been an introduction unto him not that his faith rested upon it as a finall stay but that it caused him so farre to respect the word of the Gospell to listen unto it and with a kind of acquisite and humane faith to believe it that he was thereby fitted to a better illumination by force whereof he might more certainly believe it to be of God But that the testimony of one Father in one place in a matter of such consequence should be of that force it is strange We deny not the ministery of the Church as an externall meanes to move us to imbrace the word of God but we deny the authority of the Church to be the principall meanes When we call the Scriptures Canonicall we call them not so passively because they are received into the Canon by men and accepted of but actively because they prescribe a Canon and rule to us The office of the Church in respect of the Scripture stands in foure things 1. To distinguish Canonicall Scripture from that which is not Canonicall although the determination of the Church be not the onely or chiefest cause why the Apocrypha are rejected 2. To be a faithfull keeper of those books which are inspired by God like a notary which keepeth publique writings 3. To publish declare and teach the truth as a cryer with a loud voyce ought to pronounce the Kings edicts but to pretermit adde or alter nothing Matth. 28. 19 20. Acts 8. 35. 1 Tim. 3. 15. This Church here is not that Church which the Papists make to be the Judge of controversies neither the Church representative which is a generall Councell nor the Church virtuall which they imagine to be the Pope but the Church Essentiall the congregation of all faithfull believers the House of God as he calleth it The Apostle here speaks of a pillar not more Architectonico understanding by it some essentiall piece of the building but more forensi such a post or pillar on which Tables and Proclamations use to hang. In old time the Gentiles used to write their Lawes in Tables and so hang them upon pillars of stone that the people might read them as Proclamations are nailed to posts in market Towns The Apostle describing the Church likeneth it to one of these pillars whose use was to shew what hung thereon It is pillar not because it holds up but holds forth the truth 4. To interpret the Scripture by the Scripture Since many things in Scripture are doubtfull and hard to be understood without an Interpreter Acts 8. 31. it doth belong to the Church to expound the same to interpret and give the sence Nehem. 8. 8 9. Luke 24. 27. provided that this exposition be by the Scriptures Some of the Papists say that the Church may condere artioulos fidei facere canonicum quo ad nos and though they talke of Councels and Fathers yet all is as the Pope concludes The testimony and tradition of the Church especially the Primitive Church is necessary to know that the Gospell of Matthew is divine Scripture by an historicall and acquired faith to know this by a divine and infured faith besides the authority of the Church the matter character and contents of every booke and comparing of it with other Scriptures doe serve as an inward cause to produce the said infused faith Ob. We are sent to the Church to determine all controversies 1 Cor. 11. 16. Sol. Controversies are either dogmaticall concerning faith or rituall concerning true order the proposition is about these not the first Secondly from this fundamentall truth that the Scripture is immediately from God the basis indeed of all religion 1 Cor. 15. the wickednesse of the Church of Rome is farther to be condemned which will not suffer the Scriptures to be read in their Churches but in an unknowne tongue nor in private by the common people without speciall leave and certaine cautions from their superiours Of old they would not suffer them to be read at all of late they are forced to give licences to some and they teach them that they should not make the Scripture judge of the doctrine and practice of the Church but the doctrine and practise of the Church must be the interpreter and judge of the meaning of the Scripture that is they must take the Scripture to meane none otherwise whatsoever it seem to say then what is agreeable to that which the Pope doth teach and practice There cannot be a surer signe of a bad cause then that it feares to be tried by the writings which it selfe cannot deny to be written by God for correction for reproofe for instruction in righteousnesse Some Papists are more modest herein as Bellarmine l. 2. de verbo Dei c. 15. Catholica Ecclesia statuit ne passim omnibus concedatur Scripturae lectio some more rigid as Huntly and Hosiua The Papists object the obscursity of Scriptures as an argument to hinder lay-men from reading them and account it a matter of profanation to allow men women and children and all promiscuously the use of the vulgar translation and thinke they will rather be hurt then benefited by them taking occasion of erring from them Hosius urgeth that give not holy things to dogs cast not Pearles before Swine to prove the people must be barred from reading of the Scriptures It is Pope Innocents glosse a beast might not touch the mount a lay-man might not meddle with Scripture Lindan saith nihil noxae inferretur in Ecclesiam salvâ— traditionis fundamento if there were no Bible and another Scriptura citius faciet Haereticum Lutherarum quam Catholicum Because we will have all proved by Scripture and make that the compleat rule for what we believe or doe in all Theologicall matters they call us Scripturarios Scripturemen and atram entarios Theologos and so to carry or read a Bible is matter of scoffe we may stile them in Tertullians phrase Scripturarum Lucifugae Traditionaries Saint Gregory who is blessed in their Church exhorteth a lay-man to the serious study of the Scriptures that thereby he might learne the will of God alledging that the Scripture is the Epistle of God unto his creature Quid est autem Scriptura sacra nisi Epistola omnipotentis Dei ad Creaturam Greg. lib. 4. epist. 40. ad Theodorum medicum Proving further that obscurity of Scripture is so frothy an argument for perswading any devout Christian not to read them that it should rather incite them to greater diligence therein and therefore he elegantly compares the Scripture to a River wherein saith he there are as well shallow fords for Lambs to wade in as depths and gulphs wherein the Elephant may swim Chrysostome held it a thing necessary for all men daily to read the Scriptures Audite quaeso saeculares comparate vobis Biblia animae pharmaca Saint Jerome did exhort divers women thereto and commended
Church 2. We grant that the Apostâ—es living and preaching and the Canon of the New Testament being not yet sealed their Gospell delivered viva voce was no lesse a rule of faith and worship then the writings of Moses and the Prophets 3. We doe not reject all the traditions of the Church for we embrace certaine Historicall and Ceremoniall ones but we deny that opinions of faith or precepts of worship can be confirmed by unwritten traditions 4. We call that an opinion of faith to speake properly and strictly when a Proposition is revealed by God which exceeds the capacity of nature and is propounded to be beleeved as necessary to be knowne to salvation Fundamentall opinions are those which by a usuall and proper name are called Articles of faith 5. What is not in respect of the matter an Article of saith may be a Proposition to be beleeved with a Theologicall faith if you looke to the manner of revealing as that the Sunne is a great light the Moone a lesse Gen. 1. 16. that Rachel was beautifull Leah bleare-eyed The Papists doe not cease to accuse the Scripture of imperfection and insufficiency as not containing all things necessary to salvation The Councell of Trent sess 4. decret 1. Saith that the truth and discipline is contained in libris scriptis sine scripto traditionibus The Papists generally divide the word of God into the word written and traditions They affirme that there are many things belonging to Christian faith which are neither contained in the Scriptures openly nor secretly This opinion is maintained by the Papists but it was not first invented by them The Jewish Fathers did use the traditions of the Elders and it hath been said of old Marke 7. 5. Matth. 5. 21. for their errours and superstitions yea at length they affirmed firmed that God gave to Moses in mount Sinai the Scripture and the Cabala or a double Law the one written the other unwritten The Tridentine Fathers session 4th doe command Traditions to be received with the same reverend affection and piety with which we embrace the Scripture and because one Bishop in the Councell of Trent refused this he was excluded In the meane space they explaine not what those traditions are which must be so regarded none of them would ever give us a list and Catalogue of those Ordinances which are to be defended by the authority of unwritten traditions not of the word committed to writing onely they affirme in generall whatsoever they teach or doe which is not in the Scripture that it is to be put into the number of Traditions unwritten The cause of it selfe is manifest that at their pleasure they might thrust what they would upon the Church under the name of Traditions Vide Whitak de Script controviae quaest Sexta c. 5. See also Moulins Buckler of Faith p. 51. Lindan the Papist was not ashamed to say that it had been better for the Church if there had been no Scripture at all but onely Traditions For saith he we may doe well enough with Traditions though we had no Scripture but could not doe well enough with Scripture though we had no Traditions Baldwin saith a Testament may be either scriptum or nuncupativum set downe in writing or uttered by word of mouth But a nuncupative Testament or Will made by word of mouth without writing must be proved by solemne witnesses The solemne witnesses of Christs Testament are the Prophets and Apostles Let Papists if they can prove by them that part of the Testament of Christ is unwritten Because our Adversaries doe contend for Traditions not written hotly and zealously against the totall perfection of the Scripture that they might thrust upon us many points by their owne confession not contained in Scripture and usurpe to themselves irrefragable authority in the Church it shall not be amisse largely to consider of this matter And 1. to enquire of the signification of the words Greek and Latine which are translated Tradition and then to come to the matter which is controverted between us and the Papists The Greeke word signifying Tradition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which in the new Testament is used only in these places Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. 1 Cor. 11. 2. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 8. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and in the vulgar Latine is rendred Traditio Matth. 15. 2. 3. 6. Marke 7. 3. 5. 8. 9. 13. Gal. 1. 14. Col. 2. 6. 2 Thess. 2. 15. and 3. 6. and praecepta 1 Cor. 11. 2. Whereto the Rhemists translation which seemeth to be but a bare translation of the vulgar Latine doth wholly agree using the word Tradition every where excepting 1 Cor. 11. 2. where they use the word precepts but set in the margent the word Tradition Arias Montanus in his Interlineall translation doth render it traditio Beza doth commonly expresse it by the word traditio In the English Geneva Bible we translate it by the word instruction tradition calling mens precepts traditions the Apostles doctrine Ordinances or instructions not that we feared the word tradition but because we would not have the simple deceived as though the unwritten verities of the papists were thereby commended or as though we had some honourable conceite of them and what we did herein the signification of the word doth give us free liberty to doe in our last English Translation we use the word tradition as often as the vulgar Latine or the Rhemists have done not that we were driven by feare or shame to alter what was done before but because we would cut off all occasion of carping at our translation though never so unjust First we contend not about the name tradition the word may lawfully be used if the sense affixed thereto be lawfull 2. All traditions unwritten are not simply condemned by us 3. The Apostles delivered by lively voyce many observations dispensable and alterable according to the circumstances of time and persons appertaining to order and comelinesse onely we say that they were not of the substance of Religion that they were not generall concerning all Churches 4. We receive the number and names of the authors of Books Divine and Canonicall as delivered by tradition but the Divine truth of those Books is in it self clear and evident unto us not depending on the Churches authority The Books of Scripture have not their authority quoad nos from the approbation of the Church but winne credit of themselves and yeeld sufficient satisfaction to all men of their divine truth whence we judge the Church that receiveth them to be led by the Spirit of God yet the number authors and integrity of the parts of those Books we receive as delivered by tradition 5. The continued practise of such things as are neither expressely contained in Scripture nor the example of such practise expressely there delivered though the grounds reasons and cause of the necessity of such practise be
there contained and the benefit and good that foloweth of it we receive upon tradition though the thing it selfe we receive not for tradition Of this sort is the Baptisme of Infants which may be named a Tradition because it is not expressely delivered in Scripture that the Apostles did Baptize Infants nor any expresse precept there found that they should so doe yet is not this so received by bare and naked tradition but that we finde the Scripture to deliver unto us the ground of it Bellarmine and Maldonate both doe confesse that the Baptisme of Infants may be proved by the Scripture and therefore Maldonate concludes nobis verò traditio non est Bellarmine * as Whitaker shewes contradicts himselfe for first he saith that the Baptisme of Infants is an unwritten tradition and after that the Catholicks can prove Baptisme of Infants from the Scriptures To this head we may referre the observation of the Lords day the precept whereof is not found in Scripture though the practise be And if for that cause any shall name it a Tradition we will not contend about the word if he grant withall that the example Apostolicall hath the force of a Law as implying a common equity concerning us no lesse then it did them If any man shall call the summary comprehension of the chief heads of Christian doctrine contained in the Creed commonly called the Apostles Creed a tradition we will not contend about it For although every part thereof be contained in Scripture yet the orderly connexion distinct explication of those principall Articles gathered into an Epitome wherein are implyed and whence are inferred all conclusions Theologicall is an Act humane not divine and in that sense may be called a Tradition But let it be noted withall that we admit it not to have that credit as now it hath to be the rule of faith for this is the priviledge of holy Scripture The Creed it selfe was gathered out of Scripture and is to be expounded by the Scripture therefore it is not given to be a perfect Canon of faith and manners By Tradition is noted 1. Whatsoever is delivered by men divinely inspired and immediately called whether it be by lively voyce or by writing 2. In speciall it notes the word of God committed to writing 1 Cor. 15. 3. 3. It signifies rites expressely contained in writing Act. 6. 14. 4. It betokens that which is not committed to writing but onely delivered by lively voyce of the Apostles 5. It signifieth that which is invented and delivered by men not immediately called In Scripture Tradition is taken 1. in good part for any rite or doctrine of God delivered to his Church either by word or writing whether it concern faith and good works or the externall government of the Church 2 Thess. 2. 15. 1 Cor. 11. 15. 23. 2. In ill part it noteth the vaine idle and unwarrantable inventions of men whether Doctrine or Rites Matthew 15. 3. Marke 7. 8 9. When the Fathers speake reverently of Traditions by the word Tradition either they understand the holy Scripture which also is a Tradition it is a Doctrine left unto us Or by Traditions they understand observations touching Ecclesiastill policy D. Moulin Reasons confirming the sufficiency of Scripture against Popish traditions 1. The whole Church is founded upon the Doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles which were not true if any doctrin was necessary to salvation not revealed by the Prophets and Apostles 2. The Prophets and Christ and his Apostles condemne Traditions Esay 29. 13. Mathew 15. 3. 6. Col. 2. 8. Therefore they are not to be received Christ opposeth the Commandement and Scriptures to Traditions therefore he condemnes Traditions not written If the Jewes might not adde to the Bookes of Moses then much lesse may wee adde to the Canon of Scripture so much increased since 3. Those things which proceede from the will of God onely can be made knowne to us no other way but by the Revelation of the Scripture all Articles of Faith and Precepts of Manners concerning substance of Religion proceede from the Will of God onely Mathew 16. 17. 1 Cor. 2. 9 10 11. Gal. 1. 8. As in this place the Apostle would have nothing received besides that which he Preached so 1 Cor. 4. 6. He will have nothing admitted above or more then that which is written See Act. 26. 22. John 20. ult whence it is manifest that all necessary things may be found in Scripture since full and perfect Faith ariseth from thence which eternall salvation followeth Bellarmin saith John speakes onely of the miracles of Christ that hee wrote not all because those sufficed to perswade the World that Christ was the Sonne of God Those words indeede in the 30 Verse are to be understood of Christs Miracles but those in the 31. Verse rather are to be generally interpreted for the History onely of the Miracles sufficeth not to obtaine Faith or Life The question betwixt the Papists and us is de ipsa doctrina tradita non de tradendi modo touching the substance of the Doctrine delivered not of the manner of delivering it and of Doctrine delivered as the Word of God not of Rites and Ceremonies They maintaine that there bee doctrinall Traditions or Traditions containing Articles of Faith and substantiall matters of Divine worship and Religion not found in the holy Scriptures viz. Purgatory Invocation of Saints Adoration of Images Papall Monarchy Bellarmin and before him Peresius distinguisheth Traditions both from the authours and the matter From the Authours into Divine Apostolicall and Ecclesiasticall From the matter into those which are concerning Faith and concerning Manners into perpetuall and temporall universall and particular necessary and free Divine Traditions that is Doctrines of Faith and of the worship and service of God any of which we deny to be but what are comprised in the written Word of God Apostolike Traditions say they are such Ordinances as the Apostles prescribed for ceremony and usage in the Church as the observation of the memoriall of the Nativity Death and Resurrection of Christ the alteration of the seventh day from the Jewes Sabbath to the day of Christs Resurrection Ecclesiasticall ancient Customes which by degrees through the Peoples consent obtained the force of a Law Traditions concerning Faith as the perpetuall Virginity of Mary the Mother of Christ and that there are onely foure Gospels of Manners as the signe of the Crosse made in the forehead Fasts and Feastings to be observed on cetaine dayes Perpetuall which are to bee kept to the end of the World Temporall for a certaine time as the observation of certaine legall Ceremonies even to the â—ull publishing of the Gospell Universall Traditions which are delivered to the whole Church to be kept as the observation of Easter Whitsontide and other great Feasts Particular which is delivered to one or more Churches as in the
reliquos Scripturae libros pertâ—xi Voet. Biblioth Theol. l. 1. c. 14. 4. For Popish Expositors Aquinas is esteemed by the Papists as the Oracle of the Romish Schoole whom for his profound learning and search into the mysteries of all Divinity they sirnamed Angelicall He was the first thorow Papist of name that ever wrote and with his rare gifts of wit learning and industry did set out Popery * most Maximo altissimo ingenio vir cui ad plenam absolutamque totius tam divinae quam humanae eruditionis gloriam solus defuit linguarum eloquentiae usus quem aeruditi istius saeculi ut pote sublimioribus studijs intenti neglexere Sixtus Senensis vide plara ibid. Luther on 9 of Genesis chiefely commends Lyra for following the literall sense Nicolaus Lyranus vir tanta tamque pura vera germana sacrae Scripturae scientia praeditus ut in illa exponendâ— nullum habeat illius temporis parem Rainoldus de lib. Apoc tomâ— 1. praelect 21. Ex antiquioribus tanquam universales communes commentatores habiti fuerunt Lyrasnus Glossa Voetius in Biblioth Theol. Jansenius eruditus moderatus Interpres Cajetane went over all the Scripture saving the Canticles and Prophets which dying he left begun and the Revelation quam de industria attingere noluit He was both a learned moderate Papist as Chamier and Whitaker both shew He was chiefely intent on the literall sense and that according to the Hebrew truth of which tongue he had little knowledge but had by him those that were skil'd in the Hebrew who would interprete ad verbum not onely exactly but superstitiously and often absurdly which often drew the like expositions from the Cardinall There are now 5 Papiâ—s joyned together in severall Volumes on the whole Scripture Immanuell Sa Estius Gagneius Tirinus and Menochius the last of which Grotius commends in his Preface to his Annotations on the Old Testament Estius doth excellently on all the Epistles Maldonate doth well on the Evangelists but was a most supercilious writer and no marvell since he was for his Country a Spaniard and his profession a Jesuite Masius hath written learnedly on Joshua Quanta vir ille linguae Graecae sed preaesertim Hebraeâ—cae Rabbinicae Syriacae cognitione fuerit imbutus nemini docto opinor incognitum Morinus l. 1. exercitat 9. c. 6. and exercit 1. c. 4. Andreaeas Masius linguae Hebraicae Syriacae peritissimus atque in lectione Rabbinica egregiè exeroitatus The Popish Postils are the burden of many Camels as Lipsius speakes of the Bookes of the Law and are fitly sâ—iled by godly Divines pigrorum pulvinaria Vide Zepperi Artem Habendi Audiendi conciones sacras l. 1. c. 4 p. 38 39. c. Ministers to all the meanes formerly mentioned for the interpreting of Scripture must adde a conscionable practise of what they know and must in all humblenesse of minde seeke the peoples edification The meanes to be used by the people to understand the Scripture and find out the sence and meaning of it 1. If they be learned they may make use of most of the former meanes prescribed to Ministers 2. Such as are unskilfull and know not how to make use of those meanes are 1. Diligently to read the Scripture in which are to be considered 1. Antecedent preparation that they come to the reading and studie of the Scriptures with Prayers and greatest reverence relying on the Divine promises for the inlightening of their minds by the Holy Ghost The Scripture may well be called the Revelation of Christ. Rev. 1. 1. See Rev. 5. 5. 2. The adjuncts of reading which are 1. Chiefest attention in reading and a pious disposition and spirituall frame of the heart that they may not understand onely but cordially affect what they understand 2. Application of all things to the Examination Correction and amendment of their own lives 3. Diligent Meditation 4. Conferring of it with others and Catechizing 2 They ought to have recourse to those that are more skilfull then themselves and to consult with the best Commentaries and Expositions of the Scripture and read them judiciously We teach of our Meanes that they all together doe make a perfect way whereby we may finde the right sense of the Scripture Our Adversaries prescribe this method and course to be taken in expounding of Scripture which consists in 4 rules The generall practise of the Church the Consonant interpretation of the Fathers the decrees of generall Councels lastly the rule of faith consisting partly of the Scriptures partly of traditions unwritten In all these meanes the Pope is implicitely understood for the rule of faith is that which the Pope approves the practise of the Church is that which the Pope observes the interpretation of the Fathers is that which the Pope follows the determination of Councels what the Pope confirmes so that the Pope must interprete all Scripture But divers reasons may be alleaged to shew that the true interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought for from the Popes of Rome 1. Because the Popes of Rome have frequently and grossely erred in interpreting of Scripture as in the 8th of the Romanes 8. v. those that are in the flesh cannot please God that is those that are married said Siricius the Pope Innocent so expounded those words John 6. unlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his bloud you shall have no life in you that he thence concluded that there is no salvation without receiving the Eucharist and that it is to be given to Infants Pope Boniface interpreted Luke 22. 38. of the temporall and spirituall sword delivered to the Pope 2. Because the Popes of Rome doe differ among themselves in Interpreting of Scripture as Matth. 16. 18. Some Popâ—â— say rightly that by the Rock Christ or the confession of faith given by Peter concerning Christ is meant others interprete it of the person of Peter the Apostle others expound it to be the Romane Seat or Chaire 3. Because many of the Popes of Rome have not onely erred but been grosse wicked Hereticks Liberius the Pope about the yeare 350 was an Arrian and subscribed to the unjust condemnation of Athanasius and afterward as an obstinate Hereticke was deposed Honorius the first was a Monothelite he held that Christ had but one will and so but one nature and for this heresie was condemned in 3. Generall Councels Some Popes were Atheists as Leo the tenth who called the Gospell fabulam de Christo. One cals the Pope that great Heteroclite in religion another saith The Pope is the worst of Cardinals who are the worst of Priests who are the worst of Papists who are the worst of Christians For Councâ—ls Gregory the Pope did reverence the 4 first generall Councels as the 4 Evangelists But if these foure generall Councels be of equall authority with the
as many wives as they would Doctor 〈◊〉 Preface to New-mans Concordance * The Generall view of the Holy Scriptures * Sancta sanctè Mr. Gregory in his Preface to observations upon some passâ—ges of Scriptuâ—e * Luke 16. 29. John 5. 39. Psal. 19. and 119. Augustinus affirmat omniaquae continent fidem mores in illis inveniri quae apertè posita sum in Scriptura Chrysostomus Manifesta itidem in divinâ—â— Scripturis esse perhibet quaecunque necessaria Tertullianus adorat Scripturae pâ—enitudinem Et vae Heâ—mogeniâ—i â—i quid ijs quae scripta sunt vel de traâ—at vel adijciat Rainoldus 1â— Thesi Deut. 4. â— and 12. 32. De Scripturae plenitudine perfectione quid sentiat Maldonaâ—us vide ad Joan 7. 4. De Scripturae integritate vide Estium ad Galat. 3. 10. See Bp Vshers Body of Divinity p. 18. 19 20 21. 2 Tim. 3. 16. 17 John 15. 15. Acts 20. 27. Bene habet ut iis quae sunt Scripta contentus sis Hilary â— In every age there was revealed that which was sufficient to salvation and yet now no more then is sufficient the Word it selfe is not now but the revelation only is more perfect The old Testament was sufficient for the Jewes but both the new and old make but one compleate body for the Church now Singuli libri sunt sufficientes suffiâ—cientia parâ—â—um ad quam ordinatae sunt 〈◊〉 verò Scriptura est sufficiens essentiali sufficientia per Libros singu los fusa Jun. Animad in Bellarm. Controv Primae capite quarâ—â— The Scriptures are a perfect Rule for matters of Faith but not a perfect Register for matters of fact M. Geres Whitakerus de Script c. Sexto quaest Sexâ—ae Stapletons Sâ—rrariâ—â— are more wary then some other Papists we are abused say they when we are said to hold that the Scripture is not perfect for say they a thing is said to be imperfect not when it wants any perfection but when it wants a perfection due as a man is not imperfect if hee have not an Angels perfection because this is not due unto him they say it is not a perfection due to the Scriptures to teach us very thing necessary to salvation Perinde sunt ea quae ex Scripturis colliguntuâ— atque ea quae scribuntur Nazianzen Catholici in perfectione Scripturae Papistae â—n imperfectione totius causae id est omnium controversiarum de Religiâ—ne proram puppim constituâ—nt Câ—aniâ—rus â—â—m Primâ— de canone lib. Octavo c. primo 1 Cor. 10. â— 2 3. Math. 8. 11. Lu 19. 9. Gal. 3. 7. 8. 29. Rom. 4 15 16. Some Papists say the Scriptures are not imperfect because they send us to the Church which is the perfect Rule and therefore they are perfect implicitè though not explicitè but so I might say every rustick were a perfect Rule of Faith because he can shew me the Pope who is the infallible judge If the Scripture send to the Church to learne that which is not in the Scripture by this sending shee confesseth her imperfection See Moulins buckler of faith p. 45. John 1. 18. and 3. 12. Esay 61. 1. 2. Heb. 1. 1 and 2. 3. Act. 1. 3. Matth. 11. 25. 27. Matth. 22. 32. John 5. 46. Luke 24. 44. 45. * Additio ad Scripturam fit tripliciter 1. In quo additum est contrarium est erroris 20. In quo additum est diversum est praesumptionis 30. In quo additum est consonum est fidelis instructionis * That doctrine of religion to which God would have nothing added and from which he would have nothing taken away must needs be perfect Illud perfectum in â—uo genere cui nihil in eo genere aut addi aut diminui potest Psal. 19. 8. the Hebâ—ew word signifieth that perfection cui nihil deest 2 King 5. 8. 1 Tim. 6. 11. * Salus nostra Christus est salutis via fides viae â—ux Scriptuâ—a Raynoldâ—s 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It is tâ—ken collectivè not distributivè Si 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 non totam sed omnem significaret eo fortâ—us futurum argumentum nostrum nâ—m si pâ—rtes singulae sufficerem tum multo magis omnes Chamierus * Nul'us Papista aptè plenè huic argumento unquam respondit aut respendâ—bit Whitakeâ—us * Is not the Scripture said Hawkes the Martyr sufficient for my salvation yes saith one of Bonners Chaplainâ—s it is sufficient for our salvation but not for our instruction Hawkes answered God send me the salvation and take you the instruction Fox Martyâ—ol Episc. Dav. de Judice Controvers c. 5. * Minima veritatis particula in Scripturis continetur Charronaeus * Bellarm. de verbo Dei l. 4. c. 3 Rhemists annotat â—n John 21. â—ect 3. and annotat in 2 Thessâ— 2. 16. and annotatâ— in Act. 15. sect 3. and in Apoc. 〈◊〉 sect 1. * Assâ—rimus in Scripturis non contineri expressè totam doctrinam necessariam sive de fide sive de moribâ—s proiâ—de praeter verbum Dei scriptum requiri etiam verbum Dei non scriptum idest divinas Apostolicas traditiones Bellarm. l quarto de verbo Dei non scripto Omnes libros veterâ—s novi Testamenti nec non traditiones ipsas tum ad fidem tum ad mâ—res pertinentes tanquam vel ore tenus à Christo vel à Spiritu Sancto dictatas continua successione in ecclesia catholica conservatas part pietaâ—is affectu ac reverentia suscipit ac veneratur Tridentiva synodus sess 4. Sect. 1. * Bellarmine hath a whole Book de verbo Dei nâ—â— spripto of the word of God unwritten * The word originally may import any thing which is delivered howsoever either by word or writing Thus whatsoever we have received in the Scriptures was first tradition as delivered by word and still is tradition because it is delivered in writing But though the word in it selfe have this generall and indifferent signification of any thing that is delivered yet in our disputation it is restrained to one onely manner of delivering by word and relation onely and not by Scripture We deny that either in the Law or Gospell there was any thing left unwritten which concerneth us to know for attaining of true faith and righeteousnesse towards God Abbot against Bishop Iâ— Matth. 15. * Vide Whitakerum de Script c. 9. quaest Sexta pag. 405. 406. In his Book de verbo Dei standing for unwritten traditions as a part of the word of God he will have Baptisme of Infants to be one but when he disputes for Baptisme of Infants against Anabaptists then he heaps up Texts of Scripture Mr. Blakes Birth priv * Symbolum Apostolicum ex traditione est secundum formulam rationemque verborum at secundum substantiam est scriptura ipsissima-lunius Animad in Bellarm controv 1. l. 4. Negamus ullum esse in toto Symbâ—lo
to thy face curse God and die and that Psal. 14. 1. Some answer thus these places are historically inspired not dogmatically Another question is whether preaching be not divinely inspired as well as the word written The Preaching of the Prophets and Apostles was divinely inspired but the preaching of our Ministers no further then it agrees with the word Some say the Scriptures are but a device of mans braine to give assistance to Magistrates in civill government Nothing is more repugnant to prudence and policy What policy was it in the Old Testament to appoint circumcision to cut a poore child as soon as he came into the world Two and twenty thousand Oxen were spent at the dedication of one Altar to sacrifice so many Oxen and Sheep such usefull creatures Christ chose silly illiterate men to propagate the Gospell This serves for information of our judgement and assures us of divers truths 1. That the Scriptures are for themselves worthy to be believed they have authority in and of themselves not borrowed from any persons in the world by which they binde the consciences of all men to receive them with faith and obedience for their Authors sake alone and the divine truth which shines in them though they should not be commended unto men by any authority of any creature Such as is the authority of the Authour of any writing such is the authority of the writing it selfe for all the strength of the testimony depends upon the excellency of the person which gives the testimony now God is the authour of these writings Thus saith the Lord therefore such authority as he hath such must they have a supreme highest authority which borroweth from none and is subject to none So this acknowledgement of their originall teacheth that we must not believe them for the authority sake of any man or men for Gods word can borrow no authority from men John 5. 34. I receive not testimony from man saith Christ that is need no mans testimony As the first goodnesse is to be loved for it selfe so is the first truth to be believed for it selfe saith Aquinas And as Christ by himselfe could demonstrate that he was the Messias so the Word by it selfe can prove that it is the Word of God We affirme that the Scriptures are known to be of God by themselves the Papists maintaine that we cannot be certaine of the Scriptures divinity by any other argument then the testimony of the Church which say they doth infallibly propound unto us what is to be believed what is not to be believed and Hermanus saith that the Scripture is no more worth then Aesops Fables without the testimony of the Church As in other Sciences there are alwaies some principles per se nota indemonstrabilia whence other things are proved so in Divinity all conclusions in point of beliefe and practice are proved by the Scripture The Scriptures prove themselves by their own naturall light manifesting their divine originall whence they are and their right meaning how they must be understood They are like light primum visibile which maketh all other things manifest and it selfe too by it own proper qualities 1. The Church rather depends on the Scripture which is an object not principle of Divinity the Church ought to be subject to Christ Ephes. 5. 24. the Scripture is the word of Christ Col. 3. 16. 2. All the words of the Scripture are words of truth Dan. 10. 21. some words of the Church are words of error Esay 1. 21 24. 3. 8 9. 5. 13. But the authority of him that speaks alwaies truth is greater then of him who sometimes lies ergo the authority of the Scripture is greater then that of the Church Goodnesse it selfe cannot deceive wisdome it selfe cannot be deceived God is both Titus 1. 2. The voice of the Scripture is the voice of God 2 Tim. 3. 16. but the voice of the Church is the voice of men Acts 14. 14. 15. 17. 17. 30. 3. Faith and a firme consolation in temptations ought to relie on a sure that is a divine foundation for every humane testimony is uncertaine 4. In vaine shall we dispute against the wicked concerning Religion and divine truth if we shall say it comes from God because we affirme so 5. This is proved by Scriptures John 5. 34 35. Christ in his humiliation did not receive the testimony of John much lesse will he receive the testimony of others now he is glorified John 5 34 35 36. 1 Cor. 2. 4 5. 1 John 5. 9. 6. The authority proving is greater more certaine and more knowne then the conclusion proved by the â—ame Autoritde probans is greater then probata The Papists to prove the authority of the Church flie to the Scriptures For I demand whence doe we understand that the Church erres not in delivering the Canon of the Scripture they answer it is governed by the Holy Ghost and therefore cannot erre in its decrees But how appeares it that it is so governed alwaies they answer God hath promised it and then they alleage those places to prove it Ob. The Church is ancienter then the Scripture because it was before Moses ergo it hath greater authority Sol. 1. The Prophets and John Baptist were ancienter then Christ yet not of greater authority 2. Consider the word 1. quoad formale externum as written and clothed with words so the Church was before the Scripture 2. quoad formale internum the matter and sence or meaning so the Scripture was more ancient than the Church because the Church is gathered and governed by it 1 Pet. 1. 23. John 17. 20. JAmes 1. 18. Semen semper sobole illa cujus est semen antiquius esse necesse est In the thing it selfe the being and substance of the word was before the Church although in this circumstance and manner of being it was after Ob. 2. Non erederem Evangelio nisi me commoveret Ecclesiae Catholicae authoritas saith Augustine Sol. These words saith Whitaker are so well known to the Papists that one can hardly exchange three words with them but they will produce them It is true indeed that we may at the first be much moved to receive and hearken to the Scriptures because the Church gives testimony of them as the woman of Samaria by her speeches of Christ was a meanes of moving the Samaritans to believe but when the men of Samaria had heard Christ himselfe speake they believed in him more for his own words then the womans John 4. 39 41. In which sence those words of Austin so frequently quoted by the Papists are to be interpreted Austin spake this of himselfe being a Manichee when he was a Manichee he was first moved by the authority of the Church to believe the Gospell His meaning is that he had never believed the Gospell if the authority of the Church had not
these writings come from God We should receive it with reverence believe it with confidence exercise our selves in it with diligence and delight practice it with obedience Reading the Scripture is a rehearsing out of the booke such things as are there written barely without any interpretation It is to be done publikely as it was in the Synagogues of the Jewes who had the reading of the Law and Prophets amongst them the Prophets were read in their eares every day saith Paul and after the lecture of the Law and the Prophets in another place We honour God more by a publique then a private reading of it 2. Privately the godly Jewes of Berea did search the Scriptures and the King is commanded to read in the Law Some good Divines hold that the Scriptures barely read though preaching be not joyned with it may be the instrument of regeneration since the doctrine of the Gospell is called the ministration of the Spirit Psal. 19. the law of the Lord converteth the soule it is so when not preached but the word of God is made effectuall by the Spirit more often more ordinarily to beget a new life in the preaching that is the interpreting and applying of it then in the bare reading 1 Tim. 4. 13. Matth. 28. 29. Christs custome was as we may collect out of Luke 4. where one instance is recorded to make us conceive his ordinary practice when he had read to interpret the Scripture and often to apply it Let us all learn constantly to exercise our selves in the writings of God which if we strive to doe in a right manner we shall attaine true knowledge of the way to Heaven and also grace and help to walke in that way If the Lord should deny to any man the publique helps of preaching and conference yet if that man should constantly reade the word praying to God to teach him and guide him by it and strive to follow it in his life he should finde out the truth and attaine saving grace the word would illighten and convert but if God afford publique preaching and interpretation we must use that too as a principall ordinance Let us all reade the Scripture 1. With hearty prayers to God to direct us and open the sence of it to us Psal. 119. 18. JAmes 1. 5 17. and with a resolution to put in practice that which we learne Jam. 1. 25. Matth. 7. 24. and we shall finde the word read Gods power to our edification and salvation Onely a Spirituall understanding can discerne an excellency in the Scripture Nunquam Pauli mentem intelliges nisi prius Pauli spiritum imbiberis 2. Diligently attend unto reading 1 Tim. 4. 13 15. John 5. 39. Search the Scriptures whether the Greeke word be a metaphor from hunting dogges or from diggers in mines both import diligence It was a solemne speech used in holy actions hoc age The passions of the Martyrs may be read when their anniversarie daies are celebrated Whence the name of Legends Chamier 3. Orderly that we may be better acquained with the whole body of the Scriptures We should reade on in Chronicles and Ezra and other places wherein are nothing but names and Genealogies to shew our obedience to God in reading over all his sacred word and we shall after reape profit by that we understand not for the present though it will be convenient to begin with the new Testament as more plain before we reade the old 4. With faith Heb. 4. 2. The word of God consisteth of foure parts 1. History 2. Commandements 3. Promises 4. Threats All truths taught in the History of the Scripture ought to be believed As that the world was made of nothing onely by the word of God Heb. 11. 3. and that the bodies of men howsoever they died shall rise againe at the last day Job 19. 26. 2 All precepts Genes 22. 6. Abraham went doing that commandement though strange 3 All promises as that God could give Abraham when he was 100 yeeres old a seed and posterity which should be as innumerable as the Stars in the Firmament Genes 15. 5. and that by Sarah an old and barren woman Gen. 17. 16. Abraham and Sarah believed it Rom. 4. 20 21. Heb. 11. 11. 4. Threatnings as that Gen. 6. 13. 17. though unlikely Noab believed it 2 Pet. 2. 5. because God had said it Heb. 11. 7. and that Jonah 3. 4. the people of Nineveh believed v. 5. In narrando gravitas in imperando authoritas in promittendo liberalitas in minando severitas Spanhemius or at de officio Theologi 5. Constantly Cyprian was so much delighted with the reading of Tertullian that he read something in him every day and called him his Master Da Magistrum Let Gods command the examples of the godly and our owne benefit quicken us to a frequent reading of the holy Scriptures Mr Bifield hath a Kalender shewing what number of Chapters are to be read every day that so the whole Bible may be read over in the yeere The number of Chapters while you are reading the old Testament is for the most part three a day and when you come to the new Testament it is but two sometimes where the matter is Historicall or Typicall or the Chapters short he hath set down a greater number The Martyrs would sit up all night in reading and hearing After we have read and understood the Scripture we must 1. give thanks to God for the right understanding of it and pray him to imprint the true knowledge of it in our hearts that it may not fall out 2. We must meditate in the word of God now understood and so fix it in our minds One defines meditation thus It is an action of the soule calling things to mind or remembrance and discoursing of them that they might be the better understood retained affected and possessed It is as it were every mans preaching to himselfe and is a setting ones selfe seriously to consider in his mind and apply to his owne soule some necessary truth of Gods word till the mind be informed and the heart affected as the nature thereof requires and is the wholesomest and usefullest of all exercises of piety This is to ingrast the word into ones soule to give the seed much earth this is to bind it to the Tables of our heart and to hide it in the furrows of our soules this is to digest it and make it our owne 3. We must apply to our owne use whatsoever things we reade and understand the precepts and examples of the Law to instruct our life the promises and comforts of the Gospell to confirme our faith It serves for thankfulnesse 1. that now we have the Scripture the world was a long time without it it was the more wicked because they had no canon of Scripture We are not like to erre by tradition as former ages have done 2. That we have so great a
mensura infallibilis quae nullam vel additionem vel detractionem patitur 3. It is a â—ust rule Lastly It is an universall and perpetuall rule both in regard of time and person ever since the Scripture hath beene it hath been the onely rule in the old Testament to the Law and the Testimony in the new they confirmed all things by the old it directs in every case 2 To all persons this is able to make a Minister yea a Councell a Church wise to salvation to reforme a young man whose lusts are unbridled 119. 9. to order a King 17 Deut. 29. 30. Ob. Faith was before the Scripture therefore the Scripture is not the rule of faith Sol. The word of God is twofold 1. Revealed that preceded faith 2. Written that did not Though it be a rule yet firâ—t it doth not exclude other Ministeriall helps as Prayer Preaching the knowledge of the tongues and the Ministry of the Church these are meanes to use the rule and subordinate to it we need no more rules Therefore it is a vaine and absurd question of the Papists let a man be lockt up in a Study with a Bible what good will he get by it if he cannot read 2. There must be reason and judgement to make use of it and apply it judge what I say saith Paul 1 Cor. 10. 15. The Scripture should rule our hearts thoughts and inward cogitations our words and actions we should pray heare receive the Sacrament according to the directions of it buy sell cloath our selves and carry our selves toward all as that bids us 2 Sam. 22. 23. the people of God wrote after this Copy followed this rule Psal. 119. 5. 59. 111. because they desired in all which they did to please God now God is pleased when his own will is done and to glorifie him in their lives and therefore they framed themselves according to his statutes We cannot better expresse an high esteeme of God and his excellencies then by following him in all things Every one esteems that person most excellent to whom he gives up himself most to be ruled and ordered 4. The Scripture is necessary In respect of the substance thereof it was alwayes necessary in respect of the manner of revealing it is necessary since the time that it pleased God after that manner to deliver his word and shall be to the worlds end It is not then absolutely and simply necessary that the word of God should be delivered to us in writing but onely conditionally and upon supposition God for a long time for the space of 2400 yeares unto the time of Moses did instruct his Church with an immediate living voyce and had he pleased still to goe on in that way there had beene no necessity of Scripture now more then in that age there was a continuall presence of God with them but now there is a perpetuall absence in that way and the word of God was written 1. For the brevity of mans life See the 5. the 11. Ch. of Gen. The Patriarks were long lived before and after the Floud to the times of Moses they lived some centuries of yeares therefore afterward the purity of the word could not fitly be preserved without writing By writing we have the comfort of the holy word of God which from writing receiveth his denomination in being called Scripture which is nothing else but writing 2. That the Church might have a certaine and true rule and Canon whereby it might judge of all questions doubts and controversies of Religion Luke 1. 4. Every mans opinion else would have been a Bible and every mans lust a Law 3. That the faith of men in Christ which was to come might the better be confirmed when they should see that written before their eyes which was done by the Messâ—as and see all things that were fore-told of him verified in the event 4. That the purity of Gods worship might be preserved from corruption and the truth propagated among all Nations 5. To take off excuses from men that they did not know Rom. 10. 18. civill Lawes are written and published that offenders may be excusable The Pen-men had a command from God 1. A publike and outward command as Jeremie 30. 2. and 36. 2 Moses Exod. 17. 14. and 34. 17. and John was commanded 12 times in the Revelation to write Rev. 1. 11. and 2. 1. 8. 12. 18. and 3. Ch. 1. 7. and 14. and 14. 13. and 19. v. 9. 21. 5. 2 an inward command by private inspiration and instinct 2 Pet. 1. 21. 5. The Scripture is Pure and Holy It commands all good and forbids reproves and condemnes all sinne and filthinesse it restraines not onely from evill words and actions but thoughts glances Those are frequent adjuncts of the word of God holy pure and cleane Psal. 12. 6. and 18. 31. and 119. 40 Prov. 30. 5. It is pure in its narrations it speakes purely of things evill and uncleane It is termed holy Rom. 1. 2. and 2 Tim. 3. 15. 1. From its efficient principall cause God who is the holy of holies holinesse it selfe Esay 6. 3. Dan. 9. 24. he is the author and inditer of it Luke 1. 67. 2 In regard of the instrumentall cause the Pen-men of it were holy men 2 Pet. 1. 21. Prophets and Apostles 3. From its matter the holy will of God Aâ—t 20. 27. the Scripture containes holy and Divine mysteries holy precepts of life holy promises Psal 105. 42. holy Histories 4. From its end or effect the holy Ghost by the reading and meditation of the Scripture sanctifieth us John 17. 17. it sanctifieth likewise all the creatures to our use so as we may use them with a good conscience 1 Tim. 4. 5. From the purity of it the Scripture is compared to a glasse Jam. 1. 23. to fire Jer. 23. 29. to light Psal. 119. 105. The reason of it is because God himselfe is pure most pure Psal. 92. ult Hab 1. 13. It is pure 1. Formally in it selfe there is no mixture of falshood or error no corruption or unsoundnesse at all in it Prov. 8. 6. 7. 8. 2. Virtually so as to make others pure John 15. 3. and 17. 17. Act. 20. 32. It begets grace Jam. 1. 18. 1 Pet. 1. 23. and preserves and increaseth it Act. 20. 32. Ephâ—s 4. 11. 12. The assertory part is pure what it affirmes to be is and what it dâ—nyes to be is not Psal 19. 7. and 93. 5. Jam. 1. 18. 2 What it promiseth shall be performed and what it threateneth shall be executed Numb 23. 19. 1 Sam. 2. 30. Zach. 1. 6. 3. What it commandeth is good and what it forbiddeth is evill Deut. 4. 8. Psal. 119. 108. and 19. 8. 9. Rom. 7. 12. In other Bookes some truth is taught some good commended some kinde or part of happinesse promised But in the Inspired Oracles of God all truth is taught all goodnesse commanded
all happinesse promised nay we may invert the words with Hugo de sancto victore and say Quicquid ibi docetur esâ— veritas quicquid praecipitur bonitas quicquid promittitur felicitas All that is there taught is truth all that is there commanded is goodnesse all that is there promised is happinesse It is a wonderfull thing that all the particulars which the Canticles containe being taken from marriage are handled so sincerely that no blemish or spot can be found therein Therefore the Scriptures should be preacht read and heard with holy affections and should be reverently mentioned The â—ewes in their Synagogues will not touch the Bible with unwashed hands they kisse it as often as they open and shut it they sit not on that seat where it is laid and iâ— it fall on the ground they fast for a whole day The Turke writâ—s upon the outside of his Alcoran Let no man touch this Book but he that is pure I would none might meddle with ours Alcorâ—â— signifieth but the Scripture you need not be afraid of the word but such as indeed are what other men doe but think themselvâ—s 6. The Scripture is Perfect The perfection of the Scripture is considered 2 wayes 1. In respect of the matter or the Bookes in which the holy doctrine was written all which as many as were usefull to our salvation have been kept inviolable in the Church so that out of them one most perfect and absolute Canon of faith and life was made and this may be called the Integrity of the Scripture 2. In respect of the forme viz. of the sence or meaning of these Canonicall Books or of Divine truth comprehended in them which Books containe most fully and perfectly the whole truth necessary and sufficient for the salvation of the elect and therefore the Scriptures are to be esteemed a sole adequate totall and perfect measure and rule both of faith and manners and this is the sufficiency of the Scriptures which is attributed to it in a twofold respect 1. Absolutely in it selfe and that in a threefold consideration 1. Of the Principle for every principle whether of a thing or of knowledge ought to be the perfect since demonstration and true conclusions are not deduced from that which it imperfect therefore it is necessary that the holy Scripture being the first only immediate principle of all true doctrine should be most perfect 2. Of the Subject for it hath all Essentiall parts matter and forme and integrall Law and Gospell and is wholy perfect both 1. Absolutely because for the substance it eitheir expressely or Analogically containes the doctrine concerning Faith and Manners which is communicable and profitable for us to know which may be proved also by induction that all necessary opinions of Faith or precepts of life are to be found in the holy Scripture 2. Relatively because as it hath a perfection of the whole so of the parts in the whole that perfection is called essentiall this quantitative For all the Books are Sufficient with an essentiall perfection although integrally they have not a sufficiency of the whole but only their own yet so that at distinct times every part sufficed for their times but all the parts in the whole are but sufficient for us 3. In its effect and operation it makes men perfect 2 Tim 3. 16. 17. Rom. 15. 4. John 2. ult 5. 39. 2. As opposed to unwritten Traditions all which it excludes by its sufficiency but we doe not understand by Traditions generally a Doctrine delivered in Word and Writing but specially a Doctrine not written by Prophets or Apostles whether Dogmaticall Historicall or Ceremoniall for a perfect reason of the primary opinions belonging to Faith and Manners is delivered in Scripture and those things which are out of beside or against the Scripture doe not binde the Conscience 2. Historicall the Sayings and Deedes of Christ and the Apostles are perfectly contained in the Scriptures as many as suâ—fice us for our salvation John 20. 30 31. Those things which are delivered out of Scripture are to be esteemed mans writings 3. Ceremoniall or secondary opinions concerning Ecclesiasticall Rites and Customes are for Essentialls Substantials and Fundamâ—ntals generally contained in the Word of God The accidentals accessaries and circumstantials are free and mutable If Traditions agree with the Scripture they are confirmed by it if they oppose it they are disproved by it The perfection of the Scriptures is not First Infinite and unlimited that is an incommunicable property of God every thing which is from another as the efficiente ause is thereby limited both for the nature and qualities thereof Secondly we doe not understand such a perfection as containeth all and singular such things as at any time have beene by Divine inspiration revealed to holy men and by them delivered to the Church of what sort soever they were for all the Sermons of the Prophets of Christ and his Apostles are not set downe in so many words as they used in the speaking of them for of twelve Apostles seven wrote nothing which yet preached and did many things neither are all the deeds of Christ and his Apostles written for that is contradicted John 20. 30. 31 21. 25. but we meane onely a Relative perfection which for some certaine ends sake agreeth to the Scripture as to an instrument according to which it perfectly comprehendeth all things which have beene are or shall be necessary for the salvation of the Church Thirdly the severall Bookes of Scripture are indeed perfect for their own particular ends purposes uses for which they were intended of the Lord but yet not any one Booke is sufficient to the common end the whole Scripture is compleate in all the parts thereof one speaking of that which another doth wholy passe over in silence one clearely delivering what was intricate in another Paul speakes much of Justification and Predestination in the Epistle to the Romans nothing of the Eucharist or Resurrection Fourthly since God did reveale his will in writing those writings which by Divine hand and providence were extant in the Church were so sufficient for the Church in that Age that it needed not Tradition neither was it lawfull for any humane wight to adde thereto or take therefrom but when God did reveale more unto it the former onely was not then sufficient without the latter Fifthly the holy Scripture doth sufficiently containe and deliver all Doctrines which are necessary for us to eternall salvation both in respect of Faith and good works and most of these it delivereth to us expressely and in so many words and the rest by good and necessary consequence The Baptisme of Infants and the consubstantiality of the Father and of the Sonne are not in those words expressed in Scripture yet is the truth of both cleerely taught in Scripture and by evident proofe may thence be deduced that Article of Christs
Pastor in the Old Testament had such authority much more the chiefe Priest in the New Sol. This one pastor signifieth neither the High Priest in the old Law nor the Pope in the New but Jesus Christ the High Shepheard for our soules Ob. Matth. 16. 19. Christ saith to Peter to theâ— will I give the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heaven therefore the Pope hath authority to expound Scripture Sol. First by the Keyes here is meant Commission to preach the Gospell not authority of interpreting the Scriptures When the Gospell is preached the Kingdome of heaven is opened to the beleevers and shut to the unbeleevers 2. That authority of the Keyes was not committed to Peter onely but to the other Apostles also Matth. 28. 18. 19. There is a twofold judgement 1. Of discretion 1 Cor. 10. 15. 2. Of authority as the Parllament judgeth Capitall crimes If the Papists understand the word Judge to â—ignifie Discerning as when we judge of meates by the taste every faithfull person ought to pray unto God for grace to judge to discerne and to know the true sense of the Scripture But if by judging they understand to pronounce decrees definitive and infallible judgements touching the sence of the Scriptures thereby to bind other mens consciences there is no man in the world that hath that power See Moulinâ— Buckler of Faith We have a more compendious way to come to the understanding of the Scripture It were too long when we doubt of any place to stay till we have the generall consent of the Pastors of the Church or to expect a generall counsell or to goe up to Rome But the word of God is amongst us the Scriptures themselves and the Spirit of God opening our hearts doe teach us how to understand them And yet we say not as the Papists falsely charge us that we allow every private mans interpretation of Scripture refusing the judgement of the Pastors of the Church Panoruitan saith the opinion of one godly man ought to be preferred before the Popes if it be grounded upon better authority of the Old and New Testament 2 Pet. 1. 20. No prophesie of the Scripture is of any private interpretation Stapleton saith interpretation is private either ratione personae when the man is private or ratione medij when it is not taken out of the context and circumstances or ratione finis when it is for a false end Now private interpretation in regard of the person if it be publike in regard of the meanes is not forbidden for it is lawfull for one man with Scripture toti resistere mundo saith the Glosse of the Canon-Law the meaning of this place is that the Prophets were no Interpreters or Messengers of their own minds but Gods The Catholickes hold saith Chamier meaning still by that Title the Protestants that the Scripture is to be interpreted by private labour and industry viz. of Augustine Jerome Chrysostome but not in a private sense that is in a sense arising from the braine of the Interpreter It is true saith Cartwright against the Rhemists that the Scriptures cannot be expounded of every private Spirit nor which is more of any private spirit nor yet of all private spirits together but onely of those which are inspired of God viz. the Prophets and Apostles which are here opposed unto private Interpretation And therefore it is evident that the exposition of the Scripture ought not to be fetched from Ecclesiasticall either Fathers or Councels which speake not by inspiration but from the Scriptures themselves what he meaneth he declareth in the next verse where he sheweth the reason of his saying namely that it must be interpreted as it was written and by as high authority Seeing therefore it was first spoken by holy men which spake as they were led by the holy Spirit and were inspired of God it followeth that it must be interpreted by the same authority The interpretation therefore that is brought but of the Apostles and Prophets is not private although it be avowed by one man onely On the other side that interpretation which is not brought from thence although it have the allowance of whole Generall Counsels is but private This is a principall meaning of our Saviour Christ when he willeth that we should call no man father or Master in the earth that is in matter of doctrine we should depend upon the authority of no man nor of all men in the earth but onely upon Christ and upon God Our reasons by which we prove that the chiefest judgement and authority of interpreting Scriptures is to be given not to the Church but to the Scriptures themselves and the Holy Ghost 1. That which onely hath power to beget faith that onely hath the chiefest authority of interpreting Scripture and of determining all controversies concerning faith and religion but the Scriptures onely and the Holy Ghost have this force Rom. 10. 17. the Holy Ghost onely can infuse saving faith into our hearts which is called by the Schoolemen infusa fides The faith which we have from the Church is acquired and sufficeth not to a certaine perswasion 2. The Scriptures cannot be interpreted but by the same Spirit wherewith they were written that spirit is found no where but in the Scripture whosoever have promises from God to understand the Scripture may interpret it but so have all the faithfull 3. Christ himselfe makes the Scripture a Judge John 12. 48. and still appealed to it 4. Although the Fathers were men indued of God with excellent gifts and brought no small light to understanding of the Scriptures yet learned men in our dayes may give a right sense of sundry places thereof which the Fathers saw not yea against the which perhaps they consent Hath any man living read all the Fathers nay have all the men living read them nay can they shew them can they get them I had almost said can they name them In the exposition of those words Tu es Petrus supra hanc petram almost every one of the Fathers at least the most part of them and the best expound it of Peters faith yet the Papists understand it non de fide sed de persona Petri. Here they dis-agree themselves from the Fathers John 10. 16. by the title of one Shepheard Augustine Chrysostome Jerome Cyrill Theodoret Theophylact Euthimius Rupertus Cyprian and other Fathers agree that Christ is there designed but Stapleton saith the Pope is there meant In the division of the Law they goe cleane contrary to the greatest part of the Fathers For they divide the Commandements as we doe but the Papists make the two first one and the tenth two 2. They have no Father to countenance them in this but Augustine There were no writings of the Fathers for a time many of them wrote 400 yeares after Christ but some 500 and 600 yeares after Christ what rule had they before that time of interpreting
foure Evangelists the Popes authority as Papists say being above the authority of the Councels it followeth that his authority is greater then the Evangelists then which what can be more blasphemously spoken We say the true interpretation of Scripture is not to be sought from generall Councels 1. Because even universall Councels have erred the Chalcedonian Councell one of the 4 so much magnified by Pope Gregory in rashly preferring the Constantinopolitane Church before that of Alexandria and Antioch Those that condemned Christ were then the universall visible Church Matth 26. 65. John 11. 47. See Act. 4. 18. 2. Generall councels have beene opposite one to another that of Constance to the other of Basill whereof one setteth downe that Councels could erre and so also the Pope and that a Councell was above the Pope the other affirmeth the quite contrary 3. There were no Generall Councels after the Apostles for 300 yeares till the first Councell of Nice when yet the Church had the true sence of the Scriptures 4. The generall Councels interpreted Scripture by Scripture as Athanasius and Ambrose teach concerning the first Councell of Nice 5. Because they cannot be so easily celebrated to declare any doubtfull sense of Scripture They have expounded but few places of Scripture neither is it likely the Pope will assemble them to expound the rest The Papists say that the Scripture ought to be expounded by the rule of faith and therefore not by Scripture onely But the rule of faith and Scripture is all one As the Scriptures are not of man but of the Spirit so their interpretation is not by man but of the Spirit likewise Let Councels Fathers Churches give their sense of the Scripture it 's private if it be not the sense and interpretation of the Spirit Let a private man give the true sense of the Scripture it 's not private because it 's Divine the sense of the Holy Ghost and private in 2 Pet. 1. 20. is not opposed to publike but to Divine and the words are to be read no Scripture is of a mans own interpretation that is private contrary to Divine The word is interpreted aright by declaring 1. The order 2. The summne or scope 3. The sense of the words which is done by framing a Rhetoricall and Logicall Analysis of the Text. In giving the sense three Rules are of principall use and necessity to be observed 1. The literall and largest sense of any words in Scripture must not be imbraced farther when our cleaving thereunto would breed some dis-agreement and contrariety between the present Scripture and some other Text or place else shall we change the Scripture into a Nose of wax 2. In case of such appearing dis-agreement the Holy Ghost leads us by the hand to seek out some distinction restriction limitation or figure for the reconcilement thereof and one of these will always fit the purpose for Gods word must alwayes bring perfect truth it cannot fight against it selfe 3. Such figurative sense limitation restriction or distinction must be sought out as the word of God affordeth either in the present place or some other and chiefely those that seeme to differ with the present Text being duly compared together The end of the first Booke THE SECOND BOOKE CHAPTER 1. OF GOD. HAving handled the Scripture which is principium Cognoscendi in Divinity I now proceed to Treate of God who is principium essendi or thus the Scripture is the rule of Divinity God and his workes are the matter or parts of Divinity This Doctrine is 1. Necessary 1. Because man was made for that end that he might rightly acknowledge and worship God love and honour him 2. It is the end of all divine Revelation John 5. 39. 3. To be Ignorant of God is a great misery being alienated from the life of God through the Ignorance that is in them 2. Profitable Our welfare and happinesse consists in the knowledge of God Jer. 9. 23. John 17. 3. the knowledge of God in the life to come is called the Beatificall vision 3. Difficult God being infinite and our understanding finite betwixt which two there is no proportion who knowes the things of God save the spirit of God A created understanding can no more comprehend God then a Viall-glasse can containe the waters of the Sea His wisdome is unsearchable Rom. 11. Job 11. 7. and 26. 13. Euclide answered very fitly to one asking many things concerning the Gods Coetera quidem nescio illud scio quod odêre curiosos Simonides being injoyned by Hiero to tell him what was God required a dayes time to be given him before he answered and at the end of that two when they were expired foure still doubling his time for inquiry till at the last being by Hiero asked a reason of his delayes he told him plainely that by how much the more he thought of God by so much the more he apprehended the impossibility of declaring what he was We know God per viam eminentiae negationis causationis 1. All perfections which we apprehend must be ascribed unto God and that after a more excellent manner then can be apprehended as that he is in himselfe by himselfe and of himselfe that he is one true good and holy 2. We must remove from him all imperfections whatsoever he is Simple Eternall Infinite Unchangeable 3. He is the Supream cause of all There is a threefold knowledge of God 1. An implanted knowledge which is in every mans conscience a naturall ingraffed principle about God O anima naturaliter Christiana said Tertullian 2. An acquired knowledge by the Creatures Psal. 19. 1. That is the great Booke in evey page whereof we may behold the Diety Praesentemque refert quaelibet herba Deum 3. Revealed knowledge of faith spoken of Heb. 11. 6. and this is onely sufficient to Salvation The Heathens had the knowledge of God in a confused manner Rom. 1. 19. 21. and 2. 14. a practicall knowledge 15. v. which shew the worke of the Law written in their hearts not the gracious writing promised in the Covenant the light of nature is not sufficient to bring man to Salvation onely in Judah is God known 76. Psal. 1. 2. and 147. 19. See Iâ—hn 14. 6. and 11. 27. Ephes. 2. 11. 12. The Heathen might know Gods nature and attributes that he was the Creator of the world that by his providence he did preserve and rule all things but they could not by the most industrious use of all natures helpes attaine unto any the least knowledge of God as he is mans Redeemer in Christ they knew not the truth as it is Jesus Ephes. 4. 21. In God we will consider 1. His Nature 2. His workes In his nature two things are considerable 1. That he is 2. What he is That God is is the most manifest cleare evident ungainsayable truth in the world It is the first verity
of Ales is called Doctor Irrefragabilis Thomas Aquinas after him Doctor Angelicus John Scot the last Doctor Subtilis Yet a learned Doctor of our owne saith of the Schoolmen Scholastici vel hoc nomine non tanti sunt à nobis faciendi quia in Justificationis articulo vix quicquam tradiderunt solidi The Papists themselves note twenty Articles in which their great Master Lombard erred so that that is ascribed to them hic magister non tenetur But now Paul the great Doctor of the Gentiles of whom Chrysostome writes severall Homilies is indeed an Angelicall Subtill Irrefragable Doctor Austin desired three things to have seen Christ in the flesh Rome in its glory and to have heard Paul preach What he speakes is true as Gospell and we can not apply to him what the Papists doe frequently to Peter Lumbard hic magister non tenetur We may exercise our judgement upon the writings of men there being few that write much and contradict not themselves but we must believe the Divinely inspired Writings There is a Booke in the Law called Liber Judiciarius or Doomesday-Booke because as Matthew Paris saith it spared no man but judged all men indifferently as the Lord in that great day will doe The Bible is the true Liber judiciarius or Doomesday Booke The word that I have spoken the same shall judge him in the last day I shall now in a few words discover the usefulnesse of this threefold Treatise Having been in these times of spoile unhappily plundered of my Bookes and Manuscripts which I esteemed as a precious treasure recovering this twice with some others I did resolve for preventing any future dammages in that kind to transcribe it faire for the Presse which was the worke of a whole yeere I know first the subject is very necessary for all Christians to search into and I have perused all the best writers I could find that I might handle it fully common-place wise according to the excellency of the Theme I have made use also of some Manuscrips of three worthy men now with God whose memory I shall ever honour for the compleating of the worke I have gleaned a few observations from some of the worthy Lecturers in Westminster from M. Ley of Budworth in his Lectures in the City and from divers others of the Assembly in their printed Sermons This worke I conceive may be beneficiall for these purposes Chiefly for setling and establishing of Christians in some maine principles of Divinity viz. that there is a God against the Atheists of these times that the Scripture is the Word of God against the Anti-Scripturists that Christ is God against all Arrians Socinians and other Heretickes ejusdem farinae vel potius furfuris that the so 〈◊〉 of man is immortall against such who in these daiâ—â— deny the same 2. For enabling a Christian to all dâ—â—ties prayer meditation holy conference catechizing his family For example suppose a Christian desire to instruct his family in the principles of Religion and would make use of M. Bals Catechisme for that purpose for I know not a better yet extant he may by the helpe of this worke open the heads of Religion from the beginning of that Booke to the Fall of man I would there were the like out on the whole body of Divinity But lest I trangresse the bounds of an Epistle I commend the worke to Gods blessing and desire thy benigne interpretation of my labours still resting Thy faithfull friend and hearty wel-wisher EDWARD LEIGH PROLEGOMENA HEBR. 6. 1. THe Apostle chides the Hebrews in the former Chapter for their ignorance and uncapablenesse of Divine mysteries from v. 11. to the end He tels them they were dull of hearing and that their ignorance was affected they might for their time and means have been teachers and yet now they must be taught and which is strange the very principles of the word of God Here in the beginning of this Chapter he earnestly exhorts them to encrease both in knowledge and obedience Leaving The Apostle alludes to men running a race they leave one place and goe on forward we must leave the principles of Religion that is not sticke there but passe on to a greater perfection The Apostle hath reference to the Schooles of the Jewes where hee was trained up there were two sorts of Schollers 1. Punies or petties 2. Proficients Perfectists Six principles are named as so many heads and common places of the ancient Catechisme not but that there were many other neâ—â—â—â—ary principles yet they might be reduced to 〈◊〉 â— Two maine duties that is 1. the doctrine of repentance from dead workes that every man is dead in sinne by nature and therefore had need to repent 2 The doctrine of faith in God 2 Two meanes 1 The doctrine of Baptismes by which in the plurall number he meanes both the Sacraments and also the inward Baptisme of Christ and that outward baptisme of John that is to say of the Minister though some refer it to the set times of Baptisme 2 The imposition or laying on of hands that is by a trope or borrowed speech the ministery of the Church upon the which hands were laid not the Sacrament of Confirmation as a Lapide expounds it 3 Two benefits Resurrection of the dead that the same numericall body shall rise againe and eternall judgement so called metonymically because in that judgement sentence shall be given concerning their eternall state either in weale or woe Not laying againe the foundation Three things are required in a foundation 1 That it be the first thing in the building 2 That it beare up all the other parts of the building 3 That it be firme and immoveable Simply and absolutely in respect of all times persons and things Christ onely is the foundation upon which the spirituall building of the Church is raised The first principles of heavenly doctrine are named here a foundation because they are the first things which are knowne before which nothing can be known and because upon the knowledge of these things all other parts of heavenly knowledge doe depend The Apostles are also the foundation of the Church Ephes. 2. 20. Rev. 21. 14. in three respects 1 Because they were the first which founded Churches and converted unbelievers to the faith 2 Because their doctrine which they received immediately from God by most undoubted revelation without mixture of errour or danger of being deceived is the rule of faith to all after-commers 3 Because they were Heads Guides and Pastors of the whole universall Church The Proposition or Observation which ariseth from these words thus opened may be this The Principles and Foundations of Christian Religion must be well laid Or thus Catechizing and instructing of the people in the principles of Religion is a necessary duty to be used The Apostle illustrates this by a comparison first from Schooles secondly from building the foundation
gladi puniendi Beza hath written a peculiar Tract de Haereticis a maâ—istratu puniendis Calvin also hath written aureum librum as Beza cals it of this very argument We doe deservedly condemne the cruelty of Turkes and Papists which goe about by force alone to establish their superstitions The Church of Rome and the Pope will judge what Heresie is and who is an Hereticke and they appropriate to themselves the name of Catholiques and all such as dissent from them must presently be pronounced heretickes Because Heresie is not easily defined as Austin saith and because faith should be perswaded not compelled We conceive that all faire means should be firâ—t used to convince men of their errours and discover the danger of them and that be termed Heresie which indeed is so Therefore we will premise some things concerning the nature and danger of Heresie before we speake partcularly of the punishment of heretickes Chillingworth thus defines Heresie It is saith he an obstinate defence of any errour against any necessary Article of the Christian faith Two things must concurre say some to constitute an Hereticke 1. Error in fide 1 Tim. 1. 19. 2 Pertinacia Titus 3. 10. Errare possum Haereticus esse nolo Dr Field thus describes the nature of Heresie Heresie is not every errour but errour in matter of Faith nor every errour in matter of Faith for neither Jewes nor Pagans are said to be Hereticks though they erre most damnably in those things which every one that will be saved must believe and with all the malice fury and rage that can be imagined impugne the Christian faith and verity but it is the errour of such as by some kind of profession have been Christians so that onely such as by profession being Christians depart from the truth of Christian Religion are named Heretickes Secondly for the danger of Heresie Heresie is a fruit of the flesh Gal. 5. 20 An Hereticke after the first and second admonition reject Titus 3. 10. Heresie or false doctrine is in Scripture compared to Leaven and to a Gangrene for the speading and infectious nature of it The Heresie of Arrius was more dangerous to the Church then the Sword of all the persecuting Emperours We need not to aske whether he joyne obstinacy to his errour saith Dr Field which erreth in those things which every one is bound particularly to believe because such things doe essentially and directly concerne the matter of of our salvation and he is without any further enquiry to be pronounced an Hereticke and the very errour it selfe is damnable as if a man saith he shall deny Christ to be the Sonne of God coessentiall coequall and coeternall with his Father or that we have remission of sinnes by the effusion of his blood They therefore who first hold pestilent Heresies and secondly who when before they professed the Christian Religion and held the truth have yet made a defection from the same to such Heresies and thirdly who labour to infect others and fourthly being convicted doe yet obstinately persevere in them and in the manner before mentioned such are and ought say some worthy Protestants to be punished by the Christian Magistrate with death They reason thus from the Office of the Magistrate Every Magistrate may and ought to punish offenders and the more pernicious the offenders are the more hainous ought the punishment to be That the Magistrate is both custos ac vindex utriusque tabulae these two Scriptures doe plainly evince For he is the Minister of God to thee for good but if thou doe what is evill be afraid for he beareth not the sword in vain for he is the Minister of God a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil Rom. 13. 4. and 1 Tim. 2. 2. For Kings and all that are in Authority that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godlinesse and honesty and are urged by Calvin Beza and divers others to this very purpose For if saith Beza the Magistrate have not power over Heretickes one of these two things must necessarily follow either that Heretickes doe not doe ill or that what Paul speakes in generall must be restrained to a certaine kind of evill deeds viz. to corporall sinnes From the 1 Tim. 2. 2. both Melancthon and Beza collect that the Magistrate is constituted by God not onely a preserver of the second Table but also and especially of pure Religion and the externall Discipline of it and so a punisher also of the offences against it For the inforceing of this Argument from these two Scriptures these reasons may be added 1 The sinnes against the first Table Caeter is paribus are greater then those against the second Table and the Magistrate is more to respect the glory of God then the peace of the Common-wealth Heresies and corruptions in judgement are held by a Reverend Divine to be worse then corruptions in manners his reason is taken out of Levit. 13. 44. one that was leprous in his head was utterly uncleane 2. Errours and Heresies are called in Scripture Evill deeds 2. Epist John 10 11. and Heretickes Evill dâ—ers Phil. 3. 2. Divines generally hold that such who erre blasphemously are to be put to death such as Arrius and Servetus in France One saith the Divell will thinke he hath made a good bargaine if he can get an universall liberty for removall of the Prelacy That which Jerome wrote to Augustine Quod signum majoris gloriae est omnes Haeretici te detestantur may be applyed to those of our times who have been Champions for the truth such evill doers will maligne them but if they mannage well so good a cause it will beare them out THE ERRATA REader as men have their errors so books have their errata Though my publick occasions might be an apologie for me yet I never bestowed more paines in correcting any booke then this and after my correcting of the severall sheets many faults have still passed especially in the third Booke The litterall faults where a letter is mistaken the false interpunctions nor the joyning together in the margent things of a different nature nor the mistaking of the figures in the first and third Booke nor the misplacing of Scriptures I shall not mention Others that doe wrong the sence are chiefly these In the Text Lib. 1. pag. 33. line 25. after 17. leave out Acts p. 59. l. 30. vixit p. 63. l. 21. Glasseus p. 70. l. 6. never doubted of their being p. 115. l. 2. sanctissimam p. 117. l. 30. Gretzerus 182 183. wants the figure 4 5. Lib. 2. p. 21. l. ult doth know live and will p. 30. l. 10. conceiving p. 59. l. 20. 1 Themselves 2 Stockes and stones p. 96. l. 5. suis should be quis p. 129. l. 5. same should be sonne Lib. 3. p. 10. l. 25 26. not pro singulis generum but
God shall destroy him with the Spirit of his mouth idest verbo suo Beza God hath consecrated the word to this purpose the end of it is not onely to save but destroy being the savor of death to some and it is a fit instrument for such a worke Antichrists strength is in mens consciences onely this will pierce thither Heb. 4. 12. God useth the word for the destruction of Antichrist these waies 1. It discovers him his doctrine his errours 2. It hardens him 3. It condemneth him and passeth sentence against him CHAP. III. 2. The Bookes of Scripture FRom the Divine flowes the Canonicall authority of the Scripture The bookes of Scripture are called Canonicall bookes say some from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word is used 2 Cor. 10. 13. Phil. 3. 16. Gal. 6. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 marke the double emphasis this notable Canon because they were put into the Canon by the Universall Church acknowledged to be divinely inspired by it and also are made a perfect Canon or rule of all doctrine concerning religion credendorum agendorum of faith and manners of all things which are to be believed or done toward salvation But Cameron thinks it is not termed Canonicall because it is a rule for that booke saith he is called Canonicall which is put into the Catalogue which the ancients called a Canon of those writings which are esteemed Divine Becanus saith they are called Canonicall both because they containe a rule which we ought to follow in faith and manners and because they are put into the Catalogue of Divine bookes The conditions of a Canon are these 1. It must containe truth or be an expresse form and image of truth which is in the divine mind 2. It must be commanded sanctified and confirmed by Divine authority that it may be a Canon to us in the Church These bookes were sanctified either commonly all of both Testaments by the testimony of the Spirit and Church and Canon it selfe or the books of the old Testament were specially and singularly confirmed by word signes and event as the Pentateuch but the Propheticall books and Hagiographa before their carrying into Babylon by extraordinary signe the cloud and vaile in the Temple 1 Kings 8. 10. Levit. 16. 2. and Gods answer by Ephod Urim and Thummim Exod 28. 30. after their carrying away into Babylon by singular testimonies of events The books of the new Testament are confirmed by the Sonne of God revealed in flesh by his sayings and deeds Heb. 1. 2. and by the powerfull ministery of the Apostles by signes vertues and miracles Marke 16. 20. There is a threefold Canon in the Church Divine Ecclesiasticall and False The Divine Canon is that which properly and by itselfe is called the word of God immediately inspired of God into the Prophets and Apostles This according to the divers times of the Church is distinguished into the old and new Testament 2 Cor. 3. 6 14. this is a common division of the sacred Bible among Christians as in the version of Tremelius and Junius Testamenti veteris novi Biblia sacra and the Geneva gives that title to their Bible La Bible qui est toute la Saincte Escriture du viel novean Testament Austin thinkes they are better called Vetus novum Instrumentum Heinsius Grotius vetus novum Foedus vide Grotii Annotat. in libros Evangelii A Covenant is an agreement between two a Testament is the declaration of the will of one It is called in regard of the forme convention and agreement betweene God and man a Covenant in regard of the manner of confirming it a Testament For 1. in a Testament or last will the Testators mind is declared so is the will of God in his word therefore it is called a Testimony often Psal. 19. 119. l 2. Here is a Testator Christ a Legacy eternall life Heires the elect a writing the Scripture Seales the Sacraments 3. Because it is ratified by the death of Christ Heb. 9. 16 17. The Bookes of the old Testament are the holy Scriptures given by God to the Church of the Jewes shewing them what to believe and how God would be worshipped The new Testament containeth the bookes which treate of salvation already exhibited and Christ already come in the flesh All the bookes of the old Testament were written originally in Hebrew because they were committed unto the Hebrews Rom. 3. 2. except what Daniel and Ezra wrote in the Chaldee The Jewish Church receiving them from God kept them and delivered them to posterity Many grave Authours hold that the Hebrew was the first Tongue and mother of all the rest and it may probably be collected from the names of our first parents It was called Hebrew saith Erpenius not from Heber of the posterity of Sem as Josephus Jerome and others thinke when it is manifest that he rather spake Chaldee then Hebrew because Abraham the Patriarke which drew his originall from him was a Chaldean but it was so called saith Erpenius as all the Rabbines Origen and others testifie from the Hebrews which people arose from Canaan It is honoured with the title of the holy Tongue saith the same Erpenius because the most holy God spoke it to his Prophets delivered his holy will written in it to the Church and because it is very probable from the opinion of great men that holy men shall use it with God hereafter in Heaven vide Buxtorfium de Linguae Hebraeae origine Antiquitate Sanctitate There are many Hebraismes also in the new Testament many words and phrases rather used according to the manner of the Hebrews then the Greeks by which it is mauifest that the same Spirit was the Authour of the old and new Testament The knowledge of the Hebrew much conduceth to the learning of those famous Orientall Tongues the Chaldee Syriacke Arabicke and Aethiopicke by reason of the great affinity which they have with their mother The bookes of the old Testament may be divided severall waies in respect of the stile some were written in prose some in verse in respect of time some were written before their being taken captives into Babylon as Samuel Esay Hâ—sea and many others some in the Captivity and some after as Haggai Zachary Malachy The Hebrewes divide the Bible ex instituto Esdrae into three speciall parts 1. The Law the five Bookes of Moses 2. The Prophets 1. The former Joshua Judges two bookes of Samuel and two of the Kings 2. The latter 1. Greater three 2. Lesser twelve 3. The Hagiographa for want of a more speciall name by which title all the rest are understood and they are eleven Our Saviour himselfe mentions this most ancient distinction Luke 24. 44. calling all the rest of the bookes besides the Law and Prophets Psalmes All the Scriptures of the old Testament in other places are comprised in the Law
that time of the writing of the new Testament did speake Syriacke and not Hebrew which language is mixt consisting of Hebrew and Chaldee therefore saith Whitaker it is more probable that Matthew and he which wrote the Epistle to the Hebrewes wrote in Greek because the Greeke tongue was not unknowne to the Jewes which were Hellenists Act. 6. 1. and other Apostles wrote in Greeke which wrote peculiarly to the Jewes as JAmes and Peter Matthaeum Hebraicè scripsisse convenit inter antiquos Citat Irenaeum Origenem Athanasium Epiphanium Chrysostomum Hieronymum Vossius de genere Christi dissertat Scripsit Haebraea lingua quiae praecipuè Judoeorum quos viva voce hactenus docuisset haberet rationem Id. ibid. vide Grotium in libros Evangel It was needfull that the Gospell should be written by many First for the certainty Secondly for the perfection of it Amongst all the Evangelists there is a Generall agreement and a speciall difference they all agree in the maine scope and Subject Christ they differ in the speciall argument and order All describe the life of Christ some more largely some more briefely some more loftily some more plainely yet because all were inspired by the same Spirit they all have equall authority The difference of Evangelists in some smaller matters proveth their consent in the greater to be the voyce of truth for had they conspired all together to have deceived the world they would in all things have more fully agreed The doctrine of the Covenant of grace is more plainly expounded the will of God and way to salvation more plentifully set down in the new Testament then ever it was in the daies of Moses or the Prophets and in these bookes of the new Testament all things are so established as to continue to the end so that we must not looke for any new revelation All these Bookes we receive as Canonicall because they are divine for matter and forme divinely inspired by God sanctified and given to the Church for their direction written by the Apostles or Apostolicall men sweetly consenting with other parts of holy Scripture and with themselves received alwaies by the greatest part of the Church of God They were written after the death of Christ by the direction of the holy Ghost the Apostles by lively voyce first preached because it was needfull that the doctrine of the Gospell should by their preaching as also by signes and wonders be confirmed against the contradictions and cavils of the Jewes and Gentiles and allowed by the assent of believers generally before it was committed to writing that we might be assured of the certainty of those things which were written These bookes are acknowledged Canonicall both by us and the Papists so that touching this matter there is no controversie between us and them The Epistles doubted of by some for a while were first the Epistle to the Hebrews the Epistle of JAmes the second Epistle of Peter the second and third Epistles of John the Epistle of Jude and the Revelation of which I shall treate more when I come to handle the bookes of the new Testament particularly The story of the woman taken in adultery hath met with very much opposition See Gregories preface to his notes upon some passages of Scripture Crojus defends the truth of it Observat. in nov Testam c. 17. Vide Seldeni uxorem Ebraicam c. 11. The inscriptions and titles prefixed before the Epistles are no part of holy Scripture written by the Apostles but added to the Epistles by some others The Subscriptions and Postscrips also of divers bookes are false counterfeit and erroneous not written by the Apostles but added afterward by the Scribes which copied out the Epistles The subscriptions of the latter Epistle to Timothy and also to Titus are supposititious they are neither found in the Syriacke nor in all Greeke copies nor yet in the vulgar Latin translation these additions were made some 100 yeeres after the Apostles The Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament are either Historicall Doctrinall or Propheticall 1. Historicall containing matters of fact the history of 1. Christ exhibited in the foure Evangelists or Gospels as they are stiled by God himselfe Marke 1. 1. Matthew Marke Luke and John so called because they containe a message of joy and gladnesse They all treate of one subject Christ Jesus incarnate most true Historians Luke 1. 2. John 21. 24. 2. His Apostles in the Acts written by Luke thirty yeeres after Christs ascention so termed of the principall subject of the History though the acts of others not Apostles are there recorded Dogmaticall or Doctrinall such as were written by the Apostles for the instruction of the Church of God in faith and manners commonly called Epistles and that by warrant of the Scriptures 1 Thess. 5. 27. 2 Pet. 3. 1. 16. because they were sent to them who had already received and professed the Gospell of God These are 21. written 1. By Paul 1. To whole Churches To the Romans Corinthians Galathians Ephesians Philippians Colossians Thessalonians 1. Gentiles 2. Jewes To the Hebrews 2. To particular persons 1. Timothy 2. Titus 3. Philemon 2. JAmes one 3. Peter two 4. John three 5. Jude one 3. Propheticall wherein under certaine resemblances the state of the Church of Christ till the end of the wolrd from the time of John the Evangelist is most truely and wonderfully described and receiveth its name Apoealyps of the Argument Beza Piscator Calvin Erasmus have doâ—e well on all the new Testament Of the Papists Jansenius hath done well on the harmony of the Lutherans Chemnitus and Gerhard of the Protestants Calvin Maldonate de Dieu Cameron Scultetus and Grotius have done well likewise on the Evangelists Matthew and John were Apostle of the twelve Marke and Luke Evangelists Apostles is a name of office or dignity It notes one sent from another with command in speciall certain famous Ambassadours of Christ. The Evangelists accompanied the Apostles in preaching the Gospell Matthew There was never any in the Church which doubted of its authority Some say he wrote in Hebrew but that is uncertaine as hath been already declared He interprets the Hebrew name Emanuel Chap. 1. 23. and those words Chap. 27. v. 46. therefore it is likely he wrote not in Hebrew for why should one that writeth in Hebrew interpret Hebrew words to such as understand Hebrew and how came this authenticall Copy and Prototype to be lost for it is not now extant How ever the Greeke edition is Authenticall because it came forth when the Apostles were living and was approved by them which the Ancients confirme Of the time when Matthew wrote Authours agree not Eusebius saith that he wrote in the third yeere of Cajus Caesar others say he wrote after Claudius He wrote his Gospell in the fifteenth yeere after Christs ascention saith Nicephorus the 21 saith Irenaeus in the eighth yeere saith Theophylact.
name at least thrice saying I John Chap. 1. 9. 21. 1 2. 22. 8. whereas in the Gospell he never maketh mention of his name there he writes the history of Christ here he writes of himself and the Revelations declared to him Thirdly in the last Chapter are five testimonies heaped together v. 5 6 7 8. 1. Of the Angels 2. Of God himselfe the Lord of the holy Prophets 3. Of Jesus Christ behold I come shortly 4. Of John I John heard and saw all these things 5. The protestation of Jesus Christ vers 18. Fourthly the matter of the Booke doth convince the authority thereof seeing everywhere the Divinity of a Propheticall spirit doth appeare the words and sentences of other Prophets are there set downe part of the Prophesies there delivered are in the sight of the world accomplished by which the truth and authority of the whole is undoubtedly proved there are extant many excellent testimonies of Christ and his Divinity and our redemption by Christ. Fifthly The most ancient Fathers Greeke and Latine ascribe this Booke to John the Apostle Theophylact Origen Chysâ—stome Tertullian Hilary Austin Ambrose Irenaeus To deny then the truth of this booke is contra solem obloqui to gainsay the shining of the Sunne it selfe The Chyliasts abuse many testimonies out of this Booke but those places have been cleared long agoe by the learned as bearing another sence See Dr Raynolds conf with Hart Chap. 8. p. 406. Calvin being demanded his opinion what he thought of the Revelation answered ingenuously he knew not at all what so obscure a writer meant Se penitus ignorare quid velit tam obscurus scriptor Cajetan at the end of his Exposition of Jude confesseth that he understands not the literall sence of the Revelation and therefore exponat saith he cui Deus concesserit It consists of 22 Chapters the best Expositors on it are Ribera Brightman Pareus Cartwright Dent Forbes Mode Simonds 1. The Scriptures written by Moses and the Propheâ—s sufficiently prove that Christ is the Messiah that was to come the old Testament may convince the Jewes which deny the new Testament of this truth John 5. 39. They that is those parts of Scripture written by Moses and the Prophets there were no other Scriptures then written The 53 Chapter of Esay is a large history of his sufferings We have also another Booke or Testament more clearely witnessing of Christ the Gospel is the unsearchable riches of Christ Ephes. 3. 8. So much may suffice to have spoken concerning the Divine Canon the Ecclesiasticall and false Canon follow CHAP. V. SOme Hereticks utterly abolisht the Divine Canon as the Swingfeldians and Libertines who contemned all Scriptures the Manichees and Marcionites refused all the Bookes of the old Testament as the Jewes doe those of the new as if they had proceeded from the Divell Some diminish this Canon as the Sadduces who as Whitaker and others hold rejected all the other Prophets but Moses some inlarge it as the Papists who hold that divers other Bookes called by us Aprcrypha i. hidden doe belong to the old Testament and are of the same authority with the other before named and they adde also their traditions and unwritten word equalling it with the Scripture both these are accursed Rev. 22. 18. But against the first we thus argue whatsoever Scripture 1. is divinely inspired 2. Christ commandeth to search 3. To which Christ and his Apostles appeale and confirme their doctrine by it that is Canonicall and of equall authority with the new Testament But the holy Scripture of the old Testament is divinely inspired 2 Tim. 3. 16. where he speakes even of the Bookes of the old Testament as is gathered both from the universall all writing viz. holy in the 15 verse and from the circumstance of time because in the time of Timothies infancy little or nothing of the new Testament was published 2. Christ speakes not to the Scribes and Pharisees but to the people in generall to search it John 5. 39. this famous elogium being added that it gives testimony of him and that we may finde eternall life in it 3. Christ and his Apostles appeale to it and confirme their doctrine by it Luke 24. 27. Rom. 3. 21. Acts 10. 43. 17. 11. 20 43 26. 20. the new Testament gives testimony of the old and Peter 2 Pet. 1. 19. of Pauls Epistles The Ecclesiasticall Canon which is also called the second Canon followeth to which these Bookes belong Tobit Judith first and second of the Machabees Wisdome Ecclesiasticus Baruch Additions to Daniel and Hester for these neither containe truth perfectly in themselves nor are sanctified by God in the Church that they may be a Canon of faith and although abusively from custome they were called Canonicall yet properly in the Church they are distinguished from the Canonicall by the name of Apocryphall The false Canon is that which after the authority of the Apocrypha increased was constituted by humane opinion for the Papists as well as we reject for Apocryphall the third and fourth Booke of Esdras the prayer of Manasses the third and fourth of Machabees as Thomas Aquinas Sixtus Senensis Bellarmine and so the Councell of Trent confesse when they omit these and reckon up the whole Canon The state therefore of the controversie betwixt us and the Papists is whether those seven whole bookes with the Appendices be Sacred Divine Canonicall We doe not deny but many of these especially Wisdome and Ecclesiasticus are very good and profitable and to be preferred before all humane Tractates but that they are properly and by an excellency Canonicall and of infallible truth out of which firme arguments may be drawne that we deny Those Bookes which the Jewes of old and the reformed Churches now reckon for truely Canonicall in the old Testament are received all even by our adversaries for Canonicall without any exception 2. for the Canonicall Bookes of the new Testament there is no controversie between us and so far we agree but in the old Testament whole Bookes are reckoned by them for Canonicall which we hold Apocryphall The reason why these Bookes at first were added to holy writ was this the Jewes in their later times before and at the comming of Christ were of two sorts some properly and for distinction sake named Hebrews inhabiting Jerusalem and the holy Land others were Hellenists that is the Jewes of the dispersion mingled with the Graecians These had written sundry bookes in Greeke which they made use of together with other parts of the old Testament which they had in Greeke of the translation of the 70 when they now understood not the Hebrew but the Hebrewes received onely the 22 Bookes before mentioned Hence it came that the Jewes delivered a double Canon of Scripture to the Christian Church the one pure unquestioned and Divine which is the Hebrew Canon the other in Greeke
of Scripture John 14. 26. he that teacheth all things omitteth nothing Christ said all things to his Apostles as appeares John 15. 15. and 17. 8. John 16. 13. 2. By reasons drawne from thence 1. The plentifull pouring forth of the spirit was deferred till the glorifying of Christ he being glorified it was no longer to be delayed Christ being exalted on the right hand of God obtained the Spirit promised and that was not according to measure and poured the same in such abundance as it could be poured forth and received by men so that was fulfilled which was foretold by Joel 2. 28. Act. 2. 33. John 3. 34. 35. Act. 2. 16 17. 2. The Scripture and the prophesies of the old Testament doe teach and declare that all Divine truth should fully and at once be manifested by the Messias who is the onely Prophet High-Priest and King of his Church there is no other Revelation promised none other needfull besides that which was made by him Esay 11. 9. Act 3. 23. 24. Joel 2. 23. Vide Mercerum in loc therefore the last inspiration was made to the Apostles and none other to be expected The doctrine of the Law and the Prophets did suffice to salvation yet it did send the Fathers to expect somewhat more perfect 1 Pet. 1. 10 but to the preaching of the Gospell nothing is to be added we are not sent to waite for any clearer vision 3. So long as any truth needfull to be known was unrevealed or not plainly taught the Lord did stirre up some Prophet or other to teach the same unto the Church therefore the Lord surceaâ—ng to speake since the publishing of the Gospell of Jesus Christ and the delivery of the same in writing is unto us a manifest token that the whole will of God is now brought to light and that no new Revelation is to be expected Our 7th Proposition is Christ and his Apostles were able to propound and teach by lively voyce that doctrine which pertaines to perfection John 1. 18. and 11. 11. 32. John 8. 26. and the Apostles perfectly taught all things which are or shall be necessary for the Church Act. 20. 27. Gal. 1. 7. 8. 9. The doctrine of repentance and remission of sinnes in the name of Christ doth summarily containe all things necessarily to salvation Act. 5. 31. and 11. 11. but this doctrine the Apostles preached Act. 13. 38. 39. Luke 24. 47. The word of God is not onely Milke for Babes but strong Meat for men of ripe yeares 1 Cor. 3. 1. 2. Heb. 5. 14. and 6. 1. 2. therefore it containeth not onely matter of preparation but of perfection Or 8th Proposition is The sum and substance of that heavenly doctrine which was taught by the Prophets and Apostles was by them committed to writing the Holy Ghost giving them a commandement and guiding their hands therein that they could not erre so that the word preached and written by them is one in substance both in respect of matter which is the will and word of God and inward forme viz. the divine truth immediately inspired though different in the externall forme and manner of delivery Our 9th Proposition is that nothing is necessary to be known of Christians over and above that which is found in the old Testament which is not clearly and evidently contained in the Bookes of the Apostles and Evangelists Our last Proposition is that all things which have beene are or shall be necessary to the salvation of the Church to the end of the world are perfectly contained in the writings of the Prophets and Apostles long since divinely inspired written and published and now received by the Church of God so that now no new Revelation or Tradition beside those inspired published and comprehended in the Scripture are necessary for the salvation of the Church There are 3 opinions 1. Of the Papists who altogether deny it 2. Of the Socinians which would have all things expressely contained in Scripture and if it be not totidem verbis they reject it 3. Of the Orthodoxe who say it containes all things expressely or by consequence The expresse testimonies of Scripture forbidding even Angels to adde any thing to those things which are commanded by the Lord doe prove the perfection of the Scripture Deut. 4. 5. 12. and 12. 32. and 30. 10. and 5. 12 13 14. and 28. 58. Josh. 1. 7 8. Prov. 30. 5. wherefore the Apostle commands that no man presume above that which is written 1. Cor. 4. 6. 2 Tim. 3. 15 16. Divers reasons may be drawn from this famous place to prove the perfection of the Scripture 1. The Apostle teacheth that the Scriptures are able to make a man wise to salvation therefore there needeth no further counsell nor direction thereunto but out of the Scriptures 2 The Scriptures are able to make the man of God that is the Minister of the word perfect and compleat unto every worke of his Ministery whether it be by teaching true doctrine or confuting false by exhorting and setting forward to that which is good or dehorting from that which is evill Paul would not have us thinke that all and every writing viz. of Plato Aristotle is divinely inspired for in the 15. v. he not onely useth the plurall number calling them the holy * writings thereby to note the word of God and not one sentence or Booke but all the sentences and Bookes of the Scripture and also useth the Article which hath force of an universall note therefore the Greeke word the whole Scripture signifieth the whole altogether and not every part severally in this place 2. No one part of holy Scripture is able to make the Minister perfect therefore it must needs be understood of the whole body of holy Scripture wherein this sufficiency is to be found The Ancient Fathers and other Divines have from this place proved the perfection and sufficiency of the Scripture in all things necessary to salvation We doe not reason thus as the Papists charge us it is profitable therefore it is sufficient but because 1. The Scripture is profitable for all these ends viz. to teach sound doctrine to refute false opinions to instruct in holy life and correct ill manners therefore it is sufficient or it is profitable to all those functions of the Ministery that a Minister of the Church may be perfect therefore muchâ—more for the people Argumentum non nititur unica illa voce utilis sed toto sententiae camplexu Chamierus Hitherto of the perfection of the Scripture absolutely considered now followes the sufficiency thereof in opposition to unwritten traditions or verities as the Papists speake Doctor Davenant premiseth these things for the better understanding of the sufficiency of the Scripture 1. We speake of the State of the Church saith he in which God hath ceased to speake to men by the Prophets or Apostles divinely inspired and to lay open new Revelations to his
ought to blesse God that is to observe and know his blessednes and for to doe two things to him 1 To applaude it 2 To expresse and acknowledge it In Scripture-phrase to blesse signifieth two things 1 To praise a person for those things which are praise-worthy in him as Gods name is said to be above all blessing and praise Blesse the Lord O my soule and all that is within me blesse his holy Name 2 To wish well to it that my soule may blesse thee before it die pronounce and wish thee blessed We cannot pronounce any blessing upon God nor bestow any benefit upon him He is too excellent to receive any thing by way of promise or performance from us but we must performe these two things viz. wish well to him speake well of him Wish well to him that is acknowledge his exceeding happinesse and will that he may be ever what he is as we know he ever wil be For to wish a thing continue being that is is possible and to wil Gods eternall blessed and glorious being that is one of the most excellent acts of the creature and in doing so we blesse God so much as a creature can blesse him Perfect happinesse is not to be had here but so much happines as can be had here is to be had in him he can give himselfe to those which seeke him in some degrees and then are they in some degrees happy he can give himselfe to them in the highest degree and then they are in the highest degree happy according as he doth communicate himselfe to us more or lesse so are we more or lesse happy 1 We have little mind to wish well to God or rejoyce in his welfare or to acknowledge and speake of it 2 We should stir up our selves to blesse God and say how blessed art thou and blessed by thy Name We should set our minds and our tongues aworke to set forth to our selves and others his exceeding great excellencies When we see and know excellent abilities in any man we cannot but be oft talking with our selves and others of his great worth so we seeing and knowing the infinitenesse of God must be often telling our selves and others what we do know by him thereby to stirre up our selves and others more and more to know him and we must declare before the Lord his goodnesse and his loving kindnesse to the sonnes of men 3 We must learne to seeke happinesse where it is even in God and in his favourable vouchsafing to be ours and to give himselfe to us It is not possible for the creature to be happy and enjoy it selfe unlesse it enjoy the best and greatest good whereof it is capable and which will fully satisfie all the longings and inclinations of it We should 1. see our misery that being alienated from God must needs be miserable till this estrangement be removed 2 Set our selves to get true blessednesse by regaining this union and communion with God the fountaine of all blisse and hate sinne which onely separates between God and us and hinders us from enjoying the Blessed God 3 We should place all our happinesse in him and in him alone for he is not onely the chiefe but the sole happinesse we should use the world but enjoy him Psalm 16. 11. we should use the meanes which may bring blessednesse Psalm 1. 1. Matth. 5. 3 to 12. if we live holily we may looke for happinesse All the promises in the Scripture belong to godly men they shall be blessed here and hereafter who serve God in sincerity We must expect and looke for happinesse onely in our union with and fruition of him Austin alledgeth out of Varro 288 severall opinions of Philosophers concerning felicity Blessednesse is the enjoying of the Soveraigne Good now what that is we must judge by these two Characters it must be 1. Optimum the best otherwise it wil not sistere appetitum give us content we wil be ever longing 2. Maximum the most compleat otherwise it wil not implere appetitum we shall not be satisfied therewith God is Optimus Maximus Happinesse it the summe of all our desires and the ayme of all our endeavours Perfect Blessednesse consisteth in the immediate fruition of the chiefe perfect and al-sufficient good even God himselfe The good to be deâ—ired simply for it selfe is God onely who being the first cause of all things the first essentiall eternall infinite unchangeable and onely good must needs be the chiefe good and therefore the last end intended by man given by God who being not onely desired but enjoyed of necessity must fully satisfie the soule that it can goe no further not onely because the subject is infinite and so the mind can desire to know no more but also because fulnesse of all good that can be wished is to be found in God Therefore our happinesse is compleat and perfect when we enjoy God as an object wherein the powers of the soule are satisfied with everlasting delight This may suffice to have spoken concerning Gods Essence and Attributes by which it appeares that God is farre different both from all faigned Gods and from all creatures The consideration of the Divine persons followeth for in one most simple nature of God there are distinct persons CHAP. XVI Of the Trinity or distinction of Persons in the Divine Essence WE cannot by the light of nature know the mystery of the Trinity nor the incarnation of Jesus Christ. But when by faith we receive this doctrine we may illustrate it by reason The similies which the Schoolmen and other Divines bring drawn from the creature are unequall and unsatisfactory since there can be no proportion between things Finite and Infinite Two resemblances are much used in Scripture the Light and the word The Light which was three daies before the Sunne Gen. 1. and then condensed into that glorious body and ever since diffused throughout the world is all one and the same light So the Father of lights which inhabiteth light which none can approach Jam. 1. 17. and the Sunne of righteousnesse Mal. 4. 2. in whom all the fulnesse of the Godhead dwelleth bodily and the holy Ghost the Spirit of illumination are all one and the same God Again it is the same thing that the mind thinketh and the word signifieth and the voyce uttereth so is the Father as the mind conceiving the Sonne as the word conceived or begotten the holy Ghost as the voice or speech uttered and imparted to all hearers and all one and the same God A studious Father meditating on the mysterie of the Trinity there appeared unto him a child with a shell lading the Sea into a little hole he demanding what the child did I intend said the child to empty the Ocean into this pit It is impossible said the Father as possible said the child as for thee to comprehend this profound mystery in thy shallow capacity The