Selected quad for the lemma: faith_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
faith_n church_n divine_a infallible_a 7,205 5 9.5243 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A05364 A consultation what faith and religion is best to be imbraced. Written in Latin by the R. Father Leonard Lessius, Professour in Diuinity, of the Society of Iesus. And translated into English by W.I. Lessius, Leonardus, 1554-1623.; Wright, William, 1563-1639. 1618 (1618) STC 15517; ESTC S105037 99,482 276

There are 17 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

no small matter but euen such as all other things be they good or bad are nothing in comparison therof And this damnation or saluation dependeth of good or bad Religion If thy Religion be good it shall be easy for thee to obtaine saluation but if it be euill it is impossible for thee to be saued By euill or false Religion thou canst not please God Hebr. 11. consequently not obtayne pardon of thy sinnes not true Iustice nor yet by any meanes be made partaker of Christs redemption but remaynest in death and the wrath of God remayneth vpon thee For that all men without the redemption of Christ Rom. 3.4 and liuing againe in him do remayne in death of sinne are the sonnes of wrath but whosoeuer imbraceth not true Religion is made voyd of the Redemption and quickening of Christ wherefore of necessity he must remaine in death and be the sonne of wrath and fewell for eternall fire Furthermore true Religion is only one and not manifold for that there is but one verity one faith Ephes 4. one baptisme one God Lord of all wherof it followeth by consequence First that all Religion all Faith all Confessions of faith besides this only one are false hurtefull pestilent and brought in by the Diuell as author therof and the Father of lyes Secondly no man that hath not this onely Faith can possibly obtaine euerlasting faluation and all that shall be destitute therof although otherwise they liue neuer so well shall infallibly perish eternally 1. Cor. 13. For that which the Appostle saith of charity to wit If I should speake which the tongues of men Angells if I should know all mysteries if I should distr●bute all my goods to be meate for the poore if I should deliuer my body so that I burne and haue not ch●●rity it doth profit me nothing may with better reasō be spoken of true faith religion which is the vary foundatiō of charity and of all other christian vertues Thirdly it is a very grosse errour of certaine simple people that thinke it to be inough to their saluatiō if they belieue in Christ and that he dyed for their sinnes although they belieue not many other things for examples sake those which belong to Sacraments sacrifice of the Church and other such like pointes of faith for so should almost all Sects of beretikes be saued for that all except some few do imbrace Christ or els they should not be heretikes but Apostataes and belieue that he dyed for their sinnes And so by this meanes shal be saued the Montanistes Nonutiam the Donatistes and Sabellians the Arrians Macedonians Aerians Eutichians Monethelites and such like pestes of the Church Tit. 3. Wherefore then hath the Church in all ages vehemently opposed therselfe against heresies wherfore doth the Apostle command vs to aouyd an hereticall man after one or two reprehensions 2. Tim 2. Wherfore should we beware of their very speaches as a certaine infectious canker In vayne then are all these thinges spokē and done if saluation may be obtayned togeather with heresy Then truly is that a meere forged tale against the consent of all Ages which S. Augustine reciteth in these wordes Constituamus aliquem c. Let vs imagine saith he a man to be chast continent not couetous not a seruer of Idols liberal to the poore no mans enemy not contentious Aug. l. 4. cont Donat cap. 8. patient quiet emulating or enuying no mā sober frugall c. but yet an hereticke let there be no doubt at all to any but that such a one for this only thing in that he is an heretike shal not possesse the kingdome of God For as that man as witnesseth S. Iac. 2. Iames who offendeth in one commandement is made guilty of all looseth his whole iustice although he keep the rest of the commandement● because he contemneth the lawmaker himselfe who made the whole law euē so he that denieth obstanately but one article of faith though he retayne the rest i● made guilty of his whole Religion looseth all his Faith and Religion because he contemneth the Author therof For that the chiefe supreme Verity being one and the same hath reuealed all the articles of faith and doth propose the same to be beleeued of vs by the Church her spouse 1. Tim. 3. which is the pillar and firmament of truth He therfore that doth obstinately reiect but any one the least article of Faith not relying vpon the iudgment of the Church by that very act is he iudged to contemne the Author of the first principal Verity whose preacher interpreter instrument is the Church and by this meanes he looseth al his liuely faith which is necessary to saluation Neyther helpeth it any thing at al that he yet beleeueth some principall heads or articles of faith because he beleeueth them not with a liuely faith which cōsisteth vpon only diuine authority proposed vnto vs by infallible means els he should belieue the rest also that are propounded to him by the same meanes but he belieueth them with a certaine humane faith that is to say because by his owne priuate iudgment or opiniō he so thinketh them to be belieued taking vnto himselfe authority to iudg and discerne what things are to be belieued and what are to be reiected so as the chief reason of his beliefe is his priuate iudgment and therfore all that faith and beliefe is humane and of no value For most certaine it is that as true Iustice doth extend it selfe to all the commandements so doth true faith in like māner which is required to saluation extend it selfe to all those things that are reuealed vnto vs from God in such sort that we eyther expressoly belieue or be ready to belieue them all if they be accordingly proposed vnto vs. Wherby it is manifest how carefully we ought to endeauour to obtaine true faith and Religion seing that the same is the very foundation of all our saluation and without which most certaine damnation is to be expected Wherfore I haue thought good in this place to set downe certaine Considerations or Reasons manifest and perspicuous to euery one of ordinary capacity wherupon may be framed a certaine and infallible Deliberation concerning this busines of Religion I. CONSIDERATION Of the desyre of perfection wherunto Christian Religion leadeth THAT Religion is alwayes to be preferred that sauoureth of purity and holines of life That Christiā Religion leadeth to desyre of Perfectiō which draweth our myndes from earthly affections and styrreth vs vp to the loue of heauenly For that the chiefe end and scope of Religion is to sequester mens affections from these base and temporall things and to lift them vp to meditate loue and pursue celestiall and euerlasting Such is the only Catholike Religion and no other For she persuadeth to abstaine from pleasures of the flesh and alluiements of this life She teacheth to
them That they were most holy men it is the common consent of all Christian people for so many ages past that liued in their daies Neither was there euer made any doubt therof And this the heretikes themselues do also confesse of diuers of them and specially of S. Bernard S. Dominick and S. Francis For it were a great impudency to deny or call into doubt that which the consent of the whole world auerreth If these men therfore were Saintes and Catholiks as all the world doth hold them to haue byn it followeth necessarily that the Catholike Roman religion which they held imbraced is the true religion and proceedeth from the Holy Ghost First for that it is impossible that a false religion should lead to true sanctity for that religiō is the foundatiō of sanctity That heauenly edifice cānot be built vpō vanities nor vpon pernicious sacrilegious falsities as is euery falsity in religion It cannot be that a false religion should withdraw the mind frō earthly things and so fixe it vpon heauenly that being kindled with diuine loue and feruor should force the same to vndergo so great labours paines for procuring the health of her neighbours soules Not. withstanding the re●igion which these men imbraced did performe in them al these things and consequently it cannot be that their religion was false Secondly for that without true religion Hebr. 11. it is impossible to please God But by the consent of all these men pleased God and were his great friends and familiars Therfore their religion was the true For how could they please God who is verity it selfe by a false religion Thirdly if their religion were not true then was it from the Diuell for that he is a liar from the begining and the Father of lyes who by his lying and deceytes doth euer seeke to corrupt the true religion thereby to destroy soules If it came from the Diuell how could it then lead them to sanctity and make them enemies to the Diuell 2. Cor. ● and friends to God For what society is there betwene light and darkenes and what agreement with Christ and Belial Fourthly It is altogeather incredible that God should permit men so innocent so contemning themselues and worldly affaires so studious of his diuine glory and ardent louers of him to be deceiued for so many ages in a matter of so great moment to witt in the busines of religion and foundation of all piety Who is he that will thinke so impiously of Gods diuine goodnes They pretermitted nothing on their behalfe whereby then might please God and aduance his glory taking vpon them the greatest paines labours for the obtaining therof and wholy implying and cōsecrating their liues vnto him How cā it be that his diuine goodnes that true Light which enlightemeth euery man that comes into this world should not reueale the truth and his light to so worthy seruants and louers of him but should leaue them sticking fast in their blind and pestiferous errors Then is that false which our Lord so oftē repeating promised to wit Aske and it shal be giuen vnto you seeke and you shall find Matth 7. Luc. 11. knocke and it shal be opened vnto you For euery one that asketh receaueth and he that seeketh findeth and to him that knocketh it is opened For that S. Francis S. Dominick S. Bernard S. Benet and the like lightes and wonders of the world did all their life tyme aske seeke and knocke that they might obtaine of our Lord things necessary for their health to know and fullfill his will perfect●ly in all things and yet notwithstanding obtayned nothing heerin False also shall that be which our Sauiour saith If yow then being naught know how to giue good gi●●es to your children how much more will your Father from heauen giue a good spirit to them that aske for that these men did dayly and carnestly aske this spirit and yet obtayned it not For that a good spirit can neuer be without a good Religion I omit many other things which might be brought for confirmation heerof But if it be blasphemy to say that diuine promises be false then is it necessary to confesse that these men did receiue the true faith and Religion-Wherfore seing that they imbraced the Catholike Religion and were most addicted to the Roman Church detesting and hating all other faith and Religion that was contrary to this it cannot be doubted but that the Catholike and Roman is the only true and heauenly inspired Religion And all Religions besides are false and inuented by the Diuell Finally if their Religion were not the true but rather some of the Aduersaryes the true Religion then is it necessary to confesse all the forsaid men whome the whole world hath held for Saintes not to haue byn not only holy men and friends to God but to haue byn impious and enemyes to him and so damned and adiugded to euerlasting punishments For without true Religion it is impossible to please God Neyther can it be said that they were to be excused by ignorance for that ignorance doth not excuse except in certayne secondary cases which by reason of some positiue precept are necessary but in no case doth it excuse in any fundamentall and chiefehead For otherwise any man may obtayne saluation without any knowledg of God or Christ at al which is repugnant to al Scripture But if these men erred as some of our Aduersaryes do pretend that they did then erred they in the chiefe heads First because they acknowledged not a speciall faith wherby only we are iustified and made partaker of the redemption and iustice of Christ and sinne is not imputed vnto vs as the authors of other Religions do teach Therfore they remained in sinne being depriued of the participation of the Iustice of Christ consequently were childrē of Hell Secondly because according to their judgment they were out of the true Church of Christ out of which by consent of all there is no saluation did adhere to the whore of Babylon for so do they call the Roman Church and were the chiefe ministers instrumēts of Antichrist Thirdly because they were Idolatours adoring a creature for their Creatour to wit bread and wyne insteed of Christin the Eucharist worshipping Saintes their Images c. These thinges may not be excused by any ignorance whatsoeuer And therfore all these were wicked men and adiudged to hell torments But how improbable and incredible are all these things and against the cōmon consent of all Christian men that euer were And on the contrary side in other Religions there were neuer any of famous sanctity nor can they name so much as one For that their very first Authors were giuen to temporall commodities and were followers of pleasures hauing nothing singular in their liues aboue the common sort of people but rather giuen to greater vices and wickednes But of this point we shall speake more heereafter
law but offendeth in one he is made guilty of all for he who said thou shall not commit adultery said also thou shall not kill as if he should say he is made guilty of all and shal be punished as a breaker of the whole law because he hath despised the law maker who is the author of the whole law In like manner therfore he which shall deny one article although he belieue all the rest is made guilty of violating his whole faith and Religion because he contemneth God who is the first Truth who no lesse reuealed this then the other he contēneth the Catholike Church the spouse of Christ who is the pillar strength of Truth wherby he hath no lesse determined we should belieue this then the other And this is the reason why he is no lesse an heretike who with pertinacy denieth one point of faith thē he which denieth a hundred because in that he denieth one he contemneth God who is the first truth and did reueale it he contemneth the authority of the Church the which did propose it vnto vs he maketh the Church subiect to error and a liar wherby he is made also vncertaine of all the rest and looseth all his diuine faith for the ground of his diuine faith being takē away his whole faith must needs perish and consequently there remaineth only an opinion or humane fayth subiect to error wherby he belieueth all the rest The 10. Reason Tenthly and lastly this opinion is very dangerous in the practise therof for it maketh a man that he careth not what religion he hold what he belieueth or not belieueth he doth not therfore seeke after the truth and he doth as easily and with as great security lay hold on false as true things yet all men not only Catholike but euen the more principal sects those which are learned wise men do absolut'y affirme that none can be saued without the true faith and religion and whosoeuer are depriued therof shall perish for euer The followers therfore of this opinion are condemned of all and they only promise vnto themselues saluation without any author testimony or reason for it relying and trusting only in their owne vain imagination of their foolish braine let then therefore heare out of S. Fulgentius what antiquity hath alwaies holden and what the Catholike Church hath taught in all ages Thus therfore he writeth setting downe the rules of our common saith in his booke de fide ad Petruin Diaconum Cap. 38. Belieue assuredly saith he and doubt nothing at all that not only all Pagans but also all Iewes Heretikes and Schismatikes who shall dy out of the Catholike Church shall go into euerlasting fire which is prepared for the diuell and his Angells And in the 39. Cap. Belieue assuredly and doubt nothing that euery heretik or Schismatik christned in the name of the Father of the Son and of the holy Ghost if he be not within the number of those which are of the Catholik Church what almes soeuer he hath made albeit he shall shed his bloud for the name of Christ can by no meanes be saued for neither baptisme nor large and charitable almes nor death it selfe suffered for Christes sake will auaile that mā who 〈…〉 vnity of the Catholik Church as long as this hereticall or schismaticall wickednes wh●th leadeth to perdition shall continue in him This hath always byn the faith of the Catholike Church and the most certayne and vndoubted doctrine of the holy Fathers the which I would to God al those who remaine out of the Church of God would attentiuely and diligently consider they would truly and easily preceiue in how dangerous a state they continue Thou O Christ the light of the world shyne vnto their mindes and lighten their hartes Amen FINIS
A CONSVLTATION WHAT FAITH AND RELIG●●● is best to be imbraced WRITTEN IN LATIN By the R. Father Leonard Lessius Professour in Diuinity of the Society of IESVS AND Translated into English by W. I. IHS Permissu Superiorum M.DC.XVIII TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE THE LORD MAIOR TO THE RIGHT WORSHIPFVLL THE ALDERMEN AND TO THE RIGHT WORTHY CITTIZENS OF LONDON The Translatour wisheth all Health and Happines Temporall and Eternall RIGHT HONORABLE RIGHT WORSHIPFVLL AND RIGHT WORTHY I Was p●rswaded to present you with this Treatise trāslated by 〈◊〉 into our mother tongue that hath appeared far better 〈◊〉 in ●●ow●yde it was first inuested only through the loue and respect I beare to your so we deserming persons whose speciall endeauors amidst your other sor●ous imployments in that famous Citty should be and I hope is the attayning of such a traffike that may more redound to the profit of your Soules then your temporall Estates since you know well that a sure and solid foundation of true Religion worketh Eternall Saluation and the contrary eternall woe and misery though otherwise one were neuer so fortunate in all worldly prosperity The worke it selfe is but of some few houres reading and the Author I hope will not be distastfull vnto yow in respect of his person though otherwise of a different Profession habit And though I doubt not but that many of your haue already seene other learned Bookes of like subiect yet because this affoardeth so great variety of forcible Motiues both singularly chosen and most aptly expressed to settle mens Consciences in so waighty an affayre as this is I haue therfore thought good to present it to your View though in a more humble and far lesse polished stile then so profitable a subiect deserueth And heerunto I was the more encouraged by vnderstanding the great fruite and profit which many haue all ready and do dayly reape by a diligent perusall of this Booke in other languages hoping for no lesse in our owne then it hath produced in the Latin French and Dutch especially in men so zealous in that Profession which hath by in these later tymes preached vnto you Which zeale of yours would no doub● be more feruent if Gods Grace by other moth●es proposed should open your eyes to see the cleernes of the Catholike Verity Neither should it offend you that your Consciences hauing byn setled these 60. yeares last past in the Faith that was then proposed vnto you now a new reuiew of matters belonging to Religion should be offered For synce the Scripture doth premonish vs that Heresies must of necessity be and false Teachers would come to disturbe the peace and vnity of the Church of which sort as is apparent by her contrary doctrines this our vnfortunate Age hath byn most fertile it is doublesse no disgrace or signe of leuity or inconstancy by a diligent and iudicious examen to try which of all these diuers spirits is of God and which is that Catholike Church so often commended vnto vs in the Scriptures as nothing more plainely and seriously In which important search the Reading of this little but golden Treatise will by Gods grace affoard such light to discerne Truth from Falshood and such meanes to find out the true gate of Catholike faith which only leadeth to saluation as may satisfy the most Iudicious especially if they reade with that humblenes of spirit as they ought to do who desyre to know the Truth In reading therfore consider attentiuely euery Passage ponder the waight and substance of ech Reason not posting the same ouer as many do transpotted with curiosity to read all new Bookes that come forth and I doubt not you will receaue aboundant satisfaction Read then most worthy Cittizens the ensuing Consultation with an indifferent and vnpartiall eye that you may enrich your soules with the treasure of true knowledg doctrine which leadeth to eternall Life and Happines Wherof I humbly beseech his diuine Maiesty to make you partakers to whom I haue heerewith dedicated both my selfe and seruice to remayne Your seruant euer in Christ Iesus W. I. This 30 of Septemb. 1618. THE TABLE OF THE CONTENTS of the ensuing Consultation THE Preface pag. 1. The I. Consideration Of the desire of Perfection wherunto Christian Religion leadeth pag. 8. The II. Consideration That Christian Religion excludeth liberty of sinning pag. 11. The III. Consideration Drawne frō the Sanctity of the followers of true Religion pag. 2● The IIII. Consideration From the miracles wrought by the imbracers of Catholike Religion pag. 36. The V. Consideration From the Conuersion of Nations by the imbracers of Catholike Religion pag. 48. The VI. Consideration From the Name Catholike and from the thing it selfe signed or marked with this Name pag. 55. The VII Consideration From Succession pag. 59. The VIII Consideration From the consent of the ancient Fathers and Doctours of the Church and from the decision of controuersies without which there is no sodality or fellowship pag. 65. The IX Consideration From diuers causes and reasons for which these new doctrines are to be suspected and shunned pag. 74. The I. Reason Deduced from Nouelty pag. 75. The II. Reason Taken from the defect of Succession pag. 87. The III. Reason From the defect of their Mission pag. 9● The IIII. Reason From the want of Miracles pag. 106. The V. Reason From the conditions of their liues and manners pag. 116. The VI. Reason from their errors and inconstancy in Doctrine pag. 125. The VII Reason Taken from the fraudes and deceipts which the Sectaryes commonly vse pag. 135. The VIII Reason Drawne from the ouerthrow of good Workes pag. 153. The IX Reason Deduced from the liberty of life which they yield vnto pag. 158. The X. Reason That they renew old Heresies pag. 166. The XI Reason From want of a Rule of Fayth pag. 171. The XII Reason Drawne from Absurdity pag. 181. The X. Consideration And conclusion of this Consultation pag. 189. An Appendix of the Author Whether euery one may be saued in his owne Fayth and Religion pag. 214. A CONSVLTATION WHAT FAITH AND RELIGION IS TO be imbraced GREAT is the variety of Religion in this our age and great is the contention about the truth therof Many in this point do continually wauer nor can they determine any certainty passing from one Religion to another as it were from house to house for trialls sake thereby to find tranquility of mind Others through an inconsiderate boldnes do imbrace any Religion which by chance they light vpon without either examining or vnder standing the same who when they are demanded why they preferre that Religion before others they haue no other answere but that it seemes better to them or els which commonly all do oragge of because they follow the very pure word of God This busines notwithstanding is most worthy of great deliberation and discussion seeing that heerin consisteth the very center of our saluation Euerlasting saluation or damnation is
faith eyther for guilt or payne what should let him to commit neuer so gr●euous or emormous wickednes What should he feare Hell or Purgatory Neyther for by liuely faith alone no syn shal be imputed to any man although it be neuer so grieuous and filthy What then Shall he feare the Diuine wrath or the subtraction of heauenly Grace No for that God doth not impute the same vnto him and for the satisfaction that Christ made he cannot be offended with him Doth he feare temporall satisfaction or Confession Neyther For that these things are taken away as superstitions What then doth this man more feare then any Atheist Or how doth he not open as wyde a gate to all wickednes impurity as the Atheist What Atheisme teacheth the Scripture witnesseth when she fayth The foole said in hic hart Psal 13. there is no God they are corrupt and are made abhominable in all their endeauours There is not one that doth good there is not so much as one And this doth Atheisme teach for so much as it taketh away the feare of Diuine punishment wherby men are held as with a bridle from synning But these Religions do no lesse take a way the feare of heauenly reueng and chastisement when as they teach that nosyn shal be imputed eyther for offence or payne nor any man punished therfore Moreouer I say that by these Religions this wholsome feare of God is sooner taken a way then by Atheisme For few Atheists do certainly belieue that there is not any God at al but many doubt it and feare the contrary and so they be not without feare of punishment of him They take away all feare of God foure manner of wayes that may in many things represse them But these Religions do for certaine without all doubt teach that synnes are not imputed to the faithfull and this they commaund to be most firmely belieued and therfore they leaue no feare but do shake of all suspition imaginatiō of punishment whatsoeuer so as they giue a far greater scope to all wickednes then Atheisme doth Neyther do they this by one manner of way only but by a fourefold First For that they teach that through saith synnes are not imputed vnto vs be they neuey so many or neuer so heynow wherof we haue spoken inough before Secondly For that they say that all those who haue true faith are predestinated Calu. l. 3. c. 2. §. 6.7.11.12.15.16 38. and that they ought to belieue the same most assuredly And if all the followers of these Sectes be predestinated and that they are bound to belieue the same most firmely wherfore then should they be sollicitous eyther to liue well or to shun the workes of the flesh which the Apostle recounteth For neyther can they doubt of their saluation or that they shall go to hell because Gods predestination is potent and immutable and those who are so predestinated cannot possibly perish Neyther can they feare the paynes of Purgatory which they beleeue not nor yet can they feare punishments in this life when as synnes are not imputed to them by God Thirdly For that they take away the liberty of Freewill and do teach Luth. in Assert art 36. l. 1. cap. 16. §. 8. that all things happen by an ineuitable necessity and that a man cānot make his works better or worse For if there be no liberty there is properly no sinne like as a lyon when he demoureth a man although he committeth euill yet sinneth not because he doth it not freely but by the vehement instigation of nature nor is it in his power to moderate this his instigation Noe man shall be then worthy of punishment because that which is done by force of necessity deserueth no punishment Wherefore there shal be no hell nor any punishment at all after this life For that it should be a great and intollerable cruelty to damne a man to euerlasting torments for those things which by no meanes he could auoid Wherfore then should they feare to follow their harts desire or do any thing that may please their appetite Fourthly For that they teach all mens workes Luth. supra Cal. l. 1. cap. 17. § 5. cap. 18. §. 1. as well good as bad to haue bin preordained of God from all eternity and to that end the wills of men are by him inclined incited forced and determined to performe the same For if God do worke in vs as well bad as good there is no reason why we should endeauour to auoid euill or feare the punishment therof For that God is not the reuenger of that wherof he is the Author nor can he punish that which he will haue done in vs and causeth vs to do For that this should be more then Tyrannicall cruelty from which God is knowne to be fare off and free Here by then it is as cleare as the funne that these Religions by these foure wayes now declared do take frō the minds of mē all feare of God do giue as large a scope to all wickednes as euer any Atheisme in the world and that the more perniciously because the are not exercised in the open view and shew of impiety but vnder the colour forsooth of diuine religion and honour to wit vnder the faire titles of only faith satiffaction of Christ liberty of the new Ghospell diuine prouidence and predestination Vnder these shaddows thus couertly hid is swallowed so much venome that it wholy poysoneth the mindes and maners of men Who then that hath but the least dramme of an vpright iudgment that will thinke such Religions to come from God III. CONSIDERATION Drawne frō the Sanctity of the followers of true Religion THAT Religion is to be preferred wherin very many men haue byn famous for sanctity of life For it cannot be that a naughty religion should lead a man to sanctity or that true sanctity should abide with a naughty religion But Catholike religion hath had very many in her Church in all ages who by common confession and wittnes of all the Christian world were most holy men Amongst whome to omit innumerable others were S. Ant●ny the great S. Hilarion S. Gregory Thaumaturgus S. Nicolas Bishop of Myra S. Athanasius S. Gregory Nazianzen S. Basill S. Simeon Stelites S. Cipryan S. Hilary S. Martin S. Ambrose S. Hierome S. Augustine S. Benet S. Gregory the Great S. Vedastus S. Amādus S. VVinock S. Bertin S. Romwald S. VVillebrord S. Boniface S. Bruno S. Bernard S. Romuald S. Nortbert S. Dominicke S. Francis S. Themas of Aquine S. Bonauenture S. Francis à Paula and many more in our age That all these men were followers of the Catholike religion there can be not doubt aswell for that they adhering to the Roman Church did professe the faith therof wonderfully propagated the same as also for that most of thē were Monkes vowed religiou men nay all monasticall institutions professions had their begining by
disciple of his but he was in danger to haue byn strangled himself by that diuel Cochlaeus in actis Lutheri en 1523. as witnesseth Fredericus Staphilus who was present at the act And at another time he would haue raysed to life one that was drowned in the riuer of Alba but in vayne In like manner Caluin attempted to raise one to life who by his perswasiō feigned himselfe dead but with that successe that of aliue man he became dead indeed for that by the iust iudgment of God when as Caluin came to raise him he was found without life The whole story wherof with all particulers is at large recounted by M. Hierome Bolsecke in vita Caluini cap. 23. Wherfore seing neither true nor feigned miracles do succeed with them they endeauour to take quite away from the Catholike Church this most strong rocke and firmament of miracles which altogeather conuinceth the vnderstanding of man but with no shew of probability at all as we haue shewed As those therfore who pondering and weighing well the miracles of our Sauiour and his Apostles with a quiet and humble mynd setting aside all hatred other euill affections could not doubt but that their doctrine proceeded from God euen so now they that without hatred passiō of mynd consider well of the miracles that haue byn wrought in the Catholike Church by holy men in all ages both aliue and dead cannot doubt but that their Doctrine and Religion proceedeth from God and that the Church wherunto they adhere is the true Church of God V. CONSIDERATION From the Conuersion of Nations by the imbracers of Catholicke Religion THAT Religion is esteemed to be the true and consequently to be imbraced wherunto alwayes Nations haue byn conuerted For that our Lord hath often promised in Scripture this conuersion of Nations Psal 1. 21. Ose 1. matth marc Luc. vltimo to the true faith and worship of God which promise must be fulfilled But the Religion wherunto Nations in all ages haue byn and now in this our age also are conuerted is the Catholike and Roman Religion Ergo there can be no doubt but that this is the true Religion of Christ Now then that Religion wherunto these nations haue alwayes being and are conuerted is the Catholike and Roman Religion is most manifest by that which hath byn done aswell in this our age as in former before For that in this our age there haue byn infinite and dayly still are conuerted in the East Indies in Iapone and in the vast Kingdome of China besides in many Ilands of the Indian seas All these passe from their Gentility to the Catholike Religion are vnited to the Roman Church and this by Religious mens indeauours sent thither by authority from the Pope In the last or fourtenth Age one only S. Vincent surnamed Ferrerius of the order of S. Dominicke conuerted to the Catholike faith fiue and twenty thousand partly Iewes and partly Saracens as testifieth S. Antoninus a famous Writer of that age 3. p. Histor tit 23. cap. 8. § 4. In the 13. Age were conuerted very many to the Catholik faith in-the Kingdome of Tartary by two Friars of S. Dominickes order being sent thither from the Pope the Emperour of Tartary himselfe whome they cal the Great Cam desiring the same as wryteth Paulus Venetus whose help and endeauour the said Emperour vsed in effecting of this busines In the 12. Age the people of Nor why were conuerted vnto the Romā Faith by * This Adrian was an Englishman and called Nicolas Break-speare before he was aslūpted to the Apostolik Sea Adrian the fourth before he was Pope as writeth Platina in the life of Pope Alexander the fourth In the 11. Age were the Hungarians for the most part conuerted and Bishops ordayned and appointed there by the Pope of Rome at the request of their King Stephē after wards a Saint that was newly conuerted to the said Roman faith as wryte the Centuriators of Magdeburge Cent. 11. cap. 2. In the 10. Age were many prouinces conuerted to the Roman faith by the endeauours of Henry the first Emperour Adalbert and Methodius Archbishops of Bohemia and Morauia as testify the Centuriators aboue mentioned cent 10. cap. 2. In the 9. Age were the VVandalls Bulgarians Sclauonians Polonians with those of Denmarke and Morauia conuerted to the faith and vnited to the Roman Church Centur. 9. cap. 2. In the 8. Age was conuerted a great part of Germany to the Roman faith by S. Boniface sent thither for that purpose from Pope Gregory the second Cent. 8. cap. 2. In the 7. Age were conuerted those of Franconia or Franke-County by S. Kilian sent thither from the Pope of Rome also Cent. 7. cap. 2. In the 6. Age were the Englishmen conuerted to the Roman faith by Monkes sent thither for that purpose from S. Gregory the Great Cent. 6. cap. 2. Finally those of Brabant Flaunders Holland Frizeland VVestphalia France and other adioyning Nations by whome were they conuerted Were they not conuerted by disciples of the Roman Church to wit S. Seruatius S. Eloy S. Rumwold S. Amandus S. Vedastus S. Leuin S. Remigius S. VVillebrord S. Swibert S. VVulfrane and others who all were most addicted to the Roman Church By which it is manifest that all Nations which haue byn conuerted from Paganisme or Iudaisme to Christ for these thousand yeares last past were conuerted to the Catholike Roman faith and vnited and incorporated to the Roman Church This is also confirmed besides other tokens to haue byn the Roman faith and Religion by Priests by altars by worship of holy Reliques Images by pilgrimages by Inuocatiō of Saintes by Monasteryes by Monkes by Obedience to the Pope and by very many other things proper to Catholike Religian which were in vse among all Nations after their Couuersion vntill of ●ake they were take away and abolished in some places by these new vpstart Religions What man is there that maturely considering these things can any way doubt but that Catholike Religion is the true For that in her he seeth fullfilled Gods diuine promise of the cōuersion of Nations To her do fly so many people so many remote Nations so many most porent Kingdomes forsaking their Idolatry abandoning the impurity of life reiecting the multitude of wiues forgetting their barbarous sauage manners banishing all former liberty of life and as it were to become tame and tractable vnder the yoke of Christ sweetly to tast of the feare of God to comforme themselues to all modesty of life and last of al to be inflamed with the contempt of temporall things and loue of celestiall How is it possible that that Religion should be false and impious which doth worke such wonderfull mutation in the harts of barbarous people To conclude how can it possible be t●●t the Diuine Frouidence should permital these Nations so many yeares to be deceyued when as they haue forsaken their Idolatry so hartily imbraced verity and
vnited themselues to the Church of Christ and now to force them as it were into other abhominable errors and new Idolatry and that by such who were accompted and accepted of all men for lawfull Ministers of the Church and were famous for sanctity of life wisdom miracles God for bid that euer we should so thinke of his Diuine goodnes and prouidence which he vseth for mans saluation Furthermore to Lutheranisme Caluinisme or Anabapt●sme there was neuer heard of any conuersion of Nations or Pagan Kingdomes but only a defection of some few who professing the name of Christ and weary of their ancient Religion and discipline did follow the liberty of their lust nouelty which is a manifest argument of heresy For that heresy is nothing els but a corruption of Catholike doctrine and a defection or falling away from ancient Christian Religion only retayning the name of a Christian ●●esides the study of hereticall teachers is not to conuert Ethnicks but peruert Christians which Tertullian excellently describeth in his booke of Prescriptions Of administration of the word saith he what shall I say Seing that their busines is not to conuert Ethnicks but to peruert ours Christians They do take more glory to bring to ruine those that stand fast then to help those vp that are fallen because that this their endeauour comes not from their owne building but from the destruction of truth They digge vp ours to build vp theirs So as it commeth to passe that they worke the downfall of standing edifices more easily then the building of decayed ruines VI. CONSIDERATION From the Name Catholike from the thinge it selfe signed or marked with this Name FVRTHERMORE that Religion is to be esteemed for the true Religion which hath alwayes byn accompted called Catholike according to that of the Apostolicall creed Credo Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam I beleeue the holy Catholik Church But the Roman Church of all other Churches is only called the Catholick and her followers Catholikes Ergo only the Roman Religion is the true Religiō of Christ That the Roman Church is and alwayes hath byn only called Catholick is manifest First by the very vse custome of so calling her receyued throughout the world so as oftentymes the heretikes themselues in their wrytings do call her Catholike and her followers Catholiks neyther did any Sect whatsoeuer deserue that name For neuer were the Marcionites Montanistes Donatists Pelagians Vigilantians Waldenses Lutherans Caluinists or Anabaptistes called Catholikes or their doctrine Catholike Only the Roman Church with the people adhering vnto her is called the Catholike and the Religion faith doctrine of this Church is called the Catholike Religion the Catholikefaith the Catholike doctrine and her followers Catholikes Secondly Catholike is extended to all Nations because Catholike is the same that Vniuersall most largely extending it selfe to all And such is the Roman Religion for that it being dilated and spread ouerall the world doth extend it selfe to all nations and Kingdomes For that there is no Kingdome nor Nation vnknowne to vs which eyther doth not or somtymes did or doth not now begin to imbrace this religiō Nay now adayes the professiō of this our religion is almost publike amongst all Nations to wit amongst those of Iaponia China India Persia Tartariae Turky Africa Brasile Peru Mexico c. For that in all these places are found Catholikes Churches Altars Images of Christ and of Saintes Masse is there celebrated our Sacraments are there administred holydayes and fasting dayes are there kept and finally the Roman religion is there publikely obserued Who can then doubt but that this is the true way of saluation to all which our Sauiour would haue taught preached and proposed to all nations which he would haue to increase and fructify in all Kingdomes in due tyme and season and which he doth stil conserue by some meanes or other in euery place ordayning that Catholikes be so dispersed throughout the whole world that by them Infidels may come to the knowledge of true Religion Moreouer this Catholike Religion doth extend it selfe to al tymes It extendeth it selfe to all tymes euen frō the Apostles For that there can be no age from that tyme assigned wherin this Religion did not florish In all ages hath Masse byn celebrated both for the liue and dead feastes solemnized fastes obserued Monasticall vowes made Saints worshipped their reliques honoured and such other like proper ensignes of our religion haue byn in vse and practice as is manifest out of the writers of all tymes On the contrary side No sect euer called Catholick let vs looke vpon all other sectes and we shall neuer find that any one of them was euer called Catholike nor their followers Catholikes as we haue said but that euery one tooke their names of their first Authors as the Simonians Valentinians Pelagians Lutherans No sect euer spread ouer the world Caluinists c. No sect was euer spread ouer the world When Catholike Religion began once to appeare in short tyme it was spread ouer the whole world and began to increase and fructify almost in all Kingdomes Rom. 1● Colōss 1. as S. Paul affirmeth But Lutheranisme Caluinisme and Anabaptisme now after 70. or 80. yeares are yet confined to certayne strayt corners do rather daily decay by eyther going into other sects or els returning to Catholike Religion then any way increase For that none of them hath continued from the Apostles tymes but all sprung vp and inuented within these 70. or 80. yeares last past and therfore neyther in regard of tyme place nor otherwise can they be called Catholike Againe I say that Catholike Religion is one and the selfe same euery where But these religions are exceeding different amongst themselues and disagreeing in their chiefe heads and members one damning another to the pit of hell of heresy how therfore can they be called Catholike VII CONSIDERATION From Succession FVRTHER MORE that Religion is to be accompted the true whose ministers do all descend from the Apostles and are eyther the Apostles successors or haue receiued their order and authority from their sucessours For by this reason it will appeare manifest that that Religion and Church which doth honour imbrace a religion so descended to be Apostolicall Ergo c. Now that all Ministers of the Catholike Religion whether we consider the power of their order or Iuris diction haue descended from the Apostles it is cleere For that all inferiour ministers especialy Priests Deacons Subdeacons receiue their order from Bishops Bishops also haue their order from other Bishops and these likewise againe from others and so futhermore vpwards to the Apostles who receiued this power immediatly from Christ As all men therfore according to their vitall and naturall power do by a long course of genealogy descend from our first Parent Adam so do all ministers of the Catholike Church according to their supernaturall power by a longe
succession of ordination and sanctification descend from Christ our Lord who is the second Adam And there is no minister in the Church but can deduce the power wherwith the cōsecrateth sacrificeth absolueth from synnes administreth other Sacraments and sanctifieth Christian people from Christ himselfe as the first head and Author therof So as also all those workes which by this power he effecteth are attributed to Christ as to the first and chiefe Author who instituted this said power and doth inuisibly protect and assist the same man being only but the instrument wherby all these thinges are done as S. Augustine other Fathers do excellently declare Tract in Ioan. Chrysost bom 60 Ambros l. 4. desacram cap. 4. 5. In like maner all the power of Iuridiction of Ministers in the Catholike Church by which they gouerne Christian people preach the word of God and exercise all other Pastorall offices doth descend from Christ and may be perspicuously reduced to him For that Pastors haue their Iurisdiction from Bishops Bishops from the Pope and the Pope himselfe for that he is the successour of S. Peter in the same Chayre and gouernement of the Catholike Church doth necessarily also suceed in the same Iurisdiction which was giuen immediatly by God to S. Peter and in him to all his lawfull successours And those also in the Church who haue not power ordinary but only delegated to witt no proper Iurisdiction of their owne do receiue the same from their Pastours Bishops or the Pope So as there is no minister in the Catholike Church no preacher or teacher of the word of God that cannot eleerly demonstrate his mission and shew the same to be deriued from Christ And truely except they could so do they were by no meanes to be heard or regarded but had in suspition for wolues when as they entred not into the sheepfold through the dore but crept in secretly some other way This argument alwaies did the ancient Fathers greatly esteeme and alleage Irenaeus l. 3 c 3. Tertul de praescrip August epist 165. Optatus l. 2. contr Parmen cap. 4. for the conuincing of all heresies For therby is shewed the continuall succession of our Religion throughout all Ages vp to the Apostles times I am held in this Church saith S. (a) cap. 4. contra E●ist Fundam Augustine by the Succession of Priests Bishops that haue come downe euē frō the Sea of Peter the Apostle to whō the care of feeding our Lords flocke was cōmitted to the present Bishop of Rome Anastasius that holdeth the sea at this day And the very same hath S. Hierome in his dialogue against the Luciferian Heretikes which by and by we shall haue occasion to recite Now none of the ministers of the reformed religion can shew this And as for the power of order wherby to administer Sacraments and sanctify the people truly they cannot reduce it to the Apostles and Christ as we haue done for that they haue vtterly taken all such power away Neither is there any Bishop or Priest among them except perhaps some Apostata from the Catholik Religiō whose degree ordignity amongst thē is now no more of value wheras not withstanding the Church of Christ hath alwaies had these degrees and byn gouerned therby Neither haue they any power of Iurisdiction wherby to preach the word of God administer Baptisme gouerne the people with diuine reuerence in spirituall affayres of their soules For I would demaund of whome Luther and Caluin receiued this power of Iurisdiction By whome was cyther of them sent to preach the new Ghospell and reforme the people That they were not sent by the ordinary Pastors of the Church it is euident therfore they came of themselues being sent by none But what can be a more certaine signe that they are not to be heard but rather to be fled from For how shall they preach saith the Apostle vnlesse they be sent Rom. 10. Ioan. 10. He that entreth not saith S. Iohn by the dore into the sheepfold but clymbeth vp another way he is a theese and robber but he that entreth by the dore is the Pastour of the ●heepe Now whosoeuer without ordinary and lawfull authority do exercise the office of a Pastour they enter not in by the dore But perhaps they will say that they were sent immediatly by Christ of him receaued authority to reforme the Church Whether sectaries be sent of Christ or no. But that is not inough so to say for that all Archeretikes do say the same of themselues Wherfore it behooueth them to bring forth shew their euidence wherby to witnesse it and so to conuince vs that they were sent of Christ as the Apostles did confirme their mission with many and great miracles otherwise we ought not to accept of their reformation Nay we are rather bound to reiect them as false impostors Againe how is it possible for them to be sent of Christ when as they teach so diuers and disagreeing opinions among themselues For if Luther were sent of Christ then can not Caluin be also sent of him who in many points impugneth Luthers doctrine and damneth it to the pit of hell as impious and hereticall And contrariwise if Caluin were sent of Christ then could not Luther be sent of him also for that God is not contray to himselfe neither do the spirits of his true Prophets impugne or contradict one another Other things I omit which might be alleaged to the same purpose VIII CONSIDERATION From the consent of the ancient Fathers and Doctors of the Church and from the decision of controuersies without which there is no sodality or followship THAT Religion is thought to be of Christ and to be preferred before al other in which the whole and full consent of Doctors of euery age Nation about the principall heads of our faith hath concurred and wherin there hath byn an easy determination of all Controuersyes from which if once thou chance to decline or fall thou hast no certainty left which way to betake thy selfe But such is only Catholike Religion and therfore the true religion of Christ And first of all concerning the consent of Doctors about the chiefe heads of our religion it is manifest out of their wrythings For what ancient Doctors soeuer eyther in Greece Asia Aegipt Asricke Spaine Italy France Germany or England that haue written of the mysteries of our religion they do all agree about the liberty of Freewill about merit of good workes sacrifice of the Masse for the quicke and the dead Monasticall vowes fastes inuocation of Saints and the like which are by these newfangled Religions reiected and reproued Caluin l. 2. c. 2.3.14 16. l. 3. c. 4. 5. l. 4. c. 22. Centurtatores cent 2.3.4.5 c. 4. and cannot be denied by the Lutherans Caluinistes themselues only they say that these things were blemishes of the ancient Doctors inclining as it were to superstition
and human traditions and so they appeale to the word of God expoūded by themselues in their owne sense But how improbable is it thinke yow that all these Ancients writing with so great consent of one the selfe same thing and in diuers places should erre And the consent of many about one thing especially when as there hath byn no consult or comunication had therof before is a very great signe of truth drawing vnto her and as it were binding togeather in one the myndes and iudgments of many enlightened from heauen For as it is the property of Verity because she is only one to gather togeather in one consent so is it the property of Falsity because she is manifold to dissipate and separate herselfe into diuers opinions and errors Wherby it cometh to passe that Hereticks writing of one matter in diuers places do neuer lightly agree but are deuided into very many opinions among themselues when as once they haue departed from the truth Moreouer there is not one opinion of Catholike Religion which can be shewed to haue byn brought in a new into the Church by any man which is a manifest signe that it alwayes remayned in the Church and came from the Apostles For if any new opinion should haue byn so brought in after the Apostles tyme against the Apostolicall doctrine it would easily be discouered in what tyme and age the same began In what place who was the Author and who they were that opposed th●mselues against such a nouelty seeing that no new opinion can be brought in without great stir and contradiction For if it be so that we can shew of euery least heresy in what time and place the same began who was the Author bringer in thereof who opposed themselues against it what tumults were raised therabout by what Pope and Councell the same was condemned If all this I say can be shewed of euery heresy how much more easy were it to shew the same of the principall and chiefe heads of our Religion if any innouation had beene made therein It is therefore manifest and cleere that this our Catholike Religion doth not only agree in succession of Ministers but is continued also conioyned in consanguinity as old Tertullian speaketh with the ancient and Apostolicke Tertul. l. de Praescript as now we haue sayd That the opinions of the new reformed Religions do not agree with the ancient our Aduersaryes themselues confesse when as concerning the former beads mentioned they reprehend taxe the Ancient Doctours of superstition affirming that thy cannot be excused from error as afterwards more largely we shall demonstrate Againe concerning the Controuersyes which now and then do rise vp in the Catholike Church the continual vse and practise of the same Church doth witnes that they are soone determined and ended Controuersies quickly decided in the Catholieke Church For that this Catholike Church hath an infallible Iudge of Controuersies to wit the Pope with a generall Councell by whome all controuersyes hitherto haue quickly beene decided all heresyes that haue risen in diuers ages beene condemned and put to flight by whom Catholike people haue byn preserued in one faith one Religion and doctrine throughout the world By this meanes was condemned the heresy of Arius by the Councell of Nice vnder Pope Siluester that of Macedonius by the first Councell of Constantinople vnder Pope Damasus of Nestorius by the Ephesine vnder Pope Celestine of Eutiches by Calcedon vnder Leo the first that of the Image-breakers by the second of Nice vnder Adrian the first and to omit others that of Berengarius concerning the Eucharist by the Synods of Rome and Versells in France vnder Leo the 9. by that of Towers vnder Victor the second and by two other againe of Rome vnder Pope Nicolas the 2. and Gregory the 7. And furthermore in all reason it is required that the cause weight of Religion being common to the whole Church should not be iudged of any priuate man with hath no eminency or dignity in the Church but of the vniuersall Pastour thereof togeather with other particuler assistants and Iudges to whome the gouernement of the Church is committed who do also represent the vniuersall Church it selfe as certaine heads vnited togeather And so likewise the controuersyes that arise in a Commonwealth about Lawes and priuiledges are to be decided of no other thē the King his Counsel and chiefe Nobility of the Kingdome who represent the whole Kingdome For looke to whome it belongeth to gouerne any Community or Common-wealth either in temporall or spirituall affaires to him it belongeth also to end contentions and determine all Controuersies concerning any Matter belonging to his gouernement taking away and putting to silence all contradiction arising therabout for the tyme to come And truly vnles the Church had such power and authority it would be a very imperfect and maimed Church and more miserable then any temporall Kingdome or politicke Cōmonwealth For that there should neuer be any end of contention concerning the principal heads of our fayth no decision of debates and contradictions whereby it would necessarily come to passe that the sayd Church should soone be turned and deuided into a thousand seuerall sects as we see it dayly fall out in the Heretikes conuenticles Herehence it followeth that all the chiefe heads and articles of our faith are certaine and determined ●either is there any iarring or variance therabout but rather aspeciall concord and vnion amongst all Nothing certaine out of Catholike Religion Wherby is deduced an another euident consequence that so soone as euer one falleth from Catholike Religion he hath no certainty wherevpon to rest or whither to turne himselfe or to whome he may safely commit the care of his saluation For let me aske this question In this so great variety of Religions which wouldest thou imbrace The Lutheran And why not the Caluinian or the Anabaptisticall why dost thou prefer the Lutherā before the rest do not the Caluinistes and Anabaptistes alleage Scripture for their part as fast as the Lutheran doth for his Againe if thou wilt needs be a Lutheran whether I pray thee wouldst thou be a soft or riged Lutheran to wit whether wouldest thou imbrace that pure religion which Luther the Dutch Prophet deliuered or rather that which Philip Melanchthon did polish and trim anew But this also is variable for that the Confession of Augusta hath oftentimes byn changed If thou wouldest be a Caluinist why not ●ather a Lutheran seing that Luther was the first Father that begat this light of the new Ghospell to the world Againe if thou wouldest needs be a Caluinist whether then Puritan or Protestant For so much as these two being the brood of Caluinisme do not a little differ among themselues as they that liue in England do well know I omit very many differences wherin to euery one of these sects are deuided and mangled as also the Anabaptistes No solide reason
neyther can the Lutherans or Caluinistes deny the same but only say that these things were moles or blemishes amōgst the ācient Fathers Goodly moles surely superstition Idolatry Impiety But if the doctors of former ages did not professe this religiō but for the most part reproue and disallow it then is it euident that the same is not ancient but new For no religion was euer accompted in the Church for true but that which the ancient Fathers doctors of the Church did hold and professe Wherof it euidently followeth that Lutheran religion is not Christs religion For that Christs religion is not new but ancient but Lutheran religion is new as we haue shewed and not ancient Christs religion hath alwayes florished in the world euer synce the Apostles tyme but Luthers religion hath not so done but began within these 100. yeares and before that tyme we haue shewed that it was not Againe if Luthers religion be truely Christs religion then is the visible company of men that imbrace the same the true Church of Christ Therfore Christs Church was not before Luther because the Lutheran Religion which doth make the true Church was not before Luther as we haue demonstrated For if yow say that Luthers religion was in the Apostles tymes and in some of the former ages then must yow proue that there were some men in those tymes who imbraced and professed his opinions Surely we easily proue the contrary for that it is euident that Masse for the quicke and dead Order of Ministers in the Church monasticall vowes and the like which are repugnant to the Lutheran religion were in vse in the Church in the Apostles tymes and the next succeeding Ages But let vs grant that Luthers religion was in the Apostles tymes and somwhat after yet at leastwise in the third and fourth age it began to fayle fall quite away Which thing the Lutheran Doctors themselues do also confesse as may be seene by that great Centurian worke setforth by them in the 2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10 Century or age and 4. Chapter of euery Century Therfore by this accompt the Church of Christ at least for 1300. years hath fallen away perished for that so long tyme at the least it is euident that Lutheran religion was not but the quite contrary to haue byn extant and florished As also by this accompt the true religion was extinguished for so many ages the Ghospell obscured Christes Church ouerthrowne vntil the Dutch Prophet Luther rose vp and dispersed that lamentable darknes through the light of the Ghospell to the world and reedified the ruines of the Church This do the Lutherans often insinuate in diuers townes of Germany when as they wryte vpon the forefronts of their houses in great Capitall letters these or the like words Such a yeare c. appeared the true light of Christs Ghospell to this Citty Superstition put downe c. But if the Church of Christ perished for so many ages how then is it true that she is built vpon a rocke and not rather vpon sand How then is it said that the (a) Math. 16. Gates of hell shall not preuaile againe her How is she the house of God the (b) 1. Tim. 3. Firmament and Pillar of truth How then is the (c) Daniel 2. Kingdome of Christ which is the Church stable firme euerlasting and neuer to be ruined Againe if yow say that Luthers Church religion was in all Ages from the Apostles tymes but yet in secret and hidden besides that such a fiction wanteth an Author to affirme it the same is voyd of all probability as we haue now shewed But be it so The Church of Christ cānot be hidden let vs grant that it was hidden all that while but then was it not the Church of Christ for that she is a (d) Matth. 5. Citty placed vpon a mountayne which cannot be hidden She is the (e) Isa 2. mountayne of the house of God prepared in the top of mountaynes and placed aboue the hilles cleerly seene of all men to whome all Nations in the world haue recourse She is the Kingdome of Christ that reacheth from (f) Psal 71. sea to sea and from the riuer to the bounds of the earth She is that great (g) Dan. 2. mountayne that filleth the whole earth For that the Church of Christ must be conspicuous manifest to the world that by her excelleny and comlines by her manner and outward shew she as it were may intice Gentiles vnto her so as they that will become Christians may know whither to go to whome to haue recourse and from whome to receiue instruction Likewise her Doctrine and faith must needs be also manifest or els the same would be vnprofitable to the world nor could she conuert Gentiles So as in the greatest persecutions that euer were she neuer lay so hidden but that she might be knowne to all as out of the Ecclesiasticall historyes is euident wherby it came to passe that she had so many martyrs Againe if she had layn hidden for so many ages she had byn altogeather vnworthy of the Name of a Church For how may she be called the Church of Christ that dareth not publickely to professe the true Doctrine of Christ or that she should be so faint-harted fearfull of death as to hide herselfe in a darke cormer so many ages togeather and dare to come abroad into the light least she should be seene And last of all how can she be called the Church of Christ that for so many ages hath not only hidden herselfe and suppressed the true profession of faith but hath professed also a false faith to wit Papistry adored Idols and defiled herselfe with a thousand superstitions and sacriledges For that before Luther all Christians did carry themselues outwardly in all points as Catholikes or els straight would they haue byn apprehended and accused by the Inquisitors and Bishops and punished as heret●kes And therfore should the Church of Christ haue byn more miserable then the ruines of the Synagoge or the lewish Sect which alwayes in some place or other had their Synagoges and free profession of their Religion nor was euer constrayned at least generally to the worship of Idols She should I say haue byn more miserable then all hereticall sects and Conuenticles whatsoeuer For that there was neuer any Sect of any name which had not her temples her religious houses her Couuents her Bishops the forme and profession of her faith that so she might be knowne of all Wherby it is manifest that nothing can be more absurdly said then that the Church of Christ hath layen hid for so many ages and therfore I do conclude with this Dilemma That the Lutheran or Caluinian religion was eyther before their Authors to wit Luther and Caluin or it was not If it were not then is it altogeather new and therfore cannot be the religion of Christ which is anciēt If it were before the
to the Lutherans only or to the Anabaptists How vaine and friuolous is it that euery sect should challeng this spirit as proper only to her followers and haue no other proofe thereof then that the same is manifest to him that hath the spirit and he to whome it is not manifest hath it not And is not this now to walke round in a circle running to the beginning and reuoluing euery controu●●sy to that which is most obscure and knowne to no man els For now should I know that you haue this spirit When did euer the Doctors of the Church proue their assertions on this fashion Euery proofe ought to be made by that which is most manifest to the Aduersary so as it may be therby the more easily graunted by him but this proofe of theirs whereon all their opinions are foūded doth proceed from that which is most obscure and only relyeth vpon the iudgement of a priuate man who is both a party and an accuser in the cause For you cannot proue vnto me that you haue this spirit but only by your owne testimony which you giue of your selfe Ioan. 8. But he which giue●● testimony of himselfe his testimony is not true to wit it is not to be accoumpted true vnlesse it be witnessed other wayes But they to wit the Caluinists cannot proue themselues to haue this priuate spirit by other wayes but would haue vs to beleeue them on their bare word and asseueration because they say that they are certaine thereof Therefore there is no reason why we should beleeue them but great reason father to the contrary not to belieue them at all For that the spirit of God cannot be contrary to himselfe but these men are most contrary to themselues Ergo they are not gouerned by the spirit of God To this now I adde and it belongeth to no small deceit and guilefull machination of their that seeing these men haue forsaken the ancient fayth which hath florished for so many ages and imbraced now a new and vpstart Religion when Catholike Princes according to the receaued custome from the tymes of Constantine the Emperour do go about to compell them to returne to their ancient Religion which once they professed and forsake their new then they complaine grieuously and accuse them of tyrany calling them enemies of the Ghospell and stir vp the whole world in hatred against them as though they offered violence to their consciences against their eternall saluation and withal vnder pretence of this their liberty they raise vp tumults and seditions against them But when they haue once gotten the vpper hand God so permitting the same for our sinnes they will not graunt any liberty to Catholikes but stir vp most sharp persecution against them and force them with diuers torments and losse of goods to forsake the old Religion and imbrace their new which they neuer learned neuer heard of in former tyms to which they haue no obligation which is confirmed with no sound arguments and which by my most graue weighty reasons they see condemned of the Catholike Church throughout all Christendome Is this then to deale vprightly and with a sincere mind equal right Is it not rather a kind of lionish society whose right consisteth in strength and power of armes and which doth make and repeale lawes for it owne interest And what greater tyranny can be vsed ouer mens consciences then this In the Catholike Church none are forced to imbrace her fayth but those that sometymes haue professed it and now forsaken it and this neither vntill it be fully proued that they haue so done and cannot deny it But these our new Maisters do force and constraine men to imbrace their Noueltyes who neuer before professed the same and this also before they can conuince them of errour In which point they do also against their owne doctrine For that they teach that man hath no free-will but that he doth all things by the decree and impulsion of God whereto he cannot resist and that God doth infuse his fayth only to the elect By what right then do they force Catholikes to imbrace their fayth which is not in their owne power to do And againe seeing that their whole forme of fayth is reduced to the testimony of euery ones priuate spirit they do most wickedly in compelling Catholiks to beleiue not only against the testimony of their priuate spirit but also against the publike testimony of the spirit of the vniuersal Church For it is most certaine out of the holy Writ that the Church is gouerned by the spirit of God and therefore cannot erre which notwithstanding is not any way certaine in priuate men The VIII Reason Drawn from the ouerthrow of good Workes THAT religion that taketh away all affection and loue of good works is not to be attributed vnto Christ who euery where recomendeth good workes the obseruatiō of Gods comandments but the Religion both of Luther Calum taketh away all care of good workes therefore neither of them is to bee deemed Christs Religion And that these two religions take away the study and care of good workes is manifest First for that the one and the other teacheth that a man by all his good works is made no whit the more iust before God meriteth no euerlasting reward shall haue neyther lesse nor more reward in heauen whe her he do few good workes or many or none at all For as much as say they sole faith is esteemed of with God and that in fayth alone is all iustice contained For so affirmeth Luther in these words De decem praecept c. 1. I would not giue an halfe penny for S. Peters merits for helping of me because it is not in him to helpe himselfe but whatsoeuer he hath he hath it of God by faith in Christ Where he plainely teacheth that S. Peter was not the iuster or receiued the more good in heauen for his good workes but that his faith alone was crowned And els where So you see how rich a Christian man or he that is baptized is De captiu Babil c. de Baptismo who though he would neuer so fayne cannot debarre himselfe of his saluation by neuer so great sinnes vnles he will not beleeue For no sinne can damne him but his vnbele●uing alone all other sins if his sayth returne or stand stable vpon gods promise be in an instant absorpt by the same fayth Againe in another place De votis monast Good workes cannot be ●aught vnles you preiudice and hurt saith sith saith and good workes bee in matter of iustification most contrary whence it is that the Doctrine of workes is necessarily the doctrine of the diuell and a reuolt from the saith The same is the opinion of Caluin Lib. 3. c. 13. as appeareth in his Institutions where he sayth That iustice of fayth can in no sort haue any association with the iustice of workes and that not onely the workes that
by vertue and power of Gods decree And this againe was in tymes past an heresy of Simon (d) Vincēt Lirin Magus and of (e) Eusebius l. 5. c. 20. Florinus 3. Both teach that good works be not necessary to saluation and that fayth is ynough But this was an heresy of the same Simon (f) Iren. l. 1. c. 20● Magus and of (g) Aug. haer 54. the Eunomians about the yeare of Christ 360. 4. Both also teach that syns though neuer so many and great do not hurt him who hath fayth for that the malice of them is not imputed to him who beleeueth And this was also in tymes past an heresy of the (h) Aug. haer 54. Eunomians and of Basilides and Carpocrates as witnesseth Irenaeus l. 1. c. 23. 24. 5. Caluin denyeth the reall presence of Christs body in the Eucharist But this was againe an heresy of Berengarius about the yeare of our Lord 1051. Where it is to be noted first though some priuately before Berengarius doubted of that matter and moued the question about it yet none was so hardy as to professe it in publike as testifieth Hugh of Langres and Adelman of Bressia in their epistles to Berengarius and Paschasius in his booke of the words of the Institution of this Sacrament In so much as this was the constant and vniforme doctrine of the Church not opposed against by any arch-heretike vntill the tyme of Berengarius Secondly that Berengarius his opinion was whiles he yetlyued condemned in fiue Councells and that Berengarius himselfe thrise abiured his opinion and in conclusion died very penitent in the Catholike fayth He being dead the same heresy lay buried vp welneere two hundred yeares vntill the tyme of the Lollards who brought it to light againe as is gathered out of Trithemius in his Chronicle about the yeare 1315. After this againe VVicliffe held the same as appeareth by his third article After his death againe there was a deep silence of that matter for the space of an hundred yeares vntill Swinglius renewed it and Caluin and some others after him Whereby it euidently appeareth that this opinion was euer in the Church held for a manifest heresy therfore eyther the Church hath euer erred in a principall article of fayth and so consequently it was neuer Christs Church or that opinion which abrogateth and disclaymeth from the Reall presence of Christs body is an heresy indeed 6. Both take away all traditions and would haue all things to be comprehended in Scriptures alone The same was the heresy of the Arians as is recorded by S. Augustine also of Nestorius l. 1. contra Maxim c. 2. vlt. Dioscorus and Eutiches as is declared in the seauenth Synod Act. 1. 7. Both deny the Sacraments of Penance and of Confirmation The Nouatians taught the same opinion long ago as witnesse S. Cyprian l. 4. epist 2. l. 3. baer fabularum and S. Theodoret 8. Both teach that the Church consisteth of good alone and that the Church in former tymes visible perished notwithstanding for many ages that in this tyme it only remayneth in their congregations The very like was the heresy of the Donatists as testifieth S. Augustine l. de vnit Eccl. c. 12. 9. Both of them teach that prayer is not to be made for the dead that 〈◊〉 fast of Lent or any other stable fasts be not to be keep but euery one is then to fast when it shall to him seeme good The Aerians taught the very same in former ages if we beleeue Epiphamus haer 75. and S. Augustine l. dehaer c. 33. 10. Both deny the veneration of holy Reliques of Christs and Saints Images and call it Idolatry Vigilantius did no lesse many ages past as witnesseth S. Hierome The same did the Image breakers as testify Zoneras Cedrenus and Nicephorus touching them who made war against Images By these it is more then manifest that the chiefest opinions whereof Lutheranisme and Caluinisme consist be ancient heresyes long since condemned by the Church and that the same were alwayes held in the Church for heresyes The same may we easily exemplify and declare touching the rest Vide Bellar de notis Eccl. c. 9. Coccius de signis Eccl. l. 8. art 3. Wherehence it followeth that these Religions be nothing but the very sincke of heresyes of old longe ago put to silence and now in these latter dayes brought to light againe The XI Reason From the want of a Rule of Faith THESE new Religions haue no certaine rule of Faith to follow therfore they are not to be receyued For the principall heads of Religion must be determined certaine and withall immutable And that they haue not any certaine rule of beliefe whereby it may be resolued what is necessary to be beleeued and what not is euident First for that they admit neyther the traditions of the Church nor the authority of generall Councells nor the iudgment of the ancient Doctors of the Church and of those who flourished and liued before these our Controuersies Luther reiecteth all traditions in c. l. 4. c. 8. §. 6.7 8 in Antid ad 4. fes● Conc. Trident 1. ad Galatas as doth Caluin also l. 4. Instit and they teach that nothing is to be beleeued nothing to be receyued an holy Scripture Luther so contemneth Generall Councells which haue hitherto had most great authority in Gods Church for they be as it were the Parlaments of Princes In art 115 sequentib Peers in Christs Kingdome as he will haue the definitions therof subiect to the iudgment and censure of euery priuate person And he further sayth that it is a mad thing that the Councells will conclude what is to be beleeued And in the same place he teacheth that what is to be beleeued what not is to be left to the iudgment of euery spirituall man Caluin insinuateth no lesse l. 1. c. 7. § 1.2 4. when he sayth that it is not for the Church to iudge what books be Canonicall but that appertayneth to the inward spirit alone Finally as touching the Fathers Luther careth not for a thousand Augustines l. contra Regem Augiae a thousand Cyprians Caluin also in very many places contemneth them and affirmeth that they erred Wherefore none of all these is vnto them a rule of fayth But say they The Scripture it selfe is vnto vs a rule of fayth it cānot erre But it is an easy matter ●o shew that this rule serueth not the turne First because we by this rule cannot iudge of the Scripture it selfe and so the rule it selfe will remayne vnto vs vncertain which yet should haue the greatest certitude of all For by the Scripture it cannot come to be knowne for certaine that such a book is truly Scripture is not Apocripall nor composed by some deceiptfull person that this or that sentence is not peruerted northrust in Finally that nothing is added or taken
away that maketh to the substance of doctrine All this cannot to be known by Scripture but proued only by certaine humane weake coniectures if you take away the traditions of the Church and so the whole foundatiō of our fayth shall rely vpon vncertaine coniectures Moreouer the vertue and efficacy of the Scripture consisteth not in the sound of the words but in the sense meaning which is the life and soule of the Scripture But there may be a thousand controuersies about the sense which cannot in any sort be decided by the Scripture it selfe if you take a way Traditions and the exposition of the Fathers as experience teacheth For about the sense of these words Hoc est Corpus meum and of many more there is most eager disputation betwene the Lutherans and Caluinists c. If you say with Caluin that the iudgment touching the Scriptures and the vnderstanding of them belongeth to an inward spirit this is nothing but the dictamen of an internall spirit that is for the priuate iudgment of euery particular person to set down the first rule how to beleeue For euery one may say that he hath the spirit and by the inspiration therof can iudge and determine that this part or booke is holy Scripture and not that that this is the sense not that So a● Lutheran out of his spirit giueth iudgment In prologonou● Testamer ti that S. Iames Epistle is a strawy Epistle and the Apocalyps of S. Iohn of doubtfull authority But the Caluinist out of his soiri● iudgeth the one and the other to be the word of God So Luther out of his spirit iudgeth that this false opinion is to be abolished that there be foure Gospells for that S. Iohns Gospell is but one faire true and principall and to be far preferred before the other three In like manner S. Paules and S. Peters epistles do sar go beyond sayth be the three Gospells of Mathew Marke and Luke He would willingly haue reiected them because they plainely proue establish the merit and necessity of good works and the obseruation of the commaundements and do recommend chastity and pouerty But when he durst not cleane reiect them he would extennate their authority and insinuate that they were not written with the spirit of God In like maner Caluin out of his own sense iudgeth that these words Hoc est Corpus meum haue this meaning This breed is the figure of my body and Luther will haue it This bread is truly my body I omit other thing without nūber by which it appeareth that euery ones priuate iudgment is proposed for arule of beleefe or which is the same that the Scripture it selfe is expounded and interpreted according to euery ones priuate iudgment Secondly that is not any fit rule of beliefe that is a like accommodated to contrary doctrines but the scripture is accommodated to contrary Religions and doctrines for as much as all the Sects of this time though they do in an hostile manner dissent and contend in very many and those the most inportant heads and grounds do neuertheles make this rule to serue their turne and doe vse it for the mantayning of their opinions and heresyes For the Lutherans say they rely vpon Scripture the Caluinists affirme the same the Anabaptists also are nothing behind them in auerring that the Scriptures be for them And no meruaile because euery one of them taketh and interpreteh the Scripture not conforme to the comon vnderstanding of the Church or the common exposition of the Fathers as do the Catholikes but according to the sense of euery priuate spirit in which sort it may bee easilie accommodated to all heresies Whence it is euident that this rule so taken serueth not the turne whiles all is reduced to the iudgment of euery ones priuate spirit Thirdly if there were some iudge who in euery Controuerly wherein he were to giue sentence should so doe it as it could not be certainly vnderstood for whether party he pronounced the sentence but both partyes should contend that the matter were adiudged and determined on their side and that the sentence of the Iudge was expresly plainly pronounced for them such an one in the opinion of all men could not be thought a competent Iudge sith no matter in cōtrouersie could bee determined or ended by sentence giuen by him For after sentence there would bee as greata contention about the sentence it selfe whether of them it might seeme to fauour as there had been before about the right that ech party had And such a Iudge is Holy Scripture if you take away the Churches interpretation and declaration and the exposition of the holy Fathers for as much as the sentence therof is euer such as it cannot bee euident to both parties whether of them it fauoureth whiles the one and the other doth stifly maintaine that it is most plaine that it holdeth and standeth for them And hence it is that controuersies bee neuer ended and therefore it is not onely a vaine but also a ridiculous thing to appoint the Scripture alone for Iudge For in euery controuersy there ought such a Iudge to be designed who may so giue sentence as it may be manifest to all and most of all to those parties on whose behalf the cause is adiuged otherwise such a controuersy can neuer be ended Wherfore those who make the Scripture alone the Iudge of matters in question do therin plainely manifest that they admit not any iudge at all by whome the cause may be determined besids their priuate iudgment alone For they do as if Titus and Caius hauing a suite at Law would not haue any other Iudge in the matter but Iustinian his Code together with the Pandects without hauing any thing to do with the interpretation of Doctors and Titus producing for his owne right some law should by it maintayne that the cause was manifestly adiudged for him And Caius againe should deny it who by citing an other law for himselfe should say that it was cleare that that law fauoured made for him which Titus would in lake manner deny and so they should both depart without any decision of the cause or controuersy in hand would it not be a matter worthy of laughter and all would say that neyther of them desired the determination or decision of the cause And that neyther admitted other Iudge then his owne iudgment In the very like manner in this that they wil not haue any other Iudge then Scripture and euery one reserueth the interpretatiō thereof to his owne spirit they plainely shew that they haue no will that the cause should be decided or defined by any lawfull way nor to admit any Iudg but their owne iudgment Fourthly how very insufficient this rule of beliefe is experience it selfe plainely teacheth For we see that there is not any end of controuersies among them euen about the greatest matter of fayth sith at this very tyme the Lutherans Caluinists
IF any of these new Religions for example that of Caluin were Christ●true Religion besides other absurdities insinuated before this would further follow that all Catholikes which haue byn from the Apostles tymes vntill this present be damned and adiudged to paines cuerlasting for as much as according to a principall doctrine of the Caluinists they wanted iustifying faith and therefore iustice also before God whence it is that they continued in their syns and died in them For faith necessary to iustification as this religion holdeth is that whereby a man stedfastly beleeueth that himselfe is iust before God for Christs satisfaction which is to him by this faith applyed and imputed And certaine it is that this faith was vnknown to the world vntill Luthers tyme neyther doth he deny it but gloryeth rather that he notified and reuealed to the world the true manner of iustification obscured by antiquity The same is manifest by the writings of all the ancient Fathers both for that besids faith they require an inward chaung of the will and purpose of keeping the whole law and also for that they condemne that security of saluation and will haue a man to worke his saluation with feare and trembling and to be alwayes sollicitous and carefull and therefore they do all with one consent reiect that speciall Fayth by which a man certainly beleeueth himselfe to be iust as meere presumption For though we are to bel●eue that Christ hath on his part most fully satisfied for vs yet it is not manifest vnto vs whether we haue done all that which is on our part necessary for the making of ourselues partakers of this satifaction and whether we haue not at one tyme or other lost our part in it Manifest therefore it is that all those of former tymes wanted this fayth and consequently they are all dam●ed so many holy Fathers so many 〈◊〉 so many Virgins and Saints Irenaeus Iustine Gregory Thaumaturgus Nazianzen Basill Chrysostome Damascene Hilary Ambrose Hierome Augustine Martin Nicolas Antony Benedict Bernard Dominicke Francis Laurence Vincent Sebastian Catharine Cecily Agnes and infinite others who were admirable to the world eyther for their sanctity and miracles or for the glory of martyrdone Finally all that haue been before vs euen from the Apostles tyme till now be damned And to vse Tertullians words l. de praescript adue●sus haereticos In vaine hath the Gospell byn so many ages preached in vaine haue so many thousands been baptized in vaine haue so many works of saith been exercised so many vertues and so many gifts of grace to no purpose wrought so many priesthoods and so many offices admitted in vaine and to be short in vaine haue so many martyrdomes been crowned But how past beliefe absurd and blasphemous a matter is this How contrary and repugnant to the iudgement of the whole world and of all ages past Neither can it be sayd that their ignorance excused them because none can be saued without faith without the iustice of Christ without the participation of Christs satisfaction without the remission of sins as the Scripture especially of the new Testament euery where teacheth no ignorance can make or cause that any may be saued without them Wherefore there is no ouasion heere for they eyther be all damned or els Luthers and Caluins Religions be false and impious in their principall doctrine touching Iustification Loe heere 12. Reasons by which it is made plaine that these new Religions be to be shunned as false pernicious and now we come to our last Consideration X. CONSIDERATION and conclusion of this whole Consultatiō LASTLY that Religion is to be imbraced during life that we would wish we had followed and held at the houre of our death and whereof we may be able to giue a iust accompt when we shall stand before the tribunall seat of Christ For touching what is to be done there cannot a better Cōsultation be had then by the consideration of death and of the latter Iudgment namely that we make an election of that here which in the article of our death may make most to our profit and shunne that which may at that tyme procure or cause our certaine ruine perdition or at least hazard the same And such is the Catholike religion that we shal haue a will to preferre it when we come to dye is euident First by the example of very many who though they haue lyued as heretiks yet when they come to dye do desire to dy Catholikes for so to do they deeme it most for their security Secondly for that euery one then wisheth he had done many good works and that he had carefully taken heed of all sins to both whereof the Catholike Church hath effectuall iuducements and Lutheranisme and Caluinisme haue neither the one nor the other but rather bringeth in a contempt of good works and liberty of life Thirdly for that the Catholike Religion hath many remedies and preseruati●es which are not in that dreadful passage to be cōtemned as repentance for heir sinns the absolution of Priests the Sacraments o● Extreme Vnction holy Eucharist which cause great comfort and confidence to the faithfull for by them Christs satisfaction is communicated vnto vs. But a naked faith is a very cold and weake help in that article For how may you in earnest perswade your selfe that Christ is propitious and mercifull vnto you that you are iust and to be by Christ saued who contemne the ●emedyes by him appointed and determine to dye out of the communion of the Catholike Church All lects of this tyme do brag of this fayth but all of them shall not be saued for as much as there is but one true religion of Christ out of which none can be saued as not only all Catholiks but Lutherans also Caluinists and Anabaptists do also teach And therfore your speciall fayth will not profit you any thing vnles you professe Christs true religion That also such as haue imbraced the Catholike fayth and perseuered in it shall easily be able to giue an accompt of that they haue done vnto the supreme Iudge and that not any daunger at all i● on that part to wards them is cleare For suppose that I stand before that dreadfull Tribunall and am asked wherfore I imbraced the Catholike or Papistical religion as they now tearme it and that I did not rather leauing it passe to that new religion created and reformed ●y Caluin I will with great security answere That I therfore held the Catholike sayth What a Catho like will answere at the day of ●udgment because it teacheth me to abstract my mind from ●errene things and to transferre it to the loue of c●●estiall It further ●eacheth me to maister and mortify my flesh and to crucify it with the nayles of the f●are of God to insist in good works to obay Superiors to attend to prayer and to cut off all liberty of synning Therefore I held the Catholike Religion
What things be required for the searching out of the truth and vertue But one thing there is that is most of all wont to hurt this sincere deliberation and that is a certaine anticipating and foregoing opinion that possesseth very many touching the Idolatry superstitions and abuses of the Catholike Church Wherefore let them in the first place for a time lay aside this their precipitate and fore-running iudgment and thinke that they may be deceiued in the matter For it seemeth a thing beyoud beliefe that most holy and most learned men such as the Church euer had very many did either not see this Idolatry if there were any or if they saw it did not onely not reiect it but also did with all diligence retaine and imbrace it This is a calumniation of old both of the Mahometans and of the Image-breakers And there neuer was yet any Sect of heretiks which did not with extreme rancour and malice oppugne and oppole it selfe against the Church and impose very sore and great errors and abuses vpō her For such a pretence meete was it for them to vse that they might seeme to haue had iust cause of their reuolt and departure from the Church Secondly let them not cease to craue light from God whereby they may clearly vnderstand which is Christs true religion and true Church and let them yeald themselues ready to imbrace it For fayth is Gods gift Ioan. 6. None saith he can come vnto me vnles my Father shall draw him None can come to Christ by true fayth without light giuen him from the father of heauen and therefore let them labour to procure this illustration this light and this drawing by earnest and contynuall prayer let them say with the prophet Psal 12. Lighten mine eyes that I may neuer sleep in death least when I am to depart out of this life myne enemy may say Psal 42. I haue preuayled against him Put forth thy light and thy truth let them conduct and bring me vnto thine Holy mount Psal 1 42. and into thy tabernacles Make known vnto me the way where in I may walke because vnto thee haue I lifted vp my soule Deliuer me out of the hands of the enemies of my soules good O Lord to thee haue I fled for succour teach me to do thy will because thou art my God And the like To prayer let them ioyne almes and beneficence towards the poore and needy For how much these two auaile and profit towards the obtaining of light for the imbracing of the true religion is manifested by that example of Cornelius the Centurian Act 10. to whome it was said by an Angell Cornelius thy praiers and thine almes haue ascended to be remembred in the sight of God And now send to Ioppa and send for one Simon who is sirnamed Peter he shall tell thee what thou must doe Let them therefore propose this example vnto themselues and imitate it who in this busines of true religion haue a desire to be directed of God In the meane tyme let them with diligence and with an earnest desire of knowing the truth ponder and consider those things that be in this Consultation proposed and if they find therein any thing eyther doubtfull or not sufficiently vnderstood let them repaire to Catholike doctors who will with facility giue them such satisfaction in all matters as their mind may in conclusion find full repose and quiet in the light of true religion This is that which we desire and craue and with most humble petition and suite beseech at thy hands o true light light eternall and the light both of men and Angells For notwithstanding they haue been seduced misled and carried away by the guile and deceipt of the deuill and haue reuolted from thee and thy Church and haue made war against thee and it yet they be thy creatures formed to thine Image and likenes redeemed and ransomed with the price of thy bloud made and called to the inheritance of heauen and to be consorts in thy kingdom Let not so noble a worke of thine perish which cost thee so dearely which will yeald thee eternall praises if it once know the truth and which will to thy glory shine for all eternity Dissperse and dirue away the foule darkenes that hath now possession of their mind Disolue vndoe the deuills bewitchings of them whereby the eyes of their mind be blinded their fancy and imagination peruerted Put into them a true and sensible apprehension and feare of that inextinguible and euerlasting fire prepared for all those who haue not communication with the true religion Inspi●e them with a burning loue and desire of vnderstanding the truth of procuring their owne saluation Present vnto them the light of thy mercies that they may know thy fold and haue a true vnderstanding of the fold wherin they formerly were that it was not thine but the diuells in which all such as contynue as sheepe be reserued not to life but to vtter perdition to be food for the fire meate for death Death shall feede vpon them Psal 4● Reduce and bring them backe againe into thy fold that in it they may refresh thēselues with the healthful refectiō of thy doctrine and by thy wonderfull Sacraments may receyue cure of the old wounds that Sathan had formerly giuē them and increase in thy spirit in the spirit of humility and feare of our Lord in the spirit of meeknes and charity and may receyue forces and strength to life euerlasting wherin made together with vs after the instant of this life companions of thy glory and blisse they may praise thee An admonition to Catholikes and glorifie thee for euer and euer And now am I in the second place briefly to admonish Catholiks that they duly ponder with themselues how exceding great a benefit this is of true religion which hath by diuine fauour hapned to them before infinite others who are debarerd of it and how much by occasion of ye they be obliged and bound to the Diuine maiesty This is the gift priuiledg but of a few if we consider the infinite number of such as go astray or stand in doubt and therefore for this respect the more is it to be esteemed Let them thinke that in humane things nothing is to be compared with it not pleasures nor honors nor millions of gold and syluer no not Scepters Kingdomes or Empires The margarite perle of true religion doth exceed all these by infinite degrees and he that is possessed of it though he want other things and is most poore of al tertene things is most truly rich as beeing a cittizen with the Saints the sonne of God an heyre of a Kingdome and coheire with Christ yet so as he must haue a will to lyue conformably thereunto He that wanteth it is thrice miserable indeed though he otherwise abound in all the goods of this life and hath them at his will This is
but in some few indifferent matters and nothing necessary vnto saluation in so much that it is all one in what religion thou liuest seing that thou maist indifferently in all of them obtayne thy saluation the which is nothingels but to open the way to Alcoran and to make Mahomet equall with Christ or rather manifestly to bring in Atheisme For to approue euery Religion is to take away all Religion and to thinke none necessary seing that the true Religion can be but one The fundamentall reason wherupon this opinion especially relieth is of no moment For first if it be not incredable that God for the space of some thousands of yeares hath left the whole word in Idolatry excepting only the Iewish nation being but a little portion or corner of the whole world and to haue permitted it to be vtterly ouerthrowne albeit there were so many rare wits among them so many diligent worshippers of God and all humane iustice and honesty it should not also seeme incredible if we say that now also he suffereth the Turkes and Iewes to perish Secondly the Turkes and Iewes are lesse to be excused now in that they do not belieue in Christ then the Heathens were in times past in not acknowledging one God to be the Creator of heauen and earth The reason is because when almost the whole world was in Idolatry the feruent heat of the common custome carried all by force away with it neyther was there any reason offered vnto priuate mē why they should greatly doubt of their religion neyther if there had byn doubt obiected vnto them could they find out any easy way to know the truth But now after that the fayth and Religion of Christ is diu●lged throughout the whole world and that Christians are euery where extant it cannot be but that many occasions are offered vnto the Turkes and Iewes of doubting of their Religion They are bound therfore to discusse and conferre the matter with the Christiās dwelling night vnto them the which if they do not but auert their minds frō these kind of thoughts by reason of the hatred they beare vnto Christian Religion or vpon some other cause they make themselues vnexcusable before God for the busines of our Religion saluatiō is of so great weyght and importance that it ought to be preferred before all other things when there is any iust reason of doubting offered it must with all diligence be examined albeit we should for that purpose be forced to go into farre countries for our resolution Lastly if there be any who haue hard nothing of Christian Religion or which do thinke that there is nothing wherby they may be iustly moued to any further inquisition those men shall not be damned for the sin of Infidelity that is to say because they haue not belieued in Christ but for some other things which they haue done agaynst the law of nature the which by help of God they might haue eschewed for God hath not left them so destitute of his prouidence and help but that they may auoid those synnes which they do commit if they would as they may ought to cooperate with Gods holy inspirations and take comfort and pleasure therin None therfore can impute his damnation vnto God albeit the way be straite to saluation but vnto himselfe to his owne negligence I say and wickednesse wherby he hath neglected Gods holy inspirations and cōtemned his profitable admonitions and willingly and wittingly against his owne conscience hath throwne himselfe headlong into sinne it being his vtter ouerthrow THE II. QVESTION THE other Question is whether it be sufficient to saluation to belieue in Christ and that he dyed for our sinnes albeit we will not belieue many other things Many especially of the cōmon sort of people The opinion of the vulgar people do esteeme it sufficient so that those thinges be belieued which are set downe in the Apostles Creed of God and Christ other things they account indifferent and euery one may belieue what with a good faith he pleaseth but they will haue the Apostles Creed belieued of euery one in that sense which seemeth best vnto any of them They conclude therfore that any which confesseth Christ may be saued in his owne faith whether he be a Papist or a Lutheran or a Caluinist or an Anabaptist or of any other sect for all these haue the same head which is Christ Coloss 2. 1. Cor. 3. all do rely vpon the same Foundation which is Christ Iesus they cannot therfore be deceyued of their saluation albeit they disagree in all other thinges Herupon some noble men who do vse these new religions to the establishment and increase of their power and dominions doe labour very much to make one Church of the Lutherans and Caluinists and they goe about to perswade vs that there is no difference amongst them but in some small points indifferent matters But this opinion doth include in it many inconueniences The 1. Reason First because it saueth almost all the auncient Heretikes The same refuted by ten Reasons for most of them do confesse Christ and belieue the Creed in their ownesense The Arians therfore might be saued in their herefy who denyed God the Sonne to be consubstantiall with his Father The Macedonians who made the holy Ghost lesser then God the Sonne The Nestorians who affirmed there were two persons in Christ The Eutichians who held that the flesh of Christ was conuerted into his diuinity The Apollinaristes who said that the diuine Word was vnited in Christ as a reasonable soule vnited to the body The Monothelites who affirmed that there was one only will and operation in Christ The Pelagians who denied originall sinne and taught that a man by his naturall forces might deserue the grace of God and his saluation The Donatists who affirmed that the Church of God was euery where perished but only in Donatus his company The Nouatians who denyed pennance to those that had denyed their fayth The Montanists who thought Montanus to be the holy Ghost All these according to this opinion euery one in his owne fayth and heresy may be saued because they haue belieued in Christ did hold the Apostles Creed no lesse to be belieued then now adayes the Lutherans and Caluinists do But what can be sayd more absurd or more like a paradox in the Church of God For if eternall saluation may be obtayned by this kind of fayth why haue there byn holden s●●any Councells against those heresies the Bishops throughout the whole world being assembled togeather with so great labour and charges why haue those heresies byn so often condemned by excommunication why haue the holy Fathers so much laboured in the extirpation threof why haue Catholikes so much detested the conuersation and company of those heretikes why would some of them rather chose to suffer banishment death and all kind of torm●●ts then to subscribe vnto any of these heresies All these
the last dayes there shall some depart from their saith attending to the spirits of error and doctrines of the diuell For euery heresy is the doctrine of the Diuell And S. Iohn saith 1. Ioan. 4. Do not belieue euery spirit but try their spirits whether they be of God or not For many false Prophets are gone out into the world This therefore is the spirit which beareth rule in the harts of heretiks whose testimony operation they feele inwardly engrafted in their harts and yet they thinke it to be the worke of the holy Ghost who so blindeth their mind and fansies that they iudge light to be darknesse and darknesse light that they think the most cleare truth of the Catholike faith to be an error and most filthy errors to be the cleare truth And truly if they were not wholy blinded bewitched they might easily perceiue that spirit whome they feele inwardly not to be the spirit of God or at the least they might begin to doubt therof seing that all sects among whome there is so great dissention variety of opinions do all equally feele boast of and follow that testimony of this spirit and rely vpon it in the confirmation of their most contrary opinions but this hapneth by the iust iudgment of God for as the Iewes who would not receiue Christ were permitted to be blinded by the diuell as it is manifest by the Apost 2. ad Thes 2. so heretiks because they haue forsaken the Catholik fayth the which is no lesse a fault then that of the Iewes are deliuered vnto him that he may as it were bewitch their minds and driue them into all kind of error But if any will attentiuely consider he shall easily preceyue a more potent operation of the diuell and bewitching of mindes in our Heretiks The diuell doth sooner bewitch Heretiks then Iewes then eyther in Iewes or Mahometans and that for two reasons First because the Iews agree in the same faith neither is there any variety of sects among them among the Mahomets there are only two sects and there is no great difference betwixt thē But among heretiks of these tymes there are many sects some arising by the increase of new opinions who condemne one another of heresy and all these are risen within the space of 90. yeares the which is a manifest signe that the diuell meruailously possesseth inwardly the hartes of these men troubling their fansies peruerting their imaginations and iudgments that they cannot remayne or be quiet any where Secondly because the common sort of people among the Iewes and Turkes do not rely vpon their owne iudgment or vpon the testimony and instinct of the priuate spirit but vpon the iudgment of their doctors or which is all one vpon their owne Scripture as it is interpreted vnto them by the doctors of their Religion they haue therfore the rule of their faith and ground of their beliefe conformable as it were to reason that is to say the common consent of their predecessors or the Scripture explicated vnto them by the consent of the doctors of their Religion But most of the heretikes of these tymes do not respect their Superiors and Apostles from whom they first receiued this new Ghospell but they forsake them as men subiect to error and they rely wholy vpon their owne iudgment or vpon the testimony of the priuat spirit or which is al one vpon the Scripture only vnderstood after the sense of their owne iudgment priuate spirit the which is an euident sign that Sathan doth so effectually worke in them bewitch their myndes that not only euery one feygneth vnto himselfe new heresies and opinions but also that he placeth the foundation of his beliefe rule of faith in himself in his owne inward sense and iudgement for euery one thinketh himself to be taught by our Lord and indued with the Magistery of the spirit albeit they be women yong girles therfore to be free from error but al the holy Fathers to haue byn men subiect to error The same they iudge of their Apostles and Ministers But what greater bewitching or deceiuing of people can there be then this Hence it commeth to passe that they haue no certaine and established opinions amongst them neither can they set downe or frame any body of doctrine and religion but they must wander vp and downe in vncertaintyes as the priuate spirit leadeth them neyther can there any disputation be made with them cōcerning their opinions seing that they do not defend any one opinion they being by reason of the ignorance of their predecessors altogeather vnlearned But of this spirit of folly madnesse we haue written more at large in our Consultation in the 9. Consideration the 11. Reason By these it is manifestly concluded that all the ground and foundation of faith wherupon the sects of our tymes relye is false and vncertaine and therfore their faith which relyeth theron is vnprofitable and auayleth nothing to saluation The 8. Reason Eightly if euery one who doth acknowledge Christ may be saued in his owne faith Why is there so great disagreement among religions Why do they excommunicate condemne one another of heresy Why do the Lutherans refuse to acknowledg the Caluinists for their brethren and in their publike sermons and books do call them wicked blasphemous persons Why do the chiefe of the Caluinists among whome Theodore Beza the Father of them all as it were their Pope next after Caluin handle the Lutherans in like manner why do the Anabaptists call those only of their owne sect to be the faithfull Christians and account all others as Infidels Wherby it is euident that this new opinion of doctrine is not only cōtrary to Catholike religion but to all other sects also who haue in them any zeale of piety and religion and to be banished as Atheisme only The 9. Reason Ninthly that any man be saued it sufficeth not to keepe only one two or three commandements but it is necessary to keep all according to those words of Christ Matth. 19. Matth 19. If thou wilt enter into life keep the commandements As if any be an adulterer or thiefe albeit he keep the other commandments he may not be saued as the holy Scripture often teacheth In like manner therfore it is not sufficient to saluation to beleeue two three or foure articles but it is necessary to belieue all those things which God hath reuealed and set downe to vs in his Church to be belieued for faith is no lesse necessary to saluation then obediēce of the commādments of the law of God neither should faith be lesse perfect then the obedience and keeping of the law of God As therfore obedience must extend it selfe to all the commandments so must faith extend it selfe to all things which are reuealed the which may be confirmed by the words of S. Iames in the 2. Iac. 2. Chap. VVhosoeuer hath kept the whole