it was drawen to those signes whiche had a reuerende representation of hie and spiritual thinges Which Augustine also noteth in one place It were long sayth he to dispute of the diuersitie of signes which when they perteine to diuine thinges are called Sacramentes Now of this definitioÌ„ which we haue set we vnderstande that a Sacrament is neuer without a promise going before it but rather is adioined as a certaine addition hanging to it to this ende that it should confirme and seale the promise it selfe and make it more approued vnto vs yea after a certaine maner ratified Which meane the Lord foreseeth to be nedefull first for our ignorance and dullnesse and theÌ„ for our weaknesse and yet to speake properly not so much to coÌ„firme his holy word as to stablish vs in the Faith therof For the truth of God is by it selfe sounde and certaine enough and can not froÌ„ any other where receiue better confirmation than from it selfe But our Faith as it is smal and weake vnlesse it be stayed on euery side and be by al meanes vpholden is by and by shaken wauereth staggereth yea and fainteth And herein verily the mercifull Lorde according to his great tender kindnesse tempereth himselfe to our capacitie that whereas we be naturall men which alway creping vpon the grounde and sticking fast in the flesh dooe not thinke nor so much as coÌ„ceiue any spiritual thing he vouchesaueth euen by these earthly elementes to guide vs vnto himselfe and in the fleshe it selfe to set fourth a mirror of spirituall good thinges For if we were vnbodily as Chrysostome sayth he would haue geuen vs the very same thinges naked and vnbodily Now because we haue soules putte within bodies he geueth spirituall thinges vnder visible thinges Not because there are suche giftes planted in the natures of the thinges which are set fourth to vs in the Sacramentes but because they were signed by God to this signification And this is it which they coÌ„monly say that a SacrameÌ„t coÌ„sisteth of the word the outward signe For we must vnderstande the worde to be not that which being whispered wtout meaning Faith with onely noise as it were with a magical enchauntment hath power to coÌ„secrate the element but which being preached maketh vs to vnderstande what the visible signe meaneth Therfore that which was vsually done vnder the tyraÌ„nie of the Pope was not without a great profaning of the mysteries For they thought it inough if the Prest while the people stode amasedly gazing at it without vnderstanding did mumble vp the forme of consecration Yea they of set purpose prouided this that no whit of doctrine shoulde thereof come to the people for they spake all thinges in Latine before vnlearned men Afterwarde superstitioÌ„ brake out so farr that they beleued that the consecration was not formally made vnlesse it were with a hoarse whispering sounde which fewe might heare But Augustine teacheth farr otherwise of the Sacramental worde Let the word sayth he be added to the element and there shal be made a SacrameÌ„t For whense cometh this so great strength to the water to touch the body and washe the soule but by the word making it not because it is spoken but because it is beleued For in the very worde it selfe the sounde which passeth is one thing and the power whiche abideth is an other This is the worde of Faith which we preach sayth the Apostle Wherevpon in the Actes of the Apostles it is said by Faith cleansing their hartes And Peter the Apostle sayth So Baptisme also saueth vs not the putting away of the filthinesse of the flesh but the examination of a good coÌ„science This is the worde of Faith which we preach by which without dout that it may be able to cleanse Baptisme also is halowed You se how it riquireth preaching wherupoÌ„ Faith may growe And we nede not to trauaile much in profe hereof forasmuch as it is clere what Christ did what he commaunded vs to do what the Apostles folowed what the purer Chirch obserued Yea euen from the beginning of the world it is knowen that so oft as God offred any signe to the holy Fathers there was added an vnseparable knot of doctrine without which our senses should be made amased with bare beholding Therfore wheÌ„ we heare mention made of the Sacramental worde let vs vnderstand the promise which being with a loude voice preached of the minister may leade the people thether as it were by the hande whether the signe tendeth and directeth vs. Neither are some to be heard which trauail to fight against this with a doble horned argument rather suttle than sounde Either say they we know or we knowe not that the worde of God which goeth before the Sacrament is the true will of God If we knowe it then we learne no new thing of the Sacrament which foloweth after If we know it not then neither wil the Sacramente teach it whoe 's whole force standeth in the worde Wherunto let this brefely be for an answere that the seales which are hanged at patentes and other publike instrumentes takeÌ„ by themselues are nothing forasmuche as they shoulde be hanged in vaine if the parchemente had nothing written in it yet they doe not therefore not confirme and seale that which is written when they be added to writinges Neither can they say that this similitude is lately fayned by vs whiche Paule himselfe vsed calling CircumcisioÌ„ a seale where he purposely trauaileth to proue that Circumcision was not righteousnesse to Abraham but a sealyng of that couenaunte by faith whereof he had alredy ben iustified before And what I beseche you is there that may muche offende any man if we teache that the promise is sealed with Sacramentes when of the promises themselues it is euidente that one is confirmed with an other For as euery one is manifester so is it more fit to vpholde faith But the SacrameÌ„tes do both bring most clere promises and haue this peculiar more than the worde that they liuely represent them to vs as it wer painted out in a table Neither ought that distinction any thing to moue vs which is wont to be obiected betwene Sacramentes and seales of patentes that wheras both consist of carnall elementes of this world those can not suffice or be mete to seale the promises of God which are spirituall and euerlasting as these are wont to be haÌ„ged to for sealing of the grauntes of Princes concerning fading and fraile thinges For a faithfull man when the Sacramentes are prâ—sente before his eyes sticketh not in that fleshly sighte but by those degrees of proportion whiche I haue spoken of he riseth vp with godly consideration to the hie mysteries which lie hidden in the Sacramentes And sith the Lord calleth his promises couenantes and his Sacramentes seales of couenantes a similitude may wel be brought froÌ„ the couenantes of men What can a sowe killed worke if wordes were not vsed
examples when he shewed to Abraham a lighte in a smoking ouen when he watered the flece with dew the earth remayning dry againe he watered the earth the flece being vntouched to promise victory to Gedeon when he drew the shadowe of the diall .ix. lynes backeward to promise safetie to Ezethias These thinges when they were done to relieue and stablishe the weakenesse of their Faith were then also Sacramentes But our presente purpose is to discourse peculiarly of those Sacramentes whiche the Lord willed to be ordinarie in his Chirch to nourishe his worshippers and seruantes into one Faith and the confession of one Faith For to vse the wordes of Augustine men can be congeled together into no name of religion either true or false vnlesse they be bounde together with some felowship of visible signes and Sacramentes Sithe therefore the moste good Father foresawe thys necessitie he did from the beginning ordeine certayne exercises of godlinesse for his seruantes whiche afterwarde Satan by turning them to wicked and superstitious worshippinges hath many wayes depraued and corrupted Hereupon came those solemne professions of the Gentiles into their holy orders and other bastarde vsages which although they were full of error and superstition yet they also were therewith a profe that men could not in profession of religion be without suche outwarde signes But because they neyther were grounded vppon the worde of God nor were referred to that trueth whereunto all signes oughte to be directed they are vnworthy to be rehearsed where mention is made of the holy signes whiche are ordeined of God and haue not swarued from their fundation that is that they should be helpes of true godlinesse They consist not of bare signes as were the boaw and the tree but vpon Ceremonies or rather the signes that be here geuen are Ceremonies But as it is aboue sayd that they be on the Lordes behalfe testimonies of grace and saluatiō so they be againe on our behalfe markes of profession by which we openly sweare to the name of God for our partes bynding our Faith vnto him Therefore Chrysostome in one place fittly calleth them couenātinges wherby God byndeth hymselfe in league with vs and we be bounde to purenesse and holinesse of life because here is made a mutuall forme of couenanting betwene God and vs. For as the Lorde therin promiseth that he will cancell and blot out whatsoeuer giltinesse penaltie we haue gathered by offending and doth reconcile vs to himselfe in his only begotten Sonne so we againe on our behalfes do by thys profession bynde oure selues vnto hym to the folowing of Godlinesse and innocence so that a man may rightly say that such Sacramētes are Ceremonies by which God wil exercise his people first to the nourishing stirring vp and strēgthening of Faith inwardly then to the testifieng of religion before men And euen these Sacramentes also were diuerse after the diuerse order of tyme according to the distribution whereby it pleased the Lorde to shewe hymselfe after thys or that manner to men For to Abraham and his posteritie Circumcision was commaunded wherunto afterwarde purifienges and Sacrifices and other Ceremonies were added out of the law of Moses These were the Sacramentes of the Iewes vntil the comming of Christ at which comming those being abrogate twoo Sacramentes were ordeined whiche nowe the Christian Chirch vseth Baptisme and the Supper of the Lord. I speake of those that were ordeined for the vse of the whole Chirch For as for the layeng on of handes whereby the ministers of the Chirch are entred into their office as I do not vnwillingly suffer it to be called a Sacrament so I doe not recken it among the ordinarie Sacramentes As for the rest which are commonly called Sacramentes what they are to be accompted we shal se by and by Howbeit the olde Sacramentes also had respect to the same marke wherunto ours doe tende that is to directe and in a maner leade by the hande to Christ or rather as images to represent hym and shewe hym fourth to be knowē For wheras we haue alredy taught that they are certayne seales wherwith the promises of God are sealed and where it is most certaine that there was neuer offred any promise of God to men but in Christ that they may teache vs of some promyse of God they must nedes shewe Christ. Wherunto perteineth that heauenly paterne of the tabernacle and of the worshipping in the law which was geuen to Moses in the mount One only differēce there is that those did shadowe out Christe being promised when he was yet loked for these doe testifie him alredy geuen and deliuered When these thinges shall all be particularly and eche one seuerally declared they shal be made much playner Circumcision was to the Iewes a signe whereby they were putt in mynde that whatsoeuer commeth of the sede of man that is to saye the whole nature of man is corrupte and hath nede of proyning Moreouer it was a teaching and token of remembrance whereby they should confirme themselues in the promyse geuen to Abraham concerning that blessed sede in whome all the nations of the earth were to be blessed from whome they had their owne blessing to be looked for Nowe that healthfull sede as we are taughte of Paule was Chirst in whome alone they hoped that they shoulde recouer that whiche they had loste in Adam Wherefore Circumcision was to them the same thyng whiche Paule sayth that it was to Abraham namely the seale of the righteousnesse of Fayth that is to saye the seale whereby they shoulde be more certainly assured that their Fayth wherewith they loked for that sede shoulde be accompted to them of GOD for righteousnesse But we shall vppon a better occasion in an other place gooe throughe with the comparison of Circumcision and Baptisme Baptisinges and purifienges did sette before their eies their owne vncleannesse filthinesses and pollution wherwith they were defiled in their owne nature but they promised an other washing wherby al their filthinesses should be wiped and washed away And this washing was Christ with whoe 's blood we beeing washed do bryng hys cleannesse into the sight of God that it maye hyde all our defilinges Their Sacrifices did accuse them of their owne wickednesse and therewithall did teache that it was necessarie that there shoulde be some satisfaction whiche shoulde be payed to the iugement of God That therefore there shoulde be some one chefe Bishop a mediator betwene God and men which should satisfie God by sheding of blood and by offring of a Sacrifice whiche should suffice for the forgeuenesse of synnes This chefe Prest was Christ he himselfe shed hys owne blood he himselfe was the Sacrifice for he offred himselfe obediente to hys Father vnto death by which obedience he toke awaye the disobedience of man whiche had prouoked the displeasure of God As for oure Sacramentes they doe so muche more clerely presente Christe vnto vs as he
As when he promised euerlastyng blessednesse to his seruant Abraham that he myght sett before his eies a manifest token of his fauor he addeth an other promise concernyng the possession of the lande of Chanaan After this maner we ought to vnderstande al the earthly promises that are geuen to the Iewiche nation that the spirituall promise as the hed wherunto they are directed shold alway haue the chefe place But sithe I haue more largely entreated of these thynges in the difference of the newe and olde testament therfore nowe I do the more slightly knitte it vp In the namyng of the children they finde this diuersitie that in the olde testament they were called the children of Abraham whiche issued of his sede but that nowe they are called by that name whiche follow his faith And that therfore that carnall infantie which was by circuÌ„cision graffed into the felowship of the couenant figured the infantes of the newe testament whyche are regenerate by the worde of God to immortall lyfe In whych woordes we beholde in dede a smalle sparcle of truthe but herin these lyghte spirites greuously offende that when they catche holde of that whyche fyrste commeth to theyr hande when they should go further and compare many thynges together they stand slytly vpon one worde Wherby it can not otherwyse bee but that they must somtyme be deceiued whych rest vpon the sounde knowlege of nothyng We graunt in dede that the carnall seede of Abraham did for a tyme holde the place of the spirituall sede whiche is by faith graffed into hym For we be called his children howsoever there is no naturall kinred betwene hym and vs. But if they meane as they playnly shew that they doo that there was neuer spirituall blessing promised to the carnal sede of Abraham herein they are muche deceiued Wherfore we muste leuell to a better marke whereunto we are directed by the moste certaine guidyng of the Scripture The Lorde therefore promised to Abraham that he shoulde haue a seede wherein all nations of the earthe shall be blessed and therwithall assureth hym that he would be a God to hym and his sede Whosoeuer do by Faith receiue Christe the author of blessyng are heires of this promise and therefore are called the children of Abraham But althoughe sins the resurrection of Christe the boundes of the kingdome of God haue begonne to be farre and wide enlarged into all nations without difference that according to the saying of Christ faithfull ones should be gathered from euery part to sit downe in the heaueÌ„ly glorie with Abraham Isaac and Iacob yet he had many ages before extended that same so great mercie to the Iewes And because passing ouer all other he had chosen out that only nation in which he wold restraine his grace for a tyme called them his peculiar possessioÌ„ his purchased people For testifiyng of suche liberalitie Circumcision was geuen by the signe wherof the Iewes might be taught that God is to them the author of saluation by which knowledge their myndes were raised into hope of eternal life For what shal he want whoÌ„ God hath ons receiued into his charge Wherfore the Apostle meaning to proue that the Gentiles were the children of Abraham as well as the Iewes speaketh in this maner Abraham saith he was iustified by faith in vncircuÌ„cision Afterward he receiued the signe of circumcision the seale of the righteousnesse of faith that he should be the father of all the faithfull both of vncircumcision and of circumcision not of them that glorie of only circumcision but of them that folow the fâ—â—th which our father Abraham had in vncircumcision Do not we see that both sortes are made egall in dignitie â–ª For during the tyme appointed by the decree of God he was the father of circumcision When the wall being plucked downe as the Apostle writeth in an other place by which the Iewes wer seuered from the Gentiles the entrie was made open to them also into the kingdome of God he was made their father and that without the signe of circumcision because they haue Baptisme in stede of circumcision But wher he expresly by name denyeth that Abraham is father to them which are of circumcision only that same was spoken to abate the pride of certaine which omittyng the care of godlynesse did bost themselues of only Ceremonies After which maner at this day also their vanitie may be confuted which seke in Baptisme nothyng but water But an other place of the Apostle out of the .ix. Chapiter of the Epistle to the Romaines shal be alleged to the contrary where he teacheth that they whiche are of the fleshe are not the children of Abraham but they onely are compted his sede whiche are the children of promise For he seemeth to signifie that the carnall kynred of Abraham is nothyng which yet we do set in some degre But it is more diligeÌ„tly to be marked what mater the Apostle there entreateth of For meaning to shew to the Iewes how much the goodnesse of god was not bouÌ„d to the sede of AbrahaÌ„ yea howe it nothyng auayleth of it selfe he bringeth forth Ismael and Esau for example proue it whome beeyng refused as if they were strangers although they were accordyng to the fleshe the naturall ofspryng of Abraham the blessing rested in Isaac and Iacob Wherupon is gathered that which he afterwarde affirmeth that saluation hangeth of the mercie of God whiche he extendeth to whome it pleaseth hym and that there is no cause why the Iewes shold stand in their own conceite or boast vpon the name of the couenaÌ„t vnlesse they kepe the law of the couenant that is to say do obey the worde Agayne when he hath throwen them downe from vaine confidence of their kinred yet because on the other side he sawe that the couenant which was ones made of God with the posteritie of Abraham coulde in no wyse be made voyd in the xi chapiter he argueth that the carnall kinred is not to be spoyled of his due dignitie by the beneficiall meane wherof he teacheth that the Iewes are the first and naturall heires of the Gospell but in respecte that by their vnthankfulnesse they were forsaken as vnworthy yet so that the heuenly blessyng is not vtterly remoued from their nation For whiche reason howe muche soeuer they were stubborne and couenant breakers neuerthelesse he calleth them holye so muche honor he geueth to the holy generation with whom God had vouchsaued to make his holy couenant but calleth vs if we be compared with them as it were after borne yea or the vntimely borne children of Abraham and that by adoption not by nature as if a twigg broken of from his naturall tree should be graffed into a strange stocke Therefore that they should not be defrauded of their prerogatiue it behoued that the Gospel should be first preached to them for they be in the household of God as it were the first begotten children
righteousnesse that is of God by faith coÌ„pting not his righteousnesse that which is by the law but yâ— whiche is by the faith of Iesu Christ. You see that here is also a coÌ„parison of coÌ„traries that here is declared the he which wil obteine the righteousnesse of Christ must for sake his owne righteousnesse Therefore in an other place he sayth that this was the cause of fal to the Iewes yâ— goyng about to stablish their owne righteousnesse they were not subiect to yâ— righteousnesse of God If in stablishyng our owne righteousnesse we shake away the righteousnesse of God therefore to obteine Gods righteousnesse our owne must be vtterly abolished And he sheweth the same thyng when he fayth that our glorieng is not excluded by the law but by faith Wherupon foloweth that so long as there remaineth any righteousnesse of workes how litle soeuer it be there still remaineth to vs some 〈◊〉 to glorie vpoÌ„ Now if faith exclude al glorieng then the righteousnesse of workes can no wise be coupled with the righteousnesse of faith To this effect he speaketh so playnely in the .iiij. chapter to the Romanes that he leaueth no roume for cauillations or shiftes If sayth he Abraham was iustified by workes he hath glorie And immediatly he addeth but he hath no glorie in the sight of God It foloweth therefore that he was not iustified by workes Then he vryngeth an other argument by contraries when reward is rendred to workes that is done of det and not of grace But righteousnesse is geuen to fayth accordyng to grace Therefore it is not of the deseruinges of workes Wherfore farewell their dreame that imagine a righteousnesse made of faith and workes mingled together The Sophisters thinke that they haue a suttle shifte that make to themselues sport and pastime with wrestyng of Scripture and with vayne cauillations For they expoÌ„nd workes in that place to be those which men not yet regenerate doe only literally by the endeuour of free will without the grace of Christ and do saye that it beloÌ„geth not to spiritual workes So by their opinion a man is iustified bothe by faith and by workes so that the workes be not his own but the giftes of Christ and frutes of regeneration For they saye that Paule spake so for none other cause but to conuince the Iewes trusting vpoÌ„ their owne workes that they dyd foolishly presume to clayme righteousnesse to theÌ„selues sithe the only Spirit of Christ doth geue it vs and not any endeuour by our owne motion of nature But they doe not marke the in the coÌ„parison of the righteousnesse of the law the righteousnesse of the gospell which Paule bringeth in in an other place all workes are excluded with what title so euer they be adorned For he teacheth that this is the righteousnesse of the law that he shuld obteâ—â—e saluation that hath performed that whiche the law coÌ„maundeth and that this is the righteousnesse of fayth yf we beleue that Christ died and is risen againe Moreouer we shall her after shewe in place fitioâ— it that sauctification righteousnesse are seuerall benefites of Christ Whereupon foloweth that the very spirituall workes come not into the accompt when the power of iustifieng is ascribed to fayth And where Paule denieth as I eueÌ„ now alleged that Abraham had any thing wherupoÌ„ to glorie before God bicause he was not made righteous by workes this ought not to be restrayned to the literall and outward kinde of vertues or to the endeuour of free will But although the life of the Patriarch Abraham were spirituall and in manner Angelike yet he had not sufficient deseruynges of workes to purchace him righteousnesse before God The Scholemen teach a litle more grosâ—y that mingle their preparations but these do lesse infect the simple and vnskilfull with corrupt doctrine vnder pretense of Spirit and grace hydyng the mercie of God whiche only is able to appease tremblyng consciences But we confesse with Paul that the doers of the law are iustified before God but bicause we are all far from the keping of the law herupon we gather that the workes which should most of al haue auailed to righteousnesse do nothing help vs bicause we lacke them As for the coÌ„mon Papistes or Scholemen they are in this point doubly deceiued both bicause they cal faith an assuredneâ—se of conscieÌ„ce in loking for reward at the hand of God for deseruinges and also bicause they expound the grace of God not to be a free imputation of righteousnesse but the holy ghost helpyng to the endeuour of holinesse They reade in the Apostle that he which coÌ„meth to God muste first beleue that there is a God then that he is a rendrer of reward to them that seke him But they marke not what is the manner of seking And that they are deceyued in the name of grace is plamely proued by their owne writings For Lombarde expoundeth that iustification by Christ is geuen vs two wayes First sayth he the death of Christ doth iustifie vs when by it charitie is stirred vp in our heartes by which we are made righteous Secondly that by the same death sinne is destroyed whereby Satan helde vs captiue so that nowe he hath not whereby to condemne vs. You see how he considereth the grace of God principally in iustification to be so far as we are directed to good workes by the grace of the holy ghost He would forsoth haue folowed the opinion of Augustine but he foloweth him a far of goth far out of the waye froÌ„ rightly folowing him bicause if Augustine haue spokeÌ„ any thing plainly he darkeneth it if there be any thing in Augustine not very vnpure he corrupteth it The Scholemen haue stil strayed from worse to worse till with hedlong fall at length they be rolled downe into a Pelagian errour And the very sentence of Augustine or at least his manner of speakyng is not altogether to be receyued For though he singularly wâ—ll taketh from man all prayse of righteousnesse and assigneth it wholly to the grace of God yet he referreth grace to sanctificatioÌ„ wherby we are renewed into newnesse of life by the holy ghost But the Scripture when it speaketh of the righteousnesse of faith leadeth vs to a far other end that is to say that turnyng away from the loking vpoÌ„ our owne workes we should only loke vnto the mercie of God and perfection of Christ. For it teacheth this order of iustificatioÌ„ that first God vouchsaueth to embrace maÌ„ beyng a sinner with his mere and free goodnesse consideryng nothing in him but miserie whereby he may be moâ—ed to mercie for asmuch as he seeth him altogether naked voide of good workes fetchyng from himself the cause to do him good then that he moueth the sinner himself with feling of his goodnesse which desperyng vpon his owne workes casteth all the summe of his saluation vpon Gods mercie This is the felyng of fayth by
which felyng the sinner commeth into possession of his saluatioÌ„ when he acknowlegeth by the doctrine of the Gospel that he is reconciled to God that obteyning forgeuenesse of sinnes by meanes of the righteousnesse of Christ â—e is iustified and although he be regenerate by the Spirit of God he thinketh vpon continuall righteousnesse layed vp for him not in the good workes to which he applieth himself but in yâ— only righteousnesse of Christ. When these thinges shal be euery one particularly weyed they shal geue a perfect declaratioÌ„ of our senteÌ„ce Albeit thei might be better disposed in an other order than they are set forth But it maketh litle mater so that they hang together in such sort that we may haue the whole mater truely declared surely proued Here it is good to remember the relation that we haue before sayd to be betwene faith and the Gospell bycause it is sayd for this cause that faith iustifieth for that it recemeth embraceth the righteousnesse offred in the gospel And whereas it is sayd to be offred by the gospel therby al coÌ„sideratioÌ„ of workes is excluded Which thing Paule declareth many times els where but most plainly in two places For to the Romanes comparing the lawe and the gospell together he sayth the righteousnesse that is by the law is thus the man that doth these thinges shal liue in them But the righteousnesse that is of faith offreth saluation if thou beleue in thy heart and confesse with thy mouth the Lord Iesus and that the father hath raysed him vp from the dead See you not how he maketh this the difference of the law and the Gospel that the lawe geueth righteousnesse to workes and the Gospel geueth tree righteousnesse without helpe of workes It is a notable place and that maye deliuer vs out of many harde doubtes yf we vnderstande that the same righteousnesse that is geuen vs by the Gospell is free from all conditions of the lawe This is the reason why he doth more than ones with great seming of contrarietie set the promise by way of opposition against the law as it the inheritance be of the law then is it not of the promise all the rest in the same chapter to the same effect Truely the lawe it selfe hath also her promises Therefore there must needes be in the promises of the gospel somthing different diuerse froÌ„ the promises of the lawe vnlesse we will confesse that the comparison is very sond But what diuersitie shall this bee vnlesse it be that they are freely geuen and vpholden by the only mercie of God whereas the promises of the lawe hange vpon the condition of workes Neyther let any manne here carp agaynst me and saye that in this place the righteousnesse is reiected whiche menne of their owne force and freewill would compell God to receiue for asmuch as Paule without exception teacheth that the law in coÌ„maunding profiteth nothing bicause there is none not only of the coÌ„mon multitude but also of the perfectest that fulfilleth it Loue vndoubtedly is the chefe point of the law when the Spirit of God frameth vs vnto it why is it not to vs a cause of righteousnesse but for that euen in the holy ones it is vnperfect and therefore of it self deserueth no reward The second place is this It is manifest that no man is iustified by the lawe before God Bicause the righteous man shall liue by fayth But the law is not of faith but the man that doth these thynges shall liue in them Howe coulde this argument otherwise stande together vnlesse we agree vpon this point that workes come not into the accompt of faith but are vtterly to be seuered from it The lawe sayth he differeth from fayth Why so bicause workes are required to the righteousnesse thereof Therefore it foloweth that workes are not required to the righteousnesse of faith By this relation it appereth that they which are iustified by faith are iustified byside the deseruing of workes yea without the deseruyng of workes bycause faith receyueth that righteousnesse which the Gospel geueth And the gospel differeth from the law in this point that it bindeth not righteousnesse to workes but setteth it in the only mercy of God Like herunto is that whiche he affirmeth to the Romanes that Abraham had nothyng to glorie vpon bycause fayth was imputed to him vnto righteousnesse he addeth a confirmation bycause then there is place for the righteousnesse of faith when there are no workes to whiche a rewarde is due Where bee workes sayth he due rewarde is rendred vnto them that whiche is geuen to faith is freely geuen For the very meanyng of the wordes that he vseth in that place serue to proue the same Wheras he adioyneth within a litle after that therefore we obteyne the inheritance by fayth as accordynge to grace hereupon he gathereth that the inheritance is of free gift bicause it is receyued by fayth and how commeth that but bicause fayth without any help of workes leaneth wholy vpon the mercie of God And in the same meanyng without dout he teacheth in an other place that the righteousnesse of God was openly shewed without the law although it haue witnesse borne of it by the law the Prophetes bicause excludyng the lawe he sayth that it is not holpen by workes and that we obteyne it not by workyng but come empty that we maye receyue it By this time the reader perceiueth with what equitie the Sophisters do at this daye cauill at our Doctrine when we saye that man is iustified by faith only They dare not denie that man is iustified by faith bicause it is so often fouÌ„d in Scripture but bicause this word Only is neuer expressed they can not abide to haue such an addition made Is it so But what will they answer to these wordes of Paule where he affirmeth that righteousnesse is not of fayth except it be freely geuen Howe can free gift agree with workes And with what cauillations will they mocke out that whiche he sayth in an other place that the righteousnesse of God is manifestly shewed in the Gospell If righteousnesse be manifestly shewed in the Gospell surely therein is conteyned not a torne or halfe righteousnesse but full and perfect Therefore the lawe hath no place therein And they stande vpon not only a false but also a foolish shifte about this exclusine word Only Doth not he perfectly enough geue al things to only faith that taketh al thinges from workes What I praye you meane these sayenges that righteousnesse was manifestly shewed without the law that maÌ„ is iustified freely and without the workes of the law Here they haue a witty shifte to escape withall whiche although they deuised it not themselues but borowed it of Origene certaine of the old writers yet is very foolish They prate that the ceremoniall workes of the law not the moral are excluded They profit so with
haue we shewed that there commeth not so muche as one good woorke out of holy men whiche if it be iudged in it selfe deserueth not iuste rewarde of shame SecoÌ„dly I say that if it wer possible that we shold haue som throughly pure perfect works yet one sinne is enough to blot our quench al the remeÌ„brance of the former righteousnes as the prophet saithe With whome also Iames agreeth He that offeÌ„deth saith he in one is made gilty of al. Now fith this mortal life is neuer pure or void froÌ„ siÌ„ne whatsoeuer righteousnes we shold purchace being froÌ„ time to time with sinnes folowing corrupted oppressed lost it shold not com into the sight of God nor be accoÌ„pted to vs for righteousnes Finalli wheÌ„ the righteousnes of works is entreted of we must not haue respect to the work of the law but to the coÌ„maundement Therfore if we â—eke righteousnes by the law we shal in vain bring forth one or two works but a perpetual obedience of the law is there necessarie Wherfore the Lord doth not but ones as many foolishlythinke impute to vs righteousnesse that same forgeuenes of sinnes wherof we haue spoken that hauing ones obteined pardon of oure life past we should afterwarde seeke righteousnesse in the lawe bicause he shoulde so do nothing els butte bringe vs into a false hope and mocke and laughe vs to scorne For sith no perfectioÌ„ cold com to vs so loÌ„g as we are clothed with this flesh sith the law thretneth death iudgmeÌ„t to al theÌ„ that performe not ful rightousnes in work it shal alway haue wherof it mai accuse coÌ„deÌ„ne vs vnlesse the mercie of God on the other side did wtstand it to acquite vs froÌ„ time to time with coÌ„tinual forgeuenes of sinnes Wherfore this staÌ„deth alwaye certain which we said at the beginning that if we be weied by our own worthines whatsoeuer we purpose or go about yet we with al our trauailes endeuours are worthy of death and destruction UpoÌ„ these two points we must strongly staÌ„d fast that ther was neuer any work of a godli maÌ„ which if it wer examined by the seuere iudgmeÌ„t of god was not daÌ„nable Again if ther be any such shewed which is not possible for maÌ„ yet being corrupted defiled with the sinnes wherw t it is certaine that the doer of it is loden it looseth the grace And this is the cheefe point of our disputatioÌ„ For about the beginning of iustification there is no striâ—e betwene vs the souÌ„der sort of Scholmen but that a sinner being freely deliuered froÌ„ damnation obteineth righteousnes that by the forgeuenes of sinnes sauing that thei vnder the worde of Iustification comprehende the renewing wherw t we are newly formed by the Spirite of God vnto the obedience of the law thei thus describe the righteousnes of a maÌ„ regenerate that man being ones recoÌ„ciled to God by the faith of Christ is by good workes iudged righteous before God and by theyr deseruynge vs accepted But the lord contrariwise pronouÌ„ceth that he imputed to AbrahaÌ„ faithe for righteousnes not at the time wheÌ„ he yet serued idols but wheÌ„ he had al ready mani years excelled in holines of life Therfore AbrahaÌ„ had long worshiped God froÌ„ a pure hart had performed that obedieÌ„ce of the law whiche mai be performed of a mortal maÌ„ yet he hath righteousnes reposed in faithe WherevpoÌ„ we gather accordiÌ„g to the argumeÌ„t of Paul that it was not of works Likewise wheÌ„ it is said in the prophet The righteous maÌ„ shal liue by faith it is not spokeÌ„ of wicked prophane men whoÌ„ the lorde iustifieth by coÌ„uerting theÌ„ to faith but the speach is directed to the faithfull to them is promised life by faith Paul also taketh away all Doubt wheÌ„ for coÌ„firming of that senteÌ„ce he taketh this verse of Dauid Blessed ar they whose iniquities are forgeueÌ„ But it is certein that Dauid speaketh not of the wicked but of the faithful such as him self was bicause he spake out of the feliÌ„g of his own coÌ„science Therefore this blessednes we must not haue ones in our life but hold it throughout al our life Last of all he testifieth that the embassage coÌ„cerning the fre reconciliatioÌ„ with God is not published for one or two daies but is perpetual in the church Therfore the faithfull haue euen to the end of their life no other rigteousnesse than that which is there set foorth For Christ euerlastyngly remaineth the mediatour to reconcile the father to vs the effectualnesse of his death is euerlasting namely washing satistactioÌ„ expiation finally perfect obedience wherw t al our iniquities are couered Neither doth Paul to the Ephesians say that we haue the beginning of saluation out of grace but that we are saued by grace not of workes that no man should glorie The starting holes whiche the scholemen do here seke to escape by do not deliuer theÌ„ They say the good workes are not by inward worthinesse in theÌ„selues of so great ualue that they be sufficieÌ„t to purchace righteousnesse but this that thei be of so great value is of grace accepting theÌ„ TheÌ„ because they be driuen to coÌ„fesse that the righteousnesse of workes is in this life alway vnperfect they grauÌ„t that we so long as we liue do nede forgenesse of sinnes wherby the way of workes may be supplied but that the defautes which are coÌ„mitted are recoÌ„pensed with workes of supererogation For I answere that the accepting grace as they cal it is none other thaÌ„ his fre goodnes wherwith the father embraceth vs in Christ wheÌ„ he clotheth vs with the innoceÌ„cie of Christ accompteth the same ours that by the beneficial meane therof he may take vs for holy pure innocent For the righteousnesse of Christ which as it only is perfect so only can abide the sight of God must be set in our stede and be presented at the barre as a suretic Herewith we beyng furnished to obteine coÌ„tinual forgeuenesse of sinnes in faith With the purnesse herof our filthinesses vnclenesses of imperfections being couered are not imputed but are hidden as if they were buried that they may not come into the iugement of god vntil the houre come wheÌ„ the olde maÌ„ being slain vtterly destroied in vs the goodnesse of god shal receiue vs into blessed peace with the new Adam where let vs loke for the day of the Lorde in whiche receiuing vncorrupt bodies we shal be remoued into the glorie of the heauenly kingdome If these thinges be true verily no workes of ours can of them selues make vs acceptable pleasing to god neither can the workes theÌ„selues please but in respect that maÌ„ being couered with the righteousnes of Christe pleaseth god obteineth forgeuenes of his siÌ„nes For god hath not promised the rewarde of eternal life to some certaine workes but only promiseth that he which doth these things shal liue settiÌ„g the
the beginning And here by the way it shal be profitable to touch what these formes of speakyng do differ from the promises of the law I cal promises of the law not those which are eche where coÌ„monly writteÌ„ in the bokes of Moses for as much as in them also are found many promises of the Gospel but those which properly belong to the ministerie of the law Such promises by what name so euer you list to cal them do declare that there is reward redy vpon condition if thou do that which is coÌ„maunded thee But when it is sayd that the Lord kepeth the couenaÌ„t of mercie to theÌ„ which loue him therin is rather shewed what maÌ„ner of men be his seruantes which haue faithfully receiued his couenant than the cause is expressed why the lord should do good to them Now this is the manner of shewyng it As the Lord vouchsaueth to graunt vs the grace of eternal life to this end that he should be loued feared honored of vs so whatsoeuer promises there are of his mercie in the Scriptures they are rightfully directed to this and that we should reuerence and worship the author of the benefites So ofte therefore as we heare that he doth good to them that kepe his law let vs remeÌ„ber that the children of God are there signified by the dutie whiche ought to be continual in them that we are for this cause adopted that we should honor him for our Father Therfore lest we should disherite our selues from the right of adoptioÌ„ we must alway endeuor to this wherunto our calling tendeth But let vs againe kepe this in minde that the accoÌ„plishment of the mercie of God hangeth not vpoÌ„ the workes of the faithfull but that he therfore fulfilleth the promise of saluation to them whiche answer to their callyng in vprightnesse of life bicause in them he acknoweth the natural tokeÌ„s of his children which are ruled with his Spirit vnto good Herunto let that be referred which is in the xv Psalme spoken of the Citezens of the Church Lord whoe shal dwel in thy tabernacle and whoe shal rest in thy holy hill The innocent in haÌ„des of a cleane heart c. Agayne in Esaie Whoe shall dwel with deuouring fire He that doth righteousnesse he that speaketh right thinges c. For there is not described the staye whereupon the faythfull may stand before the Lord but the manner wherewith the most merciful father bringeth theÌ„ into his felowship therein defendeth streÌ„gtheneth them For bicause he abhorreth sinne he loueth righteousnesse whoÌ„ he ioyneth to himself them he cleanseth with his spirit that he may make theÌ„ of like fashion to himself his kingdome Therfore if the question be of the first cause wherby the entrie is made open to the holy ones into the kingdome of God froÌ„ whense they haue that thei may stand fast abide in it we haue this answer ready bicause the Lord by his mercie both hath ones adopted them perpetually defendeth them But if the question be of the manner then we must come downe to regeneration and the frutes therof which are rehersed in that Psalme But there semeth to be much more hardnesse in these places which do both garnish good workes with the titiÌ„e of righteousnesse affirme that man is iustified by them Of the first sort there be very many places where the obseruinges of the coÌ„maundementes are called iustifications or righteousnesses Of the other sort that is an exaÌ„ple which is in Moses This shal be our righteousnesse if we kepe all these commauÌ„dementes And if thou take exception say that this is a promise of the law which being knit to a coÌ„dition impossible proueth nothing There be other of which you caÌ„ not make the same answer as this And that shal be to thee for righteousnesse before the Lord to redeliuer to the poore man his pledge c. Againe that which the Prophet sayth that the zele in reuenging the shame of Israell was imputed to Phinees for righteousnesse Therfore the Pharisees of our time thinke that here they haue a large matter to triuÌ„ph vpon For when we say that when the righteousnesse of faith is set vp the iustificatioÌ„ of workes geueth place by the same right they make this argument If righteousnesse bee of workes then it is false that we are iustified by faith only Though I graunt that the commaundementes of the law are called righteousnesses it is no maruell for they are so in deede Howebeit we muste warne the readers that the Grecians haue not fittly translated the Hebrue word Hucmi Dikaiomata righteousnesses for coÌ„maundemeÌ„ts But for the worde I willingly release my quarell For neyther doe we denie this to the law of God that it conteineth perfect righteousnesse For although bycause we are detters of all the thinges that it commaundeth therfore euen when we haue performed ful obedience therof we are vnprofitable seruaÌ„tes yet bicause the lord hath vouchsaued to graunt it the honor of righteousnesse we take not away that whiche he hath geuen Therefore we willingly confesse that the full obedience of the lawe is righteousnesse that the kepyng of euery coÌ„mauÌ„dement is a part of righteousnesse yf so be that the whole summe of righteousnesse were had in the other partes also But we denie that there is any where any suche forme of righteousnesse And therefore we take away the righteousnesse of the law not for that it is maymed and vnperfect of it felfe but for that by reason of the weakenesse of our flesh it is no where seene But the Scripture not only calleth simply the coÌ„maundemeÌ„tes of the Lord righteousnesses but it also geueth this name to the workes of the holy ones As when it reporteth that Zacharie his wife walked in the righteousnesses of the Lord truely wheÌ„ it so speaketh it weyeth workes rather by the nature of the law thaÌ„ by their owne propre estate Howbeit here againe is that to be noted which I eueÌ„ now sayd that of the negligence of the Greke translator is not a law to be made But for asmuch as Luke wold alter nothing in the receiued traslation I will also not striue about it For God hath commaunded these thinges that are in the lawe to men for righteousnesse but this righteousnes we performe not but in keping the whole lawe for by euery transgression it is broken Wheras therfore the law doth nothing but prescribe righteousnesse if we haue respecte to it all the seueral coÌ„maundementes therof are righteousnes if we haue respect to men of whome thei are done thei do not obteine the praise of righteousnesse by one worke beinge trespassers in many and by that same worke whiche is euer partly faulty by reason of imperfection But now I come to the second kinde in which is the chefe hardnes Paul hath nothing more strong to proue the righteousnesse of faiâ—he than that whiche is written of Abraham that his faithe was
which hath not walked in the councell of the wicked which beareth temptation Blessed are they which kepe iudgement the vndefiled the poore in Spirit the meeke the mercifull c. they shall not make but that it shall bee true which Paul saith For bicause those thinges that ar ther coÌ„mended are neuer so in man that he is therfore allowed of God it foloweth the man is alwai miserable vnlesse he be deliuered from misery by forgeuenesse of sinnes For asmuch as therfore all the kindes of blessednes which ar extolled in the scriptures do fal down void so the man receiueth frute of none of theÌ„ til he haue obteined blessedness by forgeuenes of sins which mai afterward make place for theÌ„ it foloweth that this is not only the hiest the chefe but also the only blessednes vnlesse paraduenture you will haue that it be weakned of those which consist in it alone Now ther is much lesse reason why the calling of meÌ„ righteous shoulde trouble vs which is coÌ„monli geueÌ„ to the faithful I grauÌ„t verili that thei ar called righteous of the holines of liâ— but for asmuch as thei rather endeuor to the folowiÌ„g of righteousnes than do fulfil righteousnes it self it is mete that this righteousnes suche as it is giue place to the iustification of faith from whence it hath that which it is But thei say that we haue yet more busines with Iames namelye which with opeÌ„ voice fighteth against vs. For he teacheth both that AbrahaÌ„ was iustified by works and also that al we are iustified by workes not by faith only What then wil thei draw Paul to fight with Iames If thei hold Iames for a minister of Christ his saying must be so takeÌ„ that it disagre not froÌ„ Christ speakiÌ„g by the mouth of Paul The holy ghost affirmeth by the mouth of Paul that AbrahaÌ„ obteined righteousnesse by faith not by workes we also do teach that all are iustified by faith without the works of the law The same holy ghost teacheth by Iames that both Abrahams righteousnes and ours consisteth of workes not of only faith It is certain that the holy ghost fighteth not with himselfe What agrement shall ther be therfore of these two It is enough for the aduersaries if thei pluck vp the righteousnes of faith which we wolde haue to be fastened with most depe rootes but to render to consciences their quietnesse thei haue no great care Whereby verily you may see that thei gnaw the iustificatioÌ„ of faith but in the meane tim do apoint no mark of righteousnes wher coÌ„sciences may stay Therfore let them triumph as thei list so that thei may boaste of no other victorie than that thei haue taken away all certainetie of righteousnesse And this wretched victorie thei shal obteine where the light of truth being quenched the lord shal suffer theÌ„ to ouerspred the darknes of lies But whersoeuer the truth of God shal stand thei shall nothing preuaile I deny therefore that the saieng of Iames which thei still coÌ„tinually hold vp against vs as it wer the shelde of Achilles doth any thing at al make for theÌ„ That this may be made plaine first we must loke at the mark that the apostle shooteth at then we must note wher thei be deceiued Bicause there were theÌ„ many whiche mischefe is wont to be continual in the Church which openly bewraied their infidelitie in neglecting omitting al the propre works of the faithful yet cessed not to boaste of the false name of faith Iames doth here mock the folish boldnes of such meÌ„ Therfore it is not his purpose in any point to diminish the force of true faith but to shew how â—ondly those trifles did chalenge so much the vaine image of it that being contented herw t thei carelesly ranne dissolutely abroade into all licentiousnesse of vices This ground being coÌ„ceiued it shal be easy to perceaue where oure aduersaries do misse For thei fal into two deceites in the word the one in the name of faith that other in the word of iustifieng Whereas the Apostle nameth faith a vaine opinion farr distant from the truth of faith it is spokeÌ„ by waie of graunting which is no derogation to the matter whych he sheweth at the beginning in these words What profiteth it my brothreÌ„ If any man say that he hath faith hath no works He doth not say if any haue faith wtout workes but If any man boast More plainely also he speaketh a little after where he in mockerie maketh yt worse than the deuills knowledg last of al when he calleth it dead But by the definition you maye sufficiently perceaue what hee meaneth Thou beleuest saith he that there is a God Truely if nothing be conteined in thys faith but to beleue that there is a God it is now no maruel if it do not iustifie And when this is taken from it let vs not think that any thing is a bared from the Christian faith the nature whereof ys farre otherwise For after what manner doth true faith iustifie vs but when it coÌ„ioyneth vs with Christ that being made one with him we may enioy the partakyng of hys righteousnesse It dothe not therefore iustifie vs by this that it conceiueth a knowledge of the beinge of God but by thys that it resteth vpon the assurednesse of the mercy of God We haue not yet the work vnlesse we examine also the other deceite in the word for asmuche as Iames setteth part of iustificatioÌ„ in works If you wil make Iames agreing both with the rest of the Scriptures in himself you must of necessitie take the word of Iustifieng in an other significatioÌ„ thaÌ„ it is takeÌ„ in Paul For Paul saith that we ar iustified wheÌ„ the remeÌ„brance of our vnrighteousnes being blotted out we ar accoÌ„pted righteous If Iames had ment of that takinge he had wrongefully alleged that out of Moses AbrahaÌ„ beleued God c. For he thus frameth it together AbrahaÌ„ bi works obteined righteousnes bycause he sticked not at the coÌ„maundemeÌ„t of God to offer vp his sonne And so the Scriptur was fulfilled whiche saithe that hee beleued God and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse If it be an absurditie that the effect is before hys cause eyther Moses dothe in that place falsely testifie that faythe was imputed to Abraham for righteousnesse or he deserued not righteousnesse by that obedience whiche he shewed in offering vp of Isaac Abraham was iustified by his faith when Ismael was not yet conceiued whych was nowe growen past childehode before that Isaac was borne Now therfore shal we saie that he got to himself righteousnesse by obedience which folowed long afterward Wherefore either Iames did wrongfully misturne the order which it is a wickednesse to thinke or he meant not to say that he was iustified as though he deserued to be accompted righteous How then Truely it appeareth that he speaketh of the declaration of righteousnesse and not the
lampes lightned doo shyne in the edifice of the worlde to shew forth the glory of the creatour which do so euery way display their beames vpon vs that yet of them selues they can not bryng vs into the right way In deede they raise vp certaine sparkles but suche as be choked vp before that they can spreade abrode anye full brightnesse Therfore the apostle in the same place where he calleth the ages of the worlde images of thynges inuisible sayth further that by faithe is perceyued that they were framed by the worde of God meaning therby that the inuisible godhed is in dede represēted by such shewes but that we haue no eies to see the same throughly vnles they be enlightued by the reuelation of God through faith And Paule where he teacheth that by the creation of the world was disclosed that which was to be knowen concerning god doth not meane such a disclosyng as may be comprehended by the witte of men but rather sheweth that the same procedeth no further but to make them vnexcusable The same Paule also although in one place he sayth that God is not to be sought afarre of as one that dwelleth within vs yet in an other place reacheth to what end that nerenesse auayleth In the ages past sayth he God suffred the nations to walke in their own waies yet he lefte not hym selfe without testimonie doyng good from heauen geuyng showres and fruitefull seasons fillyng the hartes of men with foode and gladnesse Howsoeuer therfore the Lorde bee not withoute testimonie whyle with his greate and manyfolde bountyfulnesse he sweetely allureth men to the knowledge of hym yet for all that they cesse not to folowe their owne waies that is to say their damnable errours But although we want naturall power wherby we can not clymbe vp vnto the pure and cleare knowledge of God yet bycause the faulte of our dulnesse is in our selues therfore all colour of excuse is cutte away from vs. For we can not so pretende ignorance but that euen our conscience dothe stil condemne vs of slouthfulnesse vnthankfulnesse It is a defence forsoothe right woorthy to be receyued if man will alledge that he wanted eares to heare the truth for the publishyng wherof the very dombe creatures haue lowde voyces yf man shall say that he can not see those thynges with his eyes whyche the creatures without eyes doo shewe hym yf man shall laye for his excuse the feblenesse of his witte where all creatures without reason doo instructe hym Wherfore sithe all thynges doo shewe vs the right way we are worthily put from all excuse of our wanderyng and strayeng out of the way But howe soeuer it is to be imputed to the fault of men that they dooe by and by corrupt the sede of the knowledge of God sowē in theyr mindes by meruailous workemanshyp of nature so that it groweth not to good and cleane fruite yet it is moste true that we are not sufficiently instructed by that bare and simple testimonie that the creatures do honourably declare of goodes glory For so soone as we haue taken by the beholdyng of the worlde a smalle taste of the godhead we leauyng the true God doo in steade of hym rayse vp dreames and fansies of oure owne brayne and doo conuey hyther and thyther from the true fountayne the prayse of ryghtousnes wysedom goodnes and power Moreouer we doo so either obscure or by yll estemyng them depraue his daily doynges that we take away bothe from them their glorye and from the authour his due praise ¶ The .vi. Chapter That to atteyne to God the Creatour it is nedefull to haue the scripture to be our guyde and maistresse THerefore althoughe that same brightnesse which both in heauen and earth shineth in the eies of al men doth sufficiently take away al defense frō the wickednesse of mē euen so as God to wrappe al mankind in one giltinesse doeth shewe his diuine maiestie to al withoute excepcion as it wer portraied out in his creatures yet is it necessary that we haue also an other and a better helpe that may rightly direct vs to the very creator of the world Therfore not in vayne he hath added the light of his worde that therby he mought be knowen to saluacion And this prerogatiue he hath vouchesaued to geue to vs whom it pleased him more nerely and more familiarly to draw together to himselfe For because he saw the mindes of al men to be carried aboute with wandering and vnstedfast motion after he had chosē the Iewes to his peculiar flocke he compassed them in as it were with barres that they should not wander out in vanitie as other did And not withoute cause he holdeth vs with the same meane in the true knowledge of himselfe For otherwise euen they should quickly swarue away that seme to stand stedfast in comparison of other For as olde men or poore blind or they whose eies ar dimme sighted if you lay a faire boke before them though they perceiue that there is somewhat written therin yet can they not reade two words together but being holpen with spectacles set betwen them and it they begin to reade distinctlye so the Scripture gathering vp together in our mindes the knowledge of God whiche otherwise is but confused doeth remoue the mist and plainly shewe vs the true god This therefore is a singular gifte that to the instruccion of his church God vseth not onely dumme teachers but also openeth his owne holye mouth not onely publisheth that there is some God to bee worshipped but also there withal pronounceth that he himself is the same God whō we oughte to worship and doeth not onely teache the electe to loke vpō God but also presenteth himselfe vnto them to be loked vppon Thys order hath he kept frō the beginning towarde his churche beside these common instruccions to geue them also hys worde Whiche is the righter and certainer marke to knowe him by And it is not to be douted that Adam Noe Abraham and the rest of the fathers by this help attained to that familiar knowledge which made them as it wer seuerally differente from the vnbeleuers I speake not yet of the proper doctrine of faith wherwith they wer enlightened into the hope of eternall life For that they myght passe from death to life it was nedefull for them to knowe God not only to be the creatoure but also the redemer as doutlesse they obteined both by the worde For that kinde of knowledge wherby was geuen to vnderstande who is the God by whō the worlde was made and is gouerned in order came before the other and thē was that other inwarde knowledge adioined which onely quickeneth dead soules wherby God is knowen not onely to be the maker of the worlde and the onely authour and iudge of all thinges that are done but also to be the redemer in the person of that mediatour But because I am not yet come to the fal of the world
to his sonne waylyng into the graue In the meane time howe great causes of griefe wayting and werinesse were the rauishment and deftourynge of his daughter and the boldenesse of his sonnes in reuenging it whiche not only made him to be abhorred in sight of all the inhabitantes of that countrey but also procured him moste present perill of vtter destruction Then followed that horrible outragious offense of Ruben his first begotten sonne whiche was suche as their coulde not chaunce a more greuous For wheareas the defilyng of a mans wyfe is reckened amonge the hyest yll fortunes what is to be sayde of it when that wickednesse is committed by a mans owne sonne Within a litle whyle after his house is spotted with an other vunaturall adulterie so that so many shames might well breake a heart that otherwise were most constant and vnable to be vanquished with calamities Nere before the ende of his life while he sought to prouide succour for the famine of himself and other he was striken with tidynges of a newe misfortune vnderstandynge that an other of his sonnes was kepte in pryson for recoueryng of whome he was compelled to leaue to the rest Beniamin his only dearling Who caÌ„ think that in suche a heape of mischeues he had any one moment geuen hym safely to take breath in And therefore he himselfe the beste witnesse of himselfe affirmed to Pharao that his dayes were shorte and â—uell vpon the earth Nowe truely he that declareth that he hath passed his lyfe by continuall miseries denieth that he felte that prosperitie whiche the Lorde had promised him Therefore eyther Iacob did vnkindely and vnthankefully weye the grace of God or he truely professed that he had ben miserable vpon the earth If his affirmation were true then it foloweth that he had not his hope fastened vpon earthly thinges If these holy fathers loked for as vndoubtedly they did a blessed lyfe at the hande of God truely they bothe thought and sawe it to bee an other manner of blessednesse than the blessednesse of earthly liâ—e Whiche thynge the Apostle also doth shewe excellently well Abraham sayth he direct by fayth in the lande of promise as in a strange land dwellyng in tentes with Isaac and Iacob parteners with him of the same inheritaunce For they loked for a citie set vpon a good fundation the maker and bilder whereof is God All these are dead in fayth not receyuyng the thinges promised but loking at them a farre of and beleuyng and confessyng that they were gestes and strangers vpon the land Whereby they declare that they sought for a couÌ„tree And yf they had ben moued with desire of that lande from whense they came they had power to returne But they sought for a better that is the heauenly couÌ„tree Wherefore God is not a shamed to be called their God for asmuch as he hath prepared them a citie For they had ben duller than blockes to followe promises to earnestly â–ª wherof there appered no hope in earth vnlesse they had loked for the fulfillynge of them els where But this he chiefely enforceth and that not without good reason that thei called this life a iourney from home euen as Moses reporteth For if they were strangers and foreners in the lande of Chanaan where is the Lordes promise wherby they were made heires of it He sheweth plainely therefore that the Lordes promise coÌ„cernyng the possessioÌ„ therof had a further respect Wherefore they purchaced not one foote in the land of Chanaan but for burial wherby they testified that they did not hope that they shuld receiue the frute of the promise till after death And that is the cause why Iacob so much estemed to be buried there that he compelled his sonne Ioseph to promise it him and to swere to performe it and why Ioseph willed his bones certayne ages after when they were longe before fallen into powder to be remoued thither Finally it appereth plainely that in all the trauailes of this life they had alway set before them the blessednesse of the life to come For to what purpose should Iacob haue so much desired with so great danger sought the preeminence of the first begotten whiche shoulde procure him nothyng but banishment and in a manner to be caste of from beyng his childe but no good at all vnlesse he had respecte to a hyer blessyng And he declared that he had this meanyng by the wordes which he spake among his last breathinges Lord I will loke for thy saluation What saluation could he haue loked for wheÌ„ he sawe that he laye ready to geue vp the ghost vnlesse he had seene in death the beginnyng of a newe life But what dispute we of the holy ones and chrildren of God when euen he was not without a taste of suche vnderstandyng whiche otherwise was enemie to the truthe For what meant Balaam wheÌ„ he sayd Let my soule dye the death of the righteous and let my laste times be like vnto theires but that he meante the same thynge that Dauid afterwarde vttered that the death of the Sainctes is precious in the sighte of the Lorde but the death of the wicked is very euell If the furthest bounde and ende were in death there coulde in it be noted no difference betwene the righteous and vnrighteous they differ one from the other by the diuersite of the estates that after death shall befall to them bothe We are not yet come beyonde Moses Whiche as these menne saye had no other office but to perswade the carnall people to worship God by the frutefulnesse of the ground and plentie of all thinges And yet vnlesse a manne will flee the light that willyngly offreth it selfe there is alredy a playne declaration of the spirituall couenant But yf we come downe to the Prophetes there with most full brightnesse bothe the lyfe euerlastyng and the kyngdome of Christ do vtter themselues And first of all Dauid which as he was before the other in time so accordyng to the order of Gods distribution he shewed the heauenly misteries in shadowes more darkely than the rest yet with what plainnesse certaintie directeth he al his sayenges to that end How he estemed the earthly dwelling this senteÌ„ce testifieth I am here a forener straÌ„ger as al my fathers were Euery liuing maÌ„ is vanitie euery one walketh about as a shadow But now what is my exspectatioÌ„ Lord euen to thee is my hope Truely he that coÌ„fessyng that in the earth there is nothinge sounde or stedfast kepeth still a stedfastnesse of hope in God coÌ„sidereth his felicitie layed vp in an other place To such consideration is he wont to call all the faithefull so oft as he meaneth to comforte them truely For in an other place after he had spoken of the shortenesse and the transitorie and vanishing image of mans life he addeth but the mercie of the Lorde is for euer vpon them that
more largely shewed how vnfit men are to beleue Therefore I wil not wery the readers with repeting the same againe Let this be sufficient that the spirit of faith is called of Paule faith it selfe which the spirit geueth vs but not which we haue naturally Therfore he praieth that god fulfil in the Thessalonians al his good pleasure the worke of faith in power Wherin calling faithe the worke of God geuing it that title for a name of additiō calling it by figure of appositiō Gods good pleasure he denieth that it is of mans own motion not contented therwith he addeth further that it is a declaratiō of Gods power writing to the Corynthians where he saith that faithe hangeth not vpon the wisedome of men but is grounded vpon the power of the holy ghoste He speaketh in dede of outewarde miracles but bicause the reprobate are blynde at the beholding of them hee comprehendeth also that inwarde seale wherof he maketh mention in an other place And God the more gloriously to set forthe his liberalitie in so noble a gifte vouchesaueth not to graunt it to al vniuersally without difference but by singular priuilege geueth it to whome he will For proofe whereof we haue alleged testimonies before Of which Augustine being a faithfull expositor crieth out that it woulde please the sauioure to teache him and that the very beleuing it selfe is of gifte and not of deseruing Noman saith he commeth to me vnlesse my father drawe him and to whome it is geuen of my father It is maruellous that twoo do heare the one despyseth the other ascendeth vp Let him that despiseth impute it to himselfe let him that ascende not yt arrogantly assigne to himselfe In an other place Why is it geuen to one and not to an other It greueth me not to say it this is the depth of the crosse Out of I wote not what depth of the iudgmentes of God which we mate not searche procedeth all that we can What I can I see whereby I can I see not sauinge that I see thus farre that it is of God But why hym and not hym That is muche to me It is a bottomelesse depth it is the depth of the crosse I maie crie out with woundering but not shewe it in disputing ▪ Finally the summe commeth to this that Christ when he enlightneth vs vnto faith by the power of hys spirite doth there withall graffe vs into his bodie that wee maie be made partakers of all good thynges Nowe remaineth that that whiche the minde hathe receiued may be further conueied into the heart For the word of God is not throughly receiued by faith if it swimme in the toppe of the braine but when it hath taken roote in the bottome of the heart that it may be an inuincible defense to beare and repulse all the engines of tentations Now if it be true that the true vnderstanding of the mynde is the enlightning thereof then in such confyrmation of the hearte his power much more euidently appeareth euen by so muche as the distrustfulnesse of the hearte is greater than the blindnesse of the witte and as it is harder to haue the mynde furnyshed wyth assurednesse than the witte to bee instructed with thinking Therefore the Spirit perfourmeth the office of a seale to seale vp in our heartes those same promyses the assurance whereof it fyrste emprinted in oure wittes and serueth for an earnest to confyrme and stablyshe them Sithe ye beleued saith the Apostle ye are sealed vp with the holy Spirite of promyse whiche is the earnest of oure inheritance See you not how he teacheth that by the spirit the heartes of the fathfull are grauen as with a seale and how for the same reason he calleth him the Spirite of promise bycause he ratifieth the Gospell vnto vs Lykewyse to the Corynthians he saithe God whiche annoynted vs whiche hath also sealed vs and geuen the earnest of hys Spirite in oure heartes And in an other place when he speaketh of confidence and boldnesse of hopigne well hee maketh the pledge of the Spirite the foundation thereof Neither yet haue I forgotten that whyche I sayde before the remembrance whereof experience continually reneweth that is that faithe is tossed wyth dyuerse doubtynges so that the myndes of the godly are seldome quyet or at least doe not alwaie enioye a peafable state but wyth what soeuer engine they be shaken either thei rise vp out of the very gulfe of temptations or do abide faste in their standing Truely thys assurednesse onely nourisheth and defendeth faithe when we holde fast that whiche is saide in the Psalme The Lorde ys oure protection oure helpe in trouble therefore we will not feare whē the earthe shall tremble and the mountaines shal leape into the heart of the sea Also this moste swete quietnesse is spoken of in an other place I laye downe and slepte and rose againe bycause the Lorde hathe susteined me It is not meante thereby that Dauid was alwaie wyth one vndisturbed course framed to a merry cherefulnesse but in respect that hee tasted the grace of God according to his proportion of faith therefore hee gloryeth that hee wythoute feare despiseth all that euer might disquiet the peace of his minde Therfore the Scripture meaning to exhort vs to faith biddeth vs to be quiet In Esaie it is saide In hope and silence shall be your strength In the Psalme Holde thee stil in the Lorde and waite for him Wherwith agreeth that saieng of the Apostle to the Hebrues Patience is needefull c. Hereby we may iudge how pestilent is that doctrine of the Scholemen that we can no otherwise determine of the grace of God towarde vs than by morall coniecture as euery man thinketh himselfe worthy of it Truely if we shall weie by oure workes howe God is minded towarde vs I graunt that we can atteine yt wyth any coniecture be yt neuer so sclender but sith faithe oughte to haue relation to a simple free promise there is lefte no cause of doubtiong For with what confidence I beseache you shall we be armed if we saie that God is fauourable vnto vs vpon this condition so that the purenesse of oure life do deserue it But bycause I haue appoynted one place proprely for the discussing herof therfore I wil speake no more of them at this present specially for asmuche as it is plaine enoughe that there is nothinge more contrarie to faith than either coniecture or any thinge nere vnto doubting And thei do very ill writhe to this purpose that testimonie of the Preacher whiche thei haue ofte in their mouthes Noman knoweth whether he be worthy of hatred or loue For to speake nothinge how this place is in the common translation corruply turned yet very children can not be ignorant what Salomon meaneth by such words that is that if any man will iudge by the present state of things whom God hateth or whom God
vnlesse our weakenesse be shewed vs as it were before our eyes we do easily esteme our owne streÌ„gth aboue due measure doubte not that what soeuer happen it wil coÌ„tinue vnbroken vnouercoÌ„me against al hard assaultes Whereby we are caried into a foolish vaine confidence of flesh and then trusting therupon we stubbornly waxe proude against God himself as though our owne powers without his grace did suffice vs. This arrogancie he caÌ„ no way better beate down thaÌ„ wheÌ„ he proueth vnto vs by experience not only how feble but also how fraile we be Therfore he afflicteth vs either with shame or pouertie or losse of childreÌ„ or sicknesse or other calamities which we beyng vnable to beare in respect of our selues doe by and by sinke downe vnder them Beyng so humbled we learne to call vpon his strength whiche only maketh vs to stand vpright vnder the heauy burden of afflictioÌ„s Yea the moste holy how wel so euer they know that they stand by the grace of God and not by their owne force yet are to muche assured of their owne strength and constancie vnlesse by the tryall of the crosse he bring them into a more inward knowledge of theÌ„selues The slouthfulnesse crept into Dauid I sayd in my rest I shall neuer be moued Lorde thou hadst stablished in thy good pleasure a strength to my hill thou hiddest awaye thy face I was striken For he confesseth that with sluggishnesse in prosperitie his senses were dulled that not regardyng the grace of God vpon whiche he should haue hanged he leaned vnto himselfe to promise himselfe perpetuall continuance If this chauÌ„ced to so great a Prophet which of vs ought not to be fearfull that we may be heedefull Therefore whereas in prosperitie they flatter themselues with opinion of a greater constancie and patience when they are ones humbled with aduersitie they learne that their former opinion was but hypocrisie The faythfull I saye beyng admonished by such examples of their diseases do thereby profit to humilitie that beyng vnclothed of the wrongfull confidence of the flesh they maye resort to the grace of God And where they are ones come to his grace they fele the presence of Gods strength wherein is abundantly sufficent succour â—or them And this is it that Paule teacheth that by troubles is engendred pacience by pacieÌ„ce profe For whereas God hath promised the faithfull that he will be present with them in troubles they fele the same to be true when they stande patiently beyng vpholden by his hande which by theyr owne streÌ„gth they were not able to do Patience therfore bringeth a profe by experience to the holy ones that God when neede requireth will in deede performe the help that he hath promised And thereby also their hope is confirmed for asmuche as it were to much vnthankefulnesse not to loke for in time to come the same truth of God that they had already by experience proued to be constant and sure We see now howe many good thinges doe come vnto vs in one knot by the crosse For ouerthrowyng the opinion that we falsly presume of our owne strength and disclosing our hypocrisie that deliteth vs it shaketh awaye the hurtfull confidence of the fleshe and teacheth vs beyng so humbled to rest vpon God only by which it commeth to passe that we neyther be oppressed nor fall downe And after victorie foloweth hope in so much as the Lord in performing that which he hath promised stablisheth the credit of his truthe for time to come Truely although there were no moe reasons but these it appereth how much the exercise of the crosse is necessarie for vs. For it is a matter of no small importance to haue the blinde loue of thy selfe wiped away that thou mayst wel know thine owne weakenesse To fele thine owne weakenesse that thou mayest learne to distrust thy selfe to distrust thy selfe that thou mayst remoue thy confidence from thy selfe vnto God to rest with confidence of heart vpon God that beyng vpholden by his help thou mayst continue vnouercomme to the last end to stande fast by his grace that thou mayest vnderstaÌ„d that he is true in his promises to know by profe the truthe of his promises that thy hope may be strengthened thereby The Lord hath also an other end of afflictyng his to trie their patience and instruct vs to obedience Not that they can vse any obedience toward him other than the same that he geueth them but so it pleaseth hym by open examples to make approued by witnesses and to set forth the graces that he hath bestowed vpon his holy ones that they should not lie idly hidde within them And therefore in bringyng forth into open shewe the strength of suffrance and constancie wherwith he hath furnished his seruauntes it is sayd that he tryeth their pacience And from hense came these sayenges that God tempted Abraham and had profe of his godlinesse by this that he refused not to offer vp in sacrifice his owne and only sonne Therefore Peter teacheth that our fayth is so proued in troubles as golde is tried in a fornace And whoe can say that it is not expedient that the moste noble gift of pacience which a faithful man hath receyued of his God shuld be brought forth into vse that it may be made certainely knowen and manifest For otherwise men will not esteme it as it is worthy Now if God himself doth rightfully when he ministreth matter to stirre vp the vertues that he hath geuen to his faithfull that they should not lie hidden yea lye vnprofitable and perish then is there good reason of the afflictions of the holy ones without which there patience shold be nothyng I saye also that by the crosse they are instructed to obedience bicause they are so taught to liue not after their owne wish but after the will of God Truely if all thinges should flowe vnto them after their owne minde they would not know what it were to folow God And Seneca reherseth that this was an olde Prouerbe when they exhorted any man to suffer aduersities Folow God By whiche they declared that then only meÌ„ truely entred vnder the yoke of God when he yelded his hand and backe to Gods correction Nowe if it be most righteous that we should shewe our selues in all thinges obedient to the heaueÌ„ly father then we ought not to refuse that he should by all meanes accustome vs to yeld obedience vnto him But yet we perceyue not howe necessarie this obedience is for vs vnlesse we do also consider how wanton our fleshe is to shake of the yoke of God so sone as it hath ben but a litle while deintily and tenderly handled The same happeneth vnto it that chaunceth to stubborne horses whiche yf they be a fewe dayes pampred idlely they can not afterward for fearcenesse be tamed neyther do know their rider to whose gouernement they somwhat before obeyed And this is continual in vs that God
if the brightnesse of the sunne can not be seuered from the heate therof shall we therfore saye that the earth is warmed with the light enlightened with the heate There is nothing more fit for this purpose than this similitude The sunne with his heate geueth life and frutefulnesse to the earth with his beames he geueth light brightnesse Here is a mutuall vnseparable cōioyning yet reason forbiddeth to conuey to the one that whiche is peculiar to the other Like absurditie is in this confusion of two sortes of graces that Osiander thrusteth in For because God dothe in dede renew them to the obseruing of righteousnesse whome he frely accōpteth for righteous therfore Osiander confoundeth that gift of regeneratiō with this fre acceptation affirmeth that they be al one the selfsame thing But the Scripture ioyning thē both together yet doth distinctly reckē them that the manifold grace of God may the better appere vnto vs. For that saying of Paul is not superfluous that Christ was geuen vs vnto righteousnesse sanctification And whensoeuer he resoneth to proue by the saluation purchaced for vs by the fatherly loue of God by the grace of Christ that we are called to holinesse cleannesse he plainely declareth that it is one thing to be iustified an other be made newe creatures But when Osiāder cometh to the Scripture he corrupteth as many places as he allegeth Where Paul saith that faith is accompted for righteousnesse to him that worketh not but beleueth in him that iustifieth the wicked mā he expoūdeth it to make righteous With like rashnesse he depraueth al the fourth Chapter to the Romains sticketh not with like fals colour to corrupt that place which I euen now alleged Who shal accuse the electes of God it is God that iustifieth where it is plaine that he speaketh simply of gilthinesse acquiting the meaning of the Apostle hangeth vpon a comparing of contraries Therfore Osiander is found to fond a babbler as wel in that reason as in alleging the testimonies of Scripture And no more rightly doth he speake of the name of righteousnesse in saying that fayth was accompted to Abraham for righteousnesse after that embracing Christ whiche is the righteousnesse of God and God him self he excelled in singular vertues whereby appereth that of two whole places he hath wrongfully made one corrupt place For the ryghteousnesse that is there mentioned perteineth not to the whole course of his calling but rather the holy Ghost testifieth that although the vertues of Abrahā were singularly excellent that with long continuance hee at length had encreasced them yet hee did no other waye please God but by this that he receiued by faythe the grace offered in the promyse Whereupon foloweth that in iustification there is no place for workes as Paull very well affirmeth As for this the Osiander obiecteth that the power of iustifiyng is not in faith of it selfe but in respect that it receiueth Christe I wyllynglye graunte it For if fayth did iustifie of it selfe or by inwarde force as they call it and as it is alwaye feble and vnperfect could not worke iustification but in part so should the iustification be maymed that should geue vs but a pece of saluation As for vs we imagine no suche thinge but in proper speakyng doe saye that God only iustifieth and then we geue the same to Christe because he was geuen vs vnto ryghteousnesse and faythe we compare as it were to a vessell For except we came emptie with open mouthe of our soule to craue the grace of Christe we can not be able to receyue Christ. Whereupon we gather that we doe not take from Christ the power of iustifying when we teache that he is first receiued by fayth before that his righteousnesse be receyued But yet I doe not admit the crooked figures of this Sophister when he sayth that faith is Christ as if an earthen pot were a treasure because gold is hidden in it For the reson is not vnlike but that faith although it be by it selfe of no worthynesse or price may iustifie vs in bryngynge Christ as a pot full of money maketh a man ryche Therfore I say that fayth whiche is onely the instrument to receyue rightuousnesse is vnfitly mingled with Christe whiche is the materiall cause and bothe author and minister of so great a benefit Nowe is this doubt also dissolued Howe this worde Faith ought to bee understanded when we entreate of iustification In the receiuing of Christ he goeth further for he sayeth that the inward worde is receiued by the ministration of the outwarde worde thereby to drawe vs from the priesthode of Christ and the persone of the Mediatour to his outwarde Godhed As for vs we deuide not Christ but we say that he is the same eternall worde of God whiche reconciling vs to God in his flesh gaue vs righteousnesse and we confesse that otherwyse he could not haue fulfilled the office of Mediatour and purchaced vs righteousnesse vnlesse he had ben eternall God But this is Osianders doctrine where as Christ is both God and mā that he was made righteousnesse to vs in respect of his nature of Godhed and not of manhode But if this properly belong to the Godhed thē it shal not be peculiar to Christ but common with the father and the holy Ghost for as muche as ther is not one righteousnesse of the one and an other of the other Moreouer that whiche was naturally frō eternitie coulde not bee conueniently sayde to bee made to vs. Butte althoughe we graunte this that God was made righteousnesse for vs howe shal it agree that that whiche is set betwene is made of God Truely that properly belongeth to the persone of the Mediatour whiche though he conteine in hym selfe the nature of Godhede yet here he is specially signified by his proper title by whiche he is seuerally discerned frō the father and the holy Ghost But the folishly triumpheth in that one worde of Hieremic where he promiseth that the Lorde Iehoua shal be our righteousnesse but out of that he shall gather nothinge but that Christ which is righteousnes is God openly shewed in the flesh In an other place we haue rehearsed out of Paules sermon that God purchased to himselfe the churche with his bloud if any man gather therupon that the bloud wherewith sinnes were purged was diuine and of the nature of Godhed who can abyde so fowle an errour But Osiander thinketh that with this so childishe a cauillation he hath gotten all thinges he swelleth he leapeth for ioye and stuffeth many leaues full with his bigge wordes when yet there is a plaine and redy solutiō for it in saying that the worde Iehoua in dede when he is made the issue of Dauid shal be the righteousnesse of the godly But Esaie teacheth in what sense saying My iust seruant shal with knowledge of him selfe iustifie many Let vs note that the
imputed to him for righteousnesse Sith therfore it is said that the acte done by Phinees was imputed to him for righteousnesse what Paule affirmeth of faith the same may we also conclude of works Whervpon our aduersaries as though thei had wonne the victorie determine that we are in dede not iustified without faith but that we are also not iustified by it alone and that workes accomplish our righteousnesse Therefore here I beseache the godly that if thei knowe that the true rule of righteousnesse is to be taken out of the Scripture only thei will religiously and earnestly weie with me how the Scripture may without cauillations be rightly made to agree with it selfe For asmuch as Paul knewe that the iustificatioÌ„ of faith is the refuge for them that ar destitute of their own righteousnesse he doth boldly coÌ„clude that al thei that ar iustified by faith ar excluded from the righteousnesse of works But sith it is certayne that the iustification of faith is common to all the faithfull he dothe thereof with like boldenesse conclude that no man is iustified by works but rather contrariewise that men are iustified without any helpe of workes But it is one thing to dispute of what value works are by themselues and an other thing what accompt is to be made of them after the stablishing of the righteousnesse of faith If we shal set a price vpon works according to their worthinesse we saie that thei are vnworthy to come into the sight of God and therefore that man hath no workes whereof he may glorie before God then that being spoiled of al helpe of works he is iustified by only faith Now we define righteousnesse thus that a sinner being receiued into the communion of Christ is by hys grace reconciled to God when being cleansed with his bloode he obteineth forgeuenesse of sinnes and being clothed with his righteousnesse as with his own he staÌ„deth assured before the heauenly iudgment â—eate WheÌ„ the forgeuenesse of sinnes is set before the good workes which folowe haue now an other valuation than after their own deseruing bycause whatsoeuer is in them vnperfect is couered with the perfectioÌ„ of Christ whatsoeuer spottes or fylthinesse there is it is wyped away wyth hys cleannesse that it maye not come into the examination of the iudgement of God Therfore when the giltines of al trespasses is blotted out whereby men are hindred that thei can bring forthe nothing acceptable to God and when the faulte of imperfection is buried whiche is wonte also to defile good workes the good workes which the faithful do are compted righteous or which is all one are imputed for righteousnesse Now if any man obiect this against me to assaile the righteousnesse of faithe first I will aske whether a man be compted righteous for one or two holy works being in the rest of the works of his life a trespasser of the law This is more than an absurditie Then I will aske if he be compted righteous for many good works yf he be in any parte founde gilty This also he shal not be so bolde to affirme when the penal ordinaâ—ce of the law crieth oute against it proclameth al them accursed which haue not fulfilled all coÌ„maundementes of the lawe to the vttermost Moreouer I wil go further ask whether ther be any work that deserueth to be accused of no vncleannesse or imperfection And howe could there be any such before those eies to whom eueÌ„ the very starres are not cleane enough nor the Angeles righteous enough So shal he be compelled to graunt that there is no good worke which is not so defiled with transgressions adioyned with it with the corruptnesse of it selfe that it can not haue the honoure of righteousnesse Nowe if it bee certaine that it proceedeth from the righteousnesse of faith that woorkes which are otherwise vnpure vncleane and but halfe workes not worthy of the sight of God much lesse of his loue are imputed to righteousnesse why do thei with boasting of the righteousnesse of workes destroye the iustification of faith wheras if this iustification were not thei shold in vaine boaste of that righteousnes Wyll thei make a vipers birthâ— For therto end the saiengs of the vngodly meÌ„ Thei can not denie that the iustificatioÌ„ of faith is the beginning foundatioÌ„ cause matter substance of the righteousnesse of works yet thei coÌ„clude the man is not iustified by faith bycause good workes also are accoÌ„pted for righteousnesse Therfore let vs let passe these follies confesse as the truth is that if the righteousnesse of works of what sort soever it be accoÌ„pted hangeth vpon the iustificatioÌ„ of faith it is by this not onely nothing minished but also coÌ„firmed namly wherbi the strength therof appeareth more mighty Neither yet let vs think that works ar so coÌ„meÌ„ded after fre iustificatioÌ„ that thei also afterward come into the place of iustifieng a maÌ„ or do parte that office betwene them faithe For vnlesse the iustificatioÌ„ remaine alway whole the vncleannes of workes shal be vncouered And it is no absurditie that a man is so iustified by faith that not only he himself is righteous but also his woorkes are esteemed righteous aboue their worthynesse After this maÌ„ner we wil grauÌ„t in workes not only a righteousnes in parts as our aduersaries theÌ„selues wold haue but also that it is alowed of God as if it wer a perfect ful righteousnesse But if we remeÌ„bre vpoÌ„ what fouÌ„datioÌ„ it is vpholdeÌ„ al the difficultie shal be disolued For then noâ— til their beginneth to be an acceptable worke wheÌ„ it is receiued with pardoÌ„ Now whense coÌ„meth pardoÌ„ but bicause God beholdeth both vs â—amp al our thinges in Christe Therefore as we when we are graffed into Christ do therfore appeare righteous before God bicause our wickednesses are couered with his innocence so our workes are be taken for righteous bicause whatsoeuer faultines is otherwise in theÌ„ being buried in the cleannesse of Christe it is not imputed So we may rightfully sai that bi onli faith not oÌ„ly we but also our works ar iustified Now if this righteousnes of works of what sorte soeuer it be hangeth vpoÌ„ faith tree iustification is made of it it ought to be included vnder it and to he sette vnder it as the effect vnder the cause therof as I may so cal it so farre is it of that it oughte to bee raysed vp either to destroy or darken it So Paule to dryue men to confesse that oure blessednesse coÌ„sisteth of the mercy of God not of works chefli enforceth that saying of Dauid Blessed are thei whose iniquitties are forgeuen and whose sinnes are couered Blessed is he to whom the Lord hath not imputed sinne If any maÌ„ do thrust in to the contrary innumerable sayings wherin blessednesse seemeth to be geuen to works as are these Blessed is the man whiche feareth the Lord whiche hath pitie on the poore
we are ioyned in felowship to the holy fathers whiche euen beyng dead doe kepe the same godlinesse with vs so that we can not be the members of Christ vnlesse we growe together with them Unlesse also the soules beyng vnclothed of the bodies did kepe still their substance were able to receyue blessed glorie Christ wold not haue sayd to the thefe This day thou shalt be with me in paradise Hauing so clere testimonies let vs not dout after the example of Christ when we are dyeng to commend our soules to God or after the example of Stephen to commit them to Christ to kepe which not vnworthily is called a faithfull shepeherd and bishop of them To enquire of their meane state is neyther lawfull nor expedient Many do much combeâ— themselues with disputing what place they kepe and whether thei do now enioye the heauenly glorie or no. But it is follie and rashnesse to searche depelier of vnknowen thinges than God doth geue vs leaue to know When the Scripture hath sayd that Christ is present with them and receiueth them into paradise that they maye enioy comfort on the other side that the soules of the reprobate do suffer suche peines as they haue deserued it goeth no further What teacher or maister shall nowe open to vs that whiche God hath hidden Of the place the questioÌ„ is no lesse fond and vayne for asmuch as we know that there is not the same dimension of the soule which is of the body Whereas the blessed gatheryng together of holy spirites is called the bosome of Abraham it is enough for vs after this wayfaryng to be receyued of the common father of the faithfull that he may communicate with vs the frute of his fayth In the meane time â—iâ—he the Scripture euery where biddeth vs to hang vpon the expectation of Christes coÌ„ming and differreth the crowne of glorie till then let vs be content with these bondes apointed vs of God namely that the soules of the godly hauyng ended the labor of their warfare doe goe into a blessed reste where with happy ioyfulnesse they loke for the enioyeng of the promised glorie and that so all thinges are holden in suspense till Christ the redemer appere As for the Reprobate it is no dout that they haue the same estate which Iude assigneth to the Deuels to be holden bound with cheynes till they be drawen to the punishment whereunto they are condemned No lesse monstruous is their error whiche imagine that soules shall not receyue againe the same bodies wherwith they are now clothed but shal haue new and other bodies And the reason of the Manichees was very triflyng that is that it is not mete that flesh which is vncleane shold rise againe As though there were no vncleaÌ„nesse of soules which yet they debarred not from the hope of euerlasting life It was therefore all one as if they shold say that that which is infected with the filth of sinne can not be cleansed by God For I now passe ouer that dotage that fleshe was naturally vncleane bicause it was create of the Deuel Only I shew that what so euer is now in vs vnworthy of heauen it hindereth not the resurrection And first wheras Paule biddeth the faithfull to cleanse themselues from all deâ—ilyng of the fleshe and of the Spirit therupoÌ„ foloweth the iudgement which he in an other place pronounceth that euery man shal receiue by his body eyther good or euel Wherewith agreeth that which he writeth to the CorinthiaÌ„s That the life of Iesus Christ may be openly shewed in our mortal flesh For which reason in an other place he doth no lesse pray that God preserue the bodies whole vnto the day of Christ than the soules and spirites And no maruell bicause it were a most great absurditie that the bodies which God hath dedicate to be temples to himselfe should fall away into rottennesse without hope of risyng againe What say we to this that thei are also the members of Christ that God commaundeth all the partes of them to be sanctified to himself that he willeth his name to be praysed with tonges pure handes to be lifted vp to him sacrifices to be offred What madnesse is it therfore that that part to whiche the heauenly iudge hath vouchesaued to graunt so great honor should be brought from a mortal man into dust without any hope of restoring Likewise when Paule exhorteth vs to suffer the Lord as well in body as in soule bycause both belong to God verily he suffreth not that whiche he chalengeth to God as holy to be adiudged to eternall rottennesse Neyther is there a plainer determinatioÌ„ of the Scripture for any thing thaÌ„ for the risyng againe of this flesh which we beare This corruptible sayth Paule must put on vncorruption and this mortall must put on immortalitie If God did make new bodies where is this changyng of qualitie If it had ben sayd that we must be renewed the doutful speache paraduenture mought haue geuen occasion to their cauillatioÌ„ But now when pointyng with his â—ingar to the bodies wherewith we are clothed he promiseth to them vncorruption he plainely enough denieth any new bodies to be made Yea he could not sayth TertulliaÌ„ speake more plainly vnlesse he had holden his owne skinne in his hand And they can by no cauillation escape froÌ„ this that where in an other place he sayth that Christ shal be the iudge of the world he allegeth this testimonie of Esaye I liue sayth the Lord euery knee shal bowe to me for as much as he plainly pronounceth that they to whoÌ„ he speaketh shal be subiect to yeld an accompt of their life which could not agree if newe bodies should be brought before the iudgement seate Nowe in the wordes of Daniel there is no doutfulnesse And many of them that slepe in the earth of dust shall awake some to eternall life and some to reproches to euerlastyng contempt sithe he fetcheth not new matter out of the fower elementes to make men but calleth dead men out of their graues And this very plaine reason teacheth For if mortalitie whiche toke beginnyng at the fall of man be accidental then the repayring which Christ brought perteineth to the same body which began to be mortall And truely wheras the Athenians laughed when Paule affirmed the resurrection therupon we may gather what manner of resurrection he preached and that same laughyng not smally anayleth to strengthen our faith The sayeng of Christ also is worthy to be noted Feare not them which kil the body can not kil the soule but feare him which can throwe both the soule and the body into hell of fire For there is no cause to feare vnlesse the body whiche we now beare be subiect to punishmeÌ„t And no lesse plaine is an other sayeng of the same Christ The houre coÌ„meth when all they that are in graues shal heare the
voice of the sonne of God and shall come forth they that haue done good into the resurrection of life but they that haue done euel into the resurrection of iudgement Shal we say that soules rest in the graues that they lieng there may heare Christ and not rather that at his coÌ„maundement the bodies shal returne into the liuelinesse which they had lost Moreouer if we shal haue new bodies geneÌ„ vs where is the likefashioning of the head and the membres Christ rose againe was it with forgyng to himselfe a newe body No but as he had sayd before Destroy this teÌ„ple and in three daies I wil bulde it vp he toke againe the same body which he had before borne mortall For he had not much profited vs if a new body beyng put in place the olde body had ben destroyed which was offred vp for a sacrifice of satisfactorie cleansing We must also holde fast that felowship whiche the Apostle preacheth That we rise againe bicause Christ hath risen againe for nothyng is lesse probable than that our flesh in whiche we beare about the mortifieng of Christ should be depriued of the resurrection of Christ. Whiche verily appered by a notable example when at the risyng agayne of Christ many bodies of the Saintes came out of the graues For it canne not bee denied that this was forshewyng or rather an earnest of the laste resurrection whiche we hope for suche as was before in Enoch and Elias whome Tertullian calleth New possessors of the resurrection bycause they beyng in body and soule deliuered from corruption were receyued into the kepyng of God I am ashamed in so cleare a matter to spende so many wordes but the readers shall contentedly beare this trouble with me that no hole maye be open for frowarde and bolde wittes to deceyue the simple The flyeng spirites wyth whome I nowe dispute bryng forth a fained inueÌ„tion of their owne brayne that at the resurrection there shal be a creation of new bodies What reason moueth them to thinke so but bicause it semeth to them incredible that a carion consumed with so long cotteÌ„nesse shold returne into his auÌ„cient state Therfore only vnbeleâ—e is the mother of this opinion But vs on the other side the Spirit of God eche where in the Scripture exhorteth to hope for the resurrection of our flesh For this reason baptisme as Paule witnesseth is to vs a seale of the resurrection to come and likewise the holy Supper allureth vs to the trust thereof when we receyue with our mouth the Signes of spiritual grace And truely the whole exhortation of Paule that we geue our meÌ„bres to be weapons vnto the obedieÌ„ce of righteousnesse shold be cold vnlesse that were ioyned whiche he addeth afterward He that hath raised vp Christ froÌ„ the dead shall quicken also your mortal bodies For what should it profit to applie our feete handes eyes and tonges vnto the seruice of God vnlesse they were partakers of the frute reward Which thing Paul plainly confirmeth with his owne wordes sayeng The body not to fornication but to the Lord and the lord to the body And he that hath raised vp Christ shall also rayse vp vs by his power More plaine are those wordes which folow that our bodies are the teÌ„ples of the holy ghost the meÌ„bers of Christ. In the meane time we see how he ioyneth the resurrection with chastitie holinesse as a litle after he sayth that the price of redemption perteineth also to the bodies Now it were not resonable that the body of Paul in which he hath borne the prinâ—es of Christ in which he honorably glorified Christ shold lose the reward of the crowne Whereupon also came that glorieng We loke for the redemer from heaueÌ„ which shal make our vile body like fashioned to the body of his brightnesse And if this be true that we must by many afflictions entre into the kingdome of God no reason suffreth to debarre the bodies from this entrie which God both exerciseth vnder the standard of the crosse honoreth with the praise of victorie Therfore of this matter there arose among the Saintes no douting but that they hoped to be coÌ„panioÌ„s of Christ which remoueth into his owne persone al the afflictions wherewith we are proued to teache that they bring life Yea and vnder the law he exercised the holy fathers in this faith with an outward ceremonie For to what purpose serued the vsage of burieng as we haue already shewed but that they should know that there is new life prepared for the bodies that are layed vp Hereunto also tended the spices and other signes of immortalitie wherewith vnder the law the darknesse of faith was holpen eueÌ„ as it was by the sacrifices Neither was that maÌ„ner bredde by superstitioÌ„ for asmuch as we see that the Spirit doth no lesse diligently reherse burialles than the chefe misteries of faith And Christ commendeth that worke as a special worke truely for none other reson but bicause it lifteth vp our eyes froÌ„ beholding of the graue which corrupteth destroyeth all to the sight of the renewyng Moreouer the so diligent obseruing of the ceremonie whiche is praysed in the Fathers sufficiently proueth that it was to them a rare pretious help of faith For neither would AbrahaÌ„ haue so carefully prouided for the burieng place of his wife vnlesse there had ben set before his eyes a religion and a profit hier than the world namely that garnishing the dead body of his wife with the signes of the resurrection he might coÌ„firme both his owne faith the faith of his household But a clerer profe of this thing appereth in the exaÌ„ple of Iacob which to testifie to his posteritie that the hope of the promised land was not euen by death fallen out of his minde coÌ„maunded his bones to be caried thether I besech you if he was to be clothed with a new body shold he not haue geuen a fond coÌ„manÌ„dement coÌ„cerning dust that shold be brought to nothing Wherfore if their authoritie of the Scripture be of any force with vs there caÌ„ be required of no doctrine either a more clere or more certaine profe For this euen children vnderstand by the wordes of ResurrectioÌ„ raysing vp againe For neither can we cal it the Resurrection of that which is now first created neither shold that sayeng of Christ staÌ„d fast Whatsoeuer the Father hath geuen me it shal not perish but I wil rayse it vp in the last day To the same purpose serueth the word of Sleping which perteineth only to the bodies WherupoÌ„ also burieng places were called Coemeteria â–ª Sleping places Now it remaineth that I speake somwhat of that manner of the resurrection I vse this word bicause Paul calling it a misterie exhorteth vs to sobrietie bridleth the libertie to dispute like Philosophers freely suttelly of it First we muste holde as
infantes was unknowen therin they most fowly doo lye For there is no writer so olde that doth not certainly referre the beginnyng therof to the tyme of the Apostles Nowe remaineth that we breefely shewe what fruite commeth of this obseruation bothe to the faithfull whiche present theyr chyldren to the Chirche to be baptised and also to the infantes themselues that be baptised with the holy water that no man shold despise it as vnprofitable or idle But if it come in any mans minde vpon this pretence to mocke at the Baptisme of infantes he scorneth the commaundemente of Circumcision geuen by the Lorde For what will they bryng foorth to impugne the Baptisme of infantes which may not also be throwen backe against Circumcision So the Lorde taketh vengeance of their arrogance whiche do by and by condemne that which they comprehend not with the sense of their owne fleshe But God furnisheth vs with other armures wherby their foolishnesse may be beaten flatt For neither this his holy institution by whiche we feele out faith to be holpen with singular comfort deserueth to be called superfluous For Gods signe communicated to a childe doth as it wer by an emprinted seale confirme the promise geuen to the godly parente and declareth that it is ratified that the Lorde will be God not onely to hym but also to his seede â—nd will continually shewe his good will and grace not to hym onely but also to his posteritie euen to the thousandth generation Where when the great kindnesse of God vttereth it selfe firste it yeldeth moste large mater to aduauÌ„ce his glorie and ouerspreadeth godly hartes with singular gladnesse because they are therwithall more earnestly moued to loue agayne so godly a Father whom they see to haue care of their posteritie for their sakes Neither do I regarde if any man take exception and say that the promise ought to suffise to confirme the saluation of our children forasmuche as it hath pleased God otherwise whoe as he knoweth our weaknesse willed in this behalfe so much to beare tenderly with it Therfore let them that embrace the promise of Gods mercy to be extended to their children thynke that it is theyr duetie to offer them to the Chirche to be signed with the signe of mercy and therby to encourage themselues to a more assured coÌ„fidence because they do with present eye beholde the couenant of the Lorde grauen in the bodies of their children Agayne the children receyue some commoditie of their Baptisme that beyng engraffed into the bodye of the Chirche they bee somewhat the more coÌ„mended to the other meÌ„bres Then when they are growen to riper age they be therby not sclenderly stirred vp to earnest endeuor to worshyp God of whom they haue ben receiued into his children by a solemne signe of adoption before that they coulde by age acknowe hym for their Father Finally that same condemnation oughte greatly to make vs afrayde that God will take vengeance of it if any man despise to marke his sonne with the signe of the couenant because by suche contempt the grace offred is refused and as it were forsworne Now let vs examine the argumentes wherby certaine furious beastes do not cesse to assaile this holy institution of God Fyrst because thei see that they be excedyngly nere driuen and hard strained with the likenesse of Baptisme and Circumcision they labor to pluck in sonder these two signes with great difference that the one shoulde not some to haue any thyng common with the other For they say that both diuers thinges are signified and that the couenant is altogether diuers and that the namyng of the children is not all one But while they go aboute to proue that first point they allege that circumcision was a figure of mortification and not of Baptisme Whiche verily we do moste willynglye graunt them For it maketh very well for our syde Neither doo we vse any other profe of our sentence than that Baptisme and Circumcision are signes of mortification Hereupon we determine that Baptisme is set in the place of Circumcision that it shoulde represente vnto vs the same thyng whiche in old tyme it signified to the Iewes In affirming the difference of the couenant with howe barbarous boldnesse do they turmoyle and corrupt the Scripture and that not in one place alone but so as they leaue nothyng safe or whole For they depainte vnto vs the Iewes so to be carnal that they be lyker beasts than men with whoÌ„ forsooth the couenant made procedeth not beyonde the temporall lyfe to whome the promyses geuen doe reste in presente and bodyly good thynges If this doctrine take place what remayneth but that the nation of the Iewes were for a tyme fylled with the benefites of God none otherwise than as they fatte a hearde of swyne in a stye that at lengthe they shoulde perishe with eternall damnation For so soone as we allege Circumcision and the promises annexed vnto it they answer that Circumcision was a litterall sygne and the promyses thereof were carnall Truely if circumcision was a literall signe there is no otherwise to be thought of Baptisme For the Apostle in the seconde Chapter to the Colossians maketh the one no more spirituall than the other For he sayth that we are circumcised in Christe with a circumcision not made with hande puttyng away the body of sinne that dwelled in our fleshe which he calleth the circumcision of Christ. Afterward for declaration of that sayeng he adioineth that we be buried with Christ by Baptisme What meaneth he by these wordes but that the fulfillyng and truth of Baptisme is also the truthe and fulfillyng of circumcision because they figure bothe one thyng For he trauaileth to shewe that Baptisme is the same to ChristiaÌ„s which circumcision had ben before to the Iewes But forasmuch as we haue now euidently declared that the promises of bothe the signes and the mysteries that are represented in them doo agree together we wil for this present tary no longer vpon them Only I will put the faithfull in mynde that though I holde my peace they should weye with themselues whether it be taken for an earthly and literall signe vnder whiche nothyng is conteyned but spirituall and heauenly But that they should not sell their smokes to the simple we will by the way confute one obiection wherwith they color this most shamelesse lye It is most certaine that the principall promises wherin was conteyned the couenant whiche in the Olde testamente God stablished with the Israelites were spriritual and tended to eternall life and then agayne that they were receiued of the fathers spirituallye as it was mete that they myght therof receiue affiance of the life to come wherunto they loÌ„ged with the whole affectioÌ„ of their hart But in the meane tyme we denie not but that he witnessed his good will towarde them with earthly and carnall benefites by which also we say that the same promise of spiritual things was confirmed
vnto the forgeuenesse of synnes â–ª which when it is graunted wil largely make for defense of our sentence For sith we be borne sinners we do euen from our mothers wombe nede forgeuenesse and pardon Now seing the Lord doth not cut of but rather assure to that age the hope of mercy why should we take froÌ„ them the signe which is much inferior than the thing it selfe Wherfore that which they go about to throwe against vs we thus throwe backe against themselues infantes haue remission of synnes geueÌ„ them therfore they ought not to haue the signe taken froÌ„ them They allege also thys out of the Epistle to the Ephesians that the Chirch is clensed of the Lord with the washing of water in the worde of lyfe ThaÌ„ which there could nothing be alleged more fit to ouerthrow their error for the rupoÌ„ groweth an easy profe of our syde If the Lorde will haue the washyng wherewith he clenseth his Chirch to be testified by Baptisme it semeth not rightful that it should want the testimonie of it in infantes â–ª whiche are rightfully accompted part of the Chirch forasmuch as they be called heires of the heauenly kingdome For Paule speaketh of the whole Chirch where he sayth that it was cleansed with the Baptisme of water Likewise of this that in an other place he sayth that we be by Baptisme graffed into the body of Christ we gather that infantes whom he reckeneth among hys members oughte to be Baptised least they be plucked away from hys body Beholde with what violence with so many engines they assault the fortresses of our fayth TheÌ„ they come down to the practise custome of yâ— time of the Apostles wherin none is fouÌ„d to haue ben admitted to Baptisme but he whiche hath before professed Faith repentance For where Peter was asked of them that were mynded to repent what was nedeful to be done he couÌ„selled them first to repent then to be Baptised into the forgeuenesse of synnes Likewise Philip wheÌ„ the Eunuche required to be Baptised answered that he might be Baptised if he beleued with al his hart Hereby they thinke that they may winne that it is not lawfull that Baptisme be grauÌ„ted to any but where Fayth and repentance goe before Truely if we yelde to thys reson the first of these twoo places where is no mention made of Faith wil proue that repeÌ„taÌ„ce alone sufficeth and the other place wherin repentance is not required will proue that Fayth onely is enough I thinke they will answer that the one place is holpen with the other and therfore must be ioyned together I say also likewise that other places must be layed together which make somwhat to the vndoing of thys knot for asmuch as there be many seÌ„tences in Scripture the vnderstanding wherof hangeth vpon the circuÌ„stance of the place As this presently is an example For they to whoÌ„ Peter and Philip spake these thynges were of age sufficient to haue practise of repentance and to coÌ„ceiue Faith We earnestly deny that such ought to be Baptised vntil after perceiuing of their conuersion and Fayth at least so farr as it maye be searched out by the iugement of men But that infantes ought to be accompted in an other nomber it is more than euident enough For in olde tyme if any man did ioyne himselfe into communion of religion with Israel it behoued that he should first be taught the couenant of the lord and instructed in the law before that he wer marked with circumcision because in birth he was a stranger from the people of Israel with whome the couenante had ben made whiche circumcision stablished As also the lord â–ª when he adopteth Abraham to himselfe doth not begin at circumcision hyding in the meane time what he meaneth by that signe but first he declareth what couenante he entendeth to make with him and then after Fayth geuen to the promise he maketh hym partaker of the Sacrament Why doth in Abraham the Sacrament follow Fayth and in Isaac his sonne it goeth before all vnderstanding Because it is mete that he which beyng in full growen age is receiued into felowship of the couenant from which he had ben hetherto a stranger should first learne the conditions therof but an infante begotten of him neded not so which by right of inheritance according to the forme of the promise is euen from his mothers wombe conteined in the couenant Or that the mater may be more clerely and brefely shewed if the children of the faithful without the helpe of vnderstanding are partakers of the couenante there is no cause why they shoulde be debarâ—ed from the signe for thys that they can not sweare to the forme of the couenant This verily is the reason why in some places God affirmeth that the infantes whiche are issued of the Israelites are begotten borne to hym For without dout he estemeth as hys children the children of them to whoe 's sede he promiseth that he wil be a Father But he which is vnfaithfull issued of vngodly parentes till he be by Fayth vnited to God is iudged a stranger from the communion of the couenant Therfore it is no maruell if he be not partaker of the signe the signification whereof shoulde be deceitfull and voyde in hym To this effecte Paule also wryteth that the Gentiles so long as they were drowned in theyr idolatrie were oute of the testamente With this shorte summe as I thynke the whole mater may be clerely opened that they whiche in growen age embrace the Fayth of Christ forasmuche as they were hetherto strangers from the couenante are not to be marked with Baptisme but wheras Fayth and repentance come betwene which onely can open them the entrie into felowship of the couenant but the infantes that are issued of Christians as they are receiued of God into the inheritance of the couenant so sone as they be borne so oughte to be receiued to Baptisme Hereunto muste that be applyed whiche the Evangelist speaketh of that they were Baptised of Ihon whiche confessed their sinnes Whiche example at this day also we thinke mete to be kept For if a Turke offer himselfe to Baptisme he shoulde not bee rashly Baptised of vs namely not til after confession wherby he maye satisfie the Chirch Moreouer they bring fourth the wordes of Christ which are rehearsed in the thirde Chapter of Iohn wherby they thinke that a presente regeneration is required in Baptisme Unlesse a man be borne againe of water and the Spirite he can not enter into the kingdome of God Loe say they howe Baptisme is by the Lordes own mouth called regeneration Them therefore whome it is more than enough knowen to be vnable to receiue regeneratioÌ„ by what color do we admit to Baptisme which can not be without regeneration First they are deceiued in thys that they thinke that in thys place mention is made of Baptisme because they heare the
euery one after the proportion of their nature yet it doth not deliuer them from necessitie of corruption but I speake of this speciall manner whereby the soules of the godly are bothe lightened vnto the knowledge of God and in a manner coupled to him By this enlightenyng of the worde sithe Adam Abel Noe Abraham and the other fathers cleaued vnto God I saye that it is not doubtfull that they had an entrie into the immortall kingdome of God For it was a sound partakyng of God whiche can not be without the benefit of eternall life But yf this seme somewhat entangled goe to let vs come to the very forme of the couenant which shall not only satisfie sobre wittes but also shall sufficiently conuince their ignorance that bende themselues to speake agaynst it For God did alwaye thus couenant with his seruantes I will be to you a God and ye shal be to me a people In whiche wordes the Prophetes themselues are wont to expound that both life and saluation and the whole summe of blessednesse is cōprehended For Dauid doth not without cause often pronounce that blessed is the people whose God is the lord blessed is the natiō which he hath chosen to be his inheritance and that not for earthly felicities sake but bycause he deliuereth them from death he preserueth them for euer and cōtinually sheweth them eternal mercie whome he hath taken to his people as it is in the other Prophetes Thou art our God we shall not die The Lord is our king our lawmaker he shall saue vs. Blessed art thou O Israel bycause thou art saued in the lord God But not to labour ouermuch in a thynge needelesse this admonition is sound eche where in the Prophetes that we shall wante nothyng toward all abundance of good thinges and assurance of saluatiō so that the Lord be our God And rightfully For if his face so sone as it beginneth to shine is a most present pledge of saluation to what man shall he openly shewe himselfe for his God but that he will also open to him his treasure of saluation For he is our God with this condition to dwell in the middest of vs as he testified by Moses But such presence can not be obteyned but that life must be also together had in possessiō with it And although there were no more expressed yet had thei a promise of spiritual life plaine enough in these wordes I am your God For he did not declare that he would be a God vnto their bodies alone but principally to their soules But soules vnlesse they be ioyned to God by righteousnesse remaine estranged from him in death But on the other side let that ioyning be present it shal bring euerlastyng saluation with it Byside that he did not only testifie that he was to them their God but he also promised that he would be so alway to the ende that their hope not contented with present benefites should be extended to eternitie And many sayenges do shewe that the speakyng in the future time meant so much as where the faithfull not only in present euels but also for the time to come doe comfort themselues with this that God will neuer fayle them Nowe as concernyng the seconde part of the promise he yet more plainely assured them of the blessyng of God to be prolonged vnto them beyond the boundes of this life in sayeng I will be the God of your seede after you For if he minded to declare his good will toward them beyng dead in doyng good to their posteritie much more would his fauour not faile toward themselues For God is not like vnto menne whiche do therefore carry their loue to their frendes children bicause their power is interrupted by death so that they can not employe their frendely doynges vpō them to whom they did beare good will But God whose bountifulnesse is not hyndered by death taketh not awaye from the very dead the frute of his mercie whiche for their sakes he poureth out into a thousand generations Therefore the Lordes will was by a notable profe to set forth vnto them the greatnesse and flowyng plētie of his goodnesse which they should fele after death when he described it to be such as should slowe ouer into all their posteritie And the truthe of this promise the Lord did then seale and as it were brought forth the fulfillyng of it when he named himself the God of Abraham Isaac and Iacob long after their death For what had it not ben a fond naming if thei had vtterly perished For then had it ben all one as if he had sayd I am the God of them that are not Wherefore the Euangelistes reherse that with this one argument the Sadduces were so driuen to a streight that they could not denie that Moses did testifie the resurrection of the dead for that they had learned by Moses that all the Saintes were in his hand Wherupon it was easy to gather that they are not destroyed by death whome he that is the iudge of life and death had receyued into his sauegard custodie and protection Now which is the principal point wherupon this cōtrouersie hangeth let vs loke whether the faithfull themselues haue not ben so instructed of the Lord that they perceiued that they shuld haue a better life els where and so neglectyng this life had an eye to the other First the state of life that was enioyned them by God was a continuall exercise whereby they might be put in minde that they were the moste miserable of all men if their happinesse were only in this life Adam most vnhappy euen with only remembrance of the happynesse that he had lost did with painfull labours hardly susteyne his nedynesse and that he shuld not be pressed with the curse of God in the only labours of his handes euen there receyued he extreme sorrow of that whiche remayned for him to be his comfort Of his two sonnes the one was taken awaye by the wicked slaughter of his brother the other he had lefte aliue whose sight he worthily detested abhorred Abel cruelly murthered in the very floure of his age became an example of the wretchednesse of men Noe while the whole world carelesly liued in pleasure spent a good part of his age with great werinesse in bildyng the Arke This that he escaped death came to passe by his greater troubles than yf he should haue died a hundred deathes For byside that the Arke was to him as a graue for x. monethes there is nothing more vnpleasaunt than to be holden so longe in manner drowned in dong of beastes When he had passed ouer so great difficulties he fell into newe matter of grefe he saw him self scorned of his owne sonne and was compelled with his owne mouth to curse him whom by the great benefit of God he had receiued safe from the generall flood Abraham in deede may be one alone
to be compared with a huÌ„dred thousand if we consider his faith which is set forâ—â— vnto vs for yâ— best rule of beleuing of whose kinred we must be accoÌ„pted that we maye be the children of God But what more absurditie is there â–ª than Abraham to be the father of all the faithfull and not to possesse so much as the smalest corner among theÌ„ but he can not be throwen downe out of the number no not from the moste honorable degree but that the whole churche muste be destroyed Now as touchyng the experiences of his lyfe When he was firste called by the coÌ„maundement of God he was plucked away from his coÌ„trey his parentes and his frendes in whome menne thinke to bee the chiefe swetenesse of life euen as if God of determined purpose meante to spoyle him of all the pleasures of life So sone as he came into the lande where he was commaunded to dwell he was dryuen out from thense with famine Thither he fled for succour where to saue himselfe he was compelled to deliuer out his wife to be abused whiche we knowe not whether it were not more bitter to him than many deathes When he was returned into the lande of his owne dwellyng he was driuen out agayne from thense with famine What a felicitie is this to dwell in that lande wherein a man muste so oft be hungry yea die for famine if he runne not awaye And therewithall he was brought to that necessitie with Abimelech that he muste needes redeme his life with the losse of his wife while many yeres longe he wandred vncertainely hether and thether he was compelled by the continuall brawlynges of his seruantes to put away his nephew whome he loued as his owne sonne Whiche departyng without doubt he dyd no otherwise take than yf he had suffred the cutting of one of his limmes A litle after he heard that he was carried awaye captiue by his enemies Whether so euer he wente he founde neyghbours outrageously barbarous whiche woulde not suffer him so muche as to drynke water out of the welles that himselfe had digged with great labour For he woulde not haue redemed the vse of them at the hand of king Gerar if he had not first ben forbidden Now when he came to old age he saw the thing which is the most vnpleasant and bitter that that age hath himselfe punished with hauing no children till beside all hope he begate Ismaell whose birth yet he payed dere for wheÌ„ he was weried with the brawlyng of Sara as yf he in maynteinyng the stubbornnesse of his bond-woman were himselfe the cause of the trouble of his household At length Isaac was borne but with this condition that his firste begotten Ismaell must as forsaken be cruelly caste out of dores When only Isaac was left in whome the weryed age of the silly good man might rest within a litle after he was commaunded to kil him What can mans wit deuise more miserable than the father to be made the butcher of his owne sonne If Isaac had dyed of any sickenesse whoe woulde not haue thought the olde manne moste miserable that had a sonne geuen him in mockeage for whome his griefe of want of children should be doubled If he had ben slayne by some straunger the vnhappinesse of the thyng woulde haue muche encresed his miserie But this passeth all examples of miserie to haue him slayne with his fathers one hande Finally he was in all the whole course of his life so tossed and vexed as if a man would in a table paint out an example of a miserable life he could finde none more fit than this of Abraham And let no man obiect that he was not altogether vnhappy for that he at length prosperously escaped from so many and so greate tempestes For we can not saye that he liueth a blessed lyfe whiche for a longe space together paynefully weareth out of infinite troubles but him that without felyng of euels quietly enioyeth present good thinges Isaac that was lesse troubled with euelles yet scarce euer toke any taste of swetenesse He also felt the same vexations that doe not suffer a manne to be blessed in the earth Famine chaced him out of the lande of Chanaan he had his wyfe violently plucked away from his bosome his neighbours ofte troubled him and by all meanes oppressed him so that he was fayne to stryue for his water at home in his owne house he suffred muche troublesonnesse by his childrens wiues he was greued wyth disagreementes of his sonnes and could not remedie that so greate a mischiefe but by the banishment of him whome he had blessed But as for Iacob he is nothynge els but a notable example of extreme infelicitie He passed his childehod moste vnquietly at home amonge the threatenynges and terrors of his elder brother to whiche at length he was coÌ„pelled to geue place When he was fled from his parentes and his natiue countrey biside that it was a greuous thing to liue in banishment he was nothyng more kindly or gently receiued of his vncle Laban TheÌ„ it sufficed not that he had serued seuen yere a hard cruell seruice but that also he muste be by guile defrauded of his wife For an other wiues sake he was driuen into new seruice where he was all the daye fried with heate of the sunne and all the night laye wakyng and payned with froste and cold as himselfe complayned While he by the space of .xx. yeares suffred so hard a life he was dayly vexed with newe iniuries of his father in lawe Neyther was he quiet in his owne house seyng it diuided and in a manner scattered abrobe with the hatred brawling enuye of his wâ—ues When he was coÌ„maunded to returne into his couÌ„trey he was compelled to watche an auantage to take his iourney much like a shamefull runnyng awaye and yet could he not so escape the vniust dealyng of his father in lawe but was fayne to suffer his reproches and rebukes in the middes of his iourney Then fell he into a muche more cruell distresse For when he came nere to his brother he had so many deathes before his eyes as mighte be prepared by a cruell manne and a bent enemie So was he aboue mesure tormented as it were drawen in sonder with terrible feares so long as he loked for his brothers comyng wheÌ„ he came ones in his sight he fel downe as half dead at his feete vntill he found him more fauorable than he durste haue hoped Biside that at his firste entrie into the lande he lost Rachel his derely beloued wyfe Afterwarde he heard word that the sonne whiche he had by her and whome therefore he loued aboue the reste was torne with wilde beastes by whose death howe great griefe he conceyued he himselfe declared in this that after longe wepynge he obstinately stopped vp all wayes whereby comfort mighte come to him leauyng hymselfe nothynge but to goe downe