Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n henry_n king_n queen_n 22,548 5 7.7438 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A27494 Clavi trabales, or, Nailes fastned by some great masters of assemblyes confirming the Kings supremacy, the subjects duty, church government by bishops ... : unto which is added a sermon of regal power, and the novelty of the doctrine of resistance : also a preface by the right Reverend Father in God, the Lord Bishop of Lincolne / published by Nicholas Bernard ... Bernard, Nicholas, d. 1661. 1661 (1661) Wing B2007; ESTC R4475 99,985 198

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of condition that may seem unequal unto any side and to refer unto his own sacred breast how fat he will be pleased to extend or abridge his Favours of whose Lenity in forbearing the executing of the Statute our Recusants have found such experience that they cannot expect a greater liberty by giving any thing that is demanded then now already they do freely enjoy As for the fear that this voluntary contribution may in time be made a matter of Necessity and imposed as a perpetual charge upon posterity it may easily be holpen with such a clause as we find added in the grant of an ayde made by the Popes Council An 11. H. 3. out of the Ecclesiastical Profits of this Land Quod non debet trahi in confuetudinem of which kinds of Grants many other Examples of later memory might be produced and as for the proportion of the sum which you thought to be so great in the former proposition it is my Lords desire that you should signifie unto him what you think you are well able to bear and what your selves will be content voluntarily to proffer To alledge as you have done that you are not able to bear so great a charge as was demanded may stand with some reason but to plead an unability to give any thing at all is neither agreeable to reason or duty You say you are ready to serve the King as your Ancestors did heretofore with your bodys and lives as if the supply of the Kings wants with monys were a thing unknown to our Fore-fathers But if you will search the Pipe-Rolls you shall finde the names of those who contributed to King Henry the third for a matter that did less concern the Subjects of this Kingdom then the help that is now demanded namely for the marrying of his Sister to the Emperor In the Records of the same King kept in England we finde his Letters Patents directed hither into Ireland for levying of money to help to pay his debts unto Lewis the Son of the King of France In the Rolls of Gasconie we finde the like Letter directed by King Edward the Second unto the Gentlemen and Merchants of Ireland of whose names there is a List there set down to give him ayd in his Expedition into Aquitain and for defence of his Land which is now the thing in question We finde an Ordinance likewise made in the time of Edward the Third for the personall taking of them that lived in England and held Lands and Tenements in Ireland Nay in this Case you must give me leave as a Divine to tell you plainly that to supply the King with means for the necessary defence of your Country is not a thing left to your own discretion either to doe or not to doe but a matter of duty which in conscience you stand bound to perform The Apostle Rom. 13. having affirmed that we must be subject to the higher powers not only for wrath but for Conscience sake adds this as a reason to confirm it for for this cause you pay Tribute also as if the denying of such payment could not stand with conscionable Subjection thereupon he inferrres this conclusion Render therefore unto all their due tribute to whom tribute custome to whom custome is due Agreeable to that known lesson which he had learned of our Saviour Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesars and unto God the things which are Gods Where you may observe that as to with-hold from God the things which are Gods man is said to be a Robber of God whereof he himself thus complaineth in case of subtracting of Tythes Oblations So to deny a supply to Caesar of such means as are necessary for the support of his Kingdom can be accounted no less then a Robbing of him of that which is his due which I wish you seriously to ponder and to think better of yielding somthing to this present Necessity that we may not return from you an undutifull answer which may justly be displeasing to his Majesty ROM 13. 2. Whosoever resisteth the Power resisteth the Ordinance of God and they that resist shall receive to themselves Damnation THe former Chapter may be called the Apostles Ethicks this his Politicks in the former he had taught them their dutys one to another in this towards the Magistrate And for this subject De officio subditorum both St. Peter and this our Apostle are very often and copious upon not only in this Epistle but in divers others inculcating it as his last words to Timothy and Titus chargeing them to teach it to the generation succeeding 1 Tim. 2. 1. 3. 1. And a some Expositors conceive one Cause to be the Rumor then falsly raised upon the Apostles as if they had been Seditious Innovators of the Roman Laws and the Kingdom of Christ preached by them tended to the absolving Subjects from their obedience to any other Whose mouths he here stops in shewing that the laws of Christ were not induced for the overturning the Civil but confirming not abolishing but establishing and making them the more sacred Abhorring those tumultuous spirits who under pretext of Religion and Christian liberty run into Rebellion as if there could be no perfect service of Christ nisi excusso terrenae potestatis jugo without casting off the yoak of earthly power In the text it self he exhorts to a Loyall subjection from these two principall Arguments First from the Originall of Regall Power ordained of God Secondly the Penalty of resisting it threatned as from God himself They shall receive to themselves damnation Every word in the Text hath its Emphosis Whosoever See how he commands a subjection without exception as in the former verse Let every Soul Omnis Anima si Apostolus sis si Evangelista si Prepheta sive quisquis tandem fueris as S. Chrysostom upon the place Resisteth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which implies how all preparative Ordering of forces Risings to that end as the Syriack renders it qui insurgit are condemned as a violation of Gods Ordinance not only an actuall resistance by open force in the field commonly called Rebellion like that of Absolom against David Jeroboam against Rehoboam but all secret undermining of a Prince by fraud and falsehood tending to it The Power 'T is observable the Apostle rather mentions the power then the person armed with it to teach us we should not so much mind the worth of the person as the authority it self he bears We acknowledge that sacred Apothegme of the Apostle Acts 5. 29. 't is better to obey God then man but both may be at once obeyed God actively and the Magistrate passively as the Apostles themselves then did The Ordinance of God As if Rebellion were Giant-like a waging of war with God himself as St. Chrysostome hath it which fully checks that proud conceit of some viz. that being made heirs of God they are no longer to be made
the English Reformation then will they make you leave the French Reformation You fail against wind and tyde you think that the Governors you shall have hereafter will be like Sir Tho. Layton you are deceived Though this day you had compassed your wish to morrow or the next day after at your Governors pleasure all shall be marred again Finally the Ecclesiasticall Government which you aske hath no ground at all upon Gods word 'T is altogether unknown to the Fathers who in matter of Christian Discipline and censure of manners were more zealous and precise then we are But you cannot of all the learned and pious antiquity shew one example of the Discipline or Ecclesiasticall order which you hold as your Bishop in his book of the perpetuall government of the Sonne of Gods Church doth learnedly teach I pass over what I have my self written concerning it in my book De diversis Ministrorum gradibus and in my Defence against the Answer of Mr. Beza and more largely in my Confutation of his book De triplicigenere Episcoporum I cannot wonder enough at the Scotchmen who could be perswaded to abolish and reject the state of Bishops by reasons so ill grounded partly false partly of no moment at all and altogether unworthy a man of such fame If the Scots had not more sought after the temporal means of Bishops then after true Reformation never had Mr. Beza's Book perswaded them to do what they have done And I assure you that your opinion concerning the government of the Church seems plausible unto great men but for two reasons the one is to prey upon the goods of the Church the other for to keep it under the Revenues and authority of Bishops being once taken away For the form of your discipline is such that it will never be approved of by a wise and discreet supreme Magistrate who knows how to govern Ye see not the faults you commit in your proceedings as well Consistoriall as Synodals men well versed in the Lawes and in government do observe them But they contemn them so long as they have the law in their own hands and that it is far easier for them to frustrate them regard neither Consistorie nor Synodes then for you to command and make Decrees Were your Discipline armed with power as the Inquisition of Spain is it would surpass it in tyranny The Episcopall authority is Canonical that is so limitted and enclosed within the bounds of the Statutes and Canons of the Church that it can command nothing without Law much less contrary to Law And the Bishop is but the Keeper of the Lawes to cause them to be observed and to punish the transgressors of your Consistories and Synodes For the present I will say no more only take notice of this that it is not likely the King who knows what Consistories and Synodes be will grant that to the Islands which doth displease him in Scotland This Gentlemen and Brethren have I thought good to write vnto you intreating you to take it well as comming from him that loves the Islands and the good and edification of the Church of Christ as much as you can doe Upon this occasion I have thought fit to add thus much concerning Dr. Hadrianus Saravia HIs learning is sufficiently known by his works his judgement in relation to the Liturgy and Discipline of the Church of England is declared by this Letter which doth further appear by his Subscriptions following 1. In Queen Elizabeth's time the form required was in these words We whose names are here underwritten do Declare and unfainedly Testify our assent to all and singular the Articles of Religion and the Confession of the true Christian Faith and the Doctrine of the Sacraments comprized in a book imprinted intituled Articles whereupon it was agreed by the Arch-bishops and Bishops of both Provinces and the whole Clergy in the Convocation holden at London in the year of our Lord God 1562. according to the computation of the Church of England for the avoiding of the diversities of opinions and for the establishing of Consent touching true Religion put forth by the Queens Authority And in testimony of such our Assents we have hereunto subscribed our names with our own proper hands as hereafter followeth Unto this Doctor Hadrianus de Saravia the sixth Prebend of the Church of Canterbury being conferred upon him subscribes in these words Per me Hadrianum de Saravia Sacrae Theologiae Professorem cui sexta Prebenda in Ecclesia Cathedrali Christi Cantuariens conferenda est sexto December is 1595. Wherein I find he did immediately succeed Doctor Whitaker whose Subscription is in these words viz. Per me Gulielmum Whitaker sacrae Theologiae Doctorem ejusdemque Professorem Regium in Academia Cantabrigiensi cui sexta Praebenda in Ecclesia Cathedrali Chrstl Cantuarens conferenda est Decimo Maii 1595. According unto which I find Mr. John Dod of Hanwell in Oxfordshire who wrot upon the Commandements to have subscribed in these words Per me Johannem Dod in Artibus Magistrum praesentatum ad Ecclesiam de Hanwell Oxon. Dioces 28. Julii 1585. unto whom abundance more and about that time might be added Mr. Richard Rogers Doctor Reynolds of Oxford c. among whom it pleased me to find the hand of the Reverend and Learned Mr. Hooker thus subscribing Per me Richardum Hooker Clericum in Artibus Magistrum praesentatum ad Canonicatum et Praebendam de Neather-haven in Ecclesia Cathedrali Sarum 17. Julii 1591. 2. In King Jame's time and since the form of the Subscription was thus To the three Articles mentioned in the 36. Chapter of the Book of Canons First that the Kings Majesty under God is the only supreme Governor of this Realm and of all other his Highness Dominions and Countries as well in all Spirituall or Ecclesiasticall things or Causes as Temporall and that no foraign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preheminence or Authority Ecclesiasticall or Spirituall within his Majesties said Realms Dominions and Territories That the Book of Common Prayer and of Ordering of Bishops Priests and Deacons containeth in it nothing contrary to the word of God and that it may lawfully so be used and that he himself will use the form in the said book prescribed in publick prayer and administration of the Sacraments and none other That he alloweth the book of Articles of Religion agreed upon by the Arch-bishops and Bishops of both Provinces and the Clergy in the Convocation holden at London in the year of our Lord One thousand five hundred sixty and two And that he acknowledgeth all and every the Articles therein contained being in number nine and thirty besides the Ratification to be agreeable to the word of God To these three Articles Doctor Hadrianus de Saravia being instituted unto the Rectory of Great Chart in the Diocess of Canterbury anno 1609. subscribes in these words Ego Hadrianus