the Pope grew obstinate in his Sentiment they would rather quit the Priesthood than Marriage and that Gregory who despised men should take the care of providing himself with Angels to govern the Church These good men without doubt spake with much sincerity and it may be if those who have endeavoured to blacken the conduct of the Reformers in that they have introduced anew the Marriage of Priests would let nature speak they would not say less But it is a great unhappiness and a great prejudice at the same time against the deluders of Virginity to live in a Church whereof they are constrained to defend all the Sentiments unless they would dishonour and destroy themselves In fine the Authors of the time of Hildebrand and those who have written since give him several times the name of Antichrist and it cannot be denied at least but that it is he who hath established the excessive authority of Popes and who the first durst to maintain that they have the power of deposing Kings and to change what they please in the Canons It is no more than may be seen in the Decretals of the Edition of Rome whereof Vsher cites divers scandalous articles He also gives the History of the quarrels which this Pope had with the Emperor Henry IV. and relates all the evil that hath been said of the first And with this he ends the first part of his work which was to have extended to the time in which the Devil hath been let loose II. As it is in the Apocalypse that a thousand years being past the Dragon was to be unloos'd for a little time Vsher begins his second part by the explication of this place and remarks that according to the maxim of Aristotle nothing being called great or little but by relation to another thing the time in which the Dragon was to be unchain'd should be short in comparison of the time during which he had ravaged the World before he had been put in Chains Roman Catholicks demand of Protestants where the Church was then if the Pope was Antichrist Vsher answers that the Church was then in the state in which some Antients and divers Catholick Authors have said that it would be under the Reign of Antichrist St. Augustin in his XX Letter which is directed to Hesychius saith that the Church appear'd not because of the excessive cruelty of the Persecutors Ecclesiam non apparituram impiis tunc Persecutoribus ultra modum saevientibus Several ancient and modern Authors have spoken to the same effect Vsher takes occasion from hence to make a parallel of the State of the Churches which followed the Council of Nice in the times that the Arians were the strongest with that wherein the West was found in these corrupt Ages The Arians reproached others with their small Number and their Poverty as it appears by these words of Gregory of Nazianza Where are those who upbraid us with our Poverty who say that the greatest Number forms the Church and who jeer the smalness of our Flock But as there lived in the Roman Empire several People who were not Arians Vsher conceives that under the Government of the Pope there was a pretty great number of Persons who were not of these opinions To shew that he doth not advance a simple conjecture he gives the History of the Original Opinions of the Vaudois who have rejected several of the Sentiments of the Church of Rome But he speaks more of them in the sequel as being a place wherein he should properly speak of them which obligeth us to pass to the vii Chapter and afterwards we will return to the Vaudois Vsher divides the time during which the Dragon hath been delivered from his Prison into three Periods the first reacheth to the time of Innocent III. The second unto Gregory XI And the third unto Leo X. The first comprehends two Ages taking it's beginning from the year 1000. The State the Western Church hath been in during the first of these two Ages and the complaints that the Authors of that time made against Corruptions which were equally seen in the Ecclesiasticks and People There have been no less complaints made of the Disorders of the twelfth Age as is plain in our Author who relates a great number thereof amongst which is this famous distich of Hildebert Bishop of Mans who saith in speaking of Rome Vrbs foelix si vel Dominis Vrbs illa careret Vel Dominis esset turpe carere fide Happy City if it had no Masters or if those who possess it believed it a shameful thing to want Faith The Popes took great care in that Age to have paid to them from England a kind of Tribute that they called St. Peters pence which Alexander II. in a Letter written to William the Norman saith had been paid by the English ever since they had embraced Christianity It appears by this Letter that the English sent this Money at first to Rome only thro' Liberality but this Liberality becoming a Necessity because the Kings commanded absolutely to do it the Authors of those times looked upon it as a Tribute Therefore Bertold of Constance who lived towards the latter end of the eleventh Age saith that it was then that the Prophecy of the Apocalypse was accomplished which saith That no Person could sell or buy without having the Mark or Name of the Beast or the Number of its Name The Reason of this is that according to the Relation of this Author in his Appendix of Hermannus Contractus towards the year Mlxxxiv William the first King of England rendred his whole Kingdom Tributary to the Pope and suffered none to sell or buy but such as submitted himself to the Apostolick See that is to say before he paid the Rome-scot or penny of St. Peter Notwithstanding this same William refused to swear an Oath of Fealty to Hildebrand and punished Bishops and other Ecclesiasticks who had offended him as he thought fit without having any regard to the Prayers and Exhortations of this Pope Some other Kings of England resisted the Popes likewise with the same vigour and we have proofs that the opinions of Rome were not yet spread every where Here is one that is pretty remarkable which is that Frederick Barbarousse being gone into the Holy Land to fight the Infidels in Mclxxxix Niaetas Choniates observes that the Germans were welcomed by the Armenians because the adoration of the Images of Saints was equally prohibited with the Armenians and Germans Hereby it appears that they had not as yet forgotten in Germany the Council of Francfort It is also remarked that several English Authors who have written after the arrival of the Normans said that the Church had in abhorrence the worship of Images The Doctrine even of Lanfranc concerning the Eucharist which the Normans brought into this Island was contrary to divers ancient Forms and Writings of the English And this is the cause that a long time after the Condemnation of
with this dignity which gave them the Preference because they were the three chief Cities of the World The second Question is whether the Bishop of Carthage was subject to the Patriarch of Rome or Alexandria and answer is made that he was subject to neither because he was a Primaâ—e himself of one of the thirteen Dioceses whereof we have spoken As to Jurisdiction he saith that according to the Canons of the Councils the order of the differences amongst Ecclesiasticks and all that concerned the Clergy was immediately to be carried before the Metropolitan and by an appeal before the Primate without acknowledging the Superiority of the Patriarchs That which makes the difficulty is that St. Augustine said that St. Cicilian in his difference with Donatus appeals to the Bishops beyond Sea But answer is made that that ought to be understood of the Council and not of a particular Bishop as that of â—ome who would draw the honour thereof to himself and attributed that Right to himself from the time that the Vandals under their King Genserick destroy'd all Africk as the Popes have done since in regard to the Greek Church by the fall of the Eastern Empire The third Question is an enquiry whether or no England ever depended on the Patriarch of Rome and it s decided in the Negative It had it's Primate who was the Bishop of York For although London according to the Relation of Tacitus was already famous through commerce notwithstanding the City of York was the Capital the Vicar of the Empire resided there and the Emperor Constance Father of Constantine the Great died there If the Gallican Church hath it's Liberties the English Church is not wanting this is examined in a Treatise which followeth those we have already spoken of but 't is not Vshers The Author establisheth for a Foundation that under the ancient Law the Priesthood and Royalty was joyned together and that when they were separated the whole Authority always remained in the Person of the Prince Which is justified by the example of Solomon who nominated Abiathar to perform the Function of High Priest and by other Examples inserted in the request that was presented to King Philip the Fair by all his Subjects against the enterprizes of Pope Boniface VIII And he thence concludes that the outward Policy of the Church belonged always to the Prince and that it 's he alone who hath the power to convocate Councils and in particular by that of Nice and Constantinople which were assembled by the Authority of the Emperours and confirmed by Constantine the Great and Theodosius the Great For tho' the Intrinsick Authority depended on the Word of God the Extrinsick nevertheless depended on the Imperial Seal to give them the force of publick Law From whence he infers Patriarchs were not erected but by the Councils and Authority of the Emperours and chiefly that of Rome the Author evidently demonstrates this dignity was not attributed to it but by the respect that the Fathers and Councils had for the Capital of the Vniverse which was adorned with the Senate and Empire To convince these who are most prejudic'd in favour of the Court of Rome we shall relate but the terms of the last Council save one The Canon of the Council of Calcedon as it is to be seen in the Manuscripts of the Libraries of M. de Thou and M. Iustel He says that the Priviledges of Rome were granted by the Fathers because it was the Mistris of the World Quod urbs illa imperarèt Neither by Divine nor Apostolick Institution as he observes but a motive purely Temporal Therefore also the same Canon grants to Constantinople new Rome the first rank after old Rome for the same reasons because it was also honoured by the Senate and Imperial Throne After that the Author descends to the Priviledges of the English Church and maintains it did not depend on the Roman Patriarch because it was a different Diocess and that it was not in the number of the Suburbicary Provinces This Verse only is a proof on 't Ad penitùs toto divisos orbe Britannos It 's also further justified by this particular circumstance that the English celebrated the Passover according to the Custom of the East and conformed not to the West Having thus prepared the Mind he shews that the Order of Parliament under Henry the 8. who shook off the Popes Yoak was not a new Law but the re-establishment of the Ancient Laws and Maxims of the Kings of England who have maintained in all Ages that the Excommunications of the Pope were void in England and he brings many Examples to prove it He thence draws this Consequence that the Church of England cannot be aspers'd with the odious term of Schismatick because it hath not raised Altar against Altar that it hath kept it's Ancient Government and can shew a Succession of Bishops not interrupted since the beginning of Christianity and consequently it had sufficient Authority to reform it self There is added to these Treatises the advice of Iohn Barnesius a Benedictine Monk Who much disapproved these flatterers of the Court of Rome who have incens'd the Minds of men in maintaining that the Kingdom of England owes any homage to the Holy See and have caused this breach with the Pope He saith it would be very happy if the Pope for the good of Peace would again receive into his Communion the Kingdom of England without rendering it dependant on him until a Council may cure the evil But the Court of Rome never lets go its hold and it 's long since that Pope Paul the fourth answered to this Proposition of Barnesius For the Embassadors of England under Queen Mary asking him Absolution in the Name of the whole Kingdom he omitted not to demand of them if he might send an Exactor of the Tribute of St. Peter declaring unto them that they should not expect this Apostle should open them the Gate of Heaven whilst they retained his Patrimony upon Earth Barnesius confesseth it 's very hard to be submitted to the Pope who when he pleaseth Arms the Subjects against their King and adds that the Councils of Constance and Basil having declared those Hereticks who hold that the Pope was not Inferiour to General Councils the Modern Popes are in the Case of Excommunication declared by these Councils This he saith not to quarrel with his Holiness but humbly to insinuate unto him the means of bringing back so fine a Kingdom into the bosom of the Church Notwithstanding the good Intentions of this poor Monk have been very ill acknowledged for he was sent out of Paris strip'd of his habit tied like a fierce beast and uncompassionately dragg'd to Rome and there cast into the dark Dungeon of the Inquisition where he miserably expired An Extract of the Letters of Grotius I. PART The Subject Criticks and Divinity WE have not seen until now but a very small Number of the Letters of this Great Man the
a general Critique of all this History to which he adds some Reflections upon M. le Grand It was translated into French and had been published long ago had not M. le Grand busied himself in making a small Book against a Letter of Dr. Burnet and against the Extract of his History of Divorce The Author of this Bibliotheque had begun to Answer it but this xi Tome of the Bibliotheque which lay upon him alone and which could not be put by made him discontinue yet 't is hop'd that the Publick will lose nothing by this delay but may see once more if God be pleased to lend him health and give him leisure to shew that M. de Meaux is none of the sincâ—rest in the World And yet this Prelate has subject to reason himself since those who approve his Works have as little sincerity as himself At least Mr. Wake shews that what the Cardinals Capisucchi and Bona teach in their Works is a very different Doctrine from that of the Catholick Exposition concerning the Invocation of Saints and the Worship of Images Dr. Wake 's Adversaries were so long silent that the Dispute was thought ended but at last they broke silence about the middle of the year 1687 when was publisht a Reply to the Defence of the Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England with a second Letter from M. de Meaux Dr. Wake a little after that made his 2d Defence which he divided into two parts in the first he justifies all that he advanced concerning the Expositions of M. de Meaux He brings many Historical Proofs of the difference between the old and new Papism or between the Speculative Doctrine of M. de Meaux and of the other Doctors of the Catholick Church and their common practice And examins in particular what Rome Teaches concerning the Worship of Images The Second Part runs upon the Nature and Object of the Divine Service upon the Invocation of Saints and upon Images and Relicks and upon the accusation of Idolatry which the Protestants charge the Roman Church with III. M. de Meaux's Apologist believed that to be even with Dr. Wake he should make a History of Controversies and presently runs upon Generalities that are not to the purpose he speaks of the Roman Catholicks Zeal and of the different methods that Rome has made use of to bring back those who have left her Communion but he has forgot the chiefest of them at least that which had most success which is her Persecution Then he comes to England jumps from the Monk Augustin to Henry the VIII makes some Reflections upon the Duke of Sommerset and on Queen Elizabeth and then like Lightning passes to the Reign of Queen Mary and then to Iames the 1 st to Charles the 2 d and then to Iames the 2 d. These Preambles gave Dr. Wake occasion to speak of several remarkable things which would be too tedious to mention here It will be enough to Remark two of the most important The First relates to the Dissentions of the Episcopal Party and the Presbyterians and the other to the Murther of Charles the 1 st 1. As to the First He acknowledges that many of those whom the Persecution of Q. Mary had Exiled were obstinate in the Form of Religion which they saw abroad but that this Spirit of Schism was fomented by Roman Catholicks who mix themselves with them pretending to be of their number In effect it was by the Roman Catholicks in 1588 that the Puritans begun to make a noise the Chief of them being Commin Heath Hallingham Coleman Benson were all Papists who thus dissembled and disguised themselves as appeared by a Letter which dropped out of Heath's pocket And it was discover'd that the Roman Catholicks had Colledges in Germany France Spain and Italy wherein the Students were brought up in Sciences and Mechanick Arts and they exercised twice a week to Dispute for and against Independents Anabaptists and Atheism it self After which they sent them to England to play the best game that they understood A Iesuit of St. Omers acknowledged that there were some of the Fathers of their Society hid for Twenty years among Quakers which is likely enough because the scruple these Fanaticks make of Swearing gives the Fryars the means of living among them being so exempted from the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy In 1625. the Jesuites published a Book Intituled Mysteria Politica or the Letters of some famous persons designing to break the League that divers Princes of Europe made against the House of Austria it contained Eight Letters equally injurious to France and England to the Venetians Hollanders and Swissers In the last the Author that counterfeited the Protestant forgot nothing which he thought proper to give a mean Idea of King Iames and to sow division between this Prince his Son and the Princess Palatine and between the Lords of the Parliament the Clergy of the Church of England and the Puritane Ministers Upon the Civil Wars of England and the death of King Charles the First Mr. Wake acknowledges that the fear of seeing Popery re-established made the People take Arms who since the Reformation had always horror for this Superstitious Worship But he maintains that the Papists were the first Authors of the troubles M. du Moulin Doctor of Divinity and Chaplain to King Charles the II. accused the Roman Catholicks with this a little after the Re-establishment of this Prince and not contented to prove it in his Answer to the Philanax Anglicus he offered to prove it legally or by Law there were then many alive that were ready to Swear that there was held a Consultation of Cardinals and Doctors of Sorbonne wherein it was declared That it was lawful for the English Roman Catholicks to push the King on to his ruin thereby to endeavor the Change of Religion and Government The Roman Catholicks instead of taking this Challenge made use of King Charles's Authority to hinder Mr. Moulin to press for the decision of this Suit And though the Book and Accusation remained without Answer for 17 years The Author renewed the Challenge in a Second Edition of his Work and dyed without being Answered none having Courage to undertake it They that do not understand English will find the most part of M. Moulin's proofs in the Politicks of the Clergy in the last endeavors of afflicted innocence And in Mr. Iurieu's Parallel betwixt Calvinism and Popery with some new reasons of the Author to which if we add what Mr. Wake has here the conjecture will be more than probable 1. In the beginning of the Troubles the King perceived that the Fanaticks were set on by the Papists Their Principles says he in his Declaration against the Rebels of Scotland are those of the Iesuites their Preachers Sermons are the style of Becan Scioppius and Eudaemon Joannes from whom they borrow their very Phrases The pitiful Arguments of their Seditious Libels are drawn word by word out
Choice of such a Person as pleases us and who has an agreeable Temper It wou'd not be unpleasing to have her handsome but since 't is not very common to find such a one we ought to be contented if she please us whether she does others or no and that 't is not always advantageous for the Wife to please all the World But 't is not sufficient to be pleas'd with her Beauty except there be a Sympathy in Humours The Author advises us to study the Genius of those we design to marry that may the better succeed in spight of the Address that some make use of to hide their weakness he adds for the better security that we may choose one that is young and resides near our own habitation In the first place he advises to a choice in a well ordered Family and to observe the equality of Condition and Fortune and to take care that she has no such pre-engagements as may make her marry him by constraint To these things only which regard the Lover he adds two others for the choice of a Husband which relate both to Women and Children he adviseth them upon the whole to a conjugal Amity good Example Devotion and Moderation in the pleasures of the Bed and gives good reasons for what he says There is upon this subject also one of the elegant Epistles of Anthoninus de Guerre's Advice touching the Education of Children In fine we may say without flattering Mr. Chause that there appears in the whole Book the Character of an honest Man and good Christian without prejudicing his Favour we may see besides good Wit much reading of the ancient Poets many things that divert the Reader at the same time that they instruct him I believe that a good part of Mankind wou'd be glad that this Work might have the same Success that the discourse of Socrates had at Xenophon's Feast this great Philosopher so sensibly touch'd the Guests in speaking to 'em of Love that those amongst 'em who were yet Batchellors made Vows to marry and those that had Wives immediately took Horse and ran full speed home that they might soon embrace their Wives 'T is a good Observation that the Author who in his Book exhorted Men to marry says not a word to perswade Virgins to the same He well foresaw that this Silence would surprize some of his Readers therefore he has put 'em out of pain in the Preface by acquainting them that Virgins are sufficiently convinced of the necessity of Marriage therefore want no Exhortations thereto 't is certain says he that though a Virgin never proposes Marriage because of her modesty there is nothing she so passionately wishes for her Heart often gives her Mouth the Lye she often says I will not when sometimes she dyes for desire The rest of the Passage ought to be read The Lives of Saints and Saintesses drawn from the Fathers of the Church and Ecclesiastical Authors Tom. 11 4to at Paris 1687 with Approbation of the Doctors WE have not seen the first Volume of this Work but 't is sufficient to give an Idea to the Reader of it and the other Ten that are to follow because 't is apparent the Saints in Ianuary and other Months have not been less fruitful in Miâ—acles than those of February whose Lives are contained in this Second Tome But two of the Licensers assure us that the Author continues to give Marks therein of his Exactness and great Judgment Tho' the Month of February hath but 28 Days yet there are more than 60 Lives in this Volume without reckoning that one Life sometimes includes the History of several Saints They are all Edifying at least for those who suffer themselves to be gained rather by Declamations than solid Reasons who are only touched with Noble Actions rather than with what is related in a Sublime and Periodick Style In the Title the Authors which are made use of are commonly marked and the place is sometimes marked in the Margen Neither do the Licensers fail to say that tho' Men make a kind of Religion of Piously cheating others in the matter that the Author treateth on after having first abused themselves He on the contrary advanceth no fact but for which he hath Witnesses which cannot in Reason be denyed being perswaded that how bright soever the Actions of Saints are they alwayes makes less Impression upon the hearts of Men as soon as there is any Ground to doubt of them It were a thing to be desired that not only the Lives of the Ancients that have been Canonized were given to the Publick but also a compleat Ecclesiastical History written in a Style as pure as that of this Book Such another Work would be extreamly profitable providing the Author always kept the Character of an Historian and fell not into the ways of Preachers eâ—pâ—cially of the Catholicks It may be that Vertuous Actions that would be read therein would make more Impression upon the Mind and would more Efficaciously oblige the Readers to imitate them such is that which the Author relates of the Solitary Moses which Maria Queen of the Sarazins asked of the Emperour Valens to be Bishop of the Christians of her Nation He was brought to Lucius Bishop of Alexandria who was an Arian to be Consecrated but Moses would not receive from him the Imposition of Hands because he had dipped them in Blood and defiled them by the Death of a great many Saints Lucius who imagined that the refusal of this Hermit came from this that he believed him an Heretick answered him That not knowing which was the Faith it was against Justice that he should thus treat him before he knew him Your Faith replyed Moses shews it self clearly by your Actions So many Servants of God banished so many Priests and Deacons Relegated into Countries where Jesus Christ is not known exposed as a Prey to wild Beasts or consumed by Fire are convincing proofs of the Impiety of your Belief For we know that these Excesses are infinitely opposed to Jesus Christ and unworthy of all those who have the Sentiments which they ought to have Ethelbert was made a Saint who was first King of Kent that embraced Christianity and he certainly deserves it were it for nothing but the Sweetness with which he received the Preachers Pope Gregory I sent him The Monk Augustine was the chief of them and was accompanied with Forty others Before they came into England he stopped in the Isle of Thanet which is on the East of the Province of Kent whence he sent word to the King that he came from Rome to bring excellent News to those that would believe him and would follow the Advices he would give them seeing they would be certain to Reign everlastingly with the True God and of enjoying Heaven and all manner of Happyness Some time after the King himself went to meet those Missioners and speak to them in these terms These are fine words and
Common-Wealths The Reverse of Fortunes the Religions Politicks and Governments of Foreign Nations by this we may consult what practices have Establish'd Kingdoms what Laws have render'd any particular Nation more Safe happy and Civiliz'd than its Neighbours and what has Contributed to the Weakness and Overthrow of Bodies-Politick and what has Facilitated its Rise and Settlement and in a Prospect of the whole a New Scheme may be drawn for future Ages to act by Longum iter per praecepta breve Essicax per exempla Wisdom got by Experience is usually very Expensive Tedious and Uncertain Several Experiences confirm ones Knowledge and a Man's Life is too little to make many in every Case But if he finds e'm faithfully done to his hands the labour is sav'd and he may grow wise at the expence of other Mens Studies It was Thales that said of History Nil Mortem à vita differre because the Life of the Deceased depends upon the remembrance of the Living Mr. Brathwait in his Nursery for Gentry says Wou'd you be enabled for Company no better Medium than Knowledge in History It wou'd be a dispraise to advance an Elogy upon this Study which reconciles all times but futurity renders all the spatious Globe of the Inhabited World common and familiar to a Man that never Travelled We may see all Asia Africa and America in England all the Confederate Countreys in ones Closet Encompass the World with Drake make New Discoveries with Columbus Visit the Grand Seignior in the Seraglio Converse with Seneca and Cato Consult with Alexander Caesar and Pompey In a word whatever Humanity has done that 's Noble Great and Surprizing either by Action or Suffering may by us be done over again in the Theory and if we have Souls capable of Transcribing the bravest Copies we may meet Instances worth our Emulation History is as by some called the World's Recorder and according to my Lord Montague we must confess That no wise Man can be an Experienc'd Statist that was not frequent in History Another tells us That to be acquainted with History purchases more wisdom than the Strictest Rules of Policy for that the first do furnish us with Instances as well as Rules and as it were personates the Rule drawing out more into full proportion History best suits the Solidest Heads Whence we find that Caesar made it his Comment We read that King Alphonsus by Reading Livy and Ferdinand of Sicily by Reading Quintus Curtius recovered their Health when all the Physical Doses they took prov'd ineffectual but whether 't is Friendly to the Body or not 't is not our business to determine Sure we are that 't is Friendly to the Mind cultivates and informs it in what is very agreeable to its Nature we mean Knowledge therein imitating its Divine Original History is the most admirable foundation for Politicks by this may be discovered all that 's necessary for a Kingdoms Safety and Peace the Stratagems of War an account of the Management of the deepest Plots and Contrivances and the carrying on such Measures for every Publick Affair whether in respect to Enemies or Allies as the deepest Heads have ever yet practis'd And as History is so useful to such as are intrusted with the Charge of Common-wealths so 't is not less necessary for the Settling and Establishment of the Christian Religion We find a Great part of the World Worship Inanimate Beings others Sacrifice to Devils others propagate a Worship made up of the most ridiculous Fables as the Turks c. and many that profess the Christian Religion are so far degenerated from the Native Simplicity and Purity of it as that 't is now another thing A Reasonable Creature born into the World and finding in himself a Principle of Adoration of some Vnknown Being can't forbear an Enquiry into Religion but when he finds so many Religions so great a Diversity of Divine Worship and every Party willing to believe themselves in the Right and condemning all the rest of Mankind that are not of their Opinion This is enough to surprize such a Person but at the same time he will make this necessary Consequence after a little thought and application of Mind Certain I am that there 's a God and as certain that this God ought to be Worshipped after such a manner as is most Suitable to his Nature and the quality of the Worshipper as to his Nature it 's too fine and Spiritual to be pleas'd with any Adoration but what is Spiritual and as for Man the Creature that is to pay this Homage and Adoration he is a Reasonable Being and therefore it 's also Necessary that the Worship he pays be the most reasonable and perfect that his Nature will admit of Now a Man needs not go out of himself to consult what Reason is he has no more to do than to see what Religion is most agreeable to his Reason and most worthy the Dignity of his Nature we speak here of unprejudic'd persons And then History will inform him what has been practis'd and shew him that Christianity is the most noble sincere and pure Religion in the World but in this we refer you to what we have already spoken upon the foregoing Subject of Divinity There only remains to inform our Reader That 't is not onely Books but Maps Monuments Bass-Reliefs Medals and all Antient Descriptions that mightily strengthen and confirm History therefore 't wou'd be very useful to read such Authors as have treated upon Medals c. In our Catalogue of Miscellanies especially the Iournal des Scavans there are several of them The following Catalogue will be of great use in this Study HISTORY CHardin's Voyages into Persia fol. Embassie of the Five Jesuits into Siam fol. Chaumont's Embassie into Siam fol. Cornellis's Historical and Geographical Memoirs of Morea Negrepont and the Maritime places unto Thessalonica Dapper's Description of Africk in fol. Tavernier 's Travels in fol. Leti Historia Genevrina in 5 Volumes in Twelves Mr. Amelot's History of the Government of Venice Ortelius Mercator Cambden's Britannia Caesar's Commentaries Philo-Judaeus Cornelius Tacitus fol. Daniel's History of England fol. Lord Bacon of Henry the 7 th History of the Roman Empire Livies History Elzevir's Edition with Notes Supplementum Livianum Johannis Florus in Usum Dephini Valerius Maximus Utropius Suetonius Tranquillus Justinus Historicus Thucidides Translated out of Greek by Hobbs Zenophon Herodotus Diodorus Siculus in fol. Sir William Temple's Memoirs Dagoraeus VVhear his Method of Reading Histories Burnet's History of the Reformation Bishop Abbot's brief Description of the World in Twelves Davilla's History of the Civil Wars of France fol. Guichardin's History of Italy fol. History of Ireland Amour's Historical Account of the Roman State c. fol. Blome's Britannia Baker's Chronicles of the Kings of England fol. Bacon's Resuscitatio fol. Caesar's Commentaries fol. Heylin's Cosmography fol. Herbert's Life and Reign of King Henry the Eighth fol. Howel's Institution of General History fol.
remarkable that he had a more than ordinary desire to be instructed in the Fundamentals of the Sciences and being yet very young he read the Works of my Lord Bacon Des Cartes and Gallileus In reading the Remarks of Scaliger upon Eusebius he observed that Chronology was founded upon Astronomy whereupon he also resolv'd to apply himself to the study of this last Science He set himself to read the Almagest of Ptolomy but he soon perceiv'd that he cou'd not read this sort of Books with advantage without the help of Geometry then he applied himself to the study of Euclides Elements in which he profited much in a little time and afterwards publish'd the Elements of Geometry explain'd in few words and better than ever was done before him Besides these are the Titles of some other Mathematical Books which he compos'd Euclidis Data Lectiones Opticae Lectiones Geometricae Archimedis Opera Apollonii Conicorum Lib. IV. Theodosti Sphaerica Lectio de Sphaera Cylindro One wou'd be surprized that so great a Geometrician cou'd also be a Poet yet we are assured in his Life that there are found several Poems amongst the Titles of his Latine Works Dr. Duport having renounc'd his Charge of Professor of the Greek Tongue he recommended Mr. Barrow who had been his Scholar whereupon he was admitted to Examination and read with great applause but he could not obtain the place because 't was thought he was inclin'd to Arminianism which was not savoured in England during the Usurpation this made him resolv'd to travail He went to France from thence to Italy where he embarked at Leghorn for Smyrna from whence he went to Constantinople there he tarried a year and we are assured during that time he read the works of the most famous Patriarch that that City ever had We may easily understand it was St Chrysostom that is here spoken of afterwards Mr. Barrow embarked for Venice from whence he returned for England by the way of Germany and Holland When King Charles the second was restored all the World believed Dr. Barrow would be preferred because he had been always firm to the Interests of the Royalists but being disappointed he made this Distich upon his unkind treatment Te Magis optavit rediturum Carole Nemo Et Nemo sensit te Rediisse Minus However he was elected Professor of the Greek tongue in 1660 and Chosen two years after to teach Geometry In the year following Mr. Lucas having founded a Chair for a Professor of Mathematicks he was the first that fill'd it and there was an Order made for him and those that were to succeed him that they shou'd be oblig'd every year to leave to the University Ten of their Lectures in writing he so passionately loved the Mathematicks that there was found before his Apollonius these words written in his own hand 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tu autem Domine quantus es Geometra cum enim haec Scientia nullos terminos habeat c. God himself hath Geometry in his thoughts but thou O Lord how great a Geometrician art thou For tho' this Science has no bounds yet one may find an infinite number of new Theorems by the only assistance of a humane Capacity THOV seest all these Truths at one glance without any chain of consequences and without being wearied with a long search of demonstrations In other things our Intellect is defective and it seems that we do think of I do not know what for want of a perfect assurance From whence it happens that there are almost as many Opinions as different Persons But all the World agree in the Truth of Mathematicks and 't is in this that the Mind of Man feels its strength and is perswaded that it can effect something great and wonderful c. This only is able to enflame me with the Love of Thee and to make me wish with as much ardor as is possible for that happy day in which my Spirit being delivered from every thing that now perplexes it shall be assured not only of these Truths but of an infinite number of others without the trouble of deducing consequences c. There is without doubt but a very few Men who amongst those reasons which induce 'em to wish for Heaven give this of expecting the Happiness of a Perfect Knowledge of the Mathematicks there Thus Mr. Barrow having wearied himself with these Speculations resolved to addict himself only to the study of Divinity After which the Bishops of St. Asaph and Salisbury gave him some Benefices and the King made him Rector of Trinity Colledge in Cambridge in the year 1672. The Colledges of the Vniversities of England are otherwise regulated than those beyond Sea The charge of the Master of a Colledge is much more considerable than that of the Rectors of Forreign Academies or Colledges A few years after Mr. Barrow was preferred to a more eminent Post to wit Vice-Chancellor which is the greatest charge of the University and after this Chancellor which is not given but to Persons of the first Quality The Author of the Life of Mr. Barrow informs us how he governed the Colledge with an Vniversal Applause but it shall suffice to say that he there composed divers Treatises and amongst others that of the Supremacy of the Pope which is at the end of the first Volume In fine he died at London the 4th of March the year 1677. and was buried at Westminster where his friends erected a Marble Monument without an Epitaph which is added to the end of his Life The first five Sermons which compose the first Volume treat of the Excellency of the Christian Religion and of the Interest which accrews to us in loving and practising it the four following expound the great Duties of Christianity Prayer and Thanksgiving The 10th 11th and 12th are upon particular occasions to wit The Return of the King The Gunpowder-Plot And the Conseâ—ration of the Bishop of Man his Vncle. The ten following from the 13th to the 23d were composed against the sin of speaking too much in conversation in speaking ill of his Neighbour and Swearing c. Mr. Barrow is very large upon these matters because there are few Vices so universal tanta hujusmodi Libido saith St. Paulinus cited by the Author Mentes hominum invasit ut etiam qui procul aliis Vitiis recesserunt in illud tamen quasi in extremum Diaboli Laqueum incidant Those which follow even to the 30th have respect unto the great Precepts in which the Law is fulfilled to wit to love God and our Neighbour All the preceding Sermons were not published till after the death of the Author but he himself caused the two last of this Volume to be printed whereof one treats of Charity towards the Poor and the other of the Passion of Iesus Christ Dr. Tillotson speaks of the first that there could be nothing more elaborate in its kind and that Dr. Barrow had spoken the utmost that the
Antient People from whence Colonies have fill'd all the World as we are taught by the oldest Histories that remain amongst us It 's true also that to this hath been added a thousand Extravagancies touching the Nature of the Divine Being and the manner of Worship done to him But 't is thus that Judaism was corrupted by the Jewish Doctors and the Christian Religion by that of the Christians which have innovated so many Changes that it was hardly known for some Ages Is it not false say they that these two Religions came from Moses and Jesus Christ The same thing hath happen'd to the first Tradition and Aristotle hath believ'd that in effect it was thus his words are too remarkable to be omitted The most profound Antiquity hath left to future Ages under hidden Fables the belief that there were Gods and that the Divinity was displayed in all the Works of Nature There 's added afterwards That these Fables teach us to perswade the People and render 'em more obedient to the Laws for the good of the State although some say that the Gods resemble Men Animals and other things If we keep to those things only which were spoke of in the beginning to wit that the Gods were the Original of Nature there would be nothing said that is unworthy of the Divinity There is some likelihood that the Sciences having been often found out and as often lost these Opinions were preserved until now as the other Doctrines of the Antients Thus we may distinguish the Opinions of our Fathers from those who lived first upon the Earth 'T would be difficult to make a better proof of a matter of fact and some have even dared to say That in Physicks there is rarely proved an existence of one Cause by a great number of effects which are so great in number so divers so sensible and so certain The harmony which is between the parts of the Universe which conspire all to the same end and always keep the same order shews that this Divinity known to all Mankind is one in Number and the same in Concord as may be seen in a State between persons of different humours which live under the same Laws Thus it appears in the March of an Army which obeys its General and thus the Order and Regularity which is seen in a House proves 't was built by one Architect only This all the World acknowledgeth in spite of the great number of Gods the Heathens have made for they themselves confess'd a Supreme Divinity to whom all others were to submit themselves as the Poets even call him The Father the King the Most High the Greatest the Most Excellent of the Gods c. This much Philosophers have acknowledged which say that even all names that are call'd upon by the People shewed but one Divinity only Quoties voles saith Seneca tibi licet aliter tunc Auctorem rerum nostrarum compellare Tot appellationes ejus esse possunt quot Munera hunc Liberum patrem Herculem ac Mercurium nostri putant c. omnia ejusdem Dei nomina sunt variè utentis sua potestate Sophocles says very often in a Tragedy that is lost 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. In truth there is a God and there is but one who hath made the Heaven the Earth the Sea and the Winds nevertheless there are many Mortals who by strange Illusions make Statues and Gods of Stone of Brass of Gold and Ivory to give them speedy deliverance from their evils they offer Sacrifices and consecrate Festivals vainly imagining that Piety consists in Ceremonies Thus Marcillius Ficinus who translated Plato into Latin and who was willing to renew the old Platonick Tenets believes amongst several more that men were offended because they found in Plato the name of God in the Plural Number but this Philosopher did only mean subalternate Gods or Angels that those says he which are not surprized with the number of Angels are not at all astonish'd with the number of Gods because in Plato so many Gods import no more than so many Angels and so many Saints Dr. Barrow concludes upon the whole that the Universal consent of all Nations does very well prove that there is a God and we cannot doubt but that it is very reasonable One may understand by this that the Sermons of this Author are rather treatises or exact dissertations than pure harangues to please a multitude If we were not resolved to keep within the bounds of an unbyassed Historian we might say that there never was a Preacher comparable to this Author but our particular suffrage or rather that of all England ought not to be a president to all Europe The Life of the most Reverend Father in God James Usher late Lord Arch-Bishop of Armagh Primate and Metropolitan of all Ireland with a Collection of 300 Letters which he writ to the most illustrious men of his time for Piety and Learning and some he received from England and other parts Published from the Original by Richard Parr after his Death to whom he had given the Care of his Papers London Sold by Nathaniel Ranew 1686. in Folio THIS Volume is composed of two Parts whereof the one contains the Life of the famous Vsher written by Parr Doctor of Divinity and the other a Collection of divers Letters that this Illustrious Arch-Bishop hath written to several Learned Men of his Time with some of their Answers 1. There have been already seen several Abridgments of the Life of Vsher but as those who compos'd them had not a memory sufficient for the Work so they have given nothing to the Publick but what was very imperfect 'T was this made Dr. Parr undertake to publish what he knew of this Prelate to whom he was Chaplain thirteen years from 1642 to 1655 he knew him throughly in that time and learn'd many circumstances of his Life which those were Ignorant of who lived at a greater distance Dr. Parr hath also received much assistance from the Papers of Vsher which among others fell into his hands and from the Conversations that he hath had with Mr. Tyrrel his Grandson a Gentleman of an extraordinary merit The Primate of Ireland was Universally esteem'd during his Life and his works are still in so great a reputation that men will not be sorry to see here a little Abridgment of his History Iames Vsher was born at Dublin the fourth of Ianuary 1580. his Fathers name was Arnold and was one of the six Clerks of the Chancery The Family of the Vshers is very Antient altho' the right name is not Vsher but Nevil but one of the Ancestors of our Archbishop chang'd it into that of Vsher because he was Usher to King Iohn who ascended the Throne of England 1199. our Prelate had from his Infancy an extraordinary passion for Learning Two Scotch Gentlemen who advis'd him in his studies entertain'd him with much care The one was nam'd Iames Fullerton the
other Iames Hamilton They went into Ireland by order of the King of Scotland to form some agreement with the Protestant Nobility of that Country intending thereby to assure himself of that Kingdom in case Q. Elizabeth died suddenly The better to cover their enterprise and to give no Umbrage to a Queen extreamly suspitious they set themselves to teach Latin at Dublin where at that time 't was very rare to find persons learn'd in Humanity Vsher having profited very much by them in a little time seem'd to have a particular inclination to Poetry which he afterwards chang'd into as great a desire of understanding History that which created this inclination in him was reading these words of Cicero Nescire quid antra quam natus sis acciderit id est semper esse puerum his Annals and his other writings sufficiently shew what progress he had made in this study whereof he has given sensible proofs in his Infancy Being in the University of Dublin establish'd principally by the care of Henry Vsher his Uncle Archbishop of Ardmagh He set himself to read the Fortalitium fidei of Stapleton which made him resolve to apply himself to the reading of the Fathers to see if this Author had cited them faithfully he began to put this design in execution at 20 years old and continued this Study without intermission for 18 years obliging himself to read every day a certain task His Father had a mind to divert him from it and engage him to Study the Law to which our Prelate had no inclination but in 1598. he dying soon after left his Son at Liberty to chuse what manner of life was most pleasing to him he was the eldest son of the family and the estate his Father left was considerable enough to make him apply all his time in Domestick affairs This made him resolve to put off this trouble and to remit the Estate to his Brother with orders to give to his Sisters what their Father had left them reserving only to himself what would maintain him in the University with a sufficiency to buy himself some Books Whilst he was at the University and but yet 18 years old he disputed against a Jesuit call'd Fitz-Symmons and overcame him in two conferences which made this Jesuit afterwards in a Book Intituled Britannomachia call him the most learn'd of those who are not Catholicks A-Catholicorum Doctissimum he made so great a progress in the first years that he apply'd himself to Divinity that his Uncle Archbishop of Ardmagh ordain'd him Priest at the 21 year of his Age. This ordination was not conformable to the Canons but the extraordinary merit of young Vsher and the necessities of the Church made him believe it was not necessary to stay till the age mark'd out by the Ecclesiastical Laws of Ireland He preach'd then at Dublin with very great applause he particularly devoted himself to the controversies which were between the Protestants and Roman Catholicks he treated on them so clearly and with so much solidity that he confirm'd many wavering Protestants and prevailed with many Roman Catholicks to embrace the Protestant Faith But amongst those who rank'd themselves in the Protestant Churches there was a great number that were not so sincere as he could have wished them they did all they could to obtain the publick exercise of the Roman Catholick Religion at Dublin that they might insensibly have had the Liberty to make a profession of their true Sentiments Vsher who believ'd that this toleration wou'd be of a very dangerous consequence oppos'd it with all his might and one day as he Preacht upon this matter with great zeal he spoke something which then no notice was taken of but 40 years after it was found to be a true Prophecy he took his Text upon these words of Ezek. ch 4. v. 5. And thou shalt bear the Iniquity of the house of Judah 40 days I have appointed thee a day for a year He applied these days to Ireland and said that he who reckon'd from this year to 40. should find that the Protestants of Ireland should bear the Iniquity of those who were for a toleration in these times this was in 1601. and 40 years were no sooner expired 1641. but the Irish Catholicks made a bloody Massacre upon the Protestants He never wholly discontinued to Preach whilst he was in Ireland altho he was Professor of Divinity in that University but he accustom'd himself to make a Voyage every three years into England where he found a greater variety of Books than in Ireland there he past one part of his time at Oxford another at Cambridge and another at London and carefully visited all their publick and particular Libraries he made collections of what Books he there read and made remarks upon them with a design to make a work that he had resolved to Intitule A Theological Bibliotheque wherein he had treated very accurately of all the Ecclesiastical Antiquities but the misfortunes of Ireland and the Civil Wars of England hinder'd him from finishing it he ordered when he died that it should be put into the hands of Mr. Laugbaine Dr. of Divinity to supply what was wanting and publish them to the World This learn'd man engag'd himself forthwith in this useful work but he died before he finished it 1657. There is yet to be seen in the Bodleyane Bibliotheque his Manuscripts which no man dares undertake to finish In 1615. there was a Parliament in Ireland and an assembly of the Clergy where certain Articles were compos'd touching Religion and Ecclesiastical Discipline Vsher who was the chief in it caus'd it to be sign'd by the Chancellor of Ireland and by the Orators of the Assembly of the Bishops and of the Clergy King Iames approved of 'em also altho' there was some difference between these and the Articles of the Church of England some ill dispos'd persons and it may be Roman Catholicks took occasion from that to spread evil reports of Vsher. They accused him of Puritanism which was no little Heresie in the opinion of the King they also made use of this artifice to render those odious who appear'd the most capable of opposing the progress that the Missionaries of Rome endeavoured to make in Ireland Indeed the people knew not what this word signified and wherein Heresie consisted but it was known the King mortally hated Puritans and that was sufficient to make 'em look upon these Puritans as most dangerous Hereticks 't was this that obliged an Irish Divine to write to Vsher who was that time in England that it would not be amiss to desire the King to define Puritanism that all the World might know those who were tainted with this strange Heresie but Vsher had no need to make use of this way to justifie himself some conversations that he had with the King setled so good an opinion of him that the Bishopprick of Meath in Ireland being vacant the King gave it him immediately and
said also that Usher was a Bishop that he had made because that he had appointed him so without being sollicited to it by any person this Election was made in 1620. Returning into Ireland sometime after he was oblig'd to discourse some persons of Quality of the Roman Religion to administer to 'em the Oath of Allegiance and Supremacy that they had refused to the Priest this discourse is inserted in his Life he remarks the form of this Oath is compos'd of two parts the one positive in which they acknowledge the King is Soveraign in all cases whatsoever and the other negative in which they declare they acknowledge no Jurisdiction or Authority of any strange Prince in the estates of the King he says afterwards in regard of the first part that the Scripture commands that we submit our selves to the Higher Powers and that we ought to acknowledge that the power the Kings have whatsoever it may be is Supream as they are Kings upon which he cites this verse of Martial Qui Rex est Regem maxime non habeat That one ought well to distinguish the power of the Keys from that of the Sword and the King of England does not exact an acknowledgment of the same power that is possess'd by the Bishops but nevertheless the Kings may interest themselves with Ecclesiastical Affairs in as much as it regards the body since according to the Church of Rome 't is the Magistrates duty to punish Hereticks For that which regards the second part of the Oath where it 's said that we shall not own any strange power as having any Iurisdiction Superiority Preheminence Ecclesiastical or Temporal in the Kingdom He says that if St. Peter were still alive he would willingly own that the King had this Authority in Ireland and that he us'd the same in regard of all the Apostles that the Apostleship was a personal dignity which the Apostles have not left hereditary to any but nevertheless suppose it was so he sees not why St. Peter should leave it to his successors rather than St. Iohn who outliv'd all the Apostles that there was no reason to believe that St. Peter shou'd leave the Apostolical Authority to the Bishops of Rome rather than to those of Antioch this last Church being founded before the first The King writ to Vsher to thank him for this Discourse which produced so good effect He afterwards went into England by the King's order to collect the Antiquities of the Churches of England Scotland and Ireland and publish'd two years after that his Book intituled De Primordiis Ecclesiarum Britannicarum 'T was in that time that the King made him Arch-Bishop of Armagh The Winter following he caused to be brought before him the Order for Toleration of the Roman Catholicks and the Lord Falkland then Deputy for the King in Ireland convocated and assembled the whole Nation to settle this Affair But the Bishops call'd by the Primate oppos'd it with much heat as may be seen by a Remonstrance sign'd by ten Bishops besides the Primate and which is in the 28th page They also spoke of raising some Forces by the Joynt consent both of Catholicks and Protestants to hinder any differences that might arise in the Kingdom the Protestants refus'd to consent thereto and wou'd not hearken to discourse the Primate thereupon in the Castle of Dublin altho' his reasonings were founded upon the principal Maxims of the Government of Ireland and maintain'd by Examples drawn from the Antient and Modern Histories of that Kingdom During the time our Primate stayed in Ireland after he had performed the Duties of his Charge which he acquitted with extraordinary care he employed the remaining part of his time to study the fruits whereof were to be seen in 1631. in the first Latin book which he ever published in Ireland 't is his History of Godescalch Monk of the Abby of Orbais who lived in the beginning of the 6th Age there was soon made a small abridgment of the History of Pelagianism which was then extreamly dispersed through Spain and England when he comes to the History of Godescalch he explains his Doctrine and shews by Flodoard and other Authors of that time that those sentiments whereof Hincmar Archbishop of Rhemes and Rabanus Archbishop of Maynce accused him and which were condemn'd by their Authority in two Councils were the same that St. Remigius Archbishop of Lyons and the Clergy of his Diocess defended openly many opinions and odious consequences according to Vsher were fathered upon Godescalch because that this Monk who maintained the opinions of St Augustine about Predestination and Grace did not at all understand ' em Ioannes Scotus Erygenus wrote a treatise against him in which are to be found the principal heads of Vsher but Florus Deacon of the Church of Lions answers it and censures him in the Name of all the Diocess Vsher gave an abridgment of this Censure as also of divers other treatises as that of St Remigius Pudentius Bishop of Troy Ratramus Monk of Corbi who writ against Scotus for his defence of Godescalch there had been two Councils which established the doctrine of this Monk and condemn'd that of Scotus 'T is true that Hincmar published a very large Book against these Councils which he dedicated to Charles le Chauve as Flodoard reports who shews briefly what it is that this Book treats of but that did not at all hinder St. Remigius and those of his Party to convocate another Council at Langres where they confirm'd the Doctrine established in the former Councils and condemn'd that new one of Scotus These Controversies were still agitated in the National Council of the Gauls where nothing was concluded altho' Barancus and others voted that Godescalch should be condemn'd there On the contrary Vsher maintains that in an Assembly which was in a small time after his Sentiments were approv'd of Nevertheless this wicked Godescalch was condemn'd by the Council of Maynce to perpetual Imprisonment where he was severely treated because he would never retract his Errours There are still two Confessions of his Faith by which one may see there are many things attributed to him which he never believ'd after having made a faithful report of the Sentiments of this Monk and those of his Adversaries Vsher concludes that it were better for men to be silent upon these matters than to scandalize the weak in proposing to 'em such Doctrines from which they may draw bad consequences There has been adds Mr. Parr and always will be different Opinions upon the great and abstruse Questions of Predestination and Free Will which nevertheless may be tolerated in the same Church provided those who maintain these divers Opinions have that Charity for one another which they ought to have That they condemn them not publickly That they abstain from mutual Calumnies and that they publish no Invectives against those who are not of the same Sentiments To return to the Life of our Prelate who altho' he
took all imaginable care that the Roman Religion should not make any progress in Ireland yet it stole in by the negligence of other Bishops insomuch that that Party which maintain'd it did sensibly increase and grow strong It was this that oblig'd King Charles the first to write a Letter to the Primate of Ireland which is to be found in page 38. wherein he authorizes him to write Letters of Exhortation to all the Bishops of Ireland that they shou'd discharge their duty better than they had done About the latter end of the year 1631. Vsher makes a Voyage into England where he publish'd a small English Treatise concerning the Antient Religion of Ireland and of the People which inhabited the North of Scotland and of England he shews in this Treatise how it was in respect to the Essential parts of the same Religion which at present is establish'd in England and which is very forreign to that of the Roman Catholicks The year following our Arch-Bishop return'd into Ireland and publish'd a Collection intituled Veterum Epistolarum Hibernicarum Sylloge whereof the first Pieces were written about the year 1590. and the last about 1180. there one may learn the Ecclesiastical Antiquities of Ireland In 1639. which was seven years after he publish'd his Book intituled Britannicarum Ecclesiarum Antiquitates wherein he inserted the History of Pelagius and his Sentiments There are to be found the Antiquities of the most distant Churches of Great Britain since Christianity was Preached there that is to say since about 20 years after the death of Jesus Christ. In 1640. Vsher makes a Voyage into England with his Family with design to return very soon into Ireland but the Civil Wars hinder'd him insomuch that he cou'd never return to his Country again T is said that in the year following he brought the King to sign the death of the Earl of Strafford but as to this Dr. Parr speaks very much in his Justification he afterwards shews us after what manner he lost all that he had in Ireland except his Library which he brought into England Strangers very much envyed this great man that his Compatriots shou'd offer him divers Places of Retreat The Heads of the University of Leiden soon gave him a considerable Pension and offered him the Title of Honourable Professor if he wou'd come into Holland The Cardinal Richelieu sent him his Medal and also proffer'd to him a great Pension with the liberty of professing his Religion in France if he wou'd come thither Our Arch-Bishop thank'd him and sent him a Present of Irish Grey-Hounds and other Rarities of that Country Three years after he publish'd a small Treatise intituled A Geographical and Historical Research touching Asia Minor properly so call'd to wit Lydia whereof frequent mention is made in the New Testament and which the Ecclesiastical Writers and other Authors call'd Proconsulary Asia or the Diocess of Asia In this Treatise there is a Geographical Description of Asia Minor and of its different Provinces as that of Caria and Lydia under which the Romans comprehend Ionia and Aeolia Vsher shews there 1. That Asia whereof mention is made in the New Testament and the Seven Churches which St. Iohn spoke of in the Apocalypse were included in Lydia that every one of these Cities were the Chief of a small Province and because of this Division they were chosen to be the principal Seats of the Bishops of Asia 2. That the Roman Provinces had not always the same extension but were often contracted or enlarg'd for reasons of State thus the Empire was otherwise divided under Augustus than it was under Constantine under whom Proconsulary Asia had more narrow bounds than formerly 't is remarkable that under this last Emperor Proconsulary Asia which was govern'd by a Proconsul of the Diocess of Asia from whence the Governor was call'd Vicarius or Comes Asiae or Dioceseos Asianae but this division was afterwards chang'd under his Successors and whereas every Province had but one Metropolis to satisfie the ambition of some Bishops 't was permitted to two of 'em at the same time to take the Title of Metropolitan 3. That under Constantine Ephesus was the place where the Governors of Asia met to form a kind of Council which decided affairs of importance and 't was for this that Ephesus was then the only Metropolis of Proconsulary Asia that the Proconsul which was Governor never submitted to the Authority of the Praetorian Prefect and that there was something so like this in the Ecclesiastical Government that the Bishop of Ephesus was not only Metropolitan of Consulary Asia but also the Primate and Head of the Diocess of Asia 4. That there was a great conformity between the Civil and Ecclesiastical Government in this that the Bishops of every Province were subject to their Metropolitans as the Magistrates of every City were to the Governors of the whole Provinces This was the time wherein Vsher published in Greek and Latin the Epistles of St. Ignatius with those of St. Barnabas and St. Polycarp seven years after he added his Appendix Ignatiana where he proves that all the Epistles of Ignatius are not suppositious and explains many ecclesiastick antiquities he published the same year his Syntagma de editione 70 Interpretum where he proposes a particular Sentiment which he had upon this version 't is this that It contained but the five Books of Moses and that it was lost in the burning of the Library of Ptolomaeus Philadelphus and that Doritheus a Heretick Jew made another version of the Pentateuch and also translated the rest of the Old Testament about 177 years before the birth of Jesus Christ under the Reign of Ptolomaeus Philometor and that the Greek Church preserves this last version instead of that which was made under the Reign of Ptolomeus Philadelphus he also treats in this same work of the different editions of this version which according to him are falsly styled the version of the 70 this Book was published a year after the death of our Prelate with another De Cainane altero or the second Canaan which is found in the version of the 70. and in St. Luke between Sala and Arphaxad This last work of Vsher was the Letter which he wrote to Mr. 〈…〉 the difference he had with Mr. a friend of the Archbishops we shaâ—â— speak of it hereafter Dr. Parr informs us that in the Civil Wars of England Vsher going from Cardisse to the Castle of St. Donates which belonged to Madam Stradling he was extreamly Ill treated by the Inhabitants of Glamorganshire in Wales they took his Books and Papers from him which he had much ado to regain and whereof he lost some which contained remarks upon the Vaudois and which shou'd have serv'd to carry on his Book de Ecclesiarum Christianarum Successione where there is wanting the History of more than 200. years viz from Gregory the 11th to Leo the 10th from the year 1371 to 1513 and
who repented after having kept them some time in Prison to put upon their cloaths violet coulor'd Crosses which they thus wore all their Life not being suffered to appear with other cloaths and with this clause that the Inquisition reserved a full power of changeing the Sentence pronounced as it should be thought fit whether those who had been condemned to wear the Cross were accused anew or whether there was no accusation at all Those whom they resolv'd to mortifie by a sad imprisonment were kept between four Walls where they were constrained to go of themselves and where they were nourished only upon Bread and Water The obstinate Hereticks were put into the hands of the Secular There was at that time in Gasconny of divers sorts as well as before In this Register are Vaudois and Albigeses condemned for divers pretended Heresies as of denying Transubstantiation and the seven Sacraments of the Romish Church of maintaining that we shall not rise in spiritual Bodies c. There have been besides Baguins certain Monks of the third Order of St. Francis who thought that it was not lawful for them to possess any thing whatever who called the Pope Antichrist because he suffered the Religious of St. Francis to possess Riches and who suffer'd themselves to be burned rather than to retract these Fantastick Opinions There is also the Condemnation of divers Manicheans And the proceeding against Peter Ruffit who quite to overthrow Concupiscence had with a Woman the same commerce as some Priests had with Young Women in the time of St. Cyprian a Custom which lasted so long that the Council of Nice condemned it As being us'd in the beginning o' th' fourth Age and that St. Basil St. Chrysostome and St. Ierome employ'd all their Eloquence to cure several Ecclesiasticks of this Custom in their time an exact account hereof may be seen in Mr. Dodwel's third Dissertation upon St. Cyprian Two small pieces of James Usher Archbishop of Armagh One of the Original of Bishops and the other of Proconsulary Asia to which is added an Appendix of the Priviledges of the British Churches At London by Samuel Smith 1687. in 8vo And at Rotterdam by Renier Leers THis is another Posthume Work of the Learned Vsher Archbishop of Armagh which sufficiently testifies that profound Learning that hath rendered him so famous and makes him still respected as one of the Oracles of England The Question he starteth here has so imploy'd the wits for some years past that instead of reuniting for the common Interest they cannot without much ado calm the Agitation which this dispute hath caused tho' it only concerns Exterior Order It is therefore pretended that in this Work Episcopacy is a Divine Institution founded upon the Old and New Testament and the Imitation of the Ancient Church Vsher immediately remarks that the chief of the Levites bore a Title which was translated in Greek by that of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Bishop of the Levites he expounds these Words of the Apocalypse Write to the Angel of Ephesus as if the word Angel was the same thing as that of Bishop The Succession of the Bishops of Ephesus appeared evident enough at the Council of Calcedon held in 451. And there 't is likely enough that Timothy or one of his Successors was the Angel to whom the words of St. Iohn are directed St. Ireneus says that he had seen Polycarp who was established Bishop of Smyrna by the Apostles Lastly he adds that Tertullian in his Book of Prescription against Hereticks and St. Irenaeus pressed the Hereticks by the Argument of the Succession of Bishops from the Apostles unto their time and chiefly upon that of the Bishops of Rome beginning with Linus Cletus or Clement that the Apostles had placed there and continuing until Elentherius the twelfth Bishop from the Apostles And it was Eleutherius who had the Glory of receiving into the Christian Faith Lucius King of England with all his Kingdom and that there were Bishops so well established from that time that ten years before the Council of Nice held in 325. three English Bishops assisted at the Council of Arles After having proved the establishment of Bishops by the Apostles Vsher examines the origine of the Metropolitans to whom he gives the same Antiquity For supposing as we have said that St. Iohn speaking of the seven Angels understands nothing else but Bishops he extends his conjecture so far as to say that St. Iohn having written to the seven Churches of Asia without denoting them more particularly it necessarily follows that they had some Preheminence and that they were distinguished by themselves that is to say by their quality of Metropolis He confirms it by this circumstance that the Prefects of the Romans resided in these Cities as Capitals and that the Adjacent Cities came for Justice thither Whence he concludes that they were as Mothers to the other Churches He concludes in shewing it to be the Sentiment of Beza and Calvin and proceeds to the second part of his Work which treats of the Proconsulary or Lydian Asia He observeth that the Name of Asia properly belonged to Lydia for they pretend that Asia was the Name of an ancient King of the Lydians and that it was Vespasian that made a Proconsulary Province on 't After that these three Questions are resolved The first if at the time of the Council of Nice all the Bishops were subject to the three Patriarchs of Rome Alexandria and Antioch It 's proved by the very Canons of the Council of Nice and by the first Council of Constantinople assembled under Theodosius the Great that each Patriarch had Power no farther than the extent of his Territory and over the Bishops of his particular Province And to inform us where the Patriarchats were limited he saith that that o◠Alexandria comprised Egypt Lybia and Pentapolis but that Africk Thebes nor the Mareotides were not subjected to it That of Antioch had not the whole Empire of the East whereof Constantinople was the Capital But only all that extended from the Mediterranean Sea towards the East to the Frontiers of the Empire That of Rome contained ten Provinces The Islands of Sicily Corse and Sardinia were three of them and the Continent of Italy on the East-side made the other seven that the ancient Lawyers called Suburbicaries But not to leave the work imperfect upon this Subject he examines in what dependance the Churches were who set up no Patriarchs To this purpose he observes that the Roman Empire was divided into thirteen Dioceses seven on the East-side and six on the West-side in all 120. Provinces Each Diocess had a Metropolis where the Primate resided as well as the Praetor or Vicar who decided appeals in Civil Affairs as also each Province had it's Metropolis It will not be useless to add that tho' Primates had the same Authority as the Patriarchs they preceded them notwithstanding in Councils and that Rome Alexandria and Antiochia were honoured
dogmata postea subtilius explicata tractet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. For what regards the High Priest Levites and the Laicks relates according to our Author to the Priesthood and to the Custom of the Jews This Epistle being written about the end of Nero's Empire or at least before that of Vespasian whilst the Temple yet stood Letter 347. 1. p. Tacitus After having said that many learned men have discovered of what use Tacitus is in Politicks without excepting the the Italians who pretend to be the great Masters in this Science He saith that Berneggerus and Freinshemius had given at Strasbourg an Edition of it in 8 vo with a very large Index and most useful Notes in the Margent He adds that he read it with pleasure and that it was esteemed by all the Ingenious of Paris The same Author undertook to make an Addition in Folio with a perpetual Commentary drawn from all the Notes which had appeared tell then upon Tacitus Letter 1092. 1. p. Theophilactus 'T is the abridgement of the Greek Fathers which had written before him and is as the Voice of the Greek Church who gave us the opinions of St. Paul which he had preserved with much Fidelity Letter 1243. 1 p. Predestinatus 'T is the Title of a Book in 8 vo printed at Paris 1643. by Father Sirmond Grotius saith that he hath drawn this Book from a Manuscript which was formerly Hinâ—mar's Archbishop of Rheims that this work is oppos'd to those that believe absolute Predestination And that the Stile is strong and elegant Letter 673. p. 2. Father Casaubon I have not had less veneration saith our Author for his natural openness and sincerity than for his great Learning He told me in the year 1613. at London where I was almost every day with him when he went out of France he quitted all Studies which belong to the ancient Souldiery to which he had been perswaded by Henry the 4 th who was as great a Soldier as a Prince and that in England he had turned his Studies of that side which most pleased King Iames who was given more to peace than War Casaubon had no Collection except in his memory Margents of his Books and upon loose Papers Wherefore we have no Notes upon Polybe but what is upon his first Book and they are imperfect also 184. Letter p. 2. Selden This Author who made his wit appear in many pieces hath given to the Publick his book entituled Mare Clausum in opposition to another intituled Mare liberum This work is very learned and attributes in particular to the King of England all the Sea that extends it self from the Coasts of England Spain France the Low Countreys and Germany unto that of Denmark Letter 590. p. 1. Selden saith Grotius in another place hath taken figurative Expressions whereof I have made use in my Poetry to defend the Laws of the King of England and hath opposed them to others more serious I am very much obliged to him for the honesty with which he hath spoken of me and I believe I shall not injure the Friendship that is between us by this Epigram that I have made upon his Book Ipsum compedibus qui vinxerat Ennosigaeum Est graeca Xerxes multus in Historia Lucullum Latii Xerxem dixere Tagatum Seldenus Xerxes ecce Britannus erit Letter 371.2 p. The Bishop of Bellai I know him saith Grotius not only by his writings but also by Conversation He is an honest man and well versed in Controversie This is the Title of one of his Books The Demolishings of the Foundation of the Protestant Doctrine He hath a great hatred to the Monks and would not have them instruct the People but have it referred to the Ordinaries He is very much esteemed amongst the Bishops and of an exemplary Life Letter 1716. p. 1. Crellius I thank you saith our Author to him Letter 197. p. 1. both for the Letter and the book youâ— sent me I have resolved to read over and over with care all that you have written knowing how much profit I have gain'd by your Works When I received your Letter I was employed in reading your Commentary upon the Epistle to the Galatians You have very happily found the design and occasion of this Epistle as well as the sequel of this discourse I have cast my eye saith our Author elsewhere in speaking to Ruarius friend to Crellius upon his Commentary to the Epistle to the Hebrews which is very Learned I have profited much thereby as well as upon that which he hath made upon the Galatians of which the Ministers of Charenton make the same judgment as I do Let. 552. p. 1. He saith to his Brother speaking of the Book that the same Crellius had written against that of Grotius de satisfactione Christi that he hath written modestly and with much learning altho' he approves not of his opinions p. 2 Letter 138. George Calixta Professor of Divinity at Helmstadt I know not whether you have seen the preface that Calixta hath put before the books of St. Austin de Doctrina Christiana and of the Commonitorium of Vincent de Lerins the book that he hath made de Clericorum coelibatu and the first part of his divine Morals with a digression touching the new Method de Arte nova I approve the judgment of this Man and the respect he hath for antiquity joyned to the love of Peace A. M. des Cordes Canon of Limages p. 1. Letter 350. see Letter 339. p. 1. Salmatius I have run through the book of Salmatius upon Simplicius There is as you say much reading I wonder he disposeth not his thoughts in a better order 'T is sometimes difficult to reconcile him to himself he often disputes about words c. To William Grotius p. 2. Letter 326. Salmatius hath been with me he is dispos'd to defend every thing to the utmost extremity and even maintains that St. Peter never set foot in Italy I wonder the spirit of a Party should have so much strength says he in the same Letter 533. Salmatius is pleas'd to defend Opinions abandoned by all the World for even Blondel who is a Minister in France maintains in a book Printed at Geneva that St. Peter was at Rome He denyes also a Woman was ever Pope but Salmatius affirms it in the same Letter 536. A great friend of Salmatius hath told me a little while since that a Book could not easily be made de lingua Hellenistica Rediviva drawn from this that he saith he is constrain'd to confess in many places that he acknowledges the thing and disputes but of the Name He saith that no body hath remark'd that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 answereth to a manner of speaking Latin But I had and even in three places Mat. vi 2. c. in the same book 6921. Daniel Heinsius I have read the Works of Heinsius upon Nonnus which was not worth my while for others have said several
inspire into the Greeks of the State of Venice the Sentiments of the Protestants to introduce the Reformation into Italy by that means See Letter 238. p. 2. It may be this was but a bare Report Grotius was too far from the places to be throughly inform'd in it but he had opportunities to be perfectly instructed of some other things which happened in Holland whilst he was there He saith Letter 11. p. 1. That in a Conference which Arminius and Gomarus had before the Gentlemen of the States of Holland as Oldenbarndvelt said to these two Gentlemen that he praised God for that the Controversies which was amongst them were not upon any fundamental Article Gomarus answered that the Opinions of Arminius his Collegue were of such a nature that he cou'd not appear before the Tribunal of God with ' em The whole dispute concerned Predestination and the greatest difference that was betwixt their opinions was that Gomarus believed God had resolved to create the most part of men to damn them without having any respect to their Actions only for the Manifestation of his Power whereas Arminius maintained that God damns not men but because of their unbelief and impenitence This last opinion is Melancthon's as Grotius saith Ep. 58. p. 1. and elsewhere The Gentlemen of the States of Holland made in 1614. an Edict which may be seen in the 3. Vol. of the Theological Works of Grotius by which they ordered the two parties which then were in the Reformed Churches of the Low Countries to support each other and to treat with moderation the controverted matters the then King Iames of England at first praised this order also divers Bishops approved it as Grotius saith in his Letters 28 and 29. But this Prince changing his opinion afterwards disapproved this conduct as appears by Letter 111. p. 1. to Mr. Anthony de Dominis Archbishop of Spalatro But that which was most fatal to Grotius and those of his party was that from that time divers Provincial Synods were held where they were not favoured as he himself says in Letter 64. p. 1. The Magistrates of every City promised Pastors of that party shou'd exercise their charge as before but those of the contrary party thought the same toleration ought not to be given to them Some refused to Preach in publick Churches because the other party were suffered there They assembled themselves in private Meetings so that the Magistrates feared these divers Assemblies wou'd cause trouble in the State as they had in the Church There was an attempt made at Rotterdam as Grotius relates Letter 65. p. 1. to calm these troubles by a particular conference where the reasons of those Pastors were heard who would not Preach in publick Churches with those who were not of their opinion nor communicate with them But this Conference had no good effect as may be seen in this Letter of our Author and in the following where he gives an account of what happened on both sides in this Assembly Lastly the Schism was made after such a manner as all the World knoweth and that besides many other reasons was no little hindrance according to the Judgment of Grotius to the design which several Pious persons formed some years after of reuniting all Protestants The King of Swedland too endeavour'd it a little before his Death having assembled at Leipswich divers Lutheran and Calvinist Divines The authority of this great King made this Conference end with mildness on both sides but his Death which hapned a little while after made all hopes of accommodation vanish It was at that time that an English Divine named Duraeus who had as 't were consecrated himself to endeavour this reunion ran vainly over all the Protestant States to induce them to Peace which the Archbishop of Canterbury William Laud whose Encomium Grotius makes in divers places v. p. 2. Ep. 405 406.532.540 and several Bishops of England passionately desired Grotius saith that an answer of Doctor Hois Preacher to the Elector of Saxony being too violent against the Reformation hindered it very much see Let. 444. p. 1. Protestants not being able to unite with one another there was no likelihood that the Union between them and the Roman Catholicks should succeed Yet there was a great talk on 't in France and Cardinal Richelieu if we believe Grotius Letter 531. p. 2. affirm'd that it would be agreed on Cardinalis quin 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 negotium in Gallia successurum sit dubitare se negat This made several persons apply themselves to writing to propose to the publick means and projects of an Union Amongst whom none appeared that made so much noise as Theophilus Brachet dela Millitiere which seemed the more surprizing because before the taking of Rochel this Author had attacked the Kings party and all the Roman Catholicks with an extraordinary heat in a little Book which he Printed for the defence of some Assemblies held at Rochel Grotius speaks of it in divers places but particularly in Letter 373. p. 1. 385.343 345. p. 2. There was then a report at Paris which gave some hope to those who penetrated not the policy of Cardinal Richeleu that there would happen a change in the Gallican Church which would much contribute to an Union Which was that the Cardinal had a design to render himself Patriarch in France and thus to draw the Gallican Church from the obedience of the Court of Rome To this design was applied according to the relation of Grotius Letter 982. p. 1. this Tetrastich of Nostradamus Celui qui etoit bien avant dans le Regne Aiant chef range proche Hierarchie Apre cruel se fera tant craindre Succedera à sacreé Monarchie Some are so far from taking away from the obedience of the Apostolick See that they scarcely dared to defend the Liberties of the Gallican Church The King who had given orders to make a Collection of the Edicts of the Kings of France and of the Acts of Parliament by which until then the excessive power of the Court of Rome was opposed got this collection suppressed in 1639. when the impression thereof was finish'd Grotius who had promised himself much from the courage of the French on this occasion could not dissemble his grievance which he too strongly expresseth Ita sub Regibus aut ignavis aut ignaris tantum sape fit damni quantum successores aegre sarciant mirumque est pro Regibus scribi Lutetiae non licere cum Romae quotidie contra Reges eorum jura liberè fiant He speaks thereof also in as weighty terms in Letter 1105. to Lewis Camerarius Ambassador from Swedland into Holland This event and some others made Grotius doubt of the Roman Catholicks ever giving any satisfaction to Protestants concerning the complaints made of the abuses which they believe to be slipt into the Roman Religion He testifies these doubts in Letter 85. p. 2. where he saith that there is more reason to wish
for the honour of the Roman Communion they must be Answer'd The Third Column will produce an infinite number of Books of Controversie which may last a long time for Questions of matters of Fact are sometimes an Abyss whereof the bottom is never seen The Philosophers of this Country will be less impatient for these Books than for the Apology for that they hope that the Author of the Apology will teach them many curious things touching the Nature of the Soul and the Easiness of changing Opinions from morning to night for without this their Apology will seem to want one of its most Essential Parts because the Cartesians have made the World experience sensibly the great force of Prejudices that there are but few thinking Men but believe that there would be need of the Adress of the most able Philosopher for two years to persuade all People that Sensible Qualities are only in the Soul that the Earth moves continually that Body and Space are the same thing c. And upon this they imagine some hardness of the Fibres of the Brain for Fâ—ith But in all likelyhood they will be otherwise lookt upon in the Apology and it will be Mechanically Explicated unto them a Method to be instructed in four days which makes People to pass from white to black in Doctrines sucked in with their Milk as of Matters of the greatest and most eminent importance The British Theater or the True History of Great Brittain Written by Gregorio Leti Amsterdam Sold by Abraham Wolfang 1684. 5 Vol. in 12. THe Author of this Book hath made himself known long since by a greaâ— many fine Italian Pieces which have been Translated into divers Tongues and amongst others by Italia Regnante by Itinerario della Carte di Roma by Politica de Principi by il Livello Politico by i Diala hi politici by Vita di Philippi II. and by la vita de Gisto V. Printed lately at Paris being Translated into very fine French The Praise of some of these Works may be seen in the Journal of the Learned Mr. Leti hath published the most part of them at Geneva where he lived several years In the First Book of the second Volume of this Brittish Theater is the reason why he left it He went into France immediately upon it and presented to the King a Panegyrick which he had made upon that Monarch Entituled la Fama Gelo sa della Fortuna The Gallant Mercury of the Month of Iuly 1680. and the Journal of the Learned of the 29th of the same Month speak much in the Commendation of the Person of Mr. Leti and of the Panegyrick which he presented at the same time to the King at Fontainebleau He was very well received by this Prince yet notwithstanding he made no stay at his Court because he saw there was nothing to be done there for Protestants he chose therefore to withdraw into England He was soon known there and honoured with a considerable Present by our King some few days after his arrival Which also obliged him to Compose a Panegyrick upon His Majesty who received it very Graciously He afterwards got leave to carry on the History of England and the Secretaries of State received Orders to fuâ—nish him with the Memoires which he would require This was the reason why this Work was much talkt of As it was one day spoken of at the King 's getting up some one said That he did not believe that a Stranger could succeed in Writing the History of England others maintained That a Stranger would succeed better because he would speak with less Interest and that there ought to be no difficulty made to furnish him with requisites for it rather than to a Native born The King who excells in Reparties said thereupon Let him alone if he doth well it is so much the better if not 't will excite some other to try to acquit himself better The Author knowing what was said of his Work afore-hand neglected nothing of what could be useful to him He visited carefully the Wisest Persons of England and had considerable Memorials of them He informed himself of the Antiquities of the Laws and of the Customs of the State and of all the Particularities of the Countrey It must not be forgotten that he was made a Member of the Royal Society by the Nomination of the Deceased Duke of Norfolk He begun with describing the Antient and Modern State of Great Brittain which he included in two Volumes in 4to He proposed to himself to compose three others for the History it self of the Country Whilst he was about these two first Volumes the King asked him one day If his History would be soon ended He Answered That he feared it would be finished too soon And why reply'd the King Because Answer'd Mr. Leti I fear the Destiny of Historians which is to be recompenced by Exile or Imprisonment You are too Wise reply'd the King to expose your self to that If one was as wise as Solomon answered the Author ones destiny cannot be avoided Well then added the King if you believe there is so much danger in Writing Histories Write Proverbs as Solomon did That seemed to be a Presage of what hapned afterwards but Mr. Leti ceased not to go on in his Work and even to say to the Court when the occasion offer'd That he Writ a History and not a Panegyrick that they should dispose themselves so as to see the Truth there without Flattery as well as without Satyrs As soon as the Edition of these two Volumes were ended he presented them to the King and Queen to whom they were Dedicated to the Duke and Dutchess of York They were very well received and during ten days Mr. Leti was seen at Court as favourably as afore He believed then that seeing the King who was willing to read the Work himself and who stayed up very late some nights to end the Reading thereof said nothing it was a sign the Book did not displease him From that time he made divers Presents to the Ambassadors who were at London and to the Lords of the Court It was it seems through the suggestion of an Ambassador that this Work which the King had read without any apparent dislike passed for a dangerous Book and hurtful to the State as treating too openly and too clearly of such Truths as were thought would be better concealed The Council assembled divers times thereupon and it was at last concluded That all the Copies should be seized which the Author had and that he should be commanded in Ten days to depart England The thing was executed but mildly One may see what Mr. Leti saith thereof p. 16. of the Second Volume He relates in the Preface of the First something a Prelate said to him which deserves to be taken notice of Signior Gregorio saith he unâ—o him a few days afore he left London voi avete fatto l' Historia per altri non
per voi e dovevate far la per voi e non per altri We thought that the Reader would be glad to learn the Adventures both of an History and an Author who have made so much noise And therefore shall proceed to the Work it self What had been Printed at London contained but the Antient and Modern State of Great Britain It is to be had entire without any thing cut off in the two First Volumes of this Edition except the Author thought it more expedient to reserve for the Fifth Volume any thing which was Historical The First Volume contains eleven Books whereof the First gives a brief account of the History and Religion of England whilst it had been possessed by divers Princes and bore the Name of Britannia to wit unto Egbert who reduced it altogether under his Power and gave it the Name of England or of Anglia at the end of the Eighth Age. There are in this First Book divers things very curious concerning the Druides and the Gods who were adored in England before the Faith had been planted in it The Author describes in the Second Book the Greatness the Situation the Provinces the Rivers the Cities the Bishopricks the Inhabitants the Fertility the Merchandises the Negotiations and the Buildings of England The Third Book is employed altogether upon the Description of the Famous City of London Here there is more exactness than in the very Writings of some English who have given the Publick the state of this Famous City and that of the whole Kingdom There is according to the supputation of Mr. Leti near Four hundred fifty thousand Souls in London and about Six Millions in the whole Kingdom The Fourth speaks of the Government and Priviledges of the same City as well as of the Factions which do divide it The Sixth describes the Humour of the English and the Application they have to Religion and to the Observation of the Laws of the Country The Seventh is a Continuation of the same subject and a description of the Laws and divers Customs of England The Eighth speaks of the strangers who are in that Country and chiefly of the French Protestants who have fled thither some time since In this is the Declaration of the King of France importing That the Children of those of the R. P. R. may convert at seven Years accompanied with political and very curious Reflections In the Ninth Book the Author describes the Three States of England the Clergy the Nobility and the People but particularly the first It contains the number and names of the Bishops of this time the manner of consecrating them their Revenues c. The Tenth speaks of the State of Roman Catholicks in England of their number of their Exercises of the Endeavours to bring in again their Religion of the Missions of Fryars and of the Complaints they make of Protestants The Author adds the Answer of the Protestants to these Complaints and shews by the Catholick Authors the Designs of the Court of Rome upon England and of the Intrigues it makes use of to bring it under its Yoke The last Book of this Volume contains the Policy of the Court of England and its Maxims of State The Second Volume is composed of Eight Books whereof the two first do treat of the Religion and different Parties which divide it Therein are to be seen the Disputes of the Conformists and of the Non-Conformists the Opinions of the Quakers of Anabaptists c. The Fourth contains the Foundations and the Rights of the Monarchy of England the Revenues of the King and other Particulars of this nature There are several things in this place which cannot be found elsewhere The fifth describes the Government of England the King's Council the Parliament and the divers Tribunals of Justice of this Kingdom Herein are the Reasons why Parliaments have opposed in so many Rencounters the Designs of King's which Strangers are commonly ignorant of The sixth speaks of the particular Government of Cities and of Countries as also of the Posts of Governours of Places of the Garisons and of the Land Forces and Sea Forces of England The seventh is a Description of the Court and the King's Officers and of the Royal Family The last speaks of the strange Ministers who are at London of the manner wherewith they receive Ambassadours there Residents Envoys c. and of the Priviledges they enjoy Here is the Description of those who were in England whilst the Author lived here He tells very frankly their good or ill Qualities and this is not a little useful to judge of their Negotiations and to know why the one succeeds without pains in his Designs whilst the other stumbles every where It were to be wished that all the Histories which we have were thus circumstantiated For as there would be much more pleasure in reading them so we might also profit thereby much more than we do We should know not only the Events but also the secret Causes the Intrigues and the means which have contributed to the great Revolutions and it is what may profitably instruct us What signifieth it to know in general that a certain thing hath happened in a certain Year if we do not know how and wherefore It is the Conduct of Men which serveth us for an Example and an Instruction and not the simple Events which of themselves are of no use to us But where are there Men so couragious as to write without Flattery the History of their Time Where are there Princes who are so just as to suffer that their Truths should be told to their Faces Where are there even Ministers of State who would permit that their Defects should be divulged during their Life Nevertheless it is but then that it can be well done for if in the time wherein things are fresh more than one half is forgotten much more are the following Ages deprived of the knowledge of a thousand particular Facts which have produced great Affairs The Author having thus described the State of the Kingdom in the two first Volumes takes up again in the three others the sequel of the History of England from Egbert and continues it unto M DC Lxxxii He hath disposed his Work after this manner that after having made all the Essential Remarks of the History of England in the two first Volumes he should not be obliged in the following to interrupt the course of his Narration The third Volume contains Six Books whereof the last is destined to the Life of Henry the VIII The fourth Volume is composed of Five Books the first whereof includes the Reign of Edward and of Mary and the Second that of their Sister Elizabeth In the Third the Author after he begins the History of King Iames who reunited the Three Kingdoms makes a Description of Ireland and Scotland and speaks of their Ancient and Modern State after which in the Fourth Book he composes the History of the Reign of King Iames wherein
are very curious Particulars There is the Life of famous M rc Antony de Dominis Arch-Bishop of Spalatro included in a Letter written from Rome The Author had already published it in the Third Part of his Brittanica Politica It is a very curious Piece wherein is seen how this Prelate imbraced the Protestant Religion and how being deluded by the Promises of Dom Diego Sarmianto de Acuna Ambassador of France in England and by that of the Court of Rome he returned into Italy where he unhappily ended his Days without obtaining any thing of what he hoped There also is a Letter of Pope Gregory XV. to the Prince of Wales who was since Charles I. Upon his Marriage with the Infanta of Spain and an Answer of this Prince to the Pope The Fifth Book contains the Reign of the same Prince where his Innocence may be seen and the unheard of Violence of his Subjects described without partiality and all the Proceedings which were made against him The last Volume is composed of Six Books The first contains the History of Cromwell's Usurpation more exact and sincere that it had been heretofore Hitherto have been but Satyrs or Panegyricks thereupon The Creatures of Cromwell have raised him up to the Clouds and his Enemies have omitted nothing that might defame him The Author pretends that he hath been the greatest Politician and the greatest Captain of his time and that he was much more able to Reign than several of those whom Providence hath plac'd upon the Throne by Inheritance But he sheweth on the other side That he was a Cheat and a Tyrant who after having dipped his hand in the Innocent Blood of his Master all his Life cheated the People by a specious Zeal for Religion The Second Book contains the History of Charles the II. until his Restauration In this Book are seen the Honours which were rendred to him in Holland his Magnificent Entry into London his Clemency to those who had bore Arms against him and his Justice towards the Murderers of his Father The same History is continued in the Third Book from the Year M. DC LXI unto the Year M. DC LXXX There is also the Life of the Duke of York until his Marriage with Chancellour Clarendon's Daughter the Quarrel which happened between the Ambassadours of France and Spain about Precedency The subtilty wherewith the Spanish Ambassador carried it the Marriage of the Princess Henrietta and that of the King the War of England with Holland and with France the Peace that was made afterwards with both the others which was followed with a secret Treaty betwixt England France appeared in M. DC Lxxii the Marriage of the Duke of York with the Princess of Modena the Calling Prorogation and dissolving different Parliaments In fine the Discovery which Oates and Bedlow made of a Conspiracy which made so great noise and whereof this Author appears not very much persuaded We find in the fourth Book the sequel of the same Troubles and the History of what passed in the Parliaments convocated in M. DC.LXXX at London and Oxford There is particularly in this Book one thing of very great importance which the Author relates with as much sincerity as if none was interessed therein Which are 1. The Endeavours the Parliament of England made to exclude the Duke of York from the Crown 2. The Reasons which were alledged for this 3. The manner wherewith the Creatures of this Prince defended his Rights The Author endeth this Book by the Description of Pensilvania without omitting either the Offers which are made to those who will go to inhabit it or the manner they may be established in it The fifth Book begins with the Encomium of the House of Savoy and tells us afterwards with a very great exactness the means which Madam c. made use of in M. DC LXXX and M.DC.LXXXII to obtain of his British Majesty that the Ambassadours of Savoy shou'd be received in London like those of Crowned Heads It is one of the finest places of the whole Work and they who love to read the particulars of a Negotiation cannot read a more curious one nor one better related than this The last contains the Affair of Count Koningsmarc with all its Circumstances which is a very good History and whence the manner may be Learned after what Strangers are judged in England Here it is that the Work endeth The Author promiseth us in his Preface another Volume where all will appear which hath happen'd in England till these latter Years The Style of this History as well as the other Works of Mr. Leti is easy and without Affectation contrary to the custom of most Italian Writers But what is most considerable is that he relateâ— Matters so nakedly and speaks so freely of the Interests of the greatest Princes of Europe that perhaps one day persons will not be easily persuaded that the Author had caused this Work to be printed during his Life and the life of those of whom he speaks if at the beginning the Year had not been marked wherein it was printed Mr. Leti hath since written a Book which treats of all that concerneth Embassies There may not only be seen the modern use of all Courts in this respect but the ancient also so that it will be a History of great concern The Author is not contented to speak of the Duties and Priviledges of all the Ministers which one Soveraign sends to another but of each according to the Degree of his Character he speaks largely also on the Origine of this Function and upon all the Principalities which are formed in the World He relates several Examples of Ambassadours who have committed gross Mistakes and gives Instructions how to manage worthily this Post according to the different Courts wherein they are oblig'd to reside Men will easily believe that a Work which treats of things of this nature and of so great a number of others is worthy of Publication An Examination of the Infallibility and Right which the Roman Church pretends to have in Judging Absolutely in Matters of Controversie 8 vo 1687. 255. WHilst the Romish Church makes use of all the Power of Soveraigns to re-unite to its Communion those who have quitted it Protestants oppose these progresses by coâ—ntaining their Cause with the soundest Reasons which they can think upon Though they differ amongst themselves about several Speculative Doctrines they perfectly agree upon Morality and the Worship which we owe to the Divinity they also in general are of one Mind in those Principles of Religion which they admit in respect to Holy Writ and have all an extream aversion for that Church which pretends to be a Judge in its own Cause and which without delay forceth those it calls Hereticks to a Worship which is against their Consciences Amongst the Protestant Societies there is none who hath declared it self more openly against Human Authority in matter of Religion and against the Constraining and Spirit of
of Bellarmin and Suarez The means they use to make Proselytes are the pure Stories and Inventions of the Iesuites and false Reports and Prophecyes and pretended Inspirations of Womens Dreams as if Herod and Pilate were reconciled and had joyned to destroy Jesus Christ his Worship and his Religion In 1640 there was a design discover'd to the Arch-bishop of Canterbury That the Pope the Cardinal of Richlieu and several English Roman Catholicks but especially the Iesuites were engaged together and that what they proposed was to cause a Rebellion in Scotland as was done a little after this is certain for the Histories of those times have it all at length Sir William Boswel was then King Charles the First 's Resident at the Hague he was told of this Conspiracy and that the Roman Clergy misled the English giving them hopes of a Presbyterian Government That there were Indulgences from Rome and Dispensations from the Pope approved by a Congregation of Cardinals that suffered Scholars to be instructed to Dispute against the Episcopal Party and against the Liturgy of the Church of England That in the space of a years time 60 Priests and Fryars went from France to England to Preach the Scotch Doctrine and to endeavor to destroy the Bishops whom they looked upon as the only Supporters of the Crown Arch-bishop Bramhall being in France some time after the King's death learned there how this business was manag'd In 1646 about 100 Popish Clergymen crossed the Seas and being Mustered in the Parliament Army they kept Correspondence with the Catholicks that served the King and acquainted them with what passed every day The ensuing year having deliberated among themselves whether the King's death would not be an advantage to their Cause and main Business they concluded in the Affirmative But some Priests and Fryars were of opinion to Consult the Universities and among others that of Sorbonne which made Answer That for the good of Religion and Interest of the Church it was lawful to alter the Government especially in a Heretick Countrey and that so they might take off the King with a safe Conscience Father Salmone in his History of the Troubles of England Printed in France with the King's Priviledge makes mention of two Companys of Walloon Catholicks which the Parliament had in it's Service and that at Edge-Hill-Fight there were many Popish Priests found among the dead of their Army After all these Proofs if one does but consider the Principles of both Religions it will be easie to find the true Authors of King Charles's Death It is certain that the Reformed had not Pastors at the Court of Vienna nor in Italy nor in Spain to cause Rebellions or beset the Prince and make them violate the Priviledges of their Subjects But it must be confest that they were for a Common-wealth as their Adversaries accuse them and not that they did not obey a King as freely as they would States it was because they loved Peace and Liberty and that after the Example of Common-wealths they sought quietness suffering others to do as they please Their Doctrine and Discipline dispose them equally for a Peaceable Life All their Ministers may Marry and because this is a Grave and Staid State there are few but do Marry When one is engaged in such firm Tyes there are but few that think of Removing or Seeing and Travelling the World whereas those that serve the Roman Church have no greater engagement than that of a Mistress which they may break at pleasure and which they always do when a good occasion serves or when they are sent into other places by their Superiors Moreover the Popish Conspirations against Q. Elizabeth and King Iames the First without mentioning other Princes make it more suspicious that the Monks were the contrivers of King Charles's death What could not they do against a King who did not love them and that is certainly dead in the Profession of the Protestant Religion since they have Sacrificed the Repose and Restitution of both his Sons whereof the latter has declared in Ascending up to the Throne that he was of their Communion After a step of that consequence one should think that the Roman Church had reason to be satisfied and that they should study to blot out the remembrance of her past Cruelties by a more moderate and mild conduct But on the contrary it is well known how far the Jesuites have pushed this easie Prince and his Retractations are undoubted proofs of the Infringments they made him guilty of they may be seen in the Memorials of the English Protestants and in his Highness the Prince of Orange's now King William's Declaration which now are very common But if these Books and several others were lost and that one had but the King 's own Writing they would be sufficient to condemn that Society The Proofs that were brought that the Prince of Wales was but a CHEAT deserved to be otherwise destroyed than by Witnesses incapable of being heard to Swear according to the Laws of the Country Or of such as only heard a Woman Groan which they did not see or have seen a Child new-born without being sure that it was the Queen's To examin a business of this consequence and to prevent Civil Wars there ought to be a Free Parliament according to the Custom of the Nation And though all England desired it yet the Roman Catholicks stay'd the King a long time from calling it to give all along the marks of their bad intentions IV. It is time to give an Idea of each of these Treatises In the Exposition of the Doctrine of the Church of England Dr. Wake follows the Bishop of Condom's Order and in explaining his Doctrine he shews wherein it agrees or disagrees with Popery as Mr. de Meaux explains it and according as the other Doctors Teach it There is a Preface in the beginning where the Author examins the Principle by which the Expositor pretends to justifie the Tenets of his Church which is that it is unjust to impute the consequences of a Tenet to Adversaries that deny them Which is true when they deny as well in deed as in word And thus the Contra-Remonstrancers are to be excused that make God the Author of Sin for this Inference can lawfully be made out of their System of Absolute Predestination Nor can it be imputed to the Lutherans that some of them believe that Iesus Christ ceased to be Man and was Transformed into a Deity after his Ascension though this is a clear consequence from the Doctrine of Ubiquity The reason is not that Contra-Remonstrants fear these consequences but because they do not influence neither their Worship nor their Practice and because they Teach contrary Doctrines to these Principles If in stead of this the first had maintained that a Man was but a Machine that had neither Liberty Vice nor Vertue nor Punishment nor Reward and that all is necessary to God himself And if the other affirms
brings Lazarus and his Sisters at the same time into Provence The strongest reason to persuade us that the Gospel was so soon Preached in England is drawn from a passage of Gildas's which was not well understood Interea glaciali frigore rigenti Insulae veluti longiori Terrarum Recessu soli visibili non proximae verus ille non de firmamento solum Dr. Stillingfleet reads Sol sed de summa etiam those who read Solum for Sol have also added this Etiam for the clearing of the sense coelorum arce tempora cuncta excedente universo orbi praefulgidum sui coruscum ostendens tempore ut scimus summo Tiberii Caesaris quo absque ullo impedimento ejus propagabatur Religio comminata senatu nolente a Principe morte dilatoribus Militum ejusdem radios suos primum indulget id est sua praecepta Christus These words of Gildas were taken until now as if he meant that the Gospel was Preached in England towards the end of Tiberius's Reign But thus the Bishop of Worcester understands them Jesus Christ the true Sun who as 't is known made his Light to shine over all the Vniverse towards the end of Tiberius 's Reign at which time his Religion was propagated without hinderance in spight of the Senate because this Prince threatned those with death that should accuse the Christians Jesus Christ I say made his Sun-beams to shine to wit his Precepts not from the Firmament but the highest place of the Heavens and which was from all Eternity upon this frozen Island distant from the visible Sun Gildas speaks of two several times wherein the visible Sun appeared the one towards the end of Tiberius's Reign at which it shined to the view of the whole World and the other that it particularly appeared in England and which he marks by the Particle interea This word relates to the time whereof he speaks to wit that in which Suetonius Paulinus Conquered the Queen Boadicea which happened towards the middle of Nero's Reign about Twenty years after that Claudius had sent A. Plautius to reduce England into the form of a Province The Monks of the last Ages fruitful in Ancient Histories affirmed that Ioseph of Arimathea came from Glassenbury where he founded a Monastery Preaching there the Gospel In a time wherein all that came from these pious Lyars was believed this Fabulous History was taken for an ancient Tradition but the Bishop of Worcester easily shews it is supported only by the Authority of such Men and actions as are very suspicious and accompanied with ridiculous circumstances Nevertheless he believes it may be proved by good Authorities and maintained by probable circumstances that Christianity entred into England in the time of the Apostles Eusebius positively affirms that these Holy Men Preached the Gospel in the British Isles Theodoret reckons the Britans amongst those People Converted by the Apostles St. Ierome saith that St. Paul after his Imprisonment Preached the Gospel in the West in occidentis partibus by which he seems to understand England as well as St. Clement who saith that St. Paul went to the farthest part of the West Terms which Dr. Stillingfleet proves to have been commonly taken for Great Britain He shews after that by the History of St. Paul's Life that this Apostle had time to come into England and that he might have been persuaded to have taken this Journey because this part of Great Britain was then reduced into a Province There is also some likelihood that Pomponia Graecina Wife to Plautius was a Christian Tacitus assuring us that she was accused of a Strange Superstition and that she lived in a continual Melancholy If this Lady was a Christian she might have inform'd St. Paul what state England was in and encouraged him to come hither He might likewise have been instructed by those whom Plautius led Prisoners to Rome True it is that it has been said that St. Peter and some other Apostles were in England but these Traditions appear altogether Fabulous and if any came it was undoubtedly St. Paul according to the Testimony of St. Clement of whom we have spoken II. To pursue the Ecclesiastical History of England our Prelate undertakes in the 2 d. Chapter to Collect what is found in the Antients about the space of time from the Apostles to the First Council of Nice The Principal Proofs from whence we conclude there were Christians in that time in England are the Testimonies of Tertullian and Origen which the Author defends and Expounds at length Many of the Writers of the last Ages said that a King of England named Lucius was Converted to Christianity in the time of M. Aurelius and Lucius Verus But suppose this true in the Main there are divers circumstances which are really false as when this Lucius is made King of all England which was at that time a Roman Province Our Prelate believes there might be a Christian Prince of that Name in some place of England and whom the Romans suffered to Reign because he was of their side such as might have been the Descendants of one Cogidunus who favoured them That this place of England perhaps was the County of Sussex where there is no Monument of the Romans This being so it may easily be conceived that Lucius had heard Discourses of the Christian Religion by some antient Britans or Soldiers of the Army which M. Aurelius brought hither and which had been delivered from an eminent danger by the Prayers of the Christians that were in it as the Emperor himself said in one of his Letters After that Lucius might send as Tradition has it Messengers to Eleutherius Bishop of Rome to be better Instructed because of the great Commerce which was betwixt England and Rome If Persons had been satisfied to have related this History after this manner it may be none would have called it in question but the Lyes wherewith it 's stuft the better to maintain it have rendered according to the Remark of the Author doubtful and suspicious that which may be true in it Others will not fail to add to this that in the Conjectures that are always made in the Enquiry after these Antiquities founded upon the Traditions of as great Lyars as the Monks of the past Ages that in these Conjectures I say Si trapassano i confini del vero per scrivere negli ampii spatii del possibile cose incerte non seguite according to an Italian Author And also the silence of Gildas who inform'd us of all he knew of the Antiquities of England yet speaks not one word of this Lucius which renders this History very suspicious even in what appears most possible in it Our Prelate proves there were Christians in England in the time of Dioclesian and that several suffered Martyrdom in it though the Persecution could not last long here seeing Constantius Father to Constantine stopped it Constantius dying at
Dr. Stillingfleet goes also further then any seeing the History of Arianism was left off at the death of Eusebius Here is an Abstract of what he adds and which is chiefly drawn from St. Athanasius The Falsities of the Arians were not discovered until after the Council of Rimini and it was chiefly at the Council of Seleucia where they declared themselves more openly It was then that the Followers of Basil of Ancyre who rejected the word Consubstantial as well as the Arians would separate themselves from them But the Arians had still recourse in this occasion to their old Artifices and consented to Sign any Creed whatever excepting that of Nice They caused Athanasius to be banished a second time but he was soon re called and his greatest Enemies were obliged to make him Reparation if he may be believed A little while after the Persecution began against him and all the rest who professed the Faith of Nice as our Author describes at large until the Council of Rimini whose Bishops were constrained to abandon the Terms of Hypostasis and Consubstantial The Orthodox Bishops would willingly depose all those who refused to Sign the Symbol of Nice and the Arians did not treat their Adversaries better when they could not prevail with them so that they ceased not Persecuting each other reciprocally Councils declared both for the one and the other which makes our Author reasonably conclude that we must not yield to the Authority of any Council whatever till having well examined the reasons of its Conduct If it was not lawful to do it in times past the Faith of Nice could not be re-established which would have received an irreparable breach at Rimini if the Orthodox Bishops were not restored to their Churches after the death of Constantius and had not re-established in smaller Assemblies what so numerous a Council had destroyed We find a remarkable example hereof in the Fragments of St. Hilary where we see that a Council Assembled at Paris declares that it abandons the Council of Rimini for assenting to that of Nice Dr. Stillingfleet conjectures that the British Churches did as much because St. Athanasius St. Ierome and St. Chrysostom do in divers places praise their Application to the Orthodox Faith Sulpicius Severus speaking of the Bishops of the Council of Rimini saith they refused to be entertained by the Emperor excepting those of England who were to poor too bear this charge Thereupon Dr. Stillingfleet makes divers Reflections whereof these are the Principal 1. That it followeth from thence that what Geoffrey of Monmouth saith of Riches which King Lucius gave the Church of England is false 2. That it is notwithstanding strange that the Bishops of England should not have wherewithal to maintain them at Rimini since before Constantine the Churches had divers Funds besides the Offerings of the People which were considerable in the numerous Churches and since Constantine had granted them great Priviledges as is shewn at length by divers Edicts of this Emperor which are in the Theodosian Codicil and elsewhere He comes thence to the Accusation of Pelagianism which Beda and Gildas had before raised against the Clergy of England He remarks first that Pelagius and Celestius were both born in Great Britain and not in the Armorick Britain as some have believed and Refutes at the same time some places of F. Garnier who hath spoken of Pelagius in his Notes upon Marius Merâ—ator 2. That the Monastick History makes him Abbot of the Monastery of Bangor but that there is little likelyhood that Bangor had had a Monastery famous in that time because the Convents of England are no antienter than the time of St. Patrick and if Pelagius was a Monk he was of such an Order as were Pammachius Paulinus Melanius and Demetriades who were pious persons withdrawn from the Commerce of the World but without Rule 3. That the Occupation of these Men after the Exercises of Piety consisted in the study of Scripture and that it was in such a Retreat that Pelagius Writ his Commentary upon the Epistles of St. Paul and his Letters to Melanius and Demetriades 4. That since he was accused of Heresie he was imployed to defend himself and that after having been Condemned in Africk and Banished he was yet Condemned in a Council at Antioch under Theodotus as Marius Mercator tells us and all that because the Sentiments of Pelagius were not well understood as the Bishop of Worcester justly saith 5. That wretched Pelagius passed the remnant of his Life in obscurity and dyed according to all likelihood without returning into England 6. That without the extraordinary cares of the Bishops of Africk Pelagianism would have been established by the Authority of the See of Rome Though Pelagius had been Condemned by the Emperor and the Councils Agricola Son to Severian Bishop who had embraced Pelagianism brought it into England It was perhaps the severe Edict of Valentinian III. Published in CCCCXXV against the Pelagians who were amongst the Gauls which drove him thence Prosper witnesseth that there were several of them in England which made some believe that Celestius was returned hither but our Author shews that this Opinion has no ground The Adversaries of the Pelagians not being able to defend themselves against so subtil Controvertists sent to demand aid of the Bishops of the Gauls who sent them Germain and Loup two Bishops of great Reputation but suspected to be Semi Pelagians the first being a great Friend to Hilary of Arles and the second being brother to Vincent of Lerins Semi Pelagians It 's found in a certain Writing that is attributed to Prosper Disciple of St. Augustin that it was Celestinus Bishop of Rome who sent him but our Author shews that there is reason to suspect this to be the writing of some other Prosper and that though it were his we have reason to believe that he was deceived Germain and Loup being arrived in England had a publick Conference at Verulam and acted so that they left England in the old Opinions as they believed but they were forced to return sometimes after Our Author relates no Head of the Doctrine of St. Germain and Loup by which we may know whether they Taught Semi Pelagianism or the Predestinarionism in England to free themselves from the suspicions which might be had of them He passeth to the Justification of Fastidius an English Bishop suspected of Pelagianism and of whom there is yet a Book de vita Christiana published by Holstenius It is not so easie to justifie Faustus of Riez from Semi Pelagianism though in his time he passed for a Saint and that he was Prayed to in this quality during many Ages in the Church of Riez Sidonius Apollinaris gives him this fine Encomium Cui datum est soli melius loqui quam didicerit vivere melius quam loquatur To whom alone it hath been given to speak better than he had Learned and to Live better
than he Spoke What has been said of him may be seen Tome 8. p. 228. and Foll of the Vniversal Bibliotheque The Learned have much Disputed to know if there really had been Hereticks who may be named Predestinarians Some believed they were but Semi-Pelagians who turn'd the Sentiments of St. Augustin into Heresie and consequences of 'em into another Name and others have said that really there were some who had indeed drawn from the Doctrine of this Father this consequence That there was no Free-will and consequently that God would not Iudge Men according to their Works Our Author proves there have been Men who maintained these strange Opinions though there was not enough to make a Sect. After that Dr. Stillingfleet returns to St. Germain and Loup who established Academies or Schools in England and who also introduced here the Gallican Liturgy Upon this Subject he seeks for the Origine of the most antient Schools of England and speaks of the Gallican Liturgy which he compares with the Roman He shews finally the Conformity of the English Church of this time with the Antient British Liturgy and concludes that the Non-Conformists are in the wrong to accuse the Episcopal Church of having received its Liturgy from the Roman Church It sufficeth to speak of this briefly because there are almost none but the English who can be curious of these sorts of things V. The same reason obligeth us to make this use of it in respect of the 6th and last Chapter where the Author treats of the fall of the British Churches He sheweth 1. That all Great Britain was never Conquer'd by the Romans and that the Picts and Scots being not subdued made Excursions upon the Britans 2. That what is said of Scotch and Irish Antiquities is no more assured than what Geoffrey of Monmouth hath published of those of England 3. That as soon as the Barbarous Nations of the North had some knowledge of Sciences they would have Histories as they saw the most Polite Nations had and to descend from some Illustrious People such as the Trojans were the Greeks and the Aegyptians whence an Infinity of Fables hath taken birth 4. That the Evils of the British Churches came from their being exposed to the Fury of the Scots and Picts upon the Declining of the Empire of the West which was no more in a way of helping them and that several times there were Walls or Retrenchments made betwixt Scotland and England to preserve the latter from the Incursions of these Barbarous People 5. That the Britans being afterwards divided one of the Parties called to its help the Saxons whose Origine is here sought for that they repented it soon after and that the Britans were obliged to make War against them whereof divers events are described drawn from the Monastick Histories full of Lyes and at the same time very defective 6. That Armorick Britain was Peopled by a British Colony towards the end of the Fourth Age. There it was that Gildas Writ his Letter where he Addresses himself to Five Kings amongst whom England was divided and describes at large the Vices of the Britans to induce them to Repentance Lastly The Bishop of Worcester Relates the manner how the Prelates of England received the Monk Augustin who was sent hither towards the end of the Sixth Age by Gregory Bishop of Rome This Augustin being made Arch-Bishop of Canterbury by the Pope desired to have a Conference with the British Bishops to whom he represented that they ought to embrace the Unity of the Catholick Church viz. to submit to him and the Pope All that he could obtain is that they asked time to consult and offered afterwards to Answer him in a greater Assembly There were Seven British Bishops and several Learned Men chiefly of the Monastery of Bangor whereof one named Dinot was Abbot The Result of the Assembly was That the Britans altogether refused to submit to the Church of Rome or to Augustin as their Arch-Bishop It is what Beda whose Authority is indisputable in these matters relates of this Conference It is yet found more at large in a M. S. published in the Collection of Mr. Spelman an Antient Britan in English and in Latin As there have been some objections made against this History and this M S. Dr. Stillingfleet Answers 'em at the end of this Chapter Thence he concludes that the British Churches are in the same case in relation to the Dispute they have with the Bishop of Rome as the Churches of Cyprus were in regard to the Bishop of Antioch who would fain be their Patriarch against their Antient Rights according to which they had a particular Metropolitan As the Council of Ephesus condemned the Bishop of Antioch who would extend too far the limits of his Jurisdiction If the pretentions of the Pope upon England be this day judged by the antient Canons he shall infallibly be condemned for striving to extend his Patriarchship in places where he hath not been acknowledged for above 600 years All the WORKS of James Alting Professor of Divinity in the Academy of Groningen Fifth Vol. in Fol. at Amsterdam Sold by Gerard Borstius 1687. THose that have read the Schilo of this Author his Treatises upon the Sabbath the Conversion of the Iews and his Theological and Philosophical Dissertations will not wonder that Mr. Becker Minister of Amsterdam hath taken care to Print all his Works Posthumâ— It hath been thought that the Style of Mr. Alting which is simple enough and sufficiently disengag'd from the terms of Schools would not be ill received in an Age where neatness is so much loved and wherein great words are no more taken for great things This is what may be judged by a general view of the Subjects to which this Divine hath applyed himself and by an Essay that shall be given here of his Method 1. We find in the First Tome an Analysis and Notes upon the Four first Books of Moses and upon the 24 First Psalms a larger Commentary upon Deuteronomy from the first Chapter until the XIX Vers. 11 and Lessons upon all the Prophet Ieremy The 2d contains besides the Parallel of divers Prophecies of the Old Testament cited in the New very ample Commentaries upon several passages of the Old Testament whose sense is given and whose use is shewn in Religion and Morality The 3d and 4th Volumes comprise Expositions of the same nature upon the whole Epistle to the Romans and divers Texts of the New Testament an Analysis of this Epistle and of that to the Colossians with Lessons upon the Epistle to the Hebrews from the beginning to the Ninth Chapter Vers. 10. In the 5th there are the Dissertations which have been already Printed with a very long Treatise upon the Nature of the Sabbath where 't is shewn it was altogether Evangelick Notes upon the Catechism of Heidelberg a Method of the Didactick Divinity Five Heptads of Theological and Philosophical Dissertations the First
Invisible Fluid which is called the Spirits and partly perhaps by little Particles which are suddenly loosened from the rest or by a Portion of Air enclosed in our Body or by some kinds of Ferments all which things cease to act with Life and cannot be discovered by the means of Anatomy 5. A Physician ought not to apply himself so much to the Disquisition of the Ends of the Author of Nature as to neglect examining the manner whereby Natural Effects do happen and the Causes which produce them more immediately In effect the one is not incompatible with the other as nothing hinders us from knowing by what Springs and Wheels a Watch playeth when we have learned for what Design it was made A Physician who would not be unworthy of this Name ought to add the first of these Knowledges to the second The Book whereof we have given an Extract though full of Matter being little enough Mr. Boyle hath added fourteen Curious Observations about divers Infirmities of the Eyes It hath been already observed That he insisted much upon this part of the Animals to prove that their Bodies were form'd designedly so that these Remarks may serve only to confirm what he hath said There is but one Power and one Wisdom so great as is that of God which could have included so many things in so little an Organ And we have an occasion still to admire his Providence in that this Organ being composed of so many Parts and so easie to be spoiled It nevertheless is found to remain in the greatest part of Mankind in the same state from their Birth to their Death The Observations which Mr. Boyle gives us here are so much the more remarkable because he hath seen most of those Persons whose Unhappiness he relates This is the last which was translated Word for Word Men it may be may be persuaded That those who perceive Objects in a Light much less than it ought to be for others to discern it may rather be accounted to have an excellent Sight than to have infirm Eyes But although this Delicacy of the Organs of the Sight may be looked upon as a Perfection in Bats and Owls which cannot take hold of their Prey but in the Twilight yet in regard to Man who ought principally to act in full Day or in a Light almost equivalent we may be sensible of the Bounty of the Author of Nature in that he hath given him Eyes so qualified as they commonly are if he had the Coat or Membrane too tender it would be an Imperfection or at least a great Inconveniency as appears by the following Observation In the Army of Charles the First King of England there was an Ingenious Gentleman who was Major of a Regiment and being forced by the Victory of the Usurper to go seek his Fortune out of the Kingdom hazarded himself at Madrid to render his Prince a Service of very great Consequence after such a manner as was judged in Spain to be altogether void of Prudence he was seized and put into a Dungeon where there were no Windows but only a Hole in the Wall by which they gave the Prisoner his Victuals after which they shut it although perhaps not very exactly This Gentleman remained some Weeks without seeing any thing whatever and in a very deep Melancholy But after that it seemed to him as if he saw a weak Light which afterwards augmented from Day to Day so that he could discover his Bed or any thing of a like Bigness At last he came to discern Objects so little that he saw Rats which came to eat the Crumbs of his Bread that fell on the Ground and distinctly observed their Motions He related several other effects of his Sight in this obscure Place Which shews that this proceeded chiefly from his Organs which became tender staying so long a Time in such a dark Place as it was But his Affairs being changed and having recovered his Liberty he durst not immediately expose himself to a full Sight fearing left a too sudden Brightness should make him lose his Sight but thought he should accustome his Eyes thereto by little and little I add here continueth Mr. Boyle this strange History with much the less Difficulty because I have it from the very Mouth of this Gentleman He told me besides other Particulars which I dare not to mention here because I have not those Memorandums I took of 'm to refresh my Memory An Extract of a Letter written from London about the Description of a Ship built after a new Form by Sir William Petti AS all Men expected the Success of Sir William Petti's Enterprize of Building a Ship after a new Make so there ran a multitude of People to the Thames-Side to see this Ship Launched being empty when it was tryed It drew Water but seven Foot and an half They were going to name it Gemini because it was composed of two small Ships but at last it was called the Experiment because of the uncertainty of the Event it would produce To apprehend its Structure we must imagine two little Ships joyned together by a Plat-form so that between the two there may be a Space almost as large as the two Ships together through which the Water has an entire Liberty to pass The Keel of each Vessel is eighty Foot long The bigness with the Platform is only thirty two Foot The height from the Keel unto the Platform is fourteen Foot If this Ship is used in War it will carry fifty Pieces of Cannon two hundred Men and three Months Provision If it be used as a Merchant Ship it will carry three hundred Tuns The Advantages which are expected from this Ship are First That it will be swifter than those hitherto used 1. Because it will carry twice or thrice as many Sails as others do 2. Having no Ballast it will be lighter and consequently swifter Secondly They pretend that this Ship will be surer than others 1. Because the Figure of its Sides with the Water which runs between the two Ships will keep it from running aground 2. And having no Ballast it cannot sink what Breaches soever it may meet with especially if it be assisted by some Pieces of Cannon 3. It s Keel being supported by a great many streight Planks will defend it if it should touch the Ground with all its Weight 4. Because it will not carry its Noses under the Water and that its Mast will be sooner Break in the Tempest Thirdly They say this Ship is still more commodious than others 1. In that the Water passing with its full Force to the Rudder along its direct Sides it will make the Ship turn more speedily than others do whose Rudder receives only the broken Water by the Sides of those Ships which are rounder 2. This Ship not being so round as others will toss less in a Tempest and as it will not Rise or Fall but very little so they may make use even in
not of the Infallibility of the holy Tribunal but burns 'em immediately without Examination agreeing with much Humanity that that is no Effusion of Blood They carry also with 'em some Boxes full of dead Men's Bones that have been accused many years before and this makes up part of the Process But to return to our Author after he was redeemed from the Gallies by the Credit of his Friends he return'd into France being resolv'd to pay no more Visits to the Inquisition nor engage a Rival Inquisitor above all Rivals The Works of P. Virgilius Maro Illustrated with the Interpretation and Notes of Charles Ruaeus of the Society of Iesus by the Command of the most Christian King for the use of the Dauphin according to the Edition of Paris London 1679. in 8vo p. 610. THis Edition of Virgil is not less fine for its being one of the first Books which were Printed in England in the same form as the Authors printed it in Holland cum Notis Variorum And it may be said that no Authors have been better printed in France than this and it s hoped that divers more will be printed in the same manner There is at the end an Idea of all the Words which may almost serve as well as that of Erythraens provided it is correct which is pretty difficult in so great a number of errors As for the Text it lacketh much of being so correct as it is well printed which happens undoubtedly in that the Booksellers have not made Proofs enough thereof to be revised as it also happeneth in Holland but too often All the World knoweth what the method of those is who have commented upon Poets for the Dauphin Father de la Rue complains justly that the Learned who had laboured until now upon the Ancients applyed themselves more to acquire Reputation in making long unnecessary digressions on the Authors which they commented upon than to make young folks comprehend well the sense thereof He might besides have said that it 's easier to play the Learned Man in putting off his collections upon the occasion of one word which is not more clear thereby than to follow the Author step by step and to leave no obscurity in his Expressions and Thoughts as those who have studied for the Dauphin have endeavoured to do This last Design is equally advantageous for those who begin to read the Writings of the Ancients or who hardly understand them and painful for those who undertake to remove all the difficulties which are found therein This is what ought to oblige the Publick or to excuse the faults which may be remarked in Interpretations otherwise so exact and agreeable to the Author Notwithstanding a part of what we have proposed to our selves in this Work consisting in making known the Opinions of the Publick or even of Particular People upon Books which are Publisht as well as to tell what they contain it will not be amiss to remark here what the Publick finds fault with in some of the Authors which are for the use of the Dauphin The Reader may observe if he pleaseth that we only relate here what we often heard said of divers able Persons in such things and not our particular Opinions It cannot be denyed that it is not a thing which Essentially belongeth to the History of Books to tell what the Learned have thought thereof as soon as they were made Publick And as an Historian ought not to have the boldness to relate any falsehood so there is no Truth but what he ought to speak of he ought to flatter no Body nor testifie hatred against any whosoever Quis nescit primam esse Hitoriae legem nequid falsi dicere audeat deindenâ—quid veri non audeat nequa suspicio gratiae sit in scribendo nequa simultatis We were obliged to make this small Digression fearing it should be thought that we have forgotten our Promise which we made three years ago of not judging of the Works whereof we should make mention Some Persons who have carefully applyed themselves to the Study of Humanity find two things to be reprehended in several Authors in Question The First is that in the Paraphrase they have not only applyed themselves to Paraphrase the Original by an equal Number of Words but also have for the most part retained certain Metaphorical Terms which helpeth on with the obscurity of the Authors Style They have even been contended to put the Terms of the Original according the Order of Construction without expounding them in the Notes tho' they were not clear It would therefore be a thing desirable that they had so scrupulously applyed themselves to the number of Words 1. Because it is impossible to speak plainer than the Author without adding some Terms For Example Virgil saith in his IV. Eclogue Ultima Cumaei venit jam Carminis aetas word for word The last Age of the Camae'an Verses is come F. De la Rue Traslates Nunc attigimus extremum saeculum vaticinij Cumaea Sybillae Those who begin to read Virgil may believe that this Signifies that we shall soon cease to respect the Verses of the Sybil of Cumes and that they are going to be buried in Oblivion or some such thing He should have said Attigimus extremam aetatem Mundi à Sybilla Cumaea decantatam we are come to the last Age of the World so call'd by the Sybill of Cumes 2. What availeth it to Paraphrase Idle Epithets chiefly when they are clear as when they Paraphrase Cast a Lucina by pudica Diana There hath never been an impudica Diana and this Epithet doth but render the Prose flat and affected for it 's known that Poets have Priviledges which Orators have not 3. In keeping a Metaphor in the Paraphrase they speak as obscurely as the Author Virgil had said Si canimus Sylvas Sylvae sint Consule dignae if we Sing we Sing country Songs let them be so fine as that a Consul may not Scorn to hear them F. de la Rue saith Si cantamus Sylvas Sylvae deceant Consulem It 's true he expounds in his Note Sylva by Country Song but if he had put it in his Paraphrase that would have spared him a Note and the Terms of deceant Consulem are at least as obscure as those of the Original Therefore it may be that it had been better to render the Metaphors into simple words that the Young Folks should Learn the Figured Style and that which is not so Besides this manner of Reckoning words hath produced another obscurity which is not of a less consequence which is that when the Author hath put no Particle to remark the Connection of his Discourse none hath been put likewise by the Commentator which makes those who want Notes to understand it not understand the Sequel and think they read a fiddle faddle Virgil thus begins to his IV. Eclogue Sicelides Musae paulò majora canamus Non omnes arbusta juvant humilesque myricae Si
sin in putting the Rods to Laban's Cattel v. 3. n. 26 q. 8. Josephus his Testimony of our Saviour v. 3. n. 27. q. 1. Jacob did he sin in defrauding his Brother v. 3. n. 27. q. 4. Jesse's Sons 1 Sam. 16. 1 Chron. 2. how reconcil'd v 3. n. 27. q. 5 Jacob did he wrestle with an Angel or with God himself v. 3. n. 28. q. 1 Jephthah had he sin'd had he broke his Vow v. 3. n. 28. q. 2. Interrupted Discourse c. create Aversions or Love v. 4. n. 3. q. 5. Infants if saved without Baptism what signifies it v. 4. n. 14. q. 7. Infants have they Faith since that is necessary to Baptism v. 4. n. 14. q. 8. Jacobites and Williamites v. 4. n. 27. q 1. Informer against Vice whether well v. 4 n. 29. q. 5. Informer against Vice is he a Busie-body v. 4. n. 29. q. 6. Informers against Sin what benefit do they get v. 4. n. 29. q. 7. John Whitehead's Miracle v. 4. n. 30 q. 2. Japan whether an Island or no v. 5 n 7. q. 8. Iury-man how to act in Causes of Life and Death v. 5. n. 12. q. 1. Irenaeus Doctrine about the Soul whet her Scriptural v 4. n. 15. q. 4. Jephtha's sacrificing his Daughter how contradicted v 5. n. 16. q 8. Impostor M. Wickam did he believe he should di◠v. 5. n. 16. q. 9. Infants incapable of being taught v. 5. n. 19. q. 1. Infant Baptism never appointed of God v. 5. n. 19 arg 2. Infants of all nations ought not to be baptised v. 5. n. 19 arg 3. Infants are not requir'd to believe v. 5. n. 19. arg 4. Infant Baptism does not tend to the Glory of God v. 5. n. 19 arg 5. Infants ought not to be Baptised v. 5. n. 20 arg 6. Infant Baptism has no precedent in Scripture v. 5. n. 20 arg 7. Infant Bap◠is not in Scripture v. 5. n. 20. arg 8. Infant Baptism no institution of Christs v. 5. n 20. arg 9. Infants of believing Gentiles v. 5. n. 21. arg 10. Infants have no spiritual Benefits by Baptism v. 5. n. 20. arg 11. Infant Baptism no promises made to it v. 5. n. 21. arg 12. Infant Baptism no Ordinance of God v. 5. n. 21. arg 13. Infant Baptism added to the Worship of God v. 5. n. 21. arg 14. Infant Baptism of Human Tradition v. 5. n. 21. arg 15. Infant Baptism reflects on the Honour of Christ v. 5. n. 21. arg 16. Iewish Proselyte v. 5. n. 21. arg 17. Infant Baptism of positive Right v. 5. n 21 arg 18. Infants not Baptis'd upon their profession of Faith v 4. n 22. arg 19. Infants not capable to enter into a marriage Vnion v. 5. n. 22. arg 20. Infants not to be baptiz'd for forgiveness of sins v. 5. n. 22 arg 21. Infant Baptism no Baptism of Christ v. 5. n. 22 arg 22. Infants baptiz'd are not in Scrip v. 5. n. 22. arg 23 Infants not to be admitted into the Church v. 5. n. 23. arg 24. Infant Baptism no lively Representation of Christ v. 5 n. 22. arg 25. Infant Baptism frustrates Christs end v. 5. n. 23. arg 26. Infant Baptism an Appendix to it v. 5. n. 23. Infants Right to Baptism v. 5. n. 27. q. 3. Infants are they to be brought to Christ v. 5. n. 27. q. 1. Infant Bapt. a mistake of the Text v. 5. n. 27. q. 2. ‖ ITrigius's Discourse of the Arch-hereticks in the Apostles Age 3 sup p. 16. Italy a new Iounrey thither 4 sup p. 15. Iod why the least in the Hebrew Alphabet 5 sup q. 3 p. 9. Iustification and Forgiveness of sins as it all one 5 sup p. 24. q. 22. †JUrien's true System of the Church p. 72. His Accomplishment of Prophecies with the Explication of all the Visions of the Apocalipse p. 76. His Treatise of Nature and Grace p. 458. K. * KIngston-Bridge why the Water always runs c. v. 1. n 16 q. 11. Knighhtood is an unbaptiz'd person capable of it v. 1. n. 21. q. 1 Know our friends in Heaven v. 1. n. 25. q. 7. Kite how suspended in the Air v. 2. n 5. q. 8. Knowles Thomas his marriage v. 2 n. 8. q. 2. Knowing nothing new v. 2. n. 17. q. 2. Kittens crying in a Cat when she was hang'd v 2 n. 20. q. 8. Knowledge of things known or unknown which most desirable v. 2. n. 23. q. 5. Kings Evil how cured by Englands Kings v. 2. n. 24. q. 22. Knowledge of future State will it be gradual v. 2. n. 30. q. 3. Knight-Errantry v. 3. n. 1. q. 3. Kingdom of the peoples giving whether worth taking v. 4. n. 11. q. 7. King James why do you reflect on him v. 4. n. 27. q. 1. King William why has he never toucht for the Evil v. 5. n. 15. q. 1. Kings of England can they cure the Evil v. 5. n. 15. q. 3. ‖ KNowing little of all things or only one thing solidly whether better 1 sup p. 25. Knowledge in Women 2 sup p. 29. L. * LAzarus's Soul v. 1. n. 1. q. 4. Lawful to beat a Wife v. 1. n. 1. q 6. Last query who the Author of it v. 1. n. 3 q. 10. Lazarus's Estate if any who enjoy'd it v. 1. n. 5. q 7. Land of Nod where was it v. 1. n. 7. q. 2. Louis le Grand of the French King v. 1. n. 11. q 6. Light is it a Body v. 1. n. 11. q. 8. Lawful to marry Cousin German v. 1. n. 12. q. 4. Lawful to marry first Wifes Sister v. 1. n. 12. q 5. Lawful to make Addresses to young Ladies v. 1. n. 13. q. 1. Lawful to marry a person one cannot love v. 1. n. 13. q. 2. Ladies Aversion what course to take to remove it v. 1. n. 13. q. 4. Lawful to look on another than ones Wife v. 1. n. 18. q. 4. Lines whether there be not an infinite power c. v. 1. n. 22. q. 14 Lucretia Codrus Plato c. did well or ill in Suicide v. 1. n. 22. q. 19. Lawful is it to do evil that good may come v 1 n 30 q 1 Levi's paying Tithes in Abraham v 1 n 330 q 2 Language before the Confusion of Babel v 1 n 30 q 9 Love when it decays v 2 n 3 q 3 Love twice whether possible with a like Ardour v 2 n 6 q 3 Language if an infant should be kept v 2 n 6 q 6 Lion whether it won't prey upon a Virgin v 2 n 8 q 5 Learning c. whether less now than formerly v 2 n 11 q 2 Lord's Supper how to approach worthily v 2 n 12 q 1 Love what is it v 2 n 13 q 2 Love why it turns to Coldness after marriage v 2 n 13 q 3 Love its Remedy and Cure v 2 n 13 q 4 Love whether absence or presence best v 2 n 13 q 6 Lover when true whether offer injury to the beloved v 2 n 13 q 8 Litany