Selected quad for the lemma: faith_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
faith_n	circumcision_n	covenant_n	seal_n	7,337	5	9.8059	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A76800	The storming of Antichrist, in his two last and strongest garrisons; of compulsion of conscience, and infants babptisme [sic]. Wherein is set down a way and manner for cburch [sic] constitution; together with markes to know right constituted churches, from all other societies in the world. Also the cruelty inequality and injustice of compulsion for conscience, by 29. arguments is opened; with an answer to 26. objections brought for the same. Also 12. arguments against the baptizing of infants; with an answer to 26. objections brought for the same. Wherein is displayed to the view of all, from the testimonies of Scriptures, Fathers, councels; the mischiefs, uncertainties, novelties, and absudities [sic] that do attend the same. Wherein is answered the most valid arguments brought by St. Martiall, in his sermon preached in the Abbey Church at Westminister, for the defence hereof. With an answer to Mr. Blake his arguments, in his book cald Birth-priviledge; and to the arguments of divers others. As also a catechisme, wherein is cleerely opened the doctrine of baptisme, together with a resolution of divers questions and cases of conscience, about baptisme. Written by Ch. Blackwood, out of his earnest desire he hath to a thorow reformation, having formerly seen the mischiefs of half reformations.	Blackwood, Christopher.	1644 (1644)	Wing B3103; Thomason E22_15; ESTC R7842	101,204	126

that keeping the Law is still joyned to circumcision So that if you ask what circumcision was it was the profession of the observation of the Law but baptisme signifies forgivenesse of sinnes death buriall and resurrection with CHRIST which is a thing of another kinde 6 Circumcision differs from baptisme 1 in the matter cutting in the flesh being the matter hereof which left a sensible signe in the flesh which the infant when he was grown up could behold all the dayes of his life But dipping in the water is the matter of baptisme which leaves no sensible signe in infants and therefore in respect of them cannot be a Sacrament 2 In respect of form of words because in circumcision there are no words recited as in baptisme the Minister saith I baptise thee therefore persons baptised ought to be capable of reason that they may understand those words and forme their thoughts unto the death and resurrection of Christ 7 It followes not because of the difference in respect of the visible church in the time of the Law and the vsible churches under the times of the Gospell which differ 1 In mater the matter of the visible church of the Jewes was the whole nation of the Jewes good and bad the matter of the Christian church are those that professe faith and repentance 2 In the form of inrightment Circumcision in the flesh gave a person inrightment to the visible church of the Jews but now circumcision of the heart at least in profession is required to make a man a member of the visible church 3 In kinde of worship the Jewish worship and Priesthood and day of worship and maintainance of Officers that is tithes are put to an end therefore there is an end of the visible Church then and instead thereof in the visible churches now there are Ministers to preach and baptise there is also a new worship and a new day of worship and a new way of maintainance of Officers Now there being a change of the Ordinances and government of the visible church it is a folly to argue from circumcision to baptisme 8 The Sacraments of the new Testament cannot be proved but by the Scripture of the new Testament therefore that consequence which is drawn from the old Testament is absurd Obj. 2. They that are in covenant they must be sealed with the seal thereof but infants of believers are in covenant Answ We deny the proposition for the covenant in times past belonged to the females of the Jewes yet were they not to be sealed with the seale of the covenant for want of a command to say they were circumcised in the males is a mistake for 1 In nothing save marriage two shall be one flesh but this was a state of infancy not of marriage 2 whereas some alledge the Jews were called the Circumcision it is onely as other denominations are from the better or greater part as Exod. 9.6 all the cattell of Egypt dyed yet vers 25. there were cattell left 2 I answer to the assumtion viz. infants of godly parents are in Covenant therefore to be baptized Then this Covenant is either the Covenant of grace made with the Elect or some outward Covenant it is not the Covenant of grace made with the Elect for 1 Those that are in the Covenant of grace God made with the Elect cannot fall away from that Covenant but those that are children of godly men doe oft fall out of this Covenant and prone to be wicked therefore the Covenant of grace God makes with the Elect cannaot be meant 2. The Covenant of grace with the Elect hath sundry branches not competible unto all the seed of godly men nor none but the Elect among the which the Church cannot tell who they be as that their iniquities shall be forgiven then Jer. 31.33.34 Esa 59.21 that they shall be all taught of God c. Therefore it cannot be affirmed that infants of godly parent or parents much lesse of the infants of a whole Nation that they are in any such Covenant Or else this Covenant is outward and so the bond on Abram and his seedes part is circumcision Gen. 17.10 This is my Covenant which you shall keep betwixt me and you and thy seed after thee every man childe shall be circumcised so Acts 7.8 and he gave him the Covenant of Circumcision and so Abraham begat Isaac Answ 1. If circumcision be the covenant it self and so the Covenant be outward then is the land of Canaan onely the counterpart of this covenant as appears Acts 7. first 8. verses 2 Those that alledge this must disclaim circumcision from being the seal of the righteousnesse by faith as they alledge for the righteousnesse by faith is the covenant with the Elect. Also they must cease to flye betwixt two lurking holes sometimes to say circumcision is a seal of the covenant made with the Elect which is the same in all ages and when they dispute in another place they onely make it an outward covenant 3 Baptisme is no outward covenant and therefore cannot succeed circumcision in any such Identity but is a signe or seal of an inward covenant viz. death buriall and resurrection with Christ Paul for all he was borne in the jewish covenant and circumcised the eighth day yet did not Ananias nor himselfe thinke this enough but he was baptized Acts 22.16 4. There is but one Covenant under the new testament the lawes whereof are writ in the hearts of beleevers Heb. 8.6 It s called a better covenant and vers 8. a New covenant in the singular number not covenants and those that are in it have their sins forgiven Those that urge circumcision to be a seale of the Covenant of grace and sometimes urge it to be the covenant it selfe they run upon this absurdity that they make the covenant and the seal to be one and the same thing in number which is impossible Object But it s said Gen. 17.7 I will be thy God and the God of thy seed If there were any distinct covenant made with Abraham it is only the same in respect of spirituall reference which was made with Noah Gen. 6.18 Chap. 9.10.11 12. Answ There the new Covenant is promised but not covenanted which promise before was made to Adam Noah Abraham Gen. 12.3 Ier. 31.31 I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel not according to the covenant I made with their fathers and vers 33. This shall bee the covenant I will put my law in their inward parts Hee saith not I have made a covenant but I will make a new Covenant which was made good at the death of Christ as the Apostle makes it appeare Heb. 8.9.10 repeating this place of Ieremie so vers 11.12 13. 2. Abraham had but three seeds viz. 1. Christ Gal. 3.16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made he saith not and to seeds as of many but as one and to thy seeds which is Christ 2. The

the sore of a guilty conscience vers 38. But this cannot be because many children of godly persons prove wicked which if they do having formerly had a promise of remission of sins and of the holy Ghost then 1. either God fals from his promise which is blasphemy to say or 2. the childe is faln from grace having formerly had the Holy Ghost but is now wicked 4 This promise was no more to these that were pricked at their heart then it was to them that were farre off vers 39. The promise is to you and to your children and to all that were a farre off whether a far ●ff from you as the G●ntiles or a farre off from the promise as men in the naturall state to them that are afarre off as many as the Lord our God shall call The Apostle doth n t as the obje●tor supposeth use an argument to his hearers to repent and be bap●ized from the benefit tha● should come to their posterity but answers a question which troubled consciences pricked for their ●illing the Lord of life made viz. What shall we doe to be saved to whom Peter said repent and be baptized in the name of Christ so re●ission● sinnes they farther scrupled what ground have you for this to whom Peter propounds the universallity of the promise viz. It is ●o you to your children to all that are a farre off even as many as God shall please in time ffectually to call They further scrupled we have contracted guilt on our children by wishing Christs blood to be on them as well as our selves to this Peter saith the promise is to you and your children 6. There was none in that place was baptized but they that gladly received the word as appeares vers 41. It is not said they and their infants or children but onely they that gladly received the word Obiect 9. The parents faith is sufficient to receive baptisme Answ 1. The iust must live by his owne faith Hab. 2.4 The righteousn●sse of the righteous sh●ll be upon him Ezek. 18.11 2. What did Isaacs faith profit Esau or Iehosophats faith Iehoram Object 10. Baptisme and circumcision are essentially the seales of faith Rom. 4 11. Therefore baptisme succeeding in the roome of circumcision ought not to be denied to infants although it be the baptisme of faith and rep●ntance Answer 1. We deny that Circumcision was an universall seale of faith but was onely an individual seale of the individuall faith of Abraham as appeares out of the text 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word translated seale signifies a signe in the first place ●t also signifies a marke seale upon any thing to know it is as well as a seale and so the meaning may be God would have Abraham circumcised as a note of his faith and a memoriall and eternall monument of his fame that he was the first circumcised person of that nation yet doth it not hence follow that it was the seale of the righteousnesse of faith either to Abraham or his seed 3. Suppose Circumcision were the seale of faith absolutely and were administred to the Jewish infants yet was it so done because it was so commanded of God in like manner the baptisme of faith and repentance were to be administred to infants if it were so commanded in the Gospell but there is no such thing commanded 4 Abram received not the seal of the Covenanant before he first beleeved now we are the spirituall sons of Abram as believers not as carnall discending from his loynes therefore we ought first to believe before we receive the seal of the new Covenant 5 Should we grant the argument yet hence none should be baptised but those that were grown persons and had the righteousnesse of faith as Abram had at this time when he was circumcised neither of which are compatible to infants of dayes It s absurd to think that baptisme should succeed circumcision in respect of infancy which is not here mentioned in the text nor now was not the age of Abraham and yet that it should not succeed it in what is mentioned in the text that is in being a seal to the righteousnesse of faith or grace received in an adult person 6 The scope of the place is this viz. As the Apostle had given a comfort to the beleiving uncircumcised Gentiles that by the example of the same righteousnesse of faith which was reckoned to Abram in uncircumcision righteousnesse should be reckoned to them vers 9 10. So he gives a consolation not the barely circumcised But to the believing Iewes who walke in the steps of Abrams faith vers 11.12 That in like manner righteousnesse should be imputed unto them But what doth this conduce to the baptising of infants 1 Cor. 7.18 Obj. 11. Holy persons are to be baptised but infants are holy ergo Answ 1. To the proposition I answer 1 Holy persons endued with a holinesse known to the Church ought to be baptised but the Apostle here speaks of an outward holinesse common to the Reprobate as well as the Elect for such a holinesse we see Heb. 9.13 The bloud of Buls sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh 2 To the assumption I answer 1 Children in this Text are not holy with an holinesse distinct from Idolaters as appeares in the repetition of the word sanctified 2 Though they were holy persons yet are they not to be baptised 1 Because there is no command for baptising of them 2 Because this holinesse must be either inward and inherent which is unknown to the Church and so the Church hath nothing to dispense baptisme or else it is outward and so the Church cannot dispense baptisme because baptisme is not a signe of outward holinesse but of the fellowship which the Church judgeth the baptized person to have in the death buriall and resurection of the Lord Jesus Here is a full answer to the argument and I need not meddle with what holinesse is here meant Yet will I speak a little of it supposing that my answer given already is sufficient should I say no more To open which consider these things 1 The occasion of these words Some Corinthian Believers scrupled whether they might live with their unbelieving yoke-fellowes vers 1. compared with vers 12. To this the Apostle saith Let not the Believer put away the unbeliever 2 Of what holinesse doth the Apostle speak of Answ I will show 1 Negatively of what holinesse the Apostle did not speak of 2 Positively of what he doth speak of 1 Negatively he speaks not of any covenant holinesse which we partake from Abram 1 Because it doth not agree with the context for the question was not after what way man woman or childe become holy But whether a Believer or an unbeliever might live one with another in marriage To which the Apostle answers affirmatively they might live together and gives a reason vers 14. For the unbelieving husband is sanctified in the wife This word For tels us it

baptisme is insufficient For the assumption we have proved before that infants want faith at their baptisme For the propositon it appeares Acts 19.2 3 4 When certain that were not well instucted in christianitie had Baptized some Disciples but had not baptised them into the name of the holy Ghost and its probable by Pauls speech verse 4. that they were not baptised so much as into the Name of Jesus Christ but onely into the name of one God hence their baptisme being defective in beleeving in some of the persons of the Trinity they counted their baptisme not to be sufficient and so had a right baptisme in the Name of the Lord Jesus neither was this a needlesse scruple of Conscience in them for Paul did approve it vers 6. By laying his hands on them How much more then is baptisme of infants insufficient that do not beleeve in any person of the Trinitie Neither let any man say this was a relation of Paul concerning Iohns hearers in the time of Iohns ministery so that this word They must have reference unto those hearers and not a relation of Paul concerning an act done by Iohn it plainly appeares because the Apostle goes on in a continued Historie concerning the Twelve to verse 8. for they that Paul laid his hands on and received the holy Ghost and spake with tongues verse 6. must needs be meant verse 4.5 And whereas those that maintain that Paul vers 4.5.6 relates concerning Iohn and his hearers Contend that imposition of hands and beleeving in Christ are all one the contrary appears Act. 16.17 10 47. Argument 8. The same condition and qualifications are required in persons baptiseable in our daies as were required in times of the Apostles But to have put on Christ to be baptized into Christs death to have the heart sprinkled from an evill conscience to be buried and risen again with Christ to have the answer of a good conscience were th● conditions then required Therefore such conditions and qualifications are required in our dayes The proposition appears because the essentials of the church of Christ are the same in all ages and it s no where said these conditions shall be essentiall requisites to the planting of churches but after churches be planted members shall come in in the faith of their master or parent For the Assumption it appears Rom. 6.3 4. Know you not that so many of us as were baptised into Iesus Christ that is the name doctrine and prof●ssion of Christ the badge of Christianity Christian worship Christian religion were baptised into his death The Apostle speaks of their being dead and buried with Christ as of a thing that was in being at their baptisme when they were baptised into the name and doctrine of Christ Obj. But this was meant onely of those that were brought out of a state of Gentilisme but this doth not hinder but the infants of such were baptised though they were not deemed to have grace Answ The Apostle cuts of all such allegations by these words Know ye not that so many of you as were baptised into Iesus Christ that is the name and profession of Christ were baptised into his death and buried with him by baptisme So Gal. 3.26 27. The Apostle had said vers 26. The Galatians were all the children of God by faith in Christ Iesus he proves it from their baptisme vers 27. For as many as were baptised into Iesus Christ that is his name and doctrine have put on Christ That is all those that were baptised in Galatia into the name doctrine and profession of Christ had put on Christ before baptisme so farre as man could judge else any man might have excepted against the Apostles reason and said this proves not the point for they are others that is to say infants that are baptised into Christ and have not put on Christ So Coloss 2.11 12. The Colossians were not baptised to beleeve in time to come but because it was supposed They had the circumcision made without hands by the spirit Christ vers 11. death buriall and resurrection with Christ vers 12. Also faith of the operation of God Now how could this be said of infants So Heb. 10.22 Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith having our hearts sprinkled from an evill conscience and our bodies washt with pure water Divines interpret this washing of our bodies of the washing in baptisme And Estius upon the place saith its the common exposition as well of the Greeks as of the Latins to understand it of the Sacrament of Baptism which must needs be meant because he names the body for if he would not have named something that he had not named before he would not have called it body but soul and have said having your soul washed with pure water but he had spoke before of the soul in these words having our hearts sprinkled from an evill conscience therefore he must needs speak of such a washing as respects the body as it is a body which can be no other then the water of baptisme Which things being so we see what kinde of persons are baptised Those that had their hearts sprinkled from an evill conscience and had faith to draw nearer in assurance to God So 1 Pet 2 21. The like figure whereunto Baptisme doth now save us not the putting away of the filth o● the flesh but the answer of a good conscience towards God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In the Greek the interrogation of a good conscience when the conscience is so purged that God hath nothing against it to condemne it it can interrogate God what he hath against it Which shews in Peters time who were the subjects of baptisme Even such as were deemed to have purged conscienc●s Hence Tertullian in his book of repentance faith that washing of baptisme is the seal of faith which faith is begun and c●mmended from the faith repentance for we are not therefore washed that we may cease to sin but because we have ceased because we are now washed in heart So that we see what qualifications were in the Apostles time and afterwards to a right receiving of baptisme and are to continue as a rule for all churches Argum. 9. That tenent which brings mischiefs to the churches and the contrary practise benefits the practising of the one is unlawfull and the contrary practise required But the baptisme of infants brings mischiefs to the churches and the delaying baptisme till persons beleeve brings benefit Therefore the practising of infants baptisme is unlawfull and the contrary practise required The proposition is undoubted the assumption hath two branches 1 That infants baptisme brings mischiefs 2 That the delaying baptisme til persons beleeve brings benefits I will show the mischiefs which infants baptisme brings 1 It fils the Church with rotten members Such persons in following times growing up prove often wicked and many of them onely civill men we know not how to get

Baptisme Answ It brings many mischiefes besides that it fils the Churches with rotten Members and confounds the world and the Church together it is a groundworke for more traditions and doth so darken the doctrine of Baptisme that we cannot know the true meaning of it when we read of Baptisme in the Scriptures yea hereby many are taken into communion in baptisme who are excluded from communion in the supper whereas the communion in both is one and the same Quest How do you prove that there is but one Communion in baptisme and in the Supper Answ Because there is the same thing signified in baptisme that there is in the supper that is to say our fellowship with Christ in his death and resurrection So that all that are baptized into one body are all made to drinke into one spirit 1 Cor. 12.13 and the same preparations of faith and repentance that are required for the one are also required for the other and he that is cast out of the one is cast out of the other seeing that by excommunication hee becomes like an Heathen or a Publicane Quest But what if an infant or any other in their childehood should die unbaptized are they not damned Answ We know nothing out of the Scriptures of their salvation or damnation and therefore we must not be too inquisitive yet may such infants so dying be saved through the presentment of the satisfaction of Christ Rom. 5.18 to the justice of God for originall sin which satisfaction though it be applied through beleeving in those that can beleeve yet may it be applied without in those that cannot beleeve for else how could any infants be saved Quest Do you thinke infants have no faith Answ Yes they have not faith for they have not reason to discerne betwixt good and evill Deut. 1.39 If they had faith they were presently to be admitted to the supper Faith is an act of understanding which comme●h by hearing as well as an act of the will Quest What grounds have you against infants baptisme Answ Many but chiefly Christs commission Mat. 28.19 Where the subjects of baptisme are those that are made Disciples and this commission is to last to the worlds end vers 20. and reaches to every creature that is to partake of baptisme Mark 16.15 16. Quest Is it not lawfull to baptize persons without they beleeve Answ No Acts 8.37 If thou beleevest it is lawfull Acts 10.47 and 16.34 and 8.12 and 18.8 Quest But may we not be baptized if we be ABRAMS seed Answ Yes but we gentiles are onely Abrams seed by beleeving Gal. 3.7 Know ye therefore that they which are of the faith are the children of Abraham so Rom. 4.16 Gal. 3.29 Quest But what think you of them that would make the children of beleevers to be the seed of Abraham Answ They are mistaken for the scripture speakes onely of three seedes of Abraham that is Christ Gal. 3.16 He saith not to seeds as of many but as of one and to thy seed which is Christ 2. the carnall Jew 3. the bel●ever of Jew and Gentile Gal. 3.28 and they adde a fourth seed of Abraham viz. The seed or children of beleevers among the Gentiles about which the scripture is silent Quest But are not the children of Godly persons visibly in the covenant of grace Answ No the covenant of grace is an invisible thing and we cannot know who are in it nor have we grounds to judge persons are in it till we see some profession of holy life and profession of faith and repentance which infants cannot make Quest What is circumcision Answ It was an obligation to keep the whole Law Gal. 5.3 Rom. 2.24 and shewed unto them that it was their duties to circumcise their hearts Ier. 4.4 Quest. Whether was it not also a seale of the righteousnesse of faith Rom. 4.11 Answ Yes to Abraham onely and if Abrahams beleeving children among the Gentiles should be baptized as he was circumcised then must it not be till they have the righteosnesse of faith as Abraham here had at least they must have it in profession Quest Whether doth Baptisme succeed Circumcision in the same Office Answ No Circumcision was to every Male though reprobate but baptisme onely to the beleever Mat. 28.19 There being a change of the visible Church and of the Ordinances this cannot succeed in room therof nor hath any dependance thereon Quest Whether may not infants of beleevers be baptized by vertue of a covenant holinesse Answ No for baptisme is not a signe or seal of any such outward holynes which may befall reprobates as well as Elect but it is a signe of death Buriall and Resurrection which the beleever hath with Christ 2. There is no command for baptizing such if the Gentiles were so holy which yet is not proved Quest Whether is infants baptisme forbid in Scripture Answ Yes where will-worship is forbid Levit. 10.1 As they that were not in the Circumcision of Circumcision were excluded because they were not exprest as the males and females of Heathen So is it in Christs Commission about Baptisme they that are not exprest in it are excluded from it But now to answer to questions or cases of conscience about this point Quest WHether is it lawfull for a person that is convicted of the unlawfulnesse of Infants baptisme or doubteth thereof to be present at it Answ No in no wise for these reasons 1 Because the inward man and outward man must not bee divided in worship 1 Cor. 6.20 Glorifie God both with body and spirit which are his It s grosse hypocrisie when the outward man is at a worship which the heart doth not love 2 Because by our presence at such a worship we strengthen and embolden others at a false worship wiles they look on us as those that worship the same kinde of worship 1 Cor. 8.10 If any man see thee which hast knowledge fit at meat in the Idols temple shall not the conscience of him which is weak be imbouldened to eat those things which are offred to Idols 3 Because the person that is present at such a worship is not able to make any apologie to God why hee or she is present at such a worship in bodily presence though he or she reserve their hearts to God As a mans wife that is taken in an adulterous bed with another man can give no excuse for her presenting her body there though she say she keep her heart and affection to her husband 4 Because in false worship we are not so much as to touch the unclean thing 2 Cor. 6.17 Come out from among them and touch not the unclean thing Now this being an unclean thing in my conscience I cannot nor must not touch it any way neither with my affection nor with my bodily presence but that as soon at any preacher begins to pray for any such thing I must instantly depart though it be in his prayer after his Sermon 5 Because

that it may be signified and sealed unto them that are baptised that they are taken into the communion of the covenant of grace planted in Christ and his misticall body justified of God for the blood of Christ powred out for us and ● generated by the spirit of Christ and likewise we are bound to worship him in faith and a good conscience and to call upon this God the Father Son c. ●oc 47. ●g 6●7 Bucan saith Baptisme is a seal of the righteousnesse of saith that is of our incorporation with Christ of remission of sins of giving the Holy Ghost and regeneration whereby we are sealed unto Christ incorporated and buried with Christ and die unto sin by the power of the death of Christ and rise to newnesse of life Or it is a mutuall obligation of God testifying that he receives the person baptised into favour and of the person baptised giving his faith to God that he will worship him rightly ●g 612. ●p 81 of ●aptisme Greenham saith Baptisme is a pledge of our washing in Christs blood Acts 2.39 of our justification Gal. 27. of our ingrafting into Christs body Ephes 4.16 of our dying to sin Rom. 6.3 of our resurrection 1 Cor. 15.29 of our unitie of spirit with our brethren ●ontr 12. ●est 1. Willet Synepsis saith we define Baptisme a signe or s●al of regeneration whereby we are assured that as verily by saith in the blood of Christ we are cleansed from sins as our bodies are washed with water in the name of the Father And a little after he saith It is the proper act of faith to regenerate us not of Baptisme the use and end whereof is to strengthen and increase our faith ●oc com ●g 614. Mu●culus saith Baptisme is a Sacrament of regeneration purgation or if you will of washing imitation sanctification and incorporation whereby we repenting and professing faith and Christs religion that being washed from our sins we may walk in newnesse of life are incorporated and sealed to Christ and his church ● 2. Trelcatius saith the primary end of Baptisme is to signifie seal and show Sacramentally the forgivenesse of sins benefit of regeneration and union with Christ I might heap up many assertions of Divines like these alledged but these are enough to show how the practicals jar with these assertions laid down and how unsound divers of them are if affirmed of infants 9 Infants Baptisme produces many absurdities 1 It puts an infant in a state of grace and remission of sins M.F.C. i● his Book of K Iesu p. 5 6 7 8 before calling 2 It makes them visible members of Christs church before calling contrary to 1 Cor. 1.2 3 It upholds a nationall church as Circumcision did the nationall church is but one candlestick the particular churches are seven candlesticks Apoc. 1. 20 4 It intayles grace to generation not to regeneration contrary to Joh. 3.5 6. 5 It goes quite contrary to Christs order who first bids make disciples and then baptise after haec ille 6 Hereby the carnall seed is taken and acknowledged to be the spirituall seed of Abram 7 Whereas the Scripture requires onely persons to be baptised who gladly receive the word Acts 2.41 and desire baptisme Acts 8.36 by this infant baptisme all are compelled they and their children to be made Christians whether they will or no. 8 Christ did never ordain the Sacrament of Baptisme any way to concurre towards grace but as it workes in by and upon the understanding for if we go any other way we must say the Sacrament of Baptisme confers faith then is it an absurditie to dispense it where there is no understanding to conceive the history or mystery thereof 10 Infants Baptisme is a foundation for the Arminians to maintain Ane Sy●alia de pe●●ever ●anctor cap. 11. falling from grace If infants be baptised because they are in covenant with God then it seems they after proving wicked are faln away This Argument was urged by the Remonstrants which Doctor Ames was forced to slight because he could not answer 11 Many by infants Baptisme are received into communion of Baptisme who are excluded from the communion in the Lords Supper whereas the communion in both is one and the same which I prove by four reasons 1 One and the same thing is signified and sealed both in Baptisme and the Supper that is to say our partaking in the death and resurrection of Christ therefore the communion is the same 2 The same preparations that are required for a right receiving the Lords Supper are required for a right receiving of Baptisme and the qualifications which doth exclude from the one doth also exclude from the other For example faith and repentance qualifies for the Supper so for Baptisme nay there are plainer places to prove the necessitie of these requisites in Baptisme then in the supper Ex Gr. For repentance a preparation to Baptisme we see Acts 2.37.38.41 Repent and be baptised and they that gladly received the Word were baptised Math. 3 6. They were baptised of Iohn in Iordan confessing their sins hence B●ptisme is called the baptisme of Repentance Luk. 3.3 Because it was administred onely to penitent persons See Mark 4. Acts 13.24 Luk 3.3 How Iohn preached the baptisme of repentance so faith is another prec●ding requisite to baptisme we see Mark 16.16 Whosoever beleev●th and is baptised Acts 8.12 When the Samaritans beleeved Philip they were baptised Acts 8.37 If thou beleevest it is lawfull Acts 10.47 Can any one forbid water that these sh●uld not be baptised that have received the Holy Ghost as well as we Now for preceding requisites to the Supper we see 1 Cor 11.27.29 He that eateth and drinketh unworthily c. This word worthily shows there are certain preceding requisites without which God will not think us worthy receivers these are 1. repentance for which we can hardly bring a plain place the most is 1 Cor. 11.28 Let a man examine himselfe So for faith we have it to be a preparation only by deduction Matth. 26.28 The cup is said to be the Blood of the new Testament shed for the rem ssion of sinnes but this being apprehended no otherwise then by faith faith must be a precedent requisite to right receiving This is the summe of the four Evangelists concerning this matter saving that Luke addes these words Luk. 22.19 This is my body which is given for you which requires faith to beleeve this promise For the sixth of Iohn the best Divines upon undoubted grounds confesse Christ speakes not a word of the Supper Another deduction I onely remember is from 1 Cor. 10.16 Where bread and wine or rather the Cup of blessing are called the Communion of the Body and Blood of Christ that is by faith comming betwixt for by faith onely we have union and communion with Christ To conclude seeing the Scripture doth require the same requisites to precede Baptisme that it doth to precedr

carnall Jew so we Gentile cannot be the seede 3. Beleever of Iew and Gentile we Gentiles come to be the seed only this way Gal. 3.29 If ye be Christs then and not till then are ye Abrahams seed and heirs according to the promise Gal. 4.28 Now we brethren as Isaack was are the children of promise Which was only by Isaacks faith looking on the promised Messiah and so we Now many mistake besides these three seeds which are all the seeds the Scripture names a fourth seed that is the seed of beleevers unto which they thinke God will be a God because they are such which cannot be because many of them prove wicked and none of them for the present appeare to be Godly Object 4. Baptisme succeeded Circumcision as an initiating signe Col. 2.12 For the Collossians objected this if Circumcision be abolished then we Christians have no outward signe at all to confirme unto us Christs satisfaction where by the mindes of beleevers may be confirmed and parswaded that they are partakers of the Spirituall benefits in Christ Now if baptisme succeed circumcision as an initiating signe then as infants were the circumcised so infants should be now baptized Answ 1. We deny the consequence for those in Colosse that were baptized were not infants but grown persons that were circcumcised with the circumcision wade without hands and had faith tbrough the operation of God 2. We deny there was any such scruple in the Colossians 1. Because had there been any such scruple the apostle would have given some intimation thereof or preparation thereto in words preceding but he speakes not one word tending to any such thing 2. because he was not come to a period in answer to the circumcision teachers and did not come to a period till the end of this 12. verse therefore could not bee upon any other subject in this verse then he was in the former and so much the word Also proves and the apposition of buried circumcised and risen again proves it 3. Because the Collosians had baptisme already being buried and risen again with Christ therein therefore they could not reasonably object that the circumcision teachers would abolish baptisme nor could they say what shall we do for an initiating signe to confirme our faith for they had baptisme already 3. But suppose it were granted that baptisme did succed circumcision as an initiating signe yet where is there any such thing in the text as this viz. As Baptisme shall succeed in the same latitude of infancie of so much as Males much lesse of Females which is the supposition endeavoured to be proved from the text nay the contrary appears that there were none but grown persons because they are said to have faith and buriall and Resurrection with Christ which could not in an ordinarie way be affimed of infants Suppose all the objectors premises were true yet all that can properly be deduced from it is this viz. That circumcision was an initiating signe to the Iewish church and Baptisme is an initiating signe to the Christian church and hereof there would be no great contention 4. The true connection of the words with the foregoing is this Paul having answered Philosophy teachers verse 9.10 The word Also showes he comes to answere teachers who would have brought in circumcision to whom he answers adversitively whereas you would bring in circumcision which is made with hands we have a better Circumcision made without hands which consists not of cutting off the bodily skin of the flesh but in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh by the Circumcision of the Spirit of Christ and having laid downo the benefit or priviledge vers 11. He comes further to confirme them in it by the seal or instrumentall signe thereof which these Collossians had already received that is to say by the seal or signe of baptisme buried with him in baptisme wherein ye are also risen again c. Object 5. If infants may not now be baptized then are they deprived of some grace Circumcision did conferre Answ No For 1. Circumcision did not bring any grace to the Jews but was rather a yoke of a curse Acts 15.10 11. Why tempt ye God to put a yoke upon the neck of the Disciples which neither our fathers nor we were able to beare He speakes of Circumcision not as the false teachers would then have brought it in but as it was considered simply in it selfe in that he calls it a yoke upon their fathers not able to be borne who lived before those false teachers were What this yoke was we see Gal 5.3 to be debttors to keep the whole Law and for failing in one point to be under the curse Gal. 3.10 Deut. 27.26 and the Apostle vers 11. opposes the grace of the Lord Jesus to this yoke 2. It is not a benefit but a misery for children to be baptized for hereby they are apt to thinke themselves Christians when they are strangers from Christ Object 6. Vnlesse infants be baptized they are excluded from the new Covenant but they are not excluded Mat. 19 14. Of such is the kingdome of God Answ 1. We deny the consequence for 1. The females of the Iewes were saved without Circumcision So Iob Lot So the Cananitish woman without baptisme were in Covenant with Christ 2. You thinke your infants not baptized are saved 3. The Scripture no where sets downe baptisme as a gate to let in or a condition without which we cannot partake of Gods covenant 2. For the Assumption it followes not because Christ bad suffer those little children therefore that he would permit all from a particular to an viniversall these is no consequence because it once rained Manna and once water came out of the Rock therefore it shall be so alwaies 2. From a negative there cannot be drawne an affirmative conclusion Christ did not baptize any John 4.2 therfore we ought to baptize infants 2 It s probable the kingdome of glory doth in a great part consist of such infants so dying in infancie through the free grace of God and presentment of the Satisfaction of Christs death to the justice of God for Originall sin yet doth it not follow they must be baptized neither doe we know which will dye in infancy free from actuall sin or which will live and grow up and prove wicked therefore we cannot baptize any If it should be concluded Christ laid his hands upon them and blessed them therefore wee ought so to doe the conclusion were probable 4. Christ being God and knowing all things his divine nature might communicate to the Humanity that to those infants that were then brought and such like as they were the kingdome of God did belong as knowing all things he knew them to be elect yet it followes not to other infants that the kindome of God should belong the greater part whereof grew up and proved wicked 5. Of such is the kingdome of God there is a two fold suchnesse 1.