the Doctrine of Christ for ab initio non fuit sic that a verbal Contract of words should pretend above the real Contract of carnal knowledg And the Lady Grey though it doth not appear but that she was otherwise a very vertuous Lady yet if she knew the truth of what is before mention'd concerning the Lady Lucy she cannot be excused in taking that Husband to her self who had already given the first pledg and made the cheif and real Contract of Marriage with another Woman and far happier might she have been if she had ascended a meaner but more lawful Bed for the Earl of Warwick at his return home from France finding by this Marriage his Embâ—ssage frustrated the Lady Bona deluded the French King abused and himself made a stale and the disgraceful Instrument of all this deeply resented and waiting his time raised an Army and by surprize took the King Prisoner and presently conveyed him to Middleton-Castle in York-shire to remain there in safe custody with the Bishop of York where if he had not by fair words and Money gotten his Keepers to permit him the recreation of Hunting and thereby means to escape he had lain at Mercy And after he was escaped and had gather'd sufficient Forces whereby he made the Earl of Warwick fly to the French King where he was honourably received yet the Earl returned again so Potent with the French joined with the great party he had in England that the King was fain to fly to Burgundy and the new advanced Queen to take Sanctuary at Westminster And though her Husband again returned and by a hazardous Battel wherein Warwick himself and many other Lords were slain he recover'd again his Kingdom yet he had so little quiet and less security that what injoyment she obtained of him was always in fear and danger of the Field and other Competitors of the Bed after a man guilty so more unhappy then her self and when she lost him by death she lived to see those Remains of him he had left her two hopeful Sons most cruelly Murther'd and for the conclusion of all her self confined to the Monastery of Bermondsie in Southwark and all her Goods confiscate by her own Son in Law Henry the Seventh yet no just cause appearing against her In which Monastery in great pensiveness within few Years she died There is a Case reported by Sir Jo. Davies and likewise mention'd by the learned Dr. Godolphin in his Repertorium Canonicum 488. to have happened in Ireland which was this G. B. Esq had Issue C. B. on the Body of J.D. whom he had never carried to Priest or Temple but his Son C. B. Desertion of a Woman after a Child for a richer in Ireland was begot by natural marriage without any Pontifical Ceremony About Sixteen Years after G. B. having found a Lady who was richer and of a greater Estate and Reputation then his first Woman by whom he had his eldest Son C. B. Marries her with assent of her Friends by whom he had Issue E. B. and died after the death of G. B. the said C. B. his reputed Son and his Mother being both left alive continued silent by the space of nine Years 'till they happened to have one of their Kindred Bishop of K. by whom they then were encouraged by new hope to obtain their Right who it seems not experienced in the Forms of Judicial Proceedings without any Libel exhibited and not Convocatis Convocandis proceeded to take the Depositions of many Witnesses to prove that the said G. B. Twenty-nine Years before had lawfully married and took to Wife the said J. D. Mother of the said C. B. And the said C. B. was the Legitimate and lawful Son and Heir of the said G. B. And these Depositions so taken the said Bishop caused to be ingrossed and reduced into the Form of a solemn Act and having put his Signiture and Seal to that Instrument delivered the same to C. B. who publish'd it and thereupon alledged himself Son and Heir to the said G. B. Hereupon an information is put into the Castle-Chamber in Ireland against the Bishop suggesting a Conspiracy to Legitimate C. B. Son and illegitimate E. B. the Daughter of the said G. B. And for this Practice the said Bishop and others were Censured This Case and the foremention'd Case of Kenne are both contrary one to another and both contrary to the Law of God In Kennes Case the wrong Heir is Legitimated by the nullifying of a lawful Marriage consummate by carnal knowledg and birth of the right Heir by Sentence of the Spiritual Jurisdiction and there the Common-Law will not releive the right Such Faith they say they are bound to give to the Spiritual Sentence whether right or wrong whether with cause or without cause until the Spiritual Judg revoke his own Sentence himself but here where a right Heir is made Legitimate by Sentence Declaratory of a lawful Marriage between the Father and Mother of the right Heir in the Castle-Chamber the Common-Law will Legitimate the wrong Heir and will give no faith to the Sentence of the Spiritual Judg if that they think it wrong so it seems the Common-Law in Westminster-Hall and the Common-Law in the Castle-Chamber are very contrary one to another as to the point of giving faith concerning Marriage and Legitimation to Spiritual Jurisdiction yet both contrary to right and destructive to the lawful Heir according to the Law of God and both give faith to Common and Canon-Law above the Supreme Law and Legislator Amongst the Greeks the manner of the Contract of Marriage was The Parties going to the Temple before the Priest the Man swore in the presence of Witnesses Se sponsam post concubitum invitum non deserturum That he would not after he should have lain with the Woman forsake her without her consent Arch. Att. 156. The like form of words in the Marriage-Contracts was used by the ancient Romans who shall rise up in Judgment against the Popes who unless Parties mumble the aforemention'd Nonsense of Verba de praesenti give Licence for Money to deceive and desert a Thousand though they have never so many Children by them and to make all Women common and to their own Priests to give example being interdicted all verbal Marriage that they may have the more liberty to abuse the real and to take and leave all they please and as oft as they please The like do the Guiny Priests who converse with the Devil and their form of Contract of Marriage is no doubt according as he will have it For the Woman is there sworn to the Man that she will not desert but the man swears not to her nor will oblige himself by any verbal Contract but is to be left as free as any Popish Priest whatsoever Desertion after deflouring hath caused Seditions and Civil Wars This deflouring and desertion was a while in fashion amongst the Roman Nobles and Patricians who
devour her Child as soon as it is born The People who are Terrae Filii to be the Earth helping the Woman Prelacy being wroth and going to make War with Dissentient Protestants to be the Dragons being wroth with the Woman and going to make War with the Remnant of her Seed which keep the Commandments of God Old Teslament false translated by Bishops in 848 places and have the Testimony of Jesus Christ And that these are not the only false translations which Bishops make of the Scripture appears by the great Linguist Broughton who in his Advertisements of Corruptions affirms to the then Bishops of England That their publick translations of Scriptures is such as that it perverts the Text of the Old Testament in no less then Eight Hundred Forty Eight places and causeth Millions to reject the New Testament and to run into Eternal Flames Sixthly To shew that Coke needs no other to confute him in the signification of Nothus not to be a Child born out of Wedlock but a plece of his own Rhime I shall recite it which is by him set down Manseribus scortum notho Moechus dedit ortum and is a false Verse for No in Notho is short which might happen by some Error of his Scribe but the true Verse is in Calv. Lex whence I suppose he might have it Sed Moecha Nothis dedit ortum which Moecha signifies an Adulteress which she cannot be unless she is a Married Woman therefore it is plain the Rhime it self confutes him that Nothus is not a Child born out of Wedlock but in Wedlock which is unanswerable as to him because ex ore suo though not as to others who are on better reasons unanswerably answer'd before They corrupt the Press both as to Scripture and Law and interdict Protestants to write against Papists or answer them Act of Parliament against Lollards counterfeit by Bishops Coke 3. part 40. saith There was a Statute supposed to be made 5. R. 2. That Commissions should be by the Lord Chancellor made and directed to Sheriffs and others to Arrest such as should be Certified into the Chancery by the Bishops and Prelates Masters of Divinity to be Preachers of Heresies and notorious Errors their Fautors Maintainers and Abetters and to hold them in strong Prison until they will justifie themselves to the Law of the Holy Church By colour of this supposed Act certain Persons that held Images were not to be worship'd c. were holden in strong Prison until they to redeem their vexation miserably yielded before these Masters of Divinity to take an Oath and did swear to worship Images which was against the Moral and Eternal Law of Almighty God We have said by colour of the supposed Statute c. not only in respect of the said Opinion but in respect also that the said supposed Act was in truth never any Act of Parliament though it was Entred in the Rolls of Parliament for that the Commons never gave their consent thereunto And therefore in the next Parliament the Commons prefer'd a Bill reciting the said supposed Act and constantly affirmed that they never assented thereto and therefore desired that the supposed Statute might be aniented and declared void For they protested that it was never their intent to be justified and to bind themselves and their Successors to Prelates more then their Ancestors had done in times past And hereunto the King gave his Royal Assent in these words Ypleist au Roy. And mark well the manner of the penning the Act for seeing the Commons did not assent thereunto the words of the Act are It is Ordained and Assented in this present Parliament That c. And so it was being but by the King and the Lords It is to be known that of ancient time when any Acts of Parliament were made to the end the same might be published and understood especially before the use of Printing came into England the Acts of Parliament were ingrossed into Parchment and bundled up together with a Writ in the King's name under the great Seal to the Sheriff of every County sometime in Latine and sometime in French to command the Sheriff to proclaim the said Statutes within his Bailwick as well within Liberties as without And this was the course of Parliamentary Proceedings before Printing came in use in England and yet it continued after we had the Print till the Reign of H. 7. Now at the Parliament holden in 5. R. 2. John Braibrook Bishop of London being Lord Chancellor of England caused the said Ordinance of the King and Lords to be inserted into the Parliamentary Writ of Proclamation to be proclaimed amongst the Acts of Parliament which Writ I have seen the purclose of which Writ after the recital of the Acts directed to the Sheriff of N. in these words Nos volentes dictas concordias sive ordinationes in omnibus singulis suis Articulis inviolabiter observari tibi praecipimus quod praedictas concordias sive ordinationes in locis infra Balivam tuam ubi melius expedire volueris tam infra libertates quam extra Publice Proclamari teneri facias juxta formam Praenotatam Teste Rege apud Westm 26. Maij. Anno Regni Regis R. 2.5 But in the Parliamentary Proclamation of the Acts passed in Anno 6. R. 2. the said Act of the 6. R. 2. whereby the said supposed Act of 5. R. 2. was declared to be void is omitted and afterwards the said supposed Act of 5. R. 2. was continually Printed and the said Act of 6. R. 2. hath been by the Prelates ever from time to time kept from the Print A Counterfeit Act Printed by Bishops against Protestants What English Protestant can read this without horror what doth he not observe it why 't is that Counterfeit Act of Parliament 5. R. 2.1382 whereby Bishops usurp to be Judges of the Souls and Consciences of Protestants and to put them in strong Prison till they conform and submit to the will of the Bishop 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they usurp to be Judges of Heresie and to make Protestants Hereticks when they please 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they have compell'd the Subjects to swear to worship their Idols 't is that Counterfeit Act whereby they have dragged so many Pious Martyrs to the Stake and burnt them filling the whole Land with fiery Furnaces 't is that Counterfeit Act by which the Bishops have usurped Power to destroy Religion Liberty Propriety and Lives of all Protestant Subjects at their pleasure 't is that Counterfeit Act which was never assented to but disclaimed detested abrogated and declared null and void by the House of Commons 6. R. 2. Anno 1383. and hath been yet most presumptuously caused to be printed as a valid Act by the Bishops being Masters of the Press and the true Act of Abrogation 6. R. 2. Whereon all the Subject hath depends most wickedly suppress'd and never Printed Coke 2.
and no Certificate of Bishops hath power to take that right from them 7. Here the wantonness of Widows is forbidden who are for new Husbands as soon as the old is put in his Grave whereby who are Fathers of their Children is made uncertain 8. Here is no false Fathering of Children on those who are within four Seas 9. Here is no punishing Men twice for one offence once by the Temporal Court and then by the Spiritual Court or contrary punishments by contrary Courts one by the Contentious Court and another by the Penitential Court 10. Here is no Auricular Confession of their Wives or Daughters by Priests in Temples or Chambers and defiling thereby of their Families 11. Here is no punishing of Women for bringing forth Children nor the Murders of so many Infants caused thereby as by the Papist Laws is continually done Yet I conclude though the Law of the Turk is far better than that of the Pope and shall rise in Judgment against such as plant his Canons in their Courts in defiance of the Law of God and Nature I think neither a fit Rule to judge Marriage Legitimation or Succession by CHAP. V. Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession not to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws THE Question is Whether Marriage Legitimation and Succession ought to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws No English Lawyer can mention my Lord Coke without great honour but how he came so biass'd as to endeavour to set up Papal and Episcopal Laws under the name of Regal appears not Object 1 It is objected by Coke lib. 5.1 part 40. in Cawdryes Case That the Kingdom of England is an absolute Monarchy and if the King cannot Authorize by his Commission or Writ Ecclesiastical Judges to determin and judg those great and important Causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy by Certificate of the Bishop who is the Ecclesiastical Witness and Judg both of Fact and Law and by the Canon Laws which by use and custom are now our Ecclesiastical Laws Then he is disabled to be supreme Governour of this Realm in all Spiritual things or Causes as well as Temporal according to the Oath of Supremacy due to him And that he could not then cause Justice to be administred to his Subjects in these so great and important causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy on which depends the strength of mens Descents and Inheritances This I conceive though not in the same words yet in sence and substance to be the weight of my Lord Coke's Argument whereby he would make use of Marriage as one means amongst his many other to set up an Ecclesiastical Law and Judg over the Temporal Freeholds and Inheritances and other Birth-rights of the Subjects To which is answer'd First As to the words Absolute and Supream I suppose he intended no such absolute Monarchy or Supremacy as is not under the Law of God though it be not so express'd in the form of the Oath of Supremacy For though Regum timendorum in proprios greges Ecclesiastical Laws not needful to the King's Supremacy but hurtful Reges in ipsos imperium est Jovis then I think he doth not intend it to be above the Law of the Land seeing the King himself by his Oath is pleased to oblige himself to his People to govern according to that Law where it is not contrary to the Law of God Then as to the pretended want of Power of doing Justice concerning causes of Free-hold and Inheritance depending on marriage except by Ecclesiastical Laws and Judges that is very strange for how was Justice done in the times of Primitive Christianity for many Hundred Years after Christ when neither Bishops or any other Ecclesiastical Judges ever pretended Jurisdiction todetermin Temporal Right or Propriety but left the same to be judged by the Imperial Laws How was Justice done in the time of Henry the Second when the Jurisdiction of all Matrimonial causes remained in the Temporal Courts Richard the First his Son being the first as Matthew Paris writes whom the Clergy got by his publick Edict to give the Jurisdiction of Power and Gifts by reason of Marriage and of all Matrimonial causes to the Bishops Courts and the same Richard likewise gave them Jurisdiction of all breach of Faith Promises and Oaths whereby if much of the Power so rashly granted had not been by him so speedily resumed they had hookt to themselves the whole Jurisdiction from the King's Courts of all Contracts and Conveyances Bonds and Obligations as well as Marriages concerning Temporal Goods and Inheritances And why cannot general as well as special Bastardy be tryed at Common Law And how likewise are all Rights depending on all Marriages made during the late Civil Wars by pretence of any Ordinance of Parliament made by 12. Car. 2. cap. 33. to be tryed by a Jury and the Common Law and not by Certificate of the Bishop or any Ecclesiastical Judg to the advancement and not prejudice of Justice and a far greater expedition and advantage to the same would it be if by the like Act the Jurisdiction of all Marriages and Legitimations as it was in the time of Henry the Second were again restored to the Common-Law-Courts So likewise anciently Bastardy alledged in an Action of Trespass was triable by Jury but now usurped by Bishops as well in personal as real Actions 4. Edw. 4.35 Object 2 Coke lib. 5.1 part in the same case of Cawdry it is further alledged Circumspectè agatis gives no Jurisdiction of Marriage to Bishops That the Statutes of Circumspectè agatis made 13. Eliz. 1. of Articuli Cleri made 9. E. 2. Anno Domini 1315. of 15. E. 3. Cap. 6. of 31. E. 3. Cap. 11. give Jurisdiction of marriage to Bishops To which is answer'd That in the Statute of Circumspectè agatis there is not a word mention'd of marriage but only by it Jurisdiction is given to the Bishops of Fornication and Adultery which is not Marriage but rather Anti-marriage for Marriage is an Ordinance of God Fornication and Adultery are Ordinances of the Devil and whereas before the Jurisdiction of Fornication and Adultery as acknowledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 488. was in Leets under the name of Letherwit or more properly Lecherwit yet had Leets never Jurisdiction of Marriage or Divorce neither consequently could Bishops have it from them As for Articuli Cleri and the other Statutes there is not a word in them concerning Marriage nor so much as of Fornication and Adultery the Jurisdiction therefore pretended was never given by any Statute Linwood likewise expounds the words of the Statute of Circumspectè agatis which gives Bishops Jurisdiction of all deadly Sins as Fornication and Adultery and the like Non intelligas de omni peccato mortali sed de tali cujus punitio spectat merè ad forum Ecclesiasticum nam si de ratione cujuslibet peccati mortalis cognosceret Ecclesia sic periret temporalis gladii Jurisdictio
by her assent the Emperor is endeavour'd to be stoned by the people in hatred of his Concubine Zoe pacifieth the people Ib. Impotency and Sterility is a cause of Divorce The Law of Solon allowed Impotency in the Man or Sterility in the Woman to be a good cause of Divorce Plutarch in Solon vid. Aust contra c. because then old Folks might not Marry Such was the modesty of ancient times in Rome that from the first foundation of the City for the space of Five Hundred and Twenty Years there happened no Divorce between a Husband and Wife Val. Max. l. 2. cap. 1. And the first who began it was Spurius Carbillus who put away his Wife for Sterility which though it seem'd a tolerable cause yet wanted not reprehension from divers who thought the Conjugal Faith ought to overweigh the desire of Children Anno 631. Dagobert the great King of France repudiated his first Wife for Barrenness and Marrieth Nantildis a Nun Amandus a Bishop reproves him and he banisheth the Bishop afterwards having a Son he revoketh the Bishop to baptize him Calais Anno Christ 1263. The Queen of Bohemia being old and Barren the King intendeth a Divorce she layeth the fault on him he maketh her this offer That she should appoint him a Maid and if he got her not with Child in a Year he would be reputed faulty the Queen accepteth it and in Ten Months he hath a Son and afterwards divers Daughters She is Divorced and Marrieth Kum Grand Daughter to the Duke of Muscovia Chron. Boh. Regner King of Denmark Anno 820. marrieth Langertha a Warlike Woman of Suevia and had by her Fridlanus and two Daughters Crom. After he Repudiateth Landgertha for the inequality of the Match and Marrieth the Daughter of Hezotus King of Suevia by whom he had many Sons Crom. Anno 1354. Peter King of Spain repudiateth Blanch Daughter to the Duke of Bourbon and Marrieth Jean de Castro Histor Hispan Anno 1373. The King of Portugal refused a Match in Castile and taketh a Nobleman's Wife and banisheth him his Subjects are discontented with him Hist Hisp Anno 696. Pepin King of France repudiated his Wife and married Alpaida his Concubine by whom he had Charles Martell and he kill'd Lambert Bishop of Thuring for reproving his Marriage Am. Fris. Anno 576. The Wife of Chilperic King of France was divorced and thrust into a Monastery for being Godmother to her own Child Truon Charles the Eighth of France was Espoused to Mary the Daughter of Maximilian Maximilian marrieth Ann the Daughter and Heir of the Duke of Britain by Deputy The King of France repudiates the Daughter of Maximilian and marries the Daughter of the Duke of Britain Luis the Twelfth of France repudiates his Wife and marries Ann his Predecessor's Widow Anno 1333. The Marquess of Misnia having married Judeth the Daughter of the King of Bohemia the Emperor causeth the Marquess to repudiateher and marry his Daughter The King of Bohemia taketh divers places in Misnia and giveth Judeth to John Son of the French King Dub. The Arch-Bishop of Gnesna in Polonia forced Married Priests to be Divorced from their Wives Alsted Anno 1218. Lewis the Seventh King of France having married Elianor Daughter and Heir of William Duke of Guyen and having two Daughters by her notwithstanding divorced himself from her on pretence they were Couzins in the fourth degree She was after married to Henry the Second of England who had by her Five Sons and Three Daughters and was she who revenged her self on Rosamond though not in so high a degree injurious to her as Adela the Daughter of the King of France affianced to her Son Richard who was after King was suspected to be of whom it was commonly reported That her Husband was so far inamor'd that he having Committed Elianor to Prison resolved to be divorced from her and marry Adela Bak Hist 55.59 King John having maâ—ried Avice Daughter and Heir of Robert Duke of Gloucâ—ster having no Issue by her divorced himself from her alledging that she was his Couzin in the third degree Juan Daughter of Edward the First for her Beauty called the fair Maid of Kent was married first to William Montacute Earl of Salisbury and from him divorced but it appears not for what cause and was after married to Sir Thomas Holland in her right Earl of Kent and Father of Thomas and John Holland Duke of Surrey and Earl of Huntingdon and lastly she was Wife of Edward of Woodstock the black Prince of Wales and by him Mother of the infortunate King Richard the Second Henry the Eight married first Katharine Daughter of Ferdinando King of Spain the relict of his older Brother Arthur and was after Twenty Years marriage and the Birth of his Daughter Mary after Queen of England by her divorced from her on the opinion of some Divines that it was not lawful for him to marry his Brother's Wife and having successively married two other Wives after their death he married his fourth Wife Ann Sister to the Duke of Cleave she lived his Wife six Months and then was likewise Divorced Civilians Canonists Divines Lawyers and one Pope against another Aliment of Children and all by the Ears about Divorce and unless as we ought we wholy consult the Moral Law of God there is not a word of sence in the Laws of men but they are all for gain As Desertions and Divorces of Mothers without cause have been too frequent both amongst Gentiles Jews and Christians so likewise is the Desertion and not giving Aliment to Children Aristotle stain'd his Philosophy with the bloody Doctrine of exposing Infants The Chinoys who are poor think it Charity to strangle their Infants and save their Aliment Fornicators make it their custom to deflour Virgins and get them with Child and then illegitimate and desert both Mother and Child to save the charge of Aliment And oh horrid amongst Christians who le Parishes rise with Swords and Staves against one poor Sucking Babe to exterminate both it and the Mother naked and to be Vagabonds to beg steal or starve only to save so small an Alms as Aliment to one poor Infant not able to speak or beg for it self It is related by Travellers that some Indians use when a Child is born if it take not to suck the Dug of the Mother well they carry it out of the House and hang it naked on a Tree and leave it there returning themselves into the House after a while they go out again and bring in the Child and offer it the Teat if it take it not they carry it the second time and let it hang twice as long and fetch and offer it the Teat again if it take it not then they hang it on the Tree the third time and leave it hanging till it dies God made man righteous and writ the Moral Law in his heart but since the Devil hath seduced him to the Ceremonial he is become
cùm vix esset dare causam quin ratione peccati possit deferri ad Ecclesiam Object 3 Stat. Merton gives them no Jurisdiction It 's alledged That it appears by the Statute of Merton that Henry the Third writ in his time to the Bishop to certifie Marriage and Bastardy First It is to be understood therefore that in the time of Pope Alexander the Third Anno Dom. 1160. which was Anno 6. H. 2. in whose time all Matrimonial Causes beonged to the King's Courts This Constitution was made That Children born before Solemnization of Matrimony where Matrimony followed should be as Legitimate to inherit to their Ancestors as those that were born after Matrimony It is likewise further to be known that King John the Father of Henry the Third who made this Statute of Merton following was by the then Pope Innocent Excommunicated King John Excommunicated as likewise at the same time was the Emperor Otho and the whole Kingdom of England Interdicted and so remained for the space of Six Years Three Months and Fourteen Days during all which time there was no Church open for Marriages or Burials but the poorer People were buried like Dogs in Ditches and where they married God knows Through which King John was driven to such distress by his own Bishops and Barons and the French assisting the Pope against him that he was forced before he could get to be released of this Excommunication to pay the Pope vast Sums of Money and to lay down his Crown and Scepter Mantle Sword and Ring the Ensigns of his Royalty at the feet of Pandolphus the Pope's Legat and submit himself to the Mercy and Judgment of the Church Two Days some write Six it was before the Legat restored him to his Crown which he likewise received again on no better Terms then to hold the Kingdom of England and Lordship of Ireland from the See of Rome at the Annual Tribute of a Thousand Marks Silver and the Excommunication was not to be taken off but deferred till further and full satisfaction was made to the Clergy which was not done till Two Years after The Bishops being hereby arrived at so great an height of their Tyrannical Power over this King The Bishops usurped the exercise of Ecclesistical Laws by force over their Kings As that when the King having obtained absolution had gather'd a great Army to have been revenged on the French King the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury told him 't was against his Oath at his Absolution and the King in a great passion reply'd He would not defer the Business for his pleasure seeing Lay-judgment appertained not to him the Arch-Bishop presumed to threaten his native Soveraign that unless he desisted he would Excommunicate him Note therefore That in the time of H. 3. who was the Eldest Son of King John the Bishops continued to assume the Power of Lay-judments as well in Marriages as they did of shutting up of Churches in which they were made from the Pope to whom they had inforced King John to surrender his Crown and not from the King 's Writ as that Statute of Merton shews rather a proud Renunciation and scorn to answer the King 's Writ concerning Marriage then any use permitted by them to the King of the same unless he would as his Father had done lay down again his Crown to them and have Marriage judg'd according to the Law of the Pope for otherwise they tell him plainly They neither will nor can answer his Writ as appears by the Statute it self the words whereof follow 20 H. 3. Cap. 9. To the King 's Writ of Bastardy Whether one being born before Matrimony may Inherit in like manner as he that is born after Matrimony All the Bishops answer'd That they would not nor could not answer to it because it was directly against the common Order of the Church that is meant the Romish Church And all the Bishops instanted the Lords that they would consent that all such as were born afore Matrimony should be Legitimated as well as they who were born within Matrimony as to the succession of Inheritance for so much as the Church accepteth such for Legitimate And all the Earls and Barons answer'd with one voice That they would not change the Laws of the Realm which hitherto have been used and approved Coke 2 part Inst 97. It is said Though the Bishops are Spiritual Persons yet in case of general Bastardy when the King writes to them to certifie who is lawful Heir to any Lands or other Inheritances they ought to certifie according to the Law and Custom of England and not according to the Roman Canons and Constitutions yet if they do make their Certificate according to the Canon Law No remedy against Bishops making Certificates contrary to the King's Laws General Bastardy uâ—urped by Bishops not given them by Law and not the Law of the Land there appears no Remedy unless such a one as is worse then the Disease Sir Galfred le Scrope Cheif Justice saith Before this Statute of Merton the Party pleaded not general Bastardy but that he was born out of Espousals and the Bishop ought to certifie whether he were born before Espousals or not and according to that Certificate to proceed to Judgment according to the Law of the Land And the Prelates answered That they could not nor would not to this Writ answer and therefore ever since special Bastardy viz. that the Defendant c. was born before Espousals hath been Try'd in the King's Courts and general Bastardy in the Bishops Court and herewith agree out old Books and the constant Opinion of the Judges ever since Coke 2 part Inst 99. It being before granted That the Law of England cannot be changed but by an Act of Parliament and Magna Charta being before made and being a Declaration of the ancient Common Law First That no Freeman was to be put out of his Free-hold or Inheritance but per legale Judicium parium and there being no cause of its own Nature more Temporal or more concerning Succession to Temporal Inheritance then Marriage It was contrary to Magna Charta and the Common Law to judg the Fact of it by any other Judges then Juries and the Law of it by any other Judges then those of Temporal Courts and though the Pope and Bishops in those Superstitious times forced the Kings many times as they did King John to yeild his Crown and the Subjects to yeild their Marriages and other Temporal Rights to their Arbitrary and Saleable Sentence for fear of Excommunication yet doth not this any way prove that the Jurisdiction of Marriage was ever granted them by any Law or Act of Parliament or could be without it were contrary to a known Common Law and Act of Parliament which expressly gave the trial of Temporal Rights and Inheritances to a Legale Judicium parium and not to any Ecclesiastical Judges or Laws Now therefore it being clear they had
no Jurisdiction but by Usurpation of so Temporal a Right as Marriage before this Statute let any who thinks he can see Nine Miles into a Milstone once more look into the Statute of Merton before recited and try whether he can screw out of it any word giving the Bishops either a Jurisdiction of Marriage or general Bastardy or that this Statute ever forged so rude a Romish Tool as the two edged Sword of general and special Bastardy to divide the living Child or tear it in peices between the Bishop and the Temporal Judg or how it was then consistent with a Legale Judicium parium to expose a Child no Alien but the King 's Native Subject to be tried for all he had by a then Foraign Ecclesiastical Law and a Judg a sworn Canonical Subject to a Foraign Pope or that the wisdom of that Parliament intended to coin a Chimera of a Distinction without a difference of general and special Bastardy which neither they themselves understood nor any Lawyers which write to this day give any sensibly Interpretation or agree amongst themselves concerning it or that they who made the Statute to oppose the Bishops Jurisdiction of Marriage should create a Notion of general Bastardy which le Scrope says was not in Esse before to give them a new Jurisdiction which was to change the Laws of England which they positively refuse in the Statute it self to change Object 4 No Similitude of fetching the Laws of Athens to Rome and bringing the Romish Laws to England It is further alledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 9. That as the Romans fetching divers Laws from Athens yet being approved and allowed by the State there they were called Jus Civile Romanorum And as the Normans borrowing all or most of their Laws from England yet baptized them by the name of the Laws and Customs of Normandy So albeit the Kings of England derived their Ecclesiastical Laws from others yet so many as were approved and allowed hereby and with general consent are aptly and rightly called the King's Ecclesiastical Laws o. England To which is answer'd That there is no similitude between making or changing the Laws of the Athenians which were Foraign Laws to become the Laws of the Romans and the making or changing either the Foraign Papal or native Provincial Canons or Ecclesiastical Laws into the King's Ecclesiastical Laws of England For First The Athenian Laws before they were made Denizons of Rome were not admitted in cumulo but Articulated and every Article examined one by one by the Decem viri or Ten Men as our usurped Ecclesiastical Laws were appointed to have been done by the Statute of 25 Hen. 8.19 by the Two and Thirty Men and likewise in time of Edward the Sixth by others but neither succeeded before the same was received for a Roman Law Secondly Such Athenian Laws as were pickt or garbled from the rest were by the Authority of the Legislative Power of Rome both Senate and People caused to be writ in Twelve Tables and inacted to be the Laws of Rome but in England there was never by Authority any Articulation selecting or garbling of Canon Laws effected nor the same reduced into Tables Written or Printed by any Act of Parliament Ecclesiastical Laws in an unknown Language Thirdly The selected Athenian Laws were written in the Roman Language to be understood by the People before they would be received as Roman Laws but there is no such thing in the Ecclesiastical Laws of the Holy-Church concerning Marriage or any thing else but they all still remain in the Language of the Beast and can be neither call'd the Laws of the Church which by the Scripture are forbidden to be spoke in an unknown tongue as appears 1 Cor. 14.19 It is said In the Church I had rather speak five words with my understanding that by my voice I might teach others also then ten thousand words in an unknown tongue It is as utterly unlawful therefore to make that a Law of the Church or an Ecclesiastical Law of Marriage which is in the unknown Language of Latin as it had been to have made any form of Prayer taken from the Romish Church though the Pater Noster it self the form of Prayer of the Church of England while it was in Latin for the Minister would then have been a Barbarian to the English man and the English-man a Barbarian to him and it is as bad for the poor English-man for his Law-sutes in Latin for a Wife in the Court of Arches and other Ecclesiastical Courts as it would be if his Prayers were again in Latin in the Church For though he pay his Lawyers dear to plead his Cause there he cannot understand for his Money whether they call him and his Wife Rogue and Whore or honest People or whether the Judg by his Sentence will give him his Wife or take her from him but by the implicit Faith of an Interpreter as let any one look on the Sentence of Divorce in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 E. he may understand or not understand the same Ecclesiastical Laws are not the Laws of the Land Fourthly The Athenian Laws were not obtruded on the Romans by Conquest of their Bodies by the Temporal Sword or their Souls by the Spiritual Sword of Excommunication but the Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage have been obtruded on England ever since the Conquest by the superstitious Terrors or actual force of Excommunication either Papal or Episcopal and never by consent in Parliament The suffering of an oppression therefore is no consent nor an abuse against Law an Use Custom or Law neither can a wicked Oppression Use Custom or Law in name only be turned into a Law of England except by consent in Parliament or other humane Power besides it is by the very before recited Statute of Merton declared That the Laws of the Church are not the Laws of England for when the Bishop quarrel'd that the Law of England as to Marriage was not according to the Law of the Church and would have had them changed into the Law of the Church the Earls and Barons with one voice answer'd We will not change the Laws of England Whereby it 's plain the Laws of England and Laws of the Church are opposite Laws and not the same and this is confessed by Coke himself in the exposition of his Statute of Merton 2 part Inst fol. 98. where he saith Here our Common Laws are aptly and properly called the Laws of England because they are appropriated to this Kingdom of England as most apt and fit for the Government thereof and have no dependence upon any Foraign Law whatsoever no not on the Civil or Canon Law other then in Cases allowed by the Laws of England and therefore he saith the Poet spake truly hereof Et penitus toto divisos orbe Britannos So as the Law of England is proprium quarto modo to the Kingdom of England therefore Foraign Precedents are
Parliament Besides there is not de facto that name given for the Ecclesiastical Court is kept in the Bishop's name and not in the King's name And the Bishop takes all the profits and not the King Fain he would mend the matter and says That a Leet is kept in the Lord's name and he hath the profits yet it is the King's Court. It might better been said it was once the King 's before he gave it or sold it to the Lord of the Leet as are many Lands not being Ancient Crown-Lands The King purchases but if he sell again such Lands for valuable considerations the propriety as well as the name of such Lands is then in the buyer and not in the King Therefore though he hath set out his Book as baptized both in Latin and English by the name of de jure Regis Ecclesiastico and of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws yet with due Reverence to the opinion of so great a Father of the Law it may be said there appears none either to baptize or confirm the name nor any God-father to it but himself Neither will the Title of the King 's Temporal Laws set upon Magna Charta which gives that liberty to every Subject of Tryal of his Birth-right per legale judicium parium be consistent with the Title of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws which take it away and give it to a Trial by Certificate of the Bishop Object 6 It is again by Coke alledged and Precedents cited That Edward the Confessor William the First Henry the First Henry the Third Edward the First Edward the Second and all English Kings have Govern'd and Ruled both the Kingdom and the Holy Church and have given Jurisdiction to Abbots Priors and Bishops and have granted prohibitions when they transcended the bounds of their Jurisdictions and that Reges sacro oleo uncti sunt spiritualis Jurisdictionis capaces but still this is nihil ad rhombum nor pertinent to make good the Name or Title he hath set his Book of the King 's Ecclesiastical Laws For there is a great difference if he had Entitled it de jurisdictione Regis Ecclesiastica for the King's Jurisdiction and the King's Laws are clean divers things And there is a great difference where he grants Jurisdiction to Ecclesiastical Persons and where he grants them by what Laws they shall exercise that Jurisdiction for the King 's of England have Anciently granted Jurisdiction and Commissions to Ecclesiastical persons as Bishops and Priests to be Judges in the King's-Bench Chancery and other Courts yet could they not grant them power to judge by any other Laws than the Laws of England except by Act of Parliament Then as to granting prohibitions where the King had not or could not by Law grant them Jurisdiction proves nothing that any King did or could by Law grant them Jurisdiction of general Bastardy without Act of Parliament or that there was any Law or Act of Parliament which gave them Jurisdiction of general Bastardy because the King's Courts durst not grant prohibitions for general Bastardy For in those superstitious times neither the King nor Judges dar'd provoke their Excommunication and therefore at the making of the Statute of Merton when the contest was between the Ecclesiastical and Secular Power which of them should give the Law to Marriage The Temporal Judges for fear of their Excommunication took only like the Jackal what the Lion refused and left them which they called special Bastardy So quod non capit Christus capit fiscus which is intended of the false Christ for the true Christ took nothing from it but paid tribute to it Besides if many Jurisdictions should judge by other Laws this would be destructive both to the King and Subject Though the King therefore give the Sword he cannot change the Ballance as is in effect confess'd by Coke himself 3 pt Inst fol. 120. in his Exposition of the Statute 27 E. 3. of Praemunire where he saith The right of King and Subjects not triable per alias Leges or aliud Examen then the laws of the Land If Freehold and Inheritance Goods or Chatâ—les Debts or Duties wherein the King and Subjects have a right or property should be judged per aliam legem which he mention'd before to be Civil or Canon Law And other Trial which he makes to be any Trial except by Jury or be drawn ad aliud examen These three mischiefs endeavour'd to be prevented in the said Statute would necessarily follow viz. Disherison of the King and his Crown the Disherison of all his People and the undoing of the Common Law And fol. 121. he farther saith Some have made a question whether since the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction was acknowleged in the Crown an Ecclesiastical Judge holding Plea of a Temporal Matter belonging to the Common Law doth incur the danger of a Praemunire Though hereof is no question at all yet lest any Man might be led into an Error in a Case so dangerous we will clear this point by Reason Precedent and Authority The Reason holdeth still to draw the Matter ad aliud examen c. And he citeth before several Precedents and says The reason of all these Cases is because it drawes matters Triable at Common Law ad aliud examen and to be discussed per aliam legem Peter du Moulin that famous Protestant Divine writes That there was a a Book printed in the former Age entitle The Canons of the Apostles Anti-Christian whereby the Temporal power of the Pope is wholly taken away And the sixth Canon expresly forbids a Bishop to meddle in Civil affairs And in the 84th Canon are these words A Bishop that meddles in War or seeks to obtain these two things that is to say the Empire of Rome and the Sacerdotal Government let him be deposed for the things of Caesar are to be given to Caesar and the things of God to God And that one Arnold who Preached this Doctrine That the Pope had no Jurisdiction nor any thing to do with the Temporal affairs with great applause was in the year 1155 made a Martyr and most cruelly burnt at Rome by the order of Pope Adrian And this agrees with the Testimony of Christ himself Bishops Judg. not only as to Jurisdiction of Marriage and Legitimation but all other matters wherein Temporal propriety comes in question that he refused the Jurisdiction of it as appears Luk. 12.13 And one of the company said unto him Master speak unto my Brother that he divide the inheritance with me And he said unto him Man who made me a Judge or Divider over you It appears therefore the Episcopal Jurisdiction of judging or dividing Temporal goods in the Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Courts came not from Christ but was usurped by Anti-Christ by force of Fire and Faggot and is from him derived to Bishops and Ecclesiastical Courts to the destruction of the rights of Princes and the liberty and propriety of the people
who ought only to stand to Caesar's Judgment Seat and to be tried per legale judicium parium for the same According to this principle Henry the first Pope Paschal seeking to incroach on the liberty of the Kingdom writes unto him in this manner Netum habeat sanctitas vestra quod me vivente auxiliante deo dignitates usus Regni nostri Angliae non imminuentur si ego quod absit in tanta me dejectione ponerem Optimates mei totus Angliae populus id nullo modo paterentur Let your Holiness know that by God's help while I live the Dignities and Customs of our Kingdom of England shall not be diminished and though I which God forbid should suffer my self to fall into so dejected a condition my Nobles and whole People of England will never suffer it Object 7 It is further objected in behalf of Trial of marriage by Ecclesiastical Laws that by the Statute of 25 H. 8. c. 19. which gives power to the King to appoint 32 persons to examin the Canons and to continue such as they think fit and abridge the rest It is provided That such Canons Constitutions Ordinances and Synodical Provincials being already made which be not contrariant or repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customs of this Realm nor to the damage or hurt of the King's Prerogative Royal shall now still be used and executed as they were before the making of this Act till such time as they be viewed searched or otherwise order'd and determined by the said 32 persons or the most part of them which Statute is revived 1 Eliz. 1. To which is answer'd That 1. what is contrariant or repugnant to the Law of God is made void without this proviso and the assuming the Jurisdiction of marriage and dividing Inheritances insuing thereby is before proved to be Anti-Christian for Spiritual persons who alledge themselves Successors of Christ and much more therefore the assuming the Legislative power or giving Laws or Canons for the same 2. It is shewen likewise before that the same power of Legislation and Jurisdiction concerning marriage was usurped by Fire and Faggot and Excommunication and therefore their Canons concerning marriage are not intended or if they were yet this proviso cannot Lawfully preserve such usurpations so contrary to the Law of God 3. It is manifest that all Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Laws and Canons of marriage are contrariant and repugnant to the Laws Statutes and Customs of this Realm as First the Canons then made were That marriage should be a Sacrament and thereby draw to it self Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction which latter Acts of Parliament establishing the Protestant Religion doth thereby abolish the being of marriage a Sacrament and consequently the Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical incident to it as a Sacrament and the Canons which make it so or give any Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction relating to the same 4. All Ecclesiastical Canons of marriage are contrariant and repugnant to Magna Charta and draw the Subject from his liberty propriety and Birth-right ad alias leges aliud examen and aliud judicium then legale judicium parium which Magna Charta of liberties to the Subject hath been confirmed by several Kings succeeding above thirty times Object 8 It is objected Admit there is no Act of Parliament gives Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction of Marriage yet the unwritten Law of Use and Custom which is the Common Law of England and so long toleration gives it To which may be answer'd That by the Canon Laws Malus usus abolendus besides there was never any use of Jurisdiction of marriage in the Ecclesiastical Courts otherwise then in reference to the same as being a Sacrament which being now taken away cessante causa ratione legis cessat lex So likewise where the thing which a Use or Custom concerns is but changed the Use and Custom vanisheth as if by custom a Rate Tith be paid for two Fulling Mills in one House and one of them is changed to a Corn Mill the custom is gone But besides this being malus usus is of it self void and were it never so long used can never grow to have the obligation of the Common Law or to be thereby the Common Law As was well answered by a young Gentleman when complaint was made in Parliament against the wrongful incroachments of the Ecclesiasticks and they alledged for themselves That they had used and accustomed time out of mind to practise what was excepted against He reply'd So have Thieves at Shooter's Hill used time out of mind to Rob there yet the Law allows no such prescription nor doth the forced Toleration of their wickedness by such people as were not able to resist their Robberies oblige Successors to follow their precedents Reasons against Ecclesiastical Laws concerning Marriage 1. Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage came from the Devils c. The first Reason against Ecclesiastical Laws is in regard of the wicked Authors for all the Laws by which Bishops judge Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession were invented by Daemons Pagan Gods and Goddesses Magicians Aruspices Astrologers South-sayers Priests of Priapus and Venus Jupiter Juno Cybele Flora Diana common Prostitutes Popish Saints Popish Councils Popes or Papists The Canon prohibiting and nulling all Marriage without a Priest in a Temple except by the Pope's good License or Dispensation was made by the Pope and the Council of Trent as appears Ego Concil 147. pt 5. Concil 197. pt 6. as a main Pillar to support their tottering Kingdom against the growing strength of the then Lutheran Protestants All marriage Preists instituted in the Mysteries of Priapus and they took their pious precedents from the old Pagan Priests of Priapus and Venus and they had it from their Damons or Devils That all the ancient Pagan Priests were first initiated in the Mysteries of Priapus before they could be capable to execute the Priests office cannot be denied and is testified by divers Authors and particularly by Cornelius Agrippa de van Sci. p. 738. in these words Sordidissimus Priapus pro Deo habitus hunc coluerunt primi illi Religionum artifices Chaldaei Aegyptii Assyrii Babylonii Arâ—bes Scythae Aethiopes ac perinde tota Africa Asia Europa nec fas erat ullum sacerdotem fieri qui Priapi sacris non erat initiatus Hic est ille Belphegor idolum omnium antiquissimum quod Chamos dictum est à Chamo filio Noe. The filthy Priapus was estemed a God and was worshiped by those first founders of Religion the Chaldeans Egyptians Assyrians Babylonians Arabians Scythians Phoenicians Ethiopians and even all Africa Asia and Europe neither was it lawful for any to be a Priest unless he were first initiated in the Rites of Priapus This is that Belphegor of all other Idols the most ancient which is likewise called Chamos of Cham the Son of Noah Now this was the Law of these Priests for the wicked ends which are after mentioned Dispensation with Incest came
of the same by the Priest are inventions of Men and but Ceremonies as well as the other Heyl. 196. This was a Contract but no Matrimony Of Pulcheria Sister to Theodosius the Emperour married to Martianus Of the Lady Etheldred married to two Husbands The Lady Amigunda married to the Emperour Henry the Second The Lady Editha to Edward the Confessor The Lady Ann of Cleve to Henry the Eighth all married by the Priest but not by their Husbands Zonaras reports That the Empire being in great danger by reason of Wars with the Goths Pulcheria on consideration that there was necessary to be chosen some able person to be Emperour against them Theodâ—sius being dead without any Son and Martianus an old experienced Captain being taken to be the fittest for that purpose he was chosen Emperour by the order of Pulcheria the Sister of Theodosius and to give him the greater Authority Pulcheria assented to marry him on security given by him that they should both live Chast and he suffer her to continue in Virginity on which they were married and they both faithfully observed their agreement of Chastity This Lady made a very repugnant Vow to live a Nun yet to marry therefore I think her Vow doubly unlawful first as to her self if young open to a necessary temptation and then as to her Husband though an old Soldier to a probable one Mr. Ricaut Turk Hist p. 72. Saith Ghear Han Sultan That Ghear Han Sultan Daughter to Sultan Ibrahim hath had already five Husbands yet continues a Virgin Etheldred Etheldred was the Daughter of Anna King of the East-Angles she was married to two Husbands one after another yet continued still a Virgin and at last became a Nun and was Canonized a Saint under the name of St. Audry Amigunda Henry the Second Emperour having married Amigunda the Daughter of the Count Palatine of Rhine they lived most Chastly both of them observing voluntary Virginity without having any carnal knowledge one with the other It is reported that being accused of Adultery she purged her self by going bare-foot upon plates of fiery hot Iron and that the Emperour was Penitent for exposing her to such danger being so Chast and Vertuous a Woman she was very much beholding to him to deny to Husband her himself yet quarrel so far as to suspect her of another Edward the Confessor married Editha the beautiful and indeed vertuous Daughter of Earl Godwin Editha and because he had taken displeasure against the Father he would shew no kindness to the Daughter he made her his Wife but conversed not with her as a Wife but only at Board and not at Bed or if at Bed no otherwise than David with Abishag and yet was content to hear her accused of incontinency whereof if she were guilty he could not be innocent and he not only entertained such thoughts of his Wife but the like accusation against his own Mother Queen Emma of unchast familiarity with Alwin Bishop of Winchester and suffer'd her to be put to her purgation of fire Ordeal by passing over Nine red hot Plow-shares bare-foot which she all escaped to the astonishment of the beholders and thereupon was adjudged Innocent though there might be much jugling in those Tryals but whether there were so or not it became not a Son to divulge the shame of his Mother It seems he was Chast but without discretion and not without injury to his Wife and impiety to his Mother Bak. Hist 18. Ann of Cleve The same dealing had the Lady Ann of Cleve who was married to Henry the Eighth who lay by her six Months yet left her a Virgin And when her Ladies who attended her said they looked now every day to hear of her being with Child to whom she reply'd They might look long enough unless saying How dost thou sweet-heart Good-morrow sweet-heart and such like words could make a great belly for said she more then this never passed between the King and me Bak. Hist 288. I hope therefore none of our Protestant Ladies will believe this wicked Doctrine of Pope or Turk That Consensus non Concubitus facit Matrimonium if they do we shall have no young Souldiers to fight against either Of the Custom of desertion of Virgins after deflouring Of the desertion of the Lady Lucy by Edward the Fourth for the Lady Elizabeth Grey and the infelicity followed thereon to them and their Children Of the like desertion by a Gentleman in Ireland after the birth of a Child Of the ancient Form of Marriage-Contracts Se post concubitum non deserturum now repugnantly turned into verba de praesenti Of Seditions and Civil Wars raised for the said Crime of Desertion Of the Law giving liberty of Temptation of a Minor married to an Husband of desertion of her Husband after carnal knowledg and to take a richer A relation of the same practised in Scotland Of the Law tempting Women to desert their Husbands by giving more Alimony then the Portion Desertion of the Lady Lucy by Edward the Fourth There being a Marriage in Treaty between Edward the Fourth King of England and the Lady Bona Sister to Carlot the French Queen the King happen'd to fall in love with the Lady Elizabeth Grey the Widow of John Grey who in the Civil War between the House of Lancaster and York was his Enemy and died in Battel at St. Albans against him the old Dutchess of York his Mother was very eager for the French Match but however desired if that did not please him and he would needs marry one of his own Subjects he should rather marry the Lady Elizabeth Lucy whom he had a little before inticed to his Bed which was a Marriage before God and better then the Lady Elizabeth Grey who was the relict of another Man and his Enemy too and thereupon she instigated the Lady Elizabeth Lucy to claim a Praecontract of him which Lady though set on by the King's Mother and others yet when she was solemnly sworn to speak the truth she confess'd to this effect That he never in direct express words made any Promise or Contract to her of Marriage but he spake so loving words unto her that she verily hoped he would have married her and that if it had not been for such kind words she would never have assented he should have lain with her on which pretence the flattering Bishops as though all Impediments were removed by the not proving any express or formal words of Contract though the real Contract of lying with her was apparant to please the King gave him their allowance That he should please his second Fancy and not to be tied to his first And he accordingly married Elizabeth Grey according to the Ecclesiastical Law Consensus non Concubitus facit matrimonium Which Repudiation of the Lady Lucy was certainly as much against the Law of God as the Bill of Divorce by the Law of Moses was against
in the said Chancery-Orders Printed 1669. presumes to do in the Court of Conscience what was never heard of to be done in the Courts of Turks Infidels or the most Barbarous Judicatories in the World for he is not ashamed publickly to give License to Cursitors and their Clerks to commit Crimen Falsi which we call Forgery by Antedating Writs taking them out of Returns past or of a former Term by reason of which Forgery of Writs and Forgery of Returns Antedated Capiases Proclamations Exigends and Outlawries Antedated have been likewise Forged and Thousands of Poor men unjustly cast in Goals and miserably undone without any Summons or Hearing and these are likewise the damnable effects of the Chancellours Writs by which as by others the Plaintiffs so here the Defendants are destroyed without Hearing and certainly these Crimes of Antedating and Forgery of Judicial Acts though here Licensed by Orders of Chancellors and Protected by Courts by not Licensing Averments against them are by the Civil Law and Laws of Scotland and of many other Nations both of these and Instruments Death and even by our own the imbeselling of a Record by a Clerk and Counterfeiting of Fines is Felony and if the second time so is the Forgery of Deeds Writings and Court-Rolls and deservedly the Offender better deserving death than a Robber on a High-way and why any Crimes of this Nature should be publickly Licensed to the Ruin of all Truth and Justice by any Chancellour in his Chancery Orders is very strange the mischievous effects of which said Attachments on Affidavit and Antedating Writs and Forgery of Outlawries are notoriously known and not complained of here without good Cause and Testimony and some particular experience of my own to my loss who have as well as others suffer'd in an high degree by the false Affidavit of a Fellow who Subscribed and Swore it by a false name and not his own and likewise procured a Forged Outlawry antedated against me It belongs not to a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity in England 5. It belongs not to the Chancellours Office to be a Judg of Equity or to make Orders Edicts Laws or Writs and thereby to Imprison the Persons and dispose of the Lands and Goods of the Subjects Arbitrarily and at his Pleasure Coke 4. part 82. saith That all Statutes which give Authority to the Chancellour to determin Offences in Chancery are to be intended only in the Ordinary Court there which proceeds in Latine and is Secundum Legem c. and not in any Extraordinary Court which proceeds in English Secundum Aequum bonum and 37. H. 6.14 27. H. 8.18 it is Resolved That the Court of Chancery Proceeding by English Bill is no Court of Record and therefore it cannot bind either the State of the Subjects Lands or the Property of his Goods or Chattels and therefore they there admit he may Imprison the Person Chancellour cannot bind the Subject's Goods not Persons which is not only a Non sequitur but a contrary conclusion follows on it for if he cannot bind the Subjects Goods à Fortiori he cannot bind his Person For the Life is more than Meat and the Body is more than Raiment Luke 12.23 And though those Common Law Judge of H. 6. and H. 8. so sordidly deliver'd the Subject Prisoner to the Chancellour so as they might keep his Lands and Goods to themselves yet had they no more Law or Right to do it than they had to deliver him Prisoner to the Turks or to send him to the Barbado's for the Subject is no Slave neither ought he to be given or sold for one without his own Assent by his Representative in Parliament and having so good a Protection against the Chancellours and Common Law Judges and the Orders and Writs of both as Magna Charta and the Petition of Right both for his Lands Goods and Person they ought to shew some greater Laws than their Writs and Orders of Courts or Forgeries of Clerks before they presume to invade either 6. There being no Law in England which ever Ordained a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity or to make Edicts or Orders concerning the same he can pretend no Title thereto unless from the Laws of France and to that effect Polydor Virgil saith The Chancery came in with the Conquest to which though my Lord Coke saith Perperam Erravit because the Mirror saith The Constitutions of the ancient Kings were that every one should have out of the Chancery of the King a Writ Remedial for his Flaint without difficulty yet he himself seems to be in the Error and not Polydore for though the name of Chancellour and Chancery was before the Conquest and divers other Countries use the name of Chancellour as well as England yet the greatest part of the Writs came from Normandy and are mention'd in their Customary as who will peruse it shall find but as to the Writ of Subpoena Centum librarum and Arbitrary Power of the Chancellour and to be a Judg of Equity came first from the Conquest and was never used before nor did it belong to the Chancellour's Office either of England or Scotland that having other employment and more than a Chancellour could do though he never troubled himself with Judgment but left the same to the Judges to whom the King Delegated the cause by Writ and this the very name of Chancellour testifieth who was Originally no other than a Master of Requests to the Prince whom he served and on Petitions deliver'd to him by the Subjects if unfit to be Granted he strook cross lines over them like Cancelli or Lettices by which he Cancell'd them and thence had his name of the Canceller or Chancellour as Turn lib. 11. advers c. 25. and not according to that Fictitious Verse of his Power Hic est qui Leges Regni Cancellat iniquas For when was ever any Chancellour in England allowed to Cancel any Roll or Act of Parliament And when these Petitions for Justice were deliver'd by the People to this Master of Requests call'd the Canceller of such of them as were Evil such as were Just he Cancelld not but on behalf of the Petitioner Granted the Princes Rescript or Warrant to the Praeses Provinciae where the cause of Action arose or the Defendant lived for Actor Sequitur Forum Rei which Rescript or Warrant we now call a Writ containing in it self 1. A Questus est nobis a short recital of the Complaint 2. Si A. fecerit te securum a taking Security or Pledges of the Plaintiff de Prosequendo 3. A Summoneas or Summons of the Defendant to appear before the Prince himself or such Judges as he Delegated though out of the Province or County where he lived which was the Reason of taking Pledges of the Plaintiff because he made the Defendant appear many times Hundreds of Miles from his Home when he might in those days implead him before the President
or Sheriff or Lord of the Barony in his County unless he excepted Partiality or other just cause against him 4. A taking of Pledges of the Defendant to appear 5. To make Return of the Writ and left Writs should be Counterfeit the Chancellour was Keeper of the Seal and Sealed them It appears by the Lex Julia de repetundis Chancellour not to sell Writs and Copies of Bills and Answers that the Master of Requests or Canceller was not to take any Fees for these Writs for giving or not giving a Judg out of the Province or County where the Defendant lived for it was a great vexation and oppression of the People to be Summon'd out of the Provinces on malitious Suggestions without cause and our own Parliaments in England have often complained against the same oppression here by the Pope on whose Citations and false Suggestions without cause men were compell'd to give personal Appearances at Rome as many and as often as he pleased if any would but buy there of his Officers a Citation and to prevent this vexatious exaction of Appearances on Writs of men out of their own Counties besides the requiring of Pledges on all Common Law Writs and the enjoining of Pledges to be taken in the Chancery-Writ of Subpoena as in the Lex Julia so is it mention'd in Magna Charta Nulli vendentus nulli negabimus Justitiam vel Rectum which is intended of a Writ of Right and all other Writs whereby Right is obtained for if the Chancellour were not to take Fees and sell his Subpoena's and other Writs he would not so often by them make men Travail thorough Nine Shires to Westminster when they may have better Justice done at home in their own County on no other cause than Fictitious and Malitious Suggestions of the Plaintiff and that he may take a Fee for the same and he would Cancel according to his Office more Petitions and Bills than he would Grant but assoon as Chancellours took Fees for Writs which Sale of Right 't is likely as Polydore says came from the French then no Suit could be begun without Writ all were driven to Westminster Parties Witnesses and Juries unnecessarily and to no purpose but to inrich the Judicatories and undo the People in like manner the Plaintiffs and Defendants ought to give one another mutually Copies of their Bills Declarations and Pleas at the expenses of the Giver which is very small and easie to the Parties and not to be compell'd to buy them of the Chancery or Common Law Officers so the Chancellour had neither his Jurisdiction to Judg of Equity or his Sale of all the Judicial Parts of the same and of the Law with it from the Law of England but A-la-mode de France from the Conqueror till Magna Charta abolished his Tyranny by the Judgment of Peers and of his French Comtes by the 28. E. 1. cap. 8. by which Act that gallant King grants every County the free Election of their own Sheriff after which the Land was free from the Chancellours Troubling men out of their own Counties by his Subpoena's till H. 5. Conquer'd France by which as is usual in other Conquests some Touch of the Diseases and Vices of the Conquer'd will be return'd on the Conquerors and accordingly in the time of his Son H. 6. the Subpoena and a Chancellour with a Pretorian Jurisdiction pretended of Equity with Power of making Laws Edicts and Chancery-Orders and Forms of Writs and to Sentence above all Appeal all which Powers belonged to the Roman Pretor of which the French Chancellour was the Ape and Ours of the French and this pretended Pretorian Jurisdiction ever since hath grown so much A-la-mode partly by making Bishops Chancellors who pretended Supremacy in all matters of Conscience and had in their hands amongst the Superstitious the flaming Sword and Thunder-bolt of Excommunication partly by their Power overtopping and overawing the Common Law Judges and partly by flattering the People with doing Justice in the English Tongue which was very grateful to them and would be as grateful now in the Common Law Courts if they could get it the Chancellours contrary to the greatest Fundamental Laws and Acts of Parliaments of the English introduced on them a most lawless Arbitrary Power and Servility of a Foreign Nation to dispose of their Lands Goods Persons Liberty and Propriety at their pleasure And what is more have assumed like the old Romish Pretors the Power of making Laws Edicts Forms Writs Obligatory to the Subject's Persons Lands and Goods for Coke on the Question In what Text the Common Law is to be found saith In Forms of Writs and Forms of Entries in Courts of Records And Bracton saith Breve ad similitudinem Regulae Juris Formatum So who assumes the Power of making Writs Judicial Edicts Forms and Orders assumes the Legislative Power notwithstanding and above Acts of Parliament to dispose of the Subject's Liberty and Propriety at pleasure yet this have Chancellours done Forming divers Writs in the Register out of their own Heads Lamb. Archeion which always are Formed for the greatest Profit of the Clerks and Courts which make them and not of the People and Episcopal Chancellours have so far in time of Popery deceived Parliaments that Westm 2. cap. 24. gives the Clerks of the Chancery as good as Power to make what Writs they will and the pretence is insinuated by the Clerks De caetero non recedant querentes à cur ' Regis sine remedio or Ne Curia Regis desiceret in Justitia exhibenda whereas none who understands the least part of the Forms of Judicial Proceeding there is who doth not know that the Kings Court if he please may do far better Justice if all the new Writs made by Clerks and all the old Writs in the Register were made a Bonfire all together and none but Copies of Declaaations served without them then 't is possible to do with them which Del gation of Power to Clerks to make Writs must be void for the making of Forms of Writs Edicts or Orders is an Act of Legislation and to give Votes in Legislation is a Personal Office of Trust reposed by the People in their Representative Elected by them and by the known Law no Office of Trust can be Assigned Granted over or Delegated if the Parliament therefore please to enact themselves any Judicial Forms or Orders of Proceeding they ought to be obeyed as Laws but it would be a great injury to the People if they should Grant over the Office of Trust in them to a Chancellour and Clerks never Elected or Intrusted by the People Chancellour of England or Scotland no Pretor Let a French Chancellour be therefore what he will 't is clear no English Chancellour ought to be a Pretor Judg of Equity maker of Laws Edicts Forms or Orders of Judicial Proceeding nor any Chancellour of Scotland the full of the matters of both whose Offices though they may differ
Brother yâ—ur self when Caught you find In snares for others you designed Learn Who ill Principles extends Against his Foes destroys his Friends And when for us you dig a Pit You are the next fall into it It was your Church what er'e it saith Law Latine left and Latine-Faith And Babbled without Mood or Tense In Church and Court and without Sense That blind might lead the blind and they Rob so all pass'd through their dark way You before Hearing first did Curse And Oulaw too to take a Purse Of which too late you now complain And we to help have tri'd in vain The Papist too brought Fictions in And Forgery that foulest Sin The Papists too were the first sharks And sate in Courts Bishops and Clerks And left their Cursed Presidents Of Forms for their wicked Intents Which still continue now and you As well as we begin to Rue At least the Poor of either side Though they touch not the Prelat's Pride And if you Perish by the same Who but your selves now can you blame The Protestant at length Essai'd Although by greater Power dismai'd Forms Fictions and Forgeries By Papist left to blind the Eyes Of Justice and Religion And in a Language still unknown And the High Places of old Baal Which did both Souls and Bodies Thrall To take away and teach their Youth Worship in Spirit and in Truth And Justice too by those who swayed In a True Ballance to be weighed For Fictions and Forgeries Come from the Father of all Lies But still the Protestant in vain To Supreme Power did complain While Papist-Peers in Parliament And Pensioners the Publick Rent Force from the Common's Skin and Bones It was in vain to make our moanes From Justice then with many Jeers You kept and first made us shed Tears Although deceived in your hope Perhaps now from your selves they drop And you and we suffer alike From strokes which you and us did strike Am I not in as bad a Case As you within this Dismal Place And me to make yet in a worse They Outlaw may as well as Curse You have unto the Dreadful Doom Of God Appeal'd which is to come You nothing owe I to the same Appeal and his most Dreadful Name I have committed no Offence ' Gainst men nor ' gainst my Conscience For which I 'm Sentenc'd to lie here And be your Fellow-Prisoner Who Rule the Conscience can but God Or who can change it with a Nod I see not when the Bishop winks Or if I think not as he thinks Or cannot by Implicit Faith Believe what e're the Bishop saith Is' t just because that I cannot I should lie here to Starve or Rot Pap. Brother I 'le freely tell my mind And say where Protestants are kind To Catholicks in Recompence They each enjoy their Conscience And Toleration hath united Not only those before Recited But bloody Wars could not be ceased In Germany 'till Conscience eased On each side was in the same Nation By a mutual Toleration The like in Hungary was acted And no Peace there could be transacted Between the Emperor and them 'Till Grafted both on the same Stem And many other like appear Too many to be Cited here They are not Commons but our Peers Who set us both now by the Ears They Pensions take from Rome and France Poor Us to Tyburne to advance And with some part when 't is espi'd They Pardon Buy and us Deride Why then should English Freedom miss More than our Neighbour Dutch or Swiss Or Driven be to Gaol or Church Conscience and Justice both to Lurch Prot. Brother I 'm not so void of Sense As Punishment on Conscience To wish who in so high degree Suffer for it my self you see But on what Terms the wiser State Will both Religions Tolerate I cannot tell or if no fears They have of Poor but only Peers I know not only this I say We should small Prudence then bewray To trie for others and in vain 'Till our own Liberty we gain Pap. Yet we in this do both agree Though Toleration none there be And both alike for this contend That whether he is Foe or Friend Yet before Hearing he ought not In Cruel Prison Starve or Rot And Magna Charta none can be Of Property or Liberty Unless 't is in the same Expres't Before a Judgment no Arrest 7. The Three Kingdoms condemn one another without Hearing by a Non-Union of their Three Parliaments Of the Fatal Danger threatning all Protestants by the Division of the Three Parliaments of England Scotland and Ireland and the inestimable Benefits ensue the Union of the same in one House Unless the Supreme Judicatory is rightly constituted to Judg between the King and his Subjects Church and Church Kingdom and Kingdom Nation and Nation Possession and Succession and between one Subject and another it is in vain to constitute inferior Judicatories to any of those great ends of Preservation of Religion and Justice Peace and Truth Liberty and Propriety for there being no Supremeequal Judg constitute there will-be no inferior Judg equally constitute and being no equal Judg Supreme or inferior if Kingdoms happen to become Plaintiffs and Defendants one against another for Religion or any other Quariel they are necessitated to condemn one another without Hearing because they agree not by what Judg they will be heard but will like the Scythians worship the Sword and Fortune for the Gods and Judges of the World and begin their Sute one against another with Execution by the unjust Capiases and Outlawries of War and Proclamations of the same by the Trumpet 1. First therefore the great danger these Three Protestant Kingdoms lie under is If any Papist should again as they have by their perpetual Plots hitherto endeavour'd to kindle a Civil War there can be nâ— Judg equal Elected by them able without the Persons Elected sit in one House to punish the Incendiaries and prevent the War Succession of the Crown divided by divided Parliaments 2. If the Succession of the Crown should happen to become contentious between Competitors and the Parliaments continue as they do divided in several Houses and several Places the Three Kingdoms if they depart from the immutable Moral Law of God either to the Ecclesiastical Laws of their several Churches or to the Temporal Laws of the several Kingdoms they may each have several Laws Privileges and Customs of Succession one from another and the Houses of Lords may have different Customs and pretences to Judicatories from Houses of Commons and the Episcopal Assemblies and Synods may pretend several Rights of Judicature from the Law-Courts so every Kingdom may happen to be divided in their Sentence of Succession and one to Judg it to A. another to B. another to C. the House of Lords in one to Judg it to D. in the other to E. in the other to F. the House of Commons to Judg it in one to G. in the other to H. in the other to
for State-Assairs So of the Grisons Yet do the Cantons remain in the nature of several Commonwealths with several Laws and Customs which Union is very imperfect Livy lib. 2. complains of this defect of Union of Councils in Rome and saith Profecto si essent in Republica Magistratus nullum futurum fuisse Romae nisi publicum consilium nunc in mille Curias Concionesque cum alia in Esquiliis alia in Aventino fiant Concilia dispersam dissipatam esse Rempublicam And by this doth Tacitus confess it was that Rome Conquer'd Great Britain Nec aliud adversus validissimas gentes pro nobis utilius quà m quod in commune non consulunt rarus duabus tribusque Civitatibus ad propulsandum commune periculum conventus ita dum singuli pugnant Vniversi vincuntur Neither saith he was there any thing so profitable for us against the most valiant Nations as that they had no Common Council a rare matter it was amongst them to have a Convention of Two or Three Cities against the common danger so while they every one fought single they are all Conquer'd Whereas if Great Britain had been then united under one King and one Parliament of the whole Island they perhaps might have as well said of his second Landing as of his first Territa quaesitis ostendit terga Britannis So doth Justin mention of the States of Greece every one of them had at last their Councils apart and fought single whereby one after another they were all overthrown What hath United the Heptarchy of the Saxons and the mixture of Danes inseparably but the equal Mission of their Representatives to the same Parliament and what did Unite the Noble Remainder of Britains to England but the Statute of 27. H. 8.26 Enacting That all Persons born in Wales should enjoy all Liberties Privileges and Laws as other Subjects in England do and should send their Knights and Burgesses to the same Parliament with them The Glory of a King is the multitude of his People and what more Glorious for a King who hath the Royal English Scotish Irish and British Blood United in him who is the Head than to have the same United in his Parliament who is the Body Let it not offend if I mention here the late Experience of Union of the Three Parliaments in one House by the late Usurper seeing we are commanded to learn Wisdom though from the Serpent and if he under so great disadvantages of Opposition made great Benefit the lawful Prince may make far greater thereby and his Subjects likewise by his Favour participate of the same I cannot deny that it was my Fortune though I never sought it to be chosen for a County and to serve in that great Convention at Westminster Anno 1656. called then a Parliament wherein the Parliaments of England Scotland and Ireland were Convened and United in One with the same facility as they are Convened to sit in Three Places and there being then a War designed against Spain it was wonderful to see with what Expedition and Courage all things were moved towards the Design and what an Endearment it was between the Three Nations to meet be acquainted eat drink and converse together about the Common Concernments Having consider'd so far of the great Benefits of an Union of the Three Parliaments of the Three Kingdoms in One it may not be amiss next to consider the Requisits necessary to perfect the same 1. Whether an Union of Crowns be necessary to perfect an Union of Parliaments and Kingdoms It seems for the Affirmative 1. Because where the Natural Person of a King is One if the Politick Person or Capacity is not made One the one Politick Capacity may be divided against the other in the same Natural Person as on the Succession of King James to Queen Elizabeth the Queen of England had declared War against the King of Spain the King of Scotland was in Peace with them so in the diverse Rights of Two Crowns there was War and Peace at one time between the same Persons the like Doubts may arise Whether the Royal Assent may pass contrary Politicks Acts and Laws in the Parliament of one Nation to what he hath pass'd in the other in reference to the contrary Rights of each Crown Whereas if both are consolidated and made one no contrariety of Acts can happen 2. It is as dangerous to have Two Crowns as Two Marble-Chairs for they may be kept in several places and the more easily may an Usurper happen on the possession of one of them and the Vulgar be deluded to think Possession of those Signs of Supreme Honor to be equal to the Right and besides that a Fatality will follow them 3. Seeing it hath pleased God to make the Head of the Three Kingdoms One men ought to follow his Example and make the Crowns One 4. The continuance of several Crowns is apt to continue a perpetual memory of Hostilities between the Kingdoms 2. Whether an Unity of Protestant Churches is necessary to an Union of Protestant-Kingdoms It seems for the Affirmative Because if Protestant-Churches divide one against another the Kingdoms will be a Prey to the Papist and the Protestant will have none to Unite 3. Whether permission of Protestants to Excommunicate Protestants is consistent with the Unity of Protestant-Churches Neg. If the Pope Excommunicate Protestants it Unites them the firmer but if they Excommunicate one another they denounce War and destroy one another with their own hands and leave the Spoils to be divided by the Pope An Elegy on Protestants in the late Civil Wars Excommunicating Protestants LVgeat in trisidis jam moesta Britannia flammis Et doleat jam fulminibus percussa trisulcis Intonuit falsus nebulosa Tibride Petrus Et Magicis stolidum perterruit Artibus Orbem Piscator Twedae retonat multisque cachinnis Rupibus ingeminans sua fulmina misit ab Altis Becketi Lemures contra hunc torsere minaces A Thamisi gelidas Vulcania tela per auras Heu non Oceanus circum vaga Littora fusus Nec freta compescant tantis ardoribus ignes Risit Romanus Tarpeia Rupe Tyrannus Cumque suis inquit sese immisere Gebennis Pontifices Britonum per mutua vulnera tandem Ne sic deficerent inferno gurgite flammae Ipse super terram viventes igne cremabo Ecce jocum mintrat mus rodens Rana coaxat Et cum limosis ineunt certamina juncis Milvus spemque suam motis circumvolat alis Ipse paludosam sic vellem carpere Ranam Et sic ridiculum vellem discerpere Murem Englished LET Britain mourn who burns in triple Fires And struck with threefold Thunder-bolts expires A Peter false from Tyber in a Cloud By Magick Art did Thunder it aloud The Fisher-man of Tweed with many Mocks Return'd his Thunder double from the Rocks Proud Beckets Ghost ' gainst him from Thames broke forth And with Vulcanian Darts fired the North. What Ocean which her wandring Shores doth drench Or
take any Oath unless it be only in Cases Matrimonial or Testamentary But whereas also by a certain Act in Parliament began and holden at Westminster the 8th Day of May in the 13th Year of our Reign and there continued till Wednesday the 30th Day of July in the 13th Year of our Reign afâ—resaid and from the same Day the Parliament Adjourned till the 20th Day of November then next following amongst other things it was Enacted by the Authority of the said Parliament That it should not be lawful for any Arch-Bishop Bishop Vicar General Chancellor Commissary or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction to offer tender or administer to any Person whatsoever the Oath usually called the Oath Ex Officio or any other Oath by which such Person to whom it may be offered or administred might be burdened or compelled to confess or accuse him or her self of any Criminal matter or thing whereby he or she might be burdened with any Censures or Punishments as in the said Act amongst other things it is more fully contained Yet you the aforesaid Bishop after the Coming forth of this Act viz. the 23d Day of July in the 27th Year of our Reign in no wise regarding the said Law and Statute at Chichester in the County of Sussex did offer and tender unto the said Thomas Watersfield being then Church-Wapden of the Parish Church of Arundel in the said County of Sussex a certain illegal Oath Ex Officio to be performed by the said Thomas Watersfield in a Cause neither Matrimonial nor Testamentary by which the said Thomas Watersfield might be forced to accuse himself of divers matters Criminal and with which he might be Burdened with divers Punishments and Censures Ecclesiastical In which Oath as it was then tendered the said Thomas Watersfield should with his utmost Diligence Present every Person which then or lately was Inhabiting within the said Parish of Arundel who hath done any offence or neglected any Duty mentionâ—d in certain Articles contained in a certain Printed Book which Book was then and there shewn by you the said Bishop to the said Thomas Watersfield and the said Thomas Watersfield doth Aver at the time of the Tendering of the said Oath and before and afterwards ever since and hitherto That he hath dwelt and been Resident in Arundel aforesaid and that in the said Printed Book at the said time that the said Oath was tendered to be performed there was contained amongst other thâ—ngs this Question viz. Whether every Person Inhabiting or Sojourning within the Parish of Arundel aforesaid did daily resort every Lords-day and Festival appointed for Divine Service to the Church and whether they did there remain the whole time of Divine Service quietly with Reverence Order and Decency and whether Church wardens and Officers called Sides-men did observe those which came late after the beginning of Divine Service or went away before the end of the same and whether they did suffer some to stand idle or to talk in the Church-Porch or to walk in the Church-Yard during the time of Prayer and Preaching or other Sacred Duties And forasmuch as the said Thomas Watersfield did then and there refuse to take the said Oath you the aforesaid Bishop did pronounce the Sentence of Excommunication upon him afterwards that is to say upon the 23d Day of July in the 27th Year of our Reign aforesaid at Chichester aforesaid In Contempt of Us and the manifest Damage Prejudice and Impoverishment of the said Thomas Watersfield and against the Form and Effect of the said Statute and the Common Law of this Our Realm of England And whereas such Pleas by the Laws of England of Right belong to Us and not to You We therefore being willing to maintain the Laws of our Crown and the Law and Custom aforesaid as by the Bond of our Oath we are bound to do We forbid you firmly enjoining you not to intermeddle or hold before you the said Bishop the Plea and Sentence aforesaid as to any Answers in the said Articles concerning the said Thomas Watersfield or any thing from thence attempted But that you Release and Dissolve all Decrees and Sentences if any be against the said Thomas Watersfield by reason of the said Fulmination And that you do absolutely Release him the said Thomas Watersfield from all Decrees and Sentences upon occasion of the said Fulmination Teste at Westminster the 6th Day of May in the 28th Year of Our Reign Wurley The Suggestion on which this Prohibition is granted remains Recorded in the said Court of Common-Pleas in Mr. Wurley's Office Roll 551. Excommunicators Murderers John Hus and Jerome of Prague held That Priests ought to Preach notwithstanding Excommunication That Bishops were Murderers for delivering men over to the Lay-power for Disobeying them That such Excommunication was a humane Invention to maintain the Pride and Cruelty of the Clergy And were Martyr'd for this and other Truths The King shall be forced to Execute every Decree of the Pope or Priests with the Temporal Sword though contrary to his Conscience otherwise he shall be Censur'd if obstinate not worthy to hold his Crown Sheriff of Englands Oath The Sheriffs of England are compell'd to be Sworn to Assist and Execute all the Commands of Bishops not excepting against the King himself which is a most wicked Oath to be suffer'd For though it doth not Swear in express words to give the Supremacy of the Temporal Sword to this Spiritual Sword of Excommunication that the Priests were too subtle to have appear openly in their Form Excommunicators Usurp Supremacy yet doth it require him to Swear what is Aequipollent to assist and maintain the Bishops and Commissioners of the Holy Church as often as by them requirâ—d whereby their Spiritual Sword is made the Imperant and the King 's Temporal Sword the Obedient The Imperant hath Supremacy over the Obedient as it is said Rom. 6 16. Know ye not to whom ye yeild your selves Servants to Obey his Servants ye are to whom ye Obey Shall the Sheriff therefore be compell'd to be a Traitor to deliver the Temporal Sword intrusted in his hand by the King to those who assume that Luciferian Title of the Holy-Church to be Supreme above the King which is point-blank contrary to his Oath of Supremacy which obliges him to suppress with it such a Rebellious Pride to the utmost of his Power The Sheriff is likewise by the Law of Scotland to do Execution on Excommunicate Persons as appears Skene de verb. signif tit Schiriff Sheriff of Scotland whose words are The Sheriff shall take and apprehend all Cursed and Excommunicate Persons at the desire of the Bishop or his Official and put them in Prison untill they satisfie God and the Kirk Stat. 2. Reb. Br. specially them quhahes remained under the Censure of Excommunication by the space of Forty Days Quon Attach Rextali 76. And by Ja. 2. P. 4. cap. 7. it is Enacted That
nane against quhome the Process beis led be received in the Kings Castle or Place or in his Presence nor admitted to Councel or Parliament heard nor answer'd in the Law of Judgment of Fee and Heritage or uther Causes bot ever Eschewed as Cursed unto the time the said Persons cum to amendis and assyith the Party and obteine Absolution in Form of Law And Jac. 6. p. 3. cap. 53. in the Kings Minority an Act was got by the Kirk ' That all Excommunicate Persons not Conforming ' in Forty Days should be denounced Rebels and put to the Horn. The English Commissioners in the said late time of the Troubles had Instructions to take from the then Kirk such Letters of Horning and not to assist any Excommunication with the Temporal Sword which we performed accordingly The King of Spain joined with Tyrone and the Rebels in Ireland against Queen Elizabeth And Don John de Aquila Landing in Ireland with 4000 Spaniards intitled himself Master-General and Captain of the Catholick King in the Wars of God for holding and keeping the Faith in Ireland only on pretence of Excommunication Sextus Quintus the Pope of Rome on the Invasion prepared by Spain against England Anno 1588. sent out his Crusado as if against the Turks and having pass'd Sentence of Excommunication and Deprivation by his Bulls against Queen Elizabeth promising Pardon of Sins Heaven and Eternal Life to all who di'd in the Invasion 1. To grant a Pope or a Bishop Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Subjects is to grant him Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Kings 2. To grant him Power to Excommunicate Protestant-Kings is to grant him Power to Levy Money Raise Soldiers Denounce War and Depose them 3. Of the Dilemma of Danger threatning Princes who seek Security of Goverement from the Excommunication of Popes or Bishops either over a People Religious or Superstitious 4. Of the Impossibility of Security for Princes unless their Subjects are Educated or Instructed to be free from the Superstition of Excommunication and to contemn it 5. Of the Impossibility of obliging Popes or Bishops either by Benefits or Oaths Excommunication is as Proscription made a pretetence of Confiscation without shewing cause The Romans saith Aman. Marcellus proscribed Ptolomy the then King of Cyprus being their Confederate for no fault only they wanted Money in the Treasury who therefore poison'd himself and the Isle became Tributary to the Romans In the like manner do Popes and Bishop fall on the Richest with their Excommunication to fill their empty Purses Pope Gregory the Tenth Commanded Percham Arch-Bishop of Canterbury to pay him Four Thousand Marks within Four Months on pain of Excommunication So Excommunication is a ready way to Levy Money for War Anno 1230. The Pope having Excommunicated the Emperor the Emperor was fain to pay for his Absolution an Hundred and Twenty Thousand Ounces of Gold Plat. Nam Anno 1231. The Emperor for memory of this hard Penny-worth for his Absolution put into a Pool at Helbrand divers Pikes and other Fishes with Brass Rings having Inscriptions of his name and the Year of the Lord one of the Fishes was taken up 267. Years after Ann. Suev Calv. Henry the Second after that Traitor Beckett the then Arch-Bishop of Canterbury had been Slain though not by the Kings Command was enjoined amongst other things this Slavish Penance He walked Three Miles bare-foot on the sharp Stones that he at length had so cut his Feet they marked the ground with Blood every step he went And after this which was worse than Running the Gantilope he Received of the Priests Monks Bishops and Abbots on his naked Flesh so many Jerks with Rods Oh brave Pedants and Pontifical Government for Princes as according to Baronius amounted to at least Fourscore Lashes which doubtless was the Number the Jew administred to the vilest Rogues lest their Brothers should be despised in their Eyes and not heard to have been Exercised in their Eyes and not heard to have been Exercised on the Priests Bishops and Abbots themselves though they kill'd and murder'd many Lay-men without Law or Justice they incur'd only a deprivation and instead of Hanging which they deserved sometimes no more than a suspension Temporary ab Officio In the time of King John Anno 1211. The Pope Excommunicated him and gave the Kingdom of England to the King of France Paris Wend. The Pope Excommunicated Henry the Eighth and gave the Kingdom Primo Occupanti Queen Elizabeth was Excommunicated by Three Popes Pius Quintus Gregory the Thirteenth and Sextus Quintus Anno 1308. The Pope Excommunicateth Andronicus Emperor of the East and setteth up the King of Russia against him Bzou So he dealt alike with the East and Western Emperors Excommunications have brought the Venetians to extreme Straights formerly therefore they are yet no Friends of it Dandalus Duke of Venice was compell'd by Pope Clement the Fifth to Crouch under the Table Chain'd like a Dog before he could obtain Peace for the Venetians The Pope Excommunicated John King of Navar and Granted his Kingdom to the Spaniards Nicephorus Phocas Emperor of the East was Excommunicated by Polyeuchus then Patriarch of Constantinople because he had been God-father to a Child of Theophania Wife to his Predecessor and after his Predecessor's Death Married her Pope Zachary deposed Chilperick the French King and gave the Crown of France to Pepin The two French Kings H. 3. and H. 4. who were Assassinated had great Guards whereby it appears though Princes may secure themselves in Vaults and Caves from Thunderbolts yet can they not against the Bishops of Romes Ignis Fatuus of Excommunication but that to Assault them Per medios ire Satellites Et perrumpere amat saxa potentius Ictu fulmineo Eight Emperors were Excommunicated by Popes who were these Frederick the First Frederick the Second Philip Conrad Otho the Fourth Lewes of Bavaria Henry the Fourth and Henry the Fifth The Emperor Henry the Fourth Fought in Threescore and Two several Battles and had for the most part Victory he was Excommunicated by the Pope and to obtain his Absolution came Three Days together bare-foot to the Gates of the City Canusium where the Pope then was and with much difficulty obtain'd it The Catholick Majesties of Spain cannot secure themselves from Excommunication without Money nor their great Vice-Roys in America for a Rebellion was Raised in Mexico by the Arch-Bishop there Excommunicating the Governors the People by Superstitious Episcopal Education made more afraid of the Counterfeit Power of the Keys than of the true Power of the Sword and will side in Rebellion with the Bishop against the Secular Governor men may talk therefore and believe what they please that the Supremacy of the Temporal Sword is Consistent with the Spiritual of Excommunication but when it comes to Trial amongst a Superstitious People they will be very much deceived and perhaps Ruin'd Bzovius de Pont. Roman 611 612. to maintain the Power That the Popes may depose Kings
Recites a Catalogue of above Thirty Kings and Princes deposed by them all which pretended Power of Excommunication and if Bishops are granted the same Power of Excommunication which Popes have what hinders but that British Popes and British Bishops are thereby granted when they dare and have opportunity to Excommunicate and Depose Kings as well as the Romish Popes and Bishops who are as quiet as the British till they have opportunity and dare shew their Teeth Pagan Priests claim Supremacy in Judgment above Kings This was commonly practised by the Pagan Priests whom the Pope and Bishops follow to claim Supremacy in Judgment Jure Divine over their Kings to which purpose Tacitus speaks lib. 4. cap. 2. That the Priests amongst the Germans took on them the Power of Judicature not by Commission from the Prince but by Command pretended from God whom they account to be then in presence and to be assisting in their Fights which Power claimed by those ancient Pagan German Priests is no other than the Jurisdiction at this day claimed by the later German Arch-Bishops and Bishops over their Emperors The like Power long before them was claimed by the old Aegyptian Priests over their Kings whom they thereby divers times Sentenced and put to Death How vain the hopes are of obliging Bishops either by their Duty of Allegiance to their Native King or by Benefits or Oaths it appears by the Examples following Bishops not to be obliged by Benefits or Oaths When William the Conqueror came in he took this Kingdom from the Gift of the Pope and promised in consideration thereof to hold it Feudatory of him and thereupon coming hither with a Bull and an Hayne of St. Peter and other Romish Trinkets the Bishops who were then more Potent than the Temporal Barons forsook Edgar Atheling their Native Prince and the unquestionable Lawful Successor and betrai'd the Land to a Foreigner though he after served them in their kind and left not a man of them to sit in their Sees Henry the First after the Death of his Queen Matilda Married Adeliza the Daughter of Godfry Duke of Lorrain when she was to be Crowned Ralph Arch-Bishop of Canterbury who was appointed to Crown her first came to King Henry sitting Crowned in his Chair of State asking him Who had set the Crown on his head The King Answer'd He had now forgotten 't was so long since Well said the Arch-Bishop whosoever did it he did me wrong to whom it belonged and as long as you had it thus I will do no Office at this Coronation Then said the King do what you think good Whereupon the Arch-Bishop took off the Crown from the Kings Head and after at the People's intreaty set it on again and so proceeded to Crown the Queen It was a sufficient favour that the King appointed him to Crown his Queen and whosoever Crowned himself it was fit the King should have his own choice if done by a Bishop who should do it But the Arch-Bishop will have the Power of a Pope or none to put on and take off the Crown from a King at his pleasure so that unless well paid if he please the King shall not be Crown'd And all this Imperious Pride pâ—oceeds from his Imaginary Power of Excommunication and the Profuse Bounty of Kings towards Bishops which doth not oblige but disoblige and cause them to despise their Benefactors who have Raised them to Revenues equal or Superior to their ownâ— Of which a notable Example appears in Hubert another Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Anno Domini 1021. The Feast of the Nativity approaching King John and his Queen appointed to keep that Festival with great Magnificence at Guilford Hubert Arch-Bishop of Canterbury being in disfavour of the King to shew how little he regarded it and to put an Affront on him Published he would keep a Châ—istmas of as great Magnificence as the King and accordingly performed it in his own Palace with that Splendor and Multitude of Attendants Richness of Banquets Pageantry Costly Attires and Gifts at Canterbury as the King could not exceed him at Guilford Matth. Par. in Antiq. Eccl Angl. in vita Huberti Which very much Incensed the King to see himself purposely outbraved by a Priest Anno 1473. Edward the Fourth Seised on the Mitre of George Nevil Arch-Bishop of York which was so Rich with Gold and Pretious Stones that the King of the same made himself a Crown and likewise he Seised on Twenty Thousand â—ounds-worth more of his Money and Goods A vast Sum in those Days Ant. Brit. Anno 1421. The King wanting Money for the French Wars pawned the Crown to the Bishop of Winchester for Twenty Thousand Pounds Ant. Brit. So we see the Bishops Head is as Richly Crowned as the Kings and when a Bishop grows so Rich a Broker besides as to take Crowns to pawn it may be then said in no Disloyal sence The Mitre is above the Crown for the Borrower is a Servant to the Lender Which Excess of Riches Insatiable Covetousness High Titles Precedency of the Temporal Barons and till the same was alter'd by Act of Parliament Precedency of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbâ—ry of the Kings Brothers themselves Elevates Prelacy to so great a height of intolerable Pride and makes them so much over-value their own Merits as 't is impossible to oblige them by Benefits Bishops perfidious to the English Kings Henry the Second Raised Becket from nothing to be Chancellor of England and after to be Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and to have the Education of his Son yet as soon as he saw himself invested with the Power of Excommunication he moved all the other Bishops being under the Oath of Canonical Obedience to him and Threatned the King that His Sword strook only with Temporal Death but that of Bishops strook the Soul with Eternal Death to Hell The difference between the King and the Bishop was the King would have it Ordained That the Clergy-men who were Malefactors should be Tri'd before the Secular Magistrate as Lay-men were this Becket Proudly opposed and said it was against the Privileges of the Church and therefore against the Honor of God and very high and hot the Contentions were about it till at last Becket condescended to assent to the Ordinance Salvo Jure Suo the King liked not the Clause as being delusive of the Ordinance at last with much ado the Arch-Bishop yields to this also and set his hand to the Ordinance and takes his Oath to observe it But going homewards his Cross bearer and some other about him blamed him for what he had done whereupon the next day when they met again he openly Repented his former Deed Retracts his Subscription and openly sent to the Pope for an Absolution of his Oath Which the Pope not only granted but incouraged him to persist in the Course he had begun The King seeing his Perjury and that there was no prevailing by fair means Seises on his Temporalities and
his direct Judge next the Pope and without Consent of his fellow-Bishops who then all arose and humbly desired the Kings Clemency in his behalf but finding him Resolute they took away their fellow-Bishop from the Bar and delivered him to the Custody of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury till some other time the King should appoint for his answer to what he was charged withal Shortly after he was again taken and Converted as before which the Clergy understanding The Bishops rescue a Traitor-Bishop from the Bar of Justice the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury York and Dublin and Ten other Bishops all with their Crosses erected went to the place of Judgment and again took him away with them Charging all men on pain of Excommunication to forbear to lay violent hands on him with which audacious Act the King was much displeased and presently Commanded inquiry to be made Ex officio Judicis Concerning those objections against the Bishop whereto he Refused to appear and answer and he being found Guilty of the same Judgment was passed against him as Contumaciously absent and thereupon all his Goods and Possessions were seised into the Kings hands this Act Lost him the Clergy and added Power to the Discontented Party which by Reason of the misfortunes of the Prince and his having advanced unpopular officers As Gaveston and Spencer were grown in the people and Concurred to his after Deposeing from the Throne and horrible Murder when Deposed Hence may be very well observed in what a sad Condition a Prince is who must Depend on the Protection of Bishops and their Excommunications And how shamelesly notwithstanding they will boast that no Bishop no King For here are France and Scotland Confederated against the Kingdom the King is valiant but young and unexperiensed his Bishops and Barons are Corrupted against him by French Pensions and cause the Overthrow of his Army he discovers one of the Bishops guilty of the Treason and had he not been Rescued by the other Traytor-Bishops his Companions he might perhaps have discovered the whole Plot and all his Complices The King very Justly Sentences him both as Mute and Contumaciously absent and seises on his Estate as forfeit What more Just proceeding than this here is no condemning without Liberty of Answer and Hearing yet this must lose the King all the Arch-Bishops and Bishops in England and Ireland and all the Clergy of both Kingdomes who received Ordination from them And they will no longer be his subjects unless he will allow them to betray and sell him to his Enemies and not Punish or question the Treason But all concur to irritate the Temporal Barons the people and his own Trayterous Queen to depose and destroy him And the Bishop of Hereford Preaching before her took this Text My Head aketh my Head aketh and thence drawes this wicked Doctrine and Use to a wife that she must cut off her Husbands Head who was her Head and when after the King was deposed and his son chosen the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury Preached in Westminster-Hall on this Text Vox Populi Vox Dei to encourage the people in the Treason which was after perfected by his horrible murder in Prison The next Consideration will be how this might have been prevented by his Renowned Father who was of such Wisdome Vigilance and Valour as neither Gaveston nor Spencer nor Bishops Dared to abuse if he had suspected they would have practised such Treachery against the younger yeares of his son Concerning which it seemes he was able and might have easily prevented it had he not Committed two oversights the one was That he only Banish'd Gaveston and had not cut off his head if he had deserved it for assoon as he was dead Gaveston returned again and corrupting the young King was the first occasion his Enemies made Use of to cast the vices and misgovernments of his Favorites on himself It may be here objected That perhaps though Gaveston was a wicked vitious person yet he might not be Guilty of any Crime for which he might be lawfully put to death To which is answered That it possibly might be so though it be not likely And if he were not Guilty of such a Crime he ought not to have been put to Death for a Throne cannot be Established by shedding Innocent Blood But neither he nor his son needed to have been Guilty of it for his son needed not have sent for him Contrary to his Fathers Command and though he incurr'd that fault the Lords cut â—ff his Head who must answer for it and freed him from the Guilt and danger of him The second oversight was of more weight that was When he made an Act against Mortmain for the future he had not taken away as H. 8. after did all that was before Mortmained And when he took the Moiety of the Reverend Fathers Money and Goods he had not taken all and when he Lopt the Branches of Privileges and Jurisdictions of Bishops and other Ecclesiasticks he had not took both Root and Branch For it is as lawful to take present Mortmaines as 't is to prohibit Future And if lawful to take the Moiety it was lawful to take the Whole And if lawful to take the Branches it was as lawful to take the Root of Hierarchy which if he had done This clear Benefit he had Received by it he had left his son secure from any Spiritual French Pensioners who are the most Dangerous sort of all other And the Temporal Barons could not have had without them so great and specious advantages to have Betrayed him 2 He had freed him from such Audacious Traytors as would Rescue their fellowes from the Bar of Justice which Temporal Barons never dared do 3 He had fâ—eed all his successors who should happen to be superstitious from having Rebellions raised against them and themselves Deposed by Excommunication by abolishing Bishops and their ordination which had been an advantage none of his neighbour Emperours or Kings could hitherto ever obtain nor if Bishops had been taken away Episcopal or Ecclesiastical Government by halves though it was sufficient to abate their Power as to himself it was worse for his Son than if he had done nothing at all for he thereby left Bishops and a Clergy full of Rancour in their minds for those blowes they had been beaten with by the Father which though they dare not revenge themselves on him yet did they on his Son to his destruction and though there never had been a Gaveston or a Spencer would have found other pretences enough for their Treasons which they could not have done had he cleane abolish'd them and not left a See for a Bishop to fit in Arch-Bishop threatens to Excommunicate Edw. 3. Edward the Third being with his Army in France and disappointed of his Supply of Treasure upon his last Return into England had in great displeasure Removed his Chancellor and Imprison'd his Treasurer with other Officers most of them Clergy men
John Stratford Arch-Bishop of Canterbury on whom the King likewise laid the blame of his Wants writes a proud Letter to the King and desired him and his Council without delay to deliver the said Prisoners otherwise he plainly writes That according to his Pastoral Charge he must proceed to the Execution of the Sentence of Excommunication concluding how notwithstanding it was not his Intention to include the King Queen or their Children so far as by Law they might be Excused It was well for the King he was in the head of a brave Army in France for if he had been single as his Father was they who durst Menace him amongst all his Forces in the Field if he had lost the Day as his Father did were as likely to bring him for a French Pension to as miserable a destruction as they brought his Father but by Gods Providence he proved afterward Victorious but first Replied by another Letter to the Arch-Bishop That Relying on his Council he was first put on the Action of the French and that he had promised and assured him he should not want Treasure to perform the work and that notwithstanding by the negligence and malice of the said Arch-Bishop and his Officials those Provisions Granted him by his Subjects in Parliament were in so slender proportion Levyed and with such delays sent over as he was pressed of necessity to his great Grief and Shame to Condescend to the late Truce with the French though extreme Wants charged with mighty Debts forced him to throw himself into the Gulf of the Usurers in such sort as he began to look into the Dealing of his Officers some of which upon apparant notice of their ill Administration of Justice their Corruptions and Oppressions of his Subjects he removed from their Places and others of mean Degree he Committed to Prison and there detained them to the end he might find out by their Examinations the truth of their Proceedings Then he charges the Arch-Bishop with his own Corruption and declares how himself being under Age had through his ill Council made so many Prodigal Donatives prohibited Alienations and excessive Grants and Gifts that thereby his Treasury was utterly Exhausted and his Revenues diminished and how the Arch-Bishop corrupted with Bribes Remitted without reasonable cause great Sums which were due unto him applying to his own Use or Persons ill deserving many Commodities and Revenues which should have been preserved for his necessary Provisions and concluded Unless he desisted from his Rebellious obstinacy he intended in due time and place more openly to proceed against him and the King before the Arch-Bishop Submitted caused a Letter to be sent to the Pope from the Parliament not to make any more Collations of Benefices in England and prohibited them on pain of Death on any that should present or admit them which Resolute slighting of Excommunication both from Arch-Bishop and Pope though in the very time of War with France made the Pride of the Arch-Bishop stoop and with much ado got himself Reconciled to the Kings favour for which the King was bound to thank God and not the Pope or Bishop who gave him that Victory and Success against the French as neither Pope or Arch-Bishop dared to Excommunicate him Against Richard the Second one of the Articles brought against him to have him deposed was That whereas the Realm is immediately holden of God after he had obtained divers Acts for his own particular Ends he obtained Bulls heavy Censures from Rome to observe and perform them contrary to the Honour and ancient Privilege of this Kingdom whereby appears That even in a time of Popery the Assistance of the Pope and Bishops which were included in it was so far from being a Protection to the King that it was Destructive to him much more is the Assistance of Bishops likely to be Destructive rather than a Safety in a time of Protestancy The Bishop likewise Concurr'd with the rest and accused him That he had taken Money Jewels and Plate from them at his going into Ireland Bishops accuse R. 2. for Trifles to Depose him so far were they from seeking to preserve the Kings Life with those Superfluities of theirs where they could keep them and their Bishopricks together that they shewed their Fidelity to their Native King by endeavouring to destroy him For such Trifles divers other Articles were laid against him in behalf of the Bishops by whose doing only the King was utterly undone Truss 46. And not one of all the Bishops in England or Ireland spoke so much as one word to preserve their Native Sovereigns Life but only one namely Thomas Mercks Bishop of Carlisle Dilemma of danger from Excommunication As to the Dilemma a Prince falls under in expecting safety of Government from the Power of Excommunication of Popes or Bishops either the greater part of his Subjects will be Religious or Superstitious if Religious they will so easily see through the Superstition of Consecration and Excommunication as it will rather Irritate and Provoke them as it did in the late unhappy Civil Wars but if Superstitious will the Pope or Bishop make Use of the great Interest and Strength they gain thereby in the People to advance their pretended Spiritual Sword above the Temporal and their own Supremacy above Temporal Kings and Princes which if Resisted by the Princes of such Subjects hazards their being Deposed and losing Kingdoms and Lives together as appears by the Examples before Recited In the same danger is a Prince who Trusts a Temporal Officer whether Treasurer or other with too much Power of Money as Theocritus Anno 518. caused Amantius an Eunuch to give Justin Amantius the General of the Army a great Sum of Money to give the Soldiers to choose Theocritus Emperour but Justin distributed it for himself and so obtained himself the Empire The Western Emperours first raised the Popes to that height as to Excommunicate the Eastern Emperours the succeeding Popes to return their Advancers due thanks Excommunicated after the Western Emperour The French Kings assisted and after raised the Popes to such height that they Excommunicated Deposed and Poisoned the Western Emperour after by the same Power the French King gave them in thanks they Excommunicated and Assassinated the French Kings The Princes of Sicily and Naples had been mighty defendors of the Papacy but when they had made it mightier than themselves the Succeeding Popes took from them their Sovereignty to themselves As to the Impossibility of Safety of Princes amongst Subjects Educated in fear of Excommunication Subjects Educated in fear of Excommunication dangerous to Princes It is to be Noted as well from the Testimony of approved Authors as from the Scripture it self that amongst the Primitive Christians those who are now called Bishops but in the Original word signifie only Overseers were Parochial Bishops or Overseers and not Provincial and that they were the same with Presbyters and differ'd not in