Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n john_n king_n lord_n 19,972 5 4.1650 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A33823 English liberties, or, The free-born subject's inheritance containing, I. Magna Charta, the petition of right, the Habeas Corpus Act ... II. The proceedings in appeals of murther, the work and power of Parliament, the qualifications necessary for such ... III. All the laws against conventicles and Protestant dissenters with notes, and directions both to constables and others ..., and an abstract of all the laws against papists. Care, Henry, 1646-1688. 1680 (1680) Wing C515; ESTC R31286 145,825 240

There are 13 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

five Year of our Reign Sententia lata super Chartas The Sentence of the Clergy against the Breakers of the Articles above written IN the Name of the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost Amen Whereas our Sovereign Lord the King to the Honour of God and of Holy Church and for the common profit of the Realm hath granted for him and his Heirs for ever these Articles above written Robert Archbishop of Canterbury Primate of all England admonished all his Province once twice and thrice Because that shortness will not suffer so much Delay as to give knowledge to all the People of England of these presents in Writing We therefore enjoyn all Persons of what Estate soever they be that they and every of them as much as in them is shall uphold and maintain these Articles granted by our Sov L. the K. in all points And all those that in any point do Resist or break or in any manner hereafter procure Counsel or any ways assent to resist or break those Ordinances or go about it by word or deed openly or privily by any manner of Pretence or Colour We the foresaid Arch-bishop by our Authority in this Writing expressed do Excommunicate and accurse and from the Body of our Lord Jesu Christ and from all the Company of Heaven and from all the Sacraments of Holy Church do Sequester and exclude NOTES It may be observed that this Curse is left out of our late Printed Statute-Book though inserted at large in that Printed in three Volumns in Queen Elizabeth's days Anno. 1557. There is likewise another like dreadful but more full and express Curse Solemnly pronounced before in the time of King Henry 3d. which being also omitted in our Modern Statute-Book I shall add here for the Readers satisfaction The Sentence or Curse given by the Bishops against the Breakers of the Great Charter IN the Year of our Lord One thousand two hundred and fifty three the Third day of May in the great Hall of the King at Westminster in the Presence and by the assent of the Lord Henry by the Grace of God King of England and the Lord Richard Earl of Cornwal his Brother Roger Bigot Earl of Norfolk and Suffolk Marshal of England Humphry Earl of Hereford Henry Earl of Oxford John Earl Warren and other Estates of the Realm of England William Boniface by the Mercy of God Arch-bishop of Canterbury Primate of all England F. of London H. of Ely S. of Worcester E. of Lincoln W. of Norwich G. of Hereford W. of Salisbury W. of Durham R. of Exeter M. of Carlile W. of Bath E. of Rochester T. of Saint Davids Bishops apparelled in Pontificials with Tapers burning against the Breakers of the Churches Liberties and of the Liberties or other Customs of the Realm of England and namely of those which are contained in the Charter of the Common Liberties of England and Charter of the Forrest have denounced the Sentence of Excommunication in this Form By the Authority of Almighty God the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost and of the Glorious Mother of God and perpetual Virgin Mary of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul and of all Apostles and of all Martyrs of Blessed Edward King of England and of all the Saints of Heaven We Excommunicate Accurse and from the Benefits of our Holy Mother the Church we Sequester All those that hereafter willingly and maliciously deprive or spoil the Church of her Right And all those that by any Craft or Wiliness do Violate Break Diminish or Change the Churches Liberties and free Customs contained in the Charters of the Common Liberties and of the Forr est granted by our Lord the King to Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates of England and likewise to the Earls Barons Knights and other Freeholders of the Realm And all that secretly or openly by Deed Word or Council do make Statutes or observe them being made and that bring in Customs or keep them when they be brought in against the said Liberties or any of them the Writers the Law-makers Councellors and the Executioners of them and all those that shall presume to judge against them All and every which Persons before mentioned that wittingly shall commit any of the Premises let them well know that they incurr the foresaid Sentence ipso facto i. e. upon the Deed done And those that Commit ought ignorantly and be admonished except they reform themselves within 15 dayes after the time of the admonition and make full satisfaction for that they have done at the will of the Ordinary shall be from that time forth wrapped in the said Sentence and with the same Sentence we burden all those that presume to disturb the Peace of our Soveraign Lord the King and of the Realm To the perpetual Memory of which thing we the foresaid Prelates have put our Seals to these presents So Zealous were our Ancestors to preserve their Liberties from encroachments that they employed all the strength of humane Policy and Religious Obligations to secure them intire and inviolate And since this Act is still in as much force as the Act against Conventicles I cannot fadome the Reason why our Prelates should not as well hold themselves obliged twice a Year to accurse the Infringers thereof as to Prosecute Protestant Dissenters However we may note that by this Statute Chap. 2. it is expresly provided that if any Judgments be given from that time forwards against any of the points of Magna Charta they shall be annull'd and holden for nought therefore Quaere whether the conviction of Protestant Dissenters by a Justice and spoiling them of their goods without any Trial and Conviction by a Jury which is expresly against the 29 Chapter of Magna Charta ought not to be taken notice of and redress'd and the original Promoters thereof to be Curs'd by my Lords the Bishops as aforesaid A Statute made Anno 34 Edw. 1. commonly called de Tallageo non Concedendo CHAP. I. The King or his Heirs shall have no Tallage or Aid without consent of Parliament NO Tallage or Aid shall be taken or Levied by Us or our Heirs in our Realm without the good Will and Assent of Arch-Bishops Bishops Earls Barons Knights Burgesses and other Freemen of the Land CHAP. II. Nothing shall be purveyed to the Kings Vse without the Owners consent NO Officer of ours or of our Heirs shall take Corn Leather Cattel or any other Goods of any manner of Person without the good Will and Assent of the Party to whom the Goods belonged CHAP. III. Nothing shall be taken of Sacks of Wooll by Colour of Maletot NOthing from henceforth shall be taken of Sacks of Wooll by colour or occasion of Maletot CHAP. IV. All Laws Liberties and Customs confirmed WE Will and Grant for Us and our Heirs That all Clerks and Lay-men of our Land shall have their Laws Liberties and free Customs as largely and wholly as they have used to have the same at any time
no new Laws bind the People of England but such as are by common consent agreed on in that great Council By the second He has a share in the Executive part of the Law no Causes being Tryed nor any man Adjudged to lose Life Member or Estate but upon the Verdict of his Peers or Equals his Neighbours and of his own Condition these two Grand Pillars of English Liberty are the Fundamental Vital Priviledges whereby we have been and are preserv'd more free and happy than any other People in the World and we trust shall ever continue so For whoever shall design to Impair Pervert or Undermine either of these do strike at the very Conisttution of our Government and ought to be Prosecuted and Punished with the utmost Zeal and Rigour To cut down the Banks and let in the Sea or to Poyson all the Springs and Rivers in the Kingdom could not be a greater Mischief for this would only affect the present Age but the other will Ruine and Enslave all our Posterity But besides these General Paramount Priviledges which the English are Estated in by the Original Constitution of their Government there are others more particularly declared and expressed in diverse Acts of Parliament of which several of the most remarkable and usefull are here presented at large to the Reader with some Notes thereupon for his better understanding of the same MAGNA CHARTA or the Great Charter made in the ninth Year of King Henry the Third and confirmed by King Edward the First in the eight and twentieth Year of his Reign EDward By the Grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland and Duke of Guyan To all Arch-Bishops Bishops c. We have seen the great Charter of the Lord Henry sometimes King of England our Father of the Liberties of England in these Words HEnry By the Grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland Duke of Normandy and Guyan and Earl of Anjou To all Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons Sheriffs Provosts Officers and to all Baysliffs and other our Faithful Subjects which shall see this present Charter Greeting Know you that We unto the Honour of Almighty God and for the Salvation of the Souls of our Progenitors and Successors Kings of England to the Advancement of Holy Church and Amendment of our Realm of our meer and free Will have Given and Granted to all Arch-Bishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons and to all Free-men of this our Realm these Liberties following to be kept in our Kingdom of England for ever CHAP. I. A Confirmation of Liberties FIrst We have granted to God and by this our present Charter have confirm'd for Us our Heirs for ever That the Church of England shall be free and shall have all her whole Rights and Liberties Inviolable 2 We have granted also and given to all the Free-men of our Realm for Us and our Heirs for ever these Liberties under-written to have and to hold to them and their Heirs for ever CHAP. II. The Relief of the Kings Tenant of full Age. IF any of our Earls or Barons or any other which Hold of Us in Chief by Knights Service dye and at the time of his Death his Heir be of full Age and oweth to us Relief he shall have his Inheritance by the old Relief that is to say the Heir or Heirs of an Earl for a whole Earldom by one hundred pound the Heir or Heirs of a Baron for an whole Barony by one hundred marks the Heir or Heirs of a Knight for one whole Knights Fee one hundred shillings at the most And he that hath less shall give less according to the old Custom of the Fees CHAP. III. The Wardship of an Heir within Age The Heir a Knight BUt if the Heir of any such be within Age his Lord shall not have the Ward of him nor of his Land before that he hath taken of him Homage 2. And after that such an Heir hath been in Ward when he is come to full Age that is to say to the Age of one and twenty Years he shall have his Inheritance without Relief and without time so that if such an Heir being within Age be made Knight yet nevertheless his Land shall remain in the keeping of his Lord unto the Term aforesaid CHAP. IV. No wast shall be made by a Guardian in Wards Lands THE Keeper of the Land of such an Heir being within Age shall not take of the Lands of the Heir but reasonable Issues reasonable Customs and Reasonable Services and that without destruction and waste of his Men and his Goods 2. And if we commit the Custody of any such Land to the Sheriff or to any other which is answerable unto us for the Issues of the same Land and he make destruction or waste of those things that he hath in Custody we will take of him amends and recompence therefore 3. And the Land shall be committed to two lawful and discreet men of that Fee which shall answer unto Us for the Issues of the same Land or unto him whom we will Assign 4. And if we give or sell to any man the Custody of any such Land and he therein do make destruction or waste he shall lose the same Custody And it shall be Assigned to two lawful and discreet men of that Fee which also in like manner shall be answerable to Us as afore is said CHAP. V. Guardians shall maintain the Inheritance of their Wards And of Bishopricks THe Keeper so long as he hath the Custody of the Land of such an Heir shall keep up the Houses Parks Warrens Ponds Mills and other things pertaining to the same Land with the Issues of the said Land And he shall deliver to the Heir when he cometh to his full Age all his Land stored with Ploughs and all other things at the least as he receiv'd it All these things shall be observed in the Custody of Arch-Bishopricks Bishopricks Abbeys Priories Churches and Dignities vacant which appertain to Us Except this that such Custody shall not be sold CHAP. VI. Heirs shall be Married without Disparagement HEirs shall be Married without Disparagement CHAP. VII A Widow shall have her Marriage Inheritance and Quarentine The Kings Widow A Widow after the Death of her Husband Incontinent and without any difficulty shall have her Marriage and her Inheritance 2. And shall give nothing for her Dower her Marriage or her Inheritance which her Husband and She held the day of the Death of her Husband 3. And She shall tarry in the chief House of her Husband by forty days after the Death of her Husband within which days her Dower shall be Assigned her if it were not Assigned her before or that the House be a Castle 4. And if she depart from the Castle then a competent House shall be forthwith provided for her in the which She may honestly dwell until her Dower be to her Assigned as it is aforesaid And She shall have in the
quam nolumus esse Arguendam By our Prerogative which we will not have disputed Yet such Protections have been argued by the Judges according to their Oath and Duty and adjuged to be void As Mich. 11 H. 7. Rot. 124. a Protection granted to Holmes a Vintrier of London his Factors Servants and Deputies c. Resolved to be against Law Pasch 7. H. 8. Rot. 66. such a Protection disallowed and the Sheriff amerced for not executing the Writ Mich. 13. and 14 Eiiz. in Hitchcocks Case and many other of latter time And there is a notable Record of Ancient time in 22 E. 1. John de Mershals Case Non pertinct ad vicecomitem de protectione Regis Judicare imo ad Curiam Justice or Right We shall not sell deny or delay Justice and Right neither the End which is Justice nor the Mean whereby we may attain to the End and that is the Law Right is taken here for Law in the same sence that Justice often is so called 1. Because it is the Right Line whereby Justice distributive is Guided and Directed and therefore all the Commissioners of Oier and Terminer of Gaol-delivery of the Peace c. have this Clause Facturi quod ad Justititiam pertinet secundum Legem Consuetudinem Angliae that is to do Justice and Right according to the Rule of the Law and Custom of England and that which is called Common Right in 2 E. 3. is called Common-Law in 14 E. 3. c. and in this sence it is taken where it is said Ita quod stat Rectus in Curia id est Legi in Curia 2. The Law is called Rectum because it discovereth that which is Tort Crooked or Wrong for as Right signifieth Law so Tort Crooked or Wrong signifieth Injuries and Injuria est contra Jus Injury is against Right Recta Linea est index sui obliqui a right line is both declaratory of it self and the oblique Hereby the Crooked Cord of that which is called Discretion appeareth to be unlawful unless you take it as it ought to be discretio est discernere per Legem quid sit Justum discretion is to discern by the Law what is Just 3. It is called Right because it is the best Birth-right the Subject hath for thereby his Goods Lands Wife and Children his Body Life Honour and Estimation are protected from Injury and Wrong Major Haereditas venit unicunque nostrum a Jure Legibus quam a Parentibus A greater Inheritance descends to us from the Laws than from our Progenitors Thus far the very words of that Oracle of our Law the Sage and Learned Coke which so fully and excellently explain this incomparable Law that it will be superfluous to add any thing further thereunto A Confirmation of the Charters of the Liberties of England and of the Forrest made in the 35th Year of Edw. the First EDward by the Grace of God King of England Lord of Ireland and Duke of Guyan to all those these present Letters shall hear or see Greeting Know ye that we to the Honour of God and of Holy Church and to the profit of our Realm have granted for us and our Heirs that the Charter of Liberties and the Charter of the Forrest which were made by Common Assent of all the Realm in the time of King Henry our Father shall be kept in every point without Breach And we will that the same Charter shall be sent under our Seal as well to our Justices of the Forrest as to others and to all Sheriffs of Shires and to all our other Officers and to all our Cities throughout the Realm together with our Writs in the which it shall be contained that they cause the aforesaid Charters to be published and to declare to the People that we have Confirmed them in all points And that our Justicers Sheriffs Majors and other Ministers which under us have the Laws of our Land to guide shall allow the same Charters pleaded before them in Jugdment in all their points that is to wit the Great Charter as the Common Law and the Charter of the Forrest for the Wealth of our Realm Chap. 2. And we will that if any Judgment be given from henceforth contrary to the points of the Charters aforesaid by the Justicers or by any other our Ministers that hold plea before them against the points of the Charters it shall be undone and holden for nought Cap. 3. And we will that the same Charters shall be sent under our Seal to Cathedral Churches throughout our Realm there to Remain and shall be read before the People two times by the Year Cap. 4. And that all Archbishops and Bishops shall pronounce the Sentence of Excommunication against all those that by Word Deed or Council do contrary to the foresaid Charters or that in any point break or undo them And that the said Curses be twice a Year ddenounced and published by the Prelates aforesaid And if the same Prelates or any of them be Remiss in the Denunciation of the said Sentences the Archbishop of Canterbury and York for the time being shall compel and distrain them to the Execution of their Duties in Form aforesaid Cap. 5. And for so much as divers People of our Realm are in fear that the Aids and Tasks which they have given to us beforetime towards our Wars and other Business of their own Grant or good Will however they were made might turn to a bondage to them and their Heirs because they might be at another time found in the Rolls and likewise for the prizes taken throughout the Realm by our Ministers We have granted for us and our Heirs that we shall not draw no such Aids Tasks nor Prises into a Custom for any that hath been done heretofore be it by Roll or any other Precedent that may be founden Cap. 6. Moerover we have granted for us and our Heirs as well to Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors and other folk of Holy Church as also to Earls Barons and to all the Commonalty of the Land that for no business from henceforth we shall take such manner of Aids Tasks or Prises but by the common assent of the Realm and for the common profit thereof saving the Ancient Aids and Prises due and accustomed Cap. 7. And for so much as the more part of the Commonalty of the Realm find themselves sore grieved with the Maletot of Woolls that is to wit a Toll of Forty Shillings for every sack of Wooll and have made Petition to us for to Release the same We at their Request have clearly Released it and have granted for us and our Heirs that we shall not take such things without their common consent and good will saving to Us and Our Heirs the Custom of Woolls Skins and Leather granted before by the Commonalty aforesaid In Witness of which things we have caused our Letters to be Patent Witness Edward our Son at London the 10th of October and the Twenty
Laws of the Kingdom A DIGRESSION touching the Antiquity Vse and Power of PARLIAMENTS and the Qualification of such Gentlemen as are fit to be chosen the Peoples Representatives THe Recital of these several Laws for frequent calling of Parliaments declaring the same to be of such Importance or Necessity to the safety and wel-being of the Nation Invites us to give the vulgar Reader some further Information touching those most Honourable Assemblies which though a digression will I hope be no Transgression for I am willing at any time to go a little out of my way provided I may thereby meet with the Readers profit and Advantage Of the Names and Antiquity of Parliaments THe word PARLIAMENT is French derived from the three words Parler la ment to speak ones mind because every Member of that Court should sincerely and discreetly speak his mind for the general good of the Common-Wealth and this name saith Cook 1 Instit fo 110. was used before William the Conquerer even in the time of Edward the Confessor But most commonly in the Saxons time it was called Michegemote or Witenage Mote that is the Great Mote Meeting or Assembly whence our Ward-Mootes in London receive their name to this day or the Wise-Moote that is the Assembly of the wise men and Sages of the Land But this word Parliament is used in a double sense 1. Strictly as it includes the Legislative Power of England as when we say An Act of Parliament and in this Acceptation it necessarily includes the King the Lords and the Commons each of which have a Negative Voice in making Laws and without their joint Consent no new Laws can pass that be obligatory to the Subject 2. Vulgarly the word is used for the Two Houses the Lords and Commons as when we say the King will call a Parliament his Majesty has Dissolved his Parliament c. The Lords of Parliament are divided into two sorts viz. Spiritual that is to say the Bishops who sit there in respect of their Baronies parcel of their Bishopricks which they hold in their Politick Capacity and Temporal The Commons are likewise divided into three Classes or parts viz Knights or Representatives of the Shires or Counties where note that though the Writ require two Knights to be chosen and that they are called Knights yet there is no necessity that they should actually have the degree of Knighthood provided they be but Gentlemen for the Statute 23 Hen. 6. cap 15 hath these words That the Knights of the Shires for the Parliament hereafter to be Chosen shall be not able Knights of the same Counties for which they shall be chosen OR OTHERWISE such Notable Esquires or Gentlemen born of the same Counties as shall be able to be Knights and no man to be such Knight which standeth in the degree of a Yeoman and under Secondly Citizens chosen to Represent Cities Thirdly Burgesses that is to say those that are chosen out of Boroughs Note that the difference between a City and a Borough is this a City is a Borough Incorporate which is or has within time of Memory been an Episcopal See or had a Bishop and this althô the Bishoprick be Dissolved as West minster having heretofore a Bishop though none now still remains a City Cook 1. Instit Sect 164. Boroughs are Towns Incorporated but such as never had any Bishops Of the Three Estates in Parliament THere has been a great debate about the Three Estates some zealously pleading That the Bishops are one of the three Estates of the Realm and the Lords Temporal a Second and the Commons-house the Third and the King over all as a Transcendent by himself Others as stifly deny this and assign the King as he his the Head of the Common Wealth to be the first Estate the Lords as well Spiritual as Temporal jointly to be the Second and the Commons-House the Third Non opis est nostrae tant as Componere Lites We shall not presume to undertake a decision of this arduous Controversy but in our poor opinion the matter seems to appear more difficult than really it is by means that the contending Parties do not first plainly set down what it is they severally mean by the word Estate Which may be taken 1. For a rank degree or Condition of Persons considered by themselves different in some notable Respects from others wherewith they may be compared And in this respect my Lords the Bishops may very properly be said to be an Estate or one of the Estates of the Realm for then there will be several Estates above the number of three for so in the House of Commons there may be said to be three Estates viz. Knights Citizens and Burgesses And heretofore in the days of Popery when there were 26 Abbots and Priors that held per Baroniam too as well as the Bishops called to the Parliament and sat in the Lords House see Fullers Church History Lib. 6. 292. Whether they being Religious and Monastical Persons whereas the Bishops were Seculars no small difference in their account might not as well claim to be a distinct Estate by themselves as now the Bishops do may be a question But secondly When we spake of three Estates in the Constitution of our English Government 't is most natural to mean and intend such a poize in the Ballance or such an Order or State as hath a Negative Voice in the Legislative Power For as the King and Commons excluding the Lords so neither the King and Lords excluding the Commons much less the Lords and Commons excluding the King can make any Law but this glorious Triplicity must be in mutual Conjunction and then from their united Influences spring our happy Laws But in this sence the Lords Spiritual by themselves have no pretence to be a distinct Estate That is they have by themselves no Negative Voice which I conceive the proper Characteristick or essential Mark of each of the three Estates For suppose a Bill pass the Commons and being brought into the Lords House all the 26 Bishops should be against it and some of the Temporal Lords yet if the other Temporal Lords be more in number than the Bishops and those that side with them the Bill shall pass as the Act of the whole house and if his Majesty please to give it his Royal Assent is undoubted Law Which demonstrates the Bishops have of themselves no Negative Voice and consequently are none of the three Estates of the Realm But if any will have them called an Estate and mean something else be it if he please to explain his Notion 't is like I shall not contend with him about a fiddle faddle word Touching the Power of the Parliament THe Jurisdiction of this Court saith Cook 1 Instit Sect. 164. is so Transcendent that it maketh Inlargeth Diminisheth Abrogateth Repealeth and reviveth Laws Statutes Acts and Ordinances concerning matters Ecclesiastical Civil Martial Marine Capital Criminal and common And 4 Instit Fol. 36.
great or highly in favour at Court but sooner or later they hit him and it proved his Ruine Take a few examples King Edw. the second dotes upon Pierce Gaveston a French Gentleman he wastes the Kings Treasures has undeserv'd Honours conserred on him affronts the antient Nobility The Parliament in the beinning of the Kings Reign Complains of him he is banisht into Ireland The King afterwards calls him home and marries him to the Earl of Glocesters Sister the Lords complain again so effectually that the King not only consents to his second Banishment but that if ever he returned or were found in the Kingdom he should be h●ld and proceeded against as an Enemy to the State Yet back he comes and is received once more by the King as an Angel who carries him with him into the North and hearing the Lords were in Arms to bring the said Gaveston to Justice plants him for safety in Scarborough Castle which being taken his Head was Chopt off In King Richard the Seconds time most of the Judges of England to gratifie certain corrupt and pernicious Favourites about the King being sent for to Nottingham were by Perswasions and Menaces prevailed with to give false and Illegal Resolutions to certain questions proposed to them declaring certain matters to be Treason which in truth were not so For which in the next Parliament they were called to Account and Attainted and Sir Robert Tresilian Lord Chief Justice of England was drawn from the Tower through London to Tyburn and there Hanged As likewise was Blake one of the Kings Council and Vske the Under-Sheriff of Middlesex who was to pack a Jury to serve the present Turn against certain Innocent Lords and others whom they intended to have had taken off and five more of the Judges were Banisht and their Lands and Goods forfeited And the Archibishop of York the Duke of Ireland and the Earl of Suffolk three of the Kings Evil Councellors were forced to fly and died miserable Fugitives in Forreign Parts In the beginning of King H. the 8ths Reign Sir Richard Empson Knight Edmond Dudley one of the Barons of the Exchequer having by colour of an Act of Parliament to try People for several Offences without Juries committed great oppressions were proceeded against in Parliament and lost their Heads In the 19 Year of the Reign of King James at a Parliament holden at Westminister there were shewn saith Bakers Chron. Fo. 418. two great Examples of Justice which for future Terrour are not unfit to be here related one upon Sir Giles Mompesson a Gentleman otherwise of Good parts but for practising sundry abuses in erecting and seting up new Inns and Ale-houses and exasting great Summes of Money of people by pretence of Letters Patents granted to him for that purpose was sentenced to be degraded from his Knighthood and disabled to Bear any Office in the Common-Wealth though he avoided the Execution by Flying the Land But upon Sir Francis Mitchel a Justice of Peace of Middlesex and one of the Chief Agents the sentence of Degradation was Executed and he made to ride with his face to the Horse tail through the City of London The other Example was of Sir Francis Bacon Viscount St. Albans Lord Chancellour of England who for Bribery was put from his place and Committed to the Tower In King Charles the firsts time most of the Judges that had given their opinions contrary to Law in the Case of Ship-Money were call'd to Account and forced to Fly for the same And in the 19th year of our present Sovereign the Earl of Clarendon Lord Chancellour of England being questioned in Parliament and retiring thereupon beyond the Seas was by a special Act Banished and Disabled In a word it was well and wisely said of that excellent Statesman Sir William Cecil Lord Burleigh and High Treasurer of England That he knew not what an Act of Parliament might not doe which Apothegm was approved by King James and alleadged as I remember in one of his published Speeches And as the Jurisdiction of this Court is so transcendent so the Rules and Methods of Proceedings there are different from those of other Courts For saith Cook 4. Instit fo 15. As every Court of Justice hath Laws and Customs for its Direction some by the Common Law some by the Civil and Canon Law some by Peculiar Laws and customes c. So the High Court of Parliament suis propriis Legibus Consuetudinibus Subsistit Subsists by it's own Peculiar Laws and Customs It is Lex Consuetudo Parliamenti the Law and Custom of Parliament that all weighty matters in any Parliament moved concerning the Peers or Commons in Parliament assembled ought to be determined adjudged and discussed by the Course of the Parliament and not by the Civil Law not yet by the Common Laws of this Realm used in more Inseriour Courts Which was so declared to be Secundum Legem Consuetudinem Parliaments according to the Law and Custom of Parliament concerning the Peers of the Realm by the King and all the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the like pari ratione for the same reason is for the Commons for any thing moved or done in the House of Commons and the rather for that by another Law and Custom of Parliament the King cannot take notice of any thing said or done in the House of Commons but by the Report of the House of Commons and every Member of the Parliament hath a Judicial place and can be no Witn●●● And this is the Reason that Judges ought not to give any opinion of a Matter of Parliament because it is not to be decided by the Common Laws but Secundum Legem Consuetudinem Parliamenti according to the law and Custom of Parliament And so the Judges in diverse Parliaments have confessed And some hold that every offence Committed in any Court panishible by that Court must be punished proceeding Criminally in the same Court or in some higher and not any Inferiour Court and the Court of Parliament hath no higher Thus Cook Great complaints have been made about a late House of Commons sending for some Persons into Custody by their Serjeant at Arms but certainly they did no more therein then what their Predecessiors have often done every Court must be supposed Armed with a power to desend it self from Affronts and Insolencies In all Ages when the House has appointed particular Committees hath it not been usual to order that they shall be impower'd to send for Papers Persons and Records But to bring Men to a sober Consideration of their Duty and Danger I shall give a few Instances besides those before mentioned of what the House of Commons hath done in former Ages 1. Anno 20. Jacobi Doctor Harris Minister of Bletchingly in Surry for misbehaving himself by Preaching and otherwise about Election of Members of Parliament upon complaint was called to the Bar of the House of Commons and there as a Delinquent on his Knees
order to which we must consider for what ends they serve and they are principally Two The first is the preservation of our Religion from Popery the other is to preserve inviolable our Liberty and Property according to the known Laws of the Land without any giving way unto or Introduction of that Absolute and Arbitrary Rule practiced in Forreign Countreys which we are neither to imitate or regard Therefore 1. Take Care to Choose such as are well known to be men of good Consciences fearing God throughly Principled in the Protestant Religion and of high Resolution to maintain it with their Lives and Fortunes And amongst these rather cast your Favour upon themof large Principles I mean in matter of meer opinion such as will not sacrifice their Neighbours Property and Civil Rights to the frowardness of their own Party in Religion Narrow Souls that will own none but those that bear their own Image and superscription will sooner raise Persecution at home than secure us from Popery and Invasion from abroad The great Interest of England at this day is to Tolerate the Tollerable to bear with the weak to encourage the Conscientious and to restrain none but such as would restrain all besides themselves 2. As we ought as near as we can possibly judge to Elect good Protestants towards God and just towards men yet since in this Corrupt Age wherein we Live men are not so spiritual as they ought to be it is not amiss to seek for those whose spiritual Interest is seconded by a Temporal one For though men talk high and keep a great Noise with Conscience and love to their Country yet when you understand Mankind aright not as it should be but as it is and I fear ever will be then you will find that private Interest is the string in the Bears Nose it is that Governs the Beast And therefore the surest Champions for our Religion Caeteris Paribus against the Papacy are our Abby Landed-men for notwithstanding the Registred Dispensation to King Henry the Eighth from the Pope for the seizing of those Monasteries and Lands yet of late they pretend that the Pope had not Power to Alien them from the Church so that the present Possessors can never trust or rely upon that or any new promises or Actual Grants thereof especially from him whose everlasting and declared Maxime it is Never to keep Faith with Hereticks Undoubtedly to make easy his ascent into the Saddle he will proffer many Assurances and Grants but if these Abby-Landed men be not the most silly of all others they will never believe him For when he is once firmly setled then will he with his Canon-Law Distinctions like Fire under Quicksilver Evaporate away all his Promises and violently Resume the Lands glorying of his own Bounty if he require not the mean profits ever since they have been sacriligiously with-held from Holy Church 3. Endeavour to Chuse men of Wisdom and Courage who will not be Hectored out of their Duties by the Frowns and Scowles of men Never had you more need to pitch upon the old English Spirit that durst be faithfull and just against all Temptations What a degenerate Race have we known that could never yet Resist Smile or Frown but tamely sunk below their own Convictions and knew the Evil they did yet durst not but Commit it 4. Make it your business to Chuse such as are resolved to stand by and maintain the power and priviledges of Parliament for they are the Heart-strings of the Common-Wealth together with the power and just Rights of the King according to the Laws of the Kingdom so as the one may not Entrench upon the other And such as with a becoming true English Courage will Prosecute all Traitors whether already Impeached or to be Impeached And to secure us from Popery hereafter and to get removed all Corrupt and Arbitrary Ministers of State and wicked Judges and stiflers of the discovery of the Popish Plot and Suborners and vile Pamphleteers that endeavour so industriously to Clear the Papists and expose the Protestant Religion and poison the People Lastly Take particular notice of those who are men of Industry and Improvement for such as are Ingenious and laborious to propagate the growth and advantage of their Country will be very tender of yeilding to any thing that may weaken or Impoverish it If you Conduct yourselves thus prudently honestly and gallantly in your Choice without putting the Gentlemen whom you chuse to serve you to charges the consequence will be that as you will be sure to have a good Parliament when ever His Majesty shall please to call one and such as will be zealous for the safety of the Protestant Religion and prosperity of the Nation if they shall continue to sit and Act so on the other side If they should be Dissolv'd and never so many new Parliaments be called yet you run no hazard for the same Candidates will still be ready to serve you And so we shall conclude our discourse of Parliaments when I shall first have observ'd that antiently all Freemen of England though not Free-holders had a right to chuse their Representatives till the same was altered and limited by the following Statute for the reasons therein mention'd The Statute Anno 8. Hen. 6. Cap. 7. What sort of men shall be Chusers and who shall be Chosen Knights of the Parliament ITem whereas the Elections of Knights of Shires to come to the Parliaments of our Lord the King in many Counties of the Realm of England have now of late been made by very great Outragious and Excessive numbers of People dwelling within the same Counties of the Realm of England of the which most part was of people of small Substance and of no value whereof every one of them pretended a voice Equivalent as to such Elections to be made with the most worthy Knights and Esquires dwelling within the same Counties whereby Man Slaughter Riots Batteries and Divisions among the Gentlemen and other People of the same Counties shall very likely rise and be unless convenient and due Remedy be provided in this behalf 2 our Lord the King considering the premises hath provided ordained and stablished by Authority of this present Parliament that the Knights of the Shires to be chosen within the said Realm of England to come to the Parliament of our Lord the King hereafter to be holden shall be chosen in every County of the Realm of England by People dwelling and resident in the same Counties whereof every one of them shall have Landor Tenement to the value of forty Shillings by the year at the least above all Charges 3 and that they which shall be so chosen shall be dwelling and resident within the same Counties 4 and such as have the greatest number of them that may expend forty shillings by the year and above as afore is said shall be returned by the Sheriffs of every County Knights for Parliament by Indentures sealed
no Man of what Estate or Condition soever he be shall be put out of his Lands or Tenements nor taken nor Imprisoned nor Dis-inherited without being brought in to Answer by due Process of Law 5. And by another Statute made in the two and fortieth year of the Reign of the said King Edward the Third it is Enacted That no Man be put to Answer without Presentment before Justices or matter of Record or by due Process and Writ Original according to the Old Law of the Land and if any thing be done to the contrary it shall be void in Law and holden for Errour 6. And by another Statute in the six and thirtieth year of the Reign of the same King Edward the Third it is amongst other things Enacted That all Pleas which shall be pleaded in any Courts before any of the King's Justices or in his other places or before any of his other Ministers or in the Courts and places of any other Lords within the Realm shall be Entred and Enrolled in Latine 7. And whereas by the Statute made in the third year of King Henry the Seventh Power is given to the Chancellor the Lord Treasurer of England for the time being and the Keeper of the Kings Privy Seal or two of them calling unto them a Bishop and a Temporal Lord of the King 's Most Honourable Council and the Two Chief Justices of the King's Bench and Common Pleas for the time being or other two Justices in their Absence to proceed as in that Act is expressed for the punishment of some particular Offences therein mentioned 8. And by the Statute made in the one and twentyeth year of King Henry the Eighth the President of the Council is Associated to joyn with the Lord Chancellour and other Judges in the said Statute of the Third of Henry the Seventh mentioned 9. But the said Judges have not kept themselves to the points limited by the said Statute but have undertaken to punish where no Law doth warrant and to make Decrees for things having no such Authority and to Inflict heavier punishments than by any Law is warranted 2. And forasmuch as all matters Examinable or Determinable before the said Judges or in the Court commonly called the Star-Chamber many have their proper Remedy and Address their due punishment and correction by the Common Law of the Land and in the ordinary course of Justice elsewhere 2. And forasmuch as the Reasons and Motives inducing the Erection and Continuance of that Court do now cease 3. And the Proceedings Censures and Decrees of that Court have by Experience been found to be an Intollerable Burthen to the Subject and the means to Introduce an Arbitrary Power and Government 4. And forasmuch as the Council-Table hath of late times assumed unto it self a Power to Intermeddle in Civil and matters only of private Interest between Party and Party have adventured to determin of the Estates and Liberties of the Subjects contrary to the Law of the Land and the Rights and Priviledges of the Subject by which great and manifold mischiefs and inconveniences have arisen and happened and much Incertainty by means of such proceedings hath been conceived concerning mens Rights and Estates for settling whereof and preventing the like in time to come 3. Be it Ordained and Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That the said Court commonly called the Star-Chamber and all Jurisdiction Power and Authority belonging unto or Exercised in the same Court or by any the Judges Officers or Ministers thereof be from the first day of August in the Year of our Lord God one thousand six hundred forty and one clearly and absolutely dissolved taken away and determined 2. And that from the said first day of August neither the Lord Chancellour or Keeper of the Great Seal of England the Lord Treasurer of England the Keeper of the Kings privy Seal or President of the Council nor any Bishop Temporal Lord privy Councellour or Judge or Justice whatsoever shall have any power or Authority to hear examine or determine any matter or thing whatsoever in the said Court commonly called the Star-Chamber or to make pronounce or deliver any Judgment Sentence Order or Decree or to do any Judicial or Ministerial Act in the said Court 3. And that all and every Act and Acts of Parliament and all and every Article clause and Sentence in them and every of them by which any Jurisdiction Power or Authority is given Limited or appointed unto the said Court commonly called the Star-Chamber or unto all or any the Judges Officers or Ministers thereof or for any Proceedings to be had or made in the said Court or for any matter or thing to be drawn into question Examined or determined there shall for so much as concerneth the said Court of Star-Chamber and the power and Authority thereby Given unto it be from the said first day of August Repealed and Absolutely Revoked and made void 4. And be it likewise Enacted That the like Jurisdiction now used and Exercised in the Court before the President and Council in the Marches of Wales 2. and also in the Court before the President and Council Established in the Northern parts 3. and also in the Court commonly called the Court of the Dutchy of Lancaster held before the Chancellour and Council of that Court 4. And also in the Court of Exchequer of the County Palatine of Chester held before the Chamberlain and Council of that Court 5. The like Jurisdiction being Exercised there shall from the said first day of August one thousand six hundred forty and one be also Repealed and Absolutely Revoked and made void any Law prescription Custom or Usage or the said statute made in the third year of King Henry the Seventh or the statute made the one and twentieth of Henry the Eighth or any Act or Acts of Parliament heretofore had or made to the Contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding 6. And that from henceforth no Court Council or place of Judicature shall be Erected Ordained constituted or appointed within this Realm of England or Dominion of Wales which shall have use or Exercise the same or the like Jurisdiction as is or hath been used practised or Exercised in the said Court of Star-Chamber 5. Be it likewise declared and Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That neither His Majesty nor his Privy Council have or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power or Authority by English Bill Petition Articles Libel or any other Arbitrary way whatsoever to Examine or draw into question determine or dispose of the Lands Tenements Hereditaments goods or Chattels of any of the Subjects of this Kingdom but that the same ought to be tryed and determined in the ordinary Courts of Justice and by the ordinary course of the Law 6. And be it further provided and Enacted That If any Lord Chancellor or Keeper of the Great Seal of England Lord Treasurer Keeper of the Kings Privy Seal President of the Council Bishop Temporal Lord Privy
thereby p. 205. What persons ought to be Jury men and how Qualified p. 209. Jurors in Antient Law-books call'd Judges p. 211. Of the Duty of Grand Juries p. 212. Their Oath p. 213. That Juries are Judges of Law in some respects as well as Fact p. 220. to p. 223. That Juries are not fineable or any way to be punished under pretence of going contrary to Evidence or against the Judges Directions p. 223. The Conclusion Bushels Case reported by the Learned Sir John Vaughan Licensed by the present Lord Chancellor the Lord Chief Justice North and all the Judges then in England THE PROEM THE Constitution of our English Government the best in the World is no Arbitrary Tyranny like the Turkish Grand Seignior's or the French Kings whose Wills or rather Lusts dispose of the Lives and Fortunes of their unhappy Subjects Nor an Oligarchy where the great ones like Fish in the Ocean prey upon and live by devouring the lesser at their pleasure Nor yet a Democracy or popular State much less an Anarchy where all confusedly are hail fellows well met But a most excellently mixt or qualified Monarchy where the King is vested with large Prerogatives sufficient to support Majesty and restrain'd only from Power of doing himself and his People harm which would be contrary to the very end of all Government and is properly rather weakness than power the Nobility adorn'd with Priviledges to be a Screen to Majesty and a refreshing Shade to their Inferiours and the Commonalty too so Guarded in their Persons and Properties by the fence of Law as renders them Free-men not Slaves In France and other Nations the meer Will of the Prince is Law his Word takes off any mans Head imposes Taxes or seizes any mans Estate when how and as often as he lists and if one be Accused or but so much as suspected of any Crime he may either presently Execute him or Banish or Imprison him at pleasure or if he will be so Gracious as to proceed by Form of their Laws if any two Villains will but swear against the poor Party his Life is gone Nay if there be no Witnesses yet he may be put to the Rack the Tortures whereof make many an Innocent Person confess himself Guilty and then with seeming Justice he is Executed or if he prove so stout as in Torments to deny the Fact yet he comes off with Disjoynted Bones and such Weakness as renders his Life a Burthen to him ever after But in England the Law is both the Measure and the Bond of every Subjects Duty and Allegiance each man having a fixed Fundamental Right born with him as to Freedom of his Person and Property in his Estate which he cannot be deprived of but either by his consent or some Crime for which the Law has Impos'd such a Penalty or Forfeiture For all our Kings take a solemn Oath At their Coronation to Observe and cause the Laws to be kept which was done by our present most Gracious Soveraign Likewise all our Judges take an Oath wherein amongst other points they swear To do equal Law and Right to all the Kings Subjects Rich and Poor and not to delay any Person of Common Right for the Letters of the King or of any other Person or for any other Cause But if any such Letters come to them they shall proceed to do the Law the same Letters notwithstanding Therefore saith Fortesoue who was first Chief Justice and afterwards Lord Chancellor to King Henry the 6th in his Book de Laudibus Legum Angliae cap. 9. Non potest Rex Angliae c. The King of England cannot alter nor change the Laws of his Realm at his pleasure For why he Governeth his People by Power not only Royal but also Politick If his Power over them were only Regal then he might change the Laws of his Realm and charge his Subjects with Tallage and other Burthens without their consent and such is the Dominion that the Civil Laws purport when they cry Quod principi plecuit Legis habet Vigorom The Princes pleasure has the force of a Law But from this much differeth the power of a King whose Government over his People is Politick For he can neither change Laws without the consent of his Subjects nor yet charge them with Impositions against their Wills Wherefore his People do frankly and freely enjoy and occupy their own Goods being Ruled by such Laws as they themselves desire Thus Fortescue with whom Accords Bracton a Reverend Judge and Law-Author in the Reign of King Henry the third saying Rex in Regno suo superiores habet Deum Legem The King in his Realm hath two Superiors God and the Law for he is under the Directive though not Coercive Power of the Law and on the same Score Judge Vaughan speaking of our Fundamental Laws which are Coeval with the Government sticks not to say The Laws of England were never the Dictates of any Conquerors Sword or the Placita or good Will and pleasure of any King of this Nation or to speak Impartially and Freely the Results of any Parliament that ever sate in this Land And the late cited Fortescue in his 13 chap. has a very apt similitude to Illustrate and Demonstrate this The Law says he taketh its name a Ligando to bind for thereby the Politick Body is knit and preserv'd together as the Natural Body by the Bones and Sinews and Members which retain every one their proper Functions And as the Head of a Body Natural cannot change his Sinews nor cannot deny or with-hold from his inferiour Members their peculiar Powers and several nourishments of Blood and Spirits no more can a King which is the Head of a Body Politick change the Laws of that Body nor withdraw from his People their proper Substance against their Wills and Consents in that behalf 'T is true the Law it self affirms The King can do no wrong which proceeds not only from a presumption that so Excellent a Person will do none But also because he Acts nothing but by Ministers which from the lowest to the highest are answerable for their doings so that it a King in Passion should command A. to kill B. without process of Law A. may yet be prosecuted by Indictment or upon an Appeal where no Royal Pardon is allowable and must for the same be Executed such Command notwithstanding This Original happy frame of Government is truly and properly call'd an English mans Liberty a Priviledge not to exempt from the Law but to be freed in Person and Estate from Arbitrary Violence and Oppression A greater Inheritance saith Judge Cook is deriv'd to every one of us from our Laws that from our Parents For without the former what would the latter signifie And this Birth-right of English-men shines most conspicuously in two things 1. Parliaments 2. Juries By the first the Subject has a share by his chosen Representatives in the Legislative or Law-making Power for
place then under pretence of Service as Ambassador or the like he might send him into the furthest part of the World which being an Exile is prohibited by this Act. 5. No Man destroyed That is forejudged of Life or Limb or put to Torture or Death every oppression against Law by colour of any usurped Authority is a kind of destruction And the words Aliquo modo any otherwise are added to this Verb destroyed and to no other Verb in this Chapter and therefore all things by any manner of means tending to destruction are prohibited as if a Man be accused or Indicted of Treason or Felony his Lands or Goods cannot be granted to any no not so much as by promise nor any of his Lands or Goods seized into the Kings hands before he is Attainted For when a Subject obtaineth a promise of the forfeiture many times undue means and more violent prosecution is used for private Lucre tending to destruction than the quiet and just proceeding of the Law would permit and the party ought to live of his own until Attainder 6. By Lawful Judgment of his Peers That is by his Equals Men of his own Rank and Condition The general division of Persons by the Law of England is either one that is Noble and in respect of his Nobility of the Lords House of Parliament or one of the Commons and in respect thereof of the House of Commons in Parliament And as there be divers degrees of Nobility as Dukes Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons and yet all of them are comprehended under this word Peers and are Peers of the Realm so of the Commons there be Knights Esquires Gentlemen Citizens and Yeomen and yet all of them of the Commons of the Realm And as every of the Nobles is one a Peer to another though he be of a several degree so it is of the Commons and as it hath been said of Men so doth it hold of Noble Women either by Birth or Marriage And forasmuch as this Judgment by Peers is called Lawful it shews the Antiquity of this manner of Trial It was the ancient accustomed Legal Course long before this Charter Or by the Law of the Land That is by due process of Law for so the words are expresly expounded by the Stat. of 37 Edw. 3. chap. 8. And these words are specially to be referred to those foregoing to whom they relate As none shall be condemn'd without a lawful Trial by his Peers so none shall be taken Imprison'd or put out of his Free-hold without due process of the Law that is by the Indictment or Presentment of good and lawful Men of the place in due manner or by Writ Original of the Common-Law Now seeing that no Man can be Taken Arrested Attached or Imprisoned but by due process of Law and according to the Law of the Land these conclusions hereupon do follow 1. That the Person or Persons which commit any must have lawful Authority 2. It is necessary that the Warrant or Mittimus be lawful and that must be in Writing under his Hand and Seal 3. The Cause must be contained in the Warrant as for Treason Felony c. Suspicion of Treason or Felony or the like particular Crime For if it do not thus specifie the Cause if the Prisoner bring his Habeas Corpus he must be discharged because no Crime appears on the Return Nor is it in such Case any offence at all if the Prisoner make his escape whereas if the Mittimus contain the Cause the escape would respectively be Treason or Felony though in Truth he were not Guilty of the first offence And this mentioning the Cause is agreeable to Scripture Acts 5. 4. The Warrant or Mittimus containing a lawful Cause ought to have a lawful conclusion c. And him safely to keep until he be delivered by Law c. and not until the party committing shall further Order If any Man by colour of any Authority where he hath not any in that particular Case shall presume to Arrest or Imprison any Man or cause him to be Arrested or Imprisoned this is against this Act and it is most hateful when it is done by Countenance of Justice King Edw. the 6th did Incorporate the Town of Saint Albans and granted to them to make Ordinances c. They made a by-Law upon pain of Imprisonment and it was adjudged to be against this Statute of Magna Charta so it had been if such an Ordinance had been contained in the Patent it self We will sell to no Man deny to no Man c. This is spoken in the Person of the King who in Judgment of Law in all his Courts of Justice is present And therefore every Subject of this Realm for injury done to him in Bonis Terris vel Persona in Person Lands or Goods by any other Subject Ecclesiastical or Temporal whatever he be without exception may take his Remedy by the course of the Law and have Justice and Right for the Injury done him Freely without sale Fully without any denial and Speedily without delay For Justice must have three Qualities it must be Libera Free for nothing is more odious than Justice set to sale Plena Full for Justice ought not to limp or be granted Piece-meal and Celeris speedy Quia Dilatio est quaedam negatio Delay is a kind of denial And when all these meet it is both Justice and Right We will not deny nor delay any Man c. These words have been excellently expounded by latter Acts of Parliament that by no means common right or common law should be disturbed or delayed no though it be commanded under the Great Seal or Privy Seal Order Writ Letters Message or Commandment whatsoever either from the King or any other and that the Justices shall proceed as if no such Writs Letters Order Message or other Commandment were come to them all our Judges swear to this for 't is part of their Oaths so that if any shall be found wresting the Law to serve a Court Turn they are perjur'd as well as unjust The Common-laws of the Realm should by no means be delayed for the Law is the surest Sanctuary that a Man can take and the strongest Fortress to protect the weakest of all Lex est tutissima Cassis the Law is a most safe Head-piece and sub Clipeo legis nemo decipitur no man is deceived whilst the Law is his Buckler but the King may stay his own suit as a Capias pro fine for the King may Respit his Fine and the like All Protections that are not Legal which appear not in the Register nor warranted by our Books are expresly against this Branch nulli diff●remus we will not delay any Man As a Protection under the Great Seal granted to any Man directed to the Sheriffs c. and commanding them that they shall not Arrest him during a certain time at any other Mans suit which hath words in it Per Prerogativ●m nostram
or make payment in deceit of our said Lord the King and of his People 7. And if a Man Slay the Chancellor Treasurer or the Kings Justice of the one Bench or the other Justices in Eyre or Justices of Assize and all other Justices Assigned to Hear and Determine being in their Places doing their Offices 8. And it is to be understood that in the Cases above rehearsed that ought to be judged Treason which extends to our Lord the King and of his Royal Majesty 9. And of such Treason the Forfeiture of the Escheats pertaineth to our Lord as well of the Lands and Tenement holden of other as of himself 10. And moreover there is another manner of Treason that is to say when a Servant slayeth his Master or a Wife her Husband or when a Man Secular or Religious slayeth his Prelate to whom he oweth Faith and Obedience 11. And of such Treason the Escheats cught to pertain to every Lord of his own Fee 12. And because that many other like Cases of Treason may happen in time to come which a man cannot think nor declare at this present time it is Accorded That if any other Case supposed Treason which is not above specified doth happen before any Justices the Justices shall tarry without any going to Judgment of the Treason till the Cause be shewed and declared before the King and his Parliament whether it ought to be judged Treason or other Felony 13. And if percase any Man of this Realm Ride Armed covertly or secret with Men of Arms against any other to Slay him or Rob him or Take him or Retain him till he hath made Fine or Ransome for to have his deliverance it is not the mind of the King nor his Council that in such Case it shall be judged Treason but shall be judged Felony or Trespass according to the Laws of the Land of old time used and according as the Case requireth 14. And if in such Case or other like before this time any Justices have judged Treason and for this cause the Lands and Tenements have come into the Kings hands as forfeit the chief Lords of the Fee shall have the Escheats of the Tenements holden of them whether that the same Tenements be in the Kings hands or in others by Gift or in other manner 15. Saving always to our Lord the King the Year and the Waste and the sorfeitures of Chattels which pertain to him in the Cases above named 16. And that the Writs of Scire Facias be granted in such Case against the Land-Tenants without other Original and without allowing any Protection in the said Suit 17. And that of the Lands which be in the Kings hands Writs be granted to the Sheriffs of the Counties where the Lands be to deliver them out of the Kings hands without delay The Comment TReason is derived from Trabir which signifies Treacherously to betray when it concerns the Government and the Publick 't is called High Treason but against particular Persons as a Wife killing her Husband a Servant his Master c. it is Petty Treason High Treason in the Civil Law is called Crimen Laesae Majestatis a Crime wronging Majesty but in our Common-Law-Latine Alta proditio and in an Indictment for this offence the word Proditorie must be in Before the making this Act so many things were charged as High Treason That no Man knew how to behave himself Now by this Statute the particulars of that Grand Crime are reckoned up and all others excluded till declared by Parliament And the settling of this Affair was esteemed of such Importance to the Publick-Weal That the Parliament wherein this Act passed was called long after Benedictum Parliamentum the Blessed Parliament The substance of this Statute is branched out by my Lord Cook 3d. part of Instit. Fol. 3. into six Heads viz. The first concerning Death by compassing or imagining the death of the King Queen or Prince and declaring the same by some Overt Deed. By killing and murdering of the Chancellor Treasurer Justices of either Bench Justices in Eyre Justices of Assize Justices of Oier and Terminer In their Places doing their Offices The second is to Violate that is to Carnally know the Queen the Kings Eldest Daughter unmarried the Princes Wife The third is Levying War against the King The fourth is Adhering to the Kings Enemies within the Realm or without and declaring the same by some overt Act. The fifth is Counterfeiting of the Great the Privy Seal or the Kings Coin The sixth and last by bringing into this Realm Counterfeit Mony to the likeness of the Kings Coin Now as to the particular Exposition of the several parts of this Statute 1. When a man doth compass c. in the Original it is Quant Home which extends to both Sexes but one that is Non compos mentis or an Infant within the Age of discretion is not included but all Allens within the Realm of England being thereby under the Kings Protection and owing a Local Allegiance if they commit Treason may be punisht by this Act but otherwise it is of an Enemy 2. To compass and Imagine Is to contrive design or intend the death of the King but this must be declared by some Overt Act. But declaring by an open Act a design to Depose or Imprison the King is an Over Act to manifest the compassing his death For they that will depose their King will not stick to Murder him rather than fail of their end and as King Charles the First excellently observed and lamentably experienced There are commonly but few steps between the Prisons and the Graves of Princes 3. By the word King is intended 1. A King before his Coronation as soon as ever the Crown descends upon him for the Coronation is but a Ceremony 2. A King de Facto and not de Jure is a King within this Act and a Treason against him is punishable thô the Right Heir get the Crown 3. A Titular King as the Husband of the Queen is not a King within this Act but the Queen is for the word King here includes both Sexes 4. What is to be understood by the Kings Eldest Son and Heir within this Act I answer 1. A second Son after the death of the first Born is within the Act for he is then Eldest Secondly The Eldest Son of a Queen Regnant is as well within the Statute as of a King Thirdly The Collateral Heir Apparent or Presumptive is not within this Statute Roger Mortimer Earl of March was in Anno Dom. 1487. 11 Rich. 2. Proclaimed Heir Apparent Anno 39. Hen. 6. Richard Duke of York was likewise Proclaimed Heir Apparent and so was John de la Poolen Earl of Lincoln by Rich. 3. And Henry Marquess of Exeter by King Henry the 8. But none of these or the like are within the Purview of this Statute saith my Lord Coke 3 Instit fol. 9. 5. Note Whereas in the Printed Statute-Books it is there
said Courts are to make out process for Levying the Twelve pences which shall be Levied by the Church-Wardens for the use of the poor However there being 52 Sundaies and 29 Holy-daies appointed by our Liturgy to be observed in the year the Constant charge by this statute for not coming to Church would be but 4l 1s p. An. And yet by the way Note That We have more Holy-daies or Feasts to be observed since his Majesties Restauration than ever the Church of England owned before For there were antiently but 27. But upon the Review of the Book of Common prayer my Lords the Bishops were pleased to add 2 New ones viz. The Conversion of St. Paul and St. Barnabas and whereas in our old Common-prayer-Books 't is said The Feast of St. Michael the Arch-Angel in our present Books 't is St. Michael and all Angels Which seems an Affront to S. Michael at once to leave out his Title of Arch-Angel and at the same time bring in all other Angels as well of the lower as Higher Hierarchies to share with him in a Festival the Honour of which he had enjoyed so long solely and Intire to himself but this by the by So that upon the whole matter If any body should be busy to Execute this Act upon the Protestant dissenters from the Established Church of England yet considering the trouble of such a Conviction and the difficulty of proving a Negative viz. that a man was not at Church for note the words are shall repair to his own Parish Church or to some usual place where Common Prayer shall be used So that if he were at Mr. Read's Meeting-House I Conceive he were safe from this Act. All this I say Considered the Labour would be more than the trouble therefore let 's proceed 2. The second Act of this kind is 23 Eliz. Cap. 1. Intituled An Act to Retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience And by this to Reconcile any or for any to be Reconciled to the See of Rome To with-draw or be with-drawn from the Establisht Religion to the Romish Religion Is made High-Treason And that every one saying Mass shall forfeit 200 Marks and every one that hears it 100 Marks And every one above 16. years old not repairing to some Church or Chappel but forbearing the same contrary to the said Stat. 1. Eliz. C. 2. shall being lawfully Convicted forfeit 20 l. for every month And the Justices at the Quarter Sessions are Impowered to Inquire into the Offences against this Act Except Treason And if any Indicted hereupon Except for Treason will submit in open Court and conform before Judgment given he shall be discharged Now that this Statute was expressly and wholly made against the Papists is evident by the whole Scope thereof as punishing saying of Mass drawing the Queens Subjects to Popery c. More especially by its preamble which alwaies opens and declares the Scope of a Law whereas since the Statutes made in the 13. year of the Reign of the Queen our Soveraign Lady Intituled An Act against the bringing in and putting in Execution of Bulls Writings Instruments and other Superstitious things from the See of Rome divers ill affected Persons have practised by other means than by Bulls or Instruments Written or Printed to with-draw Her Majesties Subjects to obey the said usurped Authority of Rome and IN RESPECT OF THE SAME pray mark to perswade great numbers to with-draw their due Obedience from Her Majesties Laws establisht for the due service of Almighty God For Reformation WHEREOF be it Enacted viz. That to with-draw to the Church of Rome shall be Treason and not coming to Church shall forfeit 20 l. p. month Nothing can be more plain than that this Levelled wholly against the Papists and cannot at all affect dissenting Protestants 3. The Statute of 29. Eliz. Cap. 6. Is only a Reinforcement of the last Act and therefore must be only intended of the same Persons viz. Popish Recusants For as yet there were no other whose Penalties this Statute Encreases for not coming to Church For where is by the former Statute of 23d it was to be only 20 l. p. month and bound to the good Behaviour after Conviction This gives to the Queen Her Heirs a Right to 20 l. p. month for every month after such Conviction till they came to Church And if default be made of payment of the 20 l. a month then to seize all their Goods and 2 parts of their Real Estate 〈…〉 But this is still concerning Popish Recusants for it respects the same that were Offenders against the Statute of the 23. And they were only Papists Therefore 't is absurd and unjust to turn the Edge on 't upon Protestants 4. We come now to the Statute of 1. Jac. Ca. 4. which confirms all the former Statutes made against Popish Recusants in the Queens time But provides for their being discharged tho Convicted upon their coming to Church And that it means and intends none but Jesuits and Popish Priests and other Popish Recusants appears manifestly not only in the Title but in the first Section of the Act it self and so throughout The Title is An Act for the due Execution of the Statutes against Jesuites Seminary Priests Recusants the 2 former words including the Romish Clergy the latter the Laiety c. and begins thus For the better and more due Execution of the Statutes heretofore made Against whom as well against Jesuites Seminary Priests and other SUCH-LIKE Priests That is other Popish Priests tho not bred up in the Serminaries as also against all manner of Recusants That is Papists tho not in Orders Be it Enacted c. That all every the Statutes heretofore made against Jesuites seminary Priests and other Priests Deacons and Religions and Ecclesiastical Persons whatsoever made ordained or professed or to be made by any Authority or Jurisdiction derived Challenged or pretended from the See of Rome together with all those made against any manner of Recusants That is Papists still but Lay men not in Orders nor professed of any Order of Monks or Friars as those before mentioned were shall be put in due and Exact Execution Nothing can be more absurd than to rack force this Law so far besides its Scope as to make use of it against Protestants agreeing with the Church of England in all the Doctrines and only differing in a few Indifferent Ceremonies When it most manifestly appears intended only against Jesuits Romish Priests and other Papists 5. And now was discovered the Hellish Powder-Plot of the Papists which occasioned the making of the Statute 3 Jac. Ca. 4. Intituled An Act for discovering and Repressing Popish Recusants So that both the occasion and the very Title shews evidently against whom this Act is designed which also appears further in the preamble the whole purport of this Act all along being only to Reinforce the rest of the Acts against Popish Recusants and for that as
what they Swear or if we do not find as the Judge directs we may come into trouble the Judge may Fine us c. I Answer this is a vain fear No Judge dare offer any such thing you are the proper Judges of the matters before you and your Souls are at stake you ought to Act freely and are not bound though the Court demand it to give the Reasons why you bring it in thus or thus for you of the Grand-Jury are sworn to the Contrary viz. To keep secret your fellows Counsel and your own and you of the Petty Jury are no way obliged to declare your motives it may not be convenient T is a notable Case before the Chief Justice Anderson in Q. Eliz. daves A Man was Arraigned for murder the Evidence was so strong that 11. of the Jury were presently for finding him Guilty the 12th man refused and kept them so long that they were ready to starve and at last made them comply with him and bring in the Prisoner not Guilty The Judge who had several times admonisht this Jury-man to join with his Fellows being surprized sent for him discoursed him privately to whom upon promise of Indempnity he at last own'd that he himself was the man that did the Murder and the Prisoner was Innocent and that he was resolv'd not to adde Perjury and a second Murder to the first But to satisfie you that a Jury is no way punishable for going according to their Conscience though against seeming Evidence and the Reasons why they are and ought not to be question'd for the same I shall here Recite an Adjudged Case that of Bushel in the two and twentieth year of His Majesty Reported by the Learned Sir John Vaughan whose Book is Licensed by the present Lord Chancellor the Lord Chief Justice North and all the Judges then in England the said Case begins fol. 135. and continues 150. The whole well worth Reading but I shall only Select Certain Passages The Case was this BUshel and others of a Jury having at a Sessions not found Pen and Mead Two Quakers Guilty of a Trespass Contempt Vnlawful Assembly and Tumult whereof they had been Indicted were fined forty pound a man and Committed till they should pay it Bushel brings his Habeas Corpus and upon the Return it appeared he was Committed For that contrary to Law and against full and Clear Evidence openly given in Court and against the Directions of the Court in matter of Law they had Acquitted the said W. P. and W. M. to the great Obstruction of Justice c. Which upon solemn Argument was by the Judges Resolved to be an Insufficient Cause of fining and committing them and they were discharged and afterwards brought Actions for their Dammage The Reasons of which Judgment are reported by Judge Vaughan and amongst them he Useth these that follow which I shall give you in his own words Fol. 140. One fault in the Return is That the Jurors are not said to have Acquitted the persons Indicted against full and manifest Evidence Corruptly and Knowing the said Evidence to be full and manifest against the Persons Indicted For how manifest soever the Evidence was if it were not manifest to them and that they Believed it such it was not a Finable fault nor Deserving Imprisonment Vpon which Difference the Law of punishing Jurors for false Verdicts principally Depends And Fol. 141. I would know whether any thing be more Common than for two men Students Barristers or Judges to deduce Contrary and opposite Conclusions out of the same Case in Law And is there any Difference that two men should Infer distinct Conclusions from the same Testimony is any thing more known than that the same Author and place in that Author is forceably urg'd to maintain contrary Conclusions and the Decision hard which is in the Right is any thing more frequent in the controversies of Religion than to press the same Texts for Opposite Tenets How then comes it to pass that two persons may not apprehend with Reason and Honesty what a Witness or many say to prove in the Vnderstanding of one plainly one thing but in the Apprehension of the other clearly the contrary thing must therefore one of these Merit Fine and Imprisonment because he doth that which he cannot otherwise do preserving his Oath and Integrity And this is often the Case of the Judge and the Jury And Fol. 142. I conclude therefore That this Return charging the Prisoners to have Acquitted P. and M. against full and manifest Evidence first and next without saying that they did know and Believe that Evidence to be full and Manifest against the Indicted persons is no Cause of Fine and Imprisonment In the Margent of that Fol. 142. it is thus Noted Of this Mind were ten Judges of Eleven the Chief Baron Turner gave no Opinion because not at the Argument And in the same fol. 142. he saith The Verdict of a Jury and Evidence of a Witness are very Different things in the Truth and Falshood of them a Witness swears but to what he hath heard or seen generally or more largely to what hath fallen under his Senses But a Jury-man swears to what he can Inferr and conclude from the Testimony of such Witnesses by the Act and force of his Understanding to be the Fact Inquired after which differs nothing in Reason though much in the Punishment from what a Judge out of Various Cases consider'd by him Infers to be the Law in the question before him If the meaning of these Words finding against the Direction of the Court in matter of Law be That if the Judge having heard the Evidence given in Court for he knows no other shall tell the Jury upon this Evidence the Law is for the Plaintiff or for the Defendant and you are under the pain of Fine and Imprisonment to find accordingly and the Jury ought of duty so to do then every man sees that the Jury is but a troublesome delay great Charge and no use in determining Right and Wrong and therefore the Tryals by them may be better Abolished than continued which were a strange new found Conclusion after a Tryal so Celebrated for many hundred Years It is true if the Jury were to have no other Evidence for the Fact but what is Deposed in Court the Judge might know their Evidence and the Fact from it equally as they and so direct what the Law were in the Case though even then the Judge and Jury might honestly differ in the Result from the Evidence as well as two Judges may which often happens but the Evidence which the Jury have of the Fact is much otherwise than that For 1. Being Returned of the Vicinage where the Cause of Action ariseth the Law supposeth them thence to have sufficient Knowledge to Try the matter in Issue and so they must though no Evidence were given on either side in Court but to this Evidence the Judge is a stranger 2. They may have Evidence from their own Personal Knowledge by which they may be assured and sometimes are that what is deposed in Court is absolutely false but to this the Judge is a stranger and he knows no more of the Fact than he hath Learned in Court and perhaps by false Depositions and consequently knows nothing 3. The Jury may know the Witnesses to be Stigmatized and Infamous which may be unknown to the parties and consequently to the Court. Fol. 148. To what end is the Jury to be Returned out of the Vicinage where the Cause of Action ariseth to what end must Hundredors be of the Jury whom the Law supposeth to have nearer knowledge of the Fact than those of the Vicinage in General to what end are they Challenged so scrupulously to the Array and Poll to what end must they have such a certain Free-hold and be Probi Legales homines and not of Affinity with the party concern'd to what end must they have in many Cases the View for Exacter Information chiefly to what end must they undergo the Punishment of the Villanous Judgment if after all this they Implicitly must give a Verdict by the Dictates and Authority of another Man under Pains of Fines and Imprisonment when Sworn to do it according to the best of their own Knowledge A man cannot see by anothers Eye nor hear by anothers Ear no more can a man conclude or Infer the thing to be Resolved by anothers Vnderstanding or Reasoning and though the Verdict be right the Jury give yet they being not assured that it is so from their own Vnderstanding are Forsworn at least in foro Conscientiae Fol. 149. And it is Absurd to Fine a Jury for finding against their Evidence when the Judge knows but part of it for the better and greater part of the Evidence may be wholly unknown to him and this may happen in most Cases and often doth Thus far Judge Vaughan whose words I have faithfully Recited and with it shall conclude this Subject Recommending those that would be further satisfied in the Law touching the Power and Duty of Juries to those two Excellent Learned Treatises lately published the one Intituled A Guide to English Juries c. to be Sold by Mr. Cockeril at the Three Legs over against the Stocks-Market the other The Security of English-mens Lives or the Trust Power and Duty of the Grand Juries of England Printed for Benj. Alsop in the Poultrey both which are extreamly well worthy of every English mans Perusal that is liable to be call'd to that Office And now I shall take Leave of the Reader who I hope will join with me and all English Protestants in this Prayer THat Almighty God would preserve our Religion put a stop to the Growth of Popery Confound all their Plots Protect our present Gracious King Defend us both from a Forreign Yoak and Domestick Slavery but continue to us the Enjoyment of our good old Laws Liberties and Priviledges and bring all those to exemplary Justice that have or shall dare attempt to Subvert Diminish or Vndermine them Amen FINIS 1 See Book of Oaths p. 1. 3. 2 Bakers Cron. sol 741. 3 Book of Oaths p. 216. ☞
when they had them best 2. And if any Statutes have been made by Us and our Ancestors or any Customs brought in contrary to them or any manner of Article contained in this present Charter We Will and grant that such manner of Statutes and Customs shall be void and frustrate for evermore CHAP. V. Pardon granted to certain Offenders MOreover we have pardoned Humphrey Bohun Earl of Hereford and Essex Constable of England Roger Earl of Norfolk and Suffolk Marshal of England and other Earls Barons Knights Esquires and namely John de Ferrariis with all other being of their Fellowship Consederacy and Bond and also of other that hold 20 l. Land in our Realm whether they hold of us in Chief or of others that were appointed at a day certain to pass over with us into Flanders the Rancour and Evil will born against us and all other Offences if any they have committed against us unto the making of this present Charter CHAP. VI. The Curse of the Church shall be Pronounced against the Breakers of this Charter ANd for the more assurance of this thing we will and grant that all Archbishops and Bishops for ever shall read this present Charter in Cathedral Churches twice in the Year and upon the Reading thereof in every of their Parish-Churches shall openly Denounce accursed all those that willingly do procure to be done any thing contrary to the tenour force and effect of this present Charter in any point and article In witness of which thing we have set our Seal to this present Charter together with the Seals of the Archbishops Bishops which voluntarily have sworn that as much as in them is they shall observe the tenour of this present Charter in all Causes and Articles and shall extend their faithful Aid to the keeping thereof c. The Comment THe word Tallage is derived from the French word Tailler to share or cut out a part and is Metaphorically used for any Charge when the King or any other does cut out or take away any part or share out of a Mans Estate and being a general word it includes all Subsidies Taxes Tenths Aids Impositions or other Charges whatsoever The word Maletot signifies an Evil that is an unjust Toll Custom Imposition or Sum of Money The occasion of making this Statute was this King Edward being injured by the French King resolves to make War against him and in order thereunto requires of Humphrey le Bohun Earl of Hereford and Essex and Constable of England and of Roger Bigot Earl of Norfolk and Suffolk and Marshal of England and of all the Earls Barons Knights Esquires and Freeholders of 20 l. Land whether they held of him in Capite to contribute towards such his expedition that is to go in Person or find sufficient Men in their places in his Army which the Constable and Marshal and many of the Knights and Esquires and especially this John Ferrers taking part with them and all the Freemen stoutly denyed unless it were so ordained and determined by common consent in Parliament according to Law And it seems the contest grew so hot that Baker's Chronicle Folio 99. relates a strange Dialogue that pass'd between them viz. That when the Earl Marshal told the King That if his Majesty pleased to go in Person he would then go with him and march before him in the Van-Guard as by right of Inheritance he ought to do but otherwise he would not stir the King told him plainly he should go with any other though he went not in Person I am not so bound saith the Earl neither will I take that Journey without you The King swore By God Sir Earl you shall either go or Hang And I swear by the same Oath said the Earl I will neither go nor Hang. And so the King was forc'd to dispatch his expedition without them And yet saith my Lord Coke altho the King had conceived a deep displeasure against the Constable Marshal and others of the Nobility Gentry and Commons of the Realm for denying that which he so much desired yet for that they stood in defence of their Laws Liberties and free Customes the said King Edward the First who as Sir William Herle Chief Justice of the Common-Pleas who lived in his time and served him said in the time of King Edward the 3d. was the wisest King that ever was did after his return from beyond the Seas not only consent to this Statute whereby all such Tallages and Impositions are forbidden for the future but also passes a Pardon to the said Nobles c. of all Rancour Ill-will and Transgressions If any they have committed which last words were added lest by acceptance of a Pardon of Transgression they should implicitely confess that they had Transgressed so careful were the Lords and Commons in former times to preserve the Ancient Laws Liberties and free Customs of their Country But note these words Si quas fecerint If any they have committed are left out in all the Printed Books of Statutes but they are in this Statute recited by Coke in his second Book of Institutes Fo. 535. and specially noted which he would never have done if it had not been so in the Rolls And since 't is probable them may be many more like Omissions Mistakes or Falsifications crept into the Prints and for that the R●●●●d not the printed Satute-Book varying from the Records is the Law It were to be wished that all the Rolls of Acts of Parliament were carefully by some Persons of Learning and Integrity view'd and Compared with the Prints and notice taken of all such Var●●tions and of Errors committed in the Translations and of any Statutes of a publick Import if in force that were never printed and the same to be made publick Anno 25 Edw. 3. CAP. II. A Declaration what Offences shall be adjudged Treason WHereas diverse opinions have been before this time in what Case Treason shall be said and in what not 2. The King at the Request of the Lords and of the Commons hath made a declaration in the manner as hereafter followeth that is to say When a Man doth Compass or Imagine the Death of our Lord the King or of our Lady his Queen or of their eldest Son and Heir 3. Or if a man do violate the Kings Companion or the Kings Eldest Daughter unmarried or the Wife of the Kings Eldest Son and Heir 4. Or if a Man do Levy War against our Lord the King in his Realm or be Adherent to the Kings Enemies in his Realm giving them Aid and Comfort in the Realm or elsewhere and thereof be provably Attainted of open Deed by the People of their Condition 5. And if a Man Counterfeit the Kings Great or Privy-Seal or his Money 6. And if a Man bring false Money into this Realm Counterfeit to the Money of England as the Money called Lushburgh or other like to the said Money of England knowing the Money to be false to Merchandise