day which went before the Sabaoth lay in the graue the whole Sabboth according to the custome of the Iewes which account a naturall day from Euening to Euening and rose againe the beginning of the next which was the first daye of the weeke 13 Concerning this Article of the descension of Christ into Hell it is manifest that there is no mention made of either in the Nicene or in any other of the ancient creeds and RVFFINVS witnesseth that it was not read in the Church of Rome 14 No man therefore ought to wonder if some question be made of the meaning thereof 15 That the Creede which is called the Apostles was written by the Apostles themselues before they departed from Ierusalem euerie one of them bringing in his seueral Article it is a meere fabulous tale as the very number of these Articles do shew 16 Yet it is cleare that they were faithfullie and truely gathered out of the preaching of the Apostles acounted euen frō the most ancient time as a square a rule of faith 17 Now their opinion is verie probable who doe take these words he descended into Hel if this Article was at the first in the common creed expressed in so many words not for any distinct Article but for a summary comprehension of the last and lowest degree of Christes humiliation which should bee pointed out by the wordes of suffering crucifiyng death and burial as this kind of speach is somtimes in the Scriptures Metaphorically vsed for the lowest estate of anguish and dejection So that He suffered was dead buried and descended into Hell should be but one Article of faith 18 But who can beleeue that the Fathers of Nicene and so many Synods that afterward followed and the very Church of Rome it self would haue rashly blotted out this Article if it had bin written in so many words in the common Creed 19 Either of the two therefore must needs bee necessarie namelie that either this kinde of speach in that sense that wee haue spoken though familiar vnto the Hebrues was not yet receiued in all Churches as being ambiguous and not necessary seeing it was sufficiently vnderstood by the former and so by a little and a little grewe out of vse or that this Article also was then inserted into the common Creed when as their opinion which hath bene of ancient time had by degrees taken place who thought that the soule of our Sauiour Christ beeing separated from his bodie went into I know not what place where the Spirits of the beleeuing Fathers should haue their aboad 20 But this opinion though it hath bin of a long time receaued by a common and an olde growen error cannot bee confirmed any wise by any testimonie of the Euangelicall Historie but is manifestlie ouerthrown thereby seeing it is very apparant by the woordes of the Euangelists that the Spirite of Christ being departed out of his bodie was there receaued into whose hands hee committed it when hee gaue vppe the Ghost that is into the place of aeternall blessednes whereof speaking vnto the Theefe he said this day shalt thou be with me in Paradise 21 Nowe that there was any place allotted vnto the Spirits of the Fathers that departed before the incarnation of Christ whence afterward the Spirite of Christ comming thither indeed shuld bring them with him into heauen it can in no wise bee confirmed by any colourable testimonie of the Scriptures Neither would the Euangelists haue omitted any such thing in the storie of the passion of Christ But this opinion seemeth to arise partlie in that manye are written to haue risen either by Christ or with Christ partly out of the PSALME 16.8 which PETER citeth Act. 2.25 and out of two other places also of 1. PET. 3. wrongfullie interpreted 22 Out of this error arise two other that are more absurd the one of those who beeing ledde by the misvnderstanding of the words of PETER thought that the soule of Christ went indeed into Hell to the ende that as in bodie hee had preached the Gospell vpon earth vnto those that were liuing so also he should preach the said Gospel in his Spirit vnto the Spirites of those that were dead as though that after death there were any place left for preaching repentance 23 The other errour is of those who dreamed that the Spirite of Christ should goe vnto the soules of the damned that hee might there also suffer in his soule the paines ordained in hell for the damned as though that the soule of Christ whilest it was in his bodie did not beare those punishmentes for our sake as both that horrible agonie which hee sustained in the Garden and also that fearefull crie My God my God c. which vpon the Crosse made Heauen and earth to tremble doe beare witnesse or as though that speache It is finished wherein our whole hope consisteth were vntrue 24 But wee omitting the whole controuersie concerning the putting in or the blotting out of this Article do simplie vnderstand by the Descension of Christ into hell those things which Christ being made a curse for vs suffered in his soule for our sake in those torments especiallie which were so greeuous as nothing could be no not imagined more horrible 25 By the word DESCENSION therefore is not ment any remoouing from a higher place to a lower because that can properlie agree neither vnto the Deitie which is euery where nor vnto the bodie which of it selfe lay dead in the Graue neither vnto the soule which beeing commended vnto the Father was straight way in Paradise after it was separated from the body 26 Now the word HELL which in the Scripture is diuersly taken signifieth neither the Graue because that explanation should bee superfluous and obscure neither yet the place of the damned as it is cleare out of the former Principles 27 Therefore this Descension of Christ into Hel which had an ende at his death went before the Article of his buriall but yet it is placed after the same in the order of speach euen because it was thought meet to set downe in one tenor of speach whatsoeuer did belong to the humiliation of his body Defended by HILLARIE FANTRART an English-man of Guernzy PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE RESVRRECTION OF IESVS CHRIST XLV 1 HItherto wee haue heard Christes combate with death wherein he might seeme to be ouercome by death because it so far preuailed against him as it threw his dead bodie into the graue 2 Now we are to speake of Christs victorie ouer death the beginning whereof was the preseruation of his dead bodie in the graue vncorrupted and that without the help of anie art of the Apothicarie 3 His full victorie manifested it selfe in the resurrection of his bodie seeing that life is directlye opposite vnto death 4 Now that onlie is said to rise again which lay down and therefore neither the Deitie nor the soule of Christ rose againe Yet notwithstanding the resurrection after a
the Sonne of God tooke vpon him 8 For whatsoeuer is not the diuine essence thervnto the essentiall attributes of the Deitie cannot be communicated 9 The actions furthermore which we said to be also attributes of the Deitie wee deuide both into those which they call remaining because they doe so continue in the Deitie that worketh as they bring forth no worke out of the doer of which sort are prouidence and predestination and also into those which may be tearmed passing that is those which leaue some worke out of the doer or doe inferre a suffering vnto some thing as are creation and redemption 10 As for the attributes which haue their names from the effects proceeding from God vpon the creatures thogh they seeme to haue had their beginning in time as where God is called the Creator redeemer c. yet wee denie that either they put any change in God or do agree vnto him by way of accident Defended by IOHN CASTOL of Geneua THE SIXT SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE OMNIPOTENCY OF GOD. THE ATTRIBVTES OF GOD IN GENErall haue bene dealt with now some of them in speciall are to be handled 1 THe omnipotencie of God is that very immeasurable and infinite essence of God which is communicable vnto no creature alwaies doing neuer suffering and which cannot decist to be that which it is 2 This being in deed but one may yet in diuerse considerations be said to be manifolde 3 For the omnipotencie is one way considered when we speake of it as God doth alway worke in him selfe it is another way regarded in respect that God worketh out of him selfe and can worke innumerable thinges if it pleaseth him 4 For wee hold that God is omnipotent in as much as besides that he is able to do whatsoeuer he will he can both will and do innumerable things which hee will neuer either will or doe We do therefore condemne them who say that God is for no other cause omnipotent but in as much as hee can without exception worke whatsoeuer can bee either spoken or imagined And we doe dislike of them who thinke that God is in that respect onely called omnipotent because he can do onely whatsoeuer he will For his power is in it selfe infinite whereas his will is as it were bounded within the verie act of will 5 Now we hold that God cannot do any of these things which either are repugnant vnto his personall proprieties as that the Father cannot bee begotten neither the Sonne begotten or are contrarie vnto his essence as to be finite or which implie a contradiction of which sort it is to make that a bodie shall bee truly naturall and yet neither to haue quantity nor to be contained in any place Brieflie we denie that God can doe any thing which if they were done might shew him to haue defects and weaknes in him as to die to lie to sinne c. 6 And as by faith we beleeue according vnto the Scriptures and the Creeds appointed in the church that God only is omnipotent so we do professe and publish the same with our mouth 7 For it is no lesse repugnant vnto his nature that there should be many omnipotents then that there should be many Gods Whence it is that Christian Religion doeth not acknowledge in God distinct into three persons three omnipotents but one omnipotent Now concerning the humane nature of Christ although it be vnited vnto the deuine in the person of the Sonne who is but one yet as it is not therefore made God so is it not properlie made omnipotent but it retained even it own infirmities before it was glorified wherein it might suffer and dye for vs and now being glorified although it be free from all infirmities and glorious yet is it not in it selfe made omnipotent Defended by WILLIAM MOâ—NES of Niuerse THE SEVENTH SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE KNOWLEDGE THAT IS IN GOD. I VNto the treatise of Gods omnipotencie is to be joined the declaration of the knowledge that is in him being a doctrine verie necessarie to the end that the true God may bee seuered from the false and that from it we may take counsell and consolation II Now this science or knowledge is considered both in it selfe simplie when the question is what and of what sort it is and also in respect of the things that it doth know III By this knowledge we meane an absolute and a most cleare knowledge in God both of himself and of all things created whereby he doth not onlie know all things to bee but also the reason why they are so And this knowledge is different from all the sight that men and Angels haue not by comparison that it is greater and theirs lesser but altogether in the whole nature of it The which difference wee discerne by these notes 1 That this knowledge is essentiall and euen the vnderstanding essence of God 2 That it ariseth not from the outwarde senses or from the notions that the vnderstanding doth apprehend by reasoning by joining things together and by deuiding or yet from the report of any other no not from the knowledge of principles and causes that are of themselues formed in the vnderstanding 3 That it is neither any habite nor action nor any thing different from that verie thing that doth vnderstand that is from the essence of God seeing it is moste simple 4 That it vnderstandeth all things at once 5 That it is most certaine 6 That it is alwaies the same IIII Now in respect of the things that it doth know wee affirme that God doth know al things by himself of himself 1 Himself properly and most fullie 2 All things past present and to come euen those things that are casuall 3 Yea and such things as neither are nor euer shal be 4 Euen euill things 5 Yea infinite 6 And euen all the motions of the will and their issues 7 And not onely by a generall knowledge of generall things but euen by a most exact and perfect of euerie particular V This knowledge which in respect of things to come is called praescience or fore-knowledge is not the cause of the existence of thinges although there is nothing to come to passe which God did not fore-know that it should come VI This knowledge either in whole or in part can no creature be capable off Defended by IOHN FLORIDVS of Angieu THE EIGHT SORT OF PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE VVILL OF GOD. 1 THe discourse concerning Gods will which is most of al to be sought into for our saluation followeth that which is concerning his knowledge 2 By the worde WILL in God wee vnderstand both the diuine essence which doth imbrace and delite in that chiefe and soueraigne good which it hath in it selfe and also in respect of the thinges that God will haue done wee meane the verie action of will 3 And in this latter regard it is also considered two manner of waies either as it is a decree certaine
are a sleepe vntill the last day of judgement Defended by BENIAMIN CRESSONIVS of Burgundie PRINCIPLES CONCERNING CHRIST HIS ASCENSION INTO HEAVEN XLVI SEING THE ARTICLE OF CRISTS REsurrection hath bene alreadie opened it now followeth that we deale with his ascension into heauen 1 AS the Scripture dooth teach that the death resurrection and buriall of Christ were true and not fained so the same doth testifie that his Ascension into heauen was not onely visible but also locall 2 For although the word ASCENDING is sometimes Figuratiuely spoken concerning God yet in this Article of the Faith it is taken in his proper and naturall signification in such sort that by it is expressed a passage from a lower place vnto a higher which is pointed out by the name of Heauen 3 Whereas in the Scripture there is mention made of a three-folde Heauen wee affirme that the highest of all is heere to bee vnderstood wherein is the seat and aeternall habitation of the soules of the faithfull and where also Christ is exalted aboue all Creatures 4 And although he be trulie ascended into Heauen yet doth it not follow thence that he is no more present here with his Church for the gouernment thereof seeing that the said Ascention dooth onely appertaine vnto that nature which is finite and contained in a place that is vnto his humanitie and not to his Diuinitie which is euery where alwais present and can be contained in no certaine place seeing it containeth all things For as AVGVSTINE hath spoken very notablie the body wherein Christ rose must bee in one place where as his trueth is euery where spread abroad 5 Hence we gather that hee is not now vpon earth in respect of his Manhood seeing he hath once ascended into that place whence the Scripture dooth testifie that hee will not depart vntill the restitution of all thinges and in no other manner neither then he did ascend 6 Yet wee say that God and man did ascend because that his humaine bodie was taken vp by the power of the Deity which was vnseparably joyned with the humain nature and nowe remaineth there after a manner vnknowen vnto vs. They are deceiued therefore who holde that Christ according vnto his humaine nature can be at the same time both in heauen and in earth And those also who auouch that his fleshe is euery where and all those in a word who bereaue his body of the essential and as DAMASCEN speaketh of the Caracteristical properties therof that is such as are markes of a true bodie 7 Now where as Christ after his Ascention was seen of PAVL and STEPHEN that vision was extraordinary and a peculier reuelation So that from thence it cannot bee gathered that Christ was not in that place wherevnto hee ascended 8 This Ascention furthermore was as it were a certain triumph after the victory gottē ouer the enemies of mankind which he ouercame 9 The end of this triumph is diuers and manifold First of all it testifieth that the woorke of our Redemption was finished vpon earth the which he would seale by this magnificall and royall triumph which for this cause is called by AVGVSTINE a confirmation of the Catholicall faith For by this meanes Christ hath gotten vnto the immortal and incorruptible life not an earthly but an incorruptible and aeternall mansion 10 Secondly that there should be extant a most cleare testimonie of the Diuinitie of Christ by the which his humanitie was taken vppon high whence also it appeareth that he consisteth of two natures 11 Thirdlie that hauing ouercome death hee should enjoy that glorye which was prepared and ordained for him before the foundation of the world was laid not according to his Deitie but according to his humanitie the glory wherof appeared then when a new ghuest as it were entered into heauen to wit the man GOD the which thing the Angels had neuer seene before 12 And although the man Christ was glorified by his Resurrection in such sort as there was nothing wanting vnto him yet this Ascention was a more certaine ample possession of that glory 13 Fourthly and lastly that he might prepare a dwelling for vs in Heauen and not onely prepare it but also allure vs thither that wee might follow him by an ardent desire and affection while we are in this life and here vpon earth seeke those things that are aboue 14 Nowe euen as Christ was borne for our cause dead for our cause c. So hee ascended into Heauen for our cause 15 The fruit and profite therefore which ariseth to the faithfull out of this Ascention is manifolde For first wee are thereby vndoubtedly assured that we shall once namelie at the last day ascend also into Heauen For where the head is there the members also ought to be the Ascention of the members shall bee such as the Ascention of the head was saue that he ascended by his own power where as we shall ascend not by our owne but by his vertue For our bodies ought to bee fashioned like vnto his glorious body as the members vnto the head 16 Secondly after this Ascention was the holy Ghost giuen vnto the Apostles Next were other gifts from heauen bestowed vppon men and the Church furnished with things needfull for the same 17 Thirdlye heereby a way is opened for vs vnto our heauenly countrey from whence we fell by the meanes of ADAM 18 Fourthly and lastlie his Resurrection confirmeth our faith For hereby we are assured that our soules separated from our bodies euen before the Resurrection shall passe to no other place then where Christ is that they may liue for euer in blessednes with him Defended by WILLIAM QVERCINVS Tarbiensis PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE SITTING AT THE RIGHT HAND OF THE FATHER ALMIGHTIE XLVII 1 SEeing whole Christ that is Christ personally considered or in respect that he is one subsisting person is said to sit and that the action of sitting can not in the proper signification thereof agree vnto the Deitie in it self we must needs conclude that sitting properlie taken can in no wise agree vnto the Deitie 2 And although it may be properlie applied vnto that other nature of Christ which is corporall in that sense that sitting is opposed vnto the standing or the moouing of the bodie yet wee must not thinke that that glorious bodie of his though it be truly circumscribed and contained in a place doth either continually stand sit or moue For all these things are grosse and curious matters neither are they so particulerly to bee applied to the estate of that life 3 That which is added concerning the right hand of God is much more to bee taken Figuratiuelie as whereby those thinges are attributed vnto God which are proper vnto man seeing that God who is without a bodie hath neither right side nor left as beeing altogeather immeasurable and infinite 4 By this kinde of speach therefore being taken from the custome of Kings and Princes who are wont to make a
it of vs or when our owne saluation or our neighbors doth require it or when some outward matter of great waight doth driue vs therevnto or when the case standeth that by it wee may lawfully auoyde some priuate or publicke dammage when the assurance of some promises of great moment or to bee short when the Magistrate doth craue a lawfull oath at our hands in a just matter 14 An oth taken either to perform those things which God and the publicke lawes that are good doth forbid or to leaue vndone those things which we owe vnto God and our neighbour either by reason of our generall or particular calling both priuate and publicke is not to be fulfilled Yet is not hee to be excused before GOD and his Church which taketh such an oath 15 An oath yeelded by them that are not able to discerne whether they doe well or not as by one that is mad or phranticke by a childe or by those that haue no power to binde them selues as by Pupilles and Wardes or those that are at the gouernement of their Parents or Maisters and generallie by any that are not at their owne hand and ordering or an oth that is taken concerning a matter that lieth not in the power of him that sweareth as concerning other mens goods or the keeping of perpetuall chastitie all these oathes wee saye doe not binde a man but are made voyd and anihilated by the verie law it selfe 16 An oath that is rashlie giuen drawen by deceit or extorted by force or feare bindeth the conscience if the matter be onelie concerning some priuate dammage it is the part of the Magistrate notwithstanding either to qualifie such bands according vnto equitie and conueniency or vtterly to dissanull them 17 Simplie to take an oath is so farre from beeing forbidden by the Lorde as the Anabaptists doe teach that on the other side to vse it holilie and lawfullie is both necessarie and justlie accompted a part of Gods woorshippe 18 Euerie needlesse oath also that is such as is neither profitable nor necessarie is forbidden in this Commandement 19 That an oath may be lawfull there is required also that the verie forme of it be holy 20 And seing that in an oth God is called not simply a witnes but as a witnes of the conscience also and a reuenger of perjurie against the verie soule it is a most great and heinous sinne to sweare by the thing that is created much more by false Gods 21 It is lawefull notwithstanding in the forme of an oath to make mention of Creatures yet so as in no wise the religion of an oath be referred vnto them So MOSES and ESAY call Heauen and Earth to witnes 22 The penaltie is not without great cause adjoyned vnto this Commaundement that it may be better knowen of how great waight this Commandement is to be accounted Defended by IOHN NISSOLIVS Semenensis Occitanus PIRNCIPLES CONCERNING VOWES XXXII THE TREATISE OF VOWS IS TO BE ANnexed vnto the discourse concerning an oath we are therfore in this place to intreat of them and first of all to see what a vow is 1 A Vow is a promise of things lawfull and possible made vnto God with aduised deliberation and to a godlie end wherby a man bindeth himselfe to the performance of some thing 2 For whereas euerie lawefull promise must proceede not onelie from the will but also from the reason it must needs be that in vowing not onelie the bare motion of the mind is to be present but euen a sure deliberation wherto a purpose of binding a mans self doth also concur Now this assurance doth not els-where depend then vpon a good conscience grounded vppon Gods worde by the which nothing can be lightly or rashly promised The Ethnicks therefore in times past did and the Papists now a daies doe many waies offend in this point who were and are wont to make vowes lightlie without any word of God so also did IEPHTE IVD 11. 3 But we are to take heede that wee vowe nothing that is vnlawfull much more that wee performe it not For it is vnlawefull to promise or to offer any thing vnto God that displeaseth him Next wee are to bee carefull that our vowes be not of light and jesting matters thirdly that they be not of thinges that are impossible for vs to performe 4 The first sort of these vowes are such as wherby men doe bind themselues to commit some wickednes of which sort was that vowe ACT. 23.12 And that of the mother of MICHA IVDE 17. The second sort is of them which either doe take vpon them or deny the doing of somthing that is indifferent in it owne nature vppon this or that day The third is of them who promise those things that they are not able to performe as they doe who vowe perpetuall Chastitie which God vseth not to grant vnto all but vnto some onely and that often but for a time 5 Nowe seeing GOD onelie is hee vnto whome wee owe our selues and all that wee haue and that he is the onelye searcher of the heart and hath power to take punishment of those that breake their vowes wee justlie conclude that our vows are to be made to him only DEV 23.21 PSAL. 56.12 The Papists therfore do amisse who vow at their pleasure vnto Saints that are dead 6 Som part of the ceremonial law consisted in vows whereby men being mindfull of Gods blessings did offer giftes and sacrifices vnto him in token of thankesgiuing therefore they were commaunded in the olde lawe but the necessitie of vowing togeather with other Ceremonies were taken away at the comming of Christ 7 For in the newe testament there is no commandement of vowing mentioned either in the Gospell or in the writings of the Apostles seeing the whole dutie of a Christian is contained vnder the rule of faith and charitie 8 For the vow wherewith PAVLE bound himselfe was done vpon consideration of the time and other circumstāces the Apostle framing himself vnto the Iewes that hee might win them vnto Christ Act. 21. 9 Yet vowes are nor altogether vnprofitable vnto christians that by such exercises they may conforme their wils vnto well doing restraine themselues from euill so that the cautions aboue mentioned be obserued for nothing is to be vowed which maketh not for the setting forward of Gods glorie the profit of our neighbour And after this sort did IACOB Gen. 28. and the Nazarites IVD 6. make their vowes 10 And euen as an oath made rashlie and concerning vnlawfull things ought to bee anihilated euen so a vowe that is either vnlawfull or vnpossible ought to bee justlie accounted of no force And therfore that common saying is not without good ground In things that thou hast sinfullie promised breake thy promise and this in like sort In a godles vow change thy purpose 11 For if in couenants that are betwene man and man those promises doe onely binde vs wherewith the partie with whome
in regard of those things that appertain vnto the foundation of the gouernment of the Church as for the hard places that are in the word it interpreteth them both by conference of the scriptures and also according to analogie of faith 20 Nowe as touching those thinges which appertaine vnto outward order the Church in the feare of the Lord may therein consider what is most meete vnto time and place Wee doe condemne therefore those who dreame that euerie man whatsoeuer hee professe shall bee saued by his own Religion seeing out of the Catholicke Church there is no saluation And those who tie the Catholicke Church vnto one certaine place Those who bring vnto the Church the Academicall â—ncertainty Those who require a forme of perfection in the Militant Church Those who holde the personall succession absolutelie for an vndoubted note of the Church Those who haue by little and little transformed the Christian Presbyteries or Eldership that is the gouernment ordained by Christ the onely King and Monarch of his church into the image of the beast which was the olde Romaine Empire and that first by bringing in the dignity of Bishops next by apointing degrees amongst them and last of all by placing Antichrist at Rome vnder the title of the Ministeriall head Those who doe not measure the Church according to the word of God but the word according to the bare name of the Church Defended by DAVID PIOTAEVS of Geneua PRINCIPLES VPON THE ARTICLE I BELEEVE THAT THERE IS A COMMVNION OF SAINCTS LI. 1 CHrist can be fruitfull vnto none but by participation 2 This participation is partly of Christ and partlie of of his benefites which doe flow from the participation of him 3 That therefore whereof wee are made partakers is partly substantiall and partly a quality 4 The Substantial things are both Christ himselfe God and man and also all those corporall things which are bestowed vpon vs together with Christ beeing participated vnto vs. The qualities are all those gifts both of the bodie and the mind which in him we receaue in this life and obtaine in the life to come 5 Now wee are made partakers of the Deitie of Christ onely in force and operation but of his humanity in verie deed as far as he is our brother 6 Nowe this participation by reason of the most strait baÌ„d and the vnspeakable efficacie therof not that the one substance doth touch the other is expressed by the names of vnion engraffing incorporation and such like 7 The same is for three causes called spirituall first of all because the true and the soueraigne cause thereof is that power and vnspeakable force of the holy Ghost the which notwithstanding the distaunce of place doth most trulie and most effectually joyne the Saints though here as yet vpon earth in a spiritual marriage with Christ that they may be flesh of his flesh bone of his bones althogh according vnto this flesh they are not vpon earth but in heauen 8 Secondly because again this conjunction with Christ himself according to the flesh is in regard of vs a worke not of the bodie but of the minde which receiueth Christ by faith 9 Thirdly because the end and the scope of this mutuall Communion is not to the end that a kind of monstruous bodie should arise from the vniting of his substaunce with ours but that in this life we shuld be gouerned by his Spirit and that in the life to come we should liue an aeternall and a heauenly life with him 10 Yet may this vniting bee called a corporall vnion in a sound meaning so that all ambiguitie and newnes of wordes be auoyded namely if that especiall thing which in this mysterie as before hath bin said we spiritually receiue by faith and that is the verie humanitie of Christ be considered Next if respect be had to the external means which the holy Ghost vseth to beget and nourish faith in vs namely both the outward word sounding in our ears and also the Sacramentall elements and rites that affect the rest of our senses 11 Out of this spirituall vnion ariseth that mysticall bodie wherof Christ is the head both in respect of his preheminence ouer the same and also because he doth wholie giue sense and motion therevnto Nowe all those that beleeue and are sanctified are called members vnder this head in which sense is the Church called by PETER the Citie the spirituall temple of God built of liuely stones whose foundation and cheife corner stone is Christ who sustaineth and beareth vp the whole building It is no lesse absurd therefore to suppose that there is a kind of fastning and a cleauing of Christs bodie within ours or of ours within his then it were to say that the bodies of the Saints do subsist one within another Seeing that the band of the Communion of Saints is the very same that the vnion is which they haue both with themselues and with Christ 12 Some of those things wherof we are made partakers in this mysterie are altogeather proper to the elect namelie Christ himselfe of whome none can be a member except he be indued with true faith true faith which is inseparablie joyned with true hope charitie and last of all that aeternall kingdome prepared from all aeternity according to the free purpose of God vnto the elect onelie Some also are after a sort as the Lord thinketh good common to the hypocrites and prophane by reason that they seeme to bee ingraffed into Christ as are the gifts of Prophesie of tongues and of healing togeather with manie other notable gifts of the mind and excellent benefites of this life the which as by the elect they are consecrated to God who is the giuer of them so are they prophaned by the wicked 13 Againe these gifts though not alwaies in the same measure are partly common to all the Saints as beeing necessarie to the saluation of all of which sort are the participation of Christ himselfe liuelie faith steadfast hope loue vnfained remission of sinnes and sanctification by the holie Ghost with suche like and partlye proper to euerie seuerall beleeuer the which the same holie Spirite doth distribute according to the diuers consideration of the callings of men vnto whome and in what measure hee thinketh good 14 Euerie one of the Saints seuerallie considered haue their peculier giftes both in regarde of the possession of Christ himselfe and also of his benefits as it is expressed in the similitude of the talents But in asmuch as there is one GOD and Father of all one Christ the Lord one Spirite whereof all the Saints are endued one faith one hope of the same calling one baptisme one kingdome of heauen and also because whatsoeuer graces bestowed vpon anie is therefore giuen that the vse of them may bee common vnto them all and so that they should be the one and the selfe same bodie of Christ therefore all the gifts bestowed vppon any of the
amongst so many distinct kingdoms and estates we see not seeing that they who do purposely withstand the reformation of the Church will neuer agree that there shall bee a lawefull and free meeting And seeing also too many of those whom the Lord hath in these times inlightned with the brightnes of his Gospell are so drawen into diuers factions that there is left but small hope of reconciliation except that Princes beeing kindled indeede with the true zeale of Christs glory would by their authoritie restraine the madnes of some of the Bellowses and firebrandes that Sathan hath raised in these our daies so that the discourse concerning such a general Councel may at this time seeme superfluous 22 But if the question be in generall what the authoritie of the determination of Councels ought to be wee answere brieflie and plainlie seeing we know fully that those ancient general Synods as both those foure most famous gathered against the blasphemies of ARRIVS MACEDONIVS NESTORIVS and other suche monsters and also manie others helde against the Monothelites and Monophysites were lawefull and altogeather agreeable vnto Gods woorde in respect of the truth of Doctrine that hee which dissenteth from these Synods in respect of Doctrine may justlie be said to swarue from the very worde of God which is the rule of all lawfull Synods 23 Wee dare not affirme this without exception of all prouincial synods bicause they are found marueilous contrarie and repugnant one to another Therefore wee doe affirme that the determinations of those Synods concerning Doctrine is to be very carefully and religiously measured according vnto the rule of Gods worde or the Doctrine of the Apostles the analogie of faith briefly comprehended in the Apostolicall beliefe 24 Now as touching those general councels that were manifestlie tyrannicall as that first of EPHESVS and the second of NICE wherein the worshipping of Images was established and all others gathered against Gods truth by the counterfeit Bishops of Rome together with al prouinciall assemblies like vnto them we do not onely not allowe but holde them accursed according to the commandement of PAVLE seeing the true much lesse the counterfeit Bishops are not in authoritie aboue the Angels whom he commaundeth to be held accursed if they teach any other Gospell 25 Now in those thinges which belong vnto the good order of the Church be they established by ancient or latter Canons This is first of all to be obserued that the conscience is not simplie tied by any such rules 26 And this meane is also preciselie to be kept in all of them vz. that those things which are either in their own nature supersticious or so farre abused vnto superstition as it is more expedient they should bee abollished then amended bee at once cleane taken awaye that the Church bee burdened with no Ceremonies that wicked Rites bee rooted out of the same and consideration bee had what is agreeable vnto euery place and time 1 They erre therefore most dangerouslie who holde that Councels both generall and particular cannot err and will haue the consciences of Christians to depend vppon them both in doctrine and also in traditions or Canons 2 They also doe erre who resting onely in their own priuate studies doe attribute nothing vnto the decrees of Councels 3 As those also do erre who in Ecclesiasticall controuersies will affoord no place vnto Councels Concerning Fathers 1 IT is certaine that as the Lorde in times past raised vp godly Priests leuits and prophets which might interpret his law against false teachers and apply the same vnto their time So in the Christian Churche after the labours of the Apostles and the Euangelistes hee indued with a certaine greater measure of his Spirit those whome he thought good by whose writings posterities might be instructed not that they should adde or detract any thing from the worde of GOD or change any syllable therein But that they should bee the true interpretours of the same and that there should bee an vse both of their sound disputations against heretickes and also of their holie and learned both exhortations and consolations to ouer-passe heere that the storie of the ancient Church is to be knowen out of their writings 2 But heere men do diuerslie offend for both they are greatlie to be reprooued who doe neglect so great gifts of God and they on the other side do greeuously offend who receaue the writings of the Fathers without exception for the rule of faith and those also who will haue the gouernment of the church without respect of time place and person to be framed according to the prescription of the ancients Neither are they to be heard who holde that the Fathers are to be accounted because they are ancient 3 Therefore there is this meane to bee kept in the reading of them namely in respect of Doctrine be they old or be they new for the olde themselues were sometimes new al their sayings are without preiudice to be diligentlie examined according to the rule of Gods written word the which thing they themselues euery where in their writinges wish to be done and as touching the gouernment and ceremonies of the Church receiued in their times all preposterous zeale is therein to bee auoyded in such sort as those thinges which the writings of the Apostles commaund to bee perpetually obserued in the Church are to bee descerned from the matters that are indifferent and were added since their time There is also great consideration to be had of circumstances which are alwaies necessarilie subject vnto change Defended by IOHN HALSBERGIVS a Flemming PRINCIPLES CONCERNING THE SACRAMENTS LV. WE HAVE IN THE FORMER PRINCIPLES dealt both with the word beeing one of the markes of the Church and also with those things that depend thervpon now we are to handle the other marke thereof vz. the Sacraments and first in generall 1 VVHen as God of his infinit goodnes would not haue his Church after the fall of man to remaine in that miserable estate hee did not onelie in word and promises declare his goodnes thereunto concerning the sauing thereof by Christ but also added certaine rites and ceremonies whereby hee might confirme the same in the assurance of his diuine goodnes towardes it 2 These rites did the Grecians call Mysteries because they signified secrete and hidden matters which can bee known vnto none saue vnto those only that are instructed that is vnto the members of Gods Church Now the Latines called them Sacraments either because the woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was so interpreted by the olde translatour of the new Testament or because these rites are the markes of the couenaunt betweene God and vs that hee should bee our God and we his people and that by a Metaphore borrowed from the Sacraments that is the solemne oathes whereby souldiers bound themselues vnto their Captains and the Captaines againe vnto them 3 Now although neither the word MYSTERIE nor SACRAMEMT be found in the Scripture in that
fall of mankinde by the mercifull voice of God haue and will vnto the end of the worlde consent together in the profession of his true worship 4 Nowe in asmuch as all those who haue giuen their names to bee of this meeting haue not either doone the same vnfainedlie or shewed that constancie that had bene meet by reason that Sathan neuer ceaseth to sowe tares in the field of the Lord Hence it came to passe that men haue beene alwaies enforced to take the Church sometimes in a more generall sometimes in a more speciall signification 5 The Church therefore is generallie called the congregation of all those who professe true Religion whether they do it vnfainedlie and perseuere therein or hypocriticallie and fall away from the same In speciall it is taken for all those onelie whome God of his infinite mercie hauing elected before all worldes doth effectuallie call when he thinketh good in such sort as they being endued with true faith and perseuering vnto the end may be justlie accounted to be of Gods flock 6 Hence sprung that distinction of the visible and inuisible Church of the visible which is so accounted by the notes of the outward profession without any differēce betweene the faithfull and the close hypocrites of the inuisible which is restrained vnto those onelie who trulie and constantlie beleeue to the end therfore called inuisible because true faith can assuredly be discerned by none saue by the Lord and them in whome it is 7 This inuisible Church is only one as there is but one God the Father one Christ the Mediatour and head of his mysticall bodie one faith one hope by the holy Ghost and one aeternall life and it is therefore called Catholicke that is vniuersall both because it hath bene is and shall be alwaies the one and the same and also because GOD hath alwaies gathered them into one bodye out of all sorts of men and people as it seemeth good vnto his mercie whereas before the comming of Christ the Church was particularly called out of the nation of the Iewes onelie 8 And although God for many ages had seperated the Gentiles whome the Apostles therefore affirmeth to bee without God strangers from the couenant of grace frō the seed of ABRAHAM yet was there almost no age wherein he called not some of the Gentiles vntill that the particion-wall being broken by the preaching of the Apostles that promise made vnto ABRAHAM was accomplished namely that all the nations should be blessed in his seede because they were to become ABRAHAMS seed by Christ 9 The particuler assemblies of this bodie dispearsed throughout the world considered either generallie or speciallie as it is visible or inuisible are as it were the members that make vp one mysticall body 10 And this is that Catholicke Church whereof mention is made in the beliefe therfore called holie because it is by the holy Ghost seperated from the rest of the worlde and consecrated vnto God 11 This same Church is rightly deuided into the Militant and Triumphant By the Militant is vnderstood the company of the true beleeuing yet remaining vppon the earth and striuing with Sathan and the remnants of their fleshe By the Triumphant are meant those whose blessed Spirits are already gathered vnto the Lord euen vntil both the one and the other at that glorious comming of Christ hauing receiued their glorious bodies shall triumph with Christ their head for euermore 12 That holines wherby this Catholick Church which is also inuisible in that sense that we haue spoken is seuered from the world if it be considered in respect of the puritie of the doctrine of the truth is altogeather without spot or wrinckle Or if it be considered not as it is in it selfe but according vnto the beliefe that is yeelded vnto this true and wholsome doctrine we holde againe that the force of that truth is so great that it is alwaies declared and obeied in the Church vniuersally considered Wherefore the Apostle calleth the Church taken in this sense the piller and ground of truth 13 But if the Church be respected not vniuersally but particularlie that is according as it hath diuers assemblies here and there gathered togeather then indeed it may often come to passe that some particular Churches may err yea in some fundamētal points either in part or in whole yet so as the elect do alwaies returne vnto the way neither can those particular spottes that cleaue vnto it for a time make the vniuersal church to leese her naturall beautie 14 We confesse to speake nothing here of the corruption of manners that this may come to passe much more if wee seuerally consider the members of particuler Churches for such is the weaknes of mans judgement euen in the deare Saints of God that you cannot find any so indued with the perfect knowledge of the trueth but hee doth stagger in some things especially when the Lord being prouoked by the sinnes of men doth giue efficacie and force vnto the spirit of error 15 Although that the Catholicke Church can neuer fall away from the truth yet both the Prophets and Apostles together with the holy storie in generall both before and after the comming of Christ haue foretolde and these very times wherein wee liue doe testifie that it hath often come to passe that the greatest part of particuler churches and men falling away yea and striuing against the truth the light of the Church seemed for a time though not vtterlie yet in a manner to be cleane extinguished 16 The true markes therefore of the visible Church can not bee the multitude or personall succession but the doctrine truly taught out of the written word of God and the lawfull administration that is such as is agreeable vnto Gods ordinance of the Sacraments to wit of Baptisme and of the Lords Supper 17 These two notes doe depend vpon the lawful forme that is such as is prescribed in Gods worde of the holie Ministerie constituted as it ought to be But in asmuch as the Church sometimes is brought to that passe that not onely Wolues doe supplie the place of lawfull Pastors but also the whole forme of the ordinarie Ministerie is turned into a plaine confusion that somtimes the externall Ministerie being for a time altogeather broken of the church is extraordinarilie fed as it were in the wildernes therefore is not this marke simplie and absolutelie necessary to point out the Church here vpon earth 18 Now wheresoeuer the Doctrine of the Apostles is taught ther is no question to be made but that the church is there though there bee fewe that giue eare vnto the same with fruit 19 That therefore is a true Church be it vniuersall or particuler which heareth the worde of God contained in the writinges of the Prophetes and the Apostles in suche sort as it canne adde nothing therevnto detract nothing from the same nor chaunge anie thing therein either in respect of the Doctrine it selfe or