Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
england_n france_n king_n war_n 17,303 5 6.8100 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A59475 A letter from a person of quality to his friend in the country Shaftesbury, Anthony Ashley Cooper, Earl of, 1621-1683.; Locke, John, 1632-1704. 1675 (1675) Wing S2897; ESTC R3320 30,815 37

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

that they justly and rightly claim And therefore neither our Ancestors nor any other Country free like ours whilst they preserv'd their Liberties did ever suffer any mercenary or standing Guards to their Prince but took care that his Safety should be in Them as theirs was in Him Though these were the Objections to this Head yet they were but lighty touch'd and not fully insisted upon until the debate of the second Head where the Scope of the Design was opened clearer and more distinct to every Man's capacity The second was And that I do abhorr that Trayterous Position of taking Armes by His Authority against His person To this was objected That if this be meant an Explanation of the Oath of Allegiance to leave men without pretense to oppose where the individual person of the King is then it was to be considered that the proposition as it is here set down is universal and yet in most cases the position is not to be abhorred by honest or wise men For there is but one case and that never like to happen again where this position is in danger to be Trayterous which was the Case of the Long Parliament made perpetual● by the King 's own Act by which the Government was perfectly altered and made inconsistent with its self but it is to be supposed the Crown hath sufficient warning and full power to prevent the falling again into that danger But the other cases are many and such as may every day occurr wherein this position is so far from Traiterous that it would prove both necessary and our duty The Famous instance of Hen. 6. who being a soft and weak Prince when taken Prisoner by his Cousin Edward 4. that pretended to the Crown and the great Earl of Warwick was carryed in their Armies gave what orders and Commissions they pleased and yet all those that were Loyal to him adhered to his Wife and son fought in a pitcht battel against him in person and retook him This was directly taking up Armes by His Authority against his person and against those that were Commission'd by Him and yet to this day no Man hath ever blamed them or thought but that if they had done other they had betray'd their Prince The great Case of Charles 6. of France who being of a weak and crazie Brain yet govern'd by himself or rather by his Wife a Woman of passionate and heady humour that hat●ed her Son the Dolphin a vigorous and brave Prince and passionately loved her Daughter so that She easily being pressed by the Victory of Hen. 5. of England comply'd to settle the Crown of France upon Him to marry her Daughter to Him and own his Right contrary to the Salique Law This was directly opposed with Armes and Force by the Dolphin and all good French Men even in his Father's life time A third instance is that of King Iames of blessed Memory who when he was a Child was seized and taken Prisoner by those who were justly thought no friends to His Crown or Safe●y and if the case should be put that a future King of England of the same temper with Hen. 6. or Charl. 6. of France should be taken prisoner by Spaniard Dutch or French whose overgrowing power should give them thoughts of vast Empire and should with the person and commission of the King invade England for a Conquest were it not suitable to our Loyalty to joyn with the Son of that King for the defence of His Fathers Crown and Dignity even against his Person and Commission In all these and the like Cases it was not justified but that the st●ict Letter of the Law might be otherwise co●strued and when wisely considerd fit it should be so yet that it was not safe either for the Kingdom or person of the King and His Crown that it should be in express words Swor● against for if we shall forswear all Distinctions which ill Men have made ill use of either in Rebellion or Heresy we must extend the Oath to all the particulars of Divinity and Politiques To this the aged Bishop of Winchester reply'd That to take up Armes in such cases is not against but for the person of the King But his Lordship was told that he might then as well nay much better have le●t it upon the Old Oath of Allegiance then made such a wide gapp in his new Declaration The th●rd and last part of the De●laration was or against those that are Commissioned by him Here the mask was plainly pluckt off and Arbitrary Government appear'd bare-faced and a standing Army to be established by Act of Parliament for it was said by several of the Lords That if whatever is by the Kings Commission be not opposed by the King's Authority then a standing Army is Law when ●ver the King pleases and yet the King's Commission was never thought sufficient to Protect or justify any man where it is against his Authority which is the Law this allowed alters the whole Law of England in the most essential and Fundamental parts of it and makes the whole Law of property to become Arbitrary and without effect whenever the King pleases For instance if in a Suit with a great Favourite a man recovers House and Lands and by course of Law be put into Possession by the Sheriff and afterwards a Warrant is obtain'd by the interest of the person to command some Souldiers of the standing Army to take the possession and deliver it back in such a case the man in Possession may justify to defend himself and killing those who shall violently endeavour to enter his house the party whose house is invaded takes up Armes by the King's Authority against those who are Commissioned by him And it is the same case if the Souldiers had been Commissioned to defend the House against the Sheriff when he first endeavored to take the possession according to Law neither could any Order or Commission of the King 's put a stop to the Sheriff if he had done his duty in raising the whole force of that Count to put the Law in execution neither can the Court from whom that Order proceeds if they observe their oaths and duty put any stop to the execution of the Law in such a case by any command or commission from the King whatsoever Nay all the Guards and standing forces in England cannot be secured by any Commission from being a direct Riot and unlawful Assembly unless in time of open War and Rebellion And it is not out of the way to suppose that if any King hereafter shall contrary to the petition of Right demand and levie Money by Privy-Seal or otherwise and cause Souldiers to enter and distrain fo● such like illegall Taxes that in such a case any Man may by Law defend his house against them and yet this is of the same nature with the former and against the words of the Declaration These instances may seem somwhat rough and not with the usual
sooner proposed but the E. of Shattsbury a Man as daring but more Able though of principles and interest Diametrically opposite to the other presently closed with it and perhaps the opportunity I have had by my conversation with them both who were Men of diversion and of free and open Discourses where they had a confidence may give you more light into both their Designs and so by consequence the aimes of their Parties then you will have from any other hand My L. Clifford did in express Terms tell me one day in private Discourse That the King if He would be firm to Himself might settle what Religion He pleased and carry the Government to what height He would for if Men were assured in the Liberty of their Conscience● and undisturbed in their Properties able and upright Iudges made in Westminster-Hall to judg the Causes of Meum and Tuum and if on the Other hand the Fort of Tilbury was finished to bridle the City the Fort of Plymouth to secure the West and Armes for 2●000 in each of these and in Hull for the Northern parts with some addition which might be easily and undiscernedly made to the Forces now on foot there were none that would have either Will Opportunity or Power to resist But he added withall he was so sincere in the maintenance of Propriety and Liberty of Conscience that if he had his Will though he should introduce a Bishop of Durham which was the Instance he then made that See being then vacant of another Religion yet he would not disturb any of the Church beside but suffer them to dye away and not let his change how hasty soever he was in it overthrow either of those principles and therefore desired he might be thought an honest Man as to his part of the Declaration for he meant it really The L. Shaftsbury with whom I had more freedom I with great assurance asked what he meant by the Declaration for it seemed to me as I then told him that it assumed a Power to repeal and suspend all our Laws to destroy the Church to overthrow the Protestant Religion and to tolerate Popery He replyed half angry That he wondered at my Objection there being not one of these in the Case For the King assumed no power of repealing Laws or suspending them contrary to the will of his Parliament or People and not to argue with me at that time the power of the King's Supremacy which was of ano●her nature then that he had in Civills and had been exercised without exception in this very case by His Father Grand Father and Queen Elizabeth under the Great Seal to Forreign Protestants become subjects of England nor to instance in the suspending the Execution of the two Acts of Navigation and Trade during both this and the last Dutch War in the same words and upon the same necessity and as yet without Clamour that ever we heard But to pass by all that this is certain a Government could not be supposed whether Monarchical or other of any sort without a standing Supream Executive power fully enabled to Mitigate or wholly to suspend the Execution of any penal Law in the Intervalls of the Legislative power which when assembled there was no doubt but wherever there lies a Negative in passing of a Law there the address or sense known of either of them to the contrary as for instance of either of our two Houses of Parliament in England ought to determine that Indulgence and restore the Law to its full execution For without this the Laws were to no purpose made if the Prince could annull them at pleasure and so on the other hand without a Power always in being of dispensing upon occasion was to suppose a constitution extreamly imperfect and unpracticable and to cure those with a Legislative power always in being is when considered no other then a perfect Tyranny As to the Church he conceived the Declaration was extreamly their Interest for the narrow bottom they had placed themselves upon and the Measures they had proceeded by so contrary to the Properties and Liberties of the Nation must needs in short time prove fatall to them whereas this led them into another way to live peaceably with the dissenting and differing Protestants both at home and abroad and so by necessary and unavoidable Consequences to become the Head of them all For that place is due to the Church of England being in favor and of neerest approach to the Most powerful Prince of that Religion and so always had it in their hands to be the Intercessors and Procurers of the greatest Good and Protection that partie throughout all Christendom can receive And thus the A. Bishop of Canterbury might become not only Alterius Orbis but Alterius Religionis Papa and all this addition of Honor and Power attaind without the least loss or diminution of the Church It not being intended that one living Dignity or Preferment should be given to Any but those that were strictly Conformable As to the Protestant Religion he told me plainly It was for the preserving of That and that only that he heartily joyned in the Declaration for besides that he thought it his Duty to have care in his Place and Station of those he was convinced were the People of God and feared Him though of different persuasions he also knew nothing else but Liberty and Indulgence that could possibly as our case stood secure the Protestant Religion in England and he beg'd me to consider if the Church of England should attain to a rigid blind and undistputed Conformity and that power of our Church should come into the hands of a Popish Prince which was not a thing so impossible or remote as not to be apprehended whether in such a case would not all the Armes and Artillery of the Government of the Church be turned against the pr●sent Religion of it and should not all good Protestants tremble to think what Bishops such a Prince was like to make And whom those Bishops would condemn for Hereticks and that Prince might burn Whereas if this which is now but a Declaration might ever by the Experience of it gain the Advantage of becoming an Established Law the true Protestant Religion would still be kept up amongst the Cities Towns and Trading places and the Worthyest and Soberest if not the greatest part of the Nobility and Gentry and People As for the toleration of Popery he said It was a pleasant Objection since he could confidently say that the Papists had no advantage in the least by this Declaration that they did not as fully enjoy and with less noise by the favor of all the Bishops before It was the Vavity of the L. Keeper that they were named at all for the whole advantage was to the dissenting Protestants which were the only Men disturb'd before and yet he confest to me that it was his opinion and always had been that the Papists ought to have no other