Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n honourable_a lord_n privy_a 3,111 5 10.0848 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A50695 A collection of acts of Parliament, charters, trials at law, and judges opinion concerning those grants to the Colledge of Physicians London, taken from the originals, law-books, and annals, commanded by Sir Edward Alston Kt., president, and the elects and censors / made by Christopher Merret ... Merret, Christopher, 1614-1695. 1660 (1660) Wing M1836; ESTC R18709 67,476 139

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Statute of 14. H. 8. Wherefore it was adjudged for the Plaintiff Coram Judice D. Jo. Popham APrilis die 8. Anno Dom. 1602. Compauerunt Rogerus Jinkins Simon Read in Aedibus Primarii Angliae Justitiarii D. Johannis Popham Equitis Aurati coram ipso Judice quiritantes de Injuria illis illata per Praesidentem Censores Collegii Medicorum quorum authoritate ob illegitimam Medicinae praxin in Carcerem conjecti sunt ibidemque jam per aliquot septimanas detenti Adfuerunt ex parte Collegii per Praesidentem missi Censores tres D. Johannes Nowell Edwardus Lyster Johannes Argent Incarceratorum causam agebat quidem Magister Harris Jurisperitus Judex prius sedulò perlectis iis Regni statutis quae ad medicinam faciunt Jinkins urgebat ut rationem redderet cur ausus sit Medicinam exercere licenti● non priùs impetratâ à Collegio Medicorum Is Primùm Praxin denegavit Postea urgente magis Judice haesitanter ambigue respondit Tandem metuens ne Jurejurando premeretur fassus est se aliquando Practicasse idque ut putabat non illicitè Quid inquit Judex Obtinuistine unquam Collegii Commune Sigillum Non inquit ille Sed quia Chirurgus sum in opere Chirurgico saepe necessarius est internorum Medicamentorum usus Respondit Judex re ita urgente advocandum esse Medicum atque nullo modo licere Chirurgo medicum agere Objecit Jurisperitus Praesidentis Censorum authoritatem non eam esse quâ possint quenquam in Carcerem conjicere ideoque à Collegio ad alios Judices causam omnem esse promovendam Hunc reprehendit Judex asserebatque validam esse maximéque legitimam hac ex parte Collegii authoritatem Multùm tandem conquestus est Jinkins quòd ob raram praxin eamque ex aliorum Praescripto tam gravis ei Mulcta sit inflicta Tum Libro Annalium ostenso Compertum est eum jam antea sexties Publicè accusatum esse aliquoties etiam leves mulctas subiisse Unde Judici aequissimum visum est ut cum clementer tractatus incorrigibilem tamen se praebuisset graviori tandem mulcta premeretur Et eo quòd aliorum Medicorum Praescriptis ad suam Praxin saepius sit abusus Consultissimum putavit Medicor praescriptis Dies Mensis cum patientis Nomine adscribendus Judex ut omnes Medici Praescriptis suis omnibus diem mensis Patientis nomen inscribant unde fraus iis abutentium faciliùs deprehendi possit Judex Re auditâ Collegiique Censurâ optimè approbatâ Jinkins redditur Carceri Jinkins denuò Carceri reddendum censuit donec Praesidenti Censoribus satisfactum sit Cumque quorundam Amicorum instantiâ rogatus est Judex ut fide-jussoribus admissis immunitatem illi concederet à Carcere Non est inquit Judex penes me ut hoc faciam Legibus enim Regni illis solum datur ut istud concedant Quidam qui astabat objecit Statuto quodam regni cautum esse ne quis liber Civis Londinensis per forinsecum aliquem incarceretur Perlectis statuti verbis nulloque modo sensum hunc ferentibus Hujusmodi inquit Judex interpretationibus meam etiam possitis infringere authoritatem These words the Lord Chief Justice said in hearing this Cause 1. There is no sufficient Licence without the Colledge Seal 2. No Chirurgeon as a Chirurgeon may practise Physick no not for any disease though it be the great Pox. 3. That the authority of the Colledge is strong and sufficient to commit to prison 4. That the Censure of the Colledge rising from lesser mulcts to greater was equal and reasonable 5. That no man though never so learned a Physician or Doctor may practise in London or within seven miles without the Colledge Licence Annal. l. 1. pag. 155 156. Read conquestus est Collegium contra regni statutum ultra 20 l. paenam erogasse verbis statuti perpensis pronuntiavit Judex Collegio licere quam velint mulctam infligere custodem tamen carceris non esse astrictum ut eum detineat si sit ultra 20 l. Read praxin suam asseruit quod statuto regni cuivis concessum est per herbas c. aliquos saltem morbos curare at respondit Judex nonlicere quoniam non ad missus erat per Collegium Resolutions of Questions concerning the Colledge by the Lord Chancellor and Judges THe King having directed his Letters to the Right Honourable Thomas Lord Ellesmere Lord Chancellor of England Sir John Popham Lord chief Justice and one of his privy Councel They the said Lord Chancellor and Lord chief Justice by vertue of the same Letters called unto them Sir Thomas Fleminge then Lord chief Baron Sir Thomas Walmesley Sir Peter Warburton Knights Justices of the Court of Common-Pleas and Sir David Williams and Sir Lawrence Tanfield Justices of the Kings-Bench and after due consideration had both of the Charter of King Hen. 8. and several Acts of Parliament thereof made in the 14. year of the same King and the other in the first year of Queen Mary did on the first of May 1607. at the house of the said Lord Chancellor called York-house resolve the several Questions hereafter mentioned Quest 1 Whether Graduates of Oxford and Cambridge may practise in London or seven miles compass of the same without Licence under the said Colledge Seal by vertue of the clause in the end of the Statute of 14. Hen. 8. and whether that clause hath not relation to the Statute of 3. H. 8. only or how far it doth extend Resp 1 All resolved that no Graduate that is not admitted and licensed by the President and Colledge of Physicians under their common Seal could practise in London or within seven miles compass of the same Quest 2 Whether by Graduates Graduates in Physick only are to be understood Resp 2 They resolved that the Exception in the Statute of 14. H. 8. ca. 11. of Graduates in the two Universities is to be understood only of Graduates of Physick and of no others And all resolved that by that Exception those Graduates may practise in all other places of England out of London and seven miles of the same without examination but not in London nor within the said circuit of seven miles Quest 3 If Graduates not admitted to practise in London practise there whether for evil practise or misdemeanor therein they be not subject to the correction and government of the Colledge They all agreed that they are subject to the Resp 3 government and correction of the Colledge by an express clause of the said Charter enacted which giveth to the Censors Supervisionem scrutinium correctionem Gubernationem of all persons using the practise of Medicine within the City Quest 4 If they may not practise without admission of the Colledge as their Letters patents plainly import Then whether such Graduates are not subject to the Examination without which there were