the Christian Churches were universally deceived in the Primitive Times and that in two Instances 1. They all believed that after the World was 6000 years old there would be a general Resurrection of the Dead and then that Christ would Reign on Earth a thousand Years Secondly It was an universal custom to give the Sacrament of the Lords Supper even to Infants after they were Baptized And if all the Anolent Churches were actually cheated in two things 't is probable that they were in more also at least nothing can be brought from the General Practice of those Churches to make their Customs venerable In Answer to the former Instance I have three things to offer briefly 1. That it was not matter of Fact or Discipline but matter of Opinion only in which the World might be more easily abused because points of Doctrin are not obvious to the Senses and are more hard to be retained in the Memories of men than things of Custom and Discipline And therefore Tradition is not allowed to be a safe Record of things concerning the Faith but the Scriptures only 2. That this Persuasion was not derived from the Apostles but came Originally from some Jews converted to Christianity who were mixed up and down in the Churches of Christ For such an old Tradition we read of called the Tradition of the House of Rabbi Elias that the World should continue 6000 Years and then that the Everlasting Sabbath should begin Which Fancy continuing in the Minds of most Christian Jews Papias and other Christians came by degrees to imbibe it by conversing with those of the Circumcision who were dispersed all Christendom over 3. And yet thirdly this was no universal Doctrine by your favour For Eusebius saith that Many Euseb Hist Eccl. lib. 3. in fine Ecclesiastical persons were abused with this Error And Justin Martyr tells us that though he himself and many others were of that Opinion yet there were many others men of pure and pious Judgments who did not think so And shew me if you can any such in those days that were against the received 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Dial. cum Tryph. Government and Discipline of the Church In Answer to the latter Instance we have reason to affirm that the giving of the Communion to Baptized Infants was not an universal custom in the Primitive Times whatever some Learned men have suggested to the contrary Such indeed was the exuberant Piety of those Ages that they would not fail in any thing which seemed to be a Duty and a security of their hopes and some did run away with a misconstruction of those words of our Saviour in Joh. 6. 53. But suppose that this was an usual Custom in some particular Churches it is not fair that one single Exception if yet it be an Exception should void a whole Rule and all that we can gather from it is that all their Customs were not of Apostolical Institution nor do we say they were onely Iurge that where their Customs were universal in the first Ages there is a fair probability that they came from good hands and a sufficient Argument for us to walk in a way which was so universally old But lastly in answer to both these Objections it is clear that as well the former Opinion as this Custom met in time with publick contradiction for the one was disown'd and the other was laid aside in following Ages and so the Instances do not reach us whose Establishments have passed all along without condemnation or censure nay with accessions and advantage till of late some indiscreet men resolved to run far enough from the Church of Rome ran themselves out of their wits and five senses and forgetting the Golden Mean took too quick a step out of Superstition into Confusion and now are in a fair way to run round again out of Confusion into Superstition 2. I hope that our Plea of Antiquity in defence of our Constitutions standeth yet fair notwithstanding this first Pretence The next is that even in the Apostles days the mystery of iniquity was working as S. Paul witnesseth 2 Thess 2. 7. For they who are not Friends to the way of the Church of England do generally but wrongfully understand by that Mystery of Iniquity a Spirit of Tyranny and Superstition even in the bowels of Christ's Spouse that was then setting up for Antichrist and laying the Foundations of Prelacy and a ceremonious pompous way of Worship and whatsoever else men will please to say For the voiding of this Pretence 1. We do aknowledge that there was a sort of men in S. Paul's days and the less wonder if there are such now that were like Moles blind and busie Creatures working under ground restless and mischievous notwithstanding their soft delicate and smooth Skin But then secondly we do utterly deny and 't is a marvel that any man of Learning should have the confidence to affirm that these were true Christians living in the communion of the Church and under the guidance and government of the Holy Apostles No they were the Sectaries of those times whom S. Paul meaneth by the Mystery of Iniquity a company of close Villains whose lewd designs were hid in the dark and whose abominable Practices were kept private under a Curtain and within the Walls of their Conventicles for it is a shame even to speak of those things which were done of them in secret Ephes 5. 12. The Apostles do point plainly unto these Miscreants throughout all their Epistles S. Paul gives them the Character of false Prophets deceitful Workers transforming themselves into the 2 Cor. 11. 13. Phil. 3. 2. Col. 2. 18. 1 Tim. 6. 20. 2 Tim. 3. 2 3 4 5. Apostles of Christ dogs evil workers the Concision that all good people should beware of men vainly puffed up by their fleshly minds and not holding the head pretending knowledge falsly so called lovers of their own selves covetous boasters proud blasphemers disobedient to parents unthankful unholy without natural affection truce-breakers false accusers or Make-bates incontinent fierce despisers of those that are good traitors heady high-minded lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof S. Peter calls 2 Pet. 2. 3 10. them false teachers that through covetousness with feigned words made merchandize of people despisers of government presumptuous self-willed that were not afraid to speak evil of dignities c. S. Jude Jude 4 8 9 16 describes them as men crept in unawares ungodly men turning the grace of God into lasciviousness filthy dreamers that despised dominion and spake evil of dignities and of those things which they knew not murmurers complainers c. Any man may perceive that those were the followers of Simon Magus the Gnosticks whom the Holy Writers did thus lash and expose to the World men who called themselves Christians and went under the Name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Just Mart.
Affections 't would compose our Minds and our Affairs too 't would not only make us live together with one mind in an House but moreover it would establish our House and make it strong and firm and safe over our Heads For 't is not every difference in Opinion that exposeth a Church or a Nation to danger but 't is fighting and quarrelling about the Main way that ruins all We know that among the Turks there are several Sects and Parties and different persuasions and yet the Ottoman Empire holds though it be a most Arbitrary and Tyrannical Policy and the Interest of Mahomet is carried on though it be a most palpable and fulsome Imposture because though they jangle in matters of lesser moment yet they are true to their Common Interest and agree in the Main and closely adhere to their general Model of Government Religion and Worship In like manner among the Romanists themselves who boast so much of the Unity of their Church there are many very Considerable Divisions and more perhaps than there are among Us and those as hotly maintained and yet Herod and Pilate know how to agree against Christ the Scotists and Thomists the Molinists and Jansenists the Dominicans and Jesuits and the rest are wise enough to hang together under the Laws of their Church they go quietly and hand in hand in the main way they conspire in one Common Form they are tite to their Government and keep close to their Rubricks and Establishments and as long as the Pope can but keep things in this Channel either by the Terrours of the Inquisition or by other Politick Arts he knows that his and his Churches Interest is safe and he needs not make use of his pretended Infallibility to determine those points which are controverted I wish that we would learn so much wit of the Adversaries of True Religion as not to fall out there where the safety of us all is concern'd but walk together like Friends in that plain way which the Ancient Church hath beaten out before us and the Laws of our Land have fenced in for differences in matters of Speculation and points disputable could not hurt us or lay us open to danger if some among us were but True to our Common Interest if they would but stick to our Establishments which are the Rampiers and Bullwarks of the Church if they would but be as zealous for Christ as the Turk is for Mahomet or as the Jesuit is for Him whom some suppose to be Antichrist Nothing in all Probability can give us Rest to our Souls and Security to our Nation and Prosperity to our Religion but this one thing to seek after the good Old Way Men may please themselves with Fancies and try many fruitless Conclusions and make experiments of this and of that Expedient but the World will see in the end that nothing but the observing of the Old Path will put us into a good posture 4. But yet fourthly there is one huge Advantage more which the performance of this matter would bring unto us and that indeed which I shall chiefly insist on and it is this That it would justifie our whole Cause before all the World and cut off all just occasion from those who wrongfully upbraid us all for Innovators and under that pretence trepan many a Soul Where say they was your Religion before Luther Now the Dissenter is not able to answer this Question truly throughly or to satisfaction because a great part of his Religion was no where in the world no not in Luther's days and so the Romanists have a continual and unanswerable Objection to fling in his teeth But the Church of England as it is establish'd hath a fair and full Plea that her whole Religion was long before Popery that it was in the world in the days of the Apostles that it was in the Liturgies of the primitive Churches that it is to be seen still in the Tomes of the Greek and Latin Fathers nay she can justifie her Cause out of those very Writers in communion with the Roman Church both before and since the time of Luther whose Books they like dishonest men have corrected purged and mangled by the Expurgatory Indices lest they should tell tales I do not intend now to vindicate the Doctrine of our Church in this respect for that is not so much to my present purpose and our Faith hath been by others abundantly proved to be exactly consonant to the Sence of Scripture and to the Faith of all Orthodox Christians in the purest and best Ages and by this we are ready to stand or fall let the Papist bark at us till his Tongue and his Heart aketh But my purpose is to justifie the Government and Discipline of our Church to be the same which was used in Christian Churches from the beginning and that against a sort of men among our selves who accuse us of Superstition as the Papists do accuse us of Schism though God be blessed we are guilty of neither We tell our Dissenting Brethren that our way which they have forsaken is indeed the old Path we affirm our Government to have been Primitive and Apostolical and we say too that our Discipline Rites and way of Worship is the same generally which was establish'd in the first and best times and this I shall endeavour now to prove in some measure by instancing in particulars that men who desire satisfaction herein may see that the Frame of our Religion is de facto very ancient and that on that account besides many others it ought to be upheld and maintain'd which is the thing I have already argued for and withall that our Charge of Innovation would be unjust and ridiculous did we but unanimously resolve to tread in this Path our Brethren then would be free from guilt as well as our selves 1. The first thing to be spoken to is our Form of Government I mean our Episcopacy the thing that is such an Eye-sore to Papists Atheists and Schismaticks It is clear that for 1500 years it was the onely kind of Government in the Church And whatever some Learned men have pretended I believe you can scarcely instance in any ancient Churches perfectly and completely formed that were not under the care and government of Bishops in our present Sence of the word Bishops presiding over them either in person or by their Authority Those great Luminaries of the Church to whom the World hath been and is so much beholding the Austins Cyprians Chrysostoms Basils Cyrils Gregories and Ambroses were famous and renowned Prelates some of them Metropolitanes some Patriarchs all of them Bishops Those Fathers of the third Century after the Apostles as Theodoret Jerom and others who thought the Names of Bishop and Presbyter to be indifferently and promiscuously used in the Scripture did not mean to impair the just honour and dignity of Bishops for they acknowledged that though the Names were in common yet the Office Power and
way is and walk therein Which words were spoken to the Jews by way of special direction but they were left to the Church of God for perpetual use and may be very profitable to us for particular application especially when the Judgments of God threaten us and two great Clouds hang over us each laden with thunder and each ready to discharge it self upon our heads And when the days of our Peace seem to be numbered when for the divisions among us great are the thoughts of heart and those Divisions have hastened that evil which our other sins have deserved Then surely if ever is the time for us also to stand in our ways and see whether 't is that we are going or to ask for the old paths before we take a further step and fall into perdition For all our present Calamities are come upon us by reason that men have forsaken the old and the good way as I shall shew anon those private Avenues and unbeaten Paths which the Singularity of some fond people hath sought out have served onely to shelter a sort of Hedg-birds and Banditi to make a spoil of us and of them also And therefore before we enter irrevocably into Ruin before we see this once glorious Church to fall being betrayed by those who have been nursed up in her Bosom and have eaten of her Bread before we preach her Funerals and lament at her Obsequies while others laugh and sing Ah Ah so would we have it If we have the least sense of any thing that is honourable wise or just we cannot but look back upon our Declensions and be grieved for our Folly and at last enquire after the old good and safe way that we may find rest for our Souls before Trouble cometh upon our Loins or the Harrow upon our Backs So that I shall take occasion to discourse of this matter with immediate respect unto our selves and in these times of degeneracy and danger when things are in an unsettled condition with us and Religion is off the hooks or at least turneth upon a very uncertain hinge I shall direct my Brethren as Jeremy did the Jews to the days of old as the best and perhaps the onely Expedient to gain sure Footing And in the prosecution of this matter I shall shew 1. What a reasonable just and safe Proposal this is that we should ask and seek for the old paths and walk constantly therein notwithstanding their desires of Alteration and Novelty who are given to changes 2. What an useful and advantageous thing it would be unto us if we would but be so wise as to walk unanimously according to this Rule 3. And how mischievous and hurtful the Practices of those have been and are who have declined from this good way who have left the old paths to walk in Paths of their own tracing out 1. That this is a reasonable just and safe Proposal that we should ask for the old paths and walk uniformly and constantly therein notwithstanding their desires of Alteration and Novelty who are given to changes Antiquity is that which most people are fond of for it gives a marvellous Credit to all manner of Constitutions and no Nations were ever yet so rude and barbarous but that they have held those things to be of most venerable and sacred use which have been of the most primitive and ancient Institution We see it in all Humane Societies that they gain a mighty esteem from the Date of their Foundation the further they go to derive their Original the more Fame and Veneration they acquire and then most of all when their Original is like the Head of Nilus that cannot be discover'd We see it in all Humane Laws that the longer they hold the deeper root they take till at last they become fundamental and immoveable We see it in all Human Customs that when Antiquity hath worn them into Prescriptions they are like the Laws of the Medes and Persians unalterable that you were as good stemm a Torrent as strive against a very silly Custom which has been handed down to men from their Forefathers Now since Religion is derived from him who is the Ancient of days since it is of the most Divine Descent and the most perfect Constitution it is strange if Religious Ordinances and Customs should not have at least the same Advantages which all things in the world besides have that is become the more lovely and venerable for being ancient It is strange that men should most affect Singularity there where they have the least plea and reason to be singular Before I proceed 't is necessary for me to lay down these three Cautions following to prevent uncharitable mistakes 1. That I do not take upon me to defend the Validity of all Church Traditions at large or to maintain the Sufficiency thereof to determine all Controversies concerning Faith or Manners Every man knows to how many just Exceptions that Pretence is liable and I do not intend to do the Church of England that great disservice as to say or intimate that in these distracted times of ours it would be enough for us to have recourse unto former Ages and to stick to that which we find practised then No our Establishments do not stand upon the Practice of the Church alone there is a superiour Rule of Scripture to which they are agreeable all of them at least none are contradictory and therefore we do not look upon the Sense and Practice of Primitive Times as the sole or the main thing to be regarded 2. Nor do I intend to urge the Authority of Antiquity as if every particular thing were to be observed religiously by us which we find to have been instituted by the Apostles or to have been observed in the Ages following For several Rites were grounded in the beginning of Christianity upon certain special Reasons which Reasons failing and ceasing in after times those Rites too have been thought fit to be laid aside Such was the Anointing of the sick with oyl which S. James required chap. 5. ver 14. and such were the Agapae or Love-feasts mention'd by S. Jude ver 12. and such was the Veiling of women in publick Assemblies which S. Paul speaks of 1 Cor. 11. 6. and such was the Abstinence from things strangled and from bloud which was enjoyned by the first Council at Jerusalem Acts 15. 29. And some other things there were very anciently observed in the Church which yet this and other Reformed Churches saw reason to abolish or discontinue as being useless now or unsuitable to our Times 'T is not my purpose therefore out See the Preface to our Liturgy Of Ceremonies why some are abolish'd c. of a fond regard unto Antiquity to oblige men to revive those Customs though never so ancient which the wisdom of our Forefathers thought convenient to bury 3. Much less would I persuade the World to have any the least Veneration for Antiquity in opposition to Christianity if
Provincia abundet in sensu suo praecepta majorum leges Apostolicas arbitretur Hieron ad Lucian Rites were of Apostolical Appointment and they did generally call the Customs of the Church and the Injunctions of their Ancestors by the name of Apostolical Traditions But yet 't is reasonable to believe that Christians of the second and third Century who gave diligence to search into and had means to find out the Original of many Ecclesiastical Observations were able to give a very fair and satisfactory account what had been transmitted to them from the Apostles and what not For some of them conversed with the Apostles themselves or with some of them as Polycarp Ignatius and S. Clement of Rome Others again as Irenaeus and Justin Martyr were acquainted with Apostolical men And others were so near to these as Clemens of Alexandria Origen Tertullian Cyril c. that it was not very hard for them to know whether the Ordinances and Customs then used in the Church did owe their birth to the first Preachers of Religion or whether they were postnate to the Age of the Apostles Do not we know by the Acts and Monuments of former times what the Governours of our Church did and appointed in the beginning of the Reformation under King Henry the Eighth Why it is very probable then that what the Apostles did and instituted at the Planting of Religion under Nero Vespasian and Domitian might be easily known to those Fathers of the Church who lived and flourished some ten some thirty years after them and others onward to an hundred or say two hundred years successively So that if it shall hereafter appear that the outward Frame of Religion which is establish'd in the present Church of England was the very same Model for the most part which was used anciently in other Churches in the days of those primitive Writers and the very Model which they professed to have received from Christ's immediate Successors then I cannot imagine what just reason any man can have against the asking for and the walking in a way so ancient so laudable and so safe If he will not grant that our Establishments were instituted by the holy Apostles which yet in probability is true that they were appointed by them as things useful decent and convenient though not as necessary in every particular he must needs grant that they were appointed by due Authority that is by Apostolical Persons and so may claim veneration and observance at our hands Besides it is to be consider'd that not to the Apostles onely but to their lawful Successors also was that Promise of our blessed Saviour made that he would be with them always even unto the end of the world Matth. 28. 20. and that other Promise that he would send his Spirit to guide them into all truth John 16. 13. Now though that Promise requireth certain conditions of us and extends it self chiefly to the necessaria fidei matters of faith and necessary matters too yet 't is altogether improbable that Christ and his Spirit should take so little care of his Church in reference to its Polity and Discipline as to forsake her in the very next age or to leave her to be abused by the Fancies of Dreamers and to be imposed upon by men of foolish and degenerous Spirits and to be defaced and spoiled of her pristine Beauty by the frothy Conceptions of men of corrupt minds I pray whither went the Spirit of Christ from the old Christians to speak unto us after the space of Fifteen hundred years How came he to suspend his Influences from those who lived Saints and died Martyrs and at last came to breathe afresh into dry bones and to restore Religion which had been lost in a long interval of Time and succession of Ages Can any but Franticks conceive that the Church was never pure till an hundred years ago Or that for so many Centuries she needed to be swept and yet a Besom could never be found till the DIsciplinarian started up and made one and swept at such a rate that with us Order Decency and Religion were quite flung out of doors and Hypocrisie and Oppression were set up in its room 2. Zanchius profest that he had rather drink old Wine than Vorst ad Theolog Heidelb in Epist Ecclesiasticis new meaning that he preferred the Sense of the Ancients above that of Modern Divines in all Points not determined in Scripture He said like a wise man and 't would be much for the Peace of Christendom if all Christians would resolve in matters of Opinion to follow the Judgment and in matters of Discipline to observe the Practice of the ancient Church But some Palats are for new Wine onely not because it is so good for the old is better but because it is new And I am not likely to persuade such to conform to the Establishments of our Church by this Argument because they are ancient Establishments Yet I would beseech them to consider in the second place that the way we plead for is not onely an old but a good way also We must not think that the Contrivers of our Constitutions and Usages were so many Fools how low soever they may lie in the esteem of men who have less Wisdom and worse Manners and value a little Serpentine Craft above the Dove's Innocence A Church being gather'd it was impossible that without Laws that Society should hold together or answer the ends of its Foundation and therefore Government was necessary and of all sorts of Government that by Bishops was thought most convenient and fitting because presumed to be the best Defensative against Faction Schism and Disorder and the Experience of all Ages hath found it to be so Again since the Church is a Collection of men learned and unlearned who are set apart to worship God and do hold their Title unto Christ by their Faith in him it was judg'd very expedient that Set Forms of Publick Prayer should be prescrib'd both as a Repository of wholsom and sound Doctrines and likewise as a Provision for the necessities of the ignorant and moreover as a Preservative of Order Unity and Peace among Christians Lastly considering that the Worship of God is to be celebrated with solemn Decency and Comliness suitable in some degree to the Greatness of that Majesty which is to be adored certain outward Rites and Ceremonies were appointed as good means to conduct 1 Cor. 14. 40. men to a sense of Religion and to the exercise of Godliness and to create and stir up the Devotion of the Mind and the Reverence of the Heart For by the Judgment and Practice of the whole World it doth appear that an external Solemnity and Observance of Circumstances such as Habits Ornaments Gestures c. do bring a mighty respect to all secular Transactions and the Grandeur of Princes Courts of Courts of Judicature and of Civil Corporations is much upheld and Government becomes venerable
seemeth to be as groundless an Assertion as the former For the Devisor of that Custom was either an Heretic or a Catholic First then suppose he was a known deceiver suppose he had fair opportunities of going into all parts and great ability of speaking all Languages and a strong design of corrupting the Simplicity of Religion yet it is impossible that so many wise and watchful Fathers of the Church could sleep all that time and suffer every Province and Countrey to be overrun with Superstition and Innovation in a trice Consider seriously but this one following Instance Montanus was a very early Impostor for Tertullian at last became a Proselyte to his Party This man pretended to have been inspired and profess'd greater Sanctity of Life than other men insomuch that his Adherents called all sober and regular Christians by the name of Psychici that is Animal or Carnal Gospellers He condemned all second Marriages and would have a Euseb Eccles Hist lib. 3. enacted Laws of Fasting and endeavoured to introduce a Custom of observing more Lents than one b Hieron Epist ad Marcel in a year The Christians at that time were very severe in their times and manner of Abstinence and were ready enough to comply with any usual though never so austere kinds of Discipline But yet when Montanus went about to impose upon them his attempting an Innovation gave such an Alarm to the Bishops that the Church rose up against him as one man and condemn'd him for an Heretic though if Tertullian c Non quòd aliquam fidei aut spei regulam evertant scil Montanus Maximilla sed quòd planè doceant saepiùs jejunare quà m nubere Tert. adv Psychicos may be believed he did not Innovate in any matters pertaining unto the Faith Now when we consider this single Instance can we be so unreasonable as to imagin that a Government which was set up every where was a new-fangled device Or that a Discipline which was received every where was a private Invention and of a Seducer too Or that Forms and Rituals which were used every where were Brats begotten by some doating Head and superstitious Brain and then thrown into the Bosom and forc'd into the Embraces of every Church in the World 2. Well to mend the matter a little suppose this Author of these Customs to have been a Person of Note and Eminence in the Church yet we are much mistaken if we think that the Governours of the Church were such tame easie and flexible men as to receive and admit of new Customs upon the Recommendation of a single or private Person though of unquestionable Integrity for they refus'd Offers made them by whole Churches For instance The difference about the keeping of Easter is as famous as it was old The Churches of Asia observed it on the day of the Jews Passover on whatsoever day of the week that happened The Western Churches observed upon the day when our Lord rose from the dead This Variety of Observation was from the beginning if there be any truth in Ecclesiastical History and in a little time it begat a Controversie first between two Bishops Anicetus of Rome and Polycarpus of Smyrna S. John's Disciple The matter was debated between them but neither could Polycarpus persuade Anicetus to recede from his Custom nor could Anicetus persuade Polycarpus to recede from his So they parted good Friends Almost thirty years after this Controversie Euseb Eccles Hist l. 5. c. 23 24. was revived between whole Churches in the time of Polycrates Bishop of Ephesus and Victor of Rome Several Provincial Synods were summoned to consider of the matter and on each hand Tradition was urged The Western Churches insisted upon a Tradition which they had received from some of the Apostles the Churches of Asia pleaded a Tradition which they had received from S. John who 't is likely recommended that Custom to them to gratifie the Jews And perhaps the Plea on both sides was good But so stiff they were on each hand that no Arguments could prevail with either Party to relinquish their old Custom and to take up the other so that Victor in a great heat would have cut off tot tantas Ecclesias Dei so many and such eminent Churches of God from his Communion had not the great Prelate of Lyons Irenaeus stood in the gap and reprehended Victor for his rashness Now he that shall seriously consider this story with all its Circumstances cannot with reason believe that the Ancient Churches were easie to be impos'd upon or to be corrupted with Superstition when they stood out so resolutely against an innocent Tradition Much less is it credible that a few Persons though of Repute and Dignity could possibly leven all Churches in Christendom with their private Inventions And therefore when we consider how all Churches of old did conspire as in the same Faith so in the same Government in the same Ministrations and generally in the same Rites too and those now in use with us here we must needs be startled in our thoughts and be posed to conceive how these things could arise all at once of themselves without any hand like so many Mushromes that start out of the Earth in a Night or how they could be disseminated by any Private hand Rather it seemeth reasonable to impute them to the Special Providence of God and to the Institution of the first Ministers of Religion who probably did recommend these usages as things useful or convenient though they did not Ordain or Impose them as things simply and universally Necessary I do not pretend peremptorily to derive all our Customes from Apostolical Practice although there are such fair evidences of the Antiquity of many of them that we might strongly argue that point if the Ancient Christians may be allowed what is allowed Jews and Heathens to be good Witnesses of matters of Fact But my purpose is to prove that our present Establishments in the Church of England are of a very Venerable date and for that Reason to contend that they ought not to give place to Novelties as if they were of no moment or to be kick'd down as if they are Despicable So that if better Arguments may be setch'd from Antiquity on their behalf than can be brought against them I have obtained my Ends and in order to that I urge the General as well as Ancient usage of them For certainly one Church ought to have regard to the Constitutions of other and especially the Ancient Catholick Churches or else St. Paul's Argument is trifling in 1 Cor. 11. 16. where condemning the covering of Mens Heads and the uncovering of Womens in Religious Assemblies he confronts the Practice by urging the custom observed in all Places besides Corinth We have no such custom neither the Churches of God And in St. Paul's Judgment that was enough to determine the Controversie Two things may be objected against what hath been spoken First That
made up of converted Gentiles Now over each of these Churches there did preside a Bishop with his Deacons so that frequently you shall find in Church-History two several Bishops in one City 2. Secondly that these and the Neighbouring Bishops were wont to convene and meet together to consult concerning the ordering and management of Ecclesiastical Matters 3. And thirdly that the necessities and condition of places were such in the beginning that all Churches were not so compleatly and perfectly modelled at the first as they were in process of time For as Churches were greater or less in proportion so were Church-Officers more or fewer in number Where the multitude of Christians was not great there a Bishop and his Deacon were enough to discharge the work of the Ministry where the numbers of Christians did increase there Presbyters were appointed to assist the Bishop and to act under him and where an Apostle thought good not to fix any Bishop but to hold the Government of a Church immediately in his own hands there he did commonly appoint a College or Bench of Presbyters to perform Ministerial Offices as his Proxies in his absence and by his Authority derived and delegated unto them For so did St. Paul keep the Superintendency over the Church of Corinth in his own hands as their immediate and sole Bishop because he had converted them to the Faith and what the Presbyters did in excommunicating that incestuous person they did it by St. Paul's Spirit that is by 1 Cor. 5. 4. his Episcopal Authority and Power committed unto him by Christ I verily as absent in Body but present in Spirit or by my Authority have judged already concerning him saith the Apostle This Observation will give us to understand the meaning Epiph. haeres 75. of that which we collect out of Epiphanius that in one Church there were Bishops and Deacons only where the numbers of Converts were small in another there were Presbyters without any Bishops besides an Apostle where there was need of many Ministers and yet one could not be found that was so fit for the Bishoprick in others agen there were Bishops Presbyters and Deacons too where the condition of the place did require it and the worth and abilities of the Men did admit of it Now then to come to the Objection St. Paul gives Timothy an 1 Tim. 3. account of the Qualifications necessary in Bishops and this questionless was in order to their Ordination But how doth it appear that Presbyters are meant by the word Bishops Were Presbyters now to be Ordained Did the word of God Act. 19. 20. grow and prevail so mightily in the Ephesian Churches and yet no Presbyters in them Was St. Paul among them for the space of three years preaching disputing and converting so many Act. 20. 31. Multitudes to the Faith and yet ordained no Presbyters to water what he had so prosperously planted And if Presbyters were ordained were setled in the Churches of Ephesus before the Apostles departure to Macedonia what necessity was there for him to send his Son Timothy Instructions concerning the Ordination of Presbyters especially when he hoped to return unto him shortly Divines conceive that this Epistle was sent by 1 Tim. 3. 14. him soon after he departed from Ephesus and were all the Presbyters dead in that little time 'T is hardly to be believed that Presbyters were wanting but Bishops were For hitherto St. Paul had been with the Ephesians for the most part in his own person he had governed them in his own person and had exercised his Episcopal Authority in his own person But now he was gone leaving Timothy in his room he was the first Bishop that was fixt at Ephesus and the only Bishop indeed now and yet but a young Man that had need of other Bishops to concur with him and help him in his Office and considering that St. Paul was uncertain when he should see him 1 Tim. 3. 15. again there was an urgent necessity for him to write speedily to his Son that other Bishops might be ordained that other Churches might be guarded from the Gnostic Seducers as well as Ephesus it self the great Metropolis There is no necessity then for us to conceive that St. Paul in his Epistle to Timothy did mean Presbyters when he spake of Bishops but rather that he gave directions for the Ordination of those who were to be Bishops indeed to be invested with Episcopal Power and to preside over other Cities as Timothy did over Ephesus in St. Paul's own Chair Again the Apostle saluteth the Saints at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons Phil. 1. 1. But there is no Demonstrative Reason to constrain nor probable Argument to induce us to believe that he directed his salutation to Presbyters much less that he gave them the Title of Bishops For there are several fair accounts to be given of this matter either as some conceive that there were two Bishops over two Churches in Philippi Jewish and Gentile Christians as 't was usual in other places or as others are of Opinion that the Neighbouring Bishops were now assembled at Philippi as 't was usual at other times or as others are persuaded that the Salutation is sent not to but from the Bishops and Deacons and so the words are to be read thus with a Parenthesis Paul and Timotheus the Servants of Jesus Christ to all the Saints in Christ Jesus which are at Philippi with the Bishops and Deacons Grace be unto you c. But which way soever we interpret the Text we are so far from finding any Presbyters in the Salutation that there is no argument to prove that they were at all in the City whither the Salutation was sent For Epiphanius tells us that many Churches at the first were ordered by Bishops and Deacons only and then why not the Churches of Philippi also Thus their whole Argument fails them who would prove the Office and Order of Bishop and Presbyter to have been the same in the Apostles days because forsooth the Name is given to both in Scripture Though the Consequence would not be good should their grand Principle be granted yet there is no solid reason for us to grant the Principle it self And therefore I shall not stick to conclude peremptorily That the Order of Bishops both as to name and thing is so far from being either an Antichristian or an Ecclesiastical Ordinance that it was instituted by Christ himself and founded in the Apostles of Christ and by them so establish'd and continued in all the Churches of Christ that for 1500 years together no Church in the world being perfectly and rightly form'd was ever under any other sort of Government but that the Episcopal Office and Authority hath through a continual Succession of Ages been communicated transmitted and handed down to the whole Catholick Church even from the most primitive and infant times of Christianity and consequently that this way of Government
Justin Martyr Ignatius and other the most Primitive Writers so that without all peradventure this custome is founded upon Apostolical Institution and exactly agreeable to this most Ancient and Christian custome is that Offertory appointed in our English Service-book Next follows the Prayer for the whole state of Christ's Church Militant here in earth which is highly consonant to the practice The Prayer for the Catholick Church of the Vniversal Church in all Ages in respect both of its order and matter For first before the reception of the Sacrament a Prayer of this Nature was ever offered and that saith S. Ambros according to the Rule delivered by S. Paul In some places I Comment on 1 Tim. 2. find that this Prayer was used once before the Consecration of the Elements the Deacon inditing it and the people answering Litanywise Lord have mercy and after Consecration it was repeated Clem. Const lib. 8. S. Cyril Catech 5. Justin Mart. Apol. 2. Ambros de Sac. lib. 4. c. 4. again by him that Ministred in chief the people answering only Amen But never was the Sacrament administred without supplications in the first place for the people for Kings and for the rest as St. Ambrose speaks And to the same purpose St. Cyril tells us that the Spiritual Sacrifice being prepared they went solemnly to prayer for the common peace of the Churches for the tranquillity of the World for Kings for their Armies and Allies for Cyril Catech 5. sick and afflicted people and for all that stood in need of help And of the truth of this all Liturgies extant are an abundant proof 2. Then as touching the particular matter of this excellent and Catholick Prayer it is observable 1. That our Church calleth the things laid upon the Lords Table not only Alms but Oblations and so did the Ancients call Clem. ep ad Cor. p. 52. them even S. Clement himself S. Pauls fellow-labourer For the old Christians conceived themselves obliged to make Offerings of Praise and Thanksgiving under the Gospel as well as Abel did before the Law and the Jews did under the Law The Species of Sacrifice was changed indeed for they offered not Bullocks and Goats but they did not think that all kinds of Offerings were abolisht but that they were bound to present Eucharistical Oblations unto God that they might be found thankful unto the Maker of the Vniverse as Irenaeus speaks So that in lieu of bloudy Sacrifices they presented Bread and Wine Iren. lib. 4. c. 34. V. Mede's Christian Sacrifice and the first fruits of their increase besides sums of money And these were called Oblations gifts whereby they acknowledg'd Gods right and propriety unto all their Possessions that the Earth is the Lords and the fulness thereof not as if he needed these gifts but as humble Thanksgivings unto his Offerimus non quasi indigenti sed gratias agentes dominationi ejus Iren. ut suprá Soveraignty And so they were wont to profess in those days 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Lord we restore unto thee some of thine own things 2. Our Church prayeth that God would accept these our Alms and Oblations which is perfectly answerable to the old custome for so the first Christians did beseech God that in mercy Clem. Const lib. 8. he would look upon their offerings and accept them as a sweet Odour through the Intercession of Christ 3. Then our Church goes on praying for the Vniversal Church for Kings Princes and Magistrates for the Clergy and the rest And thus did all the Churches of old pray for the holy Catholick Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from end to end for Kings Id. ibid. and all in Authority that they may be at peace with us and that we living in all quietness and concord may glorifie thee all our days through Jesus Christ for all holy Bishops rightly dividing the word of truth for all Presbyters and Deacons for all thy people and all that are in want and distress c. 4. Last of all it is customary with us at the end of this Prayer to make mention of the Saints departed and so 't was ever customary with all the Churches of old to bless God for their Faith Perseverance and Martyrdomes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Clem. Const lib. 8. beseeching that they might be made partakers of their conflicts and with them might have their perfect Consummation and bliss This was the first design of these memorials of the dead In fide morientium devotè memoriam agimus tam illorum refrigerio gaudentes quam etiam nobis piam consummationem in fide postulantes Origen lib. 3. in Job p. 274. Ed. Par. See Bishop Vshers Ans to the Challenge which latter Ages corrupted adding Prayers for the release of souls out of a pretended Purgatory But this conceit and practice was never known in the Ancient and best times And therfore our honest Church resolving to bring things to their first stay threw out of her Prayers this dross and litter and filthy stuff retaining that which was pure and Primitive Among those things which have been corrupted in the old Liturgies as we now have them there are some things which have passed all along untouched As that salutation of the Minister the Dominus Vobiscum Lord be with you and the peoples Answer and with thy Spirit it is every where to be found in the ancientest Monuments And so that other sursum corda lift up your hearts with the return we lift them up unto the Lord we find it in S. Cyprian and S. Cyril and in every Liturgy As also the following exhortation let Cypr. de Orat. Dom. us give thanks unto our Lord God and the subsequent acknowledgement it is meet and right so to do the Minister going on Sursum Corda c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is very meet right and our bounden duty c. these Forms are still entire in all Service-books that they may rationally be concluded to have sprang from Apostolical practice And so the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Therefore with Angels and Archangels and all the company of Heaven c. together with the Trisagium following which was joyntly repeated by the whole Congregation Holy holy holy Lord God of Host c. they are Forms which were very anciently and universally V. Lit. Jacob. Marc. Petri. Aethiop Mosar Christian apud Ind. Clem. Constit cum multis aliis used at this time but somewhat more largely and with a little inconsiderable difference for thus they said of old before thee do stand praising and worshipping thee numberless Hosts of Angels Arch-angels Thrones Dominions Principalities and Powers the Cherubim and the six-winged Scraphim with two wings covering their feet and with two wings covering their faces and with two wings flying and crying continually and incessantly with thousands and thousands of Arch-angels and with myriads and myriads of Angels Holy holy holy Lord God of
persecutes the Church or disturbs the peace of Christians or is an Heretick or Schismatick or is a favourer or a defender of Hereticks and Schismaticks then saith he that Prince must down and if you read Histories you will finde that it has been a common thing for Kings to be dethroned And he instanceth in the Scots that have been Rebels and Traytors from the beginning In uno Scotiae regno multos Reges legimus Lib. 11. c. 5. Nobilium Populi communi consensu è regno pulsos that is In that one Kingdom of Scotland we read of many Kings whose Crowns have been pulled off their heads by the Nobles and Commonalty Ergo the thing is very lawful And truly this is De jure regni pag. 53. Buchanan's own Argument Possum annumerare duodecem aut etiam amplius Reges c. I could says he reckon up twelve Kings of Scotland or more who have been either imprisoned or banisht or slain out-right by their Subjects for their Crimes Truly 't is a fine Honour for that Nation and though it be a most pitiful and scandalous Argument yet 't is remarkable how these two men did jump in their way of arguing there is such an Harmonia Evangelica such a sweet Harmony between these two great Evangelists that it may be questioned whether Buchanan was not a Jesuit or Azorius a Presbyterian 6. The King-killing Doctrine is justly laid at the Jesuits door for 't is his own dear Brat onely some have modestly doubted whether a Prince who is counted a Tyrant may be executed by any private hand till he has been heard and condemned by the judicial Sentence of the Nation But never let this Doctrine be laid at the Jesuits door onely For hath it not been held hath it not been put in practice by many pretended Anti papists in this Island Give me Buchanan for my money who scorns to mince the matter as others do till they have the Power in their hands for speaking of Tyrants and any Prince that pleaseth not them shall be esteem'd a Tyrant If I saith he were to make a Law I would have such men carried De Jure Reg. away into Deserts or drowned in the Sea and I would have such as kill them to be lustily rewarded not by single men but by the whole Commonwealth even as they are publickly rewarded that kill Wolves or Bears or take their Whelps There 's a man to be a Prince's Tutor but the Jesuits were his Tutors first For what brave fellows were Clement and Ravaillac in their estimation and had they liv'd would have been made Cardinals For what is more meritorious with them than to dispatch a King that is their Enemy Did not Ehud kill King Eglon saith Aquinas Did not the Captains kill Queen Athalia saith Bellarmine Yes surely they did but these instances do not reach the Case However some King-killing Protestants have urged these very Examples which were urged by the King-killing Romanists and by this we See Dang Posit B. 2. c. 1. may know what hands they were which cut off K. Charles's head and by whom they were influenced and set on work 7. But how will men answer God for these horrid Villanies Doth not our Saviour say Resist not evil Doth not St. Paul say He that resisteth shall receive to himself damnation And did not the good old Christians in the Primitive times quietly submit to the Emperours though they were Infidels Hereticks Persecutors O saith Buchanan and his Loyal De Jure Reg. p. 50 51. Brethren of the new cut you must consider the condition of those times the Church then was in its Infancy and Christians were low in Fortunes and few in number and void of Arms yet the ancient Fathers tell us the contrary and therefore 't was necessary for St. Paul to advise them to be quiet as if saith he one should now write to the poor Christians under the Turk he would advise them to be quiet because they cannot help it though the Apostle said Ye must needs be subject not onely for Wrath but also for Conscience sake But saith Buchanan if St. Paul lived now in these times he would say otherwise From this shift the Magistrate may observe how dangerous it is to indulge men of these Principles till they grow numerous strong opulent and heady for then Conscience will hang at the hilts of their Swords but that which I observe is that this Evasion is down-right Jesuitism So Cardinal Bellarmine affirm'd That the reason why Christians De Rom. Pont. l. 5. c. 7. did not depose Nero or Diocletian or Julian or Valens and the like wicked Emperours was quia deerant vires Temporales Christianis because they wanted strength And the same Evasion Parsons the Jesuit used in Q. Elizabeth's days but 't was such a pitiful Evasion that Father Watson who then hated the Jesuits was asham'd of it and did largely confute it Quodlibet 9. Art 4. I might take notice of several more Principles yet which have been entertain'd by our Sectaries and as like unto Jesuitical Principles as one Apple is like another As that when they please they can dispense with Oaths though never so lawful and lawfully impos'd such as the Oath of Allegiance Supremacy Canonical Obedience c. these have been swallowed and gone down glib when an unlawful Oath like a Jesuits Vow sticks and is ready to choak them Likewise that they make Obedience to the Civil Magistrate due with certain limitations and conditions viz. if he stick to that Religion which they suppose to be true This is a Jesuitical Principle and so Bellarmine tells us That Princes are received Vbi sup into the Church upon an Express or tacit Compact that they will submit their Scepters unto Christ and defend and preserve the Faith but if once they warp their Subjects are free from their Oaths of Obedience Exactly answerable hereunto was the Tenor of the Scotch Covenant wherein they Solemn League and Covenant Art 3. swore to preserve and defend the Kings Majesties Person and Authority not absolutely but with this limitation and restriction in the preservation and defence they are Bellarmine's very words of the true Religion Let a Prince please them and he shall be their King and so far the rankest Jesuit will be a good Subject but if he be not of their Opinion or for their Interest farewel Loyalty and let the poor Prince look to himself Moreover they thought as the Jesuits do that any Arts of Dissimulation and Equivocation were lawful Of which the late times have afforded us so many pregnant Instances that for twenty years together Hypocrisie seem'd God be merciful unto us to have ran through all proceedings like an Anima Mundi to give life and spirit to every Action But I cannot well omit one very memorable Instance when the House of Commons did solemnly declare on April 9. 1642. That they intended onely a due and necessary Reformation