaration of Gods good will in Christ to the World And this was Gospel which was preached unto Abraham Gal. 3.8 To make things more clear Take an absolute Promise for that which shall certainly be accomplished and then the Gospel alwaies begins with an absolute Promise both of end and means to wit Salvation and all means tending thereunto with relation to Gods Elect of which kind are the Promises before mentioned Gen. 3.15 and 12.3 Let an absolute Promise be taken for that which shall receive its accomplishment without any gracious precedent act of ours and then the beginning of our Salvation to wit a new heart a new spirit and faith it self is absolutely promised Jer. 3.33 34. Ezek. 36.26 27. If by Salvation be meant the continuance perfecting and consummation of Salvation in Gods eternal and everlasting Kingdom that is indeed promised upon condition we put forth acts of faith repentance holiness and righteousness throughout the whol course of our lives all which conditions as hath been said are absolutely promised Ezek. 36.27 Conditiones N Faederis non tantum praeceptae sunt sed etiam promissae Embd. Min. in the Synod of Dordt Object 3. The Promises to save absolutely and upon condition of beleeving are inconsistent Answ 1. To promise the beginning of Salvation absolutely and the continuance and accomplishment of Salvation upon condition of an holy penitential faith stand well together 2. To promise absolutely that is assuredly the continuance perfecting and consummation of Salvation upon condition we actually beleeve repent and obey is not inconsistent because the conditions are absolutely promised Object 4. The absolute Promise of Salvation through Christ propounded in the Gospel is not particular and personal but general and indefinite and therefore if we beleeve it by particular application we beleeve more than is revealed Answ Though the absolute Promise of Salvation through Christ be general and indefinite yet is it made particular to every Elect Person in his effectual call This Promise is held forth with a commandment to apply it and make it particular So saith Zanchy Lib. 5. De Naturâ Dei Cap. 2. and Mr. Perkins upon Gal. 2. When we are commanded to beleeve on the Lord Jesus Christ this is one act that is required of us to beleeve that Christ is ours 1 John 5.13 Whilst this Gospel is in preaching in our effectual Vocation the Lord sends the spirit of Adoption into our hearts gives us a new heart and a new spirit which new spirit perswades us to beleeve and apply the Promise and Christ promised and it is all one as if he should call us by name Isa 43.1 John 10.3 They who are thus perswaded by Christ not only outwardly by his Word but inwardly by his Spirit in their hearts have a good ground to beleeve that the Promise belongs unto them and that Christ is theirs nor do they herein beleeve more than is revealed To beleeve what Christ commands is no Enthusiasme Object 5. If all to whom the Gospel is preached are commanded to beleeve that the absolute Promise belongs unto them then are Reprobates commanded to beleeve a lye Answ Zanchy upon Hos 2.1 and Mr. Perkins in his Treatise of Predestination answers thus in effect Let Reprobates beleeve and they shall not find it false but true But because our act of Beleeving works no change in the Object and our beleeving makes not a thing true but it must be true before we beleeve it is not satisfactory to me Before I set down mine own apprehensions with humble submission to better Judgments I think it requisite that some things should be premised 1. I imbrace it for an
with the word of truth James 1.10 The immediate testimony is I conceive an act of the spirit by which he doth dictate and strongly suggest with a soul-ravishing inward voyce to a believing penitent humble over-coming Saint that he is the child of God his sins are forgiven or the like being compared to hidden Manna a white stone a new name Rev. 2.17 which doth exceedingly confirm Faith and it is not I suppose the portion of every good Christian but a special benefit given by God who is a most free agent before in or after sufferings for the name sake of Christ or some special service done unto him as God sees meet Sundry of our learned godly orthodox Divines do acknowledge such a testimony as Dr. Preston Mr. Bolton Mr. Elton with others and divers of the Martyrs had experience thereof as I doubt not many Christians have at this day This is part of the Comforters office 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that which is taught in the Word he shal bring to remembrance John 14.26 The spirit of truth never revealeth any thing in this kind immediately for the confirmation of Faith which is not revealed in the words of truth He shall not speak of himself saith Christ he shall take of mine and shew it unto you Joh. 16.13 14. This immediate Testimony differs not from that which is mediate by the Word in the thing testified but in the manner of testifying and stablisheth the Soul by making a deeper impression filling it with joy and with the holy Ghost 3. By spiritual sense and experience There is in Gods Children not only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Phil. 1.9 By reason of use they have their senses exercised Heb. 5.14 and that by divine objects 1. They are many times made very sensible of the grace mercy and love of God unto them in Christ The love of God is shed abroad in their hearts by the holy Ghost which is given unto them Rom. 5.5 The Lord doth again and again lift upon them the light of his countenance and in the light of his favour they see the light of all felicity Psal 36 9. Christ doth manifest himself unto them in the Spirit Joh. 14.21 They hear see look upon and handle the word of life 1 Joh. 1.1 They taste and see that the Lord is good 2. They have frequently and for the most part as of sin so likewise of the work of Gods grace in them sense and experience The wind of the Spirit blows into the gardens of their Souls and the spices of saving graces with a fragrant smell flow out Cant. 4.16 The Sun of Righteousness shines into the hearts of Beleevers acts upon the saving graces of his own spirit excites and stirs them up from whence a sweet scent goes out as from some costly perfumed Oyntment When Faith love joy godly sorrow for sin humility patience with other saving graces are vigourously acted it exceedingly affects the Saints who are very sensible of it The Virgins love Christ not only for the savour of the oyntment of his own Righteousness which they perceive and receive by faith but even of these good oyntments powred into them Cant. 1. The Spouse in the Canticles David Paul with others do largely express the great sense and feeling they had of the gifts of Gods Spirit in them accompanying salvation as an Argument of that fellowship which they had with Christ 3. Beleevers have an experimental knowledge of the gracious Works of Gods Providence about them which doth likewise confirm their Faith So had David 1 Sam. 17.37 So had Paul 2 Tim. 4.17 18 For though there be no marks set upon the outward acts of Gods Providence whereby they may be discerned to proceed from Gods eternal and fatherly love yet do the children of God behold them in and through the covenant of Grace as testimonies of Gods favour and feel them to be such by their gracious effects knowing by experience that chastisements and corrections for sin are for their good Psal 119.71 So that the long experience which we have of Gods grace upon us his work of grace in us the gracious works of his providence about us is a special means to strengthen our faith This for the substance is all that I have ever Taught or held forth concerning evidencing a good estate I am not for the sole witnessing of the Spirit with Enthusiasts nor of Faith alone with Solifidians nor of works in the first place with you but of al these Three in one and that in the Apostles order 1 Joh. 5. The Spirits inward effective testimony of Gods grace towards us in Christ in giving him unto us in the free simple promise with a command to beleeve begets faith faith produceth works of sanctification sanctification confirms faith Promises are so many Declarations of Gods good Will towards us and it is the spirits office to apply them I do humbly conceive That when the Spirit of Promise applyes the absolute Promise of Grace that by way of excellency is called The spirits witness otherwise I do not see how the spirits witness should be a distinct witness from water and blood If the conditional Promise made to beleeving be applied that is the witness of blood let the conditional Promise made to sanctification have its application that is the witness of water He who hath one of these three witnesses hath them all in some degree and he that wants one wants them all for all these three are brought in by Christ when he comes into our hearts in our effectual call as witnesses of his gracious presence So that a Christian can reason thus I have the spirits witness I am a beleever I am a Saint therefore Christ dwells in me and I in him This is the sum of all concerning Evidencing That act of Faith by which we beleeve that Christ and his Righteousness is given to us and we receive him is begotten by the inward testimony of the spirit in an absolute promise confirmed by works of sanctification the immediate testimony of the holy Ghost spiritual sense and experience Because I would not acknowledge your works to be good Evidences which you will needs have to appear before Gods Grace or Faith appear you are highly displeased and labour to make the Court Churches and all the world beleeve that I taught That sanctification is no good Evidence and if a man conclude a good estate from sanctification which he sees in himself he shall never be saved 4. The Fourth Errour which you charge me to have delivered is That they who hold not according to this Doctrine are Antichristians enemies to Christ and under a Covenant of Works If by this Doctrine you had meant That Doctrine which indeed I taught owned by me in my first Three Propositions you had done me wrong I did never expresly nor implicitly affirm That they who were not of my judgement about the grounds of