vnwritten traditions Alfonsus Uiruestus a Popish Bishop and a bitter enemie to Luther acknowledgeth so much For he saith That things may bee contayned in the Scripture eyther formally and expresly or materially being drawne by a necessary collection from the contents And this he saith is called Uirtualis continentia To denie this saith hee is not Christian wisedome but Iewish superstition And then teacheth that wee are as much bound to giue assent to those things that be materially conteyned and drawne thence by a lawfull collection as to those that be formerly and expresly conteyned Bellarmine cannot deny but that Scotus taught there was not any expresse place of Scripture to proue Transubstantiation without the declaration expositioÌ„ of the Church Neither dare the Cardinall reiect that assertion but saith that Transubstantiation belongeth to the Catholicke faith because it is collected out of the diuine Scripture In his iudgement then that is a written truth which is collected from the Scripture as well as that which is expressely set downe in the Scripture If therefore Preachers deliuer no other doctrines in their Sermons if they confute and condemne no other errors if they teach no other duties if they reproue no other sinnes if they minister no other consolations and if they vrge no other exhortations then they haue warrant in the written word of God eyther by expresse testimonies or by necessary collections the word which they preach is the very same in kind in nature and substance with the word written And so there is not one word written and another word preached as the Docter would beare men in hand but one and the same word diuersly vsed So absurd is this his obseruation so voyde of reason so destitute of proofe and so discreâ—ant from the doctrine of his owne Church that it may well be thought that rather malice against vs then any warrant from the text caused him to sâ—t it downe And heere behold how farre malice doth carry your teachers euen to forsake their owne companions and to ouerthrow the coÌ„mon and receiued doctrine of their owne Church that so they may crosse and condemne vs. And to conclude with him he that will regard what he writeth in the latter end of his obseruation may easily perceiue how hee ouerthroweth his owne note obserued in the beginning For he produceth the Apostle Peter as an in different witnes in this case who saith that the Word of God endureth for euer and this is the word which is preached among you whose testimonie doth euidently prooue that the word written and the word preached then by the Apostles and other Ecclesiasticall persons was the very same word For it is apparant by that verse which he alleadged that the word of God which endureth for euer and the word which then was preached were one and the selfe same word Now what was the word that endureth for euer was it not the word written If any will denye this let him reade the former verse in Peter and compare that verse and this with the words of the Prophet Isaiah and hee shall finde it to be the word written by the Prophet So as Peter maketh the word written by the Prophet and preached by the Apostles to be the same Againe this great Docter saith the Word is the Seede because it is vnchangeable in it owne nature and substance though diuers in explication and proueth it out of Basil and Uincentius Lyrenensâ—s who make that agreemeÌ„t betweene the word written and the word preached that they are both one in substance for they preached nothing but what was written yet the word writteÌ„ was made fruitfull by preaching SECT III. BVt to leaue the Doctor and his obseruation It may be some others will acknowledge contrarie to his minde that whosoeuer preacheth nothing but such doctrines as are either expresly taught or necessarily gathered from the scriptures preacheth nothing but the written word And yet will likewise contradict me because they hold that there is another word of God besides the written word Bellarmine saith there is verbuÌ„ Dei scriptuÌ„ verbum Dei non scriptum A word of God written namely the bookes of the old and new Testaments And a word of God not written namely the traditions of the Church which be not written in the scriptures Gregory de Ualentia holdeth it for a most certaine thing that the word of God is not onely conteyned in written letters as it pleaseth him to tearme the scriptures in way of disgrace but is also put in the voyce of the Church and there doth sound Coster the Iesuite speaketh more plainely and peremptorily That the consent of the Catholike Church and the consonant doctrine of all Christians throughout the world is the scripture And in many points excelleth the scriptures which the Apostles haue left vs in parchments And this he maketh the first and chiefest kinde of scripture which now wee haue vnder the Gospell and saith that is a scripture penned with their owne hands The scriptures penned by the Apostles and Euangelists he placeth in the second ranke And addeth that a scripture of the third kind is in the degrees of generall Councells The decrees whereof if a man respect truth if he respect the seale and confirmation of the holy Ghost or the presence of Christ haue the same waight and moment that the holy gospells of God haue And so whereas Bellarmine made but two words of God he maketh three and two of his three are neither of the Cardinalls two Now those who depend on such teachers as these wil hold that albeit the seede be the word of God and Preachers must teach nothing but the word yet they may preach the traditions of the Church and the canons of councells as well as the contents of the written word because these be the word of God as well as the written word Wherevnto I answere that if the Traditions of the Church the word put in the mouth of the Church and the decrees of Councells be eyther expresly taught in the written word or may be warranted thence by iust and lawfull consequence we will acknowledge them to be the word of God But if they be praeter verbum besides the word writteÌ„ hauing neither way any warrant thereby they are not to be preached as the word of God but to be taken as the word of man And if they be contrary to the word written they are so farre from being the word of God as they must rather bee reputed to be the word of the diuell I neede not to stand on the first and last kinde For we acknowledge the first as well as the papists and the papists doe in generall condemne the last as well as we though they iustifie some in particular All the doubt is whether such traditions and canons that bee praeter verbum are to be taught to the people as the true word of God and be the seede
hee and the rest of the Apostles preached and therefore he saith If wee or an Angell preach otherwise then that which wee haue preached And what worde hee preached I haue proued before not any traditions but the written word If it be true which Irenaeus and Nicephorus doe write that what the Apostles preached at first was afterward by the will of God set downe in the scriptures it must be acknowledged that they preached no traditions seeing we can finde no traditions penned by thē in their Epistles And though they had bene traditious when they were preached yet they ceased to be traditions when once they were written by them Againe the Fathers restraine the words of the Apostle to the scriptures as if he were accursed that would preach any thing not cōtained in them Augustine is most plaine therein Whether concerning Christ or concerning his Church or any other thing that pertaineth to our faith or life I will not say if wee for we are not to be compared to him who saide if wee but euen as he going forward added If an Angell from heauen shall preach vnto you besides that which ye haue receiued in the scriptures of the lawe and the Gospell let him be accursed Basill likewise teacheth that hearers who be skilfull in the scriptures ought to examine those things which bee deliuered of their teachers And to receiue those things which be agreeable to the scriptures and to reiect those that be not And produceth this testimonie of the Apostle to proue it which had bene an impertinent proofe if the Apostle had spoken as well of a word not written as of a word written The Cardinall mentioneth both these testimonies and would auoyd them by saying that they doe not of purpose expound this place but doe proue by this place that it is not lawfull to auouch any thing contrary to the scriptures Yet cānot he deny but that they doe alleadge this place of the Apostle And I hope he will not say but that they doe deliuer the true sense of it and doe alleadge it according to the true meaning of the Apostle Doth the Cardinall thinke that such learned fathers would giue one sense of it when purposely they expound it and another sense when they alleadged it to prooue a point which they haue in hād This were to wrest the scripture to make it serue their present turne I hope he will not so iudge of such reuerend men And to say that they onely proue thence that it is not lawful to auouch any thing contrary to scripture is to alter and inuert their words Doth not Augustine say praeterquam quod accepistis besides that which you haue receiued but of that afterward And if by that place they proue that nothing must be taught contrary to the scriptures then must they not hold with the Cardinall that the Apostle speaketh of each word as well written as not written but onely of the written word And so the Cardinall maketh them to confute him Chrysostome purposely expounding the place saith Paul preferreth the scriptures before angels comming from heauē As also that Paul doth not say if they preach contrary things or if they subuert the whole Gospell but if they preach but euen a little beside the Gespell which ye haue receiued let them be accursed Thomas Aquinas their Angelicall Doctor professedly expoūding that place doth write that nothing is to be preached but that which is conteyned in the Gospells and in the Epistles and in the holy scripture implicitely or expresly Will they say that their Traditions are conteyned in the scriptures either expresly or by way of implication or consequent thenare they not vnwritten verities as they tearme them A second answere of the Cardinall is this that the Apostle by Praeter vnderstood Contra. And therefore did not forbid new doctrines and precepts which were besides those that were deliuered but onely doctrines and precepts contrarie to the former Yet will not this serue his turne For in matters of faith and religion proeter and contra are both alike Whatsoeuer is taught as necessarie to saluation if it be besides the scripture must be condemned as well as that which is contrarie to the Scriptures The reason is because the Scriptures conteyne all thinges which Ministers are to teach as necessary to saluation And therefore Paul told Timothie that they were able to make him wise vnto saluation And were profitable to teach to improue to correct and to instruct in righteousnesse Two of which respect mens mindes what they are to know and beleeeue as the trueth and what they are to reiect as errors Two of them respect their maners what sinnes they are to auoyde what duties they are to performe Is there any things needfull to bee taught the people but these things And because the Cardinall answereth that the Scriptures are profitable for all these things but not sufficient Consider the wordes of the Apostle following where hee declareth the end of this profitablenes namely that the man of God may be absolute being made perfect to all good works By the man of God he meaneth the Minister of the Gospell That tytle had he in his former Epistle giuen vnto Timothie And Lyra saith the man of God was one ordeyned to the diuine office such a one as Timothie was If then the Scripture being profitable for those foure vses will thereby make a Minister of the Gospell absolute and perfect for each good worke belonging vnto him he is not to teach any things ouer and besides the Scripture Theophylact thus writeth on the former place Hee doth not inferre if they onely preach contrary things but if they preach that which is beside that which we haue preached that is if they shall adde any thing that is but a very little more they are subiect to the curse And indeed it may seeme strange that the Papists are so earnest to haue vnwrittē traditions as wel preached as written truthes seeing the things written are more cettaine more excellent and necessary and require a long time to bee all taught and learned They are more certaine because all men are more certainely assured that the Scriptures the doctrines conteyned in them bee the word of God then that vnwritten traditions be his worde Bellarmine confesseth that nothing is better knowne nothing more certaine then the sacred Scriptures which bee conteyned in the writings of the Prophets Apostles that he must needes be most foolish who denyeth that they are to be beleeued And produceth 5. inuincible and infallible proofes that they are the very word of God Whē he commeth to speake of traditions he alleadgeth no such proofes but onely goeth about to prooue by 4. places of Scripture which haue bene long agoe answered that there are some traditions though neyther he nor any of his fellowes can tell what they are nor can make a perfit Catalogue of them so vncertain are
they Indeede hee deliuereth fiue rules whereby true traditions may bee discerned from false and counterfait traditions yet those rules are grounded on the authoritie of men and do not infallibly proue them to bee the word of God Yea he teacheth that al traditions haue not the like authoritie some haue diuine authoritie some haue Apostolical some ecclesiastical And therfore all of them cannot haue the same authority with the written word which himselfe before proued to haue diuine authoritie And how do they know any thing to bee a tradition but by humane writings and histories which as the Cardinall confesseth can breede but humane beleefe wherein may be falshood Neither are they so necessarie and profitable as the Scripture It is able to make a man wise to saluation It is the seede ofregeneration It is the foode of our soules It is the sword of the spirit to defend vs from the Diuell It bringeth vs to faith and saluation as before I proued Can such profite bee reaped from traditions Did euer any approued authour ascribe such vertue and efficacy to them Did euer any Christian obteyne these benefites by them Moreouer the thinges taught in the Scripture are not easily learned Augustine wrote that the profunditie of the Scripture is so great that hee might hee might dayly profite in them if from the beginning of his childhood to his crooked old age he should with greatest leisure chiefest studie and better wit endeuour himselfe to learne them onely The Papists will not gain-say this seeing they hold the Scripture to be very obscure Pambo confessed that in 19. yeeres hee had not learned to practise one lesson taught him out of Psal. 39. to refraine his tongue from euill How many yeeres then may our people require to learne the meaning and the practise of al things written in the Olde and New Testament I would therefore wish our Popish Priestes and people first to learne how to vnderstand and practise all thinges that bee written and when they haue learned all those then to begin with traditions It is no wisedome to contend much and busie themselues greatly about traditions before they haue learned and practised all things written which be farre more certaine more necessarie and profitable If they would take this course I am assured that there is not any one of them though he liued to be as old as Methuselah that would euer trouble eyther himselfe or vs with traditions But it skilleth not what doctrine Papists heare if Tollet say truely That a countrey man beleeuing his Bishop deliuering hereticall doctrine doth merit by beleeuing SECT IIII. IN describing the second propertie of hearers which was their beleeuing for a time to shew what kind of faith that was I taught that there be diuers kinds of faith one proper to the elect and others common both to them and to the reprobate I may iustly feare left that doctrine will not be receiued of all my countrey men and neighbours because the contrary is taught by many Romish Rabbines The Catechisme of the Tridentine Counsel teacheth That though there bee diuers degrees of faith yet it is but one in kind The Rhemistes holde that the dead faith whereof S. Iames speaketh and the Catholicke faith is all one Maldonatus scoffeth at them who make three kinds of faith Historicall Miraculous Iustifying Bellarmine maintaineth it very stifly that there is but one faith And that the historicall faith the the faith of miracles and the faith of promises are all one and that this is the iustifying faith Lest I bee mistaken I would haue you to vnderstand that I acknowledge that there is but one faith in respect of the obiect or of the things which are to be beleeued In regard whereof the Apostle saith There is one Faith one Baptisme Meaning that we all beleeue the same thing as we are all baptised with the same rite as Bellarmine doth truely expound it And in this respect Agustine taught that there was but one faith of all beleeuers Eadem credentium fides vna But one faith of all them which beleeue the same things And in this respect the Fathers write that there was but one faith in all ages that the beleeuing Iewes vnder the Lawe and beleeuing Christians vnder the Gospel had one and the same faith differing onely in the manner not in the matter they beleeued in Christ who was to come and Christians in him alreadie come Augustine sayd truely Aliud sunt ea quae creduntur Aliud fides qua creduntur The things which are beleeued and the faith whereby they are beleeued are not one and the same The former saith he consist in things which haue beene which are and which shall be but the other is in the minde of the beleeuer And therefore though there bee but one faith in respect of the obiect and thinges to bee beleeued yet there may bee diuers kinds of faith differing much one from another in respect of the habite or facultie of the minde whereby we doe beleeue them because all persons doe not beleeue the same things after one and the same maner Againe I doe confesse that there is but one true sauing and iustifying faith in all the Saints and in all the elect Though euery one of them haue a proper and peculiar faith of his owne yet it is the same with the faith that is in others The faith of one may differ from the faith of another in degrees so as one is stronger another weaker but not in knde not in nature and substance Yet there bee in other persons diuers other kinds of faith besides this which bee not the same with it but doe much differ in substance and kinde not onely from it but likewise one from another The difference and diuersitie of these kinds I haue in the Sermons going before sufficiently proued by testimony of holy writte I will now proue the same by the testimonies of ancient Fathers and late Popish writers And that first in generall then in particular In generall that there is not onely one kind of faith but diuers and seuerall kindes of faith SECT V. MOst of the Fathers and many of the Romish writers haue distinguished betwixt these three Credere Deo credere Deum credere in De◠To beleue God to beleue that he is God and to beleeue in God As namely Augustine Eusebius Emissenus Beda Bernard Lumbard The Ordinary glosse Thomas Aquinas Antonius Bernardinus de Senis Iohannes de Combis and Ferus And I maruell much that Bellarmine writing so much of the difference and vnitie of faith did neuer mention this distinction beeing so rife in all Authours Now these three doe so much differ among thēselues as that they cannot possibly be actes of one and the same faith in kinde First they differ in respect of the nature and properties of them
all Gods children but in particular of his owne happines This his assertion doth so gall the Papists that Pamelius said it must be read warily because he knewe that if it were reade in the very sense which the words did beare and the author meant without some corrupt glosse contrary to his meaning it would iustifie our doctrine of faith and make most of the popish crew who haue no confidence of their owne saluation but an assent to the truth of Gods worde to be a company of vnbelieuers The same Father saith That how much Faith we bring thither to receiue so much we draw of Gods ouerflowing grace This is appointed of God saide Ambrose that hee who belieueth in Christ should bee saued without works by faith only receiuing freely the remission of sinnes To the like effect speaketh Hesychius Grace of mercie is both offered and also apprehended by faith alone without workes Augustine maketh Faith the hand whereby euery one must lay holde of Christ now sitting in Heauen Is not that more then a bare assent to thinges reuealed Is not this a speciall Application When the same Father stirred vp his owne soule with these wordes Let my soule say yea let it altogether confidently say Thou art my God who doth say to my soule I am thy saluation c. Did hee not in particular appropriate and apply to himselfe the generall fauours and mercies of God and made him who was God ouer all to be his God in particular And when he sayd Behold we belieue in Christ whom we receiue by faith In receiuing we know what we thinke we receiue a little and are fed in the heart he shewed the nature of faith to be rather an apprehension and application then an assent Chrysostome writing of the promises made to the Patriarches and of the maner how they receiued them saith thus They did by faith alone conceiue a certaine assurance of them seeing them a farre off before foure generations they had such a certain perswasion of them that they did euen salute them as Sea-faring men doe a farre off see the Cities desired which they salute before they enter into them Thou seest that this they receiued is to expect and haue confidence of them If therefore to haue confidence is to receiue We also may receiue them Wherein he declareth the nature of faith not to consist onely in an assent giuen to the truth of things reuealed but a confidence and assurance of the promises of God made to man And that by this confidence beleeuers are saide to receiue the promises And that as they then receiued the promises by that their confidence so also we now by the like confidence are to receiue them Damascen expounding the Apostles description of faith that it is the ground of things hoped for hath these words Faith is an vndoubted and vniudge-able hope as well of those things which are promised vs of God as of obteyning our petitions If then any man may particularly aske the forgiuenes of his owne sinnes and the saluation of his owne soule he may in particular beleeue that his owne sins shall be pardoned his owne soule saued Bernard is plentifull this way thus he saith If thou beleeuest that thy sinnes cannot be blotted out but by him against whom onely thou hast sinned thou doest well but yet adde more that thou also beleeue this that thy sinnes are forgiuen thee by him Is not this a speciall faith Is not this more theÌ„ an assent in generall to things reuealed Is not this the faith so much impugned by our late papists And for a speciall application of Christs merits vnto vs for the pardon of a mans owne sinnes and the saluation of his owne soule he speaketh as plainely But that Caine was not of the members of Christ nor had any thing to do with the merit of Christ that he might presume the same to be his he would haue called that his owne which was Christs as the member doth that which is the heades Thereby teaching that the true beleeuer being a member of Christ doeth call that his owne which is Christs and doth without sinne presume that the merit of Christ is his in particular And therefore in the next words he saith thus of himselfe Whatsoeuer is wanting vnto me from my selfe I boldly take it vnto me out of the bowels of the Lord Iesus because they flow out with mercy Let vs descend to the Popish writers we may finde many of them to iumpe with vs herein Ferus was commended by Sixtus Senensis to be a man excellently learned in the diuine Scriptures whose equall in the office of preaching the Gospell the Catholicke Churches of the Germaines haue not in this our time Yet doeth hee in many places condemne the Popish description of faith and approue ours That is not alwayes faith whith we call faith we call it faith to assent to those things which be deliuered in the diuine histories and which the Church propoundeth to be belieued The Scripture speaketh farre otherwise of Faith For according to the Scriptures faith is nothing else but a consideÌ„ce of Gods mercy promised in Christ. And he bringeth Abrahams example for proofe thereof And of this faith saith hee mention is made in the Gospell where it is sayd Hee that beleeueth in the Sonne of God shall not bee condemned The faith which the Scripture commendeth is no other thing then to trust to the free mercy of God this is the true faith whereby the iust man liueth this alone is it which God requireth of vs. An example of this faith we haue in the Centurion for we do not read that he rehearsed the Articles of faith but that he came to Christ with great trust These wordes make so much for vs that Sixtus Senensis sayd of them that hee seemeth to allude to the error of them who teach that iustifying faith is nothing else but an assurance of Gods mercy forgiâ—ing our sinnes through Christ. And Dominicus Soto tooke vpon him to confute him in that poynt but Michael Medina defended him against Soto And else-where he speaketh as fully for vs To belieue in Christ saith hee is not to know his works for Sathan knoweth this neyther is it to remember or thinke with himselfe that Christ hath suffered and risen againe for euen vngodly men remember these things and thinke of them and yet are made nothing better But it is with certaine sure and stedfast trust to take hold of Christ and all his benefits and to sticke to them with all the heart all the soule and all the strength Pighius in his booke of controuersies dedicated to the Pope Paulus 3. doth teach that although Faith as it is vsually taken by ecclesiasticall writers bee that habite of the minde whereby we do certainly and without any doubting assent to those things which for our saluation are reuealed of God to his Church
Yet vnto this faith assent of reason and the minde that it may be called a perfect faith there ought also to be adioyned a certaine sure and firme trust of the heart whereby the belieuing soule doth so stay vpon trust to the worde and truth of God that without all doubting whatsoeuer it is he hath it as sure as if he held it in his handes And hee further addeth that this is the Faith and not that assent of reason which the Lord euery where required of them whome hee vouchsafed to heale Of that he spake when he saide Daughter be of comfort thy Faith hath made thee whole And this is the same Faith which maketh prayer effectuall which Christ and Iames require in them that pray Didacus Stella hauing distinguished of faith that there is one to belieue whatsoeuer is to be belieued called a Theological vertue another is a Considence by which we belieue that the Lorde will giue whatsoeuer we aske He saith that without this faith 1. this Confidence our sinnes cannot be forgiuen For although a man belieue all thinges contained in holy Scriptures to be true and all things which the Church belieueth yet if he shuld not trust and most certainly belieue that they shall be forgiuen him they should neuer be forgiuen him And saint Iames saith Let him aske in faith nothing doubting To the like purpose doth he afterward distinguish of faith describe the later kinde saying Faith is taken two wayes One way for the habite of belieuing according to which we doe assent to the trueths of the Scripture And this is the Faith without which it is impossible to please God And this is one of the three Theologicall vertues 1. Cor. 13. And by this faith a belieuer differeth from an Infidell There is another faith which is called a Confidence whereby a man asketh of God confidently hoping and belieuing most certainly that he shall obtaine of the Lord that which he asketh Which faith is needefull for him that prayeth otherwise hee shall neuer obtaine any thing If this be the faith required of them that pray aright it is the faith of all Gods Saints and of them which are iustified for they pray often and are heard And if this man write truely then those who teach and haue no other faith then an assent to the truth of things reuealed can neuer obtaine pardon of their sinnes nor haue their petitions graunted Tollet taught and that out of Euthymius that Faith in many places of scripture is takeÌ„ Not for the assent of the minde but for the assuraÌ„ce of the will Iansenius also writeth the same Therfore most rightly as appeareth it may be saide that by the name of Faith in the Gospells wheÌ„ saluation or the obtaining of those things which wee desire is ascribed vnto it both these are comprehended both that firme assent in things to be belieued concerning God and Christ and also a Confidence conceyued from his goodnesse c. For these two doe so cleaue together that neyther can there be any Confidence without Credulitie neyther can Credulitie without Confidence obtayne any thing of God And to the same effect afterward thus These two to wit Credulity and Confidence seeme to be included together in the name Faith when it is set downe that the Lord saâ—d According to your Faith be it vnto you That the meaning may be As ye belieue that I can heale you and for this doe trust that I will heale you So be it vnto you If then by the testimonie of these Authors Faith bee often so taken in the Scriptures And if this be the only Faith whereby we obtaine such things at the handes of God Why should wee be condemned as Hereticks for teaching such a faith Ought not we to haue such a faith in Christ for the saluation of our soules that those men had in him for the curing of their bodyes Though Stapleton denie this speciall Considence yet hee acknowledgeth that for one and the same faith Christ gaue them both outward inward health Paulus Burgensis saith that Abraham by the Faith which was imputed to him for Righteousnes did not onely belieue that he should be the Father of many Nations but rather that he his seed should obtaine euerlasting life in heauen In Genes 15. Addit 2. The Diuines of Colone taught that through the faith of the word of God working in vs true Contrition and Repentance and other works of preuenting grace we are iustified as by a certaine cause preparing and disposing vs. But through the Faith whereby without doubting we doe firmely trust our sinnes are forgiuen vs through Christ wee are iustified as by a cause receiuing it And also adde further that the Righteousnes of Christ is the cause of our Iustification not as it is out of vs in him but as and when the same is imputed vnto vs for Righteousnes yet so that it be apprehended by faith Cassander who was so highly esteemed for learning and wisedome that two Romane Emperors Ferdinand and Maximilian 2. sent to him for his aduise howe to compound the controuersies in religion approueth their opinion saith that Booke was greatly commended of all the Learnedst diuines through Italy France as a Booke that excellently relateth the summe of the Ancients opinion touching religion out of whose writings the booke is as it were confirmed And with great approbation citeth these words out of it Wee confesse it to be true that it is altogether required for the iustifying of a man that a man doe certainly belieue not onely generally that for Christ sinnes be forgiuen to them that be truely penitent but also that they be forgiuen to the man himselfe for Christ by faith Hee also alledgeth out of the Ratisbone booke these words We call a liuely faith a motion of the holy Ghost whereby they who truely repent are lifted vp to God and doe truely apprehend mercie promised in Christ that now they truely perceiue that they haue through the free goodnes of God receiued remission of sinnes and reconciliation for the merits of Christ and doe crye Abba Fâ—ther And therevpon hee inferreth that rightly agreeably to the scriptures it is saide that this is the nature of a Iustifying Faith that it perceiue that feeling of Gods fauour which the holy Ghost worketh in vs. And further addeth that to obtaine Iustification Such a Faith is required whereby a man after the example of Abraham doth not doubt of the promise of God through distrust but aboue hope belieueth vnder hope that God will impute to him that belieueth in him who raised Iesus from the dead this Faith to his iustification and will not impute his sinnes to him An example whereof as he saith we haue in the cure of corporall diseases which beareth an image of the inward cure For there Christ required a Faith whereby a man did belieue that Christ
was endued with that power that he was able to heale him and trusted that such was his goodnes that he would cure him Cardinall Bellarmine after hee had written very much to prooue that Faith is only an assent to the truth of things reuealed and not an assurance or speciall application of the promises doth at last ouerthrowe all and yeelde to vs. For thus hee writeth of vs they say rightly that euery one may by faith applye to himselfe the generall promises For as I doe belieue by the Catholicke faith that Christ dyed for all So by the same faith I doe belieue that hee dyed for me who am one of them What need we any better witnes then hee who before was our greatest aduersarie Doth not this lay open the nature of Iustifying faith to bee the same that wee teach Is a particular application of generall promises no more then a bare assent to the truth of things reuealed By that faith whereby I beleeue Christ dyed in generall for all doe I also beleeue that hee dyed in particular for me And yet shall wee say that a speciall faith is a forged faith that it is against the nature of faith to apprehend and apply particularly to my selfe the promises of God and the merits of Christ Yet for all this the Cardinall will not graunt that any man is to beleeue the pardon of his owne sinnes in particular because the generall promises are not absolute but conditionall euen with the condition of faith as we acknowledge And therefore demaundeth how a man can absolutely beleeue that his sinnes are forgiuen him seeing he caÌ„not learne by any worde of God that hee hath such a faith as is required for the obteyning of the pardon of sinnes And saith that none which beleeue are saued vnlesse they beleeue as they ought to beleeue But therein the Cardinall doth not onely contradict himselfe but likewise many of his fellowes who teach that there is but one faith at all that the dead and Catholicke faith are all one as was shewed before If some beleeue as they ought to beleeue and some beleeue not as they ought haue they all one and the same faith If some so beleeue as by beleeuing they shal bee saued and some so beleeeue as by beleeuing they cannot be saued shall wee say they haue all one and the same faith Then may wee also say that Peter and Iudas had one and the same repentance The Cardinall here sheweth that they do indeede beleeue as they ought to beleeue who haue faith which worketh by loue Yet else-where he laboureth to prooue that a true and Christian faith which by way of disposition iustifyeth the vngodlie may be separated from charitie and from other vertues How repugnant are these things one to another Againe hee that beleeueth may know that he hath faith orherwise Paul would not haue bidden the Corinthians to proue themselues whether they were in the faith Augustine sayd Euery one doth see faith to be in his owne heart if he do belieue or not to be if hee doe not beleeue And that no man can see faith in another but euery one may see it in himselfe The Cardinall saith They beleeue as they ought who haue faith working by loue yet may a man easily know whether hee haue loue or not Therefore sayd Augustine Let a man looke to his heart and see if he haue charitie and then let him say I am borne of God Yea let not any one aske another let euerie one returne to his owne heart if he there finde brotherly charitie hee may bee sure hee hath passed from death to life Would hee haue sayd thus if a man could not haue knowne whether he had charitie or not Michael Medina as Sixtus Senensis testifyeth in defending Ferus against Soto saith There is no man which doubteth but that wee may know true loue and faith to be in vs. Seeing then that by charitie a man may know as the Cardinall teacheth whether hee beleeue as hee ought to beleeue and seeing a man may know whether he haue charitie or not hee may also know whether hee beleeue as he ought and if he beleeue as he ought then by the Cardinals owne confession he may particularly apply to himselfe the generall promises and certainely beleeue that his owne sinnes are pardoned And to conclude this poynt seeing this speciall faith hath such testimony not onely from the diuine Scriptures but likewise from the ancient Doctors of the Church and also from the late Romish writers doe not condemne it as hereticall but seeke earnestly for it as the speciall meane of your saluation SECT VIII THere remaineth another point to be considered touching the persons that be endued with a iustifying faith I taught that it is proper to the Elect. Notwithstanding I knowe that Cardinall Bellarmine goeth about to confute Caluine for holdin that Faith and true righteousnes is proper to the Elect Yet doth he not bring any one argument to proue that it is not proper to them but onely laboureth to proue that faith may be lost Touching this point we will acknowlâ—dge that the best faith which many of the popish prelates doe teach is common both to the reprobate and Elect. The reprobate may giue an assent to the trâ—th of things reuealed as well as the Elect. But there is another faith besides that and more excellent then it as I haue proued before and that is peculiar to Gods Elect. No maruaile though those papists who knowe it not or will not acknowledge it doe hold that there is no faith peculiar to Gods Elect. If they knew the nature of a iustifying faith they would not contend with vs about the persons who haue it Though many haue not written of this point yet besides the texts of scripture alleadged we haue the testimonies of some Augustine as was declared before saith that the faith which worketh by loue onely the seruants of God haue only the Saints of God onely the sonnes of Abraham by faith onely the sonnes of loue the sonnes of promise Will any say that the reprobate are the seruants and saints of God or the beloued sonnes of God or sons of promise If once they were such they should alwaies continue such For as the Apostle teacheth whosoeuer is borne of God sinneth not yea he keepeth himselfe and the wicked toucheth him not Is God the father of the wicked said Augustine God forbid The same father said that the faith of the praedestinate either doth not fayle at all or if there be any of them whose faith fayleth it is repayred againe before this life be ended But as for those that finally fall away from faith out of doubt saith he at that time when they liued well and godly they were not to be reckoned in that number for they were not seuered from that masse of perdition by the prescience predestination of God And therefore
doctrine of the Gospell is true and euery part of it that it teacheth vs the right way to heauen and that all things therin contained shal certainely be accomplished both for the condemnation of vnbeleeuers and for the saluation of beleeuers In regard hereof Christ saith He that receiueth his testimonie hath sealed that God is true As Paul sayde I consent to the Law that it is good So this beleeuer will say I consent to the Gospel that it is good Yea he will auouch with the same Apostle This is a true saying and worthy by all meanes to be receiued that Christ Iesus came into the world to saue sinners Herein also this faith agreeth with an hystoricall a iustifying faith And therefore those who in their hearts wil not assent to the truth of the gospel are meere Infidels though they liue in the Church yet they haue no faith at al. 3. A third degree is that he hath a desire in his heart of the pardon of his sin of the saluation of his soule through the merey of God merits of Christ. Euen as Balaam desired to dye the death of the righteous and that his last end might be like vnto his though he had no care to liue the life of the righteous nor prepare himselfe for death as the righteous man doth And as the people of the Iewes who followed Christ from place to place whē they hard him speak of the bread which cōmeth from heauen giueth life to the world desired him euermore to giue that bread And yet many of them afterward fell from him Yea moreouer they which haue this faith may not onely haue this desire in their hearts but may also expresse it by prayer to God Almightie and by vsing the meanes of saluation They may seek to enter in at the straight gate and shall not be able As Christ saith many shall doe Herein they go beyond those that haue onely an hystoricall saith for many haue it yet contemne Christ and his merits neuer seeke for saluation by him rather feare him then loue him and with the Diuels beleeue and tremble Yet herein they come short of them who haue a iustifying faith for their desire is not so earnest nor so constant nor so effectuall Not so earnest for the desire of the elect is vehement and very earnest set foorth by hungring thirsting which are vehement and strong appetites in them that haue long wanted meate and drinke yea the strongest desires that can be found in man but these men haue a desire in a lesser measure Neither is their desire so constant for it comes but by fits and may soone be gone againe like to lightning which is a sudden flash and soone gone But the desire of the other is like the light of the Sunne which is permanent Their desire may be quenched before they haue fully obtayned the thing desired but the desire of the other can neuer be satisfyed till they be assured that they haue gotten the thing they wanted Nor yet is it so effectuall in vsing the meanes of saluation with such care diligence painefulnesse and constancie The one sort think no paines too great no labour too long the other thinke lesse will serue the turne and therefore leaue off or lessen their labour in vsing the meanes before they haue gotten sauing grace for their soules 4. The fourth degree is this They may haue an apprehension of Christ and his benefites an inward feeling of some grace and a perswasion of Gods fauour in Christ. So they are sayde to taste of the heauenly gift and to taste of the good word of God and to be partakers of the holy Ghost as was shewed before Which wordes must needes import a particular apprehension and an inward cense of some good receiued and some fauour expected As some of the Israelites tasted of the fruites of the Land of Canaan did thereby perceiue what a good Land it was and conceiued some hope of enioying it and yet neuer enioyed the Land but perished in the wildernesse So these beleeuers may haue a taste of heauenly gifts and an hope of enioying euerlasting glory and yet perish in the end And indeed these beleeuers could not haue receiued the word with such ioy as was spoken of before vnlesse they had an apprehension of Gods fauour and some sense of grace in their hearts Yet herein doe they greatly differ from the regenerate 1. In the seat and so in the synceritie of these graces for these beleeuers hearts are as stony ground they cannot receiue the worde into the bottome of their hearts nor suffer the rootes of it to goe deepe enough and so their faith graces are not rooted in the bottome of the heart but sticke in the superficies or vpper part of it All things in them are superficiall and they full of hypocrisie Whereas the iustifying faith and the sauing graces of the regenerate are like a solide body hauing three dimensions length breadth and depth and do possesse the deepest and lowest parte of the heart 2. In the reason and ground of this their apprehension And so it is nothing but vaine presumption for it is built vpon false and mistaken grounds they take the shadow for the substance doe ouerweene their owne graces and take their faith to be vnfayned their repentance to be sound and their regeneration to be effectuall when indeede they are not And so they are like vnto beggers who in their sleepe dreame that they are become very rich 3. In the measure and therefore their apprehension of heauenly things is compared to tasting because the heart doth as it were but with the tip of the tongue lightly taste these spirituall things and doth not feed on them Look what difference there is betwixt Cookes and others that taste meat before it be serued vp to the table the guests that eat the same at the table the same difference there is betwixt the vngenerate the regenerate touching the measure of grace which they receiue Though the regenerate do here receiue but the first fruits of the spirit do know in part and prophesie in part beleeue in part find no perfection in thēselues yet haue they a greater measure then the vnregenerate 4. In the sense iudgement of their want The one wanteth more and yet doth lesse discerne his want like the Angel of Laodicea who thought he was rich whē he was poore miserable naked The other wanteth lesse and doth better discerne his want and therefore will say with that man in the Gospell I doe beleeue Lord helpe my vnbeleefe And with the Apostles Lord encrease our faith Yea the one like a Pharisie is proude of that which hee thinketh he hath the other is humbled by knowing what he wanteth The one contenteth himselfe with that which he hath groweth secure and laboureth not to better his estate the other striueth to grow in grace as
aâ—…oe by that ancient Father Augustine and thereby proued neuer to fayle By this faith we are iustifyed as the Apostle plainely and often teacheth and our aduersaries cannot denie though they hold that we are not iustifyed by it alone Now if we be iustified we shall also be glorified Yea whosoeuer thus beleeueth shall not be confounded The Saintes doe keepe this faith in the hottest persecution that can befall them And therefore in describing the cruell tyrannie and grieuous persecution vnder the greate beaste which opened his mouth to blaspheme GOD and his Tabernacle and them that dwell in heauen and made warre against the Saints led many into captiuitie and killed many with the sword The holy Ghost breaketh forth into these speeches Here is the patience and the faith of the Saints because the Saints doe not loose but keepe and expresse their patience and faith in such afflictions Neyther can Sathan by his tentations depriue them of faith as appeareth in the example of Peter Sathan desâ—red to winnow him as wheate yet for his comfort Christ told him that hee had prayed for him that his faith might not fayle Christs prayer was not in vaine Hee at another time acknowledged to his Father that he heard him alwaies And therefore though Peter did afterwardes fall most grieuously in denying his Maister and that with an oathe and with cursing himselfe yet did hee not loose his faith It remayned in his heart though hee did not professe it with his mouth Neyther could this be a singular prerogatiue to Peter for Christ hath as well prayed for others as for him not onely for all the Apostles but likewise for all those that should beleeue in him through their word And therefore in the midst of all afflictions and tentations they shall be kept constant in faith Hee who gaue them faith will make them to continue their faith as he who made them good will make them continue in goodnes He is so faithfull that he will not suffer them to be tempted aboue that which they be able to beare but will giue them the issue with the tentation Their faith may be assaulted but not destroyed weakened but not wasted ecclâ—psed but not extinguished hidde and couered as the Sunne vnder a cloude and fire raked vnder the ashes but not abolished The act of it may be lost for a time but not the habite for if their faith may fayle and they perish why did the Apostle say that after they beleeued they were sealed with the holy spirit of promise which is the earnest of our inheritance vntill the redemption of the possession purchased by Christ And how is it true that they are kept by the power of God through faith vnto saluation And if iustifying faith may not be lost then it is certaine that if any fall away and vtterly loose their faith they neuer had it Diuers of Christs Disciples did seeme to beleeue in him yet afterward forsooke him and thereupon he said to them there are some of you that beleeue not And the Euangelist addeth a reason for Iesus knewe from the beginning which they were that beleeued not and who should betray him As if there were some of his Disciples that beleeued and some beleeued not namely those that tooke offence at his doctrine and forsooke him as also Iudas the traitour Euen while they followed Christ they wanted this faith Doth not S. Iohn say of reuolters they went out from vs because they were not of vs for if they had bene of vs they should haue continued with vs. Who then doe fall away from the Church but only those who indeed were neuer of the Church were in it but not of it And who are they that liue in the Church and be not of it but those that want a true iustifying faith for by it we are made members of Christ and incorporated into his mysticall body the Church But as for the faith spoken of in this my text it may be lost yea it is of such a nature that seldome it is kept to the end of a mans life Inward tentation by the diuell or outward persecution by men may rob the owners of it It is like to corne growing in the house top which may flourish for a while in the spring time but in heate and drought of summer will wither away And herein consisteth a maine difference betwixt iustifying and temporary faith the one is perpetuall the other for a time And no maruaile thogh it continue not long seeing it is built on temporary causes namely these three 1. It ariseth from curiositie for these beleeuers will heare and learne receiue and professe the Gospell for the newnes of it As the Iewes reioyced for a â—…me in Iohns light especially for the noueltie of it And as the Athenians would heare Paul preach and would know the meaning of his doctrine because as they said he brought certaine straÌ„ge things to their eares And they gaue theÌ„selues to nothing but to tell and heare some newes Bernard noted diuers sorts of persoÌ„s who desired knowledge of heauenly matters seueral ends for which they desired it And the first was of theÌ„ who desired knowledge onely for this end that they might know and this is fowle curiositie Now you know that a wonder lasteth not loÌ„g They who haue curious heads and itching eares after noueltie will not long like the same thing but as the Israelites at the first liked their Manna because it was a strange kind of meate but afterward loathed it wheÌ„ they had bene a while fed with it So these men at the first hearing of the Gospell for the strangenes of the doctrine may admire it receiue it with ioy and professe the faith thereof and yet afterward waxe wearie of it 2. It often ariseth from pride and vaineglory Because others doe condemne the enemies of the Gospell but doe like and loue honour and commend those that beleeue it professe it liue accordingly they to get credit honour among men will professe the faith of Christ submit themselues to his holy Gospel EueÌ„ as the Pharisies did fast and pray and giue almes to be seene and praised of men These persons as Bernard said desire knowledge that themselues may be knowne and this is foolish vanitie which men cannot escape the girding taunt of the scoffing Satyricke Scire tum nihil est nisi te scire hoc sciat alter It doth thee nought auayle to knowe vnles thy knowledge others knowe Those that embrace and professe religion for this end cannot continue constant If the time should come that true Christians should be reuiled and euill spoken of should be made as the filth of the world and the ofscouring of all things as the Apostles were these men would renounce their faith 3. It often proceedeth from couetousnes for the getting and keeping of wealth and riches that they may clime vp to high
And therefore Augustine thus distinguished them Credere Deo To giue credit to GOD is to belieue that those things are true which he speaketh Credere Deâ— is to belieue that he is God Credere in illum to belieue in him is to loue him So else-where hee saith of two of them There is great difference whether a man belieue him to bee Christ and whether hee belieue in Christ For the Diuels belieue him to be Christ yet did not belieue in Christ. Hee belieueth in Christ who both trusteth in Christ and loueth CHRIST He that belieueth in CHRIST by belieuing in Christ CHRIST shall come into him he after a sort is vnited vnto him and is made a member in his body To the same effect speaketh Eusebius Emissenus Credere Deo is one thing Credere Deum is another Credere in Deum is another which none is proued to doe but he who deuoutly trusteth in him The like difference doeth Bernard put betwixt them Credere Deo is to giue credit to his wordes Credere Deâ— is to confesse him to be euery where Credere in Deum is to direct all his hope vnto him Bernardine likewise saith that credere Deo credere Deâ—may be acts both of a dead liuing faith but the third onely Credere in Deum is an act of a liuely faith Seeing there is a faith Quacredimus Deo and a faith Qua credimus Deum and a faith Qua credimus in Deum and all these three doe so much differ one from another in their naturall properties how can they al be one and the same faith Againe the same Authours shew a difference betwixt them because some of them be sometime giuen as well to the creature as to the Creator another belongeth onely to the Creator It is to be knowne said Augustine that we ought to beleeue the Church but not in the Church because the Church is not God but the house of God And in another place That wee may say of the Apostles We beleeue Paul but we doe not beleeue in Paul Wee beleeue Peter but we doe not beleeue in Peter Ruffinus likewise obserued that in the Creede we are taught not to say In Sanctam Ecclesiam I beleeue in the Church for then we should haue the same saith toward it that we haue toward God And further noteth That in all Articles which concerne the Godhead the praeposition In is added but in those that concerne the creatures it is omitted And by it is put a difference betwixt the Creator and the creatures betwixt diuine and humane things Though the Rhemistes finding that they can call on none but in whom they doe beleeue doe teach that we may beleeue in the Saints that so they my bee inuocated Yet is that their assertion condemned not onely by the Fathers of former ages but also by their owne fellowes of late time who with one consent doe teach that though we may beleeue others yet we must beleeue in none but God alone As therefore that feare and reuerence that seruice and worshippe which we owe to men as well as to God doth differ in kinde from that which wee doe giue onely to God So that faith which wee haue as well toward men as toward God must needs differ in kind from that which we haue in God onely Lastly many writers teach a manifest difference of these three in respect of the persons in whom they are found Augustine sayeth that the saith which worketh by loue namely Credere in Deum onely the seruants of God haue onely the Saints of GGD onely the sonnes of Abraham by faith onely the sonnes of loue onely the sonnes of promise And when I come to speake of Iustifying faith in particular I shall prooue that this belongeth onely to the elect But the other kindes are found in others Saint Iames teacheth that the Diuels belieue there is a God and but one God they knew Christ when hee was euen the holy one of God Augustine sayd the Diuels belieued ipsum esse Christum that he was the Christ nec tamen in Christum crediderunt yet they did not belieue in Christ. Likewise Credere ipsum esse Deum Daemones possunt Yea hee further saith Not onely the Diuels but likewise the Pagans credunt Deum Bernard writeth thus Deum Deo credunt Daemones non in Deum The Maister of Sentences that Diuels and wicked men and false Christians may credere Deum credere Deo Ferus that it is not all one thing Credere Deum credere Deo and credere in Deum vngodly men can doe the two former but onely godly men do the last Thomas Aquinas hauing distinguished all three sayth the two first suffices not because all men credunt Deum and Heretickes credunt Deo because they beleeue those thinges to be true which be written by the Prophets and Euangelists concerning God Christ. Who then can thinke that the faith which Diuels Pagans wicked men vngodly men false and counterfaite Christians and Heretickes haue is the selfe same in kind in nature substance with that faith which God bestoweth on the elect on them which be his children be holy and iust As they are better beloued of God and in more fauour with God so assuredly they be endued with a better kinde of faith whereby they are made partakers of that his fauour and grace SECT VI. BVt to leaue those Authours and that distinction let vs come to other writers who in other termes set forth diuers kinds of faith Bernard saith that there is a fourefold faith A dead faith a fayned faith a peruerse faith and a right faith which he also called a Catholicke faith In the first saith he are proud men riotous couetous theeues robbers and such like In the second are men disobedient to spirituall Fathers vnthankfull for heauenly gifts who are without brotherly affectioÌ„ without peace of charity accusers-of their brethreÌ„ louers of pleasures more theÌ„ louers of God hauing a shew of godlinesse but denying the power thereof In the 3. are Hereticks lifted vp against God proud of their errors and blasphemers against God In the last are meeke men patient gentle humble chast louers of God their neighbours ready to euery good worke waiting for the redeÌ„ption of the sons of God And her eckoneth euery one of these as a faith of some Christians Will any man say that all these are one and the same faith in substance and kinde and differ onely in degrees hee might as well say that crooked and straight heate and cold are the same qualities Tollet the late Cardinall in plaine tearms acknowledgeth diuers kinds of faith There is one kinde of faith whereby we beleeue and doe assent to the doctrines reuealed and propounded by the Church to be beleeued which Cyrill called a dogmaticall faith There is another kinde of faith whereby we doe not
onely assent to the doctrines but also doe beleeue that the things which we aske to be done shall be accomplished by God which we call an assurance Stella also as plainely maketh two kindes of Faith There is a faith saith he whereby we beleeue whatsoeuer is to be beleeued and this is a theologieall vertue There is another faith which is a certaine confidence to wit that whereby we beleeue that the Lord will giue vs that which we aske of him I could produce more witnesses speaking to the same purpose but I spare them till I come to speake of the seuerall kindes by themselues yet consider that not onely the ancient Fathers but likewise some great Clearkes in the late Romish Church haue made diuers kindes of faith Why then should we be condemned as Heretikes for teaching the same SECT VII LEt vs now come to the seuerall kinds of faith in particular And let vs first coÌ„sider a little touching iustifying faith It may be you will mislike two things in that description of it which I set downe in one of the precedent sermons The one respecteth the nature of it the other respecteth the persons that be endued with it because some of your side teach contrary therevnto 1. Touching the nature of it I shewed that by it a Christian doth apprehend and apply to himselfe all the promises of God in Christ and all the merits of Christ for his present iustification and for his future saluation I know it as well as you that many of your learned meÌ„ teach the contrary and therefore I feare that you will rather beleeue them then me The Rhemists say that to apprehend Christs righteousnes by faith is a phâ—ntasticall apprehension of that which is not And that it is a false faith And afterward that the Apostle knewe not speciall faith the forged faith of Protestants whereby euery one of these new Sect-maisters and their followers as it pleaseth them in the meeknes of their spirit to tearme vs beleeue their sinnes are remitted and themselues shall be saued And else-where that a speciall faith is a forged faith that neither Paul nor Iames nor any other sacred writer euer knewe or spake of any such faith Cardinall Bellermine maintaineth that Faith is neither Fiducia an assurance of Gods mercie or the Pardon of a Man 's owne sinnes nor yet Notitia a cknowledge of such thinges but but onely a firme and certaine assent to the truth of those things which God hath propounded to be deliuered Doctor Stapleton calleth them Heretickes who place the whole nature propertie vertue and greatnes of faith in a particular applicatien of Gods geuerall promises to Belieuers Indeed that which they say is true if there were no other faith taught in the word nor wrought in the hearts of Christians then that which is generally taught and found in the present Romane Church But they which vnderstand the word aright and are iustified by Faith do know and feele another kinde of faith farre surpassing that Bellarmine doth much wrong vs and more trouble himselfe in this point then needed He saith that they differ from vs in the obiect of iustifying faith because we whom he commonly calleth by the name of Heretickes doe restraine it to a sole promise of a speciall mercy And afterward spendeth many chapters in prouing that the obiect of a iustifying faith is not a speciall mercy but all things which God hath reuealed For we doe not hold that the promise of a speciall mercy to a man in particular is the obiect of a true iustifying faith vnder the new testament we finde none such made to any of vs The generall promises of mercy in Christ are the material obiects which being indefinitly propounded it is an acte of faith to make a true Christian to apply them particularly to himselfe But to come to the matter now in question It may easily be proued that a iustifying faith is not onely an assent to the truth of things reuealed in the word but likewise an apprehension and particular applying of the generall promises of Gods mercies and Christs merits for the remission of sinnes In the scriptures faith is called a receiuing of Christ. And a receiuing of the promise Can there be a receiuing of a thing without application was Christ receiued generally of all together for all together and not particularly by euery one for himself When Thomas saide to CHRIST My God and my Lorde Did not he especially and particularly applye Christ and his benefites to himselfe who was GOD and Lorde to all true Christians Yet Christ gaue it the name and Tytle of Faith saying vnto him Because thou hast seene mee thou belieuest And maketh that his faith the very same with their faith who were blessed for belieuing when they had not seene Yea with the faith of Gentiles For Augusti thinketh he did thereby preach and commend the faith of the Gentiles When Paul saide Christ hath loued me and giuen himselfe for mee Did hee not applye particularly to himselfe Christ and his benefites yet this hee did by that faith whereof hee spake immediately before euen by that faith in the Sonne of God whereby he then liued Is not Christ that bread which must nourish our soules and is not Faith the eating of him as himselfe declareth at large Ioh 6. Whervpon Augustine said What preparest thou thy teeth and thy belly belieue thou hast eaten And can there be any eating vnlesse there be be a speciall Application of the meate to the person that is fed Doth not euery one pray in particular for speciall mercie And is not euery one to belieue that what he asketh he shall obtaine And certaine it is that whosoeuer doth worthilie by Faith receiue the sacrament of the Lords supper hee doth by faith particularly receiue Christ and all his benefites and particularly applyeth all the promises of Gods mercies in him Bellarmine confesseth that they agree with vs that Faith is necessarily required for the profitable receiuing of the Sacrament And is there not an Analogie betwixt the signes and the thing signied Looâ—…e then how wee receiue the outward Signes so must wee by faith receiue the thing signified As therefore euerie one doeth particularly with his owne hand receiue to himselfe and for himselfe the outward signe So euery one that belieueth doth particularly receiue to himselfe and for himselfe Christ and all his benefites Let vs come to the Fathers It may be some of you will neither yeeld to scriptures alleadged by vs nor yet to any reasons vnles you may heare the Fathers speake as we doe That godly Martyr Cyprian said that although a man daily rehearsed all the articles of the creede Yet he doth not beleeue in God who doth not place in him onely the assurance of his whole felicitie he holdeth that faith is a confidence or assurance and not in generall of the happines and saluation of
they were not called according to his purpose and therefore not elected If therefore the elect haue such a faith as neuer shall fayle to the end of their life and yet there be some who haue a faith that shall finally fayle and they be none of the Elect it must needes follow that a stedfast and permanent faith is proper to the Elect. Feras taught that the true faith belongeth onely to the predestinate Though Dominicus Soto tooke vpon him to confute him yet Michael Medina defended him and saith peremptorily that only the Elect haue true faith that the faith which reprobates haue is no true faith and concludeth that this doctrine is no heresie but the sentence of Christ and his Apostles Sixtus Senensis mentioneth all this yet doth hee not speake one word against Medina but leaueth him vncontrolled thereby declaring that he approued his opinion SECT IX LEt vs now proceede to other kindes of faith The first kinde of faith which I said was common both to the Elect and reprobate is a miraculous faith which I made to be a distinct faith from the rest But the Rhemists say it is not another in substance then the common faith in Christ but is of another accidentall qualitie onely that is of more feruour deuotion zeale and confident trust specially for doing of miracles And Bellarmine affirmeth that all their Catholikes hold that the faith of miracles and the faith of promises are all one And he saith that the faith of miracles is no other thing then a true Catholike faith but excellent and iustifying after his maner Yet they may easily be proued to be seuerall and distinct kindes of faith First they differ in their obiects and actes The one layeth hold of Gods promises mercies in Christ as hath bene formerly proued but this hath the power of God for the obiect for by it a man beleeueth that God by his speciall power will enable him to worke a miracle And therefore Thomas Aquinas saith that the faith by which miracles are wrought doeth rest and stay it selfe on the omnipotencie of God The one resteth on Gods promises and mercies for the pardon of our sinnes and the saluation of our soules The other relyeth on Gods power in regard whereof a man is assured that God will enable him to doe some great and supernaturall worke to ratify the truth of the Gospell and to confirme the fâ—ith of others Can these bee one and the same habite Can the one bee a degree of the other seeing they differ so much one from another in their nature in their obiects and in their actes Againe a iustifying faith is an ordinary grace bestowed on men in all ages for there alwaies were now are adn alwayes shal be some endued with it The Church alwaies hath beene and euer shal continue to the end of the world And it consisteth of a number of true beleeuers But the Faith of Miracles is an extraordinary gift bestowed on some men at some certayne time And therefore it is reckoned by the Apostle among these extraordinary gifts which in his time were bestowed on some in the Church To another saith he is giuen faith by the same spirit meaning not the common faith but that whereof he speaketh afterward If I had all saith so as I could remooue mountaines as Theodoret and others doe expound the place And the Apostle maketh it not onely an extraordinary but likewise a seuerall and distinct grace as well as any of those which there hee mentioneth Many writers teach that this gift was needfull at the first preaching of the Gospell and the first planting of the Church but not afterward Euen as at the first setting and planting of a tree watering is needfull but not afterward when it hath taken deepe rooting Now can an extraordinary gift be the same with a common and ordinary Can an extraordinary gift long agoe ceased be a degree of an ordinary gift still continuing in the Church Moreouer theyr difference may bee seene in respect of the persons who receiue them The Iustifying faith is proper onely to the elect and to the Saintes of God as before hath bene proued Yet they may want this miraculous faith A man may bee in state of grace and yet want it As appeareth by the examples of Gods Saintes in all ages who were iustified by faith and yet were not able to worke miracles But wicked men may haue it Those had it who by Christs Name did cast out Diuels and worke great workes and yet shall heare him professe to them Depart from me ye workers of iniquitie Augustine confesseth that the schismaticall Donatists had it as well as the Orthodoxall Christians Popish writers teach that wicked men be sometimes indued with it Ill liuers which haue not other graces of God whereby their persons should be gratefull iust and holie in Gods sight Yea a man that is out of the state of grace Yea a man that is destitute of Charitie Now how can that be the highest degree of a iustifying faith which wicked men sometime haue and which godly men often want If it be the highest degree of a iustifying faith then none could haue it but they must haue a iustifying faith Though some might bee iustified without it yet none could haue it but they must needes be iustified Bernard put a manifest difference betwixt them saying There is one faith of precepts and another faith of miracles that is qua credimus in Deum qua credimus Deum By the faith of precepts we belieue in God Credere autem in Deum But to belieue in God is to trust in him and to loue him By the Faith of Myracles Credimus Deum quia talia potest omnia potest Wee belieue that God can doe such things and can doe all things Theophylact. distinguisheth them as plainly on Rom. 12. 3. saying that Faith in this place is to be taken for the grace of God whereby they wrought miracles For our faith is double The one as that Mar. 10. 52. Thy Faith hath made thee whole Another is the gift of God by which miracles are wrought as that If you haue faith as a graine of mustard-seede and say to this Mountaine c. Stella likewise distinguisheth this from that faith which Papists make their iustifying faith For he will not haue that faith wherby the Apostles might say to the Mulbery tree Plucke thy selfe vp by the roots plant thy selfe in the Sea to be vnderstood of faith a Theologicall vertue to belieue all things written but to be that Confidence whereby they were assured to obtaine what they asked though it were the remoouing of a Mountaine Maldonatus saith of that Faith commended by Christ to his Apostles for the remouing of mountains Math. 17. 20. That Chrysostome and Euthymius vnderstand the faith of myracles not that faith whereby we are Christians Ianâ—â—nius vpon the
same words doth in his owne name expound it of the same faith and distinguisheth it from the other faith saying Faith is here taken not for that vertue whereby wee are called belieuers as it is taken of Paul when hee saith there are three vertues Faith Hope Charitie which faith all Christians haue and then the Apostles had But it is taken for the faith of miracles which Paul putteth 1. Cor. 12. among the diuision of Graces which the holy Ghost imparteth to diuers men diuersly euen as he will And this kinde of faith is no hing else but a Confidence of obtaining or working miracâ—es when it is needfull or profitable by calling vpon the Name of God Caietane doth put as great difference betwixt them writing vpon those words 1. Cor. 12. Alteri fides in eodem spiritu saith thus There is no speech heere concerning the faith of things to be belieued but concerning the faith of thinges to be done For that is common to all Christians but this agreeth onely to some certaine persons Pighius also writeth that the faith which is Fiducia an Assurance or Confidence is in the whole kinde diuerse from that Catholike faith where vnto the power of miracles was adioyned For the one doth properly respect the truth of God for the obiect the other respecteth the goodnes of God as made ours after a manner by mutuall loue That goeth before the loue of God and is separable from it so as the Apostle affirmed that he might haue all faith of that kinde though hee had not loue But this doth follow loue and is a bud of it That may be euen in the workers of iniquitie who at the day of iudgement shall heare Christ say to them I neuer knew you But this belongeth onely to iust and holymen who haue already sanctified or Dedicated their soules to God through the obedience of Charitie So many wayes doth hee distinguish them and so farre was he from making them one and the same kinde of faith or making the one to be a degree of the other Consider then I pray you how the Rhemistes and Bellarmine are singular in this their conforming of a miraculous faith with a iustifying faith hauing not only the scriptures but also all sorts of writers gainsaying them And therefore it may well be supposed that rather a desire to contradict vs then any consent of theyr owne Church or any sound reason to warraÌ„t them hath moued them to make that confusion of two distinct gifts And will you giue credite to such spitefull and partiall writers SECT X. Of Hystoricall Faith THe first kind of ordinary faith which is common both to the Elect and reprobate I called an historicall or dogmaticall faith yet I knowe there be many who neither can abide the name and tytle of historicall faith nor yet will acknowledge any difference betwixt the thing signified thereby and a iustifying faith but make them both one Touching the name Gregory Martine said that historicall and speciall faith are hereticall tearmes newly deuised Cardinall Bellarmine saith that Catholikes do not vse the name of historicall faith least they should seeme to thinke that the deedes of the Saints which are recorded in scripture are not beleeued but for the authoritie of the historie writers And that there is but one faith which is neither to be called historicall nor miraculous but a Catholike faith Yet the thing feared by the Cardinall to arise vppon the vse of the Name is but a vaine pretence If he and his fellowes had feared the like daunger in the vse of other Names they would neuer haue allowed the name of Transubstantiation lest any should thinke that they holde a reall Conuersion of the substance of the Bread and Wine into the substance of Christs bodie for so much doth the proper signification of the word import when as the name of hystoricall faith importeth no such thing as he feareth The onely reason why hee and his fellowes contemne the tytle is because we sometime vse it Such is their hatred to vs that they are vnwilling to vse anie Terme of ours though it bee neuer so fitting and proper But first let them knowe that we may lawfully vse terms and tytles to expresse our meaning if the thing meant thereby may be prooued by the Scripture though the Terme it selfe bee not expressely found in the Scripture The ancient Fathers gaue to CHRIST the name and Tytle of omousios consubstantiall to expresse the equalitie of his Godhead with the Father The Arians misliked it because they found it not in the Scriptures Yet the Fathers one after another defended it and vsed it still because though the Name it selfe were not there yet the thing signified thereby was found there Euen as the Arians themselues gaue to the Father the tytles of Unbegotten Incomprehensible Incircumscriptible Incorporall and such like which words were not found in the Scripture yet were the things meant thereby The Cardinall relateth this at large with many testimonies And acknowledgeth that in expressing the mysterie of the Trinitie they vse many names and words which although they be not found in scripture yet their seedes and equiualents are there found And the Rhemists graunt that wee may not measure the newnesse or oldenesse of wordes and tearmes of speaking in Religion by holy Scriptures onely as though all those or onely those were newe and to be reiected that are not expresly found in holie Writte but we must esteeme them by the agreeablenesse or disagreeablenesse they haue to the true sense of Scripture Now wee meane nothing by this Hystoricall Faith but that firme assent which men doe giue to the thinges written in Scripture Not onely to the hystories of Acts done but likewise to all doctrines of faith manners there taught And therefore we also call it a Dogmaticall Faith a faith whereby wee beleeue all the Doctrines of the Scriptures to bee true By which tytle the Cardinall confesseth Cyrill and Chrysostome haue called this faith And hee himselfe calleth that a Dogmaticall Faith which hee saith wee call an Hystoricall Faith And the faith which we meane by the Hystoricall Faith wee prooue out of Scriptures as may be seene in my former Sermons Yea the Papists will not deny but that there is such a faith taught in the Scriptures Yea this is the onely faith which they require Yea Bellarmine though he scarce dare vse the name yet he acknowledgeth that by our Historicall faith wee meane that faith which they call An assent which they giue to the narration of things past not for the authoritie of men but of God himselfe who hath reuealed them And that faith he proueth by Scripture If then they agree with vs about the thing why doe they wrangle with vs about the name It is a folish thing saith Bellarmine to striue about the name when men are agreed of the thing Moreouer not onely the old Doctors
things reuealed the other respecteth the mercy and goodnes of God in Christ offered to penitent sinners Bernardinus de Senis out of Alexander Halensis saith that credere Deo hath the truth of God for his obiect and so we beleeue him because we thinke those things to be true which he speaketh but credere Deum respecteth his power as he is omnipotent and the Creator but credere in Deum hath respect to his goodnes wherevnto we come through loue Pighius naming but two of these three for he ioyneth two of them together saith the one doth properly respect the truth of God for an obiect the other doth rather respect the goodnes of God as it is after a sort through naturall loue now made ours The faith which made Abels sacrifice acceptable to God was a iustifying faith yet Erasmus said God accepted his sacrifice because he did with a sincere heart trust his goodnes And we heard before out of Iansenius that the faith by which meÌ„ are saued obtaine their requests doth not onely comprehend a firme assent in things to be beleeued but likewise an assurance conceiued and arising from his goodnes Can these be one and the same habite who differ so much in their speciall and proper obiects 4. They differ in their proper and immediate effects For first the one iustifieth the other doth not iustifie That there is a faith which iustifieth Paul teacheth at large and in many places We conclude saith he â—hat a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the law And to him that worketh not but beleeueth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnes And know that a man is not iustifyed by the workes of the lawe but by the faith of Iesus Christ. I need not proue this seeing the papists confesse with vs that there is a Faith which iustifieth though they contend with vs about the maner how it iustifieth That there is a Faith that iustifieth not the Apostle Iames teacheth Namely a dead Faith a faith without works such a faith as the diuels haue Augustine teacheth vs which is the Faith which iustifieth Namely the faith qua credimus in Deum whereby we belieue in God and which is the Faith which iustifieth not namely Fides quacredimus Deo wherby we giue credit to God wheÌ„ he saith we belieue the Apostle but wee belieue not in the Apostle because the Apostle doth not iustifie the vngodly but vnto him that belieueth in him who iustifieth the vngodly his faith shall be reputed for Righteousnesse As if Credere Deo which is an historicall and dogmaticall faith were not sufficient to â—…stifie vs but credere Deum which is to haue a special confidence in God as before was declared Not only Augustine but likewise Bernard and the M of sentences doe teach that the diuels credunt Deo doe belieue all things to be true which God hath reuealed which is a right historical faith And yet I hope the Papists will not say that the diuels are iustified For then might they holde with Origen that they shall be saued Lumbard hauing shewed the difference betwixt these three Credere Deo credere Deum and credere in Deum doth say of the last By this faith the vngodly is iustified that afterward Faith it selfe may beginne to worke by loue Because a man is iustified by it and not by eyther of the other two and because it doth worke by loue not before it iustifie but rather begins to worke by loue when it hath iustified And therefore doth not iustifie by vertue of charitie whereby it worketh Are you then so simple to belieue that the Faith which iustifieth and the faith which iustifieth not are all one That two men hauing one and the same Faith the one of them should bee iustified by his Faith and the other should not be iustified by his If they bee one and the same Faith whence comes this great difference in theyr proper and immediate effects But the other faith is without good workes as Saint Iames teacheth and this is called by him a dead faith The Councell of Trent acknowledgeth that it may most truely be said Faith without Workes is dead and idle And what faith is this but euen an hystoricall faith Ferus wrote that by Faith whereby wee assent to those things which be deliuered in the diuine hystories and which the Church propoundeth to be belieued the schoolmen call vnformed Faith and Iames calleth a Dead-faith But what faith is that which is dead and wanteth his substantiall forme Truely saith he it is no faith but a vaine opinion And then afterward describeth a iustifying faith as being another kinde of faith Though Dominicus Soto went about to confute his description of a iustifying faith yet did he not mislike any thing which hee spake of the hystoricall vnformed and dead faith And so by his silence doth iustify him heerein as may appeare in Sixtus Senensis Now the faith with workes and the faith without works doe so much differ that the one is properly called a faith and a true faith the other is not called a faith but only by equiuocation Therefore Augustine said hee doth not belieue Jesus to be Christ who doth not so liue as Christ hath commanded Iames saith 26 Shewe me thy faith by thy workes and I will shewe thee my faith by my workes As if neyther of them had any true faith vnlesse they could shewe it by their workes Whervpon Thomas Aquinas gaue this glosse Shew me thy faith As if hee should say Prooue vnto mee by some certaine signes that thou hast Faith thou canst not proue it when workes be wanting wordes are no sufficient witnesses And in another place hee saith That vngodly men seeme to haue true faith when indeede they haue not Gregory 1. once Bishop of Rome telleth vs That we ought to make knowne the truth of our faith by the consideration of our life for then are wee beleeuers in truth if that which we promise in words we fulfil in works And froÌ„ him the Councell of Mentz protested that hee doth truely beleeue who exerciseth by working that which he beleeueth If then the one of these bee a true Faith indeede and is truely and properly so to be called and the other is not a true faith indeede and improperly so called how can they be one and the same faith No more then a working horse and an idle painted horse are one and the same Againe these two doc so differ as that the one is called a liuing Faith the other is called a dead Faith That which iustifieth and bringeth forth good works is called a liuing Faith So the iust man is sayd to liue by Faith And Paul sayd I liue by the Faith in the Sonne of God Ferus hauing described the nature of a true Iustifying faith that it
is nothing else but to trust to the free mercy of God he addeth further This is the true Faith whereby the iust man liueth But that which iustifieth not and is destitute of good works is tearmed a dead Faith by the Apostle Yea as the body is dead without the spirit so is faith dead without workes But the Rhemists Cardinall Bellarmine Coster the Iesuite and others doe answere that the Apostle doth not compare a dead faith with a dead man but with a dead body And therefore as a dead body is a true body so a dead faith is a true faith But they must knowe that although the Apostle compare a dead faith not to a dead man but to a dead body yet he compareth it to the dead body of a man which is no true humane body indeed because it wanteth the soule which is the forme of it The Philosopher will teach them That when the bodye is dead there is neyther foote nor hand but onely by equiuocation for all the parts of the body are defined by their office and facultie therefore when they lye dead they are not the same but onely retaine the shadow and shew of the name Though a dead body haue the earthly and materiall parts yet it is not the true body of a man nor the same body that it was before seeing it wanteth his forme life and actiuitâ—e operation and motion So a dead faith hath some materiall parts of a true faith as knowledge vnderstanding and assent yet it is not a true faith indeed because it wanteth speciall application which is the soule of faith It wanteth actiuitie charitie and obedience which are the life of it Didimus Alexandrinus did othâ—rwise take the words of S. Iames then these papists doe for thus he writeth It is to be marked that seeing faith is dead without good workes it is now no faith at all for a dead man is not a man at all Their owne friend Ferus is as peremptorie against them and for vs. Faith without charitie saith he hath indeed the tytle of faith but if thou wilt not speake obscurely of that matter it is not in that sort faith as a body without a soule is a man as a candle put out is light or as a tree cut downe is a tree What kind of light is that which doth not shine and giue light what kinde of fire is that which is not kindled what kinde of man is that which neyther seeth nor heareth nor feeleth nor moueth What kinde of tree is that which hath neyther rootes nor boughes nor bringeth forth fruite Such a kinde of faith is that which is without charitie namely a dead Faith as Iames nameth it How then can any man iustly say that these two are both one and the same faith Lastly they differ in their effects because the one procureth the saluation of our soules namely that liuely and speciall faith which worketh by loue for of that it is sayde Whosoeuer beleeueth in the Sonne hath euerlasting life And by grace wee are saued through faith and not of our selues But the other the Historical faith destitute of works cannot saue any man so teacheth the Apostle And that all those places cannot bee vnderstood of one the same faith all writers giue euidence Augustine said not that faith of the Diuels who beleeue and tremble and confesse Iesus to bee the Sonne of God is that foundation which suffereth none to perish but that faith which the Apostle saith worketh by loue Now what he took to be the faith of the Diuels I haue before shewed Credunt Deum credunt Deo they haue an historicall faith to beleeue all things to be true which hee hath reuealed Non credunt in Deum they put no confidence in him so want a speciall iustifying faith that should saue them So Bernard writeth He that beleeueth in God shall not be confounded And therevpon inferreth that the Diuels though they beleeue God yet they doe not beleeue in God in whom whosoeuer beleeueth shall not be confounded because they doe not put their hope in him Now who that hath any vnderstanding in Religion will say that the faith which is able to saue a mans soule and the faith which is not able to saue a mans soule are both one in kind in nature and substance And that those who are tormented in hell can truely say that while they were on earth they had the very same faith which brought the Saintes to the Kingdome of heauen By that which hath bene spoken touching this point you may vnderstand what a kinde of faith is taught by the greatest Doctors in the Romish church what is the best faith which they require of the people euen an hystoricall faith to giue assent to the truth of things reuealed Which faith as hath bene prooued may be in wicked men in Reprobates in men out of the state of grace in men that shall goe to hell Yea such a faith as is found in the very diuels of Hell What saluation can be obtained in that Church whose preachers teach no better faith Who would be ledde by such guydes I knowe that they would make a difference betwixt the faith of their right Catholickes and the faith of diuels because the one hath Charitie alwayes accompanying it the other wanteth Charity But they might consider that according to their doctrine this maketh no essentiall but a meere accidentall difference Seeing they teach that the same assent to the truth of things reuealed is in some with charitie and in others without charitie it euideÌ„tly appeareth that according to their doctrine Charitie is not a proper immediate necessary and essentiall propertie of it but meerely accidentall Indeed wee hold that Charitie is a proper necessary effect of a iustifying faith so as faith is no sooner wrought in the heart of any but forthwith hee is endued with loue He cannot but loue him in whom he belieueth and of whose loue and fauour he is perswaded And therefore charitie though it do not make yet it may declare the essentiall difference and the nature of this faith But seeing it is no such necessary effect of their assenting faith it can neyther make nor declare any essentiall difference of it And therefore he who wanteth charitie may haue the same faith in substance that hee hath who is endued with Charitie Bellarmine going about to proue that true faith meaning theyr assenting faith may bee separated from loue draweth one Argument from the proper reason nature of them both If they cannot be seuered saith he 46 It is eyther because the one is of the reason or being of the other or that the one doth necessarily arise from the other Not the first because Faith charitie are not one vertue but two And besides that haue diuers subiectes actes and obiectes For faith is in the vnderstanstanding Charitie in the will Faith belieueth
charitie loueth Faith respecteth the first trueth Charitie the chiese good Not the second because although charity arise of faith yet it doth not arise as a proper passion which doth necessarily flowe from the subiect but as a vertue vnto which an other doth dispose and encline And Thomas Aquinas saith Seeing Charitie is without the essence of faith by the comming or departure of it the substance of faith is not changed And although Bellarmine holde with the school-men that Charitie is the forme of faith yet he tteacheth that it is an outward not an inward forme And such a forme as doth not giue beeing vnto it but motion Howe then can it make it make any essentiall differēce betwixt that faith which hath it and that faith which wanteth it I know that the Fathers do sometime note loue as a difference betwixt the faith of Christians and diuels and betwixt the faith of good Christians and bad Yet do they not make it the onely difference betwixt them they teach an essentiall differēce by belieuing in God with trust and confidence Againe they might better make it a difference of theyr faith then the Papists can make it a difference of the faith which they teach because it was a necessary and proper effect proceeding from that their faith not from any other For those that do so belieue in God with hope and confidence of his mercie and goodnes towards them cannot but loue him But papists haue no such confidence nor assurāce in their faith which should make them to loue God they may haue all theyr faith without loue And therefore loue cannot distinguish it essentially from the faith of diuels So then to shut vp this point it still remaineth apparent that in the nature and substance there is no difference at all betwixt popish assenting faith and the faith of diuels And surely those that now content themselues with such a faith as is no better in substance then the faith of diuels may iustly feare least hereafter they shall haue no better estate in substance then the deuils haue SECT XII THe last kinde of faith which I mentioned I called a Temporary faith which differeth from a dead faith because while it lasteth it bringeth forth outward fruites And yet is not the same with a iustfying faith because it commeth short of it by many degrees doth not saue any and continueth not vnto the end This faith is scarce knowne to the papists very fewe of their writers make any mention of it Yet lest any should thinke that it is a new coyned tearme and a newly inuented faith I will shew what authors write of it Augustine long agoe vsed the name and tytle together with the name of Historicall faith as before I declared Bernard doth at large describe it and sheweth the difference betwixt it and other kindes of faith he maketh a diuisiō of a threefold faith There is a dead faith a fained faith and a tried faith The dead faith the Apostle defineth to be a faith without workes which doth not worke by loue The fained faith saith he I thinke that is called which hauing receiued life from charitie begins to be moued to worke well but not perseuering doth faile and die as an vntimely birth In the same sense indeed I may call it fained or fashioned that we call the potters vessels fictilia non because they are not profitable so long as they last but because seeing they are brickle they doe not last long Of this fayning of faith I thinke they are noted in the Gospell who beleeue for a while and in time of tentation goe away When and whither doe they depart surely from faith to infidelitie And these saith Christ haue no rootes He doth not deny but they haue that which is good but he rather blameth them that they were not rooted in that which is good Such are the soules hauing as yet a little and tender charitie and for this cause their faith though liuely yet fained or fraile must needes faile in tentation What kinde of faith euery mans is tribulation doth try If any man faile it is knowne to be fained If any mans continue it is iudged to be a tried and a perfect faith c. So likewise in another place he hauing described what is an vnfained faith he addeth that it is called an vnfained faith to shew the difference of it from a dead faith and a fained faith A dead faith is that which is without workes A fained faith is that which beleeueth for a season and in time of tentation goeth away whence it is called ficta fayned that is fraile or brickle Bernardine hath the same distinction and almost the very same wordes with Bernard in the former place and proueth the difference of a fained and failing faith from a dead faith and a tried faith by the words of the Euangelist Luk. 8. 13. they beleeue for a time Michaell Medina was so farre from thinking that this temporarie faith was the same with a iustifying faith that he accounted it while it continued to be no true faith at all For this he writeth True faith is the faith of Gods elect onely I confesse the reprobate doe belieue but for a season For in the time of tentation they goe away Which faith because it hath no rootes the holie Scripture doth not call a true faith And that faith which doth not bring forth the fruite of glorie is no faith before Christ. In this respect the reprobate are accused of vnbeliefe Because although they seemed in outward appearance to belieue yet they did not truely belieue because they wanted eyther true Charitie or Constancie which is so annexed to true faith that in Scripture faith is taken for fidelitie and that hee proueth by the wordes of the Apostle 1. Pet. 2. 6. These wordes and many more to the same effect are related by Sixtus Senensis yet not confuted nor condemned and therefore seeme to be approued Doe not you therefore condemne me for teaching the temporary faith to be another faith then iustifying faith is Thus I hope you plainely see that there is not one only faith in all men as some of your teachers would bear you in hand but that there be diuers kindes of faith really distinct one from another in nature in degrees in efficacy and operation And that this hath beene the ancient doctrine of the true Church and still hath bene taught by some in the Romane Church I pray God that you may not deceiue your selues with a fained faith nor content your selues with that assenting faith which some doe falsely tell you is sufficient But that you may seeke and also obtaine that iustifying faith which is able to saue your soules Take heede of giuing too much credite to some late popish writers Their malice against vs prouoketh them to speake worse of faith then they ought Though it be the most necessary and most effectuall grace which
mortally after he had receyued a formed faith That faith was lost and another habit of informed faith was infused of God in steede of it He thought it was not conuenient to say any gift of God should bee bestowed on man for the practise of mortall sinne therfore he holdeth that after mortall sinne committed by a Belieuer the same habite of faith remaineth which was in him before And how can any of them say otherwise who teach as I shewed before that the faith which is in a man before grace before his repentance and conuersion is the selfe-same habite in number that is in him after grace and conuersion The Councell of Trent decreed that Faith is lost by infidelitie and by euery mortall sinne though faith be not lost yet the receiued grace of iustification is lost As if a man could not loose his faith by any mortall sinne but onely by infidelitie And that by mortall sinne a man might loose his former grace of iustification yet not loose his faith And according to that rule Bellarmine writeth that there is no sin which doth necessarily exclude faith but that which is opposed vnto it which is infidelity And this is manifestly testified by experience For we see among the Catholickes manie publicke sinners Murtherers Fornicators Thieues druÌ„kards who without all doubt giue credit to all those things which the Church propoundeth to be beleeued Coster the Iesuite likewise as the best Physitions by intemperancie breaking the Rules of theyr arte doe not thereby loose the skill and knowledge of Physicke So a Christian who against the testimony of his owne conscience doth sinne contrary to the lawes of faith neyther looseth his faith nor ceaseth to bee Christian. And seeing that by faith belieuers differ from Infidels if sinners want faith they should be Infidels and be separated from the Church after the manner of Infidels And yet sinners belâ—g to the church as Taâ—es are in the same fielde with wheate Good-fish in the same Net with bad But by the way consider what kinde of persons they acknowledge for true belieuers euen the worst that almost can be Publike sinners Murtherers Fornicators Theeues Drunkards Such as ought for theyr leawd liues to be excommunicated Such as be tares among wheate A man may finde as holy beleeuers as these in Hell Is this that faith which S. Iames would haue a man to shewe by his workes It is true indeede that their Assenting faith may bee found in such vngodly persons for it is found in the very diuels Yet a true sauing faith wherof the question is cannot be found in any such persons as keepe a continued course in the practise of these sinnes True beleeuers may somtime sinne of infirmitie yet not of wilfulnesse Thogh they fall yet they arise again and doe not long continue in sinne Cyprian asketh how any man can say hee belieueth in Christ who doth not that which Christ commanded him to doe As if hee had no true faith who wanteth obedience That is true Faith 16â— saide Beda which doth not contradict that in maÌ„ners which it speaketh in words They might therefore better say Such sinners neuer had true faith at all and so cannot loose that which they neuer had Againe obserue what their beleeuers loose by their mortall sinnes Though they loose not the habite yet they loose the forme of faith Yea they loose the life of faith for now it is become a dead faith seeing it wanteth good workes Yea they loose the grace of iustification and so become guilty againe of all theyr former sinnes They might as well loose faith it selfe such a faith as is lost will doe them no good What an absurditie it is to hold that a formed faith and an vnformed faith a liuing faith and a dead faith a iustifying faith and a faith that iustifieth not are one and the selfe same faith hath bene sufficiently proued already Yet to this absurditie are they driuen that so they may maintaine the vnitie of faith in all sorts of beleeuers When as they should rather acknowledge that their assenting faith and a true iustifying faith are distinct kindes and that those who liue and continue in grosse sinnes though they may haue the former yet they neuer had and therefore cannot possibly loose the later Michael Medina one of their owne Church doth stiffely maintaine it that though an vnformed faith doth not vanish away by mortall sinne yet that sound faith which Christ requires in the Gospell cannot stand with a peruerse continuance in haynous offences And proueth it by the testimonies of S. Paul And therefore that they onely haue a true faith who stil continue in wel doing But although that most of our aduersaries teach that faith may not bee lost by deadly sinne yet they hold it may bee lost by Infidelitie as if Infidelitie were not a deadly sinne And if this be so then Bellarmines arguments whereby he would prooue that faith may be lost are altogether impertinent and fall to the ground of themselues seeing they are drawne from a relapse into sinne not into Infidelitie When the Lord spake by his Prophet That if the righteous man did forsake his righteousness and commit iniquitie hee shall dye for the same which is the Cardinals first argument He spake not of a falling from righteousnes into Infielitie but of a falling into mortall sinne as they call it When Christ said Eueâ—y branch that beareth not fruite hee will take away hee vnderstood not of any reuolt to Infidelitie but of the sinnes of omission in which men fayle in their duties The like may be said of Christs words that iniquity should abound and charitie waxe cold And of Pauls beating of his body and bringing it into subiection which bee other of his arguments for that purpose He also endeuourth to proue it by 8. seuerall examples of persons who lost their faith Yet all of them are in the same maner impertinent The bad Angels and Adam before their falles had no such faith as now wee haue nor any such promise of perseuerance yet dare hee not say that any of them fell to Infidelitie For the Diuels haue their assenting faith as before I haue proued but it is apparant touching the rest whom hee alleadgeth Wall the Cardinall say that Saul Dauid Salomon Peter and Iudas fell froÌ„ faith to Infidelitie Became they Pagans by their falls Did they not still prosesse the same God that they did before Did they denye the trueth of his word Why then will hee produce their examples to prooue that a man may lose his faith seeing he himselfe before taught that faith cannot bee lost by any mortall sinne but onely by Infidelitie Let the Cardinall therefore eyther alter his opinion or bring more pertinent proofes But may true faith be lost by infidelitie may a iustified beleeuer become an Infidell a Iew a Turke a Pagan surely no. A man may quite loose their assâ—â—ting faith
and of a professed Christian become an Infidell but he who hath a true Justifying faith cannot quite loose it he may fall in outward shew onely still retayning faith in his heart so did Peter in his fall as shall afterward appeare but he who falleth away indeed and in truth totally and finally neuer had this iustifying faith Marcellinus Bishop of Rome seemed to fall into infidelitie when he sacrificed to Idols did he then loose his faith was he then become an Infidell indeed Then may the Bishop of Rome not onely erre in matters of faith but likewise quite loose his faith and become an Infidell yea an Infidell then may be the head of the Romane Church To auoyd this inconuenience Bellarmine answereth that he was neither Hereâ—icke nor Infidell but onely in outward acte for feare of death did sacrifice to Idolls As if he kept faith in his heart when he performed the outward act of an Infidell And of Liberius another Bishop of Rome he likewise saith That though it be true that he subscribed to the Arian heresie yet hee was no Hereticke but onely sinned in outward acte as Marcellinus did Why then may we not say that a Iustified beleeuer though hee through feare fall to the outward act of Infidelitie yet still keepeth faith in his heart Moreouer the testimonies which I alleadged out of the Fathers are absolute generall as well against the losing of faith by infidelitie as against the losâ—oâ—g of it by sinne But if any did fall to Infidelitie not onely in outward act but also in hart totally in deed in truth they were iudged by the Fathers neuer to haue had this faith Augustine said that those who doe not perseuere but so fall away from Christian faith and conuersation that the end of this life finde them such out of doubt at that time when they liued well and godly were not to be reckoned in the number of the elect and of them who are called according to his purpose So hee writeth of the Discciples which forsooke Christ at Capernaum That they were called Disciples the Gospell so speaking and yet they were not Disciples in truth because they abode not in his word According to that which he saith If yee abide in my Worde yee are verily my Disciples Therefore because they had not perseuerance As they were not truely the Diseiples of Christ So neyther were they truely the sonnes of God Euen when they seemed to bee and were so called And if they were not truely the Sonnes of God they had no faith For by Faith are we made the Sonnes of God as the scripture teacheth Yea the same Father professedly expoundsng the place of Iohn where those Disciples are mentioned saith They were to be reckoned among vnbelieuers though they were called Disciples If any suspect that I wrest his wordes contrary to his meaning Let him reade Maldonatus a Papist who writeth that 52 the Disciples which beleeued not when they followed Christ were Iudas and the murmurers And that Augustine and Beda doe thinke that those which went backe neuer had faith no more then those which S. Paul said were turned backe after Satan But of what faith must this be vnderstoode What faith did those Disciples and othe Reuolters want when they were taken for Disciples and Christians Was it an Hystoricall or assenting faith The Iesuites will not yeeld that Castor holdeth that all in the Church haue such a faith yea though they be as Tares among wheat bad fish among good foolish virgins wanting oyle in their Lamps as the guest wanting a wedding-Garment and like the incestuous Corinthian Bellarmine auoucheth that all in the Church are such beleeuers though they be wicked ones and instanceth in the forenamed Parables as if all the persons noted therein had that faith though they wanted charity good works Those Disciples and other reuolters before their backe-sliding were in the Church and yet wanted faith As Christ himself Augustine and others haue taught And therefore seeing that by the doctrine of the Iesuites they could not want an historicall and assenting faith they must needs want another faith namely a true iustifying faith But of all others Michael Medina is most plaine and copious in this point as in parte I declared when I spake of a temporary faith yet more may be added to shew his resolute opinion that none haue true faith but they which keepe it to the end According to Christian veritie saith he onely that is to be iudged a true faith which hath the efficacy of obtayning saluation According to that Hee that beleeueth in mee hath eternal life And afterward he addeth That true faith indeede doth consist with true loue but that onely is called true loue by a moral truth which hath perseuerance and continuance And that the Scripture neuer called the faith of them who beleeue for a time to be true saith And that those who are damned neuer had true faith And in conclusion he asked Soto whether he is to be called faithfull or a friend who should be ioyned vnto him for an houre by frieÌ„dship and faith which if he will not say because continuance and constancie is of the nature and being of true faith and charitie then cannot such offenders be called true beleeuers in Christ. Cardinall Bellarmine holdeth against some who then liued that Christ did not onely pray that Peter might continue in faith and in the fauour of God vnto the end but that he also prayed a little after for the perseuerance of all the Apostles yea also of all the elect Ioh. 17. Holy Father keepe them in thy Name whom thou hast giuen me How then can the Faith of any of the Elect faile Shall wee thinke that Christs Prayer was not heard Doth not hee else-where acknowledge that the Father heard him alwayes Was his prayer effectuall against the losse of grace and faith by sinne not against the losse of them by Infidelitie Then was his prayer heard but in part How can they proue that difference SECT XIIII IN prosecuting this point I produced Peuer for an Example who though he denyed his master with an Oath yet still kept Faith in his heart And least any should thinke that this was a speciall priuiledge in Peter I shewed that Christ prayed for others as well as for him Now if there be any who imagine that Christ prayed for them after a different maner and to another end let them remember what I alleadged before out of Augustine touching Christs prayer for all the elect namelie That Christ praying for them that their Faith might not fayle without doubt it shall not fayle vnto the end and therefore shall continue vnto the end neyther shall the end of this life find it otherwise then remayning But because that Bellarmine and others doe teach that Peter did quite loose his faith and the righteousnes thereof I will
so many of the Fathers and of your owne writers SECT XVI BVt to conclude least I might seeme ouer-much to exceed the lâ—ngth of a Postscript I knowe your Priests do confidently tell you that they haue all the ancieÌ„t Fathers on their side against vs Euen as Eutiches and Dioscorus insolently bragged 1. that the Fathers taught their errour And as the Arians falsly pretended that Dyonisius Alexandrinus was of their opinion And as the Pelagians alledged Clemens Alexandrinus Ambrose Arnobius Chrysost others as maintainers of their heresie I haue therfore giuen you a tast of that vntruth euen in those Controuersies touched in these sermoÌ„s The like hath bene done by others and may be done againe in other Controuersies Doe not therefore belieue those their vaine brags Againe whereas they boast much of vnitie doe make it a marke of the Church and would thereby proue themselues to be the true church you may by these few points euidently see that they haue many iarres and contentions about the chiefest points of faith As the Arians long agoe were noted not onely to differ in opinion from the orthodoxall fathers of the Church but likewise to differ much one from another and that in many points of religion So may it now be obserued that the papists doe not onely varie from vs but likewise dissent many waies one from another And that not onely in ceremonies and circumstances or matters of lesser moment as they charge vs to contend among our selues but likewise in the substantiall points of mans saluation in the very forme nature and properties of a iustifying faith And lastly whereas you all pretend that you haue that true faith in Iesus Christ which is able to saue your soules I would wish you to consider that all those doe deceiue themselues therein who doe not testifie their faith by their workes as the Apostle teacheth Much hath bene written and that by sundry men in times past touching the bad maners of Rome we who reade those reports and doe knowe the maner of your conuersation may well imagine that sinfull deeds are the proper fruites of poperie And that papists wheresoeuer they be whether at Rome or else where are all alike prophane in their behauiour I know that like pharises you are very strict in obseruing humane preceps as not to eate an egge in Lent not to doe any worke on one of the superstitious holydaies abrogated in our Church not to go out of the doores before you haue blessed your selues with the signe of the crosse not to take the better hand of a crosse standing in the high way side not to speake of a dead man vnles you say God haue mercy on his soule Yet are most of you very carelesse in keeping Gods commandements Where may we finde more vngodly swearing more impious profanation of the Sabboth more wilfull disobedience to lawfull authoritie more beastly drunkennes and disordered drinkings and swaggering more filthy whoredome more wastfull gaming more bitter rayling and vncharitable back-byting then is to be seene in the Recusants and non-communicants of this Countrey And so infectious is sinne that theyr bad example doth corrupt the mind and manners of manie about them Doe these hope to be saued by their good works Will these be accounted confessours of their Religion And yet keepe no good conscience in their conuersation Augustine said truely That they are good Catholiks who follow both sound Faith and good manners Why then should we account them good Catholickes who haue neither sound Faith nor good manners The Lord of his mercie open your eyes that you see his truth and some out of Babel And also worke true faith in your hearts that you may through his Sonne inherite his euerlasting kingdome Amen FINIS 1 Deut 6. 3 4. 31 12. 13. Math. 17. 5. 2 Isai 28. 23. 66. 2. 5. Ier. 6. 18. 9. 2 10. 1. 3 Math. 11 15. 13 9. 43 Math. 15 10 Luk. 14. 35 4 Act. 13. 16 15. 13 Reuel 〈◊〉 7. 11. 17. 5 Nehâ—m 89. Luk. 51 Lâ—k 15 1. 21. 38. Act. 10 33 13. 7 44 Act. 16. 14 6 Ieh 8. 47 18. 37 1. Ioh. 4. 6 7 Ioh 10. 27 8 Deut. 33. 3 9 Luk. 8. 21 10 Luk. 11 28 11 Math. 7 24 Luâ— 10. 42 12 Ier 23 22 Act. 2. 41 1. Cor. 14 24. 25 13 Act. 4. 〈◊〉 15. 7 Rom. 10. 17 14 Act. 10. 44 Gal. 3. 2. 5 15 Reuel 3. 20. 16 〈◊〉 Tim. 4. 16 â—…am 1. 21. 17 2 Châ—o 24. 19. 23. â—…em 9. 30. Ier. 26. 4. 5 18 Deut 18. 19 Math. 10 14 15. Math 12. 42 19 Act 15. 21. 20 Luk 4 16. 21 Act 17. 42 44 17 2 〈◊〉 4 22 â—ustin Maâ—tye apolog 2 Teâ—â—ull apolog c 39 Origen in â—x od â—omil 7. 23 Colon caâ— 9 Laoâ—ic cap 16 â—â—ul lan ca 19 Magâ—â—t cap 25. 24 Bernatdinâ—de Senâ—s de obseruaâ— sabb serm 1â— cap 3. Tollâ—t instruct sacerdoâ— lib. 〈◊〉 ca 6 Vaux catech cap 3. 25 â—hom Wassingh hist Augt in Exwar â—…1 p 43. Idoâ— dagm Neustr p 472. De Henrico 3. Math. 26 8. Ioh 12 4. Math 20 15. Nâ—hem 4 7 8 2 Tim 3 6 2 Tim 38 Tit 1 11 〈◊〉 Pet 2 3. 1. Sam. 28. 7. Epist. 48. ad viacent Leges principum rectè imploraâ—i aduersus hostes fider modo id fiat animo corrigendi non studio vindicandi August epist 48 Vides epist 50. 60. 61 127 167. 2 P. Martyr comment in Iudic 21 19 21 fol. 177 Simler comment n Exod 20 8 3 Orat in Christi natruit paulo pâ—st â—itium 4 Contra 〈◊〉 orat z prope finem 5 Apud Dadâ—ae loc comâ— tit â—estus dies 6 In psal 32 â—onc 1 In solitracâ— 3 De decem chord cap 〈◊〉 7 Toletan corcil 3. 1. Canon 22. 8 Can. 35. Vides Flac. Illyâ—is catalog test verit in Leo 4 9 Verae religionis homines etiam solennia eorum conscientia potius quà m lasciuia celebraÌ„t c. Siccine exprimitur publicum gaudium pet publicum dedecus haeccine solen es dies principium decent quae alios dies non decent Apologet cap. 35. 10 Sozom. hist l. 8 c 20. 11 In Genes 24 homil 47 in 〈◊〉 homil 55. mino 12 Can. 53 54. 13 Ludou vâ—ues de institut faem lib. 1. c. 11. Catech. Rom part 3. cap. 7. p. 351. Iudolph de vita christi part 〈◊〉 c. 66. A. Tho Aquâ—… Hugo cardio Ferus in Math 14. Iansen concord euangel cap 59. 14 Polydor vitgil de inuent lib 5. c 2 〈◊〉 8 Vaux catech cap 3 15 Nâ—tum ist omnibus nugaces turpes saltationes ab episeopis solere compesci Contr epist. Parmen lib 3 cap 6. 16 Hiero. nim epist. Tranquilin Augustin cpiss 19 coÌ„ Crescon lib. 2 cap. 31 32 Dionys. Alexandr apud Enseb hist. lib. 7 cap. 23. Quis te non videat in me apertum iactaâ—e conuitium