doe upon the knees of our hearts agâ—ze constant Faith Loyalty and Obedience to the King and his Royall progeny in this high Court of Parliament where all the body of the Realme is eyther in person or by representation We doe acknowledge that the true and sincere Religion of the Church is continued and established by the King And doe recognize as we are bound by the Law of God and Man the Realme of England and the Imperiall Crowne thereof doth belong to him by inherent byrth-right and lawfull and undoubted succession and submit our selves and our posterities for ever untill the last drop of our blood be spent to his rule and beseech the king to accept the same as the first fruits of our Loyalty and Faith to his Majesty and his posteritie for ever and for that this Act is not compleat nor perfect without his Majesties assent the same is humbly desired This proves that the Houses are not above the King that Kings have not their Titles to the Crowne by the two Houses but by inherent byrth-right and that there can bee no Statute without his expresse assent and destroyes the chymera of the Kings virtuall being in the Houses To promise obedience to the Pope or any other State Prince or Potentate 3 Jac. cap. 4 other then the King his Heires and Successors is Treason and therefore those persons who call the Houses the Estates offend this Lawe Such Bills as his Majesty is bound in Conscience and Justice to passe K. Charles Collection of Ordinances fo 727. 1 pars ib. fol. 728. are no Law without his assent To designe the ruine of the Kings person or of Monarchy is a monstrous and injurious charge Vbi Lex non distinguit ibid fol. 865. non est distinguendum all the aforesaid Acts and Lawes doe evidently prove the Militia to belong to the king that the king is not virtnally in the two Houses that the king is not considerable separately in relation to his politique capacity that the king is not a person trusted with a power but that it is his inherent byrth-right from God Nature and Lawe and that hee hath not his power from the people These Lawes have none of those distinctions of naturall and politique abstractum concretum power and person in Caesars time this Island had kings and ever since which is almost 17 hundred yeeres agoe No King can be named in any time made in this kingdom by the people A parliament never made king for they were kings before the Parliaments are summoned by the kings Writs which for Knights Citizens and Burgesses begins thus viz. Rex vic Wilis Saltem Quia Nos de avisamento assensu consilij nri pro quibus arduis urgentib negetiis nos statum defensionem Regninri Aug. Eccles Anglic. concernentibus quoddam Parliamentum urum apud B. teneri ordinavimus ibid cum Prelatis Magnatib proceribus dicti Regni uri Colloqui habere tractatum ipsi Vicecomiti precipimus firmiter injungendo qd facta Proclamatione in prox Comitatu tuo post receptionem ejusd Brevis dues Milites gladiis cinctos c. eligi facias ad faciendum consentiendum hiis quae tunc ibidem de Communi Concilio nro Angl faventi Deâ— contigerit ordinari super Negotiis antedictis ita quod pro defectis potestatis hujusmodi seu propter improvidam electionem Milium Civium Burgensium pred dicta negotia ura infecta non remanerent The King is Principium caput finis Parliamenti the body makes not the head 4 pars Instit fol. 3 4. nor that which is posterior that which is prior concilium non est Preceptum conciliarij non sunt Praeceptores for Counsell to compell a consent hath not beene heard of to this time in any age and the house of Commons by the writt are not called ad concilium the Writts to the twelve Judges Kings Councell twelve Masters of the Chancery are concilium impensuri and so of the Peeres The writts for the Cominalty Ad faciendum consentiendum Which shewes what power the representative body hath they have not power to give an oath neither do they claime it The Oath of the Justices 18 of E. 3. among Statutes of that yeere The King at all times when there is no parliament in Parliament is assisted with the advice of the Judges of the Lawe 12 in number for England at least hath 2 Sergeants when fewest an Attorny and Solicitor twelve Masters of the Chancery his Councell of State consisting of some great Prelates and other great Personages versed in State affaires when they are fewest to the number of twelve All these persons are alwaies of great substance which is not preserved but by the keeping of the Lawe The Prelates versed in divine Lawe the other Grandees in affaires of State managery of Government The Judges Kings Sergeants Attorny Sollicitor and Masters of the Chancery versed in the Lawe and Customes of the Realme All sworn to serve the King and his people justly truly the King is also sworn to observe the Laws and the Judges have in their Oath a clause That they shall do common right to the Kings people according to the established Laws not withstanding any command of the King to the contrary under the Great Seale or otherwise The people are safe by the Lawes in force without any new The Law finding the Kings of this Realme assisted with so many great men of Conscience Honour and skill in the rule of Common-wealth knowledge of the Lawes and bound by the high and holy bond of an Oath upon the Evangelists settles among other powers upon the King a power to refuse any Bill agreed upon by both Houses and power to pardon all offences to passe any Graunts in his Minority there are many great persons living hold many a thousand pound a yeare by Patents from Edward the sixt passed when he was but ten yeares of age not to be bound to any Law to his prejudice whereby he doth not binde himselfe power of warre and peace coyning of Money making all Officers c. The Lawe for the reasons aforesaid hath approved these powers to be unquestionable in the King and all Kings have enjoyed them till 3. Nov. 1640. It will bee said notwithstanding all this fence about the Lawes the Lawes have beene violated and therefore the said powers must not hold the two Houses will remedy this The answere to this is evident There is no time past nor time present nor will there bee time to come so long as men mannage the Lawe but the Lawes will be broken more or lesse as appeares by the story of every age All the pretended violations of this time were remedied by Acts to which the King consented before his departure 10. Jan. 1641. being then driven away by Tumults And the Houses for a yeere and almost three Moneths From 3. Nov. 1640 to 10
separable from his Person is High Treason by the Law of the Land which is so declared by that learned man of the Law Sir Edward Coke so much magnified by this present Parliament who in the 7. part of his Reports in Calv. Case fo 11. saith thus In the reigne of Edward the second the Spencers the Father and Son to cover the Treason hatched in their hearts invented this damnable and damned opinion that Homage and Oath of Ligeance was more by reason of the Kings Crowne that is of his politicke capacity then by reason of the person of the King upon which opinion they inferred 3. execrable and detestable consequences 1. If the King doe not demeane himselfe by reason in the right of his Crowne his lieges are bound by Oath to remove the King 2. seeing that the King could not be reformed by suit of Law that ought to be done per aspertee that is by force 3. That his lieges be bound to governe in aid of him and in default of him All which were condemned by two Parliaments one in the raigne of Edw 2. called exilium Hugonis le Spencer and the other in Anno 1. Edw. 3. cap. 2. And that the naturall body and politicke makes one indivisible body and that these two bodies incorporate in one person make one body and not divers is resolved as the Law of England 4. Eliz. Ploydon Com. fol. 213. by Sir Cobert Catlin Lord Chiefe Justice of England Sir James Dier Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas the Lord Sanders Lord Chiefe Baron of the Exchequer and by the rest of the Judges viz. Justice Rastall Justice Browne Justice Corbet Justice Weston Baron Frevyll Conne and Pewdrell Sergeant Gerrard Atturny Generall Carreâ— Atturny of the Dutch Plowdon the learnedst man of that age in the knowledge of the Law and Customes of the Realm 8. The Law in all ages without any controversie is and hath beene That no Act of Parliament bindes the Subjects of this Land without the assent of the King either for person Lands Goods or Fame No man can shew any sillable letter or line to the contrary in the bookes of the Law or printed Acts of Parliament in any age in this Land If the vertuall Power be in the Houses there needes no assent of the Kings The stiles of the Acts printed from 9. Hen. 3. to 1. Hen. 7. were either 9 Hen. 3. Magna Charta So in every age till this day and in every Kings time as appears by the Acts in Print 1 part of the Instit Sect. 234. in fine where many of the Law-Bookes are cited 7. H. 7.14.12 of Hen. 7.20 The King ordaines at his Parliament c. or the King ordaineth by the advice of his Prelats and Barons and at the humble Petition of the Commons c. In Hen. 7. his time the Stile altered and hath sithence continued thus It is ordained by the Kings Majesty and the Lords spirituall and temporall and Commons in this present Parliament assembled So that alwayes the Assent of the King giveth the life to all as the soule to the body and therefore our Law-Bookes call the King the Fountaine of Justice and the life of the Law 9. 2. H. 4. c. 22. 4 pars instit 42. M. Prin in his Treatise of the great Seale Fol. 17.27 Hen. 8. Chap. 24. Mercy as well as Justice belongs by the law of the Land only to the King This is confessed by Master Prynn and it is so without any quection The King can only pardon and never more cause to have sufficient pardons then in such troublesome times as these and God send us pardons and peace None can give any pardon but the King by the Law of the Land The whole and sole power of pardoning Treasons and Felonies belongs to the King are the words of the Law and it is a delusion to take it from any other and utterly invalid 27 Hen. 8. Cap 24. 10. Queene Elizabeth summoned her first Parliament to be held the 23. of January in the first yeare of Her Majesties Raigne The Lords and Commons assembled by force of the same writ the 23. day the Queen fell sick and could not appeare in her person in Parliament that day and therefore prorogued it untill the 25. of the same Month of January Resolved by all the Judges of England 3 Of Eliz. Dier 203. that the Parliament began not the day of the returne of the writ viz. the 23. of January when the Lords and Commons appeared but the 25. of the said moneth when the Queen came in person Which sheweth evidently that this virtuall presence is a meere deluding fiction that hath no ground in Law reason or sense They have the King now a prisoner at Holmby with guards upon him and yet they governe by the vertuall Power of their Prisoner These are some of the causes and reasons which moved me to deliver that paper to Master Corbet which I am ready to justifie with my life and should hold it a great honour to die for the honourable and holy Lawes of the Land That which will save this Land from destruction is an Act of Oblivion and His Majesties gracious generall pardon the Souldiers their Arears and every man his owne and Truth and Peace established in the Land and a favourable regard to the satisfaction of tender Consciences Aprill 29. 1647. David Jenkins THE ARMIES INDEMNITY With Addition Together With a Declaration shewing how every Subject of England ought to be tried for Treasons Felonies and all other Capitall Crimes as it is set down in the Lawes of the LAND By David Jenkins now Prisoner in the Tower of LONDON Printed in the Yeare 1647. The Armies Indemnity c. UPon the publishing of the Ordinance of the 22. of May last for the Indemnity of the Army certain Gentlemen well affected to the peace of the Kingdome and safety of the Army desired me to set downe in writing whether by the Law of the Land the said Ordinance did secure them from danger as to the matters therein mentioned For whose satisfaction in a businesse wherein the lives and fortunes of so many men were concerned and the Peace of the Kingdome involved I conceived I was bound in duty and conscience faithfully and truly to set downe what the Law of the Land therein is which accordingly I have with all sincerity expressed in this following discourse The danger of the Army by the Law of the Land is apparent to all men 25. Ed. 3. c. 11. 2 Ri. 2. cap. 3. 1 Hen. 4. c. 10. 1 and 2. Phil. and Mary c. 10 It is high Treason by the Law of the Land to leavy warre against the King to compasse or imagine his death or the death of his Queene or of his eldest Sonne to counterfeit his Money or his great Seale They are the words of the Law Other Treasons then are specified in that Act are declared to be no Treasons untill the King and
his Parliament shall declare otherwise they are the very words of the Law 3. Pars instit Pag. 22. 2. pars instit Pag. 47 48. 4. pars instit P. 23.48.29 King and Commons King and Lords Commons and Lords cannot declare any other thing to be Treason then there is declared as appeares by the Lord Cooke in the places cited in the Margin A Law-booke published by order of the House of Commons this Parliament 3. Pars instit cap. Treason Pa. 9 10 12. Mr S. Iohn the Sollicitor in his Speech upon the araignment of the Earle of Straford Printed by order of the House of Commons p. 7. 13. as appeares in the last leafe of the second part of the Institutes published likewise by their Order The Resolutions of all the Judges of England upon the said Statute of the 25. Ed. 3. as appeares in the said third part of the Institutes Chap. High-Treason have been that to imprison the King untill he agree to certaine demands is High-Treason to seize his Ports Forts Magazine for Warre are High-Treason to alter the Lawes is High-Treason The word King in the Statute of 25. Ed. 3. cap. 2. must be understood of the Kings naturall person for that person can only dye have a wife have a sonne or be imprisoned The Privilege of Parliament protects no man from treason or felony 4. Pars instit c. Parl. p. 25. howbeit he be a Member much lesse can they protect others Those who cannot protect themselves have no colour to make Ordinances to protect others who are no Members The Statute of 11. 11. M. 7. cap. 1. Hen. 7. cap. 1. doth by expresse words free all persons who adhere to the King The Army by an Act of Indemnity free themselves from all those dangers Stamford l. 2. fol. 99. 18 Ed. 3. Statutes at large 144. 20 Ed. 3. c. 1. 11. Rie 2. c. 10. 4 Pars instit Pag. 23.48.29 which an Ordinance can no more doe then repeale all the Lawes of the Land the whole and sole power by Law to pardon all Treasons Felonies c. being solely and wholly in the King as is cleared by the Statute of 27. H. 8. c. 24. and the Law of the Land in all times Having shewed the danger of the Army by the Law of the Land next consider the Ordinance of the Lords and Commons published the 22. of May last for their Indemnity By the ensuing discourse it doth appeare they have no Indemnity at all thereby The Indemnity proposed by the Ordinance is for any Act done by the authority of the Parl. or for the service or benefit thereof and that the Judges and all other Ministers of Justice shall allow thereof This Ordinance cannot secure the Army for these reasons I. Their Judges are sworne to doe justice according to the Law of the Land 3. Pars instit Pag. 22. 2 Pars instit 47 48. 1. Pars instit 193. Princes case â— â—â—perte and therefore the Judges must be forsworne men if they obey it because an Ordinance of both Houses is no Law of the Land and no man can beleeve they will perjure themselves so palpably and visibly in the eye of the world II. All trials for Treasons Felonies Robberies Magna Charta cap. 29. 25. Ed. 3. cap 4. 28. Ed. 3. cap. 3. 37. Ed. 3. cap. 8. 42. Ed. 3 cap. 3. and such like Capitall offences are by the Law of the Land to be by indictment of a Jury appointed out of the Neighbourhood where the offence was done There is no common Jury-man but understands what the Law is in these cases as well as the best Lawyers and the Law makes the Jury Judges of the fact whereby the souldier is left to their mercy whom he hath offended as some of them have lately had wofull experience Declaration of the Army presented at Warden and Printed by the appointment of the Officers subscribed and thereupon doe rightly apprehend their danger Now no man can thinke that the Jurors will perjure themselves to acquit the souldiers for robbing and plundring of the Countries and thereby utterly destroy their owne Rights and Properties III. If the Judges conceive as they may that the taking of other mens horses or goods is not by the Authority of Parliament or for the service and benefit thereof the souldier dyes for it they may say to steale or rob any man of his goods is not for the Parliaments service but against it which was alwayes the sence of the people and doubtlesse the Jurors will not thinke otherwise IV. This Ordinance is restrained to the authority 4. Pars instit pag. 1. 3. Pars instit pag. 22. 1. Pars instit pag. 1. 28. H. 8. sâ—l 11. Dier 38. H. 8. sol 60. 12. H. 7.20 1. Pars instit 159. Princes case 8. reports service or benefit of the Parliament The Lords and Commons make no more a Parliament by the Law of the Land then a body without a head makes a man for a Parliament is a body composed of a King their head the Lords and Commons the Members All three together make one body and that is the Parliament and none other And the Judges may ought and I beleeve will according to their Oathes proceed as not bound at all by this Ordinance For it is restrained to the Authority of Parliament â—â—vice or benefit thereof whereas the two Houses are not the â—â—â—liament but only parts thereof and by the abuse and misunderstanding of this word Parliament they have miserably deceived the people V. This Ordinance is against their Ordinances which expresly prohibit plundring 28 Aug. 1642. Col. of Ord. first part 565.592.605 severall Ordinances and so there is one Ordinance against another whereby their Judges have an out-let to proceed on the one or the other and thereby the Army hath no manner of security VI. The word Parliament is a French word howbeit such Assemblies were before the Norman Conquest here signifies in that Language to consult treat 1. Pars iastit 109. 1 Pars instit 110. 4 Pars p. 49. that is the sense of the word Parler in the French Tongue The Writ whereby the two Houses are assembled which is called the Writ of Summons of Parliament at all times and at this Parliament used and which is the warrant ground and foundation of their meeting is for the Lords of the House of Peeres the Judges and Kings Councell to consult and treate with the King that is the Parler of great concernments touching 1. the King secondly the defence of his Kingdome thirdly the defence of the Church of England It cannot be a Parliament that will not Parle with their King but keep him in prison and not suffer him to come to them and parle and therefore the Law and sence and reason informing every man that is no manner of Parliament the King with whom they should parle being so restrained that they will not
parle with him The Army hath no manner of security by this Ordinance For their indemnification referres to that which is not in being untill the King be at liberty VII It is more then probable that their Judges before the last circuite had instructions to the effect or this Ordinance The Common Souldiers sccond Apology 6. Grievances of the Army published 15. May last Three grievances of Col. Riche's Regiment but they the Judges making conscience of their Oath laid aside the said Instructions and ought and may and it is beleeved will no more regard this Ordinance then the said instructions What was done in the last circuite the Army well knowes touching many of their fellow-souldiers VIII The Houses in their first Proposition to his Majesty for a safe and well-grounded peace sent to Neweastle to desire a pardon from his Majesty for themselves they who desire a pardon cannot grant a pardon common reason dictates this to every man and therefore that the Army should accept an Indemnity from them who seeke it for themselves or should conceive it of any manner of force is a fancy so that no man in the whole Army but may apprehend that it is vaine and a meere delusion IX His Majesty by his gracious Message of the 12. of May fast the 22 of the same hath offered an Act of Oblivion and a generall pardon to all his people this done the Law doth indemnifie the Army without all manner of scruple for any thing that hath beene done for it is an Act of Parliament when the King and two Houses concurre and bindes all men There is no safety by the Ordinance There is safety by an act of Parliament And will not reasonable men preferre that which is safe before that which is unsafe X. His Majesty by his said Letter agrees to pay the Arreares of the Army I am sure that it is a publique Debt and the chiefest and the first that by the two Houses should be paid and before any Divident or Gratuities bestowed among themselves for their Bloud Limbes and Lives have put and kept the both Houses at rest in the power they have So by this concurrence of his Majesty for your indemnity and for your Arreares The Army have not an Ordinance or the Publique Faith but the Law of the Land to make sure unto them their Indemnity for all Acts and for their Arreares and therewith also bring peace to the Land XI The Kingdome and people generally desire these things To such an Army just and reasonable things must not be denyed the things formerly proposed are most just and reasonable you may have them if you will if you will not you render this Kingdome miserable Mr Pyms Speech against the Earle of Strafford p. 16 Sixt consideration Printed by the command of the House of Commons wherein you will have your shares of miseries The head and the body are such an incorporation as cannot be dissolved without the destruction of both The Additional Ordinance of both houses passed the fifth of June instant for the fuller indemnity of the Army makes nothing at all to the matter 1. For that it extends not to Felony Homicide Burglary Robbery or any other capitall crime which is the maine businesse insisted upon and most concerneth the Souldiers security II. The both Houses in the said Additionall Ordinance say that it is expedient that all offences be pardoned and put in oblivion Pardon and Oblivion cannot bee understood to bee for a time but for ever and they themselves confesse that an Ordinance is not binding but pro tempore which with the most advantagious Interpretation can be but a reprieve or delay of the execution of the Law and therefore that cannot pardon or put in oblivion by their owne shewing But the Law of the Land is 27. H. 8. c. 24. and so it hath constantly been practised in all times that no persons of what estate soever have any power to pardon Treason Felony or any other offences but the King onely who hath the sole and whole power to pardon all such crimes whatsoever And in the same manner an Ordinance is of no Authority at all to take away the right of private mens actions by any evidence it can give In truth all the evidence that this Ordinance will give is that it records to posterity nothing but a lawlesse and distempered time For remedy therefore I say againe it is a certaine truth This Kingdome without an act of Oblivion and a generall Pardon and the payment of Souldiers arreares and a meet regard had to tender Consciences will unavoidably be ruined June 10. 1647. David Jenkins Prisoner in the Tower of London Sundry Acts of Parliament mentioned and cited in the Armies Indemnities set forth in words at large for the better satisfaction of such as desire to be rightly informed 25. Edw. 3. Chap. 2. A Declaration what offences shall be adjudged Treason VVHereas divers opinions have been before this time in what case Treason shall be said in what not The K. at the request of the Lords and of the Commons hath made a Declaration in the manner as hereafter followeth That is to say When a man doth compasse or imagine the death of our Lord the King or of our Lady the Queen or of their eldest Son and Heire or if a man do violate the Kings companion or the Kings eldest daughter unmarried or the wife of the Kings eldest sonne and heire or if a man do levie war against the Lord our King in his Realme or bee adherent to the Kings enemies in his Realm giving to them aid and comfort in the Realme or else-where and thereof be probably attainted of open deed by people of their condition And if a man counterfeit the Kings great or privie Scale or his Money and if a man bring false money into this Realm counterfeit to the money of England and the money called Lusburgh or other like to the said money of England c. 11. Hen. 7. Cap. 1. None that shall attend upon the King and doe him true service shall bee attainted or forfeit any thing THe King our Soveraign Lord calling to his remembrance the duty of allegiance of his Subjects of this his Realm and that they by reason of the same are bound to serve their Prince and Soveraign Lord for the time being in his wars for the defence of Him and the Land against every rebellion power and might raised reared against him and with him to enter and abide in service in battell if case so require and that for the same service what fortune ever fall by chance in the same battell against the minde and will of the Prince as in this Land sometime passed hath been seen that it is not reasonable but against all lawes reason and good conscience that the said Subjects going with their Soveraigne Lord in wars attending upon him in his person or being in other places by his commandement within this
Queenes death of the Kings eldest son to coyne his money to counterfeit his Great-Seale to levie Warre against him to adhere to such as shall so do are declared by that Act to be high Treason This Statute cannot refer to the King in his politique capacity but to his naturall which is inseperable from the politique for a body politique can have neither Wife nor Child 21. Ed. 4.14 not levie Warre nor do any Act but by the operation of the naturall body A Corporation or body politique hath no soule or life but is a fiction of the Law and the Statute meant not fictitious persons but the body naturall conjoyned with the publique which are inseperable The clause in that Act that no man should sue for grace or pardon for any offence condemned R. 2.11 〈◊〉 cap. 13. 4. pars instit fol. 42. or forfeiture given by that Act was repealed by a subsequent Act in 〈◊〉 Râ—â— holden unreasonable without example and against the Law and custom of the Parliament This condemnes the Proposition for disabling the King to Pardon 4. pars instit fol. 42. The Act of 11. R. 2. so much urged by the other side was an Act to the which the King consented and so a perfect Act yet Note the Army then about the Town Note that that Law is against private persons and by the 3. cap. thereof the Treasons there declared are declared to be new Treasons made by that Act and not to be drawne to example it was abrogated 21. R. 2. and revived by an usurper 1. H. 4. to please the people and by the tenth chap. thereof enacts that nothing shall be treason but what is declared by 25. Ed. 3. 16. Râ— cap. 5. The Regality of the Crown of England is immediatly subject to God and to none other Plaine words H. 4. shewing where the supreame power is The Commission of Array is in force and no other Commission Ret. Parim â— H. 4. numb 24. an Act not printed this Act was repealed by 4. and 5. P. M. cap. 2. this repealed by the Act of 1. Iacobi and so it is of force at this day for the repealing Statute is repealed 4. pars institu fol. 51. 125. published sithence this Parliament by the desire of the house of Commons their Order is printed in the last leafe of the commentaries upon Magna Charta Sir Edward Cooke A booke alowed by Sir Nat. Brent called the reason of the War fol. 65. by their party is holden for the Oracle of the Law who wrote the said fourth part in a calme and quiet time and I may say when there was no need to defend the authority of the Commission of Array For that objection that that Commission leaves power to the Commissioners to tax men secundum facultates and so make all mens estates Arbitrary the Answer is that in levying of publick ayds upon mens goods estates which are variable and probably cannot be certainly knowne by any but the owners it is impossible to avoid discretion in the assessements for so it ever was and ever will be By this appeares that the Votes of the two houses against the commission of Array were against the Law The death of the King dissolves the Parliament H. 5. if Kings should refer to the politique capacity it would continue after his death 4. pars Inst 46. which proves that the King cannot be said to be there when he is absent as now he is 2. H. 5. 4 pars instit 46. there is no interregnum in the Kingdome the dissolution of the Parliament by his death shewes that the beginning and end thereof refers to the naturall person of the King and therefore he may lawfully refuse the Propositions 2. H. 5. Chap. 6. to the King only it belongs to make Leagues with Forraigne Princesâ— this shewes where the supreame power is 8. H. 6. numb 57. Râ—tt Parl-Cookes 4. pâ—ns instit 25 Nâ— peiviledge of Parliament is grantable for treason H. 6. Felony or Breach of the Peace if not to any one member not to two not to ten not to the Major part 19. H. 6.62 The Law is the inheritance of the King and his people by which they are ruled King and people And the people are by the law bound to ayde the King and the King hath an inheritance to hould Parliaments and in the ayds granted by the Commonâ—alty If the major part of a Parliament commit treason they must not be Judges of it for no man or body can be Judge in his owne cause and aswell as ten or any number may commit treason the greater number may aswell The King by his letters pattents may constitute a County palatine and grant Regall rights 32. H. 6 13. Plowd 334. this shewes where the supreame power is 17. Ed. 4. rot parl numb 39. Ed 4. No priviledge of Parliament is grantable for Treason Fellony or Breach of the peace if not for one not for two or more or a Major part The same persons must not be Judge and party A corporate body can committ no treason Calvins Case 7 pars fol. 11 12 nor can treason be committed against a corporate body 21. E. 4 13. ond 14. but the persons of the men who make that body may committ treason and commit it against the naturall person of him who to some purposes is a body corporate but quatenus corporate no treason can be committed by or against such a body that body hath no soul no life and subsists only by the fiction of the Law and for that reason the Law doth conclude as aforesaid Plow com 213. therefore the statute of 25. E. 3. must be intended of the Kings naturall person conjoyned with the politique which are inseparable and the Kings naturall person being at Holmby his politique is there also and not at Westminster 19. Ed. 4.46 for the politique and naturall make one body indivisible If all the people of England should breake the league made with a forreigne Prince 22. Ed. 4. Fitz juvisdiction last placite without the Kings consent the league holds and is not broken and therefore the representative body is inferior to his Majesties The King may erect a Court of Common-pleas in what part of the kingdome be pleaseth by his letters patents can the two houses do the like 1. Ed. 5. fol. 2. It cannot be said that the King doth wrong Ed. 5. 4 Ed. 4.25 5 Ed. 4.29 declared by all the Judges and Serjeants at law then there The reason is nothing can be done in this Common wealth by the Kings grant or any other act of his as to the subjects persons goods lands or liberties but must be according to established lawes which the Judges are sworn to observe and deliver betwene the King and his people impartially to rich and poor high and low and therefore the Justices and the Ministers of Justice are to be questioned and punished if
and the subversion of the Law and Land laying taxes on the people never heard of before in this Land devised new oathes to oppose forces ray fed by the King not to adhaere to him but to them in this Warre which they call the Negative Oath and the Vow and Covenant By severall wayes never used in this Kingdome they have raised monies to foment this warre and especially to inrich some among them namely first Excise secondly Contributions thirdly Sequestrations fourthly Fift parts fiftly Twentieth Parts fixtly Meale-money seventhly Sale of Plundered goods â—ightly Loanes ninthly Benevolences tenthly Collections upon their Fast-dayes eleventhly new Inpositions upon Merchandizes twelvethly Guards maintained upon the charge of private men thirteenthly Fifty Subsidies at one time fourteenthly Compositions with such as they call Delinquents fifteenthly Sale of Bishops lands c. From the Kings party meanes of subsistance are taken 1 R. 3. cap. 3. â—ract li. 3. c. 8. Stanford 192. Sir Ger. Fleetwoods Case 8. pars Cook 7. H. 4 last lease before any indictment their Lands seized their goods taken the Law allows a Traytor or Fellon attainted Necessaria sibi familie sua in victâ—â— vâ—stitu where is the Covenant where is the Petition of light where is the liberty of the subject First We have ayded the King in this warre contrary to the negative oath and other votes Our warrant is the twenty fifth of Edward the third the second Chapter and the said resolutions of all the Judges Secondly Wee have maintained the Commission of Array by the Kings Command contrary to their votes We are warranted by the statute of the fifth of Henry the fourth and the judgement of Sir Edward Cooke the Oracle of the Law as they call him Thirdly We maintained Arch-Bishops and Bishops whom they would suppresse Our warrant is Magna Charta and many statutes more Fourthly we have maintained the booke of Common prayer they suppresse it Our warrant is five acts of Parliament in Edward the sixt and Queene Elizabeths time 5. Peschâ— 35. Elizabeth inter placita Coronae in Banco Regis New booke of Entries sol 252. Penry for publishing two scandalous Libels against the Church government was indicted arraigned attainted and executed at Tyburne Fifthly We maintained the Militia of the Kingdome to belong to the King they the contrary Our warrant is the statute of the seventh of Edward the first and many statures sithence the practise of all times and the custome of the Realm Sixthly We maintained the counterfeiting of the great Seale to be high Treason and so of the usurpation of the Kings Forts Ports Shipping Castles and his Revenue and the Coyning of money against them We have our warrant by the said statute of the twenty fifth of Edward the third Chapter the second and divers others since and the practise of all times Seventhly We maintaine that the King is the only supreme govermour in all causes They that his Majesly is to be governed by them Our warrant is the statures of the first of Q. Eliza. Chapter the first and the fifth of Q. Elizabeth the first Eighthly 9. Ed. 4. sol 4. Wee maintaine that the King is King by an inhaerent birth-right by nature by Gods law and by the layâ— of the Land They say his Kingly right is an 〈…〉 Our warrant is the statute of the first of King Jaâ—â—â— Chapter the first And the resolution of all the Judges of England in Calvins case Ninthly We maintain that the politick capacity iâ— not to be severed from the naturall They hold the contrary Our warrant is two flatures viz. â—xilium Hugonis in Edward the seconds time and the first of Edward the third Chapter the second and their Oracle who hath published it to posterity that it is damnable detestable and execrable Treason Calvins case pars 7. fol. 11. Tenthly we maintain that who aids the King at home or abroad ought not to be molested or questioned for the same they hold and practise the contrary our warrant is the statute of the eleventh of Henry the seventh Chapter the first Eleventhly We maintain that the King hath power to disassent to any Bill agreed by the two Houses which they deny Our warrant is the Statute of the second of Henry the fift and the practise of all times the first of King Charles Chapter the seventh the first of King James Chapter the first Twelfthly We maintain that Parliaments ought to be holden in a grave and peaceable manner without â—â—ults They allowed multitudes of the meanest sort of people to come to Westminster to cry for Coll. of Ord. fol. 31. Justice when they could not have their will and keep guards of armed men to wait upon them Our warrant is the Statute of the seventh of Edward the second and their Oracle Thirteenthly We maintain that there is no state within this Kingdome but the Kings Majesty and that to adhere to any other State within this Kingdome is high treason our warrant is the Statute of the third of King James Chapter the fourth and the â—â—enty third of Queen Elizabeth Chapter the first Fourteenthly We maintain that to levy a warre to remove Councellours to alter religion or any Law established is high Treason They hold the contrary One warrant is the resolutions of all the judges of England in Queen Elisabeths time and their oracle agrees with the same Fifteenthly We maintain that no man should be imprisoned put out of his Lands but by due course of Law and that no man ought to be adjudged to death but by the Law established the customer of the Realm or by act of Parliament They practise the contrary in London Bristol Kent c. Our warrant is Magna Charta Chapter the twenty ninth the Petition of right the third of King Charles and divers Lawes there mentioned We of the Kings party did and do detest Monopolies and ship money and all the grievances of the people as much as any men living we do well know that our estates lives and fortunes are preserved by the Lawes and that the King is bound by his lawes we love Parliaments if the Kings Judges Counsell or Ministers have done amisse they had from the third of November 1640 to the tenth of Ianuary 1641 time to punish them being all left to Justice where is the Kings fault The law faith the King can do no wrong 11 pars Cooks Reports Magdalen Colledge Cale that he is medicus Regni pater patriae sponsus regni qui per annlum is espoused to his Realm at his Coronation The King is Gods Lieutenant and is not able to do an unjust thing these are the words of the Law One great matter is pretended that the people are not sure to enjoy the acts passed this Parliament A succeeding Parliament may repeal them The objection is very weak a Parliament succeeding to that may repeal that repealing Parliament That feare is endlesse and remedilesse for it is the
And the Law is above the King Sol. By the same reason you may say that the Courts of Chancery or any of the Courts of Law at Westminster are above the King for they make of no effect the Kings Charters which are passed against the Law and the King is Subject to Law and sworne to maintaine it Again it is no Parliament without the King and the King is the head thereof he is principium Caput finis of a Parliament as Medas tenends Parliament hath it and two houses only want principium Caput fixis of a Parliament and it is a sorry Parliament that wants all these And therefore to say that Parliaments are above the King is to say that the King is above himselfe The Parliament can enlarge the Kings prerogative 3 Ob. therefore it is above him If the King assent otherwise not Sol. and then it is an Act of Parliament and otherwise no Act. Bracton saith God the Law and the Kings Court 4 Ob viz. his Earles and Barons are above the King viz. in Parliament as Master Prynne expounds it Where is then the House of Commons Indeed take God Sol. the Law and Earles and Barons together it is true but to affirme that the Earles and Barons in Parliament are above the King the King being the head of the Parliament and they one of the members how an inferior member is above the head is hard to conceive besides that position destroyes all M. Pryâ—â—es discourse who attributes so much to the House of Commons The King is but one of the three estates of Parliament 5 Ob. and two are greater then one therefore above The Legs Armes Sol. and Trunke of the Body are greater then the Head and yet not above nor with life without it the argument holds for quantitie but not for qualitie and in truth the King is none of the three estates but above them all the three estates are the Lords Spirituall the Lords Temporall and the Commons Coke their Oracle in his Chapter of Parliaments fol. 1. In Corporations 6 Ob. the greater number of voyces make all the Acts of the Corporation valid therefore so in Parliament By this reason the Kings assent is needlesse and to no end Sol. and all the Acts of Parliament formerly mentioned and Law-Bookes have quite mistaken the matter which with unanimous voyce requires the Kings assent as necessarie besides the Corporations are so constituted by the Kings Charters that the greater number of Votes shall make their Acts valid The King as King 7 Ob. is present in his Parliament as well as in all other his Courts of Justice how be it he is not ther. In his other Courts of Justice he hath no voye Sol. he is none of the Judges in the Parliament he hath if his presence be not necessarie his voyce is not nor his assent â— Ob. Soverain power of Parliaments â—6 47. The originall prime legislative power of making Lawes to bind the subjects and their posteritie rests not in the King but in the Kingdome and Parliament which represents it Master Prynne in the same leafe affirmes and truly that the Kings assent is generally requisite to passe Lawes and ratifie them Sol. the King is the head of the Kingdome and Parliament how then can a Body act without a Head A major part of a Corporation binds 9 Ob. therefore the major part in Parliament and so of by-Lawes The Corporation is so bound either by the Kings Charters Sol. or by prescription which sometimes had the Kings concession but prescription and Law and practise alwayes left the King a negative voyce The King cannot alter the Bills presented to him by both Houses 10 Ob. go. True Sol. but the King may refuse them Acts of Parliament and Lawes ministred in the Reignes of Usurpers 11 Ob. bind rightfull Kings go. What is this to prove the two Houses power only Sol. which is the question A King de facto must be obeyed by them who submitted to him and they are his Subjects by their submission and not Subjects de facto to the true King and such being Traytors and Rebels to the Regent King having renounced the true King when the lawfull King is restored 9. Id. 4.12 may be punished by him for their Treason against the Usurper But here is a King still in both cases and the proceedings at Law holds the Judges having their Patents from the being Kings in the reignes of Kings de facto or de â—urâ— for all Kings are bound and sworne to observe the Lawes A King dies without Heire 12 Ob. is an infant non compes mentis c. the two Houses may establish Lawes go. There is no Inter-regnum in England Sol. as appeares by all ouâ— Bookes of Law and therefore the dying without Heiâ—e is a vaine supposition and by their principle 〈◊〉 is considerable in his politique capacitie which cannot die at also The Protector assisted by the Councell of the King at Law his twelve Judges the Countell of State his Attorney Solicitor and two Sergeants at Law his twelve Masters of the Chancerie hath in the Kings behalfe and ever had a negative Voyce but what is thi no the present question Wee have a King of fall age of great wisdome and judgement the power of the two Houses in such a case to be over the King cannot be showne The King cannot dis-assent to publique and necessarie Bills for the common good go. 13 〈◊〉 Nor ever did good King but who shall be judge Sol. whether they be publique and necessarie The major part in either of the Houses for passing of Bills so pretended may be but one or two voyces or very few and perhaps of no judicious men is it not then fitter or more agreeable to reason that his Majestie and Councell of State his twelve Judges his Sergeants Attorney and Solicitor twelve Masters of the Chancerie should judge of the conveniencie and benefit of such Bills for the publique good rather then a minor of which sort there may be in the Houses or a weake man or a few who oftentimes carry it by making the major part which involves the consent of all let reason determine The Kings of England have beene elective 14 Ob. and the King by his Coronation-Oath is bound to maintaine justas leges consiâ—â—tudines quas vulgas elegerit go. â—â—perie hath beene in the kingdome Soâ— and therefore to continue it still will not be taken for a good argument when things are setled for many ages to look back to times of confusion is to destroy all repose The Act of Parliament of the first of K. James Chapter the first and all our extant Lawâ—s say that the Kings Office is an heritage inherent in the bloud of our Kings and their birth-right And Usurpers that come in by the consent of the people are Kings de
Spencers did either that the King may be removed for misdemeanours or reformed per aspertè or that the Subject is bound to govern in ayde of him we only say that his power is distinguishable from his person and when he himself makes a distinction betwixt them commanding one thing by his Legall Writs Courts and Officers and commanding another thing extrajudically by word of mouth Letters or Ministers we are to obey his power rather then his person 5. We take not from the King all power of pardoning Delinquents we only say it is not proper to him quarto modo For if the King pardon him which hath murthered my sonne his pardon shall not cut me off from my appeale and 't is more unreasonable that the Kings pardon should make a whole State which hath suffered remedilesse then any private man So if the King should deny indemnity to these which in the furie of Warre have done thingâ— unjustifiable by the Lawes of Peace and thereby keep the wounds of the State from being bound up 't is equitable that an Act of Indemnity should be made forcible another may And if this will not hold yet this is no good consequence the King is absolute in point of pardons therefore he is absolâ—â—e in all things else and the Parliament hath no power to discharge Delinquencies therefore it hath no power in other matters 6. The Parliament hath declared the King to be in no condition to govern but this must not be interpreted rigidly and without distinction for if the King with his sword drawn in his hand and pursuing the Parliament and their adherents as Rebels be not fit for all Acts of Government yet 't is not hereby insinuated that he is divested of the habit or right of governing If he be unqualified now he is not unqualified for the future if he may not doe things destructive to the Parliament he is not barred from returning to the Parliament or doing justice to the Parliament This is a frivolous cavil and subturfuge 7. We sweare that the King is our supreme Governour over all persons and in all Causes but we doe not sweare that he is above all Law nor above the safety of his people which is the end of the Law and indeed Paramount to the Law it selfe If he be above all Law or liable to no restraint of our Law then we are no freer then the French or the Turks and if he be above the prime and of Law common fafety then we are not so free as the French or Turks For if the totall subversion of the French or the Turk were attempted they might by Gods Law imprinted in the Book of Nature justifie a self-defence but we must remedilesty perish when the King pleases to command our threats Besides how atchieved the King of England such a Supremacie above all Law and the community it selfe for whose behoofe Law was made If Gods donation be pleaded which is not speciall to him or different from what other Kings may pretend toâ— then to what purpose serve our Laws nay to what purpose serve the Laws of other Countries for by this generall donation all Nations are condemned to all servitude as well as we If the Law of this Land be appealed to what Books hath Mr Ienkins read where hath he found on t that Lex Regia whereby the people of England have given away from themselves all right in themselves Some of our Books tell us that we are more free then the French that the King cannot oppresse us in our our persons or estates by imprisonment denying justice or laying Taxes without our consents other Books tell us that the safety of the people is the supreme Law and that the King hath both God and the Law for his Superiour But all this is nothing to learned Mr Ienkins 8. We admit that no Acts of Parliament are compleat or formally binding without the Kings assent yet this is still to be denyed that therefore without this assent particularly exprest the two Houses can doe nothing nor have any virtuall power at all no not to examine Mr Ienkins nor to doe any other thing of like nature though in order to publick justice and safety I have done and wish Mr Ienkins would call in and lick up againe his black infamous execrable reproaches so filthily vomited out against the Parliament To the first I Was examined by a Committee appointed by the House of Commons I say and said that the House of Commons have no power to examine me for that it is no Court every Court hath power to examine upon Oath this power the House of Commons never claimed The Court of Pie-powders Court-Baron Hundred Court 5 H. 4. c. 3. 3 H. 6.46 1 H 6.43 35 H. 6.5 County Court and every other Court of Record or not of Record hath power to examine upon oath and an examination without Oath is a communication only examination in Law is upon Oath There is no Court without a power of tryall the House of Commons have no power to try any offence Sir Anthony Maynes case Cook 5. pars Reports Lit. 2. lib. Sect. 194.6 H. 4.1 nor ever practised it by Bill Inditement Information Plaint or Originall to deduce it to tryal nor to try it by Verdict Demurrer or Examination of Witnesses upon Oath without which there can be no condemnation or judgement and that which can attaine to no reasonable end the Law rejects as a thing inutile and uselesse Sapiens incipit a fine The Writ Whereby they are called gives them power Aâ— faciendum consentiendum to what to such things Que ibidem de communi Consilie ordinari contigerint 4 pars instit fol. 4. 9. viz. in the Parliament This makes nothing at all for a Court for the House of Commons that consilium which that Writ intends is cleared partly by the Writ for chusing Knights c. For the King by that Writ is said to resolve to consult and treat with the Prelates and Peeres of the Kingdome for and touching the great concernments of the Common-wealth for the King never sits in the House of Commons and this also is made evident by the Writs to the Prelates Peeres Iudges and to his Councell at Law the words in their Writ are To appear and attend the Parliament consilium impensuri the one doth consulere the other facere consentire The House of Lords where the King sits in person 7. H. 6.28 1 H. 7.20 13. E. 3. ca. 5. 4 pars instit pag. 21. assisted by his Lords Judges Serjeants Atturney Sollicitor Masters of the Cnancery is a Court of Record to many purposes set down in the Books of Law and the Statutes of the Land and that Court is only in the House of Lords where the Kings sits A Court must either be by the Kings Patent Statute Law or by the Common Law which is common and constant usage the House of Commons hath no Patent to be a
Court Plowd Com. 319. nor Statute Law to be a Court nor common usage they have no Iournall Book but since E. 6. time was there ever Fine by the House of Commons estreated into the Exchequer For murder or Felony they can imprison no man much lesse for Treason that House which cannot doe the lesse cannot doe the greater It is ordained 25. E. 3. c. 4.3 Car. Petition of Right that no man shall be imprisoned or put out of his Franchise by the King or his Councell but upon Indictment or presentment of his good and lawfull Neighbours where the deed is done or by originall Writ at the Common Law and so is Lex terrae the Law of the land mentioned in Magna Charta cap. 29. expounded and the said Magna Charta and Charta de Foresta are declared by the Stat. of 25. E. 1. c. 1. to be the Common Law of the Land All Iudges and Commissioners are to proceed Secundum legem consuetudinem Regni Anglia as appeares by all proceedings in all Courts and by all Commissions and therefore the House of Commons by themselves proceeding not by Indictment Presentment or Originall Writ have no power to imprison men or put them out of their Franchise This no way trenches upon the Parliament for it is in Law no Parliament without King and both Houses 4 pars Instit pag. 1. 3 Pars Instit p. 23. I have only in my Paper delivered to Mr Corbet applyed my selfe to that Committee that they had no power to examine me 12. â— 7.20 Princes case 8 Pars Cook 1 Pars Instit p. 159. 14. H. 8.3 Dier 38. H. 8.60 1 Pars Instit p. 19. b. but I never thought said or wrote that the Parliament had no power to examine me the Law and custome of this Land is that a Parliament hath power over my life liberty lands and goods and over every other subject but the House of Commons of it selfe hath no such power For the Lord Cooks relation that the House of Commons have imposed Fines and imprisoned men in Queen Elizabeth time and since Few facts of late time never questioned make no legall power nor Court 4 Pa. Instit ca. Parl. Ã facto ad jus is no good argument for the words of the Statute of 6. H. 8. c. 16. that a licence to depart from the House of Commons for any Member thereof is to be entred of Record in the Book of the Clark of the Parliament appointed or to be appointed for that House doth not conclude that the House of Commons is a Court of Record For first that Law of 6. H. 8. c. 26. handles no such question as that whether the House of Commons be a Court it is a maxime in all Lawes Lex aliud tranctans nil probat the word Record there mentioned is only a memoriall of what was done and entred in a Book A Plaint removed out of the County-Court to the Court of the Common-Pleas hath these words in the Writ of remove Fitzh Nat. Br. 70. Fitzh Nat. Br. 13. 12. H 4.23 34. H. 6.49 Recordari facias loquelam c. and yet the County-Court is no Court of Record and so for ancient Demesne in a Writ of false judgement the words are Recordari facias loquelam c. and yet the Court of ancient Demesne is no Court of Recoâ—d and so of a Court Baron the Law and custome of England must be preserved or England will be destroyed and have neither Law nor custome Let any man shew me that the Court of Lords or the House of Commons in any age hath made any man a Delinquent Rege dissentiente the King contradicting it under his Great Seale Sir Giles Mâ—mpessau Michell and others of late were condemned by the prosecution of the House of Commons in King James his time did King James ever contradict it And so of ancient times 4 Pars Inslit Tit. Parliam pag. 23. where the House of Peeres condemned the Lord Latimer in 50. E. 3. the Kings pardon freed him which shewes cleerly that the Kings expresse or implyed assent must of necessity be had to make a Delinquent The Geatleman saith That the Parliament sitâ— or ought to sit by something greater thâ—n the Kings Writ c. No Parliament did ever sit without the Kings Writ nor could ever Parliament begin without the Kings presence in person 4 Pars Instit pag. 4. 6. or by a Guardian of England by pacent under the Kings Great Seale the King being in reâ—â—tiâ— or by Commission under the Great Seale to certaine Lords representing the Kings person and it hath been thus in all Ages unto this Session of Parliament wherein his Majesty hath been pressed and hath passed two Acts of Parliament one for a Triennall Parliament and another for a perpeâ—uall if the Houses please to satisfie their desires â—ow these two Acts agree one with another and with the Statute in E. the thirds time where Parliaments are ordained to be holden every yeare 4 E. 3. c. 14. 36. E. 3. c. 10.21 Iac. the Act of Limitation of Actions cap. 26. and what mischiefes to the people of this Land such length of Parliaments will produce by protections and priviledges to free them and their meniall servants from all debts during their lives if they please to continue it so long and how destructive to mens actions against them by reason of the Statute of Limitations which confines their actions to certain years and many other inconveniences of greater importance is easie to understand How can any man affirm that the two Houses doe act now by the Kings Wrie which relates to Counsell and Treaty with the King concerning the King the defence of his Kingdome and of the Church of England 4 Pars Instit p. 14. these are the three points which it tends to as appeares by the Writ They keep their King prisosoner at Holnby and will not suffer him to consult and treat with them Vow and Covenant p. 11. They have made a Vow and Covenant to assist the Forces raised and continued by both Houses against the Forces raised by the King without their consent and to the same effect have devised the Oath which they call the Negative Oath Is this to to defend the Kings Kingdome or their Kingdome When by their Solemn League and Covonant they extirpate Bishops Deanes and Chapters root and branch is this to defend the Church of England that Church must necessarily be meant that was the Church of England when the said Writ bore test they were not summoned to defend a Church that was not in being 3 Pars Cookâ— Deane and Chapter of Norwich to destroy and defend the Church are very contrary things the Church is not desended when they take away and sell the Lands of the Church The Gentleman saith The King cannot contrâ—le other Courts of Justice or prevent them from sitting or acting and therefore not the
the ruine of King and people AD. 3. The Gent. affirms That the sonding Propositions to the King and desiring his concurrence is carce worth an answer for Sub ects may humbly petition for that which is their strict right and property c. The Propositions sent to Newcastle are in print wherein the two Houses are so farre from humbly petitioning that they stile not themselves his Majesties Subjects as appeares by the Propositions That they have a strict right or property to any one of these Propositions is a strange assertion every one of them being against the Lawes now in force Have the two Houses a strict right and property to lay upon the people what Taxes they shall judge meet To pardon all Treasons c. that is one of their Propositions Have they a strict right and proporty to pardon themselves and so for all the rest of their Propositions These Propositions have been Voted by both Houses 12 H. 7.20 1 Iac. cap. 1. 1 Car. cap. 7. the Kings assent theâ— being drawn into Bills makes them Acts of Parliment Hath the King no right to assent or dis-assent Was the sending but a Complement All our Law-Books and Statutes speak otherwise This Gent. and others must give an account one time or other for such delusions put upon the people AD. 4. The Gent. saith They affirm not that the Kings power is separated from his person so as the two Spencers affirmed c. His Majesties person is now at Holnby under their Guards have they not severed his power from him when by no power they have left him he can have two of his Chaplaines who have not taken their Covenant to attend him for the exercise of his Conscience For the three Conclusions of the Spencers 15. Ed. 2. Exilium Hugonis 1 E. 3. c. 2. Calvins case 7 Pars Reports 11. doe not the two Houses act every of them They saâ— his Majesty hath broken his Trust touching the Government of his people They have raised Armies to take him they have taken him and imprisoned him they govern themselves they make Lawes impose Taxes make Iudges Sheriffes and take upon them omnia insigna summae pâ—tâ—statis Is not this to remove the King for misdemeanours to reform per aspertè to govern in aide of him the three Conclusions of the â—Pencers Doe they think the good people of England are become stupid and will not â—t length see these things The Gentleman saith They doe not separate his power from his Person but distinguish it c. His power is in his legall Writs Plowd 4. Eliz. 213. the Kings power and his Person are indivisible Courts and Officers when they counterfeit the Great Seale and seale Writs with the same make Iudges themselves Courts and Officers by their own Ordinances against his consent declared under his true Great Seale of England not by word of mouth letters or ministers only their Seale is obeyed their own Writs their own Iudges their own Courts their own Officers and not the Kings The time will come when such strange actions and discourses will be lamented AD. 5. The Gentleman goes on We take not from the King all power of pardoning Delinquents we only say it is not proper to him quarto modo c. What doe you meane by quarto modo I am sure Omnis Rex Angliae solus Rex semper Rex can doe it and none else read the Books of the Law to this purpose collected by that reverend and learned Iudge Stanford Stanfor Plcas 99. 27 H 8. c. 24. Dier 163. from all Antiquity to his time who dyed in the last year of King Philip and Queen Maries Reign you shall finde this a truth undeniable and this power was never questioned in any Age in any Book by any untill this time that every thing is put to the question You Gentlemen who professe the Law and maintaine the party against the King return at length and bring not so much scandall upon the Law which preserves all by publishing such incredible things We hold only what the Law holds the Kings Prerogative and the Subjects Liberty are determined and bounded and admeasured by the written Law what they are 1 Pars Instâ—t pag. 344. Plowd 3. Eliz. 236 237. we doe not hold the King to have any more power neither doth His Majesty claime any other but what the Law gives him the two Houses by the Law of this Land have no colour of power either to make Delinquents or pardon Delinquents the King contradicting and the Army under Sir Thomas Fairfax howbeit but Souldiers doe now understand that to be Law and doe now evidently see and assuredly know that it is not an Ordinance of the two Houses but an act of Parliament made by the King Lords and Commons that will secure them and let this Army remember their executed fellow Souldiers And the Law was alwayes so taken by all men untill these troubles that have begot Monsters of opinions AD. 6. This Gentleman sayes The Parliament hath declared the King to be in no condition to govern c. There is no end of your distinctions I and you professe the Law shew me Law for your distinctions or letter syllable or line in any Age in the Books of the Law that the King may in one time be in no condition to govern and yet have the habit of governing and another time he may viz. when the two Houses will suffer him The Law saith thus Vbi lex non distinguit non est distinguendum He sayes The King is not barred from returning to His Parliament as he calls the two Houses he knowes the contrary the whole City knowes the contrary Nos juris consulti sumus sacerdotes as Institian the Emperour hath it in the first Book of his Institutions and therefore knowledge and truth should come from our lips Worth and ingenious men will remember and reflect upon that passage of that good and wise man Seneca Non qua itur sed qua eundum follow not the rayes of the Lawyers of the House of Commons God forgive them I am sure the King will if they be wise and seek it in time AD. 7. The Gent. sayes We sweare that the King is our supreme Governour over all persons and in all causes c. Why hath he lest out the word only for the oath the Members now take is that King Charles is now the only and supreme Governour in all causes over all persons 5 Elâ—z cap. 1. Cawdreys case 5 pars fol. 1. and yet they keep their only Supreme Governour now in prison and act now in Parliament by vertue of their Prisoners Writ and by a concurrent power in this Parliament and by their own strict right and property as the Gent. This Oath is allowed by the Common Lâ—w of the Land affirms in his Answer These things agree well with their Oath that the King is the only Supreme Governour in all causes over
Impossibility The death of His Majesty whose life God prolong dissolves it necessarily For the Writ of summons is Carolus Rex in hoc individuo and Carolus Rex is in this particular Habiturus colloquium tractatum cum Prelatis proceribus c. 2 H. 5. Cooke Title Parliam 3. pars King Charles being to have Conference and Treaty with his Prelates and Peeres Carolus Rex cannot have Colloquium tractatum Conference and Treaty when he is deceased and therefore it is impossible for any Parliament to continue as long as they please as for a Parliament to make a dead man alive For Repugnancie That which is but for a time cannot be affirmed to have continuance for ever it is repugnant The end of the Act of 17. Caroli Regis which is to continue at pleasure is in the said Act expressed to be to raise credit for money for these three purposes First for reliefe of his Majesties Army and people in the North. Secondly for preventing the iminent danger of the Kingdome Thirdly for supply of other His Majesties present and urgent occasions These ends are ended the reliefe of that Army the iminent danger supposed was sixe yeares agoe the supply of His Majestie hath beene a supply against him take away the end the meanes thereto are to no purpose take away the cause the effect ceaseth and therefore the three ends of this Act being determined it agreeth with Law and Reason the Act should end Sir Anthony Mayns case 5. pars 1. H. 4.6 Littl. cap. Villen the Law rejects things unprofitable and uselesse A perpetuall Parliament besides that it incites men to selfe-ends destructive of the publique of which the whole Kingdome hath had sufficient experience wil be a constant charge to the Kingdome for that every County and Borough who send Members to the Parliament are by the Law to pay wages to their Parliament men which to many Counties will amount above some Subsidies Yearely There are many poore Borough-Townes in each County of this Kingdome who being to maintaine two Burgesses in Parliament will be quickly begger'd if the Parliament have no end for all which reasons it is cleare that such long continuance of Parliaments will instead of a remedy which is and ought to be the proper and true end of Parliaments become an insufferable grievance and oppression to all the People of the Land The Writ of Summons this Parliament is the basis and foundation of the Parliament If the Foundation be destroyed the Parliament falls The Assembly of Parliament if for three purposes Rex est habiturus colloquium et tractatum cum praelatis magnatibus et proceribus super arduis negotijs concernentibus 1. Nos 2 Defensionem regni nostri 3. Defensionem Ecclesiae Anglicanae This Parliament hath overthrowne this Foundation in all 3 parts 1. Nos the King they have chased him away and imprisoned him they have voted no prelats and a number of other Lords about 40. in the City must not come to the House and about 40 more are out of Towne the colloquium et tractatus are made void therby For the King cannot consult and treat there with men removed from thence 2. Defensionem regni nostri that is gone they have made it their Kingdome not His for they have usurped all His Soveraigntie 3. Defensionem Ecclesiae Anglicanae that is gone that Ecclesia Anglicana trust be understood necessarily that Church that at the test of the Writ was Ecclesia Anglicana they have destroyed that too So now these men would be called a Parliament having abated quashed and made nothing of the Writ whereby they were Summoned and Assembled If the Writ be made void all the processe is void also that House must needs fall where the Foundation is overthrowne Sublato fundamento opus cadit the Foundation being taken away the worke falls is both a maxime in Law and Reason For some yeares past there is no crime from Treason to Trespasse but they are guilty of all Treason Felonies Robberies trespasses are contra pacem coronam et dignitatem Regis against the Peace Crowne and Dignitie of the King as appeares by all Indictments in all Ages Pax Regis the Kings Peace Corona Regis the Kings Crowne Dignitas Regis the Kings Dignitie are all trod under foot and made nothing Pax Regis the Peace of the King is become a Warre against the King His Dignitie put into prison and the Crowne put upon their owne heads All the Judges of England have resolved Nevills ease 7. part 34. 2. Jacobi that Noblemen committing Treason have forfeited their Office and Dignitie their Officeiâ—s to councell the King in time of Peace to defend him in time of Warre and therefore those men against the duty and end of their Dignitie taking not onely Councell but Armes also to destroy Him and being thereof attaint by due course of Law by a racite condition annexed to the estate of their Dignitie have forfeited the same they are the words of the Law and therefore they have made themselves incapable to be Members of the upper House The Oppressions of the People Briberies Extortions Monopolies ought to be inquired after by the House of Commons and complained of to the King and Lords what have they done The House of Commons cannot by the Law commit any man to prison who is not of the said House for Treason Murder or Felony or any thing but for the disturbance of the publique Peace by the priviledge of the whole body They have no power by the Writ which the King issueth to elect and returne Members of that House so to doe For the Writ for them is onely ad faciendum et consentiendum to those things whereof His Majestie shall consult and treat with his Prelates and Nobles et de communi consilio Regni shall be there ordained as appeares by the Writ Here is no separate power given over the Kings people to them but onely ad faciendum et consentiendum 4 Pars. institut 23.24.25 and in all times this hath beene expounded and restrained to that which concerned their owne Members in Relation to the publique Service as he is a Member of the corporate body of the Parliament wherof the King is the Head But that the House of Commons have committed any man for Treason Murder or Felony or for any offence that had no relation to a Member of the House of Commons as it is against Law and Reason so no instance can be given till this Parliament 19 H. 6.43 22. E. 4.22 5 H. 4. cap. 8. 3 H. 6.46 All Questions and trials where witnesse are examined the examination is upon oath by the Law by all our Bookes Statutes every dayes practice Examination without an Oath is but a loose discourse therefore the House of Commons not claiming power to give an Oath have no power to examine any man No man shall bee imprisoned by the King or His Councell unlesse it be