Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	henry_n	king_n	queen_n	22,548	5	7.7438	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A88116	The lier laid open in a letter, first written to a friend in the country, at his desire, for his private satisfaction: and now printed for the publick. Touching a late pamphlet, intituled, The manifold practises and attempts of the Hamiltons: and particularly, of the present Duke of Hamilton, (now generall of the Scottish Army) to get the crown of Scotland.		1648 (1648)	Wing L1948; Thomason E451_44; ESTC R202715	8,035	16

The LIER laid open In a LETTER First Written to a Friend in the Country at his desire for his private satisfaction And now Printed for the Publick Touching a late PAMPHLET INTITVLED The manifold Practises and Attempts of the Hamiltons AND Particularly of the present DUKE OF HAMILTON Now Generall of the Scottish ARMY to get the Crown of SCOTLAND London Printed in the Yeer 1648. An Answer to a Letter forged by some Malicious Person against the Illustrious Lord JAMES Duke of HAMILTON now General of the SCOTTISH ARMY And the Right Honourable WILLIAM Earl of LANERICK His Brother SIR IN satisfaction to your desire touching a malicious Pamphlet lately forged and published against Duke Hamilton and his Brother the Earl of Lanerick I shall shew you briefly and ingeniously my opinion thereof Sine amore et odio which blinds and transports most judgements The first part thereof concerning some of Duke Hamiltons Predecessors is borrowed from Buchanan who is known by all judicious impartial men of the Scottish Nation to have been suborned by the Earl of Murray then Regent to defame Queen Mary and her Posterity make them odious to the people and incapable of Government according to his pernitious principles now revived in this Island whether first invented by Jesuits or some Sectaries about the yeer of God 1536. is not material to our purpose since both Joyn issue in it and like Herod and Pilate agree against the Lords Anointed to make way for the setling of the Crown upon his own head and transferring of it to his Posterity as by Buchanan his Dialogue De jure Regni apud Scotos his Detectio and History may appear As also by the Charge which the Earls of Murray Morton and others gave in to Queen Elizabeth against Queen Mary and as King James declares plainly in his Basilicon doron And perceiving that this could hardly be effectuated so long as the race of Hamiltons the next undoubted lawful Heirs remained who stood firme to the Queen He caused Buchanan to defame them also in his Libels for that same end forfeited and banished them for their Loyalty and as Buchanan to insinuate his calumnies the better took his rise from King James the fifths minority so doth this Pamphleter now and yet makes only use of him when he serves his turn building upon his own raw invention when Buchanan makes not for it As when he instances Sir James Hamilton executed for Treason Buchanan doth not charge the Earl of Arran to have had any hand in it neither was he ever accused therof the said Sir James of Evendale being known to be a profuse wicked man Again Buchanan in terminis charges the Clergy as the chief hinderers of King James the Fift his meeting at York with his Uncle Henry the Eighth of England for fear he should have induced him to shake off the Popes Authority as himself had done a little before and that the Marriage with the Lady Mary might have been a means to procure it as they likewise hindered the Marriage of Mary Queen of Scots with Edward the Sixth agreed upon under the Great Seals of both Kingdoms The Queen-Mother and Cardinal Beaton who ruled all then sending her to France which this Pamphleter charges most injuriously upon the Duke of Chastle-rault whereas it is conspicuous that he obtained that title and 1200 Franks pension which this Duke keeps still from the French King for resigning the Regency to the Queen dowager being that he was made Regent not by a private faction as the Pamphleter saies but by the Three Estates of the Kingdom in opposition to a forged Will of the late Kings which Cardinal Beaton obtruded the Duke being inclined then to the Protestant Religion and most popular as both Buchanan and John Knox in their Histories do testifie and impute his after change in Religion to the Queens side to his Brother the Abbot of Paseley after Archbishop of St Andrews and M. David Panter his Secretary after Bishop of Rosse who returning from France got in great favour with him over ruled him being of no great intellectualls and caused remove of all his ancient servants and placed their own creatures about him And it is very plain that if he had been a man of an aspiring spirit to the Crown he would never have given up his Regency but all his actions showes him to have been a humble man and of no ambition and more inclined to a private than publick way of life And for his eldest Son the Earl of Arran he was known to be distracted and died so without marriage and Lord John the second Son this Dukes Grand-father never was a suitor to the Queen that I can read in any but this Pamphleter though I cannot see that it had been a Crime in either to have been suitors more than it was for the Lord Darnely to marry her As for the Kings murther afterwards when the Earl of Morton suffered for concealing of it a cleer Discovery was made who were the chief authors of it and actors in it the Duke of Chastle rault and his Sons having small hand in the Government at that time and standing fast to the Queen when others rose in Arms against her in prosecution of that Designe As for the Earl of Murrayes death Bothwel-haugh that perpetrated it flying after to France professed that he did it out of a private revenge because the Earl of Murray had taken his Estate unjustly from him and could not be induced by large rewards to kill a great man there neither could there ever be any legal proofes brought against the Duke his Sons or Archbishop Hamilton who was most illegally and barbarously murthered concerning the Kings murther and Regents death though much attempted by the Faction of the times out of malice to them for their Loyalty to the Queen and consequently to the Prince her Son whom the Faction set up in his Cradle to destroy his Mother under colour of his Authority invested in them which how much he abhorred he declared fully when he came to years of understanding and many of the cheif Actors did not escape Gods judgement And here I must observe how this Scribler would seem to be a Royalist and yet runs himself upon Sectarian Antimonarchical Rocks that make inevitable Shipwrack of all Monarchical power Where he sayes That the Queen was put and kept in Lochleven a prisoner by command of Parliament and that the Hamiltons took a course to releive her and suppresse the King and his party he will not deny but the Queen was their lawful Soveraigne by the Law of God and by neer 107 Descents by what law then of God or that Kingdom could a party of her Subjects imprison and disthrone her Was it Treason in my Lord Hamilton Duke of Chastle-rault to releive her and imploy all his power to defend her Let them cite the Law I demand of him Would it be so now to rescue the King out of the Isle of

Wight But he answers That it was to suppresse the King her son and the Nobility that did adhere to him This is a poore subterfuge the Prince was in his Craddle not fully 18 moneths of age and what hand could he have in the ruine of his Mother to make a President for his own the matter is clear to any reasonable man The Hamiltons would have restored the Queen according to the duty of their allegiance without wronging the young Prince in his just succession nay for the better preserving of his Royall Person to come to it in his due time according to the Law of God and of that Nation But such was the perfidious guilt of the Earles of Murray Argile Morton Ruthen and others that it could not be done without their destruction therefore they laboured to keep the power in their own hands in the name of the Infant King and to destroy the Queen and Hamiltons to put the crown upon the Earl of Murraye's head the young King being in his custody to make away when he found time And besides King James His Authority which is of great force with the judiciously learned all the Earl of Murrayes proceedings do clearly demonstrate his intended usurpation of the Crown for from the first beginning of that Rebellion he was head of it and all along acted covertly making the Earl of Argile to own it openly and made still a show to be for the Queen his dear sister abusing of her goodnes and getting into places of greatest trust the better to betray all her Counsells to Argile and the Lords of the congregations absenting himself ever from the execution of all the plots contrived against her which himself was chief author and abettor of untill at last she was imprisoned and disthroned and then when he thought all sure he took off the mask raised an Army openly defeated her in Langside field and enforced her to fly into England for safety in regard of his most violent prosecution to the disgrace both of her the young King and the Scottish Nation charging her with many base aspersions that could not but reflect upon her Son and subjecting her honour and life to the judgement of a forreign Prince contrary to the fundamentall lawes of that ancient free Kingdome never subject to any but their own Kings and at the same time forfeited and banished the Hamiltons Lord John and Lord Claud being reduced to that extremity that they were constrained to go on foot disguised through England to France such an influence and correspondence the Earl of Murray had then with Queen Elisabeth that they durst not be known there Some Two Yeares and odde Moneths after the Earle of Murry being killed by one of the name of Hamilton out of his private revenge as I touched before the Earl of Lenox got to be regent and continued the persecution of the Hamiltons out of an old quarrell that had been between these families for the death of John Earl of Lenox in King Iames the fift his minority but withall stil under the pretence of the murther of the late King and Regent and so did the two succeeding Regents the Earls of Marre and Morton to keepe the power in their own hands and debarre my Lord Hamilton from his just Right the Regency being due to him by the Lawes of the Kingdome as next of blood to the young King Thereafter Captain James Stewart a man of a violent and hot Spirit comming in favour with the young King studyed to raise his fortune being a Souldier of fortune upon the continuance of the Hamiltons ruin and first begged the Ward of the Earl of Arran being a Lunatick and afterwards got himself to be made Earl of Arran Thus for many years the Hamiltons suffered exceedingly for their loyalty untill at last a great part of the Nobilitie and Gentry not being able to endure longer Captain Iames his oppressions rose in a body called home Lord John Hamilton and Lord Claud his Brother and rescued the King at Striveling out of his hands At which time Lord Iohn venerable for his comely person and gray haires occasioned by his great afflictions falling upon his knees to kiss his Majesties hand was taken up embraced and called Father by him who being overjoyd with the Kings presence and kind reception fell again upon his knees and could not express for tears his joy mixed with grief that he should have been enforced to take that way to come to His Majesties Presence humbly begging pardon if he had given any offence to his Majesty thereby The King being much moved with his passionate expressions and manner of his carriage took him up again embraced him and desired him not to be troubled assuring him that he was now come to years to discern what he and his family had suffered above all others for their fidelity to his Mother and should reward it if God spared his days And soon after created him Marquis of Hamilton made him a Privie Councellor and desired much his advice in all business of Weight but he being of retired disposition waved as much as he could the Court to enjoy a private contented life in the Country Some of the furious Ministers wrote to him the famous 17 day of December 1596. when they stirred up the hot-headded Zelots in Edenburgh against the King to come and be head of their faction which they called God and the Kirks Cause which was a fair occasion for him to have embraced if he had been more ambitious then loyal but he flatly refused advising them to submit to their Soveraign sent their Letters to the King and offered his best assistance to suppress them and so continued all his time most passionately affectionate to his sacred Majesties service which leads me to observe this Libellers malice in his Post-script against him most injuriously and upon no ground unless he do with some of our times interpret the greatest loyalty to be treason as he asserts plainly in some parts of his discourse and particularly in the Post-script to bring home his conclusion grounded upon false Premises against my Lord Hamiltons Predecessors and to make way for a more easie belief in the Readers of these things that he libels against the Duke himself and his Brother to whose parts I am now come not esteeming it needful to insist upon the Noble disposition of the Dukes Father not mentioned by the Pamphleter and the faithful service that he did to King Iames in the general Assembly at Perth and in His Majesties Royal Family The first arrow wherewith he thinks to wound my Lord Dukes honor is drawn from that Levy for Germany about seventeen or eighteen years ago and carryed on with a long-winded story concerning the Lord Rae Ochiltrie and others Sir it is well known that in that publike tryal before the Marshal Court between the L. Rae David Ramsey and at the Councel Table between Major Borthuik and M. Robert Meldram he was acquitted David