THE VNMASKING of a Masse-monger WHO IN THE COVNTERFEIT Habit of S. AVGVSTINE hath cunningly crept into the Closets of many English-Ladies OR THE VINDICATION of Saint AVGVSTINES Confessions from the false and malicious Calumniations of a late noted Apostate By M. S. D. of EXETER 1. TIM 1.19 20. Hauing Faith and a good Conscience which some hauing put away and as concerning Faith haue made shipwracke Of whom is HYMENIVS and ALEXANDER whom I haue deliuered vnto Satan that they may learne not to blaspheme PSAL. 22.16 Dogges are come about mee and the counsell of the Wicked hath assaulted mee LONDON Printed by B.A. and T. FAVVCET for NICH BOVRNE and are to bee sold at his Shop neere to the Royall Exchange 1626. TO THE RIGHT WORSHIPFVLL AND HIS VERY WORTHIE Friends Sir BAPTIST HICKES Knight and the good Lady his Wife AS the holy Apostles Right Worshipfull so all faithfull Christians deriue their faith from CHRIST Acceptam à CHRISTO disciplinam fideliter nationibus assignarunt sayth * De praescript TERTVLLIAN speaking of the Apostles Hee is the Foundation that cannot fayle and the Truth that cannot erre and therefore are the Faithfull sayd to bee built vpon the Foundation of the Apostles and Prophets Ephes 2. because they first Preached CHRIST the onely Corner-stone and mayne Foundation of the Church Vpon the Foundation of CHRIST and his Apostles both St. AVGVSTINE and all the ancient Fathers built their Faith Doe wee then thinke that the Translator of St. AVSTINES Confessions a notorious Rinegate from the Faith of the Church of England hath reason out of that Father to draw his Romish Doctrine Sure no the poyson of his Heresie cannot be found in that holy Fathers Workes All his Confessions are directed to GOD and neyther to Saints nor Angels nor to the Virgin MARY as is the vse and practise of the Synagogue of Rome The Popes two Swords and his triple Crowne his supreme Power to judge his Cardinals Hierarchicall Orders and Vniuersall Monarchie ouer the whole Church hee knew not The reall presence of CHRISTS Body vnder the accidents of Bread and Wine and the eating thereof by the mouth of the Faithfull yea by the mouthes of the Reprobate and brute Beasts hee neuer taught Neyther did hee teach the monstrous Doctrine of Transubstantiation and the reft of the abominable Heresies established against vs in Trent Hungry Dogges may dreame of Bread 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sayth THEOCRITVS in Piscatorib And as ATMANASIVS sayth in Apolog. Defug Heretikes forge opinions according to their owne pleasure Pro libidine sua id opinâtur quod volunt But Truth will alwayes stand firme Wherefore seeing this Apostate so vnkind to his Parents so false to his Countrey so malicious to Religion hath some yeares since published St. AVGVSTINES Confessions translated into English in a long Preface and diuers false marginall Notes Obseruations and Calumniations endeuouring to induce the simple to dislike the Truth professed in this Church and to affect and approue the corruptions of Popery as if S. AVGVSTINE did fauour his Sect and dislike our Confession I haue thought it a Worke worth my labour to Vindicate that holy Father out of this impure fellowes false fingers Not that you need to bee resolued of the truth of Religion wherein I know you are firmely established but to the end that what I write for the establishing of the weake comming foorth vnder the Patronage of your name might remayne as a perpetuall testimony of that loue and respect which I haue borne and alwayes shall beare you These fellowes impudently arrogate to themselues the Name of Catholikes But as ATHANASIVS saith in his 2. Orat. against the Arrians How can they bee reputed among the members of the Catholike Church whose Faith is not Apostolike This young Nouice may please himselfe with his childish Annotations and Prefations but I shall show they are no better then those Childish fables and fooleries which S. AVSTINE Lib. 2. contr Academic would haue cast out of mens hands Nay diuers points of Poperie are no better then those monstrous Fancies which ORIGEN condemneth writing against CELSVS And this I shall God willing hereafter plainely demonstrate and not onely take from him all that hold that hee thinketh to haue eyther in Saint AVGVSTINES Confessions or in any other Booke of his This Treatise I consecrate to GOD vnder the Patronage of your fauour beseeching him that it may profit many so that the Thankes may remaine to you and that thereby you may vnderstand how much I honour you and that I shall alwayes remayne Yours much obliged and deuoted M. SVTCLIFFE THE PREFACE TO the Christian Reader FRom the excellencie of S. AVGVSTINES Pietie Vertue and Learning we purpose not Christian Reader to derogate any thing nay we doubt not to preferre him before many others both ancient and late Prelates Let the whole List of late Popes and their purple Cardinals and Mitred Prelates be produced and compared with that holy Father I suppose he will surpasse them all neyther doe we doubt but he is more worthie then manie others 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yet doth hee not exempt his Writing from other mens iudgement Id genus literarum sayth he writing against Faustus lib. 11. c. 5. Quae non praecipiendi authoritate sed proficiendi exercitatione scribuntur a nobis non cum credendi necessitate sed cum iudicandi libertate legendum est so hee permitteth others to iudge of his Writings Neyther doth he disdaine in the same place to preferre the Canonicall Bookes of Scripture before them nor doe wee thinke it any disparagement vnto him or other Fathers to haue the Apostles preferred before them as hee writeth vnto Hierome Epist 19. There also hee giueth that priuiledge to Scriptures onely Not to erre in any thing The Apostate doth in diuers places call him an incomparable Doctor yet neuer did S. Augustine so thinke of himselfe nor doe other learned men so esteeme him but that Athanasius Gregorie Nazianzene Chrysostome Basil Hierome Ambrose and others might bee compared with him But the more excellent hee is the more is our gaine the lesse the Apostates aduantage For this I affirme and I doubt not but to make it good against all the packe of Iesuites and not onely against this silly Translator whose soule is lately turned and translated Popish First that S. AVGVSTINE neuer beleeued the Popes infallible judgement in matters of Faith nor his sublime and vniuersall Monarchy ouer the whole Church nor the Doctrine of the Popes Schooles and Decretals and secondly that hee holdeth nothing as a matter of Faith and necessary to bee beleeued that is contrary to the Articles of Religion publikely professed in the Church of England In proofe whereof that wee may proceed more particularly and punctually wee shall God willing declare in the first Chapter that S. AVSTINE neuer knew eyther the Decrees of Trent enacted against vs or that part of Romish Religion which this Church of
seeth not that he concurreth rather with Pelagius then holdeth with S. Austine The Heracleonites vsed to giue Extreme Vnction to their followers mumbling certaine prayers ouer them in a Tongue not vnderstood But for this S Austine sheweth they were condemned as Heretikes de Haeres c. 16. Doth the Apostate then thinke S. Austine is of his partie who alloweth Extreme Vnction and the barbarous ministring of it in a Tongue not vnderstood Like wise commending bare-footed Fryars and Nunnes and esteeming their worke in so going meritorious is hee not rather to be condemned among the nudipedale Heretikes so esteemed by S. Austine de Haeres 68. then reputed a Disciple of that holy Father Vae etiam laudabili vitae hominum si remota misericordia discutias eam saith S. Austine Lib. Confess 9. c. 13. Yet this Apostate and his glorious Companions standing on their Merites thinke they need not Gods mercie in meriting Heauen They talke also of the Blessed Virgins Conception without originall sinne but S. Austine held that originall sinne passed ouer all and would not free her from this originall corruption Finally the whole Booke of S. Austines Confessions and the forme and frame of it doth plainely conuince this Apostate and his fellowes to be of a diuers Religion from S. Augustine Hee dedicated no Booke to the Virgin Mary as doth this Apostate Hee confessed his sinnes to God onely they to Angels Saints and the Virgin Mary Hee called vpon God onely and not vpon Saints and Angels and the Virgin Mary These pray more to the Virgin Mary to Angels and Saints then to God Hee esteemed that Christ was our onely Mediator these flye to the mediation of Angels and Saints Hee called vpon God his Father they vpon the Virgin Mary that is not so much as their Mother Hee held the Vnitie of the Catholike Church these are onely called Catholikes being departed from the Catholike and Apostolike Faith CHAP. III. That the Apostate and his consorts holding what the Church of England rejecteth are neither Catholikes nor hold the Cathosike Faith IN this Booke in his Preface and notes and all his idle talke the Hereticall rinegate presumeth to arrogate to himselfe and his fellowes the name and title of Catholikes And that is the scope of his Preface and the end of his Translation to iustifie himselfe and the Faith of the Romish Church to bee all Catholike a matter so impudently presumed and so falsely affirmed as nothing more For first None are Catholikes but such as hold that Faith that is truly Catholike and Apostolike But the Faith of this Apostate his fellowes is neither They belieue the Popes Decretals and the doctrine of Trent published against the true Faith which neither the Apostles taught nor ancient Catholikes euer beleeued nay it is not receiued by all Papists No Heretikes can be reputed Catholikes S. Austine de ver Relig. c. 8. saith They are without the Church And in the end of his Tract de heresib hee saith Haereses qui tenuerit Christianus catholicus non est but Papists holding the Popes particular sect and submitting themselues to his command are directly Heretikes For first they hold diuers Doctrines contrary to canonicall Scriptures which are generally beloued of all Catholikes which Robert Grosthead in Heur 3. apud Matth. Paris Durand and diuers others hold to bee heresie 2. They commonly interpret Scriptures contrary to the meaning of the Holy Ghost which Hierome in his Commentaries vpon S. Pauls Epistle to the Galatians holdeth to be heresie Now that they interpret Scriptures contrary to the meaning of the Holy Ghost it appeareth by the Cap. solitae de major obed and Vnam Sanctam extr com de major obed and infinite other decretale Epistles by the decrees of Trent and Schoole disputes 3. With the Simoniaens and Carpocratians and Valentinians they worship Images and burne incense to them 4. With the Angelickes and Caians they worship Angels and call vpon them 5. With the Collyridians they adore the Virgin Mary and offer consecrated Hoasts or Cakes in her honour 6. With the Marcionites and Manichees they destroy Christs humane nature giuing him a phantasticall Bodie in the Sacrament 7. With the Pelagians they make mans free-will the cause of mans predestination and saluation and hold that man is able to prepare himselfe to grace and with grace to liue without sinne 8. With the Catharists they beleeue their workes are cleare without sinne and perfectly iust 9. With the Audeans and Donatists they teach that their Priests forgiue sinnes 10. With the Staurolatrians they worship the Crosse 11. With Capernaites they beleeue that Christs flesh is eaten with the mouth Finally with the Pharisees they beleeue the iustice of Workes Christ giuing his Apostles commission to goe forth into the World bad them teach all Nations whatsoeuer he had commanded them But neyther did the Apostles teach nor was it our Sauiours meaning that all Nations should beleeue and obserue the Doctrine of Trent the determination of Schooles and the Popes Decretals concerning the bodily Reall presence of Christ vnder the accidents of Bread and Wine in the Sacrament Transubstantiation and Auricular Confession the inuocation of Saints and Angels the worship of the Crosse of the Images of the Trinitie and the Sacrament the adoration of Reliques the consecration of holy Water of Agnus Dei and Paschall Lambes and such like Romish Traditions All true Catholikes professe one Catholike and Apostolike Faith how then can the Apostate and his Companions the Popes Disciples challenge to themselues the name of Catholikes beleeuing the traditions of men to be the Word of God and receiuing the Doctrine of Trent and Schoole-sophisters concerning Purgatory Indulgences priuate Masses halfe Communions Transubstantion and such like that is neither Catholike Apostolike nor Christian As we know an Artificers worke by the rule so we know and discerne faithfull Christians and Catholikes by holy Scriptures which are the rule of Faith who then can iustly esteeme Papists to be Catholikes that rayle vpon Scriptures and flye from them and admit traditions and the Popes decretals as the rule of their Faith are Gods holy canonicall Scriptures no rule without these additions True Catholikes which are also the true members of Christs body adhere onely to Christ as their head spouse and most firme foundation of their Faith But Popish Catholikes admit the Pope as the head spouse and foundation of their supposed Catholike Church Basil in Epist. 80. ad Eustat and S. Augustine de nupt concupisc c. 33. Would haue the canonicall Scriptures and Christ speaking in them to iudge of a point of Christian Doctrine Those therefore which contrary to these Catholike Fathers iudgement decline the iudgement of Scriptures and would haue the Pope to be supreame iudge in matters of Faith cannot be Catholikes Athanasius in his Creed setting forth that Faith which he iudged and all good Christians receiue as Catholike did not so much as in one word touch the
gaue the Church Apostles Prophets Euangelists Pastors and Teachers and true Catholikes beleeue that these onely are sufficient for the worke of the Ministerie and building of the Church But the Papists beside these haue in their Synagogue vniuersall Popes Cardinals Inquisitors dumbe Woluish Prelates that neyther feede nor worke any good sacrificing Priests Monkes Fryars and Nunnes which haue no institution from Christ How then are they Catholikes Among Catholikes none were chosen Bishops in time past but by the Clergie and People nor consecrated but by conprouinciall Bishops as our Aduersaries themselues confesse c. nulla ratio Dist 62. and c. in nomine Dist 23. And this was an Ordinance allowed also by Leo the first But Popish Bishops are intruded into their Seats by the Pope without any allowance of the Clergie or the People or any conprouinciall Bishops and the Pope himselfe is neyther elected by the Clergie or People of Rome but onely by a few Cardinals the most part strangers And doe you call them Catholikes that haue no Pastors lawfully instituted by Christ or called by the Church The Apostles and their successors were sent by Christ to preach the Gospell to baptize and to administer the Eucharist according to Christs institution and those are only true Catholikes whole Prelates and Priests doe performe that Office which Christ enioyned them But among Papists Priests are ordained not to preach but to sacrifice for quicke and dead and Prelates are not ordered by the Church but by Antichrist the Aduersarie of Christ and the Church and preach not the Gospell but humane Traditions and the Popes Decrees Further they obserue not Christs institution in administring the Sacraments according to Christs institution How then are they true Catholikes among whom neyther the Word is truly preached nor Sacraments are duly administred and where in Doctrine and Chayre there is no Apostolicall succession Among ancient Catholikes onely the successors of the Apostles preached and baptized but among Papists Monkes and Fryars preach albeit they be no successors of the Apostles nor instituted by Christ but by Antichrist and Women sometime are permitted to baptize as if Women could succeed the Apostles Faith commeth by hearing and hearing by the Word of God sayth the Apostle Rom. 10. and this Faith onely is the Catholike Christian Faith But among Papists no Faith is allowed as good but that which commeth from the proposition of the Church as Canisius teacheth in Catech. c. de Fide Now this Church is nothing but the Pope and their Faith is grounded vpon Traditions not written and the Decrees of the Pope Can this Faith then be Catholike and Diuine Tiue Catholike Faith is also ioyned with firme Hope and assurance of faluation together with the certaine knowledge of God and his will and with feruent Charitie towards God and our neighbour But the Faith of the Apostate and his consorts is onely a bare assent to the word of God Knowledge of God they haue little contenting themselues with an implicite Faith and denying all assurance of saluation and warring against all that submit not themselues to the Pope and his sect But such a Faith is a dead faith a diuelish faith an erronious and wicked perswasion and not a true Catholike and Apostolike faith Finally if any man did well vnderstand the particulars of that Faith which the Apostate seeketh to commend to his Countrimen and which the Church of England reiecteth as comming from Antichrist hee might plainely see that the Papists are neither Catholikes nor hold the Catholike Faith in any thing which the Church of England disliketh Wherefore least any hereafter should boast that his Popish religion is Catholike I will hereafter specifie diuers points thereof which themselues will be forced to confesse to bee vncatholike An Appendix vnto the third Chapter contayning some principall points of the vncatholike moderne Romish Doctrine WHen wee speake against the Church of Rome and her Doctrine wee vnderstand not either the ancient Church of Rome or any Article of her Faith but the new Church of Rome as shee is subiect to the Pope and embraceth his new Faith contained in his Decretals and established in the late conuenticle of Trent and is maintained by the Schoole-men and other his factors And of this Doctrine these are some of the chiefe heads First as wee acknowledge Christ to be the author and finisher of our Faith so Papists deriue their Faith from the Pope as the Author and principall Founder thereof For whatsoeuer God speaketh to vs in Scriptures yet they allow nothing but what the Pope propoundeth We beleeue no head of the Church but Christ Iesus who is also the Sauiour of his body They professe the Pope to be the head of the vniuersall Church Wee are taught 1. Cor. 3. That Christ Iesus is the onely foundation of the Church Stapleton and his followers beleeue That the Pope and his determinations are the Churches foundation also And this is also the Doctrine of Bellarmine The Church being a chast virgin admitteth no Spouse but Christ Iosus But the adulterous Sinagogue of Rome receiueth the Pope as her Spouse as appeareth C. Vbi periculum de elect in 6. When any question ariseth about matters of Faith the Church of Rome will haue the Pope to be supreame Iudge a matter vnreasonable that an Heretike and an enemy should sit judge in matters of Faith and in his owne cause When Christ ascended into Heauen they say he left the Pope to be his Vicar But of this he sheweth no commission or proofe They beleeue also that the Pope is S. Peters onely Successor and the vniuersall Bishop and chiefe Monarch of the vniuersall Church But neither doth he teach or loue Christ. as did Peter nor doth hee demonstrate how this vniuersall Monarchy came vnto him They say he hath power to dispense against the Law the Gospell and the Apostle And so he doth indeed dispensing with periured and most flagitious men and neither regarding Law nor Gospell nor what the Apostle teacheth Suarez lib. 6. Defens Cath. Apost fid c. 4. 6. Teacheth that the Pope hath power not onely to depose Kings but to command them to bee killed Christ fled away when the people sought to make him King But the Pope challengeth not onely to be a Bishop but a King also The Popes Decretals concerning matters of Faith they say are cleare from all errors so doe the Turkes also thinke of their Alchoran Of holy Scriptures they speake euill calling them a dead Letter a dumbe Judge matter of strife a killing Letter a Nose of Waxe a Lesbian Rule They receiue the vnwritten Traditions of the Church of Rome with equall affection as they receiue holy Scriptures and yet doe they not certainly know them nor can demonstrate to others what they are The Doctrine of the Church of Rome they say is the Rule of Faith But what Rule then hath this Doctrine Some say Traditions not written added to the Scriptures make vp
Obedience With their equiuocations and mentall referuations which they take to bee lawfull they deceiue not onely priuate men but also publike Magistrates affirming denying and swearing what they list without any scruple of Conscience especially if they take the Iudge to be incompetent or themselues not bound to answer Neither doe they thinke it vnlawfull to murther Excommunicate persons being moued with zeale toward their mother the Church c. Excommunicatorum 23. q. 5. The Conuenticle of Constance giueth them libertie to breake their Oathes made with Heretikes And the Pope if any be more scrupulous then other doth easily dispense with them in cases of Periurie For Heresie they account it meritorious for Parents to bring word to burne their Children condemned for heresie and for Children to doe the like to their Parents They permit for the same cause Wiues to depart from their Husbands and husbands from their wiues Neither doe they make any scruple either to defraud their creditors or to spoyle good Christians if they be censured as Heretikes As Mariana and Philopater teach They forbid their Masse-Priests Monkes and Friers to marrie yet cannot they keepe them out of Brodels Nay they forbid not publike Stewes albeit they thinke it a great sinne for Votaries to marrie Before Marriage consummated they giue permission to either of the parties that are publikely married to betake themselues to a Monasticall life The law of God teacheth Children to honour their Parents But the law of the Popes Alchoran permitteth Children either to marrie without their Parents consent or to forsake their parents and to enter into a Monastery For Prisoners to breake prison and to breake their word and oath giuen to the Gaoler they hold to be no sinne And this is a common practise of Masse-Priests and their disciples in England They thinke it a small sinne to steale things of small value and to curse and blaspheme if it be done without premeditation They teach that Penance is not needfull for veniall sinnes and that such offences are done away by knocking of the brest or by the Bishops blessing or sprinkling with Holy water As if Christ had not made satisfaction for mens sinnes they teach that all must satisfie for sinnes committed after Baptisme eyther in this life or in Purgatorie Nay albeit sinnes be remitted yet they hold that euen iust men must satisfie for the penaltie of sinne As if debtors were to pay after the Obligation is taken vp and they which owe nothing were to make payment They teach there are 4. Stages or receptacles in Hell to wit The 1. of the Damned the 2. of Purgatorie the 3. of Children dying before Baptisme the 4. for the soules of the Patriarkes before Christs ascention But let them beware they make not their Disciples to doubt of Hell as their proofes for the other 3. places are weake and doubtfull and make men deny them The wise-man Sap. 3. saith The soules of the just are in the hands of God and that no torment toucheth them Are they then wise that cast iust men into the fire and torments of Purgatorie By Masses and Indulgences and Almes they say Soules are drawne out of Purgatorie as if S. Peter and ancient Bishops of Rome had sung Masses and granted Indulgences to Soules in Purgatorie or Soules might be freed out of Hell which comprehendeth Purgatorie Christ say they instituted Indulgences but they know not where The Conuenticle of Trent sayth also they are wholesome and profitable but the Germans in Grauam 3. denie it In the Taxe of the Popes Chamber there is a Rate set downe what is to be payd for Incest Periurie Parricides and all sinnes From the Iewes they borrow Altars Priestly Orders and Apparrell burning of Incense offering of Paschall Lambes and such like Traditions Sacrifices for the Dead Purgatorie consecrated Water and such like seeme to proceed from the Gentiles rather then from the later Iewes Because Peter had the Keyes of the Church committed vnto him the Pope inferreth that he hath power to make Lawes to dispense against Law to dispense with persons periured to dissolue Matrimonie and to depriue Princes of their Crownes Monkes and Fryars albeit they liue wickedly yet boast of their workes of supererogation and hold their profession to be a state of perfection Generally they establish their iustice of Workes and inherent Charitie the iustice of God in remitting sinnes and imputing vnto vs Christs iustice they regard not And least any man should except against them for this wicked Doctrine they giue out that the Pope defining ex Cathedra cannot erre and that the Church of Rome is the ground and pillar of Truth matters most absurd and false Finally vnlesse the Apostate can proue that these Doctrines which are aboue specified are Catholike himselfe must needes confesse that neither the Papists are Catholikes nor their Faith Catholike or true CHAP. IIII. The Examination of the Apostates Title page and his Epistle dedicatorie THus hauing declared that S. Austine either knew not the Apostates Popish religion or else oppugned it and that Papists cannot by any meanes be esteemed Catholikes beleeuing and teaching as they doe it followeth now that we enter into the listes with this Confessionist and examine his whole proceedings In the fore-front and title Page of his booke he promiseth a Translation of S. Augustines Confessions But how foolish he was and euill aduised to vndertake this worke both that holy Father himselfe and this Discourse ensuing will declare I haue also partly touched this point heretofore Here it will be sufficient to remember that hee maketh his Confessions to God onely and not to Angels or Saints or to the Virgin Mary as this idle fellow and his mates vse to doe He maketh his sinnes knowne to God these fellowes thinke they are bound to confesse all their sinnes in the Priests eares All his deuotion was to God who could forgiue sinnes this Apostates deuotion is toward the Virgin Mary and to Saints to whom if hee be in his right wits he will not giue power to absolue him from his sinnes Hee consecrated his confessions to God this Apostate doth consecrate himselfe and his translation to the Virgin Mary A translation I say so idle false malicious and full of errours that he durst not set his name vnto it Which I take to be done with some cunning the man percase meaning to deny it Hee vaunteth that his large Preface will make the Booke more profitable and pleasant But it had beene farre better if it had beene shorter for of harsh and foppish Prefaces the shortest are best His Discourse is full of obseruations false vnpleasant full of poyson and hurtfull if any of his readers bee so foolish as to giue eare and credit vnto them For his Motto or word hee setteth downe this sentence Cibus sum grandium I am meat for the strong grow and thou shalt eate mee As if his translation and notes were meat for great men and sit to bee deuoured of
fourthly he was not subiect to the Pope nor liued vnder any certaine Rule fiftly he whipped not himselfe as the Fryars now doe sixtly he retyred not into a solitarie house but into his owne house as Possidonius reporteth Was hee not then ashamed to tell so many vntruths with one breath He addeth that a principall Caualier offered to depend on his aduice in the way of spirit and that there were many Monasteries alreadie erected in S. Austines time A grosse Leasing deuised not without the instigation of some wicked Spirit For first the Monasteries of Aegypt and Syria were of another fashion secondly Benct brought the Orders of Monkes first into Italie thirdly Possidonius calleth the man Agentem in Rebus A Factor for the Emperour fourthly of the dependance vpon S. Austine by way of spirit there is no mention in Possidonius Another grosse Leasing related by the Translator is that which is related concerning a Monasterie built by S. Augustine in a Garden Possidonius sayth it was in the Church and there liued not Canons regular as this irregular and prodigall fellow reporteth but some seruants of God that followed the Apostles rule and not the fashions of Monkes or the Decrees of Popes The Order of Priesthood he tooke but not the Orders of Masse-Priests sacrificing for quicke and dead Nay he preached the Gospel which Masse-Priests doe not and was made Bishop without any Bulls of the Pope being chosen by the Clergie and People That Euangelicall perfection consisteth in Monasticall Obedience hee neuer thought nor did hee found a Monasterie for Canons Regular These be Fictions and Lyes deuised by the Apostate for the maintenance of his Popish Religion the North-starre of his Discourse by which hee directeth his broken Barke He confesseth that hee was frequent in Preaching Catechizing and teaching of youth A plaine conuiction of the sloath and negligence of the Romish woluish Prelates which neither Preach nor Teach nor Catechise He addeth that hee compounded Differences and exercised himselfe in workes of Charity But Popish Prelats enflame Warres vexe poore Christians Murther Innocents and are voyd of Charitie and full of vices and villany That his Bishoppricke should be worth 40. M. Crownes by the yeare is a pleasant conceit of a foolish Factor of the Pope measuring times past wherein the Church was poore and needy with the time present wherein Popish Prelates exceed in Luxurie and Pride To error in beleefe and sensuality of Life he confesseth hee was admirably opposite To which the Apostate and his consorts are admirably addicted being Heretikes by profession and sensuall Epicures in life and conuersation Yet did S. Austine neuer vant of his noble Cooperation with Gods grace or say he made a superabundant satisfaction for his former offences These bee glorious vaunts of Popish Heretikes which take to themselues power of satisfactions and merites due to Christ. Hee maketh S. Austine also vnspeakably pure from a Papist turning to be a Puritane and giueth that to S. Augustine that he neuer tooke to himselfe He addeth that S. Austine did expiate 16. yeares of his Youth vncleanly spent As if a man were able to purge his sinnes and to make an attonement for them Making S. Austine a Redeemer and a teacher of perfect Iustice the first being Blasphemy and the second Pelagian Heresie Of the tendernesse of S. Austines Conscience and the rigour vsed by him in examination of his small imperfections hee talketh idly himselfe and his Consorts hauing Consciences seared with hot yrons and not examining their most flagitious Offences following sensuall Lusts falsifying their Words and Oathes murthering Gods Saints maintaining Stewes teaching Rebellion and open wickednesse He accumulated sayth the Apostate a huge stocke of Merites But S. Austine alwayes disauowed his owne Merites and fled to Gods mercy Cor. 2. in Psal 36. hee saith All thinges are to bee esteemed vile to vs when wee consider what we are to receiue Vt justi ficrent merita non fuerunt sayth he Epist 150. And in his Preface in Psal 31. Nihil boni fecisti datur tibi remissio peccatorum And de Verb. Apost Serm. 2. hee sayth God doth crowne vs in pitie and mercie of a stocke of Merites he neuer spoke one word Nay so absurd is the Doctrine of Merites of condignitie that the sounder Schoole-men doe disauow it Hee addeth That he came not short in paying his Debts contracted with God and his Church by reason of his erroneous Beleefe But if he came not short of payment what needed he to begge forgiuenesse of Debts If he confuted Pelagius and other Heretikes then he was no great friend of Papists that teaching puritie of Life and perfection of Iustice and the power of Free-will in our Regeneration and doing good Workes ioyne with Pelagius and other Heretikes condemned by S. Austine The Donatists as he sayth pretended that the vniuersall Church hath erred and was perished But he lyeth grossely for they onely sayd that it erred and perished in all places saue in Afrike not as Papists say that it is perished and erreth in all places saue in the Popes Iurisdiction Hee establisheth sayth hee the supreme Authoritie vnder God of the true visible and vniuersall Church of Christ in matters of Faith But if the true Church were visible in S. Austines time then is not the Romish Church consisting of Popes Cardinals Inquisitors dumbe Prelates sacrificing Masse-Priests Monkes Fryars Nunnes fierie Ignatians and such Vermine the true Church for such a Church was not visible in S. Austines time nor long after If the Churches Authoritie be Supreme then is not the Pope Supreme nay God speaking in Scriptures is not Supreme Finally if the Church be Vniuersall then is it not confined within the Limits of the Popes Authoritie Saint Austine certes neuer beleeued the Popes supreme Iudgement nor thought the Church of Afrike to be of lesse Authoritie then that of Rome Concerning the Canon of Scripture it selfe or the Translation or interpretation thereof or the tryall of Apostolicall Tradition or whatsoeuer other Point in difference by the iudgement of great Saint Augustine the Catholike visible Church is that which must be resorted vnto as the Supreme and finall Judge on Earth as hee sayth Hee telleth vs also That hee gaue certaine generall Rules whereby all Controuersies of Faith may bee composed But first the Pope doth much scorne to follow Saint Austines Rules or Iudgement Secondly Saint Austine neuer knew any Rule of Controuersies but holy Scriptures The Rule of Faith sayth he Lib. 5. de Ciuit. Dei c. 33. is sufficiently knowne to the Faithfull by the Bookes of Canonicall Scriptures A Regula Fidei quae per alias eiusdem Authoritatis Sacras Literas satis fidelibus nota est non vberrauimus Thirdly Saint Austine Lib. 2. de Doctr. Christ. c. 11. 15. and Lib. 15. de Ciuit. c. 13. will haue Translations examined by the Originals and inferiour to them Fourthly the blinde Papists doe not follow the Iudgement of the
England admitteth not and which this Apostate and his Consorts hold to bee Catholike In the second Chapter shall bee demonstrated that many of these Points of Romish Religion which wee reject are also contradicted by S. AVGVSTINE Thirdly because the Apostate and his Consorts doe euer and anon challenge to themselues the name of Catholikes wee propose in the third Chapter by Arguments inuincible to conuince them that they are neyther Catholikes nor hold the true Catholike and Apostolike Faith The fourth Chapter shall contayne the examination of the Apostates Title page and his Epistle dedicatory In the fift Chapter the Apostates absurd tedious and malicious Preface is scanned and refuted The sixth Chapter setteth downe Notes and Animaduersions vpon the Translators idle Aduertisement Jn the seuenth and last Chapter the false wicked and absurd Notes of the Translator vpon S. AVGVSTINES Text are refuted and expugned Now how contrary S. AVGVSTINES writings are to Popery here I will giue a touch in generall Non sit nobis religio sayth hee c. 55. de Ver. Relig. in phantasmatibus nostris Let vs not frame Religion according to our fancies But Popish Religion is wholly grounded vpon the Popes fantasies and fantasticall Decretals In the same Booke and Chapter he sheweth that true Religion doth tye vs to one God that is Almightie But Popish Religion doth oblige men to serue Saints and Angels and to worship many Gods on euery Altar that haue no power And againe Non sit nobis Religio humanorum operum cultus And afterward Non sit nobis Religio cultus hominum mortuorum And speaking of Angels he sayth Honoramus eos charitate non seruitute nec eis Templa construimus So he declareth that Religion consisteth not in the worship of Images or the workes of mens hands or in the worship of dead men or Saints or in the seruice of Angels shewing that then Temples were not built in the honor of Angels or any Seruice giuen to them all direct contrarie to the practise of the Romish Church In ijs quae aperte in Scripturis posita sunt inueniuntur illa omnia quae continent fidem moresque viuendi sayth hee lib. 3. de Doctr. Christ c. 9. So hee holdeth Scriptures to be both sufficient and perspicuous in all matters concerning saluation And Lib. de Bon. Viduit c. 1. Sancta Scriptura nostrae Doctrinae regulam figit ne audeamus supera plus quam oportet All contrarie to the Doctrine of false Romish Catholikes which hold the Scriptures to be obscure and darke imperfect and no sufficient Rule without Traditions Disp 2. contr Fortunat. After that man sinned by Free-will wee were cast headlong into a necessitie of sinning And Enchirid. ad Laurent c. 30. Man ill vsing Free-will lost both himselfe and it But false Catholikes denie that it is so lost but that we may freely doe well Lib. 4. contr Iulian. he denyeth that Infidels can doe works pleasing to God which Papists admit not In his Booke de Vnit. Eccles c. 1. he acknowledgeth no Head of the Church but CHRIST IESVS the onely begotten Sonne of the liuing God who is also the Sauior of his Body False Catholikes make the Pope to be the Head of the Church Omnes homines sub Lege constitutos reos facit Lex sayth S. Austine But false Papists seeke for iustification by the Law Iustitia nostra quamvis vera sit tamen tanta est in hac vita vt potius peccatorum remissione constet quam perfectione virtutum sayth S. Augustine lib. 19. de Ciuit. Dei c. 27. He sayth Our iustice standeth in remission or sinnes and not in the perfection of vertue The Papists teach contrarie Lib. 2. contr Epist Parmen c. 8. he denyeth that S. Paul or other Apostles are our Mediators And againe Pro quo nullus interpellat sed ipso pro omnibus hic vnus verusque Mediator est But this Apostate and his Consorts vse the mediation of the Virgin Mary of Angels and Saints Cum Petro dicitur ad omnes dicitur pasce Oues meus sayth S. Austine de Agon Christ c. 30. Papists contrarie beleeue that these words doe properly belong to Peter and the Pope When it was sayd to Peter I will giue thee the Keyes of the Kingdome of Heauen the Church Vniuersall was signified sayth S. Austine Tract 124. in loan The Apostate contrarie restraineth this to the Pope S. Austine in Epist ad lanuar 118. Lib. 3. de Doctr. Christ c. 9. mentioneth onely two Sacraments which our Church alloweth False Catholikes adde other fiue and hold they iustifie ex opere operato which was a Doctrine neuer knowne by S. Augustine Lib. de Fid. ad Petrum c. 19. he sayth The Church ceaseth not to offer the Sacrifice of Bread and Wine wherein there is action of Graces and a commemoration of Christs Flesh which he gaue for vs and of his Bloud which he shed for vs. Contrariwise the Apostate and his fellowes denie that Bread and Wine are effered and suppose that his Flesh and Bloud is really offered for vs in the Eucharist Tract 30. in Ioan. S. Austine sayth that Christs Body in which he rose againe must be in one place And Serm. 53. de Verb. Dom. Christus caput nostrum sursum in coelis est The Aduersaeries of Truth say he is here below on euerie Altar and beleeue that the Pope is the Head of the Church Tractat. 26. in Ioan. in Psal 77. he sayth that the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament are equall in the thing that is signified though diuers in signes Which ouerthroweth the carnall reaell presence of Christs Body and Bloud vnder the accidents of Bread and Wine in the Sacrament De morib Eccles Cath. lib. 1. c. 3. S. Austine condemneth such as worship Sepulchres and Pictures Et de Fid. Symb. c. 7. Tale simulachrum Deo nefas est Christiano in Templo collorari sayth he condemning the making of the Image of God and placing it in Churches In his Booke de Haeres he sheweth that the Simonians Carpocratians were reputed Heretikes yet the worship of Images and Saints Reliques is reputed no small part of the Romish Faith In his 6. Booke of Confessions c. 5. hee sheweth that God perswadeth vs to beleeue Scriptures condemning such as aske how wee know that the Scriptures were deliuered to men by the ministration of the holy Ghost But false and counterfeit Christians and this Apostate doe make this question commonly and beleeue not Scriptures without Tradition Quid mihi est cum hominibus vt ipsi confessiones meas audiant sayth S. Austine lib. 10. Confess c. 2. But the Apostate and his Apostaticall Consorts thinke it a matter necessarie to confesse and reckon vp all sinnes and the circumstances thereof making Confession a necessarie ingredient of the Sacrament of Penance Finally it were an easie matter to shew that S. AVGVSTINE doth discord with the Papists in all those Points wherein they differ from vs
Doctrine of Trent concerning Traditions Iustice of workes Freewill dispositions 7. Sacraments worshipping of Saints and Images and other heresies reiected by vs. How then can Papists pretend that their Religion is Catholike which that Catholike Father admitted not as catholike The Catholike Church euer prayed and administred Sacraments in a tongue vnderstood of the hearers The Friers Monkes and Masse-Priests therefore that pray and administer Sacraments in a tongue not vnderstood of their hearers declare themselues and their adherents not to belong to the Catholike Church To hold that Christ hath a body that can neither bee felt nor seene nor can it selfe either feele or see is a Doctrine not of Catholikes but of hereticall Papists contrary to our Sauiours words Luke 24. inuiting his Disciples to feele and see They are also Heretikes and not Catholikes that destroy Christs humane nature and that giue him a body like a Spirit But so doth Bellarmine and his Disciples the Papists Without mee saith our Sauiour you caen doe nothing and this all true Catholikes beleeue But the Apostate and his consorts hold that by force of Freewill they can turne to God and prepare themselues to grace and doe good Catholikes thinke and speake reuerently of Christ But Papists blaspheme and say his holy Body is eaten of brute beasts eating the Sacrament and that it may be troden vnder feet and cast into vncleane places Catholike Christians neuer admitted 7. Sacraments or beleeued that men were iustified by Matrimony order Confirmation Confession or extreme Vnction S. Austine said the Sacraments issued out of Christs side which cannot bee verisied of the fiue Romish new Sacraments True Catholikes confesse their sinnes to God and so doth Scriptures and catholike Fathers teach them Papists contrariwise confesse to Angels Saints and the Virgin Mary They thinke themselues also bound to confesse in the Priests care contrary to the practice of true Catholikes Catholikes doe beleeue that God onely doth forgiue sinnes Are they then Catholikes that teach that Priests not onely intercede for sinne and declare sinnes forgiuen but also forgiue sinnes as did the Audean Heretikes mentioned by Theoderet haeret Fab. lib. 4 This Apostate and his mates beleeue that the Virgin Mary in body is assumed vp and crowned Queene of Heauen therefore they call vpon her as their Mediatrix But this will not be proued to be a Catholike doctrine or practise Holy Martyrs and true Catholikes in time past suffered death because they would not serue and worship Creatures and fall downe before dumbe Images Are they then Catholikes that worship Creatures and adore Images Not Catholikes but the Priests of Baal and Cybele vsed to lance whip and beat themselues thinking thereby to expiate sinne Are they then true Catholikes that practise this Heathenish custome and commend it as Christian Discipline Heathen men in time past fell downe and prayed before their Images and can they pretend to be Christian Catholikes that say Pater Noster and Aue Maria before Stocks and Stones practising this Heathenish custome Papists doe also fall downe before their Lord and God the Pope kissing his foot but this was neuer practised by ancient Catholikes or true Christians True Christians receiued deuoutly the holy Sacrament and neyther put it into Pyxes nor carryed it in Procession But these false Catholikes put it into Pyxes carry it about on Corpus Christi day and worship it as a God The Apostle 1. Tim. 4. accounteth it a Doctrine of Diuels to forbid Marriage and to command Christians to abstaine from certaine Meats Foolishly therefore Papists repute themselues to be Catholikes that forbid Marriage to Priests and Votaries and restraine certaine Orders from eating Flesh and forbid all men to eate certaine Meates in Lent and on Fasting-dayes Catholike Christians neuer beleeued they should be saued by eating Salt-Fish and Red Herrings or forswearing Marriage or keeping Holy-dayes and the Precepts of the Church of Rome How then are Papists Catholikes that beleeue such fooleries Jesus Maria were neuer ioyned together in the Prayers of Catholikes neyther did they prayse Mary as well as Jesus In this coniunction therefore Papists make a separation of themselues from true Catholikes True Catholikes vsed alwayes in time past to burie the Bones and Reliques of Martyrs A plaine argument that such as digge dead men out of their Graues and worship them vpon Gods Altar are Heretikes and Idolaters and not Catholikes Neyther did ancient Catholikes beleeue that an Agnus Dei was good against Lightening and did as well purge sinnes as Christs bloud Which is another euidence that Papists so beleeuing are not Catholikes S. John 1. Epist 1. teacheth vs that Christs bloud doth purge our sinnes and that is a point beleeued of all Catholikes Papists therefore that beleeue that the bloud of Saints and their owne bloud and Satisfactions yea that holy Water doth purge sinne are but sorry Catholikes Sorry Catholikes also and poore Christians they are holding that the paines of sinne are purged away in the fire of Purgatorie For how are they purged when they are imposed And where did ancient Catholikes teach such a Purgation Farre also were Catholikes from beleeuing that Salt and holy Water did driue away euill spirits Ancient Christian Catholikes did not say Masses for sicke Horses and Hogges nor did they sing Masses of the Crowne of Thornes or of the three Nayles or de praeputio Christi nor had they seuerall Masses for Saylers Hunters Trauailers Barren Women Maides and Women with Child Are not Papists then degenerated quite from ancient Catholike Religion True Catholikes neuer blessed Crosses nor beleeued that any Woodden or Stone Crosse consecrated by them was the Foundation of Faith or a Defence in Aduersitie or Victorie against the Enemies as Papists professe in their Pontificals plainely declaring themselues therein to be idolatrous Heretikes They doe also beleeue that our Ladies Image can helpe such as pray before it and that it is a remedie against Thundering and Lightening inundation of Waters and tumults of Warres and that the Euangelist S. Iohns Image can expell Diuels and bring to vs the assistance of Angels matters neuer heard of or beleeued by Catholike Christians In a Booke called Antidot arium animae ignorant Papists are taught to pray to the Image of Christs Face called Veronica to be purged from all blemishes of sinne to obtaine grace and the fellowship of Saints And this Prayer as they say was made by Iohn the two and twentieth Pope of that name But neyther can the Apostate nor all his Masters the Iesuites prooue that such a Prayer was vsed by any ancient or true Christian Catholike Papists also are taught to consecrate Bells to cause Tempests to cease and to driue away Diuels They doe also salute consecrated Oyle saying Aue sanctum Chrisma But if the Apostate were all greased with Oyle and signed with Crosses yet shall he neuer be able to shew that this was a practise of true Catholikes The Apostle Ephes 4. sayth Christ
also more euidently appeare by the answer made to his Obiections and by the whole Discourse ensuing The second shall manifestly bee demonstrated as well by our publike Confessions which containe nothing but sound Catholike doctrine as by his vayne friuolous and calumnious opposition in his Preface and idle Annotations See then I pray you the pride and presumption of this rinegate who at his first setting forth taketh that as granted which in all his tedious Discourse he shall neuer be able to proue For how can hee call himselfe and his fellowes Catholikes whose Doctrines reiected by vs are a composition of old and new Heresies And how can hee deny vs that title whose Faith is wholly Catholike and Apostolike Hee presenteth vs as hee professeth with a translation of S. AVSTINES Confessions A poore present God wot and nothing worth our acceptance being first as it seemeth rather turned out of Spanish then Latine and next differing from the Originall in diuers places and thirdly being corrupted with false Notes and glosses Hee presumeth it will be profitable and not vnpleasing so Geefe beleeue their owne Goslings to be goodly birds He addeth that the subject will bee now and then hard As if euery Schoole-boy could not translate S. Austines Confessions as well as hee or any Discourse could be more easie As the beauty of a person saith he consisteth in Complexion proportion and motion So he would proue S. Austine to bee excellent in the complexion of his Soule the proportion of the parts of his Booke and the actions of his Life A similitude borrowed from his skill in discerning the beautie and complexion of his out-landish Mistresses but euill befitting this Subiect For first what likenesse is there betweene Men and Bookes Secondly when did he euer see the complexion of S. Austines Soule Thirdly what beauty is there in the distinction of the Chapters made by some ignorant transcriber of S. Austines Confessions Lastly what maketh this tale of faire Complexion decent proportion and motion to his euill fauoured translation and jeiune Preface and Notes He pitieth some Critickes offended as hee saith with some tautologies of this Booke But such Critickes pitie rather the translators Morologies and Pseudologies handling an argument vnfit for such a person and with diuers lies commending his owne friends and taxing his aduersaries Vanting of his labours he saith It was not in his will to commit the least fault but what if ignorance and partialitie haue caried him into faults and errours shall wee accept his will for excuse In the Preface and Translation you shall find faults lyes and corruptions such as will easily conuince this vayne brag Hee taxeth some for falsifying and corrupting S. Austines bookes De ciuit Dei and his Meditations But his reproofe is easily answered For first he doth not nor cannot shew any proofe of the corruption of S. Austines bookes de ciuit Dei Secondly the booke of Meditations attributed to him is not his I haue seene it vnder the name of Anselme Others attribute it to some later Schoole-man and Master Rogers doth not so much translate the booke of Meditations as frame a new Discourse vpon that ground But that the beleefe and practise of S. AVGVSTINE and the Church of his time is fully agreeable to the Roman Church at this day and different from the Church of England as he affirmeth cannot bee proued out of any of S. Augustines workes This I haue cleerely demonstrated before Now I say onely hee cannot proue eyther the mysteries of the Masse or the Popes vniuersall Monarchy or the 7. Sacraments and Indulgences or the Decrees of Trent which wee refuse Onely it is easily proued that hee is an aduersary of this Church of England and so hee professeth himselfe to bee He is also an enemy of his Countrey and the State and a slaue of Antichrist albeit hee doth not professe it Hee complaineth of the great difficulty of Translating this Booke and yet a Child of 15. yeares old might well haue translated a harder Booke then this And if his betters thought so as well as himselfe both hee and his betters were poore weake and ignorant Translators The sentences of S. Austines Confessions are no such deepe matters but they may easily be vnderstood But to find Sentences that grew on the tree of S. AVSTINES soule and to gather them with Flewers and dowe vpon them is an absurd conceit and altogether impossiâ—le Neuer were any such Trees Flower or Dew heard of but in the Apostates harsh stile Let him rather beware of sentences growing out of Tiburne tree and of treacherous Doctrines taught him by Masse-Priests Monkes and Ignatians Hauing finished the Translation he found as he confesseth That hee had much mistaken the sence of diuers places And euery man that is not obdurat will yeeld that hee sayth it truely But that he reformed his mistakings it apeareth not Nay we iustly doubt he made the matter worse By his most significant and sententious soule saith hee his penne is thrust into so little roome A strange and monstrous kind of guibrish for who euer heard before of a significant and sententious soule and a penne thrust into a little roome but if S. Austine spoke significantly how could hee speake so obscurely as is pretended If the Apostates tongue were wedged in a wimble hole would he speake darke sentences thinke you The Heresie of the Manichees saith he is layd vnder the ashes of obliuion And yet in his Popish doctrine concerning prohibition of Mariage to elected Priests in the extending of Christs body into diuers places in the destruction of Christs humane nature and the Communion vnder one kind it is againe reuiued The arguments of the Chapters hee saith are not S. Augustines A very profound Speculation He might also haue added that the meaning expressed in his Translation is not S. Augustines but that shall appeare hereafter Going about to commend his Booke of Confessions hee saith He will borrow the wordes of Ribadineira And I doubt hee borrowed some light from his Spanish translation But if he had chosen out a hundred hee could not haue encountred a more wicked enemy of Religion and the State nor a more false and treacherous companion then that Jesuwide who translated and amplified that scandalous Libell of Sanders De schismate deuised of purpose to the disgrace of the Kings of England and this State The Iesuite compareth his Learning to a Spring that riseth and runneth perpetually And yet Masse-Priests and Fryars drinke rather of the puddle Decretals of the Pope then of S. Austines cleare Spring Hauing vowed Chastitie to God sayth the Translator he retyred in the companie of two friends into a solitarie house where he spent three yeeres in meditation of Scripture Prayer Fasting and other Penance But first it is most vntrue that he vowed Chastitie or other Monkish Vowes secondly he was no longer there then he pleased himselfe thirdly he read Scriptures which Monkes vse not much to doe now
glorious Saint But would he disclayme his lying and calumniating this accusation would soone cease To preferre holy Scripture before any one Father is no scorne nor wrong Caluin in some things leaueth him but Papists leaue him where he followeth the Apostle and setteth forth the grace of Christ they beleeue that Monicaes soule was in Purgatorie but so did not S. Austine Toward the end of his Preface hauing almost tyred himselfe with lying and busie search of that he cannot finde he cryeth out O Heresie how deepe are thy Rootes layd in Hell Some pang belike of Hellish Treason and Heresie wrung his rotten carkasse and pinched him at the heart for to denie Masses and Dirges for the dead is no Heresie but to destroy Christs humanitie to renounce his grace and to maintaine Pelagianisme as Papists doe is most grosse and notorious Heresie We esteeme S. Austine and other Fathers as much as they desire to be esteemed and preferre them farre before the Pope and his whole Consistorie of Cardinals But the Papists doe preferre euery blind and ignorant Popes Sentence before all the ancient Fathers of whom albeit they speake gloriously in their Breuiaries and Missals yet they neyther regard them nor the Apostles of our Sauiour if they speake against their holy Father and his profit and Monkes slow bellyes S. Austine beleeued repented and liued a boly life but yet he neyther whipped himselfe nor did Penance as Fryars do neyther did he make boast of his eminencie in all perfection of life which the Apostate attributeth vnto him The Fable of the writing of the seuen Penitentiall Psalmes before S. Austine as he lay on dying is not probable the same being a practise of Fryars and not mentioned by Possidonius We endeuor by Faith and good Workes and the testimonie of a good Conscience to make our election sure to vs and so no doubt did S. Austine but we perswade no man to assure himselfe of his saluation his life being flagitious and sensuall and himselfe being ignorant and liuing without repentance and hauing Faith onely without good Workes as this lying and flagitious Apostate doth falsely charge vs that is rather the flagitious error of the Apostate and his Consorts who promise saluation to all absolued by Masse-Priests and dying in the Popes Faith which was also the Heresie of Eunomius The example of S. Austine he sayth is profitable to all men whether they be in state of puritie or are fallen into sensualitie hauing darke and frozen soules As if S. Austine were a Catharist or Puritan or sensuall Papists whose hearts are darkened with ignorance and frozen with coldnesse of deuotion could reape any profit by S. Austines example Onely he would not haue his Reader so to remember S. Austine as to forget their deuotion to his Mother Monica who as he sayth had a manly soule indued with massie and solide vertues A note of remembrance full of stoliditie rather then soliditie for deuotion and religion in the opinion of all solide Christians tryeth vs to God and not to men or women departed this life and vnknowne to vs. Further if her soule were manly why may not the Apostate haue a female soule being so much addicted to the feminine gender If her vertues were massie why may not his vanities be spongeous and light like Tyffanie Lastly if S. Austine and his Mother were Saints being not canonized by the Pope then is the Popes power lately vsurped in canonizing Saints nothing And thus an end of the Apostates idle and long Preface proface to his indignitie that hath thus vnworthily disgraced himselfe and his gracelesse Cause CHAP. VI. Notes and Aduertisements vpon the Translators Aduertisement concerning S. AVSTINES Retractations ALthough his idle Aduertisement to the Reader is neyther worth any Animaduersion nor the Readers paines yet because it commeth in sute next after his Preface it followeth in order that vpon his Aduertisement we put our Animaduersions And first I could not ouerpasse his impudence and arrogance albeit noted before in calling himselfe and his companions Catholikes whose Faith is neyther Catholike nor Apostolike nor Christian Let him if he haue any shame demonstrate that Christs Body is made of Bread nay of Wine and that it is contained vnder the accidents of Bread and Wine and was eaten not onely by the Apostles but also by Christ himselfe yea by men and beasts eating the Sacrament that the Pope is Christs Vicar and hath two Swords and power to depose and kill Kings that Fryars and Monks were instituted by Christ and liue in perfect puritie and all the new Creed of Trent When we are vrged by Papists with the authoritie of Saint Austine making euidently against vs it is our vse sayth the Aduertiser to alledge that he made Bookes of Retractation But first he is not able to shew any authoritie of S. Austine making euidently against vs contrariwise we haue alledged places making euidently against the Popish Faction and their Heresies Secondly it is no fault to say he made Books of Retractations Thirdly wee alledge places neuer retracted Lastly it is an easie matter to auoid whatsoeuer is obiected against vs out of S. Austine without any such friuolous and idle shift as is by this poore shifter suggested and deuised for vs. Where S. Austine Lib. 9. Confess c. 13. speaketh of the price of our Redemption he sayth nothing is signified but the Sacrifice of the Masse A conceit fond and ridiculous for first what is more absurd then to confesse that the soule of the Translator and his companions is of so little value that they may be redeemed with euery three-halfe-peny Masse Secondly that Father doth not so much as in one word mention the Sacrifice of the Masse Thirdly hee vnderstandeth the Sacrifice made vpon the Crosse for our Redemption a memoriall whereof is made in the holy Mysteries prophaned by wicked Masse-Priests That which S. Austine sayth of Prayers for the Dead maketh nothing eyther for the sale of Masses or Dirges or the blazing fire of Purgatorie neyther is the Apostate able to auow his irreligion by any words of S. Austine of Vowes of Miracles or of the darkenesse of any Texts of Scriptures He telleth vs that S. Austine mentioneth Monasteries of Religious persons and great numbers of Hermites yet cannot he shew any such institation of Hermites nor demonstrate that S. Austine euer knew any Popish Monke or Fryar That one and the same Scripture hath very many and different sences is not the Doctrine of S. Austine but the foolish conceit of this idle Translator that hath in his head very many crotchets but very little sence or vnderstanding for how can we be assured of the truth and certaine vnderstanding of Scriptures if the same haue many sences Apollo Loxias gaue forth ambiguous Oracles but farre is that from the Text of holy Scriptures and the wisdome of the holy Ghost He noteth also that albeit S. Austine wrote the storie of his youth yet he was no young man