Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	john_n	king_n	lord_n	19,972	5	4.1650	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A87530	A looking-glasse for the Parliament. Wherein they may see the face of their unjust, illegall, treasonous and rebellious practices, 1 Against Almighty God. 2 Against their King. 3 Against the fundamentall lawes of the kingdome. 4 Against their own oaths and covenants. Argued betwixt two learned judges, the one remaining an exile beyond the seas, the other a prisoner for his allegiance and fidelity to his King and country.	Jenkins, David, 1582-1663.; R. H.; Heath, Robert, Sir, 1575-1649, attributed name.	1648 (1648)	Wing J595; Thomason E427_17; ESTC R202656	43,342	52

A Looking-glasse FOR THE PARLIAMENT Wherein they may see the Face of their UNJUST ILLEGALL TREASONOUS and REBELLIOUS PRACTICES 1 Against Almighty GOD 2 Against their KING 3 Against the Fundamentall LAWES of the Kingdome 4 Against their own Oaths and Covenants Argued betwixt Two Learned JUDGES the one remaining an exile beyond the Seas the other a Prisoner for his Allegiance and Fidelity to his KING and COUNTRY Printed in the Eighth yeer of the Parliaments Tyranny and Oppression 1648. To the Reader COURTEOUS READER WHosoever thou art that shalt peruse this insuing Discourse we desire thee to doe it with Candor and without prejudice of opinion before thou hast warily read it seriously consider it and advisedly weighed it and when thou hast so done if thou shalt approve of it practice it if thon doest not let us receive thy modest reproof in writing and informe us better by more learned and infallible Arguments of the truth in those grounds we have laid down to our selves and we shall hold our selves much obliged unto thee and remaine Studious to doe thee good D. I. R. H. Dated Feb. 7. An. D. 1648. A LOOKING GLASSE for the PARLIAMENT IVDGE SIR I Must confesse to you that I doe apprehend that there is a Legislative Power in the Parliament but I take it to be in sensu conjuncto not in sensu diviso in a sense when the KING is joyned to both Houses of Parliament not when he is divided from them either in his Will or Person For neither House by it self or both Houses together have Power to make a Law to binde the Subject without the Royall assent now the Legislative Power is nothing else but a Power to repeal old Lawes or to make new ones that shall binde the Subject neither can the KING by himself repeal any established or make any Law binding to the subject without the preparation or assent of both Houses not joyning with any one House make a Law or Ordinance to binde the other nor repeal any Law whatsoever and I am very confident you cannot shew me an authority in our Laws to the contaary But you will peradventure say That the KING will fully absent himself from both his Houses of Parliament and that thereupon his Power is inherent in and devolved to the Parliament If you should make this objection besides what you will finde hereafter expressed as touching this question the practice of all times shew the contrary for as on the one part if he be personally present with his Parl. yet he may be wilfully absent or absent in his will as if he answer to any bill promoted to him Le Roy s●avisera or the King will advise upon it it stands at present for a negation of the bill and thereby it is made incapable that Session to be an Act so on the contrary part if the King be absent from both Houses of Parliament in person hee may be present in his will that is if his person were at York and both Houses sitting at Westminster and they should send him Bills to signe which he should accept of and indorse this upon them Le Roy le Veut or the King wills this is an affirmation of those bills and makes them Acts of Parliament which not only proves that one or both Houses by themselves have not legislative power without the King for as to the making of Lawes they have but a preparatory power to frame and present bills for the Royall signature and approbation but also that if the King bee absent in person from them either willingly or by occasion of necessity his legislative power is not representatively lodged in or devolved unto one or both Houses of Parliament I will agree with that great lover of Parliaments and learned Father of the Law Sir Edward Cooke in the fourth part of his Institutes p. 6. That a Parliament cannot begin or be held but either in the Kings person or by representation By representation two wayes either by a Guardian of England by Letters-patents under the Great Seale when the King is in remotis out of the Realme or by commission under the Great Seale to certaine Lords of Parliament representing the Kings person he being within the Realme by reason of some infirmity so that we hereby conclude that the King is not represented in Parliament of common course but only by speciall Commission in one of these two causes in the first of which cases Edward Duke of Cornewall and Earle of Chester held a Parliament in 24. E. 3. for King Edw. the third And John Duke of Bedford brother and Lieutenant to the King and Guardian of England held a Parliament as Guardian of England in the fifth year of King H. the fifth and in the second case in 3. E. 4. a Parliament was begunne in the presence of the King and prorogued untill a further day And when William Arch-bishop of York the Kings Commissary by Letters-patents held the same Parliament and adjourned the same the cause of the said prorogation being because the King was inforced to goe into Glocestershire to represse a Rebellion there so in 28. Eli. Queen Elizabeth by her Commission did by her Letters-patents authorise John Whit gift Arch-bishop of Canterbury William Baron of Burleigh Lord Treasurer and Henry Earle of Darby to begin hold and prorogue a Parliament and this Commission is entred in the Journall booke of the Lords house over which is written Domina Regina representatur per comissionarios viz. That our Lady the Queene is represented by her Commissioners which precedents in both cases plainely prove that the King is not of course representatively in Parliament nor his power lodged there but by his speciall Commissions or Letters Patents which may suffice as to this point but for those parts of your motives that the power of both Houses is above the Kings you shall find answered unto hereafter And whereas you write that the Scots have delivered up the King and that he is a Prisoner and his Person at their disposition that the City and Parliament are united that the whole strength of the Kingdome is in their hands that Bishops will be rooted out their Lands sold and Presbyterian government setled which I conceive you alledge as arguments to perswade me to compound and take the Oathes you mention these are rather arguments of force and fraude by all zealous lovers of honour Justice and Piety to be resisted and withstood then of truth and reason tobe submittd unto and looke more like arguments of Sutors Hill then Westminster Hall but if you lay them before me as perswasions of feare and terrour I answer you in the words of King David that you may see how vaine these conceits are Psal. 2. The Princes of the earth stand up and take councell against the Lord and against his Anoynted saying Let us breake their bonds asunder and cast away their cords from us he that dwelleth in Heaven shall laugh them to scorne

Quia nullis claustris coercetur nullis metis refraenatur nullis finibus premitur it ought not to bee constrained or bridled with any bonds nor restrained to any place for a man though he may abjure his Country or his Kingdome yet he cannot abjure his Allegiance nay he cannot alien give a way or withdraw his allegiance from his King by the Law of nature to his Kings prejudice though he should gaine his liberty freedome of estate and honour or advancement unto the bargaine for St. Augustine saith nemo jure naturae cum alterius detrimento locupletior fieri debet no man by the Law of nature ought to be made richer by the losse of another but if I withdraw mine allegiance the King hath lost a subject therefore I may not doe it neither can the King release it to any of his subjects it being an inseparable accident adherent in the person of a King and is due omni soli semper to every King under heaven from his owne naturall subjects It is due to every King and alwaies to Kings and only to Kings by the Law of nature And it is only due to his person and not to his office which is only imaginary and invisible and no where formally to be found but in his person as by the said case of Calvin more fully appeares Hereupon I conclude that allegiance being due by the Law of nature to the Kings person and that I neither can abjure it nor alien it or withdraw it from him nor he release it to me and that it is only due to him and to no other I cannot take this oath and keep it without violation of the Law of nature and manifest injury both to my selfe and Sovereigne King Quia jura natura sunt immutabilia the Lawes of nature are immutable as before is observed and is plainly held forth by Bracton L. 1. cap. 6. Docter Stud. cap. 5. 6. And so from this point of the Law of nature I come to shew that this Negative Oath is absolutely against the knowne setled and established Laws of the Land the reason is because if I take it keep it it withholds me from the performance of my duty of allegiance which is due to my King from me by the Law of the land and so I am informed by the books of Law this tearm or word allegiance is rendred unto us under divers names in our Law bookes as sometimes it is called fides or faith as Bracton l. 5. Tract. de exceptionibus cap. 24. fol. 427. And so Fleta l. 6. cap. 47. Alienigena repelli debet in Anglia ab agendo donec fuerint ad fidem Regis Angliae Aliens ought to be kept from acting in England till they shall be of the allegiance of the King that is by endenization so Glanvil l. 9. cap. 1. Salva side debita domino Regi heredibus suis That is saving our faith or allegiance due to the King and his heires so Littleton l. 2. in chap. Homage where I doe my homage to my Lord Salve le foy du a nostre senior le Roy saving the faith which I owe to our Lord the King and in the Statute of 25. E. 3. De natis ultra mare these words faith and allegiance are coupled together as signifying one thing sometimes it is called obedientia Regis our obedience to the King as in the bookes of 9. E. 4. 6. 7. 2 R. 3. 2. And in the Statutes of H. 8. 14. cap. 2. and 22. H. 8. 8. and in the booke of 22. Ass pl. 25. it is called ligealty but by what name soever it bee called whether faith obedience ligealty or allegiance all is one it is due still from us subjects to our sovereigne Lord the King by the Statute of 10 R. 2. cap. 5. and 11. R 2. cap. 1. 14. H. 8 cap. 2. and many other the people are called liege people and by the Statute of 34. H. 8. cap. 1 and 35. H. 8 cap. 3. and divers other the King is stiled liege Lord of his subjects and these that are bound under the Kings power are called his naturall leige-men as in the 4. H. 3. Fitz. title Dower and 11. E. 3. cap. 2. So that I may conclude upon these authorities that Ligeantia est vinculum fidei domin● Regi our allegiance is the bond of our faith to the King which being so wee may well say of it as Sir Edward Cooke doth that ligeantia est legis essentia our allegiance is the essence of the Law and so it hath been often and sundry times declared by many sundry wise temperate and well advised Parliaments of England The government of Kings in this Isle of Britain hath been very ancient even as ancient as History it self for those who deny the story of Brutus to be true doe finde out a more ancient plantation here under Kings namely under Samothes grandchilde to Japhet the son of Noah from whom the ancient Britaines that inhabited this Land are according to their conceits descended Kings or Monarchs of great Britaine had and did exercise far more large and ample power and did claime greater Prerogatives over the people under their government and jurisdiction then the Kings of England have done since the Norman conquest as it is to be seen at large both in the Brittish Chronicles and records of these times and in our English histories and may also be gathered out of the writings of the Romans who invaded this Island and lived here upon the place and I doe not finde that ever the people of Brittaine made any of their Kings by election of voices or put them out at pleasure but that the Kingly government and right of the Crowne descended alwayes by hereditary descent and succession though in that infancy of Law and right it may be suspected that there was not so much regularity of justice or observation of right as in these latter more refined ages hath or ought to be I may boldly affirm and it cannot be denyed by any ●●at hath read all the Chronicles and Statutes of this Realme that there hath beene any King of England since the conquest that hath not beene acknowledged by both houses of Parliament of their severall times to be soveraigne Lords of this Realme and their soveraigne Lords too although that some of those Kings were onely Reges de facto and not de jure Kings onely in fact and not of right and such as by the Lawes of England had no right to the Crowne and all the Parliaments since the conquest have acknowledged that the Crowne of England and the government of the Realme hath belonged to the Kings of hereditary right and not by election some of these Parliaments in more expresse and perticular manner then the rest and they of later times more amply then the ancient By the statute called Dictum de Kenilworth made 51. H. 3. King Hen. 3. is acknowledged to be

the same that from henceforth no manner of person or persons whatsoever he or they be that attend upon the King and sovereigne Lord of this land for the time being in his person and doe him true and faithfull service of allegiance in the same or bee in other places by his commandement in his Warres within this Land or without that for the said deed and true duty of allegiance he or they be in no wise convict or attaint of high Treason ne of other offences for that cause by act of Parliament or otherwise by any processe of Law whereby he or any of them shall forfeit life lands tenements rents possessions hereditaments goods chattels or any other things but to be for that deed and service utterly discharged of any reparation trouble or losse And if any act or acts or other processe of the Law hereafter thereupon for the same happen to be made contrary to this Ordinance that then the act or acts or other processe of Law whatsoever they shall be stand and be utterly voyde provided alway that no person or persons shall take any benefit or advantage by this act which shall hereafter decline from his or their allegiance And Sir here I desire to know your opinion in your indifferent judgement upon this Law whether I need to sue out any pardon or compound for mine estate having done nothing but the duty of myne allegiance to my naturall King By the statute of 24. Hen. 8. cap. 12. It is expressed that by diverse sundry old authentique Histories and Chronicles it is manifestly declared that this Realme of England is an Empire and so hath been accepted in the World governed by one supreame head and King having the dignity and royall estate of the imperiall Crowne of the same unto whom a body politick compact of all sorts and degrees of people divided in tearmes and by names of spiritualty and temporalty beene bounden and given to beare next to God a naturall and humble obedience he being also instituted and furnished by Gods goodnesse with plenary whole and intire power preheminencie authority prerogative and jurisdiction to render and yield justice and finall determination to all manner of folkes resiants or subjects within this Realme in all causes matters debates and contentions happening or accruing within the lymits thereof By the statute of 26. Hen. 8. cap 1. It is declared in ●u●l Parliament that King Henry 8. was justly and rightfully ought to be supreame head of the Church of England and that he being their Sovereigne Lord his heyres and successors Kings of this Realme should be so accepted and taken and should have and enjoy as united and annexed to the imperiall Crowne of this Realme as well the title and stile thereof as all honours dignities preheminencies jurisdictions priviledges authorities immunities profits and commodities to the said dignitie of the same supream head of the said Church belonging or in any wise appertaining Which statute was confirmed and inlarged in some perticulars by the Acts of Parliament of 28. Hen. 8. cap. 10. and 35. Hen 8. cap. 1. By the Statute of 25. Hen. 8. cap. 22. the Parliament moved King Hen. 8. to foresee and provide for the profit and surety both of himselfe and of his most lawfull succession and heyres upon which depended all their joy and wealth and in whom they acknowledged was united and knit the onely meere true inheritance and title of this Realme without any contradiction wherefore wee say they your said most humble and obedient subjects in this present Parliament assembled calling to remembrance the great divisions which in times past have beene in this Realme by reason of severall titles pretended to the imperiall Crowne of the same which sometimes and for the most part ensued by occasion of ambiguity and doubts then not so perfectly declared but that men might upon froward intents expound them to every mans sinister appetite and affection after their sence contrary to the right legallity of succession and posterity of the lawfull Kings and Emperors of this Realme whereof hath ensued great effusion of mans blood as well of a great number of the Nobles as other of the subjects of the Realme c. By the statute of 27. Hen. 8. cap. 24. intituled an act for recontinuing of certaine liberties and franchises heretofore taken from the Crowne it is thus enacted 27. Hen. 8. where diverse of the most antient prerogatives and authorities of justice appertaining to the imperiall Crowne of this Realme have been severed and taken from the same by sundry gifts of the Kings most noble progenitors Kings of this Realme to the great diminution and detriment of the Royall estate of the same and to the hinderance and great delay of justice For reformation whereof be it enacted by authority of this present Parliament that no person or persons of what estate or degree soever they be of from the first day of July which shall be in the yeare of our Lord God 1536. shall have any power or authority to pardon or remit any treasons murders manslaughters or any kinde of follonies whatsoever they be Not any accessaries to any treasons murders manslaughters or fellonies or any utlayers for any such offences aforesaid committed perpetrated done or divulged or hereafter to be committed done or divulged by or against any person and persons in any part of this Realme Wales or the Marches of the same but that the Kings highnesse his heyres and successors Kings of this Realme shall have the whole and sole power and authority thereof united and knit to the imperiall Crowne of this Realme as of good right and equity it appertaineth any grants usages prescription act or acts of Parliament or any other thing to the contrary hereof notwithstanding Out of which statute I collect that no pardon whatsoever but the Kings can free me from his punishment if I have offended him against my allegiance by the reading of which Statute I doubt not but you will be satisfied that I neede not take a pardon from both houses of Parliament and if I should I can do my selfe no good by it but I should thereby make my selfe a traytor upon Record to mine owne perpetuall shame and ruine for every pardon you know if it be sued out before conviction is a confession of the fault and if pardon be not good in law ye● it being a matter of record the treason thereby stands confessed and the Kings Attourny may in after times take advantage of it because I have confessed it by suing out the pardon And it is also enacted by the authority of the said Parliament that no person or persons of what estate degree or condition soever they bee from the said first day of July shall have any power or authority to make any Justices of Oyre Justices of Assise Justices of Peace or Justices of Gaole-delivery but that all such officers and ministers shall be made by Letters patents under the Kings great Seale in the