Selected quad for the lemma: england_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
england_n	france_n	king_n	time_n	18,531	5	4.0048	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A52328	The pernicious consequences of the new heresie of the Jesuites against the King and the state by an advocate of Parliament.; Pernicieuses conséquences de la nouvelle hérésie des Jesuites contre le roy et contre l'estat. English	Nicole, Pierre, 1625-1695.; Evelyn, John, 1620-1706.; Arnauld, Antoine, 1612-1694.	1666 (1666)	Wing N1138; ESTC R16118	63,076	176

Of You Sir our most Noble Lord by the Grace of God King of France the people of Your Kingdom supplicate and desire because it behoves them so to doe that You preserve the Sovereign Freedom of your Kingdom which is that You own and acknowledge no Sovereign on the Earth over Your Temporals but God alone and that You give all the World to understand that Pope Boniface does manifestly erre and commit a most notorious mortal sin in sending You word by his Letters and Bulls that himself was Sovereign of Your Temporals c. and those who should believe the contrary he esteem'd as Hereticks Also that You cause to be declared that we are bound to hold the Pope himself an Heretick and not You good King and all the liege people of Your Kingdom who have ever believed and do believe the contrary The same Protestation is to be seen in several Acts inserted in that Collection which Mons. du Puy has made of the difference between King Philip the Fair and Pope Boniface where you 'l see how Pope Boniface's Bulls were then explain'd and what was the opinion of France touching Infallibility 'T is in vain to strive to make any other replies to these kind of Popes Decrees then such as the French of that Age did before us For as there 's nothing to which the Court of Rome aspires with greater passion then to this Temporal Empire so neither is there any thing which the Popes have establish'd with so much industry Cardinal Bellarmine summs up no less then 18 since Gregory the VIIth to our times who manifestly attributed to themselves this right as they call'd it of deposing Kings and chastising them temporally even to the privation of their States viz. Victor the III d Urban the II d Paschal the II d Gelasius the II d Calixtus the II d Alexander the III d Innocentius the III d Honorius the III d Gregory the IXth Innocent the IVth Boniface the VIIIth Clement the VIth Paul the II d Iulius the II d Paeul the III d Pius the Vth Gregory the XIIIth and Sixtus the Vth He counts to 16 or 17 Kings and Emperours against whom Popes have pretended this right of Sovereignty as a debt due to them amongst which there are 5 French Kings Philip the I st Philip the Fair Lewis the XIIth Henry the III d and Henry the IVth Baronius mentions also the Excommunication of a world of Germans who are not yet well agreed concerning the Pope's Power by which it appears that they alwaies pretended to make it an Heresie when at any time they were the strongest party Nor is there any thing more frequent in these Bulls then their menacing Kings and Princes to deprive them of their States in case of Disobedience Which universally betraies that Passion which the Court of Rome has to infuse this belief into the minds of the People But if one could forget those other enterprises of Rome against our Kings which are founded upon this pretented Superiority as this Superiority is upon Infallibility since France has so universally hindred their effects yet we cannot but remember that which made us lose Navarre because the wound is yet bleeding Ferdinand had no other pretext to swallow it up from Iohn d' Albret Great-Grandfather to Henry the Great besides a Bull which he obtain'd of Iulius the II d against the King and Queen of Navarre importing Privation of their Kingdom for having assisted Lewis the XIIth whom it call'd Schismatick and as having denied passage to the Army which Ferdinand King of Arragon would have sent into France to assist the King of England in the conquest of Guienne I know very well that Cardinal du Perron to render this Doctrine of the Power of Popes over the Temporals of Kings less odious to the French tells us that the real cause of the loss of the Kingdom of Navarre was the breach of the Alliance which the King of Navarre had with Ferdinand King of Arragon which Ferdinand pretended to have been establish'd on condition that if the Kings of Navarre should violate it the Kingdom of Navarre should again revert to the Spaniards who had render'd it by deed in Writing to the race of Albret and that Pope Iulius's Excommunication was neither the true Cause nor real Pretence but a certain tail of a Pretence which though Ferdinand had made no use of he had notwithstanding pretended that the Kingdom of Navarre appertain'd to him and consequently possess'd it But I know as well too that there is nothing worse founded then this answer as Mons. du Puy has made appear by most invincible proofs in his Treatise of the Right of the King to the Kingdom of Navarre For he does there prove by the Spanish Historians themselves that Ferdinand during the Usurpation and whiles he liv'd had onely the Title by the Pope's Excommunication to justifie his Arms. He shews how Ferdinand having swallow'd up this Kingdom 1512 and being press'd by the King of Navarre 1513 to doe him reason defended his possession by no other right but by that of the Excommunication and that in the two most authentick Acts on this subject one whereof is the Will and Testament of Ferdinand by which he bequeaths the Kingdom of Navarre to his Daughter Iane Queen of Castile and the other of the Union of that Kingdom to that of Castile it is expresly signified that Iohn d' Albret and Catharine his Wife had been depriv'd of it by the Pope for having adher'd to the Schism of the French Kings against Pope Iulius the II d and that the Pope had given him this Kingdom to dispose of as he pleas'd I omit the other proofs Which sufficiently shews that the Pope's Bull was no tail of Pretext but indeed the onely and sole Pretence of that unjust Usurpation which continues to this very day In the second place there is nothing more absurd then to say that the Spaniards had never rendred the Kingdom of Navarre to the race of Albret but with this written Caution That if their Successors should violate the Alliance the Kingdom should revert to the Spaniards For Iean d' Albret on whom was the Usurpation was the first of Albret's race who possess'd the Kingdom How then could it be said that the Spaniards had render'd it to Albret's race who before never enjoy'd it And supposing we did take the word render'd for given it is no less false that the Spaniards were they of Arragon or Castile gave this Kingdom to the race of Albret who in no sort held it of the Spaniards but by the Marriage of Catharine who succeeded King Francis Phoebus his Brother and Francis Phoebus to Elianor his Grandmother wife of Gastion de Foix and sole superviving Daughter of Blanch Queen of Navarre which Lady had espous'd Iohn King of Arragon the Father of Ferdinand who being born of another Venter had nothing to doe with Navarre So as this pretended Caution can be no other then a

Feudataries to the holy See and how difficult it would be to wrest it out of these Harpyes talons had they power equal to their will or to the Right they have so insolently forg'd The King of England says Bellarmine is a Vassal to the Bishop of Rome ratione directi dominii What can be more directly said to prove what I assert Nay and as a learned Prelate of ours well observes Masconius transferrs the Title of Fidei Defensor to the Pope also though 't is well known our Princes have a right of more antiquity to it then any Pope's donation and that jure Coronae as were easie to evince though we admitted Leo the Xth to have prophesied that year as his brother Caiaphas had done before him But this is fortified say they by the authority of the Canonists Decretals and what is yet more formidable then all this by the subjects and properties of a new Obediential Vow of an whole Order of King-killers Let us produce a specimen or two to shew with what Secrecy and Religion they proceed The Jesuite Binet told Casaubon at Paris that 't were better all the Kings in Christendom were kill'd then that a Confession should be reveal'd in which the life of a Prince might be concern'd and Emanuel Sà that the Confessor potest jurare se nihil scire may swear and lie too whatever he heard rather then detect the Villany of such a Traitor Eodémque modo potest penitus jurare se nihil tale dixisse c. And upon this it is that Bellarmine celebrates our Garnet for his laudable Obstinacy though the less-perverted Monks of the other Orders have made no scruple to reveal the Treason and prosecute the Traitors to the Gallows I tremble almost to repeat the Instance but 't is his Majestie 's Grandfather of Glorious Memory who affirms it of them That there was not long since a French Jesuite so impudent as to assert That if our Blessed Saviour Jesus Christ himself were now conversant on Earth passible and obnoxious to death should any man confess to him that he design'd to murther him he would suffer Jesus Christ to be kill'd rather then reveal the Confession To this Perron's Reply is so impertinent and superficial as one would even blush to see how he shuffles it over The Confessor says he needs not reveal the manner of his Treason 't is enough he give the King warning to take heed of himself So 't is reported did the Augurs to the great Caesar but it prevented not one Stab of the two and thirty nor did their Garnet so much as this nor any one of those reverend Fathers that ever I could learn But let us have a tast of their Politicks Caeso Rege ingens sibi nomen fecit says one of Henry the Third's Murtherer and Emanuel Sà Clerici Rebellio in Regem non est crimen laesae majestatis quia non est Subditus regi The Rebellion of a Church-man against his Prince is no such thing as Treason for he is none of his Subjects An excellent argument to make Kings in love with Jesuites But this is not all Summus Pontifex says Bellarmine Clericos exemit à subjectione Principum plainly Non sunt ampliùs Reges Clericorum superiores Kings are no more their superiors so that upon the matter how many Priests and Jesuites in a State so many Kings and Emperors Who art thou speaking to Princes that judgest another man's servant Domino suo stat aut cadit says the Cardinal And Santarel goes farther yet Papa sine Concilio the Pope does in spite of a Council depose an Emperor quia Papa Christi unum est tribunal they are Collegues in Office but which is more then Bozius it seems allows who speaking in the person of Popes alone says Per me Reges By me Kings reing he may remove them yea and mulct them too with death not for Heresie onely but if they so much as favour it I cannot affirm that all our Roman Catholicks are of this Belief but then I can hardly call them Roman Catholicks indeed my Lord they are not through-pac'd We see how Barclay Watson Widdrington Sheldon Bekinsaw and others have been censur'd hated and reproch'd for maintaining the contrary as of old the more loyal Sorbonists now sinking under this prodigious Tyranny to their everlasting reproch as well as prejudice of the poor Jansenists who with the Church of England are the onely Confessors amongst all the Christian Professors now extant that I could ever reade of or discover And though one might instance in some few honest Papists who were in times past of this Opinion too yet when I seriously reflect how many are now-a-daies devoted to the Jesuite I am amaz'd to consider to what disloyal temptations they are expos'd even by their very Institution Indeed Cardinal Perron denounces severely against any who shall dare to perpetrate the Crimes but in the same breath he ingenuously tells us that he means it whilst they are Kings since being once Excommunicated they are no more so but become Plebeians or but Wild beasts rather made to be taken and destroy'd and therefore that their new Saint Clement who murthered Henry the Third did not kill the King because he was depos'd Which Lesson was well took forth in our late Holy Warr at home when they were by no means to kill the KING forsooth but to shoot at CHARLES STUART For thus have all the malicious Topics and devilish Arguments been made use of by our late Fanatics as if this Cardinal had inspir'd them witness what they borrow of him from the Prophet Abias's deposing Roboam as they call it Azarias's outing Ozias c. Bellarmin affirms that Kings are not only subject to Popes but even to the most inferior Deacons We have a Pack My Lord amongst us that would think themselves much injur'd to be call'd Jesuites yet speaking of the Consistorian Discipline and power of Eldership are bold to say Non hic excipitur Episcopus aut Imperator to omit the famous T. C. and the many others I could bring on the Stage suffragans of this Doctrine had we no worse experience of it But it is not their Passion for God but for the World which makes these men defend their Interest by such pernicious Consequences Adde to these the Crue of Anabaptists and those other truculent Champions of the Fifth Monarchy who have improv'd their Principles to that notorious height and danger that God forbid their Dominion should ever be founded in his Majestie 's Grace For let us but examine what they Teach and what they have practis'd from that infallible Dictator in S. Peter's Chair to the meanest Sectarian their Writings and their Actions from Knipperdolling to Venner from Pope Hildebrand to Pope Henderson are sufficiently instructive what Princes are to expect One would think the divine right of Kings as Superiors Obedience to Governors Relative duty of

against the Lord and against his Anointed That is to say The Pope is Iesus Christ and all Christian Kings who maintain their Sovereignty against the Usurpations of Rome are the Herods and the Pontius Pilates This publick decry yet in the Books of these Writers is nothing so considerable as the particular and clandestine traverses that the Court of Rome excites upon all occasions whatsoever against those whom she believes not favourable to her Interests By that it is she stops the mouths and stays the Pens of almost all Learned persons who cannot really possess themselves of that Title that they are not inwardly persuaded of the Hypocrisies of these ambitious pretensions but they chuse rather to be silent then to speak of it Because there are but a very few persons so in love with Truth as in resolving to maintain it will endure to be tormented and barretted all their life-time and to be torn in pieces when they are dead They see that Kings and their great Ministers take not for the most part that care to protect those who maintain and defend their Right by some testimony of their acknowledging it as the Court of Rome does to persecute them or at least to deny them all kind of favour They must be touch'd with an extraordinary Zeal and very disinteress'd to surmount all these considerations and to sacrifice themselves for the Interest of their Prince and Countrey without any hope of advantage or to speak more properly with reason to apprehend all sort of disadvantage by it All those principally who are ty'd to any Community are thereby oblig'd to a silence which they believe to be just as holding themselves responsable for the conservation of their Body And 't is true these vast Bodies have stricter bonds which tie them to Rome and are more expos'd to Persecution because they have more places which expose them to seisure to which one may adde that almost all the Religious and Communities have their Generals resident at Rome who will never permit that the Divines of their Orders should undertake to teach things which would not be well receiv'd there and from which there may lie a grudge against the whole Order They are therefore Private persons onely who are fit upon these encounters to engage for the Truth but then it is necessary that they be furnished with Light to know it with Zeal to love it with Steadiness not to fear the ills it may produce and with Sincerity and Disinterest that so they may have no occasion to be in danger of being thwarted And when there were onely this last how rare a thing it is to be found Well therefore has Iohn Major that renowned Doctor of Paris long since observ'd That it was not to be wonder'd at if they were fewer who declared for a Council then for the Pope since Councils met but seldom and gave no Benefices whereas the Pope does and thence 't is saies he men flatter him with an omnipotent power as well in Spiritual things as temporal Hinc homines ei blandiuntur dicentes quòd solvere potest omnia quadrare rotundata rotundare quadrata tam in Spiritualibus quàm in temporalibus Hence it proceeds that the Liberties of the Gallican Church and the ancient Maxims of the Sorbon are now-a-daies hardly vindicated but by secular persons such as We that have less relation to the Court of Rome then Ecclesiasticks have whereof the wisest of them are rather satisfied to approve them in their heart without defending them in their Books such power have fear and interest upon the spirit of those who should be more free from them by the Sanctity of their Profession But if there be persons disinterested so as not to be touch'd by these temporal considerations it often falls out that having little judgment and less science their Piety it self engages them into these new Opinions because they are publish'd in the World under this artificial veil That 't is forsooth to violate and wound Religion to contest the Pope's Infallibility and temporal Sovereignty over Kings Those in the mean time who have no relation to it but this pretext without any mixture of humane interest may easily be disabus'd if once they but consider that the most pious of all our ancient Doctors as the illustrious Gerson wihtout mentioning Dionysius the Carthusian and the blessed Cardinal d' Arles have oppos'd with greater vigour those ambitious pretences of the Court of Rome and that they have judg'd that on the contrary 't is the sincere Zeal for the Catholick Religion which ought to oblige all judicious Divines courageously to resist this temporal Superiority over Kings and Infallibility as two inseperable Maxims one from the other either of them capable to raise very great mischiefs to the Church For in effect what is there more opposite to the real benefit of the Catholick Religion then this Doctrine of the Pope's Superiority over Kings in Temporals which is a necessary consequence of Infallibility and of the power which they give him to depose them Is not this to render Religion abhorr'd and suspected of all Princes as the Sorbon has judiciously remark'd in the Censure of Santarel to give them cause to believe that 't is impossible they should have Subjects at the same time good Catholicks and faithful to their King What Infidel Prince indeed would permit men to preach Faith in the Countries under his obedience if he knew that all those who embrace it think themselves by that dispens'd with for obedience to him farther then another Sovereign pleases who can at any time cause them to take up arms against their lawful King Were this for example a proper expedient to incline the Americans to receive our Faith to say to them as some Spaniards did that the Pope had bestow'd their Country on the King of Castile And however Barbarians as they were had they not reason to reply as they did That they knew no such thing as a Pope but that if there were he must needs be a wicked man to give away that which was none of his own Were not this also to dispose Heretical Princes not to suffer Catholicks in their States when they shall behold them but as so many subjects to another Prince who has power to command them to depose him in the Country where they live And do not we know that 't is this has so imbitter'd the King of England against the Papists and the almost sole cause of the disturbance which they suffered in Iames's time as being to this day the greatest obstacle to the progress of Religion in that Kingdom In fine what Catholick Prince would be willing that his Dominion which he takes so much pains to preserve both in Peace and War should continually depend upon the judgment of one sole Person who may be possess'd perhaps by his Enemies or transported by his proper passions For 't is a weak confidence to resolve they will give the Pope no occasion