before been made Commander of the Fleets And hee was the first for ought wee know that was created in this manner But in the next Form of Commission the name of Picardie was left out So indeed in the fourth year of Henrie the Sixth or Anno Dom. MCDXXVI John Duke of Bedford was by Commission made Admiral of England Ireland and Aquitain That Form continued about 88. years or throughout the Reigns of Henrie VI Edward IV Richard III Henrie VII and the three first years of Henrie VIII And about that time ten others were in like manner made Admirals for the most part perpetual of England Ireland and Aquitain the last of which was John Earl of Oxon who was Commissionated in that Form in the first year of Henrie the Eight But there followed another alteration or addition of Titles in the fourth year of that King Anno Dom. MDXIII At that time Sir Edward Howard Knight son of Thomas Earl of Suâ—â—ie afterwards Duke of Norfolk was made Admiral of England Wales Ireland Normandie Gascoign and Aquaitain To which words Calais and the Marches thereof are added in the Commission of William Fitzwilliams who also was Earl of Southampton beeing appointed Admiral in the twentie eight year of King Henrie the Eight This Form of Commissions held in use afterward through the whole Reign of that Henry adding according to antient Custom the clauses touching Jurisdiction But in the beginning of Edward the Sixt Thomas Baron Seymour of Sudeley brother to Edward Duke of Somerset was made Admiral almost in the same words as that William Earl of Southampton inserting after the name of Calais Boloign and the Marches of the same After him followed John Earl of Warwick who was created by Edward the Sixt in the third year of his Reign our Admiral of England Ireland Wales Calais and Boloign and our Marches of the same of Normandie Gascoign and Aquitain as also Governor general over all our Fleets and Seas And in the same Commission hee is styled afterwards Great Admiral of England and Governor of our Fleets and Seas But after a while the name of Boloign being omitted the next high Admiral of England was created in the very same Form of words as is mentioned before in the beginning of the Chapter For in the same Form was William Baron Howard of Effingham Son of Thomas Duke of Norfolk made Admiral in the beginning of Queen Marie or Anno Dom. MDLIII And the Command or Government of those Seas as the principal charge of that Office or Dignitie is more notably expressed there as you may see than in the Commission of the Earl of Warwick From that time forwards the very same Form was kept alwaies as in the Commission of the high Admiralship granted to Edward Baron Clinton afterwards Earl of Lincoln in the Reign of Philip and Marie also in the Commission of Charls Baron of Effingham afterwards Earl of Nottingham in the time of Q. Elizabeth and of Charls Duke of York in the time of King James besides George Duke of Buckingham who enjoied the same Office or Command in the same words in the Reigns of James and Charls So that for above eightie years or thereabout that is from the beginning of Q. Marie the whole form as it is set down in the beginning of this Chapter was ever expressly reteined in the Commissions of the high Admiralship of England so far as they denote either the Countries or the Seas or the Dominion of the same But therein the Admiral is styled Governor General over all our Fleets and Seas just as John Earl of Warwick was likewise expressly appointed in general tearms under Edward the sixt or over our Seas aforesaid But what were those Seas or the Seas aforesaid They are in the fore-going words expressly called the Seas of our said Kingdoms of England and Ireland our Dominions and Islands of the same That is in plain tearms Mer d' Engleterre d' Ireland Gales or the Sea of England Ireland and Wales after which manner the Seas belonging to the Dominion of England are sometimes also described in our Laws which are called likewise now and then by our Lawyers Les quatre Miers d'Engleterre or the four Seas of England divided according to the four Quarters of the World So that in the most received form of this Commission after the beginning of Queen Marie's Reign out of which also the sens and meaning of former Commissions is to bee collected wee have a continual possession or Dominion of the King of England by Sea pointed out in express words for very many years And what wee have alreadie spoken by way of Collection out of these that followed the beginning of Marie touching the sens or meaning of former Commissions wherein a positive Command of the Sea is not expressed is truly to omit the thing it self which sufficiently intimate's as much of its own nature not a little confirmed upon this ground that hee also who before any express mention of our Seas took place in the form of the Commission of the high Admiralship was next preferr'd to the same dignitie was immediately after his Creâtion according to the whole Title of his Office as beeing the same title which indeed alwaies belonged to the Admirals of England styled Great Admiral of England and Governor General of the Navie and our Seas So verily Thomas Baron Seymour whom I mentioned before is styled Admiral of England in the Patent Roll granted to him by Edward the sixt It is proved by words plain enough in the form of the Commissions for the Government or command of the high Admiral of England from antient to the present time that the Sea for whose guard or defence hee was appointed by the King of England as Lord and Soveraign was ever bounded towards the South by the shore of Aquitain Normandie and Picardie CHAP. XVII BUT in the Form alreadie shewn which hath continued in use for so many years you see mention is made onely of the Seas of our Kingdoms of England and Ireland our Dominions and Islands belonging to the same as the Province for whose guard or defence the Admiral was appointed that is as wee have told you the English Irish and Welch Sea all which is conteined under the name of the British as it hath been observéd at the beginning of this Book Yet the names of Normandie Gascoign and Aquitain besides Calais are added which are Provinces seated upon the shore over against us As to what concern's them in this place they are either to bee considered in the same manner as if they had been alwaies held in subjection by the English from the time of the first mention of them in the Commission or as they have alreadie for som Ages past been out of their Jurisdiction But suppose in the first place that they had alwaies remained in the Jurisdiction and Possession of the English Questionless
our Isles of Gernesey Jersey Serk and Aureney in the Sea between Easter and Michaelmas is according to the Custom of those places acknowledged to belong unto Us at a reasonable rate to bee paid therefore and that the said Fishermen are bound to carrie all the Fish by them taken between the Times aforesaid unto certain places in those Isles appointed that the Officers under our Governor of the aforesaid Isles may take thence for our use at what price they shall think fit and reasonable Nor is that to bee slighted which wee finde in the Chronicles of the Abbie or Monasterie of Teuxburie concerning Henrie Beauchamp Duke of Warwick who was invested by Henrie the sixt with the Title and Dignitie of King not onely of the Isle of Wight but also of Gernesey and Jersey whereunto the other Isles in this Tract do in a civil sens belong The same thing is recorded of the Isle of Wight by that Learned man William Camden and that out of the same Book The Book it self speak's after this manner But the noble Lord Henrie Duke of Warwick and first Earl of England Lord Le Dispenser and de Abergeveney King of the Isles of Wight and Gardsey and Jardsey Lord also of the Castle of Bristol with the appurtenances thereunto belonging died 3 Idus Junii Anno Dom. 1446. in the twentie second year of his Age at the Castle of Hanley and was buried in the middle of the Quire at Teuxburie And a little before it is said of the same man that hee was Crowned King of Wight by the King 's own hand no express mention beeing made in that place of the other islands but they reckoned in the same condition with this as they were part of the patrimonie of the Kings of England But it is not to bee believed that those Isles which lie before the shore of Normandie had been so turned into a Kingdom though subject to the Crown of England unless even they also who made them a Kingdom had conceived that they possessed them before by a Title superior to that of the Dutchie that is to say by a Kingly Title As King Richard the second when hee had determined that Robert Earl of Oxford who also was Marquiss of Dublin and Duke of Ireland should bee creâted King of Ireland questionless did not doubt but that hee himself in the mean time possessed that Island by no less a Title and Dignitie than of King although the name of Lord was wholly used there at that time in stead of King as also until the latter end of the Reign of Henrie the eight So it is conceived upon good ground that those Isles and the Sea lying about them did though they used different Customs constitute one entire Bodie of Empire with the Kingdom of England Whereunto also that special privilege of theirs doth relate whereby through the favor of the Kings of England they enjoie the benefit of freedom from hostilitie by Sea though there bee a Warr on foot between the Neighbor-Nations round about but of this more hereafter And in their Court-Records which contain the Acts or Decrees of the aforesaid Justices Itinerant wee very often finde Pleas of the Crown which phrase is an Evidence of the English Government Also in their Trials those Forms In contempt of our Lord the King his Crown and Dignitie and Our Lord the King was seised of the aforescid Advousen in time of Peace as of his Fee and in Right of his Crown and others not a few of that kinde wee meet with which savor not of any Right of the Dutchie Add moreover that the King of England so held the Right heretofore not onely of the Isles over against the shore of Normandie but of those also which are opposite to Aquitain as a pledg or concomitant of his possession of that Sea so far as it belong'd to the patrimonie of the Kingdom of England that though our Henrie the third renounced his claim to no small part of Aquitain yet that Isle lying before it called Oleron no less famous in the West for Naval Laws than Rhodes was of old hee granted to his eldest son Edward to bee held in time to com as a perpetual Appendant of the English Crown For this Claus was added to the Grant so that the said Isle may alwaies remain to the Crown of England and never bee alienated from the same Also in his Letters granted to the Inhabitants of Oleron hee saith Wee will not in any wise sever you from the Crown of England Som years before also hee in like manner made a Grant of Gascoign or those parts which lie upon the shore of Aquitain near the Sea to Prince Edward upon condition it should remain entirely and for ever to the Crown of England So without doubt his intent was that both the Sea-Coasts and this Isle should in a special manner bee possest by the said Prince but by no means bee disjoined from the English Empire any more than the Sea its self which washt their shores And although after a while both this and som other neighboring Isles did many Ages since for divers reasons follow the fate of those French shores which lie next to them yet in the mean time the Dominion of the Sea remained entire as it did before to the Kings of England as it sufficiently appear's by those other passages which wee have shewn The Dominion and possession of the Sea asserted on the behalf of the Kings of England from that leav of praeter-Navigation or passage which hath been usually either granted by them to Foreiners or desired from them CHAP. XX. THose things which wee have hitherto alleged concerning this possession and dominion are confirmed by several Passports that have been obteined from the Kings of England for leav to pass through this Sea whereof wee have clear Testimonies in Records that is to say granted at the intreatie of Foreiners Our Henrie the fourth granted leav to Ferrando Urtis de Sarachione a Spaniard to fail freely from the Port of London through our Kingdoms Dominions and Jurisdiction to the Town of Rochel It is manifest that in this place our Dominions and Jurisdiction do relate to the Sea flowing between And when Charls the sixt King of France sent Ambassadors to Robert the third King of Scots to treat about the making of a League they upon request made to the same Henrie obteined Passports for their safe passage par touz noz povoirs destrois Seigniories par Mer par Terre that is through all places under our Power Territories and Dominions as well by Sea as by Land There are innumerable other Letters of Passport called safe Conducts in the Records especially of Henrie the fift and sixt whereby safe Port and Passage was usually granted as well by Sea as by Land and Rivers that is to say throughout the whole Dominion of him that made the Grant And it is
were newly designed to cross over into Bretaign that they might bee arm'd and set forth in the King's service The Title of this Commission is De Navibus arrestandis capiendis For arresting and seizing of ships The Form of it run's thus The KING to his beloved Thomas de Wenlok his Serjeâ—nt at Arms Lieutenant of our beloved and trustie Reginald de Cobham Admiral of our Fleet of ships from the mouth of the River Thames towards the Western parts greeting Bee it known unto you that wee have appointed you with all the speed that may bee used by you and such as shall bee deputed by you to arrest and seiz all ships Flie-Boats Barks and Barges of ten Tuns burthen and upward which may happen to bee found in the aforesaid Admiraltie that is in the Sea reaching from the Thames mouth toward the South and West and to caus the Flie-Boats Barks and Barges aforesaid to bee well and sufficiently arm'd and provided for the warr by the Masters and owners of the same and to bring them speedily so provided and arm'd to Sandwich except onely the ships that are order'd for the passage of our beloved and trustie Thomas de Dagworth and his men that are bound for Bretaign so that you bee readie there in your own person together with the Ships Flie-Boats Barks and Barges aforesaid so well provided and fitted for the warr upon the Saturday next before the Feast of the Apostles Simon and Jude next ensuing at the farthest to go thence upon our Command according to such direction as shall then on our part bee given to the Masters and Mariners of the aforesaid Ships Flie-Boats Barks and Barges and to take sufficient Provision for the enabling of you to do the premises in such places as you shall see most convenient except onely Church-Land you making due paiment for the same and also to seiz and arrest all those that you shall finde to oppose or resist you in the execution of the premises and them to commit into our Prisons there to abide till wee shall think fit to take farther order c. All Officers also in the said Admiraltie are commanded to yield obedience and assistance upon the same occasion The usual subscription in that Age shewing the Original Autoritie of the Commission was By the King himself and his Council But that the aforesaid Sea it self was conterned under the name of the Admiraltie is clearly manifest by what wee have alreadie shewn you And King Edward the third used his antient Right as other Kings of England did also therein as well as in the Ports themselvs or Shores of England for there are innumerable examples of the staying of all Ships whatsoêver by the King's Command in Port or Shore But that which hath been alleged about the staying of Ships and Listing them for the King's Service you are alwaies to understand it was so don according to equitie that competent Pay was to bee allowed them answerable to the proportion of Tuns and also to the number of Sea-men that were so taken into emploiment Touching which particular there are several Testimonies also to bee found in the Records of Parlament That Licence hath been usually granted to Foreiners by the Kings of England to fish in the Sea Also that the Protection given to Fisher-men by them as in their own Territorie is an antient and manifest Evidence of their Dominion by Sea CHAP. XXI AS a freedom of passage so also wee finde that a libertie of Fishing hath been obteined by Petition from the Kings of England There is a clear Testimonie hereof in that which was alleged before out of the Records of Parlament concerning those Tributes or Customs that were imposed in the time of Richard the Second upon all persons whatsoëver that used Fishing in the Sea Moreover it appear's by Records that Henrie the Sixt gave leav particularly to the French and very many other Foreiners for one whole year onely somtimes for six Months c. to go and fish throughout the Sea at all times and as often c. But this leav was granted under the name even of a Passport or safe conduct yea and a size or proportion was prescribed to their Fishing-boats or Busses that they should not bee above XXX Tuns And it is true indeed there was a kinde of consideration or condition added that som others who were subjects of the King of England might in Fishing enjoy the same securitie with Foreiners Which was for this caus onely put into the Licence that if the Foreiners did disturb or molest them they should lose the benefit of their Licence The words of that consideration or condition in the beginning of those Licences run after this manner To the end that the business of the Herring-fishing and of other Fish may bee advanced continued and mainteined for the publick good yea and that the like securitie may bee yielded and afforded to som certain Fisher-men under our obedience I suppose that those certain Fisher men under our Obedience were also the French who at that time continued in subjection to the English whereas almost all in France except the Shore of Picardie had newly revolted from the King of England That is to say at the latter end of the reign of Henrie the Sixt. But that which wee finde either here touching equal securitie or in other places somtimes also about the giving of safe conduct even to the Fishermen of England by Licence granted either to French or Flemings or Bretaigns that usually hapned when the heat of War was over a Cessation agreed on to treat of Peace or Amitie In the mean time securitie of that kinde was given on both sides now and then by agreement But by the King of England as well in respect of his beeing Lord of the place as his beeing a partie that was treating about a League or Amitie By others upon this account onely not upon that unless you understand the question to bee about the use of Ports and Shores For so no man denie's but these were Lords as well as hee Moreover also in our time leav was wont to bee asked of our Admiral for French-men to fish for Soles in the neighboring Sea for King Henrie the Fourth of France his own Table as it is affirm'd by such as have been Judges of our Admiraltie and Commanders at Sea of an antient standing yea and that the Ships of those French were seized as trespassers upon the Sea who presumed to fish there without this kinde of Licence But in the Eastern Sea which washeth the Coasts of Yorkshire and the neighboring Counties it hath been an antient Custom for the Hollanders and Zelanders to obtein leav to fish by Petition to the Governor of Scarbâ—rough Castle situate by the Sea-side in the Countie of York and this for very many years past as is affirmâ—d by that learned man M r Camden speaking of those Coasts It is worth the while saith hee to note
to the Royal Patrimonie of England to the end that no man might question whether the Sea belong'd to his King by the Right of the Kingdom of England or of the Dutchie of Normandie or of any other Province in France Another also who wrote in the time of Henrie the Eighth saith it hath been received by antient custom that it is a dutie lying upon the King of England as Lord of the British Sea to scour the Sea of Pirates and to render the use thereof as of a publick Road or Thorow-fare whose soil is within his Patrimonie safe for Shipping For hee expresseth himself in English thus The King of the ould Custome of the Realme as the Lord of the narrow Sea is bound as it is said to scoure the Sea of the Pirates and petit robbers of the Sea So much also as to what concern's Dominion is without controversie admitted by our Lawyers of later time And it appear's by publick Records conteining divers main points touching which the Judges were to bee consulted for the good of the Common-weal in the time of King Edward the Third that the King's Sea-Dominion which they called the antient superioritie of the Sea was a matter out of question among our Lawyers of that Age. But consultation was had for the more convenient guarding of it For the whole Bench of Judges were advised with to the end so wee read it in the Records and that is especially to bee observed which wee finde here about the first beginning of the Naval Laws of the Isle of Oleron seated in the Creek of Aquitain at the mouth of the River Charente that the form of proceeding heretofore ordained and begun by Edward the first grandfather of our Lord the King and his Council at the prosecution of his Subjects may bee resumed and continued for the reteining and conserving of the antient superioritie of the Sea of England and the Autoritie of the Office of Admiraltie in the same as to the correcting expounding declaring and conserving the Laws and Statutes long since made by his Predecessors Kings of England for the mainteining of Peace and Justice among all people of what Nation soëver passing through the Sea of England and to take cognisance of all attempt to the contrarie in the same and to punish Offenders and award satisfaction to such as suffer wrong and damage Which Laws and Statutes were by the Lord Richard heretofore King of England at his return from the holy Land interpreted declared and published in the Isle of Oleron and named in French le ley Olyroun Here you have it declared as a thing most received and certain that the King of England hath by antient right been Lord of the Sea of the same name or that which flow's about it But that whereof the Bench of Judges were to consult was onely about the orderly maintenance of this right Nor is it truly a small sign of this Dominion that Richard the First King of England beeing in the Isle of Oleron which hee possessed as seated in his own Sea not so much for that hee was Duke of Aquitain as King of England whereof wee have alreadie spoken did as sole Ruler and Moderator of Sea-affairs first publish those Naval or Sea-Laws in that his Island which hold in force to this day and from that time gave them so large and perpetual an Autoritie by that name that as the Rhodian Naval Laws as the case stand's do prove that the Rhodians in antient time were Lords of the Grecian Sea so the Laws of Oleron having obteined such a kinde of Autoritie by Sea from their first Institution must ever declare the King of England as the Autor to bee Lord of the neighboring Sea round about But som printed Copies of these Laws make them about sixtie years later than the Reign of that Richard by what autoritie I cannot tell For they relate them to have been made in the year MCCLXVI which is the fiftieth year of our Henrie the third Also in the Law of the Land it is reckoned among the Privileges of such as are absent that they who shall bee out of the Realm of England at the levying of a Fine of any Land and making Proclamations thereupon are not so bound either by a yearly prescription as heretofore or by a five years prescription as is usual of later time but that their Right remain's entire to them upon their return home if they make their claim within the like spaces of time But intra regnum within the Kingdom is by the same Law taken and that in the usual phrase for that which is intra or as it is wont to bee barbarously render'd infra Quatuor Maria within the four Seas to wit the Southern Western Eastern and that Northen Sea which washeth both the sides of that neck of Land whereby Scotland is united to England That is to say within the outmost bounds of the English Empire in those four Seas or within the opposite Shores of the Eastern and Southern Sea or Ports belonging to other Princes and within the bounds of the Northern and Western Sea which indeed are to bee bounded after another manner but yet to bee bounded that is accordirng to the extent of possession West-ward beyond the Western Shores of Ireland and by the first beginning of that Sea which is of the Scotish name and jurisdiction But that which is opposed to this Particle intra quatuor maria within the four seas is that extra quatuor Maria without the four seas or to bee in the parts so beyond the Seas that they bee beyond the bounds of the Sea-Dominion of the King of England from whence wee are to determine of the bounds or exterior limit of the Seas And although the Land of England bee somtimes used for that which is the whole Realm or English Empire as signifying the same a more ordinarie and indeed more brief expression beeing applied as is usual in stead of a more large yet it certainly appear's that extra quatuor maria without the four seas and extra Regnum without the Realm do in our Law-Books signifie the very same thing that is to say so far as the extent and latitude of the whole English Empire is comprehended in the name of Realm not as the Realm of England is now and then distinguished in our Law from Ireland which also is a distinct Dominion of the same Empire or from the other Islands which are reckoned in the Roial patrimonie of the Kings of England For it is usual in the Language of the Law so to describe him who in that sens shall bee out of the Realm And whereas in the Reign of Richard the second to an objection made against one that would avoid the yearly prescription as not bound by it for that hee was not in England it was excepted that hee was in Scotland and so within the four Seas It was thereupon answer'd and rul'd
Kingdom the ground whereof is this becaus the Universal right of all those things which were common either by the Law of nature or Nations is transferred into his Dominion And other passages hee hath much to the same purpose as also Stephanus Paschasius Ludovicus Servinus somtime Sollicitor general for the King Popellinerius and others If they speak of the Sea of Maâ—seille or Narbon wee shall not oppose them But as to what concern's the bodie of the Sea which lie's Northward or Westward of the French or that flow's between France and the Islands of great Britain for that which lie's Westward from them upon that crooked Shore or the gulf of Aquitaine doth indeed flow between the more Westerly Coasts of our British Isles and of France as well as that which lie's Northward from them flow's between England and Normandie they neither produce any Testimonies of Antiquitie nor indeed can they if they would Unless you will have that admitted which hath been cited out of Caesar concerning the Veneti of Aremoriça and that which wee said before of the Sea bordering upon that shore Both which indeed do rather import som service called heretofore Nobilitates super navibus then any kinde of Dominion But the soveraigntie of this Sea which flow's between them and us became absolutely appropriate to the Kings of England as wee shall make it appear in the next Book And the truth is if wee look upon the Customs most in use among the French or the Civil Law of that Nation there is nothing in it that derogate's from the antient communitie of the Sea but as to them it remaine's as yet not possessed but common to all men and therefore not to bee reckoned among the Revenues or Patrimonie of their Kings if so bee credit may bee given to that Treatise lately published of the Civil Romane and French Law by Thomas Cormerius Counsellor to Francis Duke of Anjou in his Parlament of Alençon The matter that it pretend's to treat of is the Romane Gallick Law There are in it the Customs of France decrees of Princes and Privileges often â—ntermingled But under the Title of things common â—o all hee make's the Sea and Shores common to all according to the antient Law of the Romanes as if in this matter it did exactly agree with the Law of France which certainly is an argument that the French have no Dominion over the Sea Nor must wee let it pass that somwhile since there were two Constitutions pretended to in France one of Henrie the Second the other of Henrie the Third wherein they required that the Ships of Forraigners which sailed through the Sea bordering upon France should strike their top-sail forsooth in acknowledgment of that Dominion the French had over the Sea But neither of them were autorized or as they speak simply verified by the Estates in Parlament yea nor so much as admitted into Custom Nay the later of them was plainly rejected as to any effect in Law And this the French Lawyers themselvs confess in a notable case between som Merchants of Hamburgh that were Plaintiffs and Michaël Butardus and others Defendants in a Parlament held at Tours in the time of Henry the Fourth But that cerimonie hath by most ancient right and custom been observed and paid to the ships of the Kings of England out of respect and in acknowledgement of their Dominion as is shewn in the following Book where wee treat of this particular more at large I know very well it was ordained by an Edict of the French King that one third part of all goods recovered out of the Sea should belong to the King another to the Admiral and the remainder to the Sea-men that found them And that the French do reckon very many Commanders in Chief at Sea or Admirals in a line somtime continued and somtime interrupted which for the most part they begin from the time of Philip the son of St. Lewis that is from the year MCCLXXXIV as is to be seen in Joannes Feronius Stephanus Paschasius and others But that division of goods recovered out of the Sea beeing simply considered doth prove any Dominion over the Sea no more then the Tenths of any Prizes taken from an Enemie at Sea which by the grant of the King also were allotted to the Admiral of the Navie Rights of this nature are grounded upon the consent of persons to wit subjects transferr'd unto the King not upon any title of Dominion whereby any Pretence may bee made to an acquiring of the Sea it self and they are paid no otherwise then Imposts or Customs in the importation or exportation of Merchandise But no man I suppose will imagin that from such Imposts or Customs upon Merchandise any proof may bee made of a Dominion over those passages through which the Merchants sail before they arrive Neither indeed was there any such custom as this in use among the French before the time of Francis the first that is to say plainly not beeing Lord of the Sea hee desired to bee and was made a Sharer of those goods which should bee drawn by his subjects out of any Sea whatsoëver Whereas the King of Great Britain by virtue of his Dominion over the Sea is wont to take as his own whatsoëver is left or lost in the sea besides other emoluments of the like nature and that by so ancient a right as for ought wee know bear 's a date no less ancient then the Kingdom it self And as for those Admirals of France they were no other then Chief Commanders of Navies and Persons and of the Forces by sea and Judicatories at home but not qualified as Presidents of a Sea-Province or Territorie as the Custodes ipsius Maris the Guardians of the sea among the English and the Admirals of England But more of this in the Second Book Nevertheless from what hath been alleged concerning the Customs Opinions or Constitutions among the French I suppose it sufficiently appear's that they do also acknowledg that private Dominion over the sea is not repugnant to the Law either of Nature or Nations which serve 's fully for the clearing of the point in question The private Dominion of the Sea according to the received Customs of the Danes the People of Norway the Swedes Polanders and Turks CHAP. XIX WEE finde clear Testimonies in the Customs of other Nations also of Europe touching private Dominion of the sea as the Danes the people of Norway the Polanders to whom may bee added also the Turks Wee have observed by the Tolls or Customs of Denmark and Norway what Revenue the King of Denmark raiseth out of the very Navigation of the Baltick Sea as is commonly known and what is paid out of the Roialtie of the Norwegian sea to the King of Norway who at this time is also King of Denmark For in the year MDLXXXIII Frederick the second King of Denmark and Norway made a
defence of his Kingdom against Foreiners and the training up of himself and his people for warlike emploiments Thus the Guardianship or maintenance of the Dominion by Sea is evident But as concerning the Fleets aforementioned they each of them consisted of MCC ships and these as Writers say expressly very stout ones so that in the time of his Reign the British Navie consisted of such ships to the number of Three thousand six hundred Sail as Florentius and Hoveden speak expressly But others write that these Fleets amounted to Four thousand ships as John Bramton Abbot of Jorvaux others adding to these Three a Fourth Fleet whereby the number is increased to Four Thousand Eight hundred Sail as you may see in Florilegus So as Florentius also saith Hee by the help of God governed and secured the bounds of his Kingdom with Prudence Fortitude Justice and Temperance as long as hee lived and having the courage of a fierce Lion hee kept all the Princes and Lords of the Isles in aw Wee read also in Ordericus Vitalis of King Harold or Herald that hee so guarded the Sea with a force of soldierie and shipping that none of his Enemies could without a sore conflict invade the Kingdom So that wee cannot otherwise conceiv but that these Naval Forces were at that time disposed and the Sea-Fights undertaken for the defence and guard of the Sea as an Appendant of the English-Saxon Dominion in this Island Especially if wee duly compare these things alreadie manifest with those which are added by and by to this particular touching the same age The Sea-Dominion of the English-Saxons and Danes during their Reigns in Britain observed in like manner from such Tributes and Duties of their Fiduciarie Clients or Vassals as concerned the maintenance of the Navie Also concerning the Tribute or Paiment called Danegeld which was wont to bee levied for the Guard of the Sea CHAP. XI HEre follow next the Tributes and Duties of Vassals concerning the maintenance of the Navie or Guard of the Sea which are evidences also of that Sea-Dominion which was in the time of the English-Saxons I call those Tributes which were wont to bee levied for the re-inforcing of the Navie and for provision of Victuals for the Sea-men Of which kinde were those that were levied according to the value of men's estates in Land for the setting forth of ships in the time of King Ethelred For at that time whosoever possessed CCCX Cassatos or Hides of Land was charged with the building of one ship And they were all rated proportionably after this manner who were owners of more or less Hides or of part of an Hide as Marianus Scotus Hoveden and Florentius do all tell us in the very same words Ethelred King of England say they gave strict command that one Gallie should bee charged upon CCCX Cassati but a Coat of Armor and an Helmet upon nine and that ships should bee built throughout all England which beeing made readie hee victualled and manned them with choice souldiers and appointed their Rendezvous at the Port of Sandwich to secure the Bounds of his Kingdom from the irruptions of Foreiners But Henrie of Huntingdon as also Matthew Paris and Florilegus speaking of the same thing say The King charged one ship upon three hundred and ten Hides of Land through all England also a Coat-Armor and Helmet upon eight Hides Then Huntingdon tell 's what an Hide doth signifie But an Hide in English saith hee is so much Land as a man can till with one Plow for a year Others there are that determine otherwise touching the quantitie of an Hide And most certain it is that it was very various according to the different Custom of Countries but the same with Cassata and Carucata Indeed the English-Saxon Chronicles of the Abbie of Abingdon do likewise mention Hides here expressly In the year MVIII 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 say they 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hund 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Tynumaenne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 helm 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is to say the King gave command for the building of Ships carefully throughout all England to wit that one Gallie should bee charged upon CCCX Hides of Land but a Coat-Armor and Helmet upon eight Hides And it was usual according to the Laws of that Age that the richer sort should bee taxed by the number of Hides as wee see also throughout that Breviarie of England or the Book of Rates called Domesday which was first written in the time of King William Huntingdon add's also that there never had been so great a number of Ships in the time of any one in Britain which is testified in like manner by the Saxon Chronicles before cited So that that most numerous Navie of King Edgar mentioned in the former chapter was not to bee compared with this But yet that most learned man and great Light of our Island M r Camden hath so cast up the number of Hides throughout England out of the antient Records of that Age that they do not exceed 243600. If this had been so then they could have set forth no more then 785 Ships by this Tribute which is a lesser number then that of King Edgar by som thousands So that som other account is to bee made concerning Hides which is not to bee handled in this place Hereunto belong's that of Huntingdon touching King Canutus and his Son Harald In the daies of Harald saith hee as also in the time of his Father eight Marks were paid by everie Port for XVI Ships In the like manner Hoveden saith there was a Tax imposed which was paid for the maintenance of the Navie when King Canutus and King Edmond made an agreement in an Isle in the midst of Severn called Oleney Moreover Huntingdon write's that 11048 pounds were raised by Hardecanute King of England before hee had reigned two years for thirtie two Ships that is to say for the building of two and thirtie Ships Hee gave Command also as Matthew Westminster saith that eight marks should bee paid to everie Rower of his Navie and ten marks to each Commander out of all England Hee saith again also of the same King that hee appointed Officers through all parts of the Kingdom to collect the Tax imposed without favouring any and therewith to provide all things necessarie for his Forces at Sea And Florentius saith Hee gave command for the paying of eight marks to every Rower of his Navie and twelve so wee read it in that Autor to everie Commander out of all England a Tax indeed so grievous that scarce any man was able to pay it But these things spoken of Canutus his son Harald and Hardecanute relate perhaps unto that Tribute or Tax called Danegeld which was paid yearly for the maintenance of the Navie and guarding the Territorie or Dominion by
least allow such a Dominion VIII Som antient Testimonies of inferior note All the testimonies almost that are comprehended in this Division are indeed domestick but so publick and of so approved credit that hardly any thing can bee imagined which might give a clearer proof of possession whether Civil as they call it consisting in the act and intention of the minde or Natural which require's the presence of the Bodie As it will appear to any man that pleas to make enquirie Especially if hee add hereunto the judgment or acknowledgment of such Forein Nations whom it chiefly concerned whereof wee shall treat also by and by But of these things severally and in order That the Kings of England since the coming in of the Normans have perpetually enjoied the Dominion of the Sea flowing about them is in the first place proved from the Guard or Government thereof as of a Province or Territorie that is to say from the very Law of the English Admiraltie CHAP. XIV AS concerning the Guard or Government of this Sea there are three things therein that deserv special consideration 1. The bare mention and nature of the Guard of the Sea and of the Guardians or Admirals thereof in publick Records and Histories 2. The Tributes and Customs imposed demanded or accustomed to bee paid for and in consideration of the said custodie And lastly the tenor and varietie of Commissions belonging to this Guard and English Admiraltie or Government by Sea Since the coming in of the Normans there is frequent mention of a Guard or Government instituted for the defence and guarding of the Sea Here call to minde those observations touching this kinde of Guard which have been alreadie gathered out of that Record or Breviarie of England called Doomesday And King Henrie the first saith Florentius of Worcester gave order to his Butsecarli to guard the Sea and take care that no person from the parts of Normandie approach the English Coasts The same saith Roger Hoveden in the very same words almost save onely that the printed Copies err in putting Buzsecarlis for Butsecarlis These Butsecarli or Butescarles in the old English Language are Officers belonging to the Navie or Sea-souldiers as Hutesecarli were Domestick Servants or Officers in Court And that to guard the Sea here signified to secure the Sea it self not to defend the Sea-Coasts as somtimes though seldom it did with Land-forces plainly appear's out of Henrie of Huntingdon in whom it is clear that the persons who thus guarded the Sea were emploied by the King to make Warr by Sea against Robert Duke of Normandie who was then preparing an Expedition against England Now those publick Records are lost wherein the Roial Commissions for the delegation of this Command or Government were wont to bee registred all that space of time betwixt the coming in of the Normans and the Reign of K. John But from thence through all the succeeding ages unto this present time it is as clear as day that the Kings of England have been wont to constitute Governors or Commanders who had the charge of guarding the English Sea and were the Guardians or Governors thereof in the same manner as if it had been som Province upon Land First of all there were intrusted with the Government of the Sea or the Maritimae and Marinae the Maritime and Marine part of the Empire understanding by those words not onely som Countrie lying upon the Sea-Coasts but comprehending the British Sea it self though I confess it was not alwaies so such as were to guard and keep it under the title somtimes of Custodes Navium Guardians of the ships but more frequently Custodes Maritimae or Marinae in the sens aforesaid And in the time of Henrie the third Thomas de Moleton is styled Captain and Guardian of the Sea and hath autoritie given him to guard the Sea and the Maritim parts of the Eastern Shore In the same King's Reign also the Inhabitants of the Cinque-Ports are said to guard the Coast of England and the Sea So Hugh de Crequeur was Warden of the Cinque-ports and of the Sea in those parts Afterward the title of Guardians or Wardens very often changed into that of Admirals Edward the First saith Thomas of Walsingham for the keeping of the Sea divided his Shipping into three Fleets setting over them three Admirals namely over the Ships at Yarmouth and the road thereabout John de Botetort over those at Portsmouth William de Leyburn and over the Western and Irish Ships a certain Irish Knight Moreover also that John de Butetort is in the Records of that time styled custos Maritimae as were others also After this in the Reign of Edward the Second three Admirals of the three several Coasts of England saith Walsingham had the guarding of the Sea namely Sir John Oturvin Sir Nicolas Kyriel Sir John Felton Wee finde moreover in our publike Records that the principal end of calling a Parlament in the fourteenth year of Edward the Third was De Treter sur la gard de la pees de la terre de la Marche d'Escoce de la Meer i. e. That consultation might bee had concerning keeping the peace of the Land also of the Borders of Scotland and of the Sea The same regard they had to the defence of the Sea as of the Island or Land-Province giving us to understand that the Land and Sea together made one entire bodie of the Kingdom of England Other evidences of the same nature wee finde in the Records of Parlament of the same King's time or in the consultations of the estates of the Realm had about this matter that whilst they Treat indifferently De la saufegard de la terre concerning the safeguard or defence of the Land or Island and de la saufeguard de la Mere the safeguard of the Sea they seem sufficiently to declare beeing well inform'd by their Ancestors that the Dominion of this as well as of that did belong unto the Crown of England For the business debated by them was not onely how to provide a Navie to make resistance against their Enemies by Sea but for the guarding the Sea it self as well as the securing of the Isle and so for the maintaining the antient right of their King in both In the time of Richard the Second Hugh Calverlee was made Admiral of the Sea saith Walsingham and M r Thomas Percie joined in Commission with him to scour the Roades of the Sea for one year And in the Reign of the same King and likewise of the two succeeding Henries the Fourth and the Fifth debate was had in Parlament about the Guard of the Sea In the Reign of Henrie the Sixth the Guard of the Sea was with a numerous Navie Committed to Richard Earl of Salisburie John Earl of Shrewsburie John Earl of Worcester and James Earl of Wilts to whom was added Baron Sturton and afterward to John Duke
charge Which indeed is a thing wee hear not of in later times but that so it was in the Reigns of King Henrie the third and Edward the first the Records of those times do testifie But afterwards the Universal Custodie of the Sea excepting onely what was extraordinarie was committed by our Kings to the high Admirals of England and to them alone or their Deputies and apperteineth unto them now by an unquestionable right But when any person is intrusted with that Guardianship or Custodie the possession and dominion of the King who intrust's or give 's him the Autoritie is comprehended in that Government or Command which also is confirmed by words most express and home to the business in hand that are to bee seen in a Libel or Bill of Complaint hereafter mentioned which was exhibited by a great number of the neighbor-Nations to the Commissioners of our Edward the first and Philip the fair King of France The Dominion of the English Sea asserted from those Tributes or Customs that were wont to bee imposed paid and demanded for the Guard or Protection thereof after the Norman Conquest CHAP. XV. COncerning the Tributes or Customs that were wont to bee imposed paid and demanded for the Guard of the English Sea there are very ample antient Testimonies all along since the Reign of the Normans And those things which have been alreadie mentioned touching the Guard of the Sea do not a little confirm it It is manifest that the Tribute imposed in the time of the English-Saxons for the Guard of the Sea which was called Danegeld of whose Original and use wee have alreadie spoken was wont now and then to bee paid heretofore under the Norman Kings After the words there cited out of the antient Dialogue touching the Exchequer about the paiment thereof before the Norman Conquest it immediately follow 's thus in the same Dialogue In his Reign that is to say the â—â—igâ— of William the first the Danes as well as other Robbert of Land and Sea restrained the Invasions of Enemies knowing this to bee true which is written When a strong man armed keep 's his hous hee possesseth his goods in peace For they were not ignorant that resolute and valiaâ—â— men would not let injuries pass unrevenged Therefore whereas the Laâ—d had paid it along time in the same King's Reign they were unwilling to pay that every year which had been exacted upon urgent necessitie in time of warr But yet they would not have it wholly cashiered becaus of sudden occasions Therefore it was seldom paid in his Reign or the Reign of his Successors that is onely then when they either had or suspected a warr with Foreiners And among the old Laws of England wee finde that William Rufus requiring aid of the Barons for the regaining of Normandie out of the hands of his brother Robert sirnamed Cortehole who was upon a Voiage to the Holy Land Danegeld was granted to him not established nor confirmed by a Law that is to say four shillings upon every Hide of Land which were paid for defending the Dominion by Sea For that was the intent and end of Danegeld according to its nature and original Moreover Roger Hoveden saith expresly that it was usually paid until the time of King Stephen Hee speaking of the promisses which hee made at the time of his Coronation saith Thirdly hee promissed that hee would remit Danegeld for ever that is two shillings upon an Hide which his Predecessors were went to take every year The same also is affirmed by Matthew Paris and Roger of Wendover out of whom the Chronicles set forth by Matthew until the nineteenth year of Henry the third or the year of our Lord MCCXXXV were wholly taken They say of King Stephen Tertiò vovit quòd Danegeld id est qualibet ydâ terrae duos solidos quos Antecessores ejus consueverant accipere in aeternum annis singulis condonaret So indeed wee read it in the Manuscript Books of this Matthew whereby the Printed ones are to bee amended who render it onely thus Tertiò vovit quòd Antecessores ejus accipere consueverant in aeternum annis singulis condonaret But this also is added by Hoveden These especially and divers other things hee promissed before God but kept none of them as wee are told likewise by Paris and Wendover So that this Tribute was wont to bee paid in the Reigns of William the first and the second Henrie the first and King Stephen also for the guard of the Sea And it appear's by the accompâ—s of the Exchequer that it was paid somtimes in the time of Henrie the second And after that it grew out of date another cours was wont to bee taken very frequently and used as the Custom of the Land that Pay and Provisions might not bee wholly wanting to maintain the Dominion of the Kingdom of England by Sea Mention is made touching this particular in the Court-Rolls of Edward the first Terrarum ad Custodiâ—â— Maris agistatarum that is of such Lands as were charged with a Paiment or Tribute for the guard of the Sea Wee know indeed also that it was in the same manner collected at that time under pretence of the Sea for the pay and maintenance of Land-Forces neer the Shore But certain it is that the Sea it self was guarded then with Naval-Forces as well as the Shore by Land-Forces and so that that Paiment belong'd either to the Sea it self or els to the Shore as well as the Sea Moreover Subsidies have been demanded of the people in Parlament Pour la salvation du Royalme de euâ— Mesines auxint de la Meer de la March dâ— Escoce de Gascoign des Isles that is for defence of the Kingdom the Sea belonging thereunto the Scotish Border Gasooign and the Isles Thus the Sea and its defence and Dominion is reckoned in an equal right and condition with that of the Kingdom the Borders and the Isles Several other instances there are of that kinde But that especially is to bee observed in this place which wee finde in the Parlamentarie Records of King Richard the second concerning a Tribute or Custom that was imposed upon every ship that passed through the Northern Admiraltie that is in the Sea which stretcheth it self from the Thames mouth along the Eastern shore of England towards the North-East for the pay and maintenance of the Guard or Protection of the Sea Nor was it imposed onely upon the ships of such Merchants and Fisher-men as were English but also by the same right in a manner upon those of any Foreiners whatsoëver no otherwise than if a man that is owner of a Field should impose a yearly Revenue or Rent for the libertie of Thorow-fare or driving of Cattel or Cart through his Field Paiment was made at the rate of six pence a Ton upon every Vessel that passed by except such ships onely as
howsoêver the Admiral of England might then according to this Form of Commission have had Courts of Admiraltie in those Provinces as there is no place almost without Courts of Admiraltie even where not any Dominion of the Sea at all is pretended to belong unto the place wherein they are held yet by no means might hee thence bee called Commander of the Sea it self if so bee you except the Ports and such like Creeks of the Sea which are as it were incorporated within Land either as it may bee said to belong to Normandie or to Aquitain Gascoign or Picardie But by virtue of this form of Commission hee had exercised Maritim Jurisdiction in those Provinces beyond Sea no otherwise almost than our Admiral in England and Ireland or others the like do at this day over men's persons goods upon the African Mediterranean Indian or any other Sea at a remote distance For the extent of such a Jurisdiction by Sea is without bounds But the extent of his Jurisdiction or of the Sea over which hee is placed Admiral as Warden Guardian or President to defend and keep it under the Dominion of him who is Lord thereof are bounded And it sufficiently appear's by express words of the antient form of Commission that no Sea is conteined therein as a Province to bee defended but that which is either English Welch or Irish or relate's to England Wales and Ireland as an appendant From whence it follow 's that those names of the opposite shores in the Commissions do not at all mention the Sea flowing between as proper to those shores or belonging to them in any kind but serv onely as a limit beyond the Sea so far as concern's the limiting of the English and Irish Sea as those names also of England VVales and Ireland serv in stead of a limit on this side of the Sea so far as in the Commissi on they denote the Sea under the Admiral 's Charge or Protection So that even as that Officer called the Count of the Saxon shore throughout Britain was eminently according to the name of his dignitie Commander of the whole Sea flowing between Gallia and Britain as of a particular Province which hath been shewn alreadie and had the name of the opposite shore for the limit of his Jurisdiction so the high Admiral of England or Commander of the Sea belonging to the English Empire hath in the King's Commission the shore of Normandie Gascoign Aquitain and Picardie to set forth onely the beyond-Sea limits of his Jurisdiction or Command so far as hee hath charge of defending the Sea-Province or Dominion belonging to England in those shores which lie over against us For if any say that the case is otherwise wherefore then is not the sea over which hee hath command denominated from som of these shores over against us as well as of the English Irish and Welch or the Seas of the Kingdoms of England Ireland and Wales and of the Dominions and Isles belonging to the same The Reason is becaus no other Sea as it fall's under a Civil consideration for wee speak not here of the denomination given by Geographers doth flow between the Territories on this and the other side of the Sea which are mentioned in his Commission Therefore as in that Roman dignitie of the Count of the Saxon shore throughout Britain the shore was the transmarine bound or limit of that dignitie so also in the Command of the high Admiral of England so far onely as hee hath a Province or Jurisdiction by Sea as a Governor of a Territorie those opposite shores or transmarine Provinces named in his Commission are to bee reckoned the Bounds of the Sea under his Charge or Protection And this truly is sufficiently apparent from the words of the Commission alreadie handled if so bee wee suppose as hitherto wee have don for discours sake that the Kings of England did all the while that form of Commission was in use retain those Beyond sea Provinces under their Dominion as the Romans had don of old But the matter is made more evident if wee observ how the names of those Provinces have at least from the time of Queen Marie been so kept in the form of this Commission that since her Reign there remain's not the least ground for any of those in the Commission to signifie any other thing than what wee have alreadie declared For in her Reign Calais was yielded up to the French and since that time the English have not been possessed of any Province upon any part of the opposite shore Moreover also in the one and thirtieth year of King Henrie the sixt or Anno Dom. MCCCCLIII the English were driven out of Gascoign Aquitain and the other Provinces of France by the French King Charls the seventh Nor was there after the time of this Henrie any Officer or Governor of Note appointed or that could conveniently bee appointed by the English either in Normandie or in Aquitain it self yea nor in Normandie either after or long before the loss of Aquitain It is true indeed that the Countie of Guise Calais and som other Towns in Picardie besides those neighboring ones that Henrie the eight gained by force of arms in the same Countrie remained long after in subjection to the Kings of England yea and that a small part of Aquitain yielded obedience though not constantly to the King of England for som years after Henrie the sixt but not the whole Dutchie Nor doth it make to the contrarie that somtimes under som of our later Kings there was one appointed Captain General or Governor over all our subjects in Normandie with which Title both Ambrose Earl of Warwick and Adrian Poynings were honor'd in the time of Queen Elisabeth For they were meerly Generals of the Forces that were transported thither to assist the King of France not invested at all with any Government or Command of the Dutchie of Normandie But yet even after the time of Henrie the sixt the name of Aquitain was constantly retained in the Commission of the High Admiralship of England That is for one hundred and fourscore years or thereabout after the English were driven out of Aquitain as appear's in the former Chapter Hereto at length was added as is shewn there also the name of Normandie in the beginning of Henrie the eight whereas notwithstanding the King of England was not possessed of Normandie a long time before nor in any wise after nor did hee in that agreement made a little before with the King of France claim any other possession in Picardie besides that of Calais and the Territorie of Guise and Hammes And so it hath continued now for one hundred twentie two years also in the Commission of Maritim Government or high Admiralship of England without any relation at all had to the Government or Command of the Dutchie it self but onely of the shore which bounded the Sea under his Master's protection upon
oppose the Dominion of the King of England by Sea CHAP. XVIII THat there were Admirals also constituted by the French King upon the opposit Shore of France is known to everie man And as there is an Admiral appointed in Gallia Narbonensis to over-see maritim Affairs there so also on the opposite Shore there are distinct Offices of the Admiral of Aquitain Bretaign and Normandie and the adjoining Coasts But the French Lawyers of late are wont to call their Admiral in Latine Praefectus Maris Governor of the Sea as if the Sea were subject to him also as a Governor whereas notwithstanding if the thing bee rightly consider'd that Government of the Sea by what name soëver it bee called doth not signifie as among the English any Dominion of one having command in any nearer part of the Sea for wee speak not of the Sea of Marseille which hath no relation hereunto but onely of their Naval Forces in any Sea whatsoëver together with the Government of the Sea-men and Jurisdiction over their persons and moveables which may fall under the determination of a Judg pour raison ou occasion as they say de faict de la mer that is by reason or upon occasion of any suit or controversie arising about Sea-Affairs For the more plain understanding whereof wee must make farther enquirie In the more antient times there were indeed Admirals or Governors of Sea affairs among the French yet so that their Writers do not a little differ about the original of the dignitie They for the most part say that Rotlandus is found to have been Governor of the Sea of Aremorica or Bretaign under Charlemaign whom they fetch out of Eginhartus who wrote the life of Charls at that time But in Eginhartus he is expressly called Governor not of the British Sea but onely of the Shore of Britaign as wee told you in the former Book In which name there is a description not of one that govern's the Sea as a Province but who command 's the Shore as the limit of his dignitie That is to say of the same kinde as those Counts or officers were who were deputed in that Age to guard the Sea Coast and secure it from the incursions of enemies by Sea There is also a nameless Autor of a Chronicle belonging to a Monasterie called Monasterium Besuense who write's that this guarding of the Shores under the Caroline Kings was given over a little after the time of Charlemaign But in the following Ages the Kingdom of France beeing divided as it wereby piece-meals into several principalites that which a long retained this name of the Kingdom of France was reduced into so narrow a compass that the Province of Narbon was held by Sovereign Earls of its own Aquitain or the Western Shore which lie's more Southerly with Normandie by the English Bretaign either by Kings or Dukes of the same aud Flanders by Earls So that whilst the whole Sea-Coast except Picardie remained separate from that Kingdom there was Sea little enough lying before it Yea and the Naval Forces were small enough of which before the accession of a larger Sea-Coast to the French Kingdom there was most use in the expedition of the holy War Nor was any other Governor wont to bee appointed there by the name of Admiral then hee who as occasion required was put in Command over the Navie and Militarie Affairs by Sea yea and was borrowed from som Nation bordering upon the Sea as the Genoeses or others of that kinde But the Kings themselvs had at that time no Command over the Sea as it is expressly written by Johannes Tilius a Clark of the Parlament of Paris His words are these After that the Kingdom of France was lessen'd by divisions and the Kings confined to more narrow Dominions becaus they had potent Vassals who enjoied Feuds with absolute Soveraigntie if you except their homage for the King of England held the Dutchies of Normandie and Aquitain Britain had a Duke of its own and slanders Tholouse and Provence had their Earls the Kings of France for a long time had no command over the Sea and therefore had no need of Admirals until they undertook the Expedition for the holy Land at which time they made use of Genoeses whom they hired with Spaniards or other of their neighbors that were well skill'd in Sea-affairs to under-take the care of transportation having no office appointed for that purpose and by this means they had many Admirals in one single Expedition But after that the English had quitted Normandie and the Kingdom of France had gotten ground upon the Sea-Coast the use of Sea-Affairs also was somwhat augmented That is to say about the times of John and Henrie the third Kings of England So that the first Admiral that they reckon in the Catalogue of French dignities of whom any memorie is left to posteritie was Enguerandus Coucaeus in the time of Philip the Bold King of France or about the year 1280 as it is related by Joannes Feronius And what kinde of dignitie his was appear's sufficiently thence that his next Successors Matthew Momorancie and John Harcourt were onely upon a particular occasion put in command over the Sea-Forces by Philip the fair as wee understand by their Commission Yea and they are mentioned by William de Nangis by the title of Admirals as others also are by Joannes de Beka in the time of Philip the fair Although Joannes Tilius reckon's Amaurius Viscount of Narbonne to bee the first that bare the dignitie of Admiral in France as a constant setled Office over the Affairs of the Sea to wit in the time of John and Charls the fift Kings of France that is about the year 1300 whilest others are too busie in summing up divers other particulars touching the Antiquitie of this command among the French Afterwards Aquitain was added to the Dominion of the King of France in the year 1453. Henrie the sixt of England beeing driven out But in the year 1481. the Province of Narbonne in the year 1491. the Dutchie of Bretaign and lastly in the space of som years all that the English held in Picardie was added also So all the Sea-Coast except Belgium returned into the Patrimonie of the Kingdom of France Hereupon it came to pass that four Sea-Governments or Admiralships were afterwards in use therein notwithstanding that somtimes one and the same person held several together But of these the Government that belong's to the shore of Normandie and Picardie is at this day usually called the Admiralship of France becaus before that the Province of Narbonne Aquitain and Bretaigne were annexed to the patrimonie of the Crown the onely Maritim Government in the Realm of France was that of Picardie whereto Normandie was added afterward as the next Province the other three beeing denominated from their respective Provinces The whole matter is very well set forth by Renatus Choppinus
those Islands that lie before the shore of France For 't is generally known that after King John and Henrie the third were driven out of Normandie it self that the Isles Caesaria and Sarnia which wee call Jersey and Garnesey Aureney and som other Neighboring Isles lying near the shores of Normandie and Bretaign yea and situated within that Creek of Sea which is made by the shore of Bretaign on the one side and that of Normandie on the other have in the following Ages both now and heretofore remained in the Dominion of England But by the sentence passed against K. John as Duke of Normandie for the murther of his Nephew Arthur the French would have him deprived of all the Right hee had to Normandie And afterwards Henrie the third resigned his Right to Normandie But suppose wee grant what is commonly received that these Islands were of the Norman Jurisdiction or belonging to the Dutchie of Normandie yet truly even so they neither could bee taken away by the sentence nor did they fall to the French by Resignation forasmuch as the possession of the Sea and so of the Islands placed therein was still reteined after the same manner almost as manie Priories were in England it self who though they were belonging to the Norman Government in Church-matters yet even as they were of the Government of Normandie they ever remain'd under the Dominion of England as long as the Privileges of Monasteries were in force among the English as beeing situate within the undoubted bounds of the English Empire Nor is it easily understood wherefore the Islands could have been so reteined unless they also had been seated within the bounds of the English Empire in the Sea But the thing chiefly to bee consider'd here is that verie manie Foreign Nations as well as the Estates of England did in a Libel or Bill of Complaint publickly exhibited in the time of King Edward the First and King Philip the Fair before a Court of Delegates specially in that behalf by them appointed in express terms acknowledg that the King of England hath ever been Lord not onely of this Sea but also of the Islands placed therein par raison du Roialme d' Angleterre upon the account of the Realm of England or as they were Kings of England Which truly is all one as in most express terms to ascribe this whole Sea unto them as far as the Shores or Ports lying over against us But concerning that Libel I shall add more by and by Nor is it to bee omitted that the addition of a Shore larger than that of Picardie to the Kingdom of France hapned first at that time wherein those Isles were so reteined by the English after they were outed of Normandie For before the Shores of Aquitain Bretaign and Normandie were in the possession of other Princes that of Aquitain and Normandie beeing possest by the English and that of Bretaign by the Duke or Earl of that Countrie So that the French King had neither any shore almost nor any considerable use of Sea-affairs at that time by which means also the English did with the more ease retain the aforesaid antient possession of the Sea and the Isles after they were deprived of the Norman Dutchie And this sufficiently appear's also by that Sea-Fight perform'd between the French Fleet commanded by Eustachius the Monk in the time of Philip Augustus King of France and the English Fleet under the Command of Philip de Albenie Governor of the aforesaid Islands and John Marshal who both carefully guarded the passages of the Sea in the beginning of the Reign of Henrie the Third That is to say a French Fleet of about 80 Sail was designed to transport Auxiliarie Forces out of France for Lewis afterwards the Eight of that name that was King of France who through the Treason of som Conspirators made War upon the English King in England This of the French was assailed by an English Fleet of 40 Sail. But Roger of Wendover and Matthew Paris tell us that part of the French who had not been used to Sea-Fight was in a short time wholly defeated Observ here they say that hitherto the French were not accustomed to Fights by Sea But of the English they say the English being warlick and skill'd in Sea-Fight galled them with Darts and Arrows ran them through with their Lances did execution with their Swords sank their Ships and them with Lime which they did by throwing the Powder of Lime into the Aër so it might bee driven by the winde into the French-men's eies They were deprived also of all hope of relief and succor and know not which way to slie The English at that time time beeing expert in Sea-Fight did by this means make good the possession of their Sea and the Isles also that are situate therein For even this Fight relate's to the second year of Henrie the Third or the year of our Lord MCCXVIII that is at the same time almost when the English were first deprived of Normandie But as to that which is commonly said that these Islands first belonged to the English Norman right or by the right of the Dutchie of Normandie it is as easily denied as affirmed by any Nor is there any weight in this Reason that becaus those Islands have and ever had certain Customs like the Norman therefore they do belong to Normandie For the Norman Customs are often used in England as the Roman are somtimes by other Nations yet everie man know's this can bee no ground for such an Argument Nor is it any more to the purpose that those Islands were within the Diocess of the Bishop of Constances in Normandie until that in our Grand-father's daies they became subject to the Bishop of Winchester Their Ecclesiastick Government was a long time derived out of Normandie with more convenience indeed becaus of the nearness of the place which began as it is to bee supposed in those daies when the English possessed the Shores on both sides But it doth not follow thence that those Islands belong'd to the Dutchie of Normandie any more then that the many Priories heretofore in England who were of foreign Jurisdiction in Ecclesiastical matters did therefore belong to the Dominion of foreign Princes and not to that of the English Kings as Kings of England That is every jot as weak also which they use to allege about the Norman Languages beeing in use among the Inhabitants of those Islands The people of Cornwâ—l in England have alwaies used the Welch Tongue at least with a little alteration in the Dialect as the Bretaigns do also in France In like manner the Inhabitants of the Isle of Man use the Irish Tongue yet no man will conclude thence either that this paie's obedience to the Kings of England as Lords or King of Ireland or that the other are subject to their Princes by any right of the Welch Principalitie Wee know indeed that
what an extraordinarie plentiful and gainful Herring-Fishing the Hollanders and Zelanders use to have in the neighboring Sea having first obteined leav from this Castle according to the antient Custom For the English have ever granted them leav to fish reserving alwaies the honor and privilege to themselves but through a kinde of negligence resigning the profit to Strangers For it is almost incredible what a vast sum of mâ—nie the Hollanders make by this Fishing upon our Coast. So he There is another man also of very great skill and knowledg in Sea-affairs who in the time of Q. Elisabeth presented a Book to the Parlament written in the English Tongue about the Commoditie of Fishing wherein hee write's that the Hollanders and Zelanders every year toward the later end of Summer send forth four or five hundred Vessels called Buffes to fish for Herrings in this Eastern Sea Where before they fish they ask leave of Scarborough which are his very words Care was taken also by Proclamation in the time of K. James that no Foreiner should Fish in the English or Irish Sea or that which belong's to the other Isles of the Realm of England without leav first obteined and every year at least reneâ—ed from the Commissioners appointed for this purpose at London And touching the libertie of fishing granted at other times also to Foreiners by the Kings of England there are many Testimonies in other Writers But the caus why wee do not often meet with the Forms of those Licences granted either for passage or fishing in the English Sea was plainly this becaus by the Leagues that were made with the neighbor Princes a Licence or freedom of that kinde as also of Ports Shores Passage and other things was so often allowed by both Parties that as long as the League was in force the Sea served as if it were a common Field as well for the Foreiner that was in amitie as for the King of England himself who was Lord and Owner But yet in this kinde of Leagues somtimes the Fishing was restrained to certain Limits which is a thing chiefly to bee consider'd The limits related both to place and time So that according to agreement the Foreiner in amitie might not fish beyond these Limits the K. of England reteining a Dominion over the whole adjoining Sea Touching this there is a notable Example in the time of our Henrie the Fourth An agreement was made betwixt the Kings of England and France that the Subjects of both might freely use Fishing throughout that part of the Sea which is bounded on this side by the Ports of Scarborough Southampton and on the other side by the Coast of Flanders and the mouth of the River Seine The time also was limited betwixt Autumn the Kalends of Januarie following And that the French might securely enjoy the benefit of this agreement our King directed Letters to that end unto all his Sea-Captains and Commanders Here you see plainly those Limits wholly excluded the French from that part of the Sea which lie's toward the West and South-west and also from that which lie's North east of them as beeing so limited by our Henrie at his own pleasure as its Lord and Soveraign Nor was there so much as the least shadow of right or Prerogative whereby the French King might seem to have any interest as a Lord or Owner in the setting of these Limits seeing that part of the Sea which was secluded did not touch upon any Shore of his in the North nor had hee any Countrie lying before the Sea in the South except Normandie or in the West the rest beeing held either by the Duke of Bretaign or by the King of England as wee have alreadie observed From hence truly it was a Custom for the Kings of England to give protection to Fisher-men that were Strangers somtimes by Proclamation and somtimes with a Fleet of men of War when they went to Fish either by agreement made upon treatie or by leav obteined qualifications beeing added according to the English King's pleasure There is among the Records of the time of Edward the First an Inscription Pro hominibus Hollandiae c. For the men of Holland and Zeland and Friesland to have leav to fish near Jernemuth The King's Letter for their protection follow 's thus The KING to his Beloved and Trustie John de Buteturte Warden of his Port de Jernemuth Greeting For as much as Wee have been certified that many men out of the parts of Holland Zeland and Friesland also who are in amitie with us intend now to com and fish in Our Sea near Jernemuth Wee command you that you caus publick Proclamation to bee made once or twice everie week that no persons whatsoëver imploied abroad in our service presume to caus any injurie trouble dammage hindrance or grievance to bee don unto them but rather when they stand in need that yee give them advice and assistance in such manner that they may fish and persue their own advantage without any let or impediment In Testimonie whereof Wee have caused these our Letters to bee made Patents to continue in force till after the Feast of St Martin next ensuing Witness the King at Wengham the XXVIII day of September Which was in the XXIII year of his Reign and of our Lord MCCXCV The same day also in favor of the â—arl of Holland and his Subjects hee set forth three men of War toward the farther Coast of the Sea for the safeguard as hee saith in another Letter of those Uessels belonging to your and our own Countrie that are in these daies emploied about the Herring Fishing c. and to guard your Coasts near the Sea Here hee grant's a Protection to fish And in both the Letters hee limits it within the space of two Months Hee alone also protected the Fisher-men upon the Geâ—man Coasts which by reason of its nearness hee call's here your Coast near the Sea in his Letter to the Eaâ—l of Holland as well as upon the English Nor might the Fisher-men use any other kinde of Vessels but that which was prescribed by our Kings Upon which account all kindes of Fishing were somtimes prohibited and somtimes admitted this restriction onely beeing added that they should fish in such Vessels onely as were under thirtie Tuns burthen This appear's by those Letters of King Edward the Third concerning the Laws of Fishing which were directed unto his several Governors of Yarmouth Scarborough Whitby and Donwich Towns seated upon the Eastern Shore The words are these Forasmuch as wee have given Licence to the Fishermen of the aforesaid Town and to others who shall bee willing to com unto the said Town for the benefit of Fishing that they may fish and make their own advantage with Ships and Boats under thirtie Tuns burthen any prohibition or Commands of ours whatsoever to the contrarie notwithstanding wee command you to permit the Fisher-men of the aforesaid
by the Court that the Exception was of no force for that Scotland was not within the Bounds and Limits of England So that within the four Seas and within the Realm signified one and the same thing from whence these terms out of the Realm and without the four Seas becom one and the same also To bee out of the Realm is very often repeated in this â—enâ— also by Littleton the most excellent of all our Law-Writers signifying no other thing than what hee renders it in another place by one who ala oustere le mere crossed the Sea or went beyond sea â—rom thence also it seem's to have proceeded that whereas with us among the several temporal excuses of Defendants who are summoned to appear in Court in our Law wee call them Essoins there are two alleged whereof the one is intitled de ultra Mare the other De Malo veniendi and this latter is allowed to him that is hindred by any kinde of misfortune whatsoever within the Seas or on this side of the more remote bounds of those Seas which belong to England but the former to him who live's without or beyond the Seas belonging to the English Empire From thence it seem's I say to have proceeded that in former times when there was a more frequent use in Court of this kinde of excuses a Defendant beeing absent in Ireland might lawfully make use of the latter form of Essoin but not of the former Nevertheless if through ignorance hee did make use of this it took on the nature of the latter that is wholly quitting all its own nature it depended upon this that the Defendant according to the more vulgar sensâ— or acception lived beyond-Sea For according to received Custom the nature of them both was such that when any one might lawfully use the former hee might also after a while likewise enjoy the benefit of the latter But in the said kinde of Essoins or Excuses the former not beeing lawfully made use of but yet turned into the latter by construction of Law lest it should becom of no use there was no place for the latter to the end it might not bee iterated contrarie to Custom The matter it self was thus decided in the time of K. Henrie the third as it is described by Henrie Bracton after this manner Esto saith hee quòd quis se Essoniaverit de Ibernia quasi de ultra Mare attornatur Essonium illud ad simplex Essonium de Malo veniendi ut coram Martino de Patteshul in Banco anno Regis Henrici Sexto de Gilberto Mariscallo Ceciliâ uxore ejus Allano de Hyda qui vocavit ad Warrantum Willielmum Mariscallum in Comitatu Pembroke qui se essoniavit de Ibernia non fuit allocatum postea fecit de hoc quòd aliud essonium de malo veniendi ad alium diem non fuit allocatum So much wee finde also in the antient Autor of that Book entitled Fleta Doubtless Ireland is no less seated beyond sea than either France or Spain unless you take that decision as relating onely to the Civil notion of this kinde of situation to wit that it is not situate beyond that Sea which is a part and Territorie of the English Empire but placed therein and comprehended under one and the same Supreme Power with England and so that an Excuse or Essoin de ultra mare is not in that kinde to bee admitted In the antient Records also concerning the Customs of our Court of Admiraltie wee read it was an usual Custom in the time of King Henrie the first who died Anno Dom. MCXXXVI and of other Kings both before and after him That if any man accused of a capital crime don by Sea beeing publickly called five times by the voice of the Crier after so many several daies assigned did not make his appearance in the Court of Admiraltie hee was banished out of England de mer appurtenant au Roy d Angleterre or out of the Sea belonging to the King of England for fourtie years more or less according to the pleasure of the Admiral Other particulars there are that relate hereunto about Actions for matters arising in this Sea that were wont to bee entred in express terms heretofore in the ordinarie Courts of our Common Law whoâ—e Jurisdiction was ever esteemed of such a nature that an Action instituted about a matter arising in any other place than within the bounds of the Realm was by the antient strict Law alwaies to bee rejected by them After which manner as it hath been a Custom now for many years that an action ought to bee rejected unless the matter have its rise within the Bodie as they call it of the Countie that is within som Province or Countie of the Island usually given in charge to certain Governors or Officers known to us by the name of Sheriffs So also is it in this Sea-Province belonging by the antient received Custom to the high Admiral or his Deputies not onely so far as concern's its defence and guard but also as to matter of Jurisdiction So that at length it is manifest that the Sea-Dominion of the King of England is without controversie admitted and asserted also both by the Determinations and Customs of the Law of the Land and by the express words of the Writs and Forms of the Actions themselvs Nor is that of any force at all to the contrarie which either our Countrie-man Bracton the Lawyer as hath been said or som others of late as well as antient time that are Followers of him but in too careless a manner while they set down the Institutions of our English Law have unadvisedly utter'd by the way touching that antient communitie of the Sea and of Fishing also in Rivers according to the Books of Justinian as if such a kinde of communitie were admitted in our Law Truly that which they have so let slip is not so much to bee taken as contrarie to the known Law of the Land in this particular for even Bracton himself as I have shewn hath divers other passages that signifie this Dominion of the King as it is to bee reckoned for som of the reliques of Ulpian or of the School of the Imperial Law too slightly and carelesly added by the way in writing And the like may bee said of one or two more of our Writers who after the manner of reasoning received for the most part in the Imperial Law touching the middle of a River and an Island risen therein do by the way but ignorantly make the middle of the Sea flowing between to bee the bound of this Sea-Dominion of our Kings Moreover the same may bee said likewise of the Commissioners of Queen Elisabeth who treating at Bremen with the Commissioners of Christiern the fourth King of Denmark about a freedom of Navigation through the Northern Sea object a perpetual communitie of every kinde of
what hath been alreadie spoken And from hence perhaps it is that the more antient Arms of the Kings of Man were a Ship with a Sail folded together and this Inscription added Rex Manniae Insularum King of Man of the Isles as M r Camden observ's from their Sails For the three legs of humane shape now every where known are but of later time But afterwards when Ireland was subdued by Henrie the Second and King John and Reginald King of Man brought into the power of King John the English possessing this Sea at that time with a very numerous Navie there is no reason at all to doubt but that the neighboring Sea round about was taken also into the Dominion of the English For in that Age the King of Man was no absolute Prince but beeing subdued hee paid homage to the King of England yielded under his subjection But in a short time after Alexander the Third King of Scots annexed it to the Dominion of Scotland and put in a Governor who was to assist him upon occasion with thirteen Gallies five hundred Seamen Hee recover'd the Hebrides also by driving out the Norwegians transmitted it to his posteritie Then Man returned again to the English who enjoied Ireland a long time together with it that sea-territory But the Kings of the Hebrides and of Scotland enjoied the Northern part of this Western Sea after that they had expell'd the Norwegians who were Lords here of the Sea And from hence it is that as Scotland England this Isle of Man the Hebrides and Ireland with other adjacent Isles so even the Vergivian and Deucaledonian Sea it self washing the West of Scotland and surrounding these Isles with windings and turnings ought now also to bee accounted the antient Patrimonie of the King of great Britain But there is moreover in the more Westerly part of this open and main Sea another Right belonging to the King of Great Britain and that of a verie large extent upon the Shore of America Whenas S r Humfery Gilbert Knight did by Autoritie of Queen Elisabeth transport a Colonie into the New World with design to recover certain Lands in the East parts of the Northern America which of Right belong'd to the English Dominion the Queen was by him as her Procurator put into a possession for ever to bee held by her and her heirs both of the Port called by the name of S t John which is in the Island of Baccalaos and also of the whole Sea as well as Land on every side for the space of six hundred miles Then hee received this new Kingdom of the Queen as her Beneficiarie having a Branch and a Turf deliver'd in his hands according to the usual cerimonie of England in transferring the Ownership of Lands and Possessions Nor truly was it necessarie that hee should otherwise get the Possession from whence this Dominion of the Queen and her Posteritie had its Original For as Paulus saith well there is no necessitie that hee who intend's to take possession of a Field should walk about the whole but t is sufficient if hee enter any part of that Field so long as hee doth it with a minde thought and intent to possess the Field to its utmost extent and bound Which saying may relate to Seas as well as Lands that were never taken into possession So that as Siculus Flaccus Treating of Occupatorie Lands saith Men did not possess so much land as they were able to till but they reserved as much as they were in hope they might bee able to till the like also may bee said of a Sea so taken into possession Look how much was reserved in hope of using and enjoying so much also was bounded But perhaps the first original of the Dominion of this main Sea of America did not proceed from the Possession that was acquired by Gilbert Hee rather restored and inlarged the Right of the Crown here For that Island called Baccalaos was added to the English Empire by Sebastian Chabot in the time of Henrie the Seventh And it is certain that afterwards it grew to be a Custom for the Officers belonging to the High Admiral of England in whose charge are all the Seas subject to the King of England and Ireland as King of England and Ireland to demand Tributes of such as fish't also in this Sea which was I suppose a most evident token of the King's Dominion But it was provided by an Act of Parlament in the Reign of Edward the Sixth that no Tributes of that kinde to the grievance of Fishermen should bee paid any longer How far our English Colonies lately transported into America have possessed themselvs of the Sea there I have as yet made but little enquirie Touching the Dominion of the King of Great Britain in the Scotish Sea especially toward the East and North. CHAP. XXXI THose particulars which were cited before out of the Proclamation of James King of Great Britain about the Prohibition of Fishing relate as well to the Scotish Seas on every side from whence also you must acknowledg their possession hath been reteined together with an antient Sea-Dominion That is to say all Foreiners were prohibited to Fish in these Seas without leav first obteined at Edenburgh And in those Scotish Acts of Parlament they are not so much new Laws made as old ones revived wherby it was ordeined That all manner of Fischeres that occupies the Sea and vtheres persons quhat sumever that happenis to slay Hering or quihte Fish upon the Coast or within the Iles or out with the samen within the Frithes bring them to free Ports c. where they may bee sold to the Inhabitants of the same kingdom quhairby his Maâ—esties Customes bee not defrauded and his Hienes Lieges not frustrat of the Commoditie appointed to them be God under the pain of confiscation and tynsel of the veschelles of them that cumes in the contrair hereof and escheiting of all their movable guddes to our soveraine Lords use So that use and benefit is claimed hence by a special right in that Sea otherwise truly that use and bene fit would of right no more appertein either to the King of Scotland or his Subjects than to any other whomsoêver But the Law was made concerning all Fisher-men as well strangers as Scotch-men as beeing ordeined by all the Estates of that Kingdom who so well understood both the King 's Right and also their own as subordinate to the King's by Tradition from their Ancestors or by long-continued possession and Dominion that there remained not the least ground of scruple touching that business And a Scotish Lawyer speaking about Fishing in the Eastern Sea of Scotland I cannot saith hee omit to tell you that in the past Age after a most bloudie quarrel between the Scots and Hollanders about occasions belonging to the Sea the matter was composed after this manner that in time to
com the Hollanders should keep at least fourscore miles distance from the Coasts of Scotland And if by accident they were driven near through violence of weather they paid a certain Tribute at the Port of Aberdene before their return where there was a Castle built and fortified for this and other occasions and this was duly and really paid still by the Hollanders within the memorie of our Fathers until that by frequent dissentions at home this Tribute with very many other Rights and Commodities came to nothing partly through the negligence of Governors and partly through the boldness of the Hollanders So you see how limits were by agreement prescribed heretofore in this Sea to the Fishing of Foreiners But the more Northerly Sea which lie's against Scotland was for the most part in subjection heretofore to the Norwegians and Danes who were Lords of the Isles there So that the people of the Orcades speak the Gothish Language to this day Robertus de Monte tell 's us that hee who was called King of the Isles was possest of XXXII Islands in that Sea above four hundred and sixtie years ago paying such a Tribute to the King of Norway that at the succession of every new King the King of the Isles present's him ten marks in Gold and make's no other acknowledgment to him all his life long unless another King succeed again in Norway And Giraldus Cambrensis writing of these things saith that in the Northern Sea beyond Ulster and Galloway there are several Islands to wit the Orcades and Inchades or Leucades which som would have to bee the Hebrides and many other over most of which the Norwegians had Dominion and held them in subjection For although they lie much nearer to other Countries yet that Nation beeing more given to the Sea usually preferr's a Piratick kinde of life above any other So that all their Expeditions and Wars are performed by Sea Fight This hee wrote in the time of Henrie the second So that somtimes those Sea-Appendants of the Dominion of Britain in the Northern parts were invaded by Foreiners Hence also it is that Ordericus Vitalis speaking of Magnus the son of Olaus King of Norway saith hee had a great power in the Isles of the Sea which relate's unto the time of William the Second King of England The same Ordericus also saith that the Orcades Finland Island also and Groênland beyond which there is no other Countrie Northward and many other as far as Gothland are subject to the King of Norway and wealth is brought thither by shipping from all parts of the world So wee have here a clear description of the Dominion of the Norwegians heretofore as well in this neighboring Sea of Scotland as in the more open But in after time when as by agreement made between Alexander the third King of Scots and Magnus the fourth of Norwaie as also between Robert Bruce King of Scotland and Haquin of Norwaie it was concluded touching these Isles that they should bee annexed to the Scotish Dominion this could not bee don but there must bee a Cession also of that Sea-Dominion which bordered round upon the Coast of Norwaie Yet the Norwegian King possessed it for the most part and afterwards the Dane by an union of the two Kingdoms of Denmark and Norwaie until that Christiern the first King of Norwaie and Denmark upon the marriage of his daughter Margarite to James the third King of Scotland made an absolute Surrender of these Islands and in the year of our Lord MCDLXX transferr'd all his right both in the Isles of Orcades and Shetland and the rest lying in the hither part of the Northern Sea upon his Son in law and his Successors And as concerning this business I shall here set down the words of Joannes Ferrerius who was indeed Native of Piedmont but supplied with matter of Historie out of the Records of Scotland by Henrie Sainclair Bishop of Ross. Moreover in the Deucaledonian Sea toward the North-East there are the Isles of Orcades seated next to the Coast of Scotland whereof onely twentie eight are at this daie inhabited and above an hundred miles beyond the Orcades towards Norway are the Shetland Isles in number eighteen which are at this daie inhabited and in subjection to the King of Scotland concerning which there was a great quarrel in former Ages between the Scots and Danes yet the Dane kept possession All these Islands did Christiern King of Denmark peaceably surrender together with his daughter in marriage to James King of Scots until that either hee himself or his posteritie paid to the Scotish King or his Successors in lieu of her Dowrie the summe of fiftie thousand Rhenish Florens which were never discharged to this daie For so much I my self have seen and read in the Deeds of marriage betwixt Ladie Margarite daughter of the King of Denmark and James the third King of Scotland drawn up and fairly signed with the Seals of both Kingdoms Anno Dom. 1468. c. But afterwards when Ladie Margarite beeing Queen had been delivered of ber eldest son James Prince of Scotland the Danish King willing to congratulate his daughter's good deliverie did for ever surrender his right in the Islands of the Deucaledonian Sea to wit the Isles of Orcades Shecland and others which hee deliver'd in pledg with his daughter upon her marriage to the Scotish King I hear the deeds of this surrender are kept among the Records belonging to the Crown of Scotland And so at length those Isles and the Dominion of this Sea returned to the Kings of Scotland which they enjoy at this day The Kings of Scotland have a pledg of Dominion also in this Sea that is to say Tributes or Customs imposed upon Fisher-men for Fishing of which by the way you may read in their Acts of Parlament Touching that Right which belong's to the King of Great Britain in the main and open Sea of the North. And the Conclusion of the Work CHAP. XXXII COncerning that Neighboring Sea which is a Territorie belonging to the Scots I have spoken in the former Chapter But I must not omit to treat here of that Sea which stretcheth it self to a very large extent toward the North washing the Coasts of Friesland Island and other Isles also under the Dominion of the King of Denmark or of Norway For even this Sea also is asscribed by som to the King of Great Britain Albericus Gentilis applying that of Tacitus The Northern Coasts of Britain having no Land lying against them are washt by the main and open Sea you see saith hee how far the Dominion of the King of Great Britain extend's it self toward the South North and West As if almost all that which lay opposite to the Isles of Britain in the open Sea were within the Dominion of the King of Great Britain And concerning the Northern Sea also which reacheth there to parts unknown the very same
thing in a manner was acknowledged by a subject of the King of Denmarks no mean man in a Letter that hee wrote som years since to a friend of his in England his name is Gudbrandus Thorlacius Bishop of Hola in Island who in a Letter sent hither Anno MDXCV to Hugh Branham Pastor of Harwich call's the Britains almost Lords there of the whole Sea There is saith hee a report now at this day that you of Britain whom I had almost called Lords of the Sea have Negotiations every Year in Groenland But the Kings of Denmark deny it here and this more Northerly Sea which belong's to Island they challenge to themselvs as they are Kings of Norway and that by antient right if not unjustly pretended To this purpose let us observ that passage which I finde in a speech of the Ambassadors of Erricus the tenth King of Norway and Denmark delivered unto our Henrie the fift which run's to this effect Most victorious King of England may it pleas your Majestie to understand that our most gratious Lord the King of Norway c. aforesaid hath certain Islands to wit Island Jeroy Hietland and manie more belonging to his Kingdom of Norway whereunto of old no persons were wont to repair out of other Countries upon any occasions whatsoëver either of Fishing or Merchandisiâ—g under peâ—il of life and limbs nor might the men of the Kingdom of Norway more than those of other Countries without special licence from his Majestie Nor might they after Licence obteined set forth out of any other place than the Citie of Bergen nor return to the same place but upon inevitable necessitie or when they ought to paie Customs and other Duties to the King's Exchequer according to the most antient Custom of Norway which hath been constantly observed time out of minde in that Kingdom Also in the year MCCCCXLV Christophor King of Denmark and Norway granted the Inhabitants of Zirickzee in Zealand a freedom of Navigation into his Kingdom Island and other Isles beeing excepted and prohibited which are the very words of the Grant Moreover out of the League made at Koppenhagen in the year of our Lord MCDXXXII between our Henrie the sixt and the same Erricus King of Norwaie and Denmark the Commissioners of the King of Denmark who held a Treatie at Bremen with the Commissioners of our Queen Elisabeth in the year MDC II about the free use of this Sea alleged this Article almost to the same sens It is provided that all Merchants and all other men whatsoëver in subjection to the King of England and France do not presume hereafter under peril of loss of life and goods to visit the Countries of Island Finmarck Halghaland or anie other prohibited places and unlawful Ports whatsoëver in the Kingdoms of Denmark Sweden and Norway Yea and som years before the use of this Sea was prohibited both to Merchants and Fisher-men unless they were bound with Merchandise to North-barn the most eminent Town of Traffick under the King of Norwaie And touching that particular there is an Act of Parlament of Henrie the sixt whereby such a kinde of Prohibition continued in force for certain years in favor of the King of Norwaie So that there were many Letters Patents afterwards granted by our Kings to their subjects of England whereby they had Licence to go unto Island Finmark and other Dominions of the King of Norway and Sweden But that Statute the rigor whereof was dispensed with at the King's pleasure by such kinde of Grants became repealed at the beginning of the Reign of King Henrie the eight And Joannes Maior making mention of that time saith A Fleet of English went everie year to Island beyond the Arctick Circle to catch Fish But what manner of determination soêver ought to bee made touching the Dominion of this more Northerly Sea yet certain it is such a perpetual servitude at least was by several agreements betwixt the Kings of England and Norwaie imposed upon it that to this day also the subjects of England enjoy a perpetual right of sailing unto Island and of using and enjoying this sea For by a League made at Koppenhagen in the year MCDXC betwixt Henrie the seventh of England and John the second King of Denmark and Norwaie it was concluded that all Merchants and Liege-men Fisher-men and any other persons whatsoëver beeing subjects of the King of England and France might for ever in time to com sail freely to the Island Tyle that is to saie Island for in that age it was generally taken for Thule as it is now also by som thither to have recours and to enter with their ships and goods and merchandise victuals and any other commodities whatsoever upon occasion of buying selling fishing or merchandising and there to abide and convers after the manner of Merchants and from thence freely to return as often as they pleas without any Prohibition molestation or impediment of Us or our heirs and successors in the Kingdoms of Denmark and Norway or of any of our Officers they paying the due rights and usual Customs as well in that Island as also in the Ports belonging to the same where they shall happen to arrive Provided alwaies that seven years immediately after the date of these presents they do Petition to renew their Licence from us and our successors Kings of Denmark and Norway to the end that so from seven years to seven years Merchants and all otheâ— persons aforesaid may for ever acknowledg us and our successors Kings of Denmark and Norway in the renewing of their Licence But that this League was not limited by any time but concerned the heirs and successors of both the parties appear's not onely in part by what hath been alleged alreadie but by the very form of the Preface which I thought meet to add in this place VVee John by the Grace of God King as aforesaid by the unanimous advice and consent of our beloved Counsellors and others the Lords and Nobles of our Kingdom of Denmark have caused a Treatie to bee had with the Orators of the most illustrious Prince Henrie by the Grace of God King of England and France our most dear Brother James Hutton Doctor of the Civil Law Thomas Clarentieux King of Arms Thomas Carter and John Beliz Merchants of Lyn about the restoring of peace and establishing a perpetual concord between our Kingdoms which Counsellors of ours and the Orators autorised in our Citie of Koppenhagen by special Commission of the afore named King of England our most dear Brother and with full power whereof wee are assured by the Letters of the said King of England have concluded that between us our heirs and successors well willers friends and allies and the most illustrious Prince Henrie King of England and France our most dear Brother his heirs and successors well willers friends and allies there bee and shall bee for ever in time to com a perpetual peace inviolable friendship and firm concord in the following form Yea and that League was renewed in the year MDXXIII by Henrie the eight of England and Christiern the second King of
Denmark and Norway in the same form The right therefore is perpetual and transmitted to the heirs of the K. of England that the English should have a free use of this more Northerly Sea belonging to Island But frequent Ambassies notwithstanding passed on both sides about that business in the Reigns of Frederick the second and Christiern the fourth Kings of Denmark and of Elisabeth Queen of England The Danes alleged that the English had no right to use this kinde of libertie without leav first obteined of the Kings of Denmark and that renewed every seven years according to that league made in the time of John the second and Henrie the seventh Moreover Nicolas Craig who was sent Ambassador into England by Christiern the fourth in the year MDXCIX pretended the agreement at Haderslabe in the year MDLXXXIII between Frederick the second and Queen Elisabeth as if it had therein been expressly provided that this servitude in the Sea of Island established by the English might bee limited by a denial of Licence at the pleasure of the King of Denmark But it was answer'd both by the Lords at home in England as also by the Queen's Commissioners sent to Bremen for the transacting of this business that this right or Sea-servitude is so confirmed to the English as well by Prescription of time as by perpetual agreements of Leagues that that particular which occurr's in the agreements of King John the second and Henrie the seventh about asking of Licence doth in no wise relate to this effect that whether it were denied or not requested by Petition that right or servitude could bee diminished but to this end onely that the English by a customarie Petitioning every seven years might acknowledg the Norwegian right in this Sea There was neither manner nor condition nor time annexed to the servitude but it took place there onely to this end that the memorie meerly of the benefit of the League or of the Original of the servitude established might bee renewed now and then by Petition Yea Frederick the second in his letters to Queen Elisabeth dated the fourth of Maie MDLXXXV most expressly disclaim's this Claus of the League which concern's Petitioning for Licence And truly the whole right of the English in that Sea was not first claimed by them upon the account of that League at Koppenhagen whatever they of Norway may pretend to the contrarie For when the Ambassadors sent heretofore by Erricus the tenth to our Henrie the fift made complaint about English men's fishing in this Sea the King of England I suppose intimate's plainly enough that hee had som right before in that Sea while at that time hee granted this onely in favor of the King of Norwaie that the English should no otherwise use Fishing there for the year immediately ensuing than as it had been usual in antient time and this hee commanded by publick Proclamation made in the more eminent Ports and Cities The time limited and the antient Custom of Fishing do plainly import som former right But here I give you the form of the Proclamations It is required that none of the Lieges of our Lord the King for certain causes specially moving our Lord the King himself do for one year next ensuing presume to go unto the Islands belonging to the kingdoms of Denmark and Norwaie and especially towards the Iste of Islande for the caus of Fishing or any other occasion to the prejudice of the King of the aforesaid kingdoms otherwise than they were wont in antient time It appear's also by Parlamentarie Records of the same King's Reign that the English used Fishing in that Sea very many years before But that League made at Haderslabe pretended before by Craig doth not relate unto Fishing either in the Sea of Island or in this of Norwaie but to the Traffick and Merchandise used then by our Merchants of the Moscovie-Companie For this onely was agreed that the Merchants of that Companie beeing constrained by Tempests or otherwise might freely have access to the shores and Ports both of Island and Norwaie but with this Reserv that they do not in any kind Traffick and use Mercbandise in the Ports of Norwaie or Island before prohibited nor molest the Subjects of the King of the said places in any thing against the Laws of Hospitalitie and that they wholly abstein from all manner of injurie which is the summe of that Answer which was given to Craig by the Peers of England But all things are clearly explained about this business and that right of the English defended at large in the Letters sent by Queen Elisabeth to Christiern the fourth bearing date Cal. Septembris Anno MDXCIX So much whereof as concern's this particular I think meet to insert At the request of the most excellent Prince your Highnesse's Father wee sent say the Queen's Letters an Ambassador into Germanie Anno MDLXXVII who Treated with his Commissioners about all matters in controversie and especially about the Fishing of Island and Norway where it was found that the King insisted onely upon a former Treatie of two years Truce wherein it was at that time agreed that the English should not sail beyond Hagaland But there were several Treaties with the Kings John and Christiern alleged on our part wherein all former controversies beeing composed it was otherwise agreed and concluded and both parties were to stand to this Treatie of general peace made afterwards not to the preceding two years Truce Which the most excellent Prince your Father acknowledging desired by his Letters that that controversie might bee referr'd to another disquisition But since that time no such disquisition hath been made Nevertheless wee understand that our subjects fishing have been taken tormented and handled in a hostile manner Whether this bee justly don all men will bee able to judg who shall weigh our Reasons with an impartial minde Wee do not deny but that the Lord Chancellor Whitfeld and de Barnico when they came unto Us did in words pretend that the fishing of Island and Norway was used by the English contrarie to the Leagues and Agreements of the Kingdoms But seeing they neither did nor could produce any proof and wee have authentick evidences attested by the Kings John and Christiern to the contrarie whereto more credit ought to bee given than to bare Allegations the matter was put off to another time It was answer'd also to D r Craig that the Transaction which was concluded with King Frederick at Haderslabe in the year of our Lord MDLXXXIII belong's nothing at all to this Business for the reason before mentioned And a little after the Letters speak thus But that which is pretended from the Treatie with King John the aforesaid Treatie at Koppenhagen that licens for fishing ought
that in it which may seem to import that hee call's himself King of the Ocean especially if you consider those words which wee finde somtimes among Germane Writers in the Title of Charls the fifth Emperor and King of Spain In the Preface to the constitution concerning publick Judicatories in the Empire hee is called King of the Canarie Ilands also of the Islands of the Indies and of the Continent and of the Ocean Archduke of Austria c. And in the Imperial Sanctions published in high Dutch Konig-under Jnsulen Canariae auch der Jnsulen Indiarum und Terrae firmae des Maers Oceant c. as you may meet with it at least six hundred times The word Ocean is added as if hee entitled himself King of the Ocean But this is a mistake for the same in Spanish is Rey c. de las Islas y terra firma del mar Oceano c. that is King of the Islands and of the Terra firma of the Ocean namely the Islands or Continents of or lying in the Ocean which Pope Alexander the Sixth gave to Ferdinand the Fifth King of Spain all of them lying Westward from the very first Meridian of those hee entitle's himself King not of the Ocean it self How far private Dominion over the Sea is admitted according to the Customs or opinion of the French CHAP. XVIII AS concerning Dominion of the Sea according to the Customs of the French som perhaps may seem to have met with verie ancient evidences thereof in those Officers deputed for the guard of the Sea-Coasts whom wee read of in the Statute-Books and in that Rotlandus Governor of the British that is the Aremorican shore mentioned in the life of Charle-maign by Eginhartus a Writer of that time But those dignities have relation not so much to the Sea it self as to the shore and Sea-Coast or the border of the Land confining with the Sea notwithstanding that Rotlandus is by the French-men of this and the former Age promiscuously styled Governor both of the Sea and Shore as if there were no difference But it cannot bee denied that Princes heretofore upon the Shore of Aremorica or Bretaign as the Veneti of whom wee spake before did upon the same Shore impose Custom upon Ships as for the use of the Road upon their Coasts and challenge to themselvs other Rights of the like nature called Nobilitates super navibus So it is to bee read in an ancient Record made in the time of Duke Alanus in the year MLXXXVII concerning Precedence of Place among the Nobles of Bretaigne In that Record the second place is assigned to the Viscount of S t Pol de Leon who as the very words of it are had verie many of those Customs called Nobilitates super navibus imposed on such as passed the Ocean upon the Coasts of Osismer or Leon which as it was said Budicius an antient King of Bretaign did give and grant to one of his predecessors upon Marriage in reward of the virtue fidelitie and valor of that Viscount but with the consent of the Prelates Counts Barons and Nobles of Bretaign What these Nobilitates were and whence they had their original is partly declared by Bertrandus Argentraeus somtime President of the Province of Renes where hee discourseth also of the right of giving Pass ports which they call brefs de conduicte at this time in use on that shore That saith hee whereas till then it had been a right peculiar to the Princes beeing given by way of Dowrie to the Barons of Leon of which wee have alreadie spoken out of the aforesaid Record remained an hereditarie and proper right to that Familie until Joannes Ruffus the Duke redeemed it for a vast sum of monie of Guynomarius Baron of Leon after that Peter Mauclerc of Dreux Duke of Bretaign had in vain attempted to re assume it by force of arms It had its original they say upon this occasion When our Princes and antient Kings considered the daily Shipwracks made upon that shore where there were many Rocks and but few Havens they made a Law that none should set to Sea without their leav Such as did set out paying a certain rate had passes and guides appointed them that were well acquainted with the Sea and Shores They that refused forfeited their ships with all their tackling and furniture thereof and if the Ship were cast away their goods also were confiscate They that had leav were in no danger of confiscation and if they suffered Shipwrack had libertie to recover as many of their goods as they could And these guides were paid their 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Conduct-money which wee have mentioned elswhere called by them droit de salvage These Tickets or Passes are given out now as heretosore at a certain price And among other Revenues of the Exchequer they also were rented out to the Farmers of the Custom So far Bertrandus from whom Renatus Choppinus borroweth almost the very words But Petrus Berlordaeus Advocate of the Parlament of Reines tell 's us that the Custom of taking forfeiture in that manner of all shipwrack't goods was abolished there by an Edict in the year MDLXXXIII But in the mean time for so much as concern's any part of that Western Sea lying next the Shore these are manifest evidences either of Dominion or of subjection in the Sea which indeed sufficiently prove by the Customs of that people that the Sea is capable of Dominion Moreover upon occasion of these Passes there have been controversies raised somtimes between the Dukes of Bretaign and the Kings of England as may bee seen in certain memorials of the affairs of Bretaign which have relation to the times of our Richard the second and John the Fourth Duke of Bretaign But this wee know for certain that in the agreement made between our Edward the Fourth and Francis the second Duke of Bretaign in the year MCCCCLXVIII concerning mutual traffick and free passage to and fro for the subjects of each Nation during a truce of thirtie years there is an express proviso concerning Wrecks but such a one as left an equal right to both of them not altogether unlike that which for many ages hath been in use upon the English Shore No mention at all beeing made in the Articles of the Truce either of the right or use of these aforesaid Passes as beeing a thing in no wise admitted by the English But som modern Lawyers among the French do vainly affirm that their King is Lord not onely of a part of the Sea neighboring upon the Territorie of Bretaign but of the whole Sea that is adjoyning to any part of France and so of the British or English Sea also By which very Assertion of theirs they sufficiently declare their judgment that there may bee a soveraign over the Sea The King saith Charondas Caronaeus is supreme Lord of the Seas which flow about his
of Excester And in those daies it was usual to procure King's Letters commonly called in the language of the Law Protections whereby Privilege and exemption from all suits was granted to those that were emploied in this kinde of Guard or Defence of the Sea or that spent their time super salvâ custodiâ defensione Maris For the safeguarding and defence of the Sea as the form of the words hath it which wee frequently finde in the Archives Moreover in the Acts of Parlament of the same King's Reign mention is made of the safeguarding of the Sea or de la saufegard de la mier as of a thing commonly known and for which it was the Custom of the English to make as diligent provision as for the Government of any Province or Countrie And in the twentieth year of the same King the Commons preferr'd a Bill that a strong and well accomplished Navie might bee provided for the defence of the Sea becaus It is thought fit be all the Commens of this Land that it is necessarie the See be kept Verie many other passages there are to the same purpose Geoffrie Chaucer who lived in the time of Richard the Second and was a man verie knowing in the affairs of his Countrie among other most elegant and lively characters of several sorts of men written in the English Tongue describe's the humor of an English Merchant of that time how that his desire above all things is that the Sea bee well guarded never left destitute of such protection as may keep it safe and quiet Which hee speak's to set out the whole generation of Merchants in that age whose custom it was to bee sollicitous for traffick above all things and consequently about the Sea it self which would not afford them safe Voyages did not the Kings of England as Sovereigns thereof according to their Right and Custom provide for the securitie of this as a Province under their Protection The words of Chaucer are these His reasons spake hee full solemnely Shewing alway the encreas of his winning Hee would the See were kept for any thing Betwixe Middleborough and Orewel Orewel is an Haven upon the Coasts in Suffolk Middleborough is in Zealand The whole Sea that floweth between Britain and Zealand the English Merchants would have secured this they were wont solemnly and unanimously to pray for knowing that the Sea was part of the Kingdom and the Protection of them part of the dutie of the Kings of England For as concerning any Protection herein by any forrein Princes any farther then in their own Harbors or at the most within the winding Creeks between those Islands which they possessed upon the Coasts of Germanie or Gallia Belgica there is nothing as far as wee can finde to bee gathered from any Testimonies of former Ages In the succeeding Ages likewise there is frequent mention of this kinde of Guard Defence and Government of the same Sea as will hereafter more fully appear when wee com to speak of Tributes and of the tenor and varietie of the Commissions given to our Admirals But now it is to bee observed that both the name and nature of this Guard is very well known not onely by the use of the word both in the Imperial and Canon Law wherein it denotes that the Guardian ought to take a diligent care of that thing whereof hee is owner who doth either lend it or commit it to his over-sight but also by the common and obvious use which the English make of the same word in other Offices or Governments For in those daies of old when the title of Guardians or Wardens of the Sea was more usual there were appointed Wardens of the Ports even as at this day there are Wardens of the Counties who are those Commanders of Counties called Sheriffs and in the usual form and tenor of their Writ have custodiam comitatûs the Guard or Defence of the Countie committed to their charge Wardens or Keepers of the Marches or Borders Keepers of Towers or Castles Parks Houses and the like Yea and the Lord Lievtenant of Ireland was especially in the time of King John and Henrie the Third styled usually Warden or Keeper of Ireland and his Office or dignitie commonly called the Keepership of Ireland after the same manner as John Duke of Bedford and Humphrey Duke of Glocester whom Henry the fift during the time of his absence in France deputed to govern the Kingdom of England by turns were called Custodes Angliae Keepers of England as wee very often finde both in Histories and Records So Arthur Prince of Wales was made Keeper of England while Henry the seventh was beyond the Seas So Piers Gaveston was keeper of England while Edward the second remained in France So were others also in like manner The Governors also of the Islands of Jarsey and Garnesey and the rest that are situated in this Sea who now are styled Governors Keepers or Captains were in antient times called onely by the name of Guardians or Keepers This then beeing so what reason have wee to think that our Ancestors did not use the same Notion of Guardian or Keeper and of guarding or keeping in the name of the Guardian and the Guard of the Sea which they were wont to use in the Guard and keeping of the Island and in the other dignities or offices before mentioned Doubtless in all these the peculiar Dominion and Soveraigntie of him that conferr'd the Dignities is so clearly signified and included that his Dominion or Ownership of the thing to bee kept and guarded as well as Autoritie over the person dignified is plainly implied in this Title Nor is it to bee omitted that in antient times before the autoritie of the high Admirals of England was sufficiently established by our Kings and setled so distinct that the Command and Government of the Sea did belong onely to them the Governors or Keepers of the Provinces whom wee call Sheriffs of the Counties by virtue of their Office had also som Custodie or Command of part of that Sea which adjoined to their respective Provinces as of a part of the Kingdom of England Which truly to let pass other proofs is sufficiently evident by this that many times in those daies they who by the Common Law of the Land were wont as at this day to put in execution the Commands of the King in those places onely that were committed severally to their charge and custodie did do the same also in the Sea it self as well as in any Land-Province belonging to him from whom they received their autoritie For by virtue of their ordinarie power derived from the King and such as was founded upon the very same right by which they held the Government of the Countie or Province they did oftentimes remove the King's Ships and Fleets from one Port to another by Sea as through the Territorie of the Province that was committed to their
the saufegard of the Seas for the entercourse of Marchandise safely to come into and to pass out of the same which is the usual form of words That is to say these words are part of the Preface or Preamble which was usually placed in the beginning of any Law or Statute whereby that most known Custom or Impost of Tonnage and Powndage was wont to bee imposed For the keeping and sure defending of the Seas against all persons entending or that shall extend the disturbance of us your said Commons in the intercourse and the invading of this your Realm So that the King of England hath ever been so accounted the Arbitrator and Lord of Commerce throughout these Seas that it could not lawfully bee hindred without his Commission Which truly is a manifest evidence of that Dominion or Ownership whereof wee treat And here you see also that the defence of the Realm that is of the Island for somtimes the Isle alone and somtimes the Sea also as I shall shew by and by is comprehended in that name and of the Sea as of those things which are held and possessed by one and the same Right is joined together The Tribute or Custom afore-mentioned which was wont to bee imposed and the usual form of the same Imposition may bee seen compleat in the printed Acts of Parlament of K. Kdward the Sixt and others following But it appear's most certain by the Rolls that the Predecessors also of this Edward whose Records are yet extant did enjoy the same or the like according to the various Custom of the Times Observations touching the Dominion of the English and Irish Sea from the tenor and varietie of those Letters Patents or Commissions Roial whereby the Admirals of England were wont to bee put in Autoritie CHAP. XVI THe usual form of Commission whereby the High Admiral of England is wont to bee invested with Autoritie for the Guard of the Sea run's thus at this day as it hath don also for very manie years past Wee give and grant to N. the Office of our great Admiral of England Ireland Wales and of the Dominions and Islands belonging to the same also of our Town of Calais and our Marches thereof Normandie Gascoigne and Aquitain And wee have made appointed and ordained and by these Presents Wee make appoint and Ordain him the said N. our Admiral of England Ireland and Wales and our Dominions and Isles of the same Our Town of Calais and our Marches thereof Normandie Gascoign and Aquitain as also general Governor over all our Fleets and Seas of our said Kingdoms of England and Ireland our Dominions and Islands belonging to the same And know yee further that Wee of â—uâ— especial grace and upon certain knowledg c. Do give and grant to the said N. our great Admiral of England and Governor general over our Fleets and Seas aforesaid all manner of Jurisdictions Autorities Liberties Offices Fees Profits Duties Emoluments Wrecks of the Sea Ejectments Regards Advantages Commodities Preheminences and Privileges Whatsoëver to the said Office our great Admiral of England and Ireland and of the other Places and dominions aforesaid in any manner whatsoëver belonging and appertaining And afterwards there follow verie many other particulars in the King's Commission setting forth that most ample Command and Jurisdiction In former times as hath been alreadie shewn you this kinde of Commanders were called Custodes Maris Guardians or Keepers of the Sea who afterward began to bee invested with the name of Admirals in the Reign of Edward the First But their Commands were usually restrained to certain Limits of Coasts So that particular Commanders were somtimes set over each of the Three Western Southern and Northern Coasts but for the most part over the Western and Northern Seldom was one set over both before that the Title of Admiral of England Ireland and Aquitain was put into the Commissions of which more by and by But as the name of Guardian of the Sea was taken from the Sea it self whereof hee was Governor as of a Province so that of Admirals a word whose Original is very uncertain but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Amiralius was used of old for a Commander of a Fleet or Navie not onely in the West but also in the Eastern Empire derived its name of Dignitie either from the Fleet wherewith hee defended his Jurisdiction at Sea as it was usual heretofore or els from the Land either bordering upon that Jurisdiction or joined therewith as it hath been in the later Form of Commissions Whereupon from the time of Edward the first unto Henrie the Fourth about one hundred and Fiftie years they were in solemn manner created Admirals of the Fleet or Navis of our Ships towards the Northern Parts or towards the Western Parts or the Southern or as it â—â—ll out somtimes of both together For the Southern and Western Coast did as appear's by the thing it self signifie one and the same That is to say the Coast stretched here and there along the Shore from the North of the Thames But as the Dignitie of those Officers called Comes and Magister Equitum of the West Magister Equitum throughout Gallia Magister Militum throughout the East Magister Militum throughout Thrace and others of that kinde in the Imperial Offices did no less denote the Autoritie and Jurisdiction of them that commanded in these Provinces who before were Lords of the Provinces than if they had been called Comes and Magister of the West Magister throughout Gallia throughout the East and throughout Thrace so it is evident that the Admirals of the Fleets and Navies whereby the Sea is guarded after the same manner as the Land is possessed by Land-Forces did no less set forth the Command and Dominion and civil possession of those that had autoritie over the Sea who before were Lords of the Sea then if they had been styled Guardians of the Sea Commanders or Admirals in their Commissions And such as were so constituted Admirals of both Coasts or of the whole English Navie were somtimes by a general name called Admirals of England over the Sea before that form of words was put into the Royal Commissions And of this sort of Admirals you have a Catalogue set down by that eminent man Sir Henrie Spelman in his Glossarie where there are others also that follow But such a change hapned in the Form of the Commissions in the time of Henrie the Fourth that there was one man appointed Admiral not onely of the fleets or Navies but of England and Ireland over whose Fleet of Ships or Navie for Defence of the Irish Sea somtimes a particular person was made Admiral as was Thomas Percie Earl of Worcester yea and in express words also Admiral of Aquitain and Picardie As was Thomas Beaufort who also was Duke of Excester under Henrie the Fifth in the thirteenth year of Henrie the Fourth after hee had surrendred the Commission whereby hee had
the Coast of France For although Aquitain indeed was first added to the names of England and Ireland in that Commission while the English possessed the Dutchie of Aquitain nevertheless it not onely so remained likewise in that form of Commission constantly even after the expulsion of the English until our times but Normandie also which had never been named before in the Commission of high Admiral of England was added and this som Ages after that the English were wholly deprived of the Dutchie it self So that either these names do serv in stead of a Limit to the Sea under his protection or els wee must perforce admit contrarie to reason that they signified nothing in the Commission for so many years For wee see that those names of opposite Shore were reteined in the Admiral 's Commission even from the end of Queen Marie's Reign until our times or for the space of 77 years though the English in the mean time were not possest of the least part of France as also that Normandie was added many years before but yet long after the English were outed of its possession Nor ought any man fondly to imagine that these Names were inserted becaus of that right the King of England had to the Crown of France For indeed the Kings of England have by an antient Right usually entitled themselvs Kings of France Also the Dutchies of Aquitain and Normandie and the other Provinces of France mentioned in this Commission are comprehended in that name of the Kingdom as the lesser in the greater But if that had been the caus certainly the name of France should have been ascribed to our Admiral yea and other Officers of that Kingdom have been made in the same manner by the King of England after hee was driven thence Of which thing there is not the least evidence indeed any where exstant And it is to bee observed as soon as ever an alteration was made in the Draught of the Commission from that denomination of the Command of the Admirals of England which was derived from the Fleets and Coasts over which they had command unto that which is made up of the Kingdoms and Provinces that then an Addition was made of Aquitain to the end that the limit or bound as well on this as the other side of the Sea might bee pointed out by the Shores The name of Normandie beeing added afterwards and reteined still together with Calais and the Marches thereof and Aquitain upon the same account But while that the Kings of England were in former times possest of Normandie Aquitain and other Countries in France there are not found in the form of Commission wherein the Kingdoms and Provinces as hath been alreadie shewn are expressly nominated any other Admirals or Governors of the Maritim Province or Dominion by Sea made by them besides those to whose care the Fleets and Coasts were committed in the manner alreadie mentioned that is to say the whole Sea flowing between our British Isles and the Provinces over against them and the Fleets belonging to any Territories whatsoëver of the Kings of England were at that time by a peculiar right of the Kingdom of England in the Sea so subject to them who were so put in Command over the English Fleets and Coasts that there remained neither place nor use for any other Commanders of that kinde Which may bee said likewise of those times wherein som of the Kings of England stood possessed also of the Kingdom of France as Edward the Third and the two Henries 5 th and 6 th Nor is it a bare conjecture that they did not put any others in command over the Sea and Fleets besides those to whom by right onely of the Kingdom of England the power was committed to wit according to that right which comprehended the whole Sea flowing between but it is sufficiently proved also upon this ground that wee have the antient publick Records of those times touching the Offices constituted by our Kings in France and those Provinces beyond Sea in most whereof I finde not the least sign of the contrarie And if it bee demanded here wherefore it was that the Shore of Bretaign was omitted which in like manner lie's over against our Isle of Britain and together with the Shore of Picardie Normandie and Aquitain sufficiently take's up that whole Tract which stretcheth it self in the Realm of France before the English and Irish Sea certainly if the aforementioned reason take place there is little caus to doubt that it hapned thence becaus the King of England was not at any time so possest of Bretaign that beeing outed of it hee needed to bee very sollicitous touching the Bounds of the Sea-Territorie adjoining Distinct Lords of Territories confining on each other as were the King of England and Duke of Bretaign heretofore for Bretaign had Kings and Dukes of its own before Charls the Eight under whom Anno Dom. 1491. it was united to the Realm of France do for the most part keep their Bounds so distinct that they may bee the more evidently taken notice of by all but when of such kinde of Territories there is but one and the same Lord as the King of England was while hee possessed either Normandie or Aquitain or any other Maritim Province in France together with England hee beeing outed of either ought above all things to take care that the past confusion of possession bee not prejudicial to the future distinction of Bounds For fear then lest it might have been pretended that even the Sea adjoining or confining with those Maritim Provinces which were a long time heretofore possessed by the English and afterwards taken away was taken away together with the Provinces whenas perhaps by reason of the past confusion of possession in one and the same Lord all men might not bee sufficiently instructed touching the Bounds of the English Sea placed as wee have said upon the Shore over against us therefore for the setting forth of those Bounds the name first of Aquitain after its beeing lost was reteined in the Admiral 's Commission and then that also of Normandie was added And afterwards both of them with the name of Calais and the Marches in stead of the Shore of Picardie were for the same reason continued down to our times Which reason truly could not concern Bretaign at all nor Flanders likewise nor any other Shores lying Eastward over against us All which nevertheless do after the same manner bound the Sea-Territorie of England Moreover those things that have been hitherto observed shall bee confirmed by what wee shall add next touching the Office of Admiral among the French Touching the Admirals of the Kingdom of France or those constituted upon the opposite Shore their Original nature and varietie That the Sea it self flowing between Britain and France is not conteined in that command of his as of one that is Governor of a Territorie or Province nor is there any thing in it that may
as a River or Brook must bee conteined under the same Jurisdiction as an entire Bodie with the Land therefore somtimes mention is made also of this kinde of Sea flowing in as of a Sea reckoned within the Jurisdiction Current of the Sea of the opposite shores as for example of the Sea Flanders or as I finde it in som antient Manuscripts which seem to bee the Originals of certain Letters of King Henrie the Fift to the Earl of Carolois and to the Governors of Ypres Gaunt and Bruges deins la Jurisdiction l'estrem de la meer de Flandres within the Jurisdiction and stream of the Sea of Flanders which is all one For setting aside the Sea so flowing in or making an in-let or harbor before the opposite shore all that which remain's or the Sea flowing between those opposite Countries and England was ever esteemed to bee of the English Dominion according to what I have formerly shewn So that a late Writer doubtless was in a dream when upon the repairing of the Dock at Mardike hee write's that hee saw the Empire of the British Sea restored to the King of Spain And so I have don with this point touching the Declaration and acknowledgment of the Sea Dominion of our Kings made by those Forein and Neighbor-Nations who were most concerned in the Business Of the Dominion of the King of Great Britain in the Irish and Western Sea consider'd singly and apart by it self CHAP. XXX I have alreadie spoken in general of the English or British Sea which is a part of the Patrimonie of the Crown of England but chiefly as it lie's either East or South It rest's now that wee treat of the Western as also the Scotish and Northern and in a word of the whole British Sea that remain's It is evident to all that part of the Western Sea lying before England is understood as well in that Libel which was exhibited by so many Nations to the Commissioners deputed by the Kings of England and France above three hundred and thirtie years ago wherein wee so often read le mer d' Angleterre or the sea of England as in the King 's Commission-before mentioned wherein our Kings are expressly-declared Lords of the English Sea on every side and therefore I shall forbear to repeat what is cited out of Bracton about the Essoyning or excusing of a man absent in Ireland and other things of that kinde alleged before which make to this purpose Moreover also wee read every where that all the Isles in this neighboring Sea were called British as wee observed at the beginning of this Book just as if the narrow Seas flowing between like Rivers or turnings of Rivers did disjoin those Banks or Shores from great Britain as Fragments of the same Whereby it appear's that the narrow Seas themselvs with the Isles even as Rivers with their Banks are to bee reckoned a part of the British Territorie And hereunto especially relate's also that expression in the Libel so often cited to wit that the Kings of England have ever been Lords both of the English Sea or of the British so far as it stretcheth before England and also of the Isles situate therein par raison du Royalme d' Angleterre by right of the Realm of England So that the Isle of Man which as Giraldus Cambrensis saith stand's in this Sea in the very midst betwixt the Northern Parts of England and Ireland was if I understand any thing reckoned of old among the Land-Provinces of England even as the Isle of Wight Lundie and others of that kinde Nor doth it seem to bee understood otherwise by those men of antient time who upon occasion of a dispute whether this Isle ought by right to bee taken for an appendant of England or Ireland beeing placed in the midst of the Sea flowing between determined the controversie on this manner They brought venemous serpents and observing that the Isle did entertain and cherish them as well as England and the rest of great Britain but on the contrarie that Ireland destroied them it was concluded saith Giraldus Cambrensis who lived under Henrie the Second by the common censure of all that it ought to bee ascribed unto England For if they had so thought the Territorie either of Ireland or England as it consisted of Land and Sea to bee dis-joined from this Isle of Man that they had conceived the Sea lying between either common to all men or by antient right subject to other than the Kings either of Ireland or Britain they might seem to have raised a very ridiculous Controversie For I suppose the Question could bee no other than touching the bounds of England or great Britain and Ireland But that a Question about bounds may bee admitted between Owners that are Neighbors where the Territories of both are not continual or contiguous is beyond my understanding It is well said by Paulus that if a publick Thorow-fare or publick River intervene which belong's to neither of the neighboring Owners an Action cannot bee brought upon that Title of the Law Finium Regundorum And truly after that Quintus Fabius Labeo beeing appointed Arbiter by the Senate betwixt the Nolans and Neapolitans about the bounds of a Field had so craftily perswaded both of them to retire backwards apart from each other that a portion of the Field was left in the middle which hee adjudged to the people of Rome there could not any Controversie arise farther between them about the bounds of this Field becaus there ceased to bee any confine betwixt them But if any Question arose afterwards they were both to contend with the people of Rome Even so it is to bee conceived of that Question to which of the two Countries the Isle of Man ought by Right to bee ascribed it arising chiefly upon this ground becaus it lay in the midst between the Territories belonging to Ireland and Britain and at the confine of both For by an Argument drawn from the nature of the very soil onely without a civil consideration of Dominion though they would have here the very nature of the soil to bee the evidence thereof as a Lot for decision it ought no more to bee ascribed either to Britain or Ireland than to Norway Spain or France where every man know's that venemous Creatures are bred as well as in Britain Therefore to bee ascribed to England or Britain in that antient Decision is so immediately to bee annexed to the British Territorie that the Isle of Man may truly and in a civil sens bee called a Land-Province of England or Britain seeing the English Territorie is so continually extended as far as its Western Coasts that which bend's Westward from the very Confine beeing ascribed to Ireland And therefore Queen Elisabeth's Commissioners let fall those words too unadvisedly in the Treatie held at Bremen with the Danish Commissioners about free Navigation and Fishing in the Norwegian
Sea That the Kings of England never had prohibited Navigation and Fishing in the Irish Sea between England and Ireland as if they would have had it proved from thence that the Dane ought not to bee prohibited Fishing or Navigation between Island and Norway becaus neither were Lords of the Sea but had possessed the Shores onely on both sides by an equal Right There were other particulars also no less rashly spoken touching a communitie of the Sea as wee observed before Concerning Navigation and Fishing in the Norwegian Sea I shall add more by and by But as it was ill don of those Commissioners in that Treatie to make use of an Argument drawn from a necessarie communitie of the Sea so there is no truth in that which they let fall concerning the Irish Sea For wee know that not onely those pettie Potentates bordering near the Sea heretofore that were in Rebellion and had usurped the Kings Right in many places of Ireland did exact grievous Tributes of Foreiners for the very libertie of Fishing but also it was expressly provided by Act of Parlament that no Foreiner should Fish in the Irish Sea without leav first obteined to this purpose from the Lord Lievtenant or som other lawsul Deputie or Officer of the King of England yea and that all Foreiners should pay yearly for every Fisher-boat of XII Tons or upward thirteen shillings and four pence and for everie lesser Vessel two shillings upon pain of forfeiting their Vessels Furniture and all Goods whatsoëver if so they refused this kinde of paiment or did not acknowledg this Soveraignite of the Lord of the Sea But I shall insert the whole Act touching this business that wee may understand what was the most received Opinion of all the Estates of Ireland touching this Right here of the King Item at the requeste of the Commons that where divers vessels of other landes fro one daie to other goynge to fish amongst the kings Irish enemies in divers partes of this sayd land by which the kings said enemies bee greatlye advanced and strengthened aswell in vitualles harneys armor as dyvers others necessaries also great tributes of money given by every of the said vessells to the said enemies from day to day to the great augmentation of their power and force against the King's honor and wealth and utter distruction of this said land thereupon the premisses considered it is enacted and ordeined by aucthoritie of the said Parliament that no manner vessell of other landes shall bee no time nor season of the yeere from henceforth from the feast of the Nativity of our Lord Jesus Christs next comming go in no part of the said land betwixt the said Irish enemies to no manner fishing without one special licence of the Lieutenant his deputy or Justice of the land for the time being or licence of another person having the kings power to grant such licence upon paine of forfaiture of the shippe and goods to the king And that whatsoever person or persons that find or impeche any of the said vessells rumpants or forfaites against this act by the auctoritie of the same it bee lawfull to them so making any claime in behalfe of the King and approving the said forfaytures by any of the said vessels to be made that the king shall have th' one moitye of the said forfeyture and the said person or persons shall have th' other without anye impechment and that all manner vessells of other lands comming in the said land of Ireland a fishing being of the burden of twelue tunnes or lesse haveing one Drover or boate everye of them to paye for the maintenance of the Kings warres there xiii s. iiii d. by the yeer And all other small vessells as scarfes or boates not haveing Drover nor lighter being within the said burden of twelve runnes every of them shall paye twoe shillings goings a fishing in the like manner Provided alwayes that no vessell fyshing in the North parte of Wicklo be charged by reason of this art and that the Lieutenant his deputy or Justice of the land for the time being shall have the foresaid summes and duties of mony so paid to be imployed in the Kings warres for the defente of the said land and that the Customers and Collectors of the same summes shall accoumpt before the said Justice Lieutenant or Deputy for the time being or such Auditors that shall be for the same appointed by the king or them and not before the Barons of th'exchequer in the said lande and that none of the saide vessels so comming from other parts in the saide lande shall not depart out of the saide lande till every of them pay their said duties upon pain of forfeiture of the vessels and goods to the King There are som also who affirm that the King of Spain obteined leav by request from our Queen Marie for XXI years to fish in the more Northerly part of the Irish Sea and that thereupon a Revenue of one thousand pounds per annum was advanced to the Exchequer in Ireland A Proclamation also was set forth by James King of great Britain prohibiting any foreiner without leav first obteined to fish in this Irish Sea But as to what concern's that Controversie about the Isle of Man although it bee remember'd by Giraldus who wrote in the Reign of Henrie the Second nevertheless it is to bee conceived that it arose in the more antient times of the English-Saxons when all that lie's betwixt England and Ireland was in subjection either to the Kings of Ireland or Britain that is when both of them had in this Sea distinct Territories of their own whose Bounds were in question Certain it is as Beda write's that Edwin the most potent King of the Nortbumbrians or rather of all the English-Saxons subdued the Mevanian Isles to the Dominion of England about the year DCXXX That is to say both that Mevanian which wee call Anglesey the other also which is Man whereof wee discoursed But in the later time of the Anglo-Saxon Empire the Norwegians or Danes who exceedingly infested both this and the North-east Sea with very frequent Robberies at length seized both this Isle and the Hebrides and held them almost two hundred years So that in the mean time this of Man could not in a Civil sens bee ascribed either to Ireland or Britain But that the Kings thereof were at that time Lords as well of the neighboring Sea as of the Isles may bee collected out of their Annals where we find that Godred whose sirname was Crovan King of Man in the year of our Lord MLXVI brought Dublin and a great part of Laynster under his subjection And so throughly subdued the Scots that no man who built a Ship durst drive in more than three Nails So that hee gave both limitation and Law to the Shipping of his Neighbors which is all one as to enjoy the very Dominion of the Sea as I have shewn in