dore of the Church the one of them must of necessity serue the other so impossible it is that two so contrary the one to the other should stand togeather such is the implacable hostility and extreme opposition betwixt them 7. When Abraham the Father of the faithfull for so the Scriptures style him perceaued that a breach might happily fall out betwixt him and his nephew Lot vpon a dissention already begunne betwixt their heards-men he calleth vnto him consulteth the case treateth and intreateth with him and to perswade him to vnitie vseth this motiue of all the most perswasiue Let there be no dissention betwixt me and thee betwixt my heards-men and thy heards-men for we are brethren c. But it fareth not thus betwixt the Catholicke and the Hereticke no vnion can be made no communion had no condition of peace to be treated and offered betwixt them And if you will haue the reason of this they are no brethren nay which is more they cannot be brethren for the Catholicke in his spirituall birth hath God for his father and the Church for his mother wheras the Hereticke hath an Hethite to his father and an Amonite to his mother that is Sathan is his father and Schisme is his mother he is a stranger to the couenant and a meere alien to the houshould of faith And therefore as Ichu first answered Iehoram his messengers demaunding of peace Quid vobis est paci what haue you to do with peace get you behind me follow me c. And secondly vnto Iehoram himself when he came in person to meet him and demanded Is it peace Iehu what peace whilest the fornications of thy mother Iezabel and her witch-crafts are yet in such aboundance so what peace can the Catholicke make with the Hereticke whilest his heresy worse then the sinne of witchcraft and his spirituall fornications in worshipping of false gods that is intertaining false opinions in religion and dissonant from Catholicke faith continue a terrible caueat to all temporizers that will make a linsey-wolsey of all Religion reconciling Catholicke Religion with Protestants heresy which is as possible as to vnite things most contrary and deadly iarring To these I can giue no other counsaile then such as Elias gaue to the worshippers of Baal when his fiery zeale would admit no diuision betwixt Idolatrous superstition and Gods most pure and vndefiled Religion How long will you halt betwixt two opinions if Baal be God follow him but if God be God follow him c. The application is if hereticall innouation be God his true worship follow it but if Catholicke tradition be the only true and soule-sauing religion then vnder eternall paine hazard of your soules resolue halt no longer betwixt the two God will either haue all or none he careth not for a hart and a hart a deuided hart and the Church will receiue none within her bosome nor help to saue any with her Sacraments but such as are her true-borne children constantly professing her piety abandoning all kind of schisme heresy and securely resting only and truely within her bosome 8. And although I do not affirme that all Catholickes shall be saued for that euill life and matter of fact may condemne as well as bad beliefe and matter of faith yet am I most certaine and I dare pronounce it that all heretickes so liuing and so dying shall be damned agreeing with that so often times reiterated by S. Cyprian Numquam perueniet ad praemia Christi qui relinquit Ecclesiam Christi alienus est profanus est hostis est He shall neuer aspire to heauenly glory that forsaketh the Churches verity and falleth away from Christ by Apostasie he is a forreyner he is profane he is an enemy And as all perished without the Arke and were certainely corporally drowned so assuredly all without the Arke of the Church shall eternally be damned since the Scriptures teach vs that this Arke was a liuely type of the Church And as an Hereticke and a Catholicke can neuer be ioyned togeather in heauen so can neuer the Catholicke and Hereticke Catholicke Religion and heresie in any one point be conioyned vpon earth this is the vniforme and vnanime to vse his Maiesties word consent of all orthodoxe pious and religious Deuines 9. The reason of all the foresaid opposition betwixt a right-beleeuing Catholicke and a misbelieuing Hereticke is this the Catholicke knoweth nay belieueth it as the ground-worke of his faith that Christ our Sauiour hauing left the world in respect of his visible presence continueth inuisible by the immediate assistance of his holy spirit with his Church which is Domus Dei Porta Caeli the house of God and the Gate of Heauen as Iacob spake of the place of his vision Columna firmamentum veritatis the piller and foundation of truth Vnto this Church our Sauiour reuealeth all his secrets that concerne her saluation maketh her of his priuy Counsaile gouerneth her visibly first by his owne person secondly by his Apostles directeth her inuisibly by his immediate spirit the holy Ghost and so continueth her vnder visible gouernment and inuisible direction vnto the worlds generall consummation leading her into all truth such was his promise made vnto her and here is the performance And the reason that the Church is thus neare and deare vnto Christ is this Corpus est shee is his body according to that of S. Augustine Totum quod annunciatur de Christo caput corpus est Caput est filius Dei viui vnigenitus Corpus Ecclesia c. All that can be said and auerred of Christ is his head and his body The head is the onely begotten Sonne of God the body is his Church bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh for Christ hath two bodyes the one natum ex virgine and therefore naturall the other redemptum sanguine and therefore mysticall and the later was more deare vnto him then the former for he wholy bestowed his naturall body to redeeme his mysticall body 10. The Catholicke then knowing this correspondency betwixt Christ and his Church belieueth all wholy and without eyther choice or additiō of his owne which the said Church vniuersally spread ouer the world doth propose vnto him as matter of faith to be belieued conteyning himselfe within that most sure and infallible prescription of Tertullian Nobis verò nihil ex nostro arbitrio licet inducere sed nec eligere quod aliquis de arbitrio suo induxerit It is not lawfull for vs to innouate at our pleasure nor yet may I make choyce of that which another man vpon priuate fancy hath added But as for the Hereticke non sic ille non sic it goeth not so with him for being an Hereticke that is a chooser he according to his name and nature because he will not haue his name for nought maketh choice of what he listeth to belieue
this suffice for this article 40. Let vs now a litle cast about and take a view of the ninth article in order as the Creed naturally brancheth it and it is this Credo Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam c. I belieue the holy Catholicke Church the wordes of this article are agreed vpon on all partes but the senses framed thereupon and belieued of different Christians are most different and repugnant For first those of the Roman truly Catholicke Religion do according to the exposition of ancient Fathers which is a most certaine and infallible rule of their fayth vnderstand by this Catholicke Church that visible Congregation of the first belieuing Christians gathered togeather in Hierusalem at the time of our blessed Sauiour his Ascension at which assembly the holy Apostles themselues who made this article were present togeather with the Blessed Virgin Mother of God and other holy men and women vpon whome the holy Ghost descended inlightened them and inflaming them to preach the name of Christ and further establishing and confirming them in the truth encouraging them to go forwardes manfully without feare of any opposite humane power and promising them that the power of Christ assistance of the same holy Ghost should be with them and the directors of them vnto the worlds end to preserue this Church and holy Congregation in all necessities and extremities so that the gates of hell and damnable errour should neuer preuaile against it 41. Moreouer the said Catholicke Christians did euer vnderstand this Church to be called holy in respect both of the great sanctity of her doctrine and the holines of many of her children who besides the precepts of the law as S. Gregory speaketh nay ouer and aboue the precepts of the law as S. Basill and S. Chyrsostome ioyntly speake should endeauour etiam praecepta legis perfectiori virtute transcendere to transcend the precepts of the law by deuouting themselues vnto the obseruation of Christ his high Counsayles of Euangelicall perfection 42. Also this Church is called holy for the immediate and perpetuated assistance of the holy Ghost inspiring her inwardly directing her outwardly and especially for the meanes of sanctificatiō conuaied vnto her through the conducts of her Sacraments as chiefest and most holy instruments to that effect conferring grace for our assistance in the performing of all good works wherof none can be partakers to saluation out of this Church 43. This Church is also called Catholicke for the reasons before set downe in the first Chapter and first Consideration to wit that it is vniuersally spread ouer the world by the ministery of the Apostles in the very beginning and so hath hitherto continued still and euer shall to the worldes end and further it hath these signes and markes to be knowne by and to be distinguished from all hereticall Congregations whatsoeuer to wit Antiquity Vniuersality Vnion and Succession by descent of Bishops And finally for full complement it hath that communion of Saints both by vnion in fayth and communion of Sacraments which no other Schismaticall Cōuenticle or hereticall congregation hath and out of this communion there can be no possibility of life or saluation All this and much more which here I am constrayned to omit do those of the Roman Religion vnderstand by this article I belieue in the holy Catholicke Church the communion of Saints and it would require a whole volume to set downe the seuerall sentences discourses and authorities of ancient Fathers that iointly concurre in this exposition and explanation 44. But now on the other side if we cast our eyes vpon the state of the English Clergy we shall find that howsoeuer they do admit the same in wordes yea and subscribe therunto in their Ordination for that they teach their Rligion to follow their State as their State brought in their Religion yet exceeding great is the difference and large are their consciences in vnderstanding the same as may appeare in part out of the 19. article published by M. Rogers as agreed vpon by our English Bishops concerning the Church about which he hath seauen seuerall propositions first agreeing in some of them somwhat with the Catholicks and they haue learned it from the Catholicke Religion and as their vsuall practice is and then making their owne choyce to dissent and disagree at their pleasure as the inured custome of all Hereticks hath euer bene 45. His first proposition then is this There is a Church of Christ not only inuisible but also visible wherto supposing him to vnderstand of the true Catholicke Church for otherwise he saith nothing we do also agree as their Bishops in like manner may be supposed to do and yet can I speake this vpon my owne knowledg that it is against the common knowne tenent practice of their Academicall Schooles for there the question is amongst the most forward Protestants An Ecclesia sit inuisibilis whether the true Church be inuisible and yet is held affirmitiuely to wit that it is inuisible and not visible to manseies for the visibility of the Church tendeth to flat Popery which they cannot indure 46. His second proposition is That there is but one Church which we affirme also and they from vs haue learned so to speake and yet I do not see how the Protestant Puritan and other Sectaries Lutherans and Sacramentaries can make one Church they differing so fundamētally amongst themselues and in such weighty points of faith and religion as they do 47. His third assertion is The visible Church is a Catholick Church M. Rogers would haue said or at least wise should haue said that the Catholicke is a visible Church and the reason is for that all visible Churches are not Catholicke but all Catholick Churches are visible And what was the reason of this his incongruity of speach I do not see vnlesse he meant thereby to steale the name of Catholicke vnto euery visible Congregation of Sectaries which is clearly ouerthrowne by the definition and large explication of the word Catholicke set downe in the first Chapter 48. His fourth proposition is The word of God was and for tyme is before the Church which being vnderstood of the Scripture or written Word for otherwise it is nothing to our purpose it contayneth in it a senseles grosse absurdity for therupon it would follow that before Moyses tyme the first writer of the Bible which was more then two thousand yeares after the creation of man God had no Church because there was extant no written Word or Scripture which were very ridiculous to affirme But the only refuge that I can possibly perceaue that M. Rogers hath left him to make good his fourth assertion in proouing the word of God more ancient then the Church is to fly to the vnwritten word but this will not serue his turne neither since we haue only in this place to do with the litterall or written word of God begūne
great S. Beda for the latin But for that I will not be prolixe and because I hasten to my second Consideration which is the very maine Conclusiō of all my whole discourse hitherunto I will knit vp all with that goulden admonition of Vincentius Lyrinensis an Author which who so readeth and belieueth it is impossible if he will professe any religion that he should be ought els but a Roman Catholicke well his wordes are these Let vs hould that saith he which hath bene belieued generally of all for that this is truly and properly Catholicke as the very nature signification of the name doth import And then for further explication he giueth a threefold prescription for a more sure and infallible direction and this is vniuersality Antiquity and Consent all which he must as time and occasion serueth adhere vnto that will be accompted truly Catholicke And yet in the beginning of his fourth Chapter he illustrates the first Prescription of Vniuersality most pertinent for our purpose at this time by way of supposition and question moued and answered His wordes are these VVhat then shall a Catholick Christian doe if any parcell of the Church shall cut it selfe of from communion of the vniuersall faith This is the questiō moued the answere followeth VVhat els forsooth should he doe but that he preferre the health of the whole body before any one pestilent and corrupted member thereof 20. And hereupon I began to enter into a serious Cōsideration and a seuere examination of my owne Conscience in a secret recollected and most retired conference betwixt God and my owne soule touching matters of religion as they shall eyther doome me or saue me at the last day First I considered yea and seriously within my owne hart debated demaunding of my selfe whether the Protestants Church and doctrine wherof I then was a reall and formall member and Professor had not cut it selfe of yea departed and separated it selfe from the vnion and communion of the vniuersall faith and from the sauing and conuerting Ghospell of Christ his Kingdome which was first to be preached to all Nations as Christ promised that it should come to passe before the worldes great destruction and generall consummation This was my first demaund and the answere returned vnto me by the Catholicke Church of ancient Fathers vpon view of their doctrine and comparing it c. nay by the spirit of God since it was promised to be the guider and directour of his Church I say the answere returned was that the Protestants Church doctrine had abandoned both Catholick name Catholick faith and therefore as beames cut of from the sunne as boughes violently broken of frō the tree and streames and channels parted and separated from their originall fountaine as S. Cyprian speaketh they were to perish vanish and come to naught And now what course remained for me to take if I regarded at all the welfare of my soule but to follow the sage weighty counsaile of my foresaid authour Vincentius Lyrinensis my Authour indeed being the only meanes next vnder God of my Conuersion from heresy to Catholicke Religion and that is to prefer the health and welfare of the whole body before any one pestered and infested member therof His meaning in plainer termes is that in time of Schisme and Heresy or in particuler Countries Apostacy from the Catholicke Christian faith and religion euery Catholicke Christian that is already in the Church must hoouer vnder the winges of the Church by retyring into her lap and bosome in time of any danger And he that is an Hereticke and of an hereticall Congregation and consequently forth of the Church must endeauour by all means possible to become a Catholicke by returning againe vnto the Communion of Catholick Religion out of which it is impossible there should be any saluation 21. This first Consideration I enlarged yet further extending it by a second supposition to witt if the Protestants Church and doctrine be Catholicke indeed as they would beare the world in hand it is then it hath bene generally reaceaued of Christians ouer all Christendome in that sense as it is now in opposition against the Roman Church then the Protestants can produce visible Churches of theirs that haue bene extant from the Apostles time downwards hitherto that haue held the selfe same points of doctrine the selfe same number of Sacraments other such differences as now Protestant Churches haue in them from the Roman thē according to that most sure prescription of Tertullian they can Edere origines Ecclesiarum suarum euoluere ordinem Episcoporum suorum Declare the beginnings of their Church they can turne ouer and bring forth an orderly succession of Bishops running on as he saith from the very beginning and continuing without any interruption to the Apostles tyme then can they proue that the first Bishop that held these differences was instituted and ordayned by some Apostle or Apostolicall man for so saith Tertullian could the Church of the Smyrneans proue their succession of Bishops from S. Policarpus ordayned by S. Iohn and the Church of Rome proue from S. Clement placed by S. Peters in one word then according to another prescription of Tertullian can they proue that the doctrine of their Church as now it standeth in contradiction with ours conspireth with the doctrine of the originall Apostolicall and mother Churches and that they hold that very doctrine which the Church receiued from the Apostles the Apostles from Christ and Christ from God and that the same hath cōtinued by neuer interrupted succession from that time to this of theirs These things if they shall euer be able soūdly and substantially to proue on their part then shall I acknowledg that they and their Religion are Catholicke indeed and that out of their Church there is no saluation 22. But if these things haue bene by them attempted and could neuer yet be proued by them nay if their affirmatiue haue bene disproued by a negatiue in all the forenamed notes markes prescriptions of the Church and against Hereticks as is already too apparently knowne to the whole Christian world then let them at the last vpon so manifest a conuiction ingenuously confesse that the denomination of Hereticke rather then the appellation of Catholuke doth properly apertaine vnto them 23. And albeit I cannot but vnderstand that the Hereticks of ancient times and all moderne Sectaries in these our vnhappy dayes both in Germany France Holland Scotland and England doe ambitiously affect this renowned name of Catholick to haue it giuen vnto their hereticall Cōgregations nay which is more howsoeuer they do fraudulently sometimes cloath themselues in sheepe skinnes when surreptitiously they inuest thēselues with this high title supreame dignity of a Catholick though in points of doctrine amongst themselues they be neuer so much opposite the one to the other ech condemning other for Hereticks nay damning themselues amongst themselues and
point thereof not only of those articles which he there setteth downe principally against the Arians and other heresies as did also the Councell of Nice for that otherwaies some man might obiect and say that the ninth article of the Apostles Creed I belieue in the holy Catholick Church the Cōmumō of Saints which S. Athanasius mētioneth not were no article of beliefe and that a man may be saued without the faith therof especially for so much as the said article with the other three next ensuing to wit I belieue the remission of sinns the Resurrection of the flesh and Life euerlasting togeather with the fifth article he descended into hell all which are permitted by the Nicen Creed do not belong to the integrity of the whole Catholick fayth which were an Heathenish absurdity to imagine 18. S. Athanasius then as also that ancient Orthodox Councell of Nice albeit they set downe and expounded those articles in their Creedes which the Churches necessity instantly required to be explayned in those tymes against the heresies which then most infested and troubled the Church yet were they ioyntly euer of this opinion and beliefe that whosoeuer did not belieue all and euery point of the whole Catholicke fayth and that firmiter fideliterque that is both firmely and faithfully as S. Athanasius his wordes are shall most certainely be damned euerlastingly And conforme vnto this I haue shewed before in the first Chapter of this booke the vniforme consenting seuerity of all antiquity that any the least heresy or errour defended obstinately and with pertinacity against the Church be it but one sentence word fillable nay letter is sufficient to cast a man out of the bosome of the Churches vnity into hereticall prauity and Diabolicall nouelty and consequently to bring a man vnto euerlasting perdition and destruction both of body and soule And this we haue already proued by the vnanime verdict of S. Athanasius S. Basill S. Nazianzen S. Hierome S. Augustine and others which S. Augustine in the very closing period of his booke of heresies directed to Quod-vult Deus pronounceth bouldly and denounceth confidently against all heretickes and heresy that whosoeuer doth hould any one of these heresies registred in that booke of his or any other that should spring vp afterwardes he cannot be a Catholicke Christian and consequently cannot be saued for that he houldeth not the whole Catholicke fayth entirely and inuiolably 19. And now to descend from the generall to the speciall and to make iust proofe of all the former accusations and imputations laid vpon the Clergy of England first the Ministers of that Church do stiffly hould sundry of those heresies which S. Augustine hath recorded for heresies and as condemned of the Church in his tyme in that booke of his before cited 20. And for example it cannot be gainesaid but they deny all externall Sacrifice and Prayer for the dead with the Hereticke Aerius this is one heresy and a capitall one too if we do belieue S. Augustine Secondly the Protestants fall into another heresy of Aerius for they deny Statua solenniter celebranda esse ieiunia sed cùm quisque voluerit ieiunandum ne videatur esse sub lege that solemne fasts appoynted by the Church were not to be obserued but that euery man should fast when he would least he may seeme to be vnder the law These are the words of S. Augustine out of Epiphanius and is not this the very speach of our Ministers Preachers of England at this day Nay I haue heard some of them my selfe proceed so earnestly in their rayling humour against this sacred and Angelicall abstinence that they haue not sticked to condemne the holy time of Lent as Popish and superstitious tending quite to the ouerthrow of mans health and bodily constitution and therfore that the authors therof said they wanted wisdome and discretion for instituting it in such a time of the yeare as the spring is when man his body requireth the best and purest nutriments 20. Thirdly there is also recorded by S. Augustine haeres 69. the heresy of the Donatists that affirmed that the Vniuersall Church was wholy corrupted and perished except only amongst their followers And do not the Protestants to auoid the iudgement of the Church vtter the same contumelious slaunder at this day condemning all others to iustify themselues 21. Againe do not the Protestants fall into the heresy of the Iouinianists as it is registred by the same S. Augustine haeres 88. that held the equality of sinnes and did equall marriage with Virginity And therupon was the cause saith S. Augustine that diuers sacred Virgins consecrated to God by the holy and lawfull vow of sacred single life left their profession and married And is not this also practized and defended by protestants at this day do they not deny all Euangelicall Counsailes of perfection deluding Scriptures and reiecting Fathers though neuer so many neuer so pregnant for prouing and conuincing of this Witnesse a Treatise lately published by a former Minister of your Church in defence of the doctrine of Euangelicall Counsailes not long since preached by him in the Vniuersity of Oxford 22. I pretermit the heresie of the Manichees that denied Free-will and of the Nouatians who would not grant that Priestes had authority in the Church to remit sinnes All which ancient heresies with many more which I purposely omit being held in like manner in some degree or other yea defended with great resolution by our English Ministers they cannot be accompted to belieue entirely and inuiolably the Catholick faith and Creeds which condemne all these for heresies 23. And furthermore if besides this we will but consider the variety and multiplicity of other new sects of these our dayes with which our English Ministers do participate and make open profession to communicate as with their brethren we shall diserne clearely that they cannot so much as pretend to hould the sincere integrity of one only faith And the reason is for that they haue euer hitherto admitted for brethren and men of one faith the Lutherans for example who expressely condemne them for hereticks and professe in the open eares of the world themselues to dissent really from them in diuers weighty and capitall pointes as touching the Reall Presence the person of Christ Iustification freewill the law the Ghospell and many other more of like nature as by their owne bookes and writings doth appeare And how then may they be sayd to agree with the sense and meaning of S. Athanasius his Creed which pronounceth damnation against all such as do not faithfully and firmely hould the whole entyre Catholicke faith without any violation in any one article at all And so let vs passe vnto the two other Creedes to wit vnto that of the Councell of Nyce and the Apostlicall 24. In the Nicene Creed for the better and further explication of Christ his Godhead and equality with his Father against the Arian heresie there
Maties wise and religious hart who with that opinion might haue made herselfe a Protestant therby haue escaped the greatest part of her troubles and perhaps also haue auoided the violent stroake of the Axe which is well knowne to haue bene vrged vpon her especially in respect of her Religion and of the feare that was conceyued least in time she might come to the Crowne and defend the same I meane her Religion with publicke authority 67. And now whosoeuer it was wherein I remit my selfe to his Matie as most interessed therin both in Honour body and soule as her only Child and heyre chiefest Iewell in the world euident it is the opinion cannot stand as now hath bene said eyther in reason or religion and may be presumed to proceed from such as haue little care of any religiō at all onely they would liue quietly enioy their sensuality passe the time without any trouble or scruple or repugnant conscience for any thing touching religion or that whole subiect And this if I take not my ayme amisse commeth very neere to the point of secret Atheisme 68. S. Augustine recordeth the like opinion of many in his daies who thought it did not materially import them whether they were Donatists or Catholicks so as they professed the Christian faith Multi sayth he nihil interesse credentes in qua quisque parte Christianus sit ideo permanebant in parte Donati quia ibi nati erant c. Many beleeuing that it concerned them not in what side or part ech man were a Christian so he were a Christian therefore they remayned on the party or faction of Donatus the Hereticke for that they were borne therein But S. Augustine vehemently confuteth this false pestilent and indulgent perswasion aswell in the place heere cyted as in many other places of his workes confidently teaching and auerring that a man is made an Hereticke by houlding any one errour obstinately against the Church and consequently damned also In Ecclesia Christi saith he qui morbidum aliquid prauumque sapiunt si correcti vt sanum rectumque sapiant resistunt contumaciter Haeretici fiunt foras exeuntes habentur inimici Those who in the Church of Christ are infected with corrupt and naughty opinions if being admonished to belieue wholsome and true doctrine they kicke against it with contumacy then do they become Heretickes and going forth of the Church are held for enemies So he And with the same seuerity holdeth he in his booke of heresies intituled Ad Quod-vult-Deum that the belieuing of any one heresy condemned already by the Church or to be condemned if rising afterwards is sufficient to make the belieuer obstinate defender no Christian Catholicke consequently an Hereticke so impossible to be saued 69. To this opinion subscribeth S. Cyprian who shewing that euery least heresy or schisme is able to damne a man that adhereth vnto it writeth expressely thus Beatus Ioannes Apostolus nec ipse vllam haeresim aut schisma discreuit sed vniuersos qui ex Ecclesia exijssent Antichristos appellauit S. Iohn the Apostle himselfe did not put any difference or exception of any heresy or schisme at all but called them Antichrists whosoeuer were gone forth of the Church for any heresy or schisme whatsoeuer 70. And yet this point is pressed further by many other holy fathers yea strained to euery heresie were it but in one word or sillable And this was the opinion of S. Hierome His wordes are these Propter vnum verbum aut duo quae contraria essent fidei multas haereses eiectas esse ab Ecclesia we shall read that many heresies haue beene cast out of the Church for one or two words that were contrary to the receyued faith 71. To this purpose conduceth that of S. Basill registred by Theodoret to wit that a good man ought to loose his life if neede require for the defence of one only sillable pro desensione vnius syllabae diuinorum dogmatum The reason whereof is touched as well by S. Athanasius in his Creed where he saith That he shall most certainely be damned that houldeth not entirely and inuiolably the whole Catholicke faith as also by Nazianzen when he saith That heresy consisteth sometimes in one word His wordes are these Nothing can be more perilcus then Heretickes who running wholy ouer all do notuill standing in some one word as by a drop of poyson infect the sincere simple faith of our Sauiour comming downe by Apostolicall tradition This was the iudgment of Antiquity so seuere Censurers were all those holy Fathers of the least dram of Heresy 72. Thus then you apparently see that for making of an errour or heresie damnable it is not required of absolute necessity that it deny some thing of the blessed Trinity directly or some maine article of the Creed c. as many of the first ould heresies did when the doctrine therof was not so well explaned as now it is though this be a desperate shift of the Protestant and most miserable euasion and yet it will not serue his turne he being guilty of heresy in all those high pointes yea of misbeliefe almost in euery article of the Creed for that as before hath beene touched in the third Consideration the greatnes of the sinne of heresy dependeth more of malice and malignity of the sinner then of the materiall obiect about which the Hereticke erreth for that he sinneth of obstinacy and contumacy by his owne choice and therefore is said by S. Paul to be damned by his owne iudgement quia eligit sibi in quo damnatur saith Tertullian he chooseth to himselfe wherin to be damned or els as S. Leo doth more largely giue the glosse Propria pertinacia perit sua à Christo discedit in sania qui eam impietatem per quam multos ante se scit perusse sectatur religiosum atque Catholicum putat id quod sanctorū Patrum iudicio damnatum esse constat That is he perisheth by his owne pertinacity and through his owne peculiar madnes departeth from Christ who imbraceth that impiety which he knoweth hath beene the destruction of many houlding that for religious and Catholick which manifestly appeareth to be condemned by vniforme iudgment of ancient Fathers So blessed Leo expoūds the place the reason followeth for that such a one preferring himselfe by pride and vanity before the whole visible and Catholicke Church he chooseth to hould that which his owne iudgment and fancy doth lead him vnto VVhence it may come to passe that one man erring with lesse pride and obstinacy about some pointes of the blessed Trinity may sinne lesse damnably then another that erreth in points of lesser moment but with more malice as about the doctrine of the Sacraments or other pointes of the like nature And the reason therof is for that this second erreth with more obstinacy and malice which corroborateth the
very essence of heresy then the first though both of these men being out of the Church must be damned but yet with different measure of punishment 73. This fearefull Conclusion then of damnation standing a foote and remaining in full force to be inflicted vpon all kind of Hereticks we are now and next to cōsider whether the Protestants opinions at this day wherin they differ from the Catholicks be truely heresy being cōpared with the Romā faith and Religion and secondly we are to discusse whether the different sortes sects and professions of the said Protestant religion among themselues especially the principall as Lutherans Sacramentaries in Germany be heresies to the other and the like of Puritans and Protestants in England all originally rising from Martin Luther I say we are to consider whether all these seuerall heades be Hereticks indeed the one to the other or may be saued togeather ech man dying in his owne Religion 74. To proceed then in order vnto the examination of the particulers And first that Protestant Religiō in many great points throughout the mayne corps of controuersies now in hand is truly heresy to those of the Roman fayth and Catholick Religion this point being so cleare needeth no further dispute for asmuch as the Protestants do openly auouch aboue an hundred positions against the same Roman Catholick Church defending the same with obstinate resolution And the late generall Councell of Trent where the flower piety and learning of the whole Catholicke Christian world vnder one spreame Pastour and infallible conduct of God his holy Spirit were assembled hath discussed examined according to ancient grounds of holy Fathers discouered for Hereticall and thereupon hath anathematized 125. points by name and that in so many different Canons enacted concerning the Sacraments only and the controuersy of Iustification Besides all the rest I say the case being thus cleare against them and their conuiction so manifest there needes no further dispute For if by S. Augustine his iudgment euen now alleadged and other Fathers of greatest learning and credit in the Church one only erroneous proposition or assertion held with obstinacy against the doctrine of the knowne Christian Church be conuinced for a point of heresy and held for a matter of most certaine damnation to the houlder for that it casteth a man out of the said Church out of which is no saluation what is to be inferred where so many condēned assertions are held against the knowne Church authority therof 75. To the second also to wit whether Lutherans and Sacramentaries who made the first diuision of Protestants whilst Luther himselfe was yet aliue be truly and properly Hereticks the one to the other and consequently that the saluation of one is the damnation of the other were it possible that any Sectary could be saued This is with as great facility proued as the former and that first by the testimony of Martin Luther himselfe the originall Authour of all these later Sectes and then by the mutuall and concurring consent of all the Lutheran Doctors Pastours and Prelates that succeeded him 76. First I say it is well knowne that Luther himselfe euer reputed the Sacramentaries that comprehend both Zuinglians and Caluinists for dāmnable and intollerable Hereticks Let his owne testification often reiterated and seriously aggrauated in diuers of his bookes be a sufficient cōfirmation of this His first serious Censure denounced against them all is this Haereticos seriò censemus alienos ab Ecclesia Dei Zuinglianos Sacramentarios omnes qui negant Christi Corpus Sanguinem ore carnali sumi in Venerabili Eucharistia We do seriously censure for Hereticks and Aliens from the Church of God the Zuinglians and all other Sacramentaries who do deny that Christes sacred body and bloud is receaued by our carnall mouth in the Venerable Eucharist Can any thing be spoken more clearely or determined more effectually then this Or can any Caluinist with any face hereafter exempt himselfe from out of the number of them that are accursed and condemned by their owne grand Progenitour 77. The same in effect he hath in his Epistle ad Iacobum Presbyterum Ecclesiae Bremensis his wordes are these All Sacramentaries that deny the Reall Presence are Hereticks and for such to be auoided And yet in a third place least any man should thinke he had altered his iudgement de Coena Domini of the supper of the Lord he condemned by name for damned Hereticks the very first Authors of Sacramentary doctrine to wit Carolostadius Oecolampadius and Zuinglius and questionles Caluin had neuer escaped his singers as sly an Hereticke as he was had he bene then either of name or note well his finall and irreuokable doome for it was denounced against thē in his decrepit age was this Ego tamquam alterum pedem iam habens in sepulchro c. I being now ould and hauing as it were one foote in my graue do yet carry this testimony glory with me to the tribunall of Iesus Christ that with all my hart I haue condemned as enemies of the Sacrament Carolostadius Zuinglius and Oecolampadius and all their disciples and followers and haue auoided their company haue no familiarity with them eyther by letters writings wordes or deedes as the Lord hath commanded not to haue with Heretickes Thus much of Luther himselfe 78. And now if we should prosecute the seuerall iudgmentes and Censures of all others the most learned Lutherans against Sacramentaries in this matter of heresy and namely against Caluinistes who were of no reckoning in Luthers daies for that their new heresy was but then a hatching there would be no end and I should rather fill a large volume then cōteine my selfe with in the precincts of my briefe intended Considerations Let one or two of the principall serue for all Matthias Illyricus a great Lutheran Superintendent of Saxony and one of those foure that compiled the lying Centuries doth in a certaine booke intituled Desensio Consessionis Martinistarum or Luther anorum censure Caluinistarum Lyturgiam the Lyturgy or seruice of the Caluinists not only for hereticall but to be Sacrilegious also Et proh dolor saith he innumeras animas aeterno exitio inuoluere And to inuolue alas innumerable soules with euerlasting perdition 79. Franciscus Stancarus also no meane Authour one of the Lutheran side writing to the King of Polonia in his days pronounceth confidently of all those new professors vnder Caluin in Geneua that they were Publici manifesti haeretici notorious and manifest Hereticks And yet as though this were little the same Author in his booke de Trinitate prescribeth this Caueat to the Christian Reader concerning Caluin and would to God it were as well remembred and practised in the Vniuersities of England where yong Deuines are for the most part poysoned with the drugges and dregges of Caluins doctrine my hart bleedeth to thinke of it before they can tast of the pure liquor of
bookes of Preisthood doth very well declare 4. And now to come vnto these Councels and to speake particulerly of euery one of them as they lye in order The Councell of Nice was gathered togeather somewhat more then three hundred yeares after Christ and the occasion of this first great Ecclesiasticall Assembly of all the world met togeather by their Bishops in this generall Councell was for the censuring and suppressing of two capitall and damnable heresies that then inuaded and infested the Church of Christ. The first was the heresy of the Arians and this impugned nay flatly denyed the second Person his identity of essence to wit the Sonne his equality of substance and hodhead with the Father granting him to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like vnto the Father but denying him to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same substance with the Father which was the fayth and beliefe of the Catholicke Church in those dayes 5. The second heresy was the heresy of the Quartadecimans concerning the celebrating of Easter-day of which heresy to speake any thing in particuler at this tyme I intend not since it is not to my present purpose only I refer the reader vnto the author of the Three Conuersions of England where this point is both substantially and punctually discussed The mayne point wherof I am to treat in this place is to intimate vnto the Reader how both these heresies of the Arians and the hereticall Quartadecimans were determined censured and anathematized by the authority of this soueraigne and supreme Ecclesiasticall Tribunall I meane the first Generall Councell of Nice which consisted as S. Ambrose obserueth alluding to the iust number of Abraham his souldiers of three hundred eighteene Bishops gathered from all partes of Christendome And this was the first Generall Councell that could be Assembled vntill that time in respect of the most bloudy and cruell persecutions that had continued for the greatest part of the prcedentages 6. And here we are to obserue that albeit that three other Prouinciall nationall Councells are recorded to haue bene celebrated before this of Nice and after that of the Apostles Act. 15. to wit one at Rome of 60. Bishops against Nouatus vnder Decius the cruell Emperour and Cornelius the martyred Pope another at Ancyra in Galatia vnder Dioclesian the third at Neocaesarea vnder Constantines Father and Pope Melchiades according to Prateolus his accōpt yet this Councell of Nyce was the first great glorious Ecclesiasticall tribunall which was publikely erected in the Christian Church for al Nations to repayre vnto after the first planting of the faith of Christ. 7. The second generall Councell was that of Constantinople somwhat more then fifty yeares after in the yeare of our Lord 383. and it consisted of an hundred and fifty Bishops gathered togeather against Macedonius Patriarch of Constantinople who openly denyed and blasphemed against the diuinity of the holy Ghost for which damnable heresy of his both he and all that partaked with his hereticall faction were condemned censured and cast out of the Church and deliuered ouer to Sathan for that they blasphemed against the third sacred Person of the blessed Trinity And this second great and generall Councel was held vnder Gratian and Theodosius Emperours and vnder Damasus then Bishop of Rome 8. The third Generall Councell was that which was assembled at Ephesus almost other fifty yeares after that againe in the yeare of our Lords incarnation 434. This Councell consisted of two hundred Bishops gathered a-against another Archbishop of Constantinople named Nestorius but an Arch-hereticke and it was held vnder the Emperour Theodosius and Pope Celestinus This Nestorius as Vincentius Lyrinensis in his goulden tract against heresies and 17. chapter describeth his heresy whilst he made shew of distinguishing two natures in Christ he suddainly brought in two persons and by an execrable impiety thereby made two Christs the one God the other man the one begottē of God the Father the other borne of the Virgin his mother and therfore he did further auerre that holy Mary was not to be called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the mother of God but the mother of Christ because forsooth that Christ which was God was not borne of her but the Christ which was man Hitherto my Authour And for this damnable heresie was Nestorius condemned by this third Councell worthily cast out of the Catholicke Church howbeit I must confesse that I cannot see how Caluin Beza vpon the point of Christs incarnation and hypostaticall vnion with diuers others Protestants following thē can possibly auoid this ould condemned heresy but that Nestorianisme must follow as a necessary consequence of the doctrine which they deliuer vpon the point of Christs incarnation and vnion 9. The fourth generall Councell was that of Chalcedon and this was some twenty yeares and vpwardes after the foresaid counsaile of Ephesus in which Councell there were assembled six hundred and thirty Bishops Archbishops and Patriarches This great assembly was gathered against on Eutiches an Archimandrite or Abbot of Constantinople in like manner who so confounded the natures in Christ that he absolutely denied that there were two distinct natures in him For which monstrous opinion of his differing frō the Canon of Catholick faith he was cōdemned togeather with his fautor partener of his hereticall faction I meane Dioscorus Archbishop of Alexandria as was Nestorius another Archbishop before him for houlding two persons in Christ. And this famous and through the whole Christian world renowned Councell was assebled and held vnder Martian that then swayed the Empire and S. Leo the first then Bishop of the Apostlicall Sea of Rome 10. And now to make vse in generall of that which hath bene spoken concerning the foure Councels by some particuler application and illation the inference must needes be this that if the Church of England do indeed admit and reuerence these foure first Generall Councelles as it should seeme his Maiesty is of opinion it doth and their Acts of Parlament confirme the same then doth it follow by necessary and ineuitable consequence though the conclusion ouerthrow a mayne ground of Protestanticall Religion that they must needes will they nil they graunt the Catholicke Church not only to haue bene visible at this time but also to haue bene in great splendor and magnificence otherwise how could it possibly be that fix hundred and thirty Bishops could assemble and meet so readily togeather and all these for the most part out of the Easterne parts of Christēdome only to speake nothing of the west 11. Furthermore for as much as our English Church in admitting these Councels and that in the greatest Consistory of the Kingdome the high Court of Parliament doth therby acknowledge and condescend vnto that this externall visible Church consisting of good and bad is Christs true Church indued with all the priuiledges aboue mentioned of
of necessity make the visible Catholicke Church if euer Christ left behind him any Church at all to continew when he writeth that he would eyther belieue them or at least wise would be humbly silent and not condemne them as before hath bene shewed So in this very second point of particuler Fathers I find it thus written by his Maiesty 26. But for euery priuate Fathers opinion saith he it bindeth not my conscience more then Bellarmines euery one of the Fathers vsually cōtradicting of others The first part of which sentēce to wit that euery priuate opinion of euery Father bindeth not a mans conscience in matter of religion is so cleare that it needeth no proofe at all for it cannot be denyed For if the opinion be indeed priuate then is it not truly Catholicke and consequently being not the opinion of the true Church it bindeth no man 27. But for the later period of the sentence being wholy derogatory from the credit of Antiquity that is to say that euery one of the Fathers do vsually contradict others in matters concerning religion this must needes presubpose to haue some fauorable interpretation affoarded it to free it from open iniuring and wronging of the Fathers and so my hope is that this is the meaning of his Excellent Matie to wit that these contradictions supposed to be a mongst the Fathers are only diuersities of iudgment in matters that are not determinately de fide or that do not concerne any articles of beliefe but eyther such matters as S. Augustine saith that may without breach of vnion or charity be diuersly disputed of amongst Catholicke men or els when diuers Fathers do giue diuers senses of Scripture some the literall others the allegoricall and all true all intended by the holy Ghost as we haue formerly noted Now the rule that we must heere obserue concerning these poyntes wherein consent of Fathers is and must necessarily be had is that which Vincentius Lyrinensis an Authour that I can neuer sufficiently commend hath excellently laid downe in his 37. Chapter contra haereses his wordes are these Antiqua Patrum consentio Sanctorum non in omnibus diuinae legis quaestionibus sed solùm in fidei regula magno nobis studio inuestiganda sequenda est The ancient consent of holy Fathers is with great care and study to be both searched out and followed of vs not in all their questionings of holy Writ but only in the rule of fayth 28. And vnto this S. Augustine alludeth where he writeth thus Alia sunt in quibus interse aliquando etiam doctissimi atque optimi regulae Catholicae defensores salua fidei compage non consonant alius alio de vna re melius aliquid dicit veriùs There are some thinges wherein sometimes the most learned and the best defenders of the Catholick rule do not agree amongst themselues but one speaketh better and more truly then another of the selfe same thing but yet without breach of the linke of faith 29. But forasmuch as particuler Fathers do often times set downe and deliuer the publike beliefe of the Church and not any priuate opinions though they seeme to speak priuately and not in name of the whole Church when they mention this or that point concerning religion some certaine rule or note for our better direction and distinction must be set downe and the surest rule to discerne how farre forth priuate Fathers opinions ought to be esteemed or may bind a man in conscience is for a man to consider vprightly in the impartiall iudgment betwixt God and his owne conscience whether that opinion of his if he be but one or theirs if they be many haue bene withstood or gainesaid contradicted or impugned by any other Father or Fathers Synod or Councell Prouinciall Generall or Nationall of the same or other precedent or subsequent ages For if this cannot be made good against any one particuler Fathers opinion then may it more then probably be inferred that forsomuch as this particuler Father was generally reputed for a Catholicke Doctor in his time neuer reprehended taxed noted condemned for this opinion as false doubtfull or erroneous it must needes be I say necessarily inferred and concluded that that very opinion of his was the opinion iudgment and doctrine also of the Catholicke Church in the age and time wherein he liued and of which he himselfe was then a Father and Doctor For if this were not so it cannot be so much as with any probability imagined that this Father could haue taught this opinion in his dayes or diuulged it in his writings vnto posterity without some note or memory of controlment or taxation of the same eyther whilst he liued or after his death 30. And hereby it followeth that albeit this Doctrine should haue but one or two ancient Fathers that do expresly mention it in their dayes other Fathers of the same tyme either not hauing occasion to speake therof or els busied and incumbred about other as weighty poynts yet were this alone sufficient to make vs vnderstand that in their dayes that mention the same the forsaid opiniō of that Father or Fathers was held for Catholick Doctrine throughout the vniuersall Church for that otherwise without all doubt it would thē or afterwardes haue bene descried censured by the carefull vigilant watchmen of Gods Church Neyther can any instance as I imagine be giuen to the cōtrary for that frō the very first infancy of Christianity vnto our dayes it cannot be shewed that any Father or Doctor though otherwise neuer so renowned for wit and learning piety or sanctity did euer beginne any new doctrine or erroneous opinion different from the Catholicke beliefe but that presently the same was excepted against by others And this is more then euident in the particuler cases and slippes of Tertullian Origen Cyprian Lactamius and other ancient Fathers of the Church and yet when any of these transgressed the anciēt boundes innouating any thing frō the receyued faith they were all of them excepted and cryed out against noted taxed for such their priuate erroneous opiniōs as dissenting from publick vnion and Catholick Communion 31. Neyther doth any man in my iudgment explaine this point better then S. Augustine himselfe and therefore as I serued my selfe principally of him in the precedēt Consideration soe do I meane also in this For as on the one side when many Fathers do agree in their opinion against one or few as in the case of S. Cyprian about the rebaptizing of hereticks yt fell out the greater part is there to be preferred before the lesse as the said Father doth often affirme so notwithstanding when no such opposition and contradiction is of the maior part S. Augustine himselfe maketh high and singular accompt of euery priuate Fathers opinion as namely when he extolleth the authority O. S. Hilarius against lulian saving Ecclesiae Catholicae aduersus haereticos acerrimum
A notable speach of Vincentius Lyrinensis Prem p 3â— His Maiesties honorable offer Aug. l. 3. de bapt coÌ„t Donat. cap. 15. How the first three Creeds why they were ordained how greatly they are to be reuereÌ„ced The cause of ordayning the Apostles Creed Aug. ser. 181. de teÌ„p Cap. 2. coÌ„t haereses Vbi supra serm 181. de temp Signification of the word Symbol or Creed The great substance of the Apostolicall Creed The Apostolicall Creed no Scripture yet necessary to be belieued Ruff. in Symbolum The force of tradition in the Church A questioÌ„ solued where the voice of the Church may be found De fide ad Gratian. The creed of the couÌ„cel of Nice of S. Athanasius Conc. Nicen l. 4. p. 565. edit Venet. Ambros. de fide Hos. de expresso Dei verbo The great authority left in the Church for deciding Controuersies That the Ministers of EnglaÌ„d belieue notwholy entirely the faith of the 3. Creeds No saluation without belieuing the whole Catholicke sayth entirely ProtestaÌ„ts do not receaue the whole faith but mingled with many heresies Diuers ancient Heresies held now by Protestants * M HuÌ„frey Liech About the Nicene Creed Passim in Epist. ad Polonos l. cont Gentilem 2. lib. de Christ. c. 19. Caluin his Autotheisme hereticall In what particuler article of the Creed English ProtestaÌ„ts do not agree with vs. About Christs desceÌ„ding into hell Lib. 1. hist. cap. vlt. In epist. ad Trallian Bucer in cap. 27. Matth. Caluins horrible opinion about the article of Christs descensioÌ„ into hell Cal. 2. inst c. 16. 6. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Item in Catechismo paruo iteÌ„ psych. item in harmo Euangelica cap. 27. Math. 2. Inst. cap. 16. §. 10. 2. Instit. c. 16. §. 9. A story of the contention of English Ministers about the descent of Christ into hell Psal. 15. Tertul. de praescript A strange ridiculous exposition of the Article DesceÌ„dit ad inferos Tho. Rogers in his 39. articles pag. 15. 16. c. The Church of England aduersary to many of her owne for many hould that Christ desceÌ„ded not into hell at all Thaddaeus Ignatius Iustinus Martyr Irenaeus all antiquity are dreaming Papists in M. Rogers definitiue opinion Credo Ecclesiam Catholicam The visible beginning of the Catholicke Church Lib. 25. in ob c. 24. 5. Vincent Lyrinensis aduersus hareses c. 3. Tertull. de praescript cap. 32. Thè Protestantly meaning about this 9. article 1. Later propositions of the Protestáts about the Church Rogers ar 19. pag. 86. 2. 3. 4. 5. Markes of the Church 6. Ridiculous proofs that the Church may erre Rogers p. 96. Lib. de PoÌ„t à cap. 8. ad finem vsque ad cap. 15. Premonit pag. 35. How the ParlameÌ„t Church of EnglaÌ„d do admit the first foure Generall Councels Why and how these foure first Councels were gathered and how therby it is conuinced that the church caÌ„not err Vide Aug. de vnit Eccles in pluribus locis Mat. 18. 15 16. 17. 18. 1. Tim. 3. 15. Chrys. l. 3. de sacerdot Councell of Nice assembled anno 327. De fide ad Gratian. Anno. 252 Anno. 308 Adno 311. The secoÌ„d generall Councell of ConstaÌ„tinople an 383. The third generall Councell of Ephesus Ann. 434. Lib. 1. Inst. c. 13. §. 9. 23. 24. The 4. generall Councell was that of CalcedoÌ„ 20. yeares after An euideÌ„t declaratioÌ„ that the whole Church cannot erre Aug. in Psal. 101 S. Aug. excellent speach of the perpetuity of the Church Matth. 29. â—0 Application of S. Augustins speaches vnto our Sectaries Aug. in psal 47. That the Church shall neuer Apostatate De vnit Eccles. The inuincible strength of the Church Matth. 23. Why ProtestaÌ„ts do not nor can remedy their diuisions by any Generall or Nationall Councell ProtestaÌ„ts can abide parly and treaty neither with Catholiks nor amoÌ„g theÌ„selues Vide Conc. Calced act 3. p. 163. edit Venet. The terginersation of the heretick Eutiches fully represeÌ„ting the ProtestaÌ„ts Lib. 4. Iust. cap. 9. §. 1â— Vide resp Gaspar VillapaÌ„di ad bas causas ProtestaÌ„ts shifts to auoid comming to Councels Stan. Resc l. 1. de Atheism c The ProtestaÌ„ts disagreemeÌ„to in their meetings Tertul. de praescript Aug. l. 3. cont epist. Parmen c. 4. ser. 11 de verb. Domini c. Particuler points of differeÌ„ces betweene these 4. generall Councels the Protestants of our tyme for doctrine and manners Conc. Neocaes can 1. an 316. The decree of the CouÌ„cel of Nice and Neocaesaraea against the Marriage of Priests Ann. 711. Basil. epist. 1. ad Amphi c. 3. Epiphan hares 59. The answere vnto Caluins obiection about Paphnutius Another Canon of the Councel of Nice about the Reall presence A Canon of the second CouÌ„cell much making against Protestants VinceÌ„tius LyrineÌ„sis his relatioÌ„ of the CouÌ„cell of Ephesus CoÌ„c Ephes. tom 1. cap. 22. in epist. Imperat. Secular men may not meddle in Ecclesiastical consultations CoÌ„c Ephes. tom 1. c. 16 Con. Eph. tom 2. c. 17 The Supremacy of the Pope of Rome coÌ„firmed by the councell of Ephesus The CouÌ„cell of ChalcedoÌ„ CoÌ„c Calc act 1. Ibidem Act. 2. in libel Theodor Ischir SophoÌ„ c Ibid. in subscript coÌ„t DioscoruÌ„ Conc. Calc act 3. tom 2. p. 252. edit Venet. Marriage of Monks and NuÌ„ns forbidden by this Councell Prem p. 35. Aug. l. 2. cont Crescon c. 31. A complaint against the Ministers of EnglaÌ„d for misinforming his Maiesty ValeÌ„t l. 8. Ana. c. 8. Lib. con hareses The opinion of Iesuites about the authority of the Fathers A consequence of great incoÌ„uenience How S. Augustin did not admit the authority of S. CypriaÌ„ in a particuler case The different esteeme that Catholicks Protestants do make of ancieÌ„t Fathers wheÌ„ they agreâ— in one Aug. l. 2. coÌ„ Iulian. Pelag. ver sus finem S. Augustines opinion for the esteem of the Fathers Aug. l. 3. â—ypo Lib. 2. de nuptiis concupis Cap. 29. Scoffes of PelagiaÌ„ hereticks against ancient Cerimonies of Baptisme Aug. ibid. ProtestaÌ„ts become Pelagians in deriding ancient Cerimonies Aug. l. 2. coÌ„t Iulian. Pelagiau How contemptible the authority of heretickes was to S. Augustin in respect of the ancient Fathers Lib. 2. coÌ„t Iulian. circamed Aug. l. 2. coÌ„t Iulian. propefineÌ„ An excelleÌ„t reason of S. Augustine How Catholicks ProtestaÌ„ts do esteem of the testimonies of particuler Fathers Aug. l. 1. coÌ„t Iulian. Pelag. cap. 2. Lib. 1. cont Iulian Pelag cap. 2. Thesurest rule how to iudge of particuler Fathers opinions or assertions about matters of faith When any priuate Father did erre he was presently noted by others Aug. l. 3. de bapt coÌ„tra Donatist c. 4. l. 2. conâ— Cresconâ—â— cap. 32. Aug. lib. 1 contr Iulin cap. 2. One Doctors opinion the doctrine of the Church That the Fathers of euery age for the first 500. yeares did make for catholicks against ProtestaÌ„ts in matters now in coÌ„trouersy Cap. 4. 42. coÌ„t haereses Diuers things may lead vs to discerne the true Church though they be not articles of necessary beliefe Centur. prima lib. 2. cap. 4. 1. About the Reall Presence Magdebur Cent. 2. c. 4 pag. 55. 56. 57. c. 2. About Free will 3. The Doctrine of good workes 4. Whether the Commandements be impossible 5. Externall sacrifice of Christians 6. About traditioÌ„s The primacy of the church of Rome 8. Excellency merit of martyrdome 9. IntercessioÌ„ of Saints 10. About the state of Virginity The conclusion of this age 11. Inuo catioÌ„ of Angels Magd. ceÌ„t 3. c. 4. p. 75 76. deinceps Hom. 1. in EzechieleÌ„ 12. Iustification by good workes 13. The merit of good workes Scriptures Fathers reiected togeather wheÌ„ they fit not the ProtestaÌ„t fancy 14. About peÌ„nance Magd. ceÌ„t 3. c. 4. p. 81. 15. Blessing of the water of baptisme 16. Chrisme and holy vnction in baptisme 17. Prayer vnto Saints Cent. 3. c. 4 p. 85. 86. CeÌ„t. 3. c. 4. pag. 85. 18. The doctrine of Purgatory Cet 4. c. 4. pag. 242. HieroÌ„ ep ad Demetriadem Lib. 8. coÌ„ in Isaiam CeÌ„t. 4 cap. 4. p. 293. Cent. 4. p. 301. Cent. 5. c. 4 p. 501. 502. c. Gregor in 1. Reg. c. 1. Cent. 5. pag. 506. Hom. 34. in Euang. The Fathers iniuriously handled by the Magdeburgians The conclusion ImportaÌ„ce of being a Catholicke The horror of heresie The 4. heads proposed The great profit receiued by the ancieÌ„t Fathers The dangerous estate of belieuing the ProtestaÌ„ts in EnglaÌ„d A strange pittifull case happened to his Maiesty How God coÌ„curreth with the actions of euill men but not with their intentioÌ„s The mark aymed at by the first Ghospellers in Scotland concerning his Maiestie The Epilogue of all Of persecution Persecutor