Selected quad for the lemma: faith_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
faith_n	article_n	church_n	fundamental_a	4,539	5	10.3758	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A34537	The interest of England in the matter of religion the first and second parts : unfolded in the solution of three questions / written by John Corbet.	Corbet, John, 1620-1680.	1661 (1661)	Wing C6256; ESTC R2461	85,526	278

not with a safe conscience be present at the Popish Mass because he wounds his conscience by impious dissimulation thereby making a shew of approving that pretended expiatory sacrifice In another Question he resolves That Papists are bound to be present at the English Divine Service because nothing occurs therein that can be by themselves reproved In applying this to our case it is far from my thoughts to make the comparison between Presbyterians and Prelatists parallel with that between Protestants and Papists but I make the reason of both cases parallel for as Papists find nothing in the Protestant Liturgy according to their own principles impious or unsound in like manner the Prelatists can find no positive thing in the propounded terms of accommodation contrary to divine right and primitive practice only as the Papists find not so much as they would have in our Liturgy so the Prelatists in the said proposals Nay the Papists have better colour of reason to separate from our publique Service because although they find nothing positively unsound yet according to the Roman Faith they may pretend fundamental defects therein as the want of the sacrifice of the Mass but the Prelatists can here alledge no such thing the supposed defects and omissions being only in things remote from the foundation of Faith and Religion For we trust the greater number of them do not hold that there is no Church without a Prelate having sole jurisdiction over the Clergy That there is no Ministry but what is ordained by such a Prelate That there is no true divine Service where the Common-Prayer Book is not used and that there is no acceptable worship without humane mystical Ceremonies Let them that have taken up such opinions sadly consider whether they are led therein by conscience or by humour and designe Section XXVIII The greatest shew of reason opposing this moderation is a pretended fixation in Religion and indeed it is but a shew and colour That Religion is a thing unmoveable all that be truly religious do from the heart acknowledge and for the immobility thereof none contend more earnestly then the Presbyterians But they fix its unmovable state in the Canonical Scripture and they continually cry to the Law and to the Testimony against humane Traditions and Inventions in one Extream and against Enthusiasms in the other Upon occasion of any aberration in Doctrine or practice they recall us to the primitive rule and pattern and what is received from the Lord that deliver they to the Churches That sacred Rule they willingly suffer not to be captivated in its interpretation by the Churches infallibility as do the Papists nor by proud and arrogant reason as the Socinians nor by impulse and imagination as the Euthusiasts but they maintain it in its full authority to interpret it self whose authentick interpretation we are inabled to discern by rational inferences and deductions wherein we make use of reason not as an argument but as instrument As for the Decrees and Canons of the Church what rightful Authority doth make them as the Law of the Medes and Persians that altereth not Must things be enacted by the Church once and for ever And whether they be little or great clear or doubtful necessary or superfluous must they be held unquestionable and indisputable Surely this is to Idolize humane Constitutions and to equalize them with Divine and to lead the people to a blind implicite faith and a neglect of searching the Scriptures And upon this ground those large Churches as the Roman Grecian Aethiopick Armenian Indian and the rest are obstinately divided for many ages from each other and holding to this principle of unalterable Traditions and Constitutions they will be divided to the end of the world Had not all Ecclesiastical Canons and Decrees a beginning and that at sundry times and in divers manners And are not many of them as it were but of yesterday And when they were brought in where was the pretended fixation Doubtless Religion may be alike altered by Addition as by Substraction Nay Hath there not been Substraction also Are not divers Customs and Ceremonies of great antiquity now quite abolished among us If the Church of Rome may erre why not the Church of England Indeed the Papists that hold their Church infallible may hold the Decrees thereof unalterable but the Church of England claims no such priviledge Was it necessary that our first Reformers should see all things at the first day-break out of the night of Popery Or if they saw all things requisite for their own times could they foresee all future events and provide remedies for inconveniencies which time might bring forth It is a wise saying of a learned man That time it self is the greatest Innovator and again That Physick is an Innovation Surely as the naturall so the body politick sometimes needs physick and oftentimes moderate Reformations do prevent abolitions and extirpations Besides a great alteration in this kind hath continued in a stated posture for many years which inferres a greater necessity of an accommodation Nevertheless there is no attempt or question made of changing any thing that toucheth sound faith and good life or the substance of divine worship Yet in the Doctrine of the Church somthing possibly may have been inserted as an Article of Faith which is but problematical and in a fundamental Article some inconvenient expression may be used and this questionless may be altered without any imputation of uncertainty to the established Doctrine Some change in the outward Form and Ceremonies which are but a garb or dress is no real change of the Worship some change in the late external jurisdiction of the Church which was not formally Ecclesiastical and spiritual but temporal and coercive invested in the Bishops by the Law of the Land is no change in the true spiritual power that is intrinsecal to their spiritual office Nay the reformation may be encompassed with little variation as to the outward model and platform the Kingdom being already squared for it as hath been above shewed in the offers made by some Bishops Only the power will be more diffused being distributed among Bishops and Presbyters in due proportion Is it objected once remove the ancient bounds and we know not where to stop we must serve every humour and an inundation of errour and Schism will break in Surely Papists have as much to say herein against the Protestants as the Prelatists against the Presbyterians For they say that Protestantism is the womb of all Sects and that we having forsaken the infallible Guide the Church of Rome have lost our selves in a Wilderness of errour besides who were they that removed the ancient bounds set in the first English Reformation by introducing many innovations but to give a direct answer are not the sacred Scriptures and Christs holy Institutions sufficient bounds and land-marks Cannot prudent and faithful Church-guides keep the flock from wandring unless they hedge them in by unchangeable Canons