Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	henry_n	king_n	pope_n	16,586	5	6.9376	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A54633	The antient right of the Commons of England asserted, or, A discourse proving by records and the best historians that the Commons of England were ever an essential part of Parliament by William Petyt of the Inner-Temple, Esq.	Petyt, William, 1636-1707.	1680 (1680)	Wing P1945; ESTC R422	80,113	272

nuper defuncti ut animos omnium in sui promotionem accenderet amorem ut illum in Regem susciperent patronum to which it was generally answered That if he with a willing mind would grant and by his Charter confirm to them illas libertates consuetudines antiquas which their Ancestors enjoyed in the time of Edward the Confessor in ipsum consentirent in Regem unanimiter consecrarent Henry willingly granted this and taking an Oath that he would perform it consecratus est in Regem at Westm. upon Lady day favente Clero populo and so forthwith he was Crowned by Maurice Bishop of London and Thomas Archbishop of York After such his Coronation he granted and confirmed to the Nation for the advancement of Holy Church and preservation of the peace of his people a Charter of their antient Liberties The Charter the Reader may find in that industrious Revivor and Restorer of decayed and forgotten Antiquities Mr. Lambard as also in Matth. Paris Where it appears that the Archbishops Bishops Barons Earls Vicounts or Sheriffs Optimates totius Regni Angliae were Witnesses to the Charter And that at the Coronation of the King those Laws were made de Communi Consilio assensu Baronum Regni Angliae by the common advice and assent of the Barons of England It being usual in succeeding ages at the Coronations of our English Kings to confirm make and ordain Laws De assensu Baronum Regni per Commune Concilium Regni or Parliament I shall from hence observe two things 1. That these Laws were granted and confirmed assensu Baronum Regni or Baronagii Angliae there being a clear difference between Barones Regis and Barones Regni as appears in the very bowels of those Laws and elsewhere for the K. Saith Si quis Baronum nostrorum c. but who were comprehended under those first phrases Mr. Camden will tell us Nomine Baronagii Angliae omnes quodammodo Regni ordines continentur and so the Commons as we now call them were there and assented to those Laws 2. Clero Populo universo Angliae congregatis We read King Stephen assensu Cleri Populi in Regem Angliae electus per Dominum Papam confirmatus 10 H. 2. Congregato Clero Populo Regni or as Fitz-Stephens Generali Concilio the King made the Assise or Statute of Clarendon which Council the learned Selden calls a full Parliament King John was Crowned mediante tam Cleri quam Populi unanimi consensu favore Anno 50 H. 3. Per providentiam Cardinalis meaning the Popes Legate apud Kenilworth Clerus Populus convocantur which the Patent Roll of that year thus confirms The King a le request de honourable pier Sire Ottobon Legat d'Engleterre son Parlement eust sommons à Kenilworth where the Statute or Dictum de Kenilworth was made between the King and his Communante or Parlement Rex primo postmodum Clerus Populus juraverunt quod Dictum inviolabiliter observarent Thus have I at length I hope fully ascertained and explained the Historians phrase Clerus Populus and proved it to be a Parliament from the Pat. Roll of H. 3. Yet I do not think that the Lords Temporal only were the Populus nor the Lords Spiritual the Clerus for I agree with Dr. Heylyn that there is no Record either of History or Law which I have observed in which the word Clerus serves to signifie the Archbishops and Bishops exclusive of the other Clergy or any writing whatsoever wherein it doth not either signifie the whole Clergy generally or the inferior Clergy only exclusive of the Archbishops Bishops and other Prelates and 't is my opinion as far as I can find that the word Populus following Clerus was Thema universale in significando and comprehended as well the Commons as the Lords and indeed the subject matter of the Historians speaks it William the Second Henry the First King Stephen and King John were to be elected and created Kings of England having no hereditary right 't was but reasonable then and according to the Laws and precedents of other Countries in like Cases Quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbari debet and so was the solemn Resolution of both Lords and Commons in the Parliament 40 E. 3. That neither King John nor any other could put the Realm or people of England into subjection sanz assent de eux without their assent or as the Parliament 29 H. 3. declared sine assensu Regni or as Malmesbury says in vita Willielmi primi absque generali Senatus Populi conventu Edicto But now to close the Reign of Henry the first I will out of that excellent Historian Matthew Paris transcribe the Oration or Speech of that King to the Common Council or Parliament in the seventh year of his Reign his elder Brother Robert Duke of Normandy then claiming the Crown of England and ready to invade this Nation with a great Force the Speech of the King the learned Monk thus delivers to us MAgnatibus igitur Regni ob hoc Londoniam Edicto Regio convocatis Rex talibus alloquiis mel favum oleumque mellitis mollitis blandiens dixit Amici fideles mei indigenae ac naturales nostis veraci sama referente qualiter frater meus Robertus electus per Deum vocatus ad regnum Hierosolymitanum foeliciter gubernandum quam frontosè illud infoeliciter refutaverit merito propterea à Deo reprobandus Nostis etiam in multis aliis superbiam ferocitatem illius quia vir bellicosus pacis impatiens est vosque scienter quasi contemptibiles quos desides vocat glutones conculcare desiderat Ego vero Rex humilis pacificus vos in pace in antiquis vestris libertatibus prout crebrius jurejur ando promisi gestio confovere vestris inclinando consiliis consultius ac mitius more mansueti principis sapienter gubernare super his si provideritis scripta subarata roborate iteratis juramentis praedicta certissime confirmare omnia videlicer quae sanctus Rex Edwardus Deo inspirante providè sancivit inviolabiliter jubeo observari ut mecum fideliter stantes fratris mei immò mei totius Regni Angliae hostis cruentissimi injurias potenter animose ac voluntarie propulsetis Si enim fortitudine Anglorum roborer inanes Normannorum minas nequaquam censeo formidandas Talibus igitur promissis quae tamen in fine impudenter violavit omnium corda sibi inclinavit ut pro ipso contra quemlibet usque ad capitis expositionem dimicarent This Speech to me is another strong Confirmation and Argument against the Norman Conquest for 't is luce clarius 1. That King Henry the First did not pretend to hold the Crown Jure Victoris 2. That the English were not totally subdued and destroyed by his

two Houses of Parliament and that the Knights Citizens and Burgesses did not sit with the Lords the Prelates having so great advantage of the Temporal Lords in their Votes were very unkind to the Crown they made not use of their over-ballance for the delivery of the King and Prince then said to be in Custody 3. Nor have I yet met with any reasons given why when the Government of the whole Kingdom was at this Parliament of 49 H. 3. to be setled after so long and bloody a War the Barons being then so victorious and numerous as our modern Authors say they would by their absence hazard and endanger the loss of all by entrusting the Prelates and Commons with the over-ballance Many remarkable observations might be raised upon this Record both as to the Lords and Commons but I will now pass to my eight Argument concluding this with M r Pry●●s opinion how the Parliament Rolls before E. 3. came to be lost or destroyed I will use his own words That there are no Records at all in the Tower except some few antient Charters or Exemplifications of them antienter than the first year of King John all the rest from William the first his Reign till then except some few in the Exchequer not relating to Parliaments being utterly lost the first Parliament Rolls yet remaining are these 5 8 9 and 19 th of King E. 2. the Statute Roll of H. 3. E. 1. E. 2. containing some Statutes made in their Reigns a Parchment Book of some Pleas in Parliament during the Reigns of King E. 1. and 2. and a few Bundles of Petitions in the Parliaments of 6 E. 1. and 1 2 3 and 4 E. 3. none of which are here abridged viz. in the Abridgment by him published only I find in the Clause Patent Charter and Fine Rolls of King John H. 3. E. 1 and 2. some Writs of Summons and some memorials of Acts Ordinances made and Aids Subsidies Dismes Quindisms Customs granted in Parliaments held during their Reigns the Rolls whereof are perished and quite lost either through the negligence of the Record Keepers or the Injury Iniquity of the times during the Civil Wars between the King and Barons in the Reigns of King John and H. 3. and betwixt the two Houses of Lancaster and York for the Title of the Crown wherein it is very probable the prevailing King's parties by their Instruments imbezled suppressed such Parliamentary Records and Proceedings as made most against their Interests Power Prerogatives Titles or through the default of our Kings great Officers and Attornies who sending for the Parliament Rolls out of the Tower upon special occasions never returned them again for reasons best known to themselves by means whereof those Parliament Rolls being no where to be found their defects must be supplied only out of such fragments and memorials of them as are extant in our other Records and antient Historians especially in Matthew Paris Matthew Westm. William of Malmesbury Henry Arch-Deacon of Huntingdon Roger de Hoveden Simeon Dunelmensis The Chronicle of Brompton Radulphus de Diceto Ranulphus Cestrensis and Thomas of Walsingham who give us some accompts of their proceedings and transactions which else had been utterly buried in oblivion as well as their Rolls wherein they were at large Recorded as is evident by the Parliament Rolls yet extant The EIGHTH ARGUMENT From the various opinions of the learned men in and since H. 8. who never dreamed of any such origine nor was it ever heard of till of late IT would be tedious to set down the various and wandring opinions and reasons of our modern Authors in English touching the beginning of our Parliaments and constituent parts thereof especially of the Commons as now called and comprehended in the Knights Citizens and Burgesses in Parliament I will but instance in a few eminent Authors and leave the Croud behind The great Antiquary Mr. Lamberd holds that they were before the time of William the First and there are other learned men who give their assent to that as a great truth Mr. Prynn saith By all the ancient Presidents before the Conquest it is most apparent That all our Pristine Synods and Councils were nought else but Parliaments that our Kings Nobles Senators Aldermen Wisemen Knights and Commons were usually present and voting in them as Members and Judges Polydore Virgil Hollinshead Speed and Martin are of opinion that the Commons were first summoned at a Parliament at Salisbury An. 16 H. 1. Sir Walter Raleigh in his Treatise of the Prerogative of Parliaments thinks it was Anno 18 H. 1. My Lord Bacon in a Letter to the Duke of Buckingham asks Where were the Commons before H. 1. gave them authority to meet in Parliament Dr. Heylin finds another beginning and saith that H. 2. who was Duke of Anjou was the first Institutor of our High Court of Parliament which being an Anjovian he learned in France But I cannot find that any of those ever supposed the Commons were first introduced in Parliament 49 H. 3. by Rebellion Nor was this opinion entertained by any Author I can meet with Anno 1529. 21 H. 8. for in an answer of that great and excellent person Sir Thomas More Lord Chancellor of England in his supplication of Souls against the supplication of Beggers discoursing about King Johns making in the 14 th year of his Reign and three years before his granting Magna Charta the Realm Tributary to the Pope declares his Judgment without any doubt or hesitation and therein as I take it the universal tradition and belief of all learned men of that and precedent times That the Clergy and all the Lords and Commons of the Realm made the Parliament in the age of King John and that never could any King of England give away the Realm to the Pope or make the Land Tributary without their grant whose Book and so his opinion we find approved of and published by a grave and learned Judge of the Kingdom Mr. Justice Rastall and dedicated to Queen Mary her self An. 1557. not much above a Century ago The NINTH ARGUMENT From the comparison of the antient Generale Concilium or Parliament of Ireland instanced An. 38 H. 3. with ours in England wherein the Citizens and Burgesses were which was eleven years before the pretended beginning of the Commons here AS great a right and priviledge surely was and ought to be allowed to the English Subjects as was to the Irish before 49 H. 3. and if that be admitted and that their Commune Concilium or Parliament had its Platform from ours as I think will not be denied by any that have considered the Histories and Records touching that Land we shall find the two ensuing Records An. 38 H. 3. clearly evince that the Citizens and Burgesses were then a part of their great Council or Parliament That King being in partibus transmarinis and the Queen being left Regent