Exercitations CONCERNING The Pure and True AND The Impure and False RELIGION By CHARLES de BEAVVAIS Rector of the Parish of Witheham In the County of Sussex LONDON Printed by J. R. for Francis Eglesfield at the Signe of the Marygold in St. Paul's Church-Yard 1665. TO THE ORTHODOX AND TRULY Christian Church The Church of the KINGDOM of ENGLAND For the Advancement of the Glory of Almighty God And for Her Confirmation More and More IN THE Pure and True Doctrine of Faith And of Divine Worship CHARLES de BEAVVAIS One of Her most Faithfull And most Affectionate Ministers Doth in all Humility Offer And Dedicate This Present WORK An Humble Request Of the AUTHOR To the Reader THe Reader is Intreated Humbly to begin the Reading of this Book by the Methodical Representation following Because in It He shall clearly perceive all the Chapters or Heads thereof and all the Exercitations about the said Chapters or Heads Besides in It He shall find an Epitomy of the whole Work A Methodical Representation of all the Chapters or Heads and of all the Exercitations about the said Chapters or Heads that are contained in this Work Which is also an Epitomy of the whole Book SECTION I. Chap. 1. OF Religion in General 1 With this Exercitation 1. There is a Religion And that Necessarily 1 Chap. 2. Of the Distinction of Religion in True in Heretical in Schismatical and in False 2 Chap. 3. Of the True Religion in General 3 With these Exercitations 1. The True Religion can be but one 3 2. Of Antiquity concerning Religion 6 3. Nothing must be ordained concerning the Things belonging to Religion without the Word of God 4. The onely Ground and Rule of Faith and of Divine Worship is the Holy Scripture 12 5. The Holy Scripture ought to be among us the Supream Interpreter of Scriptures and the Judge of Controversies 13 6. Consequently this Power and Authority is not to be Attributed to any Creature 14 7. What force have in Religion Arguments taken from Reason 15 8. The Controversies concerning Religion in all Disputations must be decided onely by Holy Scriptures 16 Chap. 4. Concerning the Power and Authority of the Soveraign Prince in regard of Religion 18 With these Exercitations 1. The Supream Authority of Establishing Conserving and Reforming Religion doth belong to him 18 2. He must Order and Settle nothing concerning Religion without consulting the Book of Scriptures and assembling Learned and Godly Divines whose Charge is to Expound them 21 3. In what regard a Soveraign Prince is said to be the Head of the Church which is within his States and Dominions 23 Chap. 5. Of the Marks of the True Religion 24 Chap. 6. Of the True Religion in Particular 25 As such was the Religion of the Ancient Jews And the first Christian Religion Chap. 7. The Ancient Judaical Religion was a true Religion 25 Chap. 8. The first Christian Religion was Pure and True 26 Chap. 9. Of the Agreements and of the Differences between the Religion of the ancient Jews and the true Christian Religion 27 Chap. 10. So there hath been but one way to attain to the Fruition of Salvation since the first sin of Adam 28 Chap. 11. Of the Mutation which happened to the first Christian Religion in General 30 With these Exercitations 1. Vnder the Empire of Constantine the first Christian Religion suddenly changed 30 2. Of the Terms or Words and of the Ceremonies borrowed from the Jews and from the Pagans in the above said change SECT 2. Chap. 1. OF the Corruption which in Particular is happened to the First Religion of the Church of Rome 33 With these Exercitations 1. The Religion and Church of Rome is not Now what it was in the Beginning In the Beginning it was Pure and Orthodox But now it is Impure and Heretical 35 2. 1. Because the Greater part of Her Belief is contrary to Holy Scriptures 36 Art 5. 3. 2. Because besides a great part of the Ancient Heresies are received in Her and Approved by Her 38. Art 7. 4. Answer to four Objections against the above Assertion Of the First see Pag. 41 Of the Second see Pag. 42 Of the Third see Pag. 45 Of the Fourth see Pag. 48 5. Popery is not of the First and Primary Antiquity 49 Ch. 2. Of the Principles of the Roman Religion 51 With these Exercitations 1. Those Principles are Scriptures Traditions of the Apostles The Catholick Church General Councils The Ancient Fathers The Pope 51 2. These Principles are 1. Fraudulous 2. False 3. The Fraudes about the said Principles are 1. Either in regard of them all and Conjointly 2. Or in respect of each of them and separately Chap. 3. Of the Frauds about all the said Principles and conjointly 52 Which are the three following 1. The Church of Rome careth indeed for none of Her Principles but for the last which is the Determination of the Pope 52 2. Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope and take all Authority quoad nos From the Scripture So that by the Church they understand the Pope 53 3. The Pope also is thought by the Papists to be the True and Lawfull Interpreter of the Scriptures And the supreame Judge of Controversies about Religion 54 55 Chap. 4. Of the Fraudes about the First Principle which is the Scriptures 57 Which are the two following 1. The Papists making shew to receive the Scriptures for Rule of Faith do disgrace them in joyning Traditions with them 57 2. The Church of Rome which Produceth Scriptures for one of Her principles and Rules hath indeed no sufficient Scriptures by reason of the Corruption of the Vulgar Latin Translation which is the Papists Scripture 57 § Of the Corruption of the said Vulgar Latin Translation more fully 58 § Refutation of the Excessive Praises which the Seminary Priests of Rhemes gives to the English Rhemish Translation 59 § Condemnation of the Annotations joyned with the said Rhemish Translation 62 Chap. 5. Of the Fraudes about the Second principle which is the Ancient Fathers 63 Which are these two following 1. That by an Expurgatory Index the Church of Rome causes to be blotted out of the Books of the said Fathers all that is displeasing unto Her Or else doth falsifie them and alter their sense and meaning 63 2. That although the Church of Rome acknowledgeth That there are many Faults and Errors in the Books of the Ancient Fathers which are not to be approved Yet the Roman Religion is as it were a Body consisting for the most part of Rottennesse and Corruption namely the Ancient and new Errors 64 § Again of this matter more briefly 66 § Again Papists suck Errors from the Fathers unsound speeches And of a small Error of the Fathers do occasionally procreate a great one 67 Chap. 6. Of the Frauds about the Third Principle which is concerning Councils 67 These Fraudes are the four following 1. The many Frauds and Slights committed in the last Councils of
the Church of Rome 67. 2. This is a great Slight of the Popes in these last times to oppose themselves to the holding of Councils and for what Causes he doth it 68 3. This was a great Fraude and Slight in the Court of Rome to endeavour as much as could be done to suppress the Relation of what was passed in the Council of Trent 69 § Concerning the History of the Council of Trent 70 4. The Acts of the Councils have been falsyfied for the most part and things have been supposed which never were 71 A Digression of the Council of Trent in particular with the following Exercitations 1. IT is with Just Causes that the Council of Trent is rejected and condemned by the Reformed 72 2. Yet it is by great Rhetorical Ornaments commended by the Jesuites 73 3. But it deserves not such Commendations and why 74 4. Of the Decrees of that Council 75 5. Of the Examen of that Council by Kemnitius 75 6. For what Reasons the Protestants made no great hast to go to that Council 76 § A Resolution of this Question whether the Pope be above the Councils or otherwise 77 Chap. 7. Of the Fraude about the fourth Principle Namely the Church And this Fraude is that because the Scripture maketh honourable mention of the Church therefore the Roman Church is that true Church of Christ 78 79 Chap. 8. Of the Falshood of the above said Principles of the Church of Rome 79 With this Exercitation 1. By Reason of that Falshood such Principles are Excluded by the Reformed from the Rule of Faith 80 Chap. 9. 1. They Exclude justly the Traditions called Apostolical 80 Chap. 10. The Scripture is a perfect Rule of Faith without Tradition 81 Chap. 11. 2. The Catholick Church is justly excluded 83 Chap. 12. 3. General Councils are justly excluded 83 Chap. 13. Refutation of an Objection made against our Rejection of the Church and of General Councils 84 Chap. 14. 4. The Antient Fathers are justly excluded 85 Whereupon the following Exercitations are considerable 1. Answer to a Demand of the Jesuites about our Rejection of the Fathers 86 2. How the Reformed carry themselves in regard of the Scriptures and in regard of the Fathers 87 3. Of Bishop Jewels challenge to the Fathers that flourished 600. years after Christ 88 89 4. The Fathers have Errors 90 5. Notwithstanding some of their Errors we Reformed esteem them as holy Men and holy Fathers 90 6. Answer to an objection against this Declaration 91 7. There is great difference between the Errors of the Fathers and those of the present Church of Rome 92 8. Examination of some words of Luther about the Fathers reproved by the Popish Writers 93 9. Answer to two Objections against that Examination 94 95 Chap. 15. The Determination of the Pope is justly Excluded from the Rule 97 With these Exercitations 1. The Pope may fall into Heresie and have erred in great Articles of Faith 97 2. Answer to an Objection about that Assertion 98 3. Besides we say that the Pope is the great Antichrist foretold in the Scriptures 98 4. Of the divers Ages of Antichrist 100 5. What Horrour is it to submit to him that is the Antichrist 101 § Concerning Cardinals the Popes Counsellours in two Exercitations 101 102 Chap. 16. It is an observation greatly to be considered That the Arguments used in the Church of Rome for defence of their Erroneous Doctrins before the coming in of the Jesuites are declared by the Jesuites themselves to have been but sleight and weak Arguments 106 § The Jesuites then of all the Sophisters of the Church of Rome are the greatest 106 § And I do add that of all the Sophisters Jesuites Bellarmin a Jesuite is the greatest and most universal as appears by the Representation and Observation of his Faults 107 Chap. 17. Again of the Jesuites with divers Exercitations 108 c. Chap. 18. Of the Sects of Thomists Scotists Dominicans Franciscans 112 § By them appears what unity there is in the Church of Rome 113 Chap. 19. Of the Seduction of People by the Popes and the Roman Church by their false Doctrin 114 With these following Exercitations 1. This Seduction is a crying Sin 114 2. It is wrought by four Means 116 Chap. 20. The first Mean of Seduction of People Consisteth in Mysteries and Secrets 116 Chap. 21. The second Mean of Seduction of People consisteth in Impostures and Frauds 118 Chap. 22. The third Mean of the Seduction of People consisteth in Signes and Miracles 118 Chap. 23. The fourth Mean of the Seduction of People consisteth in Persecution and Cruelty 122 With two Exercitations more 122 123 § Of the Popish Inquisition 124 § Of the Cruelty and also Perfidiousnesse exercised by the Council of Constance upon John Huss and Hierome of Prague 125 § The Doctrin of the Church of Rome is False concerning the Faith given to Hereticks 126 Chap. 24. Another Fraud of the Church of Rome Which is concerning the pretended Donation of Constantine 127 And also 129 c. Besides 132 Chap. 25. Another Fraud of the Church of Rome Which is in regard of pretended Revelations both by Dreams and by extraordinary Visions and Apparitions of the Dead 136 Chap. 26. Of another Fraud of the Church of Rome in Disputations to demand onely Formal Places of Scripture contained word by word in it 137 § The necessary Consequences that are drawn from the Scriptures are as valuable in Disputations as the Formal Texts are 138 Chap. 27. This is a Fraud of some Jesuites in Disputations ever to Question and never to Answer 140 Chap. 28. This is another Fraud of the Church of Rome That the 3. following Heads are onely grounded upon worldly Interest 140 Namely 1. The Taking away of the Cup from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper 141 2. Forbidding Marriage to Priests or the Clergy 141 3. And Divine Service being in an unknown Tongue to the People 142 Chap. 29. Of a most considerable contradiction of the Priâ—cipal Doctors of the Church of Rome in regard of their Doctrine That Eternal Life is due as a Debt to our good works 142 Chap. 30. The Burden of Ceremonies which is now laid upon the Members of the Roman Church is an Intolerable Burden 144 Chap. 31. Of the False Worship of the Church of Rome 146 Chap. 32. Of the Idolatry of the Church of Rome 1 Conjointly 2 Separately 147 148 1 In regard of the Saints which are departed 149 152 154 2. Particularly in regard of the Virgin Mary 155 3. In regard of the Adoration of Relicks 157 § Of Miracles wrought by the Dead Bones and Carcasses of Saints 158 Chap. 33. The Reformed must not frequent the exercises of Popish Worship nor Assit to the Mass 159 Chap. 34. Of the Corruption of the Church of Rome in regard of Manners 160 1. In Regard of the Pope her Head 160 2. In Respect of the Popish Clergy and other Members of the said Church
If they Remember how Christ promised his Spouse Perpetual Preservation Hos 2.19 I will even betroth thee unto me for ever Isa 59.21 As for me This is my Covenant with Them saith the Lord My Spirit that is upon thee And my words which I have put in thy Mouth shall not Depart out of thy Mouth Nor out of the Mouth of thy Seed Nor out of the Mouth of thy Seeds Seed saith the Lord from henceforth and for ever And Such Like Answer to this Third Objection 1. TO what Purpose doth this Objection serve the Popish Writers Or what Argument may the Perpetuity Of Christs Universal Church afford Them against our former Assertion 2. We Believe and Confesse to the Comfort of our Souls That Christs Church hath continued And shall never fail so long as the world endureth 3. And we account it a prophane Heresie to teach that Christs Universal Church hath Perished from the Earth at any Time For this Assertion shaketh the Foundation of all Faith and Religion 4. But the Popish Writers who makes this Objection Should prove by invincible evidence of Scripture That the Catholick Universal Church of Christ is nothing Else But the Outward Succession of the Roman See If They can Prove This They should Prove their Objection Soundly And should confute our Opinion Truely 5. But it is a Thing which They cannot Doe They cannot bring us Either Texts of Scriptures or Reasons To shew that Christs Church Either is the Popes Succession Or Else dependeth upon the same See 6. For as Touching External Shew And Succession of Churches The Scriptures have foretold Apoc. 12. and 13.16 That Antichrist shall Seduce Great and Small Rich and Poor Free and Bond And that the Church shall flie into the Wildernesse And there Remain Of all which no word could be true If the Catholick Church were tied To the Popes Chaire And the Popes Chaire were the Rock That cannot be removed 7. And yet notwithstanding this General Dispersion And the Flight of the Church under Antichrist The Catholick Church shall for all That Continue 8. Although not in that outward strength And Glory In which sometimes it hath appeared And Flourished 4. Objection Of the Popish Writers Against the above Exercitations That the Now Church of Rome is Changed And is not Now what it was in the Beginning What Impudence is This say the said Writers There was never Heresie that Assaulted the Church of Rome Of which it carried not the Victory As Over the Donatists Over Jovinian Over Pelagius the Britain And over Others Answer to this Fourth Objection 1. THe Triumphs of which the Popish Writers do boast of Are no more proper to the Now or Latter Church of Rome Then the Triumphs of old Rome Over Pyrrhus Over Annibal Over Perses Over Antiochus are to be esteemed the Triumphs of Rome Now Being 2. And for the pretended Victory over Pelagius the Britain we saw that he Triumphed over the Popish Kingdome For did he not Teach That Grace was imbred in Nature And the Popish Crew of Jesuites Defendeth the same Who seeth not then Pelagius sitting in the Popish Triumphant Chariot Popery is not of the first and Primary Antiquity That is many of the present Doctrines of the Church of Rome And in what Time Errors were received in it 1. PApists are not able to produce any Record Expresse and direct testimony Canon of Council or Ecclesiastical constitution For their burning Lights in the Church at noon day before the Decree of Pope Sabinianus in the year of our Lord 605. 2. Nor for Rome to be the Head of all Churches before Pope Boniface the Third in the year 606. 3. Nor for the Invocation of Saints in their Publick Lithurgy before Boniface the Fifth in the year 618. 4. Nor for their Latine Service thrust upon all Churches before Pope Vitalian in the year 666 which is the very number of the name of the Beast 5. Nor for the Cutting of the Host into three parts and offering one part for the Souls in Purgatory before Pope Seâ—gius in the year 688. 6. Nor for setting up Images in Churches Generally and worshipping them before Pope Adrian the First and the Second Council of Nice in the year 787. 7. Nor for Canonization of Saints departed before Leo the Third about the year 800. 8. Nor for the Orall Manducation of Christs Body in the Sacrament before Pope Nicholas the Second in the year 1053. 9. Nor for the entire number of seven Sacraments before Peter Lombard in the year 1140. 10. Nor for Indulgences before Eugenius the third in the year 1145. 11. Nor for Transubstantiation of the Bread into Christs body before the Fourth Council of Lateran in the year 1215. 12. Nor for the Elevation of the Host that the People might adore it before Honorius the Third in the year 1216. 13. Nor for any Jubilee before Pope Boniface the Eighth in the yeer 1300. 14. Nor for the Carrying the Sacrament in Procession under a Canopy before Pope Vrban the Fifth In the year 1262. 15. Nor for the Day and half Communion before the Council at Constance in the year 1416. 16. Nor for the suspending the Efficacy of Sacramental Consecration upon the Priests Intention before the Council at Florence in the year 1439. 17. Nor for the Popes Superiority to General Councils before the Sixt Council at Lateran under Leo the Tenth in the year 1517. 18. Nor the vulgar Latine Translation to be held for Authentical And upon no pretended Cause whatsoever to be reiected before the fourth Session of the Council of Trent in the year 1546. 19. Nor for the Second book of the Macchabees and the Apocryphal Additions to Hester and Daniel with the History of Bell and the Dragon which S. Jerome termeth a Fable to bereceived for Canonical Scripture before the said Session in the year above named 1. Fraude 1. These be the Principles and Grounds of Faith and Worship that the Church of Rome doth Produce 1. Scriptures 2. Traditions of the Apostles 3. The Catholick Church 4. General Councils 5. The Ancient Fathers 6. The Pope which she calls the Supream Pastour of the Church 2. These be the Fraudes of the Church of Rome Concerning all the Principles and Rules above Produced The 1. of those Fraudes is That the Church of Rome careth indeed for none of Them but for the last which is The Determination of her Pope 1. THe Scripture must not be Scripture in any other Sense then as the Pope will Expound So that the Scripture being the Meaning of the Scripture And the Meaing of the Scripture being the Popes Exposition Hereof it followeth That the Scripture is nothing else but the Popes Interpretation 2. So Likewise In Traditions In Doctors In Councils In Churches If any Thing Dissent from the Popes understanding and Determination It is Rejected Abolished Condemned 3. And Finally all Faith all Religion all Divinity of the Church of Rome is only the Popes Sacred will and pleasure
Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope And take all Authority quoad nos from the Scripture So that by the Church they understand the Pope 1. THe Papists 1. take all Authority from the Scripture 2. They give it to the Church And 3. They give the Churches Authority to the Pope 2. I say 1. That the Papists take all Authority quoad nos from the Scripture which appears in that they teach that it is not the ground or pillar of truth Nor properly and of it self any Cause or Means of Belief or of Charity And that God doth not immediately speak by it Neither is the Holy Ghost joined with the writing of the Scripture And that the Church is not subject to the Scripture And that put case any person living out of the Communion of the Roman Church do read or study the Scripture it is not the word of God to them or of greater Authority then Aesops Fables 3. I have said 2. That the Papists give all Authority to the present Roman Church This appears in that they make it the onely External ground and pillar of Truth The sole Judge of Controversies The principle or first ground and foundation from whence the Scripture in regard of men receiveth all Authority 4. I have said 3. That the Papists give the Churches Authority to the Pope And no Papist in these daies can or will deny This. For 1. the Positive Speeches of their greatest Doctors thereupon manifestly confirms it Ecclesiae nomine saith Gregorius de Valentia intelligimur ejus Caput Romanum Pontificem Tom. 3. Dist 1. q. 1. part 1. pag 30. And Bannes 2.2 q. 1. Ar. 10. Animadvertendum est cum Cajetano c. quod apud Thomam pro eodem omnino reputatur Authoritas Ecclesiae universalis Authoritas Concilii Et Authoritas Summi Pontificis 2. The same Assertion followeth upon the main principles of their Doctrine which are That the Pope is the prime subject of Ecclesiastical Authority And that the whole Authority of all the Body and of all the Members thereof is derived by and from him And that the promise of the perpetual Assistance of the Holy Ghost And the Infallible Judgement and the Supream Authority And other Priviledges are intailed upon his Tribunal The 2. of those Fraudes is That The Pope also is Taught by the Papists To be the true and Lawful Interpreter of the Sense of the Scriptures And the Supream Judge of Controversies Concerning Faith and Divine Worship 1. IT is most clear that the Jesuites make both the Scripture it self and the Interpretation of it to Depend upon the Authority of the Church 2. And the Church they call not the whole Multitude of Christians and Faithful Men. 3. But they Restrain both the Name and the Nature of the Church 1. unto their Bishops 2. If Thereupon we Reformed object That their Bishops may Differ touching the Sense of the Scriptures so shall we be uncertain and shall not resolve which of them to Believe but they help this and Answer That General Councils must Decide and Determine all Questions and Controversies 3. Shall we then Rest in them No more then in then the other For the Pope must be Judge over the Councils 4. So in the Conclusion The whole Interpretation of Holy Scriptures is transferred to the Pope and must be fetched out of his Breast yea and as a proper Right he so challengeth the Power of Interpreting of the Scripture That whatsoever he thinketh That must be accounted the Sense and Meaning of them Refutation of this Doctrine of the Jesuits by the Reformed Doctors 1. THat which hath been said above is the Jesuites constant and perpetual property and disposition in interpreting the Scriptures 2. Which is full of Dotage Error and Falsehood void of Advise Knowledge and Wisdome 3. For what an Absurd and horrible Thing is it that the Sense and Meaning of the Holy Scripture should depend upon one mans Judgement and Voice 4. Specially being such a one as commonly the Bishops of Rome have been Unlearned Wicked Heretical 5. And hence have proceeded all the following goodly Interpretations 1. Take Eate That is you Priests say Private Masses 2. Drink ye all of This That is onely the Priests must Drink 3. Be ye Holy for I am Holy Therefore it is unlawful for the Ministers of the Word to marry a Wife Exception of the Jesuites Which of the Popes or what Catholick Writer ever concluded this out of that place Answer to this Exception Pope Syricius did first of all so Collect And after him Pope Innocent As it may be read in Gratian Dist. 31. cap. Tenere and Dist 82. cap. Proposuisti cap. Plurimos 4. This is another like Interpretation Give not holy things unto Doggs Therefore the people must be forbidden to read the Scriptures 5. What should we number up Innumerable more of the Popes and Papists Interpretations By which they do nothing but pervert and wrest the Scriptures In Particular These be the Frauds of the Church of Rome Concerning Her first Principle Which is the Scripture 1. Fraud The Papists making Shew to Receive the Scriptures for Ground and Rule of Faith Do Disgrace Them in Joyning Traditions with Them 1. FOr as the Scriptures are Grounds And Rule of true Doctrine So are They onely Grounds And Rule 2. And as in Matters of Faith Arguments ought principally to be drawn from Them so such Arguments onely conclude necessarily As even the Schoolman Thomas Aquinas doth Directly confesse 1. Part. 1. Quaest. Artic. 8. Ad. 2. 2. Fraud The Church of Rome which Produceth Scriptures for one of Her Principles And Rules hath indeed no sufficient Scriptures For in making an old rotten Translation which we may boldly call so being compared with the Original Word of Scripture to be the Authentical Word of God and denying the Original Faithful Texts which Moses the Prophets the Apostles the Evangelists did write to be the Word of God What doth she else but plainly as it were with one dash of a Penne Cancel the whole Scriptures 2. This Homely Latin Translation is the Papists Scripture 3. Coined and Canonized of late in the Councel of Trent And never before 4. And other Scripture have They none §. Of the Corruption of the vulgar Latine Translation more Fully 1. THe Reader of the vulgar Latin Translation may manifestly perceive That in it are manifold and almost infinite Faults of all sorts 1. By Adding 2. By Omitting 3. By Mistaking Of Letters Of Points Of Syllables And of Words 4. By wrong Interpreting the Original Text. 2. Which Faults The Popish Doctors shall never be able to Approve or Justifie Though They weary Themselves never so much with Traveling and Toiling and seeking some Defence 3. When They have said what They can say for Maintenance of These Corruptions it shall for all that Appear By all Learning and Evidence of Reason that They have Neither the Old nor the New Testament in the Entire and Original
of the Councel of Trent Written by Patre Paulo See the Addition Concerning this Question Whether the Pope be above the Councils Or otherwise Jesuites THe Jesuites puts the Pope above the Councils And they alleadge this Reason Because no Council is of any Authoritie which was not Confirmed by the Pope Answer of the Reformed to that Reason That is false 1. For the Sixth African Council and the Chalcedon Council had their Authoritie without the Pope 2. And Emperours Patriarchs and Bishops have Confirmed Councils 3. And the Council of Constantinople by Letters desired the Confirmation of the Decrees from Theodosius the Emperour Fraud This is a Fraud of the Church of Rome in Regard of another of her Principles That is the Catholick Church That because the Scripture maketh Honorable Mention of the Church The Roman Church is that true Church of Christ of which the Scripture speaketh so often 1. VVE Reformed acknowledge That both in the Old and New Testament there is every where honorable mention made of the Church And that it is called A Holy City A Fruitful Vineyard An High Hill A Direct Path The onely Dove The Kingdom of Heaven The Spouse and Bodie of Christ The Pillar of Truth The Multitude unto which the Holy Ghost being promised poureth all things needful to Salvation The Congregation against which the Gates of Hell shall never so prevail That they shall utterly extinguish the same The Congregation which who so Repugneth though he confesse Christ with his mouth yet hath he no more to do with Christ then hath a Publican and a heathen man 2. The above-said Titles do not belong to the now Church of Rome 1. FOr on the contrary It is the Babylonish Whore A Branch cut off from the true Vine A Den of Thieves A broad way leading to Destruction The Kingdom of Hell The body of Antichrist A Sink of Errors A great Mother of Fornication The Church of the wicked out of which every Christian ought to depart which Christ shall one day fearfully destroy and give her the just Recompence of all her sins 2. In vain then do the Popish Writers reckon up the praises of the Church unlesse they can demonstrate that they are proper to the Church of Rome 3. Which they shall never be able to do so long as Rome standeth As the Church of Rome is Fraudulous in regard of the Principles of Faith and Worship that she doth produce So is her Doctrine false concerning these Principles 1. Concerning the Traditions that she calleth Apostolical 2. Concerning the Church 3. Concerning General Councils 4. Concerning the Ancient Fathers 5. Concerning the Pope And therefore such Principles are justly excluded by the Reformed from the Rule of Faith 1. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith the Traditions called Apostolical by the Papists 1. FOr the Popish Apostolical Traditions are but forged and devised Things and therefore no stay for a man to settle his Conscience upon 2. That they are not such as the Papists sayes Let them tell us if they can which be the Apostles Traditions how many and where they may be found If they cannot satisfie this Demand as they cannot indeed How may they then make any Reckoning of that whereof they have no certain knoledge How can They without falling Build their Faith upon Fantasies such as they are 3. The Apostles Doctrine we have in Writing The Apostles Doctrine we have in writing 4. Other Traditions of the Apostles we receive none for our belief The Scripture is the onely Rule of Faith and not Traditions a part of the Rule of Faith that is That Scripture is a perfect Rule 1. THat I prove in this manner 2 Timoth. 3.15 Apoc. 22.18 1 Cor. 4.6 John 20.31 2. That is the onely Rule whereunto the chiefest properties of a rule do solely belong But the properties of a true and certain rule do onely belong to the holy Scriptures in matters of Faith The rule of Catholick Faith saith Bellarmine must be certain and known De verb. Dei libr. 1. cap. 2. Now there is nothing better known or more certain then the Scripture which appears Because Traditions are far more uncertain than the written word and because many of them are false and uncertain 3. The written word is a Rule of Traditions From whence it follows that it is the onely rule That the written word is a rule of Tradition appeareth by the Doctrine of our Adversaries who acknowledge that no Traditions must be admitted but such as agree with the Scripture Bellarm. de verb. Dei libr. 4. cap. 3. And which are derived from the Scripture and the writings of the Primitive Fathers Bellarm. de Script libr. 4. cap. 3. But those Traditions which are derived from the Scriptures have the same to be their rule And there is nothing more common in the Primitive Fathers then to subject all their writings to be Regulate by the holy Scriptures Therefore such Traditions as are found in the works of the holy Fathers have the holy Scripture to be their rule from whence it followeth that the Scripture is the onely primitive rule of Faith 4. It is that which is acknowledged by some of our Adversaries Gabr. Biel Can. Miss Lect. 71. whereof Ferus saith expresly The holy Scripture is the sole rule of veritie and whatsoever differs or contradicteth the same it is error and cokle with whatsoever shew it come forth Ferus in Matth. lib. 2. in cap. 13. pag. 248. col 1. And another saith The Doctrine of the books of the Prophets and Apostles is alone the foundation of truth and the rule c. Villavincen de formand Concion lib. 2. cap. 2. 2. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith the Catholick Church 1. VVE Reformed do Reverence and Love The Catholick Church as the Spouse of Christ 2. But we know that her duty is to hearken only to the voice of Christ her Husband And that she hath no Authority to adde so much as one iota in his Word or any waies to dissent from it 3. And further we know That the Romish Synagogue is not that Catholick Church of Christ whereof we speak 3. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith General Councils 1. VVE Reformed doe esteem and regard General Councils in their place We thank God for them We Read Allow and Commend them so far forth as they agree with Gods Word 2. Let therefore their Decrees be examined by Gods Word 3. And if they agree let them be received for that Agreement 4. If not let them be rejected for the contrary 5. But the Argument holdeth not in this Form such a Council decreed so and therefore so must we believe 6. If this Principle were set down for certain and perpetual in Divinity we should have strange Beliefs enow yea surely scarcely should we retain any one true Belief 7. Two famous General Councils have been held in Nice The First And the Second In the First is
themselves to forgive sins but God alone forgiveth sins Mark 1.7 2. But having the word of Reconciliation committed unto them from God they offer pardon and in his Name pronounce pardon to the sinner that believeth and that turneth from his wickednesse and sinnes unto the Lord. Refutation of this Accusation of the Jesuites and other Popish Writers that in the Religion and Doctrine of the Reformed their is no Stay or Certainty 1. VVHat greater stedfastnesse in Religion can be required then to hold Gods Word which we Reformed profess to be the Ground we build our Faith 2. If the Popish Doctors can shew wherein we swarve from it we will not refuse their Instruction 3. But that they cannot do for we plant not our Religion in mans Judgement and in the uncertainty of Traditions in vain Ceremonies and Devices as the Papists do 4. But in matters of Faith and Religion we depend upon God who in the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament hath delivered to his Church one certain Uniform and perfect Doctrine to which we add nothing from which we take nothing away in which we settle and ground our selves §. In matter of Points of Religion the private Judgement of some few is not to be objected by the Popish Doctors against the consent of a whole Reformed Church And therefore conclude that in our Reformed Religion we have no certain staie 1. FOr then may we Reformed in like manner and by as good reason argue against the Papists for a thousand such matters wherein hath been no small dissention among the Popish Divines That the Papists have no certain ground of their Faith 2. That appears by the following Examples 1 A Cardinal of Rome hath openly defended and taught that the Apostle S. Paul permitteth one Wife to Priests and to others more And that plurality of Wives is not forbidden either by the Law of God or by the Law of Nature This Cardinal was Caietan the Popes Legate in Germany and the great Adversary of Luther Katherine hath noted this among his manifold Errors 2. And another Popes Legate writ and published in print a Treatise in commendation of a foul sin for which he was greatly and grievously punished by the Pope being preferred to a great Archbishoprick 3. Pighus saith that Justice in us is a Relation wherein he hath exceedingly offended the other Popish Doctors and Writers 3. May we Reformed Now by the Papists Example hereof conclude that this is the Doctrine of the Roman Church That thus the Papists do believe generally or else that there is no stay in their Religion Refutation of this Accusation of the Jesuites and others Popish Doctors that in the Reformed Churches There is no Vnity but great Differences 1. VVE Reformed say that greater Difference shall not the Popish Doctors find among the true Professors of the Gospel and Reformed Churches then may be amongst the children of God 2. When such bitter Dissention was between the East and the West Churches about the day of Passeover and the same continued so many years with great offence and Alienation among the Faithful yet they ceased not for all that to be the Churches of Christ 3. Neither is it ever to be hoped for that such perfect concord shall be among the Professors of Christs Religion that they shall agree most joynly together in the Truth or in every particular point thereof 4. Yet let us add That although the Tyrannical and the worldly and the carnal provisions for keeping of Unity above Represented be not amongst the Reformed Churches notwithstanding through Gods grace and blessing all Churches Reformed agree soundly in all Articles of Faith that are substantial and necessary to Salvation and shall so do unto the end Refutation of this Accusation of the Jesuites and other Popish Doctors that in the Doctrine and Religion of the Reformed Churches many Paradoxes are to be found and that in General 1. HIerome said that he would not have any man to be patient if he were suspected of Heresie 2. And therefore in so much the worser part do we Reformed take it that so many Paradoxes false and horrible be by the Jesuites and other Popish Doctors objected against us 3. And indeed those Jesuites and others of the Popish Clergy that do object them to us do in this place manifest an horrible Impudence and audaciousnesse for unlesse they had quite and clean put off both all Religion of God and Reverence towards Men they would never have admitted so much Impudencie into themselves as to upbraid us with these monstrous Opinions 4 But we perceive what they intend for they hope that by slandering boldly somewhat would alwaies cleave fast which one of them was wont to say 5. For sith they lack true Imputations whereby they might oppugn our Churches it remained that either they should leave off writing which were their honestest way or at least devise some slanders which they would cast like venomed darts upon us 6. Which thing is both in it self very filthy and also a sure Argument of their desperatenesse 7. When we handle in particular the Controversies that are between us by Gods grace we shall so wipe away these their Paradoxes and Impossibilities that all men shall perceive that they are ascribed to us by them most falsly and most impudently 8. In the mean time we intreat the Reader to observe this That those pretended Paradoxes are either such things as that nothing can be truer then they or else that they are craftily and treacherously wrested by them in a perverse meaning §. It is the Doctrines and Religion of the Church of Rome that many Paradoxes are to be found 1. THe Jesuites publish that there are Paradoxes in great number in the Reformed Religion and Doctrine and do endeavour to manifest it by many Instances which they propose But although they have stirred this Puddle to the bottome with all their diligence yet they have found so much as one Paradox or a piece of a Paradox of the Reformed 2. 1. BUt now if the said Reformed should but a little make search into the most filthy Puddles of the Popish Writers as to reckon up what they have affirmed Of God Of the actual Providence of God Of Predestination Of the Person and of the Offices of Christ Of Original Sin Of the Law Of Righteousnesse and Justification Of Purgatory Of the Pope of Rome Of the Sacraments And of the rest of the greatest Matters in Reliligion how many Carts should they fill with Paradoxes horrible to be spoken or thought 2. We forbear at this present handling but general Observations to stirre this common Sewer but we will do it hereafter by Gods grace when we take in hand the particular Controversies about the said common places that have been mentioned The Renowned Doctors of the Reformed Churches are impudently accused of Ignorance by the Jesuites and others of the Roman Clergie 1. FOr we Reformed do ask of these Jesuites and their fellows and
demand to know of them what Learning is wherein it consisteth and how it may be gotten 2. Unlesse they have some special means and as it were some secret way to attain unto it which others have not The said Reformed see not why the Jesuites and others such like Popish Doctors should think that they have gotten a greater Measure of Learning and Wisdome then others who have used as great indeavour as themselves 3. And therefore the said Reformed Doctors may think that it is some spice of Pride in the Jesuites and their fellows to object Ignorance unto them 4. Who for any thing that appeareth have no cause to bragge of such knowledge or to challenge more to themselves then they may safely grant to another 5. Besides there are none of the Reformed Doctors how unlearned soever the Jesuites and others their fellows think they are but by the grace of God and the Light of his Word can easily discover the Falshood and Corruption of the Religion of the Church of Rome There is an unity in the Protestants Faith and Concord among the Protestants And how Considerable against the Slanders of Papists 1. VVE acknowledge that there be differences and jarres among the Protestants 2. But we deny that there is any such discord or difference among them as dissolveth the unity of Faith Essential to the true Church 3. The difference among the Protestants is no other then such as hath formerly been in the true Church of Christ since the Apostles age which is represented in the end of this Thesis 4. It is not in point of Faith or Primitive Articles of Faith or about things Essential in the object of Faith 1. But the difference is either in accidental probable and secondary points 2. Or touching things difficult in Religion for the searching out of the verity whereof it is profitable that Learned men proceeding modestly do dispute pro and contra 3. Or else the disagreement is personal either among private men or raised by private men Schismatically and Factiously against the Church 5. Now if our Adversaries who object Division unto the Protestant Churches dispute the question of Unity in it self the Scripture and the Fathers and the History of the Church will convince them That Unity in the substance of Faith and of Religion observed by the firmest Members of the Church is simply necessary and an essential property of the Church And other Unity is of the perfection and well being of the Church and yet contingent and variable sometimes greater sometimes less and at no time absolute in all the parts And the same many times is greatly wanting by reason of the Malice of wicked Imps. 6. In the dayes of Constantine wherein it is acknowledged by all men that the visible society of Christians was a true Church There hapned so grievous and unseemly contentions among the Bishops and Pastours that the discord of Christians was brought upon the Stage And Religion was derided and traduced by Infidels 7. Saint Augustine acknowledgeth that the concord of Godly men in this Life wherein they are not perfect but proficient is sometimes interrupted with discord and dissention ariseth even among Brethren and Saints And there be divers things saith he wherein the best learned and most worthy defender of the Catholick rule without prejudice to the Body of Faith do not accord And one of them speaketh more truly then another of the same thing 8. If it be objected that Luther saith that the differences between him and Zuinglius and Calvin are not in small points of Government and Ceremonie c. The Answer to that is that Luthers personal and fretful speech proceeding from passion against such as were contrary minded to him prove that godly men have infirmities and are sometimes over-bitter one against another Like as Cyprian was against Pope Stephen calling him proud ignorant and of a blind and wicked mind and as Epiphanius was against Chrysostome But they are not sufficient to demonstrate that Protestant Churches want the Note of Unity neither doth condemning and Anathematising one another imply dissension in profound points of Religion but may proceed from affection and from want of charity This appeareth by Pope Victor proclaiming Anathema against the East Churches about an Adiaphorous Ceremony It appeareth also by Pope Stephen and by Sergius condemning their predecessor Formosus and raking him being defunct out of his Grave c. 2. 1. IF our Adversaries of the Church of Rome will proceed substantially and prove that there is discord of Faith and of Doctrine among the Protestants they must perform these two things 1. They must produce the principal part of Doctrine belonging to the main object of Faith and demonstate that the Protestant Churches which are reputed Orthodox are divided in these For we have nothing to do with Anabaptists Arians c. 2. They must also give instance in such persons as are reputed sound Members and what parts of the several Churches wherein they live Not of Novellists Incendiaries and Extravagants which are condemned and resisted by the sound and best parts of the Church Rom. 16.17 A Representation of good Magistrates and truly Christians towards the Reformed Religion 1. SUch Magistrates are those who have been alwayes zealous lovers of Christs Gospel and who by their godly Wisdom have done their endeavour to advance greatly the Lords cause from time to time And to hinder the practices of the Adversaries 2. True Religious men ought to beseech the Lord to increase in those Godly Magistrates all those Christian vertues to the benefit of Christs Church and of the Common-wealth of all the Estates where the Reformed Churches are gathered and tollerated Concerning the Church and Religion of England touching the Conversion of England by Augustine the Monk 1. GAlfridus Monumetensis writeth that before Augustine the Monk came in England in the time of Gregory the Great Truth was preached there and sincere Doctrine delivered Vide Godofri Mon. de Orig. gest Britan Libr. 8. cap. 4. 2. Augustines pretended conversion of England was onely the planting of some trifling Ceremonies Of the shaking off of the Ropes yoak by Henry the Eight King of England 1. IT is a thing much to be admired that Henry the Eight King of England having written against Luther in the Popes behalf and for a reward of his affection and pains having received the glorious Title of Defendor of the Faith yet shortly after withdrew himself from the Popes Jurisdiction and became his open and profest Enemy 2. Which Act did seem to many to have proceeded from a cause very little commendable as if it had been onely in revenge that the Pope crossed him in the fruition of his pleasures 3. But it is most certain that the exquisite consideration both of the Kings and of the Popes proceedings thereupon doth cause us to lift up our minds to an higher cause and obliges us to confess that Gods providence hath been manifested therein in a particular
generally of all the Jesuites and Priests that did suffer in England that they did not suffer for their popish Religion but onely for their Treason and for their perturbation of that State § Great is the Evil and Harm that the Jesuites and Roman Priests hidden in England did cause and do cause to that State 1. THey trouble the peace of it 2. They corrupt its Children with an impious and strange Religion 3. They make more precious account of a forreign Enemy than of its Dignity 4. They divert the minds of people from true Religion to trouble the peace of the State 5. They estrange the minds of Loyal Subjects from their Lawful Prince 6. And turn all things topsie turvie §. In the State of England as in other States since the last Reformation of the Church extream hath been the cruelty of the Papists towards the Reformed 1. WHo are the Papists and what is their Religion That the Jesuites and Roman Priests so boldly object cruelty unto the Reformed State of England 2. 1. In Queen Maries time more of them were condemned in that State at one Sessions more executed in one day more consumed in one fire then they can recount to us to have been put to death for the Popes cause at any time or by any kind of death in the whole happy Reign of Queen Elizabeth 2 Let the Jesuites and other Papists then but call to mind the extream cruelty the exquisite Tortures the frequent Martyrdome of the times before the Keign of Queen Elizabeth And if there be in them any mark of Humanity they cannot chuse but confesse that their side hath been extream cruel And that the Englishes Reformed have been sufficiently provoked to severity against them and to have repayed them with the like 3. For what Times can afford such and so many Butcheries of men as was to be seen when the Papists were Lords over the Protestants in England let them tell what Sex or what Age they spared and did not bloodily execute all without difference and distinction Of Learned or Unlearned Of Male or Female Of Old or Young Children Virgins Married Clergie and Layetie Bishops Archbishops escaped not their hands The Martyrs they did beat with Rods their Tongues they pulled out of their Mouths their hands they burned off with Torches They Tormented Crucified Hanged and Beheaded them they burned them alive and toasted them at a soft fire Yea the Infant leaping out of the Mothers belly they received upon the Spears point and cast it into the flaming fire To conclude whatsoever barbarous cruelty could invent that they were not wanting to in execution against them 4. And if their cruelty had ended with the Living and had terminated in their deaths it had been lesse but so raging was their Tyranny that they took up the bodies of Saints interred in the Earth they arreigned them upon a day They accused them at a Bar They condemned them to Death And burned them at a Stake even exdeeding those old Tyrants in Fury and Cruelty 5. Can they name any one such Savage Fact amongst the said Reformed of England 6. Or what was he that was put to Death amongst them Reformed whom every good Man that heard of him judged not worthy of Death threefold more then of Life 7. Therefore let the Papists acknowledge their own cruelty in the State of England and accuse not the English Reformed §. What the Jesuites did alledge for their Justification of coming in England against the Laws of that State THey did alledge That they came thither upon commandment of their Superiours according to the Order of that Religion which they professe Confutation of such an Allegation 1. BUt the English Reformed did demand of the said Jesuites what necessity did lie upon them to obey his Commandement who had no Authority to enjoin them a Journey whether they were willing or unwilling to goe 2. And if that Spanish Soldier Loyola the first Authour of their Jesuitical Society were now alive and should enjoin them to set their Countrey on fire would they obey him we Reformed of England are sure they would never command such a foul fact 3. And yet he might better command and the English Jesuites execute that then this Thing for which they did professe that they were then come in England 4. For whether might it be deemed less to set houses on fire then to cause the Evils and Harms represented before 5. Which yet were the Ends of the Jesuites coming and the Order of their Profession required no less at their hands §. The Soveraign Magistrate in the Reformed State of England hath great Reason to Prohibite the Books of English Jesuites and Seminary Priests 1. THe Books of those men are such as it behooveth the Soveraign Magistrate to stop their passage 2. He must of necessity restrain their Books unless he would suffer the State to be stirred to Sedition the Church in danger of Heresie and Mens minds filled with cursed Opinions 3. For if Magistrates ought carefully to prevent lest the infection of the Plague be from other places brought into their Cities much more care is to be had that pestilent and pernicious Books be not openly spread abroad out of which simple and unlearned men do suck Poyson of deadly Error 4. Neither is the Reformed State of England the first that have taken this Course 5. It may be remembred in Queen Maries Time that they proceeded by Martial Law against all those with whom any of the Reformed Books were found If this was in the Reformed of that Time a matter worthy of Death so that they were by and by drawn to punishment as men guilty of High Treason and that without any Judicial Proceedings what reason have the English Jesuites and Seminary Priests that are in Rome Rhemes and other places abroad to look that their Books should now have such free liberty to be every where publickly sold Of Heretical Churches and Religions Of Heresies and Hereticks 1. HEresie is some opinion in matter of Faith repugnant and contrary to the Word of God being of some chosen out to themselves and wilfully maintained 2. And an Heretick is a person wilfully and stiffly maintaining false Opinions against the Scriptures after due admonition 3. There be three things required to an Heretick first that it be an Error about some Article of Christian Faith Secondly that it be contrary to the evidence and clear truth of holy Scripture soundly and generally held by the holy Catholick Church of God in the earth Thirdly that it be stoutly and obstinately maintained after conviction and lawfull admonition 4. The Doctors of the Roman Church do erre which account luch Opinions for Heresies as are not condemned but rather taught in the Word of God which is the onely Rule of saving Truth 5. It is to be noted that Heresies are compared in Scriptures to whores because they are stored with cunning pranks and a thousand entisements to make men ill advised
161 3. In Respect of the Popes Court 162 4. Again of the great and scandalous Incontinency of the Roman Clergy by reason of their single Life 163 Chap. 35. In what regard the name of Catholicks is given to the Members of the Church of Rome by some of the Reformed 165 Chap. 36. God from Time to time hath raised Godly Men that have cried against the Errors of the Roman Church and have Discovered them 166 Chap. 37. Concerning the Greek Church with the following Exercitations 1. The Greek Church could never yet be brought to joyn Her self to the Church of Rome and it is as opposite to Her as ever the Reformed Church was 167 § The Turks are beholding to none more then to the Pope for their possession of Greece and of the Eastern Empire which hath caufed the Miserable slavery of the Greek Churches 168 § Thereupon a most humble Address to the Christian Princes and States 169. n. 2 Chap. 38. Concerning the Waldenses See of them briefly Page 179. Art 5. SECT 3. Chap. 1. Of the Reformation of the Church in general with a full Thesis 169 Chap. 2. Of the last Reformation in particular made by Luther Zuinglius Bucer Calvin c. Chap. 3. Of the Reformed Church and Religion with this Exercitation 1. Which Churches and Assemblies are comprehended properly under the Appellation of Reformed Churches Affirmatively and Negatively 173 Not those of the Socinians and Anabaptists 173 Chap. 4. Concerning the First Reformers of the said Reformed Churches with the Exercitations 1. What esteem the Reformed make of the said Reformers and how far it doth extend 171 Again of the same Matter in three several Exercitations The 1. is page 180 The 2. is page 181 The 3. is page 183 2. Concerning the Contention between Luther and Zuinglius about the Sacrament of the Lords Supper 183 3. Luther retained his Error concerning Consubstantiation of his old Leaven wherewith in time of Papistry his Judgment was corrupted 182 4. Refutation of this shift of the Jesuites that because Luther was in that Error â—â—erefore 〈◊〉 Refutation of their Opinions and Doctrinâ—â— is not â—â—â—siderable 〈…〉 Chap. 5. Concerning the Reformed Churches themselves 1. Conjoyntly 2. Separately Chap. 6. Of the Reformed Churches Conjoyntly with the following subordinate Heads Head 1. The Reformed Churches have had just Causes to separate themselves from the Church of Rome 198 2. And therefore they are not Schismatical 198 § It is not a sound Argument of the Jesuites to Convince the Reformed of Schisme That they have separated themselves from the Communion of the Church of Rome 188 3. By such a Separation of the Reformed Churches they did not separate themselves from the Communion of the Catholick Church but onely from the communion of a particular corrupted Church Art 11 12 13 4. And the said Reformed Churches do declare That they are the same in kind with all the good Churches which have been in the world before them Head 2. The Reformed Religion is true and Orthodox and their Faith is sound 174 Head 3. Also the Reformed Churches Truly and Properly so called are Pure and Orthodox having the true Notes and Marks of the true Church 196 Head 4. And therefore it is falfe that the Reformed Churches and Religion are Heretical 185 § It is a false Maxim of the Jesuites That for not to be an Heretick one must have Communion with the now Church of Rome and must acknowledge the Pope for the Head and Monarch of the Church See 186 187 Head 5. Concerning the Antiquity of the Reformed Religion 176 With two Exercitations The first is page 176 The second is page 178 Head 6. Refutation of a New Sleight and Device of a Seminary Priest of Rhemes against the Religion of the Reformed Churches 193 Head 7. Concerning the Acknowledgement of a Seminary Priest of Rhemes That 3. Articles of the Controversies propounded by Bishop Jewel were and are of weight 1. The Supremacy of the Pope 2. The Corporal Presence 3. The Sacrifice of the Mass 194 c. Head 8. Against the Reconcilement and Reunion of the two Religions the Reformed and the Roman 205 Head 9. Against Toleration of false Religions with the Pure and Reformed Religion when they differ in Fundamental Articles 206 Head 10. Refutation of this slander of the Popish Doctors That the Reformed are Enemies to Scriptures 207 Head 11. Answer to this Demand of the Popish Writers to the Reformed by what Authority They maim and rob the Corps of the Bible meaning their Rejection of the Apocryphal Books from the Canon of Faith 208 209 Head 12. Refutation of this Accusation of the Jesuites That in the Religion and Doctrine of the Reformed there is no Stay or Certainty 210 Again of this matter 211 Head 13. Of the Troubles and Differences which happens in the Church about Religion In a full Thesis Again of the same matter 242 Head 16. The Remedy to such Contentions is by a Synod or a Council 243 Head 17. There is Vnity in the Reformeds Faith and Concord among them and how 212 217 Head 18. A Refutation of this Accusation of the Popish Writers That in the Doctrine of the Reformed Churches many Paradoxes are to be found And that in General 213 § It is in the Doctrines of the Church of Rome that many Paradoxes are to be found 215 Head 19. The Doctrine of the Reformed Churches That the Ministers of God have Power to forgive sins if the sinners repent and believe the Gospel maketh not the said Minister into be Priests as they are called in the Church of Rome 209 Head 20. The Reformed Doctors of the Reformed Churches are impudently accused of Ignorance by the Popish Writers 216 Head 21. Rejection of the injurious Names given to the Reformed by the Popish Writers and what names the Reformed do approve and make use of 201 Head 22. A Representation of good Magistrates and truely Christians toward the Reformed Religion 220 Chap. 7. Of the Reformed Churches Separately in regard 1. Of the Protestants called by the vulgar Lutherans 2. In regard of the Reformed Religion and Church of the Kingdome of England See of both in the following Section SECT 4. 1. Of the Reformed called Protestants and Lutherans by the vulgar And what differences in Religion there is between them and the other Reformed called Evangelicks and Calvinists by the vulgar 190 Of the Religion and Church of the Kingdoms of England with many Chapters concerning them Chap. 1. Consisting in the following Narrations 1. What Augustine the Monk sent in England by Pope Gregory did after his coming in there 221 2. Of the shaking off of the Popes yoak by Henry the 8. King of England 221 3. Of the demolishing of Monasteries in England by the said King Henry 222 4. Of the Reformation of the Church and Religion of England begun by King Henry 224 5. In Queen Mary 's time extream was the Cruelty toward the Reformed 252 Chap. 2. Consisting in
reason is given by Aquinas 2. part q. 97. Art 3. Because the Law of God proceedeth from the will of God and therefore may not be altered by Custome proceeding from the will of Man 7. In that regard very well doth S. Cyprian write lib. 2. Epist 3. ad Caecilium If only Christ is to be heard we ought not to regard what any before us hath thought fit to be done but what Christ who is before all hath first done For we must not follow the Custome of Man but the truth of God And in another place Custome without truth is nothing but Antiquity of Error Idem ad Pomp. cont Epist. Steph. Papae God alone is the Law-giver of his Church Nothing must be ordained concerning the Things which belong to Religion without the Word of God 1. THe Reason of that is because God alone is the Law-giver of his Church And the onely Author of the Doctrine Concerning Faith or Belief And Religious Worship That God is the onely Authour of the Doctrine concerning Faith or Belief we prove it by the following Arguments 1. THe 1. is taken from the Nature of Faith For all the Doctrines of Faith in regard of the matter which is to be believed must have a certain infallible and undoubted Truth Now it is the property of God alone to be infallibly true of his own nature Let God be true but every man a lyar saith S. Paul Rom. 3.4 And therefore God alone is the Author of the Doctrine of Faith 2. The 2. Argument is taken from the Quality of the Articles of Faith For the proper documents and Doctrines of Faith do exceed the capacity and apprehension of the Creature And therefore they could not be revealed but onely by the Creator Such is the Doctrine of the Trinity of the Persons in the unity of an Essence Such is the Doctrine of the Eternal Birth of the Son of God Such that of the Procession of the Holy Ghost And such that of the hypostaticall union of the two Natures of Christ Divine and Humane And such are all other Articles concerning Faith properly and strictly taken which in that they are above the naturall knowledge of the Creature cannot be known by us but by the supernaturall Revelation of the Creator Of all them this of Christ may be said Flesh and Bloud hath not revealed these things unto mankind but God the Father which is in Heaven Matth. 16.17 3. The 3. Argument is taken from the reward of Faith and the punishment propounded to unbelief and infidelity Which doe manifestly argue that it belongeth to God alone to frame and prescribe to Men Articles and dogmes concerning beliefe and Faith For the reward propounded to Faith is Eternall Life Iohn 3.36 And that is the gift of God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Rom. 6.23 And the punishment denounced against infidelity is Eternall Death Which punishment God alone is able to inflict Christ teacheth it Matt. 10.28 in these words Fear not them which kill the body but are not able to kill the soul But rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell He teacheth it also John 3.36 when he sayes that he that believeth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him 2. That God is the onely Author of the Doctrine concerning Religious Worship We prove it by the following Arguments 1. THe 1. Argument is taken from the Relation which is between God And the Church God alone in the Spiritual Government of the Soul is Soveraign Monarch Is the Housholder Is the Husband In regard of his Church This Church in regard of her Relation to God Is Called The City of God The House of Cod The Spouse of God Now who should be so Impudent As to prescribe Laws to a Foreign City Concerning her Duties to her King Or to Another Mans Family Or to Another Mans Wife Concerning the Manner Of Obeying And Rendring Service To her Master Or to her Husband 2. The 2. Argument is taken From the Reward And Punishment Annexed to the Works of Divine Worship For the Works of Divine Worship Piously observed have from the Munificence of God a Promise of Eternal Reward But being Neglected or Contemned a Commination of Eternal Death From whence it may be Gathered That God Alone who is the Lord of Life and Death Hath the Power To Ordain such Works And to Injoin Them By the Empire of a Law-giver 3. The 3. Argument is drawn from the Prohibition of God For God himself by an Expresse Law hath attributed to Himself Alone The Authority to Ordain his Service Deut. 12.32 What thing soever I command you observe to do it Thou shalt not adde thereto nor diminish from it From whence also is that of our Saviour Matth. 15.9 But in vain they do worship me Teaching for Doctrines the Commandements of men 4. The 4. Argument is Because the Works of Worship depend from the Will of God who is to be Worshipped Therefore God is not Worshipped at all by those Works By which he did not declare whether he would be Worshipped or Not. But in This None can know the Will of God unlesse he doth reveal it and Injoines it For who hath known the Mind of the Lord Or who hath been his Counsellour That is Confirmed by This That all whosoever did think to Worship God with their own Invented Works Did provoke him to Anger rather than honour him Nay they are found To have worshipped the Devil Or the Idols of their own heart rather than God They went a whoring with their own Inventions Therefore was the wrath of God kindled against his People Psal 106.39 40. §. The onely Ground and Rule of Faith And Divine Worship Is the Holy Scripture 1. NO Mortal Creature can Teach Religion 2. Nor Carnal Man can attain true knowledge unlesse God Instructs Him And his Spirit lead Him to the Truth 3. The Phrophets Agree to the Truth of this Doctrine Esa 8.20 To the Law and to the Testimony 4. So doth Christ Joh. 5.39 Search the Scriptures for in them ye think ye have eternal Life and they are they which testifie of me 5. And so do the Apostles calling the Scriptures a Rule As S. Paul doth Gal. 6.16 And as many as walk according to this Rule And Philip. 3.16 Let us walk by the same Rule 6. And so do the Ancient Fathers and Doctors Sequi Divinas Literas De fide ad Reginas c. To follow this Rule saith Cyrill is the Path unto Heaven And to be led by this Canon is the way to Salvation And S. Irene Non per alios Dispositionene Salutis cognovimus By the Scriptures we Learn to be saved §. Also The Holy Scripture ought to be among us the Supream Interpreter of Scriptures And the Judge of Controversies 1. FOr Confirmation of That this Language of the Reformed is to be noted and observed How better say They would it stand with
Marks and Parts of the True Religion 1. Teaching to know one onely God Creator of Heaven and Earth And who Conserves And Governs All Things By his Providence 2. It Discovers to the sinful Man the true Mean to be Reconciled with God Namely By the Mercy of Jesus Christ our Redeemer By whom Alone Having Satisfied the Justice of God his Father His wrath may be Appeased towards Sinners who Repent And Believe 3. It Prescribes in what Manner the true God is to be Served And Honoured Namely in Spirit and in Truth Refers All to the Glory of God And the Salvation of Men And Admits Nothing Either Absurd Or unjust Of the Agreements And of the Differences Between the Religion of the Ancient Jewes And the true Christian Religion which we Christians doe imbrace 1. Of the Agreements between both the said Religions 1. GOd is the Authour and the Efficient Cause of both 2. Christ is the foundation of both By whose onely merit all the Faithful since the first sin of our first Parents have been and are reconciled unto God See Heb. 13.8 Rev. 13.8 3. As Christian Religion so the Religion of the Ancient Jewes did aim to stirre up a defire of the blessed Immortality and to confirm the hope of the same 4. Both the Religions did bring and doth bring Justification and Sanctification to the Faithful of the Old and of the New Testament See John 8.56 5. Both the Religions have been sealed and confirmed to the Faithful of the Old and of the New Testament by the self-same Holy Spirit 2. Of the Differences between both the said Religions 1. THe Religion of the Ancient Jews did belong onely to one Nation and People The Christian Religion belongs to all People 2. The Religion of the Ancient Jews by many Ceremonies did shadow and represent Christ which was to come The Christian Religion doth teach and clearly publish that he is come 3. In the Religion of the Ancient Jews the Lord under some earthly benefits did represent the fruition of the heavenly Inheritance But in the Christian Religion directly he doth direct our minds to the Meditation of Eternal Life Omitting those earthly means and helps which he did use towards the Ancient Jewes 4. The Religion of the Ancient Jewes was darker But the Christian Religion is Clearer 5. In the Religion of the Ancient Jews the Rites of their Sacraments were bloody And difficult Namely the Rites of Circumcision and of the Paschall Lamb. But in the Christian Religion they are without blood and Easy 3. 1. FRom the abovesaid Things it appears That since the first Sin of Adam there hath been but one way to attain to the fruition of Salvation And this way hath been the Faith in Jesus Christ the Mediator See thereof Gen. 3.17 and Chapt. 22.18 Act. 15.11 and 10.43 2. Therefore the doctrine of those is to be rejected who teach a three-fold way to attain unto Salvation Namely 1. One to those who did live before the written Law by the observation of the Law of Nature 2. The second to those who did live under the written Law by the fulfilling of the same 3. And the third to those who did and do live under the grace of the Gospel by the Faith in Jesus Christ 3. The Reason why such Doctrine is to be rejected and exploded is because the Faithful and Believers under the Old Testament have had Redemption in Christ by his blood which was to be shed As we have by his Bloud which is shed For the Expiatory Sacrifice of Christ hath had a saving vertue not onely since it was offered unto God upon the Cross But even from the Eternal Decree of God And the Efficacy thereof hath been as well before as after it was exhibited In which regard it is said of Christ Heb. 13.8 That he is the same yesterday and to day and for ever And Rev. 13.8 Christ is called the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world 4. Therefore all the Faithful and Believers under the Law have had Redemption by Faith in Christ the Redeemer as we have under the Gospel Abraham did see the day of Christ and was glad as it is said John 8.56 He did see it by the eyes of Faith and not of the flesh Of the Mutation which happened to the First Christian Religion In the Great Prosperity and Pomp which happened to the Church under the Empire Constantine The First Christian Religion Suddenly Changed By the Introduction in It. Of the Ceremonies and Superstitions of the Pagans Converted To the said Christian Religion And in Borrowing the Words And the Ceremonies of the Jewes 1. 1. THe Church before this Empire had been bred In the Hills and Wildernesses 2. It came out of them clothed with Camels Haires That is to say Clothed with all Sobriety with all Simplicity And with all Innocencie 3. The Bishops for the most Part manifesting Her to the World Were ashamed to Present Her such to the Gentiles That is to say to Those who Newly came out Or would come out from Paganism 4. The Good Emperours Likewise Who were Desirous that the Christian Religion should be Received by Their People More Curious of the Outward then of the Inward Of the Appearance then of the Truth Of the Ceremony then of the Substance 5. They make then no Conscience to clothe the said Church after the Fashion of the Pagans And to Adorn Her with the Ornaments of the Gentiles To Fit the Christians Services and Ceremonies to those of the Pagans As far as without wrong to the Faith They did think They could do it 6. And this Proceeding was called Among Them Zeal and Prudence Which Tertullian would have called Sacriledge Being a Severe Observation of the first Simplicity And Purity as long as he Lived in the Church 2. 1. IN which Besides the said Bishops were to keep this Temperament That in the same Time being to give content to the Jews who did Imbrace the Christianism which for the most part did believe that their should be a Greatnesse under the Kingdom of the Messias They were very Glad to shew unto Them the Fulfilling Thereof in the outward Splendour of the Christian Church 2. And where They did Conceive that They should Adorn the Simplicity of the Christian Religion They willingly borrowed as much as they could The Terms or Words And the Ceremonies Of the Jewes Of the Terms or Words And of the Ceremonies Borrowed From the Jewes And the Pagans When the Christian Church Vnder the Empire of Constantine Did Passe From Persecution to Peace And from Thraldome To the Domination 1. AS All the Outward Service of the Jewes And of the Gentiles did chiefly Consist in Sacrifices Those of the Gentiles without a certain Scope And those of the Jewes aiming All at One onely Jesus Christ It did seem hard and scandalous unto Them To Abolish all Sacrifices Because Those New Converts believed That Religion could not be without such Sacrifices Not
Concerning that All Sacrifices are Nothing But in as much as they are Referred to the only Sacrifices of the Son of God Accomplished in the Crosse Therefore to the End That Neither the one Nor the others should be Frighted The Christians used Themselves to Speak Of Altars And of Sacrifices And as much as the Apostles had taken Pains To Teach That All Sacrifices had Ended in Christ They did Delight to call their Sacrifices Immolations Oblations Sacrifices They call The Lords Table His Altar The Commemoration of his Death in the Sacrament The Sacrifice of the Altar A Holy Host They call the Bishops and Ministers Priests The Deacons Levites c. Manners of Speech among Them well understood Which in those Ages were not Hurtful But in the Following More Ignorant And farther off from the Light have notwithstanding been the Cause of great Abuses Because they are Passed from the Figure to the Thing And from an Improperty of Words in an Error of Doctrine 2. The Gentiles Also had a Multitude of Gods To them All They Had Builded Temples Founded Altars and Sacrifices Suddenly and at a clap To Restrain Them To the Service of one God which is all Spirit And his Service all Spiritual They who were Carnal Besotted after Pomps and Ceremonies And after the Wood And Stones Was found by Humane Prudence Both Scandalous and Impudent In Regard That these Gentiles were to be Edified And not Destroyed Fed said They with milk Before They were Fed with Solid Meat For Thus this Place of Scripture was Abused Whereas Then the First Antiquity had bluntly contested That to have Many Gods was to have None That to Serve Any Creature was to forsake the Creator It was found sweet by Succession of Times To Transform Their Gods into Saints Their Goddesses into She Saints To put our Apostles and our Martyrs in Their Place To Dedicate unto Them Their Temples And Their Altars To Give them some Priests And some High Priests To Appoint To Them Holy Dayes And Honours And Services 3. Now As Humane Wit is Blind in the Things of God It Happened That under the Shadow To Draw to Christ The Jewes and the Gentiles Those Good Folks by a Laps of some Ages did Introduce mildly in the Church Both The Judaisme And the Paganisme We understand Their Ceremonies And their Outward Pomps Their Superstitions And Vanities And which is worse Many of their Presumptions And Anticipated opinions in the Doctrine it self The Religion And Church of Rome Is not Now What it was in the Beginning 1. TO Judge aright of the Roman Church we say that there is great difference between that which is now And that which was in the time of the Apostles And some Ages after their Death 2. That which was in the Time of the Apostles was Pure and Orthodox So that her Faith was spoken of throughout the whole world Rom. 1.8 3. After the Death of the Apostles during some Ages she hath been also a true Church But not the onely True Church Not the Catholick or Universal Church But a Part of the same As was the Church of Greece of Syria of Egypt And of other Places She hath been a True Church but not so Pure as in the Apostles time Errors betimes having begun to creep in her 4. But the Roman Church which is now is an Impure and Heretical Church And more Heretical than any one that ever was before Since the Plague of Antichristianisme have sticked unto her it is no more the Chaste Spouse of Christ but an Harlot And an Adulteresse It is no more a sound and vigorous body but a body full of ulcers and soars In a word she is no more Pure and Orthodox as she was before but Impure and Heterodox 5. Which we prove by two strong and Irrefragable Arguments The 1. is because the greater part of her Faith and belief is contrary to holy Scriptures And consequently is meer Heresie The 2. is because a great part of the Ancient Heresies which have been condemned by the Ancient and Orthodox Church are received in her and approved by her 6. I have said 1. That the now Church of Rome is Impure Heretical because the greater part of her Faith and belief is contrary to holy Scriptures 1. Scriptures forbids the use of Images in matter of Religion and Divine Worship The Church of Rome receives and maintains them 2. The Scripture teacheth us that the bloud of Christ doth cleanse us from all sin The Church of Rome doth establish another Purgatory 3. The Scripture teacheth us that of our selves we are not able to think any good Thing but but that all our sufficiencie is from God The Church of Rome will that by the strength of our Free-will we may do good works And make the said strength to cooperate with the Grace of God 4. The Scripture will that we pray and speak in the Church in a known Tongue All the Service of the Church of Rome is in an unknown Language 5. The Scripture doth ordain that in the Sacrament of the Lords Supper all drink of the Cup The Church of Rome hath forbid it to the Laity 6. The Scripture presents us Jesus Christ as the only Mediator between God and Men The Church of Rome doth forge a great number of Mediatours who are to help us with their Merits and with their Suffrages 7. The Scripture doth warn us concerning Christ Acts 3.21 That the Heaven must receive him until the time of restitution of all things The Church of Rome will in some sort make him to come down every day from Heaven in a million of Places And moreover exposes him under the accidents of bread to divers ignominies 8. In a word there is no Proposition mentioned against us in the Church of Rome whereof we may not be able to find the Antithesis in the Word of God In that regard there are many to be found in the said Church of Rome which are asham'd of the abovesaid Errors And except the brainlesse Spirits and resolved to maintain even the grosest Abuses few Persons will there be found who entirely keep their Religion And in some Points thereof do not find something wanting 7. I have said 2. that the now Church of Rome is Impure and Heretical because a great part of the Ancient Heresies which have been condemned by the Ancient and Orthodox Church are received in her and approved by her Those Heresies meet in her and do compound a part of Popery As all the Waters of Rivers and Springs do meet in the Sea The Devil hath made them to rise up again upon the stage in the Roman Church with some small disguising Her so insolent contempt and debasing of Holy Scriptures she hath common with all kinds of Hereticks to whom such a thing is usual She doth borrow from the Pharisees the nonwritten Traditions And the Merit of Works She borroweth from the Basilidians and the Carpocratians the worshipping of Images She hath from
Truth thereof Refutation of the Excessive Praises that the Semiminarie Priests of Rhemes gives to the English Rhemish Translation 1. 1. LEt the Seminarie Priests of Rhemes give what Commendation they will to their English Translation 2. We Reformed say against it That that Translation is the worst of all the Translations that hath been set forth of the New Testament 3. And we prove our Assertion because that translation hath such examples of unaccustomed and monstrous novelties of words as the like in no other can be found 4. So as a man may justly call it a new fangled and ridiculous Translation Devised rather to amaze the Readers and make the word of God a laughing stock then to Edifie the Church of Christ 5. For who hath ever heard or read such words and Phrases as they have used and affected in their Translation 6. Whereas They might have retained as well the common and known manner of speaking That their Translation set forth in English might have been understood of English men 7. But they of purpose have so framed the same that the English is in many places as obscure in words as the Latin 8. Which thing is in all Translations a foul fault But in Translating of Holy Scripture Intolerable 9. And what Reason should be hereof but that Men either should contemn or not understand the Scripture which yet they will seem to Translate for the benefit of the Church 2. 10. If the Reader require Examples let him take but the Book and read a little and soon shall he see strange Affectation of Novelties in words and speeches throughout their whole Translation 11. There shall he find The Transmigration of Babylon Matth. 1. v. 17. The Enemie Man Matt. 13. v. 28. Vnlesse you have Penance Luk. 13. v. 3. Give us to day our supersubstantial Bread Matt. 6. v. 11. Whatsoever thou shalt supererogate Luk. 10. v. 36. Not in Chamberings and Impudicites Rom. 13.13 An Emulator of the Traditions of my Fathers Gal. 1.14.24 I Expugned the Faith They Emulate you not well Gal. 4.17 That you might Emulate Them 1 Pet. 2.5 Be ye also your selves superedified Ephe. 4. v. 10. Once at length you have reflorished to care for me denying the onely Dominator and our Lord Jud. 4. To the Redemption of Acquisition Ephes 1. v. 14. Against the Spirituals of wickedness in the Celestials Ephes 6. v. 12. The Archisynagogue Mark 6. v. 22. Ebrieties Commessations Gal. 5. v. 21. The Dominical day Apoc. 1. v. 10. But they are written to our Correption 1 Cor. 10. v. 11. That in the Name of Jesus every knee bow of the Celestials Terrestrials and Infernals Philip. 2. v. 10. But he Exinanited himself Philip. 2.7 For with such hostes God is promerited Hebr. 13. v. 16. Let the Charity of the Fraternity abide in you Heb. 13. v. 1. O Timothy keep the Depositum 1 Tim. 6.20 That he might repropriate the sins of the people Heb. 2.17 Wrapt it in Sindon and laid it in a Monument Matt. 27.59 All shall be docible of God John 6. v. 45. Vpon probatica a Pond John 5. v. 2. Which of you shall argue me of Sin John 8. v. 46. They hated me gratis John 15. v. 26. Beyond the Torrent Cedron John 18. v. 1. It was the â—arasceve of Pasche John 19.14 3. 1. These and such like are the goodly flowers of the Rhemists English Translation 4. 2. Besides the obscurity and ambiguity of Sentences by Reason of leaving out the Verbs and other words in the English Translation which may in Latine more easily be understood 5. Hereby the Reader may judge but better by Reading the Translation it self whether we have not Truely said of it That it is a strange Translation indeed And such an one as hard it were to find the Like 6. 1. But one of the Rhemist Priests doth Answer That we Reformed rather Delight in such Novelty then They seeing they Retain the Ancient words Mass Priests c. And we Reformed refuse them 2. Of these words shall be spoken in our particular handling of Controversies between the Reformed Churches and the Roman 3. And as for certain Names of persons and of places which some of our Interpreters do reduce to the Hebrew Sound They cannot much trouble the Reader And they are rather used in Books then in Speech EXERCITATION Condemnation of the Annotations joined with he Rhemist Translation of the New Testament By the Seminary Priests of Rhemes 1. VVHosoever shall consider with himself advisedly the Rhemists Manner of Collection Their Argument Their Application of Scripture And shall Examine a little how their Conclusion followeth upon their Proofs without all Coherence or consequence of Reason must needs greatly mislike their whole Religion that is founded upon so weak so tickle and so ruinous a Foundation 2. For unless it be granted That of every Thing may be concluded any Thing and that the Word of God may be made applicable to all purposes opinions and Doctrines it is impossible that these and such like arguments of Theirs as they have in their Annotations gathered upon the words of Scripture should have in them such strength and Truth as Divinity and Religion requireth These be the Frauds of the Church of Rome Concerning another of their Principles Which is the Ancient Fathers 1. Fraud The Church of Rome doth Discover an abominable Fraud in this That putting the Ancient Fathers to be one of the Principles of their Doctrine of Faith and Religious Worship by an Expurgatory Index they cause to be blotted out of the Books of the Ancient Fathers all that is displeasing unto them Or else they falsifie them and alter their Sense and Meaning 1. THis is true in Regard of the most Ancient Fathers and particularly of the Books of S. Cyprian S. Chrysostome S. Augustine S. Cyril of Alexandria and of others They make them say the contrary to that which they will and take out from them not onely some Clauses but also whole Leafes 2. We know well that to cover this Sacriledge Sixtus of Sienna doth adde That those Writings of the Fathers had been soiled and infected by the Malice and Venome of the Hereticks of our Age But it is a False Cover For if by Hereticks he doth understand those of the Reformed Religion we maintain that which they cause to be blotted out of the Writings of the Fathers was in Them before the Reformation And That it cannot be Justified that any of the Reformed have Corrupted or Altered any Writings of the Fathers 2. Fraud The Church of Rome acknowledgeth That there are many Faults and Errors in the Books of the Ancient Fathers which are not to be Approved And notwithstanding That The Popish Religion is as it were a Body consisting for the most part of Rottennesse and Corruption Namely of Ancient and New Errors 1. 1. THe Popish Writers can as soon prove out of the Scriptures the following Points of their false Doctrine As they can draw a Fountain
condemned the Popes Supremacie Can. 6. In the Second is established the Idolatrous Worship of Images The First Belief the Papists will not allow The Second is detested by us Reformed 8. Let Councils therefore be esteemed as they deserve 9. And let them be tried as hath been said §. Objection of the Popish Writers against our Rejection from the rule of Faith the Catholick Church and General Councils IF the Church say they and general Councils be not Grounds and Rules of Faith Why then did the Ancient Fathers draw an Argument from them to Refute the Errors of the Antient Hereticks Answer of the Reformed to that Objection 1. VVE know say the Reformed That the Ancient Godly Fathers in Confuting all Hereticks used onely Arguments drawn out of the Scriptures and plainly taught That by no other Weapons an Heretick can be put to flight 2. The same Reformed do know That the Ancient Fathers did charge the Hereticks sometimes With the Judgment of Churches With Determination of Councils With Succession of Bishops With the Name of Catholicks Not as though this were a necessary Conviction of it self but thereby the rather to induce them to believe the Doctrine to be true which they did see from the first planting thereof in the Church to have remained 3. The case of the Papists drawing Arguments of Conviction from the Doctrine of their Popish Church is nothing like seeing they have onely the bare Title of the Church without the Thing and as it were the empty Casket without the Treasure 4. The Reformed justly exclude from the Rule of Faith The Ancient Fathers 1. VVE Reformed as hath been said of General Councils do esteem and regard them in their place We thank God God for them We Read Allow and Commend them So far forth as they agree with Gods word 2. For it cannot be truely said that they never disagree from it 3. We grant that they were Learned and Godly Men but yet were they Men having their Infirmities and Imperfections 4. Their Learning Their Zeal Their Ages Were not Priviledge unto them but that notwithstanding they might be deceived in their Writings and in their Expositions of Scripture 5. And let the Popish Doctors take this for a sure Conclusion That in the Sayings of Those who are all of them subject to Error there is no stable and stedy Ground to build our Faith upon least perhaps we build upon Error in stead of Truth 6. So that without Tryal and Examination no Sentence of a Father nor of all Fathers may safely be Received §. Objection of the Popish Writers against our Rejection from the Rule of Faith the Ancient Fathers SInce the Reformed Exclude the Ancient Fathers from the Rule of Faith Why say the Popish Writers do they make use of them and alledge them Answer to this Objection 1. THe Reformed do read the Ancient Fathers And oftentimes they rehearse their Sentences and their Expositions of the Scripture 2. But not as Proofs in Doctrines of themselves For they do not acknowledge them as Rule and Ground of the Faith 3. It is to stop the Papists Mouthes that cry so loud in the ears of the simple that all the Fathers are against them 4. It being most true That they are notably and generally for them § How the Reformed carry themselves in regard of the Scriptures in regard of the Ancient Fathers 1. This is their Carriage in regard of the Scriptures 1. THey receive that which the Scripture delivereth 2. They reject that which the Scripture reproveth 2. This is Their Carriage in regard of the Ancient Fathers 1. THey read the Fathers with Indifferent and Free Judgement 2. Weighing all their Doctrine in the Balance of Gods Word and thereby either allowing or refusing the same 3. This they must do or else of Fathers they make Gods of Mens Writings They make Canonical Scriptures Of Doctors Opinions they make Articles of Faith 4. And herein they do no otherwise then they are taught both by Scriptures and by Fathers to do 5. They declare to the Popish Writers That concerning these two Heads they shall never get at their hands more than this § Of Bishop Jewels Challenge to the Fathers that flourished 600 years after Christ The Popish Writers IOhn Jewel say they challenged the Catholicks calling upon and desiring the help of the Fathers as many as flourished 600 years after Christ Answer of the Reformed to that Relation 1. They Answer this THat Bishop Jewel proved all the Ancient Fathers to be against the Church of Rome in Disputing with Doctor Harding as he had affirmed at Paul's Crosse 2. They Answer this 1. THat the present Popish Writers may be ashamed to make mention of that Challenge which they have so long ago given over as a Desperate Cause 2. Wherein Doctor Harding the chiefest Adversarie could not make shew of Proof without using the Testimonies of forged and Counterfeit Writers As Amphilochius Clemens Abdias Hippolytus And such Others of which no more Account is to be made then of Fables and shamelesse Forgeries Such were the Chiefest Proofs which Dr. Harding was able to bring 2. And whatsoever he brought hath been fully Answered in the Reply by the Bishop himself Which Book as yet though it hath been in some parts nipped at by Divers yet throughly confuted was it never what the present Popish Writers can do in this Case may easily be guessed 3. They Answer This. 1. THat what which Bishop Jewel promised to give over and to subscribe If any of the 27. Articles of Controversies propounded by him could be proved by Scriptures Councils or Doctors within 660. years after Christ was not because he meant ever to subscribe to the Popish Doctrine or was unstayed in his Religion but it was of a most assured knowledge and resolute perswasion That the Popish Doctors were utterly destitute in this behalf of all Truth and Antiquity as indeed they are 2. Otherwise the Popish Doctors may remember That our Religion is grounded onely upon the Holy Scriptures of God 3. And therefore though the said Doctors brought against us Reformed Writers and Fathers never so many for these Matters as they can bring not one of Credit and Age. Yet will we never subscribe unto them having once subscribed to the certain Truth of God revealed unto us in his holy perfect and written word 4. By which all Sentences Opinions and Writings of Men whatsoever must be examined §. Notwithstanding some Errors of the Ancient Fathers we Reformed esteem them as Gods Saints and holy Men and holy Fathers 1. THe Ancient Fathers holding the Ground and Foundation of Doctrine did oftentimes build thereon Stubble and Straw partly by some Superstitious Opinions which themselves conceived of such Inventions and partly by the sway and violence of Custome whereby they were carried to a liking of those Things which they saw commended and practised by others 2. And yet God forbid that because of some Errors which they held we Reformed
should raze their Names out of the Calender of Gods Saints or think otherwise then Reverently of them § Objection of the Popish Writers against this Declaration of the Reformed HOw say they can we esteem them to be Holy teaching that they did Erre Answer to that Objection 1. VVE Reformed do Answer That the Ancient Fathers are not in such Assertions contrary to themselves 2. Were not the Apostles Holy Men when they dreamed of an Earthly Kingdom in this World Yet this Opinion is contrarie to a principal Article of our Faith Were They void of Holiness when they believed that the Gospel was to be preached to the Jews onely Which is greatly Derogatory to the Grace of God and Salvation of his people Then every Error doth not overthrow all holiness in the servants of God 3. In the Primitive Church many Holy Fathers were infected with the Error of Christs Reigning a thousand years on earth who notwithstanding are worthily accounted Saints of God 4. Cyprian and many Godly Bishops with him erred about the Baptism Ministred by Hereticks Yet lost they not for all that the Opinion and Name of Holy Bishops and Fathers 5. All such errors mentioned were such as in the before named Fathers did not raze the Foundation of the Gospel § There is great difference between the Errors of the Antient Fathers And those of the present Church of Rome And Popish Doctors 1. THe Fathers slipt a little The Popish Doctors and Papists are fallen headlong into the pit 2. The Fathers were overseen through infirmide The Popish Doctors and Papists are blind of Malice 5. The Fathers scattered some Darnel in the Lords Field The Popish Doctors and Papists have plucked up by the Roots the good Corn. 4. The Fathers have suffered losse of this building being not agreeable to the foundation yet are saved The Popish Doctors and Papists overthrow indirectly and by good consequence the foundation it self And therefore continuing in these opinions what hope can they have to be saved § Examination of these words of Luther repreved by the Popish Writers That he was not moved though a thousand Austins Cyprians Churches be against him The Popish Writers BY these words say the Popish Writers Luther did shew that he was unmeasurable Arrogant and wilful Answer to that Accusation and Presumption 1. LVther's Spirit was far from this Insolent and Immoderate Presumption as may by his own words appear ‖ Contra Regem Angliae For he saith not that he more setteth by his own private judgment then he doth by all the Fathers and Doctors But he saith That he setteth against the sayings of the Fathers of Men of Angels of Devils the Word of the onely Eternal Majestie the Gospel And again immediately he saith The Word of God is above all The Majestie of God maketh with me That I care not though a thousand Augustines and Cyprians stood against me 2. Is this to set his private judgment against All the Fathers Is this Pride Is this Presumption Must Gods word and Majesty and Gospel yield to the judgment of Fathers be they never so many 3. Luther did not think so but meant this by the words alledged against him If Augustine or Cyprian or any other Father maintain any thing against Gods Word Luther or any other Minister of Christ may in such Case preferre his Judgement warranted by the word of God before theirs 4. If the Popish Doctors deny this they are not worthy to be called Christians 5. And yet closely They doe deny it in that they reprove Luther and condemn him for saying the same §. Objections against this Answer of the Reformed by the Popish Writers 1. Objection YOu Reformed say the said Writers can bring no Instance that ever the Ancient Fathers did so Answer of the Reformed to that Objection 1. HAve the Popish Writers forgotten what fell out in the first Council of Nice when the Fathers agreeing to dissolve the Marriage of Ministers were withstood by Paphnutins and yielded in the end Here one Paphnutius Judgement was preferred before all the other three hundreds of Fathers 2. And so oftentimes the Judgement of many hath been corrected by one S. Augustine saith Whether of Christ Contra Petil. lib. 3. cap. 6. or of his Church or of any other thing that appertaineth to or Faith and Life I will not say We not to be compared to him that said Though we But as he added If an Angel from Heaven shall Preach any thing besides that ye have received in the Legal and Evangelical Scriptures let him be accursed If we may accurse them how many and whosoever they be that Teach contrary to the Prophetical and Apostolical Scriptures then may we prefer our Judgement in such Cases before them 3. In another place S. Augustine saith August Epist 19. For all these namely Fathers yea above all these the Apostle Paul offereth himself I flie to Him I appeal to Him from all Writers that think otherwise Thus was S. Augustine bold to write even to S. Jerome and feared not any suspicion either of Arrogancy or of Heresie for the same 4. Such Account then must we make of the Truth that we must stand with it against all the world and not for the Reverence of mens Persons give it over or betray it or be afraid to defend it 2. Objection THough the Fathers in the Councils of Nice of Ephesus of Chalcedon had alledged no direct and evident Place against Arius and Nestorius and Eutiches yet the Christian People was bound to believe them grounding themselves onely upon the Catholick and Universal Faith of the Churches before them Answer of the Reformed to that Objection 1. THis is boldly and bluntly spoken 2. These Godly and Catholick Fathers Assembled in Council against these Hereticks Confuted them by the Authority of Gods Word and as it were did cut the throat of their Heresies with the Sword of the Spirit This is onely the Weapon then used And with this they prevailed 3. As likewise have all other godly Councils ever done against the Hereticks and enemies of the Church The Fathers have Errors and the Doctors of the Roman Church do acknowledge it 1. IT is confessed by our Adversaries that the Fathers had their Errors 2. And themselves in divers cases challenge and censure them 3. There is none of the Fathers saith Stapleton in which something erroneous may not be observed And Anselm saith in the books of those holy Doctors which the Church readeth as Authentical some things are found wicked and heretical And Mulhusinus the Jesuite We know the Fathers were men and erred sometimes 4. Before the Pelagian Heresie arose Augustine was deceived in the matter of divine grace and freewill And although the same Father is many times Orthodox in the Question of Purgatory yet at other times he varieth at least doubtfully from his own sounder judgment The Reformed justly exclude from the rule of Faith The Determinations of the Pope 1. VVE
have said before That the Determinations of the Pope is the onely Rule of Faith in the Roman Church 2. Now then this being the Papists own certain Rule and Ground and Resolution We Reformed would gladly be Enformed How by the same a man may be assured of any Faith It being further also agreed and confessed among themselves That the Pope may fall into Heresie 3. Then who seeth not That their Ground being shaken and their Staie failing All that is Builded and upohlden thereon is clean overthrown The Popes may fall into Heresie and have erred in great Articles of the Faith 1. MArtinus sacrifice to Idols Liberius subscribe to Arianism John the 24. an hererick oppressor persecutor fornicator Simmonist did deny the immortality of the Soul and the resurrection of the body Leo the seventh was not much behind for the Life to come And Clement the 7th doubted of the immortality Answer to an Objection of the Jesuites 4. IF the Jesuites say That the Pope falling into Heresie forthwith ceaseth to be a Pope We demand who they are that must judge the Popes Cause and give Sentence against Him 4. And if the Pope be obstinate and teaching Heresie and therewith infecting the World will notwithstanding stoutly stand in defence of his Doctrine and will keep his Chaire What shift have the Papists then And what can they do against him seeing he is their Pope their Head their Author and Founder of all their Faith 6. Thus a man going with the Papists along and coming to the end of all findeth no stay but must wander still as in an endless Labyrinth wherein he shall at last languish and perish everlastingly Besides The Reformed say of the Pope That he is not the Rule of Faith and Judge of Controversies because he is the great Antichrist foretold in the Scriptures 1. IN the Bishops of Rome after Boniface the third and Hildebrand we find The Name the Seat the Apparel the Time the Pride the Cruelty the Idolatry the Coveteousnesse the Imposture the Power and the fortune of Antichrist which are the Marks whereby S. Paul and S. John describes that man of sin and son of perdition 2. The Name of Antichrist containeth in it the number 666 which Irenaeus findeth in the word Latinus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 3. The Seat of Antichrist is a City built upon seven Hills that ruleth over the whole world This City Propertius tells us to be Rome Septem urbs clara jugis toti quae praesidet orbi 4. The Apparel and Ornaments of Antichrist are Scarlet and Purple Gold Jewels and precious stones which the Popes wear especially on high daies 5. The Time of Antichrist his rising is foretold to be after the Division of the Roman Empire after whch it appears by all stories that the Pope grew to his greatnesse 6. The vices of Antichrist are these especially Pride Idolatry or Spiritual Fornication Cruelty Imposture Covetousnesse who are to be found in the Popes as hath been represented above under the Title of the Popes vices 7. The Beast is said to have horns like a Lamb and to speak like a Dragon and to exercise all the power of the first Beast Apoc. 18.11 This agreeth to the Papacy and Pope who resembleth Christ whose Vicar he calleth himself and arrogateth to himself Christs double power both Kingly and Priestly He exerciseth also the power of the first Beast to wit the Roman Empire described by seven Heads and ten Horns because as the first Beast the Roman Empire by power and temporal Authority So the Pope by policy and Spiritual Jurisdiction ruleth over a great part of the world 8. It is written of the Whore of Babylon that the Kings of the earth should give their power to her for a time but that in the end they should hate her and make her desolate Apoc. 17.13.16 which we find daily more and more fulfilled in the Papacy 9. From all which we do justly argue in this manner He in whom all or the principal Marks of Antichrist are found he is the Antichrist But in the Pope all or the principal marks of Antichrist are to be found Ergo the Pope is the Antichrist Of the divers Ages of Antichrist 1. THe First Age of Antichrist was when Bonifacius the third Bishop of Rome was declared Head of the Church and the Bishop of Bishops by Phocas who killed the Emperour Mauritius his Master and did usurp the Empire which Phocas to get the good will of the Romans drew to himself That Bonifacius the third giving him the abovesaid Title 2. The Second Age of Antichrist was when he was put in possession of the City of Rome and of the Exarchat 3 The Third Age of Antichrist was when he raised himself above the Emperours their Soveraigns and Lords The Pope being the foretold Antichrist and demonstrating it What Horrour is it to submit to him 1. ALthough the Pope be the foretold Antichrist yet people do Adore this Monster and Princes do Applaude him and very often ruine their Kingdoms at his desire and appetite and daily yet do offer their poor Subjects in a Sacrifice of good Odour to this Antichrists feet 2. Who would believe it if Gods Spirit had not foretold it 3. And who shall believe it after us when he is consumed by this same Spirit An Appendix concerning Cardinals the Popes Counsellours 1. WHen Cardinals have been raised up this is the Language of the Archbishop of Bragantia among many Prelates of the Council of Trent That in the Church had been established an Order Superiour to the Bishops in times past unknown of the Church namely that of Cardinals 2. Who in the first times were reputed to be of the number of other Priests and Deacons 3. And onely after the tenth Age had raised themselves above their Degree 4. Yet not so much that they durst make themselves equals unto Bishops unto whom they were held to be inferiours until the year of Grace a thousand and two hundred 5. But from that time Not onely have they esteemed themselves to be Equals unto Bishops but moreover have raised themselves above them So that now they hold them for servants in their Houses 6. He concluded That the Church should never be reformed untill Bishops and Cardinals were brought again to the Rank due unto each of them Of Cardinals more particularly 1. NOt one word can be found in the Antient Church concerning Cardinals save in this signification That Cardinal Priest did signifie the Parson or Rector of one of the Parishes of the Bishoprick Then Cardinal Priest was as much as principal Priest even as some virtues are called Cardinal virtues And some winds Cardinal winds that is to say First and Principal 2. And this Title was used not onely in Rome but also in other great Archiepiscopal Cities principally at Milan where Sigonius reporteth that there were 22. Cardinals about the end of the seventh book 3. And there being many Priests in one Parish he that
when he goes on 4. Concerning the particular Faults of the said Cardinal they appear in every point of controversie which he handles against the Reformed Churches Which particular Faults are clearly discovered and solidly refuted by the Doctors of the said Churches who did undertake the Answer to the said Controversie §. An Observation very considerable concerning the Society of Jesus and the Name of Jesuite 1. THe Societie of the Jesuites have separated Christ Else why have they separated Jesus from Christ 2. And leaving the Ancient ordinary Name of Christians which they scorn as too common they desiring rather to be called Jesuites a new Name of their own framing then to be called Christians 3. As though there were some society of Jesus priated to one kind of men separated from other Christians 4. If there be then is Christ divided 5. If not then you Jesuites are too Impudent to devise a new Society §. Exception of the Jesuites YOu Reformed set upon our Society and say we have divided Christ because certain men have chosen unto them this Name above all others to be accounted of the Society of Jesus because they have consecrated themselves wholy to advance this Name Must they therefore of necessity divide Christ Have not the English Christ Colledge in Oxford Answer of the Reformed to this Exception 1. WE will not strive much with you Jesuites about your Society of which we reformed make very small account 2. If you have for some special consideration Dedicated your selves unto Christ What is that consideration Why do not you tell us what Jesus requireth of you which all other Christians are not bound to do 3. If the Order of your profession require that you propagate the honour and magnifie the Name Jesus If for this all Christians ought not to labour at least Bishops and specially the Pope of Rome And if they be Jesuites who do this Why are not your Divines Bishops Cardinals and Popes Jesuites 4. It may be this care is far from them 5. Whereas then Names are for distinguishing of things they be needlesse and vain when there is no difference of the thing 6. Either shew us what is the proper and peculiar duties of Jesuites Or confesse that without any cause you have appropriated such a Name unto them 7. In Cambridge as well as in Oxford there are both Christ and Jesus Colledges but they that live in those Colledges are called onely Christians 8. Think you That because there are many Colledges different in Names there are many different Orders and Professions of men 9. In places distinctions of Names are necessary and without danger unlesse some Schism may happen betwixt the wals 10. Have you Jesuites no other thing to say for your Sect and Society Concerning the Conversion of Countries made by Papists What judgment is to be made of such Conversions 1. IT may happen that a corrupt Church which holdeth not the faith intirely throughout but erreth in some parcels thereof may convert Heathens 2. Such a conversion shall be mixed In some things it shall be to the true Faith In others it shall be to erroneous beleeving 3. Like as diseased Parents when they procreate Children do together with their nature and kind propagate hereditarie sicknesse 4. And that the Ecclesiastical story reporteth That the Arrians converted the Goths to Christianity 5. And such is the conversion of Heathens made by Papists Again Of the Conversion of the Americans by the Jesuites 1. The Jesuites which have assayed to make new kingdoms among the Indians did not serve Christ but the Pope 2. Nor did they enlarge the Kingdome of Christ but they did prepare for the Pope a Kingdom far from the Reformed where he may reign after he shall be banished from these countries 3. Which newly could easily have been effected by Lewis the 14 King of France if he had been willing to chastise or rather so far to punish Alexander now Pope as to take from him the Temporal Dominions of which the Popes are become Princes by the liberalitie of the Kings of France his predecessors Of the different Sects that are in the Church of Rome namely Thomists Scotists Dominicans Franciscans Jesuites COncerning these different Sects the Jesuites for Defense of them produce this Reason That all these did ever consent in Faith and differed onely in such things which might be disputed without any hazard of Faith Answer to that by the Reformed 1. BE it granted they did agree in matters of Faith Why then do they not follow all one Rule 3. For S. Paul reproved the Corinthians agreeing in Faith because they attributed to their Ministers more then was meet whilest one had Devoted himself to S. Paul another to S. Peter and another to Apollo What then shall be done to the Scotists to the Thomists and to others Are the Names of Scotus of Thomas of Francis more holy and lawful Names in their Disciples then the names of S. Peter S. Paul and of Apollo 3. Besides the difference is very great not in the name onely but in things also 4. As thus Let the Question be whether the Crosse of Christ and the Image of Christ be to be worshipped with the same kind of worship that Christ is Adored withal Doth not this appertain to Faith But Error in this will be plain Idolatry And yet the Jesuites know some of the Schoolmen stand for it Some against it 5. What of that Question which hath exercised all Churches and all Schools so long Whether the Virgin Mary had Original sin Or was ever pure and without spot 6. And infinite such Differences the Reformed do omit being matter of Faith § From hence I infer That the Vnitie pretended by the Popish Doctors to be in the Church of Rome is not so Intire and General as they would have it thought 1. BUt although it be not so yet if it proceeded of knowledge of the Truth and of faithful submission with the heartie obedience to the same truth it should deserve great Commendation 2. But springing from this Fountain That all men must obey the Pope whatsoever he teach and command without Examination or Resistance upon pain of Eternal Damnation It is altogether unworthie of commendation and praise because it is an easie matter upon this Foundation to raise up and maintain any unitie whatsoever 3. In that regard such unity is Tyrannical and Devilish 4. And in other Regards it is Carnal For in the chiefest Members of the Church of Rome it doth proceed from vain Ambition from worldly Pleasures and from filthy Covetousnesse 5. In another regard besides It is Brutish and also carnal proceeding in the most Members of Brutish Ignorance and of Fear Of the Seduction of People by the Popes and the Roman Church by their False Doctrine in General 1. IT is one of the Sinnes of the Popes and of the Church of Rome to seduce People by their False and Corrupted Doctrine 2. Which is a crying and an abominable Sin
perpetual Monument of the Papists Treachery and most horrible Cruelty 2. And also as a notable Caveat unto all the Godly to beware of them for the Time to come §. The Doctrine of the Church of Rome is false Concerning the Faith given to Hereticks 1. AFter that the Council of Constance had most Dishonourably infringed the safe Conduct in Writing given to John Husse 1. By the Emperour Sigismund and had put the said Husse to death contrary to publick Promise They Enacted a Law as we have said before That a Promise made unto Hereticks by the Emperour or by any King or Secular Prince should not hinder any Ecclesiastical Judges from proceeding against them according to the Law Concil Constant Sess 19. 2. IN the Regard of this Expression a Jesuite saith this That whereas the Reformed Doctors commonly say that it was decreed in this Council of Constance That Faith is not to be kept with Hereticks That such a thing is false 3. BUt let this Decree be understood in the Expression propounded We Reformed ask of the Jesuites How can we be safe going to Councils Assembled by the Popes who are mortal Enemies to Protestants If the Emperours more reasonable to them bear no sway in such Councils Other Frauds The pretended Donation of Constantine the Emperour to the Roman Church in person of the Pope Sylvester of the City of Rome and of a great part of Italy is not onely a Fable but moreover a notorious Fraud 1. BEcause all Historie is contrarie to it 2. Because the fourth Consulate of Constantine the Son and of Gallicanus which is in the Date of it is not found 3. Because Damasus Pope of Rome in the very Life of Sylvester which is so particular makes no mention thereof Neither also Anastatius 4. Because this pretended Donation was afterwards divided among the sons of the Emperour Constantine even Rome it self as it is related by Eusebius Zosimus and Zonara 5. Because Isidorus Burchardus and Yvo judging it to be Apocriphal did not insert it in their Decrees 6. Because even the Pope Agathon writing many Ages after to Constantine Pogonat calleth Rome Vrhem Imperatoris Servilem The Servile Town of the Emperour 7. Because this pretended Donation hath been confuted by some of the most famous men of the Church of Rome As By Antonine Archbishop of Florence By Raphael Volateranus By Hierom Catalan Chamberlain to Pope Alexander the 6. By Otho Bishop of Frisinghen By Cardinal Cusan By Laurence Valla a Roman Patrician By Francis Guicciardin every one of these men famous in their times By Aeneas Sylvius himself who afterwards was Pope Pius the second By an expresse book cited by Catalan 8. Because Platine the Popes Historiographer hath been ashamed to speak of it 9. Because sinally That in the pretended Original which is kept of it in the Vatican in Golden Letters the Writer himself hath added to the end thereof in this Latine Quam Fabulam longi Temporis Mendacia finxit It is a Fable which the Ancient Lye did forge 10. And notwithstanding Let us here admire the Impudency of Baronius who passeth upon this Donation as upon Fire And will give it us as a thing already judged We speak not of it saith he because we could not say other thing thereof Then that which hath been said by so many others and which should be burthensome and needlesse to repeat Volum 3. Ann. 324. Art 117. 11. And wretched man that he is how many other things doth he repeat of lesser Importance handled by many others and what else are all his Annales Fraud Of the pretended Donation of Constantine in General 1. THat Constantines Donation is a base and witlesse forgery is of old by Laurentius Valla and since that by divers of our Learned Writers so fully demonstrated that scarce ought can be added unto their Labours 2. Nor would we so much as once endeavour to treat thereof but that many of the Popes late flatterers do most pertinaciously and shamelessely continue still the claim thereof 3. And it must not seem strange to any nor be thought unsit that we should reiterate our just defence of the Truth So long as they reiterate their Cavils and vain Objections against the Truth Three Reasons by which we prove that Constanstine never made any such Donation as the Doctors of the Church of Rome doe pretend either by Word or by Writing 1. THe first Reason is the Testament of Constantine wherein he disposed the whole Empire and divided it among his three Sonnes To Constantine and Constans was attributed saith Zonaras Italy and Rome it self Africk Sicily the Cottian Alpes Cum Galliis with the Countries of the Galles To Constantius was Attributed that which was in the East 2. It is credible that if Constantine had formerly made either by Word or Writing an Absolute Donation of Rome Italy and the Western Provinces to the Pope and that so solemnly That as Leo the 9. saith He Decreed that Donation to abide firm and inviolable in finem mundi unto the end of the world It is credible we say that so pious and prudent an Emperour would within twelve years after do contrary to his own Act especially in his last Will and Testament wherein he would rather have testified his Religious affection and love to the Church by an Addition of some other gift then leave so eternal a blemish upon his Name Of Inconstancy Of Injustice Of Impietie Of Sacriledge And of making his own children inheritors of that which he knew was neither his to give Nor which they without open Injustice Impiety and Sacriledge might accept hold or possesse 2. The second reason is the perpetual possession and dominion which the Emperours had of Rome and of Italy with the Government thereof which continued still in them Nor onely after Constantines time but even while he lived until it was unjusty taken from them First by Popes and then confirmed by Pipin by Charles the Great and by others 3. The third proof that Constantine made no such Donation is the Testimonie of their own Writers Whereof though it were easie to produce a long Catalogue yet we heer cite but a few 4. The first is Bishop Canus who thus writes Eusebius Ruffinus Theodoret Socrates Sozomen Eutropius Victor and other Authors of good credit who have most diligently written all the Acts of Constantine not onely do make mention of this Donation But further they declare That he so divided the Roman Empire among his three Sons Vt Italia uni eorum tota contigerit That all Italy was allotted to one of them So Canus 5. And to him accords one of their latter and most earnest Defenders of the Popes Regalities Alex. Carerius who thus saith of this Donation of Constantine Compertum est It is certain That nothing is read in any approved Historian specially in those who writ in that or in the next age Eusebius doth not mention it Nor Hierom Nor Augustine Nor Ambrose Nor Basil
That they were grounded upon the Word of God because there is no passage which formally saith That the Son is consubstantial to the Father and that it is not a Created God 2. The Nestoreans also could say That they were grounded upon the Word of God because there is no formal place which saies That in Jesus Christ there are not two Persons 3. So much could say the Eutichians For there are no places which formally saies That the two Natures of Christ be not confused and that the Human Nature hath not swallowed up by the Divine Nature 4. Likewise the Jews who reject Jesus Christ with a prodigious obstinacie could say That they were grounded upon the Word of God because that in Moses and in all the Prophets there is not any place which saith formally That Jesus the Son of Mary born in Bethlehem under the Empire of Caesar Augustus is the Messias 5. In a word the Religion of the Mahometans could be said to be grounded upon the Word of God For there is no Text in the Bible which saith that Mahomet is a false Prophet and that his Religion is impious and abominable and that the Paradise which God promiseth to his children is not a carnal Paradise § The necessarie consequences that are drawn out of the Scriptures are as valuable to prove the falshood of a Belief as the formal Texts are as also to prove the Truth of a Belief ANd so whensoever we are to confirm the Truth and to confute Errors and Untruths it is lawful to make use of two kind of Arguments drawn out of the Canonical Books of Scripture Namely 〈◊〉 of those who expressely and as in as many words are drawn out of the Holy Scriptures Secondly of those which are drawn out of them by good and lawfull Consequence 1. Certainly those that would reject Consequences drawn out of the Reason of Holy Scriptures should condemn Jesus Christ who made use of Consequences to prove the Resurrection against the Sadducees For after he had produced the place of Moses Exod. 3.6 where God calleth himself the God of Abraham the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. He inferres by a good Consequence for proofe of the Resurrection God is not the God of the Dead but of the Living 2. Truely whosoever is against the drawing out of any Consequence doth abolish all the common sense and all use of Reason which consists onely in that 3. We acknowledge That Faith proceeds another way then Humane Sciences do for Faith drawes all her Proofs from the Divine Authority but as the most famous School-men do observe the Sacred Divinity is Argumentative that is to say That it doth not abolish but on the contrary makes more Noble the use of Argumentation and Discourse We allow besides That the Rules of Logick are not Articles of Faith But notwithstanding we say that they are Tools and Instruments to handle all knowledge with order and certainty And Consequently the Theological Matters Fraud This is a Fraud of some Jesuites that in Disputations concerning Religion they will ever Question and never Answer 1. FOr it belongs to him that Affirmeth a Thing to prove it otherwise one might Affirm all things impudently 2. According to this Rule It belongeth then unto those who maintain That every day Christ is to be offered in a Propitiatory Sacrifice who maintain The Prayers unto the Dead to Justifie their Belief by the Word of God And to make us see That it hath been written and set down in clear and formal words or that it is drawn from it by a Necessary Consequence This is another of the Frauds of the Church of Rome 1. That the taking away of the Cup from the Sacrament of the Lords Supper 2. Forbidding Marriage to Priests 3. And Divine Service being in an unknown Tongue to the People are onely grounded upon worldly Interest 1. This is true in Regard of the taking away the Cup from the Communion COncerning the taking away the Cup from the Sacrament This is the language of the Doctors of the Church of Rome That if it were possible to grant to the people the use of the Cup without doing any wrong to the Faith it should be a thing of small importance but that could not be because by the grant of the said use of the Cup a gate should be opened to require that all the Ordinances which are of positive right should be broken And yet say they They are they by which alone the Prerogative given by Christ to the Curch of Rome is conserved 2. This is true in regard of the Prohibition of Marriage to Clergie Men. FOr say the said Doctors from the Marriage of Clergie men if it were granted it should happen that they having a Family Wives and Children should no more depend from the Pope but from their natural Prince and their affections towards their issue would make them agree to all things wrongful unto the Church that they should indeavour to render Livings Hereditarie And in a short time the Holy Seat should be Restraned in the onely City of Rome That before the Coeliba or Single Life had been decreed The Roman See drew no thing at all from other Towns and Countries but by it was become Master of such a great number of Benefits Of whom by the Marriage of Clergie men it should be deprived in a short time 3. This is true in regard of Divine Service in a Tongue unknown to the people FOr say the said Doctors from the use of the vulgar Tongue in the Celebration of Divine Service it should follow that every one should esteem themselves Divines That the Prelates Authoritie should be vilified and that Heresie should creep in All. Of a most considerable Contradiction of the Principal Doctors of the Church of Rome in regard of their Doctrine That the Kingdom of Heaven And Eternal Life is due as a Debt to our good works 1. VVE Reformed do Teach That he that sinneth hath deserved death worthily in respect of the sin committed which is a Transgression of Gods will and Commandement And for which without Remission there is no hope to Escape eternal Condemnation 2. But can he that worketh well for one or two or for more good Works claim unto himself as a due Debt the Kingdome of Heaven for the same 3. The Reformed Doctors do deny it for many strong Reasons 4. The Popish Doctors in the Schooles and in handling Controversies of Religion that are between the Reformed and the Church of Rome do openly affirm it maintaining that the Kingdome of Heaven and Eternal Life is due as a due Debt to our good works 5. 1. But howsoever it is now for a Fashion with great Countenance and vehement Disputation avouched by some Doctors of the Roman Church that we merit Heaven by our good works 2. Yet we are perswaded that no Adversary of Conscience can otherwise think or dare in peril of Death otherwise say but that he hath deserved for
Baruch v. 11. So are the Papists Images with the fume of the incense they burn to them 5. The Heathen spake to their Idols as if they were able to understand them Baruch v. 41. So do the Papists to the wood of the Cross saying Ave lignum spes unica 6. The Heathenish Priests beards and heads were shaven Baruch v. 31. And so are our Popish Priests Crownes 7. The Heathens about the Calends of February visited all their Temples with Lights A like Ceremony the Papists use at Candlemasse 8. The Heathen commended every City and Village to the protection of some god or goddesse Juno was Lady Guardian of Carthage Venus of Cyprus Diana of Ephesus Pallas of Athens c. And have not our Papists likewise multiplyed their Saints according to the number of their Cities And do they not share the Patronages of them between them Doth not Venice fall to S. Marks Lot Paris to S. Genouiefs Spain to S. James France to S. Dennis Scotland to Andrews Ireland to S. Patricks England to S. Georges 9. The Heathen assigned several offices to several Gods Calling upon Ceres for Corn Upon Bacchus for Wine Upon Aesculapius for Health Upon Mercury for Wealth Upon Apollo for Wisdome c. In like manner the Papists address themselves to particular Saints upon particular and special occasions To St. Genovief for Rain To St. Marceau for fair weather To St. Michael in Battle To St. Nicholas in a Sea Tempest To St. Eustace in Hunting To St. Roch and Sebastian for remedies against the Plague To St. Raphael against Catarrhs To St. Apollonia against the Tooth-ache To St. Anthony against Inflammations To St. Margaret for safe Delivery in Child-birth And to other Saints upon other occasions as if God had granted a kind of monopolie to the several Commodities of this Life to several Saints 10. Will you have yet more Hercules hath left his Club to St. Christopher Janus hath resigned up his Keyes to St. Peter Lucina hath resigned her Office of Midwife to St. Margaret The Muses have resigned their instruments of Musick to Cecilia And Jupiter Hamun hath resigned his Horns to Moses Concerning worshipping of Saints departed thereupon the Church of Rome doth commit a great Idolatry 1. VEneration and honour of Saints departed the Protestant Churches do maintain and practice 1. We worthily esteem of their persons and recognize their excellency and glory 2. We give them honour by commemoration and by imitation of their faith and vertues 3. When they depart this life we afford their bodies a decent Burial Psalm 112. v. 6. Jos 1. v. 2. Prov. 10. v. 7. John 8. v. 39. James 5. v. 10. Acts 8. v. 2. 4. And some of our learned Adversaries seem to require no other Veneration of Saints but this Peres de Tradit p. 3. 2. But the Jesuits maintain the adoration of Saints departed with sacred and Religious worship 1. Erecting Altars 2. Building Temples 3. Placing their Images in Churches to be adored 4. Inclosing their relicks in Caskets and proposing them to be worshipped 5. Offering up Masses in the honour of them 6. And worshipping them by Church service and by Canonical hours 3. And they teach that the adoration belonging to them is after a sort divine approaching so near to divine worship as that it is exercised by the same materials and sacred rites 4. We acknowledge then on both parts that Saints are to be honoured We differ in the manner To wit whether they be to be honoured with adoration or such a kind of worship as is in a manner divine or with sacred rites appertaining to Gods religion and above rehearsed 5. St. Hierom is so far from the practise hereof that he affirmeth we do not worship and adore the relicks of Saints nor the Sun Moon Archangels or any other name spoken of in this World or in the next but we honour the relicks of Martyrs and adore him whose Martyrs they be And against Vigilantius who at any time adored Martyrs 6. And with him consent the faithful Christians of the Primitive Church who being traduced of superstition for adoring Martyrs deceased affirm that they adored Christ Jesus onely and exhibited no more to martyrs but the honour of love Euseb Histor Eccles lib. 4. cap. 15. 7. Some of our Adversaries would patronise the Popish superstition of worshipping of Saints departed with the sentence of Hierom saying That he honoureth Paula deceased Cultoris tui that is to say that worshippeth thee But to them we answer That every honour and worship is not such as Papists require and therefore to reason from honour in general to a certain kind thereof is to mock the Readers Fraud This is a great Fraud and Imposture of the Church of Rome that the members of it do not onely worship Saints against the word of God but besides worship Imaginary Saints which never were in the World AS one St. Longis who pierced as it is said our Saviours side As one St. Martial St. Peters Cozen who as it is said did serve at the Table when Jesus Christ did administer the holy Sacrament And also that he had in the time of the Gotes driven Paganism out of the Gaules when there were no Gotes in the Gauls As likewise one Saint Vrsula which is said to have been daughter of a King of England Captain of an Army of twelve thousand Virgins when there was no King in England Item one St. Katherine which is said to have been the daughter of Castor King of Alexandria And in the time of the Emperour Maxentius to have converted the Queen Faustina and fifty Philosophers All the above-said Saints were here indeed in the World as easie it may be proved and whose life by Baronius confession in his Martyrologie is full of Fables Not one good ancient Author that hath lived five hundred years after the time in which these imaginary Saints are set up doth speak of these Saints and yet prayers are made unto them It is the same of St. Margarite of which it is said that the Devil did swallow her who also bursted by that which is a kind of Child-birth from whence is the custome to read her Legend to the women that are delivered The adoration of the Virgin Mary is unlawful Thereupon the Church of Rome doth commit a great Idolatry 1. WE say with Epiphanius Let Mary have honour and let the Lord our God be adored 2. But the Papists instead of honour exhibite errour to the blessed Virgin as the same Father speaketh and their manner of worshipping her according to the said Father is Heresie and dotage 3. For some part of that worship which Papists give to the Virgin Mary are the actions of Divine adoration Namely Invocation Rom. 10. v. 14. Vows Psalm 50. v. 14. Oaths Deut. 6. v. 13. And yet Tursellin the Jesuit commendeth Paul an Hermit and saith He adored God and his mother 4. Epiphanius had another Belief for by many of his Speeches he condemneth
in general all Religious Adorations of the Virgin Mary Epiphan Haeref 72. in fine v. 79. Although saith he she is glorious holy and honourable yet she is not appointed to be Adored Again the Lord in the Gospel speaketh to the Virgin his Mother What have I to do with thee woman In which Speech to the end that none should think her over excellent he calleth her woman Prophesying as it were aforehand of the Heresies which should arise And premonishing that none in admiration of her Sanctity should fall into this Heresie of Adoration 5. Of which doting Heresie of Adoration of the Virgin the Papists are guilty in a high degree For in the Countries subject to the See of Rome all men and women wheresoever they are in the City or in the Field thrice a day when the Ave Mary Bell rings send up their united devotious to her and where one professeth himself a devote to our Saviour whole Towns devote themselves to her where one prayeth at a Crucifix ten pray at her Image where one fasteth on Friday which they account our Lords day Many fast on Saturday which they count our Ladaies day To conclude they conclude all their prayers with an Ave Maria As we do with our Lords Prayer and most of their Treatises with Laus Deiparae Virgini Praise be to the Virgin Mother of God And in the Psalter called Bonaventures they have Intituled all the 150. Psalms of David to her and where he saith Lord they put Lady Touching Adoration of Relicks It is Idolatry the Church of Rome is very much guilty thereof What office is to be rendred to the Bodies of those that are deceased by those that are alive It is not to worship them but to bury them 1. THis the Protestants reproves concerning Relicks of Saints 1. Such Adoration of Relicks as S. Hierome himself and S. Augustine condemned 2. The attributing of Supernatural Effects to Monuments and Relicks which they have not by any ordinance of God 3. To place confidence and merit in these things without any divine authority and to cause people to gad and wander to this or that place that they may receive benefit by them 4. We most of all condemn the Impostures and covetousnesse of the Romanists who in stead of true Reliks brought in counterfeits The Lance is found wherewith Christs side was pierced A Brazen Serpent made of the same Brass which Moses his Serpent was at Milan in S. Ambrose his Church Tunica Inconsutilis Domini nostri c. 5. And consequently for filthy lucre bartered and made Portsale of these Relicks abusing herein the Ignorance and Superstition of fond people 2. And on the side the said Protestants declare That the office which is to be rendred to the Bodies of Saints Deceased by those that are alive is not to Worship them but to bury them In that regard Eusebius writeth thus concerning Polycarp After we had gathered his Bones being more precious than Pearls and Gold we buried them where it was fit Of Miracles wrought by Dead Bones and Carcasses of Saints 1. WHen it pleaseth the Lord to shew his Power and to work Miracles in any place or by any means as seemeth Good unto himself we admire his power and praise his goodness 2. And we are not Ignorant how God hath used dead bones as an Instrument of Life 2 King 13. v. 21. 3. And concerning these things Bishop Jewel hath written in this manner Reply Art 1. p. 39. Almighty God for the Testimony of his Doctrine and Truth hath oftentimes wrought great Miracles even by the dead carkasses of his Saints In witness that they had been his Messengers and the Instruments of his Will But as they were godly Inducements at the first to lead people unto the Truth So afterwards they became snares to lead the same People into Errors We Protestants must not frequent Exercises of Popish Worship nor assist to the Mass 1. WE cannot be present there but either we must give great offence or commit a Greater 2. Give great offence if we do not as the Papists do and joyn not with them in Censing Images bowing before them offering unto them and kissing In calling upon Saints and praying for the releasing of Souls out of Purgatory 3. Or commit a greater if we joyn with them in their superstitious Rites and Idolatries In so doing we give greater offence to the Church of God And not onely receive a mark from the Beast but a grievous Wound 4. Constantine the Emperour thought himself defiled if he had but seen an Heathenish Altar Ambros Epist. 31. David if he had but made mention of an Idol Psal 16. v. 4. Their Offerings of Blood I will not offer nor take their names into my mouth 5. The Corinthians might not be partakers of such meats as were offered to Idols May we be partakers of such Prayers as are offered unto them It was unlawful for them to sit at the same Table with Idolaters when they kept their Solemn Feasts Can it be lawful for us to stand at the same Altar with them 6. Let us think again and again upon those fearful menaces Apoc. 14. v. 9. If any man worship the Beast and his Image and receive the mark in his forehead or in his hand the same shall drink of the Wine of the Wrath of God and he shall be tormented in fire and brimstone before the holy Angels and before the Lamb And the smoake of their torments shall ascend for ever And they shall have no rest day nor night which worship the Beast and his Image and whosoever receiveth the Print of his Name 7. We have not received any print of the Beast we are free from the least suspition of Familiarity with the Whore of Babylon we have kept our selves unspotted of Popery Therefore as we tender not onely our Honour and Reputation but chiefly the salvation of our Bodies and Souls let us keep our selves still from Idols Let us be zealous for Gods honour and he will be zealous for our safety Let us abstain from all appearance of that evil which the Spirit of God ranketh with Sorcery and Witchcraft As the Church of Rome became corrupted by Degrees in Regard of the Doctrine of Faith since the Apostles Times So did she in regard of Manners 1. This is True in regard of the Pope her Head 1. THe Common Opinion which Men did conceive of the Time in which Gregory the Great lived was that Gregory the Great was the last good and the first ill Bishop of Rome 2. He was no better then should be 3. And all the other Bishops that succeeded him were stark nought Every one striving to goe beyond his Predecessor in all leudnesse 4. So that now a Sink of all wickednesse hath hath violently burst into the Church 2. This is true in respect of the Popish Clergy and in respect of other Members of the said Roman Church 1. A Sink of all wickednesse doth now
possesse all the Parts of the Roman Church 2. The Adversaries do force us Reformed to open the Sores of their Church which we had rather not touch But they are so unreasonable that they neither spared us nor themselves 1. Bernard who was the onely Religious Man the Church of Rome had for many years How often and how grievously doth he bewaile the most desperate Estate of the Roman Church In Cant. Serm. 33. De Conversione Pauli Thus he writeth A shameful Contagion spreadeth spreadeth over the Body of the wicked Church The Servants of Christ serve Antichrist from the Sole of the Foot to the Crown of the Head nothing is sound With these and the like Speeches used Bernard to bewaile and complain of the Intolerable wickednesse of the Church of Rome which he would never have done without sufficient Reason moving thereunto 2. Aeneas Sylvius afterward Pope writeth that Charitie was waxed cold and Faith utterly gone And what manner of Church shall we judge this to have been when she had lost both Faith and Charity 3. What shall we further Recite Petrarch Mantuan and other Poets both Learned and Famous which feared not with Satyrical Verses to Inveigh against the Pope and against the Cardinals and against the whole Clergy 4. All things were then so out of order that all sins might without controlement both be practised and openly blamed 3. This is true in regard of the Popes Court. ST Bernard doth not fear to describe it Ad Eugenium Papam Lib. 4. In these words amongst these You Eugenius being their Pastor walk decked with much Pretious Apparel If I durst speak it These are rather Pastors for Devils then for Christs sheep Your Court usually receiveth good Men but maketh few good there the wicked are not made better but the good far worse A number of such places could we alledge out of him Of the great and scandalous Incontinency of the Roman Clergie by reason of their Single Life 1. THere was never generally or in regard of the greater number any true Chastity in the Popish Clergy And ever since the Law of Single Life was obtruded Whoredome and Baudery so shamefully distained them that they became a by word to the Christian world 2. Bernard complaineth in this sort If according to Ezekiel his Prophesie we dig through the wall we shall find in the house of God an horrible abomination For after and besides fornication Adultery and Incest the very passions of Ignominy and works of filthiness Rom. 1.27 are not wanting for which the Cities of Sodom and Gomorrha the very nurses of filthinesse were predamned Some of the Priests of the Church are besprinkled with the lothesome and mattery filth of this uncleannesse and abstaining from the remedy of Wedlock they brake out into all flagitious wickednesse 3. Aventine in the Story of Pope Gregory the 7. the Author of this compelled Eunuchisme speaketh in this manner And thou O vigilant Gregory what wouldest thou have done if fortune had reserved thee until our daies In which to dally with women to whore to drink to ravish and deflowre Virgins to adulterate Wives is become the principal study of Priests In so much that Cauda salax Sacrificulorum in proverbium abiit 4. Whereas the Papists in specious words rejected Wedlock in their Clergie yet indeed they did practise and admit it For although their Bishops and Priests kept no Women under the Title of Wives yet they generally maintained Lemans and Concubines which were an inferiour kinde of Wives 5. The Gloss upon the Legate Otho contains these words If a Priest keep his Concubine privately within his own or his friends house he incurreth not the penalty of this Constitution Peter Ravennas and Michael Lochmaine living about the Year 1490. report That many Clerks in their dayes kept Concubines as their Wives and brought up Children And Clemanger The Priests being at a Fee with the Prelates do commonly and openly keep their Concubines 6. That which we have said of Bishops and Priests is also true in regard of the Popes For Onuphrius saith in the Life of Pope Alexander the VI. That if this Pope at any time were not oppressed with business he devoted himself to all sorts of pleasure without respect Being especially addicted to Women of which he begate four Sons and Daughters The chief of his Lemmans was Vannocia a Roman which by reason of her Beauty and amorous Dalliance and marvellous fruitfulness in his meaner Fortunes he detained in a manner as a lawful Wife Pope Hildebrand the Father of the General Decree of single Life in the Clergie was reported to have lulled night and day without any shame in the Armes and Embracings of the great Countess Maud. And that she being surprized with the stolne Dalliance of this Pope regarded not second Marriage after the death of her first Husband Read Antonine reporting the like of Pope Clement the fift Nay Pope Leo the tenth was defamed for Sodomitical filthiness with his Pages and Chamberlains saith Joacus a Romish Bishop In what Regard the Names of Catholiques is given to the Members of the Church of Rome by some of the Reformed 1. THe Papists ought not to Triumph much for the Name of Catholiques which is given them by some of the Reformed 2. For their Meaning is to give it them no otherwise then usually the Name of Man is given to one Deadly sick or in whose Body there is nothing but skin and bone 3. He is a Catholique not who followeth the Popish Apostasie but that professeth the Doctrine of Christ God from Time to Time hath raised Godly Men that have cryed against the Errors of the Roman Religion and Church and have Discovered them 1. COncerning the Errors and Idolatries of the Roman Church when they Established themselves and chiefly when Endeavour was made to make them pass in Form of Law and to oblige to the reception of them as of Articles of Faith God did raise many godly Men who couragiously did oppose themselves to that 2. Thereupon let the Catalogue of the witness of Truth composed by Flaccus Illyricus be read and the Mysterie of Iniquity or the History of Papacy written by the most Famous and Learned Philip de Mornay 3 And not onely from among those who openly have shaken off the Popes Yoke but moreover even among those that are remaining in his Outward Communion God hath given the Grace to Acknowledge and to some of them even to Deplore and Detest publiquely great Number of Abuses and Corruptions that are in the Church of Rome Concerning the Greek Churches 1. 1. THe Greek Church could never yet be brought to joyn it self to the Church of Rome and it is as opposite to Her as ever the Reformed Church was Exception of the Jesuites 1. THis is very false say the Jesuites for in the Florentine Council the Emperour Paleolus together with the Grecians and Armenians freely acknowledged the Pope to be the Vicar of Christ and embraced the
Roman Faith 2. Yea and at this day they dissent from us in few things as Jeremy the Patriarch of Constantinople hath plainly written Answer of the Reformed to that Exception THe Reformed do answer to this Exception 1. That if that be true why are they then of the Papists accounted Schismaticks Or why do they not Obey the Pope Why came they not to the Council of Trent The Pope by all means hath sought to have them subject to Him but they still contemn him to his no small grief 2. It is true the Emperour the Patriarch and a multitude of Bishops came to the Florentine Council they agreed with them in many Things in others they dissented the Popish Transubstantiation they utterly renounced 3. At that time Josephus their Patriarch suddenly died Eugenius the Pope instantly urged a new Election they denied to make any till they came to Constantinople 4. Do not the Papists see how well they agree We have a Book of Cyril Patriarch of Constantinople in which is set down the Confession of their present Faith whereby it appeareth manifestly that they are farre nearer to the Reformed Churches in Beleif then they are to the Roman 1. The Turks are beholding to none more then to the Pope for their Possession of Greece and the Eastern Empire which hath caused the Miserable Slavery of the Greek Churches 1. IF As our Saviour Christ saith A Kingdome divided against it self cannot stand then the breaking of the strength of the Empire and weakning the power of the Christians and consequently strengthning the Turks must all be inputed to him which did rent and divide the Roman Christian Empires and of one Empire made two 2. As long as the Province and Dominions of the Empire were united We were strong enough against the Turks 3. But After Pope Leo the 10. divided the Empire the Empire of Constantinople which before had much adoe to resist the Turk was now no longer able to sustain the Burthen wanting the greatest part of the Empire 2. O Christian Princes and States unite your selves and consequently join your Forces together to pluck off from that Infidell the Turk the Empire of Greece and to join it with that of the West that so both as in Times past make but one Empire THESIS Of the Reformation of the Church in general 1. WHen the Church is infected with Errors in the Doctrine or loaded with unlawful Ceremonies or Governed by an evil Ecclesiastical Policie the Reformation thereof is not permitted to the People without the consent of the Prince and Soveraign Magistrate 2. But such a Reformation is to be made by the Prince and Soveraign as being a Right which belongeth unto him and which belongeth unto him by Divine and Humane Right 3. Neither also is it lawful to a Minister of a particular Church to change at his will the Ceremonies of his Church but if they are not to be tolerated he must with his Church make his Addresses to the Supream Magistrate to obtain from him the necessary Reformation of the same 4. The Prince being to imploy himself about the Reformation of the Church when she hath need of a Reformation ought to that effect to consult the Divines of his Countrey the most Learned the most Prudent and the most Godly and to convoke a National Synod composed of such Men. 5. It will be well done also by him to join unto his own Divines the Divines of other Reformed Churches that by that Means greater weight may be given to the Reformation which he will effect 6. The Divines assembled must carefully seek out the Truth and when they have found it the Prince ought to ordain and injoin the observation thereof 7. The said National Synod or Assembly of Divines ought to extend the Reformation of the Church to four Heads namely 1. To the Doctrine concerning Faith 2. To the Divine Worship and Service 3. To Ceremonies and outward things 4. To the Ecclesiastical Policy and Government of the Church 8. And in regard of the abovesaid four Heads the said Synod or Assembly of Divines ought to Reform the Church according to the best Form of all 9. Now a better Form of the Church cannot be conceived nor found than that according to which Jesus Christ by himself and by his Apostles did in the beginning establish and confirm the Church 10. Which hath been the Form of the Church in the Times of Christ and of his Apostles we learn it clearly out of the Books of the Evangelists and of the Acts of the Apostles and probably out of the Writings of the Doctors of the Church who lived immediately after the death of the Apostles 11. According to this Form the Church ought to be Reformed in regard of the above named four Heads bringing them back to the first beginning and to the first Springs Thas is to say to the first Antiquity 12 If it happens that between some National Reformed Churches there be a difference in regard of Ceremonies and outward things agreeing well together in regard of the Doctrine for such a difference in Ceremonies the said Churches must not be enemies one to the others But they ought to bear one another Charitably and profitably Of the 1. Reformators Luther Calvin c. What Esteem the Protestants make of the last Reformers Luther Calvin and their Associates And how far it doth extend 1. THe Protestants especially we of the Church of England acknowledge not any factious names of Lutherans Zwinglians or Calvinists with which we are injuriously nick-named by our Adversaries As of old good Orthodox Christians were called Cornelians and Cyrillians by the seditious followers of Novatus and Nestorius Phot. Cod. 280. in Excerptis Eulogii ad finem Libri Act. Conciliab Ephes in Epist Legat. Schism ad sues in Epheso pag. 281. Edit Bin. 1618. 2. With Pacianus we professe Christian is our Name and Catholick our Sur-name 3. We esteem of Luther Zwinglius and Calvin as worthy men but we esteem them not worthy to be Lords or Authours of our Faith or to lead our understanding captive both themselves were far from affecting such Divine Honour and we far from bestowing it We remember who said of Christ Hear him not hear them 4. And therefore though these mens reasons may gain our Assent their Testimony is at the best but probable we believe not what they say but what the prove 5. Much lesse can we endure being once baptized in the name of Christ to be marked with the name of any man as with a note of our servitude We disclaim the name of Calvinists we owe no service we have no dependance upon Calvin nor upon any other man as Doctor or Master of our Faith 6. We owe him and the rest of the first Reformers many thanks for their painful labours which shall remain of honourable account in all posterity We cannot bless God sufficiently for such Instruments of his glory Yet we do not Idolize their persons or adore
their Dictates and Opinions as if they were Divine Oracles That Doctor who hath the command of our Conscience hath his Chair in Heaven we love and honour such persons as our Friends yet so that we honour Truth and love it above all Friendship Which Churches and Assemblies we comprehend Properly under the Appellation of Reformed Churches 1. THey are the Churches which are entirely Reformed of which by Gods Grace we are Members 2. That is to say those Churches who having the true Marks of the Church have them also with all the Purity which is required in regard of the Doctrine of Faith and in regard of the Worship of God 1. 1. The Socinians 2. The Anabaptists Are not comprehended by the Protestants under the Appellation of Reformed and True Churches Because in their Assemblies the very Notes of the True Church do not appear 1. FOr we do not comprehend under that Appellation those Assemblies who having forsaken Idolatry Superstitions and some Errors of the Roman Church are fallen into others very great and most pernicious Such are the Assemblies of the Socinians or the New Samosatenians And such also are the Assemblies of the Anabaptists In which Assemblies the very Notes and Marks of the true Church do not appear The Reformed Religion is True and Orthodox 1. 1. THe Reformed Churches Faith is found That appears in their Belief of God the Father Of his onely Son Jesus Christ Of the Holy Ghost Of the Church Of the Sacraments Of the Ministery Of the Scriptures Of Ceremonies And of every part of Christian Belief 2. They abandon and detest as plagues and poysons all those old Heresies which either the Sacred Scriptures or the Ancient Councils have utterly condemned 3. They call home again as much as in them lieth the right Discipline of the Church which our Adversaries have quite brought into a poor and weak case 4. They punish all licentiousness of Life and unruliness of Manners by the Old and long continued Laws And with as much sharpness as is convenient and lieth in their power They maintain still the state of Kingdomes in the same Condition and State of Honour wherein they have found them without any diminution or alteration Reserving unto their Princes their Majesty and Worldly Preheminence safe and without impairing to their possible power 6. They have so gotten themselves away from that Popish Church which the Popes had made a Den of Thieves and wherein nothing was in good frame or like to the Church of God as Lot in times past gat him out of Sodome or Abraham out of Chalde Not upon a desire of Contention but by the warning of God himself 7. They have searched out of the holy Bible which they are sure cannot deceive them their sure Form of Religion and have returned again unto the Primitive Church of the Apostles and of the Ancient Fathers that is to say to the ground and beginning of things unto the very foundations and head-springs of Christs Church The Reformed Churches are the same in kinde with all the good Churches which were before them 1. THe Reformed Churches are the same with all Good Churches that had been in the World before them and do succeed the found and firm Members of the General Visible Church in whom was the Life of true Religion in the substantial matter of Faith and Godliness 2. But they having shaken off their former Errors they differ from them in manner and quality As a man who was deceived in sundry things when he becomes wiser differs from himself as he was Ignorant 3. And as a sick body when it is healed and a Commonwealth after it hath reformed disorders are in substance the same but differ in in Quality and in Goodness so the Protestant Churches have purged sundry corruptions and perfected that which was defective But are the same in kinde with all the good Churches and Christians that were before them And succeeds them of the General Visible Church in whom was the Life of Faith and of Religion Concerning the Antiquity of the Reformed Religion Jesuites THe Jesuites say That the Reformed for fifteen hundred Years could not spy out one Town one Village one House seasoned with the Doctrine that they follow Now. Answer of the Reformed 1. THe Reformed do answer That such an Accusation is very false for in the Apostles time all Churches all Cities and Towns every Family embraced the same Faith and Religion which now they profess 2. Antichrist that Man of Sin could never prevail so much nor so far in corrupting the Christian Religion and Church but a great multitude of the Saints remained and those whose Names were written in the Book of Life did utterly abhor all those filthy and wicked Superstitions of Antichrist For in the Church of Rome it self even in the worst times of it many were ever found who worshipped the God of their Fathers and kept themselves unpolluted with that horrible Idolatry And this can Histories of all Times witness which we could now Recite Vide Catalog Testium veritatis if it were needful and reckon up to the Jesuites many Houses Villages Towns Cities and Countries where Christ had many and populous Churches 3. We add That the Greek Church could never yet be brought to joyn it self to the Roman Church and it is now as opposite to Her as ever the Reformed was and is 4. Furthermore we answer to this Question of the Jesuites Where was your Church for so many years before Luther That it did never lie so hid but it was discerned by their Pope unless for so many years he persecuted shaddows § Another Answer of the Reformed to the Question of the Jesuites Where was the Reformed Religion before the Reformation made by Luther and other Divines 1. THey answer That the Apostles and the Primitive Church for almost six hundred years after Christ taught as they do 2. They answer That ever since that time there have been some that have contended for the maintenance of the Faith which they profess For Example 1. In matter of Supremacy they taught as the Reformed do till after Gregories time which was six hundred years after Christ yea Gregory himself writing against them of Constantinople held this Language If any shall call himself Vniversal Bishop I say it confidently that he is Antichrist 3. In matter of the Sacrament for a thousand years together that the People received the Wine as vvell as the Bread Aquinas cannot deny 3. In the point of Images at first the Church admitted no Images at all as Erasmus and Gregory sheweth yea Polydore Virgil confesseth That the Fathers condemned Images for fear of Idolatry and this continued till the second Nicene Council But now of late the Trent Council and Bellarmine have given unto them Divine honour 4. Bristow a Popish Doctor confesseth this The Truth is saith he that some have been in all Ages of the Protestants Opinion 5. And Illiricus Flaccus doth remember one Reynerius who
discoursing of the Waldenses a People for substance of the Protestants Religion saith in these termes They are in all the Cities of Lombardy and of Provence No Sect hath continued so long Some say it hath been since Pope Sylvesters time Some since the Apostles These Waldenses believe all Articles concerning God but they hate the Church of Rome 3. So that the Reformed have had a Church and their Religion before Luther A Refutation of this shift of the Jesuites That because Luther was in Error in Regard of his doctrine of Consubstantiation Therefore his Refutations of their Opinions and Doctrines is not to be considerable 1. THis is a strange shift indeed for is it not a miserable perverseness in the Jesuites and others Popish Doctors and Writers that being not able to maintain their own Heresies against Luther they will think to escape in the Judgement of Men from being condemned because Luther himself in one point of Doctrine erred 2. May no man convince Error but such an one as is free from Error at all Himself 3. The Scriptures are left unto us to be our Rule of Truth by them must all Doctrine be squared and directed they sit in the highest Seat of Judgement to give Sentence in every Cause 4. With Them did Luther cut down the Popish Errors 5. But one Error of Luther cannot serve to excuse infinite Errors in the Popish Church The Reformed of England France Holland c. do not Believe whatsoever the late Writers have said 1. VVE are not so addicted in these Reformed Churches as to Believe whatsoever the late Writers have said 2. We are no more partial unto them in this behalf then we are unto the Ancient Fathers 3. Our Religion and Faith hangeth not upon the sayings of Men be they old or young but onely upon the Canonical Scriptures of God 4. And if they be against us so long as Scripture is for us our Cause is good and we will not be ashamed thereof 5. From hence it followeth That therefore most false is it that the Papists say That our Divity resteth upon these late Writers and young Fathers whom the Jesuites and other Popish Doctors do so scornfully compare with the Old Fathers 6. We use not to alledge for proofs authentical of any Doctrine and as the Rule of our Faith Calvin Bucer or others 7. But our Traditive and Use is this Thus saith the Lord Thus say the Prophets Thus say the Apostles Thus the Evangelists Thus it is written in the Scriptures Thus we read in some Book of the Old or of the New Testament Again If Luther or any other Learned Man among the Protestants or of the Reformed in the Churches above mentioned have either Interpreted the Scripture in somthing amiss or have doubted of some one Book of Scripture whereof doubt also hath been made of old in the Church of Christ we are not to defend their Expositions or to approve their Judgement Again The particular Opinions of Luther and Lutherans are not to be objected by the Papists against the Reformation of England France the United Provinces c. 1. FOr these Reformed Churches are not bound to justifie all Luthers sayings and the Lutherans and their private Opinions no more then the Papists will be content to avouch whatsoever hath been spoken or published by any one or other famous man of their Sect. 2. Which thing if they will take upon them to perform then let them profess it or else they offer us the more injury that object still against us a saying which was never either uttered or allowed by us 3. This might suffice men of indifferent Reason § Of Luthers Error concerning the Bodily Presence in the Sacrament LVther retained this Error of his old leaven wherewith in time of Papistry his Judgement was corrupted § Another Answer of the Reformed to the Objection made by the Jesuites against Luther in regard of his Error of Consubstantiation That therefore his Refutation of their Doctrine is not to be considerable THe Reformed again return this answer to that Objection 1. That although Luther therein somthing swarved from the Truth yet that he might bring in other Causes assured thereof out of the Word of God reject the Opinions of such as dissent from the same word 2. Otherwise no Man in Defence of Gods Truth may challenge or bid Defiance to the Adversaries thereof seeing they have no Priviledge or Charter granted to them but that themselves also may be deceived § Again Concerning Luther 1. LVther say the Reformed was an excellent Man and a worthy servant of Christ 2. Whose Ministery especially it pleased God to use in revealing to these Times the Son of Perdition who fitteth in the Temple of God and advanceth himself above God 3. Yet Luther was a Man 4. And therefore no marvel if he were not exempted altogether as from Ignorance so also from Infirmities § Concerning the Contention between Luther and Zuinglius about the Sacrament of the Lords Supper 1. 1. THis Contention and Dissention was a very hard one hotly debated in many Books 2. And the same hath continued since to the great hinderance of the Gospel and offence of many 3. In which contrary Writings and Discourses are found oftentimes harder speeches of either against other then were to be wished 4. Now do come in the Popish Writers like crafty enemies and gathering a heap of such speeches out of sundry of their Books do insert the same in their Books to make their Readers acquainted therewith that seeing such earnest contention among the chiefest Professors of the Gospel they may be further withdrawn in alienation of mind from the love and liking thereof 2. Examination of that matter 1. THose speeches of either against other which are harder oftentimes then were to be wished are yet such as the godly Servants of the Lord in contention about the Truth somtimes are moved to utter against their Brethren 1. S. Paul openly and sharply reprehended S. Peter to his face whereat wicked Porphyrie catched a like occasion to rail at Christian Religion long since as our Adversaries do at these dayes 2. What a violent and troublesome contention was there between Theophilus of Alexandria and good Chrysostome of Constantinople 3. Who knoweth not how sharply Cyrillus a learned and wise Bishop of Alexandria hath written against Theodoretus a good and Catholick Bishop in a Controversie touching the Catholique Faith both Bishops both Catholiques both Learned both Godly both Excellent Pillars of the Church And yet he that readeth both their Writings would think that both were dangerous Enemies of the Church and of the Faith of Christ and to be avoided of all Christians 2. So in the Books of Luther and of Zuinglius and of those that maintain either part appeareth we grant great sharpness and bitterness of Dissention who all notwithstanding if we set the heat of Dissention aside were as godly as learned as zealous Christians as the World had any The Reformed
Religion and Church are not Heretical 1. WHat if the Romish Church condemned Luther Shall we say therefore that Luther is an Heretick 2. The Church of Jerusalem condemned Christ and Him and his they would have denyed to be the true Church but for all their Denial it was not less the true Church 3. The Accusation of being Heretical nothing touches our Reformed Religion and Church For by Gods Grace we are far from all kinde of Heresie and hold no other Doctrine then that which the Prophets and the Apostles and Jesus Christ himself have taught us and which is plainly contained in the Books of Canonical Scripture § The Jesuites maintain the contrary but by a False Ground which is one of their great slights Jesuites 1. THe Doctrine of the Jesuites is That for not to be an Heretick one must have Communion with the Church of Rome and acknowledge the Pope to be Vicar of Christ and Successor of S. Peter in the Quality of Head and Monarch of the Church which Church of Rome they presuppose to be the Catholique Church Answer of the Reformed 1. THe Reformed do answer to that Doctrine of the Jesuites That it must first appear that the Now Church of Rome is the Catholique Church before he that is separated from his Communion can be justly convicted of Heresie which is also to be said concerning the Pope It must appear that he is S. Peters Successor and the Head and Monarch of the Church 2. Which the Jesuites shall never be able to do and yet never have done for since the time that the Ancient Fathers of the Church did call the Church of Rome Catholick Church the course of that Church is turned and the See of Rome hath declined and degenerated from her sincere Faith to detestable falshood 3. Let the Jesuites restore unto us the old Church of Rome and we will never separate our selves from her Communion 4. But of that Church they have nothing left but the Walls and old Rubbish 5. And yet still they brag of the Name of the Catholique Church Exception of the Jesuites SO indeed Calvin answereth say the Jesuites But it shall not serve the Reformeds turn for Optatus say they proveth himself to be in the Catholique Church because he joyned himself to S. Peters Chair Answer of the Reformed to that Exception ANd what do the Jesuites call S. Peters Chair 1. Is it the external Seat or the Succession of the Bishops They shall never prove it 2. And the contrary say the Reformed we can easily object out of Optatus himself Optatus calleth Syricus Bishop of Rome his Fellow and the companion of other Bishops who held a sound and Catholique Judgement with all those Syricus agreed in one Society and Fellowship By their Letters sent one to another as Witnesses of their consenting in Doctrine and lawful Ordination Optatus then proveth that he was a Catholique because he kept the Catholique confession and conjunction with Syricius and with others Bishops 2. Secondly the Reformed do answer that Optatus Argument was good against the Donatists who did separate themselves from the Communion of the Catholique Church while they consented not with these Churches where the Doctrine of the Apostles and a lawful Ordination of Bishops did ever flourish 3. But that is nothing to us Reformed and specially to the Reformed of the Church of England It is not a sound Argument to convince the Reformed of Schisme because they have separated themselves from the Church of Rome The Jesuites do maintain the contrary 1. ANd in that regard thinking to touch the Reformed who have separated themselves from the Church of Rome they produce the Authority of Optatus who did reprove the Separation of the Donatists and did argue them to be Schismatical because they had separated from the communion of the Catholique Church Answer to the Jesuites and Refutation of their Argument 1. A Very good Argument indeed and Augustine observed the same course and it was a good Argument That the communion of the Church should be objected to the Schismatical Donatists which seditiously without cause separated themselves from the Church 2. But this Argument employed by Optatus against the Donatists makes nothing against the Reformed who have separated Themselves from the Church of Rome For the said Reformed deny the Church of Rome to be the Catholique Church 3. And therefore the Jesuites cannot by this Argument of Optatus convince us of Schisme although Optatus might thereby confute the Donatists 4. It must first appear that the Church of Rome be the Catholique Church otherwise the Reformed cannot be convicted of Schisme 5. In the time of Optatus the Church of Rome was the Preserver of Religion the Maintainer of the True Faith and she shined like a Star in the sight of all other Churches 6. No marvel then if the most holy Fathers esteemed much and reverenced this Church and urged the Schismaticks with the example of it and also the Hereticks of their time as a great prejudice unto them 7. But since that time the course of that Church is turned and the See of Rome hath declined and degenerated from her sincere Faith to detestable Falshood 8. Let the Papists as we have said before restore us the old Church of Rome and we will never separate our selves from Her 9. But of that old Church of Rome they have nothing left but the Walls and old Rubbish 10. And yet they still brag of the Name of the Catholique Church Of the Differences in Religion between the Calvinists and the Lutherans 1. THe Jars and Dissentions between the Lutherans and Calvinists are neither many nor so material as to shake or touch the Foundation easily reconcileable if men of any moderation had them in handling 2. The bitter speeches of Luther none can excuse and much less the virulent Pamphlets and Proscriptions of some of his Disciples who in a preposterous imitation of his Zeal are little less then furious But the consequence of Opinions must not be measured by the Passions or Outrages of opiniate men Two Brothers in their choler may renounce each other and disclaim their amity yet that heat cannot dissolve their inward and essential Relation 3. The Divisions of the Lutherans and Calvinists namely of the moderate of either side are rather in formes and phrases of Speech then in substance of Doctrine 4. The first and main Controversie between them is that about Consubstantiation which after occasioned that other of Ubiquity 5. In both these Controversies the main Truth on both sides is out of Controversie That Christ is really and truly exhibited to each faithful Communicant and that in his whole person he is every where The doubt is only in the manner how he is in the Symboles and how in Heaven and Earth which being no part of Faith but a curious nicity inscrutable to the Wit of Man we should all here believe where we cannot understand and not fall a quarrelling about that which we cannot
conceive How or why are saucy Questions in Divine Mysteries Just Mart. in Expos Fid. 6. I omit the Questions of Predestination being no less debated in the Roman Schools then in the Reformed 7. Their other Differences in Ceremony or Discipline are diversities without Discord 8. All wise men in the World have ever thought that in such things each several Church is left to her own Judgement and Liberty so as she keep her self to the general Apostolique Rule of Order and Edification and to the general Judgement and Practise of the Church Universal See Tertull. de virg vetand cap. 1. Fermit apud Cyprian Epist 75. August Epist so Socrat. Hist lib. 5. cap. 21. c. 9. Though the Body of Religion in divers Reformed Churches and Countries be clothed in divers Suits and Fashions yet for substance it may be one in all In all these contestations as it commonly falls out blessed be God they that are for Truth have ever been for Charity and mutual Toleration as appears by their published Writings all tending to Pacification Vide Junii Parae scripta Irenica 10. Luther himself though of a rough and vehement Spirit yet before his death being tempered by milde Melanchton that honour of Germany did much relent and remit of his rigour against Zuinglius and began to approve the good Counsels of Peace Admonit Neustad de Libro Concord cap. 6. p. 236. And 11. Among the Lutherans all are not of the same intractable Disposition As they in Polonia for instance where the followers of Luther and Calvin have long lived together in a fair and brotherly concord and communion notwithstanding their several Opinions which they still retain vide Corpu Confess Et ibi Poloniae consensum 12. Since then our Discords are of no higher Degree we say as Prudentius a Christian Poet of the Unity of his Times It hath been a little violated but is defended by Faith her Sister in whose company being safely come off she laugheth at her wounds as being easily curable Fraud A Discovery and Refutation of a New Way and Subtle Cunnings of a Seminary Priest of Rhemes against the Reformed Religion 1. THis Way and Cunning is to bring continual Allegations of Testimonies out of the Reformed own Writers craftily brought in their Books to shew a dissention of Judgement among the said Reformed Writers that so the Readers of the Books of those Popish Writers may be Induced to think the worse of the Reformed Religion 2. A Refutation of this New Slight and Device THis Device is full of Fraud Dishonesty and Malice taking Advantage of Mens Infirmities and Imperfections against the Eternal Truth of God which the said Popish Doctors cannot by ordinary and lawful kind of Reasoning Refute Concerning the Acknowledgement of a Seminary Priest of Rhemes That three Articles of the Controversies which were propounded by Bishop Jewell in this Sermon at Paul 's Cross in which he made his Callange were and are of weight 1. The Supremacy of the Pope 2. The Corporal Presence 3. And the Sacrifice of the Mass Examination of this Acknowledgement of the Seminary Priest by the Reformed Doctors 1. 1. IN that acknowledgement the Seminary Priest hath uttered his Judgement of the rest of the Articles that are in Controversie that they are not of such weight as his Church would have them to be esteemed 2. And of these three Articles he might with as good Reason have excepted the two latter and so make the first only a matter of weight 3. For that Article indeed is the substantial Point in maintenance whereof all the Popish Writers Labours are bestowed otherwise were it not for defence of their Popes wicked unreasonable Antichristian Monarchy they could easily agree with us for these two and for all the rest we doubt not 2. But what did the Priest in his Acknowledgement think then 1. Of Private Mass Is it a thing of no weight as there he would have it accounted There is not we suppose any thing in the Rome Church more used or better liked 2. What he did think of the half Communion 3. What he did think of the Latine Service 4. What he did think of Images 5. What did he think of the keeping of the Scriptures in a Tongue unknown to the People 6. And what did he think of other such Heads of the Romish Religion 3. 1. Are they of no weight Are they Trifles Are they not worth the striving for 2. Then let the Popish Writers give over all defence of them 1. Let Private Masses be abolished 2. Let the Communion be administred in both kinds according to Christs institution 3. Let the publick prayers be said in the Tongue that every Countrey useth 4. Let Images be burned 5. And all Idolatry forbidden 6. Let it be lawful for the People of all Countries to read the Scripture in their own Language 7. Let there be no controversie about the other Articles 3. For while they stand so stifly in maintenance of all these and others They cannot truly say and bear us in hand That they are not of weight in their Account The Reformed Churches truly and properly so called are Pure and Orthodox Churches And their Faith is sound and not Hereticall as falsly they are termed by the Church of Rome 1. IT is that which must be acknowledged by some certain Notes and Marks For as we judge of Coine by the pair of Gold Weights and of Metals by the Touch-stone and of Glassen and Earthen Pots by the sound so ought we to judge of the Church by her Marks 2. The true Touch-stone of the Church is the Truth It is the Scripture It is the Word of God For the true Sheep of Christ are those who hear the voice who know him and follow him John 10.27 It is the Lords Camp who marcheth after this Pillar And the Apostles Church is builded upon the Foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Jesus Christ himself being the chief Corner-stone Ephes 2.20 We hear saith St. Augustine found Christ in the Scriptures let us also seek there the Church And if they have the Church on their side let them show it onely by the Canonical Books of the Divine Scriptures As to know whether a Line be strait a strait Rule is applied unto it Even also to discern a pure Church from an impure there is no other means than to see and observe whether it doth agree with the Rule of Practice which is the Word of God 3. Under which Word of God the pure Administration of the Sacraments of the Church is also to be comprehended Because the right use of them is prescribed in the Word of God 4. Now by this true and certain mark of the Church we prove that the truly Reformed Churches are pure and Orthodox Churches because from point to point they follow it The Articles of their Doctrine as the generous young Eagle do fixly behold the Sun and without at all feeling the Eye-lids 5. If it were true
as it is pretended by our Adversaries of the Church of Rome that the Religion of the said Churches should be false and that they were deceived then it should follow that Christ the Prophets and the Apostles should have deceived them Because they defend their Institutions and imbrace their Doctrine which to think onely were blasphemie and yet more to say it The Reformed Churches are not Schismatical For having separated from the Romish Church As falsly they are accused thereof by the said Roman Church 1. HAving sufficiently shewed that the truly Reformed Churches are not Heretical we must pass further And shew also that they are not Schismatical because they have separated themselves from the Roman Church 2. For that cause they are not Schismatick because they have had just causes of their Separation Which we demonstrate in this manner 3. For not to be Schismatick in making separation from the Communion of a Church that Church must be corrupted and impure And this corruption and Impurity must be in the Doctrine and not simply in the manners And the said Separation must be for a Doctrine contrary to the Word of God which over throweth the grounds of Salvation and annihilate the Faith And besides which Erroneous Doctrine be publickly authorized and maintained by armes and the fire 4. When that doth meet and happen in a Church and that there are other Churches that God hath delivered and freed from Error then there is a necessity to withdraw and separate from such a corrupted and defiled Church for not to be partakers of her sins and not to receive the plagues of which she is threatned of God Rev. 18.4 5. And yet before that all endeavours must be done to procure Remedies to the evil after the example of the Children of Israel who before they did retire themselves from Babylon did carry their hands to her wounds to cure them but seeing that it was in vain they resolved to forsake her to go in Jerusalem there to serve God according to his word Jerem. 51.9 10. These be their words We would have healed Babylon but she is not healed forsake her and let us go every one into his own Countrey So the Apostles did not separate themselves from the Jews to turn towards the Gentiles but after that they had rejected their word and made themselves unworthy thereof 6. It hath been for that and after the same proceeding that our Fathers by thousands did separate themselves from the Roman Church 7. For which Retreat and Separation we are wrongfully accused of Schism for it is the Church of Rome which is Schismatick and not our Churches because she hath given the Cause and the necessity to our Separation Now it is the Cause and not the Separation which maketh the Schism as the Canonists do teach 8. So the Apostles were not Schismaticks in separating themselves from the Pharises But it were the Pharises that were such 9. The Roman Church hath given cause to our separation 1. By her false and Erroneous Doctrines 2. By the Domination of Antichrist And 3. By the strange cruelties which she did exercise against us when we did endeavour to repurge the Temple from the corruptions which the Devil had sowed therein during the darkness of Ignorance As antiently the Samaritans did pollute the Temple of Jerusalem in shedding therein Dead-mens Bones during the darkness of the night 10. Having been so dealt with who can lawfully revoke in doubt that our separation hath not onely been most necessary but also most just 11. The Reformed Churches for the abovesaid Reasons separating themselves from the Roman Church did not thereby separate themselves from the Communion of the Catholick Church Rather they are entered in it Such a separation hath not been a forsaking of the Church of Christ but a going forth from Babylon An escape from Sodom A quitting of a Pestiferous House and which threatneth of ruine 12. In a word by such a Separation the Reformed Churches did separate themselves only from a particular corrupted Church 1. For when the Roman Church was in her greatest purity she was not the Catholick Church but onely a member or a part thereof besides which part there were many others even more ancient than the Roman Church the Church of Antioch and the Church of Alexandria and the Church of Greece were also as the Roman Church parts of the Catholick or Universal Church 2. And the said Roman Church such as it is now and hath been in these last Ages ought not to bear the Name of a Church without adding unto it that it is an Impure Idolatrous Heretical and Antichristian Church 1. Rejection of the Injurious Names Given unto the Reformed by the Jesuites and other Popish Writers 2. Representation of the Laudable Names which the said Reformed do approve and make use 1. SOme of the Popish Writers do talk much and Dispute to and fro by what Name they may call the Reformed Either Christians Or Catholicks Or Hereticks Or Protestants Or Zuinglians Lutherans and Calvinists Or Sacramentaries Answer in General to the giving of those Names THe Papists do call indeed the Reformed at their pleasure by such Names as their malicious and railing Spirits can invent sometime by one and sometime by another Of the Names Christians and Catholicks 1. CHristians and Catholicks the Papists will not have the Reformed to be called 2. They reserve that Denomination to themselves 3. And yet notwithstanding to them of all Professors of Christian Religion the same doth least appertain The Reformed do not deserve the Injurious Name of Hereticks and do slight such a Name 1. THe Reformed for their part so long as they are sure that the Doctrine which they follow is the eternal word of God and the Gospel of his Son Christ as they are by Gods Grace most sure seeing it is plainly set down in the Holy Scripture of the Old and New Testament they care not what the Papists do think of them or what they spake of them or by what Name they reproach them 7. If they blaspheme the Doctrine of Christ and call it Heresie not fearing or sparing the Lord himself it is no wonder if they revile them with all opprobrious names that can possible be devised The Reformed reject the names of Lutherans Zuinglians and Calvinists 1. THey do Declare that they are not Lutherans nor Zuinglians nor Calvinists because they maintain not any private or proper Doctrine of Luther or of Zuinglius or of Calvin 2. No more then the Faithful in the Primitive Church to have been called Paulines or Petrines or Athanasians or by the name of any other such Minister of Christ What the Reformed say of the Name of Protestants 1. IF the Papists think it belongeth not to us Reformed of England and France c. let them give it to those whose it is 2. Being not a Name of Schism or of Sect it may as well be used as the Name of Catholicks and for Distinction sake
to swerve from the right way See Revel 14.4 6. As on the contrary in the said Scriptures simplicity of Faith is called Virginity See 2 Cor. 11. v. 2 7. The Difference which is between Heresie and Schisme is as the Difference which is between Faith and Charity Heresie is the Poyson of Faith and infecteth the Doctrine thereof Schisme is the wound of Charity and by which the Church is divided which Division is not for points of Faith but for the Ceremonies and Discipline of the Church received and established in her since a long time and well grounded upon the Word of God and that by a Spirit of contention and trouble to purchase the glory of some particular and extraordinary wisdome and sufficiencie 8. Hereticks are called Antichrists 1 John 2. v. 18. because they are fore-runners of the great Antichrist the man of sin and the Son of Perdition Heresie is a most dangerous thing and spreads soon over the whole body of the Church and produceth woful Effects 1. HEresie like a Canker soon spreads over the whole body of the Church 2. And if it be not looked into killeth and that eternally thousands of Souls breaketh the bonds of nature and cutteth asunder all sinews of humane society putteth enmity variance and implacable discords in Families soweth Seeds of Sedition in the State reacheth Daggers and Daggers to Subjects to assacinate the Sacred Persons of the Lords Anointed layeth Traines in the deep Vaults of disloyal hearts to blow up Parliaments and to offer whole Kingdomes for an Holocaust Of the Impudency of Error and Hereticks in these Times IN this wretched Time Error and Hereticks which were wont but to whisper men in the Eare and to mumble between the Teeth have been so bold as to step into the Pulpit and to belch out blasphemies against God and the true Christian Religion Concerning the Books of Hereticks whether they are to be tolerated or absolutely abolished by the Prince 1. Concerning the Books of Hereticks this is our Judgement that of them 1. Some are Magicall 2. Some are Defamatorie Books 3. Some are Blasphemous Books 4. And some are Books full of divers Errors 2. The Magicall Books are to be burned Acts 19.19 3. The Defamatory Books are to be forbidden The Emperours Constitutious do ordain a Capital Punishment for the Authors of them 4. The Notoriously Blasphemous Books of Hereticks are also to be abolished 5. Concerning the Books of Hereticks which containe divers Errors the reading of them is not to be permitted to every one and chiefly not to those who did not yet sufficiently know the grounds of true Faith and Religion 6. But for that they are not absolutely to be abolished but the reading of them is to be permitted to the Learned 7. Which we prove by the following Arguments The first is taken from the Apostles Injunctions Prove all things saith S. Paul 1 Thes 5.21 And S. John 1. Epist 4. v. 1. Brethren believe not every very Spirit but try the Spirits whether they be of God The 2. Argument is taken from the Commodities and Utilities which proceeds from the reading of such Books In the Books of Hereticks such things are written by which the Heresies themselves are confuted Besides it is profitable to know what is happened in every Age. The 3. Argument is this Which of the Fathers hath been free from all kind of Errors And in the Books of the Gentiles and of the Jews many things are contained contrary to the true Christian Faith and yet we do not abolish them Hereticks and Deceivers and Impostors grace themselves with high and strange Titles and glorious Names to blear the eyes of the simple 1. THeudas said he was some great one Simon Magus stiled himself the great Power of God Montanus arrogated to himself the Title of Paracletus the Comforter and to his three Minions Priscilla Maximilla and Quintilla the names of Prophetesses Manes bare himself as if he were an Apostle immediately sent from Christ 2. Therefore it is a silly shift of a bankrupt Disputant in the Schools to argue à vocibus ad res from the bare name of things to their nature De Not. Eccles and yet Bellarmine fights against us with this Festraw We are Sir-named Catholicks therefore we are so The Devil often maketh of women strong Instruments to dispread the Poyson of Heresie 1. SImon Magus had his Helena Marcion his female Fore-runner Apelles his Philumena Montanus his Maximilla Donatus his Lucilla Elpidus his Agape Priscillian his Galla Arius the Prince his Sister Nicholaus Antiochenus his Feminine Troops and Quires and all Arch-hereticks some Strumpets or other to serve them for Midwives when they were in Travel with Monstrous and mis-shapen Heresies Thou sufferest the woman Jezabel We must avoid the familiar company of Gods Enemies and of true Religion for fear of Infection 1. FOr such enemies are like Jacobs Poplar rods they are like the two Rivers in Mercator Axius and Aliacmon like the two Fountains in Spain whereof Maginus 1. Omnia Injecta respuit refuses all that is cast into it 2. Omnia injecta sibi assimilat makes all things cast into it like to it self 2. The danger is noted by Solomon Prov. 6.27 And by the sharp speech of Jehu the Prophet to Jehosaphat 2 Chron. 18.3 2 Chron. 19.2 3. Therefore is the Exhortation of the Apostle Wherefore come out from amongst them and touch no unclean thing 2 Cor. 6.17 4. If Saint John the Evangelist would not stay in the Bath with Cerinthus the Heretick shall we dare freely to communicate with worser Hereticks Of the Chief Errors of the Socinians 1. Their Errors concerning the Vnity of the Divine Essence and the Trinity of Persons THey deny the Trinity of Persons They deny the Divinity of the Son They say that the Birth of the Son is altogether impossible They deny the Divinity of the Holy Ghost They denie that the Holy Ghost is a Person They maintain that the Holy Ghost is onely the Power of God They teach that the Holy Ghost dwelling in the hearts of the Faithful is nothing else but a firm and certain hope of Eternal Life They deny that a particular operation of the Holy Ghost be required for the production of Faith They deny also that in God there be a certain natural Justice and Mercy 2. Their Errors concerning Christ the Mediatour THey deny that there be two Natures in Christ the Divine and the Humane They deny that Christ is risen from the Dead by his own power and vertue They deny that Christ by his Death did satisfie for our sins or that he be dead to merit Salvation unto us They deny that Christ hath reconciled us unto God They deny that Christ be come to fulfil the Law for us on the contrary they say that Christ hath added new Commandments to the Law They deny that Christ upon the Altar of the Cross did offer himself to God for us They deny also that