Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	high_a	lord_n	treasurer_n	4,230	5	10.7514	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A86290	Historia quinqu-articularis: or, A declaration of the judgement of the Western Churches, and more particularly of the Church of England, in the five controverted points, reproched in these last times by the name of Arminianism. Collected in the way of an historicall narration, out of the publick acts and monuments, and most approved authors of those severall churches. By Peter Heylyn.	Heylyn, Peter, 1600-1662.	1660 (1660)	Wing H1721; Thomason E1020_1; Thomason E1020_2; Thomason E1020_3; Thomason E1020_4; ESTC R202407	247,220	357

on some propositions to be sent to Cambridge for the appeasing of some unhappy differences in the Vniversity with which Answer her Majesty being somewhat pacified commanded notwithstanding that he should speedily recall and suppress those Aricles which was performed with such care and diligence that a Copy of them was not to be found for a long time after And though we may take up this relation upon the credit of history of the Lambeth Articles printed in Latin 1651. or on the credit of Bishop Mountague who affirms the same in his appeal Anno 1525. yet since the Authority of both hath been called in question we will take our warrant for this Narrative from some other hands And first we have it in a book called Necessario Responsio published by the Remonstrants Anno 1618. who possibly might have the whole story of it from the mouth of Baroe or some other who lived at that time in Cambridge and might be well acquainted with the former passages And secondly We find the same to be affirmed by the Bishops of Rochester Oxon and St. Davids in a letter to the Duke of Buchingham August 2. 1625. In which they signifie unto him that the said Articles being agreed upon and ready to be published it pleased Queen Elizabeth of famous memory upon notice given how little they agreed with the practise of piety and obedience to all Government to cause them to be suppressed and that they had so continued ever since till then of late some of them had received countenance at the Synod of Dort 4. Next touching the effect produced by them in order to the end so proposed so far they were from appeasing the present Controversies and suppressing Baroe and his party that his Disciples and Adherents became more united and the breach wider then before And though Dr. Baroe not long after deserted both his place in the Vniversity yet neither was he deprived of his Professorship as some say nor forced to leave it on a fear of being deprived as is said by others For that Professorship being chosen from two years to two years according to the Statutes of the Lady Margaret he kept the place till the expiring of his term and then gave off without so much as shewing himself a suiter for it Which had he done it may be probable enough that he had carried it from any other Canditate or Competitor of what rank soever The Anti-Calvinian party being grown so strong as not to be easily overborn in a publick business by the opposite faction And this appears plainly by that which followed on the death of Dr. Whitacres who died within few dayes after his return from Lambeth with the nine Articles so much talkt of Two Candidates appeared for the Professorship after his decease Wotton of Kings Colledge a professed Calvinian and one of those who wrote against Mountagues Appeal Anno 1626. Competitor with Overald of Trinity Colledge almost as far from the Calvinian Doctrine in the main Plat-form of Predestination as Baroe Harsnet or Barret are conceived to be But when it came to the Vere of the University the place was carried for Overald ●y the Major part which as it plainly shews that ●hough the Doctrines of Calvin were so hotly stickled here by most of the Heads yet the greater part of the learned body entertained them not so doth it make it also to be very improbable that Baroe should be put out of his place by those who had took in Overald or not confirmed therein if he had desired And therefore we may rather think as before is said that ●he relinquished the place of his own accord in which he found his Doctrine crossed by the Lambeth Articles and afterwards his peace distracted by several Informations brought against him by the adverse faction and thereupon a letter of Complaint presented to the Lord Treasurer Burleigh subscribed by most of those who before had prosecuted Barret to his Recantation Which letter giving very great light to the present business as well concerning Barret as Baroe though principally aiming at the last I think worthy of my paines and the Readers patience and therefore shall subscribe it as hereafter followeth A Copy of the Letter sent from some of the Heads in Cambridge to the Lord Burleigh Lord High Treasurer of England and Chancellour of the Vniversity RIght Honourable out bounden Duty remembred we are right sorry to have such occasion to trouble your Lordship but the peace of this University and Church which is dear unto us being brought into perill by the late reviving of new opinions and troublesom controversies amongst us hath urged us in regard of the places we here sustain not only to be carefull for the suppressing the same to our power but also to give your Lordship further information hereof as our Honourable Head and carefull Chancellour About a year past amongst divers others who here attempted publicity to teach new and strange opinions in Religion one Mr. Barret more boldly then the rest did preach divers Popish errors in St. Maries to the just offence of many which he was enjoyned to retract but hath refused so to do in such sort as hath been prescribed with whose fact and opinions your Lord was made acquainted by Dr. Some the Deputy Vice-Chancellour Hereby offence and division growing as after by Dr. Baroes publick Lectures and determinations in the Schools contrary as his Auditors have informed to Dr. Whitacres and the sound received truth ever since her Majesties Re●g● we sent up to London by common consent in November last Dr. Tyndal and Dr. Whitacres men especially chosen for that purpose for conference with my Lord of Canterbury and other principal Divines there that the controversies being examined and the truth by thei● consents confirmed the contrary errours and contentions thereabouts might the rather cease By whose good travel with sound consent in truth such advice and care was taken by certain propositions containing certain substantial points of Religion taught and received in this Vniversity and Church during the time ofher Majesties Reign and consented unto and published by the best approved Divines both at home and abroad for the maintaining of the same truth and peace of the Church as thereby we enjoyed here great and comfortable quiet untill Dr. Baroe in January last in his Sermon Ad Cl●rum in St. Maries contrary to restraint and Commandment from the Vice-Chancellour and the Heads by renewin● again these opinions disturbed our peace whereby his Adherents and Disciples were and are too much imboldned to maintain false Doctrine to the corrupting and disturbing of this Vniversity and the Church if it be not in time effectually prevented For remedy whereof we have with joint consent and care upon complaint of divers Batchelors in Divinity proceeded in the examination of the cause according to our Statutes and usual manner of proceeding in such causes whereby it appeareth by sufficient Testimonies that Dr. Baroe hath offended

cause to condemn them Who doth not smile at the Grecians Conceit that gave their God a glorious title for killing of flyes Gods Glory in punishing ariseth from his Justice in revenging of sin and for that it tells us as I said a very sad and unpleasant tale for who could digest it to hear a Prince say after this manner I will beget me a son that I may kill him that I may so get me a name I will beget him without both his feet and when he is grown up having no feet I will command him to walk upon pain of death and when he breaketh my Commandment I will put him to death O beloved these glorious fancies imaginations and shews are far from the nature of our gracious mercifull and glorious God who hath proclaimed himself in his Titles Royal Jehovah the Lord the Lord strong and mighty and terrible slow to anger and of great Goodness And therefore let this conceit be far from Jacob and let it not come near the Tents of Joseph How much holyer and heavenlyer conceit had the holy Fathers of the Justice of God Non est ante punitor Deus quam peccator homo God put not on the person of a Revenger before man put on the person of an Offender saith St. Ambrose Neminem coronat antequam vincit neminem punit antequam peccat he crowns none before he overcomes and he punisheth no man before his offence Et qui facit miseros ut misereatur crudelem habet miserecordiam he that puts man into miseries that he may pity him hath no kind but a cruell pity ' 7. The absolute de●ree of Reprobation being thus discharged he shews in the next place that as God desireth not the death of man without relation to his sin so he desireth not the death of the sinfull man or of the wicked sinfull man but rather that they should turn from their wickedness and live And he observes it is said unto the Coats in Saint Mathews Gospel Ite melidicti in ignem paratum he doth not say Maledicti patris Go ye cursed of the Father as it is Benedicti patris when he speaks of the sheep God intituling himself to the blessing only and that the fire is prepared but for whom Non vobis sed Diabolo Angelis ejus not for you but for the Devil and his Angels So that God delighteth to prepare neither death nor hell for damned men The last branch of his discourse he resolves into six consequences as links depending on his chain 1. Gods absolute Will is not the cause of Reprobation but sin 2. No man is of an absolute necessity the child of Hell so as by Gods grace he may not avoid it 3. God simply willeth and wisheth every living soul to be saved and to come to the kingdom of Heaven 4. God sent his son to save every soul and to bring it to the kingdom of heaven 5. God offereth Grace effectually to save every one and to direct him to the Kingdom of heaven 6. The neglect and contempt of this Grace is the cause why every one doth not come to Heaven and not any privative Decree Councel and Determination of God ' The stating and canvasing of which points so plainly curtly to the Doctrines of the old Zuinglian Gospellers and the modern Calvinians as they take up the rest of the Sermon so to the Sermon I refer the Reader for his further satisfaction in them I note this only in the close that there is none of the five Arminian Articles as they commonly call them which is not contained in terms express or may not easily be found by way of Deduction in one or more of the six consequences before recited 8. Now in this Sermon there are sundry things to be consisidered as namely first That the Zuinglian or Calvinian Gospel in these points was grown so strong that the Preacher calls it their Goliah so huge and monstrous that many quaked and trembled at it but none that is to say but few or none vel d●o vel n●mo in the words of Persius durst take up Davids sling to throw it down Secondly That in canvasing the absolute Decree of Reprobation the Preacher spared none of those odious aggravations which have been charged upon the Doctrines of the modern Calvinists by the Remonstrants and their party in these latter times Thirdly That the Sermon was preached at St. Pauls Cross the greatest Auditory of the Kingdom consisting not only of the Lord Major the Aldermen and the rest of the chief men in the City but in those times of such Bishops and other learned men as lived occasionally in London and the City of Westminster as also of the Judges and most learned Lawyers some of the Lords of the Counsel being for the most part present also Fourthly That for all this we cannot find that any offence was taken at it or any Recantation enjoyned upon it either by the high Commission or Bishop of London or any other having authority in the Church of England nor any complaint made of it to the Queen or the Counsel-Table as certainly there would have been if the matter of the Sermon had been contrary to the Rules of the Church and the appointments of the same And finally we may observe that though he was made Arch-Bishop of Yorke in the Reign of King Charls 1628. when the times are thought to have been inclinable to those of the Arminian Doctrines yet he was made Master of Pembrook hall Bishop of Chichester and from thence translated unto Norwitch in the time of King James And thereupon we may conclude that King James neither thought this Doctrine to be against the Articles of Religion here by Law established nor was so great an enemy to them or the men that held them as some of our Calvinians have lately made him 9. But against this it is objected by Mr Prin in his book of Perpetuity c. printed at London in the year 1627. 1. That the said Mr. Harsnet was convented for this Sermon and forced to recant it as heretical 2. That upon this Sermon and the controversies that arose upon it in Cambridge between Baroe and Whitacres not only the Articles of Lambeth were composed of which more hereafter but Mr. Wotton was appointed by the University to confute the same 3. That the said Sermon was so far from being published or printed that it was injoyned by Authority to be recanted For Answer whereunto it would first be known where the said Sermon was recanted and by whose Authority Not in or by the University of Cambridge where Mr. Harsnet lived both then and a long time after for the Sermon was preached at St. Pauls Cross and so the University could take no cognisance of it nor proceed against him for the same And if the Recantation was made at St. Pauls Cross where the supposed offence was given if would be known by whose Authority it was enjoyned Not by the

demonum is not alia a fide Christianorum which no man ever denyed for fides Demonum is not Donum at all so that it commeth not in Question so that I being here unsatisfied of one party meaning Mr. Chadderion and rather confirmed of the other party I do hold my positions as before And for the Retractation I purpose not to perform it Yet that the peace of the Vniversity and the Church may be preserved I do solemnly promise to keep my opinion to my self so that in this regard my humble suit unto your Worship and hearty prayer to God is this that you would suffer me to continue in the Vniversity without molestation though I live but in disgrace amongst you yet I regard it so I may be quiet For my intent is to live privately at my book untill such times as by continual conference with those that are of contrary Judgement I may learn the truth of your Assertions which when I have learned I promise before God and your Worship not to conceal But if you and the rest of your Assistants whom I reverence do purpose to proceed in disquieting and traducing me as you have done by the space of three quarters of this year so in the end mean to drive me out of the University I must take it patiently because I know not how to redress it but let God be judge between you and me These things I leave to your worships favourable consideration for this I must needs say and peradventure it may tend to your credit when I shall report it that above the rest hitherto I have found you most courteous and most just I leave your worship to Gods Direction and holy tuition expecting a gracious answrr Your dayly Beads man WILLIAM BARRET 11. But here perhaps it may be said that though Barret might be as obstinate in refusing to publish the Recantation as this letter makes him yet it appears by the whole course of those proceedings that his Doctrines were condemned by the heads of the Vniversity as being contrary to that which was received and established in the Church of England And that it was so in the Judgement of those men who either concurred in his censure or subscribed the letter to the Lord Treasurer Burleigh above mentioned in a thing past question But this can be no Argument that Barrets Doctrines were repugnant to the Church of England because these heads either in favour of Dr. Whitacres or in respect to Mr. Perkins were pleased to think no otherwise of them for if it be we may conclude by the same Argument that the Church of Rome was in the right even in the darkest times of ignorance and superstition because all those who publickly opposed her Doctrines were solemnly enjoyned by the then prevailing party to a Recantation and which is more it may be also thence concluded that the Doctrine maintained by Athanasius touching Christs Divinity was contrary to that which had been taught by the Apostles and men of Apostolical spirits because it was condemned for such by some Arrian Bishops in the Councel or rather Conventicle of Tyre which was held against him 2. It cannot be made apparent that either Dr. Duport the Vice-Chancellor who was most concerned or Dr. Baroe the Lady Margarets Professour for divinity there had any hand in sentencing this Recantation Not Dr. Baroe because by concurring to this sentence he was to have condemned himself Nor Dr Duport for I find his place to be supplyed and the whole action govern'd by Dr. Some which shews him to be absent at that time from the Vniver●ity according to the stile whereof the Title of Procancellarius is given to Dr. So●e in the Acts of the Court as appears by the extract of them in the Anti-Arminianism p. 64. compared with p. 63. But thirdly admitting that the head● were generally thus enclined yet probably the whole body of the Vniversity might not be of the same opinion with them tho●e heads not daring to affirm otherwise of Barrets Doctrine in their letter to the Lord Treasurer Burleigh then that it gave just offence to many And if it gave offence unto many only it may be thought that it gave no offence to the Major part or much less to all for if it had the Writers of the letter would not have been so sparing in their expressions as to limit the offence to many if they could have said it of the most But of this we shall speak more in the following Chapter when we shall come to feel the pulse of the Vniversity in the great competition between Wotton and Oveald after Whitacres death Of which opinion Harsnet was we have seen before And we have seen before that Baroe had many Disciples and Adherents which stood fast unto him And thereupon we may conclude that when Dr. Baroe had for 14 or 15. years maintained these opinions in the Schools as before was shewed which are now novelized by the name of Arminianism and such an able man as Harsnet had preached them without any Controul when the greatest audience of the Kingdom did stand to him in it There must be many more Barrets who concurred with the same opinions with them in the Vniversity though their names through the envy of the times are not come unto us CHAP. XXI Of the proceedings against Baroe the Articles of Lambeth and the general calme which was in Oxon touching these Disputes 1. THe differences between Baroe and Dr. Whitacres the addresse of Whitakers others to Arch-bishop Wh●tgift which drew on the Articles on Lambeth 2. The Articles agreed on at Lambeth presented both in English and Latine 3. The Articles of no authorty in themselves Archbishop Whitgift questioned for them together with the Queens command to have them utterly supprest 4. That Baroe neither was deprived of his Professorship nor compelled to leave it the Anti-Calvinian party being strong enough to have kept him in if he had desired it 5. A Copy of the Letter from the Heads in Cambridge to the Lord Treasurer Burleigh occasioned as they said by Barret and Baroe 6. Dr. Overalds encounters with the Calvinists in the point of falling from the grace received his own private judgement in the point neither for total nor for finall and the concurrence of some other learned men in the same opinion 7. The general calme which was at Oxon at that time touching these disputes and the Reasons of it 8. An answer to that Objection out of the writings of judicious Hooker of the total and finall falling 9. The disaffections of Dr Bukeridge and Dr. Houson to Calvines doctrines an Answer to the Objection touching the paucity of those who opposed the same 10. Possession of a truth maintained but by one or two preserves it sacred and inviolable for more fortunate times the case of Liberius Pope of Rome and that the testimonies of this kinde are rather to be valued by weight then tale 1. FRom barret pass we on