In the like manner the Revelations of Scripture are like a cleere well polished glasse free from dust â—lawes crackes or other deformities in them wee may behold all the mysteries of Religion cleerly represented in their shapes and proper colours so farre forth as is needfull for us to see them in this life and when attentively we marke what is shewne unto us wee may take distinct notice of every thing that is to be beleeved by us in all articles of Christian Faith And this knowledge is in it selfe distinct and cleere though compared with that other proper immediate beholding of the things themselves face to face as the Apostle speakes it may justly be termed Darke and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let one instance make all plaine in Gal. 3. 1. the Apostle saith that Christ was described unto the Galatians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before their eyes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being crucified among them Why this was not possible that what was done at Ierusalem on mount Golgatha should bee seene in Galatia many hundred miles from it How then was Christ described and crucified in the sight of these Galatians It was in the cleere and manifest declaration of him by the Apostles preaching Which though it could not make the sufferings of Christ so evident unto the Galatians as they were unto such as stood by the crosse of Christ and saw him suffer yet so cleere and distinct was the representation thereof 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the mirrour of the Apostles preaching that the Galatians faith in this case was not an assent to things obscure which they understood not It s one thing then for a matter to be present unto us in it owne nature another for it to be perspicuously plainly set forth in a narration in which latter sense we affirm against the Romanist that all objects of Faith are not Obscure but Evident in those Revelations of them which are made in Scriptures 2. Ex parte Dei Revelantis For non constat nobis clarè evidenter revelationemillam propter quam credimus articulas fidei à Deo factam esse No is it not evident to us that the Scriptures are of God To whom then was it evident to the holy men of God to whom they were first inspired Yes the Iesuite grants that but yet heare his words Num. 12. Prophetae Apostolâ— saith hee habuerunt tantùm evidentiam revelationis non autemevidentiam Primae veritatis Tamet si enim evidenter cognoscerent Deum esse qui ipsis revelabat mysteria fides non tamen evidenter cognoscebant Deum esse summè veracem qui nec falli possit nec fallere Vnde sequitur assensum illorum quem habuerunt circa mysteria fidei fuisse obscurum ejusdem speciei cum assensu fidei nostrae See ye this Iesuite how hee would blow away with one blast all the certainty of Christian faith and so bring the matter about that there shall be no sure footing for it unlesse it be in the authority of the Church and the Popes infallible fancy Revelations of Scripture are not evident to us that they are of God to the Prophets and Apostles they were indeed evidently knowne to bee of God but yet see the mischiefe the Truth of God the Revealer was not evidently knowne unto these holy men nor were they infallibly certaine but that God might and would tell them a lie A foule blasphemy and I know not whether hee doe deserve the name of a Reasonable creature who is not himselfe or thinkes there is any that is not infallibly evidently and most certainly convinced of this truth that God cannot bee deceived himselfe nor will deceive any But touching this point that wee have no such obscure tottering foundation for our faith but a most sure and cleere word full of brightnesse and majesty like light shining into our soules and by it owne characters discovering it owne divine originall of this hereafter more fitly in handling the certainty of Faiths assent Now in the meane time for conclusion of this first point touching the Objects of Faith How farre forth they are Evident or Inevident these two confectaries may be noted out of what hath been said 1. Knowledge by sight takes away Faith that is so far as sight goes but no further for as we said of Beliefe in generall so here Evident Experience of the truth in some things doth helpe our Faith in other Whence t is usuall with the godly to strengthen their faith in the promises for time to come by calling to minde Gods mercies of old and that evident triall of them they have had in time past And Thomas because hee saw the Evident truth of Ghrists Resurrection did more firmely beleeve the rest of the mystery of mans Redemption by him But otherwise in the same things as sight waxeth so Faith waineth the greater light certainty drownes the lesse where Knowledge is perfect the Faith though it remains in the Habit yet it ceaseth in the Act. This is manifest by that opposition which the Apostle makes betweene Faith and Sight 2. Cor. 5. 7. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 what this walking by Faith is is plaine Chap. 4. 18. We looke not on the things which are seene but on the things which are not seen for the things which are seene are temporall but the things which are not seene are eternall 2. A distinct explicite knowledge of divine things in the Revelations of them in Scripture is necessary to the being of Christian Faith By explicite knowledge I meane the understanding of the articles of Beliefe so farre forth as they are plainly declared in Scriptures This Historicall knowledge for so we may terme it synecdochicâ—â— of the letter and meaning of the Scriptures in such things as it proposeth to be beleeved is required to the being of Christian Faith as a necessary antecedent thereof For though this knowledge may be where Faith is not yet Faith can never be where this knowledge goes not before Ignorant in this sense and Vnbeleeving are termes reciprocall As perfect knowledge by sight excludes Faith of the thing seene so doth perfect ignorance of any thing destroy all Faith of the same thing I say of the same thing for a man may bee absolutely ignorant in some things yet a beleever in others and therefore wee doe not meane that such an explicite knowledge is necessary to faith as that wee must distinctly apprehend all points of Faith before wee beleeve for the Apostles when yet they were true beleevers were ignorant in many articles of Faith as Christs Resurrection Ascention c. But this wee affirme that where there is totall ignorance of any one article of Faith there can be no Beliefe at all of that article as for example Hee that saith I beleeve a holy Catholike Church and yet knowes not what a holy Catholike Church is what ever hee say hee doth not beleeve it That such a blinde credo is
certainely belieue such and such Articles of Faith His answere will bee Because the Church which can discerne what is what is not of God hath infallibly decreed such and such things to be belieued Against which impious doctrine we except and say That by this meanes our Faith is resolued either into nothing at all or at the furthest but only into humane Authority 1 That is resolued into iust nothing but runs round in a Circle like a mill-horse For aske a Roman Catholike why doe you belieue the Pope cannot erre His answere is because the Scripture saith so Tues Petrus c. and Orauipro te ne deficiat sides tua and Sum vâ—b scum ad consummationem saculs with such other places But how know you that those places are Scripture and that that is the right meaning of those places He answeres because the Councell of Trent and the Pope say so Yea but how know you infallibly they doe not erre in saying so Hee answeres Because the Scripture affirmes they cannot erre for Thou art Peter vpon this rocke c This is the Fayries dance wherein men smitten with the spirit of giddinesse are led round in a ring being neuer able to free them or finde any resting place whereon to fixe the assurance of their Faith 2 That at best their faith is resolued finally into Mans Authority Which appeares thus aske a Papist Why doe you belieue Purgatory He will say Because God in his word hath reuealed it as an Article of Faith Zach. 9. 11. I haue loosed thy prisoners out of the pit wherein is no water i. out of Purgatory and Luke 16. Lazarus was carried into Abrahams bosome i. into Purgatory with such like Well but why doe you infallibly belieue that this is Gods word and that this is the meaning of it Hee sayes Because the Church i. Counceis and Popes say so Hee can goe no further vnlesse hee will runne round Here then hee must stay resting his Faith on mans Testimony and Authority Which hee doth manifestly forasmuch as it appeares not by any argument from the Scriptures themselues that such a doctrine as Purgatory is contained in them and therefore he assents to the truth of it finally and onely because the Church for sooth hath conceiued the meaning of those places to be such Now this is not to belieue the Scriptures but to belieue the Opinion of the Church that is to say of men like our selues Heere Becanus helpes at a dead lift by a schoole distinction thus Fidesresoluitur Formaliter in Deumprimam veritatem reuelantem Directiuè in EcclesiaÌ„ propter infallililitateÌ„ proponeÌ„dt The shift of a Sophister What Faith is it that is thus resolued Theologicall or Humane Neither saith hee Theologicall Faith is resolued into Gods authority Humane is resolued into mans authority as to belieue an Article because Caluiâ— or Lutber teach it or say wee because Pope Paul the fift Gregory the 13. or any other Pope Cardinall Bishop or Bishops teach it What saith is it then which is resolued into the Churches authority It is saith the Iesuite neither saith neque purè diuina neque purè humana sed quasi media inferior is cuinsdam ordinis Iust so I take it men vse to speak when they cannot tell what to say It is Quasi and Aliquomodò and Alicuius generis c. It is something if they could tell what But be it what it may be if it be not a diuine Faith What shall become of the vulgar sort in their Church must they bee saued by such a middle kinde of Faith betweene Diuine and Humane This is a new way to heauen of the Iesuiâ—es inuention wherein it will bee a matter beyond his skill so to conduct a poore vnlearned Catholike that he step not aside leaning too much vpoÌ„mans authoriti whereon he should not trust at all and too little on Gods on whom he should altogether relie Plaine folke haue no skill in such nice distinctions of belieuing God Formaliter and the Church Directiuè and it will trouble the authors of them to giue a reasonable meaning of them For what is it to belieue the Church Directiuè is it to be drawne by the Churches direction in the ministeriall Preaching and application of the Scriptures vnto beleefe of the Articles of Faith Wee grant such a resolution of our faith into the Churches authority as a motiue to induce and persivade vs to belieue But Becames denies that the Church is to be reckoned inter motiua fidei and therefore he must needs account it inter formales rationes fidei as a case of reason and proper foundation of our faith whereinto it is resolued formaliter And so it is for there is neuer a Papist that wil belieue any thing that God saith but onely for this reason because the Church allowes of it It is not the light and Euidence of Gods word by it owne selfe Euincing its owne Diuinity and Interpreting its owne meaning t is not this they rest vpon if they did what need they goe further but it is meerely formally and directly the Testimony and Opinion of men whether Fathers Councels Popes or whomsoeuer they please to style the Church This impiery is horrible and so maine an errour in the foundation of Faith that it makes the whole frame to â—otter fastening the consolation and Hope of man vpon the vncertainty of another mans testimony therby throwing him into inextricable difficulties and doubts besides offering intollerable indignity vnto God in giuing such authority vnto his seruant and vassall as tends to the contumely of the Lord and Master For so it is when a few men met together in a Councell-house or one poore sinfull illeterate Pope shal be deemed of power sufficient and iudgement infallible to set themselues downe vpon the bench and to call that word which shall iudge them at the last day vnto the bar and there to interpret ratifie or nullifie what and how themselues best pleaseth Wee might wellbe ashamed of our religion when wee dispute with Athiests and infidels if wee had no better reason to confirme our Religion but our owne testimonie because we say it is the truth and the Romish Church might blush when she pleads for her infallibilitie from those places formerly mentioned yet in sine hath no other warrant from them but onely this it is so and it shall be so because shee her selfe hath decreed that onely to bee the true meaning of those Scriptures But to leaue these absurdities blasphemies and come to the truth that which we maintaine touching the Certaintie of the Scriptures Diuine authoritie is this viz. That we are infallibly ascertained of the Scriptures Diuinitie by the Scriptures themselues I or as in other Sciences there are alwayes some principles Per se not a indemonstrabiliâ— whence other things are proued so in Diuinitie all conclusions in point of Beliefe and Practise are proued by the Scriptures but for the Scriptures they
doth not teach that 't is honest to beleeve him Can any thing be more senselesse or will not every man in the world excepting a Iesuite confesse that the very light of nature teacheth him to acknowledge that it is a very good and honest thing to beleeve Gods authority let him reveale his will unto us which way hee please But t is the fashion of these writers to dorre their readers with a distinction and so to leave them with a prius conceditur posterius negatur distracted and confounded rather than any whit satisfied This of the first reason That a man may beleeve without the helpe of Gods grace the second followes which also confirmes the former viz. 2. That is no act of Iustifying Faith which is found in Divells Heretickes Hypocrites and Reprobates But this assent unto divine Revelations because of Gods authority is in those both divells and men Ergo It is no act of Iustifying Faith The major is agreed upon that the acts of Iustifying Faith are found onely in those who are justified which cannot be said those persons mentioned The minor is likewise evident That Divells Hereticks Hypocrites and Reprobates may and doe assent unto such propositions as God reveales and that because of Gods authority who doth reveale them This hath beene formerly shewed unto you in the explication of the nature of a generall Faith and t is so cleere by Scriptures and experience that our adversaries cannot deny it The forenamed Schoole-man grants it manifestly as concerning Hypocrites and wicked livers who yet professe the Catholicke Faith for disputing Cap. 8. de Habit. Fidei touching that vertue which is infused into the Will whereby it may if it list command the Supernaturall assent of the Vnderstanding heetelleth us that this Vertue is a distinct vertue from all others and is neither Charity nor Obedience § 10. in conclus and that it is perfect in it selfe though it be without them according as other morall habites of justice temperance c. are Whence hee tells us § 11. in plaine termes Potest esse sinâ— charitate ut patet in Christiano peccatorâ— qui Fidem habet siue gratia charitate A Christian that is a sinner may have Faith without grace and charity What Iustifying Faith yea according to the Romish Divinity for he may beleeve the truth of the articles of Religion because of Gods authority who hath revealed them and to do this is a Supernaturall assent and the proper act of Iustifying Faith as these men teach Now touching the Divells and Heretickes the man is a little more coy He will not confesse that the Divels yeeld that assent of Faith he speakes of They doe not beleeve the mysteries of Religion Per assensum supernat uralem i. e. because of Gods authority but Per assensum quendam naturalem qui non oritur ex pio affectu sed ex vi pondere argumentorum quibus intellectus illorum convincitur cap. 11. quaest 2. § 4. We grant willingly that they doe not assent out of any good affection nor is that needfull to make their assent supernaturall for in hypocriticall impenitent and reprobate Catholickes there 's no pious affection moving them to beleeve and yet if wee beleeve their Doctors there is in them a supernaturall assent of Faith But for that other thing That the divells beleeve onely ex vi pondere argumentorum t is utterly false seeing it cannot be doubted but that they beleeve the truth of many future contingents wherof they are not convinced by any force of argument from the things themselves but from authority of Gods Revelations in his Word or otherwise Which infallible truth of God in all his revelations is so cleerely apprehended by these damned Spirits that it makes them to acknowledge the truth and goodnesse of that which otherwise they abhorre Wherefore that comparison which hee makes betweene the faith of 〈◊〉 and wicked Christians is most vaine and erroneoâ—… 〈◊〉 â—…ith hee you consider the faith of either of them wâ—…â—egard to the Object there 's par ratio both being â—…d about the same things But if you take it with râ—â—ard 〈◊〉 honesty of the act so the assent of the Divells is farrâ—… 〈◊〉 than that of bad Christians who have faith anâ—â—…rkes But wherein He tells us The Faith of Châ—… Supernaturalis Voluntaria Honesta The Faith of Divells is Naturalis Coacta pravis circumstantijs vitiata All which are false For the Faith of Divells is Supernaturallas much as that of wicked Christians seeing both beleeve propter authoritatem Dei revelantis which is formalis ratio of Supernaturall assent Againe the Faith of divells is as voluntary as that of wicked men for it cannot bee wrought in either by compulsion simply and if the Majesty of Gods infallible truth command the assent of Divells to that which they love not doth not the same cause also prevaile with ungodly men who beare as little true affection to God and Goodnesse as the divells doe Lastly the Faith of Divells is as Honest as that of wicked men For let any man speake Is it not as Honest a thing for wicked angâ—lls to beleeve what God saith as it is for wicked men If not wherein lies the dishonesty of that act in the angells or wherein stands the honesty of that act in men Can there be named any circumstances which make the Divels Faith dishonest but that the same or as bad may bee alledged against the honesty of the Faith of wicked Christians Sure I am what everthese men conceit of the Honesty of Faith without workes in men Saint Iames is plaine in his comparison that t is no whit better than the Faith of Divells Iames 2. 19. Thou beleevest that there is one God thou doest well the Divells also beleeve it and doe not they doe well too Yes haply better than thou for they beleeve and tremble which thou doest not To conclude in the last place we object that Heretickes have such a kinde of Faith as the Romanists call Iustifying For though they erre in some articles of Faith yet others they assent unto because of Gods authority revealing them This Becanus denies telling us that Heretici qui veâ— in uno articulo sunt infideles omnem fidem amiserunt cap. 11. quaest 3. § 4. which answer hee makes upon this ground That the Habite of Faith is lost by any one act of infidelity § 2. and therefore whereas Heretickes beleeve many things t is but upon a kinde of custome and by a humane faith We reply and say that that position One act of infidelity destroyes the habit of Faith is false and contrary to reason and Scriptures as hereafter I shall have occasion to shew speaking of the opposites of Faith For the point we grant that He who is a persevering Heretick though but in one fundamentall article he hath no justifying faith not because he hath lost it but because he never had it But
Prophets in the famous Vniversity of Oxford yet I assure my selfe that whosoever reads this booke with good attention and understanding shall finde the Authors meditations therein so throughly digested and the nature properties and proper acts of Grace and Faith so distinctly layde downe and accurately distinguished that he shall reape to himselfe much profite and comfort thereby and shall with me admire the grace of God abounding toward the Author in all wisedome and in all knowledge lively sense and utterance of heavenly and supernaturall mysteries far above all which can be expected from or is ordinarily found in one of his age and yeares If as we know trees by their fruit so we may passe our sentence upon the composer of this Treatise by his work we cannot conceive or speake lesse of him but that as hee was from his childehood trayned up in the Schooles of learning and had profited above his equals in the studies of the best arts humane divine so undoubtedly he hath from his tender yeares beene throughly disciplined in the Schole of Christ and hath by much and daily experience of afflictions and manifold temptatiâ—ns in himselfe and of the inward sensible operations of Gods spirit and grace in his owne soule attained to this high measure of heavenly knowledge and understanding whereof he hath here given us a lively experiment It is not the most strong out stretched arme of humane reason nor the most swift and farre flying arrow of the sharpest naturall wit nor the farre extended lines of long continued studies which can reach so high to these heavenly and supernaturall mysteries It is onely the holy Spirit of grace comming upon all these taking possession of mans soule dwelling in him and making him a new creature which brings this kind and measure of profound wisedome and this distinct knowledge of divine things yea by the fiery tryall of inward temptations onely doth that blessed Spirit drive the thirsly soules of Gods militant Saints to digge and dive so deep into the fountaines of the sacred Scriptures and to draw such living waters from the very bottome of those Wells of salvation In a word as the Apostle saith of yongue Abel that by Faith having offered up a more excellent sacrifice than his elder brother Cain he by it obtained witnesse that he was righteous God testifying of his gifts by it he being dead yet speaketh Heb. 11. 4. so I will not doubt nor bee affraid to say of the godly and learned Author of this Booke who having offered up to God in a publike place these exercises as the first fruits of his heavenly learning did not long after leave this world in the flower of his age and ascended up into that supercelestiall glory towards which he had ever bent all his studies and desires and which alwaies hee had sought after in the whole course of his life that by faith hee though yongue in yeares hath offered up a more excellent sacrifice than many of his elder brethren by which hee being dead yet speaketh and shall speake to future ages And as hereby he shall obtaine witnesse of all Gods surviving Saints that hee himselfe was a righteous and faithfull servant of Christ excelling in grace and vertue in the dayes of his pilgrimage here on earth So God also will testifie of this his gift that it is holy and acceptable in the eyes of his Majestie by making it powerfull and effectuall to the begetting and increasing of saving grace faith and knowledge in all such as reade and peruse it with true Christian docilitie diligence and humble devotion To the blessing of which gracious God I leave this worke and to his grace commend you all desiring in my daily prayers to be and continue Your brother companion and fellow souldier in seeking the glory of Gods grace defending the truth of the Gospell and fighting against the spreading errours and springing heresies of this age George Walker The Table of the chiefe matters contained in this Treatise ABilities of man are not to be measured by his own partiall iudgement page 145 Actions of grace and holinesse how far they are in a godly mans owne power 147 Admonition three-fold about searching the Scriptures 217. c. Affections two-fold sensuall rationall described 125 Affections not quickned nor stirred vp to loue of goodnesse before conuersion 125 Not rightly moued towards Spirituall things but when thoy are affected spiritually 130 Articles of the Arminian faith 53 Arminians how they erre about vniuersall grace 54 Their errors about the worke of Gods Word and mans calling 99 Their obiections and reasons answered 106. 107. c. Their errors about the subiection of mans naturall affections to his reason discouered 125. c. They giue large allowance of grace to men vnregenerate 127 Their absurdities therein 128 Their grosse errors about mans will discouered 132 c. Their errors in holding that conuersion doth begin and consist in the act onely of beleeuing 134 135. c. The dangerous issue and conclusion of their errors 136 Assent differs in degree according to the diuersity of the obiects assented vnto 169 Assistance effectuall why denied by God at some times to the regenerate 153 B BAptizing of Infants lawfull 47 Beleefe how it differs from faith and trust 170 C CAlumnies of Arminians and Iesuites 155 Calling outward and inward described 94 How the Arminians conceiue of Calling 99 Catechizing needfull and vsefull in the Church of Christ Preface page 6 Certaintie of assent in Faith springs from three grounds The first 206 The second 220 The third 222 Communion with Christ two-fold 15 Conuersion of a sinner to God 6. 7 The causes of it 16. 24 The subiect 37 The manner how it is wrought 27 It goes before Faith 4 It signifies First Gods infusing of habituall grace Second The regenerate mans actuall imploying of grace infused 89. 144 Conuersion mistaken by Arminians which is a cause of confusion in their writings 92 Conuersion how to be truly discerned 115 Preparatiue meanes vnto it 137. 138 How weake they are and in a man vnregenerate how they are said to be sinfull 139 That they may be resisted and how 140. c. Cooperation of Gods Spirit necessarie in all holy actions of men regenerate 151 Corruption of nature what it is 5 D DEsire of spirituall things after a naturall manner is a corrupt desire 130 E ELect men onely are the proper subiect of true conuersion vnto God 41 Euidence of the Scriptures declared proued 175. 176 Conclusions touching it The first 176 The second 182 The third ibid. 183 F FAlling from grace and finall resistance described 142 Faith in Christ a part of sanctification 10 The habit and act of it and when it is wrought ibid. It is not properly the root of all grace 12 There is some Spirituall life before it 13 and some participation with Christ 15. 23 It helps forward and increaseth grace and all gracious actions 14 Faith is commanded in
truth as themselves had either received by tradition from the Ancestors or learned by new revelation from God himselfe When the Church grew out of a family into a Nation and that as men multiplied so ignorance corruption increased God himselfe writes a Catechisme for the Iewes describing a short compendium of Religion in the two Authenticke Tables of the Law containing Ten words so few and so plaine that the shortest memory and shallowest wit might easily comprehend them And withall God now layes an expresse command upon his people both for themselves and for their children Deut. 6. 6 7. And these words which I command thee this day shall be in thine heart And thou shalt rehearse them vnto thy children and shalt talke of them when thou sittest in thine house and when thou walkest by the way and when thou liest downe and when thou risest up The word is emphaticall Thou shalt rehearse them continually 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou shalt sharpen them by often and seasonable instruction giving an edge or point to the precepts of the Law that they may pierce into the mindes of the unlearned How carefully this strict injunction was afterward observed either by the Levites in publick or in private by masters of families wee cannot certainely define where Scripture is silent of both their practises but if wee may judge of the carefulnesse of former times by the carelesnesse of these there is good cause to thinke that both Levites in the Synagogues and Governours in their private houses were negligent enough in discharging this duty Yet we may well presume that there were both of the one and other not a few whose godly industry in this particular may justly shame the impious slothfulnesse of Ministers and People in latter ages Where will a David and Bathsheba be now found personages of highest quality yet counting it no disgrace to reade a Lecture of religion and morality to a yongue Salomon You shall finde their practise 2. Chron. 28. 8. Prov. 31. 1. And Salomon himselfe seemes to give that precept out of the experience of his owne most excellent education Teach a childe the trade of his way and when hee is old he shall not depart from it though himselfe scarce did so Yea albeit infinite corruptions have at this day deformed all religion among the Iewes yet even to these times may be seene some prints of their ancient discipline among them whose children are in their tender yeares first taught the law and bookes of Moses and after that their Talmudicall Traditions with such care and industry as their skill in Iudaisme at 17. exceedes the knowledge of many among us in Christianity at 70. whereof see the learned Buxd. Synag Iudaic. c. 3. But come we unto those times when the Sunne of righteousnesse arose and the knowledge of holy things shone in its full strength by the ministery of Christ and his Apostles and we may trace this practise by its apparant footsteps even from the first age of the Christian Church and downeward The words which I have read are but a copy and briefe description of the Primitive Catechisme the Apostle Paul commends to Timothies custody 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a pattern and delincation of wholesome doctrine which hee had learned from the Apostle 2. Tim. 1. 13. which also Rom. 12. 6. he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Analogy of faith contained in all fundamentall points of sacred doctrine with which all interpretations of Scripture must beare due proportion Now very necessity drave them in those Primitive times to draw religion into compendious heads and short summaries partly in regard of Infidels who being converted to the faith were to be instructed in the maine points of Christian beleefe a thorow knowledge and open confession whereof was required of them at their Baptisme partly in respect of the children of Christian parents who because of the dangerous sollicitations of Idolatrous Gentiles and Hereticall Christians privily creeping in to beguile by craftinesse ignorant and unstable soules were of necessity to have their mindes setled in the chiefe and generall conclusions of Christian doctrine by which they might defend themselves against all sophistical seducements Both these whether new Converts or yongue Christians were anciently called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 till their Baptisme and Confirmation and for such whose narrow wits could not comprehend large discourses it was needfull to make use of Epitomes Touching the word we finde it more ancient than this custome and more generally understood than of it onely In generall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in its Metonymicall signification is to teach others vivâ voâ—â— by speech sounding into their eares in speciall to instruct any in the first rudiments of an art or science because such as are ignorant learne more by others teaching than their owne study In the generall acception besides profane authors wee finde it used in the new Testament five severall times Luke 1. 4. That thou mightest acknowledge the certainty of those things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whereof thou hast been instructed saith S. Luke to Theophilus rendring the reason of the dedication of his Gospell unto him Of Apollos an eloquent man mighty in the Scriptures it s said he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 instructed in the way of the Lord Act. 18. 25. Rom. 2. 18. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 instucted by the Law againe 1. Cor. 14. 19. I had rather in the Church speake fiue words with mine understanding 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that I might also teach others than ten thousand words in a strange tongue But most notable is that place Gal. 6. 6. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Let him that is taught in the Word make him that hath taught him partaker in all his goods In all which places 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is no more than 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to bee taught or instructed as the circumstances of the Texts doe evidently demonstrate But in times presently succeeding the Apostles and since the word hath been usually taken by Ecclesiasticall Writers in the strictest sense for the first instruction of yongue beginners in the rudiments of Christianity For now began the Gentiles in great multitudes to joyn themselves unto the Church and the number of those that were to be Catechised daily increasing gave occasion to the Pastors of every Congregation to bee more frequently imployed in this businesse And as the burden grew heavier so new meanes were devised for their better institution Hence besides the Pastors and Bishops of the Churches there were some specially deputed to attend this office who from their imploiment were called Catechistae and not onely in the Temples but also in Schooles opened for that purpose did teach such as were rude and ignorant the elements of Christian religion Famous above others is that Schoole at Alexandria in Egypt wherin so many learned men taught and so many holy Martyrs and Confessors had their first education There it was that Origen
having first taught a Grammar Schoole did afterward succeed Clemens in the office of Catechist and such was eyther the necessity of those times or the excellent abilities of the man that at 18. yeares of age he took upon him that charge of publicke teaching 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Eusebius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Very yongue yeares and I know not whether he got so much honour by his learned teaching as for his constant suffering so many persecutions as were raised against him in that City Yet was he in account for both in so much that hee was not onely sent for to come into Arabia by the Governour of the country there to teach but also being driven from Alexandria by troubles there he repaired to Caesarea Stratonis there set up a Schoole and was judged worthy to expound the Scriptures and read Divinity in publicke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the same Eusebius witnesses Lib. 6. cap. 13. But I must not write a story of him or others who in those times bare this office in the Church nor yet of the Catachumeni and the severall constitutions decreed of in Councells and Provinciall Synods for their more convenient institution of the time of their admission to Baptisme and after that to the Communion of the manner of their being in the Congregation during the time of divine Service where they were to stand not mixed with the rest of the people but severally by themselves 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when they were to depart the assembly viz. before the celebration of the Eucharist at which they were by no means to be present though at the Sermons Praiers of the Church for them they might be of divers cases touching their Baptisme their relapses recoveries their phrensies and possessions by the divell their martyrdome before Baptisme with such like queres and customes of which now antiquated by time wee neede not trouble ourselves to make any curious inquiry The Acts and Canons of the ancient Councills and Church Writers of those times make frequent mention of them out of whom to compile an exact Commentary upon this matter is a worke of longer time than I can spare and lesser commodity than will pay for the paines Yet one word of the manner of teaching that was used towards these Novices in the faith which what ever it was in private for the publike seemes not to have beene dialogue-wise by question and answer after the fashion of these times but in a continued speech with much plainnesse and familiar easinesse That tract of S. Austins de Symbolo ad Catechumenos and these Catachismes of Cyrill Bishop of Ierusalem which are preserved to our times shew us what course they followed in writing and preaching of Catachisme the one being a plaine exposition of the Creede the other nothing but Sermons upon the chiefe Articles of faith and points of manners which Cyrill preached extempore to the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or newly baptized in his Church If now wee come downe to latter times when all the world was become Christian in outward profession we shall easily perceive that when they wanted Conuerts of the Gentiles whom they might instruct these ages began by degrees to neglect also the children of the Church So that for many ages whilst ambition and tyranny in Church-men wried their thoughts more to the advancement of their owne greatnesse than to the furtherance of religion godliness in the Church this sacred institution was even quite laid aside after that through ignorance barbarism superstition easily crept in soon corrupted whatsoever was sincere either in Gods worship or good maners And now was this disease growne so desperate that its thought incurable by those lazie and idle shepheards which wealth and superstition had bred vp and advanced to the oversight of Gods flockes I meane that Cloistred rabble of Monkes and Friers who sacrilegiously parting those that God hath ioyned together made a profession of Praier without preaching and thought by their devout oraisons to bring men to heaven how ignorant and wicked soever they were Yet these were the men whose lips must be thought to preserve knowledge whose brests must bee the oracles of Divinity and in their heads must lye inclosed the more secret and precious treasures of wisedome but they were indeed wells without water deceiving the hope of weary and thirsty soules empty clouds they were without raine that did not send forth one gracious showre to refresh the inheritance of the Lord. And now these dreamers in stead of curing the peoples ignorance which would have cost them some paines take a shorter course and fall to commend it as a speciall vertue and fruitfull mother of true devotion Which base impiety as it hath been detestable to Angels to men upon whom any the least beame of saving light ever shone so since the reformation hath the shame therof been sufficiently discovered and cast upon the face of that Romish Strumpet though her whores forehead cannot yet blush at it We see and now enjoy those holy ordinances of Preaching and Catechising within our Churches revived and observed with happy successe in the increase of all piety Our adversaries have seen it and sorrowed for it to behold the industry and care of the Churches in their provision for the due instruction of yonguer and weaker Christians And though they hope that their ignorance shall uphold their Church against our knowledge yet very shame hath driven them to doe somewhat for which purpose a Catechisme there was hatcht in the Councill of Trent and by it allowed wherein of a little milke of Gods Word and superfluity of ranke poison pressed out of the brests of the Babylonish Harlot such food was prepared as was thought sit for the nourishment of her infants But I must hasten what I have spoken touching this point shall be as for justification of our present exercise so for a commendation of the paines of those faithfull skilfull worke-men in the Lords building who have laboured by preaching and writing to lay a sure foundation of knowledge before they build up in the faith I could heartily wish that those among us whom either ease or pride have made carelesse in this office would bee pleased to looke abroad into such congregations where this course is held and to compare them with their owne and others where t is neglected they should soone perceive how faire and open a passage is made for preaching to follow after where diligent catechising hath gone before on the other side how hopelesse their endeavour is who labour to imprint in the heads of their people the knowledge of conclusions before they have learned the principles of Divinity If these men complaine and say I have spent my strength in vaine and my labour without profit preaching long and seeing little reformation I will not pitty them who are like unwise Nurses who when their children thrive not lay
hee had rather enter upon the Church by undermining the Faith with Heresies than at an open breach upon good manners Ill manners finde more resistance there 's feare of lawes and rod of discipline to curbe them they want their apologies and colourable excuses so lye open to the reproofe and hatred of morall honesty they come accompanied with shame and disgrace following at the heeles which hinders their appearing and entertainment in publike But Heresie easily enters and quickly spreads abroad it findes favourers enough having the advantage of mens common infirmity who are apt to entertaine novelties and take a pride to bee singular it comes armed with reason and such justifications as it thinkes it needs not blush being painted over with the colour of truth lastly it aimes at the fairest the Leaders of the flocke whose authority and example speedily infects the rest With this weapon hath the Dragon made warre with the woman raising up even of her owne children such as have fought against her by damnable Heresies against all the Articles of Faith Of which part have been cut asunder by the sword of the Spirit and yet some againe reviving have been brought into the field under new colours part though convicted condemned yet stand it out under the support of tyrannicall violence remain to this day in that Augean stable that sink or common sewer of the Romish Synagogue whereto all Heresies almost of former latter times have made their confluence Besides a new breed of Hereticall opinions not plainly denying but by consequent overturning sursum vorsum the maine Articles of Christian beleefe and therefore are so much the moâ—e dangerous by how much the lesse easily they are discernable in their damnable issues So as the Doctrine thereof is no lesse perplexed with strange disputes and difficulties than the Grace it selfe is continually assaulted by fearefull doubting and distrust Whether it bee mans infelicity to be ignorant of that which stands him in most stead or the divells malice to lessen our comforts in the vse of Faith by confounding our understanding in the knowledge of the nature thereof that so we might either dangerously erre or discomfortably doubt touching the truth of it in our selves or Writers misexplication of that excellent grace through their own weaknes or want of faith sure I am if any point of Divinity this touching faith is full of much obscurity and contention T is much men should have a grace so divine and powerfull and yet know not what it is but as the Apostle speakes of men Faith is not of all so may wee say of Writers All have not faith that write of it especially Popish Doctors who speaking of faith but by imagination have profanely censured the faith of Gods elect expounded by Protestants according to Scripture to bee but a very fancy Among whose curious and Metaphysicall discourses of this subject he that wants faith shall never finde it and hee that hath faith may chance lose it at least the life and powerfull practice of it whilst his head is intangled in subtile and nice speculations about it For our selves let it be our care so to speake and judge of faith as that most precious grace which is given us to save our soules not exercise our wits the knowledge whereof by contemplation is most empty and vain without the reall inhabitation of it within our soules It shall be my weake and yet best endeavour by the helpe of Gods assistance to give you the knowledge thereof so farre as the word in manifold precepts and examples of the Saints together with the paines of the learned have discovered it to my poore understanding In the unfolding of the nature of it I must spend more time than at first I purposed to doe because in this point some other parts of Divinity are so enterwoven and linked one with another that without the knowledge of all wee shall not cleerly discerne of any alone Such are our Vocation the forerunner and our Iustification the follower of our faith All that I have to say I will reduce to these foure generalls 1. Touching the antecedents of faith namely our Conversion Vocation of which so much as shal serve to discover unto us the generation and birth of faith 2. Touching the nature of faith it selfe wherein the being of that most heavenly vertue consists 3. Concerning the consequents and concomitants of faith both in regard of God as Iustification and our selves as Obedience whereby we may be able to judge as of the benefit so of the truth of our faith 4. Concerning the opposites and enemies of faith the knowledge whereof may arme us against them For the first namely our Conversion the knowledge thereof will give us some light to finde out how faith is wrought in us which by Divines is made the first degree of our Conversion and last Terminus of our effectuall Vocation However a part it is and that a principall one too of our first resurrection from the death of sinne to the supernaturall life of grace Which that it may appeare we must distinctly consider of the threefold difference of such qualities as are in the reasonable soule and doe either help or hinder it in its operations This difference is according to mans triple estate 1. In the state of innocency man was created right or upright Eccl. 7. 29. and very good Gen. 1 ult endowed with such strength and integrity in all parts as did wholly dispose them to all operations conformable to Gods will His understanding so farre as was needefull before his translation had a cleer apprehension of the Deity in his nature attributes and worship as also of the creatures in their essence and qualities His will embraced and clave fast unto God whom Adam knew to be the author of his being and happinesse His affections and all inferiour faculties obeyed without all resistance the rule of reason and motions of the sanctified Will This universall holinesse and perfection in the whole man was that Image of God or originall justice wherein Adam was created but continued not For in the second place 2. After his fall for a punishment of his wilfull transgression God withdrew from Adam this his Image and stript him naked of that habite of grace and perfect holinesse wherewith he was before in all parts qualified leaving onely here and there some few traces or lines of that excellent Character unblotted out And now in place of originall justice succeeds originall corruption being an universall depravation and disability of mans whole nature to work well and conformably to the law of his first creation The understanding is dark erroneous confused in the apprehension of naturall stark blinde in perceiving spirituall things The will froward averse from affecting or choosing its chief good The affections and lower faculties disorderly violent untameable And this universall corruption of mans nature is that which we call the image of Satan to whom Adam
and effect to the Word preached which wee maintaine and plead for This point will fall in more fitly to be discussed afterwards in the handling of a few Questions touching the manner of the Working of grace in mans conversion Whereinto though I am somewhat unwilling to enter because that Positive rather than Polemicall Divinity befits this place yet considering the danger whereinto mindes not rightly informed in these points may unhappily fall and that herein it is easie to slip from the truth to Arminianisme and thence to Popery there 's but a threed betweene them I have thought it would not bee unprofitable briefly and plainly to touch upon such materiall controversies as are moved in this matter that even the younger sort might have something to oppose against cauilling gainsayers of the truth and crafty seducers of the uninstructed You are therefore to understand that in point touching Mans conversion there is scarce any circumstance that wee have formerly spoken of but it is quarrelled at and corrupted with false opinions Not the nature and substance of our conversion which say they is not by the infusion of Habituall sanctity into the Soule but through Grace acquired by much paines and industrious actions of our own excited assisted by some helpe of the Spirit Not the moving Cause which is affirmed by them to bee not Gods speciall and actuall Love to his Elect but his common and equall love to all mankinde alike Not the Efficient cause which wee affirme to be the worke of Gods Spirit they say is the Freedome of our wills Not the manner of it without and above the strength of our naturall abilities as wee hold but so farre is the compasse of our owne power that we may helpe or hinder it at our pleasure Not the instrument of it the Word by the worke of the Spirit but as they would have it the Word working by it selfe without any inward vertue of the Spirit besides Lastly not the Subject the Elect only as we maintaine but all in Common upon whom sufficient grace to Conversion is bestowed if we will beleeve them All these Erroneous opinions are founded upon other rotten and unsound principles which are chiefly these 1. That God hath not precisely determined of any mans salvation or damnation in particular but hath left it to be decided by the libertie of their owne wills 2. That God doth not beare any speciall favour to one more than another but that his love is equall to all in generall and his desire of the salvation of all mankinde alike 3. That Christ hath dyed for all men alike procuring so much by his death that God is Placabilis toward all and all men indifferently are Salvabiles if they list to make use of the benefit purchased for them 4. That God requires Faith in Christ of all men whatsoever even of such Infidells as to whom Christ was never preached 5. That God cannot in justice demand of Man the performance of those things which since his fall hee hath no strength to performe and that if God require any such service he is bound in equitie to give unto man new strength for to performe it I doe but only name these articles of the Arminian Faith though even that 's enough to shew their weaknesse and untruth to any that can judge of sound doctrine but I say I mention them only that you may the better perceive what is that maine issue whereinto they are finally resolved and that in plaine termes is this That all men whether Christians or Infidells within or without the Church may bee converted and saved if they will You will say this is broadly spoken but I doe them no wrong reade their bookes compare their tenents and you shall see that this is the upshot of all their discourses God hath excluded none hee loves all alike Christ hath dyed for all Faith is required of all sufficient ability to beleeve and repent is given to all who then or what should hinder the Conversion or Salvation of any one but himselfe his owne meere free-will Surely an opinion that should not bee gainsaid by any but readily embraced by all if it had as much truth in it as it carries shew of Pity and Commiseration to mankinde Wee would be loth to be judged cruell but t is folly not pitie to take upon us to bee more mercifull than God hath declared himselfe to be and t is impiety to tell a lie for God by magnifying the glorious largenesse of his mercy beyond the bounds which himselfe hath prescribed unto it Wherefore against this wide and vast Conclusion of Arminianisme that God hath given sufficient grace to all the world to convert and beleeve if they will I oppose this directly contradictory God hath not given sufficient grace to all and in those to whom hee hath given such grace it depends not on their Free-will whether they will be converted or no. These two propositions destroy one another and one is confuted by that which confirmes the other I will proceed in the handling of them in this order Men that are capable of Vocation are of two sorts 1. Out of the Visible Church and of these the Question will bee Whether God have given to all Pagans and Heathens grace sufficient for their conuersion 2. Within the precincts of the Visible Church and of these the question will be double 1. Whether God doe give unto all Christians grace sufficient to worke their conversion 2. Whether those upon whom such sufficient grace is bestowed may if they list hinder their conversion by the power of their free-will Within the compasse of these three Questions will bee included all that is materiall touching this businesse I will use as much brevity in each as the matter will give leave of the first at this time viz. Whether the Gentiles out of the Church have grace given unto them sufficient for their conversion Wee maintaine the Negative part the Arminians affirme that all Pagans and Infidells have so much grace given unto them that by it they may be converted beleeve and worship God rightly in some sort even without the knowledge of the Gospell A monstrous assertion every way repugnant to Reason and Scriptures For 1. Let it be demanded what this sufficient Grace is that is given to the Gentiles Is it that knowledge of God and goodnesse whereto the Gentiles might come by the light of nature or it is some other supernaturall Revelation If the former there is a double error in it 1. That they call that Grace which is but Nature for if Vniversall Grace given to Heathens be but that knowledge of God and his worship which is attainable by the right use of the light of Nature through the contemplation of the creatures and remainders of the Morall Law in mans heart what is this grace but Nature what this opinion but Pelagianisme 2. In that they suppose this light of Nature well used is a sufficient
proue themselues by their owne naturall light manifesting their Diuine Originall whence they are and their right meaning how they must be vnderstood They are Primum â—â—sibile not like Colour which cannot be seene till light make it apparant but like Light it selfe which maketh all other things manifest it selfe too by it own proper Quality Wherefore when we are asked why we doe beleeue the Articles of the Creed we answer Because they are reuealed in Scripture Again How are you sure the Scriptures are the Word of God we answer we know it by the Scriptures themselues the Spirit of God opening our eyes to see those naturall and liuely caracters of Diuine truth which are imprinted vpon those sacred volumes Lastly If we be asked How know you that this is the right meaning of such or such a place We answer We know it by the Scriptures which being diligently examined and compared together plainly discouer their own right expesition In these answers we rest finally resoluing our Faith into the Word of God alone and nothing else As for the Authoritie of any one man or all men in the Church we giue it all due reuerence according to its place and degree We acknowledge the Decisions of Councels and Synods about controuersed Articles of Religion the continuall Preaching of the Word by the Ministers therof the manifold expositions of Doctrines of Diuinitie and Bookes of Scriptures by the Learned in their Writings all these we acknowledge with due regard thankefulnesse to be blessed meanes for the breeding and growth of Christian Faith because they all doe or should point vs vnto the Scriptures holding forth the light of them that we may the more cleerly diseern it in its true brightnesse Thus they are helpes to make vs see the truth but no causes why we beleeâ—e it this we do for its own sake not their saying And vnlesse what they teach doe appeare vnto vs cleerly out of the Scriptures we freely confesse that although their Reuerence will cause vs to Suspend our Iudgement and thorowly to examine the Cause yet their bare authoritie cannot command our assent to any article of Religion that shall be proposed vnto vs. The rule of the Apostle prohibits vs 1 Cor. 2. 5. Our faith may not stand in the Wisedome of Man but in the Power of God Our Aduersaries here thinke that they haue vs vpon an aduantage and caught vs in a circle too as if we also ran round from the Scriptures to the Spirit againe from the Spirit to the Scriptures thus How know you the Scriptures to be Gods Word By the Spirit reuealing the same to my heart and conscience But how know you this reuelation of the Spirit to be true By the Scriptures that testifie The secret of the Lord is reuealed to them that feare him Ps. 15. But how know you this the like places of Scriptures to be Gods Word By the Spirit again Thus they suppose we are intangled but they mistake vs and our doctrine greatly in this particular We teach indeed that we know the Scriptures to be the Word of God by the Spirit of God inwardly Reuealing and Testifying the truth of them vnto our Consciences But it must here be diligently obserued what kind of Reuelation or Testimonie of the Spirit it is wherby we may be said to be sertified assured of the Scriptures Diuine Truth It is not any inward suggestion and inspiration different from those reuelations that are in the Scriptures themselues as if the Spirit did by a second priuat particular reuelation assure me of the truth of those former reuelations made in the Scriptures We haue no warrant for any such priuat reuelations now nor is there any need of them and such as looke for them may easily embrace their own presumptuous fancies in stead of a Reuelation from heauen How then doth the Holy Ghost reueale vnto vs the truth of Scriptures I answer By remouing those impediments that hindred by bestowing those graces that make vs capable of this knowledge There is in vs a two-fold Impediment First Ignorance whereby our eyes are closed that we cannot see the light 〈◊〉 Second Corruption whereby although we see the light yet we cannot but naturally hate it and turne from it The Holy Spirit cures both by a double remedy First of Illumination restoring our decayed vnderstanding to some part of its primitiue perfection Second of Sanctification infusing into our desires and affections some degrees of their primitiue Holinesse and puritie By this worke of the Spirit Opening the eyes of our minds that we may Vnderstand the Scriptures see the wonders of Gods Law and also Rectifying our corrupt affections that we may loue and embrace the Holinesse of Diuine things by this meanes I say is the Diuine truth of Scriptures reuealed to vs. For presently vpon this Opening the eyes of our minds we see the glorious brightnesse and light of the Scriptures shining into our hearts and we discerne in them the apparant characters of heauenly Maiestie as cleerly as a seeing man beholds the Sunne Also after this renewing of our Sinfull inclinations we find presently that our Soules and those things which the Scriptures do reueale vnto vs haue a singular sympathy one towards another our loue that we beare to the beautie and Holinesse of the Word is strong that command which the Word hath ouer vs is most powerfull awfull so that now we haue as kindly a relish of the goodnesse and excellency of Scriptures as a healthfull stomacke hath of wholesome food By these things which we cleerly see in the Scriptures euidently feele in our selues we are fully ascertained in our soules that none but God is the Authour of so He menly Holy Mysteries In this sence we still pray for the Spirit of Reuelation Eph. 1. 17. so called in that place because it inlightens the eyes of our vnderstanding as in vers 18. that then we may see the excellency of Diuine mysteries reuealed to the Church Other inward and secret reuelation of the Spirit we acknowledge not in this businesse Now there is no such circle as our Aduersaries would driue vs into but a plain straight way How know you that the Scriptures are Gods Word We answer By the Scriptures themselues by that wonderfull light excellency of truth and Holinesse shining in them Here we would rest and goe no further But yet if we be asked How we come to see this Light We answer It is by the only worke of the Spirit of God giuing vs eyes to see and hearts to loue this Light If we be further vrged How know you that you doe indeed perceiue such a light as you speake of or how can you make it appeare to another that you are not deceiued therein To these questions we answer That the former is idle iust as if one should aske him that gaâ— then the sun How know you that you now see
hath the generall custome and consent of the times and Church wherein wee live whereby men are they know not how nor upon what firme grounds drawne to beleeve those things which they see others hold and maintaine fortruth Lastly 3. Some extraordinary worke or event confirming the truth of Religion So did Miracles in the time of Christ and his Apostles perswade many to beleeve who were notwithstanding farre from being true beleevers as Ioh. 2. 23. Many beleeved in his name when they saw the miracles which hee did but t was not good crediting of them that beleeved only upon miracles therefore Christ would not commit himselfe to them ver 24. And thus the Magitian when he saw the signes and great wonders which were done by the Apostles he beleeved and wondred when yet his heart was not right in the sight of God Act. 8. 13. 21. By these and the like meanes is this imperfect and generall kinde of Faith wrought in men destitute of all inward grace and holinesse Such motives as these cause this assent but there is no Internum principium no roote in themselves as our Saviour speakes Mat. 13. 21. whence this beliefe springeth no thorough sanctification of the soule conforming all the powers thereof unto the puritie and holinesse of divine things and inclining the affections to a constant embracing thereof These men like Religion well and commend it as men doe costly Iewells set forth to sale but when it comes to the point that this Good Pearle of great price is to be bought then if God will let them have it at their owne rates there 's a match made they 'le beleeve and be religious if God withall will spare them the use of some sinnes and pleasures they love well but if it must be purchased at Gods price with the sale of all that they have they are no merchants for such a hard bargaine with the yongue man they shrinke away sorrowfull that heaven cannot be had at a cheaper rate Thus when it comes to the proofe in particular application and practice this kinde of faith vanisheth away and comes to just nothing Thus you have the explication of this first degree of Faith withall you see that this faith falls greatly short of that perfection which is required unto that saith which is saving and justifying Neverthelesse our Adversaries of the Romish Church maintaine that this assent is that justifying Faith whereof the Scriptures speake Their opinion touching this point is sufficiently declared by Becanus who followes the rest of that rabble Hee Theol. Schol. Tom. 3. cap. 8. q. 1. disputing of the act of justifying Faith rejects the Lutherans opinion who place Faith in the will and make it to be Fiduciam de misericordia Dei propter Christum and saith that the doctrine of the Catholikes is this that faith belongs to the understanding and is nothing else but Credere sive assentiri eis quae à Deo revelata sunt Thence hee setteth downe this Conclusion § 6. Actus fidei consistit in assensu quo quis assentitur alicui propositioni à Deo revelatae propter authoritatem revelantis In this definition there are two parts 1. the Object of this assent Propositions revealed by God 2. The essentiall difference of this act taken à formaliratione credendi and that is to beleeve propter authoritatem revelantis By this saith Becanus Cap. 8. q. 2. § 2. assensus fidei constituitur in sua specie essentiall that is the assent of Faith is made supernaturall and justifying when wee beleeve things because God hath revealed them for saith he if articles of faith be beleeved upon other motives as upon mans authority c. then this assent of faith is naturall as in Heritickes and Divells So then according to Popish doctrine that faith which justifies us is nothing but a bare assent of the minde to such things as God reveales because of Gods authority that revealed them Than which explication of the nature of justifying faith nothing can be poorer and more below the majestie of so high a grace as faith is I will trouble you but with two reasons proving that this kinde of assent is not that faith whereby wee are justified 1. The act of justifying faith must needs be supernaturall such as cannot bee done without the aide of speciall grace of Gods spirit But unto this assent there is required no such speciall grace therefore it is not an act of justifying faith The Major is evident and granted by the Schooleman Cap. 8. 4. 4. that something there is in faith above nature requiring a supernaturall cause whereto the Scriptures plainely inforce him Eph. 2. 8. By grace yee are saved thorough Faith and that not of ourselves it is the gift of God Phil. 1. 29. Vnto you it is given for Christ that not only yee should beleeve in him but also suffer for his sake So Ioh. 6. 45. Wherefore § 3. he teacheth that this act of assent must be supernaturall partly in regard of the Object id est divine revelations and partly in regard of the principium or cause by which it is produced id est non per solas naturae vires sed per auxilium gratiae Wee agree then in the Proposition For the assumption That there needes not any speciall grace of the Spirit to worke this bare assent unto the truth of divine revelations this wee prove out of the same Schoolemens doctrine who teach that the Vnderstanding assents not unlesse the Will command it because say they the act of beleeving is absolutely in our treewill Cap 8. q. 5. Well be it so But now say wee the Will may without the helpe of grace command the assent of the Vnderstanding which wee prove thus Whatsoever the Vnderstanding by the only light of Nature judges to be honest that the Will can desire by the only strength of nature But by the only light of Nature the Vnderstanding judges that it is an honest thing to beleeve Gods authority revealing any thing to us therefore the Will by the only strength of Nature may desire this act of beleeving and so consequently there 's no need of Grace to move the Will to command the Vnderstanding T is Becanus owne argument against himselfe cap. 8. q. 5. § 9. Whereto he would faine giue an answer if hee could tell how Something he sayes to that Minor proposition whereof he thus distinguisheth The Vnderstanding by the only light of Nature judges it a thing honest to beleeve Gods authority when hee reveales any thing Via ac modo naturali not when he reveales any thing Via ac modo supernaturali Beleeve it a rare distinction and full of mystery Divine Revelations are of two sorts supernaturall and naturall Againe when God reveales his will to us by naturall meanes then the very light of Nature teacheth us that 't is honest to beleeve his authority But if hee reveale things to us by supernaturall meanes the light of nature
wee affirme that for that other generall faith in assenting to the truth of divine things because of Gods authority this faith as he had when hee was a Catholike so hee still hath it in part now he is an Hereticke and by the same faith he beleeved matters of Religion before his Heresie by the same he beleeves them afterward And those that are Heretickes indeed or such whom wee stile by that name let them bee asked why they beleeve such and such points of religion they 'le answer truly and resolutely they beleeve them because of Gods authoritie that hath revealed them in his Word and for such things wherein they dissent could they be perswaded the Scripture did teach the contrary they would for the same authority sake beleeve the contrary The Iesuite is yet urgent upon us and tells us that no Calvinist or Lutheran beleeves Gods authority but doubts of it Wee tell him againe that 's a foule slander and more than hee can make good yes that he will by a distinction too Gods authority considered Abstractivè in it selfe so indeed we doubt not of But Gods authoritie considered practicé in respect of the Church as it is proposed unto us by the Pastors of the Church so we doubt of it because wee admit not the judgement of the Church but follow our owne phantasie ibid. § 7. To this we answer that we passe very little to be judged Infidells upon such a ground because wee call in question the supposed infallibility and authority of the Romish Church We finde in Scriptures no such straight relation betweene her authority and Gods authority that if wee call hers in question wee must needs doubt of his Wee doubt not of the authority of Scriptures but we denie that the Romish Church hath any infallible authority of judging and interpreting them No one man nor all men ought to usurpe such authority over our faith And let the truth be judge who be the greater Insidells Calvinists and Lutherans that beleeve the Scriptures authority for its owne sake or popish Catholikes that will not beleeve but for mans saying Thus you have this second reason somewhat largely that Faith which our Adversaries call Iustifying is in Divells and ungodly men therefore it is not that justifying faith which the Scriptures speake of and appropriate unto the Elect Tit. 1. 1. Here it is but a vaine shift our Adversaries make to runne unto that poore distinction of Fides Formata and Informis namely that Faith may exist two wayes 1. Vt est conjuncta cum charitate ut in homine iusto and then Faith is called formata viva because Charity is Vita animae In this case Faith can Elicere operationes vitales seu aeternae vitae moritorias Gal. 5. 6. Faith worketh by Charity 2. Vt est separata à charitate quod fit in homine peccatore qui amissa per peccatum mortale charitate retinet fidem quamdin Catholicus est This Faith is called Informis mortuâ— nec potest habere operationes vitales seu meritorias Iam. 2. 17. Faith if it have no workes is dead in it selfe and ver 26. as the body without the spirit c. Becan tom 3. cap. 10. § 4. 5. 6. Thus they would have the quality and proper act of justifying Faith to be in reprobate men and divells but yet it doth them no good because t is without Charity Faith without Workes may be in its nature justifying Faith because t is an assent to the articles of Religion upon Gods authority but yet it justifies not because t is without workes Hereunto we reply that in this distinction there is not a syllable of sound doctrine nor yet of reasonable sense Thus much we grant that there is according to St. Iames. a kinde of â—aith without Workes namely a generall assent unto the truth of divine things but we denie that this kinde of Faith is for the substance one and the same with that Faith which is properly called Iustifying Faith without workes is of one kinde Faith with workes is of another not onely in regard of consequent because one hath workes the other hath not but in regard of their proper nature because the quality and acts of the one differ from the quality and acts of the other Wherefore in vaine doe they tell us that the same Faith is sometime with sometime without Charity Iustifying Faith is never without Charity and that which is is not Iustifying Vnto that conceit that Charity is the forme of Faith wee say t is Metaphysicall and such as no good construction can be made of it He saith Charity is Vita animae hee would say Vita fidei but take his meaning Faith lives by Charity as the body by the forme or soule Here 1. T is absurd to make one habite of the minde the forme of the other wee may as well say that Temperance is the forme of Liberality Each habite of the minde is distinguished by its proper object and actions and this the Schooleman cap. 18. quaest 2. § 3. grants in the strict sense 2. How doth Faith live by Charity We say it lives with Charity as its fellow-grace not by Charity as its soule We say without Charity it is dead yet t is not Charity that gives it life The Iesâ—it saith it doth for being joined with it Faith can elicere vitales operationes performe vitall acts Yea but what are these actions Faith hath but two acts 1. proper and immediate viz. Credere seu Assentiri 2. by consequent Iustificare Neither of these comes from Charity even by these mens owne doctrine Not the first for Catholickes without Charity may assent to the articles of Faith for Gods authority sake Not the second for to Iustifie in the Popish sense is to Sanctifie of a bad man to make a good Now how absurd is it to say Faith by Charity Iustifies i. e. Faith by the love of God and our neighbour sanctifies us or taking Charity for the Act not the Habite Faith by good workes of prayer fasting almes-deeds c. sanctifies us Both these are senselesse propositions for t is manifest that hee who hath Charity i. e. loves God and his Neighbour and doth good workes is not as yet to bee sanctified and made good of bad but is thereby sanctified already T is true that Faith is one part of our sanctification or inherent grace and Charity is another but neither doth Faith sanctifie by Charity nor Charity by Faith but we are sanctified by both together If there by any other vitall acts of Faith they should have beene named The glosse which the Iesuit addeth whereby he interpreteth what hee meaneth by vitall operations viz. aeternae vitae meritorias such as deserve eternall life carrieth with it as absurd a sense as the other Thus Charity is the forme and life of Faith i. e. Charity makes the acts of Faith to be Meritorious sâ—il our love of God and man or our good
workes makes our Faith i. e. our assent to the Articles of Religion because of Gods authority to deserve eternall life Is there in the Scriptures the least intimation of such a strange and uncouth meaning when it tells that wee are justified by Faith To the places of Scriptures Gael 5. 6. Faith workes by Charity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wee answer the meaning of the place is no more but That in Christianity no outward matters are of value that onely which is to be regarded is Faith that bringeth forth good workes These good workes come from Charity or inward love of God and man This Charity is stirred up and provoked to worke through Faith So that Faith workes by Charity as by that chiefe instrument which Faith imployes in the doing of all good works but Charity works by Faith as by the moving cause whereby t is excited to worke according to 1. Tim. 1. 5. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Faith is the first wheel in the clock that moves all the rest Faith stirs up and directs the other graces of the soule in their operations whose strength and vigour increaseth according as Faith increaseth Tantum amamâ—… quantum credimus t is cleer in all experience those that have the strongest Faith they shew the greatest love to God and man as in Abraham Moses Paul all the Martyrs But of this more in shewing the connexion between Faith and Obedience To that other place Iames 2. 26. As the body without the Spirit is dead even so Faith without workes is dead we answer that S. Iames understands by that similitude not modum Informationis but necessitatem Vnionis that good workes are necessarily coupled with a justifying Faith not that good workes are the forme and life of Faith à priori They are arguments and effects of a living Faith they are not causes that make it living as is apparent because it is impossible any good worke should goe before justifying Faith Heb. 11. 6. Wherefore this similitude is not so to be strained unto a Philosophicall construction where the Apostle intends no more in all his dispute but to shew that true saying Faith must of necessity bee conjoyned with good workes And if our adversaries bee so strict upon the termes of this similitude t is manifest that they fit not their doctrine for so as the soule is the forme of the body so workes shall be the forme of Faith i. e. an Act shall bee the forme of a Habite which is against reason and their owne doctrine who make the Habituall grace of Charity not good workes the fruits of it to be the forme of Faith S. Iames therefore is to bee taken in the former sense or else wee may without any violence interpret 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in that place not Spiritum i. e. Animam but Spiritum i. e. Halitum Respirationem and thus the comparison is exact as the body without breathing and motion is dead so Faith without workes Thus it appeares how Faith is sleighted by our adversaries whilst they hold that the Faith wherby a sinner is justified is nothing but an assent to Articles of Religion because of Gods authority Some places of Scriptures there are they would faine build this upon as Heb. 11. 1. Rom. 4. 3. Tit. 1. 1. Ioh. 20. 31. but their arguments thence are so inconsequent and weake they are not worth the mentioning or refuting I proceed therefore from this generall Faith unto that other which is speciall particular Particular assent of Faith is when all things revealed by God are assented unto as most true and excellent in regard of our selves when they are particularly applyed to our proper occasion and compared with all desires and provocations whatsoever to the contrary When we know and beleeve those things that are generally delivered for our selves in application to our owne use and practice as Iob was counselled by his friends so that wee beleeve in this particular aswell as in that at this time aswell as at another In the Explication of the nature of such a particular assent I propose to your consideration two things 1. The Roote and Cause whence it springs 2. The Object of it whereto it is directed 1. The true root and fountaine whence this Blessed assent of Faith ariseth is that grace of sanctification wrought in the heart by the holy Ghost renewing the soule in all the powers thereof T is not common illumination for many know and despise the truth or beleeve it but in generall T is not the Authority of all the men in the world that can perswade to it wee should not then have had so many thousand â—…rmons of Prophets Ministers learned holy and powerfull in their doctrine yet preached to very small purpose with the most of mâ—n T is not miracles and strange accidents that can force this Faith the Iewes had plenty of them yet continued still unbeleeving T is only the sanctifying Grace of Gods spirit that brings this to passe For consider with your selves how deadly an opposition there is betweene a mans unsanctified nature and the wisedome and goodnesse of God all his counsells seeme but craft his words foolishnesse his mercies light and not worthy of estimation His exhortations promises or threatnings are entertained with inward disdaine and the heart saith within it selfe Who is God that I should feare him or what profit shall a man have by beleeving his Word and walking in his wayes Yea men that are otherwise ingenuous and of fairer temper in this case are full of secret scorne and despite of God and goodnesse they account basely of the holinesse of Religion being privie scoffers and bitter deriders of the power of Grace when they are alone by themselves or in company that fits them They make a tush at Scriptures and smile at such perswasions to pietie as they afford counting it an indignitie for men of parts and resolution to bee moved with faire words of a simple man though hee speake in the words of God If their beliefe and knowledge of the truth be good in the generall yet in the application the heart makes violent opposition it begins to hold probable dispute whether it be wisedome to doe so or so whether they be bound in conscience considering such and such circumstances it casts all inconveniences that may possibly be thought on to discourage it selfe yea perchance the truth it selfe shall be called in question and it thinkes Sure I am deceived Gods meaning is otherwise at last it resolves I may doe this and yet fare well enough and If I doe no worse I hope t will not be much amisse and I trust that these commodities and pleasures I enjoy may well countervaile the neglect of such or such a small matter Thus the heart not washed by the holy Ghost in the laver of Regeneration but abiding in its naturall corruption is not nor can be subject to the law of God but proves either impudent and
not properly an assent of Christian faith I prove thus To assent or dissent is an action of the Vnderstanding or of the Will if of the Vnderstanding the object of it is Truth or Falsehood if of the Will the object of it is goodnesse or evill For the assent of the Will the case is manifest that it doth never assent unto and allow of the goodnesse of the obiect or dissent from and disallow the evill of it untill there be knowledge and apprehension of both For this approbation or reprobation of any thing by the Will cannot bee without Election nor Election without foregoing deliberation and judgement of the understanding upon the thing that is chosen or refused Againe for the Vnderstanding how can it assent unto the Truth or dissent from the Falsehood of such things whereof it hath no apprehension at all For so here should be an Act without an Object at least an irrationall act of the rationall part of man For if the Vnderstanding assent or dissent without understanding of whereto or from what is not a non-ens the object of such an act and is not such an act more like the naturall propensions of senslesse creatures whereby they are carried to unknowne ends than the judiciall determination of a reasonable man Though the things beleeved exceed reason yet the revelations of them are not above our knowledge and our assent unto them must be so farre forth rationall that if wee cannot give a reason of the thing beleeved yet wee must give a reason of our beliefe A reason of our beliefe is then rendred when we understand that testimony and authority wherein the thing to be beleeved is revealed unto us This only makes our assent reasonable For as in Scientificall knowledge and opinion the understanding never assents till the nature of the thing it selfe be knowne either fully or in part so in beliefe the understanding assents not till the meaning of the relation or testimony be understood what that thing is distinctly whereto it must assent In the two former wee give the reason of our assent from the thing it selfe knowne in the last wee give the reason of our assent from the authority of the revealer In every one our assent presupposeth knowledge in the former of the thing it selfe in the later of the Revelation Wherefore that implicite faith of the ordinary Papist who following the doctrine of his Teachers contents himselfe that he gives his assent in grosse unto all what ever is in the Bible Churches traditions that it is true whilst yet he understands scarce any Article of his religion distinctly this their implicite assent is meerely bruitish and unreasonable Contrary to the expresse precept of the Apostle Paul Rom. 12. 1. commanding us to offer unto God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a reasonable service and Peter 1 Pet. 3. 15. bidding us be ready to give an answer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not a bare answer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but with a defence to every one that demandeth of us 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Reason of our Faith Now it would be knowne of the Romish Laiety what reason they can give for their faith what Apologie they are able to make for it when as they are utterly ignorant of Scriptures the only reason and defense of our Faith And is not their service and worship of God the very unreasonable motion of an unintelligent beast that 's ordered by his driver but understands not why and for what reason and ground Where particulars are not knowne there may be a generall kinde of beliefe But this generall beliefe is not an actuall assent to the truth of any particular thing revealed till that particular bee knowne and understood Actuall assent to particular truths is then only when they are knowne and according to the increase of distinct knowledge so this assent increaseth Before there is this distinct knowledge there can be no more but Praeparatio animi a resolution of the minde to yeeld assent to any particular if it bee once knowne Which though it be good when wee can doe no otherwise by reason of unavoydable ignorance yet to teach that this is sufficient to true faith is to teach men to be carelesse of all religion T is good where there is knowledge in part and when for the rest ignorance is seene bewayled and avoyded by all earnest desire and possible endevour to get knowledge in all points but t is monstrous flothfulnesse to bee content with this that in generall we beleeve all though we assent to nothing in particular This were indeed a short cut to heaven if no more were required to Christian faith but to force upon ones selfe such a resolution as this Here is the Bible I am resolved to beleeve all that it saith but for particulars I le looke no further let the Church and those that are learned looke to that How farre such a blinde resolution is from Christian faith and pietie besides experience which testifies that all those who have true faith in some things doe alwayes much lament their ignorance and eagerly desire the increase of distinct knowledge the Scriptures also doe abundantly witnesse unto us Wherein no exhortation more common then this unto the encrease of Knowledge yea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. as the Apostle prayes for the Collosians Col. 2. 2. And for the Corinthians hee wisheth the like 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2 Cor. 8. 7. How many prayers of the Saints doe wee finde they have made for knowledge every where mentioned How often is Faith and Knowledge coupled together Ioh. 10. 38. 1 Ioh. 4. 16. c. yea many times confounded and taken one for the other 2 Cor. 4. 14. Esa. 53 â—1 Ioh. 17. 3. c Againe this knowledge is easie to be had by the ayde of the holy Spirit inwardly inlightening and teaching the faithfull when they use such meanes as hee hath appointed See for that purpose Ier. 31. 33 34. 1. Cor. 2. 10. 12. 2. Cor. 4. 6. Ioh. 14. 21. where Christ promiseth to shew himselfe visibly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to those that love him Were knowledge a thing impossible or very difficult or unprofitable some pretence there were to pleade for ignorance but when t is so often commanded us when it may be so easily had when t is so usefull in the having so dangerous to want it it s now impudence to patronize ignorance as a friend to Religion which is a professed enemy to mans reason Wherefore it is a shamelesse assertion of Bellarmine De Iustif. l. c. 5. That Faith may better be defined by ignorance than by knowledge A pestilent conceit which once rooted in men breeds in them an horrible contempt distaste and neglect of Scriptures and all Religion as matters not possible nor necessary for them to comprehend But this is a gull put upon poore people by the Clergy thereby to excuse their owne idlenesse in not teaching them or to gaine the
our assent vnto Diuine Truths springs from these three fountaines 1 From the Infallible Authority of the Reuelation 2 From the excellent greatnesse and worth of things Reuealed 3 From the manifest experiment of some part of their Truth knowne vnto vs. Of these in order The first and chiefest ground whereon is built the Certainty of faiths assent is The Infallible truth and Authority of Diuine Reuelations I call this the chiefest ground because it is that whereunto finally all our Beliefe is resolued For aske the question wherefore do you firmely belieue the Articles of the â—reed The answere is Because God hath reuealed them in Scriptures to be belieued The reason of which answere is this because What euer God saith istrue Now this is a principle in Nature aswell knowne to the reasonable creature as that they haue reason it is grauen deepe vpon the conscience of euery one which tels him That God is so infinitely Wise that hee can be ignorant of nothing that none can circumuent and ouer each him And againe that he is so infinitely good holy and Iust that no â—ie can come of this truth as Iohn speaketh Iohn 2. 21. Wisedome it selfe cannot bee deceiued Truth it selfe cannot deceiue and God is both Wherefore none but a Iesuite like Becaâ—… whose wits haue serued an apprentiship in the mystery of lying and aequiuocation vnder the Father of â—ies would haue affirmed that the Prophets and Apostles though they knew it was God that reuealed heauenly mysteries vnto them yet they knew not Euidently whether God was not deceiued himselfe or would not deceiue them Alying surmise much like that of the Serpent when hee tempted the Woman Yea saith he hath God indeed said so Yes the woman answeres God hath said so and we know it But Satan replies Are you sure that God spake true when hee said it The Diuell then denyed it and Becanus staggers at it as a thing very doubtfull telling vs that when God speakes man cannot be euidently certaine whether he speaks true or false But we reiect with abomination such a suggestion to Infidelity that strikes at the roote of all Christian Faith and shakes the lowest foundation-stone in all that building we know and are euidently assured That God is truth and in him or of him there is no Lie From this first ground of faith in Gods Essentiall truth wee draw another that whersoeuer any Reuelation is certainely known or belieued to be of God there the reasonable creature doth fully assent to the truth of things reuealed Whence all the holy Pen-men of Scriptures did for themselues most certainely belieue the truth of all things they deliuered though sometimes they vnderstood but darkely what was the meaning of that which they spake and wrote because they knew that they were taught them immediatly from God Yea the diuels themselues when they know as they doe these reuelations to be from God howeuer they tempt men to distrust and out of malice raises vp lies and slanders vpon Gods truth yet in the meane time are themselues cleerely conuinced of this truth and doe assent vnto it in their consciences The diuell knew well that Gods threatning to Alam was a certaine truth euen whilst he perswaded him it was but a lie And when he inspired the Pharisies to call Christ. Samaritan Belzebub a possessed Daemoniacke a Deceiuer and all to nought euen then himselfe could not but confesse that he was that Christ Iesus the Sonne of the most high God Mar. 5. 7. But this is the malice of Hell to sight against the Light and furiously to oppose what we cannot but acknowledge to be truth Well Thus far then our Faith goes vpon a sure ground That whatsoeuer God saith is true And againe When wee know euidently that God sayes it wee are ready to belieue it without further question But here in the next place is all the doubt How know wee infallibly that God is the Author of the Scriptures and that such things as therein are proposed for vs to belieue are reuealed by God himselfe This is a fundamentall Question wherein it greatly behoues euery Christian to be rightly informed It would require a large discourse to bee prosecuted through euery particular I shall but onely touch vpon the generall and giue occasion to each one carefully to bethinke himselfe that his faith be built on the rocke and not vpon the Sand. The Question is How is it knowne certenly that the Scriptures are the very word of God it hath two braÌ„ches 1 Toaching each seuerall part of Scripture as it was reuealed and giuen to the Church of God How did the People of the Iewes know that what was deliuered by Moses and other Prophets after him from time to time was the word of God To which I answere they knew the writing and Preaching of Moses and the Prophets to be of diuine Inspiration partly by the holinesse of the Doctrine which they taught the liuely power and worke whereof the hearts of the godly then felt partly by the miracles which they wrought for confirmation of their propheticall office partly by the certaine and infallible accomplishment of all their prophecies Of which triall of Prophets and their prophesies wee haue a generall rule set downe Deut. 18. 18. c. I will raise them vp a Prophet from among their brethren like vnto thee and will pur my words in his mouth and hee shall speake vnto them all that I command him 19. And whosoeuer will not hearken vnto my words which hee shall speake in my name I will require it of him 20. But the Prophet that shall presume to speake a word in my name which I haue not commanded him to speake or that speaketh in the name of other gods euen the same Prophet shall die 2â— And if thou thinke in thine heart How shall wee know the word which the Lord hathnot spoken 22. When a Prophet speaketh in the name of the Lord if the thing follow not nor come to passe that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken but the Prophet hath spoken it presumptuously thou shalt not so be afraid of him By the same meanes were the preaching of Christ also the preaching and writing of the Apostles knowne in their times 2 Touching the whole Scripture as it is now compleatly deliuered vnto vs in writing How can it euidently and infallibly appeare vnto vs that what wee finde written in the Bible is of diuine inspiration the very oracles of God not mans Inuentions In the solution of this Question our aduersaries of the Romish and wee of the Reformed Churches differ irreconcileably Wee affirme that the Scriptures are knowne to be of God by themselues they maintaine that we cannot bee certaine of the Scriptures Diuinity by any other argument then the testimony of the Church which say they doth infallibly propose vnto vs what is to be belieued what is not to be belieued So that ask a Roman Catholike Wherfore do you