Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n henry_n king_n york_n 5,445 5 9.8000 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A94265 Syllogologia; or, An historical discourse of parliaments in their originall before the Conquest, and continuance since. Together with the originall growth, and continuance, of these courts following, viz. [brace] High Court of Chancery, Upper Bench, Common-Pleas, Exchequer, Dutchy, and other inferiour courts now in use in this Commonwealth. J. S. 1656 (1656) Wing S93; Thomason E1646_1; ESTC R203463 29,703 88

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

only the direction of his demeasns and receipts the administration of Common justice continuing still in that other Court of his as it was before his coming hither For proofe of which matter I call to witnesse Gervasius Tilberiensis a learned man that lived so neer to the time of the Conquest that he confesseth he had talk with Henry Bishop of Winchester which was son to the Conquerours sister This man was an officer of the Exchequer here and penned speciall dialogues of the observations of the Exchequer which he dedicated to King Henry the second and are yet in the Exchequer in the Black Booke there in the first part of which his dialogues ca. 1. he writeth for the advancement of the Antiquity of the Exchequer that it was brought out of Normandy by the Conquerour and for the authority of the Court he hath amongst other words these following Nulli licet statuta Scaccarii infringere vel eis quavis temeritate resistere habet enim hoc commune cum ipsa domini Regis curia in qua ipsc in propria persona jura decernit quod nec recordationl nec sententiae in eo latae liceat alieni contradicere Whereby it is plainly proved the Court of the Exchequer was at that time a distinct Court from that Court of the King in the which he himself sometimes and commonly his justice called then Prima justitia did use to sit The one Court having authority over the Kings demeasns and receipts as Gervasius in all that worke at large discourseth and the other using the power of distributing common justice as his words in this place do sufficiently purport And therefore I cannot but here by the way note the error of them which do maintain that the Exchequer was in this time of King Henry the second a Court of whatsoever Common pleas for all subjects and which for proof of their assertion do alledge the Title of Mr. Glanvil●'s book in part thus Et illas solum leges continet consuetudines secundum quas placitatur in curia Regis ad scaccarium for overthrow whereof first I say that the words of this title be not the words of Glanvill himself but of that man whatsoever he were that published his book by print for he entituleth the book thus Tractatus de legibus tempore Reg is Henrici secundi compositus illustri viro Ranulpho de Glanvill juris regni antiquarum Consuctudinum eo tempore peritissimo which doth plainly discover that he speaketh of Glanvilla as of another man and which also lived not then but at another time Secondly I affirm that if it were the speech of Glanvill himself yet if you will take the rest of his words with you then you shall see that they have another meaning for the words stand thus together Secundum quas placitatur in Curia Regis ad Saccarium coram Justiciis ubicunque fuerint which words coram Justiciis ubicunque fuerint do set forth the other Courts of the King whereof I now speake Lastly I undertake to shew not by the title but by the Text of Glanvills owne booke that in his time the Kings Court was one and the Exchequer another for throughout his whole worke he called the Court of Common P●eas Curiam Domine Regis And the Stile of the writ therefore is quod sit coram me vel Justiciis meis But when he cometh to speake of the Exchequer he talketh of Acompts to be made to the King there and of none other matter as namely in the 7. book Ca. 10. where he hath this Si dominus Rex aliquam custodiam alicui commiserit tunc distinguitur utrum ei custodiam pleno jure commiserit ita quod nullum inde reddere compotum oporteat ad Scae●arium aut aliter But before that I leave the raign of this King Henry the second I must add this also that he in the xxiii of his raign did by the advice of some of his Bishops cut the Realm into 6. parts and to every of these parts appointed three Justices the which are by Henry Bracton called Itinerants and in Brittons Book Justices in Eire quasi errantes as Gervas of Tilbery expoundeth it The proper names of which Justices are set down by Roger Hoveden who also describeth their circuits not to differ much from the same that our Justices of Assize do now ride And so I conclude that not only during all the time of the Conquerour himself of William his son and of his other son Henry the first which was a peaceable Prince and a maintainer of the antient Laws and learned in them whereof he had the name Beauclark but also under the government of King Stephen and of this Heury the second there was one Court following the King which was the place of Soveraign justice both for matter of Law and conscience and one other standing Court which was Governess only of the lands and revenues of the Crown The first of which was then called Curia Domini Regis Aula regia Bract. fol. for that the Prince himself did many times fit in person there and had Justices a latere suo residentes as Bracton saith namely his chiefe Justice Chancellour Constables Marshall and others The later was then as it is now cal●ed Scaccarium eo quod lusibilis Scaccarii formam haberet If you will give credit to Garves Tilber or else it took the name of Statarium Eo quod stabilis et firma effect ibi as Paulus Aemilius and after him Polydore Virgil doth write of it and in this the Prince sate not personally at any time but his chiefe Justice as President and then the Chancellor of the Exchequer the Treasurer and Barons The Common Place And in this manner that high Court of the King continued untill that Henry the third in the 9. yeare of his raign which was about the time in which he aspired to the age of xxi years granted unto his subjects that great Charter of the liberties of England in the 11. Ca. whereof he ordained thus Communia placita non sequuntur curiam nostram sed teneantur in aliquo loco certo whereupon followed two things The first This Court was in being before this statute it doth not appeare that it was then newly e. rected by the stat of M. Ch. that this Court was directed for the determination of all such pleas as did not concern the Crown and dignitie of the Prince but were meerly civill and did belong unto the subjects between themselves The second that this Court was established in a place certain and that was at Westminster to the end that the people might have a standing Seal of Justice wher to they might resort for the tryall of their owne causes and not to be driven to follow the King and his Court but only where the matter respecte him And after this fo 105.108 all the Writs that are recited in Henry Bractons book
might not be put off to shew cause from day to day which rather increaseth trouble and charges than either furthereth the suit for the hearing or benefits the parties in their cause Which thing whether it might be more couvenient than the present manner of motions I will leave to the judgement of such as have more wisdom to devise and power to execute And will sum up the rest of our Courts and make an end The Court of the Dutchy or County Palatine of Lancaster which is by a late Act of Parliament committed to the custody of a Commissioner grew out of the grant of King Edward the third The Court formerly called The Dutchy Court the jurisdiction whereof is now committed to a Commissioner or Commissioners County Palatine of Lanc. erected in Parliament 50 E. 3. and Iustices of Assises Gaole delivery and of the Peace have been since the erection of it Cook lib. 4. f. 204. 205. who first gave that Dutchie to his Son John of Gaunt and endowed it with such royall rights as the County Palatine of Chester had And forasmuch as it was afterward extincted in the person of King Henry the 4th by reason of the union of it with the Crown of the Realm the same King knowing himself more rightfully Duke of Lancaster then King of England determined to save his right in the Dutchy whatsoever should befall the Kingdom And therefore he separateth his Dutchy from the Crown and setleth it so in the naturall persons of himself and his heirs as if he had been no King or Pollitique Body at all in which manner it indured during the reign of King Henry the first and of King Henry the 6th that were descended of him But when King Edward the 4th had by recovery of the Crown recontinued the right of the House of York he feared not to appropriate that Dutchie to the Crown again And yet so as he suffered the Court and Officers to remain as he found them And in this manner it came together with the Crown to King Henry the 7th who liking well of that policy of King Henry the fourth by whose right he also obteined the Kingdom made by separation of the Dutchie as he hath done and so left it to his posterity It appeareth in our Books of the Tearms of King Edward the 4th The Star Chamber and the Report of cases happening under the usurpation of Richard the third This Court was in being before 28 E. 3. Cook lib. That sometimes the King and his Counsell And sometimes the Lord Chancellour and other great personages did use to sit Judiciall in the place then and lately called for that it is decked with certain Stats the Star Chamber But forasmuch as be like that Assembly was not ordinary therefore the next King Henry the 7th and his Son Henry the 8th took order by two severall Laws That the Chancellour assisted with others there named should have power to hear complaints against Reteinors Embraceries misdemeanours of Offices and such other offences which through the power and countenance of such as do commit them do lift up the head above other faults and for the which inferiour Judges are not so meet to give correction And because that place was before time dedicated to the like service it hath ever since also been so used untill it was taken away in the late King Charls his reign The Court of Requests The Court of the Requests being of the same nature as I said with the Chancery took beginning by Commission from King Henry the 8. before which time the Masters of the Requests had no warrant of ordinary Jurisdiction This Court had no warrant by act of Parliament or prescription to establ shit Cook lib. 4. fol. 97. but travailed between the Prince and Petitioners by direction from the mouth of the King The same King also established one Court of President and Counsell in the Marches of Wales 34. 35. H. 8. The Court of the Marches of Wales and that of the North parts were taken away in the late K Ch. his reign Anno 17. Car. And another like Court of President and Counsell in the North parts which Court in Wales was a Court of Law in its principall Jurisdiction although it did withall exercise other powers of equity by vertue of other severall Commissions that did accompany the same and the Court of York was in its principall Jurisdiction Equity and did exercise other powers by vertue of other Commissions Court of Wards The Court of Wards began about the 32th year of the reign of King Henry the 8 who also in the next year after added thereto the office of the Masters of the Liveries and withall conjoyned the names ordaining that it should be called The Court of his Wards and Liveries The same King likewise had erected one Court of the generall Surveiours of his Lands and one other of the Augmentations and Revenues of his Crown and a third Court of the first fruits and Tithes of Benefices But all these were afterwards dissolved and by Queen Mary united to the Court of Exchequer Thus having run along these Courts deriving them from the Crown I might proceed yet further to shew the originall and beginnings of some Courts erected by the late Parliament and the nature and beginning of the High Court of Justice that was erected in Westminster Hall Anno 1648. but they being so fresh in the memory of this age I shall not need to make mention thereof FINIS
Assent of the King and of the Lords spirituall and Temporall and of the Commons it is enacted or thus It is enacted by the authority of this present Parliament It is also all one in effect and substance for the words assenteth and enacteth are equivalent in this case 7. H. 7.14 2 H. 7. ●7 as it is holden 7. H. 7.14 2. H. 7.27 whereas otherwise the necessitie of the Assent of all the 3. estates of Parliament is such as without any one of them the rest will lose their labour For it fell out upon a time that the King in Parliament willed that a certain man should be attainted and should lose his hands whereunto the Lords assented But because there was nothing spoken of the Commons it was adjudged by all the Iustices 4. H. 7.18 That this was no Acte that might binde 4. H. 7.18 and therefore the partie was restored Hitherto of the Continuance and Assent of this our first and highest Court This Court of Parliament maketh inlargeth diminisheth abrogateth repealeth and reviveth Lawes statutes c. concerning matters ecclesiasticall capitall criminall common civill martiall maritine c. Cook 1 Inst fol. 110. sect 164. see 4. Inst chap. Parlia ment whereunto after that I shall have added a word or two of the jurisdiction thereof I will proceed to the rest if all judgements as Cicero said be conversant either in the punishment of offences or in the decision of controversies then is the Judgment of our Parliament of as ample authority as the assent of any or all other Courts whatsoever for it declareth the lawes that do bind all persons in all Causes aswell ecclesiasticall as temporall whereof you may see a great many examples in the volume of the old saxon Parliaments how strange a thing so ever the popish Clergie in former times have thought it to be it hath jurisdiction also in such causes which have need of help and for which there is no help by any law already in force And whereon the erronious Judgments of any other Courts must be reversed by a higher authority this Court doth not only reverse the errors of the upper Bench formerly called the Kings Bench which is superior to all other but it may also amend the errors committed by the Parliament it self if any such shall at any time appeare Ecclesiasticall Courts were many in number diverse in nature whereof the Chiefe was the Convocation of the Clergie of the whole nation of England and Wales which was assembled together with the estates of Parliament and it consisted of the Deanes Chapters Archdeacons Procurators of all the Cathedrall Churches the next were the 2. provinciall Synods of Canterbury and of Yorke to the later of the which there were only three Bishopricks subject that is to say Durham Carlisle and Chester and all the rest owed their obedience to the See of Canterbury After those were the generall Courts of the Arch-Bishops of Canterbury that is to say the Consistory or Court of the Arches for Appellations the Court of Audience of the Chancellours Court which was wont to be in the Arch-Bishops house The Commissaries or the Praerogative Court which is now in being for probate of Testaments and the Court of Faculties for dispensations then followed the speciall Courts of this Arch-Bishop namely his Consistory holden by his Commissary at Canterbury for his diocaesse and lastly the Court of those peculiar Deanaries which did belong unto him and do ly in the diocaesses of other Bishopps The other Arch-Bishops and each other Bishop had in his owne Diocesse the Court of his Chancellour and the Court of his Archdeacon or his Officiall But forasmuch as the description of these ecclesiasticall Courts perteineth to another learning I meane to the Civill and Canon Laws by which they were governed and do withall require a double treatise by themselves I will content my self with this bare enumeration of them at this time and bend my labour to the discovery of the Lay or temporall Courts that now have place amongst us Lay Courts were of two sorts The sorts of Lay Courts in antient time at the first only base and high concerning the beginning whereof I read that even as Moses the speciall minister of Justice appointed by God finding himself unable to sustain the burden of deciding all the Controversies of the people Deut. 1. Exod. 18. did set Judges over Tribes Hundreds Fifties and Tenths of the multitude to whom he referred the determination of smaller causes reserving to himself the knowledge of matters that were of greater importance so also that Saxon but Christian King of England Alfred divided his whole Realm of England first into Shires Division of the Realm for juris diction then those shires into Rathes Rapes or Rideings and these again into Wapentakes or Hundreds and lastly those also into Leets Barons or Tything and did withall establish jurisdiction in every of these permitting to the Reeves or Judges of the lower roomes authority of hearing smaller suites granting greater power to the Shiriffs and Aldermen which have charge of greater Assemblyes and detaining to himself the decision of such matters as by just cause of appellation either for Law or equity should be brought unto him This Court of the whole Shire was of two sorts whereof the one then called Scyre-Gemote that is the Assembly of the Shire and now termed the Sheriffs turn was then as now also holden twice in one year And this Court was of like jurisdiction to the Court of the Leet or of the Boroughs or Tything as it was then called The second and the Hundred Court then named Hundre des-Gemote was in those appointed to be holden once in a month at the least and that was of like nature to the County Court which is now kept every month also unto the Court Baron antiently called healgemote and corruptly halymote that is as I said the Court of a Hall or chief place which is now at this day to be kept and maintained once in three weeks if the Lord will so have it I read further more in the Laws of the Saxon King Edgar thus ne Gesece nan man Sone Synz c. Let no man seek to the King in matter of variance unless he cannot find right at home but if that right be too heavy for him then let him seek to the King to have it lightned The very like whereof is to be seen in effect in the Laws of Canutus the Dane sometimes King of this Nation also The hygh Court of justice before the Conquest for Laws and equity Out of which laws I gather four things First that every man had means to use in these base Courts at home in the Countrey for the recovery of his right Secondly Then that no man ought to use it out of the County or to draw his plea from thence without good cause both which things lye plainly in the letter of this Law Thirdly that