Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n french_a king_n truce_n 2,525 5 11.6510 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A91306 A true and full relation of the prosecution, arraignment, tryall, and condemnation of Nathaniel Fiennes, late colonell and governor of the city and castle of Bristoll, before a councell of war held at Saint Albans during nine dayes space, in December, 1643. Touching his cowardly and traytorly surrendering of this city and castle, with all the canon, ammunition, arms, magazines, prisoners and colours therein to the enemy, in lesse then three whole dayes siege, before any outwork taken, or the least battery or assault agains the city or castle walls; to the ineffable losse, danger and prejudice of the whole kingdom. Set forth at the earnest desire of many persons of quality, to vindicate the verity of this much disguised action, prosecution, tryall, sentence, and some subsequent proceedings; ... / By William Prynne and Clement Walker, Esqs; Prynne, William, 1600-1669.; Walker, Clement, 1595-1651. 1644 (1644) Wing P4111; Thomason E255_1; ESTC R210055 195,553 170

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

of a generall Councell of War yet we see the Governour adjudged to lose his head for not holding it out to the utmost extremity according to his duty And if his plea could not secure him from such a sentence Colonell Fiennes his plea being the very same with his that he surrendred the City and Castle of Bristoll to the enemy before utmost extremity because they were weak and untenable for any long time to save the lives and estates of the Garrison and Parliaments friends and that by the counsell and assent of all the Knights Esquires Souldiers and Inhabitants thereof must needs be frivolous and can no way extenuate his fault nor save his neck from the blocke the rather because Bristoll was of far greater consequence to the Kingdome now and better provided fortified manned victualed and more likely to be relieved then Arde was then The second President was of Pierce de Cressingham and John de Spikesworth Esquires who were arrested and arraigned in Parliament 7 Rich. 2. num 17. for yeelding up the Castle of Drinkham in Flanders to the enemies from whom it was gained by the Bishop of Norwich though it were well and sufficiently stored with victuals and other necessaries and strong enough to be held against the enemies without the will or command of the King or his Lievtenant To which Spikesworth pleaded That he had never the custody of that Castle or any thing to doe therewith but was chased into it by the enemy it being then in the custody of Piers de Cressingham That soone after the enemy assaulting the Barbican he was unhappily routed and one of his Varlets slaine close by him That he had never any thing to doe in the Castle neither as a Souldier thereof nor in any other manner whatsoever but onely continued in it in manner aforesaid till it was surrendred by the said Piers And therefore prayed that it would please the King to have him excused Whereupon it was ordered he should be set at liberty if nothing else could be said against him Piers Cressingham who had the custody of the Castle alledged That upon the yeelding up of the Towne and Castle of Burburgh to the enemy of all the Garrison souldiers he had with him at Drinkham none would continue with him for the safeguard of that Castle but onely five persons by reason of which great necessity he was constrained for the safety of his owne person and people to enter into a Treaty with the enemies to deliver up that Fort and thereupon he yeelded it up and not for any other cause nor in any other manner but onely by constraint of the power of the enemies aforesaid denying that he ever received any thing from the enemies by way of gift or in any other manner Whereupon he conceived that no man ought to impute any manner of blame or reproach unto his person but if it should be thought he had done ill in any manner he most humbly cast himselfe upon the grace of his Liege Lord. But because this excuse was held insufficient he was committed to prison till the King should otherwise declare his opinion concerning him Here was a case of far greater extremity then Bristoll without any apparent mixture of treachery but onely five of the garison left to defend the Castle when as the Defendant had 2300 Souldiers at least in Bristoll and a surrender by common advise for the Governours and Inhabitants safety yet because Cressingham the Governour by virtue of his office was bound to hold it till the utmost extremity he was for the present adjudged to prison and to expect a further sentence afterwards whereas Spikesworth was acquitted because he came casually into the Castle as forced by the enemy and had no charge of it as a Governour Officer or garrison Souldier all which as appeares by this resolution are answerable and punishable for delivering up the smallest Fort before utmost extremity The third president is the case of the Bishop of Norwich accused in Parliament 7. R 2 num 32. for surrendring the Town of Gravelin to the enemy before utmost extremity upon condition that it should be totally demolished To which the Bishop pleaded that by reason of the disobedience of his Captains who quitted the field and betooke themselves to their Forts he was constrained to retire with his Forces to the Towne of Graveling which he would have held out well enough against all men and did hold out till the other Captaines had surrendred their Forts adjoining to the French and after that untill speedy supplies might have arrived from England But because there were sixe or 7000 English-men who came out of the Forts surrendred lying on the sands neare Calice who could not get into the Towne and were in danger to be slaine by the French within two or three dayes the Truce being then expired whose losse would have been charged principally upon him thereupon he was commanded by the King himselfe to render the Towne to the enemies or else to demolish it and then to march to succour the said English and after that towards England to save himself and others of his Army in case they were in any great want of victuals as in truth they were and because it behoved him to abate and void the Towne as it was lawfull for him to doe at his pleasure being gained by his proper conquest from the enemy it seemed to him that he ought to be well excused of what ever was surmised against him for compounding with French to rase the Towne to the ground and to depart whither he would with his bagge baggage and men To which was answered by the Lord Chancellor That there was sufficient victuals in the Towne when the Kings Letter came there after which the King sent other victuals thither in great plenty with Letters importing how he had appointed his Uncle to come speedily to his aid and succour yet notwithstanding he departed thence leaving the Towne to the enemies against the forme of his Indenture by which the King granted him whatever he should conquer not at all to surrender sell or leave the same to the enemy but to hold and possesse it And as for the disobedience and defaults of his Officers and their surrender of the Fortresses they neither could nor ought at all to excuse him seeing they were all named and chosen by himselfe not by the King or his Councell and the Articles of the surrenders sealed between them and the enemies were made without the authority and consent of the King Wherefore by the assent of the Earles Barons and other Lords temporall present in Parliament it was assented and decreed That the Bishop should be in the King mercy who out of his grace would forbeare to lay hands on his body in regard of his function though he might justly have proceeded against him as a Lay-man that he should be put to a fine and ransome according to the quantity and quality of his offence
the said towne was taken upon the said Robert and two of the Sonnes of the said Robert there slaine in the defence of the same Notwithstanding because that the said Baron himselfe had taken upon him the safeguard of the said towne to the said Grandfather and departed himself from thence without command of the said Grandfather and the said towne of Barwick was lost in the absence of the Baron he being in the company of the said Grandfather in the parts of France as is aforesaid It was adjudged by advice of the said Grandfather the King of Castile who is present the Nobles Dukes and Counts Henry late Duke of Lancaster the late Earle of Northumberland and Stafford and Sir Walter de Manny that the said towne was lost in default of the said Baron and for this cause he had judgement of life and member and that he should forfeit all that he had and to render his judgement in these words the said Sir Walter had a command from the said Grandfather Which things considered and this also that you William surrendred the said castle of Outhrewyke to the enemies of our Lord the King aforesaid without any duresse or want of Victuals against your allegeance and undertaking aforesaid the Lords abovementioned sitting here in full Parliament adjudge you to death and that you shall be drawne and hanged But because that our Lord the King is not yet informed of the manner of this judgement the execution thereof shall be respited untill the King be informed thereof Whereupon it was commanded to the said Constable safely to keep the said William untill he had other command from our Lord the King This case is very punctuall this judgment fatall to the Defendant wherein all his former pleas and far better then he could make are over-ruled against him long since even in full Parliament First this Weston as soon as he heard of the enemies approaches and intent to besiege Outhrewyke castle sent post to the Councell and to the Governour of Calice acquainting them with the weaknesse of the Garrison and craving present aid as the Defendant pretended he sent to his Excellency yet could receive no supplies from either Secondly his Garrison was not halfe enough to resist the enemies great power neither had he meanes to encrease it when as Bristoll garrison was abundantly sufficient to resist the enemy and the Defendant might have doubled it had he pleased there being 6000 or 8000 able men more in the towne whom he might have imployed in its defence Thirdly there were 8400 enemies before it as many or more then were before Bristoll and but 50 men onely in the castle to defend it whereas there were 2000 foot and 300 horse at least to guard Bristoll a vast disproportion Fourthly they had nine great Peeces of battery a great Ram or Morter-peece greater then ever were seen in those parts before with many other Engines as many or more then the enemy had at Bristoll Fifthly the siege battery and assault thereof continued from Munday till Saturday whereas Bristoll was besieged onely from Munday till Wednesday noone not halfe so long and then yeelded upon parley Sixtly all the walls and houses of the Castle were beaten downe and battered exceedingly and the ditches drained of the water by trenches and all their barricado's beaten downe yet they still held it out whereas not one shot at all was so much as made against the Castle or walls of Bristoll but against the Out-works onely Seventhly after the walls and barricado's were thus broken downe and the ditch drained they manfully repulsed the enemy who fiercely assaulted it and slew divers of them with the losse and wounding of some of the garrison whereas Bristoll Castle and the body of the Towne were yeelded up before the least battery Mine or Assault Eighthly they made all things ready for an assault planting all their Ordnance Engines Galleries and Faggots close to the Castle-ditch and sent two severall Heraulds and Messengers to him for a Parley ere he would treat whereas the Defendant before any battery or assault against the City or Castle sent out twice to the enemy for a Parley with so much haste that he would not hearken to any who would beat them out or oppose or delay the Treaty Ninthly twelve of his fifty men were by this time slaine sick and wounded so that he had onely 38 left to make good the castle thus battered and assaulted with so great a power whereas the Defendant lost but eight men at most and had at least 2300 horse and foot when he fell to parley Tenthly he surrendred the Castle by the advice of a generall Councell of War upon better grounds then the Defendant yeelded up Bristoll to wit because the wals were beaten downe the garrison over small to defend it the enemy very likely to force it by the assault no present reliefe neare at hand and to save his owne with the Souldiers lives and goods which else were indangered to be lost none of which the Defendant can justly alledge as we have manifested Eleventhly he made the most of an ill bargaine by selling the Victuals and Prisoners in it to the French for 1500 Franks with which he paid his Souldiers their arrears of wages discharged the debts of the castle owing for Victuals and defrayed the charges of their passage into England whereas the Defendant yeelded up all the Prisoners and Victuals to the enemy gratis with which provisions the ships that brought over the Irish Souldiers were victualled and left the State to pay the Souldiers arreares and other debts contracted by him there amounting to many thousand pounds which ought to be made good out of his owne estate Therefore in these respects he ought to undergoe the selfe same judgement of death and to be drawne and hanged much more justly then he To these Presidents Col. Fiennes Answered 1. That these Governours had all of them Commissions under the great Seale of England to keep these Townes and Castles and that made their offence so great but hee had no such Commission under the great Seale of England to bee Governour of Bristoll and this he conceived differenced the cases much To which Mr Prynne replyed First that the Defendant was much mistaken in this point for these Towns and Castles lying in France if the Commissions of their Governourships were under any Seale it was under the great Seale of France not of England as appeares by the expresse Statute of 14. E. 3. Stat. 4. 1. H. 6. Rot. Parl. Num. 14. 15. Secondly that the great Seal being carried from the Parliament when his Commission was granted he could not expect any such Commission under the great Seal but from the King himselfe in opposition to the Parliament to whom he surrendred Bristoll perchance for want of a Commission under the great Seal to keep it Thirdly if this were a good plea or warrantable distinction then all the Governours of Towns and