points but for convelling and tearing up the foundations of many generations in * As the invisibility of the Catholick Church c. Doctrine Worship and Discipline without legitimate Authority and for other things which need not here be named Their third instance of the defectiveness of the Articles Object 3 is that they speak nothing of the creation of providence fall of man of sin of the punishment of sin of Gods Covenants effectual calling Adoption Sanctification Faith Repentance Perseverance of the Law of God Christian Liberty and liberty of conscience Religious worship of the Sabbath or Lords day of Marriage and Divorce the Communion of Saints Church-Government and Discipline of the Resurrection or of the last Judgment All which the Scripture teach as necessary and are comprised in the Apostles creed That the Assemblies Confession hath all these and that with proofs of Scripture which the Answ 1 Articles want But they should consider that a Confession of faith is one thing and a Catechism or a common-place book to refer ones reading unto is another If the Church shall think fit to compile one of these for the help of young students no doubt but all those shall be expresly treated on though perhaps not in the same form or titles But to constitute a Confession of Faith of all these heads with the several Articles which the Assembly hath subjoyned would doubtless have excluded many more from subscription than the Articles ever did Especially where they have made that an Article of faith which never was a Protestant doctrine viz. That the Church Catholick is a visible and organical body Assemblies Confess ch 35. Artic. 2. whereas it is an article of our faith in the Apostles Creed and not of sense And that which is laid as the foundation of the usurpation of the Bishops of Rome Bellarm. de Eccles l. 3. c. 2. by Bellarmine for either that or somewhat like it must follow upon that ground so that a fair Bridge is hereby laid from Thames to Tiber for his Holiness to walk upon A point universally opposed by the Protestant party except Peter Ramus and perhaps one or two more althongh of late owned by some of them of which * Vindicia Catholicae in answer to Mr. Hudson else-where I instance in this that be it true or false yet a point of this nature should not have been made an Article for the not subscribing whereto men must have been rejected from the Ministry others there are that would have stuck no doubt with many men orthodox able and godly 2. As to the things themselves they are all in effect touched either in the Articles Articles of Ireland Anno 1615. whence taken or the Homilies which are approved by the Articles or in the Liturgy or in the Book of Ordination a branch also of the Articles And the Articles of Ireland which are more full in themselves than ours and comprehend in terminis most or all these heads they are taken verbatim out of the books now mention'd And to give some instances The Creation and Providence is mentioned in the first Article of God and in the Catechism in the Common-prayer-book And more largely in the Homily for Rogation week part 1 2. The fall of man his sin and punishment of it professedly discours'd of in the Homily of the misery of mankind and is touched in the Articles Artic. 9. 10. of Original sin and Free-will Gods Covenant may be understood in the Articles of Justification and Predestination Artic. 11. 17. and is discours'd on largely in the Homily of Salvation Effectual calling also in the same 17th Article and more largely in the Homily of Faith Where also of Adoption as likewise in the lesser Catechism in the Liturgy Faith in the Article of Justification by faith Sanctification in the Homily of good works and divers others Repentance hath a proper Homily for it Perseverance is expresly set down in the 17th Article Of the Law of God in the Homily of the misery of Man And in the Catechism in the Liturgy so far as concerns practice Christian liberty in the Articles of the Traditions of the Church And the Homily of disobedience and wilful rebellion Religious worship is the subject of the Liturgy And of several Articles and of the Homily of the time and place of prayer The Sabbath or Lords day in the Homily of the time and place of prayer Of Marriage both in the Homily of Matrimony and in the Exhortation at Marriage in the Common-prayer-book Divorce as a point of Law is discoursed in the Canons Communion of Saints is the ground of all Exhortations to Unity as the Homily against Contention and exhortation to Charity as love and good works Church-government is the subject of Artic. 20. 21. of the authority of the Church and of General Councils And for Orders they are in the Book of Ordination For the Rules in the book of Canons and in the Rubricks in the Liturgy about Order and in the Commination there Of the Resurrection the Homily on Easter-day And of the last Judgment in the Homily against the fear of Death Seeing therefore that most or all of these heads are either expresly treated on or occasionally either in the Articles or branches of them how say they that they contain nothing of them Proofs to Confessions Lastly for the proofs added in the Assemblies Confession not added in the Articles they know it is not usual to add Proofs unto Confessions as may be seen in the Confessions of the Reformed Churches where they are rare And even lately their Brethren of the Independent way published their Confession without proofs And unless it be that of New England the Assemblies and those of the Separation I remember not that I have seen any with frequent proofs And if I mistake not it had not been amiss if the Assembly had kept the Track in this in as much as the Proofs sometimes do not infer the Article In a Catechism or Sermon or Dispute they are more proper than in a Confession Because that is a thing supposed to be grounded not in this or that place but on the current of the Scripture Besides Proofs occasion Dispute which is abhorrent from the nature of a Confession The places alledg'd may be clear a proof and yet not so to every less-intelligent Reader I conclude this discourse touching the imperfection and defectiveness of the Articles with that considerable passage of Erasmus to this purpose Summa religionis nostrae pax est unanimitas Erasm presat in Hilarium ea vix constare poterit nisi de quà m potest paucissimis definiamus in multis liberum relinquamus suum cuique judicium propterea quod ingens sit rerum plurimarum obscuritas c. The sum saith he of our Religion is peace and unanimity of which there is little hope unless those things which shall shall be enjoyned as matters of faith be
of that Church challenging them all John 8.46 exp if they could tax him of sin that is of failing in any duty that he owed to the Church as well as other things which they would have readily done had he failed We have besides this his Precepts and Directions in this very case That namely where the peril is Mat. 13.37 c. that the Corn should be plucked up it is his will that the tares should rather be suffered to grow until the Harvest which himself expounds to be at the end of the World which place is with more mirth Apolog. cap. 12. p. m. 90. than either strength or modesty derided by Mr. Robinson in his Defence of Separation Object 1 For although it be said The field is the World yet it is onely the World where the Gospel is published Resp and where the Corn and Cocle grow together as those that are generated by the Word Vers 47. as evidently appears by the Parable of the Draw-net which is said expressy to gather both good and bad and that the Separation should be made at the end of the World Again when he saith That that Particle Suffer them to grow till the Harvest Object 2 is not repeated in the expounding of that Parable of the Tares by our Saviour Resp it is answered That it is impliedly repeated and expounded in that he saith The Harvest is the end of the World having said before that the Tares if the Wheat be in peril by their plucking up should be suffered till then there was therefore no necessity of repeating that Particle Object 3 That he saith The Text it self and Reason sheweth that he speaketh not of Excommunication but of final rooting out unto perdition Resp This is begged not proved nor can be granted For it is a general expression and may include all cutting off in such case either in this World or at the end of it Lastly whereas he saith Object 4 Though that should be granted yet the very Constitution of our Assemblies which he makes the ground of all others the corruptions in them being naught Resp because the Members were constrained by Laws whether they were good or bad willing or nilling to embrace the Gospel and that therefore this Parable is not applicable to them SECT II. Causes constitutive of the Church of England WE reply That whereas unto the constitution of any thing in its proper Being there is required onely two things first right matter and secondly the due form And the matter of the Church being indeed as he cryeth A holy people Rom. Corinth Galat. and sanctified in Christ Jesus as by the Titles and Directions of the Apostolical Epistles and otherwise doth appear The Form also being a profession of repentance and faith or the Covenant of Grace in Christ Jesus owned and an association thereby in the Society of Saints Robins ubi supra p. 81. The Church of England will appear a sound Church in both and not to be separated from First 1. Matter of the Church of England for the matter of the Church A holy people and sanctified in Christ Jesus or visible Saints We must here premise a twofold distinction First of the Church which is either mystical or visible then of Saints which are either real or appearing Now the matter of these Churches are correspondent to the nature of them The members of the Church mystical are real Saints onely the members of the visible are Saints visible Now a person visible in any profession A visible Professor is he who understandeth the general grounds of it owneth them and acteth accordingly nor doth any thing whereby the main of that Profession is overthrown Now the people of the Church of England do generally know the grounds of the Faith expressed in the Creed and expounded in the Catechism which the Church appoints to be taught to all before they come to the Communion and to be professed by them Next they own this Profession And they neither in opinion nor practice do that which necessarily overturneth this Profession generally though in many things they and we as Saint James speaks offend all James 3. And this Principle is owned by other Reformed Churches Epist 284. pag. 322. edit 2. The Church of Geneva and Calvin among them doth acknowledge That forasmuch as men remain in the visible Church till they utterly renounce the Profession of Christianity Church of Geneva's Judgement in this point we may not deny unto Infants their right by withholding from them the publick sign of holy Baptism if they be born where the outward acknowledgement of Christianity is not clean gone and extinguished Vbicunque non prorsus intereidit vel extincta fuit Christianismi professio fraudantur jure suo Infantes si à communi symbolo arcentur And this also is acknowledged in practice even by the Belgick Churches Apol. cap. 12. Belgick Christian Church Judgement also which Mr. Robinson so predicates for the liberty they have for they also Baptize the Infants of all which surely they could not do if they judged not their Parents matter of the visible Church and Saints by calling in respect of their outward profession The general Profession of a Jew though he should do some things contrary and of a Turk and the partaking of those signs and symbols which are notes of that Profession doth constitute them such Our people therefore owning the Christian Faith and partaking of the Ordinances and living visibly under them and not living so as if they did beleeve nothing of their profession though failing much doth constitute them visible Saints and the matter of a Church If any be very exorbitant the Discipline of the Church and the Laws of the Nation which are a part of christian Discipline are to reform him 2. Form of the Church of England constitutive Next for the Form The profession of Faith and Repentance and formal covenanting We are here to note That there is a formal and a virtual Covenanting or rather a Covenanting immediately in our own person or by a Deputy as in Law a man may answer by his Attorney So all the Churches of England do formally make Profession of their Faith and Repentance and enter into Covenant at their Baptism and do personally repeat it themselves in the rendering account of their Catechism at confirmation and before the Lords Supper which is the express Injunction of the Church Rubrick after Confirmation if it be neglected this is not to be imputed to the Church though indeed for substance it is not neglected neither are any usually admitted to the Holy Communion but such as give an account of their faith and are not scandalous in their lives As for the Objection That they were forced to this Object 1 by the Law at the Reformation We are to consider ibid. Answ 1 First Forcing to Religion That Christianity was received voluntarily in
the sap and spirit of the body and Vine unto us First one recent Calvine namely who defining Baptism Instit l. 4. c. 15. § 1. saith Baptismus signum est initiationis quo in ecclesiae cooptamur societatem ut Christo insiti inter filios Dei censeamur Baptism is the sign of our entrance vvhereby vve are received into the society of the Church that being grafted into Christ we might be accounted among the children of God And elsevvhere Salutis symbolum ac pignus dedit Deus in Baptismo In Tit. 3.5 nos in suam Ecclesiam cooptans inferens in corpus filii sui Quare Baptismus congruenter verè savacrum regenerationis dicitur And that therefore Bapt. is properly and truly called the laver of Regeneration Thus he Now although he make the first particular benefit in Baptism to be remission of sins and afterward the grace of the holy Ghost Jnst l. 4. c. 15. §. 5. Yet seeing he makes our new birth to be effected in Baptism and that it is properly therefore truly called the Laver of Regeneration and that therein we are first ingraffed into Christs Body and made the children of God it follows thence that we receive remission of sins by spiritual regeneration Aug. contra Jnlion l. 2. c. 3. The other is Antient to wit Austin who doth in terminis express the same which the Church hath done in that Prayer Lex quippe ista peccati quae in membris est corporis mortis hujus remissa est regeneratione spiritali manet in carne mortali Remissa scilicet quia reatus solutus est in Sacramento quo renascuntur sideles For this law of sin saith he which is in the members of this body of death both is remitted by spiritual regeneration and also remains in the flesh that is mortal It is remitted because the guilt of it is discharged in the Sacrament whereby the faithfull are regenerated And afterward Cap. 8. Justificatio porro in hac vitâ nobis secundum tria ista confertur Priùs lavacro regenerationis quo remittuntur cuncta peccata deinde congressione cum vitiis à quorum reatis absoluti sumus tertio dum nostra exauditur oratio qua dicimus dimitte nobis debita nostrae Justification how conferr'd Our justification in this life saith he is conferred upon us by these three things First by the laver of Regeneration whereby are all our sins forgiven Next by our conflicting with sins he takes the word Justification here largely as comprehending the work of Grace also from the guilt of which we are absolved Thirdly When our Prayer is heard wherein we ask ' Forgive us our debts c. The Church therefore in that Prayer hath spoken both according unto truth and to Antiquity I dismiss that point Come we to the next which is their Exception against the Catechism touching the Sacraments Except 11 which was contrary say they to the Statute of 1 Eliz. 2. added in King James time Page 30. Touching Additions hath been answered above But further that act did not prohibite the King from adding any thing for explanation which another Act as we saw gives power to do so it be not contrary to any thing in the Book established But this might perhaps be a caution to his present Majesty The Brethren caution the King lest his indulgence in remitting of that Law by his late Gracious Declaration be as well interpreted a violation of it for there is no act for that whereas for his Grandfathers explaining there was one Next in this Paragraph is an Exception against the Answer to the Question in the Catechism Except touching the Sacrament How many Sacraments hath Christ ordained in his Church Answ Two onely as generally necessary to salvation For it may say they without racking be interpreted as a tacite admission of more as Marriage holy Orders Answ c. The Apostle giving rules of speech unto Titus Tit. 2.8 warns him that it be sound and such as cannot be condemned by the contrary part This rule therefore was here observed by the Composers of this Answer For they knew that the word Sacrament in a large sense was applicable to many sacred things not onely instituted in Scripture but also in the practice of the Church Accordingly Austin in one of the places above cited saith Noveris diem natalem domini Januar. Epist 119 cap 1. non in Sacramento celebrari Agimus pascha ad Sacramenti significationem Thou must know that the day of Christs birth is not celebrated as a Sacrament But we celebrate Easter under a sacramental signification Where he takes the word Sacrament to signifie the mystical things wrought and pointed at in Christs resurrection Therefore to avoid contention with froward spirits the expression in the Catechism is so uttered that there is no occasion given and yet the Doctrine secured forasmuch as all Sacraments properly so called are generally necessary to salvation Their next Exception is That whereas in the same Catechism it is demanded why children are baptized when by reason of their tender age they cannot perform the Conditions required in Baptism viz. Repentance and Faith It is answered Yes they do perform them by their Sureties who promise and vow them both in their names which when they come to age themselves are bound to perform This the Brethren say is a meer tale Except 2 We must not be offended Jer. 13. if the Leopard cannot change his spots nor the Brethren their Black-more language They add for proof That it was never read nor heard of in Scripture that one man either repented or believed in the room and name of another whereby that other did receive all or any of the spiritual benefits exhibited and sealed in either of the Sacraments And 't is not a vowing by one that another shall repent and believe when he is not at present able to do either that can truly be said to be a performing of them Thus the Brethren Wherein there is a double mistake first of the meaning of the Answer in the Catechism and then in Answ 1 the matter of their Reply Touching the first The distinction in the Catechism viz. that there is an outward and visible sign which comprehends both the Element and the Form and Action of baptizing and an inward and spiritual Grace Or there is Sacramentum as the Schools speak the outward and visible part and there is res Sacrâ—menti that which is inward and spiritual this helps us to an Answer for accordingly it may be said of Repentance and Faith required to this Sacrament There is the inward Repentance and Faith or the res ipsa and there is the outward repentance and Faith that is the profession of them Now as to the partaking of the inward grace viz. Christ and his benefits there is required the inward graces of repentance and faith so for the outward part of it the visible