Selected quad for the lemma: faith_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
faith_n	abraham_n	believe_v	impute_v	7,639	5	9.9008	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A54199	Quakerism, a new nick-name for old Christianity being an answer to a book entituled Quakerism no Christianity, subscribed by J. Faldo : in which the rise, doctrine and practice of the abused Quakers are truly, briefly and fully declared and vindicated from the false charges ... made by that adversary with a key opening the true meaning of some of their doctrine ... / by one of them and a sufferer with them in all their sufferings, William Penn.	Penn, William, 1644-1718.	1672 (1672)	Wing P1347; ESTC R30094	154,759	271

into our Justification an uncooth Phrase before God and our Salvation To prove which he brings forth three Passages of our Friends All that are called Presbyterians and Independents with their Feeding upon a Report of a thing done many hundred years ago E. Burroughs's Trump p. 17. Which J. Faldo wickedly construes thus This he saith by way of Reproach against all that act Faith on and receive Comfort from the Blessed Effects of Christ's Righteousness and Sufferings by him wrought and suffered when he was in the World Whereas in Honesty and Truth which J. Faldo shews himself wholy unacquainted with he meant no more then their Excessive Admiration of and the Regard to what Christ did without whilst they neglected undervalued and decry'd for Blasphemy and Euthusiasm the Appearance Work and Righteousness of Christ within But he thinks we have mistaken him and that he is better armed for us then we are aware of What Righteousness Christ performed without me was not my Justification neither was I saved by it R. Farnsworth he quotes for Author but no Book which is very unfair However this may be said in Defence of R. F. that what gives daily Access and Acceptance to and with the Lord is that Preparation of Clean and Righteous Adornment the Soul actually receives from Christ who is the Lord her Righteousness And take Justification in this sense and not for Remission in which he meant it if ever he said it and we do all own and acknowledge the same and let our Adversary do his worst Only I desire him to tell us the Book next time which affords that Expression § 2. But I. Pennington he thinks he has made his own Can Outward Blood clense the Conscience Can Outward Water wash the Soul clean Quest p. 25. I beseech you that read me hear his comment A plain Denial of the Efficacy of the Blood of Christ shed on the Cross to clense the Soul from the Guilt of Sin by its Satisfaction to the Justice of God I have had to do with many Enemies to God's Truth But I must profess to the whole World I never yet saw spoak to or read of a more disingenuous Man To pervert our Words alter Sentences draw Generals from Particulars and then call them Ours is Base and Unmanly I would fain have an impartial Man answ●r me Doth I. P. deny or any way meddle with the Outward Blood concerning the Guilt of Sin past how far it had an Influence into Justification taking Justification in that Sense But does he not treat of the Outward Blood with respect to Purgation and Sanctification of the Soul from the present Acts and Habits of Sin that lodge therein Is he so Sottish as to make no Distinction betwixt being pardon'd Sin past and the Ground of it and being renewed and regenerated in Mind and Spirit and the Ground of that Conversion or else is he so impiously Unjust that because we do deny that Outward Blood can be brought into the Conscience to perform that Inward Work which they themselves dare not nay do not hold Therefore I. Pennington denys any Efficacy to be in that Outward Offering and Blood towards Justification as it respects meer Remission of former Sins and Iniquities This may give the Sober-minded some Relish of his Rancker We do say that Outward Blood can no more clense then Outward Water But we also say that Christ's Blood had an Influence into Justification as he phraseth it which I shall presently show § 3. He undertakes the Defence of what he falsly says we deny but so confusedly as ought to shame a modest Man and a Pretender to Controversy His first Scripture is this And he received the Sign of Circumcision a Seal of the Righteousness of Faith which he had yet being uncircumcised that he might be the Father of all them that believe though they be not circumcised that Righteousness might be imputed to them Rom. 4. 11. His Observation and Inference run thus that Imputation is a Reckoning that to any which they have not from themselves nor actually from another otherwise it could not be Grace therefore it was the Righteousness of another not his own This is so base a Pervertion and Mis-using of the Word that Imputation both in Scripture and Common Discourse is always taken and used in the contrary sense Let him produce me one Scripture that countenanceth his Notion This imputed Righteousness is best understood by the Context Even as David also describeth the Blessedness of the Man unto whom God imputes Righteousness without Works saying Blessed are they whose Iniquitys are forgiven and whose Sins are covered Blessed is the Man unto whom the Lord will not impute Sin Cometh this Blessedness then upon the Circumcision only or Uncircumcision also for we say that Faith was reckoned to Abraham for Righteousness How was it then reckoned when he was in Circumcision or Uncircumcision And he received the Sign of Circumcision a Seal of the Righteousness of the Faith which he had yet being Uncircumcised that he might be the Father of all them that believe though they be not Circumcised that Righteousness might be imputed unto them also vers 6 7 8 9 10 11. In which we may perceive First that the Righteousness was by the Apostle inferr'd from David's Words of the Blessedness of that Man unto whom God imputed not Sin As much as if he had said whom God forgives he imputes not Sin to and to whom he imputes not Sin such he lookes upon as Righteous that is to be as clear of the Guilt of former Sin by Remission as if it had never been committed Secondly that not Works of our own no though assisted by the Holy Spirit to perform them stricktly consider'd can justifie in this sense but Faith only in the Goodness Mercy and Promise of God to Pardon Remit and show Favour unto all such who Distrusting their own Weakness and Repenting of their former Miscarriages humbly yet firmly put their Confidence in him This being Abraham's Case with respect to himself and Posterity God no more lookt upon him as a Stranger at a distance from him but one who by Faith was brought nigh and became thus justified not by Works of Righteousness that he wrought but by Faith in God which was accounted unto him for Righteousness and that really too since he could not believe without an Inward Act of Righteousness but not of his own § 4. In short Justification bears a twofold sense in the Scripture and because we are frequently mistaken about it by such as understand not the Extent and Use of the Word I will explain it Justification is sometimes to be understood of Remission or non-Imputation of Sin upon Repentance and Faith in the Promise of God In which sense we say That all the righteous Works Man is capable of either from himself if such can be or from the Assistance of the Holy Spirit stricktly as such can never move one Jot to