Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	john_n	king_n	lancaster_n	3,233	5	11.4353	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A36231	Judge Dodaridge, his law of nobility and peerage wherein the antiquities, titles, degrees, and distinctions, concerning the peeres and nobility of this nation, are excellently set forth : with the knights, esquires, gentleman, and yeoman, and matters incident to them, according to the lawes and customes of England.; Magazine of honour	Bird, William, 17th cent.; Doddridge, John, Sir, 1555-1628.	1658 (1658)	Wing D1794; ESTC R11125	103,063	198

and of such a King who is heir unto the said Prince Edward And such a first begotten son and heir apparant to the Crown shall inherit the said Dukedom in the life of the said King his father with manner of limitation of estate was short excellent and curious varying from the ordinary Rules of the Common Law touching the framing of any estate of inheritance in fee-simple or fee-tail And neverthelesse by the authority of Parliament a speciall fee-simple is in that onely case made as by judgment may appear in the Book aforesaid and the case thereof fol. 27. and 21 E. 3.41 b. And ever since that creation the said Dukedom of Cornwall hath been the peculiar inheritance of the Kings eldest son ad supportandum nomen on us bonoris to support the name and weight of that his honourable estate during the king his fathers life so that he is ever Duxnatus non creatus a Duke born not created and the said Duke the very first day of his nativity is presumed and taken to be of full and perfect age so that he may sue that day for his livery of the said Dukedom and ought of right to obtain the same as well as if he had been full 21 yeers of age And the said Black-Prince was the first Duke in England after the Conquest for though Bracton who made his Book in H. 3. saith Et sunt sub rege duces as before appeareth yet that place is to be understood of the ancient kings who were before the conquest for in Mag. Charta which was made in Anno 9 H. 3. we finde not the name of Duke amongst the Peers and Nobles there mentioned For seeing the Norman Kings themselves were Dukes of Normandy for a great while they adorned none with this honour of Duke And the eldest son of every King after this creation was Duke of Cornwall and so allowed As for example Henry of Munmouth eldest son of H. 4. and Henry of Winsor eldest son of H. 5. and Edw. of Westminster the first son of Ed. 4. and Arthur of Winchester first son of H. 7. and Edward of Hampton first son of H. 8. but Richard of Burdeaux who was the first son of the Black-Prince was not Duke of Cornwall by force of the said creation for albeit after the death of his father he was heir apparant to the Crown yet because he was not the first begotten son of a King of England for his father dyed in the life time of king Ed. 3. the said Richard was not within the limitation of the grant and creation by authority of Parliament made in the 11 yeer of king Edward above mentioned And therefore to supply that defect in the 5. yeer of Ed. 3. he was created Duke of Cornwall by a speciall Charter Elizabeth eldest daughter to king Edw. 4. was not Durches of Cornwal for she was the first begotten daughter of king Edw. 4. but the limitation is to the first begotten son Henry the 8. was not in the life of his father king H. 7. after the death of his eldest Brother Arthur Duke of Cornwall by force of the said creation for albeit he was sole heir apparant to the king yet he was not his eldest begotten son Cooks 8 part 29. b. and 30. a. And the opinion of Stamford a learned Judge hath been that he shall have within his Dukedom of Cornwall the kings Prerogatives because it is not severed from the Crown after the form as it is given for none shall be inheritour thereof but the kings of the Realm For example whereas by the Common Law if a man hold divers Mannors or other lands and tenements of severall Lords all by kn●●hts service som● part by priority and ancient Feoffment and other lands by posterity and by a latter Feoffment and the Tenant so seized dyeth his son and heir within age In this case the custody of Wardsh●p of the body and his marriage may not be divided among all the Lords but one of them onely shall have right unto it because the body of a man is intire and the Law doth say That the Lord of whom some part of those lands be holden by priority and by the same tenure of Chivalry shall have it except the king be any of the Lords for then though the Tenant did purchase that land last yet after his death the king shall bee preferred before all or any other the Lords of whom the Tenant did hold by priority And so shall the Duke of Cornwall in the same case have the same Prerogative if his Tenant dye holding of him but by posterity of Feoffment for any tenure of his Dutchie of Cornwall although the said Duke is not seized of any particular estate whereof the reversion remaineth in the king for the Prince is seized in fee of his Dukedom as before is said Iohn of Gaunt the fourth son of king Edward 3. did take to wife Blanch who was daughter and heir to Henry Duke of Lancaster who had issue Henry afterwards king of England so that the said Dutchy of Lancaster did come unto the said Henry by discent from the part of his mother and being a subject he was to observe the Common Law of the Land in all things concerning his Dutchie For if he would depart in Fee with any part thereof hee must make livery and seizen or if hee had made a Lease for life reserving rent with a reentery for default of payment and the rent happen to be behind the Duke might not enter unlesse hee doe make a demand or if he had aliened any part thereof whilest he was with age hee might defeat the purchaser for that cause and if hee would grant a reversion of any estate for life or yeares in being there must also be Attornment or else the grant doth not take effect But after that hee had deposed King Richard the second and had assumed upon him the Royall estate and so had conjoyned his naturall bodie in the bodie Politique of the King of this Realme and so was become King Then the possessions of the Duchie of Lancaster were in him as King and not as Duke For the name of Duke being not so great as the name of a King was drowned by the name of King and by the State Royall in him who was Duke for the King cannot bee a Duke within ●●s owne Realme but out of his Realme hee may And likewise the name of the Duchie and all the Franchizes Liberties and Jurisdictions of the same when they were in the hands of him who had the Crowne and Jurisdiction Royall were gone by the Common Law and extinct for the greater doth distinguish the lesse and after those times the possessions of the Dutchie of LANCASTER would not passe from King Henry the fourth but by his Letters Patents under the great Seal of England without livery of seisin and without Attornment and if he make a Lease for life being Duke reserving a rent with reentry for

person with us Wherefore by the Councell and consent of the Prelats Dukes Earls Viscounts and Barons of our Kingdom being in our present Parliament we have made and created and by these presents make and create him the said Edward Prince of Wales and Earl of Chester and to the same Edward we give and grant and by this Charter have confirmed the Name Stile Title State Dignity and the honour of the said Principality that he may therein in governing rule and in ruling direct and defend We by a Garland upon his head by a Ring of Gold upon his Finger and a Virge of Gold have according to the manner invested him to have and to hold to him and to his Heirs the Kings of England for ever Wherefore we will and straightly command for us and our Heirs that Edward our Sonne aforesaid shall have the Name Stile Title State Dignity and honour of the Principality of Wales and of the County of Chester aforesaid unto him and his Heirs the Kings of England aforesaid for ever These being witnesses the Reverend Father John Cardinall and Archbishop of Canterbury Primate of all England our Chancellor and William Archbishop of York Primate of England Thomas Bishop of London John Bishop of Lincolne and William Bishop of Norwich our most welbeloved Cousins Richard Duke of York Humphry Duke of Buckingham our welbeloved Cousin Richard Earl of Warwick Richard Earl of Salisbury John Earl of Wiltshire and our welbeloved and faithfull Cousins Ralph Cromwell Chamberlain of our House William Falconbridge and John Sturton Knights Dated at Our Palace at Westminster the fifteenth day of March and in the yeer of Our Raign thirty two And here by the way may be observed that in ancient time and in the time of the English Saxon Kings the use was as well in penning the Acts of Parliament as of the Kings Letters Patents when any lands franchises or hereditaments did passe from the King of any estate of inheritance as also in their creations of any Man unto honour and dignity the conclusion was with the signe of the Crosse in forme aforesaid that is his Testibus c. But long time that forme hath been discontinued so that at this day and for many yeares past all the Kings Patents for lands franchizes and hereditaments doe conclude with teste me ipso neverthelesse in all creations of honour and dignity by Letters Patents the ancient forme of concluding with his testibus is used at this day Cookes 8. part 19. And it hath been resolved by the Judges that all Acts of Parliament and Statutes whien doe concerne the Prince who is the first begotten son of the King and heire apparant to the Crowne for the time being Perpetuis futuris temporibus in all succession of ages and times be such Acts whereof the Judges and all the Realme must take conusance as of generall Statutes for every subject hath interest in the King and none of his subjects who is within his Lawes be divided from him being his head and Soveraigne so that the businesse and things of the King doth touch all the Realme and namely when it doth concerne the Prince the first begotten sonne of the King and Heire apparant to the Crowne Corruscat enim Princeps radiis Regis Patris sui censetur una persona cum ipso For the Prince shineth with the beames of the King his Father and is holden to be one person with him Cookes 8. part 28. Although the Prince by expresse words hath no priviledge by the great Charter of the Forrest 9 H. 3. cap. 11. for hunting in the Kings Forrests or Parks passing by them and sent for by the Kings commandment yet by construction the Prince is to take benefit and advantage thereby as well as Bishops Earls or Barons who are expressed Crompt Courts des Justices de Forrests 167. In the Parliament 31 H. 8. c. 10. an Act concerning the placing of the Kings children and Lords in the Parliament and other assemblies were amongst other things made as followeth First it is enacted by the authority aforesaid that no person or persons of what degree estate or condition whatsoever he or they be except only the Kings children shall at any time hereafter attempt or presume to sit or have place at any side of the cloth of state in the Parliament chamber neither of the one hand of the Kings Highnesse or of the other whether the Kings Majesty be there personally present or not The Prince shall not find pledges for the prosecution of any Action and therefore shall be amerced more then the King should be or the Queen his wife Vide Cooks 8. part 61. b. Of the most noble and excellent Prince that now is it is truly said that he is omni nomine numine magnus by destiny name providence of God the greatest before Cook to the Reader before his 8. Book the last leaf Neverthelesse as he is a distinct person by nature from the King so is he distinct by the Law viz. a Subject and holdeth his principalities and seigniories of the King neither shall he have all those Prerogatives which the King shal have for example when the King seizeth his Subjects lands or taketh away his goods from him having no title by order of the Law so to do In this case the Subject is to sue to his Soveraign Lord by way of Petition onely for other remedy hath he not but suit by Petition can be to none other then to the King for no such suit shall be made to the Prince but Actions as the case requireth as against a Subject Stamf. praerog ca. 22. And in token of subjection the Prince doth not upon his Posie of his Arms disdain the old Saxon word Ich dien I serve as Lambert doth mention in his Book of Perambulation of Rent 364. And there is a case that Gascoin chief Justice of Engl in the time of H. 4. did commit the Prince who would have taken a prisoner from the Bar in the Kings Bench and the Prince did humbly obey and did go at his command in which the King did greatly rejoyce that hee had such a Judge who durst minister justice upon his son and also that hee had a son so gracious as to obey Court de Banco Regis 79. Crompton A question was moved to the Justices in the first yeer of H. 7. what order should be in that present parliament for the anulling and making void certain attainders for so much as divers who were returned of that Parliamēt did stand attainted of treason and all the Justices resolved That so many of the Knights of the shires or Citizens or Burgesses as stood then attainted of treason should depart out of the Parliament house at the reversall of the Act of Parliament for their attainders But as soon as the Act of Parliament was reversed and annuld that they and every of them that is to say Lords and Commons should come into their places and

default of payment and after his assumption of the Crown the rent happen to be unpaid he might re-enter without demand for the King is not bound to do such personall Ceremonies as the Subjects are by the Law compelled to do Therfore to have the said Dutchy to be still a Dutchy with the liberties to the same as it was before and to alter the order degree of the lands of the Dutchy from the Crown the said King H. 4. made a Charter by authority of Parliament which is intituled Charta Regis Henrici quarti de seperatione ducatus Lancastria a corona authoritate Parliamenti anno Regni sui primo The Charter of Henry the fourth for the separation of the Dutchy of Lancaster from the Crowne by the authority of Parliament in the first yeer of his raign of the said King as by the tenure thereof may appear And so by authority of Parliament the said Dutchy withall the Franchises and liberties were disjoyned from the Crown and from the Ministers and Officers of the Crown and from the receit of the revenues of the Crown and from the order to passe by such conveyance which the said Law did require in the possessions of the Crown But although the possessions of the Dutchy by force of the said Statute stood divided from the Crown and ought to be demeaned and ordered and passe as they ought before Henry the fourth was King yet there is no clause set down in the said Charter which doth make the person of the king who hath the Dutchy in any other degree then it was before but things concerning his person shall in the same estate as they were before seperations Insomuch as if the Law before the Charter by the authority of Parliament adjudged the person of the King alwayes of full age having regard unto his gifts as well of the lands which he doth inherit in his naturall body as in that he doth inherit in the right of his Crown or politique body it shall be so adjudged for the Dutchy land after the said Statute for the Statute doth go and reach unto the estate condition and order of the lands of the Dutchy but doth not extend to the person of the king who hath the lands in points touching his person neither doth it diminish or alter the preheminences which the Law doth give or attribute to the person of the King For if king Henry 4. after the said Act had made a Lease or other grant of parcell of the Dutchy by the name of H. Duke of Lancaster onely it had been void for it should have been made in the name of Henry 4. king of England And thus stood the Dutchy of Lancaster severed from the Crown all the raign of H. 4. H. 5. and H. 6. being politiquely made for the upholding of the Dutchy of Lancaster their true and ancient inheritance howsoever the right heir unto the Crown might in future time obtain his right thereunto as it happened in king Edward 4. his time But after king Edward 4. obtained his right unto the Crown of England and was in his remitter he in Parliament attainted H. 6. and appropriated unity and annexed the said Dutchy again unto the Crown of England as by the Statute thereof made in the first yeer of his Raign may appear By which Statute three things were ordained 1. First the County Palatine of Lancaster was again established 2. Secondly he did vest it in the body politique of the kings of this Realm 3. Thirdly he did divide it from the order of the Crown-lands and in this force it did continue untill the time of H. 7. who forthwith being descended from the house of Lancaster did separate it onely in order and government from the Crown and so continueth at this day and all that is before spoken concerning the Duke and the Dukedom of Lancaster appeareth in Plowden 212. and that which there followeth Before I write further concerning the Nobility I should set down the form of the Kings Letters Patents of their Creations and the manner of solemnity used in the admittance and investry of Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons according to their severall degrees But I do willingly omit so to do partly because in effect the same may appear by that before recited Patent for the Creation of a Duke altering onely such things which of right ought to be altered and partly because their Patents are not onely extant and of Record but also because all those things are to be read in a printed English Book of this subject judicially made by Tho. Mills being a matter also proper to the Colledge and Corporation of Heralds and not unto the drift of my discourse and I will briefly set down some other things observable concerning each of them Of Marquesses A Marquesse that is if we consider the very nature of the word is a Governour of the Marches and hath the next place of honour after a Duke This title came to us but of late dayes and was not bestowed upon any one before the time of King Rich. 2. who made Robert Vere Marquesse of Dublin and then it became with us to be a title of honour for before time those that governed the Marches were called commonly Lords Marchers and not Marquesses After the Normans had conquered this land it was carefully observed by them as a matter of much moment and a point of speciall policie to place upon the confines and borders of the Britains or Welsh c. not then subdued men of much valour not onely sufficiently able to incounter the inrodes and invasions of the enemy but also willing to make on-set of them and inlarge the Conquest these men thus placed were of high bloud credit and countenance among their country-men the Normans and in whose faith and power the Conqueror reposed speciall confidence and trust and therefore in their territories given unto them to hold their tenures were devised to be very speciall and of great importance and their honours inriched with the name and priviledges of Earls of Chester and for the North border of Wales created to be a County Palatine and the Barons of the middle Port of the South Marches were adorned in a manner with a Palatine Jurisdiction having a Court of Chancery and Writs only among themselvs pleadable to th' intent that their attendance might not thence be driven for the prosecution of controversies and quarrells in the Law and as for the other part of the South Marches they seemed sufficiently fenced with the River of Severn and the Sea Of Earls FIrst It is to be observed that originally within this Kingdome Earldomes of Counties in the ancient English Saxon Government were not onely Dignitie● of Honour but also Offices of justice for that they did further the administration of justice in the Counties whereof they were Earls or Aldermen They had likewise their Deputies under them the Sheriff an Officer yet in being and retayning the name of his Substitution

in Latine therefore called Vicecomes as it is to be read at large in Cambden The Earls in recompence of their travell concerning the Officers of the County received a Sallary namely the third peny of the profits of the said County which custome continued a long time after the Conquest and was inserted as a Princely benevolence or gift in their Patents of Creation as by divers ancient Patents thereof may appear which afterwards were turned into pensions for the better maintenance of that honour as appeareth by a Book Case upon the pleading of a Pattent whereby King Henry the sixth Created that worthy Knight Sir John Talbott Earl of Shrewsbury which pension is so annexed to their dignity as that by any means of Alienation it cannot be at any time severed and disjoyned from the same and therefore in respect of such pensions which were the third part of the profits of the County or such other sum given in lieu thereof some men have not without probability thereof imagined quod Comites nominabantur quia in multis fiscu Regii Socti et Comites item participes essent vide Cooks 7 part 34. a. Of the single Earls and not Palatine within the Realm of England there were and have been principally two kindes but every of them subdivided into severall branches for they either take name of a place or hold their title without any place at all Those that take their name of a place are of two kindes for either the same place is a County and this is most usuall as the Earl of Devon-Shire Cornwall Kent c. or else of some other place being no County as a Town Castle Honour or such like of which later sort some are most ancient having their originall even from the Conquerer or shortly after as the Earldome of Richmond in York-Shire Clarence in Suffolk Arundel ni Sussex all which had their originall in the time of the Conquerer by Donation of those Castles and Honors the Earldome of Bath in the time of H. 7. and after in the time of H. 8. erected in the Family where it now remayneth and the Earldome of Bridgewater whereof Giles Dawbery was created in the time of H. 7. Earldomes which have their titles without any place are likewise of two kindes either in respect of office as is the Earl Marshall of England for it is granted in this or the like manner Officium Marescalli Angliae with further words viz. A. B. c. Comitem Marescall●●● Anglia creamus ordinavimus constituimus c. By which it appeareth that the very Office is an Earldom which title of Earl Marshall of England King Richard 2. gave first to Thomas Newbray Earl of Nottingham whereas before they were simply stiled Marshalls of England Cambden 167. The second sort of Earls by birth and so are all the Sonnes of the Kings of England if they have no other dignity bestowed upon them and therefore it was said that John afterwards King of England in the life of his Father Hen. 2. was called countiscane terrae before he was affied to Alice the daughter of the Earl of Moreton in France though Hollenshed fol. 103. writing of the degrees of people in England saith That the Kings younger Sonnes are but Gentlemen by birth till they have received creation from the King of high estate Earls and all others of the degree of Nobility and honour have Offices of great trust and confidence being for two principall purposes ad consulendum Regi tempore Pacis to Councell the King in time of peace the other ad defendendum Regem Patriam tempore belli to defend the King and Country in time of Warre and therefore Antiquity hath given unto them two Ensignes to resemble both the said duties For the first the head is adorned with a Cap of honour and a Coronet and the body with a Robe in resemblance of Councell Secondly They are girt with a sword in resemblance that they must be faithfull and true to defend the Prince and Country Cooks 7. part 34. a. But to come to the Kings high Councell of Parliament No man ought to presume before he hath received the Kings-Writ of Summons for the rule is ad consilium ne accedas antequam voceris the forme of a writ of Summons to an Earl is as followeth Rex c. Unto his welbeloved Cosin Edward Earl of Oxford greeting Because by the assent and advise of our Councell for certain weighty and urgent businesse concerning us the State and defence of our Kingdom and Church of England we have ordai●ed to be holden a certain Parliament at our Citie of Westminster the 22. day of November next coming and there together with you and with the Prelates the great and noble men of our said Kingdom to have conference and treaty commanding and firmely enjoyning you upon your faith and alleageance whereby you are holden unto us that the dangers and perills imminent of that businesse considered and all excuse set a part you be present the said day in the same place with us and with the Prelates and great and noble men aforesaid to treat and give Councell upon the aforesaid businesse and hereof fail you not as you tender us our honour and the safeguard and defence of our Kingdom and Church aforesaid Witnesse our self at Westminster in the second day of March in the first yeer of our Raign Cromptons Courts tit Parliam 1. which is recited out of the Book of Entries 594. Upon this Writ three things have been observed First A priviledge incident to an Earl or other of degree above him for the Kings doth salute him by the name of his Cosin although he peradventure be of no consanguinity to the King Secondly When the King doth summon an Earl or any other Peer of the Realm of the Parliament he doth send his Writ directed to himself particularly and not to the Sheriff of the County as the generall Summons are for Knights and Burgesses for the Parliament Thirdly The Writ is to the Earl of Oxford greeting not naming him Knight though he be a Knight and though that degree be parcell of his name as appeareth 3. Hen. 6. fol. 29. And Priscot chief Justice in the 32. H. 6.29 That i● an Esquire be made Knight he looseth the name of Esquire But if a Knight be made a Nobleman he doth still retain the name of Knight and so ought to be stiled in all Writs And Cooks 4. part fol. 118. a. saith That if a Baron be created an Earl yet his title of Baron doth continue But in Plowdens Book 213. It is agreed That if the Crown of England do descend to a Duke within England his name of Duke is gone for omne majus tollit minus The increase of Name by the Addition of Honour AFter a Man is created an Earl Viscount or into any other title of honour above them his title is become parcell of his name and not an addition only and in

act in law presently upon the death of the Ancestor unto the heire or not at all Wherefore the custome of our countrey and manifold presidents doe prove that this kind of Barony doth descend from the Ancestors to the heire and there needs not any words of heirs in the writ of summons Onely one president there is in a speciall writ sometimes directed to Sir Henry Bromsted in 27. H. 6. wherein he was stiled Lord Veysey wherein there are these words inserted Volumus tamen vos haeredes vestros masculos de corpore vestro legitimè procreatos excuntes Barones de Veysey existere which is to bee read in Co. 7. part 33. b. Wherefore as it is true that where the heire of any such Baron by writ is called to the Parliament that his descent of honour is thereby established and approved by the gracious judgment of our sacred Soveraigne so it is also true that if it shall stand with his Highnesse pleasure that such heire shall not be summoned at all for none can come to so high a Councel unlesse he be called then that Nobility is much empaired and in a manner extinguished in the censure of all men for that it had none other originall but by writ of summons from the which in the judgment of the supreme soveraign he is excluded As to the second principall point whether the Barony by writ may descend to the heires females it shall not be amisse likewise to view the reasons of either part and by conflict of argument the truth may the better be discerned Those that maintain the affirmative part do reason after this manner In reason the sexe of the heire female ought no more to bar her of the dignity than the nonage of the heire male ought to bar him although during his nonage he be unable to do the service but as the service of the one is forborne for a time so the sexe of the other may at all times be supplied by the maturity and sufficiency of her husband Offices of honour which do much import the publique weale being passed by inheritance do descend to the heire female if there be no nearer heire male As the office of the high Constableship of England which descended to the daughters of Humphrey de Bohun Earle of Hereford and Essex a memoriall whereof is in Dyer 285. but more at large in Keilway 6. H. 8. Also the office of Lord-Steward descended to Blanch daughter to H. Earle of Lancaster the like may be said of the office of Earle Marshall which descended by an heire female unto the house of Norfolk all which offices are unfit to be exercised by a woman as it is unfit for a woman to be summoned to the Parliament as a Baronesse by writ And many noble houses in England do support the dignity of Baronage unto them descended by women They which stand on the negative part of this controversie do encounter their adversaries on this manner viz. The writ of summons to the Parliament whereby the Baron by writ hath his originall is to call that honourable and worthy person so summoned to be one of the number of that right high and honourable Assembly and to be a Judge to sit heare and determine life and member plea and right of land if there shall come occasion likewise to give counsell and advice in the most weighty affaires of the Realme But these things are convenient for the quality of men unfitting and altogether unbeseeming the sexe of women Ergo having respect unto the finall purpose of such writs such inheritances should only descend unto the heire male and not unto the heire female Secondly if it shall be answered that although the heire female to whom such inheritance is descended be unfit in her owne person for the accomplishing of these things yet she may marry with one sufficiently able for her and in her behalf to execute the same this answer will neither satisfie nor salve the inconveniences For admit that such heire female were at full age at the death of her Ancestor unmarried it doth lie in her own choice who shall be her husband so shall the pleasure of the Soveraigne in the choice of his Councell in the great causes of the Realme be subject to the will of his subject in the choice of her husband which were altogether inconvenient Thirdly if such husband shall be called in the right of his wife the writ should make some mention hereof for otherwise it may well be taken that the husband was chosen in his own person and in behalfe of himselfe and not in regard of his wife or such pretended dignity descended unto him But there was never such writ of summons seen wherein the wife was mentioned and if the husband of such wife have been called to the Parliament which is alwayes by generally writ not mentioning his wife he is now made thereby a Baron of himself and in his own right by that writ Having thus heard both sides speak place doth now require to interpose opinion to compound this controversie This question or point is somewhat perplexed by means of difficult presidents for first it is observed that some presidents do prove that Baronies by writs have descended unto heires females whose husbands have beene called to the Parliament whether in regard of themselves or in regard of their wives it matten not But sure it is that the marriage of such Ladies gave them occasion so to be summoned and such husbands and their posterity have and do lawfully beare the same name of dignity which the Ancestors of such wife did before rightfully beare For by this controversie there is no purpose to call the right of such noble houses into question Howbeit secondly this is to be observed out of the presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutifull subject that the Kings Majesty is neverthelesse at liberty to call to the high Councell of Parliament whom his Highnesse shall in his Princely wisdom think most meet which his Majesties Progenitors have in former ages observed And therefore whereas Radulph Lord Cromwell being a Baron by writ died without issue having two sisters and coheirs Eliz. the eldest married to Sir Tho. Nevill Knight and Joan the younger married Sir Hunt Bourcher he who had married the younger sister was called to the Parliament as L. Cromwell and not the said Sir Tho. Nevill who had married the elder sister 3. It is to be observed that if a Baron by writ die without heire male having his daughter sister or other collaterall heire male that doth or can challenge the lands of the said Baron deceased by any ancient entaile or otherwise the title of such heire female hath bin heretofore allowed as by the honourable opinions and relations of the right honourable the late Commissioners in the office of Earle Marshall signified unto the late Queene upon the Petition of the sister and heire of Gregory late Lord Dacres deceased may appeare Moreover in the

may have three Chaplains wherof every one may purchase license or dispensation and receive have and keep two Benefices with care of souls and they of this Order wherof I have now writ are called Knights of the spur and Butcher Knights And so it is used in the statute of 13. R. 2. cap. 1. and in the statute of 3. Ed. 4. cap. 5. Hereof see Cambden 176. and M. Seldens Title of Honours fol. 336. Between Doctors of the Civill law and Knights have ever bin question for precedency and Serjeants at law since either of them have obtained credit in the Common wealth as may appear by the comparison that Tully maketh between Mucius Maurena a Knight of Rome and Publius Sulpicius a Lawyer either of them standing for the Consulship In his Eloquent Oration m●de for Mu●ena and many Disputes of Bardell and Bardus arguing the Case to and fro which although it be yet disputable in forreign Countries where the civill law is in credit yet here amongst us in England it is without controversie and so the precedency thereof is undoubtedly in the Knight and Sergeant at law in regard of their Callings But if they both are of equall degree of knighthood or a Serjeant at law not Knight then it goeth otherwise as by Knighthood by Seigniority and by Serieantship by the Kings Writ and degree allowed thereupon Dr. Ridley 95. and so Selden his Titles of Honour fol. 55. touching part of this Discourse not all The opinion of some men hath lately bin that Knights Lieutenants that is to say such as have beene Ambassadours to forraigne Princes or Judges within the Realm may and ought to have during their lives precedencie above men of their owne rankes after these their Offices expired and many of them doe stand strongly hereupon sub judice lis est not determined by judgement but admitting it to be so by way of Argument in that case yet all the Heraulds doe utterly deny that priviledge to the Maior of London and Aldermen or Justice of the peace who have their limited Jurisdiction of Magistracie confined within the compasse of their owne walls and divisions But touching the former they are generall Magistrates throughout the Realme and their imployment concerneth the whole Common-weale and having the publike Justice of Honour of the whole estate committed unto them do more meritoriously draw from thence a greater respect of honour according to the generallitie of their administrations and imployments which an inferiour and more confined Magistrate may have The name of a Knight is the name of Dignity and a degree as is the name of a Duke Earle c. But in all actions he shall be named Knight otherwise the Writ shall abate See The●wall lib. 3. cap. 3. A Knight also must be named by the name of Baptisme and by his sirname as Sir Ierome Bowes Knight but those of degree honourable who are made by pattent may be named onely by their Christian name and by their title of honour as Iohn Earle of Clare and that for two causes first because of their solemne creations it is notorious et nomen dicitur a noscendo Secondly there is but one of that title of honour within England and therefore it is certaine what person he is but otherwise of Knights as it is certainely knowne in Anno 8. Edw. 4.24 a. And Priscot Chiefe Justice saith in 32. H. 6. fol. 26. b. that if an Esquire be made a Knight hee loseth his name of Esquire but albeit a Knight may be made a Nobleman or of any high degree he still retaineth the name of Knight and so ought to be stiled in the making of all Writs See Milles fol. 81. Also if a man do recover in an action by the name of Iohn Stiles Esquire and afterwards he is made a Knight he must sue out his Scire facias by the name of Knight Vide Long. anno 5. Ed. 4. fol. 19. And this name shall not dye with him for if hee were bound by an Obligation by the name of Gentleman or Esquire and afterwards is made Knight and dyeth the Plaintiffe in the Action to be brought against his Executors must name him Knight otherwise the Writ shall abate Vide anno 7. H. 4.7.6 26. Ed. 3. fol. 64. a. Thomas Ormond was attainted by Parliament by the name of Thomas Ormond Knight whereas hee was no Knight he shall not forfeit any thing by that attainder because it cannot be intended the same person for this word Knight is parcell of his name 21. E. 4. fol. 17. a. If a Grant be made to H. Knight when he is no knight it is a void Grant But if it be a Feofment in Fee with livery of seism the livery it maketh good Vide Broek titulo Grants 50. Anno. 4. H. 6. If the Plaintiffe or Demandant do in his Writ name the Defendant or Tenant Esquire when he is a Knight the Writ shall not only abate but also the Plaintiffe or Demand●nt may not have another writ by Iournier account Finches book 59. Vide Cooks b. part de les Reports 1. b. But by the statute Anno 1. Ed. 6. cap. 7. It is amongst other things Enacted that albeit any person or persons being Justices of Assise Justices of Goal delivery or Justices of the Peace within any of the Kings Dominions or being in any other of the Kings Commissions whatsoever shall fortune to be made or created Duke Arch-Bishop Earl Marquesse Viscount Baron Bishop Knight Justice of the one Bench or on the other or Sergeant at Law or Sheriffe yet notwithstanding he and they shall remain Justices and Commissioners and have full power and Authority to execute the same in like manner and Form as he or they might or ought to have done before the same By the statute of Anno 5. H. 5. cap. 5. It is enacted as followeth That every Writ originall of accounts personall appeals and Ind●ctments shall be made with the addition of their Estates and Degrees c. and a little after it is provided That if the said Writs of accounts personall be not according as the record and deed by the surplusage of the additions aforesaid that for this cause they are not Iohn a Stile Gent. is bound by obligation to one A. B. the Obliger is afterwards made Knight the Bond is forfeited A. B. by his Attorney draweth a note or title for an originall Writ according to the defendants degree though it vary from the originall specially as it ought to be made by the statute But the Cursitor mistaking did ●ake the originall only according to such addition as was specified in the Obligation omitting his degree of dignity and the Entry of Capias alias plures was according to the said originall but in the Exigent and Proclamation and in the Entry of it the Defendant was ●amed according to his degree of Dignity upon a Writ of Errour after judgment doubt was if this might be a●ended in another Court then