Selected quad for the lemma: faith_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
faith_n authority_n divine_a infallible_a 4,224 5 9.5906 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A65753 A vvay to the tree of life discovered in sundry directions for the profitable reading of the Scriptvres : wherein is described occasionally the nature of a spirituall man, and, in A digression, the morality and perpetuity of the Fourth Commandment in every circumstance thereof, is discovered and cleared / by Iohn White ... White, John, 1575-1648. 1647 (1647) Wing W1785; ESTC R40696 215,387 374

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

by vertue of another under whom it commands is humane 2. In the subject matters prescribed 1. Principles of faith The second difference between the Authority of God and man is in respect of the subjects or matters prescribed which are either principles of saith or rules of life for the former because God is true every man a lyer Rō 3.4 therefore in grounds of faith Which only God can deliver 1. Because many of them are unsearchable by man we admit no testimony but Gods alone for two reasons First the imperfection of our knowledge arising partly by the nature of the things to be beleeved whereof many are unsearchable by mans wisdome and therefore must be revealed by the Spirit 1 Cor. 2.11 12. and partly from the weaknesse of the means of our knowledge which is the information by sense that looks onely on the outward appearance 1 Sā 16.9 so that it is impossible that man should know any thing in matters of faith but by revelation from God which also he apprehends weakly and imperfectly So that in matters of faith there is no infallibility in mans knowledge and that which is depends upon the credit not of the man but of the Spirit which reveals it Another reason why mans testimony is no sufficient ground of faith 2. Because men may lye is because men may deceive as well as be deceived wherefore though they often speake truth we are not sure that they doe so always because it is not contrary to their nature to lye Whereas Gods knowledg is infallible 1. Because he hath light in himself 2. And knows by vision not by discourse as it is unto Gods Tit. 1.2 Neither of these imperfections are found in God whose knowledge must needs be every way perfect because he sees by his own not by a borrowed light which must therefore be without any mixture of darknesse 1 John 1.5 And because the means of Gods knowledge is by vision not by discourse yea by such a sight as pierceth through the very nature of all things seeing God himself is in and through all Ephes 4.6 Besides the most of the things which we beleeve 3. And must needs understād what he freely gives are things freely given us of God 1 Cor. 2.12 which therefore he must needs understand fully seeing the spirit in man understands the things of a man although no man else know them 1 Cor. 2.11 Now in the next place there can be no more question of Gods fidelity in revealing then there is of his infallibility in understanding all things seeing truth is Gods nature And can no more deceive then be deceived which therefore he can no more swerve from then from himself So seeing we finde Gods testimony every way infallible and mans uncertain it must needs be granted that it is peculiar to God alone to establish grounds of faith Againe for the regulating of mans practise 2. And rules of life onely to be prescribed by God 1. Whose will is infallibly good 2. And the duties prescribed are his services there is a wide difference between Gods and mans Authority for if we respect the substance of duty that can be prescribed by none but God alone both because onely his will is infallibly good Psal 143.10.119.39 and therefore only fit to be the rule of righteousnesse and besides because the duties commanded being all of them immediately or mediately services unto God it was most fit that God alone should appoint the duties of his own service The truth is in matters of practise mans authority hath to doe only in two things First in applying the rules of morall duties to particulars for the preservation of order and peace thereby Secondly in compelling men to obedience in such duties as are prescribed In brief then divine Authority establisheth principles of faith and prescribes the substance of morall dutie humane authority meddles not in laying down any grounds of faith at all and in morall duties prescribes not the substance but onely the order and manner of outward performance of that which divine authority hath commanded The third difference between divine and humane Authority 3. In the extent of this authority which bindes the consciēce belonging onely to God is in the extent of them both Humane authority being ordained for preservation of order and by it of peace in civill society for the furtherance and supporting of godlinesse and honesty 1 Tim. 2.2 reacheth no farther then to binde men to conform to order in the course of their practise but divine Authority having an higher scope even the renuing of the heart and bringing under the thoughts thereof to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10.5 bindes the conscience that is both the judgement of man to allow that which is commanded as holy and just with the Apostle Rom. 7.12 and the will to choose it as good and the affections to embrace it Rom. 7.22 accordingly yea the whole man to follow it with the strength of constant endeavours after the Prophet Davids example Psal 119.106.112 Hence it follows that in obeying mens commandements he that doth what Authority requires so he perform it in a willing submission thereunto in obedience to God which the Apostle cals obeying for conscience sake Rom. 13.5 hath performed his duty neither hath cause to judge himself a transgressour though he approve not the law it self as good and holy nay though upon good ground he think the contrary to that which is commanded more fit and convenient so he think not so out of any self-conceipt rash judgement or distaste of the Authority that commands But in obeying Gods Commandements it is far otherwise For though a man fulfill the law in the outward act yet if he allow it not as holy and just if his endeavour be not to conform his will to Gods will therein if he rejoyce not in performing it as a good man doth Prov. 21.15 his own conscience ought to condemn him as a transgressour and sinner against God at least in some degree So then divine Authority bindes the conscience by a double band both of the power that commands and of the justice of the commandement but humane Authority bindes onely by vertue of the power that commands not by the equity of the commandement further then it agrees with Gods law or conduceth to order and peace for which Authority was established The last difference between divine and humane Authority 4. In the sanctions annexed to the precepts is in respect of the sanctions annexed to their laws which are proportioned to the nature and quality of the obedience required and to the power of him that requires it For Gods commands in his laws are specially inward holinesse righteousnesse love c. and that under the penalty of the curse and wrath of God 1. Reaching to the soul 2. And reaching to eternity to bee poured out on the soul as well as on the body both in this life
must be certain now mans understanding we know is capable of error Rom. 3.4 and that for two reasons First mans knowledge is not by vision or looking through the nature of things themselves but by information from sense which represents onely the outward appearance 1 Sam. 16.7 and leaves reason to guesse at the inward nature of things wherein there cannot but be much uncertainty Secondly seeing it is light which makes all things manifest Eph. 5.13 which none hath originally in himself but God alone who dwelleth in the light 1 Tim. 6.16 nay is light it selfe 1 Iohn 5.5 and therefore men can have no light but by communication from God who illightens every one that comes into the world Iohn 1.9 it must needs follow that man can have no infallibility of judgement because he judgeth by that light which is not in his own power but is supplied or withheld according to the will of God who disposeth it at his pleasure Now then men having no infallibility of judgment in themselves must necessarily rest upon something without themselves for a certain rule of truth which must needs be God alone First because onely God both is light in himself as we have shewed and withall is in and through all things Ephes 4.6 which are therefore said to be naked in his sight Heb. 4.13 as will be farther shewed hereafter And secondly because hee is a God that cannot lie 3. And cānot lie Tit. 1.2 being a God of truth Deut. 32.2 nay truth it self Iohn 14.6 and consequently may be rested on as an infallible oracle of truth an honour peculiar to God and incommunicable to any creature So that the first branch of Authority which is the power and right of giving rules of truth belongs to God alone and cannot be challenged by any creature The next branch of Authority 2 To the will Which belongs likewise to God only is the right of prescribing to the will which must also be appropriated unto God onely and that on three grounds First because it can be no otherwise for seeing both man and all creatures have their beeing not onely originally from God 1. Because it moves In and By him and therefore must have the rule of moving From him but besides in him by continuall support Act. 17.28 it must follow that they can move no otherwise nor no longer then his power assists them no more then the staffe can doe without the force of the hand that useth it which also is true of all other creatures that they are turned about by his counsell to doe what he wils Iob 37.12 Psalm 148.8 So that as all other creatures so man amongst the rest must of necessity have the rule of his motions from Gods will Secondly it is not more necessary then equall 2. He only hath power to doe with his own what he will that it should be so because of the totall and absolute dependence that man hath upon God every way for it is just that one may do with his own what he wil Matth. 20.15 which also the very principles of nature teach all men as appears by subjecting children to the will of their parents on whom notwithstanding they depend neither totally nor principally Nay this equity is much greater in man then in any other creature because the acknowledgement of Gods will in all things to be most just Psal 119.128 by submitting and subscribing thereunto and thereby to himself to be a God without iniquity Deut. 32.4 is the main end for which man was created and endowed with understanding and with a will to be directed by it and there is great reason the workman should use his tool to that end for which he made it Lastly it is every way convenient that God should prescribe to mens will 3. It is best that Gods will should be our rule 1 t For men in particular seeing his will is onely infallibly 1. Good 2. And certain 3. And assures good successe by his assistance 2ly And in general 1. When men are best united and preserved by following one rule 2. And God is most honoured when all submit to his will both in respect of themselves in particular and in respect of the administration of the world in generall For men in particular it is better because Gods will first is absolutely good Psal 143.10 whereas mens are evill Secondly is constant and unchangeable Ps 33.11 whereas mens are variable every moment And thirdly the following of Gods direction in our ways assures us both of successe in our endeavours Iosh 1.8 and acceptance of our service when we know we doe nothing but what God himself commands And as for the generall administration of the world it must needs be every way most convenient that God prescribe unto all men that when all are guided by one rule order and unity might be preserved Lastly how Gods honour is furthered when his laws passe for rules of practise without contradiction and by mens submission thereunto are acknowledged to be holy and just hath been partly intimated before Hitherto then it appears that divine Authority reacheth to the prescribing and giving rules to the two most eminent faculties in man the Vnderstanding and Will what to beleeve embrace and prosecute A power which he hath right unto by the absolute soveraignty which he hath overall things by the infallibility of his truth and lastly by the unchangeable righteousnesse and goodnes of his wil. All which laid together must necessarily infer that absolute Authority is founded originally in God and in him alone It hath pleased him notwithstanding to impart this power of his to men This Authority God having absolutely in himselfe imparts to men whom he hath made his substitutes on earth but within certain bounds and limits this limited Authority committed by God to men is for distinction sake called humane authority as that absolute Authority from which it is derived is called divine What either of these are and by what limits they are severed will best appear by laying their differences one against another The first difference between divine and humane Authority is in the fountain whence they spring Distinguished from his absolute power 1. In the fountain Gods is originally in himself Mans derived from him Gods Authority is founded in himself mans in God Therefore Gods affirmation or command must be received without contradiction though we understand neither reason why nor end wherto so that to silence our very thoughts it is enough to say The Lord hath spoken it but when men affirm or command we cry To the law and to the testimony Isa 8.20 wherewith if their commands or assertions agree not there is no light in them so that we may warrantably except with the Apostles Whether it be meet to obey God or men judge ye Act. 4.19 So then the first difference is this that Authority that prescribes by the absolute power of the commander is divine that which prescribes
in all things else respect to his own glory For the advancing of his own glory 1. Our faith bearing witnesse to his Al-sufficiency Truth 2. Our obedience to his Authority Righteousnesse Yet are not all things in Scripture alike necessary which is testified at least by our faith and obedience For our relying on him by faith bears witnesse to his sufficiency faithfulnesse truth as our obedience in submitting chearfully to his will in all that he commands acknowledgeth his Authority Wisdome and Holinesse So then this will of God in requiring of us these conditions is every way just as well as free Now when wee say the grounds and rules of faith and obedience contained in Scripture are necessary to salvation we mean not that all are of like necessity Ignorance or unbeleef in God or Christ excludes absolutely from salvation John 3.18 so doth not ignorance or unbeleef in some temporall promise although it cannot be excused from sinne In brief then when we say all things necessary to salvation are contained in Scripture we mean both that the things written therein are necessary to that end although not alike necessary and that there is nothing necessary to that end that is not to be found there We are next to shew what we understand by this tearm containing Scriptures containe things 1. In expresse tearms 2. By necessary consequence Now things may be contained in Scripture either expresly and in plain tearms or by consequence drawn from some grounds that are delivered in Scripture and one of these two ways all grounds of faith or rules of practise are to be found in these holy writings It is no where affirmed in Scripture in expresse tearms that the holy Ghost is God but we read 1 John 5.7 that the Father the Word and the holy Ghost are one and from thence infer by necessary consequence that the holy Ghost is God because he is one with the Father who is God We are no where in precise words commanded to baptize infants but from the precept given to the Fathers to circumcise them we take our selves to be warranted to baptize them because Baptisme and Circumcision are in substance one Sacrament Wee are no where expresly commanded to discover the fault of what we sell or to give a just value for that which we buy But we have generall rules commanding us to speak the truth from the heart Ps 15.2 To doe as we desire to be done unto Mat. 7.12 and forbidden to defraud our brother in any matter or goe beyond him in bargaining which imports as much Thus where all things needfull to be beleeved or done are not clearly expressed in Scripture yet they are implied and drawn out from thence by necessary consequence This truth that the Scriptures contain whatsoever is necessary to salvation is sufficiently ratified by evident testimony of the Word it self which sends us to the Law and to the Testimony Isa 8.20 tels us that in them we have eternall life John 5.39 that they alone are able to make the man of God perfect to every good work 2 Tim. 2.17 and wise to salvation ver 15. that the Law of God is perfect Psal 19.7 and though there be an end of all other perfections yet the commandement is exceeding broad Psal 119.96 that is comprehends all needfull things so that nothing is wanting in it Whence proceeds that curse upon every one that addes as well as upon them that take away from that Book Rev. 22.18 Yea besides this truth is consonant to all grounds of reason whatsoever our adversaries alledge to the contrary For first we have reason to presume It was fit that God should deliver his will in writing 1. As the most easie way to make it publike that God would take the easiest way for the instruction of his Church now it is evident that it is more easie to leave things upon record in writing then to charge them upon mens memories especially when they are many and consequently must burthen the memory whereas lying before mens eyes in writing they may easily be overlooked at all times without trouble If it be replied that traditions are few and may therefore be easily remembred VVe answer first they may bee infinite for ought we know seeing no man ever took upon him to tell us how many they are And secondly be they more or fewer yet they are more easily preserved by writing then by tradition as all men know Again it was fit that in teaching his Church 2. As the safest way to prevent corruption God should take the safest way and freest from errour as well for his own honour as for his peoples good both which must needs be extreamly hazarded and hindered by corrupting the truth with errours which lead men into perdition and can hardly be prevented by delivering the word by tradition partly because many mens memories are weak and a great part are negligent especially in things of this nature and lastly because many are maliciously bent against the law which the wisdome of the flesh cannot admit Rom. 8.7 whereas the word written being an unerring record easily helps the weak and convinceth the refractary by setting the undoubted truth before mens eyes Farther 3. As the best way to win credit to his Word seeing the word is the ground of faith it is fit that it should be so delivered as might win most credit and estimation amongst men Now we know that written records are most authenticall and of most accompt with men and therefore are fittest to work men to assent unto the truth of God It is true I grant that mens faith depends neither upon wirting nor tradition but upon the testimony of the Spirit that dwels within the godlies hearts manifesting that the truth proposed is the word of God Notwithstanding the outward credit which the Scriptures carry amongst men by which such as are won afterwards to beleeve beginne at first to think reverently of them and others that beleeved not are restrained from scorning or opposing them seems to be much furthered by the Authority that the writing brings unto those records which are received and submitted unto by the Church and commanded and countenanced by the testimony thereof Lastly 4. And as most honourable whereas there is so much honour done to all humane laws by which States are governed that they are composed into one body and preserved in books written or printed for that purpose it seems absurd that God should deliver his law thus by patches part by writing and part by tradition resembling the feet of Nebuchadnezzars image Dan. 2.33 part of iron and part of clay and unworthy both of the Majesty of him that gives the law and of the law it self that is given And if we may take precedent from former times we may say with our Saviour from the beginning it was not so For when God left the law to be delivered by tradition he delivered it
but in this place we understand by it both the apprehension of such as are represented and the judging of them after they are apprehended by way either of approbation or disallowing both these acts of the understanding the Apostle mentions Phil. 1.9 Againe although embracing seeme first to import election of the will 2. Embracing including the motions of the will and affections yet here we include under it the prosecution of things chosen with the affections of desires hopes cares joyes c. Together with the opposite motions of rejecting hating fearing shunning c. of such things as the understanding in judgement disallowes By All things we understand things of all kinds 3. All things whether naturall or spirituall or mixed 1. Natural Now Naturall things are all sorts of creatures with their severall qualities adjuncts and operations which though they are themselves naturall yet their first cause their dependences ends relations and whole order of administration are of spirituall consideration which therefore a meere naturall man can neither throughly comprehend nor at all judge of aright as the Psalmist witnesseth Psal 92.6 as a spirituall man which the Scripture calls a wise man can doe Hos 14.9 neither consequently can he make that right and holy use of them which a spirituall man may doe and doth usually Psal 64.10 Spirituall things 2. Spiritual are God himselfe in the first place whom the world hath not knowne John 17.25 as spirituall men doe 1 Iohn 2.13 and next the things freely given us of God as the Apostle termes them 1 Cor. 2.12 especially Christ with all his treasures which the Apostle affirmes none but a spirituall person can comprehend 1 Cor. 2.14 as being hid from all ages and generations and manifested onely to the Saints Col. 1.26 27. and that by God himselfe Mat. 11.25 Those things which are of a mixed nature 3. Mixed are spirituall things expressed and represented by such as are naturall as are the Word and Sacraments For in the word the phrases and formes of speech are according to nature and of use amongst naturall men but the things meant and expressed by them are spirituall And in the Sacraments the elements and the Sacramentall actions by which they are used and applied we know are naturall but those things that are represented by them are wholly Mysticall and Spirituall in both the naturall man understands the phrases expressions and rationall discourse in the Word and in the Sacraments not only the visible Elements and actions but their signification also but the things signified in both seeing they are such as eye hath not seene and that cannot be comprehended by any Naturall meanes they cannot be understood by any naturall man All the difficulty in unfolding this truth lyes in interpreting this terme Spiritually 4. Spiritually a word that may be taken in a double sense as is also the word Spirit whence it is derived For a spirit in strict signification is that which is absolutely and meerely so and in that sense the name is appropriated to God alone Iohn 4.24 According to this sense Spirituall is that which is of or belonging to God or heavenly and spirituall Comparatively a Spirit signifies that which is lesse grosse or materiall to which is opposed grosse carnall and sensuall both senses may be included under this terme in this place Againe to comprehend spiritually may be referred First to the object comprehended Which referred to the object imports 1. to comprehend that in things which is spirituall Or by a Spirituall Light to comprehend all things and so it signifies to comprehend that which is spirituall in that object Secondly it may be referred to the meanes and it signifies to comprehend things by a spirituall light or judgement Lastly referred to the manner it implies to comprehend in a Supernaturall way which we specially intend in this place though withall we include both the former senses What it is to comprehend or understand things spiritually is hard to expresse as it is hard to describe what it is to see or heare which are well knowne to such as see or heare but is impossible to be described so distinctly by discourse Resembled by sight to which faith answers The Scripture sets it out by resemblance of outward senses as Heb. 5.14 and amongst the senses sets out the two wayes of discovering things spiritually faith by sight and experience by taste So Abraham beleeving Christ by faith is said to see his day Iohn 8.56 And taste which shadowes out spirituall experience Moses to see him that is invisible Heb. 11.27 And againe we are said to taste that is prove by experience that the Lord is good 1 Pet. 2.3 both are joyned together Ps 34.8 The two severall wayes of comprehending things spiritually Faith and Experience we are now to enquire into describing them as plainely as the nature of them will give leave SECT III. Of Faith and the two sorts of faith Historicall and Iustifying FAith or beleeving is in common use of speech taken for inclining strongly in opinion unto that of which we have no infallible assurance Faith not taken here as opposed to certaine knowledge and in that sense it is opposed to knowledge which signifies assurance of some thing upon certainty Butimporting certain knowledge upon Divine testimony and that most commonly by some sense or other But amongst Divines Faith is commonly taken for a full perswasion of any truth upon Divine Testimony This Faith is usually distinguished into Historicall Temporary and Justifying Faith as for that which they tearme the faith of Miracles it concernes not the subject that we have in hand But because Temporary faith will hereafter appear to differ not in nature but onely in some degree from Historicall faith we shall need onely to entreat of that and Justifying faith at present The nature of true faith and the difference between that and the other which we call Historical will be most easily clearly discovered by setting downe a briefe description thereof True or justifying Faith described and by explaining the severall parts of it afterwards We therefore define faith to be a spirituall habite by which a Regenerate man having in himselfe upon a Divine testimony an evidence of the truth and goodnesse of the Promise and Covenant of eternall Salvation through Jesus Christ relies on him onely for everlasting life and blessednes We call Faith an habit Which is 1. An Habit yet unlike it 1. Seeing it is infused not gotten by use 2. And cannot as habits may be wholy lost because it much resembles those habits which are properly so called especially in this that it is hardly or according to truth never to be removed or wholly lost Although otherwise it differ from them in this that those naturall habits are acquired by use whereas faith is infused by the Spirit of grace if we respect the first planting of it in the heart