Trojano anno dom 120. formulam catechizandi catechimenos addisceret nam inducit Christianam siccine Ethnicos catechizantem licet animo blasphemo Deum alte regnantem magnum aetherium atque aeternum fiilium patris spiritum sanctum ex patre procedentem unum ex tribus ex uno tria Patres Concilii Constantinopolitani anno dom 383. mittunt libellum Synodicam Romam at Damasum aliosque Episcopos ibidem convicatos in quo exhibent fidei suae Confessionem Fidei Nicenae consentaneam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consentaneam baptismati 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Nazianzenus his contemporaâ—â—us orat 32. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Socinus anno dom 1604. scribit epistolam Smaltio itidem Sociniano de baptismo ut non necessario remittendo atque ad synaxin excipiendis hominibus vitae honestae ac probatae religionem christianam professis quamvis nunquam baptizatis adeo abhorrent acfloccipendunt baptismum Satan ut fidem nostram ab ipsis radicibus convelleret partim de divina filii Spiritus Sancti essentia partim de personali distinctione ingentes pugnas semper movebat Calvin Institut lib. 1. cap. 13. §. 21. Servabat tamen Dominus in Papatu renascituri suo tempore populi semen manebat salvus baptismus in Patris Filii Spiritus Sancti nomen quamvis perigrinae linguae usu multis aliis conspurcatus superstitionibus manebat frustra toties oppugnatum unitatis essentiae trinitatis personarum fundamentum manebat doctrina de duabus Christi naturis Beza epist 81. Mysteries of Christian Religion which it hath pleased God in His infinite Wisdom Mercy Goodness to reveal to His Church on Earth on which they are to build their Faith and Salvation the Mystery of the Sacred Trinity one God in three Persons is the first in order and of great concernment even the three that bear record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one 1 Joh. 5. 7. These three bear witness to the truth of all the Scriptures then assuredly to this truth also that they are three Persons in one Godhead and among the twelve Articles of the Apostolick Creed this Mystery of the Trinity takes up three This sacred Mystery is most clearly manifested in our Saviour's Baptism Mat. 3. 16 17. Luk 3. 21 22. John 1. 32 33. The Father speaks from Heaven this is my well beloved Son while at the same time the Son is baptized in Jordan and the Holy Ghost came down from Heaven in the likeness of a Dove and lighted upon God the Son and abode upon Him Moreover The Sacrament of Baptism being ordained of God Father Son and Holy Ghost the first Sacrament of the Covenant of Grace in it all the Promises of Mercy and Salvation are sealed to Believers and by it Christians are solemnly entered into the Church and House of God so that the Contemner of this Sacrament debarreth himself from Salvation Therefore God Himself hath appointed this Program to be prefixed upon the Porch of His Church that this Almighty God in whose Name we are baptized and in whom we Believe is Father Son and Holy Ghost and It cannot be supponed but that these Men and Women who were Proselyted and being Pagans before admitted to the benefite of Christian Baptism behoved to take a time to learn the Grounds of their Religion therefore the the Doctors of the Church not only wrote Catechisms for these young Christians who therefore betwixt their first offering of themselves to the Christian Church until the time they were baptized were called Catechumeni These Doctors also wrote certain short Sums of Christian Faith commonly called Creeds that before these Pagan Catechume in received Baptism they were to give a confession of their Faith contained in their Creed in all which Creeds written by the Church whether longer or shorter and in their Catechisms the Doctrine of the Trinity was a special part and accordingly that Synod of Divines at Westminster in their lesser Catechism have not omitted the Trinity So the reformed French Church in Geneva have a little Catechism containing only twenty one short Questions on which they examine these who are at first to be admitted to the Lords Table which little Catechism begins with the Trinity and is bound in with their French Version of the Bible printed at Geneva 1567. The Sacred Trinity being the Program of Christian Baptism proved the strong and invincible Fort of the Christian Faith in the Trinity of Persons in the Godhead against the Arrians and other Antitrinitarian Hereticks wherefore Socinus who hath drunk much deeper in the poysonable Cup of Blasphemy against the blessed Trinity then the old Arrians hath very slightingly written of the Sacrament of Baptism The second great Mystery of Christian Religion is that the Word was made Flesh Joh. 1. 14. and this the Holy Ghost calls the great Mystery of Godliness God manifested in the Flesh 1 Timoth. chap. 3. vers 16. which Mystery viz. that the Word the second Person God the Son was incarnate and not the Father or the Holy Ghost this cannot be known and believed aright until first we know believe that there are three distinct Persons in the Godhead therefore our Saviour Joh. 17. 3. joyns these two together This is life everlasting to know thee the only true God and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent and the Apostle Paul Coloss 2. 2. to the acknowledgement of the mystery of God and of the Father and of Christ. If it be objected that it seems to be a hard saying That the Knowledge and Faith in God and three Persons Father Son and Holy Ghost and in Christ God and Man in one Person is necessary to Salvation Seing both these are profound Mysteries so far above Humane Reason and Capacity I answer first Not only these two are great Mysteries but also the whole Gospel is a Divine Revelation of a continued tract of Mysteries Mark 4. 11. Rom. 16. 25. 26. Eph. 3. 9 16 19. Coloss 1. 26 27. called the great Mystery of Godliness 1 Tim. 3. 16. for there is no other Name under Heaven given among Men whereby we must be saved but the Name of Jesus Acts 4. 12. who is the Captain of our Salvation Heb. 2. 10. the Author of Eternal Salvation Heb. 5. 9. and the Gospel is called the Knowledge of Salvation Luk. 1. 77. the Word of Salvation Acts 13. 26. the Way of Salvation Acts 16. 17. the Salvation of God Acts 28. 28. the Power of God to Salvation Rom. 1. 16. the great Salvation Heb. 2. 3. so that whosoever will not believe these Gospel Mysteries is damned I answer secondly that to Divine and Saving Faith as such demonstrative knowledge in the Logical Sense far less comprehensive knowledge is required but the Lord condescending to Mans Humane weak Capacity accepts of Faith albeit apprehensive Knowledge go before it not alwayes requiring that they know how such a thing is true
of Faith to be allowed and accepted of God and to be comfortable to your Soul for I suppone it well grounded on the Word of God His Promise and Command whosoever believes in Christ shall be saved John 3. 16. and John 6. 40. But I John such a one believe in Jesus Christ therefore I John such a one shall be saved the General Promise is express in the Word but not your two following Acts of Faith builded thereon and yet you will assume they are Acts of true Faith and for the first of the two it 's truth is best known to your selves who are alone privy to that heart secret of yours 1 Cor. Chap. 2. 11. For all within the visible Church say I believe in Christ â—ccording to the Apostles Creed received by the universal Church for an Act of true Faith and yet a great part speak not truly This is a sad but sure Truth but as truely as thou believes in Christ it is assuredly as true thou shall be saved then if I grant that your Act whereby you believe to be saved is True Faith and rightly believed by you albeit it is not express in in your Bible then why shall not this be an Act of Faith when a Christian believes it is lawfull to sing Glory to the Father Son and Holy Ghost albeit these words be not express in the Bible altogether but deduced from the Scripture by infallible consequence I could proceed further in this point but because the Babes are not able to bear it and the Learned are fully clear in this Truth I shall not insist and these who will not assent to the Truth the defect is in themselves and not in the Truth for Children so long as they are such will think speak and understand as Children for which the strong Christian should not despise the Babes but consider they were once Babes themselves and on the other hand the Children should not presume nor overwean themselves nor judge uncharitably of the strong but that they sing the Doxology in Faith grounded on a strong Scriptural Consequence as when the weak Christian takes his Sacrament and I request the weak Christian to think soberly of himself when David a Man according to Gods own heart said in sincerity Psalm 131. 2. I have quieted my self as a child that is weaned of his mother and if ye will ask wherein he so behaved he tells you himself he did not aspired things too high for him If every Christian would do so there would be more peace in the Church CHAP. XI The Reasons why the General Assembly was not in power to lay aside the Doxology proving their great reluctancy to their own deed with several other circumstances alleviating the same IN this Chapter we are to answer the Grand Objection to wit That the singing of the Doxology in the publick worship of God was laid aside by the Generall Assembly of this Church Anno Dom. 1649. To this my first answer is that Assembly hath fourty two Sessions mentioned in the Index of the imprinted Acts thereof but the laying aside of the Doxology is not mentioned in the Printed Acts of that Assembly nor yet in the index of the imprinted Acts therefore seing there is no mention in the Register of the Church to prove to Posterity that the Doxology was laid aside it may put some to demurr in that affair seing there is no legal proof of it extant 2 dly I answer though the laying aside of the Doxology was res gesta yet seing there is not a word of it in the Register of the Church the laying of it aside will come under the Notion of an unwritten Tradition to Posterity 3 dly I answer That it is to be considered whether or not the Generall Assembly was in potestate and had lawfull power to lay aside the Doxology for in their National Covenant they grant their Religion as reformed at the first expelling of Idolatry and was Ratified in Parliament in Anno Dom. 1560. And it 's Confession of Faith to be Christs true and perfect Religion that they shal adhere to it all their dayes to which they bind themselves with Solemn and fearfull Curses but so it is That at the said Reformation in the Lyturgy then appointed and Printed at the beginning of the Psalm Book Glory to the Father and to the Son and to the Holy Ghost as it was in the beginning is now and aye shall last is extant in Print yea in that Psalm Book of the Church of Scotland of the old Edition there is great variety of the Meeter Poesies and lest any of them having their diverse Tune should want the Doxology sung at the close of it each of these diverse Poesies have a diverse Doxology one in substance with the ordinar Doxology but differing in some words being framed to be sung according to the particular musical Tunes all which Doxologies were in use in the Church of Scotland after the Reformation which Book is yet extant Printed at Aberdeen cum privilegio in Anno Dom. 1638. So that the National Covenant compared with our first Reformation engadgeth us in all Scotland not to quite the Doxology under the pain of perjury as for that foresaid Lyturgy of Scotland which was Printed and bound in with the Psalm Book it was drawn up by the General Assembly Anno Dom. 1560. and 1555 and 1567. The Fourth Answer The General Assembly 1639. August 30. Which day that Assembly hath enacted thus The General Assembly considering that the intended Reformation being recovered may be established Ordains that no Innovation which may disturbe the peace of the Church and make division be suddenly proponed or enacted but so as the motion be first communicat to the severall Synods Presbytries and Churches that the matter may be approven by all at home and Commissioners may come well prepared unanimously to conclude with settled deliberation upon these points in the general Assembly Which Act of Assembly as it was prudently made so accordingly practised thereafter for in the General Assembly Anno Dom. 1642. August 6. There are four Overtures Printed with the Acts of that Assembly to be advised by Presbyters against the next Assembly So that his laudable Act was carefully obeyed in other things but not so in laying aside the Doxology For it was done abruptly without the knowledge or advertisement of particular Churches Presbytries or Synods who should have been acquainted before and canvassed the matter before any thing had been determined in the General Assembly anent the Doxology and the laying of it aside which was an innovation suddenly proponed and instantly passed to the discomforming division of themselves from all transmarin Protestants yea and from the universal Church Fifthly In the Solemn League and Covenant of Scotland and England approven by the General Assembly of Scotland Anno. Dom. 1643. August 17. In the said League and Covenant with hands lifted up to the most high God they swear sincerely and constantly to
meek and lowly Matth. 11. 29. So in all due humilitie as one of the least of the Sons of my Mother Church what I have written on this Subject in submission I lay it down at her Feet fully resolving to obey the Law of my Father in Heaven which is not to despise or forsake the Law of my Spiritual Mother on Earth Prov. 1. 8. and Prov 6. 20. That our Father in Heaven may have all the Glory His Church Edification and the Lambs of Christ their Milk which shall be my desire and Prayer at the Throne of Grace THE CONTENTS of the Several Chapters Chap. I. PRoveth the great Fundamentality of the Doctrine of the most blessed Trinity from the Sacred Scriptures and illustrateth it by Fathers and Councils and modern Divines and answers the common Objection Chap. II. Containeth a Catalogue of the chief Blasphemers of the Blessed Trinity the first 400. Years with the many evils of Sin and misery that followed thereupon and how the Lord from Heaven and His Church on Earth gave effectuall and prevalent Testimony against them Chap III. Containeth the rise of the Arian Heresy in the Fourth Century their Persecution and Activity their Fashood Injustice and Cruelty and the Testimonie both of God and His Church against them Chap. IV. The unanimous Practice and Appointment of the universall Church for Singing the Doxologie be Occasion of Satan and his Supposts great Opposition to the Doctrine of the Trinity and in that their War against God Chap. V. The cause of the continuance of the Doxologie in after Ages viz. The continuance of the Churches Persecution and Temptation from Arians and other Blasphemers of the Trinity as Eutichians within and Mahumitans without the Church and the Rise and Growth of the Socinian Heresie notwithstanding Gods witness against them and the Church and Magistrats endeavours in many Kingdoms these Blasphemous Antitrinitarian Hereticks remained and nested with Anabaptists and Quakers all three Blasphemous Antitrinitarian Hereticks which gives sufficient cause for the continuance of the Doxologie Chap VI. The lawfulness of Singing the Doxologie proven by these Arguments 1 Because all Christians are Baptized in the Name of Father Son and Holy Ghost 2. They believe or profess their Faith in Father Son and Holy Ghost 3. They believe Father Son and Holy Ghost to be their Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier 4. Their Faith and Hope of Eternal Glory is from Father Son and Holy Ghost 5 God Father Son and Holy Ghost made all things and especially for His Glory 6. This Lord of Glory often calls mans tongue His Glory 7. From the practise of the Saints and Angels 8. From Gods Command 9. The Appointment and Practice of the universal Church 10. The indivisibility of the Worship we give to God one in Essence and three Persons Illustrat by Fathers and Councils Chap. VII The lawfulness of singing the Doxologie proven by the induction of all it's Parts 12. from the three Holies Isa 6. 3. Chap. VIII 13 Reason from that Song Revel 5. 9. 14. From Gods Command 1 Cor. 16. 20. Illustrat by Councils and Fathers Chap. IX 15. Reason from the necessar Difference of the Christians worship as in reading of the Word Prayer and Sacraments they exceedingly-diffet from Christians shal not then also be a difference betwixt the Christian singing of Psalms and the Jewes by singing the Doxologie 16. As the Jewes in their Psalms of David close many of them with a Doxologie answering to the measure of their Light dispensed to them in the Old Testament So it becomes the Christian to have a Doxologie answerable to their greater measure of light of the Trinity in the New Testament 17. Reason founded upon the signification of Jehovah Elohim which is often in the Doxologie of the Old Testament Chap. X. A Reason given for singing the Doxologie satisfactory to every strong Christian and that born in also upon the weak Christian by Scripture Reason Chap. XI The Reasons why the General Assembly was not in power to lay aside the Doxologie proving their great reluctancy to their own deed with several other circumstances alleviating the same Chap. XII That invalid Scruple answered because the Doxologie is not to be found altogether in one place of Scripture and the conveniency of singing is proven Chap. XIII The many evils that flow from the refusing to sing the Doxologie Chap. XIV An exhortatory conclusion to the strong and orderly Christian to receive and imbrace with all Christian Love and tenderness every weak Christian who shall return from their wandring in Error to live in Order and Unity in the Bosome of their Mother Church THE DOXOLOGY Approven CHAP. I. The great fundamentality of the Doctrine of the most blessed Trinity proven from the Sacred Scriptures and illustrated by Fathers Councils and Modern Divines and the great Objection answered AMongst all the Divine In symbolo Athanasil ab ecclesiae universali recepto utpote in principio fine fidem in trinitate personarum esse necessariam ad salutem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his asseritur Zanchius de Deo lib. 1. part 1. cap. 1. §. 2. quaestio de Trinitate ut est omnium in Theologia creditu maxime necessaria ita omnium cognitu dissicillima Meisnerus contra Socinianos scite probat plurimis argumentis primum magnum articulum fidei christinae esse unum Deum in Trinitate personarum quibus argumentis adstipulatur Hoorn Beek Socinianismi confutati 1. lib. 1. cap. 9. à pag. 226. ad pag. 243. Voetius select disp theol par 1. pag. 472. dogma de trinitate est fundamentale 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 imo fundamentum fundamenti quia fundat alia dogmata fundamentalia quod multis ibid probat Melanct. loc commun cap. 27. summa Evangelii erudite comprehensa est in verbis baptismi Eusebius Pamphilus in conc Niceno fatetur symbolum Nicenum paucis solum verbis differre à symbolo quod inquit nos ab episcopis antegressis accepimus cumque lavatro baptismatis abluti essemus audivimus Socrat. hist eccles l. 1. c. 5. Theodoret. lib. 1. cap. 12. Socrates Hist lib. 7. cap. 17. Judaeus requirens baptizari ante baptismi participationem multis diebus fidem christianam addiscere cum precibus jejuniis praecipitur idem cap. 30. lib. 7. gens Burgundorum à Paganismo conversa petit Baptismum quae post septem dies in eis catechisandis impensos cum praece jejunio votum obtinuere hinc canon 46. Conc. Laodicen anno dom 364. Baptizandos oportet fidei symbolum discere baptizanti reddere Symbolum Con. Nicen. anno dom 325. Constantinopolitani anno dom 381. Chalcedon anno dom 451. Symbolum Athanasii Symbolum quod habet Irenaeus lib. 1. adversus Haeresis cap. 2. primum concilium Toletan conc Lateranum in omnibus praedictis symbolis habetur articulus trinitatis tanta cura Paganos Catechimenos articulum trinitatis docuerunt ut Lucianus qui vixit sub
but that howsoever it is true And because of the mysteriousness of these Gospel Divine Truths there is a necessity for a Christian to deny himself before he can follow Christ Matt. 16. 24. deny his carnal Wit and corrupt Reason therefore in the Lord's work of Man's Conversion in which He applys His exceeding great and Mighty Power Eph. 1. 19. He casts down Imaginations and every high thing that exalteth it self against the Knowledge of God and bringeth into captivity every thought unto the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10. 5. where albeit the Almighty Hand of God is first in order and chief in the work yet the Christian himself willingly consents to captivate all his carnal Imaginations and Thoughts and over the belly of them all gives the assent of Faith to the Mysteries of the Gospel because they are the Truth of God who is infinite in Truth and cannot Lie for he who piously and humbly captivates his Thoughts to Christ will stop the mouth of all Objections of corrupt Reason with Abraham against hope believing in hope Rom. 4. 18. which assent of Faith gives God far more Glory then the assent of Science which flows naturally from the force of that natural Light born in by the knowledge of the Cause but the assent of Faith is supernatural being a supernatural Grace and gift of God with all its degrees And because the Mystery of the Trinity and Christ's Incarnation were so high above Man's corrupt Reason therefore in the first 400. Years of the New Testament Satan wrought mightily in the Children of Disobedience and did find it an easie work to raise up many blasphemous Hereticks who in the pride of their undaunted Heart refused to captivate their corrupt Reason to believe the Mysteries of the Trinity and Incarnation which were not contrary to Reason but above it CHAP. II. This Chapter hath three Parts First a Catalogue of the Chief Ring-leading Hereticks against the Doctrine of the Sacred Trinity the first 400. Years Secondly The many evils of Sin and Misery that followed upon these Heresies Thirdly How the Lord and His Church opposed and confounded them AS for the Roll of the Ring leading Hereticks after our Lord's Ascension intending brevity We passe by all the Errors or Heresies mentioned or foretold in the New Testament Matth. 24. v 9. and 24. Act. 20. v. 29 and 30. Acts 15. Rom. 16. v. 17 and 18. Gal. 1. 6 7. Col. 3. v. 1. Col. 9. v. 10. Col. 2. v. 8. 1 Tim. 1. 20. Col. 9. 1. 2 Tim. 2. v. 17 18. 2 Tim. 3. 8. 2 Thess 2. v. 8. Albeit therein be instanced diverse Doctrines of Devils and St. Peter foretells that some would deny the Lord that bought them 2 Pet. v. 4. and St. John 2 Epist 4. 3. mentions many Antichrists in the General and denyers of Christ but particularizeth none as such for Simon Magus Act. 8. 18. Was a baptised Christian and falling in the Sin of Simonie in a most gross manner was justly and bitterly rebuked by the Apostle Peter And Ecclesiastick Hystoriographers record that thereafter he returned with the Doge to his vomite and with the Sow to the wallowing in the myre went to Rome and turned to his old trade of witchcraft where he was admired for his Lying Satanical Wonders as before his Baptism he had been admired in Samaria Act. 8. v. 9 10. and blasphemously called himself Father Son and Holy Ghost b Euseb hist Eccles lib. 2 cap. 1. cap. 12. 13 14. Ignatius Epistola ad Tralesios Ireneus lib. 1. cap. 20. Justinus Martyr Apologia secunda fusius Cerinthus blasphemed Christ Jesus to be only a Man and not the Messia Anno Dom. 75. c Ireneus lib. 1. cap. 25. lib. 3. cap. 3. Euseb lib. 3. cap. 22. The third Ring-leader Heretick Ebion vented the like Blasphemies by occasion of which three Hereticks and their many followers the Apostle St. John who lived to this time wrot the Gospel in which his chief intent is to prove and maintain against these Blasphemous Hereticks that Christ is God and Man in one Person d Ireneus lib. 1. cap. 26. Eusebius lib. 3. cap. 21. Ignatious epist ad Trallianos Epiphanius heresie 51. Cerdon Blasphemed that the God of the Old Testament was not Christ's Father Anno Dom. 143. e Ireneus lib. 1 cap. 28. Euseb lib. 4. cap. 10. Valentinus of whom came the Genosticks rejected the Doctrine of the Sacred Trinity and made up a fiction as it were of three Gods Anno Dom. 145. f Euseb lib. 4. cap. 10. Ireneus lib. 1. cap. 1. alibi passim multis refutat a Euseb lib. 5. cap. ult Eumcum prioribus refutat Ignatius nominatim Epist ad Tralianos Theodotus That Christ was only Man he denyed Christ to be the Word Joh. 1. 1. An. Dom. 194. b Hos refutat Tertul. Praxeas denyed the Trinity his Followers were called Patripossiani Anno Dom. 210. c Hos refutat Tertul. Melchizedeciani blasphemed that Melchizedeck was greater then Christ d Eus lib. 7. cap. 5. refutatur ad Athanasio Sabellius denyed the blessed Trinity e Damnatus in Concilio Antiocheno Anno Dom. 272. Samosatenus denyed Christ to be God Anno Dom. 269. f Eus lib. 7. cap. 25. Socrat 1. lib. 1. cap. 17. Exortus est Anno Dom. 276. eum Augustinius multus eruditus refutavit Manes and his Followers denyed Christ and the Holy Ghost to be God g Damnatus a 318. Episcopis Socret lib. 1. cap. 3 4 5. Theodoret lib. cap. 1. 7. Sozomen lib. 1. cap. 16. Anno Dom. 325. Arius denyed the second Person of the blessed Trinity to be one in substance co-equall and co-eternall with God the Father he was confuted in the Council of Nice his Blasphemy condemned and he Excommunicated An. Dom. 325. h Socrat. lib. 2. cap. 24. a Basilio magno in disputatione devictus Photinius fell unto the heresie of Sabellius and Sam. Satanius he was condemned in the Council of Serinium i Socrates lib. 2. cap. 35. ab Athanasio Basillo refutatus Macedonius denyed the Holy Ghost to be God Anno Dom. 360. He was condemned in the General Council of Constantinople Anno Dom. 381. k Socrat. lib. 7. cap. 33. in hoc concilio contra Nestorium Cyrillus magnam sustinuit partem Nestorius denyed the Personal Union of Christ's Divine and Humane Natures Therefore was condemned by a General Council at Ephesus by 200. Bishops Anno Dom. 431. And being obstinat was banished by the Emp. Theodosius Albeit these forementioned Heriticks all Blasphemed the Sacred Trinity yet none of them but were poysoned with moe Errors besides for mans corrupt heart is a too fertill soil to receive Satans Inventions l Di onisius Episcopus Alexandrinus Eus lib. 7. cap. 6. Anno Dom. 260. One of the Antients by reading the Blasphemies of Hereticks did not only condemne them but also
pag. 58. Thus he writs all men may see that many in England are Arians and Antitrinitarians he writs also pag. 136. a Letter from Holland to London dated 1646. Here we burn the Books of the Socinian Errors and they dare not be sold in these parts but at London is taught Blasphemy against God and his Christ and a Minister in Holland wrot a Letter dated October 18. 1646. to some Ministers in London that diverse English Merchants were seeking to buy Socinus Works and Crellius c. from a Stationer in Holland and when the Stationer answered that these Books were prohibit by the States General the Merchant replyed nevertheless you may transport them from other Nations and we shall give you for them what you will and the Generall Assembly in Scotland Anno Dom. 1648. Sess 43. Writs thus Socinianisme is now spread in England As for our sentiment upon the Socinian there was in the ancient Church two Heresies that were most dangerous and prevalent First the Arian then the Pelagian both which the Orthodox Church zealously opposed and justly condemned but the late Socinian hath drunk in all the poyson both of the Arian and Pelagian and much more Secondly That as the Ancient Church did condemne Arius and Pelagius in their Councils and being obstinat Excommunicat them So the Ancient Fathers b Athanasius oratione prima contra Arianos multis probat Arianos non debere dici christianos Idem scribit Theodoretus lib. 2. cap. 16. Fulgentius Hilarius ad Imperatorem Constantium denyed the Arian to deserve the name of Christian yea the moderns both Papists and Lutherians that wrot against the Socinians deny them also to be Christians the same doth Gomarus and Doctor Forbes in his Theological Instructions lib. 10. cap. 13 Sect. 14. denyes the Socinian Baptism to be valid The Professors of Leyden Anno Dom. 1598. gave their judgment of Osterodius the Socinian his Writs that they led Men very near to Turcism and Grotius writing of the Piety of the States of Holland saith Seing Heresie is the Venom of the Church and that suddenly working yet there are degrees in Heresies whereof some are more hurtful then others but a worse Heresie then Socinianism is not to be found at the very mentioning of which all the godly should shrink Against this Heresie not only the Civil Magistrate and Church but also the God of Heaven by His immediate Hand of Providence hath given Testimony the Magistrate hath put them to death not only in the reformed Church but also the Roman Church Thus the Parliament of Pole being informed Anno Dom. 1638. that the Socinians in Racovia had begun to print a Book of Blasphemies against the Sacred Trinity a Libri titulus Tormentum Throno Tritnitatem deturbans they did take from them their Bibliotheck Printinhouse and Press and being many banished them the Town As for the immediate Hand of God upon the Socinian it is remarkable both in Temporal and Spiritual Judgments that some of them were their own Murderers and others of them died in Despair others renunced Christ and turned Mahumetan Thus having spoken of the Socinian remains a word of the Anabaptist and Quaker who also are Blasphemers of the Trinity That the Anabaptists are such the Professors of Leyden are sufficient Witnesses b Profess Leidens disp 23. in antithesi Sabellius Praxias hodie libertini Anabaptistae quidam trinominem Deum statuentes personarum realem distinctionem tollentes modumque tantum patesactionis varium inducentes Patrem incarnatum passumque revera statuunt As for the Quakers who not only are in England and Jreland but even some of them scattered in Scotland It 's well known by many of their own printed Pamphlets and by the Books of others their mad Pranks and Blasphemies and Disputes against the Sacred Trinity for instance The Phanatick History printed at London Anno Dom. 1660. pag. 54. In a publick Dispute at Cambridge they denied the Sacred Trinity with Blasphemies that I abhor to write And Anno Dom. 1657. a Book printed at London by John Stalham called the Reviler rebuked wherein he refutes Quaker Richard Fairnworth who printed and spread a Pamphlet about that time wherein he denied the Holy Ghost to be a Person in the Trinity Therefore as the Universal Church of old did piously and wisely appoint and practise the singing of the Doxology to confirm the Flock of Christ against the dangerous Blasphemies of Arius and other Antitrinitarian Hereticks so to this day the Universal Church do still continue that practice to guard their Flocks against the Blasphemies of Anabaptists and Quakers but especially Socinians who in horrid and hellish Blasphemies out do the old Arian CHAP. VI. The lawfulness of Singing the Doxology proven by these Arguments 1. Because all Christians are baptized in the Name of Father Son and Holy Ghost 2. They believe or profess their Faith in Father Son and Holy Ghost 3. They believe Father Son and Holy Ghost to be their Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier 4. Their Faith and Hope of Eternal Glory is from Father Son and Holy Ghost 5. God Father Son and Holy Ghost made all things and especially for His Glory 6. This Lord of Glory often calls Man's Tongue His Glory 7. From the practice of the Saints and Angels 8. From God's Command 9. The Appointment and Practice of the Universal Church 10. The indivisibility of the Worship we give to God one in Essence and three Persont illustrate by Fathers and Councils IN the former Chapters I having described the occasion upon which the Universal Church did appoint the singing of the Doxology to wit The abounding of Blasphemers against the Trinity proven in the first three Chapters Secondly The unanimous Agreement of the Church for singing the Doxology in the fourth Chapter and the reason of its continuance in the Church to this day even because the Church ever since hath never altogether wanted some blasphemous Hereticks within the Church besides the Turk and Jew both deniers of the Trinity without the Church Follows the second part of this Treatise which is subdivided thus First I prove by many Arguments the lawfulness of the singing of the Doxology in the sixth seventh eighth ninth and tenth Chapters Secondly I answer some Objections in the eleventh and twelfth Chapters Thirdly I show the many Evils from the refusing to sing the Doxology Lastly I close with an Exhortation to receive with all tenderness all that shall return from their Errors In this and some following Chapters I have accumulate Arguments because I supponed I did write to some Christians weak in Knowledge I say weak in Knowledge because I am loath to judge that any Christian strong in Knowledge will deny its lawfulness unless their Judgement be strangely overclouded by prevalent Prejudice and if any such there be we have also brought Arguments for their perusing We begin with Arguments for the Weak All who are baptized in
the Name of Father Son and Holy Ghost to them it is lawful to sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost But all Christians are baptized in the Name of Father Son and Holy Ghost therefore to all Christians it's lawful to sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost Second Reason All who believe and profess their Faith in Father Son and Holy Ghost to them it 's lawful to sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost but all Christians throughout the World believe and profess Faith in Father Son and Holy Ghost therefore it is lawful to all Christians throughout the World to sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost Third Reason All who believe or profess that God Father Son and Holy Ghost is their Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier to them it is lawful to sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost But all Christians believe and profess that God Father Son and Holy Ghost is their Creator Redeemer and Sanctifier Therefore c. Fourth Reason All who believe hope and profess to enjoy eternal Glory in Heaven from and with Father Son and Holy Ghost to them it is lawful to sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost But all Christians believe hope and profess to enjoy eternal Glory in Heaven from and with the Father Son and Holy Ghost Therefore c. Fifth Reason God Father Son and Holy Ghost made all things for His own Glory and Man's chief end is to glorifie God the first words of the lesser Catechism of the Westminster Synod Therefore it is lawful for Man to glorifie Father Son and Holy Ghost in a Song Sixth Reason God Father Son and Holy Ghost hath given to Man his Tongue and Speech that therewith he may glorifie God Father Son and Holy Ghost Therefore often in the Book of Psalms Mans Tongue is called his glory Psal 57. 8. Awake up my glory Psal 108. 1. I will sing praise with my glory Psal 16 9. My heart is glad my glory rejoyceth which glory the Maker of the Tongue Acts 2. 26. expones to be the Tongue in these words My heart did rejoyce and my tongue was glad Psal 30. 12. That my glory may sing praise unto thee and not be silent O Lord my God Shall then Mans Tongue his glory be commanded silence by Man and not to sing glory to God the Father Son and Holy Ghost when his Maker gave him his Tongue to sing glory to his Maker Seventh Reason That which is the practice of the Angels and of all the Saints in Heaven and Earth is lawful but to sing glory to God Father Son and Holy Ghost is the practice of the Angels Luk. 2. 14. The heavenly host sang glory to God and Rev. 5. 13. All in Heaven and in Earth did sing glory to God Eighth Reason That which is commanded of God is lawful but to sing glory to God is commanded by God I prove the assumption Psal 96. 1 2. These commanded Sing unto the Lord and vers 3. declare his glory and vers 7 8. give unto the Lord the glory due unto his Name c. Ninth Reason That which hath been the constitution and constant practice of the Universal Church these 1300. Years without scruple or refusal and still retained in all the reformed Churches after their purgation from Idolatry and Superstition that is lawful the same Argument is used by St. Paul 1 Cor. 11. 16. to stop the mouth of the Contentious to wit we have no such custom neither the Churches of God Tenth Reason a Rationis fundamentum illustratum Justinus Martyr in expositione fidei sive unam duas vel tres personas proferamus necesse est animo semper possidere 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 de Patre Filio Spiritu Sancto Athanasius lib. de communi essentia Patris Filii Spiritus Sancti cap. 00 quod non sunt tres dii 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Idem in Symbolo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Basilius magnus lib. 5. contra Eunomium cap. 15. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 licet haeretici disrumpant sese non tamen disrumpetur Trinitas Nazianzenus Orat. 40. Quae est in sanctum baptisma 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Idem Orat. 37. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ephiphanius Haeresi 62. §. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haec eadem est doctrina communiter Scholasticorum Alensis in summa Theologiae parte 3. quest 3. membro 1. Articulo 3. Aquinas 2. 2. quest 81. articulo 3. quest 84. articulo 1. Et Franciscus à Sancto Claro in expositione confessionis Anglicanae Orat. 28. negat unam personam divinam praecise sumptam esse terminum formalem adorationis latriae sed deitatem primario personas ut identiscantur cum essentia Calvinus Institut lib. 1. cap. 13. §. 2. Si non consideramas tres persanas in deitate nudum inane duntaxat Dei nomen sine vero Deo in caerebro nostro volitat §. 6. ubi in Scripturis fit simplex Dei mentio indefinita non minus ad Filium Spiritum Sanctum pertinet nomen hoc quam ad patrem Et §. 20. In eundem sensum Amesius meduil lib. 1. c. 6. §. 26. Equalis honor omnibus personis divinis equaliter à nobis debetur That which is commanded by God is lawful but to sing glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost is commanded by God Therefore c. I prove the minor the glory commanded by God and given to God is indivisive and due to all the three Persons equally so says the lesser Catechism they are equal in Power and Glory and whensoever a Christian sings glory to God then it is not only lawful but also necessary that in the thought that Christian at that same time shall ascribe that glory to all the three Persons which if he do not he is worshipping an Idol and not the true God then whatever thought of a Christian is lawful and commanded it is lawful for him to express that thought with his Tongue then when he is singing glory to God and lawfully and equally in his Mind is giving that glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost then it is lawful for him at that same time to give that glory expressly with his Tongue to Father Son and Holy Ghost for all the Worship and Adoration that the Christian gives to God should and is rightly given to God one in Essence and three in Persons Father Son and Holy Ghost who all three have one Almighty Power one Will one external Action in hearing our Prayers and granting our Requests and therefore the Worship given to them is indivisible therefore Perkins saith well writing on Matth. 6. vers 9. We should worship the whole Trinity conjunctly and not one Person alone and when we name God alone we should in our mind worship the three Persons also Then upon the sound and infallible Doctrine of Christianity as no Christian dare deny the lawfulness of singing Glory to God so upon the same ground and as
hanc questionem posse agitari num sit possibile aut saltem probabile Christianum posse esse certum de sua salute eundem non esse certum de hac veritate bonum est expedit Christianum psallere Doxologiam Patri filio spiritui sancto ratio dubitationis est haec probavimus nullum Christianum habere certitudinem propriae salutis nisi in cognitione religiosa scripturarum in fide sanctificatione fortem at vix est verisimile hunc fortem christianum acquisivisse certitudinem propriae salutis quae veritas est dissicillima acquisitu quia multum excedit lumen naturae solum fundatur in lumine gratiae at haec veritas Deus est licite hymno glorificandus Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus haec propositio non solum fundatur in himine scripturarum gratiae sed etiam in lumine naturae ut probatum est Alia ratio probans certitudinem salutis esse veritatem acquisitu difficiliorem quam eam praedictam de Doxologia haec est plurimi quibus nunquam contingit certitude vera salutis quia impossibilis at ex eisdem non pauci qui callent sensum Scripturarum Literalem Historicum dogmaticum praecipâ—e si in Philosophia sunt bene versati quamvis vel Hypocritae vel flagitiosi tamen haec veritas licet glorificare Deum Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum hymno facillime potest ab ijs comprehendi quia Christiani millies milleni nec ad salutem credentes in Christum nec pij tamen has duas veritates certo credunt scilicet licet Deum hymno glorificare hanc assumptionem Deus est Pater Filius Spiritus Sanctus Simodo sint Philosophi nullatenus de conclusiâ—ne dubitabunt itaque possit mirum videri homines cognitionis fidei pietatis certitudinis propriae salutis multum jactantes attamen eosdem quasi sit mysterium incomprehensibile an sit licitum vel expediens saltem Deum Patâ—â—m Filium Spiritum Sanctum hymno glorificare dubitantes nec mirum videatur objectum fidei justificantis de sua salute Christiani certissimi hypocritae dogmatice solum credentis de sua salute incerti idem esse nempe Deum Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum nam justificatus credit in Deum toto corde Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum in Christum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sibi salvatorem at hypocrita credit esse Deum eumque esse Patrem Fiâ—ium Spiritum Sanctum Scripturas Dei Verbum esse veras at neutiquam credit in Deum Patrem Filium Spiritum Sanctum in Christum salutorem fidei justificante coâ— purificante renovante ipsum Deo in Christo vinculo Spiritus Sancti in Aeternum uniente hypocritae fides est more speculativa in cerebro fluctuans at credentis ad salutem in corde radicata pieque fiducialis practica that the Doxologie is of this nature which reason of the strong is thus framed whatsoever is clearly lawful from the light of Nature and the Word of God that to the religious Christian is lawful to do but to sing glory to God is clear from the light of Nature and from the holy Scriptures therefore it is lawful for the religious Christian to do it First It is clear from the light ol Nature because many learned Pagans who had no more but the light of Nature did sing holy Hymns of praise to their gods this is abundantly clear in Humane History and undenyable Secondly The Holy Scriptures are full of it especially the Book of the Psalms commanding us to sing praises to God now this proves infallibly the general that it is lawful to sing glory to God Which Conclusion being proven I make up a second Reason and takes the proven Conclusion for the Major and I reason thus It is unquestionably lawful to sing glory to God I assume God is Father Son and Holy Ghost then it is unquestionably lawful to sing Glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost and if any think themselves strong and being under prejudice are not satisfied with this reason I would ask them if their Infant-Baptism was not an act of lawful Worship and done in faith of the Minister that Baptized and of their Parent that required and received that Sacrament for their use in both which I judge the Minister consecrat and administrat the Sacrament lawfully and their Parents lawfully received them from the Laver of Regeneration and yet I would gladly know from these that are not content with singing the Doxologie because it is not express in Scripture that the Christian sing glory to Father Son and Holy Ghost why then do they not reject their Infant-baptism because it is not express in Scripture Baptize Infants but well proven to be lawful by necessary consequence from Scripture which with the universal Church we think a sufficient ground for Infant-baptism And what is the cause that Antipedobaptists have fallen in that error and separat from the true Church Even because they were too deep in that opinion that necessary consequence from Scripture is not sufficient warrand for an act of religious Worship of which error ye would be aware lest it draw you into other greater errors then you are aware of 2. What express Scripture had Rahab to receive the Spies conceal them and send them away safely Joshua 2. 9. c. Heb. 11. 31. Jam. 2. 25. All which that she did in Faith is proven clearly from these quoted Scriptures then her faith was good and acceptable to God albeit only built on good consequences from Scripture 3. I ask of you John who comes to Church and Communicats taking the Lords Supper whether your worship be in faith which I in charity suppon it is but where is your express warrand in your Bible you John such a man come and worship and take the Lords Supper as the pledge of your salvation These words are not to be found in the whole Scripture why then dare ye come to worship and take the holy Sacraments I think ye will or should answer because in the express Word of God there is a general invitation Come to me all ye that labour and are heavy laden and I will give you rest Mat. 11. 28. From which gracious general invitation I suppon ye assume in sincere and good Conscience I John am heavy loaden and labours to be freed of my burden by all the good means appointed by God preparatory to that holy Sacrament which if you can truly affirm in the sight of God then I dare assure you in the Name of Jesus that your worshipping and communicating is in faith albeit you have not express warrand in your Bible for you such an one by name to communicate 4ly You John believes to be saved but no expresse warrand have you in your Bible that you John such a one shall be saved yet I suppon with you in charity your Act