Selected quad for the lemma: faith_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
faith_n	church_n	true_a	visible_a	19,269	5	9.3685	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A81501	The Discipline and order of particular churches, no novelty. Proved from Scripture, reason, autiquity, and the most eminent modern divines. Or, A discourse of the church, in a scripture notion, with her extent, power and practice, tending to moderate the minds of men, toward dissenters in matters ecclesiastical, and to acquit such from the charge of innovation, faction, separation, schism, and breach of union and peace in the church, who cannot conform in many things to the rules, canons, and practices of others. / By a Lover of truth, peace, unity, and order.	Lover of truth, peace, unity, and order.	1675 (1675)	Wing D1558A; ESTC R174652	61,995	98

Church and if not then it may be believed that they will say be it far from us to determine in such cases for others or to desire our determinations should be imposed upon others And then we are confident the Magistrate will be farther from Challenging any right to determine of those things nor will he undertake to impose by Law upon the Churches but it hath been common amongst Church men to deal subtilly in these things first themselves determine and set down Rules in these cases and tender them to the Magistrate to confirm by Laws as those things which are necessary to the ends aforesaid And then when they are established by Law and they themselves cannot justifie many or any of them to be necessary or any way answering the ends proposed They presently lay the charge upon the Magistrates and say it s commanded and we must obey being by virtue of his Law bound in Conscience so to do Certainly let us not deceive our selves God is not mocked Christ hath pronounced a wo against them by whom offences come The excuse of the Magistrates commanding it will not serve their turn when our Lord comes to judge in Righteousness Yet there are some who are highly offended against such who walk after the Rules herein before set down as near as they can and fear to erre from it as that way of worship and managing of Church affairs which they judge according to Gods word to be Christ's mind they should walk by and as that in which the Churches in the Primitive and best ages walked and which also hath been by many learned and Godly men in all ages since held to be the true way And these offended ones generally conclude against such that they are Separatists from the Church Schismaticks Factious c. for so doing the old Callumnies cast upon the Apostles and other Saints in former ages and by Papists upon Protestants in latter ages and their way called Heresie and evil spoken of as Act. 24 c. 25. c. 28. Though in Truth these offended ones understand not in this case what they say or whereof they affirm either it is pure ignorance in such not understanding what a Church is from which properly a Separation may be said to be made or in which a man may be said to be guilty of making a Schisme or what Act it is that may properly be called a separation from or constitute a man a Schismatick in such a Church or else ignorance that is wilful arising from interest that blinds them These do just as the Presbyterian Ministers once said in Smect p. 58. 59. take it in their own words These do as the Papists dazle the Eyes and astonish the senses of poor People with the Glorious name of the Church c. This is the Gorgons-Head as Doctor White said which inchanted them they call say they for obedience to the Church c. no mention of God and Scripture If we say these Divines there question what is meant by the Church of England they storm as he that holdeth by an unjust Tytle will not suffer the Tytle to be questioned they say these men sometimes make the Convocation the Church excluding both Presbiters and people as not worthy to be reckoned of the Church sometimes the bounds of the Kingdome is the Church If so say they why not England Scotland and Ireland one Church being under one Monarch Thus they contend and know not upon what foundation but having heard of the name of the Church and found Ordinances and Formes of worship amongst them and Discipline used according to humane Laws and Constitutions here they go and never so much as enquire or put it to the question whether they are agreeable to Scripture or Rules prescribed by God And then they take it for granted presently that such who do not in these matters as they do are Separatists and Schismaticks and deserve punishment as rashly as the two Disciples did in another case Luke 9. who would have fire from heaven upon the Samaritanes but they knew not what Spirit they were of as Christ told them they never considered upon what ground they desired such a thing whether it were Christ mind or not that it should be so And as Augustine quoted by Mr. Stillingfleet in his aforesaid Book p. 61.62 complained of men in his dayes about Ceremonies who contended highly yet had no ground for it but this as his words are because it had been the custom of their Country or because they have found them in another Church c. they think that nothing is right and Lawful but what they do themselves And as Bishop Jewel in his Reply before cited said of many Hereticks That they had nothing to plead but that they were born lived in and received of their Fathers what they did practise upon some such poor grounds as these doth the ignorance of men work thus to abuse their brethren And that it may so appear Let such persons be perswaded to weigh the premises well in the fear of God and take these conclusions with him First that such who continue in the Faith of our Lord Jesus Christ and thus hold Union with the Head of the Church according to John 15.4 5. continue in and do not separate from the Catholick Church the body of our Lord Jesus Christ the first Church in this discourse described for there is no other Union between the members of this Church as such but this their being by one Faith united to one Head and from thence animated by one Spirit and such who so continue cannot be called Schismaticks in this Church To this Doctor Carleton agrees in his aforesaid Book p. 6 7 8 9 10. c. 2dly That such who continue to make a profession of the Faith of our Lord Jesus and do not openly deny him in their works do still abide in the visible body of Jesus Christ The Church 2dly above described and cannot be said to separate from this Church or be guilty of Schisme here for this profession is the only thing wherein the unity of the whole visible Church lyeth And thus Mr. Stillingfleet in his Book called a Rational Account c. p. 331. saith That there is no separation from the whole Church but in such things wherein the unity of the whole lyeth For separation saith he is a violation of some union 3dly That such who continue to walk in and with any visible Company Congregation or particular Church on earth holding the true faith in the orderly participation of Ordinances in man-as the Scripture directs and in subjection to Christs Lawes given to be executed therein as such a Church the Church 3dly above described he cannot be said to separate from or be guilty of schisme in this Church Now then if these offended ones will justifie their charge against such who do not in Church affaires as they do It is necessary they prove such whom they thus accuse guilty either of infidelity

he tells this Church in general that they did affect Eusebius and would have Elected him to be their Bishop and then he perswades them to choose another seeing all did not agree therefore saith he not Lawful because saith he he that is Elected to a Bishoprick by the general Suffrage of Wise men assembled to deliberate thereof ought by Gods Law to enjoy it This is Recorded in Eusebius of the Life of Constantine Lib. 3. cap. 58. p. 52. Yea the great Nicene Councel agree it in these words expressed in Socrat. Lib. 1. cap. 6. p. 225. Speaking about some who might be in a Capacity of being made Ministers they say if they be found worthy and the People choose them they may Succeed the Deceased c. Yet further it 's manifest by the same History That where any one Congregation did divide into two Bodies each apart chose their own Bishops for themselves as in the Case of the Church of Antioch Socrat. Lib. 5. Cap. 9. p. 343. Lib. 4. cap. 1. p. 316. So in many other Cases when those of the true Faith had Bishops imposed upon them by the Arrians they divided themselves from the Arrians and chose to themselves Bishops and Assembled alone And it is observable That all these Bishops thus chosen and appointed of the People of these particular Churches were still acknowledged as Lawful Bishops by all and in all the Councels mentioned in those Histories Nor do we find the least Objection any where Recorded in those days against such who came thus to this Office as being unlawfully called To this Practice of the particular Churches and their Right thereto the Fathers give in their Testimonies also a touch of them therefore Tertul. in his Apol. to the Gent. Cap. 39. p. 137. English Translation saith That in these Assemblies there are Bishops that preside they are approved of by the Suffrage of them whom they ought to conduct So saith many others Possidon in vita Aug. Cap. 4. Leo. 1. Epist 95. quoted by the Magdeburg Divines Cent. 2. cap. 7. col 134 135. Cent. 1. Lib. 1. cap. 4. col 179. Cent. 3. cap. 6. col 146 147. The Roman Presbiters in their Epistle to Cyrian affirm that every Church hath a like Power of Choosing Calling and Ordaining Ministers and for just cause again to depose them Cyprian Lib. 1. Epist 4. Aug. Epist 100. Cyprian Epist 68. And Cyprian himself saith That the right of choosing such as are fit and refusing the unworthy belong to the People and whole Church and that by Divine Authority And that the Officers and People did consult about it with common consent And for these things he is quoted by the Magdeburg Writers Cent. 3. cap. 7. col 153.173 174 175. Cap. 6. col 135 136.146 and also that the People did consider the Life and Manners of the Persons to be chosen and judge and much more to this purpose in those places before John Ferus a Fryer in his Comment upon Act. 11. and Magdeburg Cent. 5. cap. 6. col 178 179 180. Now we shall add a few Testimonies and Judgments of latter Ages and of Men otherwise differing The Papists themselves at the Councel of Trent acknowledged that this was the usual Practice of the Church of God for 800 Years together after Christ for the particular Churches to choose their own Ministers and they then affirmed that there were remaining at that day the Records thereof at Rome and they then and there desired that those Records might be destroyed lest Luther who maintained this Right to the People should make use of them to bring in the Custom into the Church again And they there also acknowledge that this was taken from the Church by the Authority of a Council only who made a Decree against it See the Conference of Rayno'ds Hart c. 6. p. 223. Hart saith out of Genebrard that Clemens took not the Bishoprick by the Councel of the Lord least the Example of taking it by nomi●ation of Peter should pass to posterity and derogate from the free providence of the Church in choosing of her own Bishop Geneb●ard Chronolg l. 3. in Lin. See more l. 4. Seculo 11. Cited in the same Confer Cap. 7. l ●76 Concil Trident. in English Lib 7. p. 590 591.598 See more of the same Council Lib. 8. p. 725. And he that wrote this History complains against Rome about this in these words The Church of Rome grant not the People the Election of their Ministers which certainly saith he was an Apostolical Institution continued more than 800 Years Concil Trident. Lib. 2. p. 163. Bishop Jewel in his Reply to Mr. Harding p. 230. Saith out of Cyprian Lib. 1. Epist 4. That the Bishoprick was bestowed upon Sabinus by the consent and voices of the whole Brother-hood of that Church to which he was to be Bishop He there saith that Honorius the Emperour Writing to Boneface doth agree him to be Bishop whom some of the Clergy and whole Brother-hood shall choose And the Bishop himself then there affirms from hence that every particular Church is called the whole Church And after in p. 282. The Bishop affirms that Cyprian in the same place saith That the People being Obedient to Gods Law have Power especially to choose worthy or refuse unworthy Priests Mr. Stillingfleet in his Irenicum p. 306. quotes Tertul. Exhort Castil c. 7. for these words That all the difference between the Ministers and People comes from the Churches Authority and again p. 416. himself saith That Episcopal men will hardly find any evidence in Scripture or the Practice of the Apostles for Churches consisting of many fixed Congregations for Worship under the Charge of one man nor in the Primitive Church for the Ordination of Bishops without the preceding Election of the Clergy and at least consent and approbation of the People so much he allows there and something more in p. 339. where he useth these words speaking of Elders now the voyce of the People which was used in the Primitive times is grown out of use c. by which he confesseth it to be the Primitive Practice But Mr. Stillingfleet having as he saith been at the pains to transcribe some of Bishop Cranmer's words they will serve well here and we shall again transcribe so much of them as speaks to this particular See them in the same Irenicum p. 391 392. They are these That in the Apostles time when there were no Christian Princes by whose Authority Ministers of Gods Word might be appointed nor sins be corrected by the Sword there was no Remedy then for correction of Vice or appointment of Ministers but only the consent of Christian Multitude amongst themselves by an uniform consent to follow the Advice and perswasion of such Persons whom God had most endued with the Spirit of Wisdom and Councel c. Sometimes the Apostles and others unto whom God had given abundance of his Spirit sent or appointed Ministers of Gods

healthfull persons withwhom I can associate again And if several other persons saith he be of the same mindwith me and we therefore joyn together do we therefore divide our selves from the whole world Thus he in this place clearly intimated a withdrawing from one Society upon good grounds and then for as many as be so withdrawn and of the same mind to joyn themselves together and associate by agreement and that is no separation And no doubt but that there is matter enough to be found sufficiently to warrant such persons in this also as well as in withdrawing Communion But if yet they shall say the Church of England is that from which these separate How pray If the Church of England be granted to be a Church in either or both of the two first Descriptions herein before given though in Truth she be but a little part of both yet there is no other Union with her as one Church nor can there be but the Union in Fa●th under one Head Jesus Christ and participation of the same Spirit and the profession of this Faith So that none can be said to separate from her as a Church or be guilty of Schism or breach of Union here but such who renounce the Faith and their Union with Christ the Head in Word or Deed and forsake their profession of it And this Church of England cannot be pretended to be a particular Church under the third Description for they never yet associated as such nor is it possible for them as a Church to meet in one intire body in one place to partake of the same Ordinances or do any other Act as a Church or Society but always met in their several Bodies or Churches for performing of all Acts of a Church as such In like manner also do these who are so blamed Therefore in this sence neither can they be by any Rule of Reason said to be guilty of Schism If these Offended ones shall yet say thus That such Men refuse to joyn with our Congregations and Ministers in our way For Answer to this besides what hath been said before to justifie their continuing by themselves First it 's thought in Charity to be presumed That these Men are convinced of the Truth of the premises That in truth all things about Church-Affairs were managed in and by particular Churches Congregations or Societies by Divine Authority and so Ordered as before Their Ministers chosen the Matter of their Worship without any addition alteration or diminishing according to Divine Rules Scandalous Persons cast out c. That these cannot judge it Lawful for them to do any thing in these matters contrary or not according to this Rule but think if they should they must sin against God And then this must needs be a sufficient plea for these in this case especially since other things to them doubtful unnecessary and sinful are made necessary Conditions of Communion with those Congregations So that none can communicate with them but of necessity he must submit to own and joyn with there things and neglect the other way Secondly Is any man bound to joyn with or partake in every Congregation in England or in more than one or must he be guilty of the breach of Union Surely no may not a Man abide in his own Parish all his Life and refuse to have any Minister but his own or Communicate with any Congregation but that whereof he is a Member Yet he shall not for this be accounted a Schismatick or Separatist It is presumed no Man will say he shall Wherein then lyes the difference These men thus accused do joyn themselves to some one Congregation or Church of God according to the Rules as was in the beginning and there they abide in the Orderly participation of Ordinances and Subjection to Christs Laws therein executed and disagree in nothing of the true Faith from other Churches So that it follows That barely upon this pretence neither can they fasten the Crime of Separation upon those who do not joyn with their Congregations and Ministers May not members of Parish-Churches be as properly said to be Separatists for refusing to joyn themselves to those Congregations Societies or Churches and Ministers in their Worshipping of God as these for not joyning with them Nor can it be said That these dis-agree with the Church of England in any thing wherein the whole Church of God is agreed or the whole Church of England but only in some things wherein the Church of God yea in England dis-agree amongst themselves as Mr. Stillingfleet in his said Book called A Rational Account p. 357 358. affirms against the Papists in these words We saith he have not separated from the whole Christian World in any thing wherein the whole Christian World is agreed But to dis-agree from the particular Churches of the Christian World in those things wherein those Churches differ amongst themselves is not to separate from the Christian World but to dis-agree in some things from these particular Churches The case is here the same These do not separate from the whole Church of England but only dis-agree in those things wherein the particular Churches differ amongst themselves And then walk with such who can and will agree with them in these things If they say the Parish-Churches are most Lawful and right and so their Ministers Ministration and Order Let this be first decided by Gods Word and their Lawfulness better proved than the Churches Ministry and Order and Management of Church-Affairs amongst these and before set forth as the Primitive Practice and then they say something But if they justifie all by the Law of the Land only it may soon be answered by this That it was not so from the beginning That the other way is proved by the Law of God and Practice of the Primitive Churches and approbation of Learned and good Men in all Ages yea and of Men of contrary Practices themselves Therefore surely the best plea against this For if Magistrates or Governors appoint any thing in these matters not agreeable to these Rules so that Men cannot be satisfied in their own minds but doubt it's Lawfulness such doubting ones may not be in the practice of it till they be satisfied of it's Lawfulness without sin Nor will it be a sufficient Excuse in the great Day of the Lord if they thus sin To say that the Magistrate commanded me to do it If they shall yet further alledge That these Persons agree not to Walk not in those Practices and Rules in the Church of England which are prescribed by the same Church and to which the generality of the same Church agree and submit and therefore they may be said to be Separatists and Schismaticks Though a full Answer to this may be gathered from the Answer to the last Objection And what hath been said in this before to acquit them from this Charge upon such an Account That is that the Church of England as such

THE DISCIPLINE AND ORDER Of Particular CHURCHES NO NOVELTY Proved from Scripture Reason Antiquity and the most Eminent Modern DIVINES OR A Discourse of the Church in a Scripture Notion with her Extent Power and Practice tending to Moderate the Minds of Men toward Dissenters in Matters Ecclesiastical and to acquit such from the Charge of Innovation Faction Separation Schism and Breach of Union and Peace in the Church who cannot conform in many things to the Rules Canons and Practices of others By a Lover of Truth Peace Unity and Order London Printed Anno Dom. M.DC.LXXV THE DISCIPLINE AND ORDER OF Particular CHURCHES no Novelty c. THE Church of God since the days of the Gospel was and is according to Scripture-expressions either first the whole Body of Christ consisting of all the Elect See the disputation against Campion at the Tower Sep. 18. 1581. in the Morn by Tulk. and Goad as Eph. 5.23 Christ the head of the Church the Saviour of the Body ver 27. That he might present to himself a Glorious Church ver 25. Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it So Heb. 12.22 23. To the General Assembly and Church of the First born written in Heaven c. Col. 1.18 He is the Head of the Body the Church c. Dr. Carleton sometime Bishop of Chichester in his little Piece Called A Direction to know the true Church p. 3. saith That the Saints before the Law under the Law and under Grace make up the Body of Christ or Members of the Church and that this is the Catholick Church Or Secondly the Universal Visible Church or whole Visible Body of Believers upon the whole Earth at the same time as Acts 2.42 The Lord added to the Church daily Mr. Baxter Cure of Church-Divisions p. 82. Ho●ke● Eccl. Polity third Book p. 88. c. So Eph. 3.21 Vnto him be Glory in the Church by Christ Jesus throughout all Ages Or Thirdly a particular Congregation Society or Company of Professors of the Faith of Jesus Christ usually meeting together in one place as one Body for the participation of the same Ordinances and Exercising the same Duty as a Church in Edifying one another Reynolds in his Conference with Hart Cap. 6. p. 218. saith That a Bishop in our sence is him to whom the Over-fight and charge of a particular Church is committed such as Ephesus Philippi and the seven Churches Prayer c. Such as was the Church in Jerusalem Acts 11.22 Tydings came to the Ears of the Church which was in Jerusalem and they sent forth Barnabas and others c. That this was but one Congregation is evident from Act. 15. where Paul and Barnabas and others coming from Antioch to this Church they were received by the Church first and then the Apostles and Elders The Apostles Elders and Brethren the whole Multitude were present at the Discourse of the Matter and the Epistle wrote in the name of the whole Apostles Elders and Brethren met together with one accord ver 25. Such was the Church of Antioch which was gathered together Acts 14.27 when Paul and Barnabas came and with whom they had Assembled before a whole year Acts 11.26 And were afterwards gathered together to receive and hear the Epistle Acts 15.30 Such were the Churches which the Apostles visited and ordained Elders in Acts 14.23 for they did it by suffrage Likewise the Church in Corinth 1 Cor. 1 2. Vnto the Church of God in Corinth These met in one place 1 Cor. 5. 1 Cor. 11.18.20.23 Cap. 14.23 So the Church at Cenchrea near Corinth See Smect p. 40 41. 47 58 59. Bishop Jewels Reply to Harding p. 230. And Mr. Stillingfleet quotes Pareus in Rom. 16. for this that the Church of Corinth did meet sometimes at Cenchrea because of the violence of their Enemies in Corinth Therefore also when the Apostles spake any where of the Assemblies or Societies of Believers in any one Country they call them not a Church in the singular Number or the Church of such a Country or Isle but Churches as of many in the same Country as in Judea Macedonia Galatia Asia 1 Thes 2.14 2 Cor. 8.1.18.23 24. Gal. 1.2.22 The Holy Ghost mentions seven Churches by name in Asia Rev. 1.4 Ch. 2. Ch. 3. And as to this the same Bishop Carleton in the same Book p. 2. saith That particular Churches are visible Assemblies c. and Governed by divers visible heads and proves it by Gregory Lib. 4. Epist 3. A fourth Church in Scripture Phrase cannot be found since the time that all in every Nation which fear God are accepted as the Apostle said Acts 10.34 35. Such as National Provincial Synodical c. We read not in Scripture nor in any Church History for many years after Christ of any Church distinct from these Descriptions before given Now it is to be presumed that there are none who will affirm that the first of these three Churches could possibly meet together or do any Act as a Church either in choosing Officers determining Controversies Ordering things indifferent to Edification giving Interpretations of Scriptures partaking of Ordinances and casting out of Offenders c. Or that ever any such Power was derived down from Christ upon them as a Church so to do or that he ever intended this Church when he directs any thing to be done by the Church as such because of the utter impossibility of their performance thereof as a Church part of which being already fallen asleep and part not yet born Also it may be concluded as to the second Church above described that it is utterly impossible they should at any time meet together as a Church in one Body to agree upon consent unto Act or Order any thing according to the power given to the Churches as above joyntly as such a Church or partake of Ordinances joyntly as such Nay it 's improbable if not impossible that in their Representative this Church should meet and put themselves into a capacity to Act as a Church in any of the things to be done by a Church as such Nay was there ever any such meeting of this Church None as can be found in Story Or if this were possible where have we Authority of Scripture or Primitive Practice to justifie such a Company of Representatives to call themselves a Church in this sence and to take to themselves the Power of the whole Church given to her by Jesus Christ and to call their Acts the Acts of the Church And it would be strange for any to affirm that Christ hath put the Power as to the Execution of it into the hands of a Body that can never possibly be able to Execute the Power derived upon If any number of Men would colourably make themselves the Churches Representative It is necessary they should be chosen by the whole and some one at least for every particular Church Body Society or Congregation throughout the World as the Messengers

whose Ministers ●re made after another manner and imposed upon ●hem Or how can any such convinced Ones have ●o do in Congregations and Ordinances otherwise Ordered and Acting then according to this rule in faith to expect Gods presence and blessing in it how can any knowing these things without renouncing Christ as Lord and Lawgiver in his church own and subscribe to the exercise of this power by others then these Churches much more how can any so convinced enforce others to give subjection to any Usurping this power without sin against Christ Whatsoever is not of Faith is sin so that if we are found in the practice of any thing in these matters not commanded at all or of any thing commanded in other manner then is prescribed by the Law of Christ we cannot groundedly believe for a blessing there Mr. Hooler Eccles Polity in the Preface having no promise for it Nay it is sin if we do but doubt it Rom. 14.22.23 Therefore every one ought to be at liberty till he be convinced and fully perswaded in his own mind er'e he meddle with these things Secondly Surely this then justifies and commends such who being fully perswaded of the truth of the premises do endeavour to regulate their practices in all Church affairs by these rules for the Scripture saith as we have received how ought to walk and to please God so should we abound c. 1 Thes 4.1 and as Tymothy was charged to continue in the things he had learned and had been assured of knowing of whom he had learned them and that from a Child he had known the Holy Scriptures 2 Tim. 3.14 15. So are Saints in general commanded to stand fast and hold the Traditions which they have been taught by word or Epistle 2 Thess 2.15 especially when they have by reading and searching the Scriptures like the Noble Beraeans Act. 17. proved these things to be so and find that the primitive Gospel Churches practised according to this and so trying all things hold fast that which is good and stand fast in the liberty Christ hath left them for in so doing they are lesse like to erre Mark 12.24 do ye not therefore erre not knowing the Scriptures c. And if these have their foundation for their practices here they may boldly say with Paul Act. 24. after the way they call Heresie so worthy I c. believing all things that are written c. Bishop Jewel in his reply to Harding p. 111. alleadgeth these words out of Cyprian lib. 2. Epist 3. speaking of Bishops If any of my Predecessors have not followed or kept that thing which the Lord by his Example and Commandement hath Taught us he for his simplicity may be pardoned but if we wilfully offend there is no pardon for us who are already warned and instructed of the Lord Again that after God hath once opened his truth to us if then we shall continue in error c. And again in p. 144. he quotes Cyprian ad Caecil lib. 2. Epist 3. for these words It behoveth the Religion we professe and our reverence towards God and ●he very place and Office of our Priesthood to keep ●he Truths of the Lords tradition and by the Lords ●dvertisements to correct that thing that by certain ●ath been amisse that when he comes in his Glory ●nd Majesty he may find us to hold what he warn●d to keep that he taught us to do that he did All which words of his presseth an exact keeping to ●he Rules left us when we know them But if it shall be objected that the people of the Churches are unlearned and cannot understand ●criptures and thence 't is they mistake and wrest ●criptures that it is for learned Men who understand Tongues c. to give the meaning of Scriptures and that others ought to submit to their judgments herein and to practise as the learned Fathers and Doctors of the Church have done before us See Helis Serm. of the abuse of Difficult places of of Scripture Matth. 1● 10.11 For Answer hereto briefly First The Apostle by the term unlearned intends not unskilful in Tongues nor in humane learning but unskilful in the Spiritual meaning of the Holy Ghost in the Scripture We know the Gospel is hid to some to them that are lost c. though otherwise never so learned wise or great and to others it is given to know Secondly That in this sence the Scripture is not understood by the help of the greatest Art Skil of Tongues nor the largest humane Wisdome of any this can only reach the letter but by the help of the Spirit of God 1 Cor. 2.14 The things of God are foolishness to the Natural man nor can he know them because they are spiritually understood o● discerned Now surely none will deny but that 〈◊〉 man may be very learned and wise in humane things See the Conference between Raynolds and Hart c. 2. p. 58. cap. 6. p. 2●7 and have great skill in Tongues and ye● be but a natural man still that is not having the Spirit of God by whom spiritual things are opene● to us where is the Wise where is the Scribe wher● is the Disputer of this world and God chose th● foolish things of this world to confound the wise c. that no flesh should Glory in his presence Matth. 12.7 c. 13.10 11.12 Luk. 19.41 42. Joh. 3.10 Act. 13.17 27. Act. 26.9 a● is abundantly clear in 1 Cor. 1.18 19 20.27 28 29. And this was apparent amongst the Jew● their most learned men Scribes and Pharisees chief Priest c. with all their learning and pretence to greater knowledge than the rest of th● Jews could not find out the meaning of the Prophets concerning Christ but Crucified Him and Christ said of them that they were the blind leading the blind and that they were therefore blind because they thought they did see above others although these were as confident that they were the only knowing men as the learned Doctors and Rulers of Churches of latter ages have been of themselves And the contrary on the other hand ●o 9.39 Bish Jewel's Reply to Harding p. 533. 526 Luk. 24.44 45. John 8.12 31. Joh. 6.14 Eph. 1.17 13. 1● Epist Joh. 2.27 we see men of no knowledge in Tongues c. nor much worldly Wisdom when Christ by his Spirit had opened their understanding they then understood the Scriptures And for this end amongst others was the Holy Ghost promised to the followers of Christ he himself said that such as believed should not sit in darkness but have the light of life that his Spirit should take of his and shew it to them And the Apostle saith the anointing which they should receive should teach them c. Thirdly That this Spirit of God is neither promised nor given to the learned Doctors able Schoolmen or Governours of Churches only but is promised to all believers in general and so bestowed upon all