Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	hold_v	king_n	scot_n	2,570	5	9.5995	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A88233	A plea at large, for John Lilburn gentleman, now a prisoner in Newgate. Penned for his use and benefit, by a faithful and true well-wisher to the fundamental laws, liberties, and freedoms of the antient free people of England; and exposed to publick view, and the censure of the unbyassed and learned men in the laws of England, Aug. 6. 1653.	Faithful and true well-wisher to the fundamental laws, liberties, and freedoms of the antient free people of England.; Lilburne, John, 1614?-1657.	1653 (1653)	Wing L2158; Thomason E710_3; ESTC R207176	34,122	24

them are fully confirmed by that commonly reputed able Lawyer Serjeant John Bradshaw late Lord President of the high Court of Justice against King Charles who in his large Speech to him and against him printed in the second Edition of his Tryal and sold by Peter Cole Francis Tyton and John Playford 1650. from p. 52. to 70. And amongst other passages in p. 55. he hath this That the end of having Kings or any other Governours it is for the enjoying of justice that is the end Now Sir saith he if so be the King will go contrary to that end or any other Governour will go contrary to the end of his Government he must understand that he is but an Officer in trust and he or they ought to discharge that trust and they are to take order for the animadversion and punishment of such an offending Governour And in p. 53. he tells the King That as the Law is his superiour so also he tells him there is something that is superiour to the Law and that is indeed the parent or author of the Law and that is the people of England for Sir as they are those that at the first as other Countries have done did chuse to themselves this form of Government even for Justice sake that justice might be administred that peace might be preserved so that Sir saith he to the King the people gave Laws to Governours according to which they should govern and if those Laws should have proved inconvenient or prejudicial to the Publike the People had a power in them and reserved to themselves to alter them as they shall see cause Secondly such an Act of Parliament as the aforesaid Act of Banishment is not onely against common right common equity and common reason but it is absolutely destructive to the very ends of the peoples Trust conferred upon the Parliament and so the highest of treasons that can be committed And that it is destructive to the ends of the peoples Trust clearly appears by the Statutes of 4 Edw. 3. cap. 14 and 16 Edw. 3.10 which expresly saith that a Parliament at least shall be holden once every yeer and that for the maintenance of the peoples Laws and Liberties and the redress of divers mischiefs and grievances that daily happen And sutable to these things are the ends contained in the Writs that summon them and the intentions of those that chuse the Members and send them And sutable to this is the end of the Parliaments sitting as the present General and his Army in many of their remarkable Declarations have fully declared against the late 11 Members and their accomplices yea and forced the late Parliament to raze out of their books and Records many wicked and unjust things as they judged them to be after the Parliament had solemnly past them as Votes Orders Judgements and Acts yea and endeavoured very earnestly to hang divers of those as Traytors that had executed them as particularly Alderman Adams Alderman Langham Alderman Bunce with the Lord Maior Sir John Gayre and divers others But the greatest grievances and mischiefs in the world are by the aforesaid mischievous and unjust Banishing Act established ratified and confirmed for by it a man is condemned to lose his liberty and estate and the comforts of this life and that without any the least crime committed or accusation exhibited or legal Processes issued out to summon the party to make any defence in the world or ever calling or permitting him to speak one word for himself which is an Act or proceeding against the light and law of Nature Reason the Law of God against the law of Honour Conscience and common Honesty yea a dealing worse with the party then ever the cruel Jews did with Christ or then the bloody butchers Bishop Gardner and Bonner did with the rosted Martyrs in Queen Mary's days who always suffered them to have due processes of Law and to know and see their accusers and to have free liberty to speak for themselves and never condemned them but for transgressing a known and declared law in being Yea also dealing worse with the party then ever the bloody Gunpowder-Traytors were dealt with by King James who always allowed them fair tryals in law from the beginning to the end at the Bar of Justice for their lives Yea it is a worse dealing with the party then ever the Parliament themselves dealt with the bloodiest and most massacring Traytors that ever were in Arms against them to cut their throats Yea the forementioned practice of the foresaid most illegal and unrighteous Act of Banishment is an Act and proceedings in the highest subversion of the Fundamental Law and Liberty of England that can be invented or imagined and by consequence if it may without the highest offence or soloecism in Law be supposed that his Excellencie the Lord Gen. Cromwel Major-Gen Harison and the rest of the Members of the late Supreme Authority of the Parliament of the Commonwealth of England sitting at Westm had any real finger in it or were actors of it they may and ought all of them with all the rest under them that have executed any part of the aforesaid unjust injurious illegal Act of Parliament to be apprehended indicted and proceeded against at the Common Law as Traytors and subverters of the Fundamental Laws Liberties and Freedoms of the free-born people of England as that learned man in the Laws of England Sir Edward Cook in the second third and fourth Parts of his Institutes all three of which are published by two special Orders of the late House of Commons in anno 1641. for good Laws doth declare and prove was dealt with by Empson and Dudley in less cases then the fore-recited unjust act of Banishment and of which severe punishments those Arbitrary and discretionary Judges viz. Trisilian Fulthrop Belknap Care Holt Burge and Lockton in Richard the seconds time sufficiently tasted of as also their arbitrary Accomplices the then Lord Major of London Sir Simon Burley Sir William Ellinham Sir John Salisbury Sir Thomas Trevit Sir James Barnis and Sir Nicholas Dodgworth some of whom were destroyed and hanged for setting their hands to Judgements in subversion of the peoples fundamental Law and Liberties in advancing the Kings will above the same yea one of them was banished therefore although he had a Dagger held unto his very brest to compel him to set his hand thereto But the two first mentioned persons cases being the most remarkable the prisoner at the Bar shall only at present inlarge upon theirs Which Case of Empson and Dudley was thus At the Parliament holden by King Lords and Commons in Henry the sevenths time who was an undoubted lawful king of England and by his marriage of his wife the Lady Elizabeth heir apparent to the House of York as himself was to the house of Lancaster had united the two claimes of Lancaster and York in himself and in a pitcht battel had slaine King Richard

the third the usurper and by reason of the extraordinary many troubles of his reign and the ignorant Regal time in which he lived considered he had a thousand times more grounds to be arbitrary and discretionary in his proceedings with the people of England then the late decapitated Parliament had yet he summoned a free Parliament who sate peaceably and quietly without the force or purging of souldiers and after that several Juries at Assizes and Sessions by corruption and savour had refused to finde persons that were judicially proved guilty before them of breach of penal laws as in full and free Parliament by King Lords and Commons is avowedly declared an Act of Parliament recorded in the fourth part of Cooks Institutes fol. 40. 41. in the 11. of Hen. 7. chap. 3. was passed by King Lords and Commons in full and free Parliament to enable the Justices of Assize in open Sessions to be holden before them and the Justices of the Peace in each County in England upon information for the King before them to be made to have full power and authority by their discretion without tryals by Juries to hear and determine all offences and contempts committed against penal laws in all which arbitrary or discretional proceedings murther treason and felony was excepted out of their cognizance or jurisdiction as also all other offences whereby any person should lose life or member or lands goods or chattels to the party complaining By pretext of which Statute saith the Lord Cook in his last recited folio Empson and Dudley privy Councellors and Justices of Peace to Henry the seventh did commit upon the subject insufferable pressures and oppressions which yet at the highest was but the taking away some small part of the persons estates from them that they condemned And therefore this Statute was justly soon after the decease of Henry the seventh repealed at the next Parliament after his decease by the Statute of the 1 Hen. 8. cha 6. A good caveat saith he to Parliaments to leave all causes to be measured by the golden and streight met-wand of the law and not to the uncertaine and crooked cord of disrcetion for it is not almost credible to foresee saith he when any maxime or fundamental law of this realm is altered as elsewhere in the fourth part of Lord Cooks Reports hath been observed what dangerous inconveniences do follow which most expresly appeareth by this most unjust and strange Act of 11 H. 7. for hereby not only Empson and Dudley themselves but such Justices of Peace corrupt men as they caused to be authorized committed most grievous and heavy oppressions and exactions grinding the face of the poor subjects by penal laws be they never so obsolete or unfit for the time by information onely without any presentment or trial by Jury being the ancient birthright of the subject but to hear and determine the same by their discretion inflicting such penalty as the Statutes not repealed imposed these and other like actions and oppressions by or by the means of Empson and Dudley and their instruments brought infinite treasures to the Kings Coffers whereof the K●ng himself in the end with great grief and compunction repenced as in another place we have observed This Statute of 11. H. 7. We have recited and shewed the just inconveniences thereof to the end that the l●ke should never hereafter be attempted in any court of Parl●ament and that others might avoid the fearful end of those two time-servers Emp●on and Dudley Qui corum v●stigia insistant corum exitus per●o● rescan that is those that follow their footsteps may fear the same destruction that they had whose end in the third part of the Institutes fol. 208. and the fourth part fol. 198 199. may be seen was severally to be Indicted at common law whose Indictments is there to be read and convicted and executed as traitors for subvert●ng the fundamental laws and liberties of England viz. trials by Juries which the Conquest of the Rom●n● Saxons D●n●● or Normans could never blot out of the Kalender of English mens fundamental liberties but hath from time to time with the infinite hazards of their lives bloods been preserved as the choicest of their Jewels and as one of their chiefest fundamental rights of whom the said L. Cook in his exposition of the 29 Ch. of Magn● Charta in his 2 part Instit fol. 51. upon the words of lex terrae or the law of the land where he plentifully shews that no Englishman whatsoever ought for any Crime whatsoever in any Court whatsoever by any power or authority whatsoever to be tryed but by juries and due process of law as is before shewed expresly saith yet against the ancient fundamental las● in the face thereof I finde an Act of Parliament made saith he that as well justices of Assize as Justices of Peace without any finding or presen●ment by the Verdict of twelve men upon a bare information for the King before them made should have full power and authority by their discretions to hear and determine all offences and contempts committed or done by any person or persons against the forme ordinance and effect of any Statute made and not repeal●d c. by colour of which Act shaking this fundamental law it is not cred●ble what horrible oppressions and exaction to the undoing infinite numbers of people were committed by Sir Richard Empson knight and Edmund Dudley being Justices of the Peace throughout England upon this unjust and injurious Act as commonly in like cases ●t falleth out a new office was erected and they made masters of the Kings forfeitures But at the Parliament holden ●n the first yeer of Henry the eighth This Act of the 11. of H●nry the seventh is rejected and made void and repeater and the reason thereof is yeelded for that by force of the said act it was manifestly ●nown that many sinister and crafty feigned forged informations had been pursued aga●nst divers of the K●ngs subjects to their great damage and wrong●ul vexations and ill success hereo● and the fearful ends of the two oppressors should deter others from c●m●●tt●ng the l●ke and should admonish Parliaments that in stead of the ordinary and precious trial per legem terrae by the law of the land they bring not in absolute an partial trial by discretion And in the fourth part of his Institutes folio 37. he expresly saith That he findes an Attainder by Parliament of a subject viz. Thomas Cromwel then Earle of Essex of high treason who was committed to the Tower and thereby forth coming to be heard and yet was never called to answer in any of the Houses of Parliament Of the manner of which proceedings he thus saith Aus●●a 〈◊〉 si potest si non ut cunque silontiam legat That is let the Parl●aments crime be buried in oblivion if it be possible and if not nevertheless yet let it give place to silence for the present for saith he The

against the King for but to pull him out of his Throne slay him and divide his inheritance amongst him and his accomplices and then to set up his lust will and pleasure as the peoples standing Laws By which apparent and in the face of the ●un avowed practices of his he hath all over the Christian world brought more scorn and contempt upon the zealous profession of God and godliness and all the pretences of strugling for Liberty and Freedom then any one man that ever I read of ●n all the Histories of the world that ever my eyes were fixed upon yea and in the doing of the forementioned things hath given in the face of the sun the absolute and perfect lye to himself and all his many printed Declarations both as he is to be considered as a Parliament-man or as an Officer in Arms. And first consider him as a Parliament-man how many Oaths Covenants Protestations and Engagements hath he formerly taken to maintain the fundamental Laws and Liberties of the people of England and also after he had caused the Parliament to be purged over and over again and again and left none to sit there but those that then pleased his tooth and by their authority taken away the Kings life and altered the form of Government nominally into a Commonwealth or free State did not he and his said friends or Councellors immediately after that publish a solemn Declaration of Febr. 9. 1648. in these very words verbatim A Declaration of the Parliament of England for maintaining the Fundamental Laws of this Nation THe Parliament of England now assembled doth declare That they are fully resolved to maintain and shall and will uphold preserve and keep the fundamental Laws of this Nation for and concerning the preservation of the lives properties and liberties of the people with all things incident thereunto with the alterations touching Kings and House of Lords already resolved in this present Parliament for the good of the people and what shall be further necessary for the perfecting thereof and do require and expect that all Judges Justices Sheriffs and all Officers and ministers of Justice for the time being do administer justice and do proceed in their respective places and Offices accordingly which resolution with the reasons thereof shall be hereafter publ●shed in a larger Declaration touching the same And it is hereby ordered and appointed that this Declaration shall be forthwith proclaimed in Westminster-Hall and at the Old Exchange and the Judges in their respective Courts at Westminster and at the first sitting thereof are to cause this Declaration to be publikely read And the Sheriffs in their several Counties are to cause this Declaration to be likewise published Die Veneris 9 February 1648. Ordered by the Commons assembled in Parliament That this Declaration be forthwith printed and published and that the Members of this House do take care to disperse the said Declaration into the several Counties with all speed H. Scobel Cler. Parl. D. Com. London Printed by Edward Husbands Which said Declaration was backed also with a large pithy one the 17 of March 1648. which expresseth the grounds and reasons of their late proceedings and setling the present Government in way of a Free State Yea John Lilburn now prisoner at the bar for his further plea saith That by the Act of the late Parliament intituled An Act for the abolishing the Kingly Office in England and Ireland and the Dominions thereunto belonging it is there amongst other things enacted and declared that the Office of a King in this Nation shall not henceforth reside in or be exercised by any one single person And that no person whatsoever shall or may have or hold the office stile dignity power or authority of King of the said Dominions or any of them upon pain of high treason against the Parliament and People of England to all such said persons and to all their aiders assisters comforters or abettors Now whether or no that the said actions of laying Taxes and chusing the people Law makers be not the absolute exercising the office dignity power and authority of the greatest King that ever was in England the prisoner at the Bar submits it to the judgement of the learned Judges of the Law And in the last forementioned Act it is further declared and averred that by the abolishing of the Kingly Office a most happie way is made for this English Nation to return to its just and ancient rights of being governed by its own Representatives or National Meetings in Councel from time to time chosen and intrusted for that purpose by the people And further it is therefore there resolved and declared by the Commons assembled in Parliament That they will put a period to the sitting of this present Parliament and dissolve the same as soon as may possibly stand with the safety of the people that hath betrusted them with what is absolutely necessary for the preserving and upholding the Government now setled in the way of a Common-wealth And that they will carefully provide for the certain meeting chusing sitting of the next and future Representatives with such other circumstances of freedom in choice and equality in distribution of Members to be elected thereunto as shall most conduce to the lasting freedom and good of this Commonwealth And in several other Acts immediately made after the last forementioned Acts and particularly those two Acts of Parliament of the 14 of May and the 17 of June 1649. declaring what offences shall be judged treason it is thus expressed Whereas the Parliament hath abolished the Kingly Office in England and Ireland and in the dominions and territories thereunto belonging and hath resolved and declared that the people shall for the future be governed by its own Representatives or National Meetings in Councel chosen and intrusted by them for that purpose And the Prisoner at the Bar for further plea in the second place saith that his Declarations as a Souldier or Commander to this purpose are so full as more cannot be said and particularly that remarkable Declaration of the 14 of June 1647. printed in the Armies Book of Declar. p. 36. 37. c. in which 37. p. there he positively declares that the setling of the liberties and freedoms and peace of the Nation is the blessing of God then which of all worldly things nothing say they is more dear unto us or more precious in our thoughts we having hitherto thought all our present enjoments whether of live or livelihood or nearest relations a price but sufficient to the puchase of so rich a blessing that we and all the free-borne people of this Nation may sit downe in quiet under our Vines and under the glorious administration of justice and righteousness and in full possession of those fundamental rights and liberties without which we can have little hopes as to humane considerations to enjoy either any comforts of life or so much as life it self but at the

might not be question for any thing he advised according to his conscience But saith Mr. Pym p. 11. he that will have the priviledges of a Counsel must keep within the just bounds of a Counsellor those matters are the proper subjects of counsel wihch in their times and occasions may be good or beneficial to the King or Commonwealth But such Teasons as these the subversion of the Laws violation of liberties they can never be good or justifiable by any circumstances or occasions and therefore saith he his being a Counsellor maketh his fault much more hainous as being committed against a great trust and in page 12. he answers another excuse of his which was that what he did he did with a good intention It s true saith Mr. Pym Some matters that are hurtful and dangerous may he accompanied with such circumstances as may make it appear useful and convenient and in all such cases good intentions will justtifie evil counsel but where the matters prepounded are evil in their own nature such as the matters are with which the Earl of Strafford is charged viz. to break a publick saith to subvert laws and Government they can never be justified by any intentions how specious or good soever they pretended see in Mr. Steels answer to Duke Hambletons objection in the like case in his case stated pag. 12. 13. 14. The prisoner at the Bar shall close all at present with this plea viz. that although by the said unjust Act of Banishment the Act it self doth authorize all Judges Maiors Sheriffs Bayliffs and all other Officers as well Military as Civil in their respective places to be aiding and assisting in apprehending viz. the said banished Lieut. Col. John Lilburn yet it authorizeth none of them in the least to arraign try condemn and execute the said John Lilburn mentioned in the said Act and therefore by reason of the insufficiencie of the said Act in that very particular although John Lilburn Gent. now prisoner at the bar were that Lieut. Col. John Lilburn mentioned in the said Act of Banishment as with confidence for the just and legal reasons at the beginning of this Plea mentioned he doth a vow he is not yet in regard the Parliament is dissolved that made the said Act which in reason by reason of the said insufficiency of the said Act cannot otherwise be supposed but as they past the Act of Banishment themselves against the John Lilburn therein mentioned and meant so they resolve to o reserve onely to themselves the final judging and condemning of him which cannot be now without their sitting again And that in special and extraordinary acts of Parliament as the aforesaid Act of Banishment is there ought in law to be plain evident and full words especially when it doth concern life to demonstrate and express who shall finally put the said Acts in execution And that this is Law the same Parliament that made the foresaid Act of Banishment doth in several Acts since fully justifie this the prisoner at the Bar's averment of several of their Acts of Parliament as particularly that of Aug. 2. 1650. intituled An Act to prohibit all commerce and traffique between England and Scotland and enjoyn the departure of the Scots ou● of this Commonwealth In the Preamble or beginning of which the mischievous designes of the Scotish nation are declared and their compelling of England to make war upon them In the body of which Act it is declared for the raking off as the Act saith all pretence of ignorance and enacted That all and every person or persons within this Commonwealth of England or the Dominions thereof that shall from and after the 5 of August 1641 use hold or maintain any correspondency or intelligence with any person or persons of the Scotish nation c. or shall abet assist countenance or encourage the said Scotish nation or any other per●on or persons adhering to them in their war against the Parliament and Commonwealth of England or shall go o● send or cause to be sent or conveyed any men mon●ys horse arms ammunition or other fu●niture of war plate goods or merchandise or other supply whatsoever in●o Scotland or any ports or places thereof c. all and every such person or persons so offending without such license as is therein mentioned shall be adjudged as Traytors to this Commonwealth and shall undergo all the pains penalties and forfeitures as in case of high-tr●ason And although the Scots were at present as great enemies to the Parliament as the Parl. could imagine any persons in the world could be and the offences aforementioned of any of them against this nation as criminous and the time as arbitrary a time being a time of war as could be imagined yet the Parliament would be so just even to strangers and aliens and people or a forraign nation as not to leave them arbitrary for their transgressions to be punished by whom were pleased first to lay hold of it but in ample and plain words fixeth upon the persons that are to do it or execute it therefore the Act expresly saith The same offences shall be enquired of tryed judged and determined by the Commissioners for the high Court of Justice lately established in such manner and form as other offences already reserved to the power and cognizance of that Court are to be hdard and determined And in the second part of the Act the makers of it come to declare it treason for any person or persons of the Scotish nation without such license as is therein mentioned to be found within the Lines of Communication after Aug. 10. 1631. And in the third place the matter of the said Act makes it high treason for any person or persons of the Scotish nation without license as is therein mentioned to stay within the limits of the Commonwealth after Sept. 1. 1651. Yet the prisoner at the bar as he saith before doth now avow that the said Parl. that made the said Act would be so just men unto strangers and aliens and people of a forraign nation as not to leave them arbitrary for their transgressions to be punished by whom were pleased first to lay hold on them but in ample and plain words fixeth upon the persons that are to do it or execute it and therefore the Act again expresly saith That the said offences and treasons shall be proceeded against by the said Commissioners of the high Court of Justice who are required to give Judgement and Sentence of death against offenders And every person and persons so found guilty of the said offences shall suffer the pains of death as traytors and enemies in such manner as the said Commissioners shall adjudge and appoint And the same ample and full words as in that special Act for suppressing of Incest Adultery c. which by plain and evident words doth refer the punishment of the offenders therein named to the next Assizes or Goal-delivery to be held for the said County where the fact is committed And the very self-same particular words are in the Act intituled An Act against several atheistical blasphemous and execrable Opinions derogatory to the honour of God and destructive to humane society to refer the punishment of all the transgressors thereof at common law before the Justices of Assize or Goal-delivery as by the Acts themselves doth more fully appear unto which the prisoner at the bar for more safety referreth himself And lastly the prisoner at the bar for his final plea saith That Lieut. Col. John Lilburn indicted in the said Indictment now read is none of the prisoner at the bar's name and so he is not the party mentioned in the said Indictment now read All which premises he is ready to prove for good Law and therefore humbly prays the judgement of the Court before he put himself upon any further Tryal July 13. 1653. John Lilburn Gentleman

concerning themselves but it shall be examined and tryed before the Justices of Assizes in the Sessions of the Assize as appeareth by the 8. of Hen. 6. chap. 7. and 23. Hen. 6. chap. 15. Yea the Parliament are not to punish those that will not pay them their wages for their service done in Parliament but the refusers are to be punished by the legal administers of the law in the ordinary of Courts of Justice as appears by the 23. of Hen. 6. chap. 11. Yea the law of England which is right reason or as Sir Edward Cooke stiles it in his second part Institutes folio 179. the absolute perfection of reason and which as he saith is the surest sanctuary that a man can take and the strongest fortress to protect the weakest of all and therefore it is called the best birthright the Subjects hath for thereby his goods lands wife children his body life honour and estimation are protected from injury and wrong for saith he to every one of us there comes a greater inheritance by the law then by our parents it being the Judges guide in all causes that come before them in the wayes of right Justice which never yet misguided any man that certainly knew them and truly followed them 2 part of the Lords Cooks Institutes fol. 56 63 97 526. and the 4. part folio 41. yea and the law-book of Ed. 6. folio 36. with the arguments in the Law in the Court of Kings Bench upon the Writ of Habeas Corpus in the cases of Sir John Eliot Sir Thomas Daniel c. pag. 11. in Michaelmas-terme in the third of the late King Charles calls the good old fundamental Laws of England the great inheritance of every subject and the inheritance of inheritances without the injoyments of which inheritance we have no inheritance at all And therefore the said Oracle of the Law of England the Lord Cook doth bitterly cry out of the unexpressible mischief that accrues to the whole body of the people of England when any fundamental maximes of their good old fundamental Laws are invaded or incroached upon either by Parliament or any other power whatsoever as appears in his 2 part Institutes folio 29 46 48 51 74 103 104 179 210 249 529 533 534 540. and 3. part fol. 208. 4. part fol. 41 196 197 198. and the preface to the 4. part of the Lord Cookes Reports where he saith the Laws of England consist of three parts the Common Laws Customes and Acts of Parliament for any fundamental point of the ancient Common Laws and customs of the Realm it is a maxime in policy and a tryal by experience that the alteration of any of them is more dangerous for that which hath been refined and perfected by all the wisest men in former succession of ages and proved and approved by continual experience to be good and profitable for the Commonwealth cannot without great hazard and danger to be altered or changed see also that old Law-book called The myrror of Justice page 239. And which law as the author of the ancient and excellent law book called the Doctor and Student chap. 4.8 is grounded upon six foundation or basis viz. the law of reason Secondly the Law of God 3. Upon divers general customes of common utility 4. On divers principals that be called maximes 5. On divers particular customes 6. On divers Statutes made by the Kings and the Common-councel of the Nation all which do abhor arbitra●iness in the law-proceedings especially in criminal cases and especially it abhors the arbitrary uncertain way of proceedings in Parliaments the rules of which certainly no man in heaven or earth knoweth the vileness wickedness and mischeviousness of which is sufficiently demonstrated in the Lord Cravens late printed case And saith that worthiest of English Lawyers Sir Edward Cook in the Proeme to the third part of his Institutes It is a miserable servitude or slavery where the law is uncertaine or unknown and therefore it is that the twenty ninth Chapter of Magna Charta the Petition of Right and the Act that abolished the Star-Chamber expresly saith That no freeman of England shall be taken or imprisoned or disseized of his freehold or liberties or free customes or be outlawed or be exiled but by lawful judgement of a Jury of twelve sworn men of his equals of the same neighbourhood according to the law of the Land And that none shall be taken for any crime whatsoever by any person or Court whatsoever unless it be by Indictment or Presentment of good and lawful people of the same neighbourhood where such Deeds be done in due manner or by Process made by Writ original at the Common Law and that none be put out of his franchise or freehold unless he be duly brought in to answer and adjudged of the same according to the course of the law and if any thing be done by any persons or courts whatsoever against the tenour of the same it shall be void in law and holden for error which two last Statutes of the Petition of Right and the Act that abol●sheth the Star-chamber doth expresly and nominally ratifie and confirme the Statute of the 42. of Edward the third which according to the peoples true fundamental law of England makes void and null all Acts of Parliament Ordinances Orders Judgements and Decrees whatsoever made by any power whatsoever that are contrary unto or in diminution of the free people of Englands foresaid liberties and freedoms of due Process of Law And the Petition of Right expresly saith No man whatsoever shall be any wayes punished especially in criminal cases but according to the laws and Statutes already established in the land And those also by the said Petition of Right and the Statute that abolished the Star-chamber are precisely declared to be according to our good old native fundamental rights and liberties or else they are ipso facto null and void in law this very thing or the securing thereof alone being the principal and chief declared cause of all the late Parliaments and present armies bloodshed and wars with the late King and his son and without the inviolable preservation of these our fundamental laws and liberties it is impossible that any in the Army from the highest to the lowest in the least can acquit themselves of being justly esteemed both before God and just men real and wilful murderers of all those persons that they have staine in the late civil wars and if so wo unto them when God makes inquisition for innocent blood Neither indeed is he the now prisoner at the Bar guilty of any such high crimes and misdemeanors as is expressed in the said Act neither ever was he the now prisoner at the Bar in the least duely and legally banished and fined by the said Act nor yet is a Felon nor guilty of felony in no manner of respect whatsoever as by the said Inditement now read unto him is supposed neither can he rationally