be no more but u Bell. de amiss gra l. 5. c. 17. Andrad Ortho. expl l. 3. p. 217. the want of originall iustice and a certaine crookednesse of the will wherein he is borne which maketh him odious to God by nature exempting the concupiscence and corruption of nature that remaineth in the regenerate and all that are baptized as if it were no part of this or any sin Which is but a late deuice set abroach to maintaine the perfection and merit of our workes For the Maister of Sentences in his time x L. 2. d. 30. §. Nunc superest inde held it to be our naturall concupiscence expounding this concupiscence to be a qualitie in the soule arising from our flesh propagated to vs from our parents and stirring vs vp to sinne Thus according to the truth wherein the Iesuits now refuse him teaching originall sinne to be a habit distinguished from the naturall faculties of the soule and coming into them through the fall of Adam and there dwelling positiuely as a corrupt quality This opinion had y Alâ—iâ—â—ou l. 2. tract 2â— c 2. Greg. Arim 2. q. 30 art 2. Hen. Gandau quodl 2. q. 11. diuers partakers and Ariminensis that himselfe held it saith many both of his time and of old fauoured it Whereby it appeareth that the moderne opinion of our aduersaries was not the Catholicke receiued doctrine of that time And because then they were not so confident in their opinions as now they are there were othersome that held originall sinne to be nothing else but the sinne of Adam deriued to vs by the effects whereby we are made culpable by bearing the imputation of that which he did The which opinion is defectiue onely in this that it restraineth the sinne to that which is but one part thereof For it consisteth in this and more Yet it was holden in Lombards time as himselfe reporteth and since by z Pigh contr 1. p. 32 Catharin de casu hom peccat orig p. 182 no small men in the Church of Rome and Occham so liked it that he a 2. qu. vlt. v. professeth he would hold it but for the reuerence of some holy men which seeme to say that originall sinne is the want of that iustice which should be in vs. And Catharinus saith that hauing conferred it with many men exactly learned and good Catholickes they liked it exceedingly Whereby we may see the present opinion offered vs at this day by the Iesuites is not so vniuersall as they say it is when the former ages so litle fauoured it and if Catharinus say true the very age now running may also be iealous of it for any thing we know and remoue it againe when the maisters of their Schooles please as they formerly haue done Digression 52. Shewing that the present religion of the Romane Church was obserued and resisted in all ages as it came in and increased naming withall the Persons that made the resistance and the Points wherein and the Time when from fiftie yeares to fiftie throughout all ages since Christ compendiously obserued out of history for the satisfying of their error that so much conceit the antiquitie of Papistry and think it was neuer controlled till Luthers time 18 Againe the Iesuite with much rhetoricke and confidence asketh What voices what stirres what lamentations were heard when Rome brought in a new faith Were all asleep did none resist no Bishop preach no Doctor write against the alteration none to suffer martyrdome neuer a true hearted Christian to lament it no Historiographer neither Greeke nor Latin farre nor neare to make at least some obscure mention of such a matter in his commentaries You see what a face he setteth on the matter and yet all Histories confute him for I neuer saw ancient history Greeke or Latin and yet I haue seene and read those b Camp rat 7. Possen bibliot select l 7. c. 23. which our aduersaries reckon vp for the best most ancient but it containeth some notable memory of alterations made in the Romane Church obserued and lamented by some or other then liuing For which cause our aduersaries at this day haue taken exception against euery one of them and charged each particular author either with falsifying the truth themselues or with being falsified by others which needed not if they contained nothing in disproofe of that which here the Iesuit hath boasted Yea the Iesuite himselfe would lay this very imputation vpon them if he should be driuen to answer that which is produced out of them And then the case would be altered for he might say no more was there no Historiographer t Greek or Latin but you should see he would answer in another tune There are Historiographers Greeke and Latin farre and neare that haue mentioned such a matter but they are all liers For Eusebius Socrates and Sozomen were all 3. of theÌ„ heretickes and liers Nicephorus a lier Benno full of impudent lies Auentine a beastly lier Marianus Scotus a manifest lier Sigebert a lier for the whetstone O the fraud imposture villany of that he hath written And thus they will intertaine whatsoeuer is produced against them as I haue noted Digression 47. nu 12. and for the further manifestation of that I say there is not one of seuenteene histories reckoned vp by Posseuin for the chiefe but Caesar Baronius in his late Annals hath attainted him 19 Againe what need they make the matter so faire and so insolently call vpon vs to shew who resisted them when themselues haue destroied corrupted many authors whereby it should be shewne Auentine b Annal. Beâ—â— l. 5. pag. 455. writeth of Pope Hildebrand that for the cloaking of his ambition he deuised fables corrupted chronicles razed out the things that were done and adulterated the sacred oracles Thus they make away the euidence and then bid vs shew who resisted them Let them restore vs the writings of Wickliffe Dante 's Ockam Marsilius and others out of their ashes and Italian libraries where they lie buried and we will answer them For in the Popes owne Library are bookes both Latin and Greeke written against his primacie as is testified by c Dial. 4. c. 19. Alan Cope which is signe sufficient that the Papacie was resisted before Luther was borne yea Bristo in the preface of his Motiues writeth that scarce any peece or article of the Roman faith but by one or other first or last it hath bene called in question 20 This I will shew particularly in euery age so far as the title of this Digression bindeth me and the Iesuites demaund requireth WAS THERE NONE THAT WOVLD SPEAKE AGAINST IT NONE THAT NOTED IT For in the first 600 yeares there was no substantiall or fundamentall innouation receiued into the Church the present Romane faith touching such points being yet either vnhatched or receiued by knowne hereticks onely the mysterie of iniquitie d 2. Thess 2.7 that began to worke in
brake touching the proceeding of the holy Ghost depeÌ„ded but vpon two prepositions 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The monstrous heresie of Nestoâ—â—â—s lay but in the change of e 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one poore letter and f Concil Ephesin Graec. p. 10. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cyril would haue him euen in that to gratifie the Church and when he would not g Dalmat apolog in Concil Ephesin six thousand Bishops rose vp against him for it so religious were they that had religion that THEY VVOVLD NOT EXCHANGE h 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Basil apud Theodorit l. 4. c. 19. A LETTER OR A SYLLABLE OF THE FAITH VVHEREVVITH OVR SAVIOVR HAD â—VT THEM IN TRVST Which is our iust defence that write in the controuersies against all our censurers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i Epist ad Cleric Constantinopol in Concil Ephes p. 72. saith Cyril 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Are we enemies to peace no we rather wil pul it to vs with violence so that the true faith withal may be confessed But when it cannot be obtained we cleare the truth and by expelling their errors labour to plucke the seduced out of the fire and bring them to knowledge that their soules may be saued and their life reformed and the State secured wherein they liue 9 And this my poore endeuour in this kind I humbly present to your Lordships vnder whose iurisdiction I exercise my ministery not in affiance of any thing therein worthy your reading whom our Church hath long since knowne to be the same that Eunapius saith of two other in his time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nor in hope to escape the disgracefull censures of intermedlers but in zeale to my countrey and assurance that it may do good therein going vnder so HONORABLE protection I am so meane a man and obscure euery way that I feared the truth would sustaine losse and be contemned for my obscuritie if some extraordinary fauor did not leade it forth And let it go forward indeed and shew it selfe abroad hauing THE TRVTH to support it and so acceptable an inscription to go before and the name of so VVORTHY PATRONS to leade it forth And so desiring pardon for this my boldnesse I humbly commit your Lordships to the mercifull protection of Almightie God who long continue your prosperous estate and make you happie instruments of much good vnto his CHVRCH Octob. 29. 1608. Your Lordships in all dutie IOHN WHITE THE PREFACE TO THE READER TOVCHING THE present controuersies betweene vs and the Romish Church IT is not as some thinke touching the questions between the Church of Rome and vs that there is no reall difference Would to God it were so But they that examine the points shall find it farre otherwise 1. Concerning the Scriptures the Church of Rome teacheth that a Can. loc pag. 251. Manie things appertaine to faith and Christian doctrine which neither openly nor obscurely are contained in holy writ b Totalis enim adaequata regula est Scriptura Traditio simul Deinde Traditio parem authoritatem habet cum Scriptura Becan circul Caluin p. 278. For the totall and full rule of our faith is Scripture and Tradition both together Tradition being of equall authoritie with the Scripture This assertion is directly against the doctrine of our Church and leadeth men into pernicious errors pretended to be deliuered by Tradition and withdraweth them from the obedience of onely Scripture to the following of vncertaine authoritie 2. Concerning the iustification of a sinner c Viguer Institut theol p. 286 whereby of a wicked vniust and vncleane person he is made cleane holy and simply iust it teacheth that this is done by the habite of our owne inherent righteousnesse and not by Christs Bellarmine expounding the Councell of Trent saith d De Iustif l. 2. p. 1032. c. Our owne inherent iustice is the formall cause of absolute iustification not the iustice of Christ imputed to vs and e Pag. 1071. d. besides the merits of Christ imputed to vs for our satisfaction there is in vs an inherent iustice which is the true and absolute righteousnesse whereunto by the iust iudgement of God not punishment but glorie is due This opinion containeth so reall a difference from the truth that S. Paule f Gal. 5.4 saith of it Ye are abolished from Christ ye are fallen from grace whosoeuer are iustified by the Law 3. Concerning the merite of our workes it holdeth g Mich. Bai. de merit oper p. 12 that when men hauing conuersed godlily and righteously in this mortall life to the end obtaine eternall life this is not to be deputed to the purpose of Gods grace but to the ordinance of nature appointed presently in the beginning when man was created Neither in this retribution of good things is it looked to the merite of Christ but onely to the first institution of mankind wherein by a naturall law it was set downe that by the iust iudgement of God the keeping of the commandements should be rewarded with life as the breaking of them is punished with eternall death Whereby we see that there is a plaine difference betweene the Church of Rome and vs in the principall article of our faith touching the saluation of our soules we beleeuing stedfastly that it is to be ascribed to the merits of Christ they expecting it for the merite also of their owne works 4. Concerning Images h Concil Trid. sess 25 it practiseth the hauing and worshipping of them yea i Azor. Instit tom 1. p. 737. the Diuines of that Church hold that euery Image is to be honoured with the same honour wherewith they worship the samplar No man can be so simple but he may see a substantiall difference in these points and the like may be shewed in aboue two hundred questions controuerted betweene vs though I will not denie that in many things the heate of the contenders hath deuised differences where there are none and to discredit one another they haue wrested that which might be well vnderstood 2 Besides the Church of Rome not onely requireth vs to professe her faith but also to do it k Bell. de laic c 19. p. 19 9 c. with subiection to the Pope and teacheth l Turrecr quaest ex S. Tho. q. 13. that this is absolutely necessarie to saluation A point so fully opposite to the gouernment of our Church that it can no way be reconciled forsomuch as we know the same to be a meere pretence to hide their tyrannie 3 And as the difference is reall and of long continuance so is there no hope to reconcile it The Papacie that standeth in opposition against vs was brought in by Satan at the first and is still continued onely to seduce the world and m 2. Cor. 6.14 what fellowship hath righteousnesse with
forma iuramenti professionis fidei Bull which calleth it THE PVBLICKE PROFESSION OF THE ORTHODOXAL FAITH TO BE VNIFORMLY OBSERVED AND PROFESSED z THE NEW CREED OF THE CHVRCH OF ROME I. N. do with firme faith beleeue and professe all and singular things contained in the Creed which the Romane Church vseth namely I beleeue in one God the Father almightie maker of heauen and earth and of all things visible and inuisible And in one Lord Iesus Christ the onely begotten Sonne of God borne of his Father before all worlds God of God light of light very God of very God begotten not made being consubstantiall with the Father by whom all things were made who for vs men and for our saluation came downe from heauen and was incarnate by the holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary and was made man crucified also for vs vnder Pontius Pilate suffered and was buried and rose againe the third day according to the Scriptures and ascended into heauen and sitteth at the right hand of his Father and shall come againe with glory to iudge the quicke and the dead whose kingdome shall haue no end and in the holy Ghost the Lord and giuer of life who proceedeth from the Father and the Sonne who with the Father and the Sonne is worshipped and glorified who spake by the Prophets And I beleeue one Holy Catholick and Apostolicke Church J beleeue one Baptisme for the remission of sinnes and I looke for the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come Amen The Apostolick and Ecclesiasticall TRADITIONS and other obseruances and constitutions of that Church do I firmly admit and embrace Also the sacred Scripture according to THAT SENCE WHICH OVR MOTHER THE CHVRCH HATH HOLDEN AND DOTH HOLD whose right it is to iudge of the true sence and interpretation of holy Scriptures do I admit Neither will I euer receiue and expound it but according to the vniforme consent of the Fathers I do also confesse that there be truly and properly SEVEN SACRAMENTS of the new law instituted by our Lord Iesus Christ and necessary to the saluation of mankind though all be not for euery man that is to say Baptisme Confirmation the Eucharist Penance extreme Vnction Order and Mariage and that they confer grace and that among these Baptisme Confirmation and Order cannot be reiterated without sacriledge Also the receiued and approued rites of the Catholicke Church vsed in the solemne administration of all the aforesaid Sacraments I receiue and admit All and euery the things which concerning ORIGINALL SIN and IVSTIFICATION were defined and declared in the holy Councell of Trent I embrace and receiue Also I confesse that in the MASSE is offered to God a true proper and propitiatory sacrifice for the quicke and the dead and that in the holy EVCHARIST is truly really and substantially the body and blood with the soule and Diuinitie of our Lord Iesu Christ and that there is made a conuersion of the whole substance of the bread into his body and of the whole substance of the wine into his bloud which conuersion the Catholick Church calleth TRANSVBSTANTIATION I confesse also that vnder ONE KIND ONLY all whole Christ and the true Sacrament is receiued I do constantly hold there is a PVRGATORY and the soules detained there are holpe by the suffrages of the faithful And likewise that the SAINTS raigning with Christ are to be worshipped and prayed vnto And that they offer their prayers to God for vs and that their RELICKS are to be worshipped And most firmly I auouch that the IMAGES of Christ and the Mother of God alwayes a Virgin and other Saints are to be had and retained and that to them due honor and veneration is to be giuen Also that the power of INDVLGENCES was left by Christ in the Church and I affirme the vse thereof to be most wholsome to Christs people That the Holy Catholicke and Apostolicke ROMANE CHVRCH is the mother and mistris of all Churches I acknowledge and I vow and sweare true obedience to the Bishop of Rome the successor of S. Peter the Prince of the Apostles and the Vicar of Iesus Christ And AL OTHER things likewise do I vndoubtingly receiue and confesse which are deliuered defined and declared by the sacred canons and generall Councels and especially the holy Councel of Trident and withal I condemne reiect and accurse all things that are contrary hereunto and all heresies whatsoeuer condemned reiected and accursed by the Church and that I will be carefull this true Catholicke faith out of the which no man can be saued which at this time I willingly professe and truly hold be constantly with Gods helpe retained and confessed whole and inuiolate to the last gaspe and by those that are vnder me or such as I shall haue charge ouer in my calling holden taught and preached to the vttermost of my power I the said N. promise vow sweare so God me help and his holy Gospels The Schoolmen Lawyers were long ago in hand with this question whether the Pope had authoritie to make a new Creed And because they were long tempering with it and the affirmatiue seemed a strange position we maruelled what they would make of it But now we see they meant in good earnest indeed and this belike was the Creed whereof the Pope was with child and all his Church must receiue it This is a strange presumption that taking vpon them to bring new matter of faith into the Church and to make that necessary to be beleeued for saluatiō which before was not so yet their people should be so blind as not obserue it Suarez the Iesuit a Tom. 2. p. 30. The matter may come to that passe that without any new explicate reuelation the Church may haue sufficient motiues for the defining of this or that veritie by the infolded and still reuelation of God for this manner of defining whereby that which was not before is now made an article of faith it is sufficient that any supernaturall veritie be infoldedly contained in tradition or Scripture that the common consent of the Church by which the holy Ghost often explicates traditions and declares Scripture increasing the Church at the length may bring in her determination which hath the force of a certaine diuine reuelation in respect of vs. This consent of the Church may so increase that at the length she may simply and absolutely define it This sheweth plainly that they thinke the Pope hath power to make a new Creed and hereby the world may see that vnder pretence of things lying hidden in the Church and the common consent of the Church increasing the Pope may multiply the matters of faith and so fit in the conscience as he pleaseth 16 It is no small griefe to all that are well minded to see this more then Egyptian bondage whererein so many people liue but yet if any man looke attentiuely vpon it the matter will not seeme
integritie of the text This distinction is a Relect. princip doctrin contriou 5. q. 3. art 3. pag. 525. D. Stapletons and therefore the Iesuite must admit it and it is the truth for no translation can fully expresse the idiom or propertie of the originall language and words and phrases may be defectiue and all secondary causes haue their impediments all which may in their kind be truly called errors and we deny not but our English translation and the Latin vulgar too is subiect to them but this hindereth not the truth of the matter nor the perfection of the text saith D. Stapleton 3 And therefore that which the Iesuite vrgeth against our translations is of no force because it proueth no error in matter but inwards onely as I haue said before for we graunt as he saith the Scripture was not written immediatly in English neither was the translator assisted by the holy Ghost in such sort that he could not erre in any point but being a man be might erre for he might erre in his owne worke which he did himselfe viz. in words and proprieties but in the matter contained which is Gods work he could not holding him to the originall Hebrew and Greeke which our translator did or at the least it was not vnpossible but he might truly and faithfully translate without any new inspiration though he were a man otherwise subiect to error because the originall might leade him and many other meanes might direct and admonish him and discouer his error else what will the Iesuit say when an ordinarie Pastor preacheth Gods word to the people For that which he deliuereth may be free from error and yet his voice is a humane worke and himselfe hath no immediate or infallible inspiration The very same reason is there of translations for a diuine work propounded by a humane meanes may be free from error which I further proue by Bellarmines owne confession who speaking of the vulgar Latin b Admittimus enim interpretem non esse prophetam errare potuisse tamen dicimus eum noÌ„ errasse in illa versione quam ecclesia probaâ—it De verbo Dei l. 2. c. 11. saith He admitteth the translator was no Prophet but subiect to error yet he could not erre in that translation which the Church allowed where he granteth that some translatioÌ„s done by a man subiect to error may yet be free if the Church allow it Now the Church hath allowed our English and we say ours is the true Church and therefore the translator though he were but a man did not erre Againe thus I reason if the Latin translator were freed from erring that is to say might erre but yet did not then our English translator may be freed likewise because he hath the same meanes for if the approbatioÌ„ of the church exempted him ours also hath the same approbation but that could not exempt him for it was extant and therefore was free from error if euer it were so at al c It began to be receiued about the time of Gregory the great who entred his Papacy in the yeare 590 saith Baron annal toÌ„ 2. an 231. nu 47. but was neuer declared to be authenticall till the Councell of Trent Sess 4. anno 1546. a thousand yeares or at the least some time afore the Church either allowed it for authenticall or could take notice of it And when the Councel of Trent did approue it it put no other truth into it then was there before but onely declared it to be true It followeth therefore that the translator was preserued from error by no other meanes and why might not the same direct ours also as namely the infallible and perpetuall veritie of the doctrine it selfe translated the direction of Gods spirit his owne diligence meanes skill faithfulnesse and the Churches carefull ouersight 4 The summe of all is this that our English Bible containeth two things the Doctrine and the Translation d 1. Tim 3.16 2. Pet. 2.20 The Doctrine was inspired of God written by men infallibly assisted by the holy Ghost and therefore is free from error and so coÌ„sequently the Scripture translated into English in respect of the matter is infallibly true because it was done by the immediate inspiration of the spirit of God The translation was done by the ministerie of the Church and industrie of certaine men who though they had no supernaturall inspiration or priuiledge from error yet we know infallibly they haue not erred in the matter by the same meanes whereby we know other truths and discerne other articles of Christian faith namely by the light of the doctrine translated the testimony of the spirit the ministery of the word the rules of art the knowledge of the tongues and such like 5 To that which the Iesuite faith out of Gregory Martin I answer that Martin hath said something against our translations but proued nothing Doctor Fulkes confutation of his discouery lieth yet vnanswered and long must do Martin cannot giue one instance of the sence corrupted his exceptions are childish if you reade his booke But as e De opt gen interpret ad Pammach Ierome said of some that vnskillfully reproued his translations so I may answer Martin and the Iesuite These and such like toyes are scored vp for our hainous faults Martin missed it farre as f Treatise of Renuntiat p. 156. some of his fellowes charge him producing the Councell of Trent against him when he allowed Recusants to go to Church with a Protestation He that was so short in his proofes at home might be as wide in his discoueries abroad And if the g Palaephat de Fabul non credent Lamia would haue pluckt his eyes out of his boxe and vsed them at home as well as he did abroad he might haue seene some errors also in his owne vulgar Latin whereof I will say something in the seuenth digression 6 His next reason is that the often change and variable translations do shew that some haue erred Whereto I answer two things First though it be granted that some haue erred yet hence it followeth not that all haue which is the point he must proue else he were as gond say nothing For we defend the Scriptures well and faithfully translated not this or that mans edition whereof our Church taketh no notice whether it be pure or no. It is sufficient for the veritie of our assertion that in the Church there be some translations faithfull and agreeing with the originall 7 Secondly we do not deny but our translations varie and haue bene altered according to h Posseuin biblioth select l. 2. cap. 8. inde Sixt. Senens biblioth Sanct. lib. 8. haeres 13. Bellar. de verb. Dei l. 2. cap. 8. Caesar Baron tom 2. an 231. Aug. de doctr Christ lib. 2. cap. 11. the example of the primitiue Church before vs. But this variety hath bin in the words and style and not in any materiall
point of the sence For we know the diuine doctrine to be one and the same in all translations immediatly in the originall and more obscurely in the translations and therefore we so vse them as that we examine all by the originall approuing the best and not hindering the mending of it if need require But this change implies no such error in the matter For one true sence may be vttered diuersly and though things be alwayes one and the same yet words be diuers In which sence our translations are of differeÌ„t sort and yet no materiall error As for example some playner or in phrase liker the original then othersome One translation is in verse another in prose one word for word another sence for sence one hath a higher obscurer phrase another a lower and playner yet how can it be inferred hereupon that therfore they be erronious when they all yeeld the same diuine sence Therefore Austins iudgement is more to be preferred who saith i De doctrin Christ lib. 2. c. 12. 14. the variety and multitude of translations doth not hinder vs from vnderstanding the text but very much helpe vs specially if we shall diligently compare them one with another And what shal become of the popish Authenticall vulgar if change and varietie be a signe of error which so often was changed before it came to that it is and since the Trent approbation hath so many different copies Yea what shall become of their Missals Portesses and Seruice bookes that so many times haue bin reformed and more should be but that the Seruice of the Church would be altered so farre that scarce any shew of the ancient Religion would be remaining in it k Loc. lib. 11. cap. 5. saith Canus a Popish Doctor 8 But the Iesuite obiecteth further that seeing the translatour being but a man may erre how shall an vnlearned man be infallibly sure that this or that translation erreth not or if it erre in on point that it doth not in another vnlesse the Churches authoritie be admitted to assure vs Whereto I answer l Psal 119 105. Prou. 6.23 2. Pet. 1.19 that the doctrine conteyned in the Scripture is a light and so abideth into what language soeuer it be translated and therefore the children of light know it and discerne it For m Ioh. 10.4 1. Cor. 2.15 1. Ioh. 2 20. Ioh. 7.17 14.16.17 God directeth them by the holy Ghost who openeth their hearts that they know his voice from all others and that the light of his truth may shine vnto theÌ„ Which light is of this nature that it giueth testimonie to it selfe and receiueth authoritie from no other as the Sunne is not seene by any light but his owne and we discerne sweet from sowre by it owne tast And for the opening of our eyes to see this light whereby our conscience may be assured we haue diuers meanes some priuate as skill in the tongues learning labour prayer conference c. Some publicke as the ministery of the word which is the ordinance of God to beget this assurance which act of the Church is not authoritie to secure me but ministery to shew me that which shall secure me which ministery is founded on the Scripture it selfe in that from thence it fetcheth the reasons that may perswade me and sheweth the light that doth infallibly assure me And thus we know our translations to be true Digression 6. Declaring how the assurance of our faith is not built on the Churches authoritie but on the illumination of Gods spirit shining in the Scripture it selfe 9 So then the vnlearned man is secured not vpon the Churches credit and authoritie but by her ministery which teacheth him he is directed to the light it selfe and this ministery we haue and vse for our translations but they that obey it know the translation and so proportionably all other articles of faith to be infallible because the matter therof appeares vnto them as a candle in a lanterne shewing it selfe in it owne light And that you may see the difference betweene these two the Churches teaching and the illumination of the spirit in assuring vs the spirit of God is an inward meanes the teaching of the Church an outward the spirit secureth vs by his owne authoritie the Church directeth vs by her ministery the spirit hath light in it selfe the Church borroweth hers from the Scriptures the spirit can secure vs alone the Church neuer can without the spirit But nothing can be playner to this purpose then the saying of Constantine the great in his epistle to the Persian n 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theod. hist lib. 1. cap. 25. Marking the diuine faith I obtaine the light of truth and following the light of truth I acknowledge the diuine faith We need then a more certain authoritie then the voyce of the Church that may prostrate our mind with a lightning froÌ„ heauen and stand vpon his owne ground not drawing his resolution from any thing out of it selfe 10 This is not far from that which the learnedst of the Papists be driuen to acknowledge through the necessitie of the truth For thus writeth o Princip doctrinal lib. 8. cap. 22. Stapleton in that booke where he most defends the Churches authoritie The godly are brought to faith by the voyce of the Church but being once brought and enlightened with the light of diuine inspiration then they beleeue no more for the Churches voyce but because of the heauenly light And yet more plainely in p Triplicat inchoata aduers Gulielm Whittak in admonit ad Whitak the last booke that euer he wrote that one would wonder the Iesuite should see no authoritie to secure vs but the Churches The inward perswasioÌ„ of the holy Ghost is so necessary and effectuall for the beleeuing of euery obiect of faith q Nec absque illa quicquam à quoquam credi possit etsi millies Ecclesia attestetur per illam solam persuasiâ—nem quodlibet credenduÌ„ credi queat tâ—cente prorsus vel noÌ„ audita Ecclesia that without it neither can any thing by any man be beleeued though the Church testified with it a thousand times and by it alone any matter may be beleeued though the Church held her peace or neuer were heard Where is he then that saith we cannot be infallibly sure that this or that is doctrine of faith free from error vnlesse we admit an infallible authoritie in the Church to assure vs Digression 7. Wherein the Trent vulgar Latin and our English translation are briefly compared together 11 Which authoritie if we did admit supposing the Church were like theirs might we not speed possible as the Papists haue done in their authenticall vulgar and be assured of that which were starke naught For I thinke the Sun neuer saw any thing more defectiue maimed then the vulgar Latin yet r Concil Trid. sess 4. their Church hath canonized it for good
Church performe not For first themselues are declared and proued by another thing as the Iesuit himselfe vnawares granteth in that he saith they are gathered out of the Scripture and articles of our faith which is all one as if he freely confessed the word of God when all is done is the thing whereby the Church must be found and the true faith contained therein is knowne sooner and better then the Church which is not assured to vs till those things be found therein which agree with the Scripture and articles of faith This must be noted because hauing in the eight former sections wearied himselfe with striuing against vs and vsed much diligence to perswade that the true faith is no competent marke to discerne the Church by yet now of his owne accord he cometh home to vs and in his first words submitteth himself to that which before he gainsaid and so freely reuoketh all his former arguments 2 Next they are not so much as properties of the Church neither and therefore the vnlikeliest of a thousand to be marks thereof For a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Phauoâ—in leâ—ic they are not alwayes inseparably and incommunicably found therein that is such as at all times remaine in the Church alone and in euery part thereof For in the beginning it wanted antiquitie and succession and in the progresse it hath sometime bene without vnitie and vniuersalitie and at all times the false Church hath made so faire shew of all foure that no man could distinguish them but by retiring to the doctrine For Chrysostome b Hom. 49. in Math. op imperf writeth thus All those things which belong to the Church of Christ in truth the heresies may also haue in schisme they haue Churches and the * The booke not the doctrine sacred Scriptures yea Bishops and other degrees of Clergie baptisme the Eucharist and all other things yea * A pretence of Christ as Math. 24.5.23 Christ himself So that if any one will know which is Christs true Church he shal not be able in such a confusion to do it but onely by the Scriptures And of vnitie S. Basil c Aschet prooem de iudicio Dei saith He found much vnitie among all other professions onely in the Church of God he obserued great strife and vehemâ—nt dissention and the Pastors themselues distracted with all contrarietie of mindes and opinions Of succession Nazianzen d De laude Athan saith This is properly succession to succeed in godlinesse for he that professeth the same faith is also partaker of the same succession and he that holdeth a contrary faith must be reputed contrary to the successioÌ„ And e D. 40. Non est facile the Canon law They are not the children of the Saints which occupie their roomes but which do their works Of holinesse f Vbi supra Chrysostome saith In former times one might haue knowne Christs Church by her manners when the conuersation of the Christians either all or many was holy but now Christians are either as bad or worse then hereticks or Gentiles and there is more continency found among them though it be in schisme then among Christians And againe g Hom. 4. in Math. Whatsoeuer kind of holinesse the seruants of God haue in truth the seruants of Satan may haue in likenes for the diuel hath his that be meeke and huÌ„ble that be chast and giue almes that fast and do euery good deed which God hath appointed for the saluation of mankind and these formes of godlines hath the diuell brought in to seduce vs that a confusion being made betweene good and counterfet simple men which know not the difference betweene goodnes in deed and goodnes in shew while they seeke the goods seruants of God might light vpon the diuels seducements 3 And therefore allowing the Iesuite what leisure he will though otherwise any reader may perceiue he tooke himself leisure enough that penned this discourse and though briefly in shew yet in summe and effect hath couched whatsoeuer is extant in any Papist written concerning the matters questioned but yet giuing him a longer day he cannot by these markes make it infallibly sure that his Romane Catholicke is the Church of God and this himselfe knoweth in his owne conscience For Bellarmine h De not Eccl. cap. 3. speaking of these very markes confesseth They make it not euidently true that it is the Church but euidently probable whereby it appeareth that the Iesuite for all his set countenance yet knoweth well enough these his markes bring probabilitie but no certaintie And I am sure all Papists of learning will grant they are no markes at all but when they concurre with true faith whereas they say expresly i Greg. de Valent comment Theol. tom 3. disp 1. qu. 1. punct 7. §. 18. that among whomsoeuer the truth of doctrine and Sacraments are holden * Ex ijs constare veram Ecclesiam thereby it is knowne the Church is there And therefore the Iesuite may shew his skill in fitting his fowre markes to his Romane Church and remouing them from ours but he shall neuer come directly to the point vntill he try vs by the Scriptures and thereby sufficiently proue that which is easilie said we are not the Church of God but a company standing in oppositioÌ„ since Luthers time diuided into particular sects § 33. First the Protestants Church is not perfectly one or vniforme in dogmaticall points of faith but varieth according to the varietie of times and persons now holding one thing then another the learned men thereof are so much at iarre in matters of faith that it is hard to find three in all points of one opinion The Answer 1 The Papists themselues acknowledge a Luc. Pinel Thes Vademont Thes 83. that the vnity of the Church consisteth in this that the members thereof beleeue the same things vse the same worship of God and retaine the same sacraments but the Scriptures more fully teach vs how it is one First because b Ephes 4.4 it is from one beginning which is the holy Ghost who as one soule quickeneth and moueth all the members Next c Eph. 4.15 it hath but one head which is Christ And thirdly d Eph. 4.5 Rom. 12.5 it is but one body and one societie partaking the same doctrine sacraments worship of God The which vnitie if the Iesuit can shew to be waÌ„ting among vs good reason the game be his but for the doing herof it is not enough to say we varie vnlesse he can make true demonstration that the variance is in faith and this faith is changed with times and persons the which according to the custome of his sect he saith confidently but sheweth not whereas we for our purgation name e A booke so called to be bought in euery shop and containing the confessions of all the seuerall Protestant Churches in Europe the Harmony of confessions wherin
the particular Churches set down and name the articles of their faith the which confessions if the Iesuite can shew to iarre as he saith in dogmaticall points of faith I am content you beleeue him in all the rest Or if he can shew the Church of England since Papistry was first abolished hath altered one article of the present faith now professed 2 I will not deny but there are iarres among vs but this is that we say and for triall thereof we challenge all the Seminaries this day in England from whom the worst of our fallings out is not hid that these iarres are not in points of faith nor yet any contrarietie betweene Church and Church but onely they are quarels and dissentions betweene some particular men and me thinketh the Iesuite should not be so absurd as to hold the Church it selfe guiltie of euery fault committed by any priuate man therein no more then a ciuill state ordered by good lawes and wholesome gouernment can be discredited by some suites and quarels that now and then fall out betweene the subiects And yet it is false he saith that scarce three learned men among vs are in all points of one opinioÌ„ for that breach which is is not so great as these words imply but onely toucheth some particular men in matters not concerning faith the body of the Church in the meane time continuing in the vnitie of faith and vpholding her gouernment And for further proofe hereof our enemies haue taken infinit paines to collect and blaze abrode these our supposed dissentions but how haue they sped in the iourney what haue they performed the mountaine trauelled and was deliuered of a mouse For one part of these dissentions are falsly laid to our charge through the ignorance and fury of our aduersaries as drunken men in the pangs of their giddinesse speake of things not as they are indeed but as the impression is in their idle fancie Another part are not the iarres of the Church but the defects of some few therein whereof the Church is not guilty The rest are not dissentions in things of faith but strife about ceremonies kindled and nourished specially by the cunning of secret Papists lurking as the remnant of the Canaanites among vs wherein if any among vs haue exceeded yet f Ezek. 16.51 the Church of Rome iustifieth vs againe where neither three learned men nor three Popes can be giuen of one mind in all points but as Platina g In Steph. vi writeth This hath bin for the most part the maner that the later Popes haue either infringed or wholly taken away the decrees of the former And Papists h D. 40. Si Pap. edit GregoriaÌ„ in Annot. desiring to fetch religion rather from the Popes mouth then from holy writ cannot but change as they haue changed 3 Therefore the discord among vs being of no higher degree we say as Prudentius a Christian poet said of the vnitie of his time i Concordia laesa est Sed defensa fide quin concordia sospes Germanam comitata fidem sua vulnera ridet Psychom It hath receiued some hurt but is defended by faith her sister in whose company being safe come home she laugheth at her wounds And though we excuse not the oppositions of any who as k the twinnes of Rebecca shooke each others in their mothers wombe whereby she is made afraid and her burden becometh heauier and painefuller to her yet let not our enemies flatter themselues in this l Gen. 25.22 for Rebecca the Church among vs shall be safe God shall giue her Isaack the sonne of the promise and make her a fruitful mother after all her sorow Whose children though in some things they varie yea reproch one another yet so did Cyril and Theodoret Chrysostome and Theophilus Ierome and Ruffin and there is no impossibilitie why in the pursuite of their passion they may not be deceiued both For two brothers being in choler may one renounce the other yet still they remaine brothers for all that and their angry words proceeding not of iudgement but of choler l 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aeschyl Sept. ad Theb. cannot make voide the band of nature Digression 21. Shewing that Gods true Church in all ages hath now and then bene troubled with contentions as great as are now among vs. 4 And because our enemies may hope by vrging these contentions such as they are to discredit our profession they must be put in mind that the vnitie of Gods Church was neuer so perfect or entire but sometime it hath bene blemished with dissention yea miserably rent in sunder with the inconsiderate strife of her owne children Saint Paul m Rom. 16.17 testifieth of the Church of Rome that there were therein which caused diuisions and offences contrarie to the doctrine And of the Corinths he n 1. Cor. 3.3 saith there was among them enuying strife and contention some holding of Paul some of Apollo some of Cephas and he o 1. Cor. 11.19 writeth to them that there must be heresies among them for the trial of such as were faithfull So p Act. 15.39 Paul and Barnabas yea q Gal. 2.11 Paul and Peter had their iarres so Polycrates and Victor Cyprian and Cornelius Cyril and Theodoret Chrysostome Theophilus and Epiphanius Hierome and Ruffin Paulinus and Meletius Leo and the Councell of Calcedon Nazianzen and the Councell of Constantinople all bishops of the Catholicke Church were at extreme contention one with another r Euseb hist l. 5 c. 23. inde Niceph. l. 4 c. 37. inde The strife betweene the East and West Churches about the keeping of Easter was such that they excommunicated each other Å¿ Euseb hist l. 7 c. 3. inde Cypr. ep 74. ad Pomp. Sabrat Concil Carth. apud Cypt. apud Cypr. ep 75 Hieron de script in Dionysio The question of rebaptization bred the like broiles betweene the Bishop of Rome and the Westerne Bishops on the one part and Cyprian Dionysius and Firmilianus three metropolitans with the most Bishops in Affricke Aegypt Cappadocia Galatia and Cilicia on the other part there was no Church or Catholicke Bishop therein which was not intangled in this opposition But the broiles stirred vp by Theophilus against Chrysostome were more then tragicall and rent in sunder all the Churches in the world yet were they the Bishops of the Catholicke Church that thus contended In this variance Theophilus the Patriarke of Alexandria and Epiphanius the Bishop of Cyprus were chiefe against Chrysostome and with them ioyned the other Bishops of the Prouinces as they fancied the euent was this t Socr. l. 6. c. 21. Chrysostome lost both his Bishopricke and life in banishment u Niâ—eph l. 13. c. 13 Epiphanius and he most grieuously cursed one another x Socr. l. 6. c. 17. Niceph. l. 13. cap. 17. 21. Many were slaine in the taking of parts y Sozo l.
are as ridiculous and sottish in answering the matter For what say they to all this when it is obiected against them Bellarmin h Tom. 1. praefat in gymnas Rom. answereth If a Catholicke man fall into sinne if he commit theft adulterie murther yet notwithstanding the foundation of his building abideth still he hath many and great furtherances to his saluation he walketh not in the darke he knoweth his Physitian he may through the faith that is in him call vpon God c. Happy Church where no mans sins may preiudicate him this I beleeue is it that maketh the world runne so fast to it for sanctuary But Staphylus more groslly after his maner As for the life of the Clergy i Apol. part 1. in fine saith he God is their iudge For as of maidenhead so of Priesthood man cannot iudge And the Canon law worst of all k 11. q. 3. Absiâ— in glo If a Priest embrace a woman it shall be construed that he doth it to blesse her And a Priest embracing a woman is presumed to do well Now if this be so there is no more to be said but that in silence and astonishmeÌ„t we adore the prerogatiues of this Roman Church and admire her liberties when they that will liue therein may without any danger steale the horse but professing the Protestants religion they must be hanged for looking ouer the hedge § 39. But chiefly their Church is not holy because there was neuer yet any Saint or holy man of it approued to be such by miracle or any other euident token as by reuelation from almightie God The Answer 1 This is false that the Iesuite saith there was neuer any Saint or holy man of our Church approued so to be by miracle reuelation or any other euident token For first the Prophets and Apostles and holy men of the Primitiue Church were all of our religion in euery point and beleeued not one article of the present Romane faith as we shew in euery question and I haue purposely declared in other places Now the Iesuite will not deny but these were Saints and by miracles approued so to be Next we haue true beleeuers iustified and sanctified by the blood of Christ who by vertue of their calling are Saints or holy men as a Rom. 1.7 1. Cor. 1.2 14.33 the Scripture calleth them though their name stand not written in red letters in the Calendar And we proue them to be such first by the miracles and reuelations wherewith their faith was confirmed when the Apostles began to teach it For the men and the miracles are theirs whose the doctrine is Secondly by the fruits of sanctification and the doctrine it selfe which they beleeue the former yeelding as perfect obedience to God in all things as this sinfull life will admit the later b Tametsi dicunt remissionem non pendere à conditione operuÌ„ neque poenitentiam aut fidem aut vllum actum nostrum esse causam aut meritum iustificationis tamen non negant requiti fidem poenitentiam fidem viuam poenitentiaÌ„ setiam sine his neminem iustificati Bell. de iustif l. 3. c. 6. euen by the confession of our aduersaries binding men to a liuing faith and true repentance the which doctrine cannot be without effect and that effect can be no other then the making such holy as entertaine it Thirdly we haue c Col. 2.2 5. Rom 8.16 the full assurance of vnderstanding and stedfast faith in Christ concerning our redemption obtained partly by the reuelation of the promises in the Gospell and partly by the Spirit of God bearing witnesse with our spirit that we are the children of God and sanctified by the holy Ghost And this is a sufficient token of our holinesse and herby we know our selues to be the Saints of God the which if the Iesuite will deny then let him proue either that we teach not true iustification and sanctification or if we teach it and haue it yet it is no argument of true holines or if it be yet that it is not euident enough without miracles to demonstrate the Church or if miracles be so necessary then let him shew we haue no part in those which the Apostles did others after theÌ„ The which he cannot do but by examining the doctrine that all men may see how idly and circularly they dispute against the Protestants that do it by making holinesse or miracles the notes of the Church 2 But the Iesuites minde runneth vpon his Calendar and golden Legend wherein he thinketh to finde Saints and miracles to serue his turn But he is deceiued For let theÌ„ be examined and vpon triall it will fall out that one part were no Papists another part were not at all in rerum natura neither they nor their miracles but are meere deuices fictioÌ„s a third part consisteth of vncertainties that no man for his life can be sure it is true The last and the least part are canonized indeed and were Papists but that was of late and by the Popes doing whereupon no man that wise is will ground his faith 3 And touching this canonization because the Papists alway meane it when they talke of their Saints I obiect two things sufficient to discredit it First that it was the Popes owne inuention d Bell. de Sanct. beatit l. 1. c. 8. §. Dices 800. yeares after Christ at the least set abroach continued in policy for the confirmation of certaine idolatrous superstitions which he laboured thereby to aduance and now are made e Bell. vbi supra c. 7. the seuen points wherein the canonization consisteth setting them in a Calendar with red letters praying to them in the Church seruice erecting Churches and altars to them ministring the Eucharist and saying Canonicall houres in their honor dedicating holidaies setting vp images and worshipping their relickes Secondly f Sum. Rosell verbo Canonizâ—tio Can. loc l. 5. c. 5. q. 5. concl 3. Platin. in Bonif. 8. themselues cannot deny but it is subiect to error that is to say the Saint canonized may be no Saint and the miracles whereupon his canonization is grounded may be false as g Tract de concept de indulgent refert Catharin adu nou dogm Caiet p. 127. Caietan and others confesse disputing about the miracles pretended for the virgin Maries conception without originall sinne whereupon it followeth necessarily as h Si vnus sanctus vocatur in dubium etiam caeteri vocari possunt Quare veraces essent haeretici qui dogmatizant esse periculosum inuocare sanctos Catha vbi supra some Papists also complaine that all the Popes Saints may be doubted of and no man can inuocate or worship them without manifest perill of idolatry So that we see it is a weak kind of reasoning to proue their Church by such Saints And I am firmly perswaded themselues mistrust it in that many times they shake off as trifles
that which is in the cup he called his blood He changed the names gaue his body that name which belōged to the sign and to the signe that name which belonged to his body The reason why he thus changed the names was because he would haue such as partake the diuine sacraments not to heed the nature of those things which are seene but for the change sake of the names to beleeue the change that is made by grace For he called it wheat and bread which by nature is his body and againe on the other side he called himselfe a vine thus honoring the Symbols and signes which are seene with the name of his body and blood not by changing their nature but by adding grace to nature e Dial. inconfusus For the mysticall signes after consecration do not depart from their nature but they abide still in their former substance and figure and forme and may be seene and touched as before These testimonies are so plaine that they cannot be shifted For they containe the very speeches vsed by the Protestants he changed but the name he honoured the signes with the name of his body not changing their nature they depart not from their nature but abide still in their former substance their former kinde their former forme the substance or nature of bread and wine ceasseth not They are a figure c. And the fathers hereby confuted Eutyches the hereticke holding that Christ had but one nature and that by reason of the vnion the humanity was turned into the deitie against which error they opposed the doctrine of the Eucharist shewing that as therein bread and wine after consecration were honoured with the name of his body and blood and receiued grace vnto their nature to be a holy sacrament though still they remained in their former substance and property so the humanitie of Christ receiued grace by the hypostaticall vniting it to the Godhead and yet still retained the former property to be humane flesh And had they beleeued as our aduersaries do touching the sacrament they not onely could not thereby haue thus confuted Eutyches but Eutyches might by that very doctrine most probably haue confuted them For thus he might haue reasoned You Theodoret and Gelasius and the rest of your Church thinke the sacrament is a resemblance of the incarnation of Christ and the vnion of his two natures But in the sacrament the bread and wine after cōsecration remaine no more but are turned into the flesh and blood of Christ and so there is but one substance Therefore likewise in the incarnation after the vnion the humanitie remaineth no more but is turned into the diuinitie and the nature is but one as I say What could they haue answered to this reason if they had held transubstantiation Yea Eutyches made this argument in part against them For from the sacramental change of the signes whereby of common bread and wine they were changed to be holy signes and instruments of Gods grace vnto vs which change is it that the fathers mention and no other he could proue a change in Christs humane nature but Theodoret answereth him thus Now are you catcht in your owne net for the mysticall signes depart not from their nature but abide still in their former substance c. Which sheweth apparently that he beleeued not the transubstantiation 9 Neither had it bene possible the elder sort of Papists should haue spoken so waueringly and vncertainly touching the point if it had bene alway so vniuersally receiued in the church Concerning things alway beleeued indeed they speak resolutely they are certain and sticke not as when they speake of the Trinitie of the mysteries of the incarnation but when they come to intreat of this transubstantiation it is strange to see how they interfere in their words that they are able to make the resolutest Papist aliue doubt whether euer they beleeued it in good earnest or no. I will set downe the words of some of them because they deserue noting and I had their bookes ready at my hand to alledge them First there is no certaintie among them whether the bread remaine or no. For Petrus de Alliaco the Cardinall f 4. q. 6. art 2. f. saith That manner which supposeth the substance of bread to remain stil is possible Neither is it cōtrary to reason or to the authoritie of the Scripture nay it is easier to conceiue and more reasonable then that which saith the substance doth leaue the accidents And of this opinion no inconuenience doth seeme to ensue if it could be accorded with the Churches determinatiō And he addeh that the opinion which holdeth the substance of bread not to remaine doth not euidently follow of the Scripture nor in his seeming of the Churches determination And g Occh. centil q. 39 c. Cum Marthae de celeb miss gl §. Sanguinis Panor ibid. it appeareth euidently that it was a common opiniō in the Church of Rome euen of late that the bread in the sacrament remaineth still and that transubstantiation is no article of faith Next among such as held the reall presence there was no certaintie For h Tom. 3. d. 47. sect 3 d. 49. sect 2. Suarez relateth the opinion of some which held the change in the sacrament to consist in this that the bread and wine were assumed and vnited to the person of Christ And i Occh. 4. q. 6. k. Gabr. 4. d. 11 q. 1 Sum. Angel verbo Eucharistia 1. n. 31. diuers of the chiefest Schoolemen hold the bread is not conuerted substance into substance but annihilated by ceassing to be And this matter was so vncertaine in Peter Lombards time that it seemeth he knew not what to hold If k L. 4. d. 11. ◠saith he it be demanded what manner of conuersion it is whether formall or substantiall or of another kind I am not able to define Which is a signe that transubstantiation was not vniuersally beleeued in his daies And generally it is confessed that before the Councell of Lateran not yet foure hundred yeares since no man was bound to beleeue it Tonstal l De verit corp fang p. 46. saith It was free for all men till that time to follow their owne coniecture as concerning the maner of the presence They were not therfore bound to beleeue transubstātiation And Scotus and Biel are reported by m Soto 4. d. 9. q. 2. art 2. 4. Suar. tom 3. d. ◠s 1. the later Schoolemen to haue bene of minde that the opinion is very new and lately brought into the Church and beleeued onely vpon the authoritie of the Lateran Councell and indeed their words sound no lesse From the beginning n Script Oxon. 4. d. 10. q. 1. §. Quantum ergo ad istum saith Scotus since the matter of this sacrament was beleeued it hath euer bene beleeued that Christs body is not moued out of his place into heauen that it
might be here in the sacrament yet it was not in the beginning so manifestly beleeued as concerning this conuersion o D. 11. q. 3. §. Quantum ergo ad istum But principally this seemeth to moue vs to hold transubstantiation because concerning the sacramēts we are to hold as the Church of Rome doth where in the margin it is noted that our faith as concerning this sacrament is onely by reason of the Churches determination And he p §. Ad argumenta pro prima addeth We must say the Church in the Creed of the Lateran Councell vnder Innocent the third which beginneth with these words FIRMITER CREDIMVS declared this sence concerning transubstantiation to belong to the veritie of our faith And if you demand why would the Church make choise of so difficult a sence of this article whē the words of the Scripture This is my body might be vpholden after an easie sence and in appearance more true I say the Scriptures were expounded by the same spirit that made them and so it is to be supposed that the Catholicke Church expounded them by the same spirit whereby the faith was deliuered vs namely being taught by the spirit of truth and therefore it chose this sence because it was true q Canon lect 41. Biels words are to the same effect Which sheweth the point was neither holden nor knowne vniuersally in the Church before the Lateran Councell and that then it began to be receiued as a matter of our faith And yet since that time these men enquiring so boldly into the congruēcie of the opinion and casting so many dangers about it they shew plainly that they mistrust the proceeding of the Councell though they may not disclaime it Durand r 4. d. 11. q. 1. saith It is great rashnesse to thinke the body of Christ by his diuine power cannot be in the sacrament vnlesse the bread be conuerted into it But if this way which supposeth the bread to remaine still were true de facto many doubts which meet vs about the sacrament holding that the substance of bread remaineth not were dissolued But forsomuch as this way must not de facto be holden since the Church hath determined the contrary which is presumed not to erre in such matters therefore I answer the arguments made to the contrary holding the other part which saith the bread is changed Would our aduersaries thus backwardly come into the opinion if they had seene it to haue bene holden in all ages before in the Church or is it not rather an infallible signe that it was brought into the Church by the strength of some mens conceits without all warrant either of Scripture or fathers the want whereof so dazled those that imbraced it that they could see no reason for it but are all glad to lay it vpon the necke of a silly Pope in his Lateran Coūcell Besides ſ Scot. 4. d 11. q. 3. Bell Euchar. l. 3. c. 23. they confesse There is no Scriptare to inforce it vnlesse ye bring the Church of Romes exposition that is to say the Popes authoritie in whom t Turrect tract 73. quest q. 49. they thinke the power of the vniuersall Church in determining matters of faith principally resides if not alone u 3. part q. 75. art 1. p. 153. Caietan laieth downe diuers opinions holden among the Schoolemen touching the conuersion neuer a one whereof reacheth the transubstantiation and disallowing such as expounded Christs words This is my body metaphorically he saith his reason is because the Church hath vnderstood them properly I say the Church saith he because in the Gospell there is nothing that compelleth vs to vnderstand them properly headdeth that the conuersion of the bread into Christs body we haue receiued of the Church Now put all this together that we beleeue transubstantiation vpon the authoritie of the Church and this Church was Pope Innocent in the Councell of Lateran before which time there was no certaintie nor necessitie of beleeuing it and the Councell might haue chosen another sence of Christs words more easie and in all appearance more true for there is no Scripture sufficient to conuince it and the contrary were liable to fewer difficulties let this I say be put together and it will plainly shew that this point came in contrary to that which was vniuersally holden in the ancient Church because things vniuersally holden were certainly knowne and expresly beleeued without all this ado § 48. Let him shew also what countrey there is or hath bene where Christian faith either was first planted or continued where some at least haue not holden the Romane faith as we can shew them diuerse places especially in the Indies Iaponia and China countreys where theirs is scarce heard of The Answer 1 This is answered before sect 46. nu 2. where I shewed that when countries were first conuerted frō Paganism which was for the most part in the Primitiue Church the present Romane faith was not knowne but the Church of Rome in those daies professed the same that we do and consequently the nations conuerted by it and professing the faith thereof were conuerted to our religion and professed it For the Iesuite deceiueth himselfe with the name of Romane faith wherewith in the beginning all nations indeed vnder heauen communicated but then it was not the same that now it is as I haue plainly demonstrated in the former sect digress 49. And although since the change many nations haue still retained the same faith with it yet that iustifieth not the faith because the said faith growing on by steps and peecemeale was a generall apostasie and the mysterie of iniquitie working throughout the whole Church so that of necessitie there must be some in all places to follow it As when a generall rebellion groweth throughout a kingdome the rebels haue partakers in euerie towne and yet the possession is not proued theirs by that but onely the greatnesse and strength of the rebelling faction is shewed The Papacy that is to say the Roman faith in as much as it differeth from vs is not imagined by vs to be in another Church distinct in place and countries from the true Church of Christ but we affirme it to be a contagion raigning in the middest of the Church of Christ it self and spreading throughout the parts therof wheresoeuer and annoying the whole body like a leprosie in which disease though all the parts be affected yet the inward and vitall parts retaine their operation and still worke to expell the leprosie which at the length they do In this case the man is possessed indeed with a vile contagion but yet the man remaineth there still though the contagion be not the man And the contagion possesseth euery part of him some more some lesse being vniuersally spread ouer the body and yet hereby it is not proued to be the true nature and sound constitution of the bodie but a preuailing humor and when
erre he sitteth in the temple of God and beareth rule farre and neare 34 After 1250. to 1300 I name Å¿ Magd. Cent. 13. c. 5. Gulielmus de S. Amore. withstanding the Friers and their abuses t Crantz Metrop l. 8. c. 16. Refert Illyr Catal. The Preachers in Sweden that publickly taught the Pope and his Bishops to be heretickes u Panor de Iudicijs c. Nouit ille Naucler vol. 2. gen 45. Dante 's the Florentine wrote in a booke that the Empire descended not from the Pope for the which cause after his death they condemned him of heresie About the same time also liued Gulielmus Altisiodorensis an auncient schoolman in whose Summes are found many things confuted that then were coming in and maintained by others the which because I haue partly obserued throughout this my answer by alledging him against the Iesuite I will not now stand to produce 35 After 1300. to 1350 I name Marsilius Patauinus that writ against the Popes supremacie x Defensor pacis in which booke is to be seene the confutation of all such reasons as were made to proue him the head of the Church I name Occham the school-man y Beside his owne workes see Sleid. comment l. 2. Auent annal l. 7. p. 628 Naucl. vol. 2. gen 45. p. 1003. who exceeding vehemently writ against the Popes authoritie ouer Kings a great article of the Romane faith this day in England and Councels z Trithem de Scriptor he told the Emperour that if he would defend him with the sword he again would defend him with the word And as he resisted the Primacie so did he confute many errors now holden by the Church of Rome and confirmeth that which is our faith in not a few points as may be seene in his booke vpon the Sentences I name Gregorius Ariminensis who in his booke vpon the Sentences hath diligently confuted that which is now holden by the church of Rome touching Predestination Originall sinne Freewill the merit of workes and other matters a Illyr catal tom 2. pag. 797. The same time the Vniuersitie of Paris condemned the Popes pardons 36 After 1350. to 1400 I name Aluarus Pelagius who wrote a booke b De Planctu ecclesiae of the lamentation of the Church wherein he reproueth diuers abuses of his time c Fox acts and mon. pag. 38â— And Mountziger who in the Vniuersitie of Vlms openly disputed against Transubstantiation and adoration of the Sacrament I name Michael Cesenas d Illyr catal tom 2. who said the Pope was Antichrist and Rome Babylon and held there were two Churches one of the wicked wherein the Pope raigned which was a florishing Church the other of the godly an afflicted Church and he complained that the truth was almost extinguished The same time also liued Iohn Wickliffe and infinite more with him in England whom in that time they called Lolards resisting Papistry to the shedding of their bloud 37 After 1400. to 1450 I name againe the Lolards in England as Puruey Badby Thorp Browne Beuerly and the rest that were persecuted at that time I name Chaucer who expresly e Plowmans tale writ the Pope and his Clergie to be Antichrist The same time Nilus wrote his booke against Purgatory and the Popes supremacie and Iohn Hus Ierome of Prage and the Churches in Bohemia notoriously resisted the Papacie f Naucler vol. 2 gen 47. p. 1033. Their doctrine was the same with that of the Waldenses 38 After 1450. to 1500 I name Sauonarola the Florentine g Bucholch chronol Naucler vol. 2. gen 51. Illyr catal tom 2. p. 890. who preached that the time was come wherein God would renew his Church that the Church needed reformation he affirmed that the Pope taught not the doctrine of Christ he maintained the communion vnder both kinds and held against traditions iustification by workes and the Popes supremacie The same time Wesselus Groningensis and Ioannes de Vesalia were famous for holding against merits freewill traditions pardons shrift fasting dayes pilgrimages extreme vnction confirmation and the primacie In England also and Bohemia liued those which followed the doctrine of Wickliffe and Hus continuing the same till Luther 39 And when 1500. yeares were expired arose Luther Zuinglius Tindall and diuers others whom God raised vp to call his people out of Babylon who you see were not the first that misliked the Papacie many in all ages grudging at it before them and the reformation which they brought in was wished for and desired long before 40 And touching the catalogue that I haue set downe I warne the Reader of two things Note first that I haue not set downe all either that liued or are recorded in the seuerall ages nominated but onely some few for example to answer the Iesuites demaund by which few you may easily gather there were many more when so learned men neuer vse to want partakers howsoeuer the tyrannie and oppression of their aduerse part may keepe them vnder Next my meaning is not to iustifie euery one that I haue named to haue bene free from error and a ful Protestant in euery point though many were so in euery point fundamentall but onely to shew that the Papacie in all ages was resisted as it came forward which the Iesuite denieth If it be replied that these persons were hereticks condemned by the Church I answer first the Iesuite biddeth vs name who resisted Rome were all asleepe none to obserue the change c. and I name these whereunto it is no sufficient answer to say they were heretickes because it vpholdeth not the question and one hereticke may be able to detect another and the Iesuite should not make his chalenge so broade as to say No mention is made in any story of such an alteration Next it cannot be proued that these were heretickes For one part of them is the Greeke Church another part is some ancient Diuines of their owne Church a third part is such as the Romane Church persecuted The second are sound and lawfull witnesses being the true Church of God to this day though polluted with some errors The second though Papists in many points yet shew against al exception those points wherein they were no Papists to haue bene no part of the Catholicke faith so called in their time for then they would not haue resisted them but embrace them as they do all the rest The third part I grant the Church of Rome then persecuted and now calleth hereticks but that is the question whether they or their persecutors were the essentiall parts of the Church this must be decided by the Scriptures onely For our aduersaries say they are the true Church and proue it by their antiquitie without resistance both which we deny shewing the contrary in the precedent catologue which catologue when they will disproue againe by replying the men contained therein were condemned for heretickes by the Romane
therein and you shall find rest to your soules 3 The which thing when Martin Luther and our fathers did they found out no new way of their owne but opened the old which the Papacy had forsaken Neither do we thinke they onely were wise and they onely found the true faith but acknowledge the same wisedome and the same faith to haue bene in all ages before them as I haue shewed Onely as that company how great or how small soeuer which embraced our religion is distinguished against the other which liued and died in the practise of Papistry so we say confidently it onely was wise and in the right way and it onely had the true faith and pleased God leauing the other side to his iudgement that best knew what they were 4 And whereas the Iesuit vrgeth the matter touching our forefathers so importunately Were so many millions of our ancestors many whereof were innocent and vertuous liuers and some whereof shed their blood for Christs sake were all these hated of God did all these perish were all these damned I answer not one of them perished that was thus qualified but they were vndoubtedly saued euery mothers sonne of them that liued thus vertuously and innocently shedding their blood for Christs sake But is the Iesuite or any man so fantasticall as to thinke these millions were Papists what Tridentine and Iesuited Papists when the moderne Papacy complete as it is is not yet an hundred yeares old but yonger then Martin Luther himselfe But whosoeuer they were that so followed the corruptions of the Church of Rome that they liued and died in the practise of all the points thereof and hated and persecuted the faith contrary thereunto we say as Saint Paul doth h 2. Th. 2.10 They perished because they receiued not the loue of the truth that they might be saued and therefore God sent them strong delusions to beleeue lies that they might all be damned which beleeued not the truth but had pleasure in vnrighteousnesse and forsomuch as the State of the Papacy the Pope and his religion is Antichrist we say all that obeyed the same are eternally damned For the Scripture teacheth i Apoc. 14 9. That if any man worship the Beast and his image and receiue his marke in his forehead or in his hand the same shall drinke of the wine of the wrath of God and shall be tormented in fire and brimstone And this assertiō is neither impious cruell nor incredible because God hath spoken it whose iust iudgement regardeth not multitudes if they liue in heresie and idolatrie refusing and persecuting the truth offered them be they neuer so great and frequent as it spared not the old world or Sodom or the Iewes in the wildernes or the Gentiles that knew not God whose number farre exceeded those of the Romane Church 5 Againe for a further answer to this question Were all our forefathers liuing vnder the Papacy damned we must distinguish For the errors of the Church of Rome are of two sorts Some capitall and substantiall not onely contrary to the fundamentall articles of our faith needfull to saluation but also hindring the meanes and way which God hath appointed partly without partly within our selues for the bringing vs thereunto Of which sort are the giuing Gods honor to images iustification by workes merits the abolishing of the Scriptures and preaching and such like Some are not so principal but consist onely in the deniall of smaller truths like the hay and stubble which Saint Paul k 1. Cor. 3.12 mentioneth that is built vpon the foundation and of their owne nature other circumstances remoued destroy no article of faith as praier for the dead pilgrimages fasting daies vowes and all those customes that stood onely in rites and ceremonies Againe it is one thing to hold an error wilfully and obstinately ioyning the profession thereof with the hatred and persecution of the truth and another thing to erre ignorantly being seduced by such as teach him with a mind notwithstanding alway ready to embrace the truth whensoeuer he shall be further enlightened These distinctions being premised I answer that in all the time of the Papacy the most people erred in the later kind the greater errors being either not generally receiued or not distinctly knowne by the people As for example in the daies of king Henry the fift f Sacramental tit 1. c. 7. Waldensis noteth that the merit of workes was little knowne And although by reason they wanted teaching they erred in many things followed the custom of the times yet again they saw misliked many things whē they died because they mistrusted the present courses they wold renounce all confidence in Saints crosses images merits such like confesse they looked to be saued by Christ alone which is a signe that they held the foundation Besides they saw into many things that were then done and in their iudgment condemned them carrying a mind alway ready to be taught though the streame of time carried them away m Illyric catal tom 2. p. 867. Thus Domitius Calderinus a learned man when he went to Masse had an vsuall saying Let vs go to the common error and all stories are full of things shewing this to be true They saw the Popes tyranny noted the couetousnesse pride and ambition of the Clergy they espyed the packing of their Priests and Friers they groned vnder innumerable grieuances which they could not redresse and very few among them all held Papistry in forme Whereupon neither hath the Iesuite any reason to say all were Papists such as himselfe neither are we bound to condemne them all but as Saint Cyprian n Epist 3. saith in a certaine Epistle If any that went b fore vs either of ignorance or simplicitie hath not obserued that which the Lord commanded his simplicity through the Lords indulgence may be pardoned But we whom the Lord hath taught instructed cannot be pardoned Out of which words we see what to iudge of such multitudes as erred of ignorance and went after the the Pope o 2. Sam. 15.11 as Dauids subiects did after Absolō in his rebellion in their simplicitie knowing nothing As for the rest that both erred in the foundation and hated the truth as our aduersaries in our countrey this day do blaspheming the way of God hating instruction stopping their eares against the word that we offer them and carrying themselues obstinately and maliciously against vs and so dying in the armes of the whore of Babylon we say without impiety they are gone to eternall fire according to that which God in his word hath reuealed § 62. Nay surely I am rather to thinke that you are vnwise who pretending to trauell toward the happy kingdome of heauen and to go to that glorious Citie the heauenly Ierusalem will leaue the beaten street in which all those haue walked that euer heretofore went thither who by miracles as it were by letters sent from
decree how reconciled together 40. 45. Touching Freewil and the determination thâ—reof by Gods prouidence 40. 46 Predestination not for works foreseene 40. 49. God is not the author of sinne The Papists in this point go as far as the Protestants 40. 50. Againe touching Freewil at large shewing all the questions in that point 40. 52. inde Wherein true holinesse standeth 41. 1. How good works become an infallible signe of true holinesse 41. Touching the certaintie of grace and saluation the point explicated 41. 5. The miracles of the ancient Church do the Papists at this day no good 42. 1. The ancient Monks were not like the moderne 42. 3. Touching miracles obiected by the Papists an answer 42. 4. inde Incredible miracles and ridiculous reported 42. 8. The abuses of Monks and Monasteries detected 42. 10. A proofe that the Protestants doctrine excludeth libertie of the flesh 43. 2. The Roman doctrine is an occasion of their sinfull liues 43. 3. Some points of Papistry named that inuite men to libertie 43. 5. inde The Roman faith a meere deuice inuented to maintaine ambition and couetousnesse 43. 7. The vniuersalitie of the Protestants Church is shewed and expounded 44. 1. inde Touching the ancient Fathers their authoritie and vsage with vs and the Papists compared 44. 4. inde Who are Fathers with the Papists and who All the Fathers 44. 9. The Pope vshers the Fathers 44. 11. The Papists are notorious for contemning all the ancient writers exemplified 44. 12. inde The Protestants answer to them that bid them shew their Church in all ages 45. 1. inde The Papists haue not the Church Catholicke either in time or place 46. The Romane Church hath forsaken her ancient faith 47. inde Transubstantiation a late deuice 47. 8. 9. The present Romane Church hath conuerted no countries to the true faith 48. 1. inde The Indies knew the true faith afore the Papists came there 48. 3. Touching the conuersion of England by Austin the Monke 49. How the Roman Church hath conuerted the Indies Spanish massacres 49. 5. inde The question When did the faith faile in the Roman Church answered and disputed 50. 4. inde The time maner of the coming in of some points in Papistry 50. 8. inde The resistance made in former times against the Papacy with a catalogue 50 18. inde An answer to some things obiected against the former catalogue 50. 40. Papistry came in secretly and by little and little expounded 51. 2. 3. Images notoriously resisted when they came in 51. 5. The Papists worship stocks and stones as well as the Gentiles 51. 6. inde Touching adoration of the Sacrament 51. 9. The maner of Christs presence in the Sacrament explicated as we hold it 51. 10. The Papists haue written most spitefully against the honour of the blessed Sacrament 51. 11. Succession is in our Church and of what kind it is 52. 1. The callings of Luther and our Bishops iustified and declared 52. 5. The Fathers commending the succession of the Roman church in their time doth not helpe it now 53. The places produced out of them are answered 53. 5. Ephes 4.11 alledged to proue outward succession answered 54. 2. 3. Externall succession of persons in one place is neither onely in the Romane Church nor there at all 55. 2. Seuen things obiected against the succession of Popes to shew it hath bene grosly interrupted 55. 4. inde Touching the credit of Anastasius booke of the Popes liues 55. 7. It is not knowne who succeeded Peter 55. 5. The sea of Rome hath bene long voide 55. 6. A woman was Pope 55. 7. Hereticks haue bene Popes and intruders and boyes 55. 8. 9. Popes haue bin made and cast out again at the willl of famous whores 55. 9. Popes for wickednesse more then monstrous 55. 9. Many Popes at one time and the right Pope not knowne 55. 10. The Fathers commendation of the Romane Church expounded 56. Imputations layd vpon the Protestants as if they had forsaken the Church answered 57. 1 2. Luther defended touching his departure from the Pope his writings his life his mariage and his death 57. 3. inde Monsters of lies deuised against Luther 57. 7. Luther an honester man then any Pope in his time and many more 57. 9. Againe the calling of our Ministers is defended 58. Touching the power of a Priest in remitting sinne and the sacrament of Penance 58. 4. inde Miracles not concurring with all extraordinary calling 59. 1. Extraordinary callings distinguished 59. 2. Luther needed no miracles and why 59. 3. All men haue not bene in loue with Papistry 60. The obiection that Luther made to himselfe when he departed from the Pope 61. 1. The Protestants haue not forsaken the high-beaten-way of the Catholicke Church 61. 2. Touching the saluation of our ancestors vnder the Papacie 61. 4. The Scriptuies are surer tokens of the truth then the Popish miracles 62. A briefe exhortation of the Author to his countrimen 63. A Table of the Digressions contained in this Booke with their Titles The number set before signifieth the number of the Digression The number following signifieth the §. vnder which it standeth 1. PRouing that the Papists grounding the doctrine of faith on traditions make them equall to the written word 1. 2. Shewing the infolded faith of the Papists and confuting the same as not entire 2. 3. Wherein by the Scriptures Fathers and reason and the Papists owne confession it is shewed that the Scripture is the rule of faith 5. 4. Containing the very cause why the Papists disable the Scripture so from being the rule 5. 5. Wherein against the Iesuits conceit secretly implied in his first conclusion it is shewed that the Scriptures ought to be translated into the mother tong and so read indifferently by the lay people of all sorts 5. 6. Declaring how the assurance of our faith is not built on the Churches authoritie but on the illumination of Gods Spirit shining in the Scripture it selfe 6. 7. Wherein the Trent-vulgar-Latine and our English translation are briefly compared together 6. 8. Shewing that the Scriptures are not so obscure but that they plainly determine all appoints of faith 7. 9. Declaring that the Papists haue reason to hold the Scriptures be obscure because the articles of their religion be hardly or not at all to be found therein 7. 10. Assigning the true cause of mens errors in expounding the Scriptures 8. 11. Prouing that the Scripture it selfe hath that outward authoritie wherupon our faith is built and not the Church 8. 12. Wherein it is shewed that the Scripture proueth it self to be the very word of God and receiueth not authoritie from the Church 9. 13. Shewing against the Iesuits assumption that all substantiall points of our faith are sufficiently determined in the Scriptures and the reason why the Papist call so fast for the authoritie of the Church 9. 14.
common heresie of his Romane church maketh the matter of the Scriptures obscuritie so dangerous I wil demaund of him by the way how our reasons to the contrary may be satisfied For first the Scripture it selfe in euident places calleth vs to it g Ioh. 5.39 Esa 8.20 bidding vs search it and seeke to it and h 2. Pet. 1.19 compareth it to a light shining in a darke place yea i Hebr. 12.5 to the voice of a father speaking to his children and when men vnderstand it not k 2. Cor. 3.15 it saith a vaile is laid ouer their hearts not ouer the scriptures and Christ l Ioh. 10.27 saith his sheepe heare his voice and m Luc. 16.29 the rich glutton was told that his brethren if they would escape damnation should heare Moses and the Prophets which had bin to no purpose if they could not haue vnderstood them when they heard them 4 Secondly he can name no one necessary article of our faith but the word teacheth it as plainly as himselfe can as that there is one God three persons a generall resurrection and iudgement that Iesus is the Sauiour of mankind c. Bellarmine n Illa omnia scripta esse quae sunt omnibus necessaria De verbo Dei l. 4. c. 11. saith All those things are written that are necessary to be knowne of all men o Scripturis nihil notius Ibid. l. 1. c. 2. neither is there any thing better knowne then the Scriptures so saith p Rock pa. 193. Et Contaren de potest Pont. pag. 227. Luce meâ—idiana illustrius ostensum puto ex diuinae sapientiae vocibus Saunders We haue most plaine Scripture in all points for the Catholicke faith And in all controuersies the Papists with whom we deale crie plaine euident manifest Scripture 5 Thirdly all other questions at the last are determined by the Scripture the Fathers expositions are examined by it and q Greg. Val. to 3. disp 1. q. 1. punct 1. the Church receiueth testimony from it so that the finall resolution of all things dependeth vpon it which could not be if of all other things it were not the best knowne for things are not tried by that which is obscurer but by that which is plainer 6 Last of al what meant the Fathers of the Primitiue church so much to report this perspicuitie for r 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Protrept pag. 25. Clemens Alexandrinus saith The word is not hid from any it is a common light that shineth to all men there is no obscuritie in it heare it you that be far off and heare it you that be nigh Austin Å¿ En arrat in Psal 8. saith God hath bowed downe the Scriptures euen to the capacitie of babes and sucklings that when proud men will not speake to their capacitie yet himselfe might Chrysostome and his scholler t Lib. 2. ep 5. Isidorus Pelusiota writeth the same u Homil. 1. in Mat. saith The Scriptures are easie to vnderstand and exposed to the capacitie of euery seruant and plow-man and widow and boy and him that is most vnwise x Hom. 3. de Laz. therefore God penned the Scriptures by the hands of Publicans 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fishermen tent-makers shepheards neat-heards vnlearned men that none of the simple people might haue any excuse to keepe them from reading and that so they might be easie to be vnderstood of all men the artificer the housholder and widow woman and him that is most vnlearned yea the Apostles and Prophets as schoolemasters to all the world made their writings plaine and euident to all men so that euery man of himselfe onely by reading them might learne the things spoken therein Iustine Martyr a Dialog cum Tryphon pag. 213. grae commel saith Heare the words of the Scriptures which be so easie that it needs no exposition but onely to be rehearsed This was the perpetuall and constant iudgement of the auncient Church far from the Iesuites paradoxe that the Scriptures be so obscure and beyond the peoples capacitie that they can reape no instruction by them for the Fathers with one consent teach the contrary and yet you see the confidence of these new Romane diuines It is euident in it selfe b Bristo Mot. 48. saith one of them to any man not quite forsaken of God that the auncient Fathers make most plainly for vs c. The field is wonne c Campian rat 5. apud Posseâ— biblioth select l. 7. c. 21. saith another if once we come to the Fathers they are ours as fully as Pope Gregorie the thirteenth Their prisoners they may be but not their patrons either to erect them Seminaries as d Surius comment rerum in Orb. gest anno 1572. did Gregorie the thirteenth or to maintaine the doctrine which in those seminaries they learne and teach Digression 9. Declaring that the Papists haue reason to hold the Scriptures be obscure and hard because the articles of their religion be hardly or not at all to be found therein 7 And withall the Reader may here very opportunely be put in mind that these men haue good reason to beare the world in hand the Scriptures be very obscure because indeed the Popish religion is obscurely or not at all found therein that not the vnlearned onely but the skilfullest clearkes of their church haue much ado to find some points thereof and some they confesse cannot be found there at all And haue not these men good cause then to challenge it lustily of insufficiencie and obscuritie I haue touched alreadie the confession of Andradius that many points of their faith would reele and stagger if traditions stayed them not And that you may know the meaning of this confession to be not onely that they haue no expresse Scripture for them but also no collection from the Scripture Eckius e Enchirid. c. 4. writeth The Lutherans are dolts which will haue nothing beleeued but that which is expresse Scripture or can be proued out of the Scripture And Costerus the Iesuite f Enchird c. 1. hauing deuided Gods word into three parts that which himselfe writ as the tables of the law that which he commaunded others to write as the old and new Testament and that which he neither writ himselfe nor rehearsed to others but left it to them to do themselues as traditions the decrees of Popes and Councels c. concludeth that many things of faith are wanting in the two former neither would Christ haue his Church depend vpon them this latter saith he is the best Scripture the iudge of controuersies the expositor of the Bible and that whereupon we must wholly depend iust as Staphylus g § 2. nu 6. said before of the Colliars faith 8 Thus they sticke not to name diuers maine articles as for example h Tho. 3. q 25. art 4. Canis catech titul de praecep eccles nu 5. the worship of images
of England Yet did not Basil therefore thinke it was not the true Church as the Iesuite disputeth against vs much lesse did he separate himselfe from it but acknowledgeth the enuy of Satan who can set brethren at oddes in their fathers owne house who are to be aduised to reconcile themselues and at length to embrace vnitie when they see Papists their enemies scorning them and clapping their hands at the bickering lest all to late when Gods iudgements fall vpon them as they did vpon the primitiue Church for that same sinne they learne by their owne calamitie to professe the faith in vnitie r Philostrat heroic in Protesilao One saith the communion of good things often times begetteth enuy but when men communicate in miseries they begin to loue one another recompencing compassion for compassion § 34. And which chiefly is to be pondered as principally appertaining to this marke of vnitie they haue no meanes to end their controuersies and so to returne to vnitie and to continue therin For while as they admit no rule of faith but onely Scripture which Scripture diuerse men expound diuersly according to the diuerse humours and opinions or fancies of euery one not admitting anie head or chiefe rule infallibly guided by the holy Ghost to whose censure in matters of faith all the rest should submit themselues vt capite constituto schismatis tollatur occasio an head or chiele ruler being ordained occasion of schisme may be taken away whiles they do thus as they all do alwayes thus all proclaiming to be ruled by onely Scripture and yet almost euery one expounding Scripture diuersly and one contrary to another according to the seeming of euery ones sense and neuer a one admitting one superiour infallibly guided by the holy Spirit of God to whose iudgement all the rest should submit themselues whiles I say they do thus it is impossible they should haue the vnitie of faith which is required as a marke whereby to know Christs true Church The Answer 1 The Iesuit hauing obiected that there is no vnity among vs now giueth his reason why there can be none because we make the holy Scripture the rule of our faith and indeed it is true that all Protestants professe the Scriptures to be the rule of faith which the Iesuite may repeate as often as be pleaseth coming ouer with it againe and againe but no Papist can confute it yea many Papists seem in expresse termes themselues to grant it as I haue shewed Digression 3. where the point is handled at large and whither the reader must betake himselfe for the triall Onely I will adde the words of Acosta a Biblio select l. 2 c. 15. reported and allowed by Posseuinus the Iesuite that the diligent attentiue and frequent reading as also the meditation and conference of the Scriptures hath alwayes seemed to them the chiefest rule of all to vnderstand by And I will repeate b De verb. Dei l. 1. c. 2. the words of Bellarmine The sacred Scripture is the rule of faith most certaine and most secure yea God hath taught vs by corporall letters which we might see and reade what his will is we should beleeue concerning him Here are three of our principall aduersaries say as much as we do and yet the Iesuite alloweth it not This his vanitie common with him in euery issue betweene vs must be chastised with those words of Austin c Epist 6. See how they grow worse and worse whose runagate babling restrained neither with feare nor shame wandereth vp and downe without any punishment 2 And though we graunt that diuers men expound the Scripture diuersly according to their fancies yea contrary one to another not submitting the exposition to one chiefe head yet cannot this disable it from being a sufficient rule to keepe vs in vnitie because the men that thus diuersly expound are not as he speaketh All and euery one that professeth our religion but some priuate men erring through ignorance or affection the open ministery of our Church in the meane time cleauing vniformly to one and the same exposition which from the beginning it neuer altered and the points wherein some among vs vary are not the articles of saluation wherein alone the reason of vnitie doth consist but some difficult places the ignorance whereof remoueth not the vnitie of faith all which I haue d § 7. nu 2. § ◠nu 7. inde § 12 nu 2. inde Digress 8. 10. already handled in that which goeth before and therefore referre my selfe to the places if any more be to be said to this matter And whereas he thinketh we should admit one head or chiefe rule to whom we should submit all our faith that a head being ordained the occasion of schisme might be taken away herein he talketh absurdly For first we acknowledge one head and chiefe ruler such as he mentioneth euen the Spirit of God whose office it is to expound the Scripture and this exposition he vttereth in the Scripture it selfe e Digr 11.12 as I haue shewed Next if we would also according to his fancie betake our selues to the externall authoritie of some man or companie of men relying vpon them in matters of faith and exposition yet this would not please him neither vnlesse the Pope were he that you may see the vaine importunitie of the Iesuite Thirdly when such a head as himself meaneth admitting it also to be the Pope were agreed vpon and all power to expound the Scripture put into his hands yet still the same difficulties would remaine that he obiecteth against vs. First that his determination though neuer so plainly published would not satisfie such as are contentious f See Dig◠24. for in the Church of Rome notwithstanding the Popes supremacie there are contentions Next that whatsoeuer he determined if it were the truth he must fetch it and shew it out of the Scripture And so still we haue as competent a iudge for the maintenance of vnitie as the Iesuite can name any and when he hath trauerst ground and fetched a compasse how he can to auoide this iudgement yet the violence of the truth and his owne experience shall tumble him headlong into it againe 3 The phrase borowed out of Ierom vt capite constituto c. meaneth not the Pope or any man else that should be iudge of the Scripture but the Pastors and Bishops ordained in euery Church for preaching and gouernement which we haue and vse according to Ieroms meaning in a course more godly and profitable then that which the Church of Rome vsurpeth § 35. Contrarie the Romane Church is alway one and vniforme in faith neuer varying or holding any dogmaticall points contrarie to that which in former times from the beginning it did hold all the learned men thereof though sometimes differing in matters not defined by the Church yet in matters of faith all conspire in one The Answer 1 That which the
be more edified they want therefore this fruit Thirdly touching Latin Seruice Thomas Aquine and Cardinall Caietan u in 1. Cor. 14 hold it is better for the edification of the Church to be in the vulgar tongue Fourthly touching the power of Priesthood to remit sinne x 4. d 18. §. Non autem the Master of Sentences and y Fr. Victor relect 1. de potes Eccl. sect 3. others with him hold that onely God forgiueth sinne and the Priest bindeth and looseth onely by declaring them to be bound or loosed himself working no spirituall effect Fiftly touching shrift z De poenit d 5 in poenit gloss Panot ibid. the Canon Lawyers say it was not ordained by Christ but taken vp by an institution of the Church and Michael Bononiensis a Expos in Ps 29. saith It is not needfull for our iustification or the pardon of our sinne and Caietan b 3. Tho. q. 80. art 4. holdeth A man by contrition without any confession is made clean a formall member of the Church 6. Touching iustificatioÌ„ by our own righteousnesse Th Aquin c In Gal. 3. lect 4. saith No workes either ceremoniall or morall are the cause why any man is iust before God For works are not the cause that man is iust but the execution and manifestation of his righteousnesse because no man is iustified with God by his works but by the habite of faith infused And againe d In Rom. 3. lect 4 1. Tim. 1 lect 3. he saith The Apostle sheweth iustification to be wrought by faith onlie there is in the workes of the Law no hope of iustification but by faith onely Seuenthly touching the imputation of Christs holinesse for our iustification and the apprehesion thereof by faith Pighius e Bell. de grat l. 1. c. 3. de iustific l. 2 c. 1. holdeth that there is in vs no inherent righteousnesse whereby we may be iustified but f Controu Ratispon contr 2. pag. 47. edit Paris 1549. that we are iustified in Christ not by our owne but by the righteousnesse of God and Christ interposing his iustice betweene his Fathers iudgement and our iniustice so we present our selues boldly before Gods tribunall not onely seeming but also being iust and the reason why our righteousnesse is placed in the obedience of Christ is because we being incorporate into him * Nobis illi incorporatis acsi nostra esset accepta ea fertuâ— ita vt ea ipsa etiam nos iusti habeantur it is imputed to vs and by the same we are accounted iust And the Diuines of Collen g Antididagm Colon. pag. 29. A booke written by Gropper of whom the def of the Cens saith he was the rare man of our age See his commondations in Sur. comment An. 1547. p. 424. say We are iustified by faith as by the apprehending cause such a faith as without all doubting assureth vs of the pardon of our sinnes through Christ whereof notwithstanding it behooueth vs to be assured by the testimony of the holy Ghost through faith and after the same manner we are iustified of God by a twofold iustice as it were by formall and essentiall causes whereof the first is the perfect iustice of Christ not as it is without vs abiding in him but as the same being apprehended by faith is imputed to vs. This righteousnesse of Christ thus imputed to vs is the principall cause of our iustification whereon we must chiefly trust and stay our selues Eightly touching the certaintie of a mans owne saluation h Enchirid. Concil Colon. tit de iustif c. noÌ„ habes ergo the same Diuines of Collen write thus We confesse the truth is that to a mans iustifiâ—ation it is required that he certainly beleeue not onely in generall that they which truly repent haue their sinnes forgiuen by Christ but that his owne selfe also hath forgiuenesse through Christ by faith i Innoc. Gentill exam Con. Trid. The same was also preached openly by Marinarius a Frier at the Trent Councell Ninthly touching merits k De iustif l. 5. c. 7. idem Waldenâ— tom 3. de Sacra c. 7. Bellarmine saith In regard of the vncertaintie of our owne righteousnesse and because of the danger of vaine glory the safest way is to put our confidence in the sole mercy and goodnesse of God 10. Touching the sacrifice of the Masse Cornelius Mus l Sixt. Senen bâ—blioth sanct lib 4. a Bishop so famous for his learning that he was a Preacher at twelue yeares old and all Italie ran after him defended m Fr. Sua. tom 3. d. 74. s 2. that Christ at his last supper offered no sacrifice at all 11. Touching the Apocrypha it is cleare n Lyra Hugo Caâ—et Sigonius and others that many deny them to be canonicall Scripture 12. Touching the communion vnder one kinde Ouandus o 4. d 9. Pro. 6. saith It were better to allow the cup to the people then to deny it and lesse hurt would grow by yeelding then by detaining it 13. Touching mariage p 4. d. 26 q 3. quem refert Ioh. Capreol ibid. Durand held it was no sacrament and Canus q Loc. l. 8. c. 5. saith it is none vnlesse the Priest by solemne words of the Church do it And r Tolet. Sum. cas l. 7 c. 21. that which some Papists call heresie that the innocent party may lawfully marrie againe after diuorce is affirmed by Å¿ Comment in 19. Mat. Caietan and t Annot in Caiet l. 5. Catharinus 14. Touching freewill Ariminensis u In 2 d. 26 p. 103. denyeth that a man can will any thing that is good by nature without the special helpe of Gods grace and Alphonsus x Lib. 9. verbo Libert holdeth our wil is free from constraint but not from necessitie 15. Touching the descention of Christ into hell y In 3. d 22. q 3 Durand and z Apol. qu. 1. Picus Mirandula deny it affirming that he descended not properly and in substance but onely by effect in that without any locall motion the power of his death reached thither By these few examples you may coniecture how well they agree that thus are diuided about the principal articles of their faith and nothing can be so generally or certainly receiued but some or other among them deny it 21 And to manifest this contention yet a little more you shal see what a number of opinions they haue among theÌ„ concerning any question which themselues moue in Diuinitie For example whereas in the Sacrament they thinke the substance of bread and wine passe away the formes or accidents onely remaining the question is in what subiect or substance these accidents abide Some say they remaine separated without any subiect this is the opinion of Occham Biel Cameracensis Maior and the Nominals Some that they obtain a way wherby to exist of themselues this is the opinion of
the rocke of Christ and his faith c In Mat. 16. Lyra of whom d L. 4. Biblioth sanct they say that for expounding the Scriptures he had not his match and e In Mat. 16. the interlineary Glosse and f Ibid. Burgensis do all thus g Concord l. 2. c. 18. 13. Cusanus followeth Saint Austins exposition set downe immediatly before h In d. 19 ita Dom. § â—t super hanc petram The Glosse vpon Gratian saith He cannot thinke that by the rocke our Lord pointed at any other thing then the words which Peter answered him when he said Thou art Christ the sonne of the liuing God because vpon that article of faith the Church is built therfore God founded the Church vpon himselfe Marsilius i Defens pacis part 2. ca. 28. saith Vpon this rocke that is vpon Christ in whom thou beleeuest for Peter as long as he liued might erre and sinne by the libertie of his will and such a one could not be the foundation of the Church Petrus de Alliaco Chancellour of Paris and a Cardinall k RecoÌ„mendat sacrâ—â— Scripturae pag 269. writeth thus We must enquire what is the rocke whereupon the Church of Christ was to be built notwithstanding it seemeth not that by the rocke Peter should be vnderstood but Christ for who may establish the firmitie of the Church in Peters infirmitie whereof aske the maide that kept the doore and let her answer at whose speech as Gregorie saith while he feared death he denied the life Therefore seeing Peter had wauered and his Vicar is not firmely grounded l Cumque iam discrepent de summo Petri sacerdotio Pontifices litigeÌ„t de summo Pontificio sacerdotes seeing the Popes differ about Peters high priesthood and the Priests agree not about the Popes high bishopricke who dareth presume to say that any man of what holinesse or worthinesse soeuer whether Priest or high Bishop whether Peter or Peters Vicar or any other but Christ himselfe is the foundation of the Christian Church Christ therefore vpon himselfe as vpon a most steadie foundation established his Church against the Church of the diuell and vpon this firme rock he steadily confirmed Peter himselfe saying of him the sentence premised Vpon this rocke will I build 17 Thus it appeareth that our Sauiour saying Vpon this rock I will build my Church meant thereby no more but that he would ground it vpon the true faith of Christ that whosoeuer would desire to be ioyned to this Church should beleeue the same things that Peter then professed or else perish for euer And the words are thus to be expounded Thou art Peter thy name is Stone and thou hast professed a profession like thy name answering the nature of that whereby thou art called and therefore thy name is stone or rocke and the profession thou hast made is like it for thereupon I will build my Church and they which hold it shall neuer be moued This is farre from giuing Peter and the Pope any primacie and yet this is all the fathers obserued and as much we see as the discreeter sort of Papists haue collected And it is no matter though in the language that Christ spake the same word be vsed for Peter and the Rocke thus Thou art Cephah and vpon this Cephah I will build or if in the Greeke vsed by the Euangelist 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifie one thing to wit a rocke or stone as if Christ should say thou art rocke and vpon this rocke I will build for in the first place the word is vsed properly to signifie Peters name in the second appellatiuely to lay downe the nature of his profession which the Papists might haue obserued from m 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Phauor Lexic Phauorinus Camers their owne Bishop out of whose Lexicon they borrowed their speculation concerning the synonymie of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 18 To the other part of the text concerning the keyes I answer that neither do they proue Saint Peter or the Pope to be chiefe Pastor to whose definitiue sentence all the Church must be subiect but that he had the ministery of the Gospell committed to him with the other Apostles which ministery is signified by the keyes in this respect because mankind through the fall of our first parents lay plunged in the miserable bondage of sinne and Satan vtterly shut out of heauen vntill it pleased our merciful God to reueale the Gospel by preaching whereof the mind of man being enlightned the fetters of spiritual darknesse begin to fall from him and he riseth into the knowledge of Gods will so that by beleeuing in Christ he is set at libertie from the prison of sinne and condemnation and the doore of grace and life is opened to him This is done by the ministerie of the Gospell n Esa 49.9 whose nature is to say to the prisoners go forth and to them that sit in darknesse shew your selues and as o Esa 61.1 a key to open the prison doore to them that are bound and to bring liberty to captiues or if men loue darknesse better then light then hath God put p Ioh. 15.22 2. Cor. 2.16 Apoc. 11.6 an effectuall power into it to shut vp against them the kingdome of heauen and to straine them harder q Pro. 5.22 with the cords of their sinnes that they might perish This ministery being executed partly by preaching and sacraments partly by Church censures is called the keyes by reason of the likenesse thereunto and described by binding and loosing in regard of the effect 19 This exposition must needs be granted first because it sufficiently expresseth the vse and effect of keyes which is onely to let in and out or at the least that is the proper vse thereof Next r Shewed before nu 12. this is all that is meant by binding and loosing and binding and loosing containeth whatsoeuer is signified by the keyes Thirdly the Papists that most stifly defend the primacie yet confesse that all the Apostles receiued the keyes equally with Peter The promise of Christ concerning the keyes appertained not onely to Peter but was transmitted to all the Apostles Å¿ Concil ColoÌ„ sub Adulph an 1549. § Sextum medium saith Adolfus the Archbishop of Colen and his Councell t Surius comment an 1547. a man so addicted to the popish religion and carefull to restore it that he was thought meet to succeed Hermannus whom the Pope thrust out Cusanus u Concord li. 2. c. 13. saith Nothing was spoken to Peter but that which was said to the rest for as it was said to Peter whatsouer thou shalt bind so was it said to the rest whatsoeuer ye shall bind and though it were said to Peter Thou art Peter and vpon this rocke I wil build yet by the rocke we vnderstand Christ whom he confessed Thus they
speciall priuiledge to exempt them So saith Caietan Of his grace he gaue theÌ„ that power which by the ordinary way they should haue receiued of Peter so preuenting him c. TheÌ„ the which they could neuer haue said any thing more madly first to tell vs they had their authoritie from Peter and then at the next word to fall three farthings in a penny they should haue had it but by speciall grace they were exempted which dispensation they shew not neither 43 The second sort answer that the Apostles had two offices The first was the Apostleship the second their Bishoply or Pastorall dignitie The former they had immediatly of Christ but the later by and through Peter Victoria i Relect. 2. nu 8 saith Many graue writers are of this minde as k Turrecrem d. 21. in Nouo n. 3 d. 66. Porro n. 1. Sum. l. 2. c 54 Paludens de potest Eccl. Richard 4. d. 17 art 3. q. 1. ad 6. Dom. Iacobat de concil l. 10. art 7. Staplet Princ. doctr l. 6. c. 7. they are indeed but their fellowes confute them by vertue of the Romane vnitie as Victoria himself doth l Vbi supra nu 9. affirming They receiued all the power they had immediatly from Christ which he saith is proued in that he made them all Apostles and to the Apostleship belongeth three things authoritie to gouerne the beleeuers the faculty of teaching and the power of miracles so that it seemeth to him firmely to be said and holden that all the Apostles had the authoritie of orders and iurisdiction both immediatly from Christ And Henriquez m Sum. Mora. p. 403. Domin Ban. vbi supra saith There is no likelyhood in their opinion that say the Apostles receiued their iurisdiction of Peter And so we see the deuice of the Apostles delegacy vnder Peter is altogether vncertaine 44 Others propound and order the matter thus The difference of Peters power from the rest was that he alone might vse the keyes but the rest might not without him n De Sign l. 18 c. 1. saith Bozius o Visib Monar l 6. c. 2. Sanders thinketh the other disciples had the same keyes but it was neither before him nor together at the same time with him but afterwards to teach them that Peter had them by ordinarie right as Prince of all * Se autem velut ex â—peciali delegatione Christi extraordinatio iure but they as it were by Christs speciall delegation and extraordinarily p Tom 3. p. 195. Gregory of Valence laieth the primacy of Peter in two points First that he receiued his Apostleship ordinarily to endure ouer the whole Church euen in his successours wheras the other had it by extraordinary priuiledge to be made Apostles ouer all the world and immediatly by Christâ— differing in the maner of receiuing the Apostleship and in the largenesse of it being receiued For Peter had it of Christ and ouer all the world for euer which the other had not Secondly that he obtained power ouer the Apostles themselues as their Pastor to rulec onfirm and direct them in their ministery not as Apostles for so they were equall but as the sheepe of Christ subiect to him Victoria q Relect. 2. de potest eccl nu 11. p. 87. laieth it in foure things First that his power was ordinary theirs extraordinary Secondly that his was to continue in the Church their 's not Thirdly that his was ouer them but theirs neither ouer him nor one another Fourthly that theirs was subordinate to his so that he might ouerrule it Caietan r De Autho. Papae Concil c. 3. §. Et vt Clarius layeth it in fiue things First in the maner of giuing it because he receiued it ordinarily but they extraordinarily and of speciall grace Secondly in the office it selfe for he was Christs Vicar generall * Which he proueth merrily by 2. Cor. 5.20 Eph. 6.20 And by their title Apostles that is sent because Peter sent them they but his delegates Thirdly in the obiect of the power for he had power ouer all they neuer a one ouer another Fourthly in continuance of time for his was to last to the worlds end theirs determined with their life Fiftly in the essence of the power for his was preceptiue to command them their 's executiue to do what he commanded them Å¿ Bibl. sanct 1.6 annot 169. 171. Senensis laieth it thus that Peter had a threefold power one of order another of Apostleship a third of kingdome or monarchy wherin alone he excelled all the rest These men distinguish nicely to finde out somewhat that might tast of the primacy but the spite is they are not agreed which distinction to stand to and the parts distinguished either differ not or haue no foundation in the texts alledged by the Iesuite 45 But that it may appeare what lost labour it is to stand arguing with them about this matter and all men may plainly see they vphold their religion not with reason and arguments but impudency and prodigious impostures deuised to seduce the world let the Scripture be named whereupon they build the distinctions assigned and viewed if it yeeld them either certainty or vnitie therin The 21 of Iohn is said to be it where Christ biddeth Peter Feed his sheepe And let it be one example among fiue hundred of the wofull and forlorne plight wherein their cause lyeth assuring all men there is not an article of their faith controuerted but it lyeth desperatly perplexed with the same vncertainties and contradictions For t Sicut enim quae caeteris Apostolis aequè ac Petro contulit communia omnibus esse voluit euidenter expressit nimirum Luc. 22.19 Mat 28.19 18.18 Ioh. 20.22 Luc. 24.45 Ita etiam quae peculiaria voluit esse Petri apertè significauit Mat. 16.18 Ioh. 21.15 Baronius and others confesse the 16. of Mat. touching the keyes containeth as much as it the which place I haue already shewed belongeth indifferently to all the Apostles And Armachanus u qq Armen l. 11. cap. 14. holdeth that all Ecclesiasticall power whatsoeuer is included in the Apostleship and was giuen the disciples Peter and all in the third of Marke what time they were made Apostles that it were the greatest folly in the world if the prerogatiue of Peter cannot be proued by those places to thinke it may be holpen by this and yet this is the hope of most of our aduersaries But let the place be viewed and see if there be one word that giueth it First they reckon vp diuers circumstances going with the text to proue that Christ spake to Peter onely which no man denyeth But the speaking to Peter maketh him not chiefe vnlesse the words spoken signifie that which should be contained in the soueraigntie Besides though now he spake to Peter onely yet all the matter spoken belonged to the rest as well as to
next point containeth neuer a true word For not one of the persons named professed the Roman faith as it is now holdē a Trithem For Thaumaturgus liued in the yeare 240. Anthonie in the yeare 330. and Benet in the yeare 500. All which time the present religiō of the Romane Church was vnborne except a verie few points of small moment brought in by the superstition of a few and controlled by the generall doctrine of the Church as I shall clearely proue in the sections following Bernard liued later by 500. yeares but he knew not the present Romane faith He was indeed a Monke in many things superstitious what maruell liuing aboue a thousand yeares after Christ but he was a Papist in none of the principall points of the religion For he held the sufficiencie of the Scripture without traditions iustification by faith alone that our workes merite not that no man can keepe the Law that a man by the testimony of Gods Spirit within him may be certaine of grace that there is no such freewill as the Popish Schoolemen teach he stood against the pride of the Pope and the opinion touching the conception of the blessed Virgine without originall sinne as I will make good against the Iesuite or anie that will take his part Who if he would deale faithfully and to the point should not say Bernard professed the Romane faith and was a Monke but he should haue shewed that he professed the present Romane faith as the Councell of Trent and the Iesuits haue set it downe at least in the fundamentall points thereof which he can neuer do As for Francis of Assise who liued about the same time neither was he of the present Romane faith because it was not holden then as now it is though I cōfesse the matter be not great what that b Ecquis credat D. Franciscum pediculos semel excussos in seipsum solitum esse immittere Can. loc l. 11. c. 7. Lowsie Saint were 2 And as concerning the miracles whereby this Iesuite saith it pleased God to giue testimony of these mens holinesse I answer that what is reported of Bernard and Francis and Dominicke and others of that ranke are lyes and deuices Which I demōstrate by this that they are found no where but in the Legends and liues of Saints written by the Friers whose authoritie our aduersaries themselues despise as I will shew in the next Digression The things written of Gregorie Benet and Anthonie and some others of that time haue more antiquitie but no more certentie as I will likewise demonstrate in the same Digression though allowing much thereof to be true yet the Romane faith is not iustified thereby because as I said before they were done when yet it was vnhatched and Rome professed another religion 3 And whereas he saith diuerse of these were religious men and founded religious orders which Protestants reiect this is easily answered by telling him againe first that if they were religious men founded orders yet their so doing conuinceth not that they were of the same faith for there might be orders and professions erected in a contrary religion as the Essens for example had their peculiar order of religion and yet were I thinke no Papists who would be loath to be tyed to the rigor which they professed A solitarie nation c Plin. l. 5. c. 17. Solin Polyhist c. 38. saith the storie of them and admirable beyond all others in the world No woman among them nor venerie without money dwelling among the trees it is incredible to speake it the nation is eternall through thousands of ages wherein no man is borne so fruitfull vnto them is other mens repentance of their liues Next it followeth not because they founded orders of Monkes that therefore they were the same which the Church of Rome now retaineth for they may be altered as indeed they are by the confession of our aduersaries themselues Thirdly such as Anthonie and Benet and Eustathius were erecting professions and orders of life without warrant from the word or at least not by commandement thereof it was lawfull for vs to vse our libertie in putting them away againe without incurring the censure layed vpon vs by the Iesuite And yet he might haue remembred that a Cardinall of his owne Church was the first that put downe Abbeyes in England Digression 44. Answering that which the Papists obiect touching the miracles of their Church and the Saints therein 4 We denie not but the gift of miracles was in the Church at the first reuealing of the Gospell and long after verie commonly whose proper end was to reuoke the minds of men to the marking of the doctrine that accompanied them that by marking it which they would not so easily haue done had not the same of the preachers miraculous workes allured thē the efficacie thereof might lay hold vpon them and conuert them which it did Wherby it appeareth that all their strength arose from the doctrine confirmed by them in as much as it distinguished them from delusions and such like wonders as may be done by naturall causes and the conveiance of Sathan and assured the beholders that their concurrence with so pure and holy teaching shewed them to be of God For d Bell. de not eccl c. 14. de grat lib. arb l. 6. c. 1. our aduersaries confesse that No miracle can certainly be knowen to be so afore the Church approue it vnlesse the wil by some meane be inclined to beleeue it Whereby it appeareth concerning the purest miracles that euer were that although as a signe they inuited men to come and see yet the men being come were assured by the efficacie of the doctrine that what they saw was a true miracle and when God withheld this efficacie that it inclined not the mind then e As appeareth in the vnbeleeuing Iewes the men beleeued not but said they were delusions 5 This I say to shew our aduersaries that that they must not be offended if we examine the miracles offred by the doctrine of the Scriptures For if they confirme any other doctrine we may safely reiect them as lying wonders But we haue an other issue with them easier to be tried then this touching the credit and certaintie of their miracles such I meane as they haue to stand vpon For all that they can alledge for themselues are either the miracles of Christ and his Apostles or of the Saints in the Primitiue Church or of their Legends Touching the two first we answer in a word that they do but trifle away the time in talking of them till they haue proued their religion the same that those men taught for the miracles must be adiudged to that side that retains the same doctrine Whence it followeth that the Iesuit hath no portion in the miracles of the Primitiue Church because he is not of that faith the which if he will denie then the triall must be made by the
mot 45. saith The truth is that some there haue bene in many ages in some points of the Protestants opinion in so much that scarce any peece or article there is of our whole faith but by one or other first or last it hath bene called in question and that with such liking for the time that they haue all in a manner drawne after them great heards of followers I know Bristo meaneth they were hereticks that in all ages did this but that can he neuer proue yet in the meane time belike he saw some that were of the Protestants faith before of late The second is Reynerius that liued three hundred yeares ago who discoursing of the Waldenses a people for substance of the Protestants religion e Refert Illyric catal tom 2. p. 543. saith They are in all the cities of Lombardy and Prouince and other countries and kingdomes They haue many followers and dispute publickely we haue numbred fortie Churches of theirs and ten schooles in Parish No sect hath continued so long some say it hath bene since the time of Syluester some since the Apostles and there is almost no country wherein it spreadeth not They haue great shew of pietie liuing vprightly before men and beleeuing all things aright concerning God and all the articles in the Creed onely they hate and blaspheme the Church of Rome c. In this testimonie of Reynerius you may see our Church was Catholicke both in place and persons and time and doctrine and that the Church of Rome was resisted and the religion thereof refused afore Luther The true cause why it was not so frequent and publicke as now it is either in place or persons was the persecution of the Pope and the generall corruption of the Papacie which as a leprosie infected and as a mist obscured welnigh all places and persons that sometimes not the true beleeuers themselues such I meane as are come to our knowledge were void of error in euery point though they firmly held the foundatiō as these Waldenses did And if it pleased God in processe of time to giue more libertie to the persons and more puritie to the doctrine what iust occasion is this to say we are not all one Church when the true faith of Christ is not alwayes alike visibly and purely professed Minutius Felix f Octau pa. 401. saith Why are we vnthankfull and why enuie we if the truth of God hath grown ripe in our age let vs enioy our good and let superstition be bridled and wickednes expiated and true religion maintained 2 The next point that our Church is but in few places of Christendome is both false and impertinent First impertinent for if it were so yet were it no hindrance to the note of vniuersalitie For Gods Church vnder the law was shut vp within the narrow bounds of Iudaea and g Digr 17. nu 31 the Papists say theirs in the dayes of their supposed Antichrist shall be openly seene but in few places and h Dried dogm eccl l. 4. c. 2 par 2. Bellar. not eccl c. 7. confesse it is not required to the vniuersalitie of the Church that of necessitie there be at all times in euery countrey some beleeuers it sufficeth if there be successiuely Whence it followeth that if only one prouince did retaine the true faith yet should it truly and properly be called the Catholicke Church as long as it might be shewed that it were the same which it was at other times in other places of the world the which we can shew of our Church how small soeuer the compasse thereof may fall out to be at some time Next it is false for there is no place in Christendome but there are some of our religion therein as not onely experience but our aduersaries owne reports beare witnesse wherein they i Boz sign eccl l. 19. c. 1. Bell. de Rom. Pont. praefat li. 3. c. 21. item de verb. Dei praefat habit in Gymn Rom. complaine how our heresie so heretickes style it possesseth many and large prouinces England Scotland Denmark Norwey Sweden Germanie Pole Boheme Hungary Prussia Lituania Liuonia whereto they may adde France and the Low countries yea Italy and Spaine it selfe where the barbarous Inquisition dayly findeth the profession of our religion euen at their doores 3 The third point that our Church is not Catholick in doctrine neither is as ill proued as the former For negatiue doctrine so farre as it is euil standeth not in denying some points which the fathers held but in denying that which they held according to the Scriptures and which they taught and maintained to be certain and necessary matter of faith deliuered in the Scriptures wherein neither we nor the Centuries euer refused them Neither haue we denied any one point which they held in all ages for the truth as our aduersaries haue For though the Centuries reiect this and that which the Father 's held yet they deny neither this nor that which was holden for the truth in all ages as appeareth by their historie wherein they shew the succession of our faith in all ages and note how it was many times corrupted and mistaken euen by some of the ancient Fathers which is all for substance that the Magdeburgenses can be charged with wherein they haue neither denied the doctrine of the Catholicke Church nor offered the Fathers any wrong to say they had some errors as all men haue and themselues confesse which gaue occasion to others to erre likewise which errors the Centuries sometimes more then was cause noting they did not thereby notwithstanding accuse the whole Church of error because euery thing was not the Churches doctrine that some particular men therein held and what they noted of some particular Fathers must not be stretched to be meant against them all as their censuring somtimes ouermuch of many together for some things written against the truth must not be expounded to be the deniall of all they held beside for if it be and the Centuries be thus censured let this Iesuite say directly without shrinking why doth k Cathar tract de concep virg Suar. to 2. disp 3 sect 6. the Church of Rome hold the virgin Marie was conceiued without sinne l Capreol 3. d. 3. Ban. par 1. p. 75. Paul Cortes in sent which all the Fathers with one consent deny Let them looke my demaund in the face that thinke it heresie to deny the Fathers yea all the fathers consenting in one Digression 47. Of the authoritie of the ancient Fathers in matters of our faith and religion Wherein it is shewed what we ascribe to them and how farre forth we depend vpon them And the practise of our aduersaries in contemning eluding and refusing both them and their owne writers is plainly discouered 4 But this is a point that must be further looked into and not suffered to passe away thus Our aduersaries neuer make an end of boasting of the Fathers and by
in the sence of the Scripture nu 4 7. Digress 10. How a man may be certaine which is the right sence n. 7 8 12. Why many vnderstand not the Scripture Digress 10. and 14. and § 10.1 How the easinesse of the Scripture is proued 8.16 They haue the outward authoritie wherupon our faith is built Digress 11. how we know them to be Gods word Digress 11. and 12. They coÌ„taine all things needfull 9.1 The Papists say the sence of the Scripture altereth with the time 9.11 Horrible behauiour of the Papists gainst the Scriptures Digress 22. Shrift See Auricular confession Sinne. How God willeth it 40.50 Our vprising from sin is by grace our owne will not disposing thereunto 40.63 The Papists haue no certainty what power the Priest hath in remitting sinne Digress 55. We do not say all that we do is sin Digress 37. Our doctrine touching the sinfulnes cleauing to our good workes maketh not men carelesse 40.25 Sinne mortall and venial an vntrue distinction Digress 38. How the Papists hold it ib. They agree not in it ibid. Succession Wherein true succession standeth 52.1 3. How the Protestants doctrine hath succeeded 52.4 How the father 's insisted vpon succession 53. and 56. It is no note of the Church 54.1 True faith how ioyned with succession and how not 54.2 The Succession of the Romane Church proueth it not the true Church 55 2. The Greekes haue as good succession as the Romanes ibid. The Romish Church hath no true outward succession Digress 53. Such succession as the Papists meane is not needfull 58 2. Supremacy of the Pope against the first antiquitie 35.10 47.6 The Papists agree not in it 35.20 The Popes Supremacy dependeth on a point that can neuer be proued 36.24 The Primitiue Church acknowledged it not Digress 27. Phocas gaue it to Boniface 36.31 When it began ouer Bishops and kings 50.9 T TEmptation may be ouercome without Gods grace as the Papists vntruly say 40.58 Traditions made equall to Scripture 1.3 Yea preferred before it 1.2 In marg k. and 5.8 Translation of the Scripture forbidden by the Church of Rome 1.3 How translations are Gods word it selfe and the rule of faith 5.2 and how our faith relieth on them ibid The Scripture ought to be translated and read of all Digress 5. The Papists disdaine this 5.11 How our English translations may be called erronious and how not 6.2 How we know our English translation to be the infallible word of God 6.3 8. The amending or changing of our translation is no discredit to it 6.6 The Hebrew and Greeke originals are free from error 6.11 Transubstantiation a new doctrine 35.12 and 47.8 The Papists haue no certaintie of it 47.9 Treasury of the Church whence pardon arise not agreed vpon what it should be 40 34. Trent Councell what kind of Councell and the proceeding thereof Digress 20. V VAcancies of the Roman Sea 55.6 Veniall sinne what 40 â—6 Some Papists deny any sinne to be venial num 27. How done away ibid. Visiblenes of the Church See Church Vnitie of the Church wherein it properly consisteth 33.1 The true Church may be without outward vnitie n. 2. It is soÌ„time grieuously violated in the Church Digress 21. No vnitie in the Romane Church 35.1 Digress 24. What kind of vnitie the Papists haue in their Church 35.2 Vniuersalitie of the Church how to be expounded 44.2 Vniuersalitie of the Romish Church disproued 46.2 Our faith is vniuerâ—â—â—l in Time Place and Doctrine 44. Vprising from sinne is by Grace without the disposing of the will thereto 40.63 Vulgar translation of the Bible which the Papists vse canonized by the Trent Councell 6.11 Exceedingly corrupt Digress 7. W WAfers when brought into the Sacrament 50.31 Waldenses and their opinions 50.32 Woman Pope 55.7 Word of God See Scriptures The Papists by Gods word meane Traditions as wel as the writteÌ„ word 1.3 Workes See Good works and Merit and Satisfaction The Church of Rome ioyneth our workes with Christs merits iointly to satisfie therewith 40.29 GOod Reader it may fall out that in the margent of this booke specially some faults are escaped in the printing by mistaking or misplacing the figures other parts of the quotation Which is no maruel in quotations of this nature where many figures go together And I my selfe being aboue 100. miles from the presse that I could not helpe it Neuerthelesse I will maintaine the quotation for substance to be true though the Printer may haue mistaken it and learned men that will take so much pains may find that which I intend I doubt not by their owne knowledge of the place if the numbers of the quotation deceiue them I know not whether there be any such defects yet or noâ— but this I admonish because the Papists if they find an error in the printing of one of our bookes vse to exclame as if an article of our faith were razed out neuer remembring the like casualties of their own It is one thing if I haue wilfully forged or falsified a place and another thing if the Printer onely haue mistaken the quotation The latter may be but the former is not as I will be ready to satisfie any that will charge me with it FINIS