a remarkable place Gal. 3.29 if ye be Christs then are you Abrahams and consequently Isaacs seed and heirs according to premise so that the Apostle here doth instruct us that election consists of such a sort of persons so qualified the specifical seed of Isaac such a kinde of persons therefore might the Apostle well say Eph. 1.4 according as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world that is in Christ 3. This truth is further confirmed if we consider that children of promise must suppose children of faith a promise requires believing Abraham believed Gods promise and it was accounted for righteousnesse so that we have Isaac here set forth as a lively type of the nature not the number of those who shall be Justified and saved as afterwards we have Pharach set forth as a lively type of those who shall be rejected by God namely such as slight and reject God and his long-suffering grace in the Gospel which ought and is expected to leade them to repentance Rom. 2.2 This Doctrine from hence may be observed Doctrine That God in choosing and reprobating man hath a special eye to qualifications Children of the flesh are not the children of God but the children of faith in Christ not by number and name but species and qualifications Psal 4.3 God hath chosen and set apart for himself the man that is godly St. Jude tells us certain men were Ordained to that condemnation and he doth desipher them thus ungodly men turning the grace of God into wantonnesse and denying the Lord so that Ishmael and Isaac are made use of here but allegorically as they are Gal. 4. I shall speak but a very few words to ver 9. and winde up this context with a word of Use for this is the word of promise at this time will I come and Sarah shall have a son Isaac is judged a meet type of those who should be begotten by faith in the free and gratious promise of God in the Gospel we have in these words contained an explanation of what is spoken before Isaac was a significant son of promise therefore the Apostle recites the very words of the Original promise to Abraham Gen. 17.21 at this time next year will I return according to the time of life and Sarah shall have a son ver 14. at the time appointed I will return the Apostle changeth by these words I will come for God to come is understood two ways 1. To come in power to help rescue or deliver 2. Sometimes to come is to punish sometimes for God or Christ to come is metaphorically understood as Rev. 2.5 his coming is to remove the Candlestick to come ver 16. is to fight against them chap. 3.3 is to come as a thief with strength and resolution we have two things considerable in these words to Abraham recited by the Apostle 1. That Isaac's birth is the effect of Gods coming in power 2. That God in fulfilling this promise admits no delay at this time at the set time neither sooner nor later but at the set time as it was in the birth of John the Baptist Luke the 1. his mother went her exact time God makes his promise returnable at the set time so that Isaac's birth is the effect of Gods coming as to his birth and the time of it and also the effect of Gods free promise Isaac was the son of Gods word of promise I shall sum up all in one Doctrinal conclusion Doctrine That a true child of God and heir of glory is one as Isaac was begotten and brought Jorth by the strength of the free promise of God not of his own power strength or righteousnesse This our Apostle alludes unto Titus 3. and 5. not of works of righteousness that we have done I told you in the explication that Isaac's birth was an act of free mercy and speciall Providence for there was no strength in Abraham or Sarah to have a childe according to the course of nature nothing as they could lean upon so as to have hope in themselves therefore it is said Rom. 4. that Abraham against hope believed in hope vers 18. and being not weak in faith he considered not his own body now dead nor yet the deadness of Sarah's womb he staggered not but was fully perswaded that he that had promised was able to perform and this frame of spirit God liked well in Abraham and it was accounted for righteousness and hereupon he was called the friend of God James 2.23 Isaac's birth was the effect of a promise and faith in it so was John's Luke the 1. and what Elizabeth said to Mary is certainly true vers 45. blessed is she or he that believeth for there shall be a performance of what is promised a true child of God is begotten and brought forth of the promise of God in Christ therfore believing Holy S. Paul could say in the behalf of himself and the rest of believers we brethren as Isaac are children of the promise that is to say that as Isaac's birth was the product of the free promise of God so is our new birth and it is a truth that we are as weak and unable to save our selves of our selves as Abraham was to produce Isaac of himself without the mighty interposer for the promise gives a being to Christ and believing to be the means of salvation Gen. 3. Esa 55. I will abundantly pardon look unto me and be ye saved all the ends of the earth Esa 45.22 There are five inferences to be drawn from the promises 1. There is no ground from the rejecting the unbelieving Jews to conclude that there is a failing in Gods promises to Abraham and his seed because God did never intend a carnal seed in that promise but a spiritual and believing seed who should seek for justification by Christ alone forasmuch as Isaac's birth is a type of Gods method of saving souls in all ages 2. Learn from this context the indispensable necessity of faith in order to justification and salvation if Abraham and Sarah had not seconded Gods promise by faith in it they had had no Isaac therefore is the birth strongly imputed to the faith of them both Heb. 11.11 the birth of Isaac is not only a promise on Gods part but believing on their part 3. If the works of the law were rejected in point of justification which were so labourious painful and costly much less can gospel-works justifie which in comparison are no works Rom. 4.15 therefore lean not to them 4. If â—ods children are the children of promise that is begotten upon the promise then this doth instruct a gospel-minister his work and duty which is to lay before persons Gods free promises of life and salvation in Christ thus did Peter in his preaching Acts. 2. ch 3. ch 10. 5. Admire the sweetness of Gods nature to allure by promises to Obedience this was Gods proceedings with Abraham when God would have Abraham to obey him
as 1 Cor. 9.24 where we are called upon so to run that we may obtain where we have obtaining propounded as the great encouragement to running So also Heb. 12. we are to have an eye to the recompence of reward to encourage us in our running and Paul himself was not willing to run in vain and we are called upon Phil. 2.12 to work out our salvation with fear and trembling I answer That in all these places the Apostle speaks to justified persons in order to perseverance not to such as are strangers to the ways of God and his Gospel as these in our Text were and all these endeavours are more properly aâ—… sanctification then after justification we are called upon to work out our salvation and to perfect our holinesse in so doing but we are never called upon to work out our justification that is only the effect of Christs death and sufferings without any other efficient cause or means all acts of holinesse in man is rather to declare his justified state then procure it Abraham in obeying and following God in those several steps which the Scâ—pture takes notice of did not thereby procure but demonstrate his justification and see how Alrahams obedience and faith centers in one to this end our Apostle saith that Abraham believed God and it was imputed to him for righteousnesse thereby he was accounted righteous yet S. James saith our father Abraham was justified by works when he offered Isaac Jam. 2.21 that is he did declare or demonstrate it thereby Thus I have briefly run through the words by way of explication I now return to consider of them as they lie And before I proceed to those Doctrinal Conclusions which lyeth in them I shall briefly take notice of them as they are the Apostles Conelusion and result and inference from what goeth before for that they are as a conclusion they have the note of an inference or conclusion in this so then for so these words are used elsewhere See chap. 10.17 So then faith comes by hearing which words are the result from the former so chap. 8.8 so then they that are in the flesh cannot please God cha 14.12 So then every one must give an account of biâ—…self to God so 1 Cor. 3.7 chap. 7.38 thus we see that this kinde of speaking is used as a center to draw the precedent and subsequent matter to it so that this 16. verse is a result the Apostle in these words doth conclude and seal up the matter of this first argument in order to purging himself from the Jews false imputation of charging God with unrighteousnesse which they gathered from what he had said as is recorded vers 11. that God doth not justifie by works this result doth cast light upon the whole Context upon a three-fold consideration 1. As these words doth determine the nature and matter of the controversie between the Apostle and the Jews that it was about the terms of justification and who had right to make them both which are here resolved not of him that is most desirous and pursuing after it he has not power to propound but God who is the gracious donour of it 2. By the Apostles result in this verse he doth determine where the foot of the Jews objection lay which was from his interpretation made of these two instances of Ishmael and Esau as their rejection taught the rejection of works as to justification ver 11. and not upon the unequal proceedings of God with Jacob and Esau as some would have it for it will easily be granted that not of works and not of him that willeth or runneth are terms synonimous or of like signification 3. We must understand this conclusion and inference to be drawn from the words immediately going before Exod. 33.19 So then that is to say from hence it appears not to be of the willer or runner because God in shewing mercy is positively resolved in himself and from himself about it so that this conclusion concludes the propriety of Exo. 33. to this controversie and that God spâ—… the same in effect to Moses as here S. Paul spâ—… to the Jews that is to say that justification 〈◊〉 adoption is of free-grace and mercy and notâ—… works Thus much for the scope and explication of the words I shall now sum up the whole of this verse in these five doctrinal Conclusions From the nature of these words as they are a result or conclusion whilst S. Paul is labouring 〈◊〉 vindicate Gods righteousnesse and equity in this terms and proceedings with mankinde he arrives at great fatisfaction in himself The Doctrine is this That he that makes it his work to vindicate Gods righteousnesse in his proceedings with man prevaâ—… in his arguments The Apostle had no cause to be ashamed of his contest in this matter in asserting justification by faith in Christ without the deeds of the law though in so asserting he is charged for impeaching Gods righteousnesse yet he overcame and in vindâ—…ting Gods righteousnesse he vindicates his own doctrine So then it is not 2. Doctrine That justification is a prize worth the running for when once seen and understood The Apostle supposeth that these Jews had been willing and running after it as a blessed priviledge justification with God is very desirable but suppose you should ask me what it is to be justified I answer when a person is declared just upon the account of pardon and non-imputation of sin that is the blessed state which the Apostle speaks of Rom. 4.6,7,8 blessed is the man to whom God doth not impute sin but how may thee and I know whether we are in this blessed state I answer 1. If thou beest justified with God thou art acquitted in thine own conscience there remains no more conscience of sin this is that spoken of Rom. 5.1 being justified with God there is peace in thy conscience that is quiet it doth not condemn thee 2. If thou beest justified from sin thou doest experience strength against sin that sin which is pardoned we have a perfect hatred unto we have an eminent place for this 2 Corinth 7.11 there was indignation and revenge against it 3. Doctrine It is possible for persons cordially to desire and laboriously to pursue this mercy of justification and yet come short and not attain it This was the case of the Jews they were willers and runners they had a zeal a desire they sought after it verse 31. yet not attained it chap. 11.7 Israel did not attain what they fought after and why not because they were not elected vers 32. but because they sought it not by faith therefore this we may learn that in our zeal and running it is good to keep Gods line 4. Doctrine That persons to some degree righteous and obedient to Gods laws are very apt to challenge and strongly expect the great priviledge of justification as a debt for such their obedience or as a reward for such work Therefore the Apostle doth
altogether needfull in our reading this chapter to carry along in our eye the main scope and designe of the Apostle in what he here writes to this people which was in a direct line to prove his grand thesis namely justification by faith without the deeds of the law and therein this Chapter carries a compleat analogy with the former and two following Chapters of this Epiâ—le the grand scope of all which is to convince the Jew of his sin in not believing in Jesus Christ for life and salvation The Apostle in this Epistle and Chapter had an eye to the Jews great Argument with respect to the covenant made with Abraham which argument is by them formed thus if not any be justified but by faith in Christ then the Jews though the natural seed of Abraham are not justified but are in the state of condemnation for they hate Christ have persecuted and slayn him but it is absurd to conclude that the Jews are not justified therefore man may be justifyed some other way then by believing in Christ and the Minor of this argument is strengthened by a three-fold fortification which the Jews think impregnable As first say they to the seed of Abraham was the promise made and if they be not justified then there is a failing in Gods word Secondly there are not any amongst all the sons of men so zealous for righteousness therefore they must needs be the persons justified Thirdly say they if they be not justified then hath God cast off his own people which he hath chosen But these things cannot be so therefore this doctrine of justification by faith in Christ must be a doctrine of Pauls devising and not the truth of God Now my souls desire and prayer to God is that the truth in this Scripture might clearly shine into the hearts of all that are sincere who shall reade the ensuing matter and that which I designe as I go along shall be to discharge this Scripture from that hard service which it is prest to serve in which is to attest a personal absolute Election and reprobation unchangeable and irrevocable establisht before the foundation of the world which preordination of God doth unavoydably necessitate men to be what they are and shall be as to sin and death Righteousness and life which inference and conclusion will appear very forreign to the Apostles designe in this Chapter CHAP. I. Personal Reprobation Reprobated Wherein is contained what reall great and constant sorrow the holy Apostle St. Paul had for the miserable estate of the Jews under their sin of blindness Vers 1. I say the truth in Christ I lye not my conscience also bearing me witness in the holy Ghost IT may be easily and readily supposed that the Apostle had here to do with a people who partly through prejudice to the persons and partly his doctrine were likely to be hardly perswaded that Paul had affection for them that he had in his heart secret hatred and revenge against them for those injuries done to him and therefore he is necessitated to take great pains to raise and beget in them a credit of his choyce love and affection to them which he labours after in the beginning of this Chapter these 5 first verses contains the proem or preface to the Chapter In which preface we have the Apostles most ardent and patheticall complaint and manifestation of sorrow in the behalf of he Jews his countreymen who were not only ignorant but persecutors of Christ and his Gospel which rendred them in the Apostles judgement in a very sad and deplorable condition Now these five verses are two ways understood First some understand them to look backward to what the Apostle had been treating on before 〈◊〉 the former Chapter in which he had been treating of the choyce priviledges of such as were believeâ— in Christ that they were not lyable to condemnation that they were chosen of God had the spirit were heirs of God joynt-heirs with Christ and that nothing should be able to separate them from this their happy estate some I say do judge that the Apostle having been deeply contemplating upon these things breaks forth passionately and abruptly with these affection at lamentations for those his Countreymen who for the generallity of them lay short and at a distance from these priviledges Secondly there are others who understand these verses as a preface to what follows in this Chapter and as a preparative to what he had to say which I think is the likelyest to agree to truth and I shall handle them as so understood and that great truth which the Apostle takes such pains to fasten upon their hearts was this that he had a cordial and deep sence of the present state of the Jews and their condition even to exquisite sorrow and grief In which sorrow we have four circumstances considerable First the certainty of it Secondly The greatness of it Thirdly the cause of it Fourthly the heightning circumstances of this sorrow which are two 1. The Jews are his kindred 2. They were such who had been invested with very great priviledges of each of these a few words in order First the Apostle is very pathetical in this his â—ttestation of the truth of this his sorrow he doth with much earnestness assure them that he had such a simpathy with them and sorrow with them â—e would command their belief iâ— this point and therefore doth he make a solemn and sacred protestation and profession in these words I say the truth in Christ I lye not The certainty of this which the Apostle speaks is two ways confirmed First by his positive attestation I say the truth in Christ Secondly by his duplication or doubling his speech on the negative as well as the affirmative I lye not These words of our Apostle are read two ways some reade instead of in by Christ not as we reade here as Paul having an eye to Christ as a witness as if he should say Christ thou knowest that I say nothing but truth that my sorrow is real and so also doth my conscience bear witness and so doth the spirit of God also in this matter and that this is the dialect of the Apostle see elsewhere Gal. 1.10 now the things which I write unto you behold before God I lye not so also 2 Corinth 11.31 the God and father of our Lord Jesus Christ knoweth that I lye not I appeal to him that I lye not as here But 2dly the most both of antient and latter Interpreters understands and reades these words of the Apostle otherways as containing in them the nature and force of an oath because the particle translated in say they may be more properly translated by and so saith Calvin Piscator and Musculus and so they reade those words 2 Cor. 12.1 I knew a man by Christ and of the same minde are most of our latter writers who also takes these words as an asseveration or an oath but take it
of the flesh are understood to be such as look for justification and acceptance with God upon the account of the works of the law circumcision and Obedience to the ceremonial law this is plain for flesh and works of the law are often taken one for another and by this our Apostle Rom. 4.1,2 what shall we say then that Abraham our father according to the flesh hath found for if Abraham were justified by works that which is called flesh in the first part of the verse is called works in the latter part this is understood Gal. 3.3 of being made perfect by the flesh and so chap. 4.29 he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the spirit that is he that was born according to the works of the law and thus S. Paul must be understood Phil. 3. though he was circumcised and kept the law yet he had no confidence in the flesh now in this third sense must our text be understood the children of the flesh are not the children of God Adoption and heirship doth not come in that way they that have nothing else to plead must stand off let us take it in which sense we will the text is here the children of the flesh are not the children of God 1. Such as have only nature Nor 2ly those who live after the flesh though they profess to believe in Christ Nor 3dly those who are most circumspect as to the observation of the law except they believe in and obey Jesus Christ Secondly who are the Children of the promise unto whom these are opposed By children of the promise must be understood such as rest and depend upon the free promise of God in Christ for life and salvation believers in Christ who seek for acceptance and salvation by him alone such as are begotten to love and obedience by the power of the promises To this doth the Apostles words agree Such as are Christs are the seed and heirs according to the promises therefore doth the Apostle oppose the Law to the promise Gal. 3.18 For if the inheritance be of the Law it is no more of the promises but God gave it to Abraham by promise So also Gal. 4.14 if they that are of the law be heirs their faith is made void and the promise of none effect the Gospel is a dispensation of promises and consequently of faith S. Paul calleth the Saints Heb. 6.17 the heirs of promises So also Gal. 4.28 We as Isaac are children of the promises So that when the Apostle saith here the Children are counted for the seed he intends not others then true believers in Christ Jesus Thus I have briefly answered these two Questions in order to the explication of the words I shall now summary the first part of the words into this Doctrine Doct. That the true seed of Abraham are not nor were not at any time estimated or accounted as they were found in the external profession or practice of Ordinances though of Gods own appointment but of such who under such Ordinances had the life and power of them in their hearts The true heirs of justification and salvation were in all ages intended to be inwardly and believinâ—…y children of God God did never accept of any outside professors since the beginning but as he was a searcher of hearts allways so he allways required heart and inside-worship he did always require to be worshipped with heart soul and strength In Abels time Cain was a worshiper as well as Abel but the difference lay in the inside of the worship therefore it is said Heb. 11.4 by faith Abel offered to God a more acceptable sacrifice then Cain In the time of Circumcision God was not satisfyed with a fleshly circumcision only but God calls for circumcision of heart Deut. 10.16 circumcise therefore the foreskin of your hearts and we see the severe threatnings of God against Israel for the want hereof Ierem. 9. Inward spiritual worship was always required and much more in Gospel-days therefore Christ tells the Jews John 6.53 Except you eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood ye have no life in you Rom. 2.28 he is not a Jew who is such outwardly God almighty was so cautious and careful lest men should bear upon works for Justification and acceptance with him thereupon that he declares Abraham justified before he was circumcised and that our Apostle takes special notice of Rom. 4.11 Abraham received circumcision a seal of the righteousnesse of the faith which he had being not yet circumcised to which agreeth these words verse the 5. now to him that worketh not but believeth in him that Iustifieth the ungodly his faith is accounted to him for righteousnesse so that it is plain that the spirit of God is greatly concerned in beating men off from bearing upon works of righteousnesse and we see the spirit of St Eaul to this purpose Titus 3.5 not by works of righteousnesse that we have done but according to his mercy he saved us This Doct. seems to discover to us a great mistake amongst professors in this day there are but a sew who do not erre on this hand to bear upon their external obedience to ordinances and raise their comforts and hopes from thence Is not this like the plea of the pharisee Luke 18. I fast twice in the weeâ— are there not many who bless themselves upon this account and this appears because your comforts are high and low according to your duties but some may say ought it not so to be I answer you must have a special care to keep allways in a clear sight and sense and assurance of your relation you stand in to God if you are truly regenerated persons and are begotten from above do not easily let go that hold it is the duty of a child to grieve that he hath offended his loving father but not to call in question his relation to him thereupon God doth not unchilde for every fault nor for many sins if they be not wilfully committed but I pray mistake me not I would not have Gods children passe lightly over their miscarriages against him nor their unanswerable returns to him but mourn cordially as David and Peter did not in slavish but filial frame of spirit but know this that our sanctification is not the ground of our justification but the Demonstration of it good works may demonstrate our justification 2. Let each of us be instructed from hence to have a special care that we do not bear or rest upon our Gospel-obedience for acceptance or justification namely our Baptism nor other gospelobedience in ordinances for this we may be assured of as a truth that if legal performances of Godâ— appointment were not accepted being only outward much less are gospel persormances in ordinances acceptable without the spiritual part of them Baptism hath an inside as well as circumcision which consists in two parts death to sin life to righteousness now if
we have not this inside we are in a sence children of the flesh and so not the children of God therefore S. Peter takes both parts 1 Peter 3. not the putting away the filth of the flesh but the answer of a good conscience so doth Christ John 3. a true baptized Disciple of Christ is one in whom Christ dwels by faith Eph. 3.17 the Ordinance of the Lords supper hath an inside a spiritual part our hearts are to be fed as well as our bodies we are as Christ saith to eat his flesh and drink his blood or else we have no life in us it is the spiritual part attending the outward that renders a person acceptable to God for he seeks such especially now who worship him in spirit and truth John 4. Abraham did much in going out of his countrey and offering up his son yet his justification came in by his faith Rom. 3. it is true his works did manifest the life and truth of his faith Iames 2. but it is said Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness 3. If the children of the flesh or law be not the children of God then certain it is that the children of faith are and so thou who art a Gentile-believer art one of them it may be much encouragement to a poor gospel-believer it appears thou wert one of those whom God had upon his heart in his promise to Abraham at first the promise made to Abraham that he should be heir of the world was made upon gospel-terms not fleshly Rom. 4.13 If you are believers in Christ you are the proper heirs of that promise with him and so the most proper children of God though thou art a Gentile so was Zacheus yet upon his believing he is pronounc't a child of Abraham by Jesus Christ himself Luke 19.9 It is the judgment of some learned men that Abrahams children may be divided into four ranks or are of four sorts 1. Such as were his natural children according to a fleshly race who were no sharers in the promise such were Ishmael and Esau 2. Some who were descended of Ahrahams loins and were heirs of those temporal promises of Canaan and such like such were the fleshly posterity of Isaac and Jacob. 3. Such as descended of Abrahams loins according to the flesh and not only so but such as were truly godly and had the faith of Abraham even faith in Christ as Abraham had 4. Such as are not of the fleshly seed of Abrahams loins at all but were only believers of which sort are all the believing gentiles and these two latter sorts may be reckoned into and are the children of the promise which leads us to speak unto the affirmitive part of this interpretation But the children of the promise are accounted for the seed In handling this head I shall cast my eye to the verse before and verse following ver 7. ver 9. In Isaac shall thy seed be called which saying is taken out of Gen. 21.14 and the occasion we may there see in the former part of the chapter which was this as I minded before after Isaac was born and grown to some years Sarah his mother takes notice of Ishmael the bond-womans son offering some abuse to her son Isaac in mocking him she is sorely displeased thereat and besought her husband to cast both son and mother out of doors but Abraham having love to his son it seemed grevious to him to put her request in execution but soon after God himself speaks to him and bids him hearken to his wife in this matter and put the son and mother both out of doors and he gives Abraham this as an argument that Ishmael should not inherit with Isaac but in Isaac his seed should be called that Isaac should be the heir alone without Ishmael now Abraham having received this command from God proceeds accordingly ver 14. Abraham arose early in the morning to perform that service which was too grievous to him in himself it is worthy our noting By the way note this Doctrine That our father Abraham was of a tractable frame of spirit to Gods will though in things crosse and contrary to his own will and interest Abraham is not only willing to do it but he riseth early to do it This he did also in the offering up Isaac chap. 22. his dear and only son he did arise early to go about it this was the spirit of our father Abraham whose steps we are to follow Rom. 5.12 in order to blessing Abraham God called him to his foot Esa 41.2 Let us learn this lesson from it be like Abraham herein it was kindely taken at his hand God reckons him his friend James 2.23 and this priviledge is promised John 15.14 Ye are my friends when ye do whatsoever I command you if thou beest a believer thou must look to Abraham thy father Esa 51. but I only touch this by the way and now come to the words ver 7. In Isaac shall thy seed be called It is not here to be understood that all that come of Isaacs loins acording to the flesh are here meant for we know Esau came of Isaac but Isaac is here exhibited as a type of the true seed they must resemble Isaac in this birth but I shall meet with this in the interpretation as it followeth the children of the promise are accounted for the seed I have already spoken something to the explaining these words who are these children of promise in general they are such as are begotten by the promise through Christ but I would speak more particularly a few words 1. It is to be noted that the Apostle doth not here say the children of promise with respect to Isaac alone personally considered but the Apostle had an eye to a race or generation of men so qualified that is to say such as resemble Isaac as to his extraordinary birth and the extraordinary interposer of Gods power therefore he saith in special the children of the promise it is undeniably plain that if the Apostles designe had been here to lift up Isaac as a type of absolut personal election honeeded not to have proceeded this way as he doth to compute Abrahams seed by Isaac and by him in such a way but if the Apostles designe was to render Isaac as a type of such a sort of persons so qualified then the whole context will concurr with it 2. Whereas the Apostle here stileth these persons acceptable with God children of the promise we are to understand such persons as the promises are directed unto which is Originally and comprehensively to and in Christ for this we have an Emphatical place Gal. 3.16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made he saith not to seeds a many but one which is Christ so that in a true construction children of promise and children of Christ are the same for Christ is the apparent and immediate heir of the promise To confirm this we have
men though never so zealously bent and intent that way but by and from God only who is the donor because the Scripture saith unto Pharaoh meaning that inasmuch as God claimeth a just and unquestionable right to condemn whom he please he hath the same right to save whom he please so that the way by which the Apostle clears Gods righteousness in his proceedings with Jews and Gentiles is his undoubted right thereunto God is not unrighteous in justifying the gentils by faith neither is he unrighteous in condemning and hardning the obstinate unbelieving Iews because he was righteous in so proceeding with Pharaoh upon like grounds of disobedience no man ever questioned the righteousnesse of Gods proceedings with Pharaoh but justified him in it therefore the Apostle makes him here a president Pharaoh being the first born of rebellious unbelievers and obstinate disobeyers of God and a type of all gospel-disobeyers to the worlds end and so his proceedings with him a pattern of Gods proceedings with such to the worlds end as in like manner when God declares his sole love and approbation to Abraham upon his believing he doth also declare his good liking to all such like believers in all succeding generations Abraham the first-born of believing and obedient souls he is the father of obedience as Pharaoh was the father of disobedience not that the children of these two grand heads are in degree equal to Abraham in faith or Pharaoh in disobedience but their faith and their disobedience are of the same species that their fathers was as Abraham may have many sons or children who comes not to equalize him in the degree of his faith provided it be of the same kinde even so may Pharaoh have sons who may be heirs and lyable to the same hardning and condemning who notwithstanding have not disobeyed to the degree of Pharaohs disobedience and it is a certain truth that amongst all people and persons that have been since Pharaohs time none ever came so near to the degree of Pharaohs disobedience as these Jews to whom the Apostle is speaking as afterwards I shall demonstrate by the circumstances of them both for that from this casual word for we may easily gather that this instance of Pharaoh is not forreign to the Apostles businesse in hand but it doth suit with it to help to carry on his designe in vindication of the righteousnesse of God both in shewing mercy and in hardning The second circumstance to be taken notice of is the speaker of these words which is here appropriated to the Scriptures the Scripture saith unto Pharaoh which consideration by the way may be of instruction to us of the divine authority of the Scriptures for notwithstanding these words are the words of God yet the Apostle saith the Scripture-saith I have raised thee up to make my power known what God speaks and what the Scripture saith are the same with the Apostle and so it is elsewhere see Gal. 3.22 where he saith the Scriptures hath concluded all in unbelief which the same Apostle appropriates to God Rom. 11.32 So 1 Timot. 5.18 the Scripture saith thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the oxe which are a part of Gods words I must take up this by the way that sayings of God and sayings of Scripture are of equal authority and it must needs be so because the sayings of Scripture are the breathings of God by his spirit in his servants see what Peter saith to this 2d Peter 1. last verse 2. Timothy 3. but why seeing Gods sayings and sayings of Scripture are the same doth the Apostle rather choose to say here the Scripture saith rather then God saith as before verse the 15. I answer the Apostle might choose his way to declare it that he might provoke the Jews to consult and consider the whole passage as they had it in their law which also did so greatly concern them and for the same reason doth he so often use this dialect the Scripture saith as Rom. 10.11 chap. 11.2 and many other places 2. It is considerable that whilst he is saying that the Scripture saith he so rendreth it in the present tense he therein gives the Jews to understand that this saying is a standing word not only spoken but speaking it is a speaking Oracle what was said to Pharaoh still speaketh in all ages the Scripture saith I will only add a word of instruction see the choice esteem the holy Apostle had for the Scriptures whilst he reckons the Scripture sayings and the sayings of God equal Gods faithful servants in all ages have been distinguished by this their worthy esteem of the Scriptures both in Old and New Testement and so had Jesus Christ himself let us try our selves by this rule 2. Here is a rule for all preachers the Scripture saith the preacher saith well whilst he saith the Scripture saith in testimony to what he speaks thus it is written The third circumstance to be considered is the subject to whom spoken to Pharaoh worthy our consideration upon a threefold account 1. It was the common name of all the kings of Egypt successively but this was not that Pharaoh which shewed that kindenesse to Joseph nor he that appointed the midwives to slay the male-children this Pharaoh takes another way for Moses was 80 years old at this time Exo. 7.7 2. As to this Pharaoh he was an imperious proud man his power was great as he was king of Egypt he had a vast strength above other nations and as his power was so his heart was great he acknowledged none in heaven nor earth above him as appeareth by his words chap. 5.2 who is the Lord that I should obey him I know not the Lord or as Ainsworth reads it Jehovah is not revealed to me Pharaoh was a man much trusting to and leaning on Magicians and Sorcerers with which that land abounded above all lands here was those Ianies Iamebrise whâ— as the Apostle saith withstood Moses but that Pharaoh was wholely ignorant of Jehovah as to a bear knowledge few think and there may be some reasons given that Pharaoh must needs know him though he stubbornly and wilfully withstood him being thereunto seduced by the Magitians 3. This Pharaoh is considered as a type and head of all the great persecutors of Gods people as we may perceive from the prophets where Gods enemies are threatned under the names of Pharaoh and Egypt see Esa 30. Ezek. 31. the great man of sin is called Pharaoh and the place of his seat Egypt Revela 11.8 Sodom for all debauchery and prophanesse Egypt for oppression and persecution so that Pharaoh is to be understood as a head and leader of disobedience The 4th circumstance to be considered is the time when these words were spoken to him and that is plain if well considered it was after the sixth plague the plague of the botches and boyls which as some think were plague sores whereof many died and so this plague was the
taken out of the prophet Esay chap. 1. chap. 10. the Apostle in maintaining his grand doctrine of justification by faith alone doth in the Jews apprehensions introduce two nations which were hard for them to digest which was these 1. That by that his doctrine as well gentiles as Jews may become the people of God that is to say upon believing 2. From this his doctrine follows that far the greater number of the natural seed of Abraham the Jews who reject and abhor this doctrine of faith must necessarily be rejected and cast off by God from being his people Now the Apostle by concession doth allow both these nations to be truly and naturally deduced from the premises and therefore doth bring the Testimonies of their own prophets Hosea and Esaiah to confirm the same The first of these testimonies we have considered already we now proceed to the second testimony to confirm the Apostles notion that not all nor the greatest number of the seed of Abraham shall be saved but on the contrary a very small remnant according to the testimony of that royal Prophet Esaiah chap. 10.22,23 chap. 1.9 As to the first testimony we may divide the matter into two parts 1. The testimony it self 2. The amplification of it 1. The testimony it self is this that of the â—ast and innumerable body of the Jews that went into the Babilonish captivity though their numbers were as the sand on the sea yet but a small number should return out of it to re-enjoy their own land a remnant is taken for a very small part in comparison of the whole piece and we may take notice that this prophet Esaiah looked forwards also in this his prophesy even to gospel-days and 〈◊〉 their last estate is also taken in by him for the Apostle cites this place of Esaiah to sure with his present design and the Jews present case which appears plain enough by the manner of the Apostles expressing this return by the word saved a remnant shall be saved 2. The truth hereof appears from the Prophets amplification of this return Esa 10.21,22 they upon their return shall stay upon God in truth they shall return to the mighty God which return some learned interpreters expound of Conversion 2. We have the Apostles amplification of this testimony in four circumstances 1. The author the Apostle doth not deliver this from himself but he gives the Jews their own Prophets testimony if he had given this of himself he knew it would not so readily have been received by them but Esaiah was a Prophet against whom they could not object 2. In this amplification it is considerable the manner of the prophets delivering this testimony as our Apostle hath it here he cryeth shewing either his grief and sorrow for them or pathetical desire that his prophecy might be beeded and regarded by them and there seems to be an emphasis in the Apostles thus delivering himself as if he should say are you angry with me for implicitly whispering that but a few or small number of you Jews the natural seed of Abraham shall be saved when your own prophet Isaiah cryed it out and proclaimed it with a loud voice in the ears of your forefathers when time was 3. In this amplification we have the Apostles argument as to the number of the children of Israel they were as the sand on the sea therefore the matter the more to be lamented that so few should return 4. We have hinted in this 18. ver by the Apostle the way or means how those few or small number comes to be saved namely by a short word or as some reade short account which according to the best interpreters refers to the concise contracted word of the gospel which is a short word in comparison of the law but more to that â—non The second testimony which is in this 29. vers is taken from Esa 1.9 except the Lord of hosts 〈◊〉 left us a very small remnant we had been as Sodom and been made like Gomorrha this small remnant our Apostle here turns by the word seed in this testimony we have two parts First the position it self a seed or small number shall return or be left in the first or converted iâ— the last not all or a considerable number but a seed shall return as a few returned out of the captivity so a few shall be justified by faith in Christ chap. 11.6 a remnant according to faith or the choyce of grace a seed it is a metaphor taken from a husbandman who sells or spends the greatest part of his crop and but a small part is left for seed-corn to stock the ground in order to a new harvest this position is amplifyed two ways First from the author of this reservation stiled here Jehovah Saboath the Lord of hosts as he hath all creatures at his command in heaven and earth whereby he is able to save and destroy at his pleasure 2. We have here set forth the deplorable state and condition of Israel considered in themselves who had been totally destroyed if this Jehovah Saboath had not interposed their total destruction is set forth by the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrha but to come more close to the words as I obferved before upon the testimony of Hosea so here the Apostle doth not tâ—e himself to exactness of words but takes liberty to vary in some words from the letter of Esaiahs prophecy in this quotation we shall finde some verbal variations if we reade them together yet no material or substantial much less contradictious variations For explication I shall enquire into these three things 1. How doth this testimony of Esaiah accommodate the people in his present case how doth it ferve him at this time 2. What may we understand by Gods finishing and cutting short his work and making a short work in the earth 3. Why is God as to this present passage stiled by this double name of Jehovah Sabaoth To the first I answer all the service which the Apostle requires of this testimony at this time is to satisfy his antagonists the Jews that it need not seem strange or a new thing to them much less an impossibility or contrary to the promise of God to Abraham that their whole nation a very small number only excepted should be rejected and abandoned for their disobedience to the gospel seeing this had been again and again the state of their forefathers from whom they claim at prefent all their priviledges and that for their high provocations against God as is testified by their own prophets from whence it appears that God was not tied to them first or last according to the flesh but only to the righteous and faithful amongst them such as had the saith of Abraham who rejoyced in Christ the Apostles argument lyeth here if God at any one time cast off the fleshly seed of Abraham from his promises made to their fathers for their sin and disobedience then â—e might do
but know it is commendable and honourable for persons to compare what they reade and hear to the Scriptures as the Bereans did who hereupon rendred themselves more noble then those of Thessalonica Truth is so worthy a jewel that wise Solomon doth counsel us to buy it what ever it cost Pro. 23. he hath ty'd us to no price in the purchase of it and this truth now in controversie is of great concernment rightly to understand the terms of salvation it is a dangerous thing to be yoked with errour especially in a matter of such great importance about Gods decree with respect to mans eternal state it is an uncomfortable condition for persons to live in doubt and question of the reallity of Gods desire of their salvation in the offers and tenders of his grace and no opinion doth more naturally and rationally leade persons to spiritual slothfulnesse to live in a doubt hereof whether our labour will be successeful in the Lord I was lately reading a saying of a learned man respecting the Opinion that I am now opposing as to the tendency of it and these are his words in substance if not verbatim If the God of this world had a minde or opportunity to petition to the grandees or pillers in Religion met in councel that they would take some pitty on him and establish by law some few doctrins which he should nominate for the relief of his tottering kingdome this would be the first or chief he would nominate namely the doctrine of absolute personal and irrespective Election and Reprobation which doctrin is directly calculated for the flesh and old man for saith that Doctor in effect a man may be unjust unmerciful partial and full of dissimulation hating most men without cause and yet most like God himsef Thus speaketh that Author as to the import of this opinion But it will appear from the following Exposition that our Apostle had no affinity with such an Opinion of such Personal Election neither was such an opinion any ways properly conducing to the effecting his designe upon the unbelieving Jews who reckoned themselves the elect of God and none else in all the world but the whole world besides were cast off and therefore they forbid the Apostles to preach to the gentiles that they might be saved whereas the Apostles designe was to convince the Jews that Gods elect were such and such only who should believe in Jesus Christ as well gentiles as Jews there being no respect of persons with God The method which I shall proceed in is that which is usual in Treatises of this nature I first enquire into the various readings of the words 2. Consult the Original reading with them 3. Give the scope sence and meaning with an eye to the Context 4. Lay down those doctrinal conclusions that doth naturally flow from the words But I fear I shall hold the Reader too long in the Preface which to some may be unpleasant I shall therefore with a few instructions to the Reader break off and refer him to the book it self 1. I entreat the Reader that he would not judge of the matter of this book according to those many imperfections in the management of it but according to that truth shining in the scope of the whole you have here a brief compendium of the whole controversial part of the Chapter wherein you may as in a glasse see the face of the whole at once 2. Know this that there was a time when I was pathetically engaged in my judgement on the other hand till through reading and searching the Scriptures and reasoning with those differing from me in the matter the truth did forceably and convincingly shine into my understanding from whence I am instructed to wait not only with patience and with charity but hopes also as towards those who now yet do oppose this truth My own experience instructing me that a person may have a good conscience though ignorant of truth in many particulars but no man can have a good conscience who is debauched in morals 3. Labour to reade and weigh what is here offered without a prejudic't minde read to understand not to contradict 4. This I entreat that if thou findest some words phrases or sayings often repeated think it not strange for thou wilt finde it needful in order to beating out truth I will add no more but only desire thee to accept of this my service as ingeniously and candidly as it is honestly intended for this I can say I took not in hand this task because I love to see my self in print or because I fancy scribling but with a hearty and fervent desire of being instrumental to do some good which as it hath been so shall be the hearty prayer of Thy obliged Friend to serve the in the truth S. L. The CONTENTS Chap. 1. WHerein is contained what reall great and constant sorrow the holy Apostle had for the miserable estate of the Jews under their sin of blindness p. 11. Chap. 2. Asserting the great duty of Christians to mourn over the wofull estate of their unconverted relations and how much they ought to do or suffer towards the furtherance of their salvation p. 18. An explanation of S. Paul's wishing himself accursed from Christ p. 22. That Christians stand much engaged to mourn for their unconverted kindred according to the flesh and to take all possible means to convert them p. 26. A description of Jesus Christ as to his deity and dignity in it self p. 33. Chap. 3. Plainly demonstrating that the wise and holy God in choosing to salvation eternal and reprobating to damnation eternal hath a special eye to qualifications p. 35. That sometimes some passages of Gods providence do seem to crosse his promises p. 39. The true seed of Abraham in all ages are such as bears resemblance to Abraham in faith and love p. 41. That the true seed of Abraham are not nor were not at any time estimated or accounted as they were found in the external professions or practise of ordinances though of Gods own appointment but as they had the life and power of them in their hearts p. 45. That God in choosing and reprobating man hath a special eye to qualifications p. 52. Chap. 4. Wherein is evidently asserted by the truth of reason that the Apostles affirmation Jacob have I loved and Esau have I hated could not respect in the least nâ—…ther their pensons nor generations as to a final saving or damning their whole posterity p. 57. In excluding Esau God excludes works in choosing Jacob God declareth his choosing faith and free grace in the Gospel for salvation p. 68. Chap. 5. Plainly evidencing that the salvation of mankinde was the subject of Gods heart thoughts and purposes from the beginning p. 72. What we are to understand by the purpose of God and the time when they do commence p. 76. God is very stable in all his purposes and among all his purposes in none more stable then
scope of the whole it was to Solomon a sight of the true mother which would not have the Child divided an honest Expositor will take the scope whether it makes for or against him now if you shall so observe me and go along with me I dare to promise you ample satisfaction that there is no such Doctrine concluded in this context as Irrespective Election or Reprobation of persons I proceed it is granted on all hands even by those zealous on the other hand that the great designe that the Apostle carried on in this Epistle and Chapter is to assert and maintain justification and eternal salvation to come in by faith alone without the works of the law and that there is an absolute necessity of believing in Jesus Christ to prevent eternal perdition both by Jew and gentile this is positively determined Cha. 2.8.9 tribulation and wrath upon all that obey not the truth upon the Jew first and also upon the gentile there being no respect of persons with God the Jews must come in at the same door with the gentiles Now the Apostle being deeply sensible that his brethren the Jews lay under the danger of this great severity as they were Rejecters of Christ and the Gospel he is cordially concerned for them as appeareth by his solemn protestation and asseveration as to the sorrow of heart that he lay under for them vers 1. and that which he knew was as a stumbling-block in their way as to their believing in Jesus Christ was their dependance upon their carnal priviledges which they were invested with as they were Abrahams seed according to the flesh which priviledges the Apostle grants to be theirs and makes an enumeration of them verses 3 4 5. but that these priviledges were not of such a singular and saving nature as they thought he takes pains to satisfie them and moreover whereas they were ready to pleade that they were not only thus priviledged but further as they were Abrahams seed the Inheritance was theirs and so intailed upon them that they could not miscarry except a failing should be in Gods word of promise to which their supposed plea the Apostle replies ver 6. not as though the word of God had taken none effect and as to a further amplification the Apostle in the following verses takes pains to assert and maintain that they may miscarâ—y to all eternity and yet Gods promise stand firâ— and true to those to whom it was made which he doth pathetically demonstrate both negatively and affirmatively to be not Abrahams seed according to the flesh but according to faith in Christ the promises made to Abraham I will be thy God and the God of thy seed did not intend Abrahams seed according to the flesh but according to the faith in Christ which was eminently set forth in the miraculous birth of Isaac which is also confirmed in his Epistle to the Galatians in plain terms chap. 3. last if ye be Christs then are you Abrahams seed and heirs according to promise else not it must be supposed to which construction agreeth ver 7. ver 8. following neither because they are the seed of Abraham are they all Children but in Isaac shall thy seed be called or by faith shall thy seed be called as Isaac was a childe of faith this is further amplified ver 8 the children of the flesh are not the children of God but the children of the promise are accounted for the seed which vigorous and pathetical arguing of the Appstle doth clearly instruct us what was the false bottom that the Jews rested upon namely that they could not miscarry who descended of Ahrahams loins according to the flesh 2ly that God in his promise to Abraham did not intend his seed meerly according to the flesh he proceeds to demonstrate from matter of fact because some of Abrahams seed are by God east out and disinherited namely Ishmael who by appointment of God was excluded from inheriting with Isaac though begotten from Abrahams own body and whereas to this instance of Ishmael the Jews might be ready to say there might be some reason given for his rejection on fathers side mothers side and his own he was born before the covenant of circumcision his mother was a Bond-woman and Ishmael is taken mocking Isaac the Apostle proceeds to give a 2d without exception even to the instance of Esau the natural son of Isaac in whom the promises were especially lodged In Isaac shall thy seed be called this instance is without any or the least exception born in circumcision of his free-wife Rebecca and a twinn with Jacob born at the same time and yet in his race rejected the Edomites God fore-seeing they would be a wicked persecuting people predicts their servitude and bondage and exclusion from the land of Canaan to inherit the barren Mountains of Mount Seir which shews that it is not enough to be Abrahams seed if they be not of his saith and holy ness for some of Abrahams seed by his special son Isaac are rejected and hated for sin Mal. 1. Obed. 10. for his cruelty against his brother Jacob shame shall cover him so that the Apostles argument lyeth here if Esau in his posterity eminently descending from Abrahams loins through Isaac in whom the promise was lodged might be hated and his mountain destroyed then how can you Jews though the seed of Abraham in a remote sense claim from that foot of account especially considering that you have persecuted to death the son of God whom Abraham loved and rejoyced to see afar off seeing God is not obliged to any of the seed of Abraham but as they are found in Christ who was Abrahams right seed as is eminently exprest Gal. 3.16 he saith not to seeds but seed which seed is Christ and if the Jews should further pleade that beside there descent from Abrahams loins they are a people near to God in covenant by circumcision and the Ceremonial law and thereby distinguished from all the nations of the world to be Gods people the Apostle follows them in that also ver 11. that the purpose of God according to election should stand not of works that is not of works of that kinde which was eminently typed out in the excluding Ishmael out of Abrahams family and from the Inheritance for in so doing God did also exclude the works of the law from justification as we may see plainly Gal. 4.22,23,24 for Isaac and Ishmael were two lively types of the two Covenants and that from Sinai is rejected as to Justification so that neither from their pedigree nor their legall obedience could they have any special acceptance with God for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified and thus it is not of works ver 11. Now hereupon the Jews proceeds to raise a 2d and new Objection formed thus what doth not God Justifie according to works Paul then by this doctrine of thine thou seemest to contradict that declared righteous Rule
separation is not limited Fourthly Such a state was worse then the state of the Jews themselves they are not abdâ—cated eternally from God so that we cannot rationallâ— think that Paul should wish himself accursed as tâ— his in word state and spiritual condition therefore something else must be enquired after 2. Others understand the Apostles anathama to be only excluded the society and assemblyes 〈◊〉 the saints to be excommunicated the Gospel Church because sometimes and generally that iâ— rendred by the name of anathama as if the Apostle should have said I could wish my self excommâ—nicated from the Gospel Church for their sakes not only to be deprived of the honour of an Apostle but of membership in the Church Obj. But some may say our text saith separate from Christ I answer the Church is called Christ 1 Corinth 12.12 So likewise is Christ that is the body of Christ and our last expositors do so render it and understand it that the Church is called Christ so Doctor Hammond Paul did prize at a very high rate the Communion and fellowship of Saints yet for the Jews sakes he could have been content to have been excluded that sweet and happy estate But 3dly Others understand and they are the most and best approved interpreters that the Apostle doth wish not only a privation of good and all his high priviledges but a dreadful infliction of much sufferings and corporal punishments which amongst the Jews did follow their anathama they were delivered up to Sathan they were exposed to open shame and ignominy and detestation they were anathamized were disdain'd of all abhorr'd of all so that according to that interpretation this was the sence of the Apostles words I could wish my self the veryest abject and object of shame and spite let me be as thus exposed to the worst of ruines yea the most cursed death it self this interpretation seems to agree most currantly with the Scriptures not that this anathama must intend the vengance of eternal fire but present rejection with detestation so must we understand that word Gal. 1.8.9 If I or an An gel from heaven preach any other Gospels let him be anathama twice exprest that is let him be rejected as an accursed thing let him be detested and abominated and withstood to the highest and thus it must be understood Gal. 3.13 Christ was made a curse for us which being made a curse takes in all Christs sufferings and humiliation from the begining to the end all his contempt and shame and spirting on and crucifixion all his abhorrency of man Esa 49. and this an athama the ultimate of it was death and this understanding doth in some measure answer to Moses his wish Exo. 32.32 Blot me out of thy book or as Ainsworth reads it let me dye for so the book of life is understood sometimes Psal 69. let me saith Moses bear thy displeasure that thou hast against they people and whereas now I am highly in thy favour I am willing to bear thy displeasure and death from that thy displeasure rather then Israel should be cut off So here thâ—… much the Apostles words amounts unto that where as now he was set by and esteemed of his friends and all the faithful Churches of Christ throughout the world yet he could be content for his brethrens sakes to be looked upon as a person not only at the greatest distance from his brethren but from Christ himself and to be judged worthy of the worst of deaths for his brethrens sakes thus as in a glasse you see the most worthy and excellent spirit of the Apostle Paul who before his conversion was a cruel and bloody persecutor yet now why like Paul who so like Christ in his spirit as he this deep sorrow in him was the fruit and effect of his tender love to them Paul is willing to hazaâ— much for the soul-good of many such a spirit 〈◊〉 manifested in his Ministry he was willing to spend and be spent for poor souls 2 Corinth 1.12 The soul-good of many should be a strong engagement upon our hearts to expose our selves to loss and sufferings this was an engagement upon Christ many were concerned the world were concerned this may be of great use to be considered by those intrusted with the work of the minisity especially consider this example of Paul to beget a spirit for publique good if many are concerned as to their inward state venture far We now proceed to the second head which contains a description of the people and persons over whom the Apostle Paul thus cordially mourns and sorrows they are described by a double character 1. The relation they stood unto Paul they were his brethren and kinsmen according to the flesh 2. They for whom Paul thus mourned are a people greatly dignifyed and distinguisht with very high priviledges above all people in the world besides which priviledges and immunities the Apostle doth enumerate verses 4. and 5. under nine heads 1. They were Israelites 2. They had the Adoption 3. The glory 4. The Covenants 5. The giving of the law 6. The service of God 7. The promises 8. Theirs were the fathers 9. Christ came of that line A short word by way of explication to each of these 1. That which heightened the Apostles sorrow for these people was the near relation they stood to him they were his brethren his kinsmen according to the flesh brethren is a word of general signification and applicable to all men without exceptions yet here it is restrained he doth not only call them brethren as they were from Adam but as they sprung from the loyns of Abraham Isaac and Jacob and he adds here according to the flesh because notwithstanding they were the seed of Abraham yet they wanted the spirituall character the faith of Abraham yet Paul owns them as his brethren as he and they were of the natural seed of Abraham the Apostle doth fully own the brotherhood upon this account are they the seed of Abraham and more particularly Phil. â— of the stock of Israel of the tribe of Benjamin or hebrew of the hebrews S. Paul had a dear love for the people as they descended from the same Jacob and Israel according to the flesh though as yet enemies to the faith of Abraham who foresaw Christ day and rejoyced in it Note this Doctrine by the way Doct. That Christians stand engaged much to mourn for their unconverted kindred according to the flesh and to take all possible means to convert them Though it be a duty for Christians to do good to all in this respect yet more especially for kindreâ— and relations to do much and suffer much for the salvation of our kindred it is observed by the learned that Christ as to his Ministry began at Nazareth whereas he had been brought up to instruct them see Luke 4. and doubtless if outward suplieâ— are to begin there much more spirituals he is worse then an Infidel that provides not for
and salvation by the deeds of the law in opposition to Christ and the Gospel they being as they presumed the seed of those to whom the promises were by God at first made and hereupon their confidence was raised very high of their safe estate Now to such a people doth the Apostle here addresse himself And his great designe as we may clearly see is to assert Justification and salvation to come in only and alone by faith in Jesus Christ without the deeds of the law Now the course and Method which the Apostle proceeds in is this First to weaken and dissolve their grand objections and take off those absurdities which seemed to the Jews to follow upon the Apostles Doctrine of Justification by faith alone Those two Objections which he knew lay in their mindes were these 1. If the circumcised Jews be not Justified and saved unto whose fathers God had made such a plain promise and renewed from day to day and from time to time then it renders God not so good as his word then his word is of none effect But it is absurd to imagine Gods word to be fallible his promises are yea and amen therefore the circumsised Israel must be Justifyed and saved though they do reject Jesus Christ and the Gospel this is the sum of the first Argument and Objection The 2d Objection is this If God justifyeth the heathen the nations sinners of the Gentiles that are strangers to God and that without works of legal righteousnesse and reject us who are comparatively a righteous people walking in his ways living in his Ordinances and worshiping him then doth the ways and proceedings of God savour of unrighteousnesse and seems to bear a resemblance of justifying the unrighteous and condemning the righteous which as Abraham said of old is very far from God therefore it must needs be the seed of Abraham that are the subjects of justification and acceptance with God Now that this must needs be the substance will appear from those answers which the Apostle shapes out to them in the following verses and the taking off the first of these Objections takes him up the 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13. verses and the taking off the second Objection takes him up the greatest part of the chapt from the 14. ver forwards As to the first of these Objections the Apostles concess with them that Gods word cannot fayl his promises are yea and amen vers 6. not as though the word of God had taken none effect Gods word and promises are certain and true and yet you may be rejected which to demonstrate he proceeds to distinguish of the seed of Abraham and to shew that God in his special promise to Abraham did not intend the natural and fleshly seed of Abraham but such as shall be of the faith of Abraham this the Apostle speaks largely unto ver 6 to the 9. and to back and confirm this position that God did not intend Abrahams seed according to the flesh the Apostle doth descend to some instances of some persons within the compasse of their grant who though they were the seed of Abraham yet were not heirs of the promise the first Instance is of Ishmael who though a child of Abraham yet was by Gods appointment cast out of the family and disinherited from a share with Isaac and whereas they might readily pleade he was cast out partly because he was the son of the bondwoman and partly for misdemenour because he was seen mocking Isaac the Apostle proceeds to give an instance without exceptions which is Esau who was the immediate Off-spring of Isaac in whom the promise did more especially center yet he is hated and comparatively ruinated which things we have treated on to ver 13. all which tends to strengthen the Apostles distinction that Abrabams seed was not intended the natural or fleshly seed but the seed according to saith to which the Apostle to the Galathians chap. 3.29 doth fully speak if ye be Christs then are you Abrahams seed and heirs according to promise So that if Esau be not an heir it is because he is not Christs by faith and obedience so that that seed of Abraham who are the elect seed are such as own and believe in Christ therefore if the Jews though the natural seed of Abraham do reject Jesus Christ Gods word of promise stands good and stedfast although the unbelieving Jews are rejected But I shall speak more particularly to each verse and begin at the 6 verse And the Method which I shall follow in the prosecution of this work is this 1. To shew the designe drift and scope of the text and context 2. To open those words that may seem difficult and want explaining 3. Reduce the whole into such doctrinal conclusions as may be most proper and profitable and all this with as much concisenesse as the matter will admit I shall at once cast my eye upon 3. or 4. verses as to their main scope and tendency As 1st I shall take notice of those verses in which the Apostles work is to manage his distinction of Abrahams seed ver 6. 7. 8. 9. I begin with ver the 6. in which the Apostles designe is to assert the stedfastnesse of Gods word of promise made to Abraham notwithstanding his rejecting the carnal unbelieving Jew as not the right seed Therefore the Apostle in the 1st place doth disclaim the least whisperous secret imagination of minde that Gods word or promise should be liable to fail These words are read three ways 1st It cannot be that the word of God hath failed Others reade it is not possible that the word of God should miscarry Others reade but not that the word of God is frustrated there is no material difference in these readings they all amount to thus much to attest the stedfastnesse and certainty of Gods promises to those to whom they are made By word we are generally to understand the word of promise see Psal 106.24 and 119.38 I shall only note two points by the way and so passe First Doctrine That sometimes some passages of Gods providences doth seem to crosse his promises This passage seems to give occasion to question whether the word of God had not failed and thus it seemed in that passage of Abrahams offering up of Isaac as also in Gods carrying Israel into Egypt so also in the death of Jesus Christ John 12.34 that Christ should abide for ever seemed to be the promise so in this passage before us it seem'd as if God had cast off his people Rom. 11.1 the Phrases and sayings of Scripture seems to be contradictory many times that such as are inconsiderate men may be in danger to wrest them to their own destruction 2 Peter 3.16 But Secondly That however circumstances may appear to us it is safe to conclude that Gods word and promise rightly understood are certain and unfailable And that Opinion or saying whatsoever which carries in it a question of
the truth of Gods promises is in it self false and unsound we see here what pains the apostle takes to deliver himself from the least imputation of his interfering with Gods promises in what he had been asserting in the former two verses as to the priviledges and promises to this people the Apostle would have God true though all men are lyers see what he saith Rom. 4.16 the promises are sure to all the seed 2 Corinth 1.20 all the promises are in Christ yea and amen for he is a God that cannot lye Titus 1. Gods Counsels are by the same Apostle said to be immutable Now the Apostle in vindication of the stedfastness and immutability of Gods promises to Abraham takes it for granted that Abraham had two sorts of seed a seed according to the flesh and a seed according to promise but the seed according to the flesh was not the seed to whom the promise was made at first for saith he all are not Israel which are of Israel but how is this to be understood did he not say before they were Israel it 's without exception I answer so he doth also here own them to be of Israel but they were not Israel themselves they had not Abrahams nor Jacobs spirit as Christ told the Jews John the 8th though he grant them to be Abrahams seed yet they had not the spirit of Abraham inasmuch as they sought to kill him and so manifest themselves to be of their father the devil though of Abrahams seed so these are not Israel because they rejected Gods way by Christ I shall note one point by the way and pass Doct. That true heirship to Gods singular promises comes in by a supernatural way by a spiritual birth and not by common generation Persons were never in no age born heirs of singular and speciall glory it is not an Israelite but an Israelite indeed that is worthy of special noting by Christ John 1. saith Christ of Nathanael behold an Israelite indeed in whom is no guile therefore let none expect heirship or acceptance from God from carnal or birth-priviledges of most godly parents and this is farther ratified vers the 7th neither because they are the seed of Abraham are they all children that is Children of God they are not Doct. from the 7th vers The true seed of Abraham in all ages are such as bears resemblance to Abraham in faith and love It is frequent in Scripture to reckon persons the Children of those whom they resemble in good or evill some of these Israelites are the Children of the Ammonites and the Hittites Ezek. 16. some of them Children of the Adulterer and the whore Esa 57.30 yet Abrahams seed in a large fence nay some of these very Jews Iohn 8.44 are the children of the Devil and why but because they resembled the Devil in their lying and murthering so the women 1 Peter 3.6 are children of Sarah who carry it as she did Gal. 3.29 if ye be Christs then are you Abrahams seed but these did not imitate Abraham But he adds in Isaac shall thy seed be called I shall speak but a very few words to this clause in this place because I shall have a more proper occasion afterwards The occasion of these words was this Sarah taking notice that Ishmael Abrahams son by Hâ—gar the Bondwoman proved a scoffer and mocked Isaac her own son she made it her request to Abraham to turn him and his mother out of doors but Abraham at present seeming somewhat slow and unwilling to answer his wifes desire herein at last God commands the same thing of Abraham which before his wife desired of him and that this act might not be too grievous to him of casting out his son God gives him this word of encouragement and satisfaction in Isaac shall thy seed be called Gen. 21.12 he shall be thy son and heir and Ishmael shall have no share with him So that God who doth not use to contradict himself in his promise to Abraham and his seed doth not intend Ishmael though a child of Abrahams body Vers 8. That is they which are the children of the flesh are not the children of God but the children of the promise are counted for the seed In which words we have contained a more clear interpretation and explication of those passages ver 6. and 7. spoken by God and the Apostle that all are not Israel that are of Israel nor all children because they are the seed of Abraham but in Isaac shall thy seed be called This verse hath the note of interpretation upon it in these words that is or as some reade that is to say and this kinde of speaking is used by way of interpretation elsewhere also Rom. 7.18 in me that is in my fleshâ—… so chaps 10.6.7 that is now this explication contains in it a negative and an affirmative which kinde of Dialect in Scripture is the most certain and obliging kinde of speaking that can be First we have it negatively the children of the flesh are not the children of God 2dly Affirmatively but the children of the promise are counted for the seed that which will be necessary in order to the prosecuting this subject will be 1. To explain who may be understood by the children of the flesh 2. Who may be understood by the children of the promise First Who are the children of the flesh I answer Children of the flesh must be taken in the largest fence that so it may be the more teaching to us children of the flesh may bear a threefold acceptation First Such as have only a natural birth as the off-spring of Adam thus must John be understood Ioh. 3.6 that which is born of the flesh is flesh and that Christ had such a birth as this is plain Rom. 1.3 he was born of the seed of David according to the flesh that is as man So ver 5. of whom according to the flesh Christ came that is was born Now the greatest number of men and women in the world have this birth only and so are children of the flesh In this sense Ishmael is said to be born after the flesh that is to say in a common way of generation as the rest of the sons oâ— Adam as Abrahâ—m strong and Hagar in a natural capacity to bring forth Secondly Children of the flesh in Scripture are taken for such as give themselves up to the guidance of the fleshly minde and affections to follow the dictates of the natural man the old man these are said to walk after the flesh and be in the flesh this our Apostle speaks fully unto Rom. 8. from ver the 1. to the 13. and such a person so walking may be called a child of the flesh let his profession be what it will and in this sence the spirit is said to war against the flesh Gal. 5. that is the fleshly minde and this was the minde that S. Paul war'd against 2 Corinth 10. Thirdly and chiefly children
alligorically that is as it is interpreted by our Apostle Gal. 4.24 that is when by one thing another different thing is meant so we have Isaac and Ishmael an allegory of the two covenants the legal from Mount Sinai and the other that which is by Christ and as those two sons of Abraham were allegorical so these two sons of Isaac must be also if we understand the Apostle in the present text giving a new instance to the same end and import with the former now as God in ordering Ishmael and his mother to be cast out did therein figure out the rejecting of the law of works as to justification so did he corroborate and strengthen that signification in this second instance of Esau which appears plain in our text where he saith not of works but of the caller so that the covenant of works is rejected in casting out Ishmael and hating Esau so that it is plain that God will have none accepted or received for the legitimate seed of Abraham nor Isaac that seeks to be justified by works this way is reprobated and thus found in it and that this point is that which the Apostle would prove to this people see Rom. 3. for by the deeds of the law shall no flesh be justified in his sight so vers 28. the promise to Abraham that he should be heir of the world was not through the law but through faith Rom. 4.13 we are all the children of God by faih in Christ Jesus So that this is a great truth that reprobation and election is of works and faith 2. That Esau was only a type and representation of all wicked men in all ages but also of the law of works The next thing that I am to speak unto is the parentage of these subjects Jacob and Esau their father was Isaac their mother was Rebecca both godly praying holy persons we may gather that Isaac was near 20 years praying to God that he might have children and so much the more earnestly because the speciall promise of God was lodged in him in Isaac shall thy seed be calledâ— saith God to Abraham and when Isaac saw that this promise stuck in the birth and did not come forward he set himself in good earnest to seek God the text saith he entreated the Lord which word signifieth earnest importuning prayer and the text also saith Gen 25.22 the Lord was entreated so that to those parents these children were the answer of earnest prayer these were children of one father and mother and twins yet see what a great difference there was in their natures before and after their birth Jacob was a plain man Esau took like Nimrod of whom it is said Gen. 10.9 that he was a mighty hunter before the Lord or as some reade of the Lord that is to say a great persecutor to which also Esau in his posterity answered Esau was the head of the Edomites and as these differed much in their nature and civil state so also in their moral state Esau is stiled a prophane person one that slighted spirituall things as they were contained in his birth-right I am at the point to dye and what good will this birth-right do to me We may note by the way that very godly persons may have a great difference in their children and very bad children in answer of prayer this was the case with Isaac and Rebecca let not godly parents think strange of this it was so here but have a care you do not impute their badness to be the effect of an absolute decree of God as some are ready to do and such an opinion is the direct way to discourage parents from taking pains with their children 2. Have a care of setting your love to much upon your children the child that Isaac loved best proved worst it is recorded Gen. 25. that Isaac loved Esau it was observed by a godly man having occasion to speak of Barabbas a wicked man that he carried a significant name Bar-abbas the son of the father that it was to be feared that his father too much loved him which was one means to spoyl him what a cross and vexation was Esau to his father and mother in his marriage Gen. 26. but I pass this briefly CHAP. V. Plainly evidencing that the salvation of mankinde was the subject of Gods heart thoughts and purposes from the beginning WE now proceed to the predicate the oracle it self spoken of these children which was the elder shall serve the younger which words were the words of God himself spoken to Rebecca in answer of prayer Rebecca in much perplexity of minde about the strange strugling in her womb inquires of God who gives her this answer as a prophetical prediction of their future condition in their posteritys which God foresaw was like to be not as if this foresight did necessitate its coming to pass no Austin long since layd down a Maxim in this case which is this that Gods foresight of things coming to pass doth not necessitate their coming to pass it must be granted in this as well as in the other cases that those things which God foresees will come to pass doth admit of a condition in the case as it is plain 1 Sam. 23. which is a remarkable place to that purpose where David in his flight before Saul was in Keilah and afraid Saul would surprise him there he goes to God to enquire 1. Whether Saul would indeed come to that place 2. Whether the men of the place would deliver him up to both which God gives a positive answer in the affirmative 1. Saul will come 2. The men of the place will deliver him up yet neither the one nor the other came to pass for when David understood that Saul would come he hasted and got away so also in Ninivehs case 40 days saith the prophet and it shall be destroyed yet it was not so though God foresaw the servitude of Esaus posterity for it was not fulfilled in person as I have said yet this is executed upon just grounds of desert Obadiah 10. Psalm 137. if the question should be demanded when this oracle takes place I have answered already we finde the first fruits of this servitude in Davids time as we reade 2 Sam. 8.14 1 Cronicles 18. when David put garisons into Edom and made them tributaries to him but it shall be more fully accomplished in the time to come see Isaac's blessing to Jacob by faith as it is recorded of him Heb. 11. by faith Isaac blessed Jacob as to things to come and see what it is Gen. 27.29 let people serve thee and nations bow down to thee and be Lord over thy brethren this is spoken of Jacobs posterity not Jocob in person this Balaam also by a prophetical spirit foresaw Numb 24. out of Jacob shall come him that shall have the dominion that is his seed the righteous shall have Dominion in the morning Psal 29.14 so that this oracle spoken to Rebecca
turned to Idolatry when these words were spoken God did neither for works foredone nor foreseen of that kinde respect or disrespect for in this both Jew and Gentile are laid levell the Jew is no better nor the Gentile no worse upon this account neither circumcision nor uncircumcision availeth this allegation of the Apostle in this place as to the time of this Oracle doth designe the humbling and silencing the Jew who entertained two false Opinions of their state 1. That God designed the whole posterity of Abbraham for the seed 2. That they above all other people and natioâ—… of the world did deserve this signal favour 〈◊〉 their works of legal righteousnesse Now the â—…ter of these their conceits doth the Apostle strike at in these words for in effect saith he God did not choose Jacob nor Abraham into this favour to be the head of the faithful upon the account of their works of this kinde therefore Abraham is pronounced justified before he is circumcised Rom. 4.13 the promise to Abraham that he should be heir of the world was not made through the law 〈◊〉 through the righteousnesse of faith The Second Rule I offer is this that what is iâ— this Oracle to Rebecca must not be understood to determine the final and eternal state of them 〈◊〉 men as I have shewn you before It is true God hath sometimes as to some taken liberty of disposing of mens temporal estates and conditions without any respect to their righteousnesse or unrighteousnesse to dispose to a person lesse godly riches and rule whilest a person more godly is subjected to servitude and poverty sometimes persons equal in godlinesse have very unequal poâ—tions in the world for as Solomon saith Ecclesâ—… there is neither love nor hatred seen in these things that is no distinguishing or eternal love seen in them God I say doth sometimes take this liberty to dispence of outward things without respect to good or bad works but God doth not promise or give life and glory so promiscuously without any respect to terms of obedience before your children aaâ— born or have done good 〈◊〉 evil it may be said one shall be rich the other poor or may be a servant to the other as many times it is and there is some appearance of love in these things whilst God gives Jacobs posterity the land of Canaan a land flowing with milk and honey and giveth to the posterity of Esau the barren scraggy mountains places of mount Seir but this is not an infallible character of their goodnesse or badnesse as to works yet it must needs be granted that there was more manifestation of love and hatred in these things under the law then under the gospel and sometimes the posterity of Jacob were hated as well as Esau Ier. 12.8 Esa 60.15 so that by love and hatred we are not bound to understand it here of their final and eternal state but thus that God without any respect to works of legal obedience gave Iacob in his posterity rulâ— and without any respect to Esau's idolatry servitude and what is this to their eternal state after death but God when he dispenceth life and death eternal renders a reason and we finde conditions propounded as to life and death Now we proceed to the Fourth Circumstance to be handled which is the ground and reason rendred by the Apostle why God chooseth such a time to speak to Rebecca before the children or nations were born or before they had done good or evil which we have in these words that the purpose of God according to election might stand or abide not by works but by the caller I have already spoke to these terms by way of explication as the word purpose election and works so that the Apostle doth understand that the ground of this saying to Rebecca and at such a time was to declare to the world that he would exclude works in point of justification not of works and bring in faith The Apostle to the end he might assert this great trâ—… to the greatest advantage lays it down both negatively and affirmatively not of works but of the caller I designe much brevity in the following part of this paragraph therefore I shall sum 〈◊〉 what remains to be spoken to this verse into six Doctrinal Conclusions First Doctrine That many of Gods sayings of old besides their literal sence and proper signification had a further respect even to things to come What God said to Abraham about his excluding Ishmael from his Family and heirship besides the reality of it to him had a further signification it was allegorical as the Apostle saith Gal. 4.24 these two sons of Abraham type out the two Covenants Law and Gospel the rejection of Esau held forth the same the truth of this Doctrine I may prove from a hundred places of Scripture if need were when God appointed Noah to make an ark for the saving himself and his house there was more in it 1 Peter 3. when God appointed his people that they should not mussle the mouth of the oxe that treadeth out the corn besides the literall sence he had an eye to Gospel ministers maintenance See for that 1 Cor. 9.9.10 it was saith he spoken for our sakes all these passages of Gods providences to Israel are also teaching to us Gods depriving of Esauâ— posterity of the land of Câ—naan was significant of Gods depriving his elder people of the antitype thereof because they sought it not by faith but as it were by the works of the law learn from hence thus much 1. Admire the depth and riches of the Scriptures of the old testament 2. Be cautioned however of turning Scriptures into allegories contrary to the scope and current of them Second Doctrine is this That the repetition and second relation of the same things by God though under different instances and figures doth greatly demonstrate the certainty of those things We have two instances in this context to the same end as I have largely proved before and both brought to demonsttate the same thing in the antitype to shew the stability of Gods purpose of election whom or what kinde of persons he would purpose to choose the two differing dreams of Pharoah of the cattel and corn did teach the certainty of the seven years of famine and scarcity Gen. 41.32 Third Doctrine That the salvation of mankinde was the subjects of Gods heart thoughts and purposes from the beginning Gods thoughts and purposes was to provide a way to make men happy from the beginning even before the foundation of the world therefore the Apostle speaks of Gods eternal purpose Eph. 3.11 2 Timothy 1.9 which purpose of his was his designe contrivance and determination for the saving of lost man God had strong thoughts of heart this way as appears by his early promise and timely sending Jesus Christ to that end that men might be redeemed This consideration may work admiration in uâ— and in the hearts of the
sons of men that God who is so high should remember us it is more for God to remember us then to do for us to bear us upon his heart in his purposes and designes this is an unspeakable high favour See how the psalmist takes notice of it Psal 136.23 who remembred us in our low estate or as it may be read thought upon us Psal 40.17 but I am poor and needy yet the Lord thinketh upon me and vers 5th how wonderful are thy thoughts to uswards they cannot be reckoned up in order before thee or as Ainsworth thy thoughts purposes and good meanings none can count or as the chaldes it is not possible to order thâ— praise Fourth Doctrine God is very stable in all his purâ—…ses and amongst all his purposes in none more stable then that purpose respecting the way and terms of mens salvation Gods election and reprobation lyeth upon most certain and unalterable terms they are as certain as God himself therefore it is here said to stand remain abide that is to say God hath infallibly determined that justification and savation shall come in by faith in Christ and no other way Act. 4. there is no name under heaven whereby men may bâ— saved but by Christ this 4th Doctrine I shall but touch because they are more remote and be more large upon the two last Fifth Doctrine That God hath absolutely purposed and determined and is resolved that justification and salvation shall not be by works Gods purpose of election is not according to works As to this Doctrine I shall take liberty to speak a few words 1. More particularly to distinguish of works 2. Shew you how the Scriptures doth concur with this truth 3. Reconcile those Scriptures that seem to contradict this truth 4. Give you some reasons why works cannot justify 5. Shew you what this may teach us and I will be very brief in each of these 1. As to works we must understand them according as this our Apostle declares in the scope of this Epistle with that of the Galathians which works are frequently referred to circumcision and legal obedience as in oppofition to faith thus it is understood Romans 4.1 sometimes works in opposition to grace chap. 11.6 2. That other Scriptures doth concur herewith that works doth not justifie in whole or in part see Rom. 3. we conclude a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law Gal. 2.16 not of works Eph. 2. not of works lest any man should boast Titus 3.5 not of works of righteousness that we have done Thus Scriptures do willingly offer their testimony to the truth in our text that the purpose of Gods election might stand not of works But 3dly doth not some Scriptures seem to speak otherways as Rom. 2.13 not the hearers of the law are just but the doers of the law are justified and see how S. James argueth chap. 2. was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac doth not these Scriptures seem to cross this Doctrine In order to reconciling which Scriptures I answer There are two circumstances in works let them be of what sort they will if present that will reâ—der all works unacceptable and unserviceable 1. When they are meerly external without heart and soul 2. When performed with a conceit of merit 1. When there is only the external part see Rom. 2.28 he is not a Jew that is one outwardly thâ— same may be said of all works whatsoever 2ly When our services to Godward are lookt upon as meritorious and so we take justification and salvation as a compensation or sutable reward for our work now this destroys grace for if we work for wages there is no place for grace but 2. In order to reconciling these Scriptures I answer that works are never rejected of God when mixed with faith as Abrahams was in offering his son Heb. 11. works are then in their right place when they are subservient to demonstrate the truth and life of our faith James 2. as one saith though works do not justifie yet works doth demonstrate that we are justified why cannot works justifie simply considered 1. From the imperfections attending the best works 2. They are no more then what we owe to out soveraign Lord and when we have done all we have done no more then our dury is to do 3. Because God is not profited we are as to him unprofitable servants Luke 17. so that God may well purpose that salvation shall not come in this way but have a care that from what hath been said you do not conclude the Christian life an idle life a life without works no your works aâ—e not the fewer nor weaker because you work from life receiv'd no know this that the highest believer is the most industrious person witness Abraham and S. Paul a man very laborious in his place the work of a Christian is compared to labouring striving running fighting violence in storming and those that will do no good works because they shall not merit by them discover a rotten heart 2. Learn from this Doctrine that personal election is not the subject of our text but only rejection and non-election of works we have only Gods firm resolution and purpose not to elect by works as the Jews supposed he would The 6th Doctrine drawn from the affirmative part of this condition but of him that calleth or of God that inviteth or freely calleth Sixth Doctrine That justification and salvation are the effects of unmerited and undeserved grace Gods purpose to elect is this way no way to be justified and saved but by grace that which is here rendred him that calleth is elsewhere rendred in the room of it faith and grace not of works but of faith not of works but of grace here not of works but of the caller so that put all together it amounts to thus much that the salvation of man must 〈◊〉 had in a way of grace Rom. 116. God is so conversant in that gracious work of inviting and calling persons to repentance and salvation that we see he is said to be him that calleth by way of eminency he is so stiled Gal. 5.8 hiâ— that calleth 1 Thes 5. he that calleth and if we consider Esaiah 55. we may well allow him the title of him that calleth This may teach Christians to be greatly humbleâ— Is thy Justification of grace notwithstanding all gospel-works that are incumbent upon thee it informs us that all our duties are very inconsiderable to plead with God But I shall only note these two things and 〈◊〉 passe which are these and respect the premises 1. That God takes liberty to destinate and dispose of persons as to their outward estates and conditions in the world according to the counsel of his own will many times without any respect to their works some are made superiour some inferiour some rich some poor 2. This passage of such Gods dealings in proâ—…dence as to Jacob and Esau about
3. The attribute of his righteousness is magnified in his dealings with Pharaoh that he will not always clear the guilty God shews his justice righteousness holyness in this eminent passage of Pharaoh as we have it in that song made upon that account Exo. 15.11 this is imputed to God amongst the rest to be glorious in holyness Thus I have briefly past over the 17th verse by way of explication I shall proceed to the explication of the 18th verse also and then draw up those doctrines that ariseth from both CHAP. X. Plainly explaining how and in what fence God may be said to harden mens hearts in like manner how God is said to shew mercy Ver. 18. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy and whom he will he hardeneth THe Apostle having in answer to the Jews second objection been vindicating Gods rigteousness in justifying the heathen by faith and hardening and rejecting the circumcision for unbelief and disobedience to the Gospel which answer in the two branches of it he had been prosecuting of by the help of two antient sayings of God one to Moses Exo. 33.19 the other to Pharaoh chap. 9.16 he now in the verse before us proceeds to draw up the whole of both into a doctrinal result and conclusion in these words so then or therefore he hath mercy on whom he will have mercy and whom be will be hardneth that is to say it clearly appears from the premises that God is at liberty and hath unquestionable right to make his own terms upon which he will shew mercy or upon what terms he will reject at our first view of these words our Apostle seems to represent God in his proceedings with his creatures as an absolute monarch who proceeds and rules by an arbitrary power his own will being his law and so tyed to no law nor conditions and thus also Daniel represents God Dan. 4.35 he doth whatever he will in heaven and earth and that this is the power of an absolute Monarch appears from what is declared of that great heathen Monarch Dan. 5.19 whom he would he slew and whom he would he kept alive whom he would he set up and whom he would he pulled down and this is the character of that great king and Monarch the man of sin of whom we reade Dan. 11. three times over exprest vers 3. 16. and 36. he shall do according to his will thus and much more is God represented to do according to his will to shew mercy to whom he will and harden whom he will from whence some gather personal peremptory and absolute election and reprobation from his own will without any law or condition with respect to the creature but although the Apostle doth thus seem to represent God as proceeding in mercy and judgment with his creatures as an absolute Monarch yet I shall show you wherein there is an apparent difference between such an arbitrary proceeding and the proceedings of God though according to his will in five circumstances 1. God in his proceedings with men cannot will or act any thing but what in it self is righteous just and equal whereas it is very incident to men in such a capacity to err whilst they rule according to their will and therefore it hath been the endeavour of all nations to bound the wills of their Governours by laws and conditions men themselves being judges cannot impeach Gods will with any injustice or unequallity God appeals to men Ezek. 18. whether his ways were not just and equal it was Abrahams maxim that the judge of all the earth will do right to say that whatever God willeth or acteth is just is a great truth and worthy of our faith and greatly tends to Gods glory but to say of things unequal in themselves yet done or acted by God are just is a great dishonour to him Gods will cannot be swayed to injustice 2. Gods will differs from mens will because it admits of councel Ephe. 1.11 he doth all things according to the counsel of his own will 3. Gods ruling by his will differs from mens ruling by their wills for men in that capacity are understood to rule by their wills without a law but Gods will is formed into a law both as to his mercy and as to his justice therefore we finde little or no difference between Gods will Gods law they are taken one for another in Scripture to do Gods word and to do Gods will is the same thing therefore the 19th verse of this chapter by some is read instead of who hath resisted his will who hath resisted his word 4. Men commonly ruling by their will do conceal their will till the time of execution of it but Gods will is declared before-hand both to warn on the one hand and encourage on the other 5. Persons ruling according to their wills amongst men are not stedfast they may will one thing to day and another to morrow those who are the subjects of their favour or wrath are not always the same but Gods will is the same to day to morrow and for ever the subjects of Gods favour and wrath are the same yesterday to day and forever his will is that whosoever seeth the son and believeth in him should have eternal life and this is the same still and his will is that he that rejects the son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him and thus considered God may be said to shew mercy to whom he will yet shew mercy to none but such as believe in Jesus Christ and he may be said to harden whom he will and yet to harden none but those who first harden themselves for after the same manner doth the Apostle speak of the spirits distributions he divides to every man severally as he will yet upon conditions of coveting and seeking of it But before I proceed there is a question which I would speak a few words unto in order to clearing our passage that is why the Apostle rather choseth to declare God shewing mercy to whom he will and hardning whom he will then to declare Gods shewing mercy to believers and hardning impenitent sinners and rejecters of the gospel I answer he speaks after this manner to silence the proud atrogant Jews who would impose upon God and teach him whom or what sort of people he should accept into his favour and whom he should reject these Jews had a tincture of proud Pharaohs spirit who thought there was none above him therefore to humble them the Apostle doth assert Gods absolute supremacy and superintendency over man he doth what he will this was the occasion of this kinde of speaking at the first Exo. 33.19 to silence Moses who seems to be so pertinatiously pleading with God for Israel above all the nations of the world besides God takes him off by telling him I will have mercy on whom I will in shewing mercy I am not bound to give thee an account though thou art
general they all in general were as to their outward state vessels of honour they were the glory of the world the head not the tail the same Jews the same people distinguished by all these priviledges verse 4. 5. of this chap. are now abased scattered desolate for rejecting Gods designe marring in his hand upon the wheel but take it either way it will not accommodate those who are for understanding this lump to be the earth of which Adam was originally made that God of that lump or masse in his first creation made some vessels of honour and some of dishonour is not in the least to be imagined from this or any other text of Scripture from the first of Genesis to the last of the Revelations I am sure that hard favoured Opinion hath no resemblance of the nature of the just equal impartial good God whose tender mercies are over all his works Psal 145. and that this lump cannot refer to man in his Original I shall offer five reasons 1. Because in that Original making there was made no difference in vessels not then vessels of honour and dishonour as is plain they were all made innocent and upright and see what God himself saith of what he had made of this lump Gen. 1. last he saw every thing that he had made and behold it was good abundantly as the hebrew reads no defect in it or in any thing as was then made to which Solomon gives testimony Eccle. 7. last this one thing have I found that God made man upright but he hath sought out many inventions man in general considered was made upright therefore there were no vessels of dishonour 2. If we state this Original after the fall and then suppose God made the difference it will not yet hold because Jesus Christ hath restored man into an equal capacity of being vessels of honour for the plaister in Christ is as large as the sore in Adam as appears clearly Rom. 5.18 as by the disobedience of one condemnation came upon all so by the righteousnesse of one the free gift came upon all men 3. Because if by a vessel of dishonour we mean a sinful man as well as a miserable man then we shall make God the author of sin and disobedience which is far enough from God to do he doth not use to necessitate that which his soul abhorrs the potter did not designedly break the vessel on purpose that he might make it a dishonourable vessel when it was more for his interest to make it a vessel of honour I remember what Ainsworth observes upon Gen. 1. and last this sheweth saith he that sin and evil is not of God or by the work of his hands but come in after by the creature it self falling from God to which he cites the same place Eccles 7.31 It is a known maxim and a proverb that God did not make the devil nor a wicked man it is true he hath made or ordained wicked men for punishment as Solomon saith God made man but not sinful man 4. Neither could our Apostle mean this Original making in Adam in this text or context for these three reasons 1. If so it might well have silenced him as to his blaming the Jews when the defect lay in the root and Original 2. It had been altogether improper if this had been so to make so clear an appeal to Jer. 18. by way of illustration when we finde that the abising Israel was the fruit of their actual disobedience and rebellion against God as is plain in the former part of that prophesy 3. Besides this the Apostle gives an exact account why and how Israel came to misse of justification and honour which was because they sought it not by faith but as it were by the works of the law 5. If God had designedly made vessels of wrath then would he have taken pleasure in filling them with wrath which he doth not we have his solemn oath to the contrary Eze. 18. but of this more in the next verse That which remains as to our closing up this verse is after the manner of an exposition to sum up those doctrinal conclusions which doth offer themselves to our consideration from the words thus explicated which are these there are ten Doctrines observable from this 21. vers worth our noting which I shall only name and so proceed which are as followeth Doctrine 1. That God in his handling and dealing with sinful men is pleased to resemble himself to a potter a mean tradesman God thought a potter and his clay and his proceedings thereupon a meet resemblance for instruction to the prophet Ier. 18. and would have Ieremiah study the metaphor the proceedings of the potter to set forth his proceedings with Israel as they were sinful degenerated from him called marring in his hand the Church in her humble and low estate doth acknowledge God the potter she the clay I gave a threefold reason why God is stiled a potter and we the clay which I would not have forgotten 1. From the meanness of the material that God works in as well as the potter the potter works in the lowest materials not in gold or silver brass or iron but earth 2. Because if the potter makes a very mean vessel of such materials it cannot take exception or say why hast thou made me thus because it was at best but clay 3. The potter doth make curious work a rare and excellent vessel of clay so doth God many times of great sinners he makes of Saul a choice vessel of honour though of a persecutor Act. 9. 2. From the Apostles taking such pains to assert the power and prerogative of God indefinitely I note this second doctrine 2. Doctrine That God is not tyed to any person or people by vertue of any promise or covenant but only conditionally The promises of God made to Abraham Isaac and Iacob are only conditionally as their seed should be found walking in the steps of the faith of Abraham Rom. 4.12 Gal. 3.19 if ye be Christs then are you Abrahams seed here was the Jews mistake they thought God could not reject them as his seed outward 3. Doctrine That sin and disobedience is of an imbasing nature it makes man the highest piece of Gods creation Comparable to the earth the potters clay for we find this similitude used to set forth meanness baseness when applied to men this comparison is used by way of imbasement Esa 29.16 shall be esteemed as the potters clay the prophet designes by this similitude to disparage their work and forwardness in turning things upside down it shall soon be broke to the same end is that similitude made use of Esa 41.26 and Lament 4.2 〈◊〉 made vessels comparable to gold to be esteemed but as earth 4. Doctrine For people or persons to presume upon God for impunity and acceptance with him meerly upon the account of external acts of Religion and worship when living in a course of sinning in