admitted in some others ât in a scholler that pretends to haâ reade the Question in him and ââth vrge his authoritie against the âhurch of God such a pretence âth no place §. III. Waldensis yeilding to the Scripture a preminence in Authoritie will haue vs depend âon the Church for the sence of it 2. She is âo to declare which bookes are Canonicall âripture A speach of Canus touching Walâsis his Opinion examined 3. When he saith ãâã Fathers testimonie hath abolished all Heââes he doth not exclude the Authoritie of ãâã Church symbolicall or representatiue 4 âe symbolicall Church he saith against Wiâef is not the Predestinated people only but ãâã Vniuersitie of right beleeuers spred ouer the whole world 5. He held that the Church of Rome cannot faile 6. and that perfect oecumenicall Councels be infallible in their decree HAecipsa fides authoritas Ecclesiae quantum homiââ supergreditur rationem tantùm fateor diuina legis ââthoritati succumbit Baro p. 365. ex Waldensi Media est ãâã inter supremam authoritatem Scripturae infimam ratioâ fides Ecclesiae Scripturas venerabiliter attollens exhibeus rationem vagam hominis ad hanc geminam authoritaâ alligans zona Pauli Idem ex eodem 1. WALDENSIS saith the authoââtie of the Church is inferiour the authoritie of Scripture What this will you inferre that wee thârefore neede not obaie the decrââ of Councells or that the Chââches authoritie is fallible Infallibââtie may be in others besides Scââpture The Apostles were not Scââpture yet were they infallible ânesses of the trueth The Churcâ the pillar and ground of trueth thoâ the Church be not Scripture 1. Timoth. 3. Thâ may be diuers Authorities infallâ and one of them Subordinate to ãâã other And so are these two accââding to this Author as you may âby the places represented in the a Quamuis fides vniuersalis Ecclesiae inuenitur per Scripturas expressa ficut est paenè tota non tamen est eiân authoritate par sed subijcitur Waldensis de principijs fidei Doctr tomo 1. li. 2. c. 21. Fides vt est Ecclesiae Catholicae in hoc accedit fidei Scripturarum quod non licet de ipsa dubitare eo quod testimoniuÌ Ecclesiae Catholicae est obiectuÌ fidei Christianae legis latio scripturae canonicae Subijcitur tamen ipsi sicut testis iudici testimonium veritati sicut praeconâzatio definitioni sicut praeco regi Ibâdem Quod aliquis pater vnus singulariter per se sensit potes aliquo saltem colore tuo decredere quod autem poenè omnes quasi vnus homo loquuntur fidei robur habet quia vnitas ipsa in Ecclesia hoc loquitur omnium gentium linguis Idem c. 25. margine One onely I will putt here because it serues also for that which followes In the 18. Chapter of his 2. Booke Doct. Fid. he declares how the sinceritie of the Churches testimonie in matters of faith is beleeued in the Creed there where we professe to beleeue the holie Catholike Church and amongst other things to this purpose hath these words Before the written Gospell this in the heart of the Church was the Gospell which Iesus Christ wrote and which the Apostles wrote in the harts of men and to whose testimonie euerie one must stand in the controuersies whether the text of the written Gospell be vnderstood or taken by the faithfull or subuerted by the Heretick whereof the Apostle speaks to the Corinthians saying âow are our Epistle written in your hearts which is knowne and read of all men declared that you are the Epistle of Christ manifested by vs and written not with inke but by the spicit of the liuing God not in tables of stone but in fleshlie tables of the heart And a litle after Though the law of nature which men beare written in their hearts be most certaine yet much more hath the law of Christ certissimum interpretamentum a most certaine interpretation in the hearts of the faithfull succeeding one another from the beginning of the rising Church and the Apostles times foreuer according to that of the Prophet this is the testament which I will make to them giuing my lawes in their hearts and in their sense or minde I will write them I must not omitt to putt you further in minde that in the place by you cited he saith b Haec ipsa fides Ecclesiae eius authoritas quantum hominum supergreditur rationem tantum fateor diuinâ legis authoritati succumbit sed tamen quaâ minoris esse authoritatis fidelibus si eam Ecclesia non praeferret Waâd to 3. de Sacramentalibus tit 7. c. 63. Si verum sem per sit testimonium Ecclesiae semper credenda est si quandoqââ fallere consueta in omnibus est suspecta Ibidem the diuine law were vnto the faithfull * Non licet de ipsa dubitare c. vide in Addit of lesse authoritie if the Church did not preferre it And c Hoc est quod superius dixi quantumlibet eminent Scriptura diuina sanctioni Ecclesiae ipsa tamen taxabeâ se sum eius quo aliter sentire non possis cuius interpraetationi resistere capitalis est culpa dicit Origenes Ibidââ howmuch soeuer the diuinâ scripture is higher then the decree of âhe Church ipsa tamen sensum eius âaxabit she notwithstanding shall deâne the sense wherein thou maiest not âold otherwise and whose interpretaââon to resist is as Origen speakes a âapitall offence So he AD Concilium vniuersale praecipué pertinet definire qui liber sit canonicus Quam quidem propositionem aequo aniâo paterer ab haereticis non admitti sed illud tamen doleo veheâenter quod eam nonnulli fideles inficiantur in quibus Thoâas Waldensis esse videtur li. 2. doc fid c. 19. Baro. p. 365. ex âno Addit Baro c. 20. 21. SEcondlie it is obiected that he denies to the Church now ââesent power to determine which ââe bookes of scripture And for this ââe cited three Chapters of his 2. ââoke Doct. Fid. the 19. 20. and 21. âut there I finde it not He doth inâed hold that the Catholick Churh ââd no other is able to d Et hoc est secundum dictuÌ gloriosum de Ecclesia quod sc ipsa sola est cuius testimoniuÌ est tantae authoritatis praeconij vt ipsos libros diuinarum scripturaruÌ taxare decoruÌ authoribus certificare possit fideles nec fas erit tanto testimonio contraire wald li. 2. doct fid c. 20. Incertum ergo esse non potest cos esse libros canonicos habere pondus authoritatissuae quibus Ecclesia declarata per omnes gentes ab Apostolis propagata testimoniuÌ certum reddit Ibidem Dico quod Ecclesia eam doctrinam docet esse credeÌdam sub poena contumaciae Ea dico quae praesens est quae iudicia directa
manâd and the parts such as be reârsed are ill putt together so that ãâã intent and meaning cannot be âceaued as the learned reader ây obserue by looking on his ârds related in the p addition q Etsi lex naturae certissima est quam geât homines scriptam in cordibus suis vt refert Apost â 1. multo magis lex Christi habet certissimum interâamentum suum in cordibus fidelium succedentium sibi ãâã ab initio nascentis Ecclesiae temporibus Apostolorum vsâin sempiternum secundum quod per Prophetam dicit âminus hoc testamentum quod testabor ad illos dando leges âs in cordibus eorum in sensibus eorum scribam eas Quod âonens Ambrosius ô verè inquit testator aeternus qui âris in cordibus leges affigit suas scribit in sensibus âihil aliud cogitare nisi diuina praecepta possimus ãâã aliud sentire nisi Dei oracula debeamus Walden li. â 8 and continuing his discourse Haec est saies he Eccleââymbolica Ecclesia Christi inquam Catholica Apostoââmater credentium populorum quae fidem habet indefect biâ âecundum promissum Christi ad Petrum qui tunc fiâm gessit Ecclesiae Ego rogaui pro te Petre vt non deficiat âtua Non est ergo specialis Ecclesia non Africana vt âatus dixit Nec vtique particularis illa Romana sed âersalis Ecclesia non quidem in generali synodo conâata quam aliquotiens errasse percepimus velut illa âninensis congregata sub Tauro praefecto illa Conâinopolitana sub Iustiniano minore tempore Sergij Papae secundum Bedam quaedam aliae sed est Ecclesiaâ Christi Catholica per totum mundum dispersa à baptismo Christi per Apostolos caeteros successores eorum aâ haec tempora deuoluta quae vtique veram fidem continet testimonium Christi fidele sapientiam praestaâ paruulis inter extremos errores stabilem retinens veritatem c. 19. in principio That others also may conceaue the same it is to be obserued that Waldensis is disputing there against Wickleff about the Church which is the Creed wee professe to beleeue and is therefore by him called thâ Church symbolicall Wickleff considering that the faith of it is to be indeficient it being still true to saie there is such a Church or congregation would haue it to be the r Quod Ecclesia nostra symboliba est Ecclesia Catholica Titulus Cap. 17. li. 2. Mugit acriter wickleffus contra Papam Pastores Ecclesiae sub titulo iustae appâlationis Ecclesiae Christi quae est obiectum fidei Christânae de qua articulus est in symbolo Credo Sanctam Ecclesiam Catholicam Difficultas autem eius est ista Quanâ credere debemus Ecclesiam Sanctam Catholicam taâquam fidem iterum credere debemus quòd quodliâ membrum istius Ecclesiae sit praedestinatum ad gloriam credere debemus quod iste Papa vel Episcopus sit meâbrum Ecclesiae credere debemus quod repugnat ipsum peccatum finalis impoenitentiae cadere Haec Wicklef Actor Sub hoc globo verborum vnà cum praesumpto sââ Ecclesia symbolica c. Initium capitis 17. Prima ergo diâcultas de quidditate huius Ecclesia symbolicae quam vtiâ credere debemus c. Ibidem Predestinate onlie who do finallie perseuer in the faith Waldensis ouer and aboue an indeficiencie doth auouch and according to Scripture Matt. vlt. Luc. 10. Ioan. 15. 21. Act. 20. Cor. 1.12 Ephes 4. c. that it is to teach and giue testimonie of the truth in that sort that all may learne of it And therefore it is to be a visible Congregation * Ecclesia est fidelium congregatio It inuolues à Hierarchie Ephes 4 Who told Wickleff that all the beleeuers the predestinated only excepted do fall from the faith before they die or Societie Hierachicallie disposed Whence he determines it to be according to the words of the Creed it self the Catholike or Vniuersall Church that is the wholeranke or companie of the faithfull people successiuelie descending from the first assemblie made by Christ in the bank of Iordan vntill our times and from henceforth vntill the end of the world and reaching into all partes of the world wheresoeuer the shining testimonie of the faith of Christ the head and author is kindled Ibidem In which description by him there proued out of scripture and confirmed by the testimonie of S. Augustine he hath comprehended a two-fold vniuersalitie one loci of place another temporis of time as is more distinctlie there specified in the same chapter by himselfe And the benefit of this vniuersalitie heâ saith is vt t sciamus discretè quae sit vera Christi Ecclesia veramque habenâ doctrinam fidei that wee may knowe distinctlie as a communitie so vniuersall is found easilie which is the true Church of Christ and hauing the true doctrine of faith Heresies are limited as he shewes for time and place but the Symbolicall Church is both waies vniuersall And to it when heresies arise u Ad hanc Ecclesiamergo quae per totum muÌdum vnam habet doctrinaÌ Apostolicam omnes fideles intonante noua haeresi debent habere recursum ipsi enim Apostoli cuÌ vna sana doctrina adhuc manente imbuerunt totam Ecclesiam ob hoc tota Ecclesia Catholica etiam Apostolica nominatur Walden c. 18. fideles omnes debeâ habere recursum all faithfull must haue recourse as he saith in the next Chapter The reason is because she hath x c. 18. vt suprà ad lit q. in her heart the Gospell written by the holie Ghost together with a most certaine interpretation of the Christian lawe and also giues y Addit adhuc Ecclesia symbolica id est quam tenemâ in dubijs credere sub poenae perfidiae addit enim Ecclesiâ sic dictae communiter id est communi rationi Ecclesiae ãâã omnibus Ecclesijs abstracta rationem vnius fidelis induâbitantis testimonij hoc ratione qua est vna Sic enim âcredimus vnam sanctam Ecclesiam non quidem gente vel patria sed professione vnam fide de qua fide vnicum âcunctis gentibus reddit testimonium cap. 18. Nam hoc est credere Ecclesiam Catholicam credere eam habere veram âfidem de Deo vera Sacramenta Ibidem Ratione ergo qua Ecclesia est obiectum fidei Christianae sic facit testimonium abundanter de Christo cuilibet eam vel secundum eam credenti Ibidem Definita veritas antequam habeatur pro definita plus exigit sc vltra authoritatem Scripturae Spiritus sancti reuelationem fidem in dictis assumentis quod non extorqueat industriam quod per elusionem non seducatur aut non fingat hoc ipsum est quod sponsus ille Ecclesiae sponsae reliquit in dotem
And the iudge of controuersies the holie Ghost being put âo silence errour in all other matters of that kinde is remedilesse For example if a man denies the Sacrament of Baptisme this errour were pernicions to the Church and âhould it preuaile in all as it might âf the holie Ghost taught nothing but what is expressed in the Apostles Creed both infants and others inmumerable would be ruined thereby for vnles a man be borne againe of water and the holie Ghost Ioh. 3. he shall âot enter into the kingdome of heauen The Eucharist is not expressed in the Apostles Creed yet you saie that it is necessarie to receaue it and by the diuine commaund in both kinds The commandements and the interpretation which our Sauiour gaue of them be not expressed there yet the Church hath them and the whole Christian lawe written in her heart by the spirit of the liuing God Our obligations towards superiours of all sorts in conscience and by diuine precept to be performed and the rules of Christian conuersation be not expressed there though the Church may not be ignoraÌt of them Pastors and Bishops are necessarie and by God ordained for her direction and the Prophecies be necessarie for confirmation of her faith and therefore she is to knowe both the one and the other though they be not expreslie in the Apostles Creed I speake of that Creed because you name it as also because the certaintie of other Creeds set out in Councells or of the explication made and proposed by the Church is the thing here disputed I acknowledge it as proceeding from the assistance of the holie Ghost to the Church in more then is expressed in the Apostles Creed Hence it is that I beleeue the Nicene or that of S. Aâhanasius if you beleeue it too then âecall your answer for whilst it stands there is no remedie for errours in these matters and many more nor way of assuraÌce for many things which it is necessarie for the Church to knowe Moreouer it is certaine by the Gospells that our blessed Sauiour âaught many things to the Church âoth before his passion and after his âesurrection which are not expresâed in the Apostles Creede whereunâo you think only assistance is exâended Reade the Gospell of S. âohn all ouer or of S. Luke or S. Maâhewe and you shall finde this to be âue And these things also the Spiâit according to promise doth suggest I haue yet many things to saie vnâo you which you cannot beare nowe âut when he the Spirit of truth comes âe shall teach you all truth for he shall âot speake of himselfe Ioh. 16. but what things soeuer be shall heare he shall speake This before his passion and after it for fortie daies he appeared to them speaking of the kingdome of God Act. Apost c. 1. Now that all this whether written or not written otherwise then by the holie Ghost in the minde and heart of the Church is included within the obiect of the promised assistance I proue by no lesse authoritie then of our Sauiour Iesus Christ vpon whose promises all that acknowledge him to be true God Ioh. 14. should relie beleeuing them and him as most faithfull He the Spirit of truth shall teach you all things and suggest vnto you all whatsoeuer I shall haue said vnto you It is also necessarie for the Church to knowe the Scripture and the seÌââ which without assistaÌce of the holie Ghost caÌnot be done as I could easilie shew were I to treate of that matter Vide Disputat li. 3. c. 4. 5. but forbearing that discourse ãâã demaund Whether it be necessarie for the Church to knowe that oââ Sauiour did ordaine Baptisme and Eucharist and Order if perchancâ you thinke the institution of Bishop to be * Acts 20. deuine and how a man may knowe the meaning of those passages of Scripture which doe mention these things or that the texts indeed be Scripture if the holie Ghost doth by promise teach the Church no more then what is expressed in the Apostles Creed I demaund also how you come to be certaine that he doth teach that which in the Creed is expressed or that he doth teach any at all if by the Scripture theÌ he teacheth more then is expressed in the Apostles Creede for the Scripture is not expreslie there And my demaund returnes againe with a greater difficultie then before If he teach none but what is expressed in the Apostles Creed how be you certaine that the Gospells be diuine Scripture who taught you that The same Question I will aske and you must answer mark well of euerie Chaâter and of the meaning of euerie verse which you pretend to be against any part of our whole doctrine or to make for any peece of your Religion Thirdlie some perchance will obiect that though he teach the Church all the dogmaticall points or heauenlie doctrine which our Sauiour taught and commended yet this is not verified of the Bishops and Pastors but onlie of the symbolicall or vniuersall Church which may retaine it though the Bishops and Pastors all should erre You knowe out of the begining of this Relection where this euasion is insinuated and being beaten from your owne hereticall tenet of the whole Church erring you seeme to make an offer in the end to repose heere But none that beleeues the Scripture can rest in it First because our Sauiours words are directed to the Apostles and their Successors who were to teach and needed assistance in it Ioann 14. he shall teach you And so they did vnderstand it as appeares by their decree whereof I am to speake afterwards Secondlie the symbolicall or vniuersall Church doth include Pastors and people and the people are to learne of the Pastors whose office is to teach how shall they beleeue vnles they heare and how shall they heare with out a preacher Rom. 10. Teach all Nations was said Matth. vlt. not to the people but to the Pastors Ioann vlt. and S. Peter and his successors in him were bid to feede the flock of Christ wherefore it was requisite the Pastors on whom the people and among them the predestinate depend for instruction should be assisted in their teaching especiallie then when they speake all the same Thirdlie our Sauiour ordained Pastors and Doctors in the Church Ephes 4. to the end that wee be not wauering and borne about with euerie winde of doctrine in the circumuention of errour and if this meanes which is established till the worlds end be fit for this purpose as no Christian can thinke otherwise of our Sauiours prouidence whom he beleeues to be God it is assisted so that it neuer errs in the doctrine of the faith which it deliuers to the world with obligation to beleeue it Fourthlie if euer wee are to beleeue that Christ speaketh and resolueth doubts by the Pastors of the Church according to that He which heareth you heareth me Luc. 10.
dicens Eccââgo vobiscum sum omnibus diebus Non dixit recum sum sc cum aliqua singulari persona sed vobiscum sum cum toâa Ecclesia Catholica Apostolica quae seduci non potest âec seducere habet fidele testimonium de Christo noâit omnia mysteria Sponsi sui cap. 19. vide etiam suprà pag. 49. certaine testimonie to the truth Wee cannot addresse our selues to the Predestinate for instruction âor absolution for orders wee know not who they be nor how to finde theÌ out They be not the Symbolicall * wickliffs Argument The predestinate do perseuer in the faith Ergo they be the Symbolicall Church Is like this A mans soule is rationall Ergo a mans soule is a man Church they haue not all âhe conditions of it Neither is any âarticular Church or Congregation The Church symbolicall no not a Geâerall Councell A Councell is not âtill in being they be celebrated only sometimes whereas the Symbolicall Church is to be still So likewise is the Church diffused or Vniuersall Dan. 2. Matth. 16. Ioan. 14. Ephes 4. And against a Councell or a particular Church he that were disposed to cauill would pretend that faith were not allwaies in it and it therefore at that time no Church for Ecclesia is fidelium congregatio whereas the Church symbolicall is in ãâã times neuer failing which thing notwithstanding doth agree well vnto the Church vniuersall which is in ãâã times existent and in faith indeficient Esay 59. Ierem. 31. Ezech. 37. Dan. 1 Matth. 16. 28. Ioan. 14. 16. Tiâ 1. ep 3. c. Ephes 4. She only hath * The predestinated preciselie haue them not all See the Disp li. 1. c. 5. 6. 7. li. 2 c. 2. 3 li. 3. c. 1. 6. ãâã the conditions of and indeed is thâ symbolicall Church This construction of the wordâ of Waldensis to one that reads thâ whole discourse in him is plaiâ and obuious This which hetherto I haue described This I saie thâ Catholik and Apostolicall Church ãâã Christ the mother of beleeuing people which hath faith indeficient accordinâ to the promise of Christ to Peter ãâã âhen did beare the figure of the Church I haue asked for thee Peter that thy faith doth not faile is the symbolicall Church Hauing established this tenet he presentlie drawes from it an inference Non est ergo c. that being the vniuersall Church it is not anie particular as the African or the Roman particular Church or Dioces vide Disput pag. 619. ex Innoc 3. These are no more the symbolicall Church then particulars are the vniuersall Neither it is a generall synod such haue erred sometimes one at Ariminum another at Constantinople and some others But it is the Catholik Church of Christ dispersed ouer all the world come downe from the baptisme of our Sauiour by the Apostles and others their successors to thâse times which Catholik Church verilie doth containe veram fidem true faith there is one thing required to the Symbolicall Church and that which Wickleff also thought necessarie but that is not all and testimonium Christi fidele the faithfull testimonie of Christ there is an other and the exercise of both followes giuing wisdome to the litle ones amongst extreame errours retaining the truth firme The Deuil by wickleff suggested pestilent inuentions to abbet Rebellion and Schisme Praescitus non habetpotestatem c. Nullus est Dominus ciuilis nullus est Praelatus nullus est Episcopus dum est in peccato mortali Recitantur in Concilio Constant Sess 8. apud Wald. passim See aboue pag. 50. lit r. Here is the sence of his words to the full and for my part I see no more in them But you that can gase vpon chimeraes would persuade vs there are two things for your purpose the one that the Church of Rome may faile or erre and the other that no Generall Councells haue infallibilitie The former of these you ground vpon that part of his inference nec vtique particularis illa Romana neither also is it the particular Roman Church the later vpon those other quam Synodum aliquoties errasse percepimus c. which Synod wee haue vnderstood sometimes to haue erred as that of Ariminum gathered vnder Taurus the Prefect and that Constantinopolitan vnder Iustinian the yonger and some other These two parcels then and his opinion in these two points are next to be considered I take them in order 5. Nec vtique aa Suprà ad lit q. particularis illâ Romana The forme of speach is negatiue and the author by it denieâ something of the Roman Church aâ âs a particular Church the Queâon since you will needs make a âestion of it is Whether he denies âo be the Symbolicall Church as it âeares he doth by what hath âne said of this place hetherto or âether he denies it perpetuall conâncie in the faith and indefectibiliâ In answer to which question if âu turne to the 48. Chapter whose âe is de praerogatiua perpetuae immuâatis Romanae Ecclesiae in fide Christi âab omni bb contagione haeresis illibatae Locus ergo vnde fluxit ab exordio sapientia Chriâna Romana est Ecclesia Ab hac enim praestatur huânae inertiae dirigendae assistriâ sapientia sedium diuinaân vt nobiscum sit nobiscum laboret vt sciamus quid âeptum sit coram Deo omni tempore Walden to 1. li. c. 48. Quomodo erit vna fides quando pro captu suo âsquisque varia meditatur inuenit nisi vno magistro âante vnus doceat paedagogus Ille puta quem ad hoc âcium prae caeteris Christus elegit dum diceret Ego rogaâro te Petre vt non deficiat fides tua Ibidem Et quid miâ si Christo rogante Romana Ecclesia non potest in fide âcere non est magnum Haeretice non est magnum vt âod per se caderet Christo sustentante non possit cadere âdem Ergo audacter dico in Christi nomine Christo âante Romanam Ecclesiam in doctrina Christi esse imâcabilem Ibidem Interrogat quis vnde Romanae Eccleâ tanta authoritas Mihi videtur ex concessione Chriâ ad confessionem Petri primi Pontificis Primus enim confessor fuit diuinae generationis c. quomodo ergo ãâã dubijs fidei ad illam de fide consulendam non curritur ãâã per quam totam Ecclesiam suam Christus fundasse coâuincitur Ibidem you shall finde auouched anâ proued that Ecclesia Romana non pâtest in fide deficere the Church ãâã Rome cannot faile in the faith Aâ further I affirme boldlie in the naâ of Christ and Christ aiding the Româ Church that it is in the doctrine ãâã Christ impeccable The origen of thâ he refers there to our Sauiouâ prayer and his graunt and conclâding the Chapter he saith cc Ibidem vide Sixt. Sen. in Cyr. Pits
vt non solum in doctrina sed etiam in forma docendi infallibili veritate niterentur peculiare hoc Deus esse voluit c. Ibidem all they did affirme whether the matter were dogmaticall or historicall whether substance or circumstance whatsoeuer they did affirme and put into the Scripture it is a truth But the infallibilitie of Councells is not so ample it is not so farre extended This Stapleton doth proue in the place obiected where hauing giuen the prerogatiue to that in sacred writers and Apostles he concludes b Natura nihilominus ac substantia potestatis ac certitudinis eadem est Ecelesiae nunc illius Apostolorum sicut fontis ac riuuli inde fluentis eadem est in specie bonitate naturali aqua nisi ab aliquo extrinseco immutetur quod his fieri non potest quia semper eundum Spiritum Sanctum magistrum tanquaÌ formaleÌ rationem puritatiâ synceritatis tam fontis quam riuuli successores habent queÌ Apostoli ipsi habebant licet in alio diuerso gradu IbideÌ the nature notwithstanding and substance of the power and certitude of the Church now and of that of the Apostles is all one All one in substance but In the Apostles euerie waie exact as reaching to the decrees and to the meanes oâ proofes and to the consequence oâ forme and to the circumstances all and this in all kinde of matter In the Successors not so farre exact nor in that extension or fullnes but in alio gradu in another an inferior a more limitted and contracted degree In the same c Apostoli hanc certitudinem omnimodam sapientientiam habuerunt tam in medijs quam in fine Conseruare autem prius tradita c. quia non tam praeclara exacta sapientia indiget sed satis habet si diligenter acceptis âemel traditis insistat indefit quod Ecclesia succedens tanâa certitudine in ipsis medijs non dirigitur Neque enim ânta argumentorum certitudine opus est aperire expliâare quod virtute in semine fidei later aliudque ex alio âe lucere quam de nouo rem penitus ignoratam explorare ãâã docere Sic enim Philosophi c. atque haec vna causa âst quare tantam infallibilitatem in ipsa forma ratione âocendi successorum Ecclesia non desideret quantam âpsi Apostoli Stapl. doctr fidei cont 4. li. 8. c. 15. place to satisfie by the way another doubt you may finde cleerelie deliuered what some haue mistaken touching his minde in the * Metere quae alij seminauerunt exacta omnimoda infallibilitate non indiget sed satis est semel acceptis diligenter insistere Neque tanta certitudine opus est aperire explicare c. quam de nouo rempenitus ignoratam explorare Ex Staplet Relec. contro 4. q. 2. Relection those words tanta ând omnimoda or exacta which are âound there import in him a comparison not in the substance of the âertaintie or infallibilitie or assistance that as he said before is eadem the same but in modo in the quantitie manner and degree which âs diuers Out of which diuersitie in the manner and quantitie or extension it comes that the successors doe not reach vnto the meanes or ârguments and consequences and âacts and circumstances so vniuersallie with as ample and in euerie âne of those respects as immoueable a âertaintie as the first Masters and Planters of Religion and writers of the scripture did who were to âaie the foundation and by waie of âeuelation to deliuer what the Church in after times was to insist vpon Thirdlie it is to be considered that the Pastors in Councell according to this Author and as by their Acts you may perceaue doe proceed Sometimes as Deuines deducing or inferring one thing out of another and Sometimes as Witnesses of the faith and iudges of controuersie deciding and testifying the truth and proposing it to the world to be embraced and beleeued The former is a preamble to the later in which later it is alwaies infallible whether it be or be not so necessarilie and alwaies in the former from which further Question wee do heere abstract The reason is because their decrees are generallie proposed to all not to be seene or knowne scientificallie that waie were verie singugular the most part of Christians is not able to conceaue it but to be beleeued The d Ibidem Church saith thâ Author doth not teach ex arte sed ex authoritate not by art but by authoritie neither doth she conclude as it were by Theologicall science of God and diuine things but by the Pastorall powâ which from God she hath receaued sâ doth giue sentence or determine Our Sauiour did not open a schoole of science but of faith neither did he send his disciples to proue the Gospell but to preach it And teach indeed he bid them but so as by testifying and preaching they should doe it not by proueing or disputing e Ecclesiae pastoribus magistris decerneÌtibus creditur non quia legitimè probarunt quod decernuÌt sed quia apertè decernuÌt tradunt sic esse credendum siue decretuÌ suum ex legitimis medijs probasse nobis coÌstet siue non Haec enim est obedientia fidei de qua disseruimus Ibidem Fourthlie it is to be considered that the infallibilitie of the Church-decrees depends vpon the f Ioan. 14. promised assistance which was not to all veritie possible nor to all that is actuall neither but to reuealed onlie docebit vos omnia suggeret vobis omnia quaecunque dixero is the promise The spirit of truth the holie Ghost shall teach you all things and suggest vnto you all what soeuer I shall haue said vnto you To things not reuealed the promise was not extended The course was taken for bearing in minde and vnderstanding the lesson which Gods eternall Word hath giuen and whatsoeuer in this kinde the Church doth determine and propose to the faithfull to beleeue is true Neither can she propose any thing in this manner which is not indeed such as she declares it to be she hauing diuine guidance and assistance in euerie such act This which you denie Stapleton doth teach g Stapl. Relect cont 4. q. 2. not 4. Ecclesia in conclusione fidei semper est certissima infallibilis Marke that semper the Church in the conclusion of faith is alwaies most certaine and infallible So that if you finde any thing declared by the Church to be de fide it is according to his tenet most certaine and may no further be disputed And in another h Staplet de princip si contr 4. li. 8. c. 15. place Ecclesia quia non ratione sed authoritate assistentia prouidentia diuina nititur eamque infallibiliter promissam habet nec prater veritatem nec erroneè nec contra Deum vllo modo decernere
potest The Church because it relyeth not on reason but on the diuine authoritie prouidence and assistance and hath it infalliblie promised vnto her can in no sort or manner nullo modo determine besides the truth or erroneouslie or against God Whence it followes as before that if the Church doth applie her testimonie vnto any booke auouching and publikelie declaring it to be scripture or to any proposiâion determining it to be a point of âaith and proposing it vnto the world for such there can be accorâing to this author no further queâtion made of it since the diuine ârouidence doth so guide her that ân such definitions she in no sort âan iudge erroneouslie or determine âesides the truth â Neither is this integritie in deâânition violated or our sauiours promise of assistance broken if not in matter of diuine beleefe such as âor the good of his Church God âath reuealed but in i Longè aliter se habent quaestiones istae quas esse praeâer fidem arbitratur Celestius quà m sunt illae in quibus âlua fide qua Christiani sumus aut ignoratur quid verum ãâã sententia definitiua suspenditur aut aliter quam est âumana infirma suspicione conijcitur Velâââ cum quaeââtur qualis vel vbi sit Paradâsus cum tamen esse illum âaradisum fides Christiana non dubitet Vel cum quaeriâr vbi nunc sit Elias c. vel cùm quaeritur vtrum in corâore vel extra corpus in terâium caelum sit raptus Apoâolus c. vel quot sunt Caeli c. vel vtrum elementa âundi huius conspicabilis quatuor an plura sint c. vbi âotuit Methusalem viuere c. Quis non sentiat in his atâe huiusmodi varijs innumerabilibus quaestionibus sine ad âbscurissima opera Dei siue ad Scripturarum abditissiâas latebras pertinentibus quas certo aliquo generâ complecti ac definire difficile est multa ignorari salua Christiana fide alicubi errari sine aliquo haeretici dogmatis crimine S. Aug. li. 2. cont Pelag. Celest. c. 23. vide Canum li. 5. c. 5. qq 3. 4. 5. other questions which it hath not pleased him by reuelation to discouer as where is Elias where Paradice how many heauens c. not in definition and attestation but in some particular * It is one thing to argue out of reuealed principles and another thing to argue out of others Of this later kind of deduction I speake heere deduction and coniecture she doth inferre amisse Not euerie consequence orillation not euerie thing syllogisticallie inferd out of premises in matter of that nature hath infallibilitie according to this Author but the definitions and decrees all haue it If you knowe not yet the difference betwixt the one and the other you may reade him or Canus or looke vpon the Acts of the Councells where you may with litle studie discerne it If it be replied that in his fourth Controuersie he seemes to limit and contract the obiect of assistance to points onlie fundamentall excluding all other I answer that euen k Docendi infallibilitas in causa fidei Ecclesiae data taÌtummodo in illis fidei dogmatibus infallibiliter definiendis fideli populo ceâta veritate tradeÌdis locum habet quae vel in coÌtrouersiam vocantur vel alioqui ad publicaÌ Ecclesiae fidem necessariò pertinent Staplet fid doc li. 8. c. 15. Quando de ijs quaestionibus quae vel non necessariò ad fidem pertineÌt c. vel non ad publicum aliquod commune dogma explicandum quod vel omnes fideles explicitè crederè debent vel in publico religionis vsu versatur vel saltem maiores explicitè credere tenentur populus autem implicitè in maiorum fide sed ad priuatam alicuius c. Ibidem there he doth extend it to all points of faith which either are called into controuersie at any time wherein the Church is or otherwise doe necessarilie appertaine to the publike faith of the Church In which compasse is contained all that is in the Councell of Trent defined against you or in any other oecumenicall Councell proposed to be beleeued Your masters Luther Caluin and others called into question diuers things appertaining and intrinsecallie as parts to the substance or obiect of diuine faith and publike exercise of Religion as bookes of holie scripture iustification Sacraments and the Masse And therefore if according to Stapleton the Churches infallibilitie doth reach vnââ all points of faith called into question it is according to the same tenet extended vnto these which he beleeued so to pertaine to faith But in questions that are impertineÌt or * Such as some aboue pag. 97. litter i. in marg indifferent or that appertaine onlie to the direction of some one that is weake in iudgment and in some priuate case or to the satisfaction of some proude mans curiositie to conclude in questions that appertaine to the explicatioÌ of those things which are appendices additions rather then contained in or appertaining to the substance of faith if the Church should mistake it were not he thinks any preiudice to the graunt of assistance or the promised infallibilitie not if in matter of this nature she should affirme or discoursing as a Diuine which in her examination of difficulties otherwhile she doth should inferre and logicallie l Vel asserendo vel etiam concludendo Ibidem conclude amisse But to make a publike decree of that which is false and propose it openlie to be beleeued of Christians as matter of faith that she cannot being in her publike decrees ãâã definition infallible as you heard him saie before And the same he hath proued at large both by Scripture and Theologicall reasons in diuers m Doc. fi li 8. c 12. 13 Relect. cont 3. q 4 cont 4. q. 2. alibi places of his booke §. IX 1. Saint Augustine will not haue any other bookes equalled with Scripture in authoritie 2. Other witnesses or testimonies of other nature then that of Scripture and not recommended by it or by the author of it wee be not obliged to in that manner as wee are obliged to beleeue the Scripture 3. The comparison of Scripture with other writings in authoritie His forbearing to presse an Arian with the authoritie of the Councell of Nice 4. The Donatists refusing to yeild vnto the authoritie of the whole Church Catholike and consequentlie of her Councells too and admitting Scripture he doth challeng them to shew there the decision of the Controuersie which was betwixt them and him 5. He did both auouch and relie vpon the authoritie of plenarie Councells esteeming them to be in their decrees of faith infallible What mending that is which he speakes of EGo solis eis Scriptorum qui iam caâonici appellantur didics hunc timorem honoremque deferre vt nullum eorum scribendo errasse audeam credere
they who condemned and opposed the whole Catholike Church did withall sleight the authoritie of her Councells as Pagans also doe but he was to proue it by a principle which they reiected not Neither doth it followe that Councells therefore in themselues are not worthie of beleefe or infallible in their assertion or that S. Augustine did not esteeme them so when to conuince the Donatists he tooke his argumeÌts froÌ the Prophets to confirme or proue the foresaid point S. Peter heard a voice from Å¿ 2. Petr. 1. heauen testifying of our Sauiour yet he confirmes it the same way firmiorem babemus Propheticum sermonem wee haue the prophets words which yet confirme vs more and our B. Sauiour though most worthie of credit as being the truth it selfe confirmed his resurrection and other mysteries to the Disciples by the same t Ipse Dominus Iesus cuÌ resurrexisset à mortuis discipuloruÌ oculis videndum manibusque tangeÌdum corpus suum offerret ne quid tamen fallaciae se pati arbitrarentur magic eos testimonijs legis propherataruÌ psalmoruÌ confirmandos esse iudicauit ostendens ea de se impleta quae fuerant tanto antè praedicta S. Augu. de vnit Eccles c. 16. meanes One testimonie as I said before vpon the like occasion doth illustrate another and many ioyned together doe more easilie master our vnderstanding and make it yeeld obedience to the truth For the better comprehension of S. Augustines minde in this matter I will adde a word or two more touching this waie of discouering a truth in Religion suppose it be whether Iesus be the Messias and Redeemer of the world or whether this or that congregation be the Church of the Messias For the notice of the former of these two reade the Prophets where you shall finde that a Messias shall come that he shall be borne in Bethlem preach doe miracles be resisted and reiected by the Iewes who were keepers of these bookes of Prophesies be persecuted scourged put to death pierced and after death rise againe and be acknowledged and adored by the Gentiles This you reade there and it is a good direction but this is not all You must finde out the man to whom this description doth agree and in the comparison of them both together the man Iesus with the circumstances of his birth life and death to the propheticall description and the Prophesie to the man in this comparison I say you knowe that which you looke for vizt that Iesus is the Messias and redeemer of the world when you would get knowledge of the later viz. which companie is the Church you first take notice of a companie of people professing one faith in all Nations beginning at Hierusalem defending it by her Pastors u Vt omittam sapientiaÌ syncerissimaÌ quaÌ in Ecclesia esse Catholica non creditis multa sunt alia quae in eius gremio me iustissimè teneant Tenet consensio populorum atque gentium tenes authoritas miraculis inchonta spe nutrita charitate aucta vetustate firmata tenet ab ipsa sede Petri Apostoli cui pascendas oues suas post resurrectioneÌ Dominus coÌmendauit vsque ad praesentem episcopatum successio sacerdotum tenet postremò ipsum Catholicae nomeÌ c. S. August cont Epist. Fundamenti c. 4. Ego verò Euangelio non crederem nisi me Catholicae Ecclesiae commoueret authoritas Ibid. c. 5. Cum igitur tantum auxilium Dei tantum profectuÌ fructumque videamus dubitabimus nos eius Ecclesiae coÌderegremio quae vsque ad confessionem generis humani ab apostolica sede per successiones episcoporuÌ frustra haereticis circumlatrantibus partim plebis ipsius iudicio partim conciliorum grauitate partim etiam miraculorum maiestate damnatis culmen authoritatis obtinuit cui nolle primas dare vel summae profecto impietatis est vel praecipitis arrogantiae S. Aug. de vtil credendi c. 17. in Councells and otherwise offering to God euerie where Sacrifice or oblation leading an innocent life in exteriour profession and confirming with miracles her beleefe and doctrine but this alone so abstracted from the increate authoritie doth not breed an act of diuine beleefe that this companie is the Church of God wherefore you goe further and in the Prophets and other parts of the Bible reade a description of the Church diffused ouer all the world beginning at Hierusalem with power to meet in Councell and assistance of the Spirit offering to God in all Nations a cleane oblationâ disposed Hierarchicallie with her watchmen euer on her walles heâ Pastors readie to maintaine the truth and attending carefullie to the flock that by Errour they be not circumuented and then comparing one of these vnto the other vizt the companie to the prophesie the prophecie to the companie in the comparison you finde and beleeue with an act of diuine faith the true Church It is this as I conceaue which S. Augustine points at in the place before cited when he saith our Sauiour confirmed the faith oâ his resurrection by testimonies oâ the Prophets x S. Aug. de vnit Eccles c. 16 ostendens ea de sâ impleta que fuerant tanto ante praedicta shewing those things to be fulfilled of him which so longe before were forâtold And to this end he shewed hiâ hands and side when he did appeare after his resurrection Which brought his disciples in minde of foderunt manus meas pedes meos aspicient ad me quem confixerunt they haue digged my hands and my feete they shall looke vpon me whom they haue pierced and the rest mouing them to faith and S. Thomas putting his hand in to the wound in his Master found God How to finde the Church in this manner you haue beene tould y Disp li. 2. els-where Looking all about on the world and into monuments of antiquitie you see a great companie of people reaching from the Apostles time and stretched out into all Nations communicating with the See Apostolike in the profession of one and the same Religion and holding out a booke to all that will reade it You reade and obserue And considering the companie you percaue the booke is a prophesie for being written long before the companie was extant it doth describe it perfectlie and foretels the comming of it with diuers particulars that come not of necessitie but of election and free choise considering the booke you perceaue the companie to be the Church for there you finde it so deliuered and affirmed by him that made the booke Disp p. 177. who foreseeing things future many ages before they came to passe certainly foretold of it and is worthilie belieued as hauing such an infinite foresight and certaine comprehension of all kind of things future ET ipsa concilia quae per singulas regiones vel prouincide fiunt plenariorum conciliorum authoritati quae fiunt ex vniuerso orbe Christiano fine vllis
thus if wee confesse that one faith to be true which the whole Church thorough the world doth acknowledg And antiquitie thus if wee doe not in any sort goe back from those sences which it is manifest that our holie Auncestors and Fathers haue celebrated and commended and Censent likewise if wee followe the definitions and decrees of all or neere all the priests and masters in Antiquitie And d Quid igitur faciet Christianus Catholicus si se aliqua Ecclesiae particula ab vniuersalis fidei communione praeciderit quid vtique nisi vt pestisero corruptoque meÌbro sanitatem vniuersi corporis anteponats quod si nouella aliqua coÌtagia non iam portiunculam tantum sed totam pariter Ecclesiam commaculare conetur locum hunc corruperuÌt Wittaker Vitus haeretici tunc item prouidebit vt antiquitati inhaereat quae prorsus iaÌ non potest vlla nouitatis fraude seduci Quid si in ipsa vetustate duorum aut trium hominuÌ vel certè ciuitatis vnius aut etiam prouinciae alicuius error deprehendatur Tunc omnino curabit vt paucoruÌ temeritati vel inscitiae fi qua sunt vniuersaliter antiquitus vniuersalis Ecclesiae decreta praeponat Quid si tale aliquid emergat vbi nihil huiusmodi reperiatur Tuuc operam dabit vt collatas inter se MaioruÌ coÌsulat interrogeâque sententias eorum duÌtaxat qui diuersis licet teÌporibus locis in vnius tameÌ Ecclesiae Catholica communione fide permanentes magistri probabiles extiterunt quicquid noÌ vnus aut duo taÌtum sed omnes pariter vno eodemque coÌsenââ apertè frequeÌter perseueranter tenuisse scripsisse docuisse cognouerit id sibi quoque intelligat absque vlla dubitatione credendum Vinc Lyrin c. 4. more he hath to the same purpose He liued in the yeare 440. and before he wrote this booke there had been three generall Councells whose decrees though not made the * Nicenum anno 325. first of them much more then a hundred yeeres before him he âumbers amongst the records of anâiquitie which are to be looked into And in like manner the decrees maâe 200. 500. 1000. yeares before vs âake place and order in the records âf antiquitie respectiuelie to our times the distance of precedence âeing more then was the distance of any Councell precedent respectiuelie vnto him You are further to obserue that âo the vniuersalitie of a truth he doth not require that it be distinctlie beleeued of all that professe Christian religion some haue professed it who beleeued not the blessed Trinitie others denied the Incarnation the greatest mysteries were not Catholick in this sense neither doth âhe require that a point or veritie which is Catholik be such that it hath been expreslie and distinctlie beleeued of all Catholiks at all times the Catholick Epistles in this sence e Vide Disp pag. 431. An excellent lesson for these times were not all Catholick but his meaning is as I insinuated before that a sence or veritie appertaining to faith which is beleeued by the Symbolicall that is by the vniuersall catholike Church either allwaies or at any time for it can neuer erre in diuine faith or which the Fathers haue vniformelie in their times and ages taught and professed or which hath beene defined by all or neere all the Pastors those which are to teach in a generall councell is to be receaued as a Catholick sense Twice in that little booke herepeates againe this matter of finding out the Catholik sense by antiquitie consenting either in Councell or out of Councell and by vniuersalitie and in both places the definition of generall Councells and their authoritie comes in As in the 38. chapter where giuing direction how to auoid hereticks who like the Deuil vrge Scriptures against the truth in this case saith he Catholikes shall take greate care that they interprete the diuine canon according to the traditions of the vniuersall Church and according to the rules of the Catholike doctrine or decree wherein likewise it is necessarie that they follow the vniuersalitie antiquitie and consent of the Catholick Church And if at any time a part doth rebell against the whole noueltie against antiquitie or the disagreement of one or some fewe erring persons against the consent of all or at least of farre more Catholikes let them preferre the integritie of the whole before the corruption of the part And in the same whole the religion of antiquitie before the prophanesse of noueltie as also in antiquitie it selfe let them preferre before the rashnes of a verie fewe f primuÌ omnium generalia si qua sunt vniuersalis coÌcilij decreta praeponant tuÌc deinde si id minus est sequantur quod proximum est multorum atque magnoruÌ consentientes sibi sententias magistrorum Vincent Lirin c 38. first of all if any be the generall decrees of an oecumenicall Councell then after if that be not let theÌ followe that which is next to wit the sentences or opinions of many and great masters consenting amonge themselues In the next chapter he tells what Fathers those must be whose opinions wee take they must be g Idem c. 39. orthodoxe such as liuing piouslie in the Catholike faith and communion and remaining constant haue died in Christ or happilie bene put to death for him and those he saith are so to be beleeued that what soeuer either all or the greater part haue established or confirmed receauing holding or deliuering with one and the same meaning manifestlie oft constantlie as it were in a certaine councell of masters agreeing among themselues the same is to be esteemed certaine and vndoubted And againe in the h Idem c. 40. next Hos in Ecclesia Dei diuinitus per tempora loca dispensatos quisquis in sensu Catholici dogmatis vnum aliquid in Christo sentientes contempserit non hominem contemnit sed Deum He that contemnes these fathers diuinelie distributed according to times and places in the Church of God agreeing in Christ in the sence of a Catholick point of doctrine he contemneth not man but God So greate hee esteemeth this authoritie of the fathers and masters which God hath dispensed not at one but in seuerall times and yet the generall decrees of an oecumenicall Councell with him haue i c. 38. vt suprà the precedence primum omnium generalia si qua sint vniuersalis Concilij decreta praeponant tunc deinde si id minus est sequantur quod proximum est multorum at que magnorum consentientes sibi sententias magistrorum Againe in the 41. chapter he repeates a second time the same matter of finding out the Catholike sence by antiquitie consenting in Councell or out of Councell where he speakes yet more home k Diximus in ipsa Ecclesiae vetustaâe duo quaeâam vehementer studioseque obseruaÌda quibus penitus inhaerere deberent quicunque haeretici esse nolunt PrimuÌ si
Docete Matt. vlt. This Catholikes do know they be grounded they take the secure way The way which you take is temerarious it is the same which Heresie doth vsuallie take to spred it self And in making choise of it you shew in your self the disposition of a Sectarie The Sectarie findes an opinion auouched by two or three against the common and against the Spirit of the Church generallie yet because it likes him for that it is easier to be conceaued or more agreeable to some phantasie that he hath or better suting to the libertie which he could wish he is coÌtent to âhink the authoritie of those ââo or three though the ââst contradict sufficient to âake is probable and then iudâng of the reasons and motiâes which they bring as his ââfections incline him he thinks ãâã at last certaine So did the ârians depending vpon the âuthoritie first of their leaâers and then deeming their âotiue as that pater maior me ãâã to be manifestlie against the Church and for them Neither be the Leaders themselues Arch-heretickes wiââout pretence of authoritie they cite the d Fortasse aliquisinterroget An Haeretici diuinae Scripturae testimonijs vtantur Vtuntur planè vehemeÌter quidem nam videas eos volate per singulaquae que sanctae legis volumina per Moysi per Regum volumina per Psalmos per Apostolos per Euangelia per Prophetas Siue enim apud suos siue alienos siue priuatim siue publice siue in sermonibus siue in libris siue in conuiuijs siue in plateis nihil vnquam paenè de suo proferuÌt quod non etiam Scripturae verbâs adumbrare conentur Vinc. lirin c. 35. Si quis interroget queÌpiam Haereââcorum sibi talia persuadentem vnde probas vnde doces quod Ecclesiae Catholicae Vniuersalem antiquam fidem dimittere debeam Statim ille mille testimonia mille exempla mille authoritates parat de lege de psalmis de apostolis de prophetis quibus nouo malo more interpretatis ex arce Catholica in Haereseôs barathrum infoelix anima praecipitetur Idem c. 37. vbi ostendit eos à diabolo moduÌ istum didicisse Scriptum est enim Scriptures ââd gleane obscure speaches ât of auncient good writers which in shewe do make for them When a man once takes this âay he squares out his Religion to himself or rather he runnes out of all from one thing to another from more to fewer points or articles from that he calls probable to lesse and yet lesse and lesse probable till at last is he findes himself most certainlie in Hell Faith is a firme assent but his if well examined is not so It is not diuine faith he doth but flatter himself and deceaue others with a shadow If two or three tell him thatâ Councell may mistake though the rest auouch the contrarie he is content to think it may and heereupon presentlie doubts of all that is so defined Then further proceeding iâ the same sillie motiue if thâ whole Church auouch a thing yet so as some two or three at some time or other held thâ contrarie he will not beleeââ the Church neither No nor the Apostles if any tell him they might erre A Rainolds a Whittakers authoritie makes the contrarie to him probable and by that time he hath read their bookes he thinkes himself certaine of it But in the meane while where is the faith of such a man wherevnto doth he giue a firme assent To the Scriptures No their authoritie who denied them makes him doubt To the Creed nor so the authoritie of two or three serues his turne and there is nothing in the Creede that more then two or three haue not refused Arianisme Nestorianisme Sabellianisme Eutichianisme Pelagianisme Lutheranisme Swinglianisme all great Heresies haue had multitudes of abbetâors whereas two or three serue his turne Where then is his religion in his mouth peraduenture but in his heart well examined there is none Others there be not so readie to relie indifferentlie vpon the Authoritie of any whatsoeuer esteemed learned but determined extreamelie vnto one The Puritan for example to Iohn Caluin whom he prefers before the rest all together Wherein he shewes himself as extrauagantlie peccant against the light of nature as the former AmoÌgst the many principes or Axiomes which reason dictates to the Prudent this is one that in matters of beleefe the greatest Authoritie must sway our vnderstanding He will not denie that this is true he might as well denie the sunne shines at middaie but his manner of proceeding doth inuolue a deniall of it The authoritie of a Councell entirelie oecumenicall is greater then the Authoritie of one single man The greatest âchollers haue euer stooped to ãâã yet the Puritan rather beleeues Caluin then such a Councell Yea rather then all the knowne Churches in the world though e Though some now disseÌt as you for example yet these points haue had the consent of all Christian Churches as many as beleeued that our B. Sauiour had true flesh and blood consenting As in the matter of the Masse vnbloodie Sacrifice reall Presence And what way is there think you to deale with such a man or to what end is it to dispute with him If you cite Scripture he will rather take the comment of his Master Iohn then the definition and tradition howeuer auncient of the whole Church deliuering the sence of it It is so in the point of the Reall presence And in admitting the Bookes of Scripture too he will be his owne chooser and will iudge himself which is good and sound and which ought to be discarded Vide disput de Eccles pag. 304. But who shall decide the coÌtrouersie betwixt the Church and him touching the meaning of that Scripture which he pleaseth to let passe for currant The Spirit no doubt But in whom in the Church or the vniuersitie of beleeuers before his time Not so They might erre he thinkes and so might all the Councells of Bishops that euer were and all the Pastors of the world though consenting they might all he thinks be deceaued Where then speakes the Iudge he meanes to stand to when the Controuersie is about the sence of Scripture or about the sinceritie of the letter in whom speakes the Spirit which he will permit to be his Master In Master Iohn So he beleeues rather theÌ he will beleeue that he speaketh in the Church Now tell me is not this a strange manner of proceeding in matters appertaining to our eternall estate to challeng to ones self or his Master Iohn authoritie to teach and interprete Scripture and to denie it to the whole Senate of Catholike Bishops and Pastors whom God hath giuen to teach diuine doctrine and to keepe the Church from wauering in such matters and not onlie to them Ephes 4 in what age soeuer but absolutelie to the Church without exempting the first Disciples and Apostles These for
to beleeue that a part is greater theÌ the whole The Authoritie of m England also before Caluin was borne beleeued the Sacrifice of the masse and offered it for the quick and the deade See the Prudentiall Ballance all NatioÌs Christian moues me more then the Authoritie of one n Other Protestants admit not your Confession onlie now deuided and apart Neither can I be perswaded that corpus doth signifie a signe or figure onlie or that bread properlie was crucified for my sinnes I am not wiser then heeretofore men haue beene not wiser then the Church I reuerence her decrees and am readie to be directed by her Whether those you pretend vnto were so too will appeare in the discussion of the Controuersie wee now deale ân which doth concerne the generall Councells wherein she declares herself Of such Councels your fellowes haue questioned many things as first who hath power to call them secondlie what persoÌs are to be in them thirdlie who is to preside Fourthlie whether they be infallible in their decrees fiftlie which be such Councels The Controuersie wee are to speake of is none of these but onlie what learned men Catholikes haue deliuered taught about the infallibitie of a CouÌcell supposing it be intirelie oecumenicall which supposition being premised The four first your selues honour with the title of oecumenicall and it is confessedlie a possible supposition the Question is this Whether any Deuines of the Catholike communion haue openlie and to the knowledge of those to whom it appertained to looke vnto the Church auouched and maintained of Councels entirelie âecumenicall such as were generall ând approued that in decrees of Faith they might mistake and ârre Wee dispute not you and ãâã now whether this or that Councell be such a Councell That is another matter Nor whether such a Councell supâose it be and define be infalâble But what men Cathoâike Deuines haue auerred âouching the priuiledge of a Councell generall entire and âpproued The termes of the Question âe remarkable Councels not whatsoeuer but generall and âpproued or entirelie oecumeâicall Deuines of the Catholike âommunion not Hereticks Wee know that Hereticks reâuse entire approued Councels Matters of Faith not matters âf Fact Auouched openlie the knowledge of the cause goes before the sentence of the iudge Your pretence is that some Deuines haue auouched their fallibilitie in matter and manner aboue specified in the Quaere Which if it were true that I note this by the way the tenet of their Infallibilitie would notwithstanding continue firme The Church doth not at all times punish what euer she doth abhorre and negligence of discipline in a Superiour is a distinct thing from the lawes or principles of a communitie Much lesse could it be ouerturned by their doubtfull speaches if any could be found and least of all by obscure passages Dark and hard speaches may be found in o Vide S. Hieron Apolog. adu Ruf. li. 2. Fieri potest vt vel certè antequam in Alexandria quasi daemonium meridianum Arius nasceretur innocenter quaedam minus cautè loqunâi sunt quae non possint peruersarum hominum calumniam declinare vide S. Aug. de Praedest Sanct. c. 14. Auncient Writers that seeme to make againsâ such tenets of Religion as you call fundamentall and some Fathers haue doubted of some âaue denied p Euseb Hist Eccles li. 3. c. 19. Origenes apud eundem li. 6. c. 19. S. Hieron de Script Eccles in Ep. ad Dard. Bilson Suru p. 664. See the Disp pag. 431. bookes of Scriâture which all now beleeue âo be Canonicall wherefore if ãâã this matter of Councels-auââoritie the like should haue âappened the tenet of Assistanâe giuen to them in their deârees of faith being grounded ãâã Scripture and hauing for it ãâã more euident perpetuall tradiââon then you can shew for diâers parts of Scripture which âou do beleeue to be diuine âere still euen by you in like âanner to be admitted and âaintained vnles you think it âwfull to reiect those Books alââ because once doubted of or âenied and neuer to beleeue âat which might with a preânce of authoritie be oppoââd or contradicted Thus I could answer and âare the labour to talke further of the matter Vide S. Aug. li. 2. contra Donat. c. 5. but becausâ you wrong some that be leaâned worthie Authors and some Fathers too least you finâ adherents that will beleeuâ you to the preiudice of theâselues and others vpon yoâ bare word when they sââ none contradict and confuâ that you boast of I will suruââ the citations Our dispute in this matteâ is to be of Catholikes it is as bâfore was noted impertineââ to talke of others and of sucâ as in plaine termes haue auouchâ and maintained what you prâtend they did Wee know thâ some haue beene mistaken ãâã great matters and yet contânued in the Church either bâcause the thing was not suffâcientlie brought to light ãâã matters appertaining to diuinâ faith be not at all times equaâlie proposed or because they were readie to submit themselues As in the QuestioÌs of the Canon of Scripture of Baptisme giuen by Hereticks c. and conforme their iudgment as soone as the Church declared her self Wee know âoo that diuers haue beene tempted in their faith and of these some haue falne into Heresie or Atheisme wherof we haue examples in Luthers preach and before in all ages âuen the primitiue Others haâe discouered their temptaâions with all the motions of âheir vnderstanding to and âro concealing onlie the finall âesolution or euent Of which ânfirmitie some and not wiâhout scandall haue exhibited âhemselues by their writings âublicke spectacles to the âorld With those you and ãâã need not meddle being to âpeake of such onlie if any can âe found as haue openlie denied the infallibilitie aboue specified and yet enioyed the communion of the Church notwithstanding such a knowne deniall She doth not thrust out of her communion one who doth onlie propose his doubtes to be resolued nor yet if by way of disputation he venters to far but without auouching especiallie when this is donne with submission to her iudgment or if he so conceale his mind or vtter himself so that nothing can be directlie proued against him Secret and concealed thoughts she cannot look into Euerie one is to be presumed good vnles the contrarie may be proued As many as haue exteriorlie communicated with the Church are lawfullie presumed to haue receaued her tenets vnles it be made appeare otherwise Though it be true that some who liue amongst vs oâherwhile be not of vs. Some âo beare themselues for Caâholikes who be in their hearâes Atheistes or Heretikes There be no doubt Ipse Satanas transfigurat se in Angelum lucis Non est ergo magnum si ministri eius transfigurentur velut ministri iustitia 2. Corint 11. Nonne ego vos duodecim elegi ex vobis vnus diabolus est Ioan. 6.
he doth expound it repugnantes some repugnant to other and if in his iudgment they be repugnant you haue no reason to conceaue he doth approoue them all Thirdlie he doth not name any Catholike author holding that assertion which you speake of or the rest which followe but tooke them out of (b) Ex 1. p. li 5. capitibus 1. 2. 3. 7. 22. 25. 32. 35. Ochams Dialogues whence he (c) Confer capita 28. 30. 31. 32. 34. 35. cum Quaestione Vesperiali Quaestione de Resumpta Petri Camer transcribes and some times verbatim diuers peeces of these questioÌs which you would make vse of Neither doth he omitt to recite that opinion of all Christians as many as haue vse of reason erring possiblie all together against faith which Ocham himselfe had said was false and the reasons for it those which Ockam giues he calls apparentes seeming yet himselfe in the end of this Question (d) Ex praedictis sequuntur aliquae propositiones corollariae Prima est quod semper in Ecclesia vniuersali erunt plures adulti illustrati veritate fidei Secunda est quod semper in Ecclesia Vniuersali erunt plures iusti formati virtute speâ Tertia quod semper in Ecclesia Vniuersali erunt plures electi inflammati charitate Dei. Prima propositio patet quia c. Quast Vesper contradicts it and maintaines the contrarie EX sacra Scriptura non conuincitur quod sit aliqua Ecclesia particularis quae regulae legis Christi semper conformetur Baro p. 363. ex Alliac Quaest Vesp Concilium generale poteâ defformari legi Christi idem p. 364. ex Quaest. Resumpta Ecclesia Romana quae distinguitur à tota congregatione fideliuâ sicut pars à toto potest haereticari Ibidem ex eadem quast 2. THe second thing obiected is that he thought it could not be conuinced out of Scripture that any Church distinct from the vniuersall is alwaies free from errour whence is inferd that in his opinion it caÌnot be conuinced out oâ Scripture that a generall Councelâ is alwaies free I answere first weâ maintaine not all Councells which goe vnder the name of generall Secondlie it is one thing to saie lawfull Councells are free from errour in definition and an other thing to saie that wee can proue this by Scripture it is one thing to saie the Epistle of S. Iames hath sacred authoritie and another thing to saie that by Scripture you can proue it Wherefore suppose this Author had said in his yonger daies that he thought the infallibilitie of full and lawfull Councells could not be proued ex âacra Scriptura by Scripture it doth âot follow that he denied their inââllibilitie Thirdlie what he saith in âhat Question is deliuered they be (e) Haec dicta sint de tertia conclusione suis adiunctis de tota ista quaestione solùm disputatiuè non assertiuè Petrus Camer Quaest de Resumptâ sine his owne words disputatiuè ââon assertiuè by waie of dispute not ây waie of affirmation wherefore if âou wronge him not you must not âie he held that Councells infallibiâtie such Councells as had all conâtions necessarie could not be proâed yea and against a stubborne ââuersarie sufficientlie conuinced âut of Scripture Fourthlie this which âas said not assertiuè but onelie disââtatiuè he submitted to the iudââment (f) Non est ergo quò securiùs fugiam quaÌ filius ad matreÌ filius Ecclesiae ad matrem Ecclesiam c. Ad hanc igitur coÌfugiens sua lege regulari ââpiens me dicta mea omnia suae suorum filiorum tam âsentium quam absentium charitatiuae correctioni committo âsub hac alijs protestationibus fieri consuetis quas supâco haberi pro repetitis gratia breuitatis ad quaeâonis responsionem accedo Idem Quaest Vesper in prinââ of the Church therely reâacting or disauowing according ãâã the manner of the schooles yet in ââe what in this disputation might âârchance escape amisse either for ââe substance or the manner of his speech And finallie being after much more studie and reading of Scriptures publikelie in the nature oâ Professor made Bishop and Cardinall he was called to the Counceâ of (g) Acta Conc. Constant Sess 20. Constance and there witâ the rest of the Bishops he sufficientlie made knowne that he though all were bound to beleeue what ãâã generall Councell and particularlâ that of Constance did declare touching faith If you reade the interrogatories made (h) Interrogetur vtrum credat quod illud quod sacrum ConciliuÌ Constantiense vniuersalem Ecclesiam repraesentans approbauit approbat in fauââ fidei ad salutem animarum quod hoc est ab vniueââ Christi fidelibus approbandum tenendum quod ãâã demnauit condemnat esse fidei vel bonis moribus ââtrarium hoc ab eisdem esse tenendum pro condemnato âdendum asserendum Martinus quintus approbante Ceâ Constantien vtrum credat sententiam sacri Const Conâ supra 45. articuli Ioan. Wicklef Ioan. Hus latam ãâã re veram Catholicam c. Ibidem there by thâ Pope sacro approbante Concilio yâ will not vrge him any more in thâ matter TOta multitudo Clericorum Laicorum virorum pâ à vera fide deficere Baro p. 364. ex Alliac Quaââ Resumpta Intentio autem mea conclusionis sicut patuit âctis âeis erat quod data quacumque Ecclesia certae denââionis quae non sit toti congregationi fidelium generalis verbi âauâa Ecclesia Clericorum Ecclesia Italicorum Ecclesia Galliâorum c Ex Scriptura sacra non conuincitur quod semper sit âliqua talis siue consimilis denominationis quae Christi legis reâulae conformetur Idem ex eadem Quaestione 3. YOu conceaue withall what is to be said in answere to the rest âbiected out of him and particularââe vnto that of the Clergie where he âeemes not to haue then well reflected on those words of S. Paul who âoth testifie and his testimonie is in âhe Scripture that our Sauiour coÌstiâuted and (i) Ephes 4. gaue Pastors and Doctors âo the consummation of the Saincts vnto âhe worke of the ministerie vnto the ediâing of the bodie of Christ vntill wee âeete all into the vnitie of faith that âe be not children wauering and caried âbout with euerie winde of Doctrine The like wee reade in Esaie vpon (k) Esay 62. thy walls o Hierusalem I haue appointed watchmen all the daie and all âhe night for euer they shall not hold âheir peace And other places there âre to this purpose verie plaine that âânnot be auoided Neither did he finde himselfe able ãâã satisfie the argument taken from the nature of a Hierarchie and the acts pertaining to it that are alwaies to be found in the Church whilst it lasts that is all daies till the consummation of the world which argument is there brought and he doth endeuour but
some sooner then others yet all in the end approue and propose it DEbet sacrum Concilium vniuersale regulis Sancti Spiritus tam in Canone Sacrae Scriptura ac praeteritis Concilijs apertis dirigi maximè in negotio fidei quae vna inuariabilis necessario sicut fuit permanebit scripturas rimari in dubijs sicut in sexto vniuersali Concilio actum fuit alijs multis tunc definitio ex allegatis sumpta absque errore necessariò erit Vnde si ea non seruantur maximè libera omnium audientia ac vbi atiqua attentarentur in synodis quae obuiarent fidei Romanae Ecclesiae protestatio iustè ac simul appellatio ad futurum aliud Concilium fieri potest Baro p. 369. expunctis tamen ijs quae diuerso charactere notantur 2. NEither is there cause to feare that a Councell assisted by the holie Ghost and defining will contradict either scripture or the h Ex hoc etiaÌ elici potest fideÌ Romanae Ecclesiae in nulla synodo vniuersali retractari posse Cutan Conc. li. 2. c. 4. Dicit Augustiâus li. 1. con Donatistas volens stabili fundamento ex deâisione vniuersalis Concilij fidem probare Iam ne videar âumanis argumentis id agere c. Idem c. 5. vidâs quanta âniuersalibus Concilijs authoritas inest dum rectè celeâantur Vnde Augustinus l. 1 Serm. con Pelagianos diâ matris Ecclesiae hanc esse authoritatem quod quisquis ântra hunc inexpugnabilem murum arietat ipse confrinâut Ibidem faith of former times he that âs chieflie interessed in the busines vnderstands all things clearlie and cannot contradict a veritie That which is obiected vpon ocâasion of S. Augustines words that i de verbis S. Augustini cum aliquo experimeÌto rerum c. fusius agemus suo loco a plenarie Councell may faile in the experiment of things and in that case iudge amisse makes nothing to the purpose for wee dispute not of infallibilitie in things which may be found out by tryall or experiment but in matters reuealed and of faith §. VI. Clemangis professed to reuerence the authoritie of Councells and only to propose some doubts for his instruction in some things touching them NIcolaus de Clemangis in disputatione cum scholastico Parisiensi quaedam etiam tradit quae cum doctrina Pontificiorum de Conciliorum infallilibilitate manifestè pugnant Baro p. 370. Dicit Concilium generale errare posse in controuersijs morum Baro Ibidem CLEMANGIS His worke iâ a Index libr. prohibit Conc. Trid. forbidden and his frind tâ whom he directed it perceaued iâ came from b Quanquam Deum ac conscieÌtiam testari liceat nullatenus stomachato animo illa fuisse scripta quod miror tibi visum esse quia tamen vndecun que hoc euenerit ita tibi visum est vt tuae quantum fas fuerit voluÌtati ac petitioni morem geram dulciora ac sedatiora enitar Clemang ad scholast Paris p 599. edit Parisiensi anno 1576. discontent being forced as appeares by his owne Epistle c Opressus naÌque vt nosti ante aliquot annos aemulolorum insultatione me tunc grauissimè persequentium ex vrbe illa fui excedere compulsus latebrasque à facie tempestatis coÌtra me iniustè admodum illic saeuieÌtis alibi quaerere p. 600. latebras quaerere to plaie leastâ sight He writes bitterlie against the Clergie belike they made him flie Touching Councells he doth not contradict their authoritie howsoeuer he mistakes the manner of defending it but onlie writes vnto a freind to be informed better in it protesting both to honour them and to be readie to amend what in his writing should be thought amisse Heare some of his owne words d Idem pa. 587. Verilie I reuerentlie receaue and faithfullie embrace all Councells as well such as longe agoe haue been duelie celebrated as also those which are celebrated now adaies and God forbid that I should thinke or speake any sinister thing of them Neither should I therefore be calumniated as lesse sincerelie esteeming them in that for the instruction of my ignorance I seeke to know and desire to haue declared vnto me some things that I may not only thinke of them well and faithfullie but also according to the capacitie of my litle wit trulie and wiselie speake of them And a litle after e Clemang pa. 588. I desire to be taught by thee whether thou thinkest it must be beleeued as a Catholike veritie that in those things which be of fact or of manners or of iudgments a generall Councell can neuer be deceaued as well as it is faithfullie beleeued that it cannot erre in faith And in the end f Idem pa. 598. alioquin temerariuÌ esset minus intellecta velle à sapientoribus discere quamuis etiam certè paratus sim si ea quae me mouent dubia explicando aliquid in radice veritatis minus fundatum aut alicuius fortasse scandadali illatiuum nimis astruere viderer aut fideli admonitu illud eradere aut ad lineam rectitudinis lima exactiori emendare Ibidem I intend as I haue oft alreadie said neither am I loath to repeate it in these or other writings to affirme nothing but that which may be altogeather agreeable to the Catholike integritie But in case I haue proposed not affirming but doubting or arguing any thing lesse certaine or true whereby I may be the more fullie informed of the certaintie I thinke that should not be thought rashnes in me And the rest which you finde cited in the Addition DIcit Christi assistentiam c. ad solos sanctos spirituales pertinere Baro p. 370. Non obscure innuit eam persuasionem seu fiduciam de conciliorum infallibilitate qua multi tumescunt esse Ecclesiae admodum perniciosam Idem p. 371. ANd whereas he proposeth by waie of doubt that holy meÌ only were to be heard speaking out of a Councell he seemes not to haue remeÌbred what our B. Sauiour said of Scribes and Pharisees teaching out of Moyses chaire quae dicunt facite imitate not their workes but practice what they teach That such as doe celebrate a Councell should not nimis inniti to much insist or presume on this that they are a generall Councell as if therefore they might freelie doe quaecunque libuerit doth not make against vs it denies not to a Councell infallibilitie as he denies it not to Prophets and Apostles who saies they should not relie to much therevpon as if therefore they might doe what they listed Moreouer his speach is qualified by himselfe if you marke it non debent vt videtur and g Clemang pa. 597. non vtile crediderim illos inniti mee thinks they should not I should not esteeme it profitable for them to relie c. § VII 1. Canus defends the infallibilitie of approued Councells 2. His opinion of others which are not
and this custome onlie was opposed to those which endeuoured to bring in that noueltie of rebaptization because they could not apprehend the truth yet afterwards whilst amongst many on both sides it is spoken of and sought it is not only sound out but also brought to the authoritie and strength of a generall Councell after Cyprians passion indeed but afore wee were borne And a litle after the words obiected gg c. 4. Neither durst wee affirme any such thing if wee were not well grounded vpon the most consenting or agreeable authoritie of the vniuersall Church vnto which vndoubtedlie he S. Cyprian would haue yeelded if as then the truth of this question being cleered and declared had been established by a generall Councell Hence it followes first that he did acknowledge in generall Councells authoritie to determine controuersies and this controuersie particularlie of rebaptization which you hh Error de rebaptizatione hereticorum qui certè fundamentalis âo fuââ noâdum erat in concilio plenario damnatus c. Baro p. 348. confesse was not in a matter fundamentall and that therein the truth was established by authoritie not of scripture this matter was not so resolued but of the world in a Councell and so farre established that all were to beleeue it and remotis dubitationibus without as much as doubting of it Whence it comes secondlie that to resist such a decree it is diabolicall which word he doth vse vppon another occasion and that such as maintaine the contrarie are indeed heretikes Thirdlie it is to be repeated which hath been said oft before that though wee maintaine the infallibilitie of sincere and approued generall Councells in their decrees of faith yet wee doe not beleeue that their infallibilitie is extended vnto all they write or speake and in all kinde of matter as not equallizing their acts with bookes of Scripture and consequentlie there may be something in such a Councell sometime that may need mending Neither yet doe wee maintaine or beleeue that all Councells which goe vnder the name of generall haue infallibilitie in their decrees some haue as those which are approued some haue not and these later may need mending euen in the decree they make touching faith Moreouer though the Councell that is plenarie and approued cannot commaund a vice or condemne vertue by decree yet may it commaund that which after may proue inconuenient or forbid what after may be admitted when circumstances are changed And if a lawe which at first was well made the circumstances of time and persons being afterwards other then they were before and notablie changed become inconuenient and consequentlie not good in these circumstances though good in it selfe and in other circumstances such as those were wherein it was first made it may be changed by power equall to that which made it The Apostles by decree did forbid the eating of suffocata things strangled yet afterwards when the circumstances were charged and feare of scandall quite remoued the Church began to doe the contrarie To frequent the ceremonies of the lawe now it were a Sinne peccaret mortalitersi quis nunc ceremonias obscruaret S. Tho. 1.2 q. 103. a. 4. though you knowe by what authoritie for the time they were commaunded If you be sick physick is good if you be well the same is bad for you The same thing may be conuenient and inconuenient good and bad in diuers circumstances When the common-wealth is distempered a lawe may be necessarie and at other times not vsefull yea inconuenient and therefore to be annulled And the common-wealth in anulling of it mends her Statute-booke respectiuelie to these later circumstances though when she made it first she did not commit a fault Fourthlie it is to be noted that by the doctrine of S. Augustine before deliuered there be some kinde of Councells which in their decrees of faith are not to be mended nor to be doubted of that it is hereticall to oppose them and consequentlie that they haue nor exteriour onlie but interiour obedience also remotis dubitationibus due to such their decrees which being manifest in him you labour in vaine to be extend his words obiected vnto all which were to make him contradict both the truth and the Church of his time and himselfe He saith and wee too that some generall Councells may be mended when by tryall or experiment that is opened which was shut vp and knowne which before was vnknowne but some generall Councells cannot be mended no nor questioned or doubted of in their decrees touching faith Now to your obiections in particular First you saie that he speakes of mending in matter of faith I answer that those words in matter of faith be your addition He speakes indeed of mending in such matters as by triall or experiment may be knowne but diuine verities which are the obiect of our faith be not of this nature Neither if there had been expressed in that clause which is of generall Councels matters of faith were you able to conclude any thing against vs for wee graunt that some which beare the name may be mended in that also Of all wee cannot graunt it without contradicting S. Augustine and making him withall to contradict himselfe Secondlie you saie that his scope or intention was to distinguish the authoritie of Scripture from all other authoritie wherefore since no generall Councell whatsoeuer is Scripture he meanes them all and will haue all subiect vnto mending I answer that he intended to satisfie three things obiected 1. S. Cyprians sentence or example 2. S. Cyprians writings 3. S. Cyprians Councell The comparison of Scripture is with writings and it is a part of his answer to the Second point as I haue related it And it is true that this writing hath the prerogatiue aboue all writings vide suprà pag. 130. pag. 106. marg that nothing at all can be questioned which it affirmes To S. Cyprians Epistles or any other mans wee owe not that seruice or honour Of Councels he speakes afterwards in the third place and you knowe that it is not essentiall to their decrees to be written There is also great difference betwixt Councells and the Scripture in infallibilitie as hath been showne many times although the decrees in faith of such as are approued are infallible But if you will haue him aime at this that all generall Councels whatsoeuer may be mended and in their decrees of faith you make him as before was obserued to contradict himselfe For these are contradictorie some may not as that of Nice and all may Moreouer by that saepè it is manifest that his speach is not generall as you would haue it saepè is short of Semper And the qualification which he doth vse is another argument of the same Thirdlie you saie that vnles S. Augustine speake in the words principallie obiected of amendment in matter of faith he leaues vnanswered the Donatists obiection But neither will this make any thing to your
Ecclesiasticae doctrinae Idem in Eâst ad Episc Africae ouerthrowe the coÌtrarie and to put the matter b Ego arbitrabar omniuÌ quotquot vnquaÌ fuere haereticorum inanem garrulitateÌ Nicaeno Concilio sedatam esse naÌ fides quae inibi a Patribus secuÌduÌ sacras Scripturas tradita confessionibus confirmata est satis mihi idonea efficax que videbatur ad omnem impietatem euertendam pietatem eius quae in Christo est fidei constituendaÌ Atque ideo diuersis Concilijs per GalliaÌ Hispanias Romae celebratis omnes qui in eo conuentu fuere istos luci fugas qui sese etiamnum occultant quae Arrij sunt sapiunt commâ calculo vnius Spiritus incitatu anathemate percusserunt eâ quod isti sibi nomina vendicauerint Synodorum c. ãâã Athanas Epist ad Epictet Qua igitur audacia fit vt post tanti Concilij authoritatem disceptationes aut quaestiones infâtuant Ibidem out ãâã question and so farre that who ãâã did oppose themselues were c Ego autem demiratus sum tuam pietatem haec sustinuisse quod non simul istos compescuerit piamâdem in Concilio Nicaeno traditam vt suprà illis proposâerit vt ijs auditis vel in quietem se darent vel si inquieti intradicerent haeretici homines iudicarentur Ibidem âereticks It was a vaine thing so he steemed it in the Arians by other CouÌcells to seek to reuerse what was ââere established the definition of ââe holie Ghost there made the word âf God by that Councell remaines foâuer d Vanus eorum labor qui contra illud Nicenum aliâ subinde concilia moliuntur quippe qui plusquam decem synodos iam instituerint in singulis semper aliquid innouantes c. ignari interim omnem plantationem quaâ non plantauerit pater caelestis cradicandam esse verbââ autem illud Domini per oecumenicam Niceae Synodum in aternum manet S Athanas Epist. ad Episc Africae verbum illud Domini per âlicaenum Concilium manet in aeterâum As for the comparison which he âakes with scripture it e Catholici Scripturam Sacram non subijciunt sed anteponunt Concilijs neque in hoc vlla controuersia esâ Bellarm. li. 2. de Concilijs c. 12. Quod si interdum aliqâ Catholici dicunt Scripturam pendere ab Ecclesia siue ãâã Concilio non intelligunt quoad authoritatem secundum se sed quoad explicationem quoad nos Ibidem hurteth âot He that saith the scripture where it is plaine and vniuersallie âeceaued is more powerfull then a Councell or that the eternall veâtie opeÌlie reuealed as it is to Saints ãâã more powerfull then scripture âoth not preiudice infallibilitie Both âay haue it and yet one be more âowerfull And this supposed visit âhat both scripture and the Counâell be infallible but the power of cripture more the discourse of S. Athanasius is conuincing He thaâ will not submit his iudgment to thaâ authoritie which is most powerfull doth in vaine pretend he will be ruled by the lesse he doth easilie contemne a Councell who contemneâ the Scripture proposed by the vniuersall Church as the Arians did who contradicted open Scripture and all Antiquitie Neither doth this make any thing against the decision of controuersies by Councells for though the waie of Councells be a certaine waie to determine what wee must beleeue yet may there be another way to finde it out and that certaine too And doubtles he that seeth in scripture that which he knowes the whole symbolicall Church that which holds out the booke wherein âhe reades it doth beleeue is more powerfullie moued to giue assent then he that heares a Councell onâie And our assent is more proue when the Prophets and Apostles all propose the same then when one alone doth auouch it though one Prophet or Apostle by himselfe be sufficient and infallible §. XII Vincentius Lirinensis will haue Church-authoritie relied vpon in matter of faith as certaine and vndoubted How a man is to carrie himself when matter of faith is questioned The way to finde the Catholike sence Generall Councels infallible in their decrees and those are Hereticks that contradict and oppose them SAepe magno studio summa attentione perquirens à quaplurimis sanctitate doctrina praestantibus viris quonam modo possim certa quadam quasi generali ac regulari viâ Catholicae fidei veritatem ab haereticae prauitatis falsitate discânere huiusmodi semper responsum ab omnibus ferèretuli Quoâ siue ego siue quis alius vellet exurgentium hereticorum fraâdes deprehendere laqueosque vitare in fide sanus atque integer permanere duplici modo munire fidem suam Domino adiouante deberet Primò scilicet diuinae legis authoritate tuâ deinde Ecclesiae Catholicae traditione Baro p. 349. ex vincent Lycin c. 1. VINCENTIVS LIRINENSIS The argument taken from this Father is that in his golden treatise entitled Aduersus prophanas haereseôâ nouationes he hath omitted to specifie generall Councells and their decrees and diuers leaues are spent tâ proue that he did not giue vnto them any place in the direction of our beleefe But no paines will serue Hâ doth more then once or twice mention them and hath testified whaâ he thought of their authoritie Two generall a Vicent Lyrin c. 1. waies there are to distinguish the truth from errour in matâer of Religion the one by Scripture âhe other by Tradition but the scripture is profound and obscure wheâevpon it hath come to passe that diuers heretikes haue interpreted it âiuers waies so that to knowe the âight meaning of it it is necessarie âo recurre to tradition and as he âaith in the second chapter of his booke b Idem c. 2. vide Disp li. 5. c 1. li. 4. c. 8. pag. 405. pag. 395 fine that the line of the propheticall and Apostolicall interpretation be directed according to the rule of the Ecclesiasticall and Catholike sence Which Catholik sence may be found three waies chieflie according as he conceaues it one is to see if it be held by the symbolicall or vniuersall Church a second is to see if it be held by the Fathers each writing in his owne time a third to see whether it be defined in any generall Councell By these three waies principallie a man is directed to the Catholik or true sence of scripture and all three are not necessarie but any of the three will serue the turne c Vâiânt c. â In the Catholik Church saith he wee must haue a great care wee hold that which hath bene beleeued euery where that which hath been beleeued euer that which hath been beleeued by all for this is truelie and properlie Catholick as the power of the name and the definition doth declare which truelie doth comprehend all vniuersallie And this is donne in fine if we follow vniuersalitie antiquitie consent Vniuersalitie wee shall follow