Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	john_n	lord_n	treasurer_n	3,143	5	10.7684	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93107	An exact collection of choice declarations, with pleas, replications, rejoynders, demurrers, assignement of errours and the entries of judgments thereupon affirmed. / Collected by VV. S. one of the clerks of the upper bench office : in the reignes of Queen Elizabeth, King James, and the late King Charles. Diligently perused, and translated into English, for the benefit and helpe of young clerkes. With an exact table, wherein may be found the principall matters contained in the whole book.	W. S., One of the clerks of the Upper Bench Office.; J. W.; Sheppard, William, d. 1675?, attributed name.; Small, William, 17th cent, attributed name.	1653 (1653)	Wing S3185; Thomason E210_1; ESTC R10408	294,804	288

he in form by them the said William Skippon Iohn Green William Waters and Iohn Hitch had and procured the same Nicholas for making his purgation in that behalf according to the Law and cu●●om of this R●alm of England being asked then to wit at the Gaol delivery aforesaid whether he were guilty of the Felony aforesaid whereof in form aforesaid he was endicted or no and thereupon he had sayd that he was not thereof guilty and of this had then put himself upon the Country as by the Record thereupon before the Justices remaining it is fully manifest and appears the aforesaid William Skippon John Green William Waters and Iohn Hitch by Conspiracie between them at Fakenham aforesaid in form aforesaid came before the aforesaid Justices at the Assizes aforesaid and to prove him the said Nicholas guilty of the Felony aforesaid before the same justices gave in evidence upon their oath to the Jury at the Assizes aforesaid impanelled charged and sworn to enquire of the good and ill That the same Nicholas the aforesaid Mary in form aforesaid had killed and murdered according to the form effect of the Endictment aforesaid by them in form aforesaid procured which said Jury more fully understanding the truth and the Conspiracie aforesaid as is aforesaid afore had then to wit at the Assizes aforesaid said upon their oath that he the said Nicholas was not guilty of the Felony aforesaid in manner and form as the same Nicholas was endicted and he the same Nicholas then before the Justices aforesaid at the Gaol delivery aforesaid according to the Law and custom of this Rea●m of England was acquitted By vertue of which said Conspiracie Endictment taking giving in evidence and detension in the Prison aforesaid of him the said Nicholas by them the said William Skippon Iohn Green William Waters and Iohn Hitch in form aforesaid had and procured the same Nicholas not only in great scandall and infamy as also in danger of his life and also of the loss of all his Goods and Chattels Lands and Tenements he was fallen and elapsed unto But also divers great sums of mony for the making of himself clear in that behalf was constrained and compelled to the Damage of him the said Nicholas two hundred pound c. Lincoln Declaration in Conspiracie brought by one who was Endicted together with others c. before the Justices of the Peace and afterwards acquit by the Justices of Assizes March 14. Hen. 6. Ro● 6. ss T. G. lately of R. in the County aforesaid Gentleman I. P. of S. in the County aforesaid Husbandman and A.B. of the same in the County aforesaid Husbandman were attached to answer A. P. lately of S. in the County aforesaid Gentleman Wherefore by Conspiracie forehad between them the aforesaid A. P. together with E. P. lately of S. in the County aforesaid Gentleman I. G. of the same in the County aforesaid Yeoman T.C. of the same in the same County Yeoman T.S. of S. in the same County Husbandman A. H. of S. in the County aforesaid Husbandman and G.P. of B. in the County aforesaid Husbandman for that he such a day and year by force and Arms that is to say with Swords Staves and Knives and other ●urtfu●l weapons at S. aforesaid in the County aforesaid the Close and House of R. B. did break and enter and one Cart load of Hay of the price of six shillings and eight pence of the Goods and Chattels of him the said R. B. then and there found riotously took and carried away against the Peace of our Lord the King aforesaid at C. aforesaid to be Indicted and him the said A. upon that occasion to be taken and in the Pri●on of the Marshalsee of our Lord the King in the Court of him the said Lord the King before him the said King held untill the same A. before Humphry Coningsbie Knight and Iohn Carrill Justices of our Lord the King at the Assizes in the County aforesaid assigned to be taken on Friday the Feast of St. Anne last past at the Castle of Lincoln in the County aforesaid according to the Law and custom of the Realm of our Lord the King of England he was thereof acquitted to be deteined falsly and maliciously at C. aforesaid they did procure to the great damage of him the said A. and against the form of the provision in that case provided And whereupon the same A. by VV. V. his Attorney complains that the aforesaid T.G. I.P. and R.B. by Conspiracie forehad between them at C. aforesaid in the County of Lincoln aforesaid on Tuesday next before such a Feast such a year aforesaid the aforesaid A. together with E. P. lately of S. in the County aforesaid Gent. and the rest as before for that he the seventh day of October in the tenth year of the Reign of our Lord the King aforesaid with force and arms that is to say Swords Staves and Knives and other most hurtfull weapons at S. aforesaid in the County aforesaid the Close and House of R. B. did break and Enter And one Cart-load of Hay to the value of six shillings and eight pence of the 〈◊〉 and chattells of him the said R. B. then and there found rio●●●● he took and carried away against the Peace of our said Lord the ●●ng at C. aforesaid on Tuesday next before such a feast such a year aforesaid before W. Tirwhit R. Terwhit and W. H. Knights and their Companions Justices of our Lord the King for the Peace as also assigned to hear and determine of divers Felonies Trespasses and other misdemeanours in the parts of Lindsey in the County aforesaid committed to be Indicted and him the said A. upon that occasion on Wednesday next after Fifteen dayes of Easter in such a year at VVestminster in the County of Middlesex to be taken and in the Prison of the Marshall of our Lord the King in the Court of him the said Lord the King before him the said King had untill the same A. before H.C. and I.C. Justices of our Lord the King at the Assizes in the said County of Lincoln assigned to be taken on Friday the Feast of St. Anne last past at the Castle of Lincoln in the County aforesaid according to the Law and Custom of the Realm of our Lord the King of England he was thereof acquitted to be deteined falsly and maliciously at C. aforesaid they procured against the form of the provision aforesaid Whereupon he saith that he is damnified One of the Defendants Iustifies as a Counsellour at Law and the other as Witnesses to testifie a Riot before the justices of the Peace which is the same Conspiracie whereof c. and hath damage to the value of forty pounds And thereupon he brings his Sute c. And the aforesaid T.G. I.P. and R. B. by I. L. their Attorney come and defend the force and injury when c. And all Conspiracie c. And say that the aforesaid A.

Trespasse done into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in which c. entred And the said T. and J. of those Tenements with the Appurtenances in which c. wholly expelled and amoved by which the said C. was thereof possessed untill the said T. and J. at the said time in which c. with Force and Armes aforesaid the Close of him the said C. in the said place in which c. did breake and his said Grasse there then growing with the said Cattell did eat up tread and consume and the said Ground there with a Plow did rip up and also his said Wood there then growing they did cut down and carry away against the Peace c. in manner and form as the same C. before against them himselfe now complaineth And this c. whereupon from which the said T. and J. the said Trespasse before acknowledging the same C. prayeth Judgment and his said Damages by occasion of that Trespasse unto him to be adjudged c. AND they the said T. and J. say that they the said T. and J. by the said space of one yeare that is to say from the said two and twentieth day of Aprill in the fourth yeare of the said Reigne of the said now King above said untill the said foure and twentieth day of Aprill in the fifth yeare of the Reigne of the said now King aforesaid did inhabit within the said Mannor of B. and not without in manner and form as the said C. before in replying hath alledged and this c. Whereupon as before he praieth Judgment and that the said C. from his said Action thereupon against them had may be procluded c. AND the said C. as before saith that the said T. and J. by the space of one yeare and a day that is to say from the said two and twentieth day of Aprill in the fourth yeare of the Reigne of the said now King untill the foure and twentieth day of Aprill in the fifth yeare of the Reigne of the said now King did inhabit without the said Mannor of B. that is to say at C. aforesaid and within the Mannor of the said C. in manner and form as the same C. before in replying hath alledged And this he prayeth that it may be inquired of by the Country c. WILLIAM Attersale Kent Declaration upon the Statute of the eighth year of H. 6. of forcible entryes by Deeds complaineth of John Fuller and M. his wife and VV. Parker in the custody of the Marshall c. Of a Plea wherefore whereas in a Statute in Parliament of the Lord Henry late King of England the sixth after the Conquest at VVestminster in the eight yeare of his Reigne held established amongst other things it should be continued that if any person of any Lands or Tenements with main strength be expulsed and disseised or peaceably is put out and afterward is held out with force or any Feoflment or discontinuance thereof after such entry for the Right of the Possessor to defraud and take away in any manner is made the party in this behalfe grieved may have against such disseisor an Assise of new disseisin or a writ of Trespasse and if the party grieved by Assise or by Action of Trespasse shall recover and by Verdict or in other manner by due form of Law it shall be found that the party Defendant in the Lands and Tenements was by force of entry or after his entry should hold by force the Plaintiff shall recover his treble Damages against the Defendant And further shall make Fine and Redemption as in the same Statute more fully is contained Notwithstanding they the said J. M. and W. P. the said Statute little weighing and the Penalty in the same little fearing the first day of October in the sixth yeare of the now King Edward the sixth into two parts of one Messuage and twelve Acres of Land with the Appurtenances of him the said VV. A. in J. in the County aforesaid with main force that is to say with Swords Staves Clubs Bowes and Arrowes they entred and the said VV. A. with main force expulsed and disseised and him so expulsed and disseised of the same two parts of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances with the said main force withheld and as yet doth withhold from the same to the contempt of the said now King and to the Damage of him the said W. A. 20 l. and against the form of the said Statute and against the Peace of the Lord the now King And thereupon he bringeth his Suit c. Defendant iustifies by vertue of a certain demise unto them at will by one made his own Right the rest as his Servants peaceably and quietly entry into the Tenements c. AND they the said J. F. M. and W. P. by I.C. their Attorney come and defend the force and wrong when c. all Contempts and whatsoever c. And say that long before the said Entry into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances before supposed to be done one I. G. was seized of the said Tenements with the Appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee and him the said I. G. so being thereof seized the same I. G. afterward and before the said time in which c. that is to say the eighth and twentieth day of October in the yeare of the Lord 1541. at I. aforesaid made his last Will and by the same Will that I. then his Wife should have the said Tenements with the Appurtenances to the Tearm of the life of her the said J. so that after the Discease of her the said J. have those Tenements with the Appurtenances should remain unto one J. K. and his Heires for ever And afterwards and before the said time in which c. the said J. at I. aforesaid died after the death of which said J. G. by vertue of the said last Will the same J. into the Tenements with the Appurtenances entred and was thereof seized in his Demesne as of Free-hold and she the said J. so thereof being seized the same J. long before the said time in which c. that is to say the twentieth day of September in the sixth yeare of the Reigne of the now Lord King Edward the sixth at J. aforesaid demized the said Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the said J. F. one of the aforesaid Defendants to have and to hold those Tenements with the Appurtenances unto the said J. F. his Executors and Assignes from the Feast of Saint Michaell the Arch-angell Lease at will from thence next following and fully to be compleat and so from yeare to yeare as long as both parties should please By vertue of which said Demise the same J. F. into the said Tenements with the Appurtenances entred Colour by demise and was thereof possessed and the said W. A. claiming the said Tenements with the Appurtenances by colour of which Deed of Demise unto him thereof made by the said

the company and fellowship of him the said I. F. should wholly withdraw and estrange themselves such a day and yeare and place c. and diverse other times and seasons between the same such a day and such a day then next following did frequently and unlawfully repaire and come to one Elizabeth then and as yet the Wife of the aforesaid I.F. at London c. And then and there openly in the Shop of him the said I.F. he then and there had unlawfull fellowship with the same E. And the same E. then and there at some times by lacivious words and other deceitfull and flattering glances and kisses and unchaste and dishonest provocations and by divers other unlawfull wayes and means did in a Devilish manner provoke and incite her the said E. to Luxury and the committing of Adultery with him the said R. And by such his frequent and unlawfull accesses and repayres to the aforesaid E. and the evill behaviour and conversation of him the said R. he the said I. could scarsely have her the said E. in the Shop of him the said I.F. openly before the Neighbours of him the said I.F. and al the people there passing then and there at other times for the space c. by the aforesayd R. for that time used by his the said R. having brought the same E. unto so great scandall infamie of the crime of Luxury and Adultery By reason of which c. the aforesayd I. not only all the profit and advantage which he by the aforesayd E. in managing of his houshold affairs and other businesses from the aforesaid such a day untill such a day was very likely to have gotten if the premises had not been committed hath totally lost and is deprived of but also he the said I F. is drawne into great shame scandall and infamy by reason thereof And remaines so disturbed and unquieted in minde that he about the necessary businesses concerning his Art aforesaid cannot seriously and earnestly intend And the same businesses for the whole time aforesaid by reason of the evill behaviour of the aforesaid R. as aforesaid to him the said I. remaine undone To the damage of him the said I. 100. l. And thereupon he brings his Suit E. P. Complaines of R A. Esquier in the custody of the Marshall c. For that whereas according to the custome of the Realme of our Lady the Queen of England hitherto used and approved every one of the same Kingdom is bound to keep his fire safely securely day and night So that for want of good keeping of such like fire any hurt or losse may in any manner happen to any of their Neighbours yet the aforesaid R. a Fire in a certaine house of his the said R. at E. in the County aforesaid kept so negligently and improvidently that for want of good keeping of his Fire One Barne of his the said E. as also his Goods and Chattells that is to say c. to the value c. in the same Barne then and there being were burnt to the damage of him the said E. c. And against the forme of the Custome aforesaid And thereupon he brings his Suit c. A B. Complaines of C. D. in the custody of the Marshall c. for that that is to say whereas the aforesaid Plaintiffe and Defendant such a day yeare and place had accompted together between them selves of diverse summes of Mony to the aforesaid A. formerly due c. And upon that Accompt the same Defendant was found in arrerages towards the aforesaid Plaintiff in 100. l. Gilders of Flanders mony amounting unto the summe of c. of lawfull mony of England And being c. WHerefore whereas the same Plaintiff had bargained with the aforesaid Defendant such a day yeare and place to buy of him ten Quarters of Malt the aforesaid Defendant knowing that Malt to be corrupt and insufficient to make beare withall by warranting that Malt to be good and sufficient to make bear thereof the aforesaid Malt to him the said Plaintiff for a certaine summe of mony falsely and fraudulently he there sold To the damage of him the said Plaintiff 40. l. c. STATUTE OF MAYNTENANCE Declaration up●● the St●●●● of 〈…〉 in 〈◊〉 by Origin●●● M●ch 11 〈◊〉 6. Roll. 84. JOhn King of London Draper and Nicholas Bulloyne of London Merchant were attached to answer as well to our Lord the King as F. N. otherwise called c. of a Plea wherefore whereas in the Statute at Westminster lately published amongst other things it is contained that No person of the Realm of England of whatsoever state degree or condition soever he were of should maintaine or uphold in the Country or elsewhere under the paine of imprisonment and making fine and redemption to our Lord the King at the will of every such Lord the King that is to say according to their Estate degree and demerit And the aforesaid I. and N. a Plea of Complaint which was in the Court of our Lord the King ●●●s City of London before S. Brown one of the Sheriff of the same City without the Writ of him our said Lord the King according to the Custom of the City aforesaid between the aforesayd F and I Garr●n Merchant of Catalonia of the debt of 68 l. 10 s. and 6. d. which 〈◊〉 ●●me I G. required from the aforesayd F. at Burton in the Clay for and on the part of him the sayd I. G. have maintained and sustained in the contempt of our sayd Lord the King and his the sayd F. great damage And against the forme of the Statute c. And whereupon the same F who as well c. in his proper person Complaines for that whereas in the Statute at Westminster lately published amongst other things it is contained that no person of the Realm of England of whatsoever state degree or condition he should be of should maintaine or sustaine any playnt in the Countrey or else where under the paine of imprisonment and making fine and redemption to our Lord the King at the will of every such Lord the King that is to say according to their Estate degree and demerit the aforesayd J. L. and N. such a day yeare and place the plaint which was in the Court of the Lord the King of his City of London before S. B. one of the Sheriffs of the same City in Guild-hall of the City aforesayd in the Parish of St. Lawrence in the old Jury in the Ward of Cheap London without the writt of him the said Lord the King according to the custom of the City aforesayd between the aforesayd F. and I. G. Merchant of Catalonia of the Debt of 68 l. 10. s. and 6. d. which the same I.G. required of the aforesayd F. at Burton in the Clay for and on the part of him the sayd I G have maintained and sustained in the contempt of our sayd Lord the King and the damage of him the sayd F.

was taken and arrested in Execution for the Debt and Damages aforesaid as in the Record aforesaid above is specified And that the aforesaid R.T. and VV. D Bayliffs of the Libertie and Franchise aforesaid in the County of Suff●lk aforesaid did bring the aforesaid T. B. to VVestminster in the County of Middlesex on Monday before the retorn of the Writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum in the Record aforesaid above mentioned The day of the Retorn of the aforesaid Capias ad satisfaciend ' being on Monday next after the morrow of All Souls in the thirty first year of the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth now Queen of England And that before the retorn thereof the aforesaid Bayliffs of the Libertie and Franchise aforesaid the aforesaid T. B. at the request of him the said T. B. to the Village of Lambeth in the County of Surrey did carry which said Village of Lombeth is a Village neer adjoyning to Westminster aforesaid but out of the way and not in the way from the County of Suffolk aforesaid unto VVestminster aforesaid nor is between the County of Suffolk aforesaid and VVestminster aforesaid And that the aforesaid Bayliffs of the Liberties and Franchises aforesaid afterwards at the aforesaid day of the aforesaid Retorn of the aforesaid Writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum did bring the aforesaid T. B. to VVestminster aforesaid And him the said T. B. in the Court of our Lady the Queen before her the said Queen at VVestminster aforesaid into the Prison of the said Court of our Lady the Queen called the Kings Bench by vertue or colour of the aforesaid Writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum they did deliver And further the Jury say that the aforesaid T. B. from the time of the arrest of him the said T. B. aforesaid unto the retorn of the aforesaid Writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum and the delivery of the aforesaid T. B. into the Court of her the said Lady the Queen before her the said Queen as is aforesaid remained and continued with the aforesaid Bayliffs by vertue or colour of the aforesaid Writ or Warrant But whether upon the whole matter aforesaid Speciall Verdicts in form aforesaid found the bringing of the aforesaid T. B. to Lambeth aforesaid c. in manner and form aforesaid be an Escape out of Prison and a permission to goe at large in Law nor no the Jury aforesaid are altogether ignorant Whereupon they pray the advisement and discretion of the Court of our Lady the Queen now here before her the said Lady the Queen being And if it shall seem to the said Court of our said Lady the Queen that the aforesaid bringing of the aforesaid T. B. to Lambeth aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid be an Escape out of Prison and a permission to goe at large in the Law then the Jurors say upon their Oath aforesaid that the aforesaid R. T. and T. D. the aforesaid T. B. at Lambeth in the County of Surrey aforesaid out of the Prison aforesaid to Escape and to goat large they did permit in manner and form as the aforesaid T.B. he hath above alleged and if upon the whole matter aforesaid it shall seem to the Court of the Lady the Queen that the afore bringing of him to the said T.B. to Lambeth aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid be not an Escape out of Prison and a permission to go at large in the Law Then the Jurors aforesaid say upon their Oath aforesaid that the aforesaid R.T. and W.D. did not permit the same T.B. out of Prison aforesaid to Escape and to goe at large in manner and form as the aforesaid T. B. hath above alleged ACTIONS OF CONSPIRACIE CONSPIRACIE Norfolk Declaration in Conspiracie for procuring one to be Endicted for Witchcraft ss NIcholas Stockdale complains of William Skippon of Hi●cham c. John Green of c. William Waters of c. and John Hitch of c. in the custodie of the Marshall c. for that that is to say that whereas they the aforesaid William Skippon Iohn Green William Waters and Iohn Hitch the 12. day of July in the 44. year of the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England at Fakensam in the County aforesaid by Conspiracy fore thought between them the aforesaid Nicholas for that he the first day of December in the year of the Reign of the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England the 44. and diver other dayes after the said first day of December should practise and exercise Witchcraft and Sorcery wickedly and Feloniously at Hitcham aforesaid in upon and against one Mary Skippon then the Wife of the aforesaid William Skippon by which said practices and exercises of the said Witchcraft the aforesaid Mary from the aforesaid first day of December in the 44. year aforesaid untill the 20. day of the month of February in the 44. year aforesaid most dangerously and mortally was sick and languished and the same 20. day of February in the 44. year aforesaid the same Mary by the said practise and exercise of the aforesaid Witchcraft at Hitcham aforesaid in the County aforesaid dyed and that the aforesaid Nicholas Stockdale to the same Mary at Hitcham aforesaid in manner and form aforesaid of his malice fore thought willingly devillishly wickedly and feloniously by the practise and exercise of the Witchcraft aforesaid did kill and murder against the peace of our said Lady the Queen and against the form of the Statute of our said late Lady the Queen held at Westminster in the County of Middlesex in the 5. year of her Reign in that case published and provided Before our then very beloved and faithfull Counsellour of our said Lady the Queen Iohn Popham Knight chief Justice of the said late Queen of the Pleas in the Court of her the said late Queen before her the said Queen assigned to be held and Robert Clark one of the Barons of the Exchequer of the same late Queen Justices of the Assizes of the said late Queen in the aforesaid County of Norfolk then assigned to be taken held at the Castle of Norwich the twelfth day of July in the 44. year aforesaid as also the Justices of the same late Queen for the keeping of the Peace in the County aforesaid and assigned to hear and determine of divers Felonies Trespasses and other misdemeanours in the same County then committed at the Castle of Norwich in the County aforesaid to be endited and him the said Nicholas upon that occasion then and there to be taken and in the Gaol of the said Castle of our late said Lady the Queen be ore the aforesaid John Popham Knight and Robe●t Clark Justices of our said late Queen at the Gaol aforesaid to be delivered to be held falsly and maliciously they conspired and procured against the form of the Statute in that case lately published and provided after which said Conspiracie Inditing taking and imprisoning and detension of him the said Nicholas

manner whatsoever And whereas also all and singular Pleas of whatsoever trespasses speeches and publishing of scandalous English words whatsoever touching and concerning the Banckruptery or insufficiency or poverty of any person being a Merchant at the time of the speaking or publishing of the same scandalous English words and all other such Pleas and matters onely are not of the Test or Jurisdiction but doe specially appertein and belong to their now Queen and her Regall Crown and by the Lawes of the Land of this Kingdome of the said Queen of England they ought not in any manner whatsoever to be tryed ended and discussed before the Admirall or by the Admirall or by his Deputy and from the time of mans memory they ought and were accustomed to be tryed c. by the Lawes of the Land Notwithstanding which one John Raynes Merchant of the City of London not being ignorant of the Premisses cunningly devising and intending the same J. Osborn against the due form of the Law of this Kingdom of England unduly to grieve oppress and weary out and the said now Queen and her Regall Crown to dis-inherit and also the Cognizance of a Plea which to the same Queen and her Regall Crown in this behalf and not to the Court of Admiralty doth belong to another Tryall in the Court of Admiralty to draw him the said J. O. in the Court of Admiralty before the Worshipfull and excellent man The stile of the Judge in the Court Admirall Mr. David Lewis Doctor of Lawes chief President of the Court of Admiralty or his lawfull Deputy or other competent Judge in this behalf whatsoever of and for the protestation of the insufficiencie and disabling of the said John Raynes Merchant being as before is spoken of and of and for the speaking publishing and affirming of the English words following that is to say c. as by the Libell of him the said J.R. against him the said Jo. Osborn exhibited and here profered to the Court more plainly it may and doth appear where in truth the speaking publishing and affirming of the said scandalous words and the aforesaid protestation by the said J. O. before supposed to be done in the said Libell specified if any or which like speech divulging affirming or Protestation were had and done at Guilford in the County of Surrey and not upon the main Sea nor within the Maritine Jurisdiction And the said J.R. the same J. O. in the said Court of the said Admiralty to condemn and the said J. R. of and in the Premisses to answer with all his Forces as yet endevoureth and from day to day cunningly deviseth And although the said John Osborn all and singular the Premisses in the Court of the said Admiralty before the aforesaid Judge of the Court of that Admiralty for his discharge in the Premisses had often pleaded alleged and brought inevitable testimony to prove Notwithstanding which the Judge of the Court of that Admiralty altogether refused to admit that Plea and allegation in contempt of the said now Queen and to the manifest damage prejudice impoverishment and grief of him the said John O. And this the said J.O. is ready to prove whereupon the said John here most humbly imploring the gracious Ayd of the Court of the said Queen prayeth remedy and the Writ of Prohibition of the said Queen to be directed to the Judge of the Court of that Admiralty to prohibit him that he in no wise should any further hold the aforesaid Plea of the Premisses in any manner whatsoever depending before him c. And it is granted unto him c. ACTIONS OF REPLEVIN REPLEVIN ss AND the said R. R. by T.S. his Attorney cometh and defendeth the force and Injury when Defendant justifies the taking of the Cattell for Rent behinds c. And doth well avouch the taking of the said Cattell in the said place in which c. And justly c. because he saith that the said place in which c. is and from the time of the said taking and before was one acre of Land in R. aforesaid and saith that long before the time of the said taking before supposed to be done and at the same time the said R. was seized in his Demesn as of Fee of one Messuage one Garden ten acres and half an acre of land and two acres of Wood with th' appurtenances in R. aforesaid whereof the said place in which c. is And at the said time in which c. was parcell And so being thereof seized that same Messuage Garden land and Wood with th'appurtennaces long before the time of the taking aforesaid that is to say at the Feast of St. Andrew the Apostle in the year of the Reign of the Lord Edward late King of England the fourth after the Conquest brother of the Lord the now King 22. at R. aforesaid Demised unto the foresaid I.A. To have to him from the same Feast as long as it should please him the said R. yielding therefore yearly unto the said R. as long as the said J. should have and occupy the said Messuage Garden Land and Wood 21. shillings at the Feast of Pentecost and Andrew the Apostle by equall portions yearly to be paid by virtue of which Demise the said I.A. the said Messuage Garden land and wood with th' appurtenances from the said Feast of St. Andrew the Apostle untill the Feast of Saint Andrew the Apostle next before the time of the taking aforesaid had and occupied And for that that 21. shillings of the said Lease by the said time unto him the said R. at the time of the said computation remained in arrear and as yet remaineth unpaid doth well avouch the taking of the sayd Cattell in the said place in which c. and justly c. And this he is ready to prove whereupon he prayeth Judgement and the return of the said Cattell to be adjudged unto him c. Plaintif saith that before the Defendant had any thing one N. was seized of the Premisses and afterward the said Land descended to the Wife of the Plaintif as Heir of N. by which the Plaintif claimed the Tenements in hereditarie right and that the Defendant had nothing in the Tenements unlesse by Intrusion Claim ss ANd the said J. A. saith that the said R. the taking of the said Cattell in the foresaid place in which c. by any matter before alleged that he ought not to avouch the same to be just because he saith that long before the time of the said Caption and long before the said R. had any thing in the said Messuage Garden land and Wood with th' appurtenances one N. A. was thereof seized in his Demesn as of Fee and dyed of such his estate thereof seized after whose death the right of the aforesaid Tenements with th'appurtenaces descended unto one T. A his Son and Heir of him the said N. and the said R. after the death of the said N. into

paid to her the said A. when he the said I.F. should be thereunto required to be safely and securely kept for her the said A. by him the said R. and to her the said A. when he should be thereunto required yet the aforesaid R. at London in the Parish and Warde aforesaid such a day and yeare then next following the writing obligatory aforesaid delivered to him the said R. by her the said A. to be safely kept and redelivered as aforesaid he the said R did maliciously break teare and cancell to the damage of her the said A. 40 l. And thereupon she brings her Suit c. H. R. complaines of R.C. Inn-keeper of a common Inne Against an Inn-keeper for a Horse lost called the Signe of the George in S. in the custody of the Marshall c. For that that is to say whereas according to the Law and Custome of the Realm of our Lady the Queen that now is of England Inn-keepers who hold and keep Common Innes to lodge and entertaine Men travelling by those parts where such like Innes are and lodgings in them are bound to keep both by day and night their goods being within those Jnnes without any diminution or losse So that by default of these Inne-keepers or their Servants no damage should happen or come to their Guests by any means And whereas the aforesaid R. before the 20th day of F. such a yeare c. And the same 20th day c. held and kept the Common Inne aforesaid called the Signe of the George in S. aforesaid in the County aforesaid And him the said H. in the same Inne as his Guests then and there entertained And the same H. R. then and there one Gelding of a Flea-bitten colour of the price of 8. l. he brought into the Inne aforesaid with him which said Gelding the aforesaid R. in his custody then and there received and had yet certaine Malefactors unknown to him the said H. afterwards to wit the aforesaid 20th day of F. in the eighth yeare aforesaid A. S. aforesaid the Gelding aforesaid being under the custody of the aforesaid R. B. in the aforesaid Inne then and there found for want good keeping of the said R. B. and his Servants they took and led away against the law and custome aforesaid Whereupon the same H. saies that he is worsted and hath damage to the value of 20. l. And thereupon he brings his Suit c. Case against an Execution upon the promise of the testator to pay money at severall dayes where they alledge assetts Hil. 37. Eliz. Roll 935. ISraell Owen complaines of Sara de Bohault Executrix c. of John de Bohault a Forrain Merchant lately her Husband deceased in the custody of the Marshall c. for that that is to say whereas the aforesayd Israell such a day and yeare at London in the parish c. had held and delivered to the aforesaid John Bohault in his life time to the proper use and behoof of him the said John 54 Chests of powdered Sugar to the value of 543. l. 6. s. and 11. d. The same John in his life time in consideration thereof afterwards to wit the day yeare and place aforesaid assumed upon himselfe and to him the said Israell then and there faithfully promised that he the said John 543. l. 6 s. and 11 d. of lawfull mony of England to the aforesaid Israell in manner and form following would wel and faithfully Content and pay that is to say upon the 17th day of September in the 35th yeare of our Lady the Queen that now is aforesaid then next following the one halfe of the sayd summe of 543. l. 6. s. and 11. d. being 271. l. 13. s. 5. d. ob parcell of the aforesaid 543. l. 6 s. and 11. d. And upon the 17th day of December from thence next following the other halfe of the said summe of 543. l. 6 s. and 11. d. being the residue And afterwards to wit the 6th day of August in the 35th yeare of the Reign of our Lady Elizabeth aforesaid at London in the Parish and Ward aforesaid the aforesaid John de B. made his last Will and Testament in writing And by the same constituted the aforesaid Sara his Executrix thereof And afterwards there dyed yet the aforesaid Sara the promise and assumption of the aforesayd I. de B. so as aforesaid made little weighing but plotting and fraudulently intending him the said Israell of the aforesayd 271. l. 13 s. and 5. d. ob parcell of the aforesaid 543. l. 6 and 11. d. upon the aforesayd 17th day of September in manner as is aforesayd to be paid craftily and subtilly to deceive and defraud the same 271. l. 13 s. and 5. d. ob after his the said John de B. death in the aforesaid 17th day of September in the 35. yeare aforesaid to the aforesaid Israell according to the promise and assumption of the aforesaid John de B. in his life time in manner and form aforesaid made she hath not payd although to do that the same Sara afterwards to wit the 18th day of September in the 35th yeare aforesaid at London in the Parish c. by the aforesaid Israell she hath been thereunto required And although also sufficient Goods and Chattells which were the aforesaid Iohn de Bohault● at the time of his death as well to pay to him the said Israell the aforesaid 271. l. 13. s. 5. d. ob as all other debts Funerall Expences and Legacies of the aforesaid Iohn de Bohault to the hands and possession of the aforesaid Sara after the death of him the said Iohn de Bohault at London c. in the Parish c. came and as yet in her hands remaine unadministred By which the same Israell in his credit towards divers the subjects of our Lady the Queen aforesaid and chiefly to c. is much hurt and made worse whereupon he saith that he is dampnified and hath damage to the value of 466. l. And thereupon he brings his Suit c. To this the Defendant pleads a speciall plene administravit That the Testator was indebted to another in the summe of 2500 l. by Obligation who commenced Suit against her and had a Recovery in the Town Court of New Windsor And that she had not Goods over and above c. and this pleaded at large with an averment that she as Executrix is the same Person against whom that recovery was had and not other and diverse And that Iohn de Bohault in the Record aforesayd named and the aforesaid I. de B. in the Declaration aforesaid named one and the same Person and not other and diverse c. To this the Plaintiff replies and acknowledges it to be true that there was such an obligation and such a Recoverie but pleads that that Recovery was had by fraud c. The Defendant maintaines his plea and traverses the fraud and upon the traverse the plaintiff takes issue and had a

form of the Statute aforesaid in manner and form as he the same T. above by his Declaration alleadgeth and of this he puts himselfe upon the Countrey And the aforesaid T. A. who as well prosecutes for our Lady the Queen as for himselfe in like manner c. Vpon the Statute of Mayntenance where the Defendant took promise to have parcell of the Land Declar. as before yet the aforesaid R. little weighing the Statute aforesaid after the publishing the Act aforesaid to wit such a day and yeare at Derby for a certaine summe of money between him the said R and one W. L. of C. in the County of W. Yeoman agreed upon took of the same W. a promise to have the Moyetie of eight Messuages three Cottages and twenty Acres of Land with the Appurtenances in Derby of which said Moyetie of the same Tenements with the Appurtenances the aforesaid W. or any of his Predecessors or he by whom the said W. clayms the same Moyetie with the Appurtenances was not nor were not in possession nor seised of the same in Reversion or Remainder nor did receive or recovered the Rent or profits thereof by the space of one whole yeare next before the promise aforesaid thereupon made And the same W. B. sayes that the aforesaid R. D. the aforesaid time of the promise of the Moyetie of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in form aforesaid made known that the aforesaid W. L. or any of his Antecessors or those by whom the same W. claimes the same Moyetie was not nor ever were in possession nor seised of the same Moyetie with the Appurtenances in Reversion or Remainder nor did receive or received the Rents or profits thereof by the space of one whole yeare next before the promise thereupon made And further the same W. sayes that the true and entire value of the Moyetie of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in manner and forme of the aforesaid promise in the aforesaid time of the same promise did amount to the summe of 200. Marks By which the Action did accrue to him the said W. who as well c. to require and have of the aforesaid R. for the aforesaid Lady the Queen and for himselfe the aforesayd 200 Marks the value of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances against the forme of the Act aforesaid so promised yet the said R. although often required the aforesaid 200 Marks to him the said W. who as well c. he hath not as yet rendered but the same him to render hitherto hath denied and as yet denyeth Whereupon the same W. who as well c. sayes that he is worsted and hath damage to the value of twenty pounds and thereupon he brings his Suit c. And the aforesaid R. by D.C. his Attorney comes and defends the force and injury when c. and by Protestation in that the aforesaid W. was in possession of the aforesaid Moetyie of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances and receaved the Rents and profits thereof by the space of the aforesaid one whole yeare next before the aforesaid one and twentieth day of July in the sixth yeare aforesaid By protestation also that the true and entire value of the aforesaid Moyetie of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances the aforesaid one and twentieth day of July did not amount to the aforesaid summe of two hundred Marks For Plea the same R. saith that he took not of the aforesaid W. L. the promise to have the Moyetie of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances against the forme of the Statute aforesaid as the aforesaid W. B. by his Declaration aforesaid above against him supposeth And of this he puts himselfe upon the Countrey and the aforesaid W. B. in like manner c. Declaration upon the Statute of scandall mayntenance of 2 Richard the 2. Damage recovered by the Bishop of Winester against T. Iones upon this Action See Trin. 2 H. 8. rol 30. The like Easter 7 Hen. 8. Rol. 43. SVff T. Lucas late of London Gent. was attached to answer Edward D●●e of Buckingham of a Plea Wherefore whereas in the Parliament of our Lord King Richard the second late King of England after the Conquest held at Gloucester in the second yeare of his Raign published ●mongst other things it is ordained and strictly prohibited none should be so bold as to affront speak against or defame the Prelates Dukes Earles or Barons of his Realme of England nor of the Chancellor Treasurer or Clerk of the private seale Steward of his house-hold Justices of our Bench nor of other great Officers of the Kingdome aforesaid by any false newes lies or any the like false scandals whereby any scandall or discords within the aforesaid Kingdome may arise And that whosoever should do this should have and incurre the punishment otherwise thereupon ordayned by the Statute of Westminster the first as in the same Statute more fully is contained yet the aforesaid T. L. little weighing the aforesaid Statute divers false and horrible lyes of the aforesaid Duke then being one of the Peares of this Kingdome at Rasbie scandalously spoke and reported and in English words publickly published the words subscribed in English following that is to say That the said Thomas said that he set not by the Duke two pence and that the sayd Duke hath no more conscience then a Dog and so the said Duke may have goods he force not how he come thereby Whereby great scandall and discord to him the said Duke then there within the said Kingdome might arise in contempt of our said Lord the King that now is and to the dammage of him the said Duke one thousand pounds and against the forme of the Statute aforesaid c And whereupon the same Duke by I.C. his Attorney sayes c. that the aforesaid T. Lucas the Statute aforesayd little weighing such a day and yeare diverse false and horrible lyes of the aforesaid Duke then one of the Peares of this Kingdome being at R in the County of Suffolk aforesaid scandalously spoke and reported and in English words publickly published the words subscribed in English following that is to say that c. Whereby great scandall and discord to him the said Duke then there within the said Realme might arise in the contempt of our Lord the King that now is and to the damage of him the said Duke one thousand pounds c. And against the forme of the Statute aforesaid and thereupon he brings his Suit c. HErtf ss Richard Warnecomb lately of c. under-Sherife of T.C. Esquier Sherife of the County aforesaid Declaration upon the Statute of 23. Hen. 6. against Extorrion in any Sherifs c. Mich. 2● Hen. 8. Rollo 358. was summoned to answer I. E. who prosecutes as well for our Lord the King as for himself of a Plea that he render him forty pound which he owes him and unjustly detaines c. And whereupon the same I.